← Back to meetings

Meeting Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee-12/17/2025 complete

2025-12-17 · Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee

Items: 77

Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee

View on Agenda Online ↗


Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on June 18, 2025

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of June 18, 2025, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
Street, 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.





ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: December 17, 2025
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Environmental Quality and Sustainability Commission

I recommend the following for appointment as Chair:

Kelly Barr
Ms. Barr will replace Caroline Lobo as Chair for a term to be effective January 1, 2026
and to expire December 17, 2026.

North Gateway Village Planning Committee

Councilman Jim Waring recommends the following for appointment:

Jacqueline Swanson
Ms. Swanson is the Director of Operations at Mullin360 and a resident of District 2. She
fills a vacancy for a term to expire December 17, 2027.

Paradise Valley Village Planning Committee

Councilman Jim Waring recommends the following for appointment:

Karen DeMoss
Ms. DeMoss is a retiree and a resident of District 2. She fills a vacancy for a term to
expire December 17, 2027.

JoElyn Hennington
Ms. Hennington is a self-employed tax preparer and a resident of District 2. She fills a
vacancy for a term to expire December 17, 2027.

Steve Kaiser
Mr. Kaiser is the Owner of Policy Forge and a resident of District 2. He fills a vacancy
for a term to expire December 17, 2027.



Parks and Preserve Initiative Oversight Committee

I recommend the following for appointment:

Mario Aniles
Mr. Aniles is a Principal at Aniles and Company and a resident of District 6. He fills a
vacancy for a term to expire December 17, 2028.

Phoenix Employment Relations Board

I recommend the following for reappointment:

Joseph Diggs
Mr. Diggs represents the Maricopa Area Labor Federation and is a resident of District 2.
He will serve his eighth term to expire December 15, 2028.

Fernando Ortega Sr.
Mr. Ortega represents the Public and is a resident of District 5. He will serve his eighth
term to expire December 15, 2028.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Reappointment of Phoenix Municipal Court Judges - Citywide

This item is to consider the reappointment of Phoenix Municipal Court Judges, for four-
year terms.

Summary
The Judicial Selection Advisory Board (JSAB) convened on November 5, 2025, and
recommended the following reappointments of Phoenix Municipal Court Judges:

· Judge Monyette Nyquist as a Judge of the Phoenix Municipal Court for a four-year
term that would end on December 19, 2029.
· Judge Ana Sanchez as a Judge of the Phoenix Municipal Court for a four-year term
that would end on December 19, 2029.
· Judge Hercules Dellas as a Judge of the Phoenix Municipal Court for a four-year
term that would end on January 17, 2030.
· Judge Heidi Gilbert as a Judge of the Phoenix Municipal Court for a four-year term
that would end on January 17, 2030.
· Judge Frankie Jones as a Judge of the Phoenix Municipal Court for a four-year
term that would end on January 17, 2030.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Phoenix
Municipal Court.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Our Lady of Czestochowa Roman Catholic
Parish Phoenix - District 1

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Kinga Hoffmann

Location
2828 W. Country Gables Drive
Council District: 1

Function
Dinner

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
December 31, 2025 - 7 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 180 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Chipotle Mexican Grill #5705 - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 363121.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4115 W. Anthem Way
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is December 22, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant has been a responsible licensee in Arizona since the issuance of its first
license in 1999, and is committed to upholding the highest business standards for
product quality, customer service, community engagement and maintaining
compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques
of legal and responsible management and/or service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Chipotle Mexican Grill is a quick-serve Mexican eatery enjoyed by area residents,
visitors and workers. In addition to freshly-prepared tacos and burritos, Chipotle would
like to offer its guests beer and margaritas, as an incident to their meal. Alcohol sales,
which are limited to bottled beer and margaritas, account for only 2-3% of revenue;
however, it is considered an integral part of the restaurant's concept."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Chipotle Mexican Grill #5705 - Data
Attachment B - Chipotle Mexican Grill #5705 - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL #5705
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 3 2

Beer and Wine Bar 7 6 5

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 4

Restaurant 12 13 7



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 18.52 63.58

Violent Crimes 12.31 1.08 2.33

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 1

Total Violations 70 1



Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6100022 2503 689 134 24

6100023 2550 653 52 68

6100024 1657 423 15 335

6102012 2540 859 102 48

6103012 2055 370 60 189

Average 1601 393 60 177



Liquor License Map: CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL #5705
4115 W ANTHEM WAY




Date: 12/3/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - The Bar Dove Valley - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 364227.

Summary

Applicant
Amy Nations, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
2965 W. Dove Valley Road, Ste. 100
Zoning Classification: C-2 M-R NBCC
Council District: 2

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This business is currently being remodeled with plans to open in January 2026.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is December 30, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

The Bar Uptown (Series 6)
5504 N. 7th Avenue, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 8
Liquor license violations: In July 2018, a fine of $500 was paid for an employee being
intoxicated and disorderly on duty.

The Bar (Series 6)
3174 E. Indian School Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: None
Liquor license violations: None

Dilly Dally Cocktail Lounge (Series 6)
3639 E. Indian School Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 9
Liquor license violations: None

Nook Kitchen (Series 12)
4231 E. Indian School Road, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 1
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owners of The Bar Dove Valley own and have owned many different restaurants
and bar concepts in Arizona. Each owner brings significant management experience,
and a strong understanding of the responsibility of holding a liquor license. We want to
create a safe environment for guests, staff, and the surrounding community.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be


substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This area is growing rapidly and the demand, and limited nearby options demonstrate
that this issuance of this liquor license will serve the need and convenience of the
community while enriching the character and vitality of the neighboring communities.
As both residential and commercial populations increase, so does the need for
additional dining and social venues that offer high quality service and a welcoming
environment.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - The Bar Dove Valley - Data
Attachment B - The Bar Dove Valley - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: THE BAR DOVE VALLEY
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 2

Liquor Store 9 2 2

Restaurant 12 6 4


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 10.08 8.59

Violent Crimes 12.31 1.93 2.54
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 2

Total Violations 70 3



Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6113002 0 0 0 0

6113003 2126 302 98 169

6113004 1767 465 33 51

6113005 2501 532 70 0

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: THE BAR DOVE VALLEY
2965 W DOVE VALLEY RD




Date: 12/2/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Globe in the Dark LLC - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 365009.

Summary

Applicant
Divyani Komatireddy, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
21001 N. Tatum Boulevard, Ste. 34-1150
Zoning Classification: C-2 DRSP
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business is
currently being remodeled with plans to open in January 2026.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is December 29, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have professional management and operational experience in regulated service
industries requiring compliance, training, and safety procedures. The restaurant is fully
equipped with compliant kitchen appliances, food-service setup, and an established
food-handling plan emphasizing oven-based meals and global small plates. The
business is structured to operate primarily as a restaurant serving quality food with
optional cocktail pairings, ensuring that dining remains the core focus. All staff will
complete Arizona Title 4 Responsible Server/Manager certification before opening. The
premises meet all building, fire, and health codes, and the restaurant will maintain a
clean, professional, and safe environment for guests and staff.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Globe in the Dark will provide a unique international dining experience featuring oven-
prepared small plates and global entrées paired with curated cocktails. The restaurant
will enhance the Desert Ridge Marketplace food scene by offering guests a
comfortable, globally inspired atmosphere for meals, family gatherings, and social
occasions. Beverage service will complement - not dominate - the restaurant's
operations, creating a well-balanced food-and-drink experience. The establishment will
promote responsible service, local hiring, and a positive dining environment aligned
with community expectations. Our concept supports local economic growth, cultural
exchange, and responsible hospitality in compliance with Arizona liquor regulations.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.




Attachments
Attachment A - Globe in the Dark LLC - Data
Attachment B - Globe in the Dark LLC - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: GLOBE IN THE DARK LLC
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Bar 6 29 23

Beer and Wine Bar 7 13 10

Liquor Store 9 7 7

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 7

Hotel 11 2 0

Restaurant 12 78 69


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 54.11 148.4

Violent Crimes 12.31 2.99 7.85
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 1

Total Violations 70 1




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6150021 488 100 5 14

6150023 1947 397 143 101

6151001 1413 407 25 11

6152012 6102 515 722 1020

6152022 84 50 30 0

6152023 3418 1016 778 112

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: GLOBE IN THE DARK LLC
21001 N TATUM BLVD




Date: 12/4/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Kumo Sushi - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 365020.

Summary

Applicant
Jerry Shin, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
20235 N. Cave Creek Road, Ste. 115
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is December 20, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have extensive restaurant leadership experience as a general manager and
operator, with a strong record of compliant alcohol service and safe, orderly
operations. I understand and will follow Arizona Title 4 and City of Phoenix regulations,
including ID verification, refusal of service policies, incident logging, and cooperation
with enforcement. Kumo Sushi's operating procedures include staff training prior to
serving alcohol, ongoing refresher training, POS prompts for ID checks, and manager-
on-duty oversight at all times.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are food-primary, full-service Japanese restaurant beer and wine offerings
complement meals,meeting reasonable neighborhood demand without creating bar-
centric environment The business activates a retail suite with a high-quality dining
option, creating local jobs and contributing sales-tax revenue that benefits the City of
Phoenix. Operating hour, staff training, and security practices are tailored to maintain a
safe, family-friendly atmosphere in harmony with nearby businesses and residences.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Kumo Sushi - Data
Attachment B - Kumo Sushi - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.



Liquor License Data: KUMO SUSHI
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 3 3

Bar 6 4 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 15 11

Restaurant 12 13 5

Club 14 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 38.82 80.57

Violent Crimes 12.31 4.61 9.44
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 42

Total Violations 70 74




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6149002 1767 564 11 97

6169001 853 474 33 0

6169003 2235 277 111 126

6170011 0 0 0 0

6170023 1515 316 47 417

6170025 1003 348 20 0

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: KUMO SUSHI
20235 N CAVE CREEK RD




Date: 12/1/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Kiva PTO - District 3

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Jennifer Christensen

Location
4530 E. Gold Dust Avenue
Council District: 3

Function
School Auction

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
March 28, 2026 - 6 p.m. to 11:45 p.m. / 200 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - The Corner Bar - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 365672.

Summary

Applicant
Michael Kaffer Jr., Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
13470 N. 7th Street
Zoning Classification: PSC
Council District: 3

This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This location was
previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is December 30, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations



on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Playa II (Series 6)
3217 E. Shea Boulevard, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 11
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have worked for Arizona Alcohol Traffic & Firearms for 3 years helping people
acquire liquor licenses and become Title 4 certified to insure compliance with state and
local governmental laws & regulations regarding alcohol.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Tourism plays an important role in our local economy and liquor licensed
establishments (the sale of alcohol) is a very important aspect of tourism. Therefore, if
the City of Phoenix continues to lead the State of Arizona by approving quality and
diverse businesses (restaurants, bars, microbreweries, distilleries, hotels, resorts, golf
courses, special events, convenience / liquor / grocery stores & gas stations) similar to
this proposed liquor licensed business, all businesses will prosper.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - The Corner Bar - Data
Attachment B - The Corner Bar - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.

Liquor License Data: THE CORNER BAR
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 14 5

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 2

Liquor Store 9 3 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 10 10

Restaurant 12 22 22


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 28.15 64.96

Violent Crimes 12.31 2.3 6.68

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 23

Total Violations 70 41




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1036053 1043 458 15 11

1036113 2548 917 41 0

1036142 1057 405 17 44

1036151 1090 289 32 199

1037012 2137 631 104 200

1037023 1541 224 69 93

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: THE CORNER BAR
13470 N 7TH ST




Date: 12/3/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Crown Beer & Wine - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 362290.

Summary

Applicant
Jack Robin, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
9636 N. 7th Street
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was December 14, 2025. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.





Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have the necessary experience in licensed premises, a clear understanding of
licensing laws, and a proven record of integrity and compliance, I have demonstrated
sound business mangement skills, maintain fiancial responsibility, and made sure that
everything we do will protect public safety and community standards.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“It will provide residents and visitors with a safe, convient venue. Also will provide
residents with convient access to a diverse selection of quality products in a safe, well
manged store. The business is commited to responsible sales practices, preventing
underage purchases, and maintaining full compliance with all state and local alcohol
regulations.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Crown Beer & Wine - Data
Attachment B - Crown Beer & Wine - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: CROWN BEER & WINE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 2 2

Wholesaler 4 1 1

Bar 6 16 6

Beer and Wine Bar 7 5 2

Liquor Store 9 14 5

Beer and Wine Store 10 24 9

Restaurant 12 25 9

Club 14 2 1



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 143.86 215.49

Violent Crimes 12.31 31.23 49.78

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 103

Total Violations 70 168




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1046001 2192 383 93 320

1046002 1075 138 91 338

1046003 742 161 56 128

1047011 1145 53 41 385

1047012 972 374 84 103

1047013 610 316 124 151

1047021 780 85 27 150

1047022 626 136 66 266

1047023 1801 298 77 294

1052003 1287 246 57 20

1053002 2247 273 65 285

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: CROWN BEER & WINE
9636 N 7TH ST




Date: 12/3/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Velvet Taco - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 361363.

Summary

Applicant
Ryan Anderson, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
12646 N. Tatum Boulevard, Ste. 105
Zoning Classification: C-2 H-R DNS/WVR SP PCD
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in March 2026.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is December 26, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Velvet Taco (Series 12)
4166 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“The owners of the restaurant are responsible, experienced, and successful restaurant
owners of 48 locations throughout the United States. Its managers received their liquor
management training by authorized training providers but also receive additional
internal training. They owners, operators and management of Velvet Taco are
committed to following all State, Federal and local laws regarding the same and
consumption of alcohol.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The best interest of the community will be served by the issuance of the series 12
liquor license. Residents have come to expect to have the option of consuming an
alcoholic beverage when enjoying a meal at Velvet Taco.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Velvet Taco - Data
Attachment B - Velvet Taco - Map



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: VELVET TACO
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Bar 6 8 4

Beer and Wine Bar 7 12 10

Liquor Store 9 11 7

Beer and Wine Store 10 13 11

Hotel 11 3 0

Restaurant 12 65 53


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 100.1 215.18

Violent Crimes 12.31 7.59 14.64
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 26

Total Violations 69 38




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1032051 1081 423 12 54

1032052 1366 422 27 80

1032082 1476 446 407 164

1032091 1078 337 13 65

1032101 1356 384 113 128

1032102 2162 377 102 139

1032104 969 134 63 49

1032105 2200 17 84 175

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: VELVET TACO
12646 N TATUM BLVD




Date: 11/24/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Hopes Brunch House - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 364300.

Summary

Applicant
Fadil Mehmedi, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2508 N. Central Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2 HRI TOD-1
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is December 20, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been running and operating 5 other restaurant in Ilinois and Texas for the last
40 years with a great sucsess and had 5 liquor licenses issued at my name and never
had any issues or violation.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We are family run breakfast and brunch cafe with great reputation and highly ranked
among the community and social media.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Hopes Brunch House - Data
Attachment B - Hopes Brunch House - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: HOPES BRUNCH HOUSE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 2 0

Bar 6 7 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 8 2

Liquor Store 9 6 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 3

Hotel 11 1 1

Restaurant 12 49 12

Club 14 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 171.68 132.59

Violent Crimes 12.31 31.26 44.47
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 27

Total Violations 69 44




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1105013 486 47 63 125

1105022 2166 436 185 339

1118001 962 221 108 264

1118002 846 361 100 89

1118003 1247 510 88 26

1118004 1423 507 117 200

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: HOPES BRUNCH HOUSE
2508 N CENTRAL AVE




Date: 11/20/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Soon's Market - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 364643.

Summary

Applicant
Sayed Ahmed, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
5201 S. 15th Avenue
Zoning Classification: R1-6
Council District: 7

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a
convenience store that does not sell gas. This location is currently licensed for liquor
sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is December 20, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration may be given only to the applicant's personal
qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Da-Lite Market & Liquor (Series 9)
4402 S. 7th Avenue, Phoenix



Calls for police service: 19
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have owned many stores. I have never had any liquor violations and I am currently
Title 4 trained.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Forty Eight Foundation - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Ernest Hickman

Location
401 S. 1st Avenue
Council District: 8

Function
Dance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
March 27, 2026 - 8:30 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 2,500 attendees
March 28, 2026 - 8:30 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 2,500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - JetBlue - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 358670.

Summary

Applicant
Heinz Aguon, Agent

License Type
Series 8 - Conveyance - Sale of all Liquor on Board Planes

Location
3400 E. Sky Harbor Boulevard, Ste. T3
Zoning Classification: A-1
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for an airline. This location was not previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is December 20, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal and
responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“JetBlue would like to provision its aircraft with alcohol at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - JetBlue - Data
Attachment B - JetBlue - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: JETBLUE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 10 4

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 2

Conveyance 8 22 13

Beer and Wine Store 10 6 1

Restaurant 12 37 21

Club 14 17 10


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 59.68 102.01

Violent Crimes 12.31 2.41 1.59
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 1

Total Violations 70 1


Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1138006 0 0 1 0

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: JETBLUE
3400 E SKY HARBOR BLVD




Date: 12/2/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Various Vendors for 2026 Aviation Business Summit

For $75,000 in payment authority to purchase vendor services for the Aviation
Department-sponsored 2026 Aviation Business Summit (Summit). The vendor services
required for the initial set-up of the Summit include but are not limited to:
Warehouse215 for the event venue; Nibblers Catering for catering of food; Phoenix
Technology Audio Visual for audio/visual equipment and management; Visual Nature
Images, Inc. doing business as Mark Skalny Photography; and Karla Martin for
American with Disability Act Communication Access Realtime Translation (CART)
services. The Summit will provide interested businesses the opportunity to learn,
network, and understand the tools available for doing business with Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport, Phoenix Deer Valley Airport and Phoenix Goodyear
Airport.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
North American Region of the Airports Council International dba Airports
Council International - North America

For $199,187 in payment authority for the 2026 Airports Council International - North
America (ACI-NA) membership dues, for the Aviation Department. ACI-NA is an
organization that represents state, local, and regional governing bodies that own and
operate commercial airports in North America and the world, with a focus on
supporting industry issues such as finance, safety, operations, environmental,
sustainability, business and regulatory issues, as well as interpreting and coordinating
regulatory policy and rule-making with the Federal Aviation Administration,
Transportation Security Administration, Customs and Border Protection, and the
Environmental Protection Agency.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
N. Harris Computer Corporation

For $200,000 in additional payment authority through December 31, 2027, for two
years of annual maintenance costs for the iNovah cashiering system for the Finance
Department. The iNovah system is the centralized system used to process payments
for several City departments. Annual maintenance covers software support for the
iNovah system, four daily batch exports, one real-time interface, and the image cache
letter file which is used to electronically process check payments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Gift of Words LLC dba GBS Books

For $40,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about January 1,
2026, for a term of five years for firefighter training textbooks for the Fire Department.
The textbooks will assist the Fire Department in effectively communicating training
requirements and curricula to firefighter recruits. Furthermore, utilizing the electronic
textbooks will help current firefighters stay up to date on training requirements and to
further their education. The contract only contains electronic licenses.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Arizona Science Center

For $400,000 in additional payment authority for Contract 127032 for the Arizona
Science Center's reimbursement of utilities beginning January 1, 2026, through
December 31, 2027, for the Parks and Recreation Department. The contract provides
for the City to reimburse the Arizona Science Center for a percentage of annual utility
expenses. The agreement allows the Arizona Science Center to maintain and operate
on behalf of the City of Phoenix, providing science education and programs designed
to increase the knowledge and understanding of science for youth and adults alike.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Valley Water Users Association dba SRP

For $260,000 in payment authority to purchase irrigation water for 2026 and 2027
calendar years for the Parks and Recreation Department. The irrigation water is
needed to water plants, trees, shrubs, and grass at various park and recreation
locations throughout the City. The service is essential for the turf and plant material at
various City park locations.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Bureau of Reclamation

For $110,000 in payment authority to the United States Bureau of Reclamation for the
Parks and Recreation Department's annual administrative fee for calendar years 2026
and 2027. The administrative costs are associated with the agreement for land use of
the 1,200-acre Reach 11 Sports Complex Recreation Area.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Duncor, LLC dba Summit West Signs

For $65,332 in additional payment authority for Contract 162244 Change Order 1
(Project LS71200110-1) Outdoor Digital LED Signage for the Library Department. The
Change Order is for 17 signs that require variances and additional fees associated
with zoning hearing and adjustments. This work was not included as part of the original
bid. This project uses American Rescue Plan Act funds. No General Funds are
required.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Settlement of Claim(s) Bugarin v. City of Phoenix

For payment of a judgment in the amount of $89,020, plus statutory interest as
applicable, rendered against the City in Bugarin v. City of Phoenix, CV2022-091743,
21-0314-002, AU, BI, for the Finance Department, pursuant to Phoenix City Code
Chapter 42. This is a judgment on a claim involving the Police Department on April 27,
2021.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Proposed Briles Pass Annexation - Authorization to File - District 1

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to file with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office a blank petition for a proposed annexation. This
annexation was requested by Taylor C. Earl with Earl & Curley, P.C. for the purpose of
receiving City of Phoenix services. The proposed annexation conforms to current City
policies and complies with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-471 regarding
annexation.

Summary
Signatures on the proposed annexation petition shall not be obtained for a waiting
period of 30 days after filing the blank petition with the Maricopa County Recorder.
Additionally, a Public Hearing will be scheduled within this 30-day waiting period,
permitting the City Council to gather community input regarding the annexation
proposal. Formal adoption of this proposed annexation will be considered at a later
date.

Location
The proposed annexation area includes Parcels 210-11-002A, 210-11-004A, 210-11-
004C, 210-11-004G, 210-11-012A, and 210-11-014B located in the vicinity of 19th
Avenue and Jomax Road (Attachment A). The annexation area is approximately
14.334 acres (0.02239 square miles) and the population estimate is zero individuals.
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





ATTACHMENT A




JOMAX ROAD




17TH AVENUE
19TH AVENUE
Δ=1°59'56"



BRILES ROAD




SCALE 1" = 250'
EXHIBIT BRILES PASS
4550 North 12th Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85014
Phone 602-264-6831
http://www.cvlci.com
ANNEXATION PARCEL
1 OF 1
N:\01\0417901\CADD\Exhibits\VX.ANNEX.BRILES.dwg Dominique August 8, 2025



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Proposed Schroeder Annexation (Ordinance S-52503) - District 1

Request City Council authorization to extend and increase the corporate limits of the
of Phoenix, designated as the Schroeder Annexation. Further, request to authorize
current Maricopa County zoning to continue in effect until municipal zoning is applied
to the annexed territory.

Summary
The annexation was requested by Kimberly Schroeder with KAEKO, Inc. for the
purpose of receiving City of Phoenix services. The proposed annexation conforms to
current City policies and complies with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-471
regarding annexation. The City Clerk Department has received signed petitions
representing 100 percent of the assessed value and 100 percent of the owners,
excluding utilities, within the proposed annexation area.

Public Outreach
A public hearing was conducted on August 27, 2025, to allow the City Council to gather
community input regarding the annexation proposal. Notification of the public hearing
was published in the Arizona Business Gazette newspaper, and posted in at least
three conspicuous places in the territory proposed to be annexed. Also, notice by first-
class mail was sent to each property owner in the area proposed to be annexed.

Location
The proposed annexation area includes Maricopa County Assessor parcel 210-07-017,
located in the vicinity of 15th Avenue and Happy Valley Road (Attachment A). The
annexation area is approximately 5.201 acres (0.00813 sq. mi.) and the population
estimate is zero individuals.
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.




ATTACHMENT A







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Proposed Sun Up Ranch Annexation - Authorization to File - District 1

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to file with the
Maricopa County Recorder's Office a blank petition for a proposed annexation. This
annexation was requested by Chris Webb with Rose Law Group, P.C. for the purpose
of receiving City of Phoenix services. The proposed annexation conforms to current
City policies and complies with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 9-471 regarding
annexation.

Summary
Signatures on the proposed annexation petition shall not be obtained for a waiting
period of 30 days after filing the blank petition with the Maricopa County Recorder.
Additionally, a Public Hearing will be scheduled within this 30-day waiting period,
permitting the City Council to gather community input regarding the annexation
proposal. Formal adoption of this proposed annexation will be considered at a later
date.

Location
The proposed annexation area includes Parcels 202-22-001E and 202-22-005A,
located in the vicinity of 43rd Avenue and New River Road (Attachment A). The
annexation area is approximately 190.2551 acres (0.29727 square miles) and the
population estimate is zero individuals.
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





ATTACHMENT A




LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SUN-UP RANCH
ANNEXATION BOUNDARY

JOB NO. 24-0097 AUGUST 13, 2025

A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3 AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4,
TOWNSHIP 6 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT A 3-INCH GLO BRASS CAP FLUSH AT THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4,
FROM WHICH A 3-INCH GLO BRASS CAP FLUSH AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4, BEARS
SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 2637.29 FEET (BASIS OF BEARING);

THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 40
SECONDS EAST, 1318.65 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 4;

THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SOUTH 0 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 49 SECONDS WEST, 80.00 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 80.00 FEET OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, SOUTH 89
DEGREES 50 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, 1318.53 FEET;

THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 80.00 FEET OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTH 89
DEGREES 51 MINUTES 44 SECONDS EAST, 1380.16 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF EXCESS
RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RIGHT OF WAY PLANS,
PROJECT NO. I-17-1(29)22, DRAWING NO. D-7T-666, DATED SEPTEMBER 1963;

THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LIMITS OF EXCESS RIGHT OF WAY, SOUTH 16 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 46
SECONDS WEST, 113.97 FEET;

THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LIMITS OF EXCESS RIGHT OF WAY, SOUTH 5 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 55
SECONDS EAST, 350.45 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LIMITS OF INTERSTATE 17 RIGHT-OF-WAY AS
SHOWN ON THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, RESULTS OF SURVEY, PROJECT NO. 017-MA-
224- H7206-01R, DATED NOVEMBER 2007;

THENCE ALONG WESTERLY LIMITS OF INTERSTATE 17 RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 5 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 51
SECONDS EAST, 660.10 FEET;

THENCE WESTERLY LIMITS OF INTERSTATE 17 RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 4 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 48 SECONDS
WEST, 41.65 FEET;

THENCE DEPARTING FROM SAID WESTERLY LIMITS OF INTERSTATE 17 RIGHT-OF-WAY, NORTH 73 DEGREES 38
MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST, 616.77 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 18 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 08 SECONDS WEST, 593.86 FEET;
EPS Group, Inc. • 1130 N Alma School Road, Suite 120 • Mesa, AZ 85201
Tel (480) 503-2250 • Fax (480) 503-2258

S:\Projects\2024\24-0097\Land Survey\Legals\24-0097 LD02 - Sun Up Ranch - LD.docx
Doc ID: ecf09221f57eec978d173c0c1ed80bb3da335581
THENCE SOUTH 56 DEGREES 12 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST, 385.84 FEET;

THENCE NORTH 80 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 50 SECONDS EAST, 448.41 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY
LIMITS OF INTERSTATE 17 RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
RESULTS OF SURVEY, PROJECT NO. 017-MA- 224- H7206-01R, DATED NOVEMBER 2007;

THENCE WESTERLY LIMITS OF INTERSTATE 17 RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 4 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 48 SECONDS
WEST, 882.95 FEET;

THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 09
SECONDS WEST, 1363.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER;

THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, NORTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 20
SECONDS WEST, 2629.54 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER;

THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, NORTH 0 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 47 SECONDS
EAST, 1320.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SECTION 4;

THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SOUTH 89 DEGREES 39 MINUTES 36 SECONDS EAST, 1316.70
FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAD LOT 2;

THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, NORTH 0 DEGREES 06 MINUTES 49 SECONDS EAST, 1249.76
FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

SAID OVERALL PORTION OF LAND CONTAINS 8,287,511 SQUARE FEET OR 190.2551 ACRES, MORE OR LESS,
AND BEING SUBJECT TO ANY EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND/OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS OF RECORD OR
OTHERWISE.

THIS DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON IS NOT TO BE USED TO VIOLATE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE
STATE, COUNTY AND/OR MUNICIPALITY, OR ANY OTHER LAND DIVISION RESTRICTIONS.




EPS Group, Inc. • 1130 N Alma School Road, Suite 120 • Mesa, AZ 85201
Tel (480) 503-2250 • Fax (480) 503-2258

S:\Projects\2024\24-0097\Land Survey\Legals\24-0097 LD02 - Sun Up Ranch - LD.docx
Doc ID: ecf09221f57eec978d173c0c1ed80bb3da335581
INTERSTATE

I-17 HIGHWAY




Drawn by:A.G. Reviewed by:R.J. Sheet Scale:1" = 500' Sheet No: 1 of 2
Sun-Up Ranch 1130 N. Alma School Rd.
Annexation Boundary Ste. 120 Mesa, AZ 85201
T:480.503.2250 | F:480.503.2258
24-0097
www.epsgroupinc.com
Exhibit "A"
Doc ID: ecf09221f57eec978d173c0c1ed80bb3da335581
LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE




Drawn by:A.G. Reviewed by:R.J. Sheet Scale:N.T.S. Sheet No: 2 of 2
Sun-Up Ranch 1130 N. Alma School Rd.
Annexation Boundary Ste. 120 Mesa, AZ 85201
T:480.503.2250 | F:480.503.2258
24-0097
www.epsgroupinc.com
Exhibit "A"
Doc ID: ecf09221f57eec978d173c0c1ed80bb3da335581
Sun-Up Ranch
Annexation Boundary Segment #9 : Line
Job Number 24-0097 Course: S56°12'58"E Length: 385.84'
Date: August 13, 2025 North: 1053305.9987' East: 629495.3618'

Tie Segment #10 : Line
Course: N80°47'50"E Length: 448.41'
North: 1055158.8163' East: 625880.2979' North: 1053377.7125' East: 629938.0001'

Segment #1 : Line Segment #11 : Line
Course: S89°50'40"E Length: 1318.65' Course: S04°16'48"W Length: 882.95'
North: 1055155.2362' East: 627198.9430' North: 1052497.2249' East: 629872.1050'

Segment #12 : Line
Segment #2 : Line Course: S89°59'09"W Length: 1363.68'
Course: S00°06'49"W Length: 80.00' North: 1052496.8877' East: 628508.4251'
North: 1055075.2364' East: 627198.7844'
Segment #13 : Line
Easement Course: N89°39'20"W Length: 2629.54'
North: 1052512.6956' East: 625878.9326'
North: 1055075.2333' East: 627198.7810'
Segment #14 : Line
Segment #1 : Line Course: N00°01'47"E Length: 1320.59'
Course: S89°50'40"E Length: 1318.53' North: 1053833.2854' East: 625879.6176'
North: 1055071.6535' East: 628517.3061'
Segment #15 : Line
Segment #2 : Line Course: S89°39'36"E Length: 1316.70'
Course: S89°51'44"E Length: 1380.16' North: 1053825.4720' East: 627196.2945'
North: 1055068.3347' East: 629897.4621'
Segment #16 : Line
Segment #3 : Line Course: N00°06'49"E Length: 1249.76'
Course: S16°07'46"W Length: 113.97' North: 1055075.2295' East: 627198.7726'
North: 1054958.8509' East: 629865.8003'
Perimeter: 14672.94' Area: 8287511 Sq. Ft.
Segment #4 : Line Error Closure: 0.0092 Course: S65°54'51"W
Course: S05°14'55"E Length: 350.45' Error North: -0.00374 East: -0.00837
North: 1054609.8703' East: 629897.8586'
Precision 1: 1594886.96
Segment #5 : Line
Course: S05°02'51"E Length: 660.10'
North: 1053952.3301' East: 629955.9352'

Segment #6 : Line
Course: S04°16'48"W Length: 41.65'
North: 1053910.7963' East: 629952.8268'

Segment #7 : Line
Course: N73°38'59"W Length: 616.77'
North: 1054084.4225' East: 629360.9999'

Segment #8 : Line
Course: S18°17'08"W Length: 593.86'
North: 1053520.5497' East: 629174.6745'







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Election Tabulation System Services - Maricopa County Contract 190265 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-52488) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment
and add additional expenditures to Contract 152562. Authorization to extend the
contract term in alignment with the Maricopa County cooperative contract and modify
the vendor's name from Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. to Liberty Vote USA, Inc.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $1,080,000.

Summary
The contract provides a centralized ballot tabulation system, including maintenance
and support services, for the tabulation of early ballots, voting center ballots and
provisional ballots for City-conducted elections. The City of Phoenix has 125 voting
precincts and uses 28 voting centers to conduct in-person voting. The City of Phoenix
Voter Registration count is over 857,000 with over 645,000 registered voters on the
Active Early Voting List (AEVL). Voters on the AEVL automatically receive an early
ballot in the mail approximately 27 days before an election. During City-conducted
elections, voters can vote in person at any designated voting center over a three-day
period (Saturday, Monday and Election Day Tuesday). Extending this contract to align
with the Maricopa County cooperative contract will ensure that City voters continue to
benefit from reliable voting services without interruption by providing a centralized
ballot tabulation system for the tabulation of early ballots, voting center ballots and
provisional ballots and continuing to provide election results in a timely manner using a
high-speed central count solution for processing the high volume of ballots the City
expects to receive based on anticipated voter turnout.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract will be extended through July 31, 2027, with two one-year
options to extend.

Financial Impact



Upon approval of $1,080,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $2,551,116. Funds are available in the City Clerk Department’s
operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Election Tabulation System Services - Maricopa County Contract 190265 (Ordinance
S-46829) on July 1, 2020.
• Election Tabulation System Services - Maricopa County Contract 190265 (Ordinance
S-52044 ) on June 18, 2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Safety and Non-Safety Uniforms, Accessories, and Related Services Contract -
IFB 25-0771 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52483) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
AFI, LLC dba Old School City, and L.N. Curtis and Sons, Inc. to provide Safety and
Non-Safety Uniforms, Accessories and Related Services for Citywide use. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
total value of the contracts will not exceed $6,500,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide safety and non-safety related uniforms to employees
across various City departments. Administrative Regulation 2.71 authorizes the
provision of safety and non-safety City-issued uniforms to employees in designated
departments. These uniforms are intended for staff who interact with the public, work in
environments with health or safety considerations, and/or operate in shop or field
settings.

The awarded contracts will supply a range of uniform items, including shirts, pants,
hats, jackets, arc-rated gear and high-visibility reflective apparel. These items support
employees across various departments such as Aviation, Housing, Parks and
Recreation, Phoenix Convention Center, Public Works, Street Maintenance and Water
Services in performing their assigned duties. To ensure adequate service coverage
and capacity, multiple contract awards are recommended.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Nine vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on greatest discount from list price, the procurement officer recommends award to the
following vendors:

Selected Bidders
AFI, LLC dba Old School City



L.N. Curtis and Sons, Inc.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about January 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $6,500,000. Funding is available
in the various departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Financial Reporting Software - RFP-19-056 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52484) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment
and add additional expenditures to Contract 151036 with IGM Technology Corp. to
extend the contract term. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $32,500.

Summary
This contract provides the Gravity cloud-based software solution, which facilitates an
interface between City’s SAP software and the Annual Comprehensive Financial
Report (ACFR) system. Gravity offers scalability to support multiple users working
concurrently on the ACFR, an intuitive and user-friendly interface and collaboration
tools for managing large documents. Additionally, it includes workflow and project
management features such as scheduling, reviewing, commenting, comprehensive
reporting and maintaining an audit log.

This extension will support the annual process of the preparation of the ACFR and
related financial documents.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract will be extended through December 31, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $32,500 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $181,500. Funds are available in the Finance Department’s
operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Financial Reporting Software Contract 151036 (Ordinance S-46025) on September
18, 2019.



• Financial Reporting Software Contract 151036 (Ordinance S-51166) on August 26,
2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Barricade and Warning Device Rental, Set-Up - IFB 24-0015 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-52490) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 159758 with Trafficade Service, LLC dba AWP Safety, for an assignment from
Trafficade Service, LLC dba AWP Safety to AWP, Inc dba AWP Safety. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. No additional
funds are needed; request to continue use of Ordinance S-50460.

Summary
This contract provides barricade and warning device rentals and set up for
departments Citywide. Traffic control devices may be requested on a routine basis, on
an emergency basis, for ongoing needs, for yard stock rental, for one-time events and
for sporting/cultural events and other event types/locations.

Contract Term
The contract remains unchanged, ending on January 31, 2029.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract remains unchanged and will not exceed
$15,000,000. No additional funds are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
Barricade and Warning Device Rental, Set-Up, Contract 159758 (Ordinance S-50460)
on January 3, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Dedication of Right-of-Way for Roadway Purposes Across a Portion of City-
owned Property located at 9012 S. 20th Street (Ordinance S-52491) - District 8

Request for the City Council to dedicate right of way to public use for roadway
purposes a portion of City-owned property along East Dobbins Road and South 20th
Street; further ordering the ordinance recorded.

Summary
Dedication of 585 square feet of right-of-way for public use is required for roadway
purposes. The right-of-way is more fully described in the legal description to be
recorded with the ordinance.

Location
9012 S. 20th Street, within Maricopa County Assessor's parcel number 301-34-006.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Street Transportation and
Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of Easements for Drainage, Water and Sewer Purposes (Ordinance
S-52492) - Districts 3, 6 & 8

Request for the City Council to accept easements for drainage, water and sewer
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via
separate recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easements (a)
MCR: 20250633074
Applicant and Grantor: PV Retail II SPE, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: October 31, 2025
Purpose: Water and Sewer
Location: southeast of N. 46th Street and E. Paradise Village Parkway North
APN: 167-25-156
File: FN 250093
Council District: 3

Easements (b)
MCR: 20250636339
Applicant and Grantor: Peak Hotel LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: November 3, 2025
Purpose: Water
Location: 7677 N. 16th Street
APN: 164-22-124
File: FN 250091
Council District: 6

Easements (c)
MCR: 20250629677
Applicant and Grantor: HBC Office, LLC; its successor and assigns



Date: October 30, 2025
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 4640 E. Cotton Gin Loop
APN: 123-06-105
File: FN 250097
Council District: 8

Easements (d)
MCR: 20250629679
Applicant and Grantor: Donlin and Associates, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: October 30, 2025
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 4640 E. Cotton Gin Loop
APN: 123-06-106
File: FN 250097
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of Deeds and Easements for Public Utility, Roadway
and Transit Pad Purposes (Ordinance S-52493) - Districts 6 & 8

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate deeds and easements for public
utility, roadway and transit pad purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded.
Legal description is recorded via separate recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
MCR: 20250643122
Applicant and Grantor: DB Camelback Investments, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: November 6, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 3933, 3937, and 3943 E. Monterosa Street
APN: 170-32-092; 170-32-091; 170-32-090
File: 250112
Council District: 6

Deed (b)
MCR: 20250636340
Applicant and Grantor: Sukhjit K. Sandhu; its successor and assigns
Date: November 3, 2025
Purpose: Roadway
Location: west of S. 24th Avenue and W. Olney Avenue
APN: 300-16-030E; 300-16-030D
File: 250042
Council District: 8

Deed (c)
MCR: 2025-0633072
Applicant and Grantor: 40 McDowell LLC; its successor and assigns



Date: October 31, 2025
Purpose: Roadway
Location: southeast corner of N. 40th Street and E. McDowell Road
APN: 125-19-012C
File: 250063
Council District: 8

Easement (d)
MCR: 2025-0633073
Applicant and Grantor: 40 McDowell LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: October 31, 2025
Purpose: Transit Pad
Location: southeast corner of N. 40th Street and E. McDowell Road
APN: 125-19-012C
File: 250063
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Archaeology Consulting and Historic Preservation Services Contract - RFQu-26-
0018 Request for Award (Ordinance S-52497) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Agave Archaeology, LLC; Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.; Colliers
Engineering & Design, Inc.; Desert Archaeology, Inc.; Dudek, Inc.; GH2 Architects,
LLC; HDR Engineering, Inc.; Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.; Logan Simpson Design,
Inc.; Motley Design Group, LLC; North Wind Resource Consulting, LLC; PaleoWest,
LLC; Pinyon Environmental, Inc.; SWCA, Incorporated; Terracon Consultants, Inc.;
TYPSA, Inc.; Westland Resources, Inc.; Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers &
Architects; and WSP USA, Inc. to provide Archaeology Consulting and Historic
Preservation Services for Citywide use. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed
$7,100,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide archaeological and historic preservation consultants to
conduct investigations that identify cultural resources and evaluate or mitigate impacts
on sensitive cultural resources resulting from a variety of City-sponsored projects.
These projects are completed for various City departments and use different funding
sources that require specific compliance procedures in order to meet City, state and
federal archaeological and historic preservation policies and regulations. Services
provided will include, but are not limited to, archaeological and historic property
surveys, archaeological monitoring of ongoing construction sites to conduct
archaeological feature recordation and sampling, testing and data recovery
excavations, artifact analysis, evaluation and assessment of archaeological
discoveries and preparation of documents for federal reporting purposes. Services will
be used on a Citywide basis with the Parks and Recreation, Neighborhood Services,
Housing, Planning and Development and Aviation Departments being the majority
users.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).




Nineteen Offerors submitted statements of qualifications and were deemed to be
responsive and responsible. Evaluations were based on the following minimum
qualifications:

Qualifications/Acreditation/Cultural Training
Experience and Expertise
Compliance with the Scope of Work

After reaching consensus, award to the following Offerors is recommended:

Agave Archaeology, LLC
Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.
Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc.
Desert Archaeology, Inc.
Dudek, Inc.
GH2 Architects, LLC
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Logan Simpson Design, Inc.
Motley Design Group, LLC
North Wind Resource Consulting, LLC
PaleoWest, LLC
Pinyon Environmental, Inc.
SWCA, Incorporated.
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
TYPSA, Inc.
Westland Resources, Inc.
Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects
WSP USA, Inc.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about December 17, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $7,100,000 for the five-year term.
Funds are available in the various departments' operating and Capital Improvement
Program budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Finance Department.




Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Comment on Proposed Changes to Memoranda of Understanding
Submitted by Authorized Employee Organizations - Citywide

This item is to provide public comment on proposed changes to existing Memoranda of
Understanding (MOUs) submitted by employee organizations.

Summary
The Meet and Confer process is outlined in Phoenix City Code, Chapter 2, Section
218.

Under the terms of the City Code, authorized employee organizations must submit a
proposed MOU on or before December 1. The City Code provides employee
organizations the opportunity to make a presentation to the City Council regarding
proposed changes to the existing Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), which
occurred this year on December 3, 2025.

The City Code provides that at the next City Council meeting following presentations
by employee organizations, the public shall be afforded an opportunity to comment on
the proposals. This item on the December 17, 2025, agenda provides that opportunity.

The current MOUs can be viewed at https://www.phoenix.gov/hr/current-jobs/total-
compensation-information.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.





Brittany Whittle

From: Jess Mayer
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2025 1:49 PM
To: Cathleen A Simpson
Cc: Brittany Whittle; Mailbox City Clerk Department CLK
Subject: AFSCME Local 2384 MOU
Attachments: Outlook-serensaf; 2026 2028 MOU Proposed changes.docx



CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were expecting this email.

Report Suspicious

Dear Cathleen,

In accordance with the Phoenix City Code §2-218(B), AFSCME Local 2384 is enclosing the proposed
memorandum of understanding in the format the parties discussed on 11/10/2025.

Please let us know if you have any questions or need additional information.

We look forward to meeting and conferring.

Regards,



Jess Mayer
President

AFSCME Local 2384
Phone: 602-230-2301
Mobile: 480-901-2627
Email:
jmayer@afscme2384.com
3636 North 15th Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85015
www.afscme2384.com
[afscme2384.com]




Section 3-1: Wages
A. All Unit 2 employees shall receive annual base-wage increases that equal or exceed the
greater of:

1. Three percent (3%) of base rate; or
2. The average percentage wage increase granted to any other City bargaining unit or
unclassified group within the same fiscal year.
These adjustments shall be automatic and not subject to budgetary deferral.

B. Unit 2 employees shall receive a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) each July 1 based on the
U.S. CPI-U (West Region), with a guaranteed floor of 2.5% and no cap. The City shall not offset
this COLA against other negotiated raises.

C. When the City achieves an operating-revenue surplus exceeding three percent (3%) of
forecast, one-half of that surplus shall be distributed as a lump-sum economic-share bonus to all
Unit 2 employees.

D. Licensed Pesticide Applicators shall receive $1.50 per hour above their base hourly rate for
all hours engaged in related duties.

E. Employees required to hold or maintain a Commercial Driver License (CDL) for any portion
of duties shall receive $0.75 per hour added to base pay.

F. Pay-schedule calculations shall follow rate tables jointly prepared by Human Resources and
AFSCME Local 2384. Any rounding shall round upward to the employee’s benefit.




Section 3-1A: Productivity Enhancement Pay
A. Eligible employees shall receive semi-annual Productivity Enhancement payments as follows:

1. After five (5) years of service: $150 per year of service, up to $5,000 annually at twenty-
two (22) years.
2. After twenty-three (23) years: $200 per year of service, up to $8,000 annually at twenty-
seven (27) years.

B. Eligibility requires:

1. Six (6) years continuous service;
2. A performance rating of “Met” or higher;
3. Active full-time status.

C. Payments shall be pro-rated each pay period. Any delays shall be issued retroactively.




D. Compensation shall not be reduced due to reclassification or movement; Productivity
Enhancement Pay is retained by the employee.




Section 3-2: Overtime
A. Overtime is defined as time assigned and worked beyond the regular shift or 40 hours per
week (or 10 hours per day for compressed schedules).

B. All paid leave counts as time worked for overtime eligibility.

C. Overtime shall be paid at 1.5 times the regular rate. Work exceeding twelve (12) consecutive
hours shall be paid at double time.

D. Overtime shall be voluntary whenever possible. Mandatory overtime shall rotate equitably.

E. Accurate overtime lists shall be posted monthly.

F. Employees may accrue up to 240 hours of compensatory time.

G. Employees may cash out up to 80 hours of compensatory time twice per fiscal year.




Section 3-2A: Call-Out Pay
A. An eight-hour protected rest period shall apply before each shift. Call-outs during this period
provide flexible reporting time or equivalent rest.

B. Call-outs guarantee three (3) hours minimum at double time.

C. Multiple call-outs within one rest period each trigger the minimum.




Section 3-3: Out-of-Class Pay
A. Employees performing higher-classification duties for two (2) hours or more shall receive the
higher rate for the entire shift.

B. Out-of-class assignments shall not exceed ninety (90) days without reclassification or posting
the position.

C. Out-of-class assignments shall rotate equitably by seniority.



Section 3-4: Sick Leave Conversion and Payout
A. At retirement, employees may convert unused sick leave: 100% up to 1,200 hours and 50%
thereafter.

B. Employees separating with ten (10) or more years of service (and not terminated for cause)
shall receive a 75% payout.




Section 3-5: Shift Differential Pay
A. Employees working between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m. shall receive a 10% differential.

B. Weekend shifts earn an additional 5% differential.




Section 3-6: Stand-By Pay
A. Stand-by status earns two (2) hours of pay per day plus overtime for callouts.

B. Stand-by assignments shall rotate equitably.




Section 3-7: Show-Up Time
A. Employees reporting as scheduled who are not put to work shall receive four (4) hours
minimum pay.




Section 3-8: Jury Duty
A. Employees summoned to jury duty receive full pay with no loss of leave, benefits, or
seniority.

B. Employees released after 4 p.m. are not required to return to work.




Section 3-9: Deferred Compensation
A. The City shall match deferred-compensation contributions up to 3% of base pay.

B. Financial planning sessions shall be provided on paid time.




ARTICLE 4: Hours of Work / Working
Conditions
Section 4-1: Hours of Work
A. The standard work week shall consist of forty (40) hours, arranged in either five (5) eight-
hour days or four (4) ten-hour days, unless otherwise agreed by the Union.

B. Employees shall receive a regular, predictable schedule. Changes require ten (14) calendar-
days’ notice and prior Union consultation.

C. No employee shall suffer loss of pay or seniority due to City-initiated operational schedule
changes.

D. Temporary schedule changes shall be filled first by volunteers, then equitably by seniority.

E. Employees required to work on holidays or City-declared emergency days shall receive
double time plus holiday pay, with a four-hour minimum.




Section 4-2: Rest and Lunch Periods
A. Employees shall receive two (2) paid fifteen-minute breaks and one (1) uninterrupted thirty-
minute meal period each shift.

B. Interrupted breaks shall be rescheduled or paid.

C. Employees shall not be required to stay at workstations during unpaid breaks.

D. Supervisors shall provide climate-appropriate break areas with shade, seating, and potable
water.




Section 4-3: Clean-Up Time
A. Employees shall receive thirty (30) minutes before shift end for personal and equipment
cleanup.

B. Cleanup time involving hazardous materials shall be extended as needed and fully paid.

C. Departments shall provide adequate washing stations, lockers, and secure storage.




Section 4-4: Seniority
A. Seniority shall be the controlling factor for promotions, transfers, layoffs, recalls, overtime,
and shift bidding when qualifications are met.

B. Seniority shall be based on continuous City service or classification seniority, whichever
benefits the employee.

C. Seniority lists shall be verified jointly with the Union twice annually.

D. Temporary promotions or out-of-class assignments do not interrupt seniority accrual.




Section 4-5: Bump / Bid Procedure – Fleet Services
A. All reassignments and shift changes shall follow an open bidding process based on seniority,
qualifications, and employee preference.

B. Vacancies shall be posted for ten (10) days at all work sites.

C. Employees may review postings during work hours.

D. The Union shall receive all posting and award documentation.

E. Disputes are subject to expedited grievance review.

F. No employee shall be involuntarily reassigned without just cause and prior Union discussion.




Section 4-6: Technology



A. The City shall introduce new technology only after advance consultation with the Union.

B. No employee shall be laid off or demoted due to new technology without six (6) months’
notice and training or reassignment at equal pay.

C. All technology training shall occur on City time.

D. GPS or monitoring technology shall not be used for discipline inconsistent with employee
rights.

E. All technology issues are grievable.




ARTICLE 5: Benefits
Section 5-1: Health and Life Insurance
A. The City shall provide comprehensive medical, dental, and vision coverage at no cost to the
employee.

B. Multiple plan options shall be provided.

C. The Union shall approve all vendor or network changes.

D. The City shall provide life insurance equal to twice annual salary.

E. The City shall fund an Employee Assistance Program (EAP).




Section 5-2: Vacation Leave
A. Vacation accrues as follows:
● 0–4 years: 4.6 hrs/pay period
● 5–9 years: 6.2 hrs/pay period
● 10–14 years: 7.7 hrs/pay period
● 15+ years: 9.3 hrs/pay period

B. Employees may accumulate up to 600 hours.

C. Vacation scheduling shall be based on seniority.

D. Requests must be approved or denied within seven (7) days; otherwise approval is automatic.




Section 5-3: Holidays
A. Employees receive fourteen (14) paid holidays.

B. Holidays falling on days off shall be replaced with alternate paid days.

C. Holiday work is paid at double time plus holiday pay.

D. Floating holidays may be used with 48-hour notice.




Section 5-4: Sick Leave
A. Sick leave accrues at five (5) hours per pay period.

B. Sick leave may be used for illness, appointments, or family care.

C. No doctor’s note is required for three (3) days or fewer unless abuse is shown.

D. Sick leave may be donated to a Leave Bank.

E. The City shall provide twelve (12) weeks paid parental leave.




Section 5-5: Retirement Benefits
A. The City shall contribute at least one-half of ASRS obligations.

B. Retirement benefits may not be reduced without Union consent.

C. Phased-retirement options shall be offered.




Section 5-6: Other Benefits
A. Additional City-funded benefits include:
● Tuition reimbursement up to $6,000 per year
● Tool/uniform allowances
● Wellness screenings




● Short- and long-term disability insurance
● Employee recognition programs

B. All benefits are grievable and enforceable.




ARTICLE 6: Safety, Grievance Procedures,
and General Provisions
Section 6-1: Safety and Working Environment
A. The City shall maintain safe, healthy, and sanitary workplaces exceeding minimum standards.

B. Employees may refuse unsafe work without retaliation.

C. The City shall provide and replace PPE at no cost.

D. A Joint Labor-Management Safety Committee shall meet monthly.

E. Work areas shall include adequate lighting, ventilation, water, restrooms, and break areas.

F. Injured employees shall receive paid medical evaluation time.

G. All required training shall be provided on paid time.




Section 6-2: Reporting of Injuries and Hazards
A. Employees shall report hazards or injuries; the Union shall be notified within 24 hours.

B. No retaliation shall occur against reporting employees.

C. All investigations shall include Union participation.




Section 6-3: Grievance Procedure
A. Employees have the right to representation at all steps.

B. A grievance includes disputes over this MOU, safety, conditions, or discipline.



C. Step 1: Informal discussion within 14 days; response in 5 days.
D. Step 2: Written grievance to Director; meeting in 7 days; response in 10 days.
E. Step 3: Appeal to Labor Relations; response in 10 days.
F. Step 4: Arbitration; arbitrator selected from joint panel.

G. Arbitration decisions are final and binding, with full make-whole remedies.

H. Safety-related grievances shall be fast-tracked.




Section 6-4: Disciplinary Procedures
A. Discipline requires just cause.

B. Employees shall have representation rights.

C. Employees shall receive all evidence before discipline.

D. Discipline shall not be imposed until investigation is complete.

E. All discipline is grievable.




Section 6-5: Non-Discrimination and Anti-Retaliation
A. The City shall maintain a workplace free of discrimination and retaliation.

B. Retaliation for complaints or safety reporting is prohibited and grievable.




Section 6-6: Labor-Management Committees
A. A Joint Committee shall meet monthly to address working conditions, policies, and staffing.

B. No policy affecting Unit 2 employees shall be implemented without Union consultation.




Section 6-7: Savings Clause
A. Invalid provisions do not affect the remainder of the MOU.




B. The parties shall negotiate replacement language within 30 days.




Section 6-8: Entire Agreement
This MOU constitutes the complete agreement between the parties.




Section 6-9: Duration and Negotiations
A. This Agreement remains in effect for the adopted term.

B. Negotiations for a successor agreement shall begin six months before expiration.

C. Terms remain in effect until a successor is ratified.




MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

2026-2028

And
Unit 4 Employees




PREAMBLE .................................................................................................................... 4

ARTICLE 1: RIGHTS ...................................................................................................... 4
SECTION 1-1: PURPOSE/GENDER .............................................................................................................................. 4
SECTION 1-2: CITY AND DEPARTMENT RIGHTS ....................................................................................................... 4
SECTION 1-3: RIGHTS OF ASSOCIATION ................................................................................................................... 6
SECTION 1-4: RIGHTS OF UNIT MEMBERS .............................................................................................................. 11
SECTION 1-5: PROHIBITION OF STRIKE AND LOCKOUTS ......................................................................................... 20
ARTICLE 2: GRIEVANCE/ARBITRATION/LABOR MANAGEMENT .......................... 21
SECTION 2-1: GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE .................................................................................................................. 21
SECTION 2-2: LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE ................................................................................................ 25
SECTION 2-3: RESOLVING GENERAL COMPLAINTS ................................................................................................ 26
ARTICLE 3: COMPENSATION/WAGES ...................................................................... 26
SECTION 3-1: WAGES ............................................................................................................................................. 26
SECTION 3-2: PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT PAY ................................................................................................ 27
SECTION 3-3: TRAINING PAY ................................................................................................................................. 28
SECTION 3-4: COMPENSATION FOR INTERPRETING AND TRANSLATION BY SWORN POLICE OFFICERS .................. 29
SECTION 3-5: OVERTIME ........................................................................................................................................ 30
SECTION 3-6: COURT TIME OVERTIME .................................................................................................................. 32
SECTION 3-7: CALL-OUT PAY ................................................................................................................................ 33
SECTION 3-8: OUT-OF-RANK PAY .......................................................................................................................... 33
SECTION 3-9: SICK LEAVE CONVERSION AT RETIREMENT ..................................................................................... 34
SECTION 3-10: SICK LEAVE PAYOUT ..................................................................................................................... 36
SECTION 3-11: NIGHT SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL/WEEKEND SHIFT DIFFERENTIAL....................................................... 36
SECTION 3-12: STAND-BY PAY .............................................................................................................................. 36
SECTION 3-13: COURT TIME STANDBY PAY .......................................................................................................... 37
SECTION 3-14: OFF-DUTY EMPLOYMENT .............................................................................................................. 37
SECTION 3-15: JURY DUTY .................................................................................................................................... 38
SECTION 3-16: DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLANS ................................................ 38
SECTION 3-17: NON-DIRECT PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION OR BENEFITS............................................................. 38
SECTION 3-18: DRUG RECOGNITION EXPERT PREMIUM PAY ................................................................................. 39
SECTION 3-19: PHLEBOTOMIST PREMIUM PAY ...................................................................................................... 39
ARTICLE 4: HOURS OF WORK/WORKING CONDITIONS ........................................ 39
SECTION 4-1: WORK SCHEDULES ........................................................................................................................... 39
SECTION 4-2: SENIORITY ........................................................................................................................................ 41
ARTICLE 5: BENEFITS ................................................................................................ 42
SECTION 5-1: HEALTH INSURANCE ........................................................................................................................ 42
SECTION 5-2: RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE .......................................................................................................... 42
SECTION 5-3: DENTAL INSURANCE ........................................................................................................................ 43
SECTION 5-4: LIFE INSURANCE .............................................................................................................................. 43
SECTION 5-5: LONG-TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE .............................................................................................. 44
SECTION 5-6: HOLIDAYS AND VACATION LEAVE .................................................................................................. 44
SECTION 5-7: OUT-OF-STATE VACATION RECALL ................................................................................................. 46
SECTION 5-8: MILITARY LEAVE ............................................................................................................................. 47
SECTION 5-9: UNIFORM, CLOTHING AND EQUIPMENT ALLOWANCE ...................................................................... 47
SECTION 5-10: REIMBURSEMENT FOR EDUCATION EXPENSES ............................................................................... 52
SECTION 5-11: LEAVE OF ABSENCE ....................................................................................................................... 52
SECTION 5-12: WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ........................................................................................................... 52
ARTICLE 6: MISCELLANEOUS .................................................................................. 53
SECTION 6-1: SAVING CLAUSE ............................................................................................................................... 53
SECTION 6-2: COPIES OF MEMORANDUM ............................................................................................................... 53


SECTION 6-3: AID TO CONSTRUCTION OF PROVISIONS OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING........................... 53
SECTION 6-4: CHANGES IN DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS ORDERS PURSUANT TO THIS MEMORANDUM .................. 54
SECTION 6-5: PHYSICAL FITNESS ........................................................................................................................... 54
SECTION 6-6: TERM AND EFFECT OF MEMORANDUM ............................................................................................ 55
ATTACHMENT A .......................................................................................................... 57

ATTACHMENT B .......................................................................................................... 58

ATTACHMENT C .......................................................................................................... 59




Preamble
WHEREAS the parties, through their designated representatives, met and conferred in
good faith pursuant to Chapter 2, Article XVII (Employer-Employee Relations), Phoenix
City Code in order to reach agreement concerning wages, hours, and working
conditions of employees in the Police Officers Unit, and

WHEREAS the parties hereby acknowledge that the provisions of this Memorandum are
not intended to abrogate the authority and responsibility of City government provided for
under the statutes of the State of Arizona or the Charter or ordinances of the City of
Phoenix except as expressly and lawfully limited herein,

NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that this Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter
“Memorandum”) shall be submitted to the City Council of the City of Phoenix for its
consideration.



ARTICLE 1: Rights
Section 1-1: Purpose/Gender

Wherever any words used herein in the masculine, feminine or neutral, they shall be
construed as though they were also used in another gender in all cases where they
would so apply.


Section 1-2: City and Department Rights

A. The Association recognizes that the City and the Police Chief retain, whether
exercised or not, solely and exclusively, all express and inherent rights and
authority pursuant to law with respect to determining the level of and the manner
in which the City’s law enforcement activities are conducted, managed, and
administered, and the Association recognizes the exclusive right of Police Chief
to establish and maintain departmental rules and procedures for the
administration of the Police Department during the term of this Memorandum
provided that such rules and procedures do not violate any of the specific
express provisions of this Memorandum.

B. The City and Police Chief have the exclusive right and authority to schedule work
and/or overtime work as required in the manner most advantageous to the City

C. The City shall maintain patrol staffing at levels reasonably necessary to ensure
officer safety. When staffing falls below the level determined by the line-level
supervisor to be reasonably necessary for safe operations, the Department shall
take reasonable steps to increase staffing, including utilization of overtime.

D It is understood by the parties that every incidental duty connected with operations
enumerated in job descriptions is not always specifically described; nevertheless, it is
intended that all such duties shall be performed by the employee. 186
E. The Police Chief and City Manager reserve the right to discipline or discharge
employees for just cause, defined as follows, pursuant to the Civil Service laws. The
City reserves the right to lay off personnel of the Department.

1. The employer informed the law enforcement officer of the possible
disciplinary action resulting from the officer's conduct through agency
manuals, employee handbooks, the employer's rules and regulations, or other
communications to the officer or the conduct was such that the officer should
have reasonably known disciplinary action could occur.

2. The disciplinary action is reasonably related to the standards of conduct for a
professional law enforcement officer, the mission of the agency, the orderly,
efficient or safe operation of the agency, or the officer's fitness for duty.

3. The discipline is supported by a preponderance of evidence that the conduct
occurred.

4. The discipline is not excessive and is reasonably related to the seriousness of
the offense and the officer's service record.

F. The City and the Police Chief shall determine assignments and establish
methods and processes by which assignments are performed. This is not grievable
under the MOU.

G. The City and Police Chief shall have the right to transfer employees within the
Police Department in a manner most advantageous to the City. This is not grievable
under the MOU.

H. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Memorandum, the City and the
Police Chief retain unqualifiedly all rights and authority to which by law they are entitled.

I. The City shall have the authority without prior meeting and conferring to effect
reorganizations of the Police Department.

J. The Association recognizes that the City has statutory and Charter rights and
obligations in contracting for matters relating to municipal operations.

K. The Association pledges cooperation to the increasing of departmental efficiency
and effectiveness. Any and all rights concerning the management, organization, and
direction of the Police Department and the police force, including those set forth in this
Memorandum, shall be exclusively the right of the City and the Police Chief unless
otherwise provided by the express terms of this Memorandum as permitted by law.

L. The inherent and express rights of the City and the Police Chief, including those
herein specifically referred to, which are not expressly modified or restricted by a



5 187
specific provision of this Memorandum, are not in any way, directly or indirectly,
subject to the Grievance Procedure herein.


Section 1-3: Rights of Association

A. The Association, as the authorized representative, has the exclusive right to
serve as the meet and confer representative of all employees in the Police
Officers Unit as described in the City Code. Under no circumstances will the City
or Department allow any member or representative of any other labor group, or
their designee, to verbalize, memorialize in writing or insinuate that they
represent, or have the ability to represent, Unit 4 members.

Under no circumstance shall the department create or request unit members to
sign or agree to individual employment contracts without mutual agreement with
the Association. Unit members will still be required to sign for receipt of materials.

B. Union Release:
The Phoenix community benefits from harmonious and cooperative relationships
between the City and its employees. The City and the Association have
negotiated six full-time release positions, and release hours, as an efficient and
readily available point of contact for addressing labor-management concerns.
Examples of work performed by the release positions in support of the City
include ensuring representation for unit employees during administrative
investigations and grievance/disciplinary appeal meetings with management;
participating in collaborative labor-management initiatives that benefit the City
and the unit members; serving on Police Department task forces and
committees; facilitating effective communication between City and Department
management and unit employees; assisting unit members in understanding and
following work rules; and administering the provisions of the Memorandum of
Understanding. The cost to the City for these release positions, including all
benefits, has been charged as part of the total compensation contained in this
agreement in lieu of wages and benefits. The parties recognize that recent legal
precedent may require additional agreements between the City and the
Association regarding the implementation of release time positions. The parties
will develop any required agreements consistent with applicable law while
maintaining the release time framework and compensation provisions set forth in
this MOU.


1. Full-Time Release Positions:

a. The 6 full time release positions shall be sworn, full time, paid police
officers of the Phoenix Police Department, who will at all times remain
qualified to perform such duties as are normally expected and required of
a municipal police officer in the City of Phoenix, Arizona. These 6 full time
release positions will receive their regular salary including fringe benefits,
and the employer shall make all employer contributions to the Public
Safety Personnel Retirement System required by law so as to maintain
their full eligibility under the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System.
b. The 6 full time release positions shall participate in all appropriate training
requirements necessary to maintain membership in the department,
including all training mandated by the Arizona Peace Officers Standards
and Training Board (AZ POST).


c. The 6 full time release positions agree to be bound by the City’s and the
Police Department’s rules, regulations, and operations orders, including
but not limited to proper notification when utilizing sick or vacation leave.
The full time release employees may be subject to disciplinary action for
violations of any such rules, regulations, general or operations orders.
d. The 6 full time release positions may work supplemental overtime shifts
consistent with the processes and policies set in place by the Phoenix
Police Department for all sworn police officers. Employees will submit all
overtime slips to their current supervisor to ensure that overtime is being
used appropriately.
e. The 6 officers assigned to the Association and on full-time release
shall be considered as case carrying detectives with standby
responsibilities.


2. Association Representatives:

The Association may designate up to 42 representatives and shall notify the
Police Chief and Labor Relations in writing of such designations as they
occur. There shall be no obligation on the City to change or adjust normal
departmental scheduling or assignments of personnel as a result of such
designations or as changes occur.

Every quarter, PLEA will provide a list of stewards that will be posted.

a. Up to two PLEA representatives may, when the Association is designated
by the unit member as his representative, attend mutually scheduled
grievance meetings, Use of Force Boards, Disciplinary Review Boards,
IRP Meetings, and hearings with department representatives and hearings
scheduled and conducted by the Civil Service Board without loss of pay or
benefits. Up to two PLEA representatives may attend hearings with the
department representative if more than one department representative is
in attendance. Paid release time used for any other purposes, such as
gathering information, interviewing the grievant/appellant or witnesses, or
preparing a presentation shall be charged against the bank of release
hours as described in Section 1-3 D. PLEA representatives are required to
obtain the permission of their non-unit supervisor to absent themselves
from their duties to attend scheduled meetings and provide representation.

b. When new work units, precinct(s)/bureau(s) are created, the Association
may designate up to 1 additional representative per bureau and up to 3
additional representatives per precinct. The increased number will be
consistent with current practice and will be based solely on the addition of
new work unit(s). Any deviation from the above will be discussed at a
Labor-Management meeting. 189
3. Bank of Release Hours:

A bank of 1,859 hours of paid Association release time shall be created per
M.O.U. year for use by the Association to engage in legitimate Association
business. PLEA will utilize best efforts to provide advanced notice of the use of




7 190
these hours to Labor Relations so the affected chain of commands can be
notified. In all instances, PLEA will provide Labor Relations with notice of
hours used. The cost to the City for these release hours, including fringe, has
been charged as part of the total compensation contained in this agreement
in lieu of wages and benefits. Examples of how these hours are used by the
Association include:

a. For Executive Board members to attend meetings of the Executive Board,
meetings of the general membership, and for preparation for negotiations
pursuant to Chapter 2, Article XVII (Employer-Employee Relations),
Phoenix City Code.

b. For unit members to attend seminars, meetings, training classes and
conferences so that representatives better understand issues such as City
policies and practices, conflict resolution, labor-management partnerships,
and methods of effective representation.

c. For Association representatives to communicate with members, investigate
grievances or prepare for hearings. A PLEA representative wishing to enter a
work area for the purpose of investigating a formal grievance must first gain
the permission of the work area supervisor. This permission will not be
unreasonably withheld, giving proper consideration to essential work of the
department and the occupational safety of the PLEA representative. When
requesting a meeting with the work unit/site supervisor, the PLEA
representative will inform the supervisor of the purpose of the meeting. PLEA
representatives will attempt to schedule an appointment in advance whenever
possible. One additional PLEA representative may be allowed to attend such
meetings for training purposes.

Approval for use of paid release time hereunder shall be subject to
Departmental operational and scheduling factors. When using such paid
time, Association representatives and members of the Executive Board
shall give at least 24 hours written notice in advance.

In recognition of the mutual benefit to both the City and the Association, a
unit member using Association release time as defined by Articles in this
MOU to conduct Association business shall be accorded all insurance-
related benefits. Approval of claims made for benefits will be determined
on a case by case basis.

Any hours used in excess of the bank must be approved by the Police Chief,
the Labor Relations Administrator, and the PLEA president. The number of
hours used in excess of the bank at the end of the contract term will be
deducted from the bank at the start of the first year of the following contract.
Unused hours will be carried over into the first year of the next contract.

C. The president may appoint a legislative representative for the Association if the
legislative representative is registered with the Secretary of State as a lobbyist and


if the legislative representative has agreed to work with and assist the city’s
legislative lobbyist. The legislative representative shall receive 500 hours of
release time per MOU year.

D. A member of the Executive Board of the Association, or a designated PLEA
representative, will, with the approval of the Police Chief or his designee, subject
to 24 hours written notice in advance, be authorized to engage in Association
related activities during City work hours on a non-paid basis. Approval for such
authorization for more than 2 Executive Officers or Board members of the
Association or designated shift representatives is subject to 48 hours written
notice in advance. Approval for use of unpaid time hereunder shall be subject to
Department operational and scheduling factors and administration control as to
usage of such time, but shall not be arbitrarily withheld. There shall be no use of
official paid time for Association related activities under this paragraph.

E. Upon the Association’s filing of a Third Party Data Sharing Agreement with the
Labor Relations Division, during the term of this Memorandum, upon request, the
City shall furnish to the Association bimonthly at no cost a listing of all unit
members, indicating name, mailing address, phone number, employee ID, and
assignment. The City will also provide a monthly list of employees added that
month to Unit 4.

F. The City shall deduct monthly from the pay warrants of Association members the
regular periodic Association membership dues and/or special assessments in
accordance with Chapter 2, Article XVII (Employer-Employee Relations), Phoenix
City Code and pursuant to the City’s existing dues deduction authorization form
duly completed and signed by the Association member, and transmit such
deductions to the Association on a monthly basis; except, however, that such
deduction shall be made only when an Association member’s earnings for a pay
period are sufficient after other legally required deductions are made. The City
shall, at the request of the Association, make changes in the amount of the
deduction hereunder during the term of this Memorandum at cost for
implementing such change. The City shall not make dues deductions for unit
members on behalf of any other employee organization as defined in Chapter 2,
Article XVII (Employer-Employee Relations), Phoenix City Code during the term
of this Memorandum. The City assumes no liability on account of any action
taken pursuant to this paragraph.

G. The Association is authorized to use mutually agreed upon non-work areas in City
facilities for pick-up by or distribution to unit members of official Association literature
that is not political in nature, abusive of any person or organization, or disruptive of
the department’s operations, it being understood and agreed, however, that such
activity shall not be done during the on-duty time of any unit member. The
Association may, using its own resources, use the mailboxes at work locations to
communicate with unit members. The association may use Inter-departmental mail
to communicate with unit members on two occasions a year.




H. The Association and the Department will jointly present a 4-hour Employee
Wellness course to recruits who are expected to become sworn police officers.
Immediately following, the Association will be allowed 1 hour to talk to and
possibly sign newly sworn police officers into the Association and to explain the
rights and benefits under the MOU. This time will be allotted prior to reporting for
the first patrol training shift at the offices of the Association. The content of such
information shall not be political in nature, abusive of any person or the
Department or disruptive of the Department’s operation. Curriculum will be jointly
approved with the Training Bureau Division Chief.

I. It is understood by the parties that the benefits granted by this Article shall not be
interpreted or applied as requiring the employer to count as time worked, any
hours or fractions of hours spent outside the unit member’s work shift in pursuit
of benefits provided by this Article. The employer shall count as time worked any
hours or fractions of hours spent within the unit member’s regular work shift in
pursuit of benefits provided by this Article.

J. Any unit representative attending any IRP, DRB, UFB, DAC, or any other review
board will be allowed to adjust their work schedule by an equal amount of time
spent in the meeting. The adjustment will require the approval of the
representative’s supervisor with operational consideration. Approval will not be
unreasonably withheld.

K. In the interest of encouraging continuing education for unit members, the
department will mail to the Association president the AZ POST calendar and all
other job related seminar notices it receives.

L. The Association will have 2 PLEA positions, designated in writing, on continuous
paid stand-by for the mutual benefit of both the City and the Association to
respond to critical incidents as needed. No member will be placed on stand-by if
the member is not available for call-out. If call-out occurs, overtime will be paid in
accordance with Article 3, Section 3.2.

M. Upon written request from the Association, the City will provide specific
information pertinent to a written grievance, arbitration case, or Civil Service
appeal. The City will also provide pertinent collective bargaining information. This
material will be supplied to the Association at no cost.

N. To improve communication and relationships between labor and management,
the Association will be allowed an opportunity to attend one mutually agreed
upon briefing quarterly with each squad to discuss Association business and
issues of mutual concern to labor and management. PLEA will utilize best efforts
to provide advance notice of meeting.

O. The City values and benefits from the participation of Union leaders on citywide task
forces and committees, Police Department task forces and committees, Labor –
Management work groups, and a variety of Health and Safety committees. These
activities take time away from expected tasks such as representation and


communicating with the membership and may occur outside the regular work day
of the Union officials. The full-time release positions agree to participate in these
important committees and task forces. In recognition of this commitment, the City
agrees to provide a 960 hour bank of compensation for use by the full-time
release positions each MOU year.

P. Unit members who are not Association members at the beginning of the last pay
period in June of each year will receive 3.5 hours of vacation time, in addition to
their normal annual accruals, credited to their vacation leave bank on the
second paycheck in August of that same year. Unit members who are not
Association members at the beginning of the last pay period in December of
each year will receive 3.5 hours of vacation time in addition to their normal
annual accruals, credited to their vacation leave bank on the second paycheck
in February of the following year.

The number of hours distributed to Unit members who are not Association
members will be deducted from the leave banks described in Section 1-3,
beginning with the Section 1-3(C) leave bank, then the Section 1-3(B)(3) leave
bank, and then the Section 1-3(O) leave bank. If there are not enough hours in
the leave banks to refund the hours to Unit members who are not Association
members, the Association will reduce the number of full-time release positions
for the remainder of the six-month period. The value of each reduced full-time
release position will be converted to hours and credited to the Section 1-3(B)(3)
leave bank.

The City will provide Unit members who are not members of the Association “opt
in” forms, to be approved by the Association, allowing them to donate vacation
leave to be deposited into the Section 1-3(B)(3) leave bank. At any time during
the term of this MOU, any Unit member may request this “opt in” form in order to
donate vacation time in the manner above-described.

Q. As the certified unit 4 bargaining unit, the Association will be notified electronically of
Use of Force Boards and Disciplinary Review Boards at the time of scheduling.


Section 1-4: Rights of Unit Members

A. A unit member has the right to have the Association serve as their meet and
confer representative as set forth in Chapter 2, Article XVII (Employer-Employee
Relations), Phoenix City Code.

B. A unit member has the right to be represented by the Association in dealings with
the City concerning grievances and matters pertaining to their individual
employment rights and obligations.

1. If a unit member requests, representation will be allowed when the member is
the subject of an administrative investigation by Professional Standards
Bureau, any Police Department supervisor, or other City employee who is


conducting an investigatory interview. The City will notify the Association who
will obtain the most readily available unit Association representative, who
must be a bargaining unit member. The unit representative will make every
reasonable attempt to arrive within one hour from the time a phone is made
available to the unit member. Management will make a concerted attempt to
release the association representative giving the consideration of the
departments’ and the associations’ scheduling concerns. The unit Association
representative may make a request for a caucus prior to, during, or after the
interview to bring to the investigator's attention issues which may be violations
of the MOU as set forth in this Memorandum or questions outside the scope
of the N.O.I. Prior to the conclusion of the meeting, the member, or
representative on behalf of the employee, will have the opportunity to make a
closing statement.

The Union representative may assist and consult with the employee, attempt
to clarify the facts or questions asked, and suggest other employees or
witnesses who may have knowledge of the underlying issues. The Union
representative may not turn the meeting into an adversarial proceeding,
unduly disrupt the interview, interfere with the objective of the examination, or
compromise the integrity of the interview. The Union representative may not
interrupt the employee’s response to a question, speak on behalf of the
employee, or prevent the employee from responding to a question. The Union
representative also may not behave in a violent, verbally abusive, insulting, or
demeaning manner toward the interviewer.

During the interview, the interviewer may insist that they are only interested in
hearing the employee’s own account of the matter under investigation at that
time. The interviewer may not prohibit the Union representative from
engaging in meaningful representation, including assisting and consulting with
the employee.

2. The interview session shall be a reasonable period of time, taking into
consideration the gravity and complexity of the misconduct being investigated.

3. Prior to conducting an administrative interview, the City/Department will
consider the necessity of interviewing a Unit Member who is impaired by
alcohol or drugs. If the City/Department deems an immediate administrative
interview is not necessary, it will/may be scheduled at a later time.

4. At the time of the scheduled interview, or request for a departmental
memorandum, by Professional Standards Bureau, a Police Department
Supervisor, or other City Employee, the investigator will provide the unit member
and / or their representative written notices of investigation informing the officer
of the alleged facts that are the basis of the investigation, the potential for
disciplinary action, and all relevant and readily available materials, including
complaints (except for complaints that are filed with the employer and that
include allegations of unlawful discrimination, harassment or retaliation or
complaints that involve matters under the jurisdiction of the United States equal
employment opportunity commission). Material format may include video,


12 195
audio, reports, photographs, documents, and other materials in accordance
with A.R.S § 38-1104(A)(2) in effect during the term of this agreement. Upon
the request of either party, the parties shall meet and confer the impact of any
changes to the provisions of A.R.S § 38-1104(A)(2) during the term of this
agreement. All materials will be made available to the unit member and/or
their representative in the draft investigation prior to the investigative review
process (IRP).

For investigations related to critical incidents such as officer involved
shootings, in-custody deaths, and/or police contract that result in serious
physical injury or death, Body Worn Camera (BWC) video will be made
available to a unit member prior to their administrative (PSB) interview if the
unit member first completes the criminal interview process with criminal
investigators. The parties understand that there are inherent limitations to
BWCs and memory. They also recognize that the inability to review BWC
video can impact reporting accuracy.

During the course of the administrative investigation, the investigator will not
knowingly misrepresent any fact or material issue to the unit member.

Prior to interviewing an involved employee, an Internal Investigation Material
List form documenting what materials, the investigating supervisor or PSB
investigator provided to the involved employee will be completed.


5. A unit member under investigation, and the association, will be notified in
writing every 3 months as to the current status of the investigation. This will
include a brief description of the number of known witnesses still to be
interviewed and other investigative processes remaining to be completed, as
well as an estimated date of completion.

6. When a draft investigation is provided to a Unit member, it will contain an
explanation of the member’s right to review the investigation within the time
period provided in Ops Order 3.19 before signing the investigative review
control form.

7. If changes are made to an investigation after an IRP, the unit member and
representative will be provided with a revised draft of the investigation. The
unit member will have up to 5 business days to review the revised draft, and
may attach a rebuttal, before signing an IRC form.

8. If new information is added, outside what was discussed during the IRP, to
the draft investigation, the member reserves the right to have an additional
IRP to discuss the new information. The additional IRP will only be afforded to
specifically discuss the added information, not to revisit items already
discussed in the initial IRP. The additional IRP will be scheduled and
completed within 7 calendar days, unless mutually agreed upon in writing
prior to the deadline.


9. As the certified bargaining unit for all unit 4 members, all finalized
investigations will be provided to the Association monthly.

10. Analyses completed by artificial intelligence systems or programs ("Al") will
not be used as the sole basis for decisions related to Unit employee discipline
or officer assignments.

The City must notify officers, in writing, of the artificial intelligence systems or
programs ("Al") utilized by the City to review or analyze officer data, the
specific data collected and analyzed by these systems, and how any analyses
may be used.

If an "Al" system that is implemented by the department produces or presents
faulty data or misinformation related to officer reassignment or discipline; the
department in consultation with the association may will pause the utilization
of the "Al" system. At that time the City and the association will reconvene to
assess the issue and determine the appropriate action moving forward.

Artificial intelligence is the simulation of human intelligence processes by
machines, especially computer systems, to perform tasks requiring cognition,
including, but not limited to, learning, reasoning, self correction, and creativity.

C. A unit member has the right to present their own grievance, in person or by legal
counsel.

D. Unit members are entitled to representation if an overall "Not Met" performance
evaluation is appealed and is at the Executive Level (Assistant Chief or Chief) or
when management has more than one representative at the meeting to discuss
the appeal of the performance evaluation.

E.
1. A unit member covered hereunder shall, on their request and by appointment,
be permitted to examine their departmental or divisional personnel file, in the
presence of an appropriate supervisory official of the Department. The unit
member may be accompanied by another person of their choosing. When a
city directed work fitness/job performance medical evaluation process is
completed, the city agrees to give the city doctor a release to give the
information to the requesting employee.

2. No unit member shall have any adverse comments entered into their
departmental or divisional personnel file without the member being informed
by a supervisor. If the unit member requests, they may receive a copy of the
adverse comment.






3. A unit member may, at their discretion, attach rebuttal statements to any
material contained in their departmental or divisional personnel file which may
be adverse in nature.

4. Discipline older than 5 years from the date of issuance will not be considered
for progressive discipline or promotion/transfer purposes except for the
following types of discipline, which may be considered for the duration of
employment (and upon the employee's return to employment, if applicable):

Final sustained discipline of suspension or higher of the following;

• The employee has been abusive or threatening in attitude, language, or
conduct towards fellow employees;
• The employee has solicited or taken for personal use a fee, gift or favor in
the course of the assigned work or in connection with it, which would lead
toward favoritism or the appearance of favoritism or a conflict of interest;
• The employee has intentionally falsified records or documents made, kept,
or maintained for or on behalf of the City of Phoenix;
• The employee has stolen or is in unauthorized possession of City property
or the property of another employee or citizen;
• The employee is under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs on the job;
• The employee has violated City of Phoenix anti-harassment or anti-
discrimination policies;
• The employee committed a violation of the City's Ethics Policy;
• The employee committed an act of dishonesty;
• The employee committed an act meeting the elements of a felony; or
• The employee has committed a Class 3 violation of use of force.

5. A Supervisory Counseling is a documented warning presented to the
employee for signature. The effective date for any applicable appeal will start
from the date that the employee signs the Counseling.

6. Once a unit member has been disciplined, no further disciplinary action may
be imposed for the same specific allegation during the same incident of
misconduct. If a unit member has received a coaching for the same incident,
it may be considered as a mitigating factor in the final determination of
discipline. A unit member may be subjected to additional discipline if further
investigation reveals additional allegations arising from the same incident.

7. If the findings of a Departmental investigation result in a Class II or below
level of discipline, the Department will meet with the affected unit member, an
Association representative and the investigative command staff to
determine if the needs of the City and Department would be better served by
the affected member undergoing training in lieu of discipline, when
appropriate. The discipline would still be considered for purposes of transfers
and progressive discipline.

F. A unit member and Association Representative shall have the right to appear
before the departmental Disciplinary Review Board when disciplinary matters are
brought before the Board involving the unit member.
1. The purpose of such appearance is to give the unit member an opportunity to
respond to the assertions made against them.

2. The Department shall notify the unit member 10 calendar days prior to such
opportunity to respond to the Board. The notification shall contain the date,






time, violation(s) and basis of each violation that has been sustained. In addition,
the unit member, if they choose, may meet with their immediate supervisor along
with the second level supervisor or the unit member’s Bureau/Precinct
Commander for the purpose of discussing the basis of each violation to be
reviewed by the DRB. If the immediate supervisor conducted the investigation,
the unit member, if they choose, may meet with the next supervisor in their chain
of command. Such request shall be made in writing to the unit member’s
immediate supervisor. Also, the unit member, if they choose, may be
accompanied by an Association representative at either meeting.

a. At the IRP meeting, the unit member shall be afforded a reasonable
opportunity to review the written investigation. Realizing that in some
cases there may be information that would be detrimental to the
department’s ability to conduct misconduct investigations, that information
may be deleted. However, all other information will be available for review.

3. The unit member under investigation may request a copy of the DRB
information at no cost. The DRB information will be made available to the unit
member or their representative at the same time the unit member is served
with the DRB notice. Any written or electronic material to be presented by the
employee or their representative to the DRB shall also be given to the
department in a reasonable time. The information will be supplied
electronically if possible; if not, it will be supplied in written form. In addition,
the department will supply any audio/video tapes and computer graphics
which have been produced.

4. The unit member may, at their discretion, appear before the Board with an
Association representative of their choosing and may state the reasons why
the proposed action is unjustified. The unit member and their representative
may passively observe all presentations made to the board and all responses
made to questions by board members. The unit member and non-board
members will be excluded from the room during board deliberations.

5. The unit member may submit relevant written matter in support of their position.

6. If the unit member requests, representation will be allowed, consistent with
Article 1, Section 1-4(B)(1) of this Memorandum, during Use Of Force Board
(UFB) hearings. A unit Association representative will be allowed to observe
all presentations made to the Board and all responses to questions by Board
members.

a. At least 10 days prior to the convening of the UFB the unit member will be
provided at no cost with a copy of all documentation concerning their
involvement in the matter under investigation that is made available to the
UFB Board members.

b. At the conclusion of the UFB, the Board Chair will verbally advise the unit
member and representative of policies violated that support the


recommendation. The unit member and representative will also be
provided a copy of the UFB recommendation submitted to the Chief within
3 business days.

c. The Association has the right to meet with the Police Chief, or designee,
within 7 business days of the board’s decision, as scheduled by the Police
Chief’s office, to discuss an “out of policy” recommendation by the UFB
before a final decision is rendered.

7. A unit member will be provided written notice of a Loudermill hearing at least
5 working days before the scheduled hearing along with copies of all
supporting documentation. This is to ensure the member will have a
meaningful opportunity to prepare for the hearing. The unit member may
submit written information for the Chief’s consideration in advance of the
hearing. At the hearing, the unit member may present any information the
member deems relevant, including one character witness to provide a
statement. The witness will not read written statements submitted by others.

a. The timeline for written notice of a Loudermill hearing resulting from an
arrest for a felony crime under color of authority will be at the discretion of
the Police Chief.

8. In recognition of the mutual benefit to both the city and the unit member,
suspensions MAY BE served under the following time limits, at the unit
member’s option. Unit members may serve suspensions of more than 40
hours on an alternating weekly schedule. The city retains the option to deviate
from this provision for suspensions involving sexual harassment, violence in
the work place, felonies, and drugs/alcohol.

G. A unit member under investigation by Professional Standards Bureau or a Police
Department supervisor for a disciplinary matter that may lead to a written
reprimand, suspension, demotion, or discharge, and who is interviewed or
interrogated, or requested to produce any documentation, shall be given a written
Notice Of Investigation (Form 80-58DB) informing them of the specific nature of
the investigation, their status in the investigation, and all known allegations of
misconduct involved in the interview of the unit member. In addition, the unit
member and/or the Police Department supervisor/Professional Standard Bureau
representative may mechanically record such interview/interrogation. Should any
mechanical recordings take place, the department reserves the right to transcribe
any such interview/interrogation for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of the
interview/interrogation and, if requested, the unit member shall sign the
transcription if it is accurate. In the event that the investigator intends to segment
the interview or the interrogation, the NOI will inform the member of the specific
nature and all known allegations pertaining to the portion or portions of the
investigation being covered by the segmented Notice of Investigation.




1. A copy of the signed and dated Notice of Investigation will be given to the unit
member prior to the beginning of the interview. The unit member shall have the
right to retain the NOI for their use throughout the entire course of the interview.

2. The unit member will be provided a copy of all the interview/interrogation in
digital media format.

3. If any unit member is told not to speak to anyone regarding an investigation,
this admonition does not apply to speaking with an attorney functioning within
the attorney-client relationship. In addition, if an accused unit member is told
not to speak to anyone regarding an investigation, this admonition does not
apply to speaking with an Association representative, who may discuss the
matter only with the grievance chairman/Association president or their
designated representative. Once the investigation is completed, any unit
member may speak with an Association representative regarding the incident.
When the investigation is completed, the accused unit member will be notified
in writing of the findings. A unit member under internal or administrative
investigation may be reassigned (may include reassignment to their home),
until the completion of the investigation.

4. If during the course of the above mentioned investigation, information is
learned concerning additional misconduct on the part of the unit member
being interviewed, an NOI will be issued to the unit member prior to the unit
member being questioned about the additional misconduct information.

5. Investigations alleging serious misconduct and/or issues of veracity will be
investigated by Professional Standards Bureau (PSB) or other appropriate
City entity.

6. Notification regarding the general nature of a Professional Standards Bureau
(PSB) interview at the time of scheduling will be left at the discretion of the
PSB Commander.

7. If any additional NOI’s are served during the course of a misconduct interview
where a PLEA representative is not present (has not been requested), a
break in the interview of up to 1 hour will be granted (if requested) for the
employee to obtain a PLEA representative.

8. The unit member or the unit member’s representative may make a request to
the Chief, or their designee, in unusual circumstances such as a unit
member’s extended duty or hospitalization, to delay the PSB interview for up
to 24 hours after a critical incident.

9. A unit member will not be terminated for the sole reason of having been
served with an order of protection or injunction against harassment unless
that court order precludes the officer from performing their essential functions,
including but not limited to carrying a firearm; until appeal processes have
been exhausted.


H. It is understood by the parties that the benefits granted by this Article, shall not
be interpreted or applied as requiring the employer to count as time worked, any
hours or fractions of hours spent outside the unit member’s work shift in pursuit
of benefits provided by this Article. The employer shall count as time worked any
hours or fractions of hours spent within the unit member’s regular work shift in
pursuit of benefits provided by this Article.

I. The affected employee attending any IRP, DRB, UFB, DAC, Grievance meeting,
Civil Service Appeal, or any other review board while off duty shall be allowed to
adjust their work schedule by an equal amount of time spent in the meeting. The
adjustment will require the approval of the unit member’s supervisor, with
operational considerations. Approval will not be unreasonably withheld.

J. After a separation notice has been signed by the appropriate authorities, and if
the unit member is given the opportunity to resign, the unit member will have 3
hours to consult with an Association representative.

K. A unit member who receives a written reprimand will be provided a copy of the
official documentation, if any, supporting the written reprimand at the time the
unit member receives the reprimand.

L. If the Driving Analysis Committee sends a case to the DRB for review, the unit
member will receive a copy of the facts supporting the DAC position upon
request. Prior to the DAC review, unless the unit member declines, an IRP will be
completed with the unit member’s commander.

M. In accordance with the terms outlined in Section 1-4.E.4, a unit member seeking
an "at request" transfer will only have discipline of a relevant nature considered in
the determination of the transfer using the following prescribed time frames. The
class will be determined by the finalized PSB investigation.

Written Reprimands: 12 months
from date of NOI
Class I Discipline: 12 months
from date of NOI
Class II Discipline: 18 months
from date of NOI
Class III Discipline: 24 months
from date of NOI

N. If an employee is not given their performance evaluation by the annual review
date, the employee may request the merit increase in writing by sending a
memorandum directly to the Human Resources Officer in the Fiscal Management
Bureau. If the performance evaluation is an overall “met,” the request will be
processed within 21 calendar days of submittal and will be retroactive to the
performance evaluation annual review date.

O. Unit members will not be excluded from applying and/or competing in a transfer
process based solely on a pending investigation. The investigation is no longer
considered “pending” once the NOF has been served to the member. However,
the transfer process will not be delayed pending the conclusion of the related
19 203
investigation. If a unit member is passed over for transfer based on the pending
investigation, he/she may be eligible for the next available opening depending
upon the outcome of the investigation.

P. An association member, or the association at the request of the member, may
request the opportunity to discuss a good-of-the-department transfer decision
with the member's Division Commander. The Division Commander will make
him/herself available, but the transfer action will not be delayed based on this
provision. This provision does not apply to transfers made to adjust staffing
levels, reduce staff in a specific area or other similar operational need.

Q. A unit member or their representative may request the opportunity to discuss and
review a transfer that is the subject of a grievance with the Chief or their
designee. The Chief or their designee shall make themselves available to
discuss, but the transfer action will not be delayed based on this provision. The
transfer action could be delayed or reversed at the discretion of the Chief or their
designee. (This paragraph does not apply to at-request transfers or transfers
based on a selection process).

R. If the City overpays a unit member for any reason, the money will be recovered
at the same rate at which it was paid unless total amount is less than $250.00, at
which the entire amount may be recovered in one lump sum.

S. Progressive Discipline time periods will be based on date of the NOI. Only
discipline resulting from a sustained finding of a like or similar allegation will
be considered for progressive discipline purposes.

Section 1-5: Prohibition of Strike and Lockouts

A. The Association and the unit members covered by this Memorandum recognize and
agree that rendering of police services to the community cannot under any
circumstances or conditions be withheld, interrupted, or discontinued, and to do so
would endanger the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Phoenix.

B. The Association pledges to maintain unimpaired municipal services as directed
by the City. Neither the Association, nor any unit member, for any reason, will
authorize, institute, aid, condone or engage in a slowdown, work stoppage,
strike, or any other interference with the work and statutory functions and
obligations of the City or the Department. During the term of this Memorandum
neither the City nor its agents for any reason shall authorize, institute, aid or
promote any lockout of unit members covered by this Memorandum.

C. Should any unit member during the term of this Memorandum, and until such
time that it is expressly and legally rescinded, breach the obligations of Section
1-5B, the City Manager or his designee shall immediately notify the Association
that a prohibited action is in progress.

D. The Association shall forthwith, through its executive officers and other authorized
representatives, disavow said strike or other prohibited action, and shall notify in
writing all Association members and representatives of their obligation and
responsibility for maintaining compliance with this Article, including their
responsibility to remain at work during any interruption which may be caused or
initiated by others. Copies of such notification shall be delivered to the office of
the City Manager. In addition, the Association shall order all unit members
violating this Article to immediately return to work and cease the strike or other
prohibited activity. Such order shall be delivered both orally and in writing to all
unit members violating this Article with copies of the written order to be delivered
to the office of the City Manager.

E. Penalties or sanctions the City may assess against a unit member who violates
this Section shall include, but not be limited to:

1. Discipline up to and including discharge.

2. Loss of all compensation and benefits, including seniority, during the period of
such prohibited activity.

F. Should the Association during the term of this Memorandum and until such time
that it is expressly and legally rescinded, breach its obligations under this
Section, it is agreed that all penalties set forth in Chapter 2, Article XVII
(Employer-Employee Relations), Phoenix City Code, shall be imposed on the
Association, in addition to any other legal and administrative remedies available
to the City that in its discretion it may elect to pursue.

G. Nothing contained herein shall preclude the City from obtaining judicial restraint
or from seeking damages from the Association, in the event of a violation of this
Section.



ARTICLE 2: Grievance/Arbitration/Labor Management

Section 2-1: Grievance Procedure

It is understood by the parties that the benefits granted by this Article shall not be
interpreted or applied as requiring the employer to count as time worked, any hours or
fractions of hours spent outside the employee's work shift in pursuit of benefits provided
by this Article. The employer shall count as time worked any hours or fractions of hours
spent within the employee's regular work shift in pursuit of benefits provided by this
Article.

A. Informal Resolution

1. As a matter of good labor-management relations, unit members who believe
that they have a bona fide grievance will discuss and attempt to resolve it with
the appropriate lowest level of supervision.

2. If the above informal discussion is held and does not resolve the grievance,
the unit member may file a formal grievance in accordance with the following
procedure.

B. Definition of Grievance

1. A grievance is a written allegation by a unit member, submitted as herein
specified, claiming violation(s) regarding the specific express terms of this
Memorandum for which there is no other specific and formal method of review.
However, disputes specifically excluded in other Articles of this Agreement from
the Grievance and Arbitration procedure shall not be construed as within the
definition set forth above and shall not be handled in accordance with this
procedure. It is agreed that such excluded disputes are not grievable or arbitrable
under the terms of this Article or under this contract.

2. The City continues to retain the format used for grievances, including forms,
technology, etc.

3. A grievance which does not meet the requirements set forth in this Article shall
be null and void, and will not be processed in accordance with this procedure.

4. The City is not under any obligation to accept grievances where the City
Manager has previously decided on the same fact pattern.

C. Procedure

All grievances covered by this Article shall be handled exclusively in the following
manner:

A grievance must be reduced to writing, citing the specific Article and Section of
this Memorandum alleged to have been violated.

1. Step 1

The unit member shall reduce the grievance to writing by signing and
completing the grievance form provided by the City and submit it to the
Commander/Administrator, or designee, within 14 calendar days of the initial
commencement of the occurrence being grieved.

The Commander/Administrator, or designee, may investigate, further
consider, and discuss the grievance with the grievant and the grievant's
representative, if any, as deemed appropriate, and shall, within 14 calendar
days of having received the written grievance, submit a response thereto in
writing to the grievant. The parties by written mutual agreement may move
the grievance to Step 2 of the grievance procedure.

2. Step 2

If the written response of the Step 1 does not result in a resolution of the
grievance, the grievant may appeal the grievance by signing and completing
the City form and presenting it to the division head, or designee within 14
calendar days of the grievant's receipt of the Step 1 response.

The division head, or designee, may further consider and discuss the
grievance with the grievant and the grievant's representative, if any, as
deemed appropriate, and shall, within 14 calendar days of having received
the written grievance, submit a response thereto in writing to the grievant. The
parties by written agreement may move the grievance to Step 3 of the
grievance procedure.

3. Step 2.5

After the Step 2 response, but prior to review by the Grievance Committee,
the parties involved may mutually agree to submit the grievance to Labor
Relations. The grievance, as originally written and Step 1 and Step 2
responses, must be submitted to Labor Relations within 14 calendar days of
receipt of the Step 2 response. Labor Relations shall, within 14 calendar days
of the receipt of the grievance, meet with the department head, or designee,
and the grievant and the grievant's representative, if any, in an attempt to
resolve the grievance. Labor Relations shall then submit a written response to
all parties within 14 calendar days of the meeting.

4. Step 3

a. If the written response of the Step 2 (or 2.5 if applicable) does not result in
a resolution of the grievance, the grievant may, within 14 calendar days of
the Step 2 response, appeal the grievance by signing and completing the
City form and presenting it to Labor Relations. A Grievance Committee
hearing will be scheduled at which the grievant shall be afforded the
opportunity to fully present his position and to be represented.

The Grievance Committee shall be composed of:

Chairman – A member of the City Manager’s Office designated by the
City Manager.
Member – A City department head on a rotating schedule.
Member – The President of another union, other than the Grievant’s,
representing employees with the City of Phoenix.

The Grievance Committee shall submit findings and advisory
recommendation(s) to the City Manager. The City Manager shall make the
final determination of the grievance and submit it in writing to the grievant
and his designated representative.

b. If the grievant so elects in writing within the above time limit, in lieu of such
hearing the grievance may be reviewed by an arbitrator. The parties, or
their designated representatives, shall agree on an arbitrator, and if they
are unable to agree on an arbitrator within a reasonable time, either party
may request the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service to submit to
them a list of 7 arbitrators who have had experience in the public sector.
The parties shall, within 7 calendar days of the receipt of said list, select
the arbitrator by alternately striking names from said list until one name
remains. Such person shall then become the arbitrator. The arbitrator so
selected shall hold a hearing as expeditiously as possible at a time and
place convenient to the parties, and shall be bound by the following:

i. The arbitrator shall be bound by the language of this Memorandum
and departmental rules and regulations consistent therewith in
considering any issue properly before him/her.

ii. The arbitrator shall expressly confine him/herself to the precise issues
submitted to him/her and shall have no authority to consider any other
issue not so submitted to him/her.

iii. The arbitrator shall be bound by applicable State and City law.

iv. The cost of the arbitrator and any other mutually incurred costs shall
be borne equally by the parties.

The arbitrator shall submit findings and advisory recommendations to the
City Manager. The City Manager shall make the final determination of the
grievance and submit it in writing to the grievant and his designated
representative.

D. Time Limits

Failure of City Management representatives to comply with time limits specified
in Paragraph C shall entitle the grievant to appeal to the next level of review; and
failure of the grievant to comply with said time limits shall constitute
abandonment of the grievance; except however, that the parties may extend time
limits by mutual written agreement in advance of the deadline.

E. Union Grievance

The Union may, in its own name, file a grievance that alleges violation by the City
of the rights accorded to the Union by the specific terms of Article 1-3 of this
Memorandum. The Union shall file such grievance at Step 3 of this Procedure.

F. Group Grievance




When more than one unit member claims the same violation of the same rights
allegedly accorded by this Memorandum, and such claims arise at substantially
the same time and out of the same circumstances, a single group grievance may
be filed in the name of all such members. Such group grievances shall be filed at
the Step of this Procedure which provides the lowest level of common
supervision having authority over all named Grievants. Each unit member that is
a party Grievant must be named in such group grievance.

G. Employer Grievances

Should they occur as a result of official Union activities or actions, including the
failure to act as required under the terms of this Memorandum, employer
grievances will be presented directly to the Union president or any officer of the
Union within 14 days of the occurrence prompting the grievance. The president,
or designee, shall in each case provide a written answer within 14 days from
receipt of the grievance. Unresolved employer grievances may be submitted to
arbitration pursuant to Step 3 so long as the City pays the cost of the arbitrator.


Section 2-2: Labor-Management Committee

A. There shall be a Labor-Management Committee consisting of up to 6
representatives of the Association and up to 6 representatives of the Department
and City. The purpose of the Committee is to facilitate improved Labor-
Management relationships by providing an informal forum for the free exchange
of views and discussions of mutual concerns and problems as distinguished from
meeting and conferring.

B. The Committee shall meet as needed by union request, quarterly at mutually
scheduled times. Parties may mutually agree to meet more frequently.

C. Representatives of the Association on the Committee who are unit members
shall not lose pay or benefits for meetings mutually scheduled during their duty
time up to a maximum of 3 hours per unit member per meeting.

D. It is understood by the parties that the benefits granted by this Section shall not
be interpreted or applied as requiring the employer to count as time worked, any
hours or fractions of hours spent outside the unit member’s work shift in pursuit
of benefits provided by this Section. The employer shall count as time worked
any hours or fractions of hours spent within the unit member’s regular work shift
in pursuit of benefits provided by this Article.

E. For a unit member whose regular shift is other than Shift 1, there will be flexibility
in changing his normal work hours for the purposes of attending official Labor-
Management meetings called by or with the concurrence of City management or
the Police Chief or designee.




Section 2-3: Resolving General Complaints

In the spirit of continually developing good labor-management relations all parties
are encouraged to address general complaints at the lowest level of management in
attempt to seek resolution before escalating issues up the chain of command.



ARTICLE 3: Compensation/Wages

Section 3-1: Wages

A. Unit 4 employees will receive a non-continuous payment equal to the
economic value of 2.5% of their base wage to be paid out on the first full
pay period in August of 2024.

A. The Association and its members reserve the right to discuss base wage
issues upon the disclosure of City revenues and forecasts for the terms of
this Memorandum of Understanding during the designated negotiation
period.

B. Limited Reopener for FY 2025-2026: If the city projects and revenues will
exceed $1,750,000,000 for the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 in the forecast that is
presented to the City Council in February 2025, the parties may reopen
Section 3-1 of this agreement for the sole and limited purpose of Meeting
and Conferring, In February 2025, over base wage increases, if any. Unless
held invalid by operations of law and or by final judgment of any tribunal of
competent jurisdiction, all other terms and conditions of this MOU shall
remain in full force and effect during any such reopener and throughout the
duration of this MOU.

B: Steps 1-4 of the current pay scale are eliminated, making the current step 5 the
new step 1 and proceeding. The new pay structure will be a 5-step
process to top step, with pay increments advancing for all Unit 4 employees
effective the first day of the 2026 fiscal year following the implementation of
section A (above).

C. Unit members assigned to the Air Support Unit, and who have achieved and
maintained the qualification level of Pilot in Command, shall be placed at step
one of Police Officer*Pilot, Job Code 62211, in the pay schedule outlined in
Attachment C.

D. Unit members assigned to the Air Support Unit, and who have achieved and
maintained the qualification level of Rescue Qualified Pilot or PC12 Qualified
Pilot, shall be placed at step one for Police Officer*Rescue Pilot, Job Code
62212, in the pay schedule outlined in Attachment C.

E. Unit members assigned to the Air Support Unit, and who have achieved and
maintained the qualification level of Unit Certified Flight Instructor, shall be
placed at step one of Police Officer*Flight Instr, Job Code 62213, in the pay
schedule outlined in Attachment C.

F. A unit member assigned to the Air Support Unit, and who has achieved and
maintained the qualification level of Chief Pilot, shall be placed at step one of Police
Officer*Chief Pilot, Job Code 62214, in the pay schedule outlined in Attachment C.







G. Unit members assigned to one of the four described Air Support assignments
may only qualify for and receive pay for one pay step at a time. Example: A unit
member qualified as a Unit Certified Flight Instructor and receiving pay at pay
step one of Job Code 62213 shall not receive the premium pay for any other pay
step the unit member may also qualify for.

H. Unit members designated as Team Leaders on SAU squads will receive an
additional 5% base hourly rate of pay while assigned to this position.

I. It is understood that for implementation purposes, the practice of rounding of
fractional cents shall be done in accordance with accepted mathematical and
accounting principles.

J. When a conflict arises between the Pay Schedule attached hereto as
Appendices and the Pay Ordinance due to mathematical, typographical, or
printing error, the Pay Ordinance shall be the controlling authority.

K. It is the intent of the parties to permanently move the effective date of any wage
increase to the start of the first pay period in July.

L. Lateral Pay:

A Lateral Police Officer will be placed into the pay step one below where a
their previous agency has 250 or more allocated sworn positions. (I.E. 5
year lateral officer would be placed in step 4.)

A Lateral Police Officer will be placed into the pay step two below where a
their previous agency has less than 250 allocated sworn positions. (I.E. 5
year lateral officer would be placed in step 3.)

M. At least once during the MOU term, the city will conduct a market analysis of law
enforcement agencies located in Maricopa County, including the Department of
Public Safety and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, which will itemize and
compare total compensation, salary, and other benefits. This study will be
provided to the Association at no cost.

Section 3-2: Productivity Enhancement Pay

In recognition of dedicated public service and overall performance, the City agrees to
implement the following Productivity Enhancement Pay formula for unit members:

A. Pay Benefit:

1. In December 20242025, June 20252026, December 20252026, and June
20262027, a unit employee who has completed at least 7 years of continuous
full-time service and who meets the additional qualifications specified in this
Article shall receive $80, pro-rated and included each pay period in the
qualifying unit member’s regular pay check, for each full year of continuous
full-time service in excess of 6 years, up to a semi-annual maximum of
$1,040, annual maximum of $2,080 at 20 years. 212
2. In December 20242025, June 20252026, December 20252026, and June
20262027, a unit employee at 20 years and one day of continuous full-time
service shall receive $125, pro-rated and included each pay period in the
qualifying unit member’s regular pay check, for each full year of continuous
service in excess of 6 years, up to a semi-annual maximum of $2,000, annual
maximum of $4,000 at 22 years or more.

B. Qualifications:

1. A unit member must have completed at least 1 year of continuous full-time
service at the top step in his classification. Employees in step 8 as of July 8,
2002 will receive Productivity Enhancement Pay when they reach one year at
step 8 and maintain their Productivity Enhancement Pay eligibility when they
move to step 9. Employees in step 7 or below as of July 8, 2002 will be required
to complete one year at step 9 to be eligible for Productivity Enhancement Pay.

2. A unit member must have completed 7 years of continuous full-time service.
A unit member who has continuous, full time City service in another
classification(s) may apply that time to the 7 year requirement.

3. A unit member must have achieved the overall performance rating of meets
standards or better on his latest scheduled performance evaluation on file in
the Human Resources Department.

4. A unit member who receives a less than meets standards rating may appeal
that rating by memo through his chain of command to the Police Chief. A unit
member’s eligibility shall be reinstated once the unit member receives a
scheduled or unscheduled performance rating that meets standards.

5. A unit member must be on full-time active status. A unit member on industrial
leave shall qualify for this payment for only the first year of the industrial
leave. However, the entire period of industrial leave shall qualify as
continuous service when the unit member returns to active employment.

C. Terms of Payment:

1. The City will make adjustments to an employee’s Productivity Enhancement
payment within 30 days of the qualifying date.


Section 3-3: Training Pay

A. Field Training Officers (FTOs) whom the department selects to conduct
department-approved officer field training; will receive an additional 5% of their
base hourly rate of pay for every day they are assigned to an officially authorized
field training position.




28 213
B. Field Training Officers who train in place or unit member assigned to train an
O.I.T. in traffic/DUI enforcement will receive 5% base hourly rate of pay for every
day the unit member actually trains.

C. Unit members assigned to the Canine Unit, who have achieved and maintain the
qualifications for the position of Canine Unit Trainer, will receive an additional 5%
of their base hourly rate of pay for every day they are assigned to an officially
authorized Canine Unit Trainer Position. The following is a list of requirements to
receive payment as a Canine Unit Trainer:

1. The unit member must be, or be designated by the Department to become,
certified by an outside association to train police service dogs. The
certifications include patrol, narcotics detection and/or explosive detection.

2. Training being provided must include basic level training for canines and
handlers assigned to the unit. This section is not meant to include a canine
handler training only his or her assigned canine; it is meant for those who
provide basic and in service training to other canine teams in the unit.

3. An officially authorized Canine Unit Trainer Position must include responsibility
for proper written evaluation of each canine and handler being trained.

D. Detectives selected by the department selects to conduct department-approved
new Detective or civilian investigator training will receive an additional 5% of their
base rate of pay for every day they perform such training.

E. Officers selected by the department to mentor and evaluate newly assigned
special assignments bureau members will receive an additional 5% of their base
rate of pay for every day the new member is under their mentorship.

Section 3-4: Compensation for Interpreting and Translation by Sworn Police
Officers

A. Purpose

1. This regulation is written to provide guidelines for adjusting the compensation
of sworn police officers who are authorized and required by a sworn police
supervisor to utilize a language other than English, including sign language,
to conduct an official Police Department function or activity.

2. This compensation shall be for police-related functions or activities in which
the unit member is called upon to interpret in addition to their normal assigned
duties.

B. Payment Authorization

Compensation provided for by this regulation shall be given only when approved
by a sworn police supervisor prior to the actual interpretation or translation.

C. Performance Activities Approved for Special Compensation
1. Verbal interpretation, in excess of 7 consecutive minutes per occurrence,
while conducting any assigned formal police function or activity.

2. Written translation, in excess of 7 consecutive minutes per occurrence, while
conducting any assigned formal police function or activity.

3. Signing interpretation and translation, in excess of 7 consecutive minutes per
occurrence, while conducting any assigned formal police function or activity.

D. Compensation

A unit member who meets linguistic skills qualifications, as determined by a
management review panel, or in the case of sign language determined by
presenting certification recognized by the Arizona Commission for the Deaf and
Hard of Hearing (ACDHH), shall be paid a premium of $10 15.00 per hour
calculated to the nearest 1/4 hour, in addition to his base hourly rate, for each
hour he is engaged in assigned and authorized interpretation, translation, or
signing activities.

Consistent with Section 5-10, 3 of this Memorandum and A.R. 2.51, employees
are eligible to use the seminar and professional membership portion of their
reimbursement benefit for the ACDHH certification.

E. Supervisory Authorization

Authorization must be provided by a sworn police supervisor in each case.
Written notification which includes a listing of the specific time periods for which
the premium payment is sought along with signatures of the unit member and the
appropriate supervisor should be forwarded to the Police Department’s Fiscal
Management Bureau before the end of the pay period in which the additional
duty occurred.


Section 3-5: Overtime

A. Overtime is defined as time assigned and worked beyond the regularly
scheduled 40 hour work week or 8 hour work shift, or 10 hour work shift if a 4 day
work week is implemented. Duly authorized paid leave shall be considered as
time worked for purposes of the regularly scheduled work week. This provision
shall not apply to unpaid leave.

B. Overtime shall be worked and shall be allowed if assigned by the Police Chief or
his designees.

C. Overtime work will be compensated in either cash or compensation time at 1-1/2
times the regular rate of pay after the first 7 minutes assigned and worked
beyond the end of the unit member’s regularly scheduled shift, calculated to the
nearest 1/4 hour.


D. A unit member may, subject to approval of his non-unit supervisor based on
considerations of departmental scheduling and operations factors, request to use
overtime as compensatory time subject to the limitation of 300 hours on the
accumulation of compensatory time. Use of compensatory time shall be subject
to advance approval of the non-unit supervisor. If a unit member submits
overtime requests that are in excess of 300 hours, he will be paid the difference.

E. Unit members may contribute accrued compensatory time to other employees in
accordance with City policy governing contributions of leave for serious illness of
an employee or their immediate family member.

F. A unit member may be paid for accumulated compensatory time by submitting a
memorandum to the Fiscal Bureau requesting payment for any portion of the
compensatory time. This may be done at any time upon the unit member’s
request, and such payment will be made in the pay period following receipt of the
memorandum by the Fiscal Bureau.

G. At the direction of the immediate supervisor in each case, a unit member shall be
entitled to overtime in accordance with Article 3, Section 3-6 hereof, while he is
being evaluated by the authorized and designated City physician for return to
work at times he is not scheduled to be on duty nor is on paid leave or disability
benefit status, based on actual check-in and check-out time recorded by Health
Center staff. This time shall not qualify for the guaranteed minimum overtime
provision contained in Section 3-8, but shall be compensated at a minimum of 1
hour at 1-1/2. No unit member shall be compensated for other than the
supervisor directed evaluation(s) by the City physician for return to work.

H. After 4 consecutive hours of overtime, a unit member shall be entitled to a paid
meal break of 1/2 hour, but in no event shall a unit member be entitled to more
than one such meal break for every 8 consecutive hours of overtime.

For a unit member participating in the 4/10 schedule, this provision shall mean
that before a unit member is entitled to a second 1/2 hour paid meal break, he
shall have worked on an overtime basis for a minimum of 4 hours beyond the
end of his regularly scheduled 10 hour work shift.

I. If work demands preclude a unit member from taking a meal period, the unit
member will be paid an additional 30 minutes at the straight time rate. This
benefit shall apply only if the interruption occurs during the first 30 minutes of the
meal period.

J. When a unit member is off duty and is contacted by telephone by his supervisor
because of the unit member’s official duties, for purposes other than call-out, or a
supervisor approves of the making or receiving of the call, the unit member will be
paid a minimum of 15 minutes at time and one-half his regular rate of pay when any
combination of calls equals 7 minutes or more. If the call extends past this



minimum, the overtime will be calculated to the nearest 1/4 hour. He will not receive
overtime for additional duty-related calls received during this compensation period.

K. A unit member on industrial leave and assigned to his home will be considered to
have the same duty hours and N-days, up to a 7 calendar day period, as the
squad he was on when the injury/illness occurred. After the 7 days, he may be
reassigned to new duty hours and/or N-days.

L. A unit member who scheduled a leave day 30 calendar days in advance through
his immediate non-unit supervisor in accordance with departmental policy and
who subsequently is placed on court stand-by, or is required to appear in court
will, by his choice, receive overtime pay in accordance with this Section and
Section 3-7 and/or Section 3-8, in addition to the leave day.

M. A unit member who scheduled a leave day but failed to do so within 30 calendar
days in advance, and who is placed on stand-by or called to court, will receive
overtime pay in accordance with this Article and Section 3-7. However, the
number of leave hours taken will be reduced by the number of overtime hours
paid. Court stand-by hours do not apply to this provision.


Section 3-6: Court Time Overtime

A. When court time constitutes overtime, a unit member shall be entitled to overtime
compensation/minimum call-out pay consistent with Section 3-8 of this
Memorandum.

1. Court time overtime shall be continuous time compensated consistent with
Section 3-6, subsection C.

2. No cost parking will be provided for unit members who are called to testify or
appear at any City of Phoenix Municipal Court facility for any official police
department business, whether on or off-duty.

3. If performed virtual, the unit employee must report to a Phoenix Police facility
to be eligible for Court Time Overtime. If performed at a location of the unit
employee’s discretion, other than a work location, the unit member will be
paid a minimum of 15 minutes at time and one-half his regular rate of pay
when any combination of calls equals 7 minutes or more. If the call extends
past this minimum, the overtime will be calculated to the nearest 1/4 hour.
The unit employee will not receive overtime for additional duty-related calls
received during this compensation period.

B. For purposes of this Article the term Court shall be defined as including Federal
District Court; Superior Court, State of Arizona; City Court, City of Phoenix, State
of Arizona; Municipal Courts in Maricopa County; Justice Court; Federal, State,
County Grand Juries; Motor Vehicle Department hearings, and Prosecutorial and
Defense interviews. It is understood that this Article shall not apply to


administrative hearings including but not limited to arbitration hearings pursuant
to the MOU, Civil Service Board hearings, PERB hearings, and hearings
pursuant to the A.R. 2.61 grievance procedure.

C. After a unit member verifies his need to appear in court to testify concerning the
performance of his official duties at a time other than his regularly scheduled tour
of duty, and he is notified less than 12 hours in advance of the scheduled
appearance time that he need not appear, the unit member will receive 2 hours
of pay at 1-1/2 times his base hourly rate of pay.


Section 3-7: Call-Out Pay

A. A unit member called back because of his own negligence, whether in the proper
care and use of City equipment, or for his failure to complete official reports prior
to securing for the day, shall be paid for such call- back consistent with Section
3-6, subsection C, provided, however, the unit member shall not be eligible for
the 3 hour guaranteed minimum pursuant to this Article. If a claim of negligence
is disputed, it may become subject to the grievance procedure herein.

B. Anytime that a unit member is called back after leaving City facilities at a time
other than his regularly assigned shift, the unit member will receive a minimum of
3 hours pay at time and one-half the unit member’s base pay calculated to the
nearest 1/4 hour, except that a unit member shall not be eligible for additional
compensation during that three hour period.

Compensation to a unit member who is called out at times other than his regularly
scheduled shift will begin at the time the unit member is notified. The compensation
will continue up to 30 minutes beyond the completion of the duties for which the unit
member was called out, or until the member returns to his residence, whichever is
first. Where applicable, the travel time shall be paid only if the total work and allowed
travel time exceed the minimum call out guarantee. Travel time shall not apply when
a unit member is working overtime planned in advance.

C. A unit member beginning an overtime period within 3 hours or less prior to the
regularly scheduled duty reporting time, will be compensated from the time the
overtime period begins to the time he is scheduled to report for duty except that a
unit member shall not be eligible for additional compensation during that period.

D. Holdover time, i.e., being held over on shift (no break in duty exceeding 15
minutes) will be compensated for actual time spent in accordance with Section 3-
6, subsection C.


Section 3-8: Out-of-Rank Pay




A. A unit member who is temporarily required to serve in a regular authorized
position in a supervisory classification, (e.g., sergeant), shall be compensated at
the higher rate of pay in accordance with the following:

B. To be eligible for the additional compensation, the unit member must first
accumulate 10 regular working shifts of assignment in the higher rank within any
12 month period; satisfactory performance during a previous appointment to the
higher rank will be credited to the qualifying period. The days of out-of-rank
assignment need not necessarily be consecutive. Once this qualification is
satisfied, no additional re-qualification will be required. All shifts worked beyond
the 10th shift in the supervisory classification will be subject to the higher rate of
pay.

C. Temporary assignments out-of-rank shall be recorded only in full shift units. A
unit member working out-of-rank for less than 1 full shift will not be credited with
working out-of-rank service time.

D. To qualify for out-of-rank pay, a unit member must be assuming substantially the
full range of duties and responsibilities of the higher level position. Out-of-rank
pay is not authorized, for example, if the organization of a work unit is such that
each unit member carries on his normal duties during the temporary absence of
a supervisor, without a need for the direction which the supervisor would provide
on a longer term basis.

E. Time worked in a higher rank shall not earn credits toward the completion of
probationary requirements in the higher rank.

F. A unit member who has qualified under these provisions shall be compensated at
the minimum rate established for the higher rank for all shifts worked beyond the
10th shift served in the higher rank. In the event of overlapping salary ranges, a
one-step differential shall be paid for out-of-rank assignments. The higher rate of
pay shall be used in computing overtime when authorized overtime is served in
out-of-rank work assignments; the overtime rate shall be the rate established by
the overtime regulations that apply to the higher rank.


Section 3-9: Sick Leave Conversion at Retirement

Effective at the beginning of the first pay period in July, 1992, the following benefits shall
apply:

A. Definitions:

1. Qualifying hours - the minimum number of accrued and unused sick leave
credits existing on the last day of service prior to retirement, which are
necessary before a unit member can participate in the benefit program.




2. Base number of hours or base hours - the number of hours of accrued and
unused sick leave credits which are uncompensated under this Article and
above which the City will compensate the unit member.

3. Base hourly wage - the base hourly rate of pay being paid at the time of
retirement to the retiring unit member who qualifies for participation in this
benefit program.

B. Benefit and Eligibility:

1. A member that has between 1 – 899 hours of sick leave remaining in their
sick leave bank at the time of retirement, shall be eligible for payment of
100% their base wage for 50% of their hours accrued.

2. A member who has accumulated a minimum of 900 – 1,285 hours of unused
sick leave at the time of retirement, shall be eligible for payment of 100% their
base hourly rate for 65% of their remaining sick hours.

3. A member who has accumulated a minimum of 1,286 – 1,713 hours of
unused sick leave at the time of retirement, shall be eligible for payment of
100% their base wage for 80% of their remaining sick hours.

4. A member who has accumulated a minimum of 1,714 hours of unused sick
leave at the time of retirement, shall be eligible for payment of 100% their
base wage for 100% of their remaining sick hours.

5. A unit member who has accrued 1,286 hours or more of unused sick leave
may elect to have 150 hours of sick leave paid out at the member’s hourly
rate in one lump sum. A unit member may only elect to exercise this benefit 3
times in their career, and not more than 1 time in a fiscal year. Eligible
employees may elect to buy back their hours between July 1 and the last pay
period in January each fiscal year.

6. The payments described in numbers 1 through 5 above are not considered
Final Average Salary for purposes of pension calculations.

C. Administration:

1. At the time of retirement, the City’s Employee Benefits Division, or such other
individual or agency as the City may designate, shall determine the unit
member’s eligibility and the amount of unused sick leave to be compensated.

2. The unit member shall verify in writing the computations of the Employee
Benefits Division.

3. In the event a unit member’s eligibility for participation or the amount of
compensation is disputed, then the dispute shall be submitted to the City
Auditor for binding resolution.


Section 3-10: Sick Leave Payout

All accumulated sick leave hours on the city's official file at the time of the member's
death will be paid. Payment will be based upon the member's base hourly rate at the
time of death.


Section 3-11: Night Shift Differential/Weekend Shift Differential

A. A unit member shall receive $2.00 per hour in addition to his base hourly rate of
pay when working a night shift or any portions of a night shift which ends at or
after 10:00 PM.

B. A unit member shall receive night shift pay differential only for hours scheduled
and worked, and not while on paid leave time.

C. A unit member who is called out and works between the hours of 10:00 PM and
6:00 AM will be paid night shift differential for all hours worked at the rate
specified in this Article. If a unit member was called out while on a stand-by
status, he will not receive night shift differential.

D. A unit member shall receive $1.00 per hour in addition to his base hourly rate of
pay and any other shift differential or any other premium pay he may be receiving
for working a weekend shift. A designated weekend shift is defined as any shift
that starts on or after 2:00 PM on Friday, and continuing through any shift that
starts on or before, but not after 11:59 PM on Sunday.

1. A unit member shall receive weekend shift pay differential only for hours
scheduled and worked, and not while on paid leave.

2. A unit member who is called out and works between 2:00 PM on Friday and
11:59 PM on Sunday will be paid weekend shift differential for all hours
worked at the rate specified in this Article. If a unit member was called out
while on stand-by status, he will not receive weekend shift differential.


Section 3-12: Stand-By Pay

A. When a unit member is required and assigned to be available for immediate
emergency call-out at times that they are not otherwise on duty and the unit
member complies with departmental regulations incident thereto, the unit
member shall be compensated as follows: $100.00 on the unit member’s non-
work day and $80.00 on a workday.

B. When management determines it is necessary to provide call-out service, stand-
by assignments will be maintained by any detail in the department.


Section 3-13: Court Time Standby Pay

A. When a unit member receives a subpoena or other notice requiring him to stand-
by to appear in court to testify concerning the performance of his official duties at
a time other than his regularly scheduled tour of duty, and he was not notified 12
hours or more in advance of the court appearance that he need not stand-by, he
shall be entitled to a minimum of 2 hours of pay at 1-1/2 times his base hourly
rate of pay for court dockets scheduled before 1200 hours, and an additional
minimum of 2 hours of pay at 1-1/2 times his base hourly rate of pay for court
dockets scheduled after 1200 hours, for each day the subject court proceeding is
in session and the Unit member is subject to call, providing the provisions of
subsection B hereof are satisfied. If a unit member is required to remain on
stand-by after 1200 hours, the unit member shall receive an additional 1 hour of
pay at 1-1/2 times his base hourly rate of pay.

If call-out occurs before the expiration of stand-by pay, then stand-by status shall
continue until the occurrence of either (a) the expiration of stand-by pay; or (b)
arrival at the duty location or participation in virtual appearance begin. Call-out
pay and stand-by pay shall not be permitted to overlap resulting in the
compounding of compensation.

B. If a unit member fails to exercise his responsibility to contact the appropriate
representative of the court or a party 16 hours or less before the time indicated
on the subpoena to determine the continued need for him to stand-by, he is not
eligible for any stand-by pay.

C. For the purpose of this Memorandum, subpoena refers to a subpoena duly
issued by a court or the Arizona Motor Vehicle Department.

D. For purposes of this Article the term Court shall be defined as including Federal
District Court; Superior Court, State of Arizona; City Court, City of Phoenix, State
of Arizona; Municipal Courts in Maricopa County; Justice Court; Federal, State,
County Grand Juries; Motor Vehicle Department hearings; Mental Health Court;
and Prosecutorial and Defense interviews. It is understood that this Article shall
not apply to administrative hearings including but not limited to arbitration
hearings pursuant to the MOU, Civil Service Board hearings, PERB hearings,
and hearings pursuant to the A.R. 2.61 grievance procedure.


Section 3-14: Off-Duty Employment

A. The Department agrees to maintain a list of unit members who are interested in
off-duty work for use in making job referrals, provided the unit member has
received prior approval to engage in off-duty employment from the immediate
supervisor.


B. Off-duty employment shall be governed by the rules and regulations of the
Phoenix Police Department. Should the Department contemplate any changes in
these rules and regulations during the term of this Memorandum, it shall meet 222
and consult with the Association on such changes in the Labor-Management
Committee prior to implementation.

C. The Police Chief agrees to eliminate the limitation of the number of off-duty work
hours permitted. However, the Department reserves the right to take appropriate
action in the event that a unit member’s wellness, welfare, or performance is
adversely affected.

D. A unit member who works off duty in a police function for a City-sponsored event
or project, and is paid through City payroll, will be compensated at time and one-
half his regular rate of pay for all time worked.

E. The Department agrees to maintain a list of all current off duty jobs, with officers
separated by rank, as well as the hourly salary and all billable hours for all off duty
employment that specifically calls for an officer to perform the duties it entails.


Section 3-15: Jury Duty

When a unit member is called upon to serve as a juror in any court action, he will be
allowed leave from his duties without loss of pay for the time required for his service.


Section 3-16: Deferred Compensation and Defined Contribution Plans

A. The City’s contribution to DCP will continue at 2.56 4.42%.

B. At the employee’s separation, for either retirement or exiting the Deferred
Retirement Options Program, the employee’s sick leave payout amounts will be
automatically contributed into the City’s 401(a) plan. Any excess amount over the
Internal Revenue Code 401(a) plan contribution maximum limits will be
automatically contributed into the City’s 457(b) plan. Any portion of the excess
amount that cannot be contributed to the 457(b) plan because of Internal
Revenue Code 457(b) plan contribution maximum limits will be paid as taxable
income. The 401(a) Plan document as approved by the Deferred Compensation
Board will be the governing document.


Section 3-17: Non-Direct Payment of Compensation or Benefits

Various sections of this Memorandum contain a form of compensation, wages, or benefits
that have been negotiated in good faith and may or may not provide a direct payment of
wages or other benefit to each member. Those forms of compensation, wages, or benefits
that do not provide a direct payment to each unit member have been negotiated in place of
a direct payment and costed as part of the overall economic package. Examples include:
life insurance, long term disability insurance, leave payouts, etc.




38 223
Section 3-18: Drug Recognition Expert Premium Pay

Department qualified/certified Drug Recognition Experts (DRE) who are current in all
training and requirements set forth in police, and have completed all necessary training,
shall be paid a premium of $15.00 per hour, calculated to the nearest ¼ hour, in
addition to their base hourly rate, for each hour they are engaged in DRE activities.


Section 3-19: Phlebotomist Premium Pay

Department qualified/certified phlebotomists who are current in all training and
requirements set forth in police, and have completed all necessary training, shall be
paid a premium of $15.00 per hour, calculated to the nearest ¼ hour, in addition to their
base hourly rate, for each hour they are engaged in phlebotomy activities.

Section 3-20: CIT Pay

The Department shall pay a $15.00-per-hour premium, calculated to the nearest quarter
hour, to any Department-certified and current CIT-qualified employee for the hours the
employee actually performs CIT duties—whether or not assigned to a CIT squad—with
assignment alone not qualifying an employee for the premium.




ARTICLE 4: Hours of Work/Working Conditions

Section 4-1: Work Schedules

A. The regular duty hours for a unit member shall be 5 consecutive shifts of 8 hours
in a 7 calendar day work week. These 5 consecutive shifts will be preceded and
followed by 2 “N” days. If, by reason of transfer, a unit member’s “N” days are
changed, the provisions of this section pertaining to “N” days shall not apply. The
8 duty hours per shift shall be consecutive and may include any “briefing time”
and shall include a meal period of 30 minutes. When work demands permit, with
a supervisor’s approval, a unit member may combine this 30 minute meal period
with one of his 15 minute rest periods described under Subsection D of this
Article to achieve a 45 minute meal period. This shall also apply to a unit member
working a 4/10 schedule. At times, the department may have operational needs
which necessitate a change in current work schedules. The department shall give
a unit member a minimum 7 day advance written notice when his “N” days or
hours will be changed. If this (7 day written notice is not given, and there is no
operational need for not providing the notice, the “N” days or hours change will
be rescheduled to allow for a 7 day notice period.

B. If a 10 hour, 4 day work week is implemented; the regular duty hours for an affected
unit member shall be 4 consecutive shifts of 10 hours in a 7 calendar day work 224
week. These 4 consecutive shifts will be preceded and followed by 3 “N” days. If, by
reason of transfer, a unit member’s “N” days are changed, the provisions of this
Subsection pertaining to “N” days shall not apply. The 10 duty hours per shift shall
be consecutive and may include any “briefing time” and shall include a meal period
of 30 minutes. At times, the department may have operational needs which
necessitate a change in current work schedules. The department shall give a unit
member a minimum 7 day advance written notice when his “N” days or hours will be
changed. If this 7 day written notice is not given, and there is no operational





need for not providing the notice, the “N” days or hours change will be
rescheduled to allow for a 7 day notice period.

C. All unit four members assigned to patrol squads with beat responsibility will only
work the work schedule defined in subsection B of this section (4/10’s) through
June 30, 2026.

A. The regular duty work hours for a unit member performing a patrol function with
precinct, squad area and/or beat responsibility will only be 4 consecutive 10-hour
shifts in a 7- calendar day work week, preceded and followed by 3 consecutive N
days. The 10 duty hours per shift will be consecutive and will include any “briefing
time” as well as a 40-minute meal period. When work demands permit, with a
supervisor’s approval, a unit member may combine this 40-minute meal period
with one of their 15-minute rest periods described under subsection D of this
Article to achieve a 55-minute period. If, by reason of transfer, a unit member’s N
days are changed, the provisions of this section pertaining to N days shall not
apply.

B. The regular duty hours for a unit member performing any other duties will be 5
consecutive 8-hour shifts in a 7-calendar day work week, preceded and followed
by 2 consecutive N days. The 8 hours per shift will be consecutive and will include
any “briefing time” as well as a 30-minute meal period. When work demands
permit, with a supervisor’s approval, a unit member may combine this 30-minute
meal period with one of their 15-minute rest periods described under subsection D
E of this Article to achieve a 45-minute period. If, by reason of transfer, a unit
member’s N days are changed, the provisions of this section pertaining to N days
shall not apply.




C. If a unit member’s normal duty hours are changed with less than 7 days’ notice,
then the unit member is entitled to premium pay.

If a unit member’s normal “N” days are changed, then the unit member is entitled
to premium pay.

"Premium Pay" is calculated as follows:

• For a unit member assigned to a 5/8’s schedule:
• A change in normal duty hours: 2 hours at their base hourly rate of pay.
• One “N” day change: 4 hours at their regular rate of pay.
• Two “N” days changed: 20 hours at their regular rate of pay.
• For a unit member assigned to a 4/10’s schedule:
• A change in normal duty hours: 2.5 hours at their base hourly rate of
pay.
• One “N” day change: 5 hours at their regular rate of pay.
• Two “N” days changed: 10 hours at their regular rate of pay.
• Three “N” days changed: 20 hours at their regular rate of pay.
If the period during which these hours and/or N days will be changed exceeds 7
calendar days, the rate of pay for the affected unit member will become 1 ½ times their
current hourly rate for the entirety of the period following that week for which the
change occurred.


Subject to the discretion of the Chief, or designee, official mobilization as defined
in Operations Order 9.1 TM 9-00-9 is exempt from this section, however such
official mobilizations are not to be ordered for patrol coverage or similar issues.

A unit member, who requests a change in work schedules, will not receive
premium pay since the request is not a department directed change.

This section does not apply to the 30 hour or more block of annual module training.

A unit member is not eligible to receive both premium pay and overtime for the
same hours.

D. When used in the context of this Article, “Operational Needs” will be defined as:
Service demand beyond routine patrol staffing, or other required actions performed
to accomplish the mission of the department. These actions may be routine
(anticipated) or emergency (unanticipated). For routine anticipated operational
actions, a seven-day written notice will be given to change schedules. For
emergency unanticipated operational actions, unit members will be provided with
as much advance notice and information as the situation will allow.

E. In addition to all duties as assigned by the Police Chief or his designees, work
hours shall continue to include two15-minute rest periods as work demands
allow.






F. There shall be a minimum of 15 hours off between shifts, 13 hours for a unit
member working a 4/10 schedule. If this is not possible, the unit member shall
receive overtime compensation at his regular rate of pay for each full hour
worked within the described 15 hour period, 13 hour period for a unit member
working a 4/10 schedule. A unit member assigned to a specialty bureau may sign
individual statements waiving the provisions of this section. Signed waivers shall
continue in effect per fiscal year.

This section does not apply to mandatory training conducted by the Advanced
Training Detail when a member is given 30 days written notice of the required
training. The intent is not for supervisors to work employees on a double shift.
Employees’ chain of command will ensure employee’s shift prior to training is
adjusted to afford 13/15 hours off before reporting to training.

G. A unit member will be permitted to take the meal period at a location within the
squad/team area, or if no suitable eating location is available, then with the
approval of the designated supervisor, at a location outside the squad/team area.
A meal period may be taken at a private residence, with supervisory approval,
provided such residence is within the unit member’s beat area.

H. A unit member may return to his work station 20 minutes before his scheduled
end of shift if work demands permit for the purpose of completing required
paperwork, notifying oncoming unit members of any beat conditions, and to notify
his supervisor of any unusual occurrences he encountered during his shift.

I. A unit member assigned to the Canine Detail shall be allowed 4 hours of paid
time per work week to care for his police dog at his residence. The City will
determine when and how the hours will be scheduled.

J. A unit member may waive the provision of section A and B of this section to
facilitate an alternative work schedule upon written agreement of both the
Association and the Department.

K. “On duty” training will be approved at the Division Chief level.


Section 4-2: Seniority

A. The City shall provide the Association with a list of unit members showing each
unit member’s City employment date and class employment date.

B. Seniority shall be by length of service within a class. If seniority within the class is
not determinative, then length of service with the City shall prevail.

C. Seniority shall be used as a factor consistent with established Civil Service
procedures in choice of work assignments, vacation schedules and in the
determination of layoffs.

Section 4-3: No cost parking
All unit members shall be provided with free parking at a City-owned or leased parking
facility when reporting to work at their primary duty assignment if there is not a free
parking facility available at their primary duty assignment.
ARTICLE 5: Benefits

Section 5-1: Health Insurance

A. The City and Association agree to maintain the current 80/20 split for health
insurance monthly contribution for the single and family coverage. If there is a
rate increase or decrease, the city will pay 80% of the new monthly contribution
and the employee will pay 20%.

B. If there is a substantive change in the City’s Health Insurance Plan design, the
Labor Relations Administrator will discuss such change with the Association.

C. In the event of the death of a unit member while on duty or while performing a
police function as determined by the City, the City will, at a minimum, continue
to pay the full monthly health insurance premium for the spouse or qualified
domestic partner (QDP) and all eligible dependents. Should the surviving
spouse remarry or enter into a new QDP, the benefits of this provision shall be
discontinued for the spouse. Benefits for remaining eligible dependents, e.g.
children, step children, or adopted children, will remain in effect as federal law
prescribes.

In the event of the death of a unit member while commuting to or from his work
location, for a period of two hours each way, the City will continue to pay the full
monthly health insurance premium for the spouse and all eligible dependents.
The City will cover the payment of a supplementary commutation life insurance
policy for each unit member. The Association will pay the cost of this benefit, if
any, the first year of each new Memorandum period.

D. In the event Congress or the State of Arizona passes legislation which considers
the amount the City contributes to health or dental insurance as imputed income,
then the City will consider such contributions as income to the employee.


Section 5-2: Retiree Health Insurance

A. Upon retirement of a unit member, or bargaining unit member who retired on
August 1, 1992 or later, the City’s contribution to health care premiums will be
calculated without regard to age.

B. In no event will the combination of this contribution and the amount paid by the
PSPRS (Public Safety Personnel Retirement System) exceed the monthly
premium for the chosen health insurance benefit.

C. The City of Phoenix agrees to participate in the Post Employee Health Plan (PEHP)
for unit members in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan's

Participation Agreement, a copy of which is attached to this agreement. The
Employer agrees to contribute to the Plan on behalf of unit members:

Effective July 1, 2017, the Employer shall contribute for each unit member the
amount of $ 6.00 per pay period. If any contribution is an amount other than an
equal dollar amount per unit member, that contribution shall be deposited in the
unit member's Health Insurance Premium Reimbursement sub -account,
otherwise the Employer's equal dollar amount contribution per unit member shall
be deposited into the unit member's Universal Health Care Reimbursement sub-
account pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Plan.

D. By July 1, 2026, the City will establish a stand-alone trust with the sole
purpose of supplementing retiree health care for Officers. An Association member will
be on the board of any established trust created for this purpose. This trust will not be
included as a line item in the City budget, and the monies shall be for the exclusive
purpose of providing this benefit to retired officers eligible to participate in the trust’s
plan of benefits. No portion of the trust may be used or diverted for any other purpose.
This trust will be funded as follows:

In addition to any off-duty detail hour rate, a $5 per hour fee that will be
payable to a jointly established trust for the sole purpose of supplementing retiree health
care for Officers that were employed by the city on or after July 1, 2025. This fee will be
in addition to any administrative fee established by the City and/or any additional fees
due to a third-party contractor. This fee will be incurred regardless of whether the
officer employed is a City of Phoenix employee or not, and regardless of the rank of the
employed officer. The Association will have the right to audit the records of the off-duty
detail program to ensure accurate payment of the above fees.

The trust board shall determine the amount available for reimbursement for
benefits for each retiree, with the advice of an actuary or accountant, and shall
determine each retiree’s eligibility.



Section 5-3: Dental Insurance

A. The City shall pay the full premium costs for single coverage for employees
enrolled in the base HMO or PPO plan. and 75% of the premium costs for family
coverage for a City dental plan.

B. At a minimum, the plan shall include a PPO option that consists of 100%
payment of reasonable and customary charges covered for preventive and
preventive-related diagnostic services and 80% payment of reasonable and
customary covered charges for basic services and major services. At least
one plan shall include an orthodontia benefit providing for 80% payment of
reasonable and customary charges up to a maximum lifetime benefit of $4,000
per person. Dental plans may be subject to the deductibles and limitations
contained in the contract between the dental insurance carrier and the City of
Phoenix. Enrollment in prior City of Phoenix dental plans counts toward major
services time limit exclusions.

Section 5-4: Life Insurance
A. The City will continue the existing off-the-job and on-the-job life and
dismemberment insurance coverage, and will continue the face value of the
policy at $15,000. The City will continue the current policy for death in the line of
duty at $100,000.00.

B. Effective August 1, 2001, the City will increase the $35,000.00 line of duty life
and dismemberment insurance coverage to each unit member to $100,000.00.

C. Additionally, the City will provide to each unit member a $200,000 death benefit
covering the unit member’s commute to and from his city work location. The City
will cover the unit member’s commute for up to two hours before his shift begins
and two hours after his shift concludes. The Association will only pay the cost of
this benefit the first year of the MOU.








Section 5-5: Long-Term Disability Insurance

A. The City will offer a long-term disability benefit for all full-time, regular unit members
pursuant to A.R. 2.323 as may be amended (providing that such amendments shall
not be in conflict with the MOU). Employees who have been continuously employed
and working on a full-time basis for twelve consecutive months are eligible for long-
term disability coverage. Applicants must apply for benefits they may be eligible to
receive. After an established 90 calendar day qualifying period, the plan will provide
up to 66-2/3% of the employee's basic monthly salary at the time disability occurs
and continue up to age 75 for employees who have been employed full-time for 36
months and one day. Employees who have been employed full-time with the City of
Phoenix for 36 months or less, will be eligible to receive a long term disability benefit
for no more than 30 months.

B. This benefit will be coordinated with sick leave, industrial insurance payments,
social security benefits, unemployment insurance and disability provisions of the
retirement plan.


Section 5-6: Holidays and Vacation Leave

A unit member shall be entitled to holiday benefits as set forth in Paragraph 2 of
Operations Order No. 3.6, including overtime compensation for hours assigned and
worked on a specified holiday in accordance with and subject to Article 3, Section 3-6,
Overtime.

A. The compensation of a unit member who actually works on a day designated as
a holiday shall include, in addition to his regular day’s pay, additional pay or
compensatory time for hours worked up to 8 excluding overtime pay.

B. A unit member who is not scheduled to work on a designated holiday will still be
compensated for 8 hours pay or compensatory time for each holiday.

C. Paid holidays shall include:

New Year’s Day
Martin Luther King, Jr's Birthday
President’s Day
Caesar Chavez Birthday
Memorial Day
Juneteenth Day
Independence Day
Labor Day
Indigenous Peoples’ Day
Veterans Day
Thanksgiving Day
Friday after Thanksgiving
Christmas Day


Two Personal Leave Days* & **

* After 6 months of continuous service.
** Personal leave will be a total of 20 hours for all unit members.

Subject to operational and scheduling factors, a unit member’s personal
leave days shall be taken each calendar year on any day of the unit
member’s choosing.

D. For a unit member participating in the 4/10 schedule, holiday pay shall be applied
as follows:

1. When a designated paid holiday falls on a unit member’s scheduled day off,
the unit member shall be paid 8 hours of holiday pay.

2. When a designated paid holiday falls on a unit member’s normally scheduled
work day and the unit member is directed to not work that day, the unit
member shall be paid for 8 hours of holiday pay. The additional 2 hours
necessary to receive 10 hours of pay will be deducted at the unit member’s
discretion as either non-paid time, accumulated vacation or compensatory
time. If a unit member has no accumulated vacation or compensatory time,
the unit member will receive only 8 hours of pay. waived at no penalty.
Alternatively, the unit member may work for 2 hours on the holiday, paid at
straight time, performing tasks at the direction of a supervisor. The
compensation of a unit member who actually works on a day designated as a
holiday shall include, in addition to his regular day’s pay, additional pay or
compensatory time for hours worked up to 8 hours, excluding overtime pay.

E. A unit member will continue to receive holiday pay while on industrial leave.

F. Holidays shall be observed on the calendar days on which they fall for unit
members directly involved in providing continuous 24-hour or seven-day service
operations.

G. The City agrees to maintain its present vacation selection procedure and, to
every extent practicable, allow a transferred unit member to maintain his previous
vacation schedule.

H. A unit member who works a schedule at full time 52 weeks of the year shall be
credited with vacation credits for every completed calendar month of paid service
according to the following schedule:

1. Through 5 years of service 8 hrs. per month
1. 6th tThrough 10th year of service 10 hrs. per month
2. 11th through 15th year of service 11 hrs. per month
3. 16th through 20th year of service 13 hrs. per month
4. 21st year of service and thereafter 15 hrs. per month



I. Unit members who have accrued 312 hours or more of vacation, may elect to
have 150 hours of vacation leave paid out at the member’s hourly rate in one
lump sum or converted into their comp bank. The member may only elect to
exercise this benefit 4 times in their career, and not more than 1 time in a fiscal
year. This payment is not considered Final Average Salary for purposes of
pension calculations. Eligible employees may elect to buy back their hours
between July 1 and the last pay period in January each fiscal year.

Additionally, 80 hours of vacation time can be accumulated above the maximum
vacation carryover into the last 3 years of service. These hours must be used as
paid time off prior to retirement.

J. Vacation accrual, carryover and compensation at separation is as follows:

MAX ACCRUAL THAT
CAN BE
MONTHLY ACCRUAL MAXIMUM CARRYOVER COMPENSATED AT
YEARS OF SERVICE RATE (HOURS) (HOURS) SEPARATION (HOURS)


0 – 5th 8 10 232 280

6th - 10th 10 280 340

11th - 15th 11 304 370

16th - 20th 13** 352 430

21st+ 15** 400 490

** In the last three years of service an additional 80 hours may be carried over
into a new calendar year.

K. For the purposes of determining monthly vacation Accrual rates for a unit
member who had a break in service, if the unit member was reemployed within 5
years, the amount of time the person is gone is subtracted from his previous
service, thereby giving the unit member a new accrual service date.

L. A unit member may sell back up to 80 hours of vacation time each calendar year
(unit member must use a minimum of 40 hours of vacation/comp-time leave
during the calendar year to qualify for this benefit). This payment shall be made
on the first payday of December of each year, and shall be included in the unit
member’s regular, bi-weekly paycheck.


Section 5-7: Out-of-State Vacation Recall

When a unit member is temporarily recalled to duty from out-of-state while on an
authorized vacation by order of the Police Chief, or designee, he shall be reimbursed for
necessary and provable transportation expenses as determined by the Police Chief.

Section 5-8: Military Leave

A. Definition
1. Pursuant to ARS 26-168 and ARS 38-610, employees who are members of
the Arizona National Guard or the Reserves of the United States Armed
Forces, will be entitled to a leave of absence from their duties for a period not
to exceed 30 days when they are engaged in ordered annual training or to
attend camps, maneuvers, formations, or drills under orders of any branch,
including the reserve or auxiliary.

Officers that are ordered or deployed to active military status will be granted a
leave of absence from their duties for the entirety of the deployment without
loss of pay or other employment rights, less the amount of pay for military
activities while on active status, however annual vacation and sick leave will
not be accrued.


2. This leave will be granted without loss of pay or other employment rights.

B. Leave Guidelines
1. National Guard and Military Reserve leave time will be calculated using
working days.

2. Employees will not be charged with military leave time for days that fall on
their regularly scheduled days off.

3. Leave days do not have to be taken consecutively, the only limitation is the
300-hour maximum in any two consecutive military fiscal years (October 1
through September 30). This 300 hour limitation does not apply to officers
that are ordered or deployed to active military status.

4. Travel time will not be allowed in addition to inclusive dates shown on requests.

5. A copy of the Military Orders will accompany leave requests.


Section 5-9: Uniform, Clothing and Equipment Allowance

A. Department-issued equipment, as follows:

1. The Police Department will furnish to each unit member entering the
department the following:
1Uniform Belt
1Handcuff Case
1 Holster 235
1 Helmet
1 Magazine Pouch
1 Service Weapon
1 Pepper Spray Holder
1 Pepper Spray Canister
1 Pair of Handcuffs and Key





1 Uniform Breast Badge
1 Flat Badge with Case
1 (pair) Puncture resistant gloves

The department also agrees to provide spit masks on a continuous basis.

2. Pilot’s equipment list as follows:

The Police Department will furnish the following to each unit member
assigned to the Air Support Detail:

2 Nomex (or equivalent in quality) Flight Suits
1 Flight Helmet
1 Standard Headset

3. The Department shall replace those items as they, in the judgment of the
Department, become unserviceable due to wear or damage in the course and
scope of official duties.

B. A unit member will receive $1,150 1,500.00 clothing allowance per annum.
Barring unforeseen circumstances, payment for uniform allowance will be made
on or before August 1 of each fiscal year. Such payment will be made to cover
the cost of uniforms, maintenance, cleaning of such uniforms, and for other duty-
related expenses and for the unit member to provide a required flashlight and
fresh batteries.

C. A new unit member will receive an initial fiscal year uniform allowance equal to
1/12 of the annual allowance per month from the first day of the month of his
employment through the end of the fiscal year. This payment will be made in a
lump sum during the first 60 days of employment.

D. A unit member who leaves City Employment shall repay to the City the uniform
allowance equal to 1/12 of the annual allowance per month for each month
remaining in the fiscal year after the last day of the month in which separation
occurs, provided, however, that a unit member who retires will not be required to
repay any uniform allowance. In addition, the family or beneficiary of a unit
member who dies while in the employment of the City shall not have to pay back
any uniform allowance.

E. A unit member who has been on extended leave (paid or unpaid), excluding
industrial leave, sick leave, or military leave of 2 months or longer, shall have the
next annual uniform allowance reduced by 1/12 of the annual allowance for each
month of extended leave.

F.
1. On or before August 1 of each fiscal year, a unit member assigned to the
following details/squads/units will, in addition to his annual clothing allowance,



be provided a one-time payment per the following schedule upon initial
transfer to that assignment.

Canine $320
SAU (Tactical) $320
Air Unit $320
Solo Motor $320
TRU*** $320
Detectives* $320
Bike Officers** $320
Honor Guard $320
SAU Negotiators $320
Drone Pilots $320

* Detective is defined as a certified detective who is in a detective or
investigative assignment or an assignment that normally requires the unit
member to wear civilian business clothes.

** Bicycles will be furnished by the City. To be eligible for the one-time payment
of $320, a bicycle officer must successfully complete the 40-hour bicycle
certification class and be assigned to NET, DOU, CAO, the airport, or a
School Resources Assignment, or any designated bike squad approved by
the Police Chief (i.e. the Desert Horizon Precinct Bike Squad).

2. A unit member assigned to the following details/squads/units will receive, on
or before August 1 of each fiscal year, in addition to his initial uniform
allowances described in section F1 above, an annual maintenance allowance
per the following schedule:

Canine $320
SAU (Tactical) $320
Air Unit $320
Solo Motor $320
Detectives $320
TRU*** $320
Bike Officers** $320
Honor Guard $320

The provisions of Subsection D of this Section shall apply to this Subsection.

** To be eligible for the one-time payment of $320, a bicycle officer must
successfully complete the 40-hour bicycle certification class and be assigned
to NET, DOU, CAO, the airport, or a School Resources Assignment, or any
designated bike squad approved by the Police Chief (i.e. the Desert Horizon
Precinct Bike Squad). All bicycle officers, assigned to one of the details
above, who do not ride during the course of their regular duties, will be
required to work at a minimum, one shift every fiscal year with DOU, during a
regular shift or a special event, utilizing Department issued


bicycles. This event will be coordinated with DOU command staff and the
affected units’ command. Proper notice of schedule change will occur of
the shift is outside of the unit members normal work hours.

*** TRU is defined as an officer who has completed the annual TRU
certification course and is assigned to a TRU response/support squad.
The Unit member must attend annual training and maintain certification to
be eligible for allowances.

G.
1. A unit member who purchases a new ballistic vest shall, upon showing proof
of purchase, be reimbursed an amount up to, but not exceeding, $1,000.

2. At the time of the purchase, the member can utilize the remainder of stipend
to purchase department authorized armor plates.

3. Upon replacement of his ballistic vest, a unit member shall be entitled to the
above $1,000 reimbursement every 5 years.

H.
1. The City agrees to reimburse a unit member for the repair or replacement of
uniform items and for other personal property damaged in the course of
employment and performance of their assigned duties without fault or
negligence on the part of the unit member, other than normal wear and tear in
accordance with the schedule of items and maximum amounts authorized for
reimbursement outlined below:

Business Suit $250
Business Dress $100
Sport Coat $150
Dress Shirt $50
Dress Trousers $75
Dress Skirt $75
All Shoes $100
Uniform Boots ALL
Motorcycle Boots ALL
Motorcycle Gloves $100
Glasses and contacts RX ALL
Sunglasses -non-RX $80
Watches $80
Jewelry $75
Police Uniform Trousers ALL
Police Motorcycle Breeches ALL
Police Uniform Shirt ALL
Police Jacket ALL
Police Motorcycle Jacket ALL
Flashlight $100
Ballistic Vest ALL


Service Weapon and (up to cost of City weapon) authorized
attached accessories

2. Reimbursements for full, 3/4, 1/2, 1/4, value are based on the supervisor’s
evaluation and recommendations of the article’s condition and age. Items not
listed above are not covered by the policy.

3. The option to repair or replace damaged items, and to determine whether
replaced property will be returned to unit member, rests with the City.

4. The provisions of this policy shall not apply if the unit member has concealed
or misrepresented any material fact or circumstances concerning the subject
of the loss, his interests therein, or in the case of any fraud or false
statements by the unit member relating thereto.

I. Upon duty related retirement, the City will provide the retiring member a Retired
Police Officer’s Commission Card similar in appearance to the regular
Commission Card.

J. Upon retirement, with Chief approval, a unit member will receive his breast
badge mounted on a plaque, a retired flat badge and case, handcuffs, and his
fully functional department-issued service weapon, including all 3 duty
magazines, for $1.00. If the unit member dies in the line of duty or while
employed by the department, the unit member’s spouse or an adult survivor may
elect to receive these items, except for the flat badge and case, for $1.00 which
will be paid by PLEA. The unit member’s spouse or adult survivor will have the
option of receiving the service weapon in a fully functional condition, or may
request the unit member’s service weapon be disabled and mounted in a shadow
box, or may decline receiving the service weapon. The choice will be made in
writing. PLEA will provide a gun safety device, upon request by the unit member.

K. A unit member assigned to the Canine Detail will have the option of purchasing
his dog as follows:

1. If both the police dog and the unit member have been in the Canine Detail in
excess of 5 years, at retirement the unit member may purchase his dog for
$1.00.

2. If both the police dog and the unit member have been in the Canine Detail in
excess of 5 years and the unit member leaves other than for retirement, the
decision to allow the purchase of his dog will be made on a case by case
basis and this decision will not be arbitrary.

L. Unit members who are assigned a rifle, currently qualified, and assigned to patrol or
a patrol specialty unit, Downtown Operations Unit, and Airport Bureau will receive a
stipend to offset costs of any Department authorized equipment already purchased,
that assists them with deployment and utilization of their rifle as follows:



• Eligible employees will be able to submit a memo with attached receipts
for new and/or replacement rifle related equipment up to a limit of $500
every 5 years.

Members will accumulate receipts for newly purchased equipment and will make
one submission to fiscal for reimbursement.


Section 5-10: Reimbursement for Education Expenses

A. A unit member who participates in the Tuition Assistance Program shall be
eligible for tuition reimbursement pursuant to the following provisions:

1. For the 2021-2023 fiscal years, An employee may submit tuition expenses
incurred in the prior fiscal year such that the maximum total reimbursed does not
exceed $13,000 across any two-year period. Funds from the upcoming fiscal
year may be applied to any approved academic or training course in the current
fiscal year, should the tuition for said course exceed the maximum amount noted
in AR 2.51 per fiscal year (currently $6500).


2. To be eligible for any reimbursement, a unit member must have successfully
completed academic or training courses approved by the Police Chief and
the Human Resources Director, or be currently meeting academic standards
in a continuous academic program extending into the next fiscal year, as
provided in existing regulations.

3. Unit members shall be allowed to use up to $500 800.00 of their
reimbursement benefit for job-related seminars, workshops, and professional
memberships each fiscal year. Reimbursement will be made no later than the
pay period following submission of the request.


Section 5-11: Leave of Absence

Subject to development of administrative controls, a unit member who has no other
accumulative paid leave may use up to 10 hours per year of accumulated sick leave for
non-emergency home care or medical treatment for a member of the unit member’s
immediate family subject to operational and scheduling factors. When utilizing this
benefit, the member shall identify the use of such time as non-emergency family illness.
Such leave request shall not be unreasonably withheld.


Section 5-12: Workers’ Compensation

A. Employees shall continue to receive 100% of their current rate of pay while off-
duty due to an industrial injury based on current practice which is a maximum of
1 year per injury, thereafter the rate becomes 66-2/3%.

B. Should the Association believe that a dispute in jurisdiction is unduly delaying a
Workers’ Compensation claim, or if the Association believes the City needs to
provide greater assistance to an employee trying to reopen an old claim, the
Association may request a meeting with City Workers’ Compensation staff
(provided the involved employee signs a release to do so) and such meeting will
be scheduled within 14 calendar days.

C. The City will first attempt to use physicians from specialty lists created by City of
Phoenix Pension Boards for Independent Medical Examinations for employees in
Unit 4.

D. Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave shall not run concurrent with leave
paid as industrial injury/illness (e.g. Workers’ Compensation).








ARTICLE 6: Miscellaneous

Section 6-1: Saving Clause

A. If any Article or Section of this Memorandum should be held invalid by operation
of law or by a final non-appealable order of the Phoenix Employment Relations
Board or a final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, or if compliance
with or enforcement of any Article or Section should be restrained by such
tribunal, the remainder of this Memorandum shall not be affected thereby; and
upon issuance of such final order or decree, the parties, upon request of either of
them, shall meet and confer to endeavor to agree on a substitute provision or
that such a substitute provision is not indicated.

B. It is recognized by the parties that currently the provisions of the Fair Labor
Standards Act are applicable to certain of the wage and premium pay provisions
of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and that this MOU shall be
administered in compliance with the Act for so long as the Act is applicable.

C. It is recognized by the parties that currently the provisions of the Americans with
Disabilities Act are applicable to certain of the provisions of this Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) and that this MOU shall be administered in compliance
with the Act for so long as the Act is applicable.


Section 6-2: Copies of Memorandum

Within 60 days from the date that this Memorandum is adopted by the City Council, the
Association will arrange for printing of it for furnishing one to every unit member, unit
supervisor and to management personnel. The cost of such duplication and distribution
will be borne equally by the Association and the City. Printing vendors secured by the
Association shall comply with Chapter 18, Articles IV (City Construction Contractors'
Affirmative Action Requirements) and V (Supplier's and Lessee's Affirmative Action
Requirements), Phoenix City Code.


Section 6-3: Aid to Construction of Provisions of Memorandum of Understanding






A. It is intended by the parties hereto that the provisions of this Memorandum shall be
in harmony with the rights, duties, obligations and responsibilities which by law
devolve upon the City Council, City Manager, Police Chief, and other City boards
and officials, and these provisions shall be interpreted and applied in such manner.

B. The Association recognizes the powers, duties and responsibilities of the Police
Chief as set forth in the Charter and Ordinances and that pursuant thereto the
Police Chief has the authority to establish rules and regulations applicable to the
operation of the Police Department and to the conduct of the police officers
employed therein, subject to the express provisions of this Memorandum.

C. The lawful provisions of this Memorandum are binding upon the parties for the
term thereof. The Association having had an opportunity to raise all matters in
connection with the meet and confer proceedings resulting in this Memorandum
is precluded from initiating any further meeting and conferring for the term thereof
relative to matters under the control of the Police Chief, the City Council or the
City Manager. This section shall not be construed to limit free and informal
discussions under, Section 2-2 hereof.


Section 6-4: Changes in Department Operations Orders Pursuant to
this Memorandum

A. Within 60 days from the date this Memorandum is adopted by the City Council,
the Department shall provide electronic copies of those Department and
Operations Orders reflecting changes pursuant to this Memorandum. Copies of
such changes shall be available to each unit member on or about July 1 of each
fiscal year or as soon thereafter as possible.

B. During the preparation of changes to the Department’s Operations Orders, and
precinct/bureaus manuals, drafts of the proposed changes will be staffed out to
the Association.


Section 6-5: Physical Fitness

A. It is recognized by the parties that it is the responsibility of a unit member at all
times to make every effort to maintain his physical condition so as to be fully fit to
perform his duties with maximum effectiveness.

To assist a unit member in this respect, the City agrees to provide and maintain
exercise equipment for each precinct station, Deer Valley, Resource Bureaus,
Police Headquarters, and at the Training Academy.

B. The City will provide required FAA physicals to pilots assigned to the Air Support
Unit.




C. If a unit member, while carrying out his official duties is exposed to an infectious
disease/virus, the City agrees to pay the expenses for inoculation of the member.

D. Unit members are allowed to work out on their “Code 7” at Police Department
facilities. Unit members are required to remain in workpants/boots. Employees
who work out on their “Code 7”:

• Must adhere to Operations Order 4.1 (Meals and Breaks);
• Must submit a workout memo through the Chain of Command to the
Department Fitness Coordinator;
• Adhere to Operations Order 3.7 (Industrial Injuries);
• Must limit their activity to Strength Training/Cardio Training;
• May not work out on their “Code 7” during overtime shifts; and,
• May not work out during the last 2 hours of their duty shift,
unless approved by their supervisor.

Program viability will be reviewed annually by the Police Chief.


Section 6-6: Term and Effect of Memorandum

A. This Memorandum shall remain in full force and effect beginning with the first
regular pay period commencing in July 20242026, up to the beginning of the first
regular pay period commencing in July 20262028.

B. Except as expressly provided in this Memorandum, the City shall not be required
to meet and confer concerning any matter, whether covered or not covered
herein, during the term or extensions thereof. This paragraph is not intended to
preclude informal discussions under Article 2, section 2-2 hereof.

C. The provisions of this Memorandum shall be subject to Federal, State, Charter,
and existing local laws that vest jurisdiction and authority in the City Council,
Phoenix Employment Relations Board, and Phoenix Civil Service Board.

D. This Memorandum constitutes the total and entire agreements between the
parties and no past written or verbal statement/agreements shall supersede any
of its provisions.




ATTACHMENT A

DRUG TESTING
The Phoenix Police Department’s Operations Order 3.21, Controlled Substance
Screening policy, is added to this Memorandum as Attachment A.




ATTACHMENT B

RETIREE HEALTH CONTRIBUTION


The City shall provide Basic Medical Reimbursement Plan (MERP) benefits to MERP
eligible unit retirees and to unit members who are hired before August 1, 2007 and are
eligible to retire no later than August 1, 2022 (the date of an individual’s retirement
eligibility was determined on August 1, 2007), at the monthly amounts based on years
of service listed below:

5 to 14 years of service $135.00
15 to 24 years of service $168.00
25 or more years of service $202.00

Unit employees hired on or after August 1, 2007, regardless of years of service, may
qualify for a Post Employment Health Plan (PEHP) account.



Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (These benefits are not under City of
Phoenix control)*

Retiree only not on Medicare $150.00
Retiree & family not on Medicare $260.00
Retiree only on Medicare $100.00
Retiree - one with Medicare $215.00
Retiree - all on Medicare $170.00
*Rates shown are for the 2012 calendar year. For current rates, see http://www.psprs.com/




ATTACHMENT C
Unit 4 – Police Officers
WAGES
Police Officer, Job Code 62210
Effective July 8, 2024
STEP HOURLY BI-WEEKLY ANNUAL
1 35.75 2,860.00 74,360.00
2 37.44 2,995.20 77,875.20
3 39.22 3,137.60 81,577.60
4 41.09 3,287.20 85,467.20
5 43.04 3,443.20 89,523.20
6 45.08 3,606.40 93,766.40
7 47.23 3,778.40 98,238.40
8 49.48 3,958.40 102,918.40
9 51.84 4,147.20 107,827.20

Police Officer*Pilot, Job Code 62211
Effective July 8, 2024
STEP HOURLY BI-WEEKLY ANNUAL
1 49.02 3,921.60 101,961.60
2 51.35 4,108.00 106,808.00
3 53.79 4,303.20 111,883.20

Police Officer*Rescue Pilot, Job Code 62212
Effective July 8, 2024
STEP HOURLY BI-WEEKLY ANNUAL
1 50.83 4,066.40 105,726.40
2 53.26 4,260.80 110,780.80
3 55.79 4,463.20 116,043.20

Police Officer*Flight Instr, Job Code 62213
Effective July 8, 2024
STEP HOURLY BI-WEEKLY ANNUAL
1 52.76 4,220.80 109,740.80
2 55.26 4,420.80 114,940.80
3 57.88 4,630.40 120,390.40

Police Officer*Chief Pilot, Job Code 62214
Effective July 8, 2024
STEP HOURLY BI-WEEKLY ANNUAL
1 54.69 4,375.20 113,755.20
2 57.28 4,582.40 119,142.40
3 60.01 4,800.80 124,820.80



MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

2026 – 2028

CITY OF PHOENIX

AND

PHOENIX FIRE FIGHTERS ASSOCIATION

(IAFF, LOCAL 493)

REPRESENTING UNIT 5 EMPLOYEES




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PREAMBLE .................................................................................................................................. 2

Article 1: Rights .......................................................................................................................... 2
Section 1-1. Gender ................................................................................................................................. 2
Section 1-2. City and Department Rights................................................................................................. 2
Section 1-3. Rights of the Union .............................................................................................................. 3
Section 1-4. Rights of Unit Employees ..................................................................................................... 8
Section 1-5. Prohibition of Strikes and Lockouts ................................................................................... 16

Article 2: Grievance/Arbitration/Labor Management ............................................................ 16
Section 2-1. Grievance Procedures ....................................................................................................... 16
Section 2-2. The RBO / Labor-Management Process ........................................................................... 20
Section 2-3. Productivity Discussions .................................................................................................... 22

Article 3: Compensation/Wages ............................................................................................. 22
Section 3-1. Wages................................................................................................................................ 22
Section 3-2. Productivity Enhancement Pay .......................................................................................... 25
Section 3-3. Overtime ............................................................................................................................ 26
Section 3-4. Call Out Pay....................................................................................................................... 27
Section 3-5. Out-of-Class Pay ............................................................................................................... 28
Section 3-6. Sick Leave Conversion at Retirement ............................................................................... 28
Section 3-7. Deferred Compensation and Defined Contribution Plans .................................................. 30
Section 3-8. Non-Direct Payment of Compensation or Benefits ............................................................ 30

Article 4. Hours of Work/Working Conditions ....................................................................... 30
Section 4-1. Hours of Work .................................................................................................................... 30
Section 4-2. Shift Trades ....................................................................................................................... 33
Section 4-3. Filling Vacancies ................................................................................................................ 33

Article 5. Benefits..................................................................................................................... 34
Section 5-1. Health Insurance................................................................................................................ 34
Section 5-2. Dental Insurance................................................................................................................ 35
Section 5-3. Life Insurance .................................................................................................................... 36
Section 5-4. Long Term Disability Insurance ......................................................................................... 36
Section 5-5. Holidays, Vacations, and Donated Vacation Leave ........................................................... 36
Section 5-6. Uniforms ............................................................................................................................ 40
Section 5-7. Tuition Reimbursement...................................................................................................... 42
Section 5-8. Wellness, Health and Fitness ............................................................................................ 42
Section 5-9. Worker’s Compensation .................................................................................................... 43
Section 5-10. Employee Benefit Trust Fund ........................................................................................... 44

Article 6. Miscellaneous .......................................................................................................... 46
Section 6-1. Saving Clause.................................................................................................................... 46
Section 6-2. Printing of M.O.U. .............................................................................................................. 47
Section 6-3. Fire Watch ......................................................................................................................... 47
Section 6-4. Term and Effect of Memorandum ...................................................................................... 47

ATTACHMENT A ....................................................................................................................... 50
ATTACHMENT B ....................................................................................................................... 56






PREAMBLE

WHEREAS, the parties, through their designated representatives, met and
conferred in good faith pursuant to Ordinance G-3303 in order to reach agreement
concerning wages, hours, and working conditions of employees comprising the Fire
Fighter Unit, and,

WHEREAS, the parties hereby acknowledge that the provisions of this
Memorandum are not intended to abrogate the authority and responsibility of City
government provided for under the statutes of the State of Arizona or the Charter or
ordinances of the City of Phoenix except as expressly and lawful limited herein,

NOW, THEREFORE, having reached this complete agreement concerning wages,
hours, and working conditions for the term specified, the parties submit this Memorandum
to the City Council of the City of Phoenix with their joint recommendation that body resolve
to adopt its terms and take such other action as may be necessary to implement its
provisions.


Article 1: Rights

Section 1-1. Gender

Whenever any words used herein in the masculine, feminine or neutral, they shall be
construed as though they were also used in another gender in all cases where they would
so apply.


Section 1-2. City and Department Rights

A. The Union recognizes that the City and the Fire Chief retain, whether exercised or
not, solely and exclusively, all express and inherent rights and authority pursuant to
law with respect to determining the level of and the manner in which the Fire
Department's service delivery activities are conducted, managed, and administered,
and the Union recognizes the exclusive right of the Chief to establish and maintain
departmental rules and procedures for the administration of the Fire Department
during the term of this Memorandum provided that such rules and procedures do not
violate any of the specific express provisions of the Memorandum.

B. The City and the Chief have the exclusive right and authority to schedule work and/or
overtime work as required in the manner most advantageous to the City subject to
the express terms of this Memorandum.

C. It is understood by the parties that every incidental duty connected with operations




enumerated in job descriptions is not always specifically described; nevertheless, it
is intended that all such duties shall be performed by the employee.

D. The Chief and City Manager reserve the right to discipline or terminate employees
for just cause subject to Civil Service procedures.

E. The City and the Chief shall determine and establish methods and processes by
which duties are performed subject to the express terms of this Memorandum.

F. The City and Chief shall have the right to transfer employees within the Department
in a manner most advantageous to the City subject to the express terms of this
Memorandum.

G. Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Memorandum, the City and the Chief
retain unqualifiedly all rights and authority to which, by law, they are entitled.

H. The City shall have the authority to effect reorganizations of the Department.
However, any such reorganization shall be discussed by the Labor-Management
Committee prior to implementation.

I. The Union recognizes that the city has statutory and Charter rights and obligations in
contracting for matters relating to municipal operations.

J. The inherent and express rights of the City and the Chief, including those herein
specifically referred to, which are not expressly modified or restricted by a specific
provision of this memorandum, are not, in any way directly or indirectly, subject to the
Grievance Procedure herein.

K. Nothing herein shall be construed to diminish the rights of the City under provisions
established in the Meet & Confer Ordinance, Chapter 2, Article XVII, of the City Code
or to diminish the provisions of the Civil Service Rules.


Section 1-3. Rights of the Union

A. The Union, as the authorized representative, has the exclusive right to serve as the
meet and confer representative of all employees in the Fire Fighter's Unit as certified
by the Phoenix Employment Relations Board on July 29, 1976.

B. The Phoenix community benefits from harmonious and cooperative relationships
between the City and its employees. The Union plays an important role furthering this
relationship and ultimately improving service to the City and its citizens. Accordingly,
the City and the Union have negotiated various rights for unit employees as set forth
in this MOU, in exchange for services to the City and in lieu of increased
compensation. These bargained-for rights will promote and improve enhanced




service delivery models and public safety, along with other tangible benefits to the
City’s residents.

C. The Phoenix City Council has determined, and Unit 5 agrees, there are specific
activities that confer a public benefit; a dual public/private purpose or an exclusively
public purpose. Consistent with this mutually beneficial relationship, Local 493
desires to negotiate a resolution in alignment with recent legal precedent.
Accordingly, up to 2 Unit 5 (IAFF) members may be released to perform these duties
under City Business.

D. The City’s Labor Relations Administrator or authorized designee will be responsible
for coordinating the City Business Time. The Labor Relations Administrator shall
work directly with Unit 5 in order to confirm any and all paid activity of the Authorized
Employees is consistent with the activity approved below. The two Unit 5 members
identified in Subsection B shall submit reports each pay period to the Labor Relations
Administrator documenting the City Business and any leave (e.g., donated leave,
vacation leave, sick leave, etc.) used during that pay period. The City has the right
to audit time cards submitted. In the event there is disagreement, the parties will
meet to discuss the matter at the request of Unit 5 or the City. The audit may result
in Unit 5 reimbursing the City, by submitting Union Release hours, donated leave,
personal leave, or monetary payment from the Union, for activity not deemed City
Business under this Agreement.

E. City Business Time

The City has determined there are activities that confer a public benefit, a dual
public/private purpose or an exclusively public purpose for which members of Unit 5
should be released from their official duties to perform. Unit 5 acknowledges its
members will receive City Business time for the time spent performing the following
activities:

1. Authorized Employees will attend trainings that have been authorized in advance
by Administration.

2. Authorized Employees will facilitate communication between employees and
management ensuring a safe and efficient delivery of services, as well as
developing a heightened degree of labor/management cooperation.

3. In coordination with management, Authorized Employees will communicate new
programs and/or policy changes to the broader City workforce that are members
of the bargaining unit in order to streamline service delivery and ensure timely
implementation of changes in policy or programs. Changes in safety or security
policy and procedure will be prioritized.

4. In coordination with management, as a means of achieving a healthier workforce




and driving down costs associated with workers’ compensation, the cost of
providing healthcare and the use of sick time, Authorized Employees will assist
bargaining members with understanding coordination of benefits.

5. In order to ensure City resources are well coordinated, upon the direction of the
City and consent of IAFF, Authorized Employees will participate in various City
committees, labor management meetings, or labor management work groups as
a member of the committee or group.

6. Participate in Department-authorized or City-sponsored authorized community
projects and events.

7. Represent employees involved in critical incidents at the time of incident (e.g.,
personal injury related).

8. As a means of controlling administrative and litigation costs associated with
employee matters in a large and complex City and with the goal of resolving
matters at the earliest possible stage, at management’s request Authorized
Employees will assist bargaining unit members/employees and management in
matters related to employer/employee relations.

9. Legislative, lobbying or political activities with the approval of the City Manager
or authorized designee.

F. Activities not eligible for City Business Time

Authorized Employees shall be prohibited from engaging in any of the following
activities while on paid City Business time:

1. Lobbying. This includes letter writing or telephone calls, without approval of the
City Manager or authorized designee.

2. Legislative Activity. This includes participating in the preparation or distribution
of legislative proposals, without approval of the City Manager or authorized
designee.

3. Organizing. This includes preparing and/or distributing union related materials.

4. Civil Service Discipline. This includes the representation of any bargaining unit
member/employee in disciplinary matters before the Civil Service Board.

5. Bargaining/Negotiations. This includes any matters deemed to be a mandatory
subject of bargaining.

6. Representation in grievance or disciplinary proceedings.




G. Requests for City Business Time

1. A union member who wishes to use City Business time must submit a written
request (e-mail will suffice) as soon as the need for time is known but no later
than 72 hours in advance, when practical, of the time requested to an individual
designated by the Labor Relations Administrator or authorized designee. Any
such request must specify what the time will be used for. A request for City
Business time will be approved only if the activity has either a dual public/private
purpose or an exclusively public purpose. Upon Labor Relations Administrator
approval, Fire Department time management will be notified of the approved
leave for entry into Telestaff.

H. Union Representatives

1. The Union may designate one (1) 493 Executive Director, three (3) 493 Directors,
and four (4) Union Representatives to represent members of our unit when
appropriate. The Phoenix Chapter President shall notify the Fire Chief of these
designations. There shall be no obligation on the Department to change or adjust
normal departmental scheduling or assignments of personnel as a result of such
designations.

2. Union representatives may attend mutually scheduled grievance, investigative,
and disciplinary meetings and hearings with department representatives during
duty hours by using the Bank of Donated Leave. Time spent during duty hours
for any other union activity, such as gathering information, interviewing the
grievant or witnesses, attending a union meeting, or preparing a presentation
shall also be charged against the Bank of Donated Leave as described in Article
5, Section 5-5.

I. Union members may be authorized in advance in writing to engage in Union related
activities during duty hours on a non-paid basis by the Fire Chief at such time and in
such instances when in the discretion of the Chief such will not in any manner
interfere with the efficient and economical operations of the Department nor
adversely impact the level of Fire Fighting services or support services.

J. There shall be no use of official time for Union-related activities except as expressly
authorized under Section 1-3E of Article 1. The Department shall maintain
procedures to administer and control use of official time in conformity with the
provisions of this Section.

K. Upon the Union’s filing of a Third Party Data Sharing Agreement with the Labor
Relations Division, the City shall furnish to the Union on request, at actual cost, a
listing of Union members on City payroll deduction in July and January during the
term of this agreement indicating name, mailing address, and job assignment. The




City will also provide a monthly list of employees added that month to Unit 5.

L. The City shall, in conformity with the provisions established in the Meet & Confer
Ordinance, Chapter 2, Article XVII, of the City Code, deduct monthly the Union
members regular periodic Union membership dues and/or special assessments
pursuant to authorization on a form to be provided by the City, duly completed and
signed by the Union member, and transmit such deductions to the Union on a monthly
basis; except, however, that such deduction shall be made only when the employee's
earnings for a pay period are sufficient after other legally required deductions are
made. The City shall, at the request of the Union, make changes in the amount of the
deduction hereunder during the term of this Memorandum at cost for implementing
such change. The City shall not make dues deductions for Unit employees on behalf
of any other employee organization during the term of this Memorandum. The City
assumes no liability on account of any action taken pursuant to this paragraph. In
addition, with sufficient notice the Union may request a change in dues deduction to
either monthly or bi-weekly for the entire membership each July 1 or at other times
agreed to by the parties. By filling out and submitting a voluntary deduction form for
membership dues, each unit member/employee is clearly and affirmatively
consenting to the deduction of the stated amount of money for membership dues
from their pay check.

M. The City will continue to provide those bulletin boards as designated by the City in
the past exclusively for posting of official Union literature that is not political in nature,
abusive of any person or organization, or disruptive of the department's operations.
In addition, the Union will be allowed to use all Fire Department Communications
tools to disseminate such information when necessary. Such announcements shall
not be political in nature, nor shall they be abusive of any person or organization or
disruptive of the department's operation. The Assistant Chief in charge of personnel,
or his designee, shall review the content of the buck slip communications prior to
distribution.

N. Nothing herein shall be construed to diminish the Union's rights under the provisions
established in the Meet & Confer Ordinance, Chapter 2, Article XVII, of the City Code.

O. The City will provide the Union, upon request, non-confidential and readily available
information concerning the Union that is necessary to Union representatives for
negotiations, and is not otherwise available to the Union, such as personnel census,
employee benefit data, and survey information. Such requests shall be made through
the Assistant Chief in charge of personnel. Any unusual costs incurred by the City in
connection with this Section shall be borne by the Union.

P. The Union and the Department will jointly present training to new Fire Fighter recruits
about the activities that are mutually beneficial to the City and the Community. This
time will be allotted sometime during the last 4 weeks of training of said recruits at
the Training Academy. During such discussions, Union representatives shall avoid




the dissemination of information that is political in nature, abusive of any person or
organization or disruptive of the Department's operation. City business time will be
available for this purpose.

Q. Seniority

1. The City shall provide the Association with a list of unit members/employees
showing each unit member’s/employee’s City employment date and class
employment date.
2. Seniority shall be by length of service within a class. If seniority within the class is
not determinative, then length of service with the City shall prevail.
3. Seniority will be applied in conjunction with City of Phoenix Personnel Rule 14.
4. The Department will also post an annual seniority list (beginning of the fiscal year)
on the Department’s internal webpage. In addition, new promotional lists for Fire
Engineer and Fire Captain will be posted on the internal webpage after they are
certified and finalized by City HR.


Section 1-4. Rights of Unit Employees

A. All employees have the right to have the Union serve as their meet and confer
representative without discrimination based on membership or non-membership in
the Union or any other organization. Whenever the terms “employee, Unit employees,
grievant” or some derivation of those, is used in this MOU it shall be synonymous
with the term “Unit member/employee.”

B. Union employees have the right to be represented or not to be represented by the
Union in dealings with the City concerning grievances and matters pertaining to their
individual employment rights and obligations.

C. Equal and Consistent Treatment
All employees covered by this Memorandum shall be treated equitably and consistently with
similarly situated employees regarding the terms and conditions of employment, including
but not limited to recruitment, assignment of work, training, promotion, transfer, discipline,
layoff, recall, termination, compensation, and benefits.


D. Equal Employment Opportunity
The City affirms its commitment to an Equal Employment Opportunity policy. It shall not
discriminate against any employee or applicant on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age,
national origin, ancestry, disability, marital status, medical condition, sexual orientation,
gender identity, or any other characteristic protected by law. All employees shall be afforded
equal consideration and opportunity in hiring, advancement, performance evaluation,
promotion, and compensation.





E. It is understood by the parties that the benefits granted by Section 1-4 of Article 1
shall not be interpreted or applied as requiring the employer to count as time worked
any hours or fractions of hours spent outside the employee's work shift in pursuit of
benefits provided by this Section. The employer shall count as paid leave any hours
or fractions of hours spent within the employee's regular work shift in pursuit of
benefits provided by this Section.

F. The official discipline record is maintained in the Personnel File by the Human
Resources Department. Copies maintained in either the Supervisory and/or
Department files are not the official record. Employees may request to
remove/inactivate eligible documents based on the below criteria by contacting the
department Human Resources Officer. Official records may only be inactivated and
not removed per records retention law, and members/employees will receive
confirmation once the requested record is removed/inactivated.








Department File Personnel File
Document Supervisory File (if applicable) (OFFICIAL FILE)
Maintain original
in file.
Coaching’s/Supervisory Not maintained Not maintained
Remove annually
Counseling’s in file. in file.
provided no further
incidents.
Maintain copy
Maintain original
in file.
in file.
Employee may
Employee may
Written Reprimands request to remove
request to inactivate
after 2 years from
after 3 years from the
the date of
date of infraction.
infraction.
Maintain copy
Maintain copy
in file. Maintain original
in file.
Remove annually in file.
Employee may
Suspensions provided no further Employee may
request to remove
(other than below) incidents. request to inactivate
after 5 years from
after 5 years from the
the date of
date of infraction.
infraction.
Discipline under 21b2,
Maintain copy Maintain original
21b4, 21b5, 21b12,
in file. in file.
21b13, 21b14, 21b15,
Cannot Remove May not be inactivated
21b18, 21b19, 21b20.

Discipline older than 5 years from the date of infraction will not be considered for
progressive discipline or promotion/transfer purposes except for the following types of
discipline, which may be considered for the duration of employment (and upon the
employee's return to employment, if applicable):

Sustained discipline of 40-hour suspension or greater of the following types:

• The employee has been abusive or threatening in attitude, language, or conduct
towards fellow employees, customers of the City, or the public.
• The employee has solicited or taken for personal use a fee, gift or favor in the
course of the assigned work or in connection with it, which would lead toward
favoritism or the appearance of favoritism or a conflict of interest.
• The employee is in possession of a deadly weapon (as defined in ARS 13-3101),
excepting a pocketknife (as provided in ARS 13-3102) at a City worksite1, unless
such employee is a police officer.
(A worksite includes not only City buildings and property, but also City vehicles
and private vehicles while being used on City business, and other assigned work
locations).
• The employee has intentionally falsified records or documents made, kept, or
maintained for or on behalf of the City of Phoenix.
• The employee has stolen or is in unauthorized possession of City property or the
property of another employee or citizen.




• The employee is under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs on the job.
• The employee has violated City of Phoenix anti-harassment or anti-discrimination
policies.
• The employee committed a violation of the City's Ethics Policy.
• The employee’s actions meet the elements of a felony.
• The employee committed an act of dishonesty.

G. Supervisors are encouraged to discuss concerns and attempt to resolve those
concerns with a member/employee without utilizing a formal investigatory process.
Supervisors are encouraged to not utilize an investigatory process unless they have
a reasonable belief that discipline (a written reprimand or higher) could result. Should
information be made during a conversation to attempt to resolve an issue that could
result in discipline, the supervisor will stop the meeting and utilize an investigatory
process as outlined below. Any interview becomes investigatory when facts or
evidence sought by the City may result in a disciplinary action.

1. Anonymous or third-party complaints shall require corroboration within 30 days of
being received or they will be dismissed.

2. The City may, at its discretion, either conduct investigatory interviews with
members/employees or issue members/employees written questions. In either
case, a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) form will be used. The intent of the NOI is to clearly
put members/employees on notice that they are under investigation that could
result in discipline, inform them of the nature of the allegations against them, and
inform them of their right to representation.
a. The Notice of Inquiry shall be provided within 7 days of any complaint.
b. The Notice of Inquiry shall included any alleged facts, complainant identity
(if known), and all available evidence.

3. If the City elects to issue written questions to the member/employee, the following
shall apply:

a. If an NOI is being issued and there is no active questioning, representation
is not required. Members/employees may bring a representative if they
desire, however there will be no discussion during the issuance of the NOI.

b. The member/employee will have 72-hours excluding holidays and N-days
to respond in writing and provide any other material requested. This
deadline may be extended by mutual agreement if there are extenuating
circumstances.






4. If the City elects to conduct an investigatory interview, the following shall apply:

a. Prior to the member/employee being interviewed, the member/employee
shall be advised of their right to a representative at all interviews.

b. The NOI form will be issued at the meeting.

c. The union representative may assist and consult with the
member/employee, attempt to clarify the facts or questions asked, and
suggest other members/employees or witnesses who may have knowledge
of the underlying issues. The union representative may ask questions, make
statements, and advocate on the member’s behalf.

d. The member/employee or representative may ask for a caucus during the
meeting. Caucuses will be granted for a reasonable timeframe.

e. The interviewer may not prohibit the union representative from engaging in
representation, including consulting with the member/employee. The
member shall be allowed to seek advice from their representative in caucus
during the interview. The member/employee will be given the opportunity to
clarify their answer after the caucus.

f. All parties may not behave in a violent, verbally abusive, insulting, or
demeaning manner toward the interviewer.

g. Prior to the conclusion of the meeting, the member/employee or
representative shall have the opportunity to make a closing statement.

h. If the department requires a written statement at an investigatory meeting,
the member/employee will be compensated up to one hour of City time to
write the statement. Additional time may be granted at the discretion of the
department and will not be withheld arbitrarily.

i. The City will notify the Unit member/employee within 7 calendar days
following the conclusion of all investigative interviews and final preparation
the draft summaries. Upon notification, the Unit member/employee will
have 7 calendar days to make a written request for the audio files and/or
the draft summary of the Unit member/employee’s interview, which the City
will provide. After receiving the requested audio files and/or the draft
summary of the Unit member/employee’s interview, the Unit





member/employee will have 7 calendar days to provide, in writing,
clarification of the Unit member/employee’s interview answer, draft
summary of Unit member/employee’s interview, and/or a written response.
If, upon review of the audio file and/or draft summary, the Unit
member/employee provides written clarification that identifies any factual
discrepancies, omissions, or mischaracterizations of their statements, the
City shall ensure that such clarification is attached to and becomes part of
the official investigative record. The City shall further require that any
investigator, HR representative, or individual with custodial authority over
the record correct or amend the draft summary and any derivative
documents to accurately reflect the Unit member/employee’s clarification.
No investigative finding, report, or personnel action shall rely upon a version
of the record that fails to incorporate the Unit member/employee’s written
clarification.

j. Except for emergency situations, the unit members/employees shall have a
minimum of 48 hours to arrange for union representation when the
member/employee is the subject of an administrative investigatory
interview. The union representative will make every reasonable attempt to
arrive within the 48 hours. A member/employee may waive the 48-hour time
requirement if the member/employee is not opting for representation.

k. Provide the complete investigative file to the member/employee before
discipline is imposed. Including, but not limited to reports, recordings,
photos, exculpatory materials be

5. Regardless of whether the City elects to interview the member/employee, or issue
written questions, the following shall apply:

a. The member/employee will be instructed not to speak to anyone regarding
an investigation. This restriction does not apply to the union, the union’s
attorney, the member/employee’s family, the member/employee’s attorney,
the investigator, or chain-of-command.

b. The member/employee will be advised if the inquiry is supervisor initiated
or the result of a citizen complaint, employee/co-worker complaint, or other.

c. The member/employee shall also be informed of the Garrity protections
afforded to public employees who may also be under criminal investigation





or whose actions meet the elements of a crime [Garrity v. New Jersey, 385
U.S. 493, 87 S.Ct. 616 (1967)].

d. The Department will make available for review to the unit member and/or
his representative any relevant and readily available material that is being
used as the basis for an allegation of misconduct.

Material includes any video, audio, photographs, or documents known at
the time the internal investigation is initiated and that are specifically related
to the conduct of the unit member under investigation. Material does not
include audio recorded interviews of witnesses; complaints that are filed
with the employer and that include allegations of unlawful discrimination,
harassment, or retaliation or complaints that involve matters under the
jurisdiction of the United States equal employment opportunity
commission); material(s) or facts that would impede the investigation; or
investigative leads captured during the investigative process.

Prior to interviewing an involved employee, the investigating supervisor will
complete and provide an investigation material list to the involved
employee.

e. A unit member/employee shall receive a copy of any statement that they
are asked to sign.

f. Every 60 days, the Chief assigned to Human Resource, or a sworn
designee will provide, either verbally or in writing, a status update to a unit
member/employee who is under investigation. If a member/employee is in
an at home work assignment, that communication will take place every 45
days.

6. Miscellaneous

a. A unit member/employee identified solely as a witness shall have the right
to a union representative.
b. All interviews shall be recorded, including witnesses.

c. No witnesses who participate in an investigation or appeal will be retaliated
against.






d. No investigatory documentation, such as the NOI or witness statements
shall be kept in the Personnel or Supervisory Files after the investigation is
concluded.

e. The City will not require or compel Unit 5 members/employees to make any
self-incriminating statements during criminal investigations.

7. Unit members/employees will be permitted to apply and/or compete in a transfer
process while in a pending investigation. The transfer process will not be delayed
pending the conclusion of the related investigation.

8. A member/employee who receives a written reprimand or suspension may request
a copy of the information upon which the written reprimand or suspension was
based, pertaining to what was specifically cited in the discipline at no cost to the
member/employee.

9. All investigations shall be confidential. The public release of investigative materials
shall be prohibited until the completion of the investigation and/or appeal process.

10. It is understood by the parties that the benefits granted by this Article shall not be
interpreted or applied as requiring the member/employer to count as time worked,
any hours or fractions of hours spent outside the member/employee's work shift in
pursuit of benefits provided by this Article unless otherwise specified in this MOU.
The employer shall count as time worked any hours or fractions of hours spent
within the member/employee's regular work shift in pursuit of benefits provided by
this Article.

H. Member Discipline

1. Any member/employee receiving discipline that results in a loss of hours, or
days or work, will have those hours converted to match their appropriate work
schedule. Discipline for 40-hour members/employees shall be equal to 8
hours for one work day. Discipline for 56-hour members/employees shall be
equal to 11.2 hours for one work day. Any discipline exceeding one day will
be increased proportional to the hours outlined in this section. A 56-hour
member/employee may choose to use earned vacation or compensatory time
to account for the remaining workday hours.

2. A just cause definition shall be provided to members receiving discipline that
shall include notice, reasonableness, preponderance of evidence, and
proportionality.





I. Investigative timeline

Investigations shall be completed within 180 calendar days (extendable only with
written justification). Any investigation not completed in good faith within that time line
would be expired.


Section 1-5. Prohibition of Strikes and Lockouts

A. The Union pledges to maintain unimpaired Fire Fighting and related supported
services as directed by the Fire Chief. It shall not cause, condone, counsel or permit
employees, to strike, fail to fully and faithfully perform duties, slow down, disrupt,
impede or otherwise impair the normal functions and procedures of the Department.

B. Should any employees of the bargaining Unit during the term of this Memorandum,
and until such time that it is expressly and legally rescinded, breach the obligations
of Paragraph A, the Fire Chief or his designee shall immediately notify the Union that
a prohibited action is in progress. The Union shall forthwith disavow said strike or
other prohibited action and shall endeavor in good faith to cause such employees to
immediately return to work and/or cease the prohibited activity or, alternatively accept
the responsibility for the strike or other prohibited activity.

C. There shall be no lockout by the City during the term of the Memorandum.

D. The provisions of Section 2 (17) and section (13) of Ordinance G-1532, are
incorporated into this Memorandum.



Article 2: Grievance/Arbitration/Labor Management

Section 2-1. Grievance Procedures

It is understood by the parties that the benefits granted by this Article shall not be
interpreted or applied as requiring the employer to count as time worked, any hours or
fractions of hours spent outside the employee's work shift in pursuit of benefits provided
by this Article. The employer shall count as time worked any hours or fractions of hours
spent within the employee's regular work shift in pursuit of benefits provided by this
Article.

A. Informal Resolution

1. As a matter of good labor-management relations the parties encourage unit
members/employees who believe that they have a bona fide grievance to discuss




and attempt to resolve it with their immediate non-unit supervisor.

2. If the above informal discussion is held and does not resolve the grievance, the
unit member/employee may file a formal grievance in accordance with the
following procedure.

B. Definition of Grievance

1. A grievance is a written allegation by a unit member/employee, submitted as
herein specified, claiming violation(s) regarding the interpretation and/or
application of the specific express terms of this Memorandum for which there is
no other specific and formal method of review; and doesn’t have a fact pattern
that has been presented to and decided upon by the City Manager in a prior
grievance. However, disputes specifically excluded in other Articles of this
Agreement from the Grievance and Arbitration procedure shall not be construed
as within the definition set forth above and shall not be handled in accordance
with this procedure. It is agreed that such excluded disputes are not grievable or
arbitrable under the terms of this Article or under this contract.

2. The City continues to retain the format used for grievances, including forms,
technology, etc.

3. A grievance which does not meet the requirements set forth in this Article shall
be null and void, and will not be processed in accordance with this procedure.

C. Procedure

All grievances covered by this Article shall be handled exclusively in the following
manner:

A grievance must be reduced to writing, citing the specific Article and Section of this
Memorandum alleged to have been violated.

1. Step 1

The unit member/employee shall reduce the grievance to writing by signing and
completing the grievance form provided by the City and submit it to the division head,
or designee, within 14 calendar days of the initial commencement of the occurrence
being grieved. (Not withstanding other pertinent time bars, statute of limitations, etc.,
the City acknowledges that certain violations may constitute “continuing violations”
thereby permitting submission within 14 calendar days of subsequent occurrences, if
applicable.)

The division head, or designee, may investigate, further consider, and discuss the
grievance with the grievant and the grievant's representative, if any, as deemed




appropriate, and shall, within 14 calendar days of having received the written
grievance, submit a response thereto in writing to the grievant. The parties by written
mutual agreement may move the grievance to Step 2 of the grievance procedure.

2. Step 2

If the written response of the Step 1 does not result in a resolution of the grievance,
the grievant may appeal the grievance by signing and completing the City form and
presenting it to the department head, or designee within 14 calendar days of the
grievant's receipt of the Step 1 response.

The department head, or designee, may further consider and discuss the grievance
with the grievant and the grievant's representative, if any, as deemed appropriate,
and shall, within 14 calendar days of having received the written grievance, submit a
response thereto in writing to the grievant. The parties by written agreement may
move the grievance to Step 3 of the grievance procedure.

3. Step 2.5

After the Step 2 response, but prior to review by the Grievance Committee, the parties
involved may mutually agree to submit the grievance to Labor Relations. The
grievance, as originally written and Step 1 and Step 2 responses, must be submitted
to Labor Relations within 14 calendar days of receipt of the Step 2 response. Labor
Relations shall, within 14 calendar days of the receipt of the grievance, meet with the
department head, or designee, and the grievant and the grievant's representative, if
any, in an attempt to resolve the grievance. Labor Relations shall then submit a
written response to all parties within 14 calendar days of the meeting.

4. Step 3

a. If the written response of the Step 2 (or 2.5 if applicable) does not result in a
resolution of the grievance, the grievant may, within 14 calendar days of the
Step 2 response, appeal the grievance by signing and completing the City form
and presenting it to Labor Relations. A Grievance Committee hearing will be
scheduled at which the grievant shall be afforded the opportunity to fully
present his position and to be represented.

The Grievance Committee shall be composed of:
Chairman – A member of the City Manager’s Office designated by the City
Manager.
2 Members – Mutually agreed upon by City Manager’s Office and Local 493.

The Grievance Committee shall submit findings and advisory
recommendation(s) to the City Manager. The City Manager shall make the
final determination of the grievance and submit it in writing to the grievant and




his designated representative.

b. If the grievant so elects in writing within the above time limit, in lieu of such
hearing the grievance may be reviewed by an arbitrator. The parties, or their
designated representatives, shall agree on an arbitrator, and if they are unable
to agree on an arbitrator within a reasonable time, either party may request
the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service to submit to them a list of 7
arbitrators who have had experience in the public sector. The parties shall,
within 7 calendar days of the receipt of said list, select the arbitrator by
alternately striking names from said list until one name remains. Such person
shall then become the arbitrator. The arbitrator so selected shall hold a
hearing as expeditiously as possible at a time and place convenient to the
parties, and shall be bound by the following:

i. The arbitrator shall be bound by the language of this Memorandum and
departmental rules and regulations consistent therewith in considering
any issue properly before him/her.

ii. The arbitrator shall expressly confine him/herself to the precise issues
submitted to him/her and shall have no authority to consider any other
issue not so submitted to him/her.

iii. The arbitrator shall be bound by applicable State and City law.

iv. The cost of the arbitrator and any other mutually incurred costs shall be
borne equally by the parties.

The arbitrator shall submit findings and advisory recommendations to the
City Manager. The City Manager shall make the final determination of the
grievance and submit it in writing to the grievant and his designated
representative.

c. The City is not under any obligation to accept grievances where the City
Manager has previously decided on the same fact pattern.

D. Time Limits

Failure of City Management representatives to comply with time limits specified in
Paragraph C shall entitle the grievant to appeal to the next level of review; and failure
of the grievant to comply with said time limits shall constitute abandonment of the
grievance; except however, that the parties may extend time limits by mutual written
agreement in advance of the deadline.

E. Union Grievance





The Union may, in its own name, file a grievance that alleges violation by the City of
the rights accorded to the Union by the specific terms of Article 1-3 of this
Memorandum. The Union shall file such grievance at Step 3 of this Procedure.

F. Group Grievance

When more than one unit member/employee claims the same violation of the same
rights allegedly accorded by this Memorandum, and such claims arise at substantially
the same time and out of the same circumstances, a single group grievance may be
filed in the name of all such members. Such group grievances shall be filed at the
Step of this Procedure which provides the lowest level of common supervision having
authority over all named Grievants. Each unit member/employee that is a party
Grievant must be named and must sign such group grievance.

G. Employer Grievances

Should they occur as a result of official Union activities or actions, including the failure to
act as required under the terms of this Memorandum, employer grievances will be
presented directly to the Union president or any officer of the Union within 14 days of the
occurrence prompting the grievance. The president, or designee, shall in each case
provide a written answer within 14 days from receipt of the grievance. Unresolved
employer grievances may be submitted to arbitration pursuant to Step 3.


Section 2-2. The RBO / Labor-Management Process

A. The purpose of the Relationships by Objectives (RBO) committee is to enhance
service delivery models and address public safety employee-related issues. The
RBO process is done through the facilitation and open discussion of mutual concerns
and problems which may include; implementation of major department programs
and/or substantial modifications of existing major programs that will have a significant
impact on service delivery or work schedules. Items of concern are then enacted as
initiatives to be in accomplished over the course of the year that follows.

B. The RBO Committee shall meet annually at mutually scheduled times, and at other
mutually agreed upon times as necessary. The RBO Committee process consists
of a Correlating Team. The Correlating Team includes the following representatives
from Labor and Management: the Fire Chief and Executive Staff (Assistant Fire
Chiefs) and the Union President and Labor Executives. For each initiative mutually
identified in the RBO process, a Committee is established consisting of
representatives from labor and management and facilitated by co-chairs. Sub-
committees are further developed to facilitate meetings to achieve goals as set forth
in the agreed upon initiatives. Throughout the year, Committees and Sub-
Committees will meet regularly to accomplish their RBO initiatives.





C. There shall be a Fire Labor-Management Committee consisting of the Fire Chief and
Union President. The Fire Labor-Management Committee provides oversight for the
entire RBO / Labor-Management Process.

D. A standing agenda will be developed. The members shall, in advance of a meeting,
provide the co-chairs with proposed additional agenda items, and the co-chairs will
provide the members with the meeting agenda. To ensure clarity and continuity,
the parties agree that meetings should be audio recorded and the recordings
maintained in a secure database accessible to both parties for future
reference. The individuals assigned to record meeting minutes are
encouraged to capture sufficient detail of discussions and any agreements
reached, particularly when significant changes are considered, so that both
parties may accurately reference these records in the future.

E. Representatives of the Union on the Committee shall not lose pay or benefits for
meetings mutually scheduled during their duty time.

F. The Sub-Committees may be supplemented by representative(s) of the City Manager
if it is proposed to discuss mutual aid or fire protection contract matters.

G. The Sub-Committees may, if they deem proper, suggest recommendations to the
Fire Chief and the City Manager for their consideration and determination.

H. Employees who are designated by the Fire Labor-Management Committee as
RBO/Labor Management Coordinators will be eligible for compensation from a bank
of 2,112 hours. These individuals, limited to no more than 11 employees, will work
with management on the priorities determined through the RBO (Relationships by
Objectives) process. These initiatives pertain to enhancing operational efficiencies,
service delivery, and improvements to employee safety and organizational
performance.

I. It is understood by the parties that the benefits granted by Section 2-2 of Article 2
shall not be interpreted or applied as requiring the employer to count as time worked
any hours or fractions of hours spent outside the employee's work shift in pursuit of
benefits provided by this Section. The employer shall count as paid leave any hours
or fractions of hours spent within the employee's regular work shift in pursuit of
benefits provided by this Section.

J. The City will provide the professional services of a secretary for the labor-
management process. The secretary will be assigned to the community affairs
division of the Phoenix Fire Department and will work at the direction of the Fire
Labor-Management Committee. The selection process for this position shall be
determined by the Fire Labor-Management Committee.





K. In the interest of encouraging member total wellness and providing customer service
delivery, the City of Phoenix Fire Department and Phoenix Fire Fighters Association
Local 493 will develop a drug testing policy through the Fire Labor/Management
process. The drug testing program will be administered and managed by the Fire
Department.


Section 2-3. Productivity Discussions

A. Recognizing the need to provide the highest practical level of fire protection and
emergency medical service to the citizens of Phoenix, the City, Fire Department, and
Union, pledge to continue to work towards increasing the productivity of the Phoenix
Fire Department. In a continuing commitment towards increased productivity, the joint
Labor-Management Productivity Committee shall meet on a regular basis during the
term of the M.O.U. to discuss the development of structured productivity programs
within the Phoenix Fire Department.

B. The distribution of any demonstrated economic savings or other productivity
rewarding measures resulting from the implementation of productivity programs shall
be a proper subject for the Meet and Confer process pursuant to the provisions
established in the Meet & Confer Ordinance, Chapter 2, Article XVII, of the City Code.

C. It is understood by the parties that the benefits granted by Section 2-3 of Article 2
shall not be interpreted or applied as requiring the employer to count as time worked
any hours or fractions of hours spent outside the employee's work shift in pursuit of
benefits provided by this Section. The employer shall count as paid leave any hours
or fractions of hours spent within the employee's regular work shift in pursuit of
benefits provided by this Section.



Article 3: Compensation/Wages

Section 3-1. Wages
Wage Proposal Summary – Firefighter, Engineer, and Captain Classifications
A. Phoenix continues to experience extraordinary growth, both in population and in Fire
Department recruitment. This expansion presents an opportunity for the City to reaffirm
its commitment to hiring and retaining the very best candidates as we meet increasing
service demands.
In alignment with the Mayor’s stated goal that “Public Safety is key to a successful city,”
the parties agree that base wage adjustments for Firefighters, Engineers, and Captains
are essential to achieving the objective of making Phoenix Fire Department personnel
the highest paid in the State of Arizona.




Through collaboration with City Human Resources following the Class and
Compensation implementation, additional flexibility was created within the existing pay
structure—allowing greater separation between the top Firefighter step and the entry
step for the Engineer rank. Accordingly, the parties propose a minimum five percent
(5%) base hourly increase for the rank of Firefighter as an initial adjustment to
reflect this realignment.
This five percent increase establishes the minimum standard; however, both parties
recognize that additional adjustments may be warranted to achieve and maintain the
stated goal of ensuring Phoenix Fire Department personnel remain the highest paid in
base wages among comparable Arizona fire service agencies.
This effort underscores a shared commitment to recruitment, retention, and operational
excellence, ensuring that Phoenix Fire Department wages remain among the top two
highest paid public safety agencies in the State of Arizona. To ensure Phoenix Fire
Department wages stay among the top two highest paid public safety agencies in the
State of Arizona the city of Phoenix will do an annual pay in comp study for firefighters
starting in January of 2027.


A. Employees assigned to, or assigned as rovers to, Special Operations Teams, canine
search specialists team, and the ARFF program team, and who have also achieved
and maintained the level of Technician, or equivalent, through specific training and
education, shall receive Special Ops Team pay. Members certified in both hazmat
(HMT) and technical rescue (TRT) and assigned to, or assigned as rovers to fill cross
trained positions on the heavy rescue squads and/or C-957 shall receive Bi-Tech
Team pay, which is the sum of HMT & TRT Special Ops Team pay combined.

An employee who is awarded a position on a team in this section shall receive their
Team Pay no later than 6 months, if the Fire Department has not offered the employee
a training spot in the required entry level Special Operations course within 6 months
of accepting their team position.

If Employees who are required to obtain dual technician certification (C957 Captains
and employees assigned to heavy rescue squads) do not have either team pay and
employee has not been offered a training spot in the required entry level Special
Operations course within 6 months of accepting their assignment, they will receive
team pay for one of the two disciplines. If the employee has one technical certification
in good standing and is receiving team pay, the member will receive assignment pay
for the second discipline if the employee has not been offered a training spot in the
required entry level Special Operations course within 6 months of accepting their team
position.

B. Employees who meet the Fire Department’s linguistic skill qualifications and become
certified, shall receive a premium of $75.00 per month.




C. It is understood that the pay rates set forth in Attachment “A” are interpreted to be
specific with regards to steps as implemented in the classification and compensation
and passed in Ordinance S-49802 by the City Council on May 31, 2023, except that
performance related items including, but not limited to, special merit increases, special
salary adjustments, demotions, assignment pay and extensions in merit pay
anniversary dates resulting from extended leave without pay, industrial, and
reinstatements may alter an employee’s step progression and monthly salaries as
indicated in Attachment “A.”

If an employee is not given his/her performance evaluation by the annual review date,
the employee may request his/her merit increase in writing by sending a memorandum
directly to the Human Resources Officer. If the performance evaluation is an overall
“met,” the request will be processed within 21 calendar days of submittal and will be
retroactive to the performance evaluation annual review date.

D. Employees assigned by the Fire Chief to staff assignments in authorized staff
positions (40 hours) will be entitled to 10% assignment pay if such assignment is to
exceed 2 consecutive pay periods, and shall continue to receive such assignment pay
for the duration of such assignment. This provision shall not apply to employees
attending recruit training or employees assigned to limited duty. Employees assigned
to authorized 40 hour staff assignments and who begin receiving staff assignment pay
shall also be eligible to continue all other current assignment pays provided all
required certifications are maintained. Employees assigned to limited duty shall
continue to receive holiday pay and FLSA/work week adjustments (Section 4-1,
Paragraph E, of Article 4) for the duration of their limited duty assignment, irrespective
of their actual work hours.

E. Employees assigned to any 40 hour staff positions shall receive 2 8 hour or 10 hour
professional development days per year depending on their schedule. The employee
shall decide the days and areas of development. These days shall be assigned
through the vacation signup process. No employee shall receive these days in addition
to the full amount of Local 493 days.

F. The Fire Department's 21-day pay schedule normally begins on C-shift Mondays. In
any leap year, ERSO, South Shift Command, Payroll and Local 493 will identify the
first and most appropriate "Payroll Monday" to switch to a leap year schedule. The
objective will be to balance out holiday shifts between A, B, and C shift.

In the event the Department and Local 493 mutually approve and implement
an alternative Operations schedule, such as the proposed 1-3-2-3 model, the
parties agree to collaboratively review and, if necessary, adjust the 21-day pay
schedule and corresponding shift rotation to ensure proper alignment with
payroll cycles and operational continuity. Any such adjustments shall be made
jointly by ERSO, South Shift Command, Payroll, and Local 493 through the




Labor-Management process.

G. Effective the first full pay period in July 2023, Unit 5 employees shall be paid Nightwork
Pay of $5.00 $7.50 per hour on all hours actually worked between 2200 hours and
0600 hours. No employee shall receive the hourly Nightwork Pay while on paid leave.

Nightwork Pay must be accounted for in base wage computations for the purposes of
any and all classification and compensation studies and comparisons.

The parties agree to evaluate this program during the term of the 2023-24 M.O.U.

H. Union Requested Job Classification Studies

1) The Union may submit a prioritized written request of classifications specific to
the unit that they wish to have studied each contract term. All written requests
shall include a full explanation of why the classification should be studied. This
explanation shall indicate whether the Union is requesting a full classification
study (including job levels and job architecture) or if the request is limited to a
compensation review to assess market competitiveness and grade and salary
levels. Requests from the Union will be prioritized with other standing requests.

2) The Union and the City have met regularly since the implementation of the 2023
class & comp study to resolve issues that resulted. As such, the Union and City
Human Resources Department (including representatives from the Class &
Comp Division) will meet with Union leadership monthly during the term of this
MOU to discuss issues arising from the 2023 citywide classification and
compensation study.

I. FEMA/USAR Deployment Wage Payment

Members who deploy on a FEMA or USAR event shall have wages paid within
30 days of return from the deployment.



Section 3-2. Productivity Enhancement Pay

A. In recognition of the significant increase in service delivery and cost savings to the
implement the following Productivity Enhancement Pay formula for employees:

1. In November of each calendar year and June of each calendar year, employees
who have completed at least 7 years of continuous full-time service and who meet
the additional qualifications specified in Section 3-1A of Article 3 shall be paid
$80.00, pro-rated and included each pay period in the qualifying unit




member’s/employee’s regular pay check throughout the year, for each full year of
continuous full-time service in excess of 5 years, up to a semi-annual maximum
of $2,000.00, annual maximum of $4,000.00 at 30 years.

2. Employees on industrial leave shall qualify for this payment for only the first year
of the industrial leave. However, the entire period of industrial leave shall qualify
as continuous service when the employee returns to active employment.

3. Adjustments to payments will be made as soon as possible but no later than 30
days of the qualifying date.

B. An employee must have achieved the overall performance rating of "meets
standards" on his latest scheduled performance evaluation on file in the Human
Resources Department.

C. An employee who receives a below "meets standards" evaluation shall receive
another evaluation within 90 to 120 days, and if that evaluation is "meets standards,"
he will be eligible for Productivity Enhancement Pay starting with the next qualifying
date.


Section 3-3. Overtime

A. Employees who are assigned to be and are on duty beyond their scheduled work
shift shall be compensated for such assigned overtime work at 1 ½) times their
regular rate, 56 hours or 40 hours, after the first 7 minutes of assigned and worked
overtime calculated to the nearest 1/4 hour.

B. Employees shall have the option of being paid in cash for overtime, or allow the
overtime to accrue as compensatory time up to a maximum of 168 hours for
employees working a 56 hour schedule, or 120 hours for employees working a 40
hour schedule.

C. Overtime compensation shall not be paid twice for the same hours worked.

D. Use of compensatory time shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Fire
Chief and shall take into consideration departmental scheduling and operational
factors.

E. Payment for time worked shall be in conformance with the requirements of the Fire
Chief and shall take into consideration departmental scheduling and operational
factors.

F. The provisions of Section 3-2 of Article 3 shall not apply where an employee is
assigned out-of-class to a non-Unit position.




G. Allocation and opportunities for overtime shall be discussed in the
Labor/Management process.

H. The Fire Department will maintain daily “peak time” opportunities on either 2 person
rescues or 4 person units on a peak time basis only. Special events staffing and
overtime opportunities outside of the 9-11 response system will not be counted as a
peak time opportunity.

This item reflects an agreement between the Fire Department and the Union in 1984
on the future staffing of the rescues. The increased work-load and responsibility of
the full time rescues was incented by agreement that there would be overtime
opportunities on peak time rescues. Further, the department was reorganized
through the RBO process in 1993 to enhance ALS and rescue capabilities throughout
the city. This reorganization included a pool of employees to staff back rescues and
guarantee that no new employee would have to work more than 200 shifts on a
rescue. Employees agreeing to be in this pool are then entitled to work on the peak
time rescues on an overtime basis when their name comes up in a rotation. The Fire
Department and Local 493 will continue to work jointly through the RBO Process to
determine the deployment of peak time units to ensure the greatest benefit to the
service delivery system and provide adjustments, when needed.

The parties acknowledge the existence of a current side agreement between the
Phoenix Fire Department and Local 493 regarding the deployment, staffing, and
operation of peak-time rescue units. Recognizing that this agreement is active but
not yet incorporated into the Memorandum of Understanding, both parties agree to
include this item as a standing topic during the Meet and Confer process for review,
clarification, and potential modification. Any mutually agreed-upon changes resulting
from these discussions shall be formally incorporated into this Memorandum of
Understanding upon ratification.


Section 3-4. Call Out Pay/Standby Pay

A. Call out time shall be at a minimum of 3 hours at 1 ½ times the employee’s regular
rate of pay, 56 hours or 40 hours depending on assignment, after the first 7 minutes
calculated to the nearest 1/4 hour. If a unit member/employee leaves a call out event
without authorization prior to the termination of the event, Section 3-2A of Article 3
shall not apply.

B. The provisions of this Section shall not apply where an employee is assigned out-
of-class to a non-Unit position.

C. Standby pay shall be compensated at five percent (5%) of the employee’s regular
hourly rate of pay for each hour assigned to standby status.




D. If an employee is called out while on standby, those hours shall be compensated
in accordance with the established Call-Out Pay formula which is noted above.



Section 3-5. Out-of-Class Pay

Pursuant to A.R. 2.201, 16 hours of out-of-class work on a shift for employees will
constitute a full shift of out-of-class assignment pay. There will be no out-of-class pay for
working less than 16 hours. Employees assigned to work out-of-class shall receive
compensation at a rate of five percent (5%) above their base salary for the duration of the
shift.
Employees who are deemed qualified to work in an out-of-class assignment shall receive
out-of-class assignment pay immediately upon performing the duties of the higher
classification. No minimum qualifying hours shall be required.

Employees on a 40 hour schedule will complete 11 shifts, 6 hours minimum of out-of-
class assignment, to satisfy the minimum qualifications for out-of-class pay.


Section 3-6. Sick Leave Conversion at Retirement

The following benefit will apply:

A. Definitions

1. "Qualifying Hours" - The minimum number of accrued and unused sick leave
credits existing on the last day of service prior to retirement, which are necessary
before an employee can participate in the benefit program.

2. "Base Number of Hours" or "Base Hours" - The number of hours of accrued and
unused sick leave credits which are uncompensated under Section 3-4 of Article
4 which the City will compensate the employee.

3. "Base Hourly Rate" - The base hourly rate of pay being paid at the time of
retirement to the retiring employee who qualifies for participation in the benefit
program.

B. Benefit and Eligibility

1. An employee that has between 1 – 1,259 hours of sick leave remaining in their
sick leave bank at the time of retirement, or the 40 hour equivalent, shall be
eligible for payment of an amount of compensation equal to his/her base wage for
50% of their hours.




2. An employee who has accumulated a minimum of 1,260 qualifying hours or more
of accrued and unused sick leave at the time of retirement, or the 40 hour
equivalent, shall be eligible for payment of an amount of compensation equal to
his/her base hourly rate for 65% of their sick hours.

3. An employee who has accumulated a minimum of 1,800 qualifying hours or more
of accrued and unused sick leave at the time of retirement, or 40 hour equivalent,
shall be eligible for payment of an amount of compensation equal to his/her base
hourly rate for 80% of their sick hours.

4. An employee who has accumulated a minimum of 2,400 hours, or the 40 hour
equivalent, or more of accrued and unused sick leave at the time of retirement
shall be eligible for payment of an amount of compensation equal to 100% of
his/her base hourly wage for all hours.

5. Effective July 1, 2014, and thereafter, an employee who has accrued at least 1286
hours for 56 hour members, or 919 hours for 40 hour employees, of unused sick
leave may elect to have 168 hours for a 56 hour unit member/employee, or 120
hours for a 40 hour unit member/employee paid out in a lump sum. Any unit
member/employee may only elect to exercise this benefit 3 times in their career,
and not more than one time in a fiscal year. Eligible employees may elect to buy
back their hours between July 1 and the last pay period in January each fiscal
year.

6. The payments described in numbers 1 through 5 above are not considered Final
Average Salary for purposes of pension calculations.

C. Administration

1. At the time of retirement or death of an active employee who is eligible for
retirement, the City's Employee Benefits Division, or such other individual or
agency as the City may designate, shall determine the employee’s eligibility and
the amount of accrued and unused sick leave to be compensated.

2. The employee shall verify in writing the computation of the Employee Benefits
Division.

2. In the event an employee’s eligibility for participation or the amount of
compensation is disputed, the dispute shall be submitted to the City Auditor for
resolution.
3. 100% of employees sick leave will be paid at the full hourly rate to
dependents/beneficiaries/survivors in the event of a Non-Line of Duty Death.






Section 3-7. Deferred Compensation and Defined Contribution Plans

A. The City shall contribute an amount equal to 4.42% 6% of each employee’s biweekly
gross pay to the City’s 401(a) Defined Contribution Plan. Pension contributions will
be made by both the City and the employee on the contributions.

B. At the employee’s separation, for either retirement or exiting the Deferred Retirement
Options Program, the employee’s sick leave payout amounts will be automatically
contributed into the City’s 401(a) plan. Any excess amount over the Internal Revenue
Code 401(a) plan contribution maximum limits will be automatically contributed into
the City’s 457(b) plan. Any portion of the excess amount that cannot be contributed
to the 457(b) plan because of Internal Revenue Code 457(b) plan contribution
maximum limits will be paid as taxable income. The 401(a) Plan Document as
approved by the Deferred Compensation Board will be the governing document.


Section 3-8. Non-Direct Payment of Compensation or Benefits

Various sections of this MOU contain a form of compensation, wages, or benefits that
have been negotiated in good faith and may or may not provide a direct payment of wages
or other benefit to each member. Those forms of compensation, wages, or benefits that
do not provide a direct payment to each unit member/employee have been negotiated in
place of a direct payment and costed as part of the overall economic package. Examples
include, but are not limited to: life insurance, 493 and Personal Development Days, long
term disability insurance, leave payouts, member donated release time, etc.



Article 4. Hours of Work/Working Conditions

Section 4-1. Hours of Work

A. The duty hours for employees assigned to Operations or Emergency Services,
excluding 40 hour staff assignments, shall continue to average 56 hours per week.
Shifts shall continue to be 24 and/or 48hours hours in duration. Both parties
acknowledge that discussions within the RBO process regarding alternative
scheduling models, including the proposed 1-3-2-3 schedule, are ongoing, and agree
to continue collaborative efforts to evaluate, refine, and formally codify any mutually
agreed-upon changes to duty hours and shift structure through future amendments
to this Memorandum. Any such implementation shall be designed to ensure cost
neutrality to the City while guaranteeing that no Unit 5 member experiences any
reduction in annual compensation or benefits as a result of the transition, and shall
be executed in a manner that maintains the Department’s operational readiness,
service delivery standards, and commitment to public safety.




B. The work hours and schedule of employees assigned to an administrative staff
assignment (Non-Operations/56-hour schedule) shall be 5 8 hour days (excluding
authorized meal breaks), or 4 10 hour days (excluding authorized meal breaks) at the
preference of the employee, subject to operational needs and mutual agreement with
the Department.


The work hours and schedule of employees assigned to the Fire Investigations
Section may only be mutually changed by the Fire Chief and the Union President
through the Labor-Management process. Fire Investigation employees will be
assigned to one of two 40-hour schedules that may include a 4/10 or a modified A,
B, C shift schedule. All schedules will equal a 40-hour work week. All Fire
Investigators, regardless of schedule will be paid overtime at the 40-hour rate.

C. Fire Investigation employees assigned to the modified shift schedule will be required
to work on City paid holidays when their regular schedule shift occurs on that day.
Those employees required to work on a City holiday as a result of the shift schedule
will receive pay in lieu of time off. The Fire Department shall continue its long-standing
practice of using sworn Fire Captains as Fire Investigators.

The Fire Department will attempt to maintain staffing levels of the Investigations
Section, in order to provide for investigatory needs of the Department. The staffing
level shall be a minimum of 4 investigators on A, B, and C shift as soon as 15
investigators are fully trained. Any future proposed staffing level recommendations
will be discussed through the labor/management process. A maximum of one
vacation shift will be allowed per shift for those employees assigned to the modified
A, B, C shift schedule, unless pre-approved by department head or designee. If
implementation of the proposed 1-3-2-3 schedule requires adjustment to the Fire
Investigation Section’s work schedule, both parties will collaborate through the Labor-
Management process to ensure any change remains cost neutral to the City and does
not reduce member compensation, benefits, or operational effectiveness.


C. When an employee is required to change from one type of a schedule to another by
the Fire Department, the Department shall allow a minimum of 16 hours between
tours of duty.

D. The work week for employees on a 56 hour schedule shall be 53 hours. Employees
will continue to work the existing 56 hour schedule. Employees working the existing
56 hour schedule will be compensated as follows: Provided, however, that if the 1-3-
2-3 schedule currently under consideration in the RBO process is adopted after full
review and agreement by both the members and the organization, the listed monetary
figures may be adjusted as necessary to ensure that Unit 5 members experience no




reduction in their annual compensation.


1. The first 53 hours will be paid at the base 56 hour rate.

2. The 54th hour will be paid at 1 ½ times the regular hourly rate.

3. The 55th and 56th hours will be paid at 2 times the base 56 hour rate.

E. Employees attending a Department Sponsored Training Programs or courses may
be placed on one of two optional training schedules, based upon Operational,
Training, and budgetary considerations:

Schedule 1. Employees may be placed on a 40-hour work week schedule and be
entitled to a 10% increase in pay in accordance with Section 3-1 (H) of this
Memorandum of Understanding. Employees shall be paid on a 40-hour work week
until completion of the respective Training Program. In the event an employee
attending the Training Program does not receive their regular Local 493 Days (as per
Section 3-1 (I) of this Memorandum of Understanding), any missed Local 493 Days
will be re-scheduled prior to the employee’s return to the Operations Division.

Schedule 2. Employees may remain on their normal Operations schedule (A, B, or
C Shift) and be provided paid Fire Department leave to attend the Training Program
when their training is scheduled on shift. When members are required to attend
training on their days off, employees will be compensated at 1 ½ times their regular
rate for the hours they are in attendance. Compensation and Local 493 Days will
remain the same as any other employee assigned to a 56-hour work week. The
decision to utilize Schedule 1 or 2 will be discussed in a labor/management setting.

F. Each 56 hour unit employee shall receive 8 shifts off per year, referred to in this MOU
as Local 493 days. This will allow for an hours reduction without specifying a specific
number of hours in this reduction or reducing current rates of pay, FLSA, or hours
reduction pay as specified in Section 4-1, Paragraph E, of Article 4. The rotation
system shall be worked out between the Fire Chief and the Union President with the
consent of the Labor Relations Division. These Local 493 Days shall be awarded
based on total seniority as a sworn member of the Fire Department. Unit 5
employees may submit a request to work a Local 493 day. Management may hire
members to work a Local 493 day in the event the constant staffing process is utilized
to meet minimum staffing requirements. Employees who work a Local 493 day must
work the entire 24-hour shift and shall be compensated at a rate of one and one-half
(1½) times their regular rate of compensation, in addition to their regular pay.
Employees shall have the option of being paid cash or allow the compensation to
accrue as compensatory time as governed by the current MOU.






Section 4-2. Shift Trades

Two (2) employees serving in the same classification may be granted the opportunity to
exchange shifts up to a maximum of 45 such exchanges per employee in a contract year.
Shift exchanges shall not qualify an employee for premium overtime payment and cannot
be repaid in any other form of compensation. All employees seeking shift exchanges
(AWRs) must be current with all certifications and required training before being approved
for the exchange. All shift exchanges are subject to the approval of the Fire Chief or
his/her designee and shall be in conformance with regulations issued by the Fire Chief.


Section 4-3. Filling Vacancies

The Fire Chief will endeavor to permanently fill vacancies in regular positions, that are
duly authorized to be filled, expeditiously within limitations imposed on him by
administrative and operational factors, and thereafter, consistent with applicable Civil
Service Rules, based on length of service by classification when fitness and qualifications
of interested employees for the particular vacancy are deemed to be equal by the Fire
Chief. When requested, departmental management shall indicate the reason why an
employee was or was not transferred into a vacancy as part of Labor-Management
Committee proceedings. "Vacancy" hereunder is defined as a regular opening in any
position created by death, retirement, dismissal, promotion, demotion, creation of a new
regular position or transfer, provided, however, that with the filling of staff positions, all
applicants shall be considered, and the Fire Chief shall make the final determination.

A. The parties agree to a leave management ratio of thirty-three percent (33%) as the
standard benchmark for managing all leave across Operations.
B. In the event that any classification (Firefighter, Engineer, or Captain) falls below five
percent (5%) of the established thirty-three percent (33%) relief rate, employees from
other classifications may be utilized through Constant Staffing to fill temporary
vacancies as needed to maintain safe and effective operational staffing levels.
C. This provision is intended to promote balanced leave utilization, equitable workload
distribution, and continuity of service while minimizing the need for excessive callbacks,
mandatory holds, or unplanned overtime. The parties agree to review this ratio
periodically through the Labor–Management process to ensure it remains effective and
operationally appropriate.
______________________________________________________________________


Section 4-4. Vehicle Assignment for Budgeted 40-Hour Positions


A. All members assigned to true or budgeted 40-hour positions (excluding Fire




Investigators not on Day Shift) shall be provided a staff vehicle or an equivalent car
allowance, consistent with the operational needs and expectations of their assignment.
B. This provision ensures parity and recognition of the additional responsibilities
associated with full-time administrative and staff assignments. Vehicle assignment or
allowance for these positions shall not be subject to discretionary approval when the
position is formally budgeted and designated as a 40-hour assignment.
C. In cases where a staff car is unavailable, the Department shall provide a monthly car
allowance equivalent to the standard rate established by the City for comparable
administrative assignments.



Article 5. Benefits

Section 5-1. Health Insurance

A. The City and Union agree to maintain the current 80/20 split for health insurance for
both single and family coverage. If there is a rate increase or decrease in the second
year of this M.O.U., the City shall pay 80% of the new monthly contribution and the
employee will pay 20%.

B. In the event Congress or the State of Arizona passes legislation which considers the
amount the City contributes to health insurance premiums as imputed income, then
the City will consider such contribution as income to the employee.

C. The City shall provide the Basic Medical Reimbursement Plan (MERP) benefits to
MERP eligible Unit retirees and to those employees who are hired before August 1,
2007 and are eligible to retire no later than August 1, 2022 at no less than $202.00
per month. The City also contributes an additional $50 toward City retiree family
medical coverage; this credit is applied directly to the retiree’s premium deduction.
Any employee hired on or after August 1, 2007, regardless of years of service, may
qualify for a Post Employment Health Plan (PEHP) account.

D. Additional MERP amounts will be paid to eligible retirees for the following categories:

RETIREE COVERAGE – RETIREE NOT ON MEDICARE
ADDITIONAL MERP AMOUNTS
Retiree or Survivor Retiree or Survivor
Retiree or Survivor
w/family coverage – with family coverage
Only NOT on
any dependent NOT – all dependent(s)
Medicare
on Medicare ON Medicare
HMO OR PPO
$105 $325 $210
COVERAGE





RETIREE COVERAGE – RETIREE ON MEDICARE
ADDITIONAL MERP AMOUNTS
Retiree or Survivor Retiree or Survivor
Retiree or Survivor w/family coverage – with family coverage
Only - ON Medicare any dependent NOT – all dependent(s)
on Medicare ON Medicare
HMO OR PPO
$90 $195 $185
COVERAGE

These MERP amounts are what the City agrees to pay. It is solely at the discretion
of the City Manager to increase these amounts in the future.
1) additional MERP amounts shall be paid to Non-Medicare
retirees who obtain single or family health coverage.
2) The City will continue to provide a Medicare Supplement Plan
for Medicare eligible retirees and dependents as well as
survivors and will continue the additional MERP amounts as
specified above.

E. No more than one time per calendar year, the City will provide Unit 5 mutually agreed
upon healthcare data within a reasonable time, once requested. Local 493 Consultant
required data will be furnished within a reasonable time with secure data transmission
provisions in place.

F. Saver’s Choice and PPO deductibles that are met in the last quarter of a calendar
year for a high cost claim will be carried over to the following calendar year.

G. HSA Seed Money for individual and family health care coverage will be deposited in
full to the member’s HSA accounts in January as is the policy now.


H. Proposed Formulary changes shall be discussed with Local 493 Member Benefits
prior to implementation.



Section 5-2. Dental Insurance

A. At a minimum, the dental insurance plan shall include a PPO option that consists of
100% payment of reasonable and customary charges covered for preventive and
preventive-related diagnostic services, and 80% payment of reasonable and
customary covered charges for basic services and major services. At least one plan
shall also include an orthodontia benefit providing for 80% payment of reasonable
and customary charges up to a maximum lifetime benefit of $4,000.00 per person.
Dental plans may be subject to deductibles and limitations contained in the contract
between the dental insurance carrier and the City of Phoenix. For the PPO and HMO
dental plans, the City shall continue to pay 100% of the premium costs for single




employees for employees enrolled in the base dental HMO or PPO plan (employee
only coverage), and 75% of the premium costs for employees and their qualified
dependents (family coverage). Enrollment in prior City of Phoenix Dental Plans
counts towards major services time limit exclusions.

B. In the event Congress or the State of Arizona passes legislation that considers the
amount the City contributes to health insurance premiums as imputed income, then
the City will consider such contribution as income to the employee.


Section 5-3. Life Insurance

A. The City will continue the existing off the job and on-the job life and dismemberment
insurance coverage. The policy shall provide a benefit for each employee equal to
the member’s base annual salary. In addition, the City will continue the existing death
in the line of duty insurance of $75,000.00. Additionally, the City will provide to each
employee a $200,000.00 death benefit covering the employee’s commutation to and
from his City work location. This policy will cover the employee’s commute for up to
2 hours before his shift begins, and 2 hours after his shift concludes.

B. In the event of the death of an employee while commuting to or from his work location,
for a period of 2 hours each way, the City will continue to pay the full monthly health
insurance premium for the spouse and all eligible dependents. This policy will be
consistent with the payment of a supplementary commutation life insurance policy for
each employee.


Section 5-4. Long Term Disability Insurance

The City will offer a long-term disability benefit for all full-time, regular unit
members/employees pursuant to A.R. 2.323 as may be amended (providing that such
amendments shall not be in conflict with the MOU). Employees who have been
continuously employed and working on a full-time basis for twelve consecutive months
are eligible to apply for long term disability coverage. After an established 90 calendar
day qualifying period, the plan will provide up to 66 2/3% of the employee's basic monthly
salary at the time disability occurs and continue up to age 75 for employees who have
been employed full-time for 36 months and one day. This benefit will be coordinated with
leave payments, industrial insurance payments, unemployment compensation, social
security benefits and disability provisions of the retirement plan.

Employees who have been employed full-time with the City of Phoenix for 36 months or
less, will be eligible to receive a long term disability benefit for no more than 30 months.


Section 5-5. Holidays, Vacations, and Donated Vacation Leave




A. Bank of Donated Leave

1. Each unit member/employee may complete a form to voluntarily donate vacation
leave time for a specified number of hours, not to exceed the maximum number
of hours as noted in Section 5-5, Subsection A, 3. These forms will be processed
on July 1, October 1, January 1, and April 1. The voluntary donation will continue
each subsequent year on the second paycheck in July, unless revoked by the
unit member/employee. This donated time is to be used by union officers and
representatives for Union-related activities as determined by the Unit 5 Union
President and Executive Board. It is recognized that all hours negotiated in lieu
of additional pay and benefits have been donated by the members of Unit 5 from
their bank of vacation leave. By filling out and submitting a voluntary donation
form, each unit member/employee is clearly and affirmatively consenting to the
donation of the stated number of hours from their bank of vacation leave.

2. The total hours donated by the members of Unit 5 will be considered the
maximum number of hours available for donated hours under Article 5, Section
5-5.

3. The maximum number of hours that may be donated by any Unit member is 100
hours per fiscal year.

4. Only members of Unit 5 may donate hours to the Unit 5 bank of hours; Unit 5
may only accept donated hours from Unit 5 members.

5. No union member may use more than 120 hours of donated time during any one
pay period.

6. Donated time does count towards hours worked for overtime purposes.

7. Examples of work performed by representatives on member donated release in
support of the City include ensuring representation during administrative
investigations and grievance/disciplinary appeal meetings with management;
assisting unit members/employees in understanding and following work rules;
administering the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding; organizing
and participating in charity functions within the greater Phoenix area to aid our
communities. Member donated release is also used for authorized
representatives to attend Union conferences, meetings, seminars, training
classes, and workshops so that representatives better understand issues such
as City policies and practices, conflict resolution, labor-management
partnerships, and methods of effective representation, or any other purpose
authorized by the President or Executive Board.

B. The City agrees to incorporate into the Memorandum the benefits provided under




Administrative Regulation 2.11 as amended, indicating the following holidays:

1. New Year's Day
2. Martin Luther King's Birthday
3. President's Day
4. Cesar Chavez Birthday (March 31)
5. Memorial Day
6. Juneteenth Day
7. Independence Day
8. Labor Day
9. Indigenous Peoples’ Day
10. Veteran's Day
11. Thanksgiving Day
12. Friday after Thanksgiving
13. Christmas Eve Day (6 hours for 56-hour employees and 4 hours for 40-hour
employees).
14. Christmas Day

Employees working a 56 hour or 2912 (493 days included) per year schedule shall
receive 12 hours pay or compensatory time each holiday.

Unit employees assigned to a 4/10 work schedule shall not be required to modify
their schedule or submit documentation to account for the two (2) hours of paid leave
associated with City holidays.

C. Employees will continue to receive holiday pay while on industrial leave.

D. The parties recognize the importance of maintaining adequate vacation
availability to support member wellness, morale, and operational efficiency. In
recognition of the recent budget authorization to hire additional sworn
Firefighters, the City agrees that the number of available vacation slots shall
increase proportionally with overall sworn staffing levels.
E. Specifically, for every twenty-five (25) newly authorized sworn Firefighter
positions added to the Department, one (1) additional vacation slot shall be
created and allocated to the vacation leave management system.
F. This provision ensures that the ratio of available vacation leave to total sworn
personnel remains balanced as the Department grows, preventing the erosion of
negotiated benefits and supporting the continued health, safety, and retention of
all members.

G. Effective January 1, 1987, vacation accrual for employees with less than 5 years shall
be increased to 11.2 hours per month, or the 40 hour equivalent. Vacation accrual
for all other employees shall remain the same as currently authorized.





H. Employees covered by this M.O.U. shall be permitted to sell back up to 80 hours total
per M.O.U. year of accrued vacation leave to the City at the employee's regular
straight-time hourly rate. This benefit shall not exceed a total of 80 hours and may
be used as follows: 40 hours on the last pay period in November and/or May of each
M.O.U. year. Employees will only be permitted to sell back an amount of accrued
vacation hours that would not result in their total bank of hours to drop below 150 or
210 hours, depending upon the work schedule.

I. Effective July 1, 2014, and thereafter, an employee who has accrued at least 312
hours, or 223 hours for 40-hour employees, may elect to have 252 hours of vacation
for a 56 hour unit member/employee or 180 hours of vacation for a 40 hour unit
member/employee paid out in a lump sum or converted into their comp bank. Any
unit member/employee may only elect to exercise this benefit 4 times in their career,
and not more than one time in a fiscal year. This payment is not considered Final
Average Salary for purposes of pension calculations. Eligible employees may elect
to buy back their hours between July 1 and the last pay period in January each fiscal
year.

J. Employees may donate accrued vacation leave to other City employees who are on
medical leave and who have exhausted all of their paid leave based on guidelines
contained in A.R. 2.144, with the understanding that no employee shall receive more
than 12 months of donated time.

K. Employees who have less than 40 hours vacation may buy up to 120 hours personal
leave. The cost of the personal leave shall be 110% of the employee’s base hourly
rate. Such personal leave use and purchase shall not impact positively or negatively
on the employee’s pension or any other benefits.

L. On the second paycheck in July of every year, every unit member/employee will
receive 8.5 hours of vacation time, in addition to their other accruals, added to their
vacation leave. This benefit will continue in perpetuity until otherwise agreed upon in
good faith, by Unit 5 and the City, through the Meet and Confer process.

M. Military Leave

Pursuant to ARS 26-168, ARS 38-610, and A.R. 2.39, employees who are
members of the Arizona National Guard or the Reserves of the United States
Armed Forces, will be entitled to a leave of absence from their duties for a period
not to exceed 30 days in two consecutive years when they are engaged in ordered
annual training or to attend camps, maneuvers, formations, or armory drills under
orders of any branch, including the reserve or auxiliary. A day is defined as a shift
of work.

N. Local 493 Days for Industrial Injuries





Unit 5 members who sustain an approved industrial injury arising out of and in
the course of their employment shall continue to receive four (4) Local 493 Days
per calendar year in recognition of their service and the nature of their injury. This
entitlement shall apply provided the member returns to active duty prior to the
end of the calendar year. Local 493 Days granted under this provision shall not
carry over into the following year and must be used within the calendar year in
which the member returns. This provision acknowledges that Local 493 Days
were secured through prior contract negotiations in lieu of additional pay and
benefits and reflects the parties’ shared commitment to honor members injured in
the performance of their duties.

O. Military Service Time Reinstatement

PSPRS Non- Credited Service to be changed to Credited Service with employer
contributions transmitted to PSPRS within 30 days of returning to PFD service
following return from a military call up, deployment or required service.

Section 5-6. Uniforms

A. In lieu of the $135.00 per employee per year amount which was previously paid by
the City to the Fire Department for additional uniform items, employees will now
receive an equivalent annual uniform allowance amount of $129.75. Payment of this
uniform allowance will be made on or about August 1 of each MOU year. Such
payment will be made to cover the cost of uniforms, maintenance, and cleaning of
such uniforms.

B. New employees will receive the entire annual uniform allowance within 30 days of
the time they are directed to wear and maintain a uniform. The second uniform
allowance, received at the start of the next fiscal year, will be equal to 1/12 of the
annual uniform allowance for each month of the preceding fiscal period, starting with
the first month the employee was directed to wear and maintain a uniform, to the start
of the new fiscal year.

Prior to entering the Fire Academy, the Fire Department will furnish all new Firefighter
Recruits with the following:

• 3 long sleeve red shirts
• 3 short sleeve red shirts
(Recruits can select any combination of the long and short sleeve shirts noted
above – not to exceed a total of six red shirts)
• 3 pair of blue fatigue pants
• 5 blue physical training (PT) shorts
• 1 pair of blue sweatpants




• 1 red sweatshirt (seasonally dependent)
• 1 belt
• 1 pair of OSHA/ANSI approved work boots; and,
• All necessary PPE’s required to participate in Fire Academy functions.

The Fire Department will provide a full Class A dress uniform upon successful
completion of the Fire Academy and promotion to Firefighter to include the following:

• 1 approved Class A dress jacket complete with patches and full fitment
• 1 approved Class A dress shirt complete with patches and full fitment
• 1 pair of approved Class A dress pants
• 1 approved Class A dress hat
• 1 approved Class A dress tie
• 1 approved Class A belt
• 1 approved Class A pair of shoes
• All approved hardware required (badges/pins etc.) to complete the approved
Class A dress uniform; and,
• All necessary PPE’s required to participate in field functions.

Additionally, any Captain RTO (Recruit Training Officer) or Firefighter Mentor
(Firefighter or Engineer) assigned to the Recruit Training Academy will be provided
a full Class A uniform (one time purchase) if the member has not already purchased
one.

Upon promotion to Fire Engineer or Fire Captain, the Fire Department will provide a
full Class A uniform to include the following:

• 1 approved Class A dress jacket complete with patches and full fitment
• 1 approved Class A dress shirt complete with patches and full fitment
• 1 pair of approved Class A dress pants
• 1 approved Class A dress hat
• 1 approved Class A dress tie; and,
• All approved hardware required (badges/pins etc.) to complete the approved
Class A dress uniform.

The Fire Department will provide a Class A uniform to the Unit 5 member as a “one
time only” purchase based upon whichever qualifying criteria previously listed is
initially met. Until all Unit 5 members have been provided a Class A dress uniform
by the Fire Department, no additional Class A dress uniforms will be issued to
members who have already received the benefit. Labor and Management will
continue to discuss funding options for additional Class A dress uniforms and the
implementation plan for the new uniform language outlined above.

Labor and Management will meet to discuss an implementation plan for the new




uniform language outlined above.

C. Employees who leave Department employment shall repay to the City the uniform
allowance equal to 1/12 of the annual allowance per month for each month remaining
in the fiscal year after the last day of the month in which the separation occurs.
Provided, however, that employees who retire after August 31 will not be requested
to repay any uniform allowance.

D. An employee who has been on extended leave (paid or unpaid) of 2 months or longer
shall have the next annual uniform allowance reduced by 1/12 of the annual
allowance for each month of extended leave.


Section 5-7. Tuition Reimbursement and Professional Development

A. Employees who participate in the Tuition Assistance Program shall be eligible for
tuition reimbursement pursuant to the following provisions:

1. The maximum sum reimbursable to employees each fiscal year shall be $6,500.

2. To be eligible for any reimbursement, employees must have successfully
completed academic or training courses approved in advance by the Fire Chief
and the Human Resources Director and meet the requirements of A.R. 2.51 as
may be amended, provided such amendments are not in conflict with the M.O.U.

3. Unit members shall be allowed to use up to $2000 of their reimbursement benefit
for job-related seminars, workshops, and professional memberships each fiscal
year.
B. Members shall receive up to 40 paid hours per year for professional certification,
training or fire service career advancement courses.


Section 5-8. Wellness, Health and Fitness

A. For each employee, the City of Phoenix shall contribute $2.00 per month to a fitness
fund to maintain and purchase fitness equipment for fire stations which has been
charged against Unit 5’s contract. The Fire Department will also contribute $2.00
each month per member to the fitness fund. The fund will be maintained by the City
and Fire Administration. The Health and Fitness labor management committee shall
oversee the funds and purchase equipment after reviewing input from all Fire
Department personnel.

B. The Phoenix Fire Department Honor Guard is a professional organization that
represents the Fire Department at official events, memorial services, and fire fighter’s
funerals. Through the work of the United Phoenix Fire Fighters Association, a




registered 501c-3 non-profit association (ID#866053047), the Honor Guard provides
public education and community service. In order to help pay for the expenses
incurred by the Honor Guard members in the performance of their duties, the City will
contribute twenty-five thousand dollars $50,000 into a fund for each M.O.U. year. The
President of the Union or his designee will manage this fund. The City Auditor
Department may conduct annual audits of this fund. Any payments not adequately
supported by the documentation of expenses will be returned to the fund by the Fire
Union.


Section 5-9. Worker’s Compensation

A. Employees who agree to participate in the Fire Department's health centers
consultation and rehabilitation programs shall continue to receive 100% of their
current rate of pay while off-duty due to an industrial injury based on current practice
which is a maximum of 1 year per injury, thereafter the rate becomes 66-2/3%. This
shall apply to catastrophic injury, line-of-duty cancer, cardiac incidents, and other
occupational diseases.
i.

B. If there is a disagreement in treatment between the Fire Department physician and
the employee's physician, the (2 physicians shall agree on a third physician whose
decision shall be the final authority. Employees who refuse to adhere to the above
conditions shall only receive 66-2/3% based on current state law and the current
maximum monthly rate allowed. If an employee receives 66-2/3%, he/she may use
sick leave, vacation, or compensatory time to make up the difference between 66-
2/3% and 100%.

C. Should the Union believe that a dispute in jurisdiction is unduly delaying a Worker’s
Compensation claim, or if the Union believes the City needs to provides greater
assistance to an employee trying to reopen an old claim, the Union may request a
meeting with City Worker’s Compensation staff (provided the involved employee
signs a release to do so) and such meeting will be scheduled within 14 calendar days.

D. The City will first attempt to use physicians from specialty lists created by City of
Phoenix Pension Boards for Independent Medical Examinations for employees in
Unit 5 (represented by Phoenix Fire Fighters Association Local 493).

E. Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave shall not run concurrent with leave paid
as industrial injury/illness (e.g. Workers’ Compensation).

F. Members who have applied for Public Safety Retirement System Disability Benefits
will be provided with TWA assignments until the disposition of their case with the
Phoenix Local Fire Pension Board.





G. Members on Industrial Injury Full Pay status shall continue to accrue biweekly
Compensatory Time if requested by the member.

H. In the event of a decision by an Industrial Commission of Arizona Administrative Law
Judge awarding benefits in an Industrial Injury Claim that had been previously denied,
all personal leave time used by the member will be reinstated to the appropriate
personal leave banks within 30 days.

I. For those members who are required by a City of Phoenix approved Independent
Medical Examiner to have any type of invasive procedure, a policy shall be developed
on care and treatment and responsibility in the event of complications or adverse
reactions that develop from such a procedure.




Section 5-10. Employee Benefit Trust Fund

A. Effective July 1, 2023, the existence of the Employee Benefit Trust Fund is continued
for the term of this Memorandum of Understanding. The City will contribute $68 per
employee, per month, ($31.385 per pay period) into the Fund for the purpose of
providing a monthly stipend to retirees to apply to the costs of their health and/or
dental insurance, a funeral expense benefit for employees and retirees, and such
other benefits as may be lawfully provided, as determined in the discretion of the
Trustees. The City's contribution will be matched by a $29 per pay period to the same
fund made by each employee.

B. The Trust Fund shall be managed and administered by a Board of five (5) Trustees
selected as follows:

1. Two (2) Trustees shall be appointed by the City Manager;
2. Two (2) Trustees shall be appointed by the Phoenix Fire Fighters Association,
Local 493; and
3. One (1) Trustee, who shall serve as Chairperson, shall be selected by the four (4)
appointed Trustees specified above.

C. The Trust Fund shall be invested in prudent, protected investments in compliance
with applicable law. The Trustees may seek such outside, independent advice and
consultation as they shall deem appropriate.

D. The Fund Trustees may adopt such rules and regulations for their Plan of Benefits
as they deem appropriate and are authorized to secure a formal trust instrument. The
trust instrument and any amendments thereto, must be specifically approved by the
City Manager and the Union before they can become effective.




E. Sums contributed to the Trust Fund shall be tracked with each employee being
assigned a notional account which records the contributions made by such employee.
All amounts in the Fund, together with any earnings thereon, shall be available for
distribution as specified in the rules and regulations of the Plan of Benefits adopted
by the Trustees. The Trustees shall have authority, consistent with their duties as
Trustees, to amend the Plan of Benefits from time to time, including the authority to
reduce or suspend benefit levels if required by the level of funding available. In no
event will any benefit specified at any time in the Plan of Benefits be considered non-
forfeitable. Benefits may be insured by a contract of insurance, but there is no liability
upon the City, the Union or the Board of Trustees or its constituent members to
provide benefit payments over and beyond the amounts in the Fund collected and
available for such purpose.

F. Any Fund participant who separates from the bargaining Unit prior to retirement, or
who promotes out of the Unit shall receive an amount equal to all of his or her or her
contributions to the Fund, plus interest based on the average annual interest earned
by the Fund, but shall receive no other benefits and have no other claim on the Fund.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Trustees may: (1) permit participants who promote
out of the Unit to continue participation until retirement; and (2) permit participants
who have severed employment to be reinstated in the Fund; either upon such terms
and conditions as the Trustees may require.

G. Upon the death of any employee or retiree, the Fund will provide a benefit to assist
with funeral expenses in an amount to be determined by the Trustees. The Fund
Trustees may determine to provide to a surviving spouse of a deceased employee or
retiree a monthly stipend for application to the cost of their health/dental insurance.

H. The Trustees shall prepare a booklet describing the Plan of Benefits for circulation to
employees and retirees, and shall prepare and circulate, in like manner, a summary
of any modifications made to the Plan of Benefits during the term of this Memorandum
of Understanding.

I. If the Trust Fund is terminated for any reason, undistributed funds shall be distributed
to those individuals (whether active or retired) who contributed to the Fund. Such
distribution shall be pro rata based on the amount of the contribution of such
individuals to the Fund less any disbursements they have received under the Plan of
Benefits.

J. Payments to retirees from the Trust Fund shall be in addition to current City
contributions to retiree health insurance premiums.

Section 5-11. Housing Incentive for City Residency
A. In recognition of the value of having sworn Fire Department personnel residing




within the City of Phoenix, the City agrees to establish a Housing Incentive
Program designed to encourage and support Unit 5 employees who choose to
make their primary residence within City limits.
B. Eligible employees who purchase a primary residence within the City of Phoenix
shall receive a one-time housing incentive payment of three thousand
dollars ($3,000) to assist with closing costs or other housing-related expenses
associated with establishing residency.
C. This incentive shall be available to employees who have completed their
probationary period and who agree to maintain their primary residence within
City limits for a minimum of five (5) years following receipt of the incentive.
D. The intent of this program is to strengthen community ties, enhance emergency
response readiness, and contribute to local economic vitality, while supporting
firefighter recruitment and long-term retention.
E. This incentive shall apply prospectively only and shall not be retroactive to
employees who purchased or established residency within the City prior to the
effective date of program implementation.
F. The parties agree to collaborate through the Labor–Management process to
finalize program administration, eligibility verification, and fiscal alignment.

Section 5-11. Fatigue, Safety, and Behavioral Health


A. Creation of a Labor-Management Fatigue Study Committee. This committee
will review and make recommendations for shift length, rest, and mandatory
overtime practices.

B. Establish a joint Labor/Management wellness committee. This committee will
provide peer-support and employer funded counceling due to the looming
sunsetting of the Craig Tiger act. All peer support shall be confidential.



Article 6. Miscellaneous

Section 6-1. Saving Clause

A. If any Article or Section of this Memorandum should be held invalid by operation of
law or by a final judgment of any tribunal of competent jurisdiction, or if compliance
with or enforcement of any Article or Section should be restrained by such tribunal,
the remainder of this Memorandum shall not be affected thereby. In the event the
decision of the court in Cheatham, et al v. Gordon, is stayed, reversed, vacated or
otherwise not given effect in whole or in part, by any court, then the City agrees to
meet and confer within 30 days of said ruling with Unit 5 to resolve any additional




issues resulting from the ruling of the court. The basis for negotiations will be the
document dated April 13, 2014, Proposed Unit 5 Addendum.

B. It is recognized by the parties that the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act are
currently applicable to certain of the wage and premium pay provisions of this M.O.U.,
and that this M.O.U. shall be administered in compliance with the FLSA for so long
as the Act is applicable.

C. Nothing contained in the Memorandum shall preclude the parties from being in
compliance with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.


Section 6-2. Printing of M.O.U.

Printing vendors secured by the Union shall comply with Ordinance G-1372 (Affirmative
Action Supplier's Ordinance), as may be amended, and Ordinance G-1901 (Affirmative
Action Employment by Contractors, Subcontractors, and Suppliers), as may be amended.
Printing of the M.O.U. shall be done by a Union printer only.


Section 6-3. Fire Watch

A. Whenever a Fire Department employee is required by the Fire Marshal or requested
by a private party, to perform a fire watch, standby, or other associated duties for Fire
Code compliance, such opportunities shall first be offered to Unit
members/employees. Such work shall be offered to those members that are suitably
qualified and who volunteer for such duty during their off-duty hours within a rotation
system approved by the Fire Chief after consultation with the Union. In the event that
no employee accepts such work, or in case of emergency, such work shall be offered
to qualified non-Unit employees. It is understood that the rate of payment shall be at
1 ½ times the employee’s base 40 hour rate, except in cases where non-Unit
employees are utilized in which case payment shall be at 1 ½ times the non-Unit
employee’s base 40 hour rate. For purposes of Section 6-3, Article 6 only, the terms
"qualified" is defined as follows:

1. "Qualified" shall mean any employee of the Fire Department who is familiar with
the Fire Code and has successfully completed the Fire Watch training program
provided by the Department.

2. “Emergency” shall mean any fire watch situation that cannot be pre-scheduled.

Section 6-4. Term and Effect of Memorandum

A. This Memorandum shall remain in full force and effect commencing with the
beginning of the first regular pay period in July 2026, up to the beginning of the first




regular pay period commencing in July 2028.

B. Except as expressly provided in this Memorandum, the City shall not be required to
meet and confer concerning any matter, whether covered or not covered herein to
take effect during the term or extensions thereof.

C. This Memorandum constitutes the total and entire agreements between the parties
and no past written or verbal statement/agreements shall supersede any of its
provisions. Throughout the term of this Memorandum, the City and the union may
jointly decide to participate in Labor-Management meetings to discuss items of
mutual interest on an as-needed basis.

D. It is intended by the parties hereto that the provisions of this Memorandum shall be
in harmony with the rights, duties, obligations and responsibilities which by law
devolve upon the City Council, City Manager, Fire Chief, and other City boards and
officials, and these provisions shall be interpreted and applied in such manner.

E. The Union recognizes the powers, duties and responsibilities of the Fire Chief as set
forth in the Charter and Ordinances and that pursuant thereto the Fire Chief has the
authority to establish rules and regulations applicable to the operation of the Fire
Department and to the conduct of the employees and officers employed therein,
subject to the express provisions of this Memorandum.

F. The lawful provisions of this Memorandum are binding upon the parties for the term
thereof. The Union having had an opportunity to raise all matters in connection with
the Meet and Confer proceedings resulting in the Memorandum is precluded from
initiating any further meeting and conferring for the term thereof relative to matters
under the control of the Fire Chief, the City Council or the City Manager.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands this



_________________________________________________________________
Bryan Willingham, President, Phoenix Fire Fighters Association Local 493


_________________________________________________________________
Jason Perkiser, Assistant Human Resources Director


________________________________________________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager, City of Phoenix


ATTEST:


_________________________________________________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk, City of Phoenix


APPROVED AS TO FORM:


_________________________________________________________________
City Attorney, City of Phoenix



Local 493 Team: City of Phoenix Team:
Bryan Willingham, President Jason Perkiser, Assistant HR Director
Ben Lindquist Tim Gammage Sr., Assistant Fire Chief
Tim West Raymond Ochoa, Assistant Fire Chief
Tim Gammage Jr. Paul Moore, Battalion Chief
Mike Brannan Keith Slattery, Deputy Chief
Scott Crowley Julie Taylor, Human Resources Supervisor
Patrick Cardenas Brianna Aceves, Admin. Assistant II (Coordinator)
Scott Porter Jennifer Flaherty, Secretary, (Scribe)
Brian Mike Saylor
Brian Moore
Gabe Orosco
Elliott Simmons
Matt Shaughnessy




ATTACHMENT A
HOURLY PAY RATES



HOURLY PAY RATES
Effective July 8, 2024


FIREFIGHTER
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 545 GRADE 549

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
11 $19.636 11 $30.31
12 $20.614 12 $31.82
13 $21.650 13 $33.41
14 $22.729 14 $35.08
15 $23.864 15 $36.84
16 $25.057 16 $38.68
17 $26.314 17 $40.61


FIREFIGHTER/SO
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 547 GRADE 551

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
11 $20.614 11 $31.82
12 $21.650 12 $33.41
13 $22.729 13 $35.08
14 $23.864 14 $36.84
15 $25.057 15 $38.68
16 $26.314 16 $40.61
17 $27.629 17 $42.64








FIREFIGHTER HMT & TRT
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 549 GRADE 553

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
11 $21.650 11 $33.41
12 $22.729 12 $35.08
13 $23.864 13 $36.84
14 $25.057 14 $38.68
15 $26.314 15 $40.61
16 $27.629 16 $42.64
17 $29.007 17 $44.77


FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 549 GRADE 553

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
12 $22.729 12 $35.08
13 $23.864 13 $36.84
14 $25.057 14 $38.68
15 $26.314 15 $40.61
16 $27.629 16 $42.64
17 $29.007 17 $44.77


FIREFIGHTER SO/PARAMEDIC
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 551 GRADE 555

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
12 $23.864 12 $36.84
13 $25.057 13 $38.68
14 $26.314 14 $40.61
15 $27.629 15 $42.64
16 $29.007 16 $44.77
17 $30.457 17 $47.01


FIREFIGHTER HMT & TRT/PARAMEDIC




56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 553 GRADE 557

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
12 $25.057 12 $38.68
13 $26.314 13 $40.61
14 $27.629 14 $42.64
15 $29.007 15 $44.77
16 $30.457 16 $47.01
17 $31.979 17 $49.36


ENGINEER
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 555 GRADE 559

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
12 $26.314 12 $40.61
13 $27.629 13 $42.64
14 $29.007 14 $44.77
15 $30.457 15 $47.01
16 $31.979 16 $49.36
17 $33.579 17 $51.83


ENGINEER SO
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 557 GRADE 561

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
12 $27.629 12 $42.64
13 $29.007 13 $44.77
14 $30.457 14 $47.01
15 $31.979 15 $49.36
16 $33.579 16 $51.83
17 $35.257 17 $54.42




ENGINEER HMT & TRT





56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 559 GRADE 563

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
12 $29.007 12 $44.77
13 $30.457 13 $47.01
14 $31.979 14 $49.36
15 $33.579 15 $51.83
16 $35.257 16 $54.42
17 $37.021 17 $57.15


ENGINEER PARAMEDIC
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 559 GRADE 563

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
12 $29.007 12 $44.77
13 $30.457 13 $47.01
14 $31.979 14 $49.36
15 $33.579 15 $51.83
16 $35.257 16 $54.42
17 $37.021 17 $57.15

ENGINEER SO/PARAMEDIC
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 561 GRADE 565

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
12 $30.457 12 $47.01
13 $31.979 13 $49.36
14 $33.579 14 $51.83
15 $35.257 15 $54.42
16 $37.021 16 $57.15
17 $38.871 17 $60.00




ENGINEER HMT & TRT/PARAMEDIC





56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 563 GRADE 567

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
12 $31.979 12 $49.36
13 $33.579 13 $51.83
14 $35.257 14 $54.42
15 $37.021 15 $57.15
16 $38.871 16 $60.00
17 $40.821 17 $63.00


CAPTAIN
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 559 GRADE 563

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
15 $33.579 15 $51.83
16 $35.257 16 $54.42
17 $37.021 17 $57.15


CAPTAIN SO
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 561 GRADE 565

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
15 $35.257 15 $54.42
16 $37.021 16 $57.15
17 $38.871 17 $60.00


CAPTAIN HMT & TRT
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 563 GRADE 567

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
15 $37.021 15 $57.15
16 $38.871 16 $60.00
17 $40.821 17 $63.00


CAPTAIN PARAMEDIC





56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 563 GRADE 567

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
15 $37.021 15 $57.15
16 $38.871 16 $60.00
17 $40.821 17 $63.00


CAPTAIN SO/PARAMEDIC
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 565 GRADE 569

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
15 $38.871 15 $60.00
16 $40.821 16 $63.00
17 $42.857 17 $66.15

CAPTAIN HMT & TRT/PARAMEDIC
56-HOUR 40-HOUR
GRADE 567 GRADE 571

STEP HOURLY RATE STEP HOURLY RATE
15 $40.821 15 $63.00
16 $42.857 16 $66.15
17 $45.000 17 $69.46



Progression through these steps shall be in accordance with established regulations and
the City's Pay Ordinance. It is understood that any time a member is promoted to another
classification or assigned as a firefighter paramedic and is within a pay classification
range, the member will proceed to the next higher step upon promotion or assignment.








ATTACHMENT B
VACATION CARRYOVER

With the reinstatement of vacation buy back in FY 2021-2022, vacation carryover will be
the established maximum plus 240 hours (or the 56-hour equivalent). In FY 2022-2023,
the vacation carryover will be the established maximum plus 160 hours (or the 56-hour
equivalent). In FY 2026-2028, the vacation carryover will be the established maximum
plus 160 hours (or the 56-hour equivalent). Any hours over that limit will be paid out to
that member on the last check of December.











Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Document Management System Contract - RFA 26-0040 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52512) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
NetDocuments Software, Inc. to provide document management system software for
the Law Department. Further request exception to the indemnity and assumption of
liability provisions of Phoenix City Code Section 42-18, pursuant to Phoenix City Code
Section 42-20. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1,500,000.

Summary
This contract will provide Document Management System (DMS) software for the Law
Department. NetDocuments is the Law Department's current DMS. It is integrated with
the major electronic case management system for the Civil Division. The Law
Department relies on a DMS to manage not only contracts, ordinances and other legal
documents but also litigation and investigatory case related documents.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition.

NetDocuments is the Law Department's DMS. This DMS is integrated with the Civil
Division electronic case management system. Entering this contract will benefit the
Department by not changing its DMS after recent implementation.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about December 17, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1,500,000 for the five-year maximum



aggregate term. Funding is available in the Law Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Law Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Lease Agreement with the Chinese Senior Citizens
Association located at 734 and 735 E. Elm Street to Extend the Term (Ordinance
S-52496) - District 4

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Lease Agreement
125301 with the Chinese Senior Citizens Association, to extend the term for a one-
year period for the purpose of conducting a Facility Condition Assessment and ARC
Flash (electrical) study for negotiating a longer term lease on building located at 734
and 735 E. Elm Street. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item.

Summary
The Human Services Department (HSD) is lessee for two parcels, one improved (155-
36-043) with a 7,839 square-foot fraternal building, and a parking lot (155-63-038E)
located at 734 and 735 E. Elm Street for the purpose of operating the Phoenix Chinese
Senior Citizens Center and Nutrition Program. HSD desires to extend the lease for one
year to continue the operation and to conduct a Facility Condition Assessment and a
ARC Flash (electrical) study of the leased improvements. The current lease expires
December 31, 2025, and will be extended for a one-year period beginning January 1,
2026, through, December 31, 2026, to allow time for the City and the Chinese Senior
Citizens Association to assess the condition of the buildings for the support of future
long term lease negotiations. Base rent during the one-year extension is $6,707.62 per
month, plus applicable taxes, utility costs, and alarm fees.

Contract Term
The lease term will be for a one-year period, beginning January 1, 2026, and ending
December 31, 2026.

Financial Impact
Base rent during the one-year extension is $6,707.62 per month, plus applicable taxes,
utility costs, and alarm fees. The aggregate amount is estimated to be $99,151,
including base rent, applicable taxes, utility costs, and alarm fees.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Lease Agreement 125301, Ordinance S-35715 adopted December 10, 2008.



Lease Agreement 125301-001, Ordinance S-36976 adopted April 21, 2010.
Lease Agreement 125301-002, Ordinance S-39240 adopted October 3, 2012.
Lease Agreement 125301-003 to 006, Ordinance S-40380 adopted November 20,
2013.
Lease Agreement 125301-007 to 010, Ordinance S-44109 adopted November 29,
2017.
Lease Agreement 125301-011, Ordinance S-51511 adopted December 18, 2024.

Location
734 and 735 E. Elm Street
APNs: 155-36-043 and 155-36-038E
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Contract with Arizona Community Action Association
dba Wildfire for Additional Utility Assistance Funding (Ordinance S-52499) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Contract 163534
with the Arizona Community Action Association dba Wildfire, to accept $170,280 in
additional emergency utility assistance funding for a new contract total of $1,050,280.
Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller
to disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
This amendment will provide additional funding for emergency utility assistance to low-
income individuals and families in Phoenix, allowing the City of Phoenix Human
Services Department to serve approximately 465 additional households.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, which began on July 1, 2025, and ends on
June 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
The new total value of the contract will not exceed $1,050,280. There is no impact to
the General Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· City Council approved Contract 163534 (S-51878) on May 7, 2025.
· City Council approved to increase pay authority (S-521120) on June 18, 2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Enter Into Contract for Senior Nutritional Meal Services
(Ordinance S-52501) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contract with
Everytable PBC to provide Senior Nutrition Meal Program Services for the Human
Services Department (HSD). The term of this contract will be for six months beginning
on or about January 1, 2026, through June 30, 2026, with three, one-year options to
extend through June 30, 2029. The services for this contract will begin on or about
February 1, 2026, with the five month contract value not to exceed $1,452,740. The
total value of the contract will not exceed $11,912,468. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. Funding is provided by the
Area Agency on Aging, Region One, Inc. and General Funds.

Summary
HSD recommends the City enter into a contract with Everytable PBC to provide senior
nutrition meal program services. The contract will provide congregate and home
delivered meals (HDM) services to elderly and disabled Phoenix residents.

The senior population in Arizona, age 65 and older, continues to grow, and proper
nutrition is essential to their health and well-being. HSD has long provided congregate
meals at senior centers and HDM to homebound seniors and individuals with
disabilities. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24, approximately 87,703 congregates meals
were prepared for approximately 400 senior center members and 241,417 hot and
frozen meals were prepared and delivered to more than 950 HDM clients.

Procurement Information
In accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10, a solicitation was
completed. HSD received three offers which were determined to be responsive to the
solicitation requirements. The offers received were:
· Selrico Services - 751 points
· Everytable PCB - 740 points
· Aioli Gourmet Burgers dba BLT Kitchens - 608 points

Negotiations were held with Selrico Services regarding cost and services, culminating



in a Best and Final Offer request. However, Selrico's proposal exceeded the allocated
budget, and the City was unable to reach a contract agreement. Therefore, a contract
award recommendation to Everytable PCB is in the City's best interest.

Contract Term
This contract will begin on or about January 1, 2026, and expire on June 30, 2026,
with three, one-year options to extend, for an aggregate contract term of three years
and six months.

Financial Impact
Expenditures are not to exceed $11,912,468 over the life of the contract. Funds are
available from a combination of grant funds received from Area Agency on Aging, Inc.
and City of Phoenix General Funds.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Contract 156849 to Increase Payment Authority for
Custodial Services (Ordinance S-52509) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to increase funding for
Contract 156849-0 with Universal Building Maintenance, LLC dba Allied Universal
Janitorial Services (Allied Universal), for the Human Services Department (HSD).
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditure will not exceed $11,467.26. Funds are available in
HSD's budget.

Summary
Allied Universal provides custodial services for 13 HSD locations. The services include
general cleaning of the interior and exterior of these locations on a daily and weekly
schedule, emergent services as necessary, and ancillary services for more advanced
cleaning of floors, windows, and upholstery, as needed. The additional funding will
support additional fees incurred because of the increase in minimum wages.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2027.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $11,467.26 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract
will not exceed $1,700,487.26. Funds are available in HSD's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· Ordinance S-52277 was adopted on September 17, 2025, to increase funding for a
revised contract value of $1,689,020.
· Ordinance S-48773 was adopted on June 15, 2022, authorizing staff to enter into
contract for Custodial Services.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Issuance of a Multifamily Revenue Note (The Hacienda at Sunnyslope
Apartments Project), Series 2025 (Resolution 22354) - District 3

Requests City Council approval for the issuance of a Multifamily Revenue Note (The
Hacienda at Sunnyslope Apartments Project), Series 2025, to be issued in a tax-
exempt series, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000.

Summary
Request City Council adoption of a resolution (Attachment A) granting approval of the
proceedings under which The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix,
Arizona (the “Phoenix IDA”) has previously resolved to issue its Multifamily Revenue
Note (The Hacienda at Sunnyslope Apartments Project), Series 2025, in an aggregate
principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000, in a tax-exempt series (the “Note”), for
use by ARH-AZ Partners, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (together with its
successors, assignees and designees, the “Borrower”), to finance, and/or refinance, as
applicable, all or a portion of the costs of the acquisition, construction, improvement,
rehabilitation, and/or equipping of a multifamily residential rental housing community
expected to be comprised of approximately 150 units, all or a portion of which will be
set aside for occupancy by low to moderate-income tenants, situated on approximately
five acres of real property in Phoenix, Arizona, (collectively, the “Facility”), funding any
required reserve funds, paying capitalized interest on the Note, if any, and paying fees,
expenses and costs incurred in connection with the authorization, issuance and sale of
the Note (collectively, the “Project”), and the plan of financing for the Project, for
purposes of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix IDA Board has previously resolved to issue the Note at its meeting held
on December 5, 2025.

Location
The Facility is located at or near 730 West Vogel Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85021.
Council District: 3

With the exception of certain housing notes or bonds, the Phoenix IDA can finance
projects located anywhere in Arizona. In addition, the Phoenix IDA may issue notes or



bonds to finance projects outside of Arizona, if the out-of-state project provides a
benefit within the State.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Ginger Spencer.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT THE OFFICIAL COPY
OF THE FINAL, ADOPTED RESOLUTION

RESOLUTION

A RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE
ISSUANCE OF A MULTIFAMILY REVENUE NOTE (THE
HACIENDA AT SUNNYSLOPE APARTMENTS PROJECT),
SERIES 2025, IN AN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT
NOT TO EXCEED $12,000,000, IN ONE OR MORE TAX-
EXEMPT AND/OR TAXABLE SERIES, OF THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY
OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA




WHEREAS, The Industrial Development Authority of the City of Phoenix,

Arizona (the “Authority”), is a nonprofit corporation designated a political subdivision of

the State of Arizona (the “State”) incorporated with the approval of the City of Phoenix,

Arizona (the “City”); and


WHEREAS, Title 35, Chapter 5, of the Arizona Revised Statutes, Section

35-701 et seq., as amended (the “Act”), authorizes the Authority to issue revenue bonds

for the purposes set forth in the Act, including the making of secured and unsecured loans

to finance or refinance the development, acquisition, construction, improvement,

equipping or operation of a “project” (as defined in the Act) whenever the Board of

Directors of the Authority finds such loans to further advance the interests of the

Authority or the public interest, and to refund outstanding obligations incurred by an

enterprise to finance the costs of a “project” when the Board of Directors of the Authority

finds that the refinancing is in the public interest; and




The Hacienda at Sunnyslope Apartments Project 1 Resolution No.
4924-3633-7020, v. 4
4924-3633-7020.4
WHEREAS, ARH-AZ Partners, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (together

with its successors, assignees, and designees, the “Borrower”), has requested that the

Authority issue its Multifamily Revenue Note (The Hacienda at Sunnyslope Apartments

Project), Series 2025 in one or more tax-exempt and/or taxable series (the “Note”), the

proceeds of which Note will be used by the Borrower to finance and/or refinance, as

applicable, all or a portion of the costs of: (a) the acquisition, rehabilitation, construction,

development, improvement, equipping and/or operating of a qualified residential rental

facility (including improvements and facilities functionally related and subordinate

thereto), which is expected to be comprised of approximately 150 units, all or a portion of

which will be set aside for occupancy by low- to moderate-income tenants, situated on

approximately 5.00 acres of real property generally located at 730 West Vogel Avenue,

Phoenix, Arizona 85021 (collectively, the “Facility”); (b) funding any required reserve

funds; (c) paying capitalized interest on the Note, if any; and (d) paying fees, expenses

and costs incurred in connection with the authorization, issuance and sale of the Note

(collectively, the “Project”), all in accordance with the Act; and


WHEREAS, in furtherance of the purposes of the Act and in the interest of the

Authority and the public thereunder, the Authority proposes to issue the Note and loan the

proceeds thereof to the Borrower to finance all or a portion of the costs of the Project; and


WHEREAS, the Authority, by Resolution 2025-23, duly adopted by the Board of

Directors of the Authority at a lawful meeting called and held on December 5, 2025

granted approval of the issuance and assignment of the Note in an aggregate principal

amount not to exceed $12,000,000; and



The Hacienda at Sunnyslope Apartments Project 2 Resolution No.
4924-3633-7020, v. 4
4924-3633-7020.4
WHEREAS, Section 35-721(B) of the Act provides that the proceedings of the

Authority under which the Note are to be issued require the approval of the Council of the

City; and


WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Code requires that an “applicable elected

representative” (as that term is defined in the Code) approve the issuance of the Note

and the plan of finance for the Project following a public hearing, which public hearing

was held by the Authority on December 12, 2025; and


WHEREAS, information regarding the Project to be financed with the proceeds of

the Note has been presented to the Council of the City; and


WHEREAS, it is intended that this Resolution shall constitute approval by the

Council of the City pursuant to Section 35-721(B) of the Act and of the “applicable elected

representative” as defined in Section 147(f) of the Code with respect to the Note.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

PHOENIX, ARIZONA as follows:


SECTION 1. The proceedings of the Authority under which the Note are to be

issued are hereby approved.


SECTION 2. The issuance of the Note and the plan of finance for the Project are

hereby approved for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Code.


SECTION 3. Notice of Arizona Revised Statutes Section 38-511 is hereby given.

The provisions of that statute are by this reference incorporated herein to the extent of



The Hacienda at Sunnyslope Apartments Project 3 Resolution No.
4924-3633-7020, v. 4
4924-3633-7020.4
their applicability to matters contained herein.




The Hacienda at Sunnyslope Apartments Project 4 Resolution No.
4924-3633-7020, v. 4
4924-3633-7020.4
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA this day

of December, 2025.




MAYOR


ATTEST:



Denise Archibald, City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney



By:
Chief Counsel David H. Benton



REVIEWED BY:



Ed Zuercher, City Manager




The Hacienda at Sunnyslope Apartments Project 5 Resolution No.
4924-3633-7020, v. 4
4924-3633-7020.4



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
South Mountain Community Library Maintenance, Capital Improvements, and
Operating Expenses (Ordinance S-52498) - District 8

Request authorization for the City Manager, or designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 126876 with Maricopa County Community College
District. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. Further request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to
Phoenix City Code § 42-20 pertaining to this transaction for indemnification and
assumption of liability, which would otherwise be prohibited by Phoenix City Code § 42
-18. The additional expenditures will not exceed $705,000.

Summary
In 2009, the City entered Contract 126876 with the Maricopa County Community
College District concerning operation of a shared community library located on the
South Mountain Community College Campus. This contract has a term of 40 years,
with a mutual option to extend indefinitely for five-year periods, and requires the City
contribute funding towards maintenance, capital improvements, and operating
expenses for the community library. If approved, this item would authorize the payment
of these contractual obligations through December 31, 2030.

Contract Term
Contract 126876 runs through 2049 with mutual options to extend indefinitely for five-
year periods.

Financial Impact
Funds are available in the Library Department's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· South Mountain Community Library Maintenance, Capital Improvements, and
Operating Expenses 126876 (Ordinance S-36500) on August 26, 2009.
· South Mountain Community Library Maintenance, Capital Improvements, and
Operating Expenses 126876 (Ordinance S-48941) on August 31, 2022.




Location
South Mountain Community Library, 7050 S. 24th Street
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Library Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Proposed Ordinance Changes to Align Phoenix City Code with the Parks and
Recreation Code of Conduct (Ordinance G-7466) - Citywide

Request City Council approval of proposed changes to the City Code amending
Sections 24-36, 24-38, 24-42, 24-48, 24-54, and adding new Sections 24-32, and 24-
55 to better align City Code with the Parks and Recreation Code of Conduct.

Summary
The mission of the Parks and Recreation Department (Parks) is to build healthy
communities through parks, programs and partnerships, and make Phoenix a better
place to live, visit, and play. With one of the largest parks systems in the nation, the
City provides residents and visitors with more than 41,000 acres of desert parks and
mountain preserves with more than 200 miles of trails; 189 parks; and much more.
Parks provide open space and opportunities for recreation. The Department remains
steadfast in its commitment to enhance park safety and continues to use a variety of
methods to address and reduce negative behaviors and security concerns in parks.

Code of Conduct and Park Rangers
In 2021, the Parks and Recreation Board approved the Parks and Recreation Code of
Conduct. The goal of the Code of Conduct is to promote behavior that allows everyone
to enjoy clean, safe, accessible, and inviting parks, facilities, and programs by
providing clear expectations of acceptable behavior in flatland parks, desert and
mountain parks and preserves, and other park facilities (collectively referred to as
"parks"). The Code of Conduct, which includes trespass authority, was written in
partnership with the community and several City departments, including the Law
Department, the Prosecutor’s Office, and the Police Department.

Urban Park Rangers are dedicated to patrolling the City’s 189 flatland parks twenty-
four hours a day, seven days a week. With the support of the Phoenix City Council, the
Urban Park Ranger team has grown from 12 Park Rangers in 2019, to a team of 44
today. The objectives of the Park Ranger Program include maintaining safe and
welcoming parks for all park users. Park Rangers assist daily in the proactive
education and enforcement of the Code of Conduct. Urban Park Rangers educate the
public about park rules, enforce the Code of Conduct, address common violations, and
issue citations or trespass notices. In 2025, through November, Park Rangers



averaged more than 62 daily park visits and approximately 41 daily educational and
enforcement contacts that resulted in educating on and/or enforcing Code of Conduct
violations. Partnerships with the Phoenix Police and Fire departments, as well as the
Office of Homeless Solutions, have enhanced responses in high-activity areas. In
addition, the Office of Homeless Solutions continues to support encampment
response, outreach, and safe cleanup efforts. Daily monitoring enables early
intervention in high-activity areas.

Police Department Trespass Authority on Park Property
Parks staff have worked with the Police and Law departments to streamline trespass
enforcement. A system for sharing active trespass data with Police Officers is in place
and has resulted in improved efficiency of Officers' ability to take related enforcement
action. A long-term digital solution is currently in development to further enhance
information sharing and efficiency.

Proposed Ordinance Changes and New Ordinance
Phoenix City Code has not been updated to reflect the Code of Conduct since it was
approved by the Parks and Recreation Board in 2021. In collaboration with the Law
Department, Parks has developed proposed changes to better align City Code with the
Code of Conduct. The ordinance changes are designed to enhance park safety and
ensure the City of Phoenix parks system remains welcoming and safe and provides
enjoyable spaces for all.

The proposed Ordinance G-7466 (Attachment A) aligns existing prohibited behavior
described in the Parks and Recreation Code of Conduct with the City Code, to provide
for efficient and consistent enforcement as follows:

· New Sec. 24-32 Penalties. - Although penalties currently exist for every section,
there are several sections in Sec. 24 that do not currently list a penalty within each
specific section. Placing the language for the penalty within each section makes the
penalty easier to locate for enforcement. It also allows varying penalties amongst
the sections should the need arise in the future. It also authorizes the issuance of a
Trespass Notice when appropriate.
· Sec. 24-36 - Entering park areas closed to public use. - Adds language that
includes use “during posted hours of operation” to match the Code of Conduct.
· Sec. 24-38 Spiritous liquor in parks. - Adds Class 1 misdemeanor penalty within the
section.
· Sec. 24-42 Restrictions on smoking and fires in parks and mountain preserve
areas. - Defines smoke and smoking and adds a prohibition for vaping in the
ordinance. The ordinance currently allows the Director to post signs prohibiting



smoking and fires in parks and mountain preserve areas. The proposed changes
add language to allow the Director to post these restrictions at any time. It includes
the existing penalty provision in the section.
· Sec. 24-48 Water activities: bathing, swimming or wading; boating; ice or water
sliding; fishing. - Section expanded to prohibit bathing in any fountain, hydrant,
drinking fountain, sink or water amenity not intended for such use at a park or
preserve. Adds Class 1 misdemeanor penalty within the section.
· Sec. 24-54 Order to leave park; unlawful failure to comply. - Adds the phrase
“compliance with law” and adds a trespass provision. Clarifies that the chapter is an
exercise of the police power of the City for the preservation and protection of the
natural environment, public peace, health, safety, and welfare, which aligns with the
City’s Charter status.
· New Sec. 24-55 - Obstructing park guests or amenities. This new section
addresses obstruction of use of amenities and proper use of amenities and provides
a misdemeanor penalty within the section.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Parks and
Recreation Department.





Attachment A




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PHOENIX CITY CODE
CHAPTER 24 PARKS AND RECREATION TO
ALIGN WITH THE PARKS CODE OF CONDUCT
AND IMPROVE CONSISTENCY IN ENFORCEMENT

__________



follows:
T
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

SECTION 1. Phoenix City Code, Chapter 24, is amended as follows:

Sec. 24-32. PENALTIES.
AF
A. WHEN A CRIMINAL VIOLATION OCCURS IN A PARK OR MOUNTAIN
PRESERVE PARK OR MOUNTAIN PRESERVE AREA, A PARK RANGER
OR POLICE OFFICER MAY ISSUE A TRESPASS NOTICE FOR UP TO



D
ONE YEAR, IN ACCORDANCE WITH GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY
THE PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR.



R
B. CONSISTENT WITH SECTION 13-717, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, IN
ADDITION TO OR IN LIEU OF ANY SENTENCE IMPOSED PURSUANT TO
THIS SECTION, THE COURT MAY SENTENCE A PERSON TO PERFORM
COMMUNITY RESITUTION OR ORDER A TERM OF EDUCATION OR
TREATMENT.




SECTION 2. Phoenix City Code, Chapter 24, Division II, Section 24-36 is

amended as follows:

Sec. 24-36. Entering park areas closed to public use.

A. No person shall knowingly enter or remain unlawfully in any park except in
those areas designated as open to public use AND DURING POSTED
HOURS OF OPERATION. by the Board.

B. The Director shall provide public notice of the designation of areas as open
or closed to public use by publishing a map which shall be available for public
review and inspection at the City Clerk’s Office and the Department’s
administrative offices and by any of the following:

1. Posting of appropriate signs or maps; or

2. Establishing physical barriers, including, but not limited to, posts, branches or
rocks; or
T
3. Any other means reasonably calculated to give notice to the public of areas


AF
open or closed to public use.

C. The prohibitions of this section shall not apply to any person performing any
work or activity which is authorized by the Director or the Director’s
designees.

D. A person who is convicted of a violation of this section is guilty of a Class 1


D
misdemeanor and shall be sentenced to pay a fine of not less than fifty
dollars and to perform not less than eight hours of community service under


R
the supervision of the Department. The Court shall not suspend any part or
all of the imposition or execution of any sentence required by this subsection.


SECTION 3. Phoenix City Code, Chapter 24, Division II, Section 24-38 is
amended as follows:

Sec. 24-38. Spiritous liquor in parks.

A. For the purposes of this section:

1. Beer means any beverage obtained by the alcoholic fermentation, infusion or
decoction of barley malt, hops, or other ingredients not drinkable, or any
combination of them.

2. Park means any park as defined in Section 24-31



2 Ordinance G-
3. Spiritous liquor means alcohol, brandy, whiskey, rum, tequila, mescal, gin,
wine, porter, ale, beer, any malt liquor or malt beverage, absinthe, a compound or
mixture of any of them or of any of them with any vegetable or other substance,
alcohol bitters, bitters containing alcohol, any liquid mixture or preparation, whether
patented or otherwise, which produces intoxication, fruits preserved in ardent spirits,
and beverages containing more than one-half of one per cent of alcohol by volume.

B. It shall be unlawful for any person to consume or have in his possession any
spirituous liquor in a park except as provided in Subsection C of this section.

C. The Director is empowered to issue permits authorizing the consumption and
possession of beer in a park and to adopt rules and procedures for the issuance of such
permits.

D. A person who has obtained a permit pursuant to Subsection C of this Section
shall display the permit upon request. The permit holder and all persons covered by the
permit shall abide by the stipulations of use set forth in the permit. The permit may be
revoked for failure to comply with the requirements of this Subsection.

T
E. This Section shall not apply to premises for which a license has been issued
pursuant to Title 4, Arizona Revised Statutes.



AF
F. VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS A CLASS 1 MISDEMEANOR.

SECTION 4. Phoenix City Code, Chapter 24, Division II, Section 24-42 is

amended as follows:




D
Sec. 24-42. Restrictions on smoking and fires in parks and mountain preserve areas.

A. No person shall smoke or start a fire in ANY a park or mountain preserve area


R
where one or more signs are posted prohibiting such activity.

B. The Director of the Parks and Recreation Department is authorized to post signs
prohibiting smoking and fires in parks and mountain preserve areas AT ANY TIME OR
when there is a risk of fire becoming uncontrolled due to dry vegetation or climatic
conditions.

C. "SMOKE" OR "SMOKING" MEANS INHALING, EXHALING, BURNING, OR
CARRYING ANY LIGHTED OR HEATED CIGAR, CIGARETTE, PIPE, HOOKAH, OR
ANY OTHER LIGHTED OR HEATED TOBACCO OR PLANT PRODUCT INTENDED
FOR INHALATION, WHETHER NATURAL OR SYNTHETIC, INCLUDING
MARIJUANA/CANNABIS, IN ANY MANNER OR IN ANY FORM. “SMOKING”
INCLUDES THE USE OF AN ELECTRONIC SMOKING DEVICE WHICH CREATES
AN AEROSOL OR VAPOR, IN ANY MANNER OR IN ANY FORM, OR THE USE OF
ANY ORAL SMOKING DEVICE.




3 Ordinance G-
SECTION 5. Phoenix City Code, Chapter 24, Division II, Section 24-48 is

amended as follows:


Sec. 24-48. Water activities: bathing, swimming or wading; boating; ice or water sliding;
fishing.

A. No person may swim, bathe or wade in any body of water in a park or preserve,
except in a swimming pool that is open to the public or rented. NO PERSON MAY
BATHE IN ANY FOUNTAIN, OR AT ANY HYDRANT, DRINKING FOUNTAIN, SINK,
OR WATER AMENITY NOT INTENDED FOR SUCH USE AT ANY PARK OR
PRESERVE.

B. No person may operate any boat, raft or other watercraft, including remote-
controlled watercraft, on any body of water in any park or preserve except in
accordance with rules promulgated by the Director.

T
C. No person may use a block of ice, water, or other object to slide within any park
except in accordance with rules promulgated by the Director.



AF
D. No person may fish in any body of water within a park without a valid state
fishing license or urban fishing license issued by the Arizona Game and Fish
Department. No person may exceed the legal bag limit as determined by the fishing
regulations of the Arizona Game and Fish Department. The taking of any fish for any
purpose from any body of water within a park by any means other than a fishing rod is
prohibited. Fishing is permitted only in bodies of water approved for fishing by the



D
Director and in accordance with rules promulgated by the Director.

E. VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS A CLASS 1 MISDEMEANOR.


R SECTION 6. Phoenix City Code, Chapter 24, Division II, Section 24-54 is

amended as follows:

Sec. 24-54. COMPLIANCE WITH LAW; Order to leave park; unlawful failure to comply.

A. ANY PERSON MAY USE PARKS AND MOUNTAIN PRESERVE AREAS FOR
ANY LAWFUL PURPOSE; PROVIDED HOWEVER, THE USE SHALL BE SUBJECT
TO COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE, RULES
AND REGULATIONS ESTABLISHED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD
AND THE CITY, AND STATE AND FEDERAL LAW.

B. The Director or designee may order any person who has violated any park rule,
regulation or stipulation of usage or any other Federal, State or Local Law to
immediately leave the park in which the violation occurred. No person may remain in a
park or return to such park on the same day after such person has been ordered to
leave the park.


4 Ordinance G-
C. A PERSON WHO VIOLATES THIS SECTION OR CHAPTER IS SUBJECT TO A
TRESPASS NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CODE OR THE RULES AND
REGULATIONS ESTABLISHED BY THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD OR
THE DIRECTOR.

D. THIS CHAPTER IS DECLARED TO BE AN EXERCISE OF THE POLICE
POWER OF THE CITY, AND ITS PROVISIONS SHALL BE LIBERALLY CONSTRUED
FOR THE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT,
PUBLIC PEACE, HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE.

SECTION 2. Phoenix City Code, Chapter 24, Division II, Section 24-55 is

amended as follows:

SEC. 24-55. OBSTRUCTING PARK GUESTS OR AMENITIES

A. IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR A PERSON TO OBSTRUCT OR CAUSE AN

T
OBSTRUCTION, OR IMPEDE OR INTERFERE, WITH OTHER PARK GUESTS’
USE OF A PARK OR USE OF PARK AMENITIES, OR MAINTENANCE OF
PARK AND PARK AMENITIES BY CITY STAFF. THIS INCLUDES ENTRY AND



AF
EXIT POINTS OF A PARK AND THE ADJACENT PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
AREAS OF A PARK.

B. IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR A PERSON TO USE PARK AMENITIES,
INCLUDING PICNIC TABLES, AND PLAYGROUNDS, OUTSIDE OF THEIR
INTENDED OR APPROVED PURPOSE.



D
VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS A CLASS 1 MISDEMEANOR.



R ******




5 Ordinance G-
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of

December 2025.


_______________________________
MAYOR
_______________________________
Date

ATTEST:



____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
T
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


AF
By:______________________________

______________________________


DR
REVIEWED BY:



____________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager

DSC:phs:(LF25-2558);12/17/25:4927-8741-9264




6 Ordinance G-



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Medical Care in City Parks Ordinance (Ordinance G-7467) - Citywide

Request City Council approval of proposed changes to the City Code adding new
Section 23-45 relating to safe medical care in City parks.

Summary
The mission of the Parks and Recreation Department (Parks) is to build healthy
communities through parks, programs and partnerships, and make Phoenix a better
place to live, visit, and play. The City has one of the largest parks systems in the nation
that provides residents and visitors more than 41,000 acres of desert parks and
mountain preserves that have more than 200 miles of trails; 189 parks; and much
more. Parks provide open space and opportunities for recreation and the Department
remains steadfast in its commitment to enhance park safety and continues to use a
variety of methods to address and reduce negative behaviors and security concerns.

Proposed Ordinance
The proposed Ordinance G-7467 (Attachment A) would add a new Sec. 23-45, Safe
Medical Care in Parks. This ordinance prohibits events designed to provide medical
treatment or care to the public, the sale or exchange of syringes and needles, and the
sale or distribution of harm reduction kits in City parks and mountain preserves, as
defined by Chapter 24 of the Phoenix City Code. The new ordinance does not apply to
first responders, family members administering aid to another family member, or a
person rendering aid to another person experiencing an emergency, including an
emergency that requires the administering of Naloxone. The prohibition does not apply
to the distribution of Naloxone in either a non-emergency or emergency situation.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Parks and
Recreation Department.





ATTACHMENT A - Revised

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT THE OFFICIAL COPY OF THE
FINAL, ADOPTED ORDINANCE


ORDINANCE G-7467

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PHOENIX CITY CODE
CHAPTER 24 PARKS AND RECREATION TO ADD NEW
SECTION RELATING TO SAFE MEDICAL TREATMENT.

__________


BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as
follows:
T
SECTION 1. Phoenix City Code, Chapter 24, is amended as follows:



AF
SEC. 24-45 SAFE MEDICAL TREATMENT IN PARKS

A. THIS SECTION APPLIES TO PARKS AS DEFINED IN PHOENIX CITY
CODE CHAPTER 24.

B. THE FOLLOWING ARE PROHIBITED:



D
1. FOR ANY PERSON, GROUP OR ORGANIZATION TO INVITE, PROMOTE,



R
ADVERTISE, SPONSOR, ORGANIZE, OR CONDUCT AN EVENT OR
ACTIVITY DESIGNED TO PROVIDE MEDICAL TREATMENT TO THE
PUBLIC IN A PARK, UNLESS SUCH EVENT OR ACTIVITY IS
SPONSORED BY OR OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE CITY BY
APPROVAL THROUGH ESTABLISHED CITY PROCESSES. FOR THE
PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, MEDICAL TREATMENT IS DEFINED AS
ANY ACT AIMED AT DIAGONSIS, CURE OR TREATMENT OF DISEASE,
INJURY, ILLNESS, OR WOUND, AND DOES NOT INCLUDE PROVIDING
INFORMATION, INFORMATION SHARING, PROVIDING CONNECTION
TO SERVICES, OR TRANSPORTATION TO A MEDICAL FACILITY.

2. FOR ANY PERSON, GROUP OR ORGANIZATION TO INVITE, PROMOTE,
ADVERTISE, SPONSOR, ORGANIZE OR CONDUCT THE SALE OR
EXCHANGE OF SYRINGES AND NEEDLES OR ORGANIZE OR
CONDUCT A NEEDLE EXCHANGE OR A NEEDLE EXCHANGE
PROGRAM.




3. FOR ANY PERSON, GROUP OR ORGANIZATION TO INVITE,
PROMOTE, ADVERTISE, SPONSOR, ORGANIZE OR CONDUCT THE
SALE OR DISTRIBUTION OF HARM REDUCTION KITS, INCLUDING
ANY EVENT ORGANIZED PURSUANT TO A.R.S. § 36-798.51. FOR
PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A “HARM REDUCTION KIT” IS ANY
COLLECTION OF PARAPHERNALIA USED TO SAVE THE LIFE OR
PROTECT THE HEALTH OF A PERSON OR THE COMMUNITY FROM
THE CONSEQUENCES OF DRUG USE. THIS COLLECTION MAY
CONTAIN, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, STERILE SYRINGES, ALCOHOL
CLEANING WIPES, OR TESTING KITS.

C. EXCEPTIONS. THIS SECTION OF THE CODE DOES NOT APPLY TO THE
FOLLOWING:

1. FIRST RESPONDERS, INCLUDING FIREFIGHTER, LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, PARAMEDIC, EMERGENCY MEDICAL
TECHNICIAN, OR OTHER INDIVIDUAL (INCLUDING AN EMPLOYEE OF

T
A LEGALLY ORGANIZED AND RECOGNIZED VOLUNTEER
ORGANIZATION, WHETHER COMPENSATED OR NOT), WHO, IN THE
COURSE OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL DUTIES, RESPONDS TO FIRE,



AF
MEDICAL, HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, OR OTHER SIMILAR
EMERGENCIES.

2. FAMILY MEMBERS ADMINISTERING AID TO ANOTHER FAMILY
MEMBER.

3. A PERSON RENDERING AID TO ANOTHER PERSON EXPERIENCING


DAN EMERGENCY, INCLUDING AN EMERGENCY THAT REQUIRES THE
ADMINSTERING OF NALOXONE.


R
4. THE DISTRIBUTION OF NALOXONE IN NON-EMERGENCY OR
EMERGENCY SITUATIONS.

D. VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS A CLASS 1 MISDEMEANOR.
******




2 Ordinance G-7467
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of

December 2025.


_______________________________
MAYOR
_______________________________
Date

ATTEST:



____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
T
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


AF
By:______________________________

Jennifer Vega
______________________________


DR
REVIEWED BY:



____________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager

DSC:phs:(LF25-2602);12/17/25:4919-8421-0048




3 Ordinance G-7467
ATTACHMENT A




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PHOENIX CITY CODE
CHAPTER 24 PARKS AND RECREATION TO ADD NEW
SECTION RELATING TO SAFE MEDICAL CARE.

__________


BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as
follows:
T
SECTION 1. Phoenix City Code, Chapter 24, is amended as follows:



AF
SEC. 24-45 SAFE MEDICAL CARE IN PARKS

A. THIS SECTION APPLIES TO PARKS AS DEFINED IN PHOENIX CITY CODE
CHAPTER 24.

B. THE FOLLOWING ARE PROHIBITED:



D
1. FOR ANY PERSON, GROUP OR ORGANIZATION TO INVITE, PROMOTE,
ADVERTISE, SPONSOR, ORGANIZE, OR CONDUCT AN EVENT DESIGNED


R
TO PROVIDE MEDICAL TREATMENT OR CARE TO THE PUBLIC, UNLESS
SUCH ACTIVITY IS SPONSORED BY OR OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY THE
CITY.

2. FOR ANY PERSON, GROUP OR ORGANIZATION TO INVITE, PROMOTE,
ADVERTISE, SPONSOR, ORGANIZE OR CONDUCT THE SALE OR
EXCHANGE OF SYRINGES AND NEEDLES OR ORGANIZE OR CONDUCT A
NEEDLE EXCHANGE OR A NEEDLE EXCHANGE PROGRAM.




3. FOR ANY PERSON, GROUP OR ORGANIZATION TO INVITE, PROMOTE,
ADVERTISE, SPONSOR, ORGANIZE OR CONDUCT THE SALE OR
DISTRIBUTION OF HARM REDUCTION KITS, INCLUDING ANY EVENT
ORGANIZED PURSUANT TO A.R.S. § 36-798.51. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS
SECTION, A “HARM REDUCTION KIT” IS ANY COLLECTION OF
PARAPHERNALIA USED TO SAVE THE LIFE OR PROTECT THE HEALTH OF
A PERSON OR THE COMMUNITY FROM THE CONSEQUENCES OF DRUG
USE. THIS COLLECTION MAY CONTAIN, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO, STERILE
SYRINGES, ALCOHOL CLEANING WIPES, OR TESTING KITS.

C. EXCEPTIONS. THIS SECTION OF THE CODE DOES NOT APPLY TO THE
FOLLOWING:

1. FIRST RESPONDERS, INCLUDING FIREFIGHTER, LAW ENFORCEMENT
OFFICER, PARAMEDIC, EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN, OR OTHER
INDIVIDUAL (INCLUDING AN EMPLOYEE OF A LEGALLY ORGANIZED AND
RECOGNIZED VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION, WHETHER COMPENSATED OR
NOT), WHO, IN THE COURSE OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL DUTIES,
RESPONDS TO FIRE, MEDICAL, HAZARDOUS MATERIAL, OR OTHER
SIMILAR EMERGENCIES.
T
2. FAMILY MEMBERS ADMINISTERING AID TO ANOTHER FAMILY MEMBER.



AF
3. A PERSON RENDERING AID TO ANOTHER PERSON EXPERIENCING AN
EMERGENCY THAT REQUIRES THE ADMINSTERING OF NALOXONE.

4. THE DISTRIBUTION OF NALOXONE IN NON-EMERGENCY OR EMERGENCY
SITUATIONS.




D
D. VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION IS A CLASS 1 MISDEMEANOR.




R ******




2 Ordinance G-
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of

December 2025.


_______________________________
MAYOR
_______________________________
Date

ATTEST:



____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
T
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


AF
By:______________________________

______________________________


DR
REVIEWED BY:



____________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager

DSC:phs:(LF25-2602);12/17/25:4919-8421-0048




3 Ordinance G-



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
North Mountain Park Renovation - Construction Manager at Risk Services -
PA75200612 (Ordinance S-52489) - District 3

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Valley Rain Construction Corporation to provide Construction Manager at Risk
Preconstruction and Construction Services for the North Mountain Park Renovation
project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as
necessary within the City Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services
for all phases of the project will not exceed $30 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to renovate the existing North Mountain Park set in the
Phoenix Mountain Preserve. It is a popular park that serves as a trail head for hikers
and walkers while also providing some more traditional park amenities like picnic areas
and a playground.

Valley Rain Construction Corporation will begin in an agency support role for
Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services. Valley Rain Construction
Corporation will assume the risk of delivering the project through a Guaranteed
Maximum Price agreement.

Valley Rain Construction Corporation's Preconstruction Services include, but are not
limited to: detailed cost estimating, project planning and scheduling, construction
phasing, alternate systems evaluations, constructability studies, long lead
procurement, protect the City's sensitivity to safety and environmental factors, advise
on green building materials, and participating with the City in a process to establish a
Small Business enterprises (SBE) goal for the project.

Valley Rain Construction Corporation's initial Construction Services will include
preparation of a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal provided under the agreement.
Valley Rain Construction Corporation will be responsible for construction means and
methods related to the project and fulfilling the SBE program requirements. Valley Rain
Construction Corporation will be required to solicit bids from pre-qualified
subcontractors and to perform the work using the City’s subcontractor selection



process. Valley Rain Construction Corporation may also compete to self-perform
limited amounts of work.

Valley Rain Construction Corporation’s additional Construction Services include, but
are not limited to: new restrooms, ramadas, roadways, parking lots, removal of excess
pavement areas, restoration of Sonoran Desert landscape, construction of new trails,
and an interactive nature-based playground. Infrastructure upgrades are also needed
to update the electrical service, establish sewer connection, and upgrade water
distribution throughout.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. In accordance with A.R.S section 34-
603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received or the
scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Six firms submitted proposals and are
listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Valley Rain Construction Corporation

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Willmeng Construction, Inc.
Rank 3: Hunter Contracting Co.
Rank 4: Haydon Companies, LLC
Rank 5: Core Construction, Inc.
Rank 6: Rafael Construction, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Valley Rain Construction Corporation will not exceed $30
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend


past the agreement termination.

Location
10608 N. 7th Street
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher, Deputy City Manager David
Mathews, the Parks and Recreation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aerial Displays - Fireworks & Drones Contract - PKS-RFQu-26-0118 Request for
Award (Ordinance S-52494) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Northern Lights Drone Shows and Southwest Fireworks, LLC to provide Aerial Display
Services for the Parks and Recreation Department. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts
will not exceed $1.5 million.

Summary
This contract will provide professional-quality aerial entertainment of fireworks and/or
lighted drone show displays for various Parks and Recreation Department events.
Under the contracts, pyrotechnic entertainment and/or drone shows and related
activities will be provided for department-sponsored events, as requested. Aerial
displays are presented as entertainment for City residents and visitors attending the
events.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).

Two offerors submitted qualifications and were deemed to be responsive and
responsible. An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the
following minimum qualifications:
· Qualifications and Experience
· Certifications and Licenses

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following offerors:
· Northern Lights Drone Shows
· Southwest Fireworks, LLC

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about December 3, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.



Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts value will not exceed $1.5 million.

Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Theatre Historical Restoration Contract - RFQ 25-0664 Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52485) - Districts 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Belfor USA Group, EverGreene Architectural Arts, Holdsworth Construction Inc, John
Canning & Co., and Kowalski Construction, Inc. to provide historic property repair
services for a five-year period on an as-needed basis, for the Phoenix Convention
Center Department (PCCD). Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed
$150,000.

Summary
The contracts will provide site evaluations, base estimates, labor, equipment, and
materials, in order to responsibly maintain and restore historic elements such as
painting and interior wall repair as well as all other historic elements at the PCCD and
Venues.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).

Five offerors submitted qualifications and were deemed to be responsive and
responsible. An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the
following minimum qualifications:
· Five years in business
· Provide pictures of previous restoration projects

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following offeror(s):
· Belfor USA Group
· EverGreene Architectural Arts
· Holdsworth Construction Inc
· John Canning & Co.
· Kowalski Construction, Inc.




Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about January 1, 2026, for a 5-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts value will not exceed $150,000.

Funding is available in the Phoenix Convention Center Department's operating and
Capital Improvement Program budgets.

Location
Orpheum Theatre, 203 W. Adams Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003
Symphony Hall, 75 N. 2nd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004
Phoenix Convention Center, 100 North Third Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Amber Williamson and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Lower-Level Displays Contract - IFB-PCC-26-0084 Request for Award (Ordinance
S-52486) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Sound Mind AV LLC to provide labor and equipment to furnish and install five LED
marquees for the Phoenix Convention Center. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will
not exceed $300,000.

Summary
This contract will provide replacement of the existing lower-level video walls and
advertisement monitors that no longer support the level of communication, safety
visibility, and guest service required for the Phoenix Convention Center (PCC). The
current system is built from individual monitors with thick bezels that create black grid
lines across the display, making event information, directional guidance, and safety
notices difficult for patrons to read. The inconsistent brightness and frequent washout
in normal lighting conditions further limit the PCC's ability to communicate clearly
during high attendance events, creating a direct impact on public way finding and
emergency messaging.

Over the past decade, the aging monitors have required repeated panel replacements
and have not maintained dependable performance, causing interruptions during events
and increasing maintenance workload for staff. These issues affect clients who rely on
the video walls to deliver schedules, sponsorship messages, and program content,
and they reduce the visibility and effectiveness of advertising that generates revenue
for the department.

The new LED displays will provide seamless, bezel-free viewing surfaces with uniform
brightness and professional-grade reliability designed for continuous operation. This
upgrade is necessary to ensure that patrons receive clear, uninterrupted event
information, that safety messages remain highly visible in all lighting conditions, and
that clients can depend on the system for professional presentation quality. The
improved reliability will also reduce operational disruptions.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services



Department.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Twelve vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Bidder A: Sound Mind AV LLC

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about January 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $300,000.

Funding is available in the Phoenix Convention Center Department's operating budget.

Location
Phoenix Convention Center, 100 N. 3rd Street
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Amber Williamson and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Adoption of 2024 International Fire Code with Phoenix Amendments (Ordinance
G-7464) - Citywide
Request to adopt the 2024 International Fire Code (IFC) with Phoenix amendments.

Summary
The IFC is a national standard, and the 2024 IFC is currently being adopted by
jurisdictions in Maricopa County and the State of Arizona, including the State Fire
Marshals' Office. Phoenix has utilized the IFC since 2006. The IFC is developed
through a public consensus process and is consistent with Phoenix Council Resolution
19015, approved in December 1997, that supports the development of consensus-
based construction codes and standards. The continued use of the IFC allows Phoenix
customers to utilize a code that reflects the current evolution of building materials,
technologies, industry practice, and reduces the cost of construction and compliance.

Since the fire and building codes are complementary, the Phoenix Fire and Planning
and Development departments work in coordination to ensure requirements and
terminology are consistent, predictable, and user-friendly for customers. It is also
essential that codes be technically relevant and updated to the latest industry
standards and approaches. In July 2025, the Phoenix Construction Code, based on
the 2024 International Building Code (IBC) with Phoenix Amendments, was adopted.

The approach taken by Phoenix Fire staff in the Fire Code adoption process has been
to involve the fire protection and development sectors, as well as community
representatives, through industry meetings and listening sessions, along with
engagement from the Fire Safety Advisory Board's (FSAB) open public meetings. The
FSAB is a City Council-appointed board representing the interests of many
stakeholder groups, including, but not limited to: architecture; building owners and
managers; fire protection engineers and contractors; event industry; solar contractors;
hazardous materials industries; health care; property insurance communities; real
estate; and the public. The goal of the process is to adopt the IFC base code while
making clarifying amendments tailored to Phoenix that support, assist, and protect the
Phoenix community.

Highlights of the 2024 IFC and Phoenix amendments include:




New National Base Code Operational Permits
· New operational permit requirements for temporary heating and cooking in special
event tents and in wildfire risk areas.
· New operational permit requirements for temporary heating at construction sites.
· New operational permit requirements for stationary and mobile Energy Storage
Systems (ESS).
· New operational permit requirements for the accumulation of greater than 15 cubic
feet of lithium-ion batteries.

Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) (Chapter 12)
· Bringing new first responder-focused signage at BESS sites to identify and bring
situational awareness to the firefighters and other response personnel of the BESS
system onsite.
· Clarification and enhancement of the requirements for the detection of toxic and
flammable gases to help designers and planners understand gas detection
requirements for their BESS system, to help detect and mitigate explosive
conditions.
· Bring forth national fire code language that further clarifies that BESS operated by
utility providers are to comply with the requirements found in the Phoenix Fire Code
and are not exempt.
· Enhanced requirements for automatic fire sprinkler design criteria, now taking into
account the energy capacity of the BESS.
· Add additional new battery chemistry types to the Phoenix Fire Code in relation to
maximum allowed quantities, regulations, and enforcement, which are not in the
current Phoenix Fire Code.
· Enhances signage requirements at electrical disconnect boxes for firefighter
awareness at single-family homes with BESS onsite outside or in the vehicle
garages.

Professional Engineer Stamp (Chapter 1)
· Adjusts the Professional Engineer (PE) Stamp requirement to align with State Law
and engineering practices.

Emergency Access (Chapter 5)
· Increase the distance from a fire lane to a building. Slight adjustment from the 2018
current code, taken from stakeholder and first responder engagement and
feedback.



· Clarifies the testing intervals and parameters for emergency radio responder
coverage systems (ERRCS) used to support firefighter radio communications in
buildings.

Refrigeration and Gas Detection System (Chapter 6)
· Adoption of a new national code language to support the transition from toxic
refrigerants like ammonia to less toxic options.
· Consolidation of gas detection requirements found throughout the current fire code
to a singular section to enhance customer experience and increase compliance.

Motor Fuel Dispensing Locations (Chapter 23)
· Adding language to allow cellular phones in place of fixed land lines at unattended
fueling locations to contact 911 in the event of an emergency after industry and
stakeholders' feedback.

National Standard Referenced (Chapter 80)
· Updating numerous national standards references to their current editions to
enhance and promote new technologies and risk reduction processes, also to align
with the latest industry standards.

The IFC and Phoenix amendments are included as Attachment A.

The Fire Code adoption process is consistent with the 2024 International Building
Code (IBC) adoption process approved by the City Council on June 18, 2025. The Fire
Safety Advisory Board acts as the reviewing body for the IFC, just as the Development
Advisory Board (DAB) acts as the reviewing body of the IBC. The Fire Safety Advisory
Board gave their unanimous approval of the adoption of the 2024 IFC with the
proposed Phoenix Amendments on October 2, 2025.

The effective date of the new Fire Code, if adopted by Council, is February 17, 2026.
After the effective date of this ordinance, any person who has already substantially
completed the design work on a project may request that the Fire Code Official allow
completion of the design using the preceding Phoenix Fire Code (G-7242). If allowed,
by the Fire Code Office's opinion and discretion, such a person will have until August
31, 2026, to complete the design and submit a complete permit application to the City
for review.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was presented to the Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning (TIP)



Subcommittee on November 19, 2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.





2024 Phoenix Fire Code
Proposed Adoption Packet
Attachment A




Phoenix Fire Department - Fire Prevention Section - 150 S 12th St. - Phoenix, AZ 85034 353
2024 Phoenix
Phoenix Fire
Fire Code
Code
Proposed Adoption
Proposed Adoption Packet
Packet




Section 1
Section 1
Summary of
Summary of Changes
Changes




Phoenix Fire
Phoenix Fire Department
Department -- Fire
Fire Prevention
Prevention Section
Section -- 150
150 S
S 12
12th
th
St. -- Phoenix,
St. Phoenix, AZ
AZ 85034
85034 354
2024 International Fire Code with Phoenix Amendments Proposed Adoption


The Phoenix Fire Department’s Fire Prevention Section conducts more than 30,000
inspections and engagements annually. The success of these efforts depends on
maintaining a modern, technology-relevant Phoenix Fire Code that safeguards lives,
property, and first responders in a rapidly evolving and changing environment.
The Phoenix Fire Code is codified as Chapter 15 of the Phoenix City Code. Beginning
in the early 2000s, Phoenix began adopting the International Fire Code (IFC),
developed by the International Code Council (ICC), as its foundational model fire code.
Although the ICC releases updated codes on a three-year cycle, the City of Phoenix
has historically adopted new base codes on a six-year cycle to reduce the financial and
operational impacts of implementation.
The current Phoenix Fire Code is based on the 2018 International Fire Code. While
continuous incremental updates have been adopted, the past seven years have brought
significant advances in technology, development trends, and community risk reduction
practices. Adopting the 2024 International Fire Code with Phoenix amendments will
strengthen our ability to protect the community and first responders while supporting
continued development and industry growth.
The 2024 IFC includes updates that reflect current technology, evolving building
practices, modern materials, and enhanced fire and life safety strategies. These
changes are the result of an open and consensus-driven process involving fire service
professionals, building officials, engineers, architects, legal input, and industry
stakeholders from across the country. By adopting the updated IFC, Phoenix maintains
alignment with nationally recognized standards that support safety, innovation, and
economic development. Importantly, the IFC serves as a companion code to other
critical model codes, such as the International Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, and
Electrical Codes, used by the City’s Planning and Development Department.
Maintaining consistency across these interrelated codes ensures clarity for applicants,
improves coordination between departments, and enhances enforcement effectiveness.
This document provides a per chapter summary of the proposed Phoenix Fire Code
amendments, along with detailing the proposed change, its rationale, and anticipated
impact on the city and our community.
If approved, these amendments would be incorporated into the 2024 International Fire
Code and adopted as the Fire Prevention Code, Chapter 15 of the City Code
(commonly referred to as the Phoenix Fire Code).




2024 Phoenix
2024 Phoenix Fire
Fire Code
Code
Proposed Adoption
Proposed Adoption Packet
Packet




Section 2
Section 2
Amendment Details
Amendment Details




Phoenix Fire
Phoenix Fire Department
Department -- Fire
Fire Prevention
Prevention Section
Section -- 150
150 S
S 12
12th
th
St. -- Phoenix,
St. Phoenix, AZ
AZ 85034
85034 356
Chapter 1 Scope and Administration
1. 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the 2024 International Fire Code with Phoenix
Amendments, hereinafter referred to as “the Phoenix Fire Code”.
Reason: Provides proper title.
2. 101.2 Scope. The provisions of this code shall supplement all laws relating to fire safety and
shall apply to all persons without restriction, unless specifically exempted. This code
establishes regulations affecting or relating to structures, facilities, processes, premises and
safeguards regarding all of the following:
1. The hazard of fire and explosion arising from the storage, handling or use of structures,
materials or devices.
2. Conditions hazardous to life, property or public welfare in the occupancy of structures or
premises.
3. Fire hazards in the structure or on the premises from occupancy or operation.
4. Matters related to the construction, extension, repair, alteration or removal of fire
suppression or alarm systems.
5. Conditions affecting the safety of fire fighters and emergency responders during
emergency operations.
Reason: Increases scope of the fire code.
3. 101.2.1 Appendices. Provisions in the appendices shall not apply unless specifically adopted.
Appendices A, B, D, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, and N are adopted and are considered to be part of
this code.
Reason: Adopts applicable appendices. New to 2024 the addition of adopted appendix
include E - This appendix provides information, explanations and examples to illustrate and
clarify the hazard categories contained in Chapter 50 of the International Fire Code., F - is
intended to be a companion to the specific requirements of Chapters 51 through 67, which
regulate the storage, handling and use of all hazardous materials classified as either
physical or health hazards., G - gives the fire code official and registered design
professional a ready reference tool for the conversion of the liquid weight and volume of
cryogenic fluid to their corresponding volume of gas and vice versa and is a companion to
the provisions of Chapter 55 of this code., H - is intended to assist businesses in
establishing a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP) and Hazardous Materials
Inventory Statement (HMIS) based on the classification and quantities of materials that
would be found on-site in storage or use., I - is intended to provide the fire code official
with a list of conditions that are readily identifiable by the inspector during the course of an
inspection utilizing this code., L - provides for the design, installation and maintenance of
permanently installed fire fighter breathing air systems in buildings designated by the
jurisdiction. Breathing air is critical for fire-fighting operations., M - the intent to provide an
option for adoption by jurisdictions that choose to require existing high-rise buildings to be
retrofitted with automatic sprinklers.
4. 101.2.2 Explanatory materials. A diamond (◆) in the margin indicates that a City of Phoenix
explanatory material document has been created to clarify the application of this code, in
accordance with Section 104.1.
Reason: Consistent with amendments in prior codes. Provides users with a marker that
identifies where an explanatory policy exists.

5. 102.3 Change of use or occupancy. A change of occupancy shall not be made unless the use
or occupancy is made to comply with the requirements of this code, the Phoenix Building Code
or the International Existing Building Code.
Exception: Where approved by the fire code official, a change of occupancy shall be permitted
without complying with the requirements of this code, the Phoenix Building Code and the
International Existing Building Code, provided the new occupancy or proposed use is less
hazardous, based on life and fire risk, than the existing occupancy in accordance with the
Tarver Ordinance and Table 903.1.5.
Reason: Occupancy classifications are determined by the Phoenix Building Code and must
be in accordance with the Tarver Ordinance.
6. ◆ 102.7.3 Fire protection system conflicts. Where there is a conflict between a general
requirement and a specific requirement for all fire protection systems, the most restrictive
requirement shall be applicable.
Reason: Provides specific direction for resolving conflicts within this code regarding fire
protection systems. Grammar issue was resolved.
7. 104.2.1.1 Exempt buildings. A federal, state, county agency or municipal corporation may
declare itself exempt from the requirements of this code.
Reason: Authorizes the Fire Prevention Division to require payment for services.
8. 104.2.1.2 Annexation. A building or facility under construction on the effective date of
annexation shall be required to secure City building permits and pay fees. From the effective
date of annexation, all construction shall conform to the pertinent City construction codes and
ordinances.
When approved by the fire code official a building may be allowed to complete the project
under the previous authority having jurisdiction and obtain green tags/approvals from that
jurisdiction.
Circumstances that would prohibit obtaining City building or fire permits require an appeal.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [105.2.4]
Reason: Allows for business continuity of installation to approved plans by other
Authorities Having Jurisdiction.
9. 104.2.1.3 State fire code. Pursuant to the provisions of Arizona Revised Statute Section 41-
2163(A)(2), the City of Phoenix assumes jurisdiction for prescribing and enforcing minimum
fire prevention standards within the City of Phoenix, except for state- or county-owned
buildings.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Prescribes enforcement authority between State Fire Marshal and City of Phoenix
jurisdiction for State or County owned building within City limits.
10. 104.2.5 Special inspection. The fire code official is authorized to require special inspections.
The owner, engineer or architect of record acting as the owner’s agent shall employ one or
more special inspectors who shall provide inspections. The special inspector shall be a qualified
person who shall demonstrate competence, to the satisfaction of the fire code official, for
inspection of the system installation or modification requiring special inspections.

Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [106.10]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [106.6.2]
Reason: Authorizes the Fire Prevention Division to require special inspections as needed
to address issues that require outside expertise.
11. 104.2.5.1 Duties and responsibilities of the special inspector. The special inspector shall
observe the work assigned for conformity to the approved design drawings and specifications.
The special inspector shall furnish inspection reports to the fire code official, the engineer or
architect of record, and other designated persons. All discrepancies shall be brought to the
immediate attention of the contractor for correction, then, if uncorrected, to the proper design
authority and to the fire code official.
The special inspector shall submit a final signed report stating whether the work requiring
special inspection is, to the best of the inspector’s knowledge, in conformance to the approved
plans and specifications.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [106.10]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [106.6.2]
Reason: Identifies the duties of the special inspector.
12. 104.6 Notices and orders. The fire code official is authorized to issue such notices or orders
as are required to affect compliance with this code in accordance with Section 113. Notices
or orders that are given verbally shall be confirmed by service in writing. Signs, tags or seals
posted or affixed by the fire code official shall not be mutilated, destroyed or tampered with
or removed without authorization from the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [105.2.4]
Reason: Ensures verbal orders are documented.
13. 104.10.2 Forensic analysis. The fire code official may require a forensic analysis of the cause
of failure by an independent laboratory approved by the fire code official.
Reason: Allows for more extensive investigation after an incident.
14. 104.12 False and misleading reports.
No person shall willfully submit to the Fire Department and any of its members, any false,
fraudulent, misleading, or unfounded reports or statements to misrepresent any fact for
the purpose of interfering with the fire department or with the intention of misleading any
fire department personnel.
Reason: Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). Language brought in from
1997 UFC.
Adds specific additional provisions to this codes authority.
15. 105.1 General. Permits shall be in accordance with Sections 105.1.1 through 105.6.26.13
Reason: Includes City of Phoenix permit section.
16. 105.1.1 Permits required. A property owner or owner’s authorized agent who intends to
conduct an operation or business, or install, modify or remove fire protection systems and
equipment that are regulated by this code, or to cause any such work to be performed, shall
first make application to the fire code official and obtain the required permit.
Reason: Further clarifies when a permit is required.
17. 105.1.2 Types of permits. There shall be two types of permits as follows:
1. Operational permit. An operational permit allows the applicant to conduct an operation or
a business for which a permit is required by Section 105.6 for either:
1.1. A prescribed period.
1.2. Until renewed or revoked.
2. Construction permit. A construction permit allows the applicant to install or modify systems
and equipment for which a permit is required by Sections 105.6 through 105.6.26.13
2.1. Fire protection system permits shall only be issued to current business certificate holders.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Regulation R1001.3.2 April 1, 2002 – Add NICET qualifications.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4160 March 12, 1999 – (1997 UFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-3941 June 26, 1996
Fee for Fire Protection Equipment Companies $70.00 Revised 7/1/89
Adopted by Ordinance G-2922 October 17, 1986 (1986 Fire Prevention Code).
Adopted by Ordinance G-2221 September 1, 1981 -- (1981 Fire Prevention Code).
Reason: Non-qualified persons were attempting to install and/or maintain life safety
systems. The Business Certificate system ensures minimum standards are met by
qualifying contractors who install/maintain life safety systems, fire lines, extinguishing
systems or other fire-extinguishing or detection systems, devices or appliances. Business
certificate holder requirements have been in the code since 1975.
18. 105.1.4 Emergency repairs. Where equipment replacement and repairs must be performed in
an emergency situation, the permit application shall be submitted within 72 hours of
identifying the emergency, to the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Allows for emergency repairs and business continuity while providing the
requirements for permitting.
19. 105.1.5.1 Restoration procedures following a fire, explosion or hazardous materials release. A
permit is required to repair damage to a building, premise, storage facility or outdoor area
following a fire, explosion or hazardous materials release. All work is subject to inspector
approval. Additional permits and approved plans may be required.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added to cover what was being considered, by some, to be maintenance.
20. 105.3 Conditions of a permit. A permit shall constitute permission to maintain, store or handle
materials; or to conduct processes that produce conditions hazardous to life or property; or
to install equipment utilized in connection with such activities; or to install or modify any fire
protection system or equipment or any other construction, equipment installation or
modification in accordance with the provisions of this code where a permit is required by
Section 105.5, 105.6, or 105.7. All work done on new and existing systems shall meet the
requirements of the current adopted codes and standards. Such permission shall not be


construed as authority to violate, cancel or set aside any of the provisions of this code or other
applicable regulations or laws of the jurisdiction.
Reason: Adds section number to include Phoenix permits and explicitly states new work
requires current code compliance.
21. 105.3.1 Expiration. An operational permit shall remain in effect until reissued, renewed or
revoked, or for such a period of time as specified in the permit. Construction permits shall
automatically become invalid unless the work authorized by such permit is commenced
within 180 days after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or
abandoned for a period of 180 days after the time the work is commenced. Before such
work recommences, a new permit shall be first obtained and the fee to recommence work,
if any, shall be one-half the amount required for a new permit for such work, provided that
changes have not been made and will not be made in the original construction documents
for such work, and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not
exceeded one year. Permits are not transferable and any change in occupancy, operation,
use or hazard, tenancy or ownership shall require that a new permit be issued.
Reason: Adds additional triggers to ensure current permits are obtained.
22. 105.3.3 Occupancy prohibited before approval. The building or structure shall not be occupied
prior to the fire code official issuing a permit and conducting associated inspections indicating
the applicable provisions of this code have been met.
Exception: It shall be lawful to occupy portions of buildings or structures under a Temporary
Certificate of Occupancy issued by the City of Phoenix, subject to the conditions stated therein.
Reason: Allows for occupancy of the building where requirements of the Temporary
Certificate of Occupancy have been met and validated through PDD and PFD inspections.
23. 105.3.3.1 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. In accordance with Section 111 of the
International Building Code, the fire code official, in conjunction with the building official, is
authorized to approve the conditions necessary to occupy the premises or portion thereof
before the entire work or operations on the premises is completed. When issued, such portion
or portions shall be occupied safely prior to full completion or installation of equipment and
operations without endangering life or public welfare.
Reason: Change of section reference to the correct section of the IBC
24. 105.4 Revocation. The fire code official is authorized to revoke a permit issued under the
provisions of this code where it is found by inspection or otherwise that there has been a false
statement or misrepresentation as to the material facts in the application or construction
documents on which the permit or approval was based including, but not limited to, any one
of the following:
1. The permit is used for a location or establishment other than that for which it was issued.
2. The permit is used for a condition or activity other than that listed in the permit.
3. Conditions and limitations set forth in the permit have been violated.
4. There have been any false statements or misrepresentations as to the material fact in the
application for permit or plans submitted or a condition of the permit.
5. The permit is used by a different person or firm than the name for which it was issued.
6. The permittee failed, refused or neglected to comply with orders or notices duly served in
accordance with the provisions of this code within the time provided therein.
7. The permit was issued in error or in violation of an ordinance, regulation or this code.
8. The permit holder’s does not possess a current business certificate.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Business Certificates are required to remain current and responsible parties’ in
compliance.
25. 105.4.1 Work without a permit. Operating or starting work without the applicable fire
prevention permit is strictly prohibited. A penalty equal to 300 percent of the cost of the
required Fire Department construction permit and inspection fees shall be assessed for the
work.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Added to be consistent with the Planning & Development Dept. penalties for
work without a permit.
26. 105.5 Required operational permits. The fire code official is authorized to issue operational
permits for the operations set forth in Sections 105.5.2 through 105.5.58.16.
If a permit is denied, the applicant has the right to file for an appeal to the Fire Marshal in
accordance with Section 104.7.4.
Reason: Extends section to include additional permits required by Phoenix.
27. 105.5.5.5 Carnivals and fairs. An operational permit is required to conduct a carnival or fair.
See Section 105.5.40, Outdoor assembly event.
Reason: Points applicant to the specific/correct permit section for outdoor assembly
event.
28. 105.6.4 Cryogenic fluids. A construction permit is required for installation of or alteration to
indoor/outdoor stationary cryogenic fluid storage systems where the system capacity
exceeds the amounts listed in Table 105.5.11. Maintenance performed in accordance with
this code is not considered to be an alteration and does not require a construction permit
Reason: New to 2024, added requirement for permits of indoor cryogenic fluids systems.
29. 105.5.5.15 Exhibits and trade shows. An operational permit is required to operate exhibits
and trade shows as regulated by Appendix N.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024, with the adoption of appendix N, this permit section was updated
to reference the requirements of appendix N.
30. 105.5.18 Flammable and combustible liquids. An operational permit is required:
1. To use or operate a pipeline for the transportation within facilities of flammable or
combustible liquids. This requirement shall not apply to the off-site transportation in pipelines
regulated by the Department of Transportation (DOTn) nor does it apply to piping systems.
2. To store, handle or use Class I liquids in excess of 5 gallons (19 L) in a building or in excess
of 10 gallons (37.9 L) outside of a building, except that a permit is not required for the
following:
2.1. The storage or use of Class I liquids in the fuel tank of a motor vehicle, aircraft,
motorboat, mobile power plant or mobile heating plant, unless such storage, in the opinion of
the fire code official, would cause an unsafe condition.


2.2. The storage or use of paints, oils, varnishes or similar flammable mixtures where such
liquids are stored for maintenance, painting or similar purposes for a period of not more than
30 days.
3. To store, handle or use Class II or Class IIIA liquids in excess of 25 gallons (95 L) in a
building or in excess of 60 gallons (227 L) outside a building, except for fuel oil used in
connection with oil-burning equipment.
4. To store, handle or use Class IIIB liquids in tanks or portable tanks for fueling motor
vehicles at motor fuel-dispensing facilities or where connected to fuel-burning equipment.
Exception: Fuel oil and used motor oil used for space heating or water heating.
5. To remove Class I or II liquids from an underground storage tank used for fueling motor
vehicles by any means other than the approved, stationary on-site pumps normally used for
dispensing purposes.
6. To operate tank vehicles, equipment, tanks, plants, terminals, wells, fuel-dispensing
stations, refineries, distilleries and similar facilities where flammable and combustible liquids
are produced, processed, transported, stored, dispensed or used.
7. To place temporarily out of service (for more than 90 days) an underground, protected
above-ground or above-ground flammable or combustible liquid tank.
8. To change the type of contents stored in a flammable or combustible liquid tank to a
material that poses a greater hazard than that for which the tank was designed and
constructed.
9. To manufacture, process, blend or refine flammable or combustible liquids.
10. To engage in the dispensing of liquid fuels into the fuel tanks of motor vehicles at
commercial, industrial, governmental or manufacturing establishments in accordance with
Section 5706.5.4 or to engage in on-demand mobile fueling operations in accordance with
Section 5707.
11. To utilize a site for the dispensing of liquid fuels from tank vehicles into the fuel tanks of
motor vehicles, marine craft and other special equipment at commercial, industrial,
governmental or manufacturing establishments in accordance with Section 5706.5.4 or, where
required by the fire code official, to utilize a site for on-demand mobile fueling operations in
accordance with Section 5707.
12. To conduct pump-out of flammable and/or combustible liquid tanks.
13. To slurry fill an underground tank.
14. To abandon an underground or aboveground tank.
Reason: This codifies the requirement for permit and inspection for the pumping out of
contents.
31. 105.5.19 Floor finishing. An operational permit is required for floor finishing or surfacing
operations exceeding 350 square feet (33 m2) using Class I or Class II liquids.
Buildings under construction or renovation with a valid construction permit do not require a
permit to conduct this activity.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Codifies that a permit is not required for finishing being conducted under a
construction or renovation permit.
32. 105.5.22 Hazardous materials. An operational permit is required to store, transport on site,
dispense, use or handle hazardous materials in excess of the amounts listed in Table 105.5.22.

Reason: Add reference to table
33. Table 105.5.22
FOOT NOTES:
a. 22 gallons where Table 5003.1.1(1) Note k applies and hazard identification signs in
accordance with Section 5003.5 are provided for quantities of 22 gallons or less, where
such materials are necessary for maintenance purposes, operation, or sanitation of
equipment.
b. 220 pounds where Table 5003.1.1(1) Note k applies and hazard identification signs
in accordance with Section 5003.5 are provided for quantities of 220 pounds or less
where such materials are necessary for maintenance purposes, operation, or sanitation of
equipment
Reason: When chemicals are necessary for normal operations associated with specialized
equipment quantities associated with that operation do not require additional permitting.
34. 105.5.25 Hot work operations. An operational permit is required for hot work including, but
not limited to:
1. Public exhibitions and demonstrations where hot work is conducted.
2. Use of portable hot work equipment inside a structure.
Exception: Work that is conducted under a construction permit, or work conducted at one-
and two-family dwellings.
3. Fixed-site hot work equipment, such as welding booths.
4. Hot work conducted within a wildfire risk area.
5. Application of roof coverings with the use of an open-flame device.
6. Where approved, the fire code official shall issue a permit to carry out a hot work program.
This program allows approved personnel to regulate their facility’s hot work operations. The
approved personnel shall be trained in the fire safety aspects denoted in this chapter and shall
be responsible for issuing permits requiring compliance with the requirements found in
Chapter 35. These permits shall be issued only to their employees or hot work operations
under their supervision.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Residential operations are not covered under the fire code.
35. 105.5.28 Liquid-fueled, gas-fueled or electric vehicles or equipment in buildings. An
operational permit is required to display, operate or demonstrate liquid-fueled, gas-fueled or
electric vehicles or equipment in buildings.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added to address new technology not addressed by the base code.
36. 105.5.30 LP-gas. An operational permit is required for:
1. Storage and use of LP-gas.
Exceptions:
1. A permit is not required for individual containers with a 500-gallon (1893 L) water
capacity or less or multiple container systems having an aggregate quantity not exceeding
500 gallons (1893 L).
2. Containers serving occupancies in Group R-3.

3. Vapor service less than 2,000 gallons (7570 L) water capacity.
4. Operation of cargo tankers that transport LP-gas.
5. Flare off.
Reason: This codifies the requirement for permit and inspection for the pumping out of
contents.
37. 105.5.36 Open burning or bonfire. An operational permit is required for the kindling or
maintaining of an open fire or a fire on any public street, alley, road, or other public or private
ground. Instructions and stipulations of the permit shall be adhered to.
Exception: Recreational fires.
Reason: Modified to include bonfire requirement for operational permit.
38. 105.5.38 Open flames and candles or flame performers. An operational permit is required to
use open flames or candles in connection with fire performers, assembly areas, dining areas
of restaurants or drinking establishments.
Reason: Permit added to address life safety issues that were not being considered.
39. 105.5.40 Outdoor assembly event. An operational permit is required to conduct an outdoor
assembly event where planned attendance exceeds 1000 persons or confining 50 or more
persons by temporary installation of fencing or barrier.
Reason: Alter the text to align with the code’s definition of an outdoor assembly. Change
from “confined area” to “by temporary installation of fencing.”
40. 105.5.50 Storage of used, scrap tires and tire byproducts. An operational permit is required
to establish, conduct or maintain storage of used or scrap tires and tire byproducts that
exceed 2,500 cubic feet (71 m3) of total volume of scrap tires, and for indoor storage of
tires and tire byproducts.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added clarity to section
41. 105.5.53 Waste handling and recycling operations. An operational permit is required for the
operation of wrecking yards, junk yards, waste material-handling facilities and recycling
operations. An additional assessment fee shall be charged in accordance with Chapter 28.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [105.6.26]
Reason: Loss history at recycling operations where combustible loading is equivalent to
waste handling facilities.
42. 105.5.58 City of Phoenix permits. The fire code official is authorized to issue operational
permits for work as set forth in Sections 105.6.51.1 through 105.6.51.19.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: These facilities operate in other occupancies.
43. 105.5.58.1 Agro-industrial and solid biomass facilities. An operational permit is required to
store agro-industrial products, chips, hogged material, lumber or plywood in excess of 2,500
cubic feet (71m3). An additional assessment fee shall be charged in accordance with Chapter
28.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.


44. 105.5.58.2 Ammunition. An operating permit is required for manufacturing or reloading any
amount of small arms ammunition for resale, or to manufacture or reload any amount of
military, specialty or custom ammunition.
Exception: Storage in Group R-3 occupancies of smokeless propellant, black powder and small
arms primers for personal use, not for resale and in accordance with Section 5606.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: These facilities operate in other occupancies.
45. 105.5.58.3 Assisted living facilities. An operational permit is required to operate an assisted
living facility. This includes assisted living homes R-3 (1–5 beds), R-4 (6–10 beds), assisted
living centers (11 or more beds), supervisory care and adult foster care.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
46. 105.5.58.4 Behavioral healthcare facility. An operational permit is required to operate a
behavioral healthcare facility.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
47. 105.5.58.5 Carbon dioxide liquid systems. An operational permit is required to operate a
carbon dioxide liquid system.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: These facilities operate in other occupancies.
48. 105.5.58.6 Commercial daycare facilities. An operational permit is required to operate a
commercial daycare facility for children or adults.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
49. 105.5.58.7 Correctional facilities. An operational permit is required to operate a correctional
facility.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
50. 105.5.58.8 Developmentally disabled group care homes. An operational permit is required
to operate a developmentally disabled group home.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
51. 105.5.58.9 Educational facility. An operational permit is required for public and private schools
K through 12.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restored. Rest of section renumbered accordingly.
52. 105.5.58.10 Emergency Responder Communication Enhancement Systems. An operational
permit is required to operate Emergency Responder Communication Enhancement Systems.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Adding the operational permit for the ERCES system to section 105 is consistent
with the structure of the code, rather than section 510.3.2 in the base IFC.
53. 105.5.58.11 Firefighter Breathing Air Replenishment System. An operational permit is
required to operate Firefighter Breathing Air Replenishment System.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).


Reason: The Firefighter breathing air replenishment systems should be added to bring
forward requirements identified in L103.3.
54. 105.5.58.12 Fireworks, indoor retail sales. An operational permit is required to conduct retail
sales of fireworks indoors.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restored. Rest of section renumbered accordingly.
55. 105.5.58.13 Fireworks, outdoor retail sales. An operational permit is required to conduct retail
sales of fireworks outdoors.
Reason: Restored. Rest of section renumbered accordingly.
56. 105.5.58.14 Fireworks, wholesale sales. An operational permit is required for wholesale sale
of consumer fireworks.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
57. 105.5.58.15 Hospital and nursing homes. An operational permit is required to operate a
hospital or nursing home.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
58. 105.5.58.16 Indoor temporary place of assembly. An operational permit is required conduct a
public assembly when the means of egress are altered.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
59. 105.5.58.17 Junk yard, salvage and wrecking operations. An operating permit is required for
the operation of wrecking yards, salvage, and junk yards.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
60. 105.5.58.18 Juvenile group homes. An operational permit is required to operate a juvenile
group home.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Groups Phoenix only permits in one section as to not alter base code numbering.
61. 105.5.58.19 Medical facilities. An operational permit is required to operate a State of Arizona
Department of Health Services (DHS) Licensed patient treatment medical facility.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Add Arizona State DHS to define medical facilities requiring permits. Original
intent of this permit was to inspect facilities that requested fire inspections due to their
state licensed requirements from Arizona DHS. It was not intended to require all medical
facilities to obtain an operational permit.
62. 105.5.58.20 Semiconductor facilities. An operational permit is required to operate a
semiconductor facility that is not part of an HPM facility.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: HPM facilities can be semiconductor facilities, however not all semiconductor
facilities are HPM facilities.
63. 105.6.51.21 Temporary indoor building use (TIBU). An operational permit is required
conduct a public assembly event in a building not designed for assembly.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Permit is issued where necessary for use of building not designated as A
occupancy.
64. 105.6 Required construction permits. The fire code official is authorized to issue construction
permits for work as set forth in Sections 105.6.1 through 105.6.26.13
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Clarifies section reference for user.
65. 105.6.9 Flammable and combustible liquids. A construction permit is required:
1. To install, repair or modify a pipeline for the transportation of flammable or combustible
liquids.
2. To install, construct or alter tank vehicles, equipment, tanks, plants, terminals, wells, fuel-
dispensing stations, refineries, distilleries and similar facilities where flammable and combustible
liquids are produced, processed, transported, stored, dispensed or used.
3. To install, alter, remove, abandon or otherwise dispose of a flammable or combustible
liquid tank.
Exceptions:
1. To temporarily or permanently install a storage tank or above-ground storage tank
or pressure vessel for Class I, II or III-A liquids of fewer than 125 gallons (473 L)
outside a building, or 60 gallons (227 L) inside a building.
2. To temporarily or permanently install a storage tank or above-ground storage tank
or pressure vessel of fewer than 1,000 gallons (3785 L) for Class III-B liquids.
3. To slurry fill an underground tank.
4. To neutralize the hazard and abandon an underground or above-ground tank.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC). #6
Reason: Added to accommodate bio-fuel.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). #4 & #5
Reason: Added to cover fuel dispensing operations where non-listed and inappropriate
tanks were installed.
Reason: Temporary tanks added due to loss history.
Phoenix does not issue construction permits for temporary tanks.
66. 105.6.13 Hazardous materials. A construction permit is required to install, repair damage to,
abandon, remove, place temporarily out of service, or close or substantially modify a storage
facility, hazardous materials storage tank, gas cabinet, exhausted enclosure, gas room or
chemical drainage and containment area or other area regulated by Chapter 50 where the
hazardous materials in use or storage exceed the amounts listed in Table 105.5.22.
Exceptions:
1. Routine maintenance.
2. For repair work performed on an emergency basis, application for permit shall be
made within two working days of commencement of work.
Prior to the installation or modification of piping, systems, or tanks containing hazardous
materials or the installation or modification of hazardous materials storage rooms, gas
cabinets, exhausted enclosures, gas rooms or chemical drainage and containment areas, plans
shall be submitted to the fire code official for approval. A Registered Design Professional shall
seal and sign the construction documents.

Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures plan review by a qualified inspector before installation.
67. 105.6.16 LP-gas. A construction permit is required for installation, alteration or modification
of an LP-gas system including:
1. LP-gas containers with an aggregate water capacity of 125 gallons (473 L) or more used
exclusively for vapor service.
2. Racks storing 20-pound cylinders for the purpose of conducting an LP-gas exchange
program at a specific site.
3. LP-gas containers used for liquid transfer service.
4. Individual containers less than 125-gallon (473 L) water capacity serving occupancies in
Group R-3, exclusively for vapor service.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), item #4 added at industry
request.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added due to loss history and increased installation of exchange cabinets.
68. 105.6.20 Smoke control or smoke exhaust systems. Construction permits are required for
installation of or alteration to smoke control, smoke removal, smoke and heat vents or smoke
exhaust systems. Maintenance performed in accordance with this code is not considered to
be an alteration and does not require a permit.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Added to allow for evaluation, permitting and inspection. This hybrid system not
adequately covered by the Mechanical code.
69. 105.6.26 City of Phoenix required permits. The fire code official is authorized to issue
construction permits for work as set forth in Sections 105.6.26.1 through 105.6.26.13.
Reason: Specifies the City of Phoenix only permits
70. 105.6.26.1 Access, site. A construction permit is required to install or modify premises
identification review, fire lanes, identification of fire protection equipment, key boxes, stairwell
identification, photoluminescent installation and pedestrian gates.
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for access to a construction site for the fire department
vehicle.
71. 105.6.26.1.1 Address directories. A construction permit is required to install or modify address
directories.
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for address identification requirements in multi-family
complexes.
72. 105.6.26.1.2 Alternate surface access roads. A construction permit is required to install or
modify alternative surface fire apparatus access roads.
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for use of an alternative surface when constructing an
access road.
73. 105.6.26.2 Access and special egress control devices. A construction plan review and permit
are required for strike card access and magnetic lock devices.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).


Reason: Phoenix specific permit for connecting egress control devices to the fire alarm
system.
74. 105.6.26.3 Blasting operations. A construction permit is required to conduct blasting
operations using explosives
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for blasting operations conducted within city limits.
75. 105.6.26.4 Carbon dioxide compressed gas systems, liquefied. A construction permit is
required to install or modify a liquefied carbon dioxide compressed gas system (beverage
dispensing, etc.).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for beverage dispensing systems liquid.
76. 105.6.26.5 Carbon dioxide compressed gas systems, high pressure. A construction permit
is required to install or modify a high-pressure carbon dioxide compressed gas system
(beverage dispensing, etc.).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for compressed gas systems.
77. 105.6.26.6 Combustible dust or fiber collection system. A construction permit is required to
install, modify or alter a dust or fiber collection system for combustible dust- or fiber-
producing operations.
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for combustible dust safety systems.
78. 105.6.26.7 Fire apparatus access roads. A construction permit is required to install or
modify fire apparatus access roads.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for fire department access road construction
79. 105.6.26.8 Firefighter breathing air system. A construction permit is required for
installation or modification of a firefighter breathing air system.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for breathing air systems installed in high-rise buildings.
80. ◆ 105.6.26.9 Fire protection system removal permits. A removal permit allows the applicant
to remove systems or equipment. The fire department shall be notified when any system is
to be removed. Removal permits shall only be issued to current qualified contractors.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides tracking of installation locations. Explanatory policy
81. 105.6.26.10 Fire lines. A construction permit is required for the installation or modification
of fire lines that serve fire protection systems, fire hydrants, or any combination thereof.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Remove the word “hydrants.” Hydrant construction permits are covered in code
in section105.7.19. This section was intended to be specific to fire lines only.
82. 105.6.26.10.1 Stub-outs and water supply. Stub-outs, which are installed and tested as
part of the underground fire line, are included in the fire protection system lead-in charge.
Where permitted separately from the building’s underground fire line, a separate over-the-
counter permit is required for each stub-out. Stub-outs shall not extend more than 10 feet
(3048 mm) from outside the building to 6 inches (152 mm) above the finished floor and
shall not contain more than one 90-degree bend.
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for fire sprinkler system riser connections to onsite fire
lines, often installed by separate contractor from the installing contractor for the fire
sprinkler system.

83. 105.6.26.13 Water tank. A construction permit is required to install, alter or modify a static
water tank.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for water tanks installed in Phoenix to support fire
sprinkler system water supply.
84. ◆ 105.7 Business certificate to conduct business. The fire code official shall issue a
business certificate to conduct business to qualified contractors that install, modify, alter,
add to, test, repair, provide required inspections or service any life safety system including
fire alarm system, sprinkler system, standpipe system, fire main, fire pump or any other
fire-extinguishing or gas or detection system, device or appliance. Fire protection system
construction permits shall only be issued to current business certificate holders.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix specific permit for qualified parties installing life safety systems within
city limits. Tied to an explanatory policy which provides further guidance to applicants.
Explanatory policy.
85. 105.7.1 Qualified contractors. The following conditions shall be met to become a business-
certificate-qualified-contractor:
1. A current Arizona Registrar of Contractors license.
2. State of Arizona privilege tax license.
3. The qualified contractor shall be employed by the company to which the permit is issued.
Employment verification may be required.
4. The qualified contractor applicant knows and understands the requirements of applicable
standards and the code requirements appropriate for the business certificate being
issued. This knowledge and understanding shall be determined by one of the following
methods:
4.1. The fire code official may accept a National Institute of Certifying Engineering
Technicians (NICET) Level 3 or 4 certification in lieu of an examination by a
recognized testing agency in the following fire protection equipment categories:
automatic sprinkler systems; underground fire mains and hydrants; fire alarm
systems; and special extinguishing systems, all fire extinguishing systems (i.e.,
kitchen hoods).
4.2. The contractor applicant shall submit and maintain proof to the fire code official
that his or her NICET certification is current in the proper fire protection equipment
field for which they are applying.
The maintenance of the NICET certification shall be a condition of the business-
certificate-qualified contractor. Failure to maintain the required certification shall void
business-certificate-qualified contractor status.
4.3. The fire code official may accept a valid Arizona Board-certified professional
engineer. Required certificates must be maintained for the permit to be valid for
qualified contractor status.
4.4. The fire code official may accept a successful completion of an exam by a
recognized testing agency.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.

86. 105.7.2 Responsibilities. The business-certificate-qualified contractor shall be responsible for:
1. Ensuring that all installations, modifications, maintenance and testing performed by the
company comply with the applicable codes and standards.
2. Ensuring that the plans submitted for a permit meet minimum requirements of the codes
and standards that apply.
3. Ensuring that the installation is done correctly and completely.
4. Ensuring that permits are inspected and green tagged by the Phoenix Fire Department.
5. Notifying Fire Prevention when an employee designated as a competent party is no longer
employed by the company.
6. Ensuring that all work is done or supervised by the appropriate competent party.
7. Notifying Fire Prevention in writing of any address change within 10 calendar days after
such change. Failure of the individual to give such notification of a change of address is
grounds for revocation of business certificate.
8. Upon request, producing and showing proper identification and the business certificate
to anyone for whom that individual seeks to render services or to the fire code official.
Facility self-inspection. Testing, repairing, or servicing of fire protection equipment, devices
or appliances may be conducted by facility employees or employees of the qualified
contractor, both of whom are required to have valid qualifications.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.
87. 105.7.3 Business certificate renewal. Business certificates shall be renewed every 3 years from
the date of issuance. When a certificate has expired, all work shall stop until updated
qualifications have been submitted to Fire Prevention and a new certificate issued. Renewal
shall take place prior to expiration.
Where a business certificate has expired, applications for renewal shall be filed in the same
manner as a new application for a qualified contractor.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.
88. 105.7.4 Suspending a qualified contractor business certificate. The following conditions may
result in the suspension of a qualified contractor permit or certificate:
1. A single instance of performing work or an activity without a permit within a two-year
period.
2. Three or more documented instances in a two-year period of two or more significant code
violations at one construction project, or the completion or covering of work without
inspections.
3. Failure to submit inspection deficiency reports.
This list of conditions is not all-inclusive.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.
89. 105.7.5 Revocation of a business certificate. The fire code official may revoke business-
certificate-qualified contractor status for due cause including:

1. Three or more instances of performing work or an activity without a permit within a two-
year period.
2. The performance of any fraudulent installation including but not limited to installation of
sprinklers without connection to a piping system or installation of fire alarm devices
without being connected to a fire alarm control panel.
3. Suspended or revoked Arizona Registrar of Contractors license.
4. Failure to submit inspection reports.
This list of conditions is not all-inclusive.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.
90. 105.7.5.1.1 Suspension or revocation procedures. No suspension or revocation of a permit
or certificate is lawful unless, prior to the action, the fire department provides the
individual or business with notice and an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with this
section. If the fire department finds that the public health, safety or welfare requires
emergency action and incorporates a finding to that effect in its order, summary
suspension of a permit or certificate may be ordered pending proceedings for revocation or
other action. These proceedings shall be promptly instituted and determined.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.
91. 105.7.5.1.2 Serving notice for hearing. All parties shall be afforded an opportunity for a
hearing after reasonable notice. Unless otherwise provided by law, the notice shall be
given at least 15 business days prior to the date set for the hearing.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.
92. 105.7.5.1.2.1 Evidence and arguments. Opportunity shall be afforded all parties to respond
and present evidence and argument on all issues involved.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.
93. 105.7.5.1.2.2 Informal depositions. Unless precluded by law, informal depositions may be
made of any contested case by stipulation, agreed settlement, or default.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.
94. 105.7.5.1.2.3 Notification. Suspension or revocation shall be effective when the certificate
holder is notified by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure a minimum professional standard be met that is not covered by
AROC. Has been in code since 1975.
95. 105.8 Competent party. A competent party shall possess a valid certificate issued by an
approved governmental agency, or other approved organization for the type of system and
work performed, and remain on site during installation, modifications, maintenance and
testing performed on fire protection systems.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).

Reason: Competent party added to ensure minimum professional standards for designers
and installers not covered by AROC. Per NFPA 13 & 72 requiring qualifications acceptable
to the AHJ.
96. 105.8.1 Qualifications. The following conditions shall be met to become a competent party:
1. The competent party shall be employed by, or under contract with, a company that is
a qualified contractor. Verification may be required.
2. The competent party shall be knowledgeable with and comply with the applicable
standards and the code requirements for the permit(s) issued.
This knowledge and understanding shall be determined by one of the following
methods:
2.1. Successfully passing an examination provided by a recognized testing agency in
the category for which the competent party is performing the work.
2.2. Fire code official acceptance of a current Arizona Registered Engineer or National
Institute of Certifying Engineering Technicians (NICET) Level 2 or 1 certification
or higher in lieu of the required examination in the following fire protection
equipment categories: water-based system layouts, fire alarm systems, and
special extinguishing systems.
2.2.1. The applicant shall submit and maintain proof to the fire code official
that his or her NICET certification is current, in the proper fire protection
equipment category and at the appropriate level within that category.
2.2.2. When the fire code official accepts NICET certification in lieu of the
required written exam, the maintenance of the NICET certification shall
remain current for the certificate to remain valid.
2.3. Factory training and certification in accordance with NFPA 72 for fire alarm
installation.
2.4 Current trade certification for sprinkler installation and design.
2.5 Other qualifications for design and installation acceptable to the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Competent party added to ensure minimum professional standards for designers
and installers not covered by AROC. Per NFPA 13 & 72 requiring qualifications acceptable
to the AHJ.
97. 105.8.2 Maintenance. Failure to maintain the required certification shall void the
competent party certificate. Competent party certificate holders may not use their
certifications when expired. It is the responsibility of the individual to maintain their
certifications.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Competent party added to ensure minimum professional standards for designers
and installers not covered by AROC. Per NFPA 13 & 72 requiring qualifications acceptable
to the AHJ.
98. 105.9 Certificates of fitness. A certificate of fitness is required by persons to apply for and
obtain a permit for pyrotechnics and blasting operations.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Language brought in from 1997 UFC amendments, has been in code for appx 40
years. Fingerprints removed as it is redundant process already completed by a
superseding agency (ATFE).

99. 105.9.1 Qualifications. An applicant for any of the various certificates of fitness shall submit
evidence attesting to his or her qualifications and experience as follows:
Pyrotechnic Outdoor Fireworks. Pyrotechnic operators shall be a minimum of 21 years of age.
The applicant shall require 2 years of active training with a licensed outdoor fireworks
pyrotechnic operator, and the applicant shall have participated in the setting up, loading, and
firing of outdoor fireworks in not fewer than eight electric or manual outdoor fireworks
displays.
Pyrotechnic Indoor Effects. Pyrotechnic operators shall be a minimum of 21 years of age and
shall require 2 years of active work with a licensed indoor pyrotechnic operator. The applicant
shall have participated in the setting up and loading of pyrotechnics in not fewer than eight
electric indoor displays.
Blasters. Blasters shall be a minimum of 21 years of age and shall require a minimum of 2
years of experience in the conduct of blasting operations. Experience shall include the
understanding of blasting designs, drilling of holes, loading of holes, decking, stemming,
and wiring methods. Military experience in blasting does not qualify as blasting experience
under the fire code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Language brought in from 1997 UFC amendments, has been in code for appx 40
years. Fingerprints removed as it is redundant process already completed by a
superseding agency (ATFE).
100. 105.9.2 Examinations. Every individual applying for a certificate of fitness to conduct
pyrotechnic displays or to use explosive materials shall successfully pass a prescheduled
written examination and oral interval approved by the fire code official. The minimum
passing score is 80 percent. An applicant who does not pass the examination may
reschedule to take the entire examination not fewer than 30 days from the date of the
previous examination. An applicant who does not pass the examination on the second
attempt shall not be allowed to retake the examination for a minimum of 30 days.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Language brought in from 1997 UFC amendments, has been in code for appx 40
years. Fingerprints removed as it is redundant process already completed by a
superseding agency (ATFE).
101. 105.9.3 Letters of recommendation. Applications shall be accompanied by a minimum of three
letters of recommendation. The letters shall be written and signed by past or present
pyrotechnic or blasting company owners or their authorized representatives. Each letter of
recommendation shall document the following information:
1. The name and title of the person recommending the applicant.
2. The recommending person’s employer name, address and telephone number.
3. The applicant’s employment dates if applicable.
4. The applicant’s job responsibilities associated with the use of explosive materials.
5. The applicant’s qualifications, experience, integrity, knowledge and training in the use
and handling of explosive materials. The fire code official may contact all references
submitted with the application to confirm qualifications and experience, as well as
compliance with state laws and regulations, and competency of the applicant to perform
in a safe manner.

Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Language brought in from 1997 UFC amendments, has been in code for appx 40
years. Fingerprints removed as it is redundant process already completed by a
superseding agency (ATFE).
102. 105.9.4 Background verification. Each applicant who applies to conduct pyrotechnic
displays or use explosive materials shall have a cleared background verification conducted
by the fire department or other enforcement agency and shall provide and maintain a valid
ATF license.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Language brought in from 1997 UFC amendments, has been in code for appx 40
years. Fingerprints removed as it is redundant process already completed by a
superseding agency (ATFE).
103. 105.9.6 Expiration. Certificates of fitness shall expire 3 years from the date of issuance.
When a certificate has expired, revoked or suspended all work authorized by that
certificate shall stop until the certificate is reinstated or a new certificate is obtained.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix specific requirement for expiration timeframes for those working with
fireworks and pyrotechnics.
104. 105.9.7 Suspension or revocation The following conditions may result in the suspension
of a certificate of fitness:

1. Two instances of performing work or an activity without a permit within a two-year
period.

2. Three or more documented instances in a two-year period of two or more significant
code violations at one construction project, or the completion or covering of work without
inspections.

3. Failure to maintain the required ATF license.
This list of conditions is not all-inclusive.
Reason: Phoenix specific requirement for suspension or revocation for pyrotechnic or
blasting certificate of fitness based on the criteria listed within the section in an effort to
enhance public safety.
105. 106.2.1 Information on construction documents. Construction documents shall be drawn to
scale on suitable material. Electronic media documents are allowed to be submitted where
approved by the fire code official. Construction documents shall be of sufficient clarity to
indicate the location, nature and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that it will
conform to the provisions of this code and relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations
as determined by the fire code official.
Two sets of accurate and legible construction documents shall be submitted to the fire
code official for approval, in the following scale:

Site Plans 1 inch = 50 feet
Fire Protection Systems ⅛ inch = 1 foot

Other scales may be used with prior approval from the fire code official. Electronic
submittals require a bar graph scale on each page.
Where the scope of work is by definition, engineering practice, the plans shall be sealed by
a licensed Arizona Engineer professional.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Establishes minimum scale for shop drawings for consistent review and record
keeping. New to 2024, includes the requirement for plan submittals that meet the
definition of engineering practice to be sealed by a licensed Arizona Engineer professional.
This was added to ensure scopes of work that deal with the life, health and safety of the
public are reviewed by a licensed professional.
106. ◆ 106.2.2.1 Life Safety Report. A Life Safety Report, providing a description of the fire
protection in the building, shall be prepared by a Registered Design Professional prior to
submitting construction drawings for: high-rise buildings; covered mall buildings; buildings
containing atriums, storage height over 40 feet (12 192 mm) or Group F and S occupancies over
500,000 square feet (464 512 m2); and other structures as determined by the fire code or
building official. This description shall include the basic concepts used for suppression, alarm,
notification, egress, fire resistive assemblies, smoke control, and other related systems, as well
as the coordination of those systems. Additional fire protection and/or life safety systems
including hose connections may be required by the fire code official. Upon completion of the
project, a copy of the approved documentation shall be maintained for the life of the building,
and shall include any changes and modifications related to the contents of the report, at the site
and with the Fire Department.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 11, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason:  Policy is created to ensure complete and consistent reports which are required
to ensure the coordination of interactive life safety systems at these types of high risk
facilities.
107. 108.3 Permit valuations. The applicant for a permit shall provide an estimated value of the
work for which the permit is being issued at the time of application. Such estimated valuations
shall include the total value of work, including materials and labor, for which the permit is
being issued, such as electrical, gas, mechanical, plumbing equipment and permanent
systems. Where, in the opinion of the fire code official, the valuation is underestimated, the
permit shall be denied unless the applicant can show detailed estimates acceptable to the fire
code official. The fire code official shall have the authority to adjust the final valuation for
permit fees.
Reason: Permit valuations are not used by Phoenix Fire Department, see fee schedule.
108. 108.2 Schedule of fees.
A fee for fire prevention activities shall be paid as required, in accordance with the
schedule as established by the applicable governing authority.

Reason: Specifies fire prevention activities fee requirements are guided by the published
schedule.
109. 108.5.1 Permit related fees. The fire code official is authorized to assess fees for expedited
plan review, expedited operational and new construction inspections, operational and new
construction reinspections and standby personnel.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5193 August 1, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package)
Reason: Added at customer request. (expedited operational permits)
Adopted by Ordinance G-4834 November 1, 2006 (2003 amendment package). [4603.2]
Reason: Codifies re-inspection fees.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5898 April 18, 2014 – (2012 IFC amendment).
Reason: Added as billing mechanism for additional staff at special events. (standby)
110. 108.7 Fire-fighting operations. If it is discovered that a fire is the result of a code violation,
fees may be assessed to cover fire-fighting operations.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Means of cost recovery for Operations that are outside normal loss expectancy
due to negligence.
111. 108.8 Fire-fighting on county islands. Fees may be assessed to cover fire-fighting
operations that occur on county islands.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Per City Council and operations to cover mutual aid calls
112. 108.9 Assessment fees. The fire code official is authorized to assess fees annually for: agro-
industrial or solid biomass facilities and pallet yards when material quantities meet those listed
in the Fire Prevention Fee Schedule Agro-Industrial, Solid Biomass, and Pallet Fee Assessment
Table.
The fire code official is authorized to assess fees annually for: hazardous materials or
substances when quantities reach reportable quantities in accordance with the Fire Prevention
Fee Schedule Hazardous Materials Assessment Classification Table.
Exceptions: The following hazardous materials, occupancies or uses are exempt from the
annual assessment fee. Exemption from the assessment fee does not waive any of the
applicable requirements contained or adopted in this code:
1. Tanks used as part of a hazardous waste treatment system are exempt from this
requirement.
2. Radioactive materials regulated in accordance with A.R.S. Title 30, Chapter 4.
3. Fire-extinguishing systems.
4. Any material used or stored for noncommercial purposes at single-family residences.
5. Any material contained in a transportation vehicle when the vehicle is not being used
for permanent storage.
6. Small quantity and large quantity hazardous waste generators that follow all
applicable regulations in C.F.R Part 262 and Arizona Administrative Code R-18-8-262.
7. Underground storage tanks containing flammable or combustible liquids.
8. Underground storage containers containing flammable or combustible liquids.
9. Underground storage containers containing liquefied petroleum gases.
10. LP-gas cylinder exchange cabinets.
Reason: This “assessment fees” section contained two separate types of assessment fees.
One for outdoor combustibles facilities (agro, biomass, and pallet yards) and the other for
hazardous materials. Unfortunately, as the code was printed, it combined them into one
paragraph and resulted in confusion for our customers as to the specific types of activities
and their fees. This clerical change separates them into their two categories.


The code also referenced the old fee schedule that was part of the fire code as Chapter 81
prior to 2021. In 2021 Council action removed this fee schedule from the fire code and
created a stand alone fee schedule document with the same assessment fees included.
The third change is in reference to facilities with more than 250,000 sq ft; which was a
duplicate statement to section 106.10. Its removal clarifies and reduces possible customer
confusion on requirements.
113. 108.10 Area assessment fees. Facilities more than 250,000 square feet (23 225 m2), shall
be assessed an additional fee calculated on the total area of the developed site. The
assessment fee shall be calculated in intervals of 250,000 square feet (23 225 m2) in
accordance with the fee schedule. For those facilities being assessed hazardous material
fees, area fees will be based on the fee group in accordance with the Fire Prevention Fee
Schedule Area Assessment Fee Table.
Reason: Add “developed” text to the calculation utilized for fees. It was intended to only
charge a fee based on the area the facility uses, not undeveloped land on said property.
Secondly, the old reference to chapter 81 (8106.3) fees is removed to reflect the current
fire prevention fee schedule table location.
114. 109.2 Inspections. The fire code official is authorized to conduct such inspections as are
deemed necessary to determine the extent of compliance with the provisions of this code and
to approve reports of inspection by approved agencies or individuals. Reports of such
inspections shall be prepared and submitted in writing for review and approval. Inspection
reports shall be certified by a responsible officer of such approved agency or by the responsible
individual. The fire code official is authorized to engage such expert opinion as deemed
necessary to report on unusual, detailed or complex technical issues subject to the approval
of the governing body.
The fire code official is authorized to conduct a general inspection fee-for-service
program for inspections that are voluntary or not required by the fire code. A fire
inspection report will be issued noting compliance with the fire code or noting any issues
to be addressed. Reinspections will continue until all compliance issues are resolved.
Reinspection fees shall apply.
Reason: Allows fee for service in the form of non-required inspections.
115. 109.5 Annual Facilities Program. The fire code official may authorize fire department
participation in the Annual Facilities Program.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [106.11]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [106.7]
Reason: Authorizes the Fire Prevention Division to utilize the AFP program.
116. ◆ 110.3 Recordkeeping. A record of periodic inspections, tests, servicing and other
operations and maintenance shall be maintained on the premises or other approved
location for not less than 3 years, or a different period of time where specified in this code
or referenced standards. Records shall be made available for inspection by the fire code
official, and a copy of the records shall be provided to the fire code official on request. The
fire code official is authorized to prescribe the form and format of such recordkeeping. A
copy of the inspection report shall be submitted through the online reporting system within
30 days of the inspection completion regardless of the compliant or non-compliant
inspection results. Additionally, correction reports shall be submitted through the online
reporting system within 30 days of correction completion. The fire code official is
authorized to require that certain required records be filed with the fire code official.

Reason: New to 2024, clarifies the reporting requirement and method of uploading ITM
reports through The Compliance Engine. See Explanatory Policy.
117. 112.5 Appeal to the Fire Marshal. An appeal shall be submitted to the Fire Marshal in
writing.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 July 19, 2019
Reason: The Phoenix Fire Code does not regulate or have authority over the procedures
of filling timelines of the Arizona Superior court.
118. 113.3 Notice of violation. Where the fire code official finds a building, premises, vehicle,
storage facility or outdoor area that is in violation of this code, the fire code official is
authorized to prepare a written notice of violation describing the conditions deemed in
violation. Nothing herein shall require the issuance of a notice of violation prior to
commencement of emergency abatement, the issuance of a citation or civil or criminal
violation proceedings.
Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and the City of Phoenix
Prosecutors, this section has been modified to more accurately reflect procedures and
actions set forth by the Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court procedures and rules.
119. 113.3.1 Service of notice of violation. A notice of violation issued pursuant to this code
shall be served on the owner, the owner’s authorized agent, operator, occupant or other
person responsible for the condition or violation, either by personal service, mail, e-mail or
by delivering the same to, and leaving it with, some person of responsibility on the
premises. For unattended or abandoned locations, a copy of such notice of violation may
be posted on the premises in a conspicuous place at or near the entrance to such premises
further served in accordance with this section.
Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and the City of Phoenix
Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more clarity and more accurately
reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court
procedures and rules.
120. 113.3.5 Service of civil citation. A civil citation issued pursuant to this code shall be served
on the owner, the owner’s authorized agent, operator, occupant or other person
responsible for the condition or violation, either by personal service, mail, or by delivering
the same to, and leaving it with, some person of responsibility on the premises. For
unattended or abandoned locations, a copy of civil citation shall be posted on the premises
in a conspicuous place at or near the entrance to such premises and the civil citation shall
be mailed by certified mail or registered mail, with return receipt requested. Service of civil
citations may also be accomplished as provided under rule 2.3 of the Local Rules of
Practice and Procedure for the City of Phoenix Municipal Court.
Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and the City of Phoenix
Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more clarity and more accurately
reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court
procedures and rules.
121. 113.3.2 Compliance with orders and notices. A building, premises or thing shall not be
used when in violation of this code as noted on a tag order or notice in accordance with
Section 104.5. A notice of violation issued or served as provided by this code shall be
complied with by the owner, the owner’s authorized agent, operator, occupant or other
person responsible for the condition or violation to which the notice of violation pertains.
In case of extreme danger to persons or property, immediate compliance is required.
Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and the City of Phoenix
Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more clarity and more accurately
reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court
procedures and rules.
122. 113.3.5 Cumulative proceedings and remedies. If violations are not promptly remedied,
the fire code official is authorized to request the legal counsel of the jurisdiction to institute
the appropriate legal proceedings at law or in equity to restrain, correct or abate such
violation or to require removal or termination of the unlawful occupancy of the structure in
violation of the provisions of this code or of the order or direction made pursuant hereto.
The proceedings and remedies are cumulative and the City may proceed to seek one or
more such remedies.
Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and the City of Phoenix
Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more clarity and more accurately
reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court
procedures and rules.
123. 113.3.6 Civil violations. Any person, firm or corporation who causes, permits, facilitates,
aids or abets any violation of this code, or who fails to perform any act or duty required by
this code, is subject to a civil sanction of not less than $500 nor more than $2,500. Each
day that a violation continues may be deemed a separate violation.
Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and the City of Phoenix
Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more clarity and more accurately
reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court
procedures and rules.
124. 113.3.7 Criminal violations. Any person, firm or corporation who causes, permits,
facilitates, aids or abets any violation of this code, or who fails to perform any act or duty
required by this code, shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Each day that a violation
continues may be deemed a separate violation.
Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and the City of Phoenix
Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more clarity and more accurately
reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court
procedures and rules.
125. 113.4.2 Abatement orders. The Municipal Court of the City of Phoenix shall have
jurisdiction to issue orders to the property owner of record, as recorded in the Maricopa
County Recorder’s Office, to abate unsafe conditions or any other violation of this Code, or
to issue orders permitting the City of Phoenix to abate unsafe conditions as defined in this
Code. Abatement orders may be issued by the Municipal Court pursuant to a request from
the fire code official, or may be initiated by the Court in addition to any civil sanction or
criminal penalty assessed for violations of this Code.
Reason: In conjunction with the Fire Department’s Legal Council and the City of Phoenix
Prosecutors, this section has been modified to provide more clarity and more accurately
reflect procedures and actions set forth by the Fire Code, Municipal Codes, and Court
procedures and rules.
126. 114.4 Failure to comply. Any person who shall continue any work after having been served
with a stop work order, except such work as that person is directed to perform to remove
a violation or unsafe condition, shall be liable to a civil sanction of not less than $500 nor
more than $2,500 or a Class 1 criminal misdemeanor.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: COP clarification, adding specific amounts added to IFC base code in 2003, but
not adopted until 2013 code.


127. 115.1 General. If during the inspection of a premises, a building or structure, or any
building system, in whole or in part, constitutes a clear and imminent threat to human life,
safety or health, the fire code official shall issue such notice or orders to remove or remedy
the conditions as shall be deemed necessary in accordance with this section, and shall
refer the building to the building department for any repairs, alterations, remodeling,
removing or demolition required.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Provides clarity.
128. 115.1.1 Unsafe conditions. Structures, yards, or any building system, in whole or in part or
existing equipment that are or hereafter become unsafe or deficient because of inadequate
means of egress, that constitute a fire hazard, are otherwise dangerous to human life or
the public welfare, or involve illegal or improper occupancy or inadequate maintenance,
shall be deemed an unsafe condition. A vacant structure that is not secured against
unauthorized entry as required by Section 311 shall be deemed unsafe.
Reason: Added to clarify jurisdiction over mulch and recycling yards.
129. 115.2 Evacuation. The fire code official or the fire department official in charge of an
incident or inspection shall be authorized to order the immediate evacuation of any
occupied building, site or facility deemed unsafe where such building has hazardous
conditions that present imminent danger to building occupants. Persons so notified shall
immediately leave the structure or premises and shall not enter or re-enter until authorized
to do so by the fire code official or the fire department official in charge of the incident.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), add or inspection and site or
facility.
Reason: Language added when Fire Prevention was challenged on having authority for an
individual occupancy inside a building
130. 115.6 Restoration or abatement. The structure or equipment determined to be unsafe by the
fire code official is permitted to be restored to a safe condition. The owner, the owner’s
authorized agent, operator or occupant of a structure, premises or equipment deemed unsafe
by the fire code official shall abate or cause to be abated or corrected such unsafe conditions
either by repair, rehabilitation, demolition or other approved corrective action. To the extent
that repairs, alterations or additions are made or a change of occupancy occurs during the
restoration of the structure, such repairs, alterations, additions or change of occupancy shall
comply with the requirements of Section 105.1.5 and the International Existing Building Code.
If the person, firm or corporation responsible for an unauthorized discharge is undetermined
or unable to be contacted, then the property owner shall institute and complete all actions
necessary to remedy the effects of such unauthorized discharge, whether sudden or gradual,
at no cost to the jurisdiction.
Where deemed necessary by the fire code official and in the absence of the owner or
responsible party, emergency measures may be taken to provide for security of property
and its contents. The cost of such actions shall be borne by the property owner or other
responsible party. Upon notification, the owner or responsible party may be required to
provide for ongoing security of the property if deemed necessary by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Pool abatement and coverage of imminent hazards prior to owner intervention.
131. 115.8 Emergency abatement. Where deemed necessary by the fire code official,
emergency abatement measures shall be taken to provide for the public safety, security
and rapid mitigation of hazards to property and contents. Where any resources, including
services, special equipment and materials, are required to abate the hazard(s), and the
resources are not available on site, where required by the fire code official the owner or
responsible party shall have, under written agreement with a resource provider, access to
and use of resources sufficient to ensure rapid response and timely abatement. Resources
may include, but are not limited to, material-handling equipment, water trucks, earth
movers, qualified operators and any other equipment or personnel necessary to complete
the abatement. The agreement(s) described herein are required and all current
agreement(s) must be kept on site and provided to the fire code official immediately upon
request. A copy of the service agreement(s) shall be submitted and kept on file with the
operational fire permit application. The cost of procuring resources shall be borne by the
property owner or responsible party.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5898 April 18, 2014 – (2012 IFC amendment).
Reason: Mulch fire abatement requirements and addresses owner readiness at City
Council request.
132. 115.9 Material-handling equipment. Material-handling equipment shall be available for
moving mulch, dirt (soil or earth), wood chips, hogged material, wood fines, pallets or raw
product during firefighting operations. All material-handling equipment located on site and
required for either emergency abatement or abatement deemed necessary by a fire code
official shall be kept in operable condition or replaced through the relevant agreement(s)
described herein until repaired.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5898 April 18, 2014 – (2012 IFC amendment).
Reason: Mulch fire abatement requirements and addresses owner readiness at City
Council request.
133. 115.10 Security of property or premises. Upon notification, the owner or responsible party
may be required to provide ongoing security of the property if deemed necessary by the
fire code official.
Reason: Specifies the owner or RP is responsible for providing security of a property
where deemed necessary by the fire code official.
134. SECTION 116
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
116.1 General. A valid certificate of insurance shall be filed with the fire code official when
applying for a permit to conduct blasting, and pyrotechnics.
Reason: Restored
135. SECTION 117
FIRE WATCH
117.1 Where required. Fire watch shall be provided as follows:
1. Where required by other sections of this code.
2. Where the fire code official deems a condition essential for public safety.
3. Where the fire officer determines that conditions may result in a rekindle.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [113.4]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added to become an enforceable code item as required when fire life safety
systems are unavailable. Provides guidelines for minimum qualifications and expectations.
#9 added to coordinate with base code changes to Chapter 33 requiring fire watch on
certain new construction sites.


136. 117.1.1 Financial responsibility. The property owner, the tenant or the occupant in control
of the premises shall be responsible for the cost of providing a fire watch.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [113.4]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added to become an enforceable code item as required when fire life safety
systems are unavailable. Provides guidelines for minimum qualifications and expectations.
#9 added to coordinate with base code changes to Chapter 33 requiring fire watch on
certain new construction sites.
137. 117.2 Qualifications. Personnel assigned to fire watch duties shall possess the following
minimum qualifications:
1. Shall be at least 18 years of age.
2. Shall be able to speak, read and understand English.
3 Shall be capable of executing the duties and responsibilities as specified in Section 115.4.
4. Shall be capable of operating a mobile telephone or portable radio, or both.
5. Shall be capable of walking the assigned watch area.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [113.4]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added to become an enforceable code item as required when fire life safety
systems are unavailable. Provides guidelines for minimum qualifications and expectations.
#9 added to coordinate with base code changes to Chapter 33 requiring fire watch on
certain new construction sites.
138. 117.3 Number and hours. The fire code official shall specify the number of fire watch
personnel required and the hours during which they must be present based on the
conditions and size of the facility.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [113.4]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added to become an enforceable code item as required when fire life safety
systems are unavailable. Provides guidelines for minimum qualifications and expectations.
#9 added to coordinate with base code changes to Chapter 33 requiring fire watch on
certain new construction sites.
139. 117.4 Duties and responsibilities. Fire watch duties and responsibilities include, but are not
limited to, the following:
1. Know the address of the facility being watched.
2. Be equipped with a mobile telephone that can be used to contact 9-1-1 or a portable
radio that can be used to communicate with a constantly attended
security/communications center.
3. Continuously make rounds and monitor all assigned areas.
4. Immediately report any sign of smoke, fire or other emergency to 9-1-1 or to the
security/communications center.
5. Activate the fire alarm system where the building is equipped with such a system or notify
those present to evacuate the building or area.
6. Assist with the evacuation of people present in the area.

7. Keep a fire watch log that includes the following information:
7.1. Identifies the building or area by name and address that is under watch.
7.2. The date and time each round or tour is completed, plus comments on what
was observed. Each entry shall contain the name and signature of the person
conducting the watch.
Fire watch logs shall be immediately accessible for review by the fire code official.
A copy of the fire watch log shall be submitted to the Phoenix Fire Department, Fire
Prevention Division.
8. Continue the fire watch until permission has been received from the Phoenix Fire
Department to terminate the fire watch activities.
9. The proper use of portable fire extinguishers.
Fire watch personnel shall not be assigned additional duties during their fire watch tour.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [113.4]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added to become an enforceable code item as required when fire life safety
systems are unavailable. Provides guidelines for minimum qualifications and expectations.
#9 added to coordinate with base code changes to Chapter 33 requiring fire watch on
certain new construction sites.




Chapter 2 Definitions
140. ADDRESS DIRECTORIES. Graphic displays of dwelling unit or business suite
locations that are weather resistant, internally illuminated, and permanently
mounted adjacent to the fire apparatus access road.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes to support fire operations.
141. ALTERNATIVE SURFACE ACCESS ROADS. Roads for fire department use that are
required for fire department access and that are constructed with approved
materials, other than pavement.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes to support fire operations and allow
design alternatives.
142. COMMON AREA. For the purposes of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
compliance for visual notification, a common area shall be a room, space, or
element made available for the use of a restricted group of people (for example,
occupants of a homeless shelter; the occupants of an office building, or the
guests of such occupants). Common areas shall include restrooms, hallways,
lobbies, meeting and conference rooms, classrooms, cafeterias, filing and
photocopy rooms, employee break rooms, open office areas exceeding 300
square feet, examination and treatment rooms, and similar areas that are not
used solely as employee work areas in accordance with the U.S. Access Board
Technical Bulletin on Visual Alarms. Mechanical, electrical and telephone closets,
janitor’s closets, and similar non-occupiable spaces that are not common areas or
assigned work areas are not required to have visual alarms.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added for consistent outcomes for audio/visual compliance
incorporating IFC, IBC and ADA requirements.
143. CONTROLLED ACCESS GATES. Automatic or manually operated gates or devices
that are placed across a fire apparatus access road or access path.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes to support fire operations.



144. CROWD MANAGER. An individual designated to maintain safe conditions and assist
with evacuations prior to and during a special event where crowds exceed 500
attendees.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to identify individuals with specific responsibility at large special
events.
145. ENGINEERING PRACTICE. Professional service or work requiring engineering
education, training and experience in applying engineering principles and
interpreting engineering data to engineering activities that impact the health,
safety and welfare of the public and the engineering design of buildings,
structures, products, machines, processes and systems to the extent that the
engineering education, training and experience requirements prescribed by
sections ARS 32-122 and 32-122.01 are necessary to protect the health, safety
and welfare of the public.
Reason: New to 2024; This definition comes from the AZBTR and supports PFD’s
efforts to require PE stamps where necessary based on the definition of
engineering practice.
146. FIRE CODE OFFICIAL. The fire chief or other designated authority charged with the
administration and enforcement of the code, or a duly authorized representative.
Within the City of Phoenix, the Fire Marshal is the designated fire code official.
Reason: New to 2024; Added language to clarify who in the Phoenix Fire
Department is considered the fire code official, and to clarify where the code
states where required by the fire code official that an appeal may also be required
where not specifically referenced in the code.
147. FIRE FLOW. The flow rate of a water supply, measured at 20 psi (137 kPa)
residual pressure that is available for firefighting.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provided for consistent outcomes for operations. Phoenix fire hoses do
not function well with pressures under 20 psi.
148. FIRE LANE/EMERGENCY APPARATUS LANE. A road or other passageway
developed to allow the passage of fire apparatus. A fire lane is not necessarily
intended for vehicular traffic other than fire apparatus.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provided for consistent outcomes for operations.
149. FIRE SAFETY DIRECTOR. A representative of the owner of the building who is
responsible for implementing the Fire Safety and Evacuation Plan and providing
information and training to staff, tenants, residents, and guests. The director is


responsible for directing the Fire Safety and Evacuation Plan during and after an
emergency. The director is responsible for ensuring alternates are designated. The
Fire Safety Director is the liaison to city agencies during emergencies.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provided for consistent outcomes for operations.
150. HYDRAULICALLY MOST DEMANDING HYDRANT. The fire hydrant that results in
the most demanding flow and pressure requirement needed to supply the private
fire distribution main(s).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Reason: Provided for consistent calculation outcomes.
151. MAINTENANCE. The repair or replacement of defective or damaged equipment,
systems or programming with an exact duplicate model. Maintenance also includes
testing of equipment.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Defines the necessity of permitted work. This in response to fire alarms
being replaced with non-compatible, non-upgradeable systems.
152. MODIFICATION. Any change or reprogramming of any existing fire and life
safety equipment or system regulated by this code that is not the exact same
model, area or programming from original equipment or installation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Defines the necessity of permitted work. This in response to fire alarms
being replaced with non-compatible, non-upgradeable systems.
153. OUTDOOR ASSEMBLY EVENT. An outdoor gathering of persons for any purpose
having a projected attendance of 500 or more persons or confining 50 or more
persons by temporary installation of fencing.
Reason: Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Section 114 Fireworks moved to 115 to restore the 114 Insurance requirements.
154. PEDESTRIAN GATES. Gates used by pedestrians to provide access to or egress
from buildings, yards, patios, courts, swimming pools and similar areas.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Defined when Knox requirements for access, other than apparatus,
were initiated.


155. PREEMPTION DEVICE. An approved electronic device attached to a controlled
access gate that is used to open the gate when an electronic signal is received
from an emergency vehicle.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Defined when Knox requirements for access, other than apparatus,
were initiated.
156. SALVAGE. Something extracted (as from rubbish) as valuable or useful.
Reason: New to 2024. Added to define work conducted by facilities that operate
salvage yards.
157. SHELL BUILDING. A shell building is a structure with empty spaces that have not
yet been classified with a known tenant. This condition will remain until a future
tenant proposes a use to the building department.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC, maintenance and
modification added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), common area
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC) common area
added.
Reason: Added to define the scope of required systems and permittable
actions.
Common area added as a combination of fire code, building codes and ADA
definitions to provide guidance for audio/visual alarms.
158. SIGNAGE. Required fire department signage shall be either .80 3M aluminum, or
Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) approved aluminum composite
material or equivalent.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Defined when Knox requirements for access, other than apparatus,
were initiated.
159. SPREAD NUMBERS. Numbers attached to a building that show the unit number of
each dwelling unit on each floor of that residential building in a multibuilding
residential complex.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment
package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).

Reason: Defined when Knox requirements for access, other than apparatus,
were initiated.
160. TIPPING AREA. An area within an agro-industrial, solid biomass facility for vehicles
to unload new material.
Reason: Added as it is an industry standard term.
Reason: Correct the language of a tipping area. Was not the intention.




Chapter 3 General Requirements
161. 302.1 Salvage
Reason: New to 2024. Definition added from Chapter 2.
162. 303.1 Transporting. Asphalt (tar) kettles shall not be transported over any highway,
road or street when the heat source for the kettle is operating. All kettle doors shall be
tightly closed and latched when in transit.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5898 April 18, 2014 (2012 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added due to loss history of roof fires in Phoenix.
163. 303.2 Location. Asphalt (tar) kettles shall not be located within 20 feet (6096 mm) of any
combustible material, combustible building surface or any building opening and within a
controlled area identified by the use of traffic cones, barriers or other approved means.
Asphalt (tar) kettles and pots shall not be utilized inside or on the roof of a building or
structure. Roofing kettles and operating asphalt (tar) kettles shall not block means of
egress, gates, roadways or entrances. Asphalt kettles and fuel containers shall not be left
unattended in a street or roadway.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5898 April 18, 2014 (2012 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added due to loss history of roof fires in Phoenix.
164. 303.10 Maintenance. Asphalt kettles and all integral working parts shall be in good working
condition and shall be maintained free of excessive residue.
Reason: Added to prevent excessive residue that contributes to poor operations.
165. 308.3.2 Theatrical performances. Where approved, open-flame devices used by fire
performers or in conjunction with theatrical performances are allowed to be used where
adequate safety precautions have been taken in accordance with NFPA 160.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), flame performers added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added to address increase in fire performers working in the city.
166. 315.2.1 Site plan.
Each site shall maintain a current site plan that includes a general description of the
property, the boundaries of the lot, the size and location of buildings, and all of the
following:
1. Utilities.
2. Type of construction and presence of sprinkler protection for other buildings on the
site.




3. Water supply sources for fire-fighting purposes.
4. Location of hazardous material storage areas.
5. Location of pallet storage.
6. Equipment protected with a dust collection system.
7. Fire apparatus access roads.
8. Designated smoking areas.
9. Location of fire alarm control panels.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures facilities storing miscellaneous combustibles have a plan.
167. 315.2.2 Fire protection plan. The owner or operator shall prepare a fire protection plan for
any facilities processing and/or storing finished lumber products, and solid biofuel
products, in quantities requiring a permit. The fire protection plan shall address monitoring
for, controlling, and extinguishing fires. The fire protection plan shall be submitted to the
fire code official.
The fire protection plan shall include the following:
1. A scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating property lines, buildings, access
roads, fire hydrants, location of tipping areas, salvage areas, pile height indicators,
piles and push-out areas.
2. Pile contents (hogged material, compost, tipping, manure, etc.) and maximum pile
dimensions of each pile.
3. Monitoring procedures and schedules for checking for pile temperature and
moisture content.
4. Fire suppression methods and emergency plans.
5. Other procedures and methods to reduce fire within piles or stacks.
6. Employee training.
7. Equipment and resources available on site, and through contract, for fire prevention
and suppression.
8. Thresholds for calling 911.
9. Location of fire alarm control panels.
10. Type of construction and presence of sprinkler protection for other buildings on the
site.
Written plans, in support of the fire protection plan, shall be made available upon
request by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures facilities storing miscellaneous combustibles have a plan.
168. 315.4.3 Stacking. The method of stacking shall be solid piles in an orderly array.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).

Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
169. 315.4.4 Separation from buildings. Outside storage of combustible materials or
combustible waste shall not be located within 20 feet (6096 mm) of a building.
Exception: Commercial trash receptacles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
170. 315.4.5 Size of piles. The maximum size of piles shall be 20 feet (6096 mm) wide by 150
feet (45 700 mm) long separated by aisles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
171. 315.4.6 Aisles width. Aisles shall be a minimum of 20 feet (6096 mm) wide and shall be
maintained clear and unobstructed at all times.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
172. 315.4.7 Dead ends. No dead-end aisles shall be allowed within the facility.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.



173. 315.4.8 Fencing. An approved minimum 6-foot-high (1829 mm) noncombustible security
fence or wall shall be provided.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
174. 315.4.9 Fire apparatus access roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided to
within 150 feet (45 700 mm) of all combustible materials piles in compliance with Chapter
5. Fire apparatus access gates shall be in accordance with Chapter 5.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
175. 315.4.10 Fire hydrants and water supply. Approved fire hydrants and water supply shall
be provided in compliance with Chapter 5.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
176. 315.4.11 Fire extinguishing equipment. Fire extinguishing equipment shall be provided
throughout the facility in accordance with NFPA 10, Portable Fire Extinguishers. Travel
distance to reach fire-extinguishing equipment shall not exceed 75 feet.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.




177. 315.4.12 Additional equipment. A reliable means of rotating the combustible materials
shall be readily available on the property (for example, pallet jack, front end loader or
back hoe with bucket).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
178. 315.4.13 Vegetation. Weeds, grass and similar vegetation shall be eliminated throughout
the entire yard.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
179. 315.4.14 Fire watch. When required by the fire code official, a fire watch shall be provided
in accordance with Section 115.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
180. 315.4.15 Sources of ignition.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid bio-
mass and other miscellaneous storage.
181. 315.4.15.1 Smoking. Smoking shall be prohibited within the storage area and shall
comply with Section 310.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).

Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
182. 315.4.15.2 Clearance from sources of ignition. No heating equipment, including
salamanders, braziers, portable heaters and other open fires, shall be located or used in
the storage area. Potential sources of ignition such as hot work, warming or open fires
and heating devices shall not be allowed within 60 feet (18 288 mm) of storage piles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 March 1,2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added after multiple storage facility fires of recycled materials and pallets.
Provides consistent outdoor storage requirements for lumber and mulch yards, solid
bio-mass and other miscellaneous storage.
183. 315.7 Outdoor pallet storage. Pallets stored outdoors shall comply with Sections 315.7
through 315.7.8. Pallets stored within a building shall be protected in accordance with
Chapter 32. Pallets at pallet manufacturing and recycling facilities shall comply with
Chapter 28.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides clarity for consumers.
184. 315.7.8 Fire protection plan. A fire protection plan for outdoor storage, in accordance with
315.2.2, shall be submitted to the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures facilities storing miscellaneous combustibles have a plan.
185. SECTION 316
HAZARDS TO FIRE PERSONNEL
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), moved to Chpt 3 and
amended.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5193 August 1, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package)
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), hazards to fire fighters or
fire department personnel.
Reason: Changes title to include all fire personnel (inspectors).
186. 316.3 Pitfalls. The intentional design or alteration of buildings to disable, injure, maim or
kill intruders is prohibited. A person shall not install and use firearms, sharp or pointed
objects, razor wire, explosives, flammable or combustible liquid containers, or dispensers
containing highly toxic, toxic, irritant or other hazardous materials in a manner that could
passively or actively disable, injure, maim or kill a fire fighter who forcibly enters a building
for the purpose of controlling or extinguishing a fire, rescuing trapped occupants or


rendering other emergency assistance; or a fire code official who enters a building or
premises for the purpose of conducting inspections, or to perform the duties authorized
by this code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), moved to Chapter 3 and
amended.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5193 August 1, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), hazards to fire fighters or
fire department personnel.
Reason: Includes fire inspector.
187. SECTION 323 SWIMMING POOL BARRIERS
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [321]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [321]
Reason: Added to give Fire Inspectors authority in accordance with the Pool Abatement
agreement with Neighborhood Services Dept. – Date: October 10, 2008
188. 323.1 General. Swimming pool barriers shall be maintained in accordance with Section
3109 of the International Building Code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [321]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [321]
Reason: Added to give Fire Inspectors authority in accordance with the Pool Abatement
agreement with Neighborhood Services Dept. – Date: October 10, 2008
189. SECTION 324 TRADE SHOWS AND EXHIBITS
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: This adopts the International Fire Code Appendix N that regulates and permits
trade shows and exhibits. These activities can present a unique fire danger based on
their contents, layout, booth construction, and large attendance. Prior to this appendix
creation, the Phoenix Fire Code had a specific trade show section. This aligns Phoenix
Fire Code with the national fire code.
190. 324.1 Trade shows and exhibits. Trade shows and exhibits shall conform to Appendix
N.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: This adopts the International Fire Code Appendix N that regulates and permits
trade shows and exhibits. These activities can present a unique fire danger based on
their contents, layout, booth construction, and large attendance. Prior to this appendix
creation, the Phoenix Fire Code had a specific trade show section. This aligns Phoenix
Fire Code with the national fire code.




Chapter 4 Emergency Planning and Preparedness
191. 401.9 Fire or emergency alarm initiation. No person shall silence a fire or emergency alarm
system, alarm-initiating device or component until the fire department arrives.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Ensures fire investigations is conducted before alarm is silenced.
192. 401.10 Monitoring stations. Monitoring stations shall immediately notify the fire
department of alarm signals initiated by manual fire alarm boxes, automatic fire detectors,
water flow from the automatic sprinkler system or actuation of other fire extinguishing or
detection systems or equipment. Any monitoring station shall notify the fire department
of an alarm signal prior to contacting the subscriber.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Requires fire department be contacted first in case of alarm signal.
193. 402.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:
CROWD MANAGER.
EMERGENCY EVACUATION DRILL.
FIRE SAFETY DIRECTOR.
LOCKDOWN.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added for clarity as, and not addressed in national code. Phoenix identifies
these personnel in special events and fire preparedness.
194. 403.11.1 Fire watch personnel. Where, in the opinion of the fire code official, it is
essential for public safety in a place of assembly or any other place where people
congregate, because of the number of persons, or the nature of the performance,
exhibition, display, contest or activity, the owner, agent or lessee shall provide one or
more fire watch personnel, as required and approved. Fire watch personnel shall
comply with Sections 115, 403.12.1.1 and 403.12.1.2. Such fire watch personnel shall
not be required or permitted, while on duty, to perform any duties other than those
specified herein, in accordance with Section 115.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Ensures personnel assigned to fire watch will not be distracted by other
duties.
195. TABLE 405.2
FIRE AND EVACUATION DRILL
FREQUENCY AND PARTICIPATION
GROUP
FREQUENCY PARTICIPATION
OROCCUPANCY
High-rise buildings Annually All occupants

Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: All occupants added to ensure full building evacuation including guests.
196. 405.7 Notification. Where required by the fire code official, prior notification of
emergency evacuation drills shall be given to the fire code official. Prior to activating a
fire alarm signal, for conducting an evacuation drill, the building owner or authorized
representative shall contact fire department dispatch at 602-495-5555. The building
owner or authorized representative shall notify fire department dispatch on completion
of the evacuation drill.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and prevents unintended false alarms.
197. SECTION 408
EMERGENCY RESPONSE PREPLANNING
408.1 Emergency response preplanning. When required by the fire code official, a facility,
property, and/or business shall provide the fire code official with a site plan and building
layout (internal and external) identifying emergency access points, fire control and
protection equipment locations, and other life safety features inside the property and
structures.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: To assist operations with knowledge of site conditions and improve firefighter
safety




CH 5 Fire Service Features
198. 501.3 Construction documents. Construction documents for proposed fire apparatus
access, location of fire lanes, security gates/barriers across fire apparatus access roads
and construction documents and hydraulic calculations for fire hydrant systems shall be
submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Broader definition provided to ensure greater compliance.
199. 501.5 Inspection of fire apparatus access roads. Roads used for apparatus access shall be
subject to field inspection and may be subject to testing using fire apparatus. The owner
is responsible for any repairs necessary due to the inadequate design of the fire
apparatus access road.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations ensuring roads are maintained and will carry fire trucks.
200. 502.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:
AGENCY.
FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD.
FIRE COMMAND CENTER.
FIRE DEPARTMENT MASTER KEY.
FIRE FLOW.
FIRE LANE/EMERGENCY ACCESS LANE.
KEY BOX.
PEDESTRIAN GATES.
PREEMPTION DEVICE.
SIGNAGE.
SPREAD NUMBERS.
TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC). – Signage added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added for consistent outcomes and clarity of intent.
201. 503.1 Where required. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in
accordance with Sections 503.1.1 through 503.1.3.
The Phoenix Fire Department is the only authority authorized to designate a fire apparatus
access road.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Ensures fire department review and assists operations. Ensures
202. 503.1.1 Buildings and facilities. Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided for
every facility, building or portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within
the jurisdiction. The fire apparatus access road shall comply with the requirements of this
section and shall extend to within 150 feet (45.72 m) of all portions of the facility and all
portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved
route around the exterior of the building or facility.

Exceptions:
1. The fire code official is authorized to increase the dimension of 150 feet (45.72 m)
to 350 feet (107 m) where any of the following conditions occur:
1.1. The building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler
system
installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3.
1.2. Fire apparatus access roads cannot be installed because of location on property,
topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades or other similar conditions, and an
approved alternative means of fire protection is provided.
1.3. There are not more than two Group R-3 or Group U occupancies.
2. Where approved by the fire code official, fire apparatus access roads shall be
permitted to be exempted or modified for solar photovoltaic power generation facilities.
3. Facilities equipped with an automatic standpipe system in accordance with Section
905.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Following 2024 IFC for exception #1, giving industry accepted options and
following established design criteria.
203. 503.2.1.1 Vehicle passing points. Where fire department access roads exceed 300 feet
(91.44 m) in length, vehicle passing points shall be installed at intervals not to exceed 300
feet (91.44 m). Vehicle passing points shall be not less than 30 feet (91.44 m) in width
exclusive of shoulders and 50 feet (15.24 m) in length.
Exception: Where code-compliant fire lanes are continuous through a property leading to
an approved exit point, no passing points are required.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 January 30, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Added to allow for apparatus access in congested areas.
204. 503.2.1.2 Loading areas and passenger drop-off areas. On private property, where fire
apparatus access roads are utilized for loading or unloading or are utilized for passenger
drop-off or pickup, an additional 8 feet (2.438 m) of width shall be added to the fire
apparatus access road. This width is in addition to the mini-mum 20-foot (6.096 m) access
road width exclusive of shoulders. Fire apparatus access roads established and approved
per Phoenix Fire Department or Planning and Development Department site plan prior to
June 20, 2007 are not required to be widened if maintained and marked in accordance with
this chapter.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
205. 503.2.3 Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support
the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather
driving capabilities in accordance with Maricopa Association of Governments standards.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Utilizing local

county standards for road design.
206. 503.2.3.1 Stabilized edge. A stabilized edge meeting Maricopa Association of Governments
standards or equivalent is required on fire apparatus access roads.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Utilizing local
county standards for road design.
207. 503.2.3.2 Live loads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to
support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be designed and maintained to
support the imposed live load of 70,000 pounds (31 752 kg) with a maximum axle load
of 28,000 pounds (12 701 kg).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Based on Phoenix
Fire Department apparatus specifications.
208. 503.2.3.3 Alternative surface. Alternative surface fire lanes shall meet the requirements
of fire apparatus access roads and this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Ensures alternative
surface roads, installed permanently are designed to the same standards as non-
alternative surface roads.
209. 503.2.4 Turning radius. The required turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall
have a minimum 45-foot (13.716 m) centerline radius [35-foot (10.668 m) inside radius,
55-foot (16.764 m) outside radius] on curves.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Based on Phoenix
Fire Department apparatus specifications.
210. 503.2.7 Grade. The grade of the fire apparatus access road shall not exceed 15 percent
(15 feet in 100 feet) (4.572 m in 30.480 m). Cross-slope of an access road shall not exceed
a depth of 6 inches (.152 m).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Based on Phoenix
Fire Department apparatus specifications.
211. 503.2.7.1 Drainage. Water drainage shall be directed away from the fire apparatus
access road or piped under fire apparatus access roads. Ponding water on an fire
apparatus access road shall not exceed a depth of 6 inches (.152 m).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Revised language
to provide clarity.
212. 503.2.8.1 Curbs. A rolled curb meeting Maricopa Association of Governments standards
or equivalent shall be installed at the entrances to fire apparatus access roads.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Utilizing local
county standards for road design.
213. 503.2.9 Maintenance. Fire apparatus access roads shall be maintained by the owner in
accordance with section 503 at all times.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes. Revised language to provide clarity.
214. 503.2.10 Alternative surface. Alternative surface fire lanes shall meet the requirements
of fire apparatus access roads and this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Allows for enforceability.
215. 503.2.10.1 Report. Alternative surface fire apparatus access roads shall be designed by
an engineer professional registrant. The engineer shall prepare a sealed design report to
address soil compaction, the imposed live load, drainage, stabilization and curbing for
submittal to and approval by the fire department. Plans shall be sealed and submitted
with the report (see Section 501.3).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensure alternative access roads are designed and built under the review of a
professional engineer.
216 503.2.10.2 Stabilization. Stabilization of the fire apparatus access road surface shall be
addressed in the alternative surface fire apparatus access road report and may be
accomplished by curbing.
At a minimum, the surface of fire apparatus access roads shall be as follows:
1. Minimum 6 inches (.152 m) of native soil compacted to 95 percent of standard
proctor density (ASTM D698), and
2. Minimum 4 inches (.102 m) of aggregate base compacted to 100 percent of
standard proctor density (ASTM D698).
The surface of fire apparatus access roads may differ from the above
requirements if it is shown that the surface provided is sufficient to support an
imposed live load of 70,000 pounds (31 752 kg) with a maximum axle load of
28,000 pounds (12 701 kg). An engineer professional registrant shall prepare and
seal the soil compaction report. The report shall be available for review by the
fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restores previous amendment. Provide specific stabilization requirements
based on Phoenix Fire Department apparatus.
217. 503.2.10.3 Compaction. Minimum 95 percent compaction of subgrade soil is required.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restores previous amendment. Provide specific compaction requirements
based on Phoenix Fire Department apparatus.
218. 503.2.10.4 Curbs. A rolled curb shall be installed at the entrances to fire apparatus
access roads. See Chapter 80, Referenced Standards, for Maricopa Association of
Government Standards with City of Phoenix supplements.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restores previous amendment. Provide specific curb construction
requirements based on Maricopa County standards.
219. 503.2.10.5 Marking. The curb shall be painted red or red reflectors shall be installed to
define the width of alternative surface fire apparatus access roads. The reflectors shall
be imbedded into bordering curbing at intervals not exceeding 25 feet (4572 mm) (see
Appendix D).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restores previous amendment. Provide specific curb marking requirements
based on the Phoenix Fire Department apparatus.
220. 503.2.10.6 Special inspections. An Arizona-registered professional engineer shall
conduct a special inspection prior to final approvals being issued for the alternative
surface fire apparatus access road. The report shall be submitted for review by the fire
code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restores previous amendment. Specifies special inspection requirements for
alternative surface FD access roads. This ensures design and build of roads are under
the review of a registered engineer.
221. 503.2.10.7 Special inspection documentation. The special inspection documentation
shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Subgrade soil compaction report.
2. Base material quality, thickness and compaction.
3. Concrete depth and compressive strength, when applicable.
4. An evaluation of the installation in accordance with design drawings and
manufacturer specifications.
5. Crown and drainage requirements.
6. Stabilization.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restores previous amendment. Provides guidance on what the special
inspection for alternative surface FD access roads is to include.
222. 503.3 Marking. Where required by the fire code official, approved signs or other
approved notices or markings that include the words NO PARKING—FIRE LANE shall be
provided for fire apparatus access roads to identify such roads or prohibit the
obstruction thereof. See table 503.3 and Appendix D. The means by which fire lanes are


designated shall be maintained in a clean and legible condition at all times and be
replaced or repaired when necessary to provide adequate visibility.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restores previous amendment. Added language to include new table shown
below.
223. Table 503.3 Marking
Occupancy Marking on both sides Marking on one side Marking not required
20 feet ≤ width < 28
Group R-3 Width < 20 feet feet Width ≥ 28 feet
28 feet ≤ width < 36
Others Width < 28 feet feet Width ≥ 36 feet


Reason: New to 2024. The table replaces several sections of written narrative on
where the signs and markings are required.
224. 503.3.1 Signage. Required fire department signage shall be either .80-inch 3M
aluminum, or Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) approved aluminum
composite material or equivalent (see Appendix D).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restores previous amendment. Provides guidance on signage requirements
and points users to appendix D for example signage.
225. 503.3.2 Fire apparatus access road signs. Fire apparatus access roads shall be identified
by fire lane signs (see Appendix D) and red curbs as follows:
1. Signs shall be attached to an approved stationary pole set not less than 18 inches
(.457 m) in concrete.
2. The bottom of each sign shall be 7 feet (2.137 m) above grade.
3. The signs shall face oncoming traffic.
4. The signs shall be set back from the curb line or sidewalk not less than 12 inches
(.305 m) or greater than 18 inches (.457 m).
5. Signs shall be plainly visible at all times. Vegetation or other obstructions shall be
located such that a minimum 3-foot (.914 m) clearance is maintained along the line of
sight.
6. A sign shall be installed no less than 15 feet (4.572 m) from the beginning and end of
the fire lane.
6.1. Signs and red reflective markers shall be placed at 100 feet intervals, alternating
every 50 feet.
7. Fire apparatus access roads shall be identified by curbs painted red on both the top
and face along the entire length of the fire apparatus access road. Where no curb
exists, or a rolled curb is installed, a 6-inch (152 mm) wide red stripe shall be applied
the full length of the fire apparatus access road.
Reason: New to 2024. Restores previous amendment. Consolidated amendment
503.3.1 & previous version of 503.3.3.2.
226. 503.3.2.1 Marking. Reflectors shall be placed on the curbs and roadway.
Reason: New to 2024. Text was copied from Appendix D details. No new requirements,
only adding Appendix text to code text to make finding the requirement easier. This
requirement is found in Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) specifications.
227. 503.3.2.1.2 Red reflectors shall be provided in accordance with table 503.3

Reason: New to 2024. Text was copied from Appendix D details. No new requirements,
only adding Appendix text to code text to make finding the requirement easier. This
requirement is found in Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) specifications.
228. 503.3.2.1.3 Red reflectors shall be spaced at 100 foot intervals on hard surfaces and 75’
on alternative surfaces.
Reason: New to 2024. Text was copied from Appendix D details. No new requirements,
only adding Appendix text to code text to make finding the requirement easier. This
requirement is found in Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) specifications.
229. 503.3.2.1.4. Blue reflectors shall be placed in the center of the roadway adjacent to the
hydrant.
Reason: New to 2024. Text was copied from Appendix D details. No new requirements,
only adding Appendix text to code text to make finding the requirement easier. This
requirement is found in Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) specifications.
230. 503.3.2.1.5 Reflector Installation. There are three acceptable adhesives for installing the
markers.
(1) Wedco A-4036 Epoxy Part A Resin, Part B catalyst
(2) Thermoset EP-308 Epoxy resin part ‘A’ and EP-308 epoxy hardener Part ‘B’
(3) Bituminous adhesive
The adhesive shall be placed uniformly on the cleaned pavement surface in an amount
sufficient to result in complete coverage of the area of contact of the marker, with no
void present and with slight excess after the marker has been placed. The marker shall
be placed in position and pressure applied until firm contact is made with the pavement.
The marker shall be protected against impact until the adhesive has set to the degree
acceptable to the Engineer.
Reason: New to 2024. Text was copied from Appendix D details. No new
requirements, only adding Appendix text to code text to make finding the requirement
easier. This requirement is found in Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG)
specifications.
231. 503.3.3 Stenciling. The fire code official is authorized to require stenciling or other
permanent markings to improve the identification of fire apparatus access roads. Where
required, the stenciling shall state “FIRE LANE — NO PARKING.” Lettering shall be white
on a red painted curb and shall be a minimum of 3 inches (76 mm) high with a 1/2-inch
(13 mm) brush stroke.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes - Richard Tritch memorial code.
232. 503.3.4 Marking not required. A fire apparatus access road that is greater than 36 feet
(10 973 mm) in width shall not be required to have signs and painted curbs on either
side of the fire apparatus access road.
Reason: New to 2024. Clarifies where marking is not required for fire apparatus access
roads.
233. 503.4.2 Fences and pedestrian gates. Where distances from an approved fire
department access road exceed the maximum distance allowed in Section 503 and
fences are installed, a pedestrian gate shall be provided in the fence to maintain the
required fire department access. The gate shall be not less than 4 feet (1219 mm) in
width and be equipped with a key box in accordance with Section 506.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Added to address additional security measures that potentially block fire
apparatus and personnel access.
503.4.3 Other obstructions to access. Where other obstructions are installed that cause
234. the distances from an approved fire department access road to exceed the maximum
distance allowed in Section 503, the fire code official is authorized to require additional
fire protection as specified in Section 901.4.4.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Added to address additional security measures that potentially block fire
apparatus and personnel access.
503.5.1 Secured gates and barricades. Where required, gates and barricades shall be
235. secured in an approved manner. Roads, trails and other accessways that have been
closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by Section 503.5 shall not be
trespassed on or used unless authorized by the owner and the fire code official. Chains
alone across a fire apparatus access road are prohibited.
Exception: The restriction on use shall not apply to public officers acting within the
scope of duty.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added due to loss history, firefighter injuries, and provides consistent
outcomes.
236. 503.6 Security gates. The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access
road shall be approved by the fire code official, and in accordance with Section 512.
Where security gates are installed, they shall have an approved means of emergency
operation. The security gates and the emergency operation shall be maintained
operational at all times. Electric gate operators, where provided, shall be listed in
accordance with UL 325. Gates intended for automatic operation shall be
designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F2200.
Fire apparatus access gates shall be designed and installed such that they do not
obstruct the ingress or egress of emergency vehicles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and addresses security requirements and their impact on
accessibility for fire operations providing consistent outcomes.
237. 503.6.1 Group R-3. Where access to the primary access door is obstructed by an
automatic gate in single-family, detached Group R-3 occupancies, a key switch shall be
provided, on the exterior side. Key switches shall be identified with an approved sign
reading “FD Access.”
Exception: Single-family residences where the primary access door is not obstructed by
the restrictions of fences or gates shall not require a permit.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Requires specific single-family homes developments to install key switch for

FD access where access is obstructed by gating the property.
238. 503.7 Preemption devices. Preemption devices are required on all new automatic fire
access gates installed after January 1, 2001 at multifamily residential properties, gated
communities with more than two Group R-3 occupancies, and other occupancies as
required by the fire code official. Gates installed without permits or proof of installation
date, require preemption devices. Voluntary installations of preemption devices shall
comply with the requirements of this policy.
Exception: Access road serving three or fewer Group R-3 occupancies.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes, provides quicker
response at multi-family and large complexes.
239. 503.7.1 Locations. The devices shall be installed such that the gate will open for both
ingress and egress of emergency vehicles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes, provides quicker
response at multi-family and large complexes.
240. 503.7.2 Minimum installation standards. The installation of preemption devices shall
comply with the following:
1. Detectors shall be mounted 8 feet to 10 feet (2439mm to 3048 mm) above grade.
2. Detectors shall be located not less than 18 inches (457 mm) behind the gate on the
property side.
3. Detectors shall be mounted on a separate 4-inch by 4-inch (102 mm to 102 mm)
metal post and not on the guidepost. The metal post shall be cemented not less than 18
inches (457 mm) below grade.
4. Detectors shall activate at not less than 150 feet (45 720 mm) from the gate.
5. Detectors shall point toward both the approach and the exit path of the emergency
vehicle.
6. The sight path of the detector shall be free of visual obstructions such as signs,
covered parking, canopies and vegetation.
7. Individual detectors shall be mounted together with the power module in the dual
detector/mounting box. Detectors shall be approved and tested by the fire department.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes, provides quicker
response at multi-family and large complexes.
241. 504.1 Required access. Exterior doors and openings required by this code or the
International Building Code shall be maintained readily accessible for emergency access
by the fire department. An approved access walkway leading from fire apparatus access
roads to exterior openings shall be provided where required by the fire code official. Key


boxes, keys, toggle switches and padlocks required for fire department access shall be
in accordance with Section 506 and Chapter 10.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added for operations access to facilities.
242. 504.2.1 Exterior door access. Required exterior doors shall have a key cylinder or other
means to be opened from the exterior.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure key cylinders installed in door, due to security concerns they
were being removed.
243. 504.2.2 Exterior stairwells. Where determined by the fire code official that access is
necessary for lifesaving or fire-fighting purposes, exterior stairwells providing access to
fire protection equipment shall be marked in accordance with Section 503.3.1.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations. Points users to signage requirements of section and to
appendix D for examples of signs.
244. 505.1 Address identification. New and existing buildings shall be provided with approved
address identification. The address identification shall be legible and placed in a position
that is visible from the street or road fronting the property. Address identification
characters shall contrast with their background. Address numbers shall be Arabic
numbers or alphabetical letters. Numbers shall not be spelled out. Each character shall
be not less than 4 inches (102 mm) high with a minimum stroke width of 1/2 inch (12.7
mm). Where required by the fire code official, address identification shall be provided in
additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Where access is by
means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, or the
building is a podium building or has multiple fire separations with interior corridors, a
monument, pole or other sign or
means installed in accordance with Section 505.1.3.4 shall be used to identify the
structure and features. Address identification shall be maintained clearly visible and free
from obstructions, including landscaping, and shall be kept current.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures Operations can quickly and easily identify their location and features
of the facility. Maintenance includes more than just the sign itself.
245. 505.1.1 Single-family homes. Individually addressed townhouses and detached single-
family homes shall be provided with address numbers not less than 4 inches (102 mm)
high, with a minimum 1/2-inch (12.7 mm) brush stroke on a contrasting background.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and allows for quicker identification of buildings in
response events.
246. 505.1.1.1 All other residential occupancies. The address, individual building, spread, and
dwelling numbers shall be in accordance with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations for timely response during critical period.
247. 505.1.1.1.1 Building or site address. The building or site address shall be designated by
characters not less than 12 inches (305 mm) high that must be clearly visible from the
fire apparatus access road. The building address is required to be internally or externally
illuminated.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations for timely response during critical period.
248. 505.1.1.1.2 Building identification. Each building shall display its specific alphabetical or
numerical designation, which must be clearly visible from the fire apparatus access
road. The building identification shall be not less than 18 inches (457 mm) high with a
minimum 3-inch (76 mm) brush stroke on a contrasting background. The building
identification is required to be internally or externally illuminated.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations for timely response during critical period.
249. 505.1.1.1.3 Spread numbers. Spread numbers shall be provided adjacent to the building
identification to indicate the apartment or unit numbers by floors in the building. Spread
numbers shall be not less than 7 inches (178 mm) high with a 1-inch (25 mm) brush
stroke on a contrasting background. The spread numbers are required to be internally
or externally illuminated.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations for timely response during critical period.
250. 505.1.1.1.4 Unit identification at entrances. Spread plates are required where more than
one dwelling or unit is accessed from a building entrance, a spread plate is required.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations for timely response during critical period.
251. 505.1.1.1.5 Apartment or unit numbers. Individual apartment or unit numbers shall be
not less than 4 inches (102 mm) high with a minimum 3/8-inch (9.52mm) brush stroke
on a contrasting background.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations for timely response during critical period.
252. 505.1.1.1.6 Additional identification signs. Where a building is not visible from the fire
apparatus access road, a directional sign indicating the location of the unit is required.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations for timely response during critical period.
253. 505.1.1.1.7 Buildings more than 100 feet (30 480 mm) long. Where buildings are more
than 100 feet (30 480 mm) long, not fewer than two building address numbers shall be
provided on opposite end of the building visible from the fire apparatus access road.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides consistent outcomes.
254. 505.1.1.1.8 Buildings with multiple fire apparatus access points. Where buildings have
multiple fire apparatus access points, numbers and addresses shall be provided at each
access point.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides consistent outcomes
255. 505.1.2 Commercial occupancies. Premises identification shall be provided for Group A,
B, E, F, H, I, M, S and U occupancies. The building identification is required to be
internally or externally illuminated to meet visibility requirements in low or no light
conditions.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations
256. 505.1.2.1 Buildings less than 200 feet. Buildings less than 200 feet (60 960 mm) long
and less than 100 feet (30 480 mm) from the edge of the road shall be identified with a
building address that is not less than 12 inches (305 mm) high with a minimum 2-inch
(51 mm) brush stroke on a contrasting background. The address shall be visible from all
access directions.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides consistent outcomes
257. 505.1.2.2 Buildings more than 200 feet. Buildings more than 200 feet (60 960 mm) long
and set back from the road 100 feet or more (30 480 mm) shall be identified with a
building address that is not less than 24 inches (610 mm) high with a 4-inch (102 mm)
brush stroke of a contrasting color. The address shall be visible from all access
directions.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides consistent outcomes
258. 505.1.2.3 Buildings more than 500 feet. Buildings greater than 500 feet (152 400 mm)
in length shall have building addresses that are visible from all access directions.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides consistent outcomes
259. 505.1.2.4 Multiple-tenant buildings. Individual tenant spaces in multiple-tenant buildings
shall have their address or suite identification posted at the front entrance and rear
access doors. This building identification shall be not less than 6 inches (152 mm) high
with a 1-inch (25 mm) brush stroke on a contrasting background.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides consistent outcomes
260. 507.3.1 Exterior storage. Where there is exterior storage of combustible or hazardous
materials, the required fire flow to protect exterior storage shall be in accordance with
Appendix B and based on an approved engineering analysis. If the fire flow required to
protect the exterior storage exceeds the fire flow required to protect the building, the
higher flow shall be provided.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Loss history of major outdoor multi-alarm storage fires.
261. 507.3.2 Minimum standards. Where a water supply for fire protection is not available
from the City of Phoenix, or if the flow rate, pressure or duration of the water supply
available from the City does not meet the minimum requirements of the Phoenix Fire


code, the owner shall be responsible for installing infrastructure required to meet the
fire flow, pressure and duration requirements of the Phoenix Fire code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Codifies Water Dept. policy for developers to provide infrastructure on
developments. Stricken text modifies sentence structure only.
262. 507.3.3 Failure to maintain water supply. Failure to provide and maintain the required
water supply necessary for fire protection shall be considered a hazard to life or
property and is subject to enforcement under Section 104 of the Phoenix Fire code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Loss history of developed lands. Makes enforceable code.
263. 507.5.1 Where required. Where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed
or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet (122 m) from a hydrant
on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior
of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where
required by the fire code official.
Exceptions:
1. For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, the distance requirement shall be 600
feet (183 m).
2. For buildings equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system
installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2, the distance requirement
shall be 600 feet (183 m).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Elimination of amendment to align with base code requirements.
264. 507.5.1.2 City of Phoenix hydrant specifications.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes and minimum standards reflecting Water dept
guidelines.
265. 507.5.1.2.1 Phoenix threads. Fire hydrants shall be provided with Phoenix threads.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes and minimum standards reflecting Water dept
guidelines.
266. 507.5.1.2.2 Color of hydrants. The color of hydrants shall be Maricopa Association of
Government Standards, standard fire hydrant yellow. Private fire hydrants shall have the
bonnet painted reflective white. Hydrants not intended for fire department use shall
have the bonnet painted black. The red bonnet indicates a hydrant coming off a sub-
standard main, or a low-flow hydrant, normally coming off a 4-inch (101 mm) feed.
When the water supply static and residual pressures meet or exceed 125 psi the
hydrants on the water supply zone shall be marked with a dark blue stripe that spans
from each 2-1/2” connection and over the top of the hydrant.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes and minimum standards reflecting Water Dept.
guidelines and MAG guidelines. New to 2024 requirement for identification of high-
pressure hydrants added to address high-pressure hydrants that could impact firefighter
safety.
268. 507.5.1.2.3 Height. Fire hydrants shall be installed so that the centerline of the lowest
outlet is not less than 18 inches (457 mm) above grade and the highest outlet does not
exceed 30 inches (762 mm) above grade.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes and minimum standards reflecting Water Dept.
guidelines and MAG guidelines.
269. 507.5.1.2.4 Hydrant location. New hydrants shall be located on the right-hand
(passenger) side of the street. Fire hydrants shall be located not less than 1 foot (305
mm) and not more than 6 feet (1829 mm) from the back of the curb of the access road
or other vehicle access point. The largest outlet on the hydrant shall face the access
road.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes, supports operations and minimum standards
reflecting Water Dept. guidelines.
270. 507.5.1.2.5 Hydrants on major streets. Fire hydrants on major streets, collector streets,
or any other streets that are not divided by raised median islands or light-rail tracks can
be included in the coverage analysis. If those streets classes are divided by raised
median islands or light-rail tracks, then the existing hydrant can only be included in the
coverage analysis if its location is on the same side of the median as the new
development.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes, supports operations and minimum standards
reflecting Water Dept. guidelines.
271. 507.5.1.2.6 First new hydrant. The first new fire hydrant shall be located at the street
intersection or at the main entrance(s) into a subdivision, apartment complex or
commercial development.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes, supports operations and minimum standards
reflecting Water Dept. guidelines.
272. 507.5.1.2.7 Additional hydrants. Additional hydrants shall be spaced up to 500 feet (152
m) apart in single-family residential developments and shall be up to 300 feet (91 m)
apart in all other development types. The distance between hydrants shall be measured
along the path of the fire apparatus access road.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes, supports operations and minimum standards
reflecting Water Dept. guidelines. Strikethrough of language not necessary for
enforcement.
273. 507.5.1.2.8 Parking areas. In open-air, on-grade parking areas, at least one fire hydrant
shall be located within 600 feet (183 m) of all areas.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes, supports operations and flexibility in large
parking areas.
274. 507.5.1.2.9 Distance. Distance to fire department connection (FDC). At least one fire
hydrant shall be located within 200 feet (61 m) of a FDC supplying building fire
protection systems. The distance between the hydrant and FDC shall be measured
along the path of the fire apparatus access road and as fire fighters would lay hose (see
also Section 912).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Provides consistent outcomes, supports operations.
275. 507.5.1.2.10 Tampering and obstructions. Vehicle parking shall be prohibited within 15
feet (4572 mm) in either direction of a fire hydrant installed parallel to a curb line. For
hydrants that are set back from the curb, the 15-foot (4572 mm) clearance shall be
measured from the curb line.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and more specifically addresses issues.
276. 507.5.1.2.11 Accessibility. Fire hydrants shall be accessible to fire department apparatus
by roads meeting the requirements of Section 503. The largest outlet on the hydrant
shall face the fire apparatus access road.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes and specific isolation valves for partial
impairment repair and defines undefined code terms in NFPA documents.
277. 507.5.1.2.12 Sectional valves. Sectional valves shall be provided to ensure minimal
impairments to fire protection should any mains require repair or alteration.
1. Every looped private main shall have backflow prevention serving a minimum two
sectional valves at the point of connection on each leg of the loop and a minimum of
one sectional valve separating the supply line in two approximately equal sections.
The backflow valve assembly can serve as a sectional valve.
2. One sectional valve shall be placed on the private main supply to isolate every
four to six connections to either sprinkler systems or hydrants, which each sprinkler
lead-in and hydrant feed require their own control valves by NFPA 13 and NFPA 24.


When a large private fire main has six or more connections to the main, multiple
sectional valves are required to minimize impairments.
3. The backflow supply valve installed on connections from City of Phoenix public
water mains is required outside the City of Phoenix right-of-way. The backflow valve
assembly
may serve as the fire sprinkler connection valve only for a dedicated sprinkler system
supply.
4. If the sprinkler riser supply piping is run more than 5 feet (1524 mm) under the
building, a Post Indicator Valve (PIV) shall be provided adjacent to the foundation,
within 25 feet (7620 mm) to isolate the pipe running under the foundation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes and specific isolation valves for partial
impairment repair and defines undefined code terms in NFPA documents.
278. 507.5.1.2.13 Marking. Curbing adjacent public hydrants shall be painted red in
accordance with Municipal code sections 36-27 and 36-134.
Reason: New to 2024, makes currently adopted municipal code enforceable via the fire
code.
279. 508.1.1 Location and access. The location and accessibility of the fire command center
shall be approved by the Fire Department The fire command center shall be identified
by a permanent, easily visible sign noting “Fire Department Command Center” located
on the door to the fire command center (see Appendix D).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Supports operations
280. 508.1.6 Required features. The fire command center shall comply with NFPA 72 and
shall contain and maintain the following features:
1. The emergency voice/alarm communication system control unit.
2. The fire department communications system.
3. Fire detection and alarm system annunciator.
4. Annunciator unit visually indicating the location of the elevators and whether they
are operational.
5. Status indicators and controls for air distribution systems.
6. The fire fighter’s control panel required by Section 909.16 for smoke control
systems installed in the building.
7. Controls for unlocking interior exit stairway doors simultaneously.
8. Sprinkler valve and water-flow detector display panels.
9. Emergency and standby power status indicators.
10. A telephone for fire department use with controlled access to the public
telephone system.
11. Fire pump status indicators.
12. Schematic building plans indicating the typical floor plan and detailing the
building core, means of egress, fire protection systems, fire-fighter air-replenishment
systems, fire-fighting equipment and fire department access, and the location of fire
walls, fire barriers, fire partitions, smoke barriers and smoke partitions.

13. An approved Building Information Card that includes, but is not limited to, all of
the following information:
13.1. General building information that includes: property name, address, the
number of floors in the building above and below grade, use and occupancy
classification
(for mixed uses, identify the different types of occupancies on each floor) and the
estimated building population during the day, night and weekend;
13.2. Building emergency contact information that includes: a list of the building’s
emergency contacts including but not limited to building manager, building
engineer, fire alarm and sprinkler contractor, security system contractor, and
elevator contractor and their respective work phone number, cell phone number
and e-mail address;
13.3. Building construction information that includes: the type of building
construction
including but not limited to floors, walls, columns and roof assembly;
13.4. Exit access stairway and exit stairway information that includes: number of
exit access stairways and exit stairways in building; each exit access stairway and
exit stairway designation and floors served; location where each exit access
stairway and exit stairway discharges, interior exit stairways that are pressurized;
exit stairways provided with emergency lighting; each exit stairway that allows
reentry; exit stairways providing roof access; elevator information that includes:
number of elevator banks, elevator bank designation, elevator car numbers and
respective floors that they serve; location of elevator machine rooms, control
rooms and control spaces; location of sky lobby; and location of freight elevator
banks;
13.5. Building services and system information that includes: location of
mechanical rooms, location of building management system, location and
capacity of all fuel oil tanks, location of emergency generator and location of
natural gas service;
13.6. Fire protection system information that includes: location of standpipes,
location of fire pump room, location of fire department connections, floors
protected by automatic sprinklers and location of different types of automatic
sprinkler systems installed including but not limited to dry, wet and pre-action;
13.7. Hazardous material information that includes: location and quantity of
hazardous material.
14. Work table.
15. Generator supervision devices, manual start and transfer features.
16. Public address system, where specifically required by other sections of this code.
17. Elevator fire recall switch in accordance with ASME A17.1/CSA B44.
18. Elevator emergency or standby power selector switch(es), where emergency or
standby power is provided.
19. A key box shall be permanently installed near the door to the fire command
center. The key box shall be located 4 to 5 1/2 feet (1219 mm to 1677 mm) above
grade in a clearly visible location, with no fewer than eight sets of keys, unless
additional keys are required by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), #19 added
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).

Reason: Add items 1-6 to 13.2 in list format, #1-3,6, 7, & 11 remove “via the…” #11 add
individually indicated. #19 supports operations, reference 506.1.4 to a maximum of 12 on site.
281. 508.1.6.2 Fire department communications system. Two-way hardwired communication
systems are required in high-rise buildings.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Clarifies the requirements for high-rise buildings to have both a hardwired and
wireless communication system.
282. 509.1 Identification. Fire protection equipment shall be identified in an approved
manner. Rooms containing controls for air-conditioning systems, sprinkler risers and
valves, or other fire detection, suppression or control elements shall be identified for the
use of the fire department. Approved signs required to identify fire protection
equipment and equipment location shall be constructed of durable materials,
permanently installed and readily visible. See Appendix D.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Points to Phoenix details for signage in Appendix D
283. 510.1.1 New buildings that pass a benchmark test are not required to re-test annually to
verify compliance. A re-test is required for any of the following qualifying events.
1. New construction or tenant improvement.
2. Change of occupancy or use.
3. Operations or other public safety departments flag the property for radio
communication issues.
4. Where required by the Fire Code Official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: The added section clarifies how often a building is required to be tested and
includes the qualifying events for retest. New to 2024.
284. 510.3 Permit required. A construction permit for the installation of or modification to
emergency responder radio coverage systems and related equipment is required as
specified in Sections 105.7.6 and 105.5.14. Maintenance performed in accordance with
this code is not considered a modification and does not require a permit.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: The section in 510 should reference the operational permit in section
105.5.14. New to 2024.
285. 510.3.1 Permit required. A construction permit for the installation of or modification to
in-building emergency responder communications enhancement systems and related
equipment is required as specified in Section 105.6.5. Modifications include, but are not
limited to, changes to the frequency list, BDA replacements, donor antenna changes, or
re-optimization with Regional Wireless Cooperative (RWC) require permits.
Maintenance performed in accordance with this code is not considered a modification
and does not require a permit.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: The permit requirement needs additional clarification on what a modification
is. New to 2024.
286. 510.4.2 System design. The in-building emergency responder communications
enhancement system shall be designed in accordance with Sections 510.4.2.1 through
510.4.2.10 and NFPA 1225.
Reason: Provides user with design guidelines and reference standard for ERRCS. New
to 2024.
287. 510.5.5 FCC compliance. The in-building emergency responder communications

enhancement system installation and components shall comply with all applicable
federal regulations including, but not limited to, FCC 47 CFR Part 90.219. The system
shall not radiate more than -43 dBm of noise in-band and -70dBm of noise out-of-band
of operation.
Reason: Greater detail added to this to clarify what reporting shall be provided at
acceptance testing. New to 2024.
288. 510.5.5.1 FCC licensee control. An emergency power off button (EPO) shall be provided
at the main BDA for emergency shut down of the system. When the EPO is used the
RWC and Fire Department shall be notified. The EPO shall be identified with signage in
accordance with Appendix D.
Reason: The BDA are often in secured buildings and areas that prevent the easy
access of the FCC licensee to be able to shut down these systems. An EPO will allow
any person who has access to the system to easily shut down the system with no prior
knowledge of how to interact with the system. Includes requirement to notify the Fire
Department and RWC when a BDA is shut down. New to 2024.
289. 510.5.6 Acceptance test documentation. At the conclusion of acceptance testing,
updated documentation shall be kept at the site that includes the following:
a. All system equipment utilized
b. Manufacturer’s data sheets
c. Installation, testing, and maintenance documentation
d. As-built drawings showing all equipment locations
e. FCC License Holder express written consent.
f. Written documentation acceptable to the AHJ of the initial system testing,
including system performance measurements at all locations covered by the
installed system
g. Secondary power calculations
h. List of assigned frequencies
i. Where signal boosters are used, system isolation test results
j. Measured signal source levels
k. Identification of the type of signal source
l. The settings of all frequency channels or bands, subbands, channel/band gains,
and filter bandwidths, and all configurable parameters of automatic gain control
(AGC) modes used during the installation and testing
m. FCC part 90 in band and out of band test results.
n. Material and installation warranty information.
o. Central station report showing alarm points tested.

Reason: More clarity added as to the level of detail needed in the documents left
onsite. New to 2024.
290. 511.1 Sprinkler requirement. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in Group
R-3 and R-4 occupancies on hillside areas where the gradient for a fire apparatus access
road exceeds 15 percent, or hydrant spacing does not comply with Section 507, or a
reliable water supply is not available. Group R-4 occupancies up to four stories in height
shall require a minimum NFPA 13R automatic sprinkler system to be installed. Group R-
3 occupancies, one-and two-family dwellings and manufactured homes, shall require a
minimum NFPA 13D automatic sprinkler system to be installed.

Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: 1988 code sprinkler requirements that pre-date the Tarver Ordinance.
Supports operations and provides consistent outcomes.
291. CONTROLLED ACCESS/SECURITY
GATES OR BARRIERS
512.1 General. The installation of controlled access/security gates or barriers across a
fire apparatus access road shall be approved by the fire code official and meet the
requirements of Section 512.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and addresses security requirements and their impact on
accessibility for fire operations providing consistent outcomes.
292. 512.1.1 Permits. Permits shall be required to install or modify controlled access gates.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: A way to monitor installations.
293. 512.1.2 Gate installation companies. When gates are installed at any location that
obstructs a fire apparatus access road, the installing company shall be licensed by the
Arizona Registrar of Contractors as L-5 or C-5.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Accountability and consistent outcomes.
294. 512.1.3 Egress. Fire apparatus access/security gates or barriers shall be designed and
installed such that they do not obstruct the egress or departure of emergency vehicles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and addresses security requirements and their impact on
accessibility for fire operations providing consistent outcomes.
295. 512.1.3.1 Pedestrian gates. Pedestrian gates installed as part of the means of egress
shall comply with the Phoenix Building Code and Chapter 10 of this code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and addresses security requirements and their impact on
accessibility for fire operations providing consistent outcomes.
296. 512.1.4 Maintenance. All fire apparatus access gates shall be maintained operable at all
times and shall be inspected at least annually. Copies of the annual inspection report
shall be maintained and be accessible for fire department review.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and addresses security requirements and their impact on
accessibility for fire operations providing consistent outcomes.
297 512.1.5 Inoperable gates. Controlled access gates that are inoperable and impede the
entrance of fire apparatus shall be chained open or removed at the owner’s expense.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and addresses security requirements and their impact on
accessibility for fire operations providing consistent outcomes.
298. 512.1.6 Illegal gates. Controlled access gates that cross fire apparatus access roads that
have been installed without a permit shall be chained open or removed at the owner’s
or installing contractor’s expense until a permit and final approval have been obtained
from the fire department.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides legal means to address violations.
299. 512.2 Fire apparatus access gates.
512.2.1 General. Access openings are required to be automatic where no turnaround is
provided for fire apparatus.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations.
300. 512.2.2 Main entrance identification. Access openings shall have signs that identify the
location of the property’s primary entrance, and signs shall be bolted on the street side
of the fire apparatus access gate (see Appendix D).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
301. 512.2.3 Marking and signage. Manual and automatic access openings are required to be
marked in accordance with Section 512.3.5. Signage shall be provided in accordance
with Section 512.5.2.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
302. 512.3 Controlled access gate specifications. When con-trolled access gates are installed
across a fire apparatus access road the specifications in Section 512.2 shall apply.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
303. 512.3.1 Opening width. When the gate is fully opened, a minimum 20-foot (6096 mm)
clear width shall be provided for both the entrance and exit gates. Gates installed and
approved prior to Nov. 8, 2003 shall be maintained in accordance with the original
approval. The fire code official shall require additional width opening where a 45-foot
(13 716 mm) fire apparatus turning radius cannot be met.
Exception: Access roads serving three or fewer Group R-3 occupancies within 350 feet
(107 m) from the street to each residence’s main entrance as the fire fighters travel
shall be exempt from the requirement of 20 feet (6096 mm).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes
304. 512.3.2 Electric and solar voltaic power system operated gates. Electric and solar-
operated gates shall be installed in accordance with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), added solar.
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Ensures gates are
installed with backup power.
305. 512.3.2.1 Backup power systems. Electric and solar operated gates shall be provided
with a backup power system. Backup power is permitted to be, but not limited to,
battery backup or connection to an emergency generator. The activation of the system
shall open gates and maintain them in the open position until primary power is restored
to the system.
Exception: Controlled access gates installed at occupancies other than multifamily
residential properties may remain closed until the emergency gate switch is activated
and shall then remain open while the backup power system is operating the gate.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Ensures gates are
installed with backup power.
306. 512.3.3 Opening time. Electric and solar-operated controlled access gates shall open at
a minimum rate of 1 foot per second (0.305 m/s).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides minimum standards.
307. 512.3.4 Key switch. Each electric and solar-operated controlled access gate shall be
equipped with an approved key switch on both sides of the gate. Where separate entry
and exit gates are provided, the emergency key switch shall open the entrance and exit
gates.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
308. 512.3.5 Key switch identification. An approved sign reading “F.D. ACCESS” shall be
installed within 12 inches (305 mm) of the emergency key switch. The key switch shall
be illuminated so as to be visible from fire apparatus (see Appendix D).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
309. 512.3.6 Height. The key switch shall be mounted between 51/2 and 6 feet (1676 to
1829 mm) above grade.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for access from fire apparatus.
310. 512.3.6.1 Solar photovoltaic cell location. The solar cell shall be located not less than 7
feet (2133 mm) above grade. The photovoltaic cell shall be located on the 4-inch by 4-
inch preemption post as shown in the solar powered gate detail (see Appendix D).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
311. 512.3.7 Obstruction and impairment. Posts, fences, vehicles, growth, trash, storage and
other materials shall not be kept near key switches in a manner that would prevent the
key switches from being visible.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes. Strike through
change to numbering sequence to correct 2018 error.
312. 512.3.8 Bypass of systems. When activated, the emergency key switch shall bypass all
occupant and loop switch systems.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes
313. 512.4 Preemption devices. Preemption devices are required on all new automatic fire
access gates installed after Jan. 1, 2001, at residential properties. Gates installed
without permits or proof of installation date require preemption devices. Voluntary
installations of preemption devices shall comply with the requirements of Section
512.4.2.
Exception: Access roads serving three or fewer Group R-3 occupancies.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes, provides quicker
response at multi-family and large complexes.
314. 512.4.1 Locations. The devices shall be installed such that the gate will open for both
ingress and egress of emergency vehicles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
315. 512.4.2 Minimum installation standards. The installation of preemption devices shall
comply with the following:
1. Detectors shall be mounted 8 to 10 feet (2439 to 3048 mm) above grade.
2. Detectors shall be located not less than 18 inches (457 mm) behind the gate
on the property side.
3. Detectors shall be mounted on a separate 4-inch by 4-inch (102 to 102 mm)
metal post and not on the guide post. The metal post shall be cemented not less
than 18 inches (457 mm) below grade.
4. Detectors shall activate at not less than 150 feet (45 720 mm) from the gate.
5. Detectors shall point toward both the approach and the exit path of the
emergency vehicle.
6. The sight path of the detector shall be free of visual obstructions such as
signs, covered parking, canopies and vegetation.
7. Individual detectors shall be mounted together with the power module in the dual
detector-mounting box. Detectors shall be approved by the fire department. A list of
approved devices will be maintained by the fire department and available to the public.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
316. 512.5 Manually controlled access gates. Where the fire code official determines that
manually controlled access gates cross fire apparatus access roads or other roads that
provide access to areas where immediate access is necessary for lifesaving or fire-
fighting purposes, such gates shall comply with Section 512.3.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes.
317. 512.5.1 Locking mechanism. All manual controlled access gates that cross a fire
apparatus access road shall use an approved dual padlock mechanism (see Appendix
D). Gates installed and approved prior to Nov. 8, 2003 shall be maintained in
accordance with the original approval.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes
318. 512.5.2 Signs. Approved signs shall be provided on the manual gates. The signs shall
have a reflective background and shall be bolted back-to-back onto each side of the
gate (see Appendix D).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes
319 512.5.3 Marking. Red, crosshatched striping not less than 6 inches (152 mm) wide shall
be painted on the ground surface on both sides of the manual access gate, including
recessed areas as determined by the Fire Department. No fewer than two applications
of paint are required.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides for consistent outcomes




Chapter 6 Building Services and Systems
320. ◆ Section 604 Fire Service Access Elevator, Elevator operation, maintenance and fire
service keys
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
321. 604.8 General.
Where required by Section 403.6.1 of the International Building Code, every floor
above and including the lowest level of fire department vehicle access of the building
shall be served by fire service access elevators complying with Sections 604.8 through
604.8.9. Except as modified in this section, fire service access elevators shall be
installed in accordance with this chapter and ASME A17.1/CSA B44.
Exceptions:
1. Elevators that only service an open or enclosed parking garage and the lobby of the
building shall not be required to serve as fire service access elevators.
2. The elevator shall not be required to serve the top floor of a building where that
floor is utilized only for equipment for building systems.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
322. 604.8.1 Automatic sprinkler system. The building shall be equipped throughout with
an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, except as
otherwise permitted by Section 903.3.1.1.1 and as prohibited by Section 3007.2.1 of
the International Building Code.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
323. 604.8.2 Prohibited locations. Automatic sprinklers shall not be installed in machine
rooms, elevator machinery spaces, control rooms, control spaces and elevator
hoistways of fire service access elevators.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
324. 604.8.3 Automatic sprinkler system monitoring. The automatic sprinkler system shall
have a sprinkler control valve supervisory switch and water-flow-initiating device
provided for each floor that is monitored by the building’s fire alarm system.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
325. 604.8.3 Water protection. Water from the operation of an automatic sprinkler system
outside the enclosed lobby shall be prevented from infiltrating into the hoistway
enclosure in accordance with an approved method.

Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
326. 604.8.4 Shunt trip. Means for elevator shutdown in accordance with Section 3005.5
shall not be installed on elevator systems used for fire service access elevators.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
327. 604.8.5 Hoistway enclosures. The fire service access elevator hoistway shall be
located in a shaft enclosure complying with Section 713.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
328. 604.8.5.1 Structural integrity of hoistway enclosures. The fire service access elevator
hoistway enclosure shall comply with Sections 403.2.2.1 through 403.2.2.4 of the
International Building Code.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
329. 604.8.5.2 Hoistway lighting. When firefighters’ emergency operation is active, the
entire height of the hoistway shall be illuminated at not less than 1 footcandle (11 lux)
as measured from the top of the car of each fire service access elevator.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
330. 604.8.6 Fire service access elevator lobby.
The fire service access elevator shall open into an enclosed fire service access elevator
lobby in accordance with Sections 604.8.6.1 through 604.8.6.5. Egress is permitted
through the enclosed elevator lobby in accordance with Item 1 of Section 1016.2 of
the International Building Code.
Exceptions:
1. Where a fire service access elevator has two entrances onto a floor, the second
entrance shall be permitted to be protected in accordance with Section 3006.3.
2. A fire service access elevator lobby is not required to be provided at an occupiable
roof.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
331. 604.8.6.1 Access to interior exit stairway or ramp. The enclosed fire service access
elevator lobby shall have direct access from the enclosed elevator lobby to an
enclosure for an interior exit stairway or ramp.


Exception: Access to an interior exit stairway or ramp shall be permitted to be through
a protected path of travel that has a level of fire protection not less than the elevator
lobby enclosure. The protected path shall be separated from the enclosed elevator
lobby through an opening protected by a smoke and draft control assembly in
accordance Section 716.2.2.1 of the International Building Code.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
332. 604.8.6.2 Elevator lobby separation. The fire service access elevator lobby shall be
separated from each floor with a smoke barrier in accordance with Section 709 of the
International Building Code, except that lobby doorways shall comply with Section
604.8.6.3.
Exception: Fire service access elevator lobbies are not required to be separated at the
levels of exit discharge.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
334. 604.8.6.3 Elevator lobby doorways. Other than doors to the elevator control room or
elevator control space, each door in the smoke barrier shall be provided with a 3/4-
hour fire door assembly complying with Section 716 of the International Building
Code. Such a fire door assembly shall comply with the smoke and draft control door
assembly requirements of Section 716.2.2.1.1 of the International Building Code and
be tested in accordance with UL 1784 without an artificial bottom seal.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
335. 604.8.6.4 Lobby size. Regardless of the number of fire service access elevators served
by the same elevator lobby, the enclosed fire service access elevator lobby shall be
not less than 150 square feet (14 m2) in an area with a dimension of not less than 8
feet (2440 mm).
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
336. 604.8.6.5 Fire service access elevator symbol. A pictorial symbol of a standardized
design designating which elevators are fire service access elevators shall be installed
on each side of the hoistway door frame on the portion of the frame at right angles to
the fire service access elevator lobby. The fire service access elevator symbol shall be
designed as shown in Figure 604.8.6.5 and shall comply with the following:
1. The fire service access elevator symbol shall be not less than 3 inches (76 mm) in
height.
2. The helmet shall contrast with the background, with either a light helmet on a dark
background or a dark helmet on a light background.
3. The vertical center line of the fire service access elevator symbol shall be centered
on the hoistway door frame. Each symbol shall be not less than 78 inches (1981 mm),

and not more than 84 inches (2134 mm) above the finished floor at the threshold.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
337. FIGURE 604.8.6.5 FIRE SERVICE ACCESS ELEVATOR SYMBOL




Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
338. 604.8.7 Elevator system monitoring. The fire service access elevator shall be
continuously monitored at the fire command center by a standard emergency service
interface system meeting the requirements of NFPA 72.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
339. 604.8.8 Electrical power. The following features serving each fire service access
elevator shall be supplied by both normal power and Type 60/Class 2/Level 1 standby
power:
1. Elevator equipment.
2. Elevator hoistway lighting.
3. Ventilation and cooling equipment for elevator machine rooms, control rooms,
machine spaces and control spaces.
4. Elevator car lighting.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
340. 604.8.8.1 Protection of wiring or cables. Wires or cables that are located outside of
the elevator hoistway and machine room and that provide normal or standby power,
control signals, communication with the car, lighting, heating, air conditioning,
ventilation and fire-detecting systems to fire service access elevators shall be
protected using one of the following methods:
1.Cables used for survivability of required critical circuits shall be listed in accordance

with UL 2196 and shall have a fire-resistance rating of not less than 2 hours.
2.Electrical circuit protective systems shall have a fire-resistance rating of not less than
2 hours. Electrical circuit protective systems shall be installed in accordance with their
listing requirements.
3.Construction having a fire-resistance rating of not less than 2 hours.
Exception: Wiring and cables to control signals are not required to be protected
provided that wiring and cables do not serve Phase II emergency in-car operations.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
341. 604.8.9 Standpipe hose connection. A Class I standpipe hose connection in
accordance with Section 905 shall be provided in the interior exit stairway and ramp
having direct access from the enclosed fire service access elevator lobby.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
342. 604.8.9.1 Access. The exit enclosure containing the standpipe shall have access to the
floor without passing through the enclosed fire service access elevator lobby.
Reason: New to 2024, section 3007 Fire Service Access Elevator from the
International Building Code bring incorporated into the Phoenix Fire Code to align code
requirements with enforcement authority seated within Fire Prevention under the Fire
Marshal.
343. 605.4.2 Fuel oil storage inside buildings. Fuel oil storage inside buildings shall comply
with Sections 605.4.2.2 through 605.4.2.8 and Chapter 57.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
344. 608.1.3 Pipe labeling. Piping shall be labeled every 20 feet or change of direction per
Section 5003.2.2.1(2). All piping containing ammonia shall be labeled per IIAR Bulletin
14.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
345. 608.1.4 Valve tagging. All valves shall be tagged per Section 5003.2.2.1(2), and
marked on the Piping and Instrumentation diagram.
346. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
347. 608.7.2 Maintenance. Mechanical refrigeration systems shall be maintained in proper
operating condition, free from accumulations of oil, dirt, waste, excessive corrosion
and other debris and leaks, in accordance with the International Mechanical Code.
348. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
349. 608.7.3 Operators. Facilities using ammonia refrigeration equipment shall, upon the


request of the Fire Department, provide evidence that the refrigeration equipment is
maintained and operated by technicians who have Certified Industrial Refrigeration
Equipment Operator (CIRO) certification through the Refrigeration Engineer’s and
Technician’s Association, or similar nationally recognized certification approved by the
fire code official.
350. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
351. 608.7.4 Emergency response documents.
Emergency response documents shall be maintained at a location approved by the fire
department and include the following:
1. Hazardous material permit application.
2. Site map.
3. Hazardous materials inventory statement.
4. EPCRA emergency response plan questionnaire.
5. Facility emergency response plan.
6. Refrigerant system operation guide detailing compressor room layout, piping and
instrumentation diagram (P&ID), valve schedule, emergency pressure control
shutdown procedures, and supporting documentation as required by the fire code
official.
352. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
353. 608.9 Refrigerant detection. Refrigerant detection systems shall be in accordance with
Section 916.
Reason: New to 2024, the intent is to consolidate all gas detection requirements
throughout the Phoenix Fire Code to section 916.
354. 608.9.2 Ventilation system. A clearly identified ventilation system switch of the break-
glass type or an approved tamper-resistant cover shall provide on-only control of the
machinery room ventilation fans in accordance with the International Mechanical Code.
355. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
356. 608.9.3 Wind indicator. A wind sock, pennant or other wind indicator shall be provided
and clearly visible near the machinery room.
357. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
358. 608.9.4 Machinery room door sign.
A permanent sign shall be mounted on or near the machinery room door with the
following information:
1. Name of facility.
2. Address.


3.Total refrigerant system charge.
359. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
360. 608.13.8 Additional ammonia diffusion tank features.
An ammonia diffusion tank shall have the following additional features:
1.Automatic fill capability.
2. External sight board visible from a distance of not less than 150 feet (45 720mm)
for the fire apparatus access lane.
3. Ammonia leak detection in relief vent piping or at diffusion tank.
4. A fire hydrant located within 200 feet (60 960 mm) from the fire department
connection to the ammonia diffusion tank.
5. The Fire Department Connection (FDC) marked with a sign that says: “FDC TO
AMMONIA DIFFUSION TANK ONLY” per PFD specifications. See Appendix D.
6. An ammonia diffusion tank labeled: “AMMONIA DIFFUSION TANK” using
contrasting background that is visible at a distance of at least 150 feet (45 720 mm).
An ammonia diffusion tank shall have a low water sensor with an audible or visual
alarm located in an approved location nearby. The audible or visual device shall be
labeled: “Low Water—Ammonia Diffusion Tank.”
361. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
362. 608.16 Records. A record of refrigerant quantities brought into and removed from the
premises shall be maintained in a location approved by the fire code official.
363. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
364. 608.18.4 Alternative design requirements for refrigeration systems. Alternative designs
shall be approved by appeal to the fire code official.
365. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.
366. 609.3 Cryogenic tanks and piping. Cryogenic tanks and piping associated with
hyperbaric facilities shall also comply with Chapters 50 and 55.
367. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Existing unchanged amendment brought forward, section reference change
made in 2024.




Chapter 7 Fire and Smoke Protection Features
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at this time.
Reason:




Chapter 8 Interior Finish, Decorative Materials and Furnishings
368. 807.1 General. The following requirements shall apply to all occupancies:
1. Furnishings or decorative materials of an explosive or highly flammable character shall
not be used.
2. Fire-retardant coatings in existing buildings shall be maintained so as to retain the
effectiveness of the treatment under service conditions encountered in actual use.
3. Furnishings or other objects shall not be placed to obstruct exits, access thereto, egress
therefrom or visibility thereof.
4. The permissible amount of noncombustible decorative materials shall not be limited.
Upon request by the fire code official, the business owner or designee shall provide proof
of flame retardancy. The procedure for conducting field flame tests on combustible
decorative materials and decorative vegetation shall be in accordance with Section 806 and
807 and the provisions of NFPA 701 and 705.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Codifies standard operating procedures found in NFPA 701 and 705 for field
testing flame treated fabric.
369. 807.3.1 Proof of retardancy. Proof of flame retardancy shall be in the form of a certificate
from the decorative material manufacturer, or the business owner or designee shall submit
documentation showing that the decorative material has been treated with a sufficiently
effective amount of flame retardant. Where documentation/certification is not provided, a
field flame test shall be conducted in accordance with NFPA 705, Recommended Practice
for a Field Flame Test for Textiles and Films.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Codifies standard operating procedures found in NFPA 701 and 705 for field
testing flame treated fabric.
370. 807.3.2 Match flame test. A match flame test shall be conducted as follows:
1. The test shall be performed in a draft-free, safe location.
2. Test samples shall be dry and shall be at least 11/2 inches (38 mm) wide and 4 inches
(102 mm) long.
3. The sample shall be held in a vertical position with the flame from a wood match
applied to the center of the bottom edge, 1/2 inch (12.7 mm) above the bottom of
the flame.
4. After 12 seconds of flame exposure, the match shall be removed from the sample.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Codifies standard operating procedures found in NFPA 701 and 705 for field
testing flame treated fabric..
371. 807.3.3 Passing field flame test. A combustible decorative material may be deemed flame
resistant when all the following criteria are met:
1. The flame does not spread over the complete length of the sample or more than 4
inches (102 mm) from the bottom of the sample.
2. When the fire is removed, there is no more than 2 seconds of after-flame.
3. The material does not break or drip flaming particles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).

Reason: Codifies standard operating procedures found in NFPA 701 and 705 for field
testing flame treated fabric..
372. 807.3.4 Failing field flame test. The fire code official shall require that combustible
decorative materials that do not meet the field flame test be removed from the building or
structure.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Codifies standard operating procedures found in NFPA 701 and 705 for field
testing flame treated fabric.




Chapter 9 Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems
373. 901.2 Construction documents. The fire code official shall have the authority to
require construction documents and calculations for all fire protection systems and
to require permits be issued for the installation, rehabilitation or modification of any
fire protection system. All work done on new and existing systems shall meet the
requirements of the current adopted codes and standards. Construction documents
for fire protection systems shall be submitted for review and approval prior to system
installation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Reiterates Section 102 language.
374. 901.4.7.3 Environment. Automatic sprinkler system riser rooms and fire pump rooms
shall be maintained at a temperature of not less than 40ºF (4ºC) and not more than
100ºF (37ºC). All fire protection equipment in the room/space shall be listed for the
temperatures anticipated in the space/room. If equipment listing temperatures
and/or manufacture specifications fall below the anticipated maximum room/space
temperatures, then cooling shall be provided to meet equipment listing. Heating and
cooling units shall be permanently installed.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Accommodates City of Phoenix permits.
375. 901.5.2 Stocking and loading. No portion of a building or structure shall be stocked
or loaded with combustible fixtures or furnishings or regular stock until the required
automatic fire sprinkler system has been tested and approved and a temporary
certificate of occupancy issued. Where a fire alarm system is required, it shall be
approved and monitored or fire watch shall be provided, prior to stocking and
loading. No hazardous materials or processes shall be introduced until all required
fire protections systems or process piping systems are installed and approved.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5898 April 18, 2014 (2012 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Addresses what actions are permitted prior to full TCO issuance. Added
to assist businesses and opening dates.
376. 901.6 Inspection, testing and maintenance. Fire protection and life safety systems
listed in Table 901.6.1 shall be maintained in an operative condition at all times, and
shall be replaced or repaired where defective. Nonrequired fire protection and life
safety systems and equipment shall be inspected, tested and maintained or removed
in accordance with Section 901.8. Appendix I is adopted as part of the Phoenix Fire
Code. This appendix is not intended to provide comprehensive inspection, testing
and maintenance requirements. Rather, it is intended to identify problems that are
readily observable during fire inspections.
All fire protection systems shall be inspected and tested by a contractor licensed by
the State of Arizona who is a current qualified contractor by the Phoenix Fire
Department to work on the particular fire protection system being inspected or
tested in accordance with NFPA standards (see Section 110.1). It shall be the
responsibility of the owner to ensure that these requirements are met.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).

Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. 901.6 has changed in base IFC, PFD has amended table
901.6.1 to include systems previous amended in 901.6in the 2018 edition of PFC.
The remainder of existing amendments were brought forward to ensure a
qualified party is conducting inspections and providing maintenance on life safety
systems.
377. 901.6.1 Standards. Fire protection systems shall be inspected, tested and
maintained in accordance with the referenced standards listed in Table 901.6.1.
Where no minimum maintenance standards exist, inspections shall be not less than
annually.
TABLE 901.6.1 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM
MAINTENANCE STANDARDS
SYSTEM STANDARD
Smoke control systems NFPA 92
Standard on Breathing Air Quality
for Emergency Services NFPA 1989
Respiratory Protection
Emergency Responder
Communication Enhancement NFPA 1225
Systems
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Adding NFPA standards as refences for the testing inspection and
maintenance of the life safety systems they are associated with.
378. 901.6.3.1 Records information. Initial records shall include the name of the
installation contractor, type of components installed, manufacturer of the
components, location and number of components installed per floor. Records shall
include the manufacturers’ operation and maintenance instruction manuals. Such
records shall be maintained for the life of the installation.
Inspection and test reports and records shall include the name of the company
performing the inspection or test, the qualified contractor contact information, and
the printed name and signature of the company representative performing the
inspection and tests.
Exception: In Group R-3 occupancies, other than R-3 Arizona licensed care facilities,
the owner or a licensed contractor shall be responsible for inspecting and testing all
fire protection and detection systems.
All required inspection reports shall be sent to the fire code official upon completion
of inspection. If the system is found to be noncompliant, a brief description and
corresponding code shall be listed. A copy shall be signed by the building owner or
representative. For systems out of service see Section 901.7.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added to increase accountability of those conducting inspections and
maintenance and includes the requirement to submit reports to the fire code
official.
379. 901.6.3.2 Inspection and testing tags. Upon completion of the inspection and
testing of fire protection systems, a tag shall be attached to the system in a
conspicuous location. The tag shall document the date of inspection or test, the
name of the qualified contractor company, the name of the individual performing
the inspection or tests and whether the system has deficiencies.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Added to increase accountability of those conducting inspections and
maintenance and provide leverage to when repairs are not being made.
380. 901.6.3.3 Inspection forms. Inspection and test records shall be documented on
forms that comply with the appropriate inspection standard. The forms shall clearly
identify type and quantities of all components inspected or tested and identify all
deficiencies found. Deficiencies shall be identified by the appropriate code or
standard referenced.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Added to increase accountability of those conducting inspections and
maintenance and provide leverage to owners when repairs are not being made.
381. 901.7 Systems out of service. Where a required fire protection system is out of
service and, where required by the fire code official, the building shall be either
evacuated and/or an approved fire watch shall be provided for until the fire
protection system has been returned to service.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC). Last sentence added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Identifies proper contacts during system service. Allows operations to
make alternative choices on response.
382. 901.7.4 Preplanned impairment programs. Preplanned impairments shall be
authorized by the impairment coordinator. Before authorization is given, a
designated individual shall be responsible for verifying that all of the following
procedures have been implemented:
1. The extent and expected duration of the impairment have been determined.
2. The areas or buildings involved have been inspected and the increased risks
determined.
3. Recommendations have been submitted to management or the building
owner/manager.
4. The Phoenix Fire Department at 602-495-5555 has been notified.
5. The insurance carrier, the alarm company, the building owner/manager and
other authorities having jurisdiction have been notified.
6. Occupants in the areas to be affected have been notified.
7. A tag impairment system has been implemented.
8. Necessary tools and materials have been assembled on the impairment site.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), #9 added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Identifies proper contacts during system service. Allows operations to
make alternative choices on response. #6 amended to provides specific contact
info and direct instructions to be provided to occupants not just Supervisors.
Provides specific contact info and direct instructions to be provided to occupants
not just Supervisors.
383. 901.7.6 Restoring systems to service. Where impaired equipment is restored to
normal working order, the impairment coordinator shall verify that all of the
following procedures have been implemented:
1. Necessary inspections and tests have been conducted to verify that affected
systems are operational.
2. Occupants in the areas affected have been advised that protection is
restored.
3. The Phoenix Fire Department Alarm Room 602-495-5555 has been advised
that protection is restored.
4. The building owner/manager, insurance carrier, alarm company and other
involved parties have been advised that protection is restored.
5. The impairment tag has been removed.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Identifies proper contacts during system service. Allows operations to
make alternative choices on response.
384. 901.8.1 Removal of or tampering with appurtenances. Locks, gates, key boxes, key
switches, preemption devices, doors, barricades, chains, enclosures, signs, tags or
seals that have been installed by or at the direction of the fire code official shall not
be removed, unlocked, destroyed, tampered with or otherwise vandalized in any
manner.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added to address unscrupulous gate vendors who were removing and
reusing equipment, leaving operations locked out of facilities noted to have key
boxes.
385. 901.11 Clearance around fire-protection systems and equipment. A minimum 3-foot
(914 mm) clear space, on a minimum of two sides, shall be maintained for ready
access to fire protection equipment, including control valves and control panels.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and give fire protection the same access
requirements as electrical equipment.
386. 901.12 Protection of exterior exposed sprinkler system components. Protection for
exterior exposed sprinkler system components shall be as follows:


1. Steel sprinkler pipe and components located on the exterior of a building shall
be either galvanized or painted to protect from corrosion. There is no restriction
on size for freezing protection.
2. Non-steel sprinkler pipe smaller than 2 inches (51 mm) in diameter shall be
insulated to protect from freezing.
3. Hydraulic design information signs shall be metal with the information
maintained clearly and permanently stamped onto the sign.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: More lenient that national code provides minimum consistent outcomes
for enduring life safety systems in the Phoenix climate.
387. 902.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:
COMMON AREA.
MAINTENANCE.
MODIFICATION.
SHELL BUILDINGS.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC, maintenance and
modification added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), common area
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC) common area
added.
Reason: Added to define the scope of required systems and permittable
actions.
Common area added as a combination of fire code, building codes and ADA
definitions to provide guidance for audio/visual alarms.
388. 903.1 General. Automatic sprinkler systems shall comply with the Bret Tarver
Sprinkler Ordinance. An approved automatic sprinkler system shall be installed
throughout all levels of all new Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R-1, R-2, R-4 and S
occupancies of any size and throughout all Group R-3 occupancies including one-
and two-family dwellings built under the International Residential Code, and Group
U occupancies of more than 5,000 square feet (464 m2).
The calculated area of Group R-3 occupancies shall include all livable space and the
area of any attached garage and carports or areas located under living spaces.
Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 13 for Group
A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R-1, R-2, R-4 and S occupancies. Automatic sprinkler systems
shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 13R for residential occupancies up to and
including four stories in height, in Groups R-1, R-2, R-4 occupancies and NFPA 13D
for one- and two-family dwellings and mobile homes in Group R-3 and R-4
occupancies with six to 10 licensed beds. Exceptions to or reductions in code
requirements are not allowed for the installation of residential sprinkler systems
installed in accordance with NFPA 13R and NFPA 13D unless specifically allowed by
the International Building Code. Exceptions to or reductions in code requirements
for NFPA 13 systems allowed in the International Building Code are allowed.


Exceptions:
1. Detached gazebos, temporary tents and ramadas for residential and public
use.
2. Independent building of any construction or occupancy, other than Group E
or H, of 700 square feet (65 m2) or less.
3. Detached noncombustible carports or parking canopies, and detached
noncombustible canopies used exclusively for automotive motor fuel
dispensing station not exceeding 5,000 square feet (464 m2).
4. Factory-built buildings utilized as temporary office buildings similar to real
estate leasing offices and construction offices.
5. Playground equipment, carwashes and small canopies for shade that are
less than 5,000 square feet (464 m2) in area and constructed of limited or
noncombustible material and are more than 5 feet (1524 mm) from the
nearest structure.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), #2 increased from 600
square feet. #3 & 4 covered by #2 and #3 added. The last sentence of
paragraph 2 edited after change in State law regarding residential sprinklers.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4821 August 30, 2006 (2003 amendment package),
deletes #3
Adopted by Ordinance G-4795 May 3, 2006 (2003 amendment package), item #5
adopted [#5 in blue]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC), exceptions 1-8
adopted.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4669 January 12, 2005 (1997 UFC amendment), adds
Occupancy Hazards Table, changes zero square footage requirement to 2,500
and higher hazard.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4771 November 13, 2002– (1997 UFC amendment),
increase equipment/storage bld. Size, adds additions in 3-year period, R-3 50%
increase in size = >5,000, change of occupancy or 50% increase or > 10,000
commercial.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4432 June 15, 2002 – (1997 UFC amendment).
Reason: Added as a response to the death of firefighter Bret Tarver, to ensure
a minimum life safety and property protection in line with other jurisdictions in
the Valley.
389. 903.1.1 Alternative protection. Alternative automatic fire-extinguishing systems
complying with Section 904 shall be permitted instead of automatic sprinkler system
protection where recognized by the applicable standard and approved by the fire
code official.
903.1.1 Retrofit. Existing buildings are required to comply with the provisions of
Sections 903.1.2 through 903.1.7.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. 903.1.1 changed in 2024 to Alternative protection,
previously 903.1.9. PFD will keep Alternative protection section 903.1.9 as to not
resection more of base code. Added as a response to the death of firefighter Bret
Tarver, to ensure a minimum life safety and property protection in line with other
jurisdictions in the Valley. Southwest Super Market had had many renovations
creating combustible concealed spaces.
390. 903.1.2 Retrofit in Group R-3 occupancies. One or more additions within any 3-year
period are made to a Group R3 occupancy and comply with all of the following:
1. The aggregate of the additions exceeds 50 percent of the square footage of
the house as of June 17, 2002.
2. The new total area of the building is greater than 5,000 square feet (464 m2).
The calculated area of Group R-3 occupancies shall include all livable space and
the area of any attached garage, carports, aircraft hangar or basement.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Amended by Regulation 903.1.2 to add “all” back, due to change in State law
regarding existing sprinkler code.
Amended by Ordinance G-5989 Effective April 18, 2014 (to remove all of).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Added as a response to the death of firefighter Bret Tarver, to ensure a minimum
life safety and property protection in line with other jurisdictions in the Valley.
Southwest Super Market had had many renovations creating combustible concealed
spaces.
Reason: This amendment represents a compromise with the Home Builders
Association when the citizen Fire Safety Advisory Board wanted a zero-square
footage requirement. It was agreed that the 5,000-square foot size was no longer
“affordable” housing. This large structure behaves more like a commercial building
when on fire.
391. 903.1.3 Building additions. Building additions in existing occupancies other than
Group R-3 shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler where any of the
following apply:
1. Building additions equal 50 percent or more of the existing building floor area,
or exceed 10,000 square feet (929 m2), whichever is less.
2. Two or more building permits related to increased square footage are issued
over any three consecutive years where:
2.1. The aggregate of the additions exceeds 50 percent of the square
footage of the building as of June 17, 2002.
2.2. The new total area of the building is greater than 10,000 square feet
(929 m2).
3. They are required to be protected in accordance with the City of Phoenix
Building Code or City of Phoenix Residential Code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), fire area added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5149 June 6, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 January 30, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment
package). [903.2.1.3]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [903.2.1.3(4)
Reason: Added as a response to the death of firefighter Bret Tarver, to ensure
a minimum life safety and property protection in line with other jurisdictions in
the Valley. Southwest Super Market had had many renovations creating
combustible concealed spaces.
392. 903.1.4 Building remodels. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed
where 50 percent or more of the roof structure is replaced or repaired or where the
removal of existing fire-rated assemblies results in an increase of the original basic
fire area.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), fire area added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5149 June 6, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 January 30, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment
package). [903.2.1.3]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [903.2.1.3(4)
Reason: Added as a response to the death of firefighter Bret Tarver, to ensure
a minimum life safety and property protection in line with other jurisdictions in
the Valley. Southwest Super Market had had many renovations creating
combustible concealed spaces. If half of the roof is in repair sprinklers can easily
be installed.
393. 903.1.5 Change of occupancy within hazard level 1. An automatic fire sprinkler
system shall be installed where a building, regardless of the building area,
undergoes a change of occupancy within Hazard Level 1 as defined by Table
903.1.5.
TABLE 903.1.5
HAZARD LEVEL
1997 UBC 2018 IFC 2024 IFC
HAZARD
OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY
LEVEL
TYPE TYPE2 TYPE
H, I, A, R-1, R-2, H, I, A, R-1, R-2,
H, I, A, R-1,
1 (highest) R-4 R-4, B-ACF1
R-2
B-ACF1
2 S-1, S-5, F-1 S-1, F-1 S-1, F-1
E, F-2, S-2, S- E, F-2, S-2
3 E, F-2, S-2
3, S-4
4 (lowest) B, M, U, R-3 B, M, U, R-3 B, M, U, R-3


1. Business, Ambulatory Care Facility.
2. Provided for guidance of equivalent occupancy types.

Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [903.2.1.3(5)]
Reason: Added as a response to the death of firefighter Bret Tarver, to ensure
a minimum life safety and property protection in line with other jurisdictions in
the Valley. Increases in hazard and life safety at risk and matched the
requirements for a new build.



394. 903.1.6 Change of occupancy over 2,500 square feet (232 m2). An automatic fire
sprinkler system shall be installed in any building 2,500 square feet (232 m2) or
greater that undergoes a change of occupancy.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: This amendment represents a compromise with the development
community when the citizen Fire Safety Advisory Board wanted a zero-square
footage requirement.
395. 903.1.7 Change of occupancy under 2,500 square feet (232 m2). An automatic fire
sprinkler system shall be installed in any building 2,500 square feet (232 m2) or less
that undergoes a change of occupancy to a higher hazard level as defined by Table
903.1.5.
Exceptions: An automatic fire sprinkler system is not required where the
following requirements are met:
1. The occupancy is 1,500 square feet (139 m2) or less.
2. There are openings entirely above the adjoining ground level totaling not
less than 20 square feet (1.85 m2) in each 50 linear feet (15 240 mm), or
fraction thereof, of exterior wall in the story on at least one side. Openings
shall have a minimum dimension of not less than 30 inches (762 mm). Such
openings shall be accessible to the fire department from the exterior and
shall not be obstructed in a manner that firefighting or rescue cannot be
accomplished from the exterior; and the occupancy is not classified as
Group H.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5308 March 6, 2009 (2006 IFC amendment package)
Reason: This amendment represents a compromise with the development
community when the citizen Fire Safety Advisory Board wanted a zero-square
footage requirement.
396. 903.1.8 Sprinkler systems—partially sprinklered buildings. When existing non-
sprinklered buildings of mixed occupancy are required to install sprinklers based on
a change of occupancy classification, sprinklers shall be installed throughout the fire
area that includes the new occupancy. Fire barriers or horizontal assemblies
separating sprinklered and non-sprinklered fire areas shall have a fire-resistance
rating of not less than 2 hours. Fire department connection signage shall be in
accordance with Section 912.4.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), exception added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Compromise for change of occupancies within strip malls and other
divided occupancies. Ensures new occupancy is not responsible for installing
sprinklers in the entire structure. The R occupancy exception ensures life safety
of occupancies where people are sleeping and not occupying businesses.
Provides for entire areas being upgraded at the same time.
397. 903.1.9 Alternative protection. Alternative automatic fire-extinguishing systems
complying with Section 904 shall be permitted instead of automatic sprinkler

protection where recognized by the applicable standard and approved by the fire
code official. Alternative fire suppression systems intended for prevention of
business interruption and equipment protection shall not substitute for full automatic
sprinkler coverage installed for structural and life safety protection.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Ensures documentation through the appeals process for non-
sprinklered buildings.
398. 903.2 Where required. Approved automatic sprinkler systems in new buildings and
structures shall be provided in the locations described in Sections 903.2.1 through
903.2.12. Where there is a conflict between a general requirement and an
occupancy specific requirement, the most restrictive requirement shall be applicable.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures special hazards are adequately protected through the proper
application of life safety.
399. 903.2.13 Shell buildings. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed in shell
buildings, other than Group M, F or S occupancies, of light and ordinary hazards per
Section 903.3.1.1 and NFPA 13. All of the following requirements shall be applied to
the design and installation of these systems.
1. Only nominal inch orifice, 5.6K, standard spray upright and pendent sprinkler
shall be used in shell building fire sprinkler system designs and installations.
2. Reduction in remote areas of operation for hydraulically designed systems shall
be prohibited when utilizing quick response sprinklers in shell building fire
sprinkler system designs and installations.
3. Extended coverage sprinkler shall be prohibited in the design and installation of
shell building fire sprinkler systems.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added at the request of the Fire Safety Advisory Board to ensure that
shell buildings can be adapted to office use without starting over with new piping
& design. Not otherwise addressed in the code.
400. 903.3 Installation requirements. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be designed and
installed in accordance with the following and Sections 903.3.1 through 903.3.8.
Design documents. For fire sprinkler systems, the following are considered to be
Registered Design Professional activities in accordance with the requirements of
the Arizona Board of Technical Registration.
1. Consider the range of hazards of the project.
1.1. Automatic sprinkler system design shall be based on the hazard
classification of the building or area in accordance with NFPA 13.
1.2. Automatic sprinkler system designs for high-piled storage shall be in
accordance with Chapter 32, High-piled Combustible Storage, and
Chapter 57, Flammable and Combustible Liquids.



2. Prepare hazard analysis; identify the hazard classification of the intended
occupancy, including any special hazards.
3. Determine the applicable codes and standards and appropriate engineering
practices.
4. Ascertain the availability and adequacy of the water supply for the project.
5. Determine the appropriate design density and area of operation for each
hazard area.
These activities shall be completed prior to development of construction
documents to be submitted for permit.
Exception: Automatic sprinkler systems installed in accordance with NFPA 13D.
Where Items 1 through 5 are addressed in a stamped narrative or single page,
the remaining fire sprinkler shop drawings may be prepared by a NICET 3 or 4.
Non-registrants may lay out automatic fire sprinkler systems and their related
hydraulic calculations for installation or permit.
Owner responsibilities. The owner of a building or structure where the fire
sprinkler system is going to be installed, or their authorized agent, shall provide
the design professional with the following information prior to preparation of
design documents in accordance with NFPA 13:
1. The intended use of the building.
2. A description of the materials to be used or stored within the building.
3. A description of how the materials are to be used in the building.
4. A description of the commodity stored and proposed storage configuration
including the maximum height.
5. A preliminary plan of the building or structure along with the design concepts
necessary to prepare the design documents listed in Section 903.1.9.
6. Speculative buildings with high-piled storage capability shall be in accordance
with Chapter 32.
These activities shall be completed prior to developing construction documents
to be submitted for permit.
Exception: Automatic sprinkler systems installed in accordance with NFPA 13D.
Shop drawings shall be prepared by a designer in accordance with the Arizona
Board of Technical Registration.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), item #6 added
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Added to delegate responsibilities for actual occupant hazard
classification to the owner so that engineers and architects could design
appropriately.
401. 903.3.1.1.1 Exempt locations. Automatic sprinklers shall not be required in the
following rooms or areas where such rooms or areas are protected with an approved
automatic fire detection system in accordance with Section 907.2 that will respond
to visible or invisible particles of combustion. Sprinklers shall not be omitted from a
room merely because it is damp, of fire-resistance-rated construction or contains
electrical equipment.
1. A room or space where sprinklers constitute a serious life or fire hazard
because of the nature of the contents, as determined by a technical opinion
and report prepared in accordance with Section 104.7.2 and where approved
by the fire code official.
2. Generator and transformer rooms separated from the remainder of the
building by walls and floor/ceiling or roof/ceiling assemblies having a fire-
resistance rating of not less than 2 hours.
3. Rooms or areas that are of noncombustible construction with wholly
noncombustible contents.
4. Fire service access elevator machine rooms and machinery spaces.
5. Machine rooms, machinery spaces, control rooms and control spaces
associated with occupant evacuation elevators designed in accordance with
Section 3008 of the International Building Code.
6. Sprinklers may be omitted from electrical vaults where access to the vault is
under control of the electrical utility company and the vaults are separated
from the rest of the building by fire-resistant construction in accordance with
the NFPA 70.
7. Linen closets or pantries that have multiple-level shelving and cannot be
walked into shall be considered cabinetry and shall not require sprinkler
protection.
8. Dedicated pedestrian walkways of noncombustible construction meeting the
criteria of NFPA 13.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), added item #9.
Adopted by Amendment Errata Items #7 & 8.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: #1 & 3 edited to involve appeals process in the decision
making/documenting process. #7 added from NFPA 70 to help with consistent
installation. #8 added because it is not adequately addressed in NFPA 13 or the
IFC. #9 added in reference to NFPA 13.
402. 903.3.1.1.4 Industrial shade canopies. Industrial shade canopies shall be protected
by an automatic sprinkler system.
Exceptions:
1. Industrial shade awnings and canopies attached to buildings that are not
otherwise required to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system.
2. Detached industrial awnings and shade canopies that do not exceed 1,000
square feet (93 m2) in area.
3. Detached industrial shade awnings and canopies that are made of
noncombustible material with a flame spread index not greater than 25 when
tested in accordance with ASME E84 which does not exceed 5,000 square
feet (372 m2).
4. Where slatted, lattice or louvered awnings or a canopy roof system is not less
than 50 percent open to the sky.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Language brought in from Phoenix Building Code for clarity.

403. 903.3.1.1.5 Mercantile shade awnings and canopies. Mercantile shade awnings and
canopies shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system.
Exceptions:
1. Where a slatted, lattice or louvered awning or canopy roof system is not less
than 50 percent open to the sky.
2. Where the shade membrane fabric used to cover garden, greenhouse,
landscaping or plant nursery products or materials does not exceed 5,000
square feet (372 m2).
3. Mercantile shade awnings and canopies attached to buildings that are not
otherwise required to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system.
4. Mercantile shade awnings and canopies that are made of noncombustible
material with a flame spread index not greater than 25 when tested in
accordance with ASME E84, not exceeding 10,000 square feet (93 m2).
5. Where sprinklers are permitted to be omitted for noncombustible shaded
walkway or pedestrian entry areas.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Language brought in from Phoenix Building Code for clarity.
404.  903.3.1.1.6 Nonresidential shade canopies. Nonresidential awnings, canopies
and patio covers shall be protected by an automatic sprinkler system.
Areas used for storage, seating and assembly shall be sprinklered. Structures over
5,000 square feet (372 m2) that receive an occupancy classification are subject to the
sprinkler requirements of the Bret Tarver Ordinance.
Exceptions:
1. Awnings, canopies and patio covers that do not exceed 400 square feet (37
m2) in area.
2. Awnings, canopies and patio covers attached to buildings that are not
otherwise required to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, and the
combined awing and building area do not exceed 2,500 square feet, in
accordance with Section 903.1.7.
3. Where a slatted, lattice or louvered awning, canopy and patio roof system is
not less than 50 percent open to the sky.
4. Where sprinklers are permitted to be omitted for noncombustible shaded
walkway or pedestrian entry areas.
5. Nonresidential awnings, canopies and patio covers that are made of
noncombustible material with a flame spread index not greater than 25 when
tested in accordance with ASME E84, not exceeding 1,000 square feet (93
m2).
6. Nonresidential awnings, canopies and patio covers that are used for covering
playground equipment and made of material with a flame spread index not
greater than 25 when tested in accordance with ASME E84.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Language brought in from Phoenix Building Code for clarity.


405. 903.3.1.2.1 Balconies and decks. Sprinkler protection shall be provided for exterior
balconies, decks and ground floor patios of dwelling units and sleeping units where
any of the following conditions exists:
1. The building is of Type V construction, provided that there is a roof or deck
above.
2. Exterior balconies, decks and ground floor patios of dwelling units and sleeping
units are constructed in accordance with Section 705.2.3.1, Exception 3 of the
International Building Code.
3. Patios with living spaces directly above.
Sidewall sprinklers that are used to protect such areas shall be permitted to be
located such that their deflectors are within 1 inch (25 mm) to 6 inches (152 mm)
below the structural members and a maximum distance of 14 inches (356 mm)
below the deck of the exterior balconies and decks that are constructed of open
wood joist construction.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added due to loss history in Phoenix and to protect living spaces not
clearly addressed in NFPA 13R
406. 903.3.1.2.4 Exterior storage closets. Sprinkler protection shall be extended into
attached exterior storage closets in Group R-1 and R-2 occupancies protected by
automatic sprinkler systems installed in accordance with NFPA 13R.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added to address loss history in Phoenix.
407. 903.3.1.2.5. Attached garages and carports. Attached garages and carports shall be
provided with sprinkler protection.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added due to loss history in Phoenix and to protect living spaces not
clearly addressed in NFPA 13R.
408. 903.3.1.2.6 Residential combination services. With prior Water Services Department
approval, a single combination water supply shall be permitted, provided that the
domestic demand is added to the sprinkler demand as required by NFPA 13R.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Clarifies requirement for Water Services Department approval in order
to use combination supply.
409. 903.3.1.3.1 Attached garages and carports. Attached garages and carports with
living space directly above shall be provided with sprinkler protection. Open patios
or balconies with living spaces directly above shall be provided with sprinkler
protection.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added due to loss history in Phoenix and to protect living spaces not
clearly addressed in NFPA 13D.
410. 903.3.1.3.2 Domestic services. Where the domestic service provides the water
supply for the automatic sprinkler system, the supply shall be in accordance with
Section 903.3.1.3.3 and NFPA 13D.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added for guidance as Phoenix water meters do not supply the same
amount of flow as the national code assumes.
411. 903.3.1.3.3 Residential combination services. A single combination water supply
shall be permitted, provided that the domestic demand is added to the sprinkler
demand as required by NFPA 13D.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added for guidance as Phoenix water meters do not supply the same
amount of flow as the national code assumes.
412. 903.3.5 Water supplies. Water supplies for automatic sprinkler systems shall comply
with this section and the standards referenced in Section 903.3.1. The potable water
supply shall be protected against backflow in accordance with the requirements of
this section and the International Plumbing Code or the Uniform Plumbing Code. For
connections to public waterworks systems, the water supply test used for design of
fire protection systems shall be adjusted to account for seasonal and daily pressure
fluctuations based on information from the water supply authority and as approved
by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added for guidance as Phoenix water meters do not supply the same
amount of flow as the national code assumes.
413. 903.3.5.3 Water supply tests. Hydrant flow tests used to design sprinkler systems,
standpipe systems, and fire supply mains shall be performed on public hydrants by
the City of Phoenix Water Services Department within 1 year of fire plans submittal.

A copy of the city's hydrant flow test report shall be submitted with the construction
documents and calculations. When conducting a hydrant flow test for the design of
automatic fire sprinkler systems, the minimum flow volume of the test shall meet or
exceed the system demand.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
2018: Change flow test to be completed within one year, in accordance with
historic data.
Reason: Amendment ensures fire flow for sprinkler systems.
414. 903.3.5.4 Water supply tests on private hydrants. Hydrant flow tests performed on
private hydrants by the property owner or his representative to be used in the design
of fire protection systems shall be witnessed by the Phoenix Fire Department. When
conducting a hydrant flow test for the design of automatic fire sprinkler systems,
the minimum flow volume of the test shall meet or exceed the system demand.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Ensures water supplies are adequate on private systems and adequate
for sprinkler system fire flow with the same integrity as public water tests are
subject to.
415. 903.3.5.5 Sprinkler design safety factor. Sprinkler systems for NFPA 13, 13R and
13D systems shall be designed with a minimum safety factor as follows:
1. When the static pressure exceeds 90 psi (621 kPa), the maximum design static
pressure shall be 80 psi (552 kPa) regardless of actual test pressure. The slope
of the original water supply curve shall be used even though the design
pressure is reduced to 80 psi (552 kPa).
The actual flow test pressures shall be used to determine the need for sizing
fire pumps, pressure reducing valves, and hanger requirements in accordance
with NFPA 13, 13D and 13R.
2. When the static pressure is less than 90 psi (621 kPa), a minimum 10 psi (69
kPa) safety factor shall be provided between the available water supply and the
system flow and pressure demand and shall include hose stream allowances
required by NFPA 13, 13D and 13R.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures water supplies will be available on new development areas
when the area is developed to the full extent of the Water Dept. area design.
Allows for seasonal and daily fluctuations.




416. 903.3.9 High-rise building floor control valves/water flow switches. Approved
supervised indicating control valves/water flow shall be provided at the point of
connection to the riser on each floor in high-rise buildings.
Mezzanines that cover more than one-third of the entire interior building footprint
shall be provided with sectional floor control valves as outlined in this section.
Exceptions:
1. Residential occupancies three stories or fewer with a total building square
footage less than 52,000 square feet (4831 m2).
2. All other occupancies two stories or fewer with a total building square
footage less than 22,000 square feet (2044 m2).
3. Buildings up to three stories, above or below grade, that are not
classified as high-rise buildings, may have the sectional floor control
valves located in a manifold configuration in the dedicated fire riser
room on the grade level of the building.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added to address buildings other than high-rise for consistent
outcomes. Allows for design of residential buildings with a single riser.
417. 903.4.1 Electronic supervision. Valves controlling the water supply for automatic
sprinkler systems, pumps, tanks, water levels and temperatures, critical air
pressures and waterflow switches on all sprinkler systems shall be electrically
supervised by a listed fire alarm control unit.
Exceptions:
1. Automatic sprinkler systems protecting one- and two-family dwellings, other
than assisted living Group R-4 occupancies.
2. Limited area sprinkler systems in accordance with Section 903.3.8, provided
that backflow prevention device test valves located in limited area sprinkler
system supply piping shall be locked in the open position unless supplying an
occupancy required to be equipped with a fire alarm system, in which case
the backflow preventer valves shall be electrically supervised by a tamper
switch installed in accordance with NFPA 72 and separately annunciated.
3. Automatic sprinkler systems installed in accordance with NFPA 13R where a
common supply main is used to supply both domestic water and the
automatic sprinkler system, and a separate shutoff valve for the automatic
sprinkler system is not provided.
4. Jockey pump control valves that are sealed or locked in the open position.
5. Control valves to commercial kitchen hoods, paint spray booths or dip tanks
that are sealed or locked in the open position.
6. Valves controlling the fuel supply to fire pump engines that are sealed or locked
in the open position.
7. Trim valves to pressure switches in dry, pre-action and deluge sprinkler
systems that are sealed or locked in the open position.
8. Underground key or hub gate valves in roadway boxes.
9. Backflow-preventer or post indicator valves shall be supervised by one of the
following methods:

9.1. A local signaling service that will initiate an audible signal at a
constantly attended location.
9.2. Valves locked in the open position and inspected monthly in
accordance with an approved procedure.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Adds language to address requirement not addressed elsewhere.
418. 903.4.2 Monitoring. Alarm, supervisory and trouble signals shall be distinctly
different and shall be automatically transmitted to an approved supervising station
or, where approved by the fire code official, shall sound an audible signal at a
constantly attended location.
Exceptions:
1. Underground key or hub valves in roadway boxes provided by the
municipality or public utility are not required to be monitored.
2. Backflow prevention device test valves located in limited area sprinkler
system supply piping shall be locked in the open position.
3. Building occupancies in Group A-2 less than 5,000 square feet (465 m2).
4. Group H and E shall be monitored at 0 square feet.
5. All other building occupancies less than 12,000 square feet (1115 m2).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Amended Items #4 & 8 by Ordinance G-5898 effective April 18, 2014, exceptions
1-6 added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC), exception #7 only.
Reason: #1-2 were added to line up with the sprinkler requirements in the
national code with triggered monitoring. #3-5 were removed to align with
national standard for monitoring.
419. 903.4.4 Monitoring at a constantly attended location. Where monitoring of the
sprinkler system is required per Section 903.4.1, the facility’s owner may request to
monitor the system(s) at the facility site using facility personnel. Where the alarm
monitoring station does not strictly comply with the NFPA 72 requirements for a
proprietary supervising station, the following minimum provisions shall be met and
approved by the fire code official:
1. The policies and procedures for monitoring the sprinkler system shall be
written and submitted to the fire code official for approval prior to occupancy
or terminating central station service or remote service. A copy of the
approved fire alarm policies and procedures shall be maintained at the
constantly attended location.
2. The alarm monitoring station shall be constantly attended by competent,
trained personnel. At least one person shall monitor the fire alarm panel at
all times. Provisions shall be made to relieve the alarm monitor prior to shift
changes, during breaks, or during performance of other assigned duties
outside of the alarm monitoring room.


3. A list of trained personnel qualified to monitor the sprinkler system shall be
maintained at the alarm monitoring station. Documentation of the alarm
monitoring training shall be approved by the fire code official, and maintained
at the alarm monitoring station and made available to the fire code official on
request.
4. The policies and procedures shall address the dispensation of the various fire
alarm signals. The fire department shall be immediately notified upon the
activation of a fire alarm signal (smoke or heat detector, sprinkler water flow,
manual pull station, special extinguishing system, etc.). Any investigation by
the facility staff shall occur after or concurrent to notification of the fire
department. If the investigation by facility staff determines that there is no
emergency condition at the facility, the fire department shall be immediately
notified to allow them to modify their response.
5. The fire department shall not be summoned for emergency response upon
receipt of a supervisory or trouble signal, but procedures shall address
dispensation of those signals by facility personnel.
6. A log shall be maintained at the monitoring station, noting all of the signals
received and the dispensation of those signals. The log sheet shall be made
available to the Phoenix Fire Department on request.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides clear guidelines for self-monitoring of fire and life safety
systems. Providing the same level of reliability and professionalism that 3rd party
monitoring is required to maintain.
420. 903.4.4.1 Location. In buildings greater than one story or 22,500 square feet
(2090 m2), the fire alarm panel or a fire alarm annunciator panel shall be
installed in a location that is visible from the lobby or area adjacent to the
primary fire department response entrance. It shall be permissible to locate the
fire alarm panel in a room immediately adjacent to this lobby, provided that the
door to this room is accessible to the fire department, visible from the lobby and
is provided with a permanent visible placard identifying the location of the fire
alarm control panel.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added to support operations and C99 in larger facilities.
421. 904.1 General. Automatic fire-extinguishing systems, other than automatic
sprinkler systems, shall be designed, installed, inspected, tested and maintained
in accordance with the provisions of this section and the applicable referenced
standards. Alternative automatic fire-extinguishing systems designed to prevent
business interruption and protect equipment shall not replace the requirement for
full automatic sprinkler coverage.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Maintain overall building sprinkler systems when supplemental systems
are installed for equipment and business interruption purposes.
422. 904.14.2 System interconnection. The actuation of the fire-extinguishing system
shall automatically shut down the fuel and electrical power supply to the cooking

equipment. The fuel and electrical supply reset shall be manual. If the fire
extinguishing system is listed to be effective with the commercial cooking exhaust
system on or off, the system shall remain on.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures all equipment shuts down upon activation.
423.  905.1 General. Standpipe systems shall be provided in new buildings and
structures in accordance with Sections 905.2 through 905.11. In buildings used for
high-piled combustible storage, fire protection shall be in accordance with Chapter
32. Temporary standpipes shall be installed during construction in accordance with
Chapter 33.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides chapter reference for applicable requirement.
424. 905.2.1 Pressure-reducing valves on standpipes. All pressure-reducing valves on
standpipes shall be required to be field adjustable on the system without special
tools.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Operational imperative to supply proper pressure to hose valves under
varying fire conditions.
425. 905.2.1.1 Testing. All pressure-reducing valves shall be tested annually in
accordance with NFPA 25 and the manufacturer’s instructions.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: To meet national standards educating the public.
426. 905.2.1.2 Minimum gpm. Pressure-reducing valves shall be set to provide a
minimum 250 gpm at 100 psi when installed.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ideal operating pressures and flow for Phoenix equipment.
427. 905.2.1.3 Standpipe outlets. Standpipe outlets on the roof shall be designed to
provide a minimum 500 gpm at 100 psi for the first standpipe and up to a total of
1,000 gpm at 100 psi for all standpipe outlet water supplies. Testing standpipe outlet
pressure and flow shall include the friction loss through 150 feet of hose on the roof.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Operational imperative to supply proper pressure to hose valves under
varying fire conditions. Provides for consistent outcomes.
428. 905.2.1.4 Signage. Pressure-reducing valves shall be provided with signage
indicating static pressure, residual pressure and flow on both sides of the valve.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Vital information under fire conditions.
429. 905.3.1 Height. Class III standpipe systems shall be installed throughout buildings
where any of the following conditions exist:
1. Four or more stories are above or below grade plane.
2. The floor level of the highest story is located more than 30 feet (9144 mm) above
the lowest level of the fire department vehicle access.

3. The floor level of the lowest story is located more than 30 feet (9144 mm) below
the highest level of fire department vehicle access.
Exceptions:
3. Class I manual standpipes are allowed in parking garages where the highest floor
is located not more than 75 feet (22 860 mm) above the lowest level of fire
department vehicle access.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: 75’ is the classification for high-rise in the building code.
430. TABLE 906.1ADDITIONAL REQUIRED PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS


SECTION SUBJECT

6303.1.4 Oxidizers (pool chemicals)




Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to 6303.1.4 Oxidizer general requirements.
431. 906.1.2 Extinguishers near oxidizers. Minimum 2A water portable fire extinguishers
shall be provided in areas where oxidizers that can release chlorine are stored. The
placement and use of dry chemical extinguishers containing ammonium compounds
(Class A:B:C) is prohibited in areas where oxidizers that can release chlorine are
stored. Halon extinguishers shall not be used in areas where oxidizers are stored.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), item #7 added.
Reason: This is item #7 and is moved to its own section in 2018 amendment.
432. 907.1.1 Construction documents. Construction documents for fire alarm systems
shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the location, nature and extent of the work
proposed and show in detail that it will conform to the provisions of this code, the
International Building Code and relevant laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, as
determined by the fire code official.
For fire alarm and other code-regulated alarm systems, the following are considered
to be Registered Design Professional activities in accordance with the requirements
of the Arizona Board of Technical Registration:
1. Determine the system type.
2. Determine the applicable codes and standards and appropriate engineering
practices.
3. Determine device types and locations.
4. Prepare generalized riser diagram.
5. Coordinate and interface with other systems.
6. Develop system specifications.
Exceptions:
1. Where the modification of fire alarm systems does not require mathematical
calculations or hazard analysis.

2. Where Items 1-6 are addressed in a stamped narrative or single page, the
remaining fire alarm shop drawings may be prepared by a NICET 3 or 4.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Specifies what activities require an engineer.
433. 907.1.2 Fire alarm shop drawings. Shop drawings for fire alarm systems shall be
prepared in accordance with NFPA 72 and submitted for review and approval prior
to system installation and shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
1. A floor plan that indicates the use of all rooms.
2. Locations of alarm-initiating devices.
3. Locations of alarm notification appliances, including candela ratings for visible
alarm notification appliances.
4. Location of fire alarm control unit, transponders and notification power supplies.
5. Annunciators.
6. Power connection.
7. Battery calculations.
8. Conductor type and sizes.
9. Voltage drop calculations. The two predominant methods of voltage drop
calculation are point-to-point and end-of-line lump sum. Center loading of the
circuits is also an acceptable method.
10. Manufacturers’ data sheets indicating model numbers and listing information for
equipment, devices and materials.
11. Details of ceiling height and construction.
12. The interface of fire safety control functions.
13. Classification of the supervising station.
14. Identification of the communications methodology
15. Design minimum audibility level for occupant notification.
16. Emergency voice alarm communication plans, which shall include the following:
16.1. A graphic depiction of acoustically designed spaces.
16.2. A written description of acoustically designed spaces.
16.3. A graphic depiction of areas that require intelligibility testing and areas that
do not require intelligibility testing.
16.4. A written description of areas that require intelligibility testing and areas that
do not require intelligibility testing.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Specifies what is required to submit shop drawings.
434.  907.1.4 Monitoring. Fire alarm systems shall be monitored by an approved
supervising station in accordance with Section 903.4.1. Annunciator panel shall be
in accordance with 903.4.4.
Exceptions:
1. Single and multiple station smoke alarms required by Section 907.2.10.

2. Smoke detectors in Group R-3 and I-3 occupancies.
3. Supervisory service is not required for automatic sprinkler systems in one- and
two-family dwellings other than Group R-4 occupancies.
4. Proprietary service that will initiate an audible signal at a constantly attended
location in accordance with Section 903.4.1.4.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: This provides consistency between monitoring between sprinklered and
non-sprinklered systems.
435.  907.2 Where required—new buildings and structures. An approved fire alarm
system installed in accordance with the provisions of this code and NFPA 72 shall
be provided in new buildings and structures in accordance with Sections 907.2.1
through 907.2.23 and provide occupant notification in accordance with Section
907.5, unless other requirements are provided by another section of this code.
Not fewer than one manual fire alarm box shall be provided in an approved
location to initiate a fire alarm signal for fire alarm systems employing automatic
fire detectors or waterflow detection devices. Where other sections of this code
allow elimination of fire alarm boxes due to sprinklers, a single fire alarm box shall
be installed.
For guidance on when required by Phoenix Fire Department in NFPA 72, see the
NFPA 72 Authority Having Jurisdiction Policy.
Exceptions:
1. The manual fire alarm box is not required for fire alarm systems dedicated to
elevator recall control and supervisory service.
2. The manual fire alarm box is not required for Group R-2 occupancies unless
required by the fire code official to provide a means for fire watch personnel to
initiate an alarm during a sprinkler system impairment event. Where provided,
the manual fire alarm box shall not be located in an area that is open to the
public.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Policy as NFPA 72 lessened its authority and moved it to the Authority
Having Jurisdiction. The policy outlines when NFPA 72 is required in Phoenix.
436. 907.2.13.2 Fire department communication system. Two-way hardwired fire
department communication system is required in high-rise buildings. In other
buildings where a wired communication system is approved in lieu of an emergency
responder radio coverage system in accordance with Section 510, the wired fire
department communication system shall be designed and installed in accordance
with NFPA 72 and shall operate between a fire command center complying with
Section 508, elevators, elevator lobbies, emergency and standby power rooms, fire
pump rooms, areas of refuge and inside interior exit stairways. The fire department
communication device shall be provided at each floor level within the interior exit
stairway.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Base International Fire Code language assumes that in building
emergency radio coverage is provided for fire fighter use and removed this wired
system requirement. Amendment specifies high-rise are required to have hard-
wired communication systems. This was added to address industry confusion

over the requirement to have both hard-wired and wireless fire department
communication systems in high-rise buildings.
437. 907.3.5 Kitchen hood systems. Where kitchen hood systems are installed in buildings
equipped with a fire alarm system designed to notify the building occupants,
actuation of the hood system shall initiate the fire alarm system.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed in the base code.
438. 907.5.2.1 Audible alarms. Audible alarm notification appliances shall be provided
and emit a distinctive sound that is not to be used for any purpose other than that
of a fire alarm. Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R, S and U occupancies shall meet the
Public Mode Audible Requirements of NFPA 72.
Exceptions:
1. Audible alarm notification appliances are not required in critical care areas of Group
I-2, Condition 2 occupancies that are in compliance with Section 907.2.6, Exception
2.
2. A visible alarm notification appliance installed in a nurses’ control station or other
continuously attended staff location in a Group I-2, Condition 2 suite shall be an
acceptable alternative to the installation of audible alarm notification appliances
throughout the suite in Group I-2, Condition 2 occupancies that are in compliance
with Section 907.2.6, Exception 2.
3. Where provided, audible notification appliances located in each enclosed occupant
evacuation elevator lobby in accordance with Section 3008.9.1 of the International
Building Code shall be connected to a separate notification zone for manual paging
only.
4. Group I occupancies shall be allowed to use the Private Mode Audible Requirements
of NFPA 72, where approved by appeal to the Fire Marshal. Registered design
professionals shall specify on plans and in construction documents the mode for
each area of the occupancy.
5. Where the private mode is specified, the designer shall provide written
documentation for the use of this mode when approved by appeal to the Fire
Marshal.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: This provides guidance for Group I-2 facilities to accommodate their
operational needs and still provide adequate notification to essential staff, at
stakeholders request.
439. 907.5.2.1.1 Average sound pressure. The audible alarm notification appliances
shall provide and maintain a sound pressure level of 15 decibels (dBA) above the
average ambient sound level or 5 dBA above the maximum sound level having a
duration of not less than 60 seconds, whichever is greater, in every occupiable space
within the building.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added for clarity where devices do not maintain the sound pressure level
for the duration.

440. 907.5.2.2 Emergency voice/alarm communication systems. Emergency voice/alarm
communication systems required by this code shall be designed and installed in
accordance with NFPA 72. The operation of any automatic fire detector, sprinkler
waterflow device or manual fire alarm box shall automatically sound an alert tone
followed by voice instructions giving approved information and directions for a
general or staged evacuation in accordance with the building’s fire safety and
evacuation plans required by Section 404. In high-rise buildings, the system shall
operate on at least the alarming floor, the floor above and the two floors below.
Speakers shall be provided throughout the building by paging zones. At a minimum,
paging zones shall be provided as follows:
1. Elevator groups.
2. Interior exit stairways.
3. Each floor.
4. Areas of refuge as defined in Chapter 2.
Exception: In Group I-1 and I-2 occupancies, the alarm shall sound in a constantly
attended area and a general occupant notification shall be broadcast over the
overhead page.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Supports emergency operations standard operating procedures.
441. 907.5.2.3 Visible alarms. Visible alarm notification appliances shall be provided in
accordance with Sections 907.5.2.3.1 through 907.5.2.3.3.
Exceptions:
1. Visible alarm notification appliances are not required in alterations that do not
involve:
1.1. Changing the floor plan by the addition, removal, or relocation of walls.
1.2. A change in occupancy classification.
1.3. The modification, upgrade or replacement of an existing fire alarm system.
1.4. The installation of a new fire alarm system.
2. Visible alarm notification appliances shall not be required in exits as defined in
Chapter 2.
3. Visible alarm notification appliances shall not be required in elevator cars.
4. Visual alarms are not required in operating rooms or treatment rooms of Group I
occupancies where patients are under direct supervision by trained facility
personnel.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Supports emergency operations standard operating procedures.
442. 907.6 Installation and monitoring. A fire alarm system shall be installed and
monitored in accordance with Sections 907.6.1 through 907.6.6.5 and NFPA 72.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Includes Phoenix Amendment (907.6.6.3) refence for installation and
monitoring requirements.


443. 907.6.3.2 Device labels. All field devices shall be labeled with the unique identifier
that corresponds with the device address or label on the plans.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Field devices shall have labels so they can be identified in the field.
444. 907.6.6.4 Multi-tenant buildings with different addresses. The alarm monitoring
station shall identify all addresses of buildings, floors or suites protected by a fire
protection system and provide this information to the Phoenix Fire Department alarm
room center.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Support operations to locate the location of the event.
445. 907.6.6.5 Monitoring communicator. There shall be no more than one Fire
Alarm/ Sprinkler monitoring communicator in a building.
Reason: New to 2024. Multiple disparate communicators with multiple central
stations can cause confusion when responding to an alarm.
446. 907.8.1 Maintenance required. Where required for compliance with the provisions
of this code, devices, equipment, systems, conditions, arrangements, levels of
protection or other features shall thereafter be continuously maintained in
accordance with applicable NFPA requirements or as directed by the fire code
official. Maintenance shall be provided by qualified contractors to install, maintain,
inspect and test fire alarm systems as directed by the fire code official.
The audible alarm notification appliances shall be maintained to provide a sound
pressure level of 15 decibels (dBA) above the average ambient sound level or 5 dBA
above the maximum sound level having a duration of at least 60 seconds, whichever
is greater, in every occupied space within the building.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: To ensure minimum audibility requirements are met after tenant
improvements or other alterations to the building. Provides consistent outcomes.
447. 907.8.4 Inspection, testing and maintenance. The building owner shall be
responsible to maintain the fire and life safety systems in an operable condition at
all times. Service personnel shall meet the qualification requirements of NFPA 72 for
inspection, testing and maintenance of such systems. and shall be a qualified
contractor to install, maintain, inspect and test fire alarm systems. Records of
inspection, testing and maintenance shall be maintained.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports the Business Certificate program and provides for contractors
to be trained in fire alarms.
448. 909.18.8 Testing for smoke control. Smoke control systems shall be tested by a
special inspector prior to and separate from the final acceptance test. The City of
Phoenix Fire Department shall witness and approve the final acceptance test of

the system after the special inspection is complete.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Ensures approved agencies for smoke control testing have expertise in
fire protection engineering, mechanical engineering and certification as air
balancers.
449. 910.3 Smoke and heat vents. The design and installation of smoke and heat vents
shall be in accordance with Sections 910.3.1 through 910.3.3. Smoke and heat
vents shall operate automatically by actuation of a heat-responsive device. The
device shall be rated a minimum of 50°F (10°C) above the rating of the automatic
sprinklers, but not more than 386°F (197°C).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Temperatures listed are from FM 4430. Newer technology has higher
limits.
450. 910.4 Mechanical smoke removal systems. Mechanical smoke removal systems
shall be designed and installed in accordance with Sections 910.4.1 through
910.4.7 in approved locations and shall be listed for the environmental conditions
to which they will be exposed.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Provides survivability of crucial components under adverse
circumstances.
451. 912.1 Installation. Fire department connections shall be installed in accordance with
the NFPA standard applicable to the system design and shall comply with Sections
912.2 through 912.7. All fire department connection underground piping shall be
installed as a minimum Class 200.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Codifies operations specific requirements.
452. 912.2 Location. With respect to hydrants, driveways, buildings and landscaping, fire
department connections shall be so located that fire apparatus and hose connected
to supply the system will not obstruct access to the buildings for other fire apparatus.
The location of fire department connections shall be approved by the fire code
official and within 200 feet of a usable hydrant. A site plan detail shall be submitted
to the fire code official for approval as part of the construction documents. See
Section 105.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Fire department connections are reviewed during the plan review
process during the construction phase.
453. 912.2.1 Visible location. Fire department connections shall be located on the street
side of buildings or facing approved fire apparatus access roads, fully visible and


recognizable from the street, fire apparatus access road or nearest point of fire
department vehicle access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official.
The location of fire department connections shall be approved and installed:
1. Within 50 feet (15 240 mm) of an approved roadway or driveway, and arranged
so that hose lines can be readily attached to the inlets without interference from
any nearby objects including buildings, fences, posts, plantings, or other fire
department connections.
Hose lines shall not lie across a median. Connections shall not be designated
maintenance black cap hydrants. Hydrant shall not be on the same supply loop
that the FDC supplies.
2. Within 200 feet (60 960 mm), as the firefighter and apparatus can travel, of an
approved hydrant arranged so that hose lines can be readily attached to the inlets
without interference from any nearby objects including buildings, fences and posts.
3. So that the inlet height shall not be less than 18 inches (457 mm) nor more than
48 inches (1219 mm) above grade.
A site plan detail shall be submitted to the fire code official for approval as part of
the construction documents. See Section 105.
A 3-foot (914 mm) minimum clearance shall be maintained at all times and
without obstruction in the approach path.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Codifies operations specific requirements.
454. 912.2.2 Existing buildings. On existing buildings, wherever the fire department
connection is not visible to approaching fire apparatus, the fire department
connection shall be indicated by an approved sign mounted on the street front or
on the side of the building. Such sign shall have the letters “FDC” not less than 6
inches (152 mm) high and words in letters not less than 2 inches (51 mm) high or
an arrow to indicate the location. Such signs shall be subject to the approval of the
fire code official. Signs shall be in accordance with Section 912.5. See Appendix D.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations.
455. 912.3 Fire hose threads. Fire hose threads used in connection with standpipe
systems shall be approved and shall be compatible with Phoenix hose threads.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Codifies operations specific requirements.
456. 912.3.1 Inlet connections. The minimum size of a fire department inlet
connection shall be 21/2 inches (64 mm) with Phoenix threads.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Codifies operations specific requirements.
457. 912.4 Access. Immediate access to fire department connections shall be maintained
at all times and without obstruction by fences, bushes, trees, walls, mechanical


equipment, retention ponds or any other fixed or moveable object. Access to fire
department connections shall be approved by the fire code official.
Exception: Fences, where provided with an access gate equipped with a sign
complying with the legend requirements of Section 912.5 and a means of
emergency operation. The gate and the means of emergency operation shall be
approved by the fire code official and maintained operational at all times.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), added in the approach
path.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations.
458. 912.4.1 Locking fire department connection caps. The fire code official is authorized
to require locking caps on fire department connections for new and tampered-with
water-based fire protection systems where the responding fire department carries
appropriate key wrenches for removal.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC). [caps required
different language]
Reason: Supports operations.
459. 912.5 Signs. A metal sign with raised letters not less than 1 inch (25 mm) in size
shall be mounted on all fire department connections serving automatic sprinklers,
standpipes or fire pump connections. Such signs shall read: AUTOMATIC
SPRINKLERS or STANDPIPES or TEST CONNECTION or a combination thereof as
applicable. Where the fire department connection does not serve the entire building,
a sign shall be provided indicating the portions of the building served.
Each fire department connection (FDC) shall be identified by a permanent weather
resistant sign. The sign face shall be not less than 12 inches by 12 inches (309 × 309
mm) and fabricated from .080-inch (2.032 mm) aluminum sheet or equivalent. The
sign face shall have a white 3M diamond grade sheeting or equivalent applied as
background. See Appendix D.
Where the system supplied by the FDC does not supply the entire building or
supplies multiple buildings, the sign shall identify the buildings or areas of the
building supplied by the FDC. The FDC sign shall identify the building address or
area, where necessary, and type of systems the FDC supplies.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations.
460. 912.6 Backflow protection. The potable water supply to automatic sprinkler and
standpipe systems shall be protected against backflow as required by the
International Plumbing Code or Uniform Plumbing Code.
Reason: New to 2024. Change made to UPC to align with Planning and
Development.
461. 912.6.1 Backflow inspection, testing and maintenance. All backflow connections

shall be periodically inspected, tested and maintained in accordance with NFPA
25. Private hydrants may be used for backflow testing.
For systems without private hydrants, the valve test connection may be made
with an accessible connection. The valve and capped outlet shall be a hose
thread connection so that fire hose with standard female Phoenix thread can be
easily connected and shall be sufficiently sized to allow testing at the highest
anticipated flow rate. For testing, the provided hose shall be of sufficient
diameter and length to be run outside the building to a location that will mitigate
the potential for injury or damage to property.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Water supply tests are covered in Section 903.5.3; backflow testing is
required by the Planning & Development Dept.
462. 913.2 Protection against interruption of service. The fire pump, driver and controller
shall be protected in accordance with NFPA 20 against possible interruption of
service through damage caused by explosion, fire, flood, earthquake, rodents,
insects, windstorm, freezing, vandalism and other adverse conditions.
Where a required or optional electrical emergency or standby power system is
installed and an electric fire pump is installed, the fire pump shall be connected to
both the normal electrical service and the standby power system. A UL-listed
automatic transfer switch is required to be installed on the power supply to this
pump.
Where the building, or a portion of the building, served by the fire pump is
intended to remain occupied during a utility power outage, the electric fire pump
shall be connected to both the normal electrical service and emergency or
standby power system.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), second sentence,
where required… added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Ensures the fire pump will work to protect the building in all
circumstances.
463. 913.5.1 Acceptance test. Acceptance testing shall be done in accordance with the
requirements of NFPA 20. The pump suction pressure shall not drop below 20 psi.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: The 20 psi (1.4 bar) limitation is used as a precaution to avoid possible
cavitation of the underground piping.
464. 914.3.5 Emergency voice/alarm communication system. An emergency voice/alarm
communication system shall be provided in accordance with Section 907.5.2.2. Two-
way hardwired fire department communication system is required in high-rise
buildings.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendment clarifies both wired and wireless emergency responder
radio systems are required in High-Rise buildings as found elsewhere in the code.
465. 916.1 Gas detection systems. Gas detection systems required by this code shall
comply with Sections 916.2 through 916.11.
916.2 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Section 105.6.11.
916.2.1 Construction documents. Documentation of the gas detection system
design and equipment to be used that demonstrates compliance with the
requirements of this code shall be provided with the application for permit.
916.3 Equipment. Gas detection system equipment shall be designed for use with
the gases being detected and shall be installed in accordance with
manufacturer’s instructions.
916.4 Power connections. Gas detection systems shall be permanently connected
to the building electrical power supply or shall be permitted to be cord connected
to an unswitched receptacle using an approved restraining means that secures
the plug to the receptacle.
916.5 Emergency and standby power. Standby or emergency power shall be
provided or the gas detection system shall initiate a trouble signal at an
approved location if the power supply is interrupted.
916.6 Sensor locations. Sensors shall be installed in approved locations where
leaking gases are expected to accumulate.
916.7 Gas sampling. Gas sampling shall be performed continuously. Sample
analysis shall be processed immediately after
sampling, except as follows:
1. For HPM gases, sample analysis shall be performed at intervals not exceeding
30 minutes.
2. For toxic gases that are not HPM, sample analysis shall be performed at
intervals not exceeding 5 minutes, in accordance
with Section 6004.2.2.7.
3. Where a less frequent or delayed sampling interval is approved.
916.8 System activation. A gas detection alarm shall be initiated where any
sensor detects a concentration of gas exceeding the
following thresholds:
1. For flammable gases, a gas concentration exceeding 25 percent of the lower
flammability limit (LFL).
2. For nonflammable gases, a gas concentration exceeding one-half of the IDLH,
unless a different threshold is specified by the
section of this code requiring a gas detection system.
Upon activation of a gas detection alarm, alarm signals or other required
responses shall be as specified by the section of this
code requiring a gas detection system. Audible and visible alarm signals
associated with a gas detection alarm shall be distinct from
fire alarm and carbon monoxide alarm signals.
916.9 Signage. Signs shall be provided adjacent to gas detection system alarm
signaling devices that advise occupants of the nature
of the signals and actions to take in response to the signal.
916.10 Fire alarm system connections. Gas sensors and gas detection systems
shall not be connected to fire alarm systems unless
approved and connected in accordance with the fire alarm equipment
manufacturer’s instructions.
916.11 Inspection, testing and sensor calibration. Inspection and testing of gas
detection systems shall be conducted not less than
annually. Sensor calibration shall be confirmed at the time of sensor installation
and calibration shall be performed at the frequency
specified by the sensor manufacturer.
Reason: Removal and reworking of Section 916 includes changing base code as
it is written. All gas detection requirements found throughout the IFC have been
consolidated to Section 916, and as such they are now an amendment to base
IFC.

466. 916.1 General. Gas detection systems shall comply with Sections 916.2 through
916.6.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
467. 916.2 Permits. Permits shall be required in accordance with Section 105.6.11. The
permit application shall include gas detection system design documents that fully
demonstrate code compliance and are signed and sealed by an Arizona registered
design professional. Permits shall only be issued to contractors with a valid
Phoenix Fire Department Business Certificate in accordance with Section 105.8.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
468. 916.3 Where Required. Gas detection systems shall be provided where specified in
this section.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
469. 916.3.1 Hazardous Materials. A gas detection system shall be provided for:
1. Systems containing inert cryogenic fluids in quantities exceeding the amount
listed in Table 105.5.11.
2. Areas containing the following types of systems containing gas quantities
exceeding the amounts listed in Table 105.5.9:
2.1 Carbon dioxide enrichment systems.
2.2 Insulated liquid carbon dioxide beverage dispensing systems.
2.3 Systems containing carbon dioxide for an application not listed above.
2.4 Systems containing asphyxiant gases.
3. Areas containing storage or use of the any of the following in quantities
exceeding the maximum allowable quantity per control area in accordance with
Section 5003.1.1:
3.1 Corrosive gases.
3.2 Flammable gases or cryogenic fluids.
3.3 Toxic or highly toxic gases.
3.4 Oxidizing gases or cryogenic fluids.
3.5 Unstable reactive gases.
Exceptions:
1. Insulated liquid carbon dioxide beverage dispensing systems where ventilation
is provided in accordance with Section 5307.3.1.
2. Group H-5 occupancies shall have gas detection for HPM gases where the
physiological warning threshold level of the gas is at a higher level than the
accepted permissible exposure limit (PEL), and for flammable gases.
3. Where a technical report prepared in accordance with Section 104.2.2, and
subject to approval through an Appeal to the Fire Marshal, demonstrates that a
reasonable worst-case release scenario does not result in any of the following:
3.1 An asphyxiation hazard for systems using asphyxiant gases.
3.2 Flammable gas accumulation exceeding 25 percent of the lower flammable
limit (LFL) for systems using flammable gases.

3. Toxic or highly toxic gas accumulation exceeding 50 percent of the
Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) limit for systems using toxic or
highly toxic gases.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
470. 916.3.2 Specific Applications. A gas detection system shall be provided for:
1. Machinery rooms for mechanical refrigeration systems in the scope of Section
608.
2. Stationary fuel cell power systems in the scope of Section 1206.
3. Energy storage systems in the scope of Section 1207.
4. Repair garages in the scope of Section 2311.8.
5. Semiconductor fabrication facilities and comparable research and development
areas
classified as Group H-5 in the scope of Chapter 27.
6. Processing and extraction facilities in the scope of Chapter 39.
7. Hydrogen fuel gas rooms in the scope of Section 5808.
8. Ozone-gas-generator rooms in the scope of Section 6005.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
471. 916.3.3 Existing Buildings and Structures. The provisions of Section 916 shall be
applicable to existing structures, facilities, and conditions as specified in Section
102.1. In addition, a gas detection system shall be provided in existing buildings
and structures where the following occurs:
1. A new hazardous materials system requiring a gas detection system in
accordance with Section 916.3.1 is installed.
2. An existing permitted hazardous materials system is modified with an increased
capacity, such that the post-modification quantity of hazardous materials is within
a threshold specified in Section 916.3.1.
3. A new application listed in Section 916.3.2 is introduced in a building or
structure.
4. An existing permitted application listed in Section 916.3.2 undergoes a
modification that results in an increased quantity of hazardous materials, or a
different type of hazardous material.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
472. 916.4 Installation. Gas detection system installation shall comply with this
section. All gas detection system equipment shall be installed in accordance with
the manufacturer's instructions.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
473. 916.4.1 Controllers. Controllers used as part of a gas detection system shall be
listed, and shall be compatible with all connected gas detection system

components in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Controllers
shall be capable of being supervised by a listed fire alarm control unit, and the
means of connection shall comply with NFPA 72.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
474. 916.4.2 Detectors. Detectors used as part of a gas detection system shall have
manufacturer-prescribed means for calibration, shall be listed for use with the
specific gas intended to be detected at the setpoints identified in Section
916.4.4.1, and shall perform sampling continuously.
Exceptions:
1. Detectors intended for asphyxiant gas detection can be listed for use with
oxygen.
2. Less frequent sampling intervals are subject to approval through an Appeal to
the Fire Marshal.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
475. 916.4.2.1 Locations. Selection and placement of gas detectors shall be based on
an engineering evaluation. Among other factors, this evaluation shall consider
the effects of gas expansion after initial release on detector mounting height.
Detection shall be provided at the following locations:
1. Approved storage and use locations where gas is expected to accumulate or
leaks are most likely to occur.
2. The discharge of treatment systems provided for toxic or highly toxic gases.
3. In machinery rooms for mechanical refrigeration systems.
4. In enclosures, exhaust systems, and rooms for fuel cell power systems.
5. In rooms where carbon dioxide enrichment occurs.
6. In lubrication or chassis-service pits in garages used for repairing nonodorized
LNG-fueled vehicles.
7. For semiconductor facilities:
7.1 In fabrication areas where HPM gas is used in the fabrication area.
7.2 In HPM rooms where HPM gas is used in the room.
7.3 In gas cabinets and exhausted enclosures for HPM gas.
7.4 In gas rooms where HPM gases are not located in gas cabinets or exhausted
enclosures.
7.5 In the space defined by the walls of a corridor and the floor or roof above the
corridor where HPM gas piping is contained in the space.
Exception: Not required for occasional transverse crossings of corridors by supply
piping enclosed in ferrous pipe or tube for the width of the corridor.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
476. 916.4.3 Notification Appliances. Notification appliances used as part of a gas
detection system shall meet the public mode audible and visible requirements of
NFPA 72, and the audible and visible signals shall be distinctly different from
those used for fire alarm and carbon monoxide.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being

proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
477. 916.4.3.1 Locations. Audible and visible notification appliances shall provide
approved coverage in the following locations:
1. In the hazard area.
2. Immediately outside doors leading to the hazard area.
3. As otherwise required by the fire code official.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
478. 916.4.4 Sequence of Operations. Initiation and activation of gas detection
systems shall comply with this section.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
479. 916.4.4.1 Initiation. Detector setpoints for gas detection system initiation shall be
as follows:
1. Carbon dioxide:
1.1 Supervisory: 5,000 ppm.
1.2. Alarm: 30,000 ppm.
2. Asphyxiants:
2.1 Supervisory: 19.5 percent oxygen.
2.2 Alarm: 18 percent oxygen.
3. Oxidizers:
3.1 Supervisory: 22 percent oxygen.
3.2 Alarm: 23.5 percent oxygen.
4. Toxics and Highly Toxics:
4.1 Supervisory: 25 percent of the Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health
(IDLH) limit.
4.2 Alarm: 50 percent of the IDLH.
5. Flammables:
5.1 Supervisory: 12.5 percent of the lower flammable limit (LFL).
5.2 Alarm: 25 percent of the LFL.
6. Group A2L and B2L Refrigerants:
6.1 Supervisory: Occupational Exposure Limit (OEL) in Table 1103.1 of the
International
Mechanical Code.
6.2 Alarm: Refrigerant Concentration Level (RCL) in Table 1103.1 of the
International Mechanical Code or 25 percent of the LFL, whichever is less.
Exception: For toxics and highly toxics, where a gas does not have a published
IDLH, the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL), ceiling limit, or TLV-TWA of the gas
can be used in lieu of the IDLH where approved by the fire code official.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
480. 916.4.4.1.1 Semiconductor Facilities. For semiconductor facilities in the scope of
Chapter 27, the setpoints listed in Section 916.4.4.1

apply with the following modifications:
Toxics and Highly Toxics:
1. Supervisory:
1.1 50 percent of the IDLH for detectors located inside an exhausted enclosure,
ventilated enclosure, or gas cabinet.
1.2 50 percent of the PEL for detectors located outside an exhausted enclosure,
ventilated enclosure, or gas cabinet.
2. Alarm:
2.1 100 percent of the IDLH for detectors located inside an exhausted enclosure,
ventilated enclosure, or gas cabinet.
2.2 100 percent of the PEL for detectors located outside an exhausted enclosure,
ventilated enclosure, or gas cabinet.
Exception: For toxics and highly toxics, where a gas does not have a published
IDLH, the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL), ceiling limit, or TLV-TWA of the gas
can be used in lieu of the IDLH where approved by the fire code official.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
481. 916.4.4.2 Supervisory Response. Gas detection at the supervisory setpoints
specified in Section 916.4.4.1 shall result in the following sequence of operations:
1. A gas-specific supervisory signal shall be transmitted to an approved
monitoring station in accordance with NFPA 72.
2. For mechanical refrigeration systems using Group A2L and B2L refrigerant,
mechanical ventilation systems shall activate at the OEL level in accordance with
Table 608.18.2.
3. Mechanical ventilation systems required for carbon dioxide enrichment
systems shall activate.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
482. 916.4.4.2.1 Alarm Response.
Gas detection at the alarm setpoints specified in Section 916.4.4.1 shall result in
the following sequence of operations:
1. The audible and visible notification appliances required by Section 916.4.3
shall activate.
2. A gas-specific alarm signal shall be transmitted to an approved monitoring
station in accordance with NFPA 72. For semiconductor facilities, the signal shall
also be transmitted to the emergency control station.
3. For mechanical refrigeration systems using Group A2L and B2L refrigerant,
mechanical ventilation systems shall activate at the RCL level in accordance with
Table 608.18.2.
4. Mechanical ventilation systems required by other sections of this code to be
connected to the gas detection system shall activate at the required performance
levels.
5. For mechanical refrigeration systems, the refrigerant compressors, pumps, and
normally closed automatic valves located in the machinery room shall
automatically shut off.
6. Stationary fuel cell power systems shall be shut down.
7. For systems in semiconductor facilities, systems containing toxic or highly toxic
gases, carbon dioxide enrichment systems, and stationary fuel cell power
systems, valve closure in accordance with 916.4.4.3 shall occur.
Exception: Automatic shutdown is not required for reactors utilized for the
production of toxic or highly toxic gases where such reactors are:
7.1 Operated at pressures less than 15 psig.
7.2 Constantly attended.
7.3 Provided with emergency shutoff valves that have ready access.
8. Heating systems located in repair garages or extraction rooms shall be
deactivated.
9. Light switches and electrical outlets in extraction rooms shall be de-energized.
10. Ozone-gas-generators shall shut off.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
483. 916.4.4.3 Valve Closure. When required as a response by Section 916.4.4.2,
valve closure shall occur as follows:
1. Where the activated gas detector is in a gas cabinet or exhausted enclosure,
the shutoff valve in the gas cabinet or exhausted enclosure for the specific gas
detected shall automatically close.
2. Where the activated gas detector is in a gas room and gas containers are not
in gas cabinets or exhausted enclosures, the shutoff valves in all gas piping for
the specific gas detected shall automatically close.
3. Where the activated gas detector is in a piping distribution manifold enclosure,
the shutoff valve for the container of specific gas detected supplying the
manifold shall automatically close.
4. Where the activated gas detector is at a use location, or within a gas valve
enclosure of a branch line downstream of a piping distribution manifold, the
shutoff valve in the gas valve enclosure for the branch line located in the piping
distribution manifold enclosure shall automatically close.
5. Where the activated gas detector is part of a gas detection system for carbon
dioxide enrichment systems or stationary fuel cell power systems, the flow of gas
shall be stopped by an approved automatic fail-safe emergency shutoff valve
located as close as practical to the source of gas.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
484. 916.4.4.4 Gas Detection System Failure. Failure of gas detection system
controllers, detectors, or the supervising fire alarm control unit shall initiate the
same response as an alarm setpoint, except notification appliances shall not be
required to activate. Gas detection systems shall be maintained in an operational
condition at all times, and shall be immediately repaired or replaced when failure
occurs.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
485. 916.4.5 Wiring. All gas detection system electrical wiring shall be in accordance
with the applicable provisions of NFPA 70 and NFPA 72.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout

the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
486. 916.4.6 Power. Gas detection systems shall be permanently connected to the
building's normal electrical power supply and shall be circuit locked and labeled.
Emergency power shall be provided for gas detection systems used in
semiconductor applications, and in toxic or highly toxic gas applications. Standby
power shall be provided for gas detection systems in all other applications.
Standby and emergency power systems shall be in accordance with Chapter 12.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
487. 916.4.7 Monitoring. Gas detection systems shall be electrically supervised by a
listed fire alarm control unit, and monitored by an approved supervising station
in accordance with NFPA 72. All gas detection system signals received by the
supervising station shall be gas-specific and distinct from other types of alarm
signals. Connections between gas detection systems and fire alarm systems
shall be installed by a contractor with a valid Phoenix Fire Department Business
Certificate in accordance with Section 105.8.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
488. 916.4.8 Signage. Approved signs shall be provided immediately adjacent to gas
detection system notification appliances that advise occupants of the nature of
the signals and actions to take in response to the signal.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
489. 916.5 Acceptance Testing. Acceptance testing shall be in accordance with Section
901.5 and shall be conducted in the presence of the fire code official. Acceptance
testing for gas detection systems shall consist of testing every detector with an
approved certified test gas and verifying the correct sequence of operations
occurs.
Exception: Where approved and as specified by the fire code official, acceptance
testing may be conducted through special inspection in accordance with Section
104.7.3.
Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
490. 916.6 Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance. Inspection, testing, maintenance,
and detector calibration for gas detection systems shall be conducted as specified
by the system manufacturer, but not less than annually. Periodic detector
calibration shall be performed at the frequency specified by the sensor
manufacturer. Detector setpoint testing and calibration shall be performed with
an approved test gas. All test gases shall have a recognized certification that
documents the type and percentage of gas. Inspection, testing, and maintenance
shall be conducted by a contractor with a valid Phoenix Fire Department Business
Certificate in accordance with Section 105.8.

Reason: New to 2024. Changes to Section 916 for gas detection are being
proposed in an effort to consolidate all gas detection requirements throughout
the fire code to section 916. This effort will assist designers, engineers, and users
of the code by way of pointing all gas detection requirements to Section 916.
491. SECTION 918
FIRE-FIGHTER AIR SYSTEMS
918.1 Scope. The design, installation and maintenance of fire-fighter air systems shall
be in accordance with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
492. 918.2 Required installations. Effective May 2, 2004, a firefighter air system shall be
installed in the following buildings:
1. Buildings classified as high-rise in accordance with the building code.
2. Underground structures that are two or more floors below grade with an area
greater than 10,000 square feet (929 m2).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
493. 918.3 Plans and contractor qualifications.
918.3.1 Plans. Prior to the installation of a fire-fighter air system, a minimum of two
sets of plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Phoenix Fire Department for
review and approval. Plans shall demonstrate compliance with the requirements of
this section and shall include calculations prepared by a Registered Design
Professional demonstrating that the design criteria for all pressure-containing
components is satisfied plus a minimum safety factor of 25 percent.
The plans submittal shall also include specifications for the tubing, fittings and
manufacturer data sheets for valves, pressure regulators, pressure relief devices,
gauges, RIC universal air connections and cylinder filling hoses.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
494. 918.3.2 Contractor qualification. The fire-fighter air system shall be installed by
Arizona state-licensed contractors.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
495. 918.4 Design criteria.



918.4.1 Fill. The system shall be designed to fill, at each interior cylinder filling panel,
one 66-standard-cubic-foot compressed breathing air cylinder to a maximum
pressure of 4,500 psig (31 028 kPa).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
496. 918.4.2 Filling operation. The filling operation shall be completed in not more than
two minutes upon connection of the cylinder to the fill hose.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
497. 918.4.3 Flow of breathing air. The minimum design flow of the breathing air
piping system shall be calculated using two interior cylinder filling panels
operating simultaneously and located at the highest level above the most remote
location from the base station exterior fire department connection panel and
enclosure base.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
498. 918.5 Operating pressure. All components used in the system shall be rated to
operate at a minimum pressure of 5,000 psig (34 475 kPa) at 70°F (21°C).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
499. 918.6 Marking. System piping, gauges, valves and air outlets shall be clearly marked
by means of steel or plastic labels or tags indicating their function. Markings used
for piping systems shall consist of the content's name and include a direction of flow
arrow. Markings shall be provided at each valve; at wall, floor or ceiling penetrations;
at each change of direction; and not more than 20 feet (6096 mm) throughout the
piping system.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
500. 918.7 Base station exterior Fire Department connection panel and enclosure.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.

501. 918.7.1 Location. A Fire Department connection panel shall be attached to the
building or on a remote monument at the exterior of the building. The panel shall
be secured inside of a weather-resistant enclosure. The panel shall be within 50 feet
(15 240 mm) of an approved roadway or driveway, or other location approved by
the Phoenix Fire Department. The enclosure shall be visible and accessible on
approach to the building.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
502. 918.7.2 Construction. The Fire Department connection panel shall be installed in a
cabinet constructed of minimum 18-gauge carbon steel. Where constructed of steel,
the cabinet shall be provided with coating to protect the cabinet from corrosion.
Where the enclosure is constructed of nonmetallic materials, the enclosure shall be
resistant to ultraviolet and infrared solar radiation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
503. 918.7.3 Vehicle protection. Where the panel is located in an area subject to vehicle
traffic, impact protection shall be provided in accordance with this code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
504. 918.7.4 Base station enclosure marking. The front of the enclosure shall be marked
“FIRE-FIGHTER AIR SYSTEM” on a securely attached steel, plastic engraved or
painted plate. The lettering shall be in a color that contrasts with the enclosure front
and in letters that are not less than 2 inches (51 mm) high with a 3/4-inch (9053
mm) brush stroke. The marking of the enclosure shall be visible.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
505. 918.7.5 Base station enclosure components. The components in the base station
panel shall consist of the necessary components to provide air to the air substations
located on upper or lower building levels, or both. The fire department air supply
source shall be designed to connect to the base station panel. The following
components shall be installed in the base station enclosure:
1. One (1) CGA-347 adapter. When connected to a female fitting, the assembled
CGA-347 adapter shall meet the construction, performance and dimensional
requirements of NFPA 1981, Standard on Open Circuit Self-Contained Breathing
Apparatus for Fire and Emergency Services.

2. One (1) downstream shutoff valve.
3. One (1) pressure gauge to check pressure of the piping distribution to air
substations located on upper and lower building levels.
4. One (1) pressure relief valve designed for 1.25 times the design discharge of the
fire department air supply or air supply trucks. All fittings, hoses and hard piping in
the base station supply panel and distribution piping to air substation supply panels
shall be designed for an air pressure of 1.5 times the pressure of the fire department
air delivery system.
5. The base station can be designed so that an air pressure supply piping system
supplies air-to-air substations.
The air supply lines require an intermediate regulator to provide air pressure for a
5,000 psi (34 473 kPa) 4.5 air pack system. The air supply lines will be fitted with
separate pressure relief valves set at 1.25 times the working pressure of the air supply
line and the operating pressure of the pressurized lines.
6. The relief valve, piping, pressure regulator, pressure gauges, fittings and
connection hoses shall meet the requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Code, 7 Section VIII, Unified Pressure Vessel Code. The installation of the
piping system, as a minimum, will be based on ASME B31.3.
7. Mechanical supports for piping, hoses, gauges and pressure components will
be designed and built to provide a solid rigid structure.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
506. 918.7.6 Security. To prevent unauthorized access to or tampering with the system,
the fire department connection panel enclosure shall remain locked by an approved
means.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
507. 918.7.6.1 Door Tamper Switch. Each fill panel door shall have a tamper switch that
is monitored by the fire alarm system.
508. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
509. 918.7.7 Fire department key box. A fire department key box shall be provided
within 15 feet (4572mm) and on the same side of the building as the fire
department connection panel and enclosure. A key for the enclosure shall be
provided in the key box.
510. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).

Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
511. 918.8 Interior cylinder fill panels and enclosure—air substation.
918.8.1 Location. Cylinder fill panels shall be installed in the interior of buildings as
follows:
1. Above-ground structure. An interior air substation cylinder fill panel and enclosure
shall be installed on floor landings. Regardless of height, buildings classified as high-
rise shall have an interior air substation cylinder fill panel and enclosure installed in all
stairwells, commencing on the second floor landing, and every other floor thereafter.
2. Underground structure. An interior air substation cylinder fill panel and enclosure
shall be installed in all stairwells on the floor landing on the first level below grade
and every other below-grade level thereafter. The panel shall be located not less
than 36 inches (914 mm) but not more than 60 inches (1524 mm) above the finished
floor or a stairway landing.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
512. 918.8.2 Cabinet requirements. Each air substation cylinder fill panel shall be installed
in a cabinet constructed of minimum 18-gauge carbon steel. The depth of the
cabinet shall not create an exit obstruction when installed in building stairways. All
components with the exception of the shutoff valve, pressure gauges, fill hoses and
ancillary components shall be contained behind a minimum 18-gauge interior panel.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
513. 918.8.3 Door. Hinges for the cabinet door shall be located inside of the cabinet. The
door shall be arranged such that when the door is open, it does not reduce the
required exit width or create an obstruction in the path of egress. A minimum of 80
percent of the door surface area shall be constructed of tempered glass. The
thickness of the glass shall not be greater than 1/2 inch (3.17 mm).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
514. 918.8.4 Cabinet marking. The front of each cylinder fill panel shall be marked “FIRE-
FIGHTER AIR SYSTEM.” The lettering shall be in a color that contrasts with the cabinet
front and in letters that are not less than 2 inches (50 mm) high with 3/8-inch (5 mm)
brush stroke. The marking of the cabinet shall be visible to emergency response
personnel.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).

Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
515. 918.8.5 Air substation cabinet components. The cabinet shall be of sufficient size to
allow for the installation of the following components:
1. One (1) isolation valve located between the air discharge line to the next air
substation and the downstream line to the air base station supply or the air
substation immediately below to the next substation above the air base station.
2. Fill hoses and isolation valves installed between the air bottle connection line and
the fresh air supply.
3. Excess bleed valves located between the air bottle fill hose and the next air
substation.
4. Four (4) SCBA fill hoses. These hoses are required at a single air substation, shall
have air supply lines identified as 4,500 psig (31 028 kPa) pressure and shall be
controlled by a single valve between the air supply and air bottle. The SCBA fill hoses
shall be designed with RIC UAC fittings. A protective cap shall be provided for each
hose.
5. Mechanical supports for piping, hoses, gauges and pressure components,
designed and built to provide a solid rigid structure.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
516. 918.8.6 Cylinder filling hose. The design of the cabinet shall provide a means for
storing the hose to prevent kinking. When the hose is coiled, the brackets shall be
installed so that the hose bend radius is maintained at 4 inches (102 mm) or greater.
The discharge outlet of each cylinder filling hose shall have a female RIC UAC. The
female fitting shall be designed to connect to a male RIC UAC. The assembled RIC
UAC shall meet the construction, performance and dimensional requirements of
NFPA 1981, Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus for Fire
and Emergency Services.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
517. 918.8.7 Security. To prevent unauthorized access to or tampering with the
system, each panel cover shall remain locked by an approved means.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
518. 918.9 Installation of components.
918.9.1 Pressure monitoring switch. An electric low-pressure monitoring switch shall
be installed in the piping system to monitor the air pressure. The pressure switch
shall be connected to the building’s fire alarm system. The pressure switch shall
transmit a supervisory signal when the pressure of the breathing-air system is less

than 3,000 psig (20 685 kPa) at 70°F (21°C). If the building is not equipped with a
fire alarm system, activation of the pressure switch shall activate an audible alarm
located at the building’s main entrance. A weather-resistant sign shall be provided
adjacent to the audible alarm stating: “FIRE-FIGHTER AIR SYSTEM LOW AIR
PRESSURE ALARM.” The lettering shall be in a contrasting color and the letters shall
be not less than 2 inches (51 mm) high with 3/4-inch (9.53 mm) brush strokes.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
519. 918.9.2 Tubing. Piping shall be constructed of stainless steel or other approved
materials that are compatible with breathing air. The use of nonmetallic materials
shall be compatible with breathing air. Where stainless steel tubing is used, it shall
meet ASTM A269, Grade 316 or an equal standard. Stainless steel fittings shall be
Grade 316 and be not less than 0.375 inch (9.5 mm) outside diameter by .065 inch
(1.6 mm) fully annealed seamless. Stainless steel fittings shall be at least Grade 316
and meet the requirements of ASTM A479 or equal. Routing of tubing and bends
shall be such as to protect the tubing from mechanical damage.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
520. 918.9.3 Support. Piping shall be supported at maximum intervals of 5 feet (1524
mm). Individual tubing clamps and mounting components shall be mechanically
secured to the building support members in accordance with the manufacturer’s
specifications.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
521. 918.9.4 Fittings. Fittings shall be constructed of stainless steel or other approved
materials that are compatible with breathing air. The use of nonmetallic materials
shall be compatible with breathing air. Stainless steel fittings shall be at least Grade
316 and meet the requirements of ASTM A479 or an equal standard.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
522. 918.9.5 Prohibition. The use of carbon steel, iron pipe, malleable iron, high-
strength gray iron or alloy steel is prohibited.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
523. 918.10 System assembly requirements. The system shall be welded except where
the tubing joints are readily accessible and at the individual air fill panels. When
mechanical high pressure tube fittings are used, they shall be approved for the type
of materials to be joined and rated for the maximum pressure of the system. Welding
procedures shall meet ASME B31.1, Part 4 and Chapter V (Exhibit VI). Prior to and
during the welding of sections of tubing, a continuous, regulated dry nitrogen or
argon purge at 3 psig (20.68 kPa) shall be maintained to eliminate contamination
with products of the oxidation or welding flux. The purge shall commence a
minimum of 2 minutes prior to welding operations and continue until the welded
joint is at an ambient temperature between 60°F and 80°F (15.5°C to 26.6°C).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
524. 918.11 Prevention of contamination. The installing contractor shall ensure that, at
all times, the system components are not exposed to contaminants including, but
not limited to, oils, solvents, dirt and construction materials. When contamination of
system components has occurred, the effected component shall not be installed in
the system.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
525. 918.12 Testing and inspection.
918.12.1 Testing. Following fabrication, assembly, and installation of the piping
distribution system, exterior connection panel and interior cylinder fill panels, the
Phoenix Fire Department shall witness the pneumatic testing of the complete system
at a minimum test pressure of 5,500 psi (37 923 kPa) using oil-free dry air, nitrogen
or argon. A minimum 24-hour pneumatic or hydrostatic test shall be performed.
During this test, all fittings, joints and system components shall be inspected for leaks.
A solution compatible with the system component materials shall be used on each
joint and fitting. Any defects in the system or leaks detected shall be documented on
an inspection report, repaired or replaced. As an alternate, a pressure decay test in
accordance with ASME B31.3 is allowed. A test of the low-pressure monitoring switch
shall be performed. Each air fill panel shall be tested for compatibility with the fire
department’s CGA-347 adapter. The pipe or tubing manufacturer mill report shall be
provided to the Phoenix Fire Department.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
526. 918.12.2 Air samples. Not fewer than two samples shall be taken from separate
air fill panels and submitted to an independent, certified gas analysis laboratory
to verify the system's cleanliness and that the air is certified as breathing air. The
laboratory shall submit a written report of the analysis to the Phoenix Fire

Department documenting that the breathing air complies with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
527. 918.12.3 Quality analysis. During the period of air quality analysis, the air fill
panel inlet shall be secured so that no air can be introduced into the system and
each air fill panel shall be provided with a sign stating: “AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS
IN PROGRESS, DO NOT FILL OR USE ANY AIR FROM THIS SYSTEM.” This sign
shall be a minimum of 81/2 inches by 11 inches (215 mm by 279 mm) with a
minimum of 1-inch (25 mm) lettering.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
528. 918.12.4 Inspection. Annually, the breathing air within the system shall be
inspected and one air sample shall be taken and certified as breathing air in
accordance with the section. The laboratory test results shall be available for
review by the Phoenix Fire Department.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
529. 918.13 System acceptance and certification. Prior to the final acceptance of the
air system, the building owner shall provide for the testing and certification of
the system. This testing shall include verifying the system’s compatibility with the
fire department’s SCBA apparatus; the system’s ability to maintain 5,000 psi (34
475 kPa) working pressure; the operability of the low-pressure monitoring
switch; and that the system’s air quality complies with the requirements of
Section 918.12. Prior to final acceptance, the building owner shall provide the
Phoenix Fire Department with written verification of a testing and certification
contract. Upon satisfactory completion of all tests and verification of air quality,
the system shall be considered complete.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not provided for in base code until 2018 where it is an appendix.
530. SECTION 919
HIGH-RISE SMOKE
REMOVAL SYSTEMS
919.1 Smoke removal.
To facilitate smoke removal in post-fire salvage and overhaul operations,
buildings and structures shall be equipped with natural or mechanical ventilation
for removal of products of combustion in accordance with one of the following:
1.Easily identifiable, manually operable windows or panels shall be distributed
around the perimeter of each floor at not more than 50-foot (15 240 mm)
intervals. The area of operable windows or panels shall be not less than 40

square feet (3.7 m2) per 50 linear feet (15 240 mm) of perimeter.
Exception: In Group R-1 occupancies, each sleeping unit or suite having an
exterior wall shall be permitted to be provided with 2 square feet (0.19 m2) of
venting area in lieu of the area specified in Item 1.
2. Mechanical air-handling equipment providing one exhaust air change every 15
minutes for the area involved. Return and exhaust air shall be moved directly to
the outside without recirculation to other portions of the building.
3. Any other design that will produce equivalent results approved by the fire code
official, through the appeals process. The City of Phoenix Fire Department does
not allow breaking of windows for post fire smoke removal
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures fire customers are aware of IBC requirement.




Chapter 10 Means of Egress
531. 1001.1 General. Buildings or portions thereof shall be provided with a means of egress
system as required by this chapter. The provisions of this chapter shall control the design,
construction and arrangement of means of egress components required to provide an
approved means of egress from structures and portions thereof. Sections 1003 through
1030 shall apply to new construction. Section 1031 shall apply to existing buildings. See
International Building Code Chapter 10, Means of Egress, for all City of Phoenix
amendments to the means of egress.
New in 2018
Reason: This is a cooperative agreement between the departments. The Fire Code
defers to the Building Code for means of egress issues, the Building code defers to the
Fire Code for Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems.




Chapter 11 Construction Requirement for Existing Buildings
532. 1101.1 Scope. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to existing buildings constructed
prior to the adoption of this code. Unless specifically indicated in this chapter, all work
done on new and existing systems shall meet the requirements of the current adopted
codes and standards.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Eliminates confusion for work in existing buildings to provide consistent
code compliant outcomes with system compatibility.
533. 1103.1 Required construction. Existing buildings shall comply with not less than the
minimum provisions specified in Table 1103.1 and as further enumerated in Sections
1103.2 through 1103.10.
The provisions of this chapter shall not be construed to allow the elimination of fire
protection systems or a reduction in the level of fire safety provided in buildings
constructed in accordance with previously adopted codes.
A modification that increases the area protected by a fire protection system by 50
percent or a fire alarm control panel replacement shall be considered a new installation.
When the fire alarm control panel is replaced, the entire fire alarm system shall be
brought to the current performance and installation standards in accordance with
Section 907.5. When fees for modifications exceed the fees for new systems, fees for
new systems shall apply.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Clarifies when a modification is considered a new installation
534. 1103.1.1 Historic buildings. Facilities designated as historic buildings shall develop a fire
protection plan in accordance with NFPA 914. The fire protection plans shall comply
with the maintenance and availability provisions in Sections 404.3 and 404.4. When a
buildings fire alarm control panel is replaced, the entire fire alarm system shall be
brought to the current performance and installation standards in accordance with
section 907.5.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendment addresses when a building is required to replace antiquated
equipment in existing buildings provide consistent code compliant outcomes with
system compatibility.
535. 1103.3.2.1 Elevator emergency exit. Elevator cars with a total travel distance of 75 feet
(22 860 mm) or more shall include a locked emergency exit lock that can be opened
from outside the car. The key or combination to the lock shall be kept in the Fire
Command Center.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations in elevator rescue. Word lock added for clarity.
536. 1103.3.2.2 Emergency door release. Elevator doors shall provide a hoistway access
escutcheon hole (drop-key hole) on the outside for emergency door release. The key
shall be kept in the Fire Command Center, or an approved location.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations in elevator rescue.



537. 1103.4 Vertical openings. Interior vertical openings, including but not limited to
stairways, elevator hoistways, service and utility shafts, that connect two or more
stories of a building, shall be enclosed or protected as specified in Sections 1103.4.1
through 1103.4.10. Modification to an existing smoke control system shall be in
accordance with Sections 901.6.2.1 and 901.6.2.2.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations in smoke management and emergency operations.
538. 1103.4.1 Group I-2 and I-3 occupancies. In Group I-2 and I-3 occupancies, interior
vertical openings connecting two or more stories shall be protected with 1-hour fire-
resistance-rated construction.
Exceptions:
1. In Group I-2, unenclosed vertical openings not exceeding two connected stories
and not concealed within the building construction shall be permitted as follows:
1.1. The unenclosed vertical openings shall be separated from other unenclosed
vertical openings serving other floors by a smoke barrier.
1.2. The unenclosed vertical openings shall be separated from corridors by smoke
partitions.
1.3. The unenclosed vertical openings shall be separated from other fire or smoke
compartments on the same floors by a smoke barrier.
1.4. On other than the lowest level, the unenclosed vertical openings shall not serve
as a required means of egress.
2. In Group I-2, atriums connecting three or more stories shall not require 1-hour
fire-resistance-rated construction where the building is equipped throughout with an
automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3, and all of the
following conditions are met:
2.1. For other than existing approved atriums with a smoke control system, where the
atrium was constructed and is maintained in accordance with the code in effect at the
time the atrium was created, the atrium shall have a smoke control system that is in
compliance with Section 909. Modification to an existing smoke control system shall
be in accordance with Sections 901.6.2.1 and 901.6.2.2.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures modifications are to new installation requirements found in Ch 9.
Supports operations in smoke management and emergency operations
539. 1103.5.3 Group I-2, Condition 2.
In addition to the requirements of Section 1103.5.2, existing buildings of Group I-2,
Condition 2 occupancy shall be equipped throughout with an approved automatic
sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1. The automatic sprinkler
system shall be installed as established by the adopting ordinance. Effective July 19,
2019.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides timeline for application of code section, backdates enforcement to
July of 2019.
540. 1103.5.6 Bret Tarver sprinkler ordinance. An approved automatic sprinkler system shall
be installed throughout all levels of all new Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R-1, R-2, R-4 and
S occupancies of any size and throughout all Group R-3 occupancies including one-and

two-family dwellings built under the International Residential Code, and Group U
occupancies of more than 5,000 square feet.
The calculated area of Group R-3 occupancies shall include all livable space and the
area of any attached garage and carports or areas located under living spaces.
Automatic sprinkler systems shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 13 for Group A,
B, E, F, H, I, M, R-1, R-2, R-4 and S occupancies. Automatic sprinkler systems shall be
installed in accordance with NFPA 13R for residential occupancies up to and including
four stories in height, in Groups R-1, R-2, R-4 occupancies and NFPA 13D for one and
two family dwellings and mobile homes in Group R-3 and R-4 occupancies with six to
ten licensed beds. Exceptions to or reductions in code requirements are not allowed for
the installation of residential sprinkler systems installed in accordance with NFPA 13R
and NFPA 13D unless specifically allowed by the International Building Code. Exceptions
to or reductions in code requirements for NFPA 13 systems allowed in the International
Building Code are allowed.
Exceptions:
1. Detached gazebos, temporary tents and ramadas for residential and public use.\
2. Independent building of any construction or occupancy, other than Group E or H, of
700 square feet (65 m2) or less.
3. Detached noncombustible carports or parking canopies, and detached
noncombustible canopies used exclusively for automotive motor fuel dispensing
station not exceeding 5,000 square feet (464 m2).
4. Factory -built buildings utilized as temporary office buildings similar to real estate
leasing offices and construction offices.
5. Playground equipment, carwashes and small canopies for shade that are less than
5,000 square feet (464 m2) in area, and constructed of limited or noncombustible
material and are more than 5 feet (1524 mm) from the nearest structure.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for existing
buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012. Leads to
consistent outcomes for existing structures.
541. 1103.5.5.1 Retrofit. Existing buildings are required to comply with the provisions of
Sections 903.1.2 to 903.1.7.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Amended in Ordinance G-5898 effective April 18, 2014, removes “all of” from
1103.5.5.2.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for existing
buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012.
542. 1103.5.5.2 Retrofit in Group R-3 occupancies. One or more additions within any 3-year
period are made to a Group R3 occupancy and comply with all of the following:
1. The aggregate of the additions exceeds 50 percent of the square footage of the
house as of June 17, 2002.
2. The new total area of the building is greater than 5,000 square feet (464 m2).
The calculated area of Group R-3 occupancies shall include all livable space and the
area of any attached garage, carport, aircraft hangar or basement.

Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to Construction Requirements for Existing
Buildings chapter when it was added to base code.
543. 1103.5.5.3 Building additions. Building additions in existing occupancies other than
Group R-3 shall be protected by an automatic fire sprinkler when any of the following
apply:
1. Building additions that equal 50 percent or more of the existing building floor area,
or exceed 10,000 square feet (929 m2), whichever is less.
2. Two or more building permits related to increased square footage are issued over
any three consecutive years where:
2.1. The aggregate of the additions exceeds 50 percent of the square footage of the
building as of June 17, 2002.
2.2. The new total area of the building is greater than 10,000 square feet (929 m2).
3. Are required to be protected in accordance with the City of Phoenix Building Code or
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for existing
buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012. Added as a
response to the death of firefighter Bret Tarver, to ensure a minimum life safety and
property protection in line with other jurisdictions in the Valley. Southwest Super
Market had had many renovations creating combustible concealed spaces. If half of
the roof is in repair sprinklers can easily be installed. Retrofit requirements copied to
construction requirements for existing buildings chapter when it was adopted.
544. 1103.5.5.4 Building remodels. An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed when
50 percent or more of the roof structure is replaced or repaired or when the removal of
existing fire-rated assemblies results in an increase of the original basic fire area.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for existing
buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012. Added as a
response to the death of firefighter Bret Tarver, to ensure a minimum life safety and
property protection in line with other jurisdictions in the Valley. Southwest Super
Market had had many renovations creating combustible concealed spaces. If half of
the roof is in repair sprinklers can easily be installed. Retrofit requirements copied to
construction requirements for existing buildings chapter when it was adopted.
545. 1103.5.5.5 Change of occupancy within Hazard Level 1. An automatic fire sprinkler
system shall be installed when a building, regardless of the building area, undergoes a
change of occupancy within Hazard Level 1 as defined by Table 1103.5.5.
TABLE 1103.5.5.5 HAZARD LEVEL
1997 UBC 2018 IFC 2024 IFC
HAZARD
OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY OCCUPANCY
LEVEL
TYPE TYPE2 TYPE




H, I, A, R-1, H, I, A, R-1,
H, I, A, R-1,
1 (highest) R-2, R-4 R-2, R-4, B-
R-2
S-3, B-ACF1 ACF1

2 S-1, S-5, F-1 S-1, F-1 S-1, F-1
E, F-2, S-2, S- E, F-2, S-2
3 E, F-2, S-2
3, S-4
4 (lowest) B, M, U, R-3 B, M, U, R-3 B, M, U, R-3


1. Business, Ambulatory Care Facility.
2. Provided for guidance of equivalent occupancy types.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for existing
buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012. Increases in
hazard and life safety at risk and match the requirements for a new build. This
amendment represents a compromise with the development community when the
citizen Fire Safety Advisory Board wanted a zero square footage requirement.
546. 1103.5.5.6 Change of occupancy over 2,500 square feet (232 m2). An automatic fire
sprinkler system shall be installed in any building 2,500 square feet (232 m2) or greater
that undergoes a change of occupancy.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for existing
buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012. Increases in
hazard and life safety at risk and match the requirements for a new build. This
amendment represents a compromise with the development community when the
citizen Fire Safety Advisory Board wanted a zero square footage requirement.
547. 1103.5.5.7 Change of occupancy under 2,500 square feet (232 m2). An automatic fire
sprinkler system shall be installed in any building 2,500 square feet (232 m2) or less
that undergoes a change of occupancy to a higher hazard level as defined by Table
903.1.7.
Exceptions: An automatic fire sprinkler system is not required when:
1. The occupancy is 1,500 square feet (139 m2) or less; and
2. There are openings entirely above the adjoining ground level totaling at least 20
square feet (1.85 m2) in each 50 linear feet (15 240 mm) or fraction thereof, of
exterior wall in the story on at least one side. Openings shall have a minimum
dimension of not less than 30 inches (762 mm). Such openings shall be accessible
to the fire department from the exterior and shall not be obstructed in a manner
that firefighting or rescue cannot be accomplished from the exterior; and
3. The occupancy is not classified as Group H.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for existing

buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012. Increases in
hazard and life safety at risk and match the requirements for a new build. This
amendment represents a compromise with the development community when the
citizen Fire Safety Advisory Board wanted a zero square footage requirement.
548. 1103.5.6 Sprinkler systems—partially sprinklered buildings. Where existing non-
sprinklered buildings of mixed occupancy are required to have sprinklers based on a
change of occupancy classification, sprinklers shall be installed throughout the fire area
that includes the new occupancy. The fire-resistance rating of fire barriers or horizontal
assemblies separating sprinklered and non-sprinklered fire areas shall be a minimum of
2 hours. Fire department connection signage shall be in accordance with Section 912.
Exception: Group R-1, R-2, R-4 occupancies and multistory buildings shall be sprinklered
throughout regardless of separation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for existing
buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012. Compromise
for change of occupancies within strip malls and other divided occupancies. Ensures
new occupancy is not responsible for installing sprinklers in the entire structure. The
R occupancy exception ensures life safety of occupancies where people are sleeping
and not occupying businesses. Provides for entire areas to be upgraded at the same
time.
549. 1103.5.6.1 Change of occupancy to Group B or M under the Building Department
Adaptive Reuse Interpretation. Where an occupancy undergoes a change of occupancy
to a Group B or M from a Group B or M, an automatic fire sprinkler system shall be
installed.
Exception: Changed occupancies need not install an automatic fire sprinkler system
where all of the following criteria are met:
1. Where the fire area containing the occupancy has a total area of 5,000 square feet
(464.515 m2) or less.
2. Where the fire areas are separated by a minimum 2-hour fire resistance rated
assemblies.
3. Where the occupancy does not store, handle or use hazardous materials over the
exempt amount.
4. Where only one control area is allowed for the building.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to accommodate changes of occupancy under Planning &
Development’s Adaptive Reuse Interpretation.
550. 1103.5.6.2 Changes in commodity hazard. Changes of commodity to a higher hazard
classification or storage configuration that exceeds the capabilities of the existing
sprinkler system design shall require the sprinkler system to be modified. The sprinkler
system shall be modified to provide an approved design in accordance with NFPA 13,
or other applicable design standard, for the commodity present in the building or area.
In existing non-sprinklered buildings, storage above the ordinary hazard class shall
require automatic fire sprinkler installation throughout the building.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Referenced in NFPA 13 2016, not otherwise addressed in the IFC.
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for existing
buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012.
551. 1103.5.7 Installation of quick-response sprinklers in existing light hazard occupancy
sprinkler systems being modified. Where existing occupancies and sprinkler systems are
being remodeled or renovated, existing standard-response sprinklers shall be replaced
with quick-response sprinklers as follows:
1. Where any tenant improvement, system repair or replacement is made to an existing
fire area, existing standard-response sprinklers shall be replaced with quick-response
sprinklers.
2. Where an existing system with standard-response sprinklers is being modified,
the standard-response sprinklers shall be replaced with quick-response sprinklers
throughout the tenant space, floor or suite. Where 50 percent of the floor sprinklers
are replaced, all sprinklers on the entire floor shall be replaced with quick-response
sprinklers.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Allows for consistent outcomes and improved life safety in light hazard
occupancies. The national code has varied in its interpretation and requirements in
the last 4 code cycles. Retrofit requirements copied to construction requirements for
existing buildings chapter (Chapter 11) when it was added to base code in 2012,
previously found in Section 903.3.2.1.
552. 1103.6.3 Pressure reducing valve settings. Where a new or replacement fire pump
serving an automatic standpipe is installed, existing standpipes shall be designed in
accordance with NFPA 14 and the following requirements:
1. Pressure-reducing valves shall be set to provide a minimum 250 gpm at 100 psi
where installed inside a structure.
2. Standpipe outlets on the roof shall be designed to provide a minimum 500 gpm at
100 psi for the first standpipe and up to a total of 1,000 gpm at 100 psi for all
standpipe water supplies.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations. Ensuring adequate water pressure is available
throughout.
553. 1103.7 Fire alarm systems. An approved fire alarm system shall be installed in existing
buildings and structures in accordance with Sections 1103.7.1 through 1103.7.6 and
provide occupant notification in accordance with Section 907.5 unless other
requirements are provided by other sections of this code.
Where automatic sprinkler protection is provided in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1
or 903.3.1.2 and connected to the building fire alarm system, automatic fire detection
system shall not be required, unless specifically required based on the occupancy
classification.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied from 907.5.2.1 to Construction Requirements
for Existing Buildings Chapter 11 when it was added to base code. Strikethrough
clarifies automatic fire detection is not required which aligns with the national
standard.
554. 1103.7.1.1 Fire alarm devices. When an existing building is required to install a fire
alarm, devices, combinations of devices, appliances and equipment shall be approved.
The automatic fire detectors shall be smoke detectors.
Exception: An approved alternative type of detector shall be installed in spaces such as
boiler rooms where, during normal operation, products of combustion are present in
sufficient quantity to actuate a smoke detector.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Triggers fire alarm installation throughout an existing area.
555. 1103.7.1.1.1 Occupancy requirements. A fire alarm system shall be installed in
accordance with Sections 1103.7.2 through 1103.8.1.
Exception: Occupancies with an existing, previously approved fire alarm system in
compliance with 907.5.2.1.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Amendment added to ensure full replacements and upgrade occur upon
equipment failure.
556. 1103.7.1.1.2 Visible alarms in existing facilities. Visual fire alarm devices shall be
installed in public and common areas of existing facilities in accordance with Sections
907.5.2.3 through 907.5.2.3.4.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 January 30, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package),
edits in blue.
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied from 907.5.2.1 to Construction Requirements
for Existing Buildings Chapter 11 when it was added to base code
557. 1103.7.1.1.3 Visual alarms in Groups I-1 and R-1. Shall be in accordance with Sections
1103.7.2 and 1103.7.5.2.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 January 30, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package),
edits in blue.
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied from 907.5.2.1 to Construction Requirements
for Existing Buildings Chapter 11 when it was added to base code
558. 1103.7.1.1.4 Changes in occupancy. Where a building undergoes a change in occupancy
classification, the fire alarm system shall comply with the requirements of Section 907.2
for that occupancy.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 January 30, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package.
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied from 907.5.2.1 to Construction Requirements
for Existing Buildings Chapter 11 when it was added to base code
559. 1103.7.1.1.5 Building renovations. Buildings undergoing structural renovations,
alterations or modifications, including but not limited to the addition, removal or

relocation of walls and partitions, shall have visual alarm devices installed in any new
public or common area created by the renovations.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 January 30, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package),
edits in blue.
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied from 907.5.2.1 to Construction Requirements
for Existing Buildings Chapter 11 when it was added to base code
560. 1103.7.1.1.6 Fire alarm panel replacement. Visual alarm devices shall be installed in
public and common areas, including elevator lobbies, restrooms, and corridors of
building core areas when an existing fire alarm control panel is replaced.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 January 30, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package),
edits in blue.
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied from 907.5.2.1 to Construction Requirements
for Existing Buildings Chapter 11 when it was added to base code.
561. 1103.7.1.1.7 Pre-signal system. Pre-signal systems shall not be installed unless
approved by the fire code official. Where a presignal system is installed, 24-hour
personnel supervision shall be provided at a location approved by the fire department,
in order that the alarm signal can be actuated in the event of fire or other emergency.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Gives personnel onsite the opportunity to review th alarm prior to dispatch.
562. 1103.7.1.1.8 Protected areas in buildings with partial fire alarm systems. In buildings
with partial fire alarm systems, fire-alarm protected areas and nonprotected areas shall
be separated by fire-resistance-rated fire barriers or horizontal assemblies with not less
than 2 hours of nonautomatic sprinkler protection or not less than 1 hour of automatic
sprinkler protection.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Gives credit for automatic sprinklers for partially sprinklered buildings.
563. 1103.7.1.2 Audible alarms. Audible alarm notification appliances shall be provided and
emit a distinctive sound that is not to be used for any purpose other than that of a fire
alarm. Group A, B, E, F, H, I, M, R, S and U occupancies shall meet Public Mode Audible
Requirements of NFPA 72.
Exceptions:
1. Visible alarm notification appliances shall be allowed in lieu of audible alarm
notification appliances in critical care areas of Group I-2 occupancies.
2. Where provided, audible notification appliances located in each occupant evacuation
elevator lobby in accordance with Section 3008.10.1 of the International Building
Code shall be connected to a separate notification zone for manual paging only.
3. Group I occupancies shall be allowed to use Private Mode Audible Requirements of
NFPA 72 where approved. Registered design professionals shall specify on plans and
in construction documents the specific mode for each area of the occupancy. Where


the private mode is specified, the designer shall provide written documentation for
the use of this mode.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied from 907.5.2.1 to Construction Requirements
for Existing Buildings Chapter 11 when it was added to base code. 907.5.2.1
564. 1103.7.1.2.1 Average sound pressure. The audible alarm notification appliances shall
provide and be maintained to provide a sound pressure level of 15 decibels (dB) above
the average ambient sound level or 5 dB above the maximum sound level having a
duration of at least 60 seconds, whichever is greater, in every occupiable space within
the building.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Retrofit requirements copied from 907.5.2.1 to Construction Requirements
for Existing Buildings Chapter 11 when it was added to base code. Ensures the
sound level is maintained.
565. 1103.7.1.2.2 Maximum sound pressure. The maximum sound pressure level for audible
alarm notification appliances shall be 110 dB at the minimum hearing distance from the
audible appliance. Where the average ambient noise is greater than 95 dB, visible alarm
notification appliances shall be provided in accordance with NFPA 72 and audible alarm
notification appliances shall not be required.
Exception: Group I occupancies shall be allowed to use Private Mode Audible
Requirements of NFPA 72, when approved by appeal to the Fire Marshal.
Registered design professionals shall specify on plans and in construction documents
the mode for each area of the occupancy. Where the private mode is specified, the
designer shall provide written documentation for the use of this mode.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason:
566. ◆ 1103.7.1.2.3 Zones. Each floor shall be zoned separately and a zone shall not exceed
22,500 square feet (2090 m2). The length of any zone shall not exceed 300 feet (91
440 mm) in any direction.
Exception: Automatic sprinkler system zones shall not exceed the area permitted by
NFPA 13. See Section 903.4.1 for sprinkler alarm monitoring requirements.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added to contractors using loop holes provided by NFPA 13 and not
otherwise supported in NFPA 72. Helps to coordinate alarm reporting.
567. 1103.7.1.2.4 Zoning indicator panel (fire alarm annunciator panel). A zoning indicator
panel and the associated controls shall be provided in an approved location. The visual
zone indication shall lock in until the system is reset and shall not be canceled by the
operation of an audible alarm silencing switch.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).

Reason: Added to support operations and C99 to determine the location of the
alarm and nature when arriving on-site. Not otherwise addressed in the code.
Retrofit requirements copied to Construction Requirements for Existing Buildings
chapter when it was added to base code.
568. 1103.7.1.2.5 Location. In buildings greater than one story or 22,500 square feet (2090
m2), the fire alarm panel or a fire alarm annunciator panel shall be installed in a location
that is visible from the lobby or area adjacent to the primary fire department response
entrance. It shall be permissible to locate the fire alarm panel in a room immediately
adjacent to this lobby, provided that the door to this room is accessible to the fire
department, visible from the lobby and is provided with a permanent, visible placard
noting the location of the fire alarm control panel.
Exception: A zone indicator panel is not required for single-story buildings protected by
a fire alarm system where the initiating devices consist of automatic sprinklers supplied
by a single sprinkler system
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added to support operations and C99 to determine the location of the
alarm and nature when arriving on-site. Not otherwise addressed in the code.
Retrofit requirements copied to Construction Requirements for Existing Buildings
chapter when it was added to base code.
569. 1103.7.5.2 Group R-1 boarding and rooming houses manual fire alarm system. A
manual fire alarm system that activates the occupant notification system in accordance
with Section 907.5 shall be installed in existing Group R-1 boarding and rooming houses.
Exception: Buildings less than two stories in height equipped with single-station smoke
alarms meeting or exceeding the requirements of Section 907.2.10.1 and where all
sleeping units, attics and crawl spaces are separated by 1-hour fire-resistance-rated
construction and each sleeping unit has direct access to a public way, egress court or
yard.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures that smoke alarms are installed wherever sleeping units are.
570. 1104.7.3 Groups R-3 and R-4. In Group R-3 or R-4 occupancies, a keyed locking device
on the main entrance door in state licensed facilities classified and designated as
“directed care” shall be allowed when the following stipulations are complied with:
1. The facility’s state license states “directed care.”
2. At all times they are in the facility, each employee has on their person a key that will
open the door from the inside.
Failure to maintain compliance with these requirements shall require immediate removal
of the keyed locking device and replacement with an approved locking device that does
not require a key or special knowledge to open the door from the inside.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to allow state license facilities to maintain locked doors provided
employees maintain keys on person to unlock the doors from the inside.
571. 1104.25 Egress path markings. Existing high-rise buildings of Group A, B, E, I-1, M
and R-1 occupancies shall be provided with luminous egress path markings in
accordance with Section 1025. It shall be up to the owners to install egress path

markings. In the event of a power outage, any liability for injury would fall upon the
owner. All existing facilities shall have egress paths marked by January 1, 2023.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Retroactivity included in this section to include existing building
requirements for luminous egress markings. Strikethrough added to align with PDD
amendment.
572. SECTION 1107
EXISTING HIGH-RISE SMOKE
REMOVAL SYSTEMS
1107.1 Smoke removal. To facilitate smoke removal in post-fire salvage and
overhaul operations, buildings and structures shall be equipped with natural or
mechanical ventilation for removal of products of combustion in accordance with one
of the following:
1. Easily identifiable, manually operable windows or panels shall be distributed around
the perimeter of each floor at not more than 50-foot (15 240 mm) intervals. The area
of operable windows or panels shall be not less than 40 square feet (3.7 m2) per 50
linear feet (15 240 mm) of perimeter.
Exception: In Group R-1 occupancies, each sleeping unit or suite having an exterior wall
shall be permitted to be provided with 2 square feet (0.19 m2) of venting area in lieu of
the area specified in Item 1.
2. Mechanical air-handling equipment providing one exhaust air change every 15 minutes
for the area involved. Return and exhaust air shall be moved directly to the outside
without recirculation to other portions of the building.
3. Any other design that will produce equivalent results approved by the fire code official,
through the appeals process. The City of Phoenix Fire Department does not allow
breaking of windows for post fire smoke removal.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: This amendment reinforces requirements found in section 919 for high-rise
smoke removal systems.




CH 12 Energy Systems
573. 1203.1.1 Stationary generators. Stationary emergency and standby power generators
required by this code shall be listed in accordance with UL 2200. Associated flammable or
combustible liquid tanks shall also comply with Chapters 50 and 57.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures permits and compliance with specific code requirements.
574. 1203.2.5 Exhaust ventilation. Standby power shall be provided for mechanical exhaust
ventilation systems as required in Section 1207.6.1.2.1. The system shall be capable of
powering the required load for a duration of not less than 6 hours.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: New in 2018, carried into 2024 and incorporated into Section 1203.2.5 as
appropriate.
575. 1205.1.1 Permits. Permits shall be obtained for solar photovoltaic power systems in
accordance with Section 105.7.21.
Exception: Solar photovoltaic systems with less than 3 kW alternating current nameplate
rating.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides for tracking of system installations.
576. 1205.1.2 Marking. Marking is required on interior and exterior direct-current (DC) conduit,
enclosures, raceways, cable assemblies, junction boxes, combiner boxes and disconnects.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides clarification. This is base code language is from 2012 Chapter 6.
577. 1205.1.2.1 Materials. The materials used for marking shall be reflective, weather resistant
and suitable for the environment. Markings shall have all letters capitalized with a minimum
height of 3/8 inch (9.5 mm) white on red background.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides clarification. This is base code language is from 2012 Chapter 6.
578. 1205.1.2.2 Marking content. The marking shall contain the words “WARNING:
PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE.”
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides clarification. This is base code language is from 2012 Chapter 6.
579. 1205.1.2.3 Main service disconnect. The marking shall be placed adjacent to the main
service disconnect in a location clearly visible from the location where the disconnect is
operated.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).

Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides clarification. This is base code language is from 2012 Chapter 6.
580. 1205.1.3 Location of markings. Markings shall be placed on interior and exterior DC conduit,
raceways, enclosures and cable assemblies every 10 feet (3048 mm), within 1 foot (305
mm) of turns or bends and within 1 foot (305 mm) above and below penetrations of
roof/ceiling assemblies, walls or barriers.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides clarification. This is base code language is from 2012 Chapter 6.
581. 1205.2 Access and pathways. Roof access, pathways, and spacing requirements shall be
provided in accordance with Sections 1205.2.1 through 1205.3.3. Pathways shall be over areas
capable of supporting fire fighters accessing the roof. Pathways shall be located in areas with
minimal obstructions, such as vent pipes, conduit or mechanical equipment.
Residential structures shall be designed so that each photovoltaic array is not greater than
150 feet (45 720 mm) by 150 feet (45 720 mm) in either axis.
Exceptions:
1. Detached, nonhabitable Group U structures including, but not limited to, detached
garages serving R-3 buildings, parking shade structures, carports, solar trellises and similar
structures.
2. Roof access, pathways and spacing requirements need not be provided where the fire
code official has determined that rooftop operations will not be employed.
2. Building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems where the BIPV systems are approved,
integrated into the finished roof surface and are listed in accordance with UL 3741. The
removal or cutting away of portions of the BIPV system during firefighting operations shall
not expose a firefighter to electrical shock hazards.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides clarification. This is base code language is from
2012 Chapter 6.
582. 1205.2.1 Solar photovoltaic systems for Group R-3 buildings. Solar photovoltaic systems for
Group R-3 buildings shall comply with Sections 1204.2.1.1 through 1204.2.1.3.
Exceptions:
1. These requirements shall not apply to structures designed and constructed in
accordance with the International Residential Code.
2. These requirements shall not apply to roofs with slopes of 2 units vertical in 12 units
horizontal or less.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides clarification. This is base code language is from
2012 Chapter 6. Strikethrough of exceptions necessary as R-3 buildings are required to
comply with sections 1204.2.1.1 – 1204.2.1.3 regardless of roof slope or IRC.
583. 1205.3.2 Interior pathways. Interior pathways shall be provided between array sections to
meet the following requirements:
1. Pathways shall be provided at intervals not greater than 150 feet (45720 mm) throughout
the length and width of the roof.

2. A pathway not less than 4 feet (1219 mm) wide in a straight line to roof standpipes or
ventilation hatches.
3. A pathway not less than 4 feet (1219 mm) wide around roof access hatches, with not
fewer than one such pathway to a parapet or roof edge.
4. The pathway shall be over areas capable of supporting the live load of firefighters
accessing the roof.
5. The centerline axis pathways shall be provided in both axes of the roof. Centerline axis
pathways shall run where the roof structure is capable of supporting the live load of
firefighters accessing the roof.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides clarification. This is base code language is from
2012 Chapter 6.
584. 1205.3.3 Smoke ventilation. The solar installation shall be designed to meet the following
requirements:
1. Where nongravity-operated smoke and heat vents occur, a pathway not less than 4 feet
(1219 mm) wide shall be provided bordering all sides.
2. Smoke ventilation options between array sections shall be one of the following:
2.1. A pathway not less than 8 feet (2438 mm) wide.
2.2. Where gravity-operated dropout smoke and heat vents occur, a pathway not less than 4
feet (1219 mm) wide on not fewer than one side.
2.3. A pathway not less than 4 feet (1219 mm) wide bordering 4-foot by 8-foot (1219 mm
by 2438 mm) venting cutouts every 20 feet (6096 mm) on alternating sides of the pathway.
3. Arrays shall be not greater than 150 feet (45720 mm) by 150 feet (45720 mm) in
distance in either axis in order to create opportunities for fire department smoke ventilation
operations.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations and provides clarification. This is base code language is from
2012 Chapter 6.
585. 1207.1.3 Scope. ESS having capacities exceeding the values shown in Table 1207.1.3 shall
comply with this section. Approved signage is required for all installations.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: New in 2018. Supports operations and provides clarification. This is base code
language is from 2012 Chapter 6.
586.
Table 1207.1.3 ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (ESS) THRESHOLD QUANTITIES
Energy
Technology Capacitya

Capacitor ESS 3 kWh

Flow batteriesb 20 kWh
Lead-acid batteries, all types 70 kWhc

Lithium-ion batteries 20 kWh
Nickel-cadmium (Ni-Cd), nickel metal hydride (Ni-MH) and nickel zinc
(Ni-Zn) batteries 70 kWh
Nonelectrochemical ESSd 70 kWh
Other battery technologies 10 kWh
Sodium nickel chloride batteries 70 kWh
Zinc manganese dioxide batteries (Zn-MnO2) 70 kWh
Stationary ESS in R-3 and R-4 occupancies 3 kWh
a. Energy capacity is the total energy capable of being stored (nameplate rating), not the
usable energy rating. For units rated in amp-hours, kWh shall equal rated voltage times
amp-hour rating divided by 1,000.
b. Shall include vanadium, zinc-bromine, polysulfide-bromide and other flowing
electrolyte-type technologies.
c. Fifty gallons of lead-acid battery electrolyte shall be considered equivalent to 70 kWh.
d. Covers nonelectrochemical technologies such as flywheel and thermal ESS.
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: The row added to this table serves only to better articulate the size of energy
storage system that would be regulated and permitted by this section.
587. 1207.1.6.1 Fault condition. The hazard mitigation analysis shall evaluate the consequences
of the following failure modes. Only single failure modes shall be considered.
1. A thermal runaway condition in a single electrochemical ESS unit.
2. A mechanical failure of a nonelectrochemical ESS unit.
3. Failure of any battery (energy) management system or fire protection system within the
ESS equipment that is not covered by the product listing failure mode effects analysis
(FMEA).
4. Failure of any required protection system external to the ESS, including but not limited to
ventilation (HVAC), exhaust ventilation, smoke detection, fire detection, gas detection,
temperature control or fire suppression system.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: New in 2018, carried into 2024.
588. 1207.1.8 Fire remediation. Where a fire or other event has damaged the ESS and ignition or
re-ignition of the ESS is possible, the system owner, agent or lessee shall take the following
actions, at their expense, to mitigate the hazard or remove damaged equipment from the
premises to a safe location. The fire code official may also require a forensic analysis of the
cause of failure by an independent laboratory approved by the fire code official, in
accordance with Section 104.10.2.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: New in 2018, carried into 2024.

589. 1207.3.4 Energy storage management system. Where required by the ESS listing, an
approved energy storage management system that monitors and balances cell voltages,
currents and temperatures within the manufacturer’s specifications shall be provided. If
potentially hazardous temperatures or other conditions such as short circuits, over voltage or
under voltage are detected, the system shall disconnect electrical connections to the ESS or
otherwise place it in a safe condition and shall transmit an alarm signal to an approved
location and to an approved annunciator panel.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: New in 2018, language incorporated into 2024 IFC Section 1207.3.4 where
appropriate.
590. 1207.3.4.1 Annunciator panel. The approved annunciator panel shall visibly indicate any
hazardous temperature or other conditions. The location of the annunciator panel shall be
approved by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: New in 2018, retained in 2024.
591. 1207.4.8.1 NFPA 704 diamond. Where NFPA 704 diamonds are provided near entrances to
areas containing ESS, they shall incorporate additional symbols as shown in the Appendix D,
and as required by the fire code official.
Reason: New in 2024. The new version of the detail manual is planned to include a
template for an NFPA 704 diamond including a battery symbol in the bottom quadrant.
592. 1207.6.1.2.1 Standby power. Mechanical exhaust ventilation shall be provided with a
minimum of 6 hours of standby power in accordance with Section 1203.2.5.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: New in 2018, carried into 2024 and incorporated into Section 1203.2.5 as
appropriate.
593. 1207.6.1.2.4 Gas detection system. Where required by Section 1207.6.1.2, rooms, areas and
walk-in units containing ESS shall be protected by an approved continuous gas detection
system that complies with Section 916 and the following:
1. The gas detection system shall be designed to activate the mechanical ventilation system
when the level of flammable gas in the room, area or walk-in unit exceeds 25 percent of the
LFL.
2. The mechanical ventilation system shall remain on until the flammable gas detected is less
than 25 percent of the LFL.
3. The gas detection system shall be provided with a minimum of 2 hours of standby power
in accordance with Section 1203.2.5.
4. Failure of the gas detection system shall annunciate a trouble signal at an approved
central station, proprietary or remote station service in accordance with NFPA 72, or shall
initiate an audible and visible trouble signal at an approved constantly attended on-site
location.

1207.6.1.2.4 Gas detection system. Gas detection systems provided for ESS shall be in
accordance with Section 916.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
594. 1207.11.3 Location. ESS shall be installed only in the following locations:
1. Detached garages and detached accessory structures.
2. Attached garages separated from the dwelling unit living space and sleeping units in
accordance with Section 406.3.2 of the International Building Code.
3. Outdoors or on the exterior side of exterior walls located a minimum of 3 feet (914 mm)
from doors and windows directly entering the dwelling unit.
4. Enclosed utility closets, basements, and storage or utility spaces within dwelling units and
sleeping units with finished or noncombustible walls and ceilings. Walls and ceilings of
unfinished wood-framed construction shall be provided with not less than 5/8-inch Type X
gypsum wallboard.

ESS shall not be installed in sleeping rooms, or in closets or spaces opening directly into
sleeping rooms.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Not allowed in closets, carried forward from 2018 to 2024.
595. 1207.11.2 Installation. ESS shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and their listing. ESS that have the potential to release toxic or highly toxic gas
during charging, discharging and normal use conditions shall not be installed within Group R-
3 or R-4 occupancies.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: New in 2018, carried forward into 2024, incorporated where sensible in Section
1207.11.2.
596. 1207.11.10 Signage. Approved signs warning of the presence of an ESS shall be provided on
or adjacent to the main electrical panel. The signage shall be in accordance with the
Phoenix Fire Department Access and Identification Detail Manual including the following or
equivalent:
1. WARNING: ESS INSIDE GARAGE
2. WARNING: ESS ON HOUSE EXTERIOR WALL
Reason: Provides emergency responders with concise advance warning of the presence of a
residential ESS.




Chapters 13-19 Reserved
These chapters remain reserved and unchanged.
Reason:




Chapter 20 Aviation Facilities
597. 2001.1 Scope. Airports, heliports, helistops and aircraft hangars shall be in accordance
with this chapter, and the most current version of other nationally recognized standards.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Compliance with other standards is required by other governing agencies.
NFPA is the Standard on Aircraft Hangars.
598. 2007.6 Foam protection. Foam fire-protection capabilities shall be provided for rooftop
heliports. Such systems shall be designed, installed and maintained in accordance with
the applicable provisions of Sections 903 through 905 and NFPA 11 and NFPA 418.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Compliance with other standards is required by other governing agencies.
Correction made for NFPA 418 is the Standard on Aircraft Hangars.




Chapter 21 Dry Cleaning
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at
this time.
Reason:




CH 22 Combustible Dust-Producing Operations
1. 2201.2 Permits. Permits shall be required for combustible dust-producing operations as set
forth in Sections 105.5 and 105.6.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Construction permits are now required.




CH 23 Motor Fuel-Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages
599. 2301.1 Scope. Automotive motor fuel-dispensing facilities, marine motor fuel-dispensing
facilities, fleet vehicle motor fuel-dispensing facilities, aircraft motor fuel-dispensing facilities
and repair garages shall be in accordance with this chapter and the International Building
Code, International Fuel Gas Code and International Mechanical Code and NFPA 52 and 30A.
Such operations shall include both those that are open to the public and private operations.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Incorporates additional nationally-recognized reference standards from NFPA.
600. 2304.3.6 Communications. A telephone not requiring a coin or card to operate or other
approved, clearly identified means to notify the fire department shall be provided on the site
in a location approved by the fire code official.
Exception: An approved mobile or cellular communication device can be used to notify the
fire department.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Exception allows for a mobile or cellular device to be used.
601. 2304.5 Fleet Vehicle Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities. Fleet vehicle motor fuel-dispensing
facilities shall comply with Sections 2304.5.1 through 2304.5.6.
Reason: New to 2024. Add a section to the IFC to include Fleet vehicle motor fuel facilities.
These proprietary facilities have greater controls than the attended or non-attended
facilities.
602. 2304.5.1 The dispensing of motor fuels shall be conducted only by employees or other
authorized affiliates of the business or operation.
Reason: New to 2024. Add a section to the IFC to include Fleet vehicle motor fuel facilities.
These proprietary facilities have greater controls than the attended or non-attended facilities.
603. 2304.5.2 If dispensing is conducted after normal working hours of the facility or when
normal facility telecommunications are not available for use, then a telephone or other
approved, clearly identified means to notify the fire department shall be provided on the site
in a location approved by the authority having jurisdiction.
Reason: New to 2024. Add a section to the IFC to include Fleet vehicle motor fuel facilities.
These proprietary facilities have greater controls than the attended or non-attended facilities.
604. 2304.5.3 Dispensers Dispensing devices shall comply with Section 2306.7.
Reason: New to 2024. Add a section to the IFC to include Fleet vehicle motor fuel facilities.
These proprietary facilities have greater controls than the attended or non-attended facilities.
605. 2304.5.4 Emergency controls. Approved emergency controls shall be provided in accordance
with Section 2303.2. Emergency controls shall be of a type that is only manually resettable.
Reason: New to 2024. Add a section to the IFC to include Fleet vehicle motor fuel facilities.
These proprietary facilities have greater controls than the attended or non-attended facilities.
606. 2304.5.5 Operating instructions. Dispenser operating instructions shall be conspicuously
posted in approved locations on every dispenser.
Reason: New to 2024. Add a section to the IFC to include Fleet vehicle motor fuel facilities.
These proprietary facilities have greater controls than the attended or non-attended facilities.
607. 2304.5.5.1 The instructions in 2304.5.5 shall include the location of emergency controls and
a requirement that the user stay outside of their vehicle and in view of the fueling nozzle
during dispensing.
Reason: New to 2024. Add a section to the IFC to include Fleet vehicle motor fuel facilities.
These proprietary facilities have greater controls than the attended or non-attended facilities.
608. 2304.5.6 Emergency procedures. An approved emergency procedures sign, in addition to the
signs required by Section 2305.6, shall be posted in a conspicuous location and shall read:
IN CASE OF FIRE, SPILL OR RELEASE
1. USE EMERGENCY PUMP SHUTOFF
2. REPORT THE ACCIDENT!
FIRE DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE NO.
FACILITY ADDRESS

Reason: New to 2024. Add a section to the IFC to include Fleet vehicle motor fuel facilities.
These proprietary facilities have greater controls than the attended or non-attended facilities.
609. 2307.2.3 Breakaway protection. Breakaway protection shall be provided in a manner that, in
the event of a pull away, LP-gas ceases to flow at any separation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides protection not otherwise provided for in the base code.
610. 2307.2.4 Breakaway devices. A breakaway device shall be installed at every dispensing
point. A breakaway device shall be arranged to separate using a force not greater than 150
pounds (68 kg) when applied in any direction that the vehicle would move.
An emergency breakaway device shall be installed and shall be listed, in compliance with
NFPA 58 and UL 567, Standard for Emergency Breakaway Fittings, Swivel Connectors, and
Pipe-Connection Fittings for Petroleum Products and LP-Gas and designed to retain liquids
on both sides of the breakaway point, or shall be a device approved by the fire code official
affording equivalent protection.
Exception: Where approved by the fire code official, an alternative breakaway device shall
be used where equivalency can be justified through an appeal to the Fire Marshal.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides protection not otherwise provided for in the base code.
611. 2308.2.5 Breakaway devices. Breakaway devices shall comply with ANSI/IAS NGV 4.4,
Breakaway Devices for Natural Gas Dispensing Hoses and Systems.
A breakaway device shall be installed at every dispensing point. A breakaway device shall
be arranged to separate using a force not greater than 150 pounds (68 kg) when applied in
any direction that the vehicle would move.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides protection not otherwise provided for in the base code.
612. 2308.2.6 Breakaway protection. Breakaway protection shall be provided in a manner that, in
the event of a pull away, natural gas ceases to flow at any separation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides protection not otherwise provided for in the base code.
613. 2311.8.9 Gas detection system. Gas detection systems provided for repair garages shall
comply with Section 916.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
614. 2311.8.9.1 System activation. Activation of the gas detection alarm shall result in all of the
following:
1. Initiation of local audible and visual alarms in approved locations.
2. Deactivation of heating systems located in the repair garage.
3. Activation of the mechanical exhaust ventilation system, where the ventilation system is
interlocked with gas detection.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
615. 2311.8.9.2 Failure of the gas detection system. Failure of the gas detection system shall
automatically deactivate the heating system, activate the mechanical exhaust ventilation
system where the system is interlocked with the gas detection system and cause a trouble
signal to sound in an approved location.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.




CH 24 FLAMMABLE FINISHES
617. 2401.3 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Sections 105.5 and 105.6.
Exception: Buildings under construction or renovation with a valid construction permit do not
require a permit to conduct this activity. The activity shall be performed in accordance with
Section 2410 and all applicable standards.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure customers are not charged twice for the same activity.




Chapter 25 Fruit and Crop Ripening
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at this
time.
Reason:




Chapter 26 Fumigation and Insecticidal Fogging
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at
this time.
Reason:




Chapter 27 Semiconductor Fabrication Facilities
618. 2701.5 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Sections 105.5 and 105.6.
Reason: Amended to include requirement of an operational permit
619. 2703.13 Gas detection systems. A gas detection system complying with Section 916 shall
be provided. for HPM gases where the physiological warning threshold level of the gas is
at a higher level than the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for the gas and for flammable
gases in accordance with Sections 2703.13.1 through 2703.13.2.2.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
620. 2703.13.1 Where required. A gas detection system shall be provided in the areas
identified in Sections 2703.13.1.1 through 2703.13.1.4.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
621. 2703.13.1.1 Fabrication areas. A gas detection system shall be provided in fabrication
areas where HPM gas is used in the fabrication area.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
622. 2703.13.1.2 HPM rooms. A gas detection system shall be provided in HPM rooms where
HPM gas is used in the room.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
623. 2703.13.1.3 Gas cabinets, exhausted enclosures and gas rooms. A gas detection system
shall be provided in gas cabinets and exhausted enclosures for HPM gas. A gas detection
system shall be provided in gas rooms where HPM gases are not located in gas cabinets
or exhausted enclosures.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
624. 2703.13.1.4 Corridors. Where HPM gases are transported in piping placed within the
space defined by the walls of a corridor and the floor or roof above the corridor, a gas
detection system shall be provided where piping is located and in the corridor.
Exception: A gas detection system is not required for occasional transverse crossings of
the corridors by supply piping that is enclosed in a ferrous pipe or tube for the width of
the corridor.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
625. 2703.13.2 Gas detection system operation. The gas detection system shall be capable of
monitoring the room, area or equipment in which the HPM gas is located at or below all
the following gas concentrations:
1. Immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH) values where the monitoring point is
within an exhausted enclosure, ventilated enclosure or gas cabinet.
2. Permissible exposure limit (PEL) levels where the monitoring point is in an area outside
an exhausted enclosure, ventilated enclosure or gas cabinet.
3. For flammable gases, the monitoring detection threshold level shall be vapor
concentrations in excess of 25 percent of the lower flammable limit (LFL) where the
monitoring is within or outside an exhausted enclosure, ventilated enclosure or gas
cabinet.
4. Except as noted in this section, monitoring for highly toxic and toxic gases shall also
comply with Chapter 60.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
626. 2703.13.2.1 Alarms. The gas detection system shall initiate a local alarm and transmit a
signal to the emergency control station when a short-term hazard condition is detected.
The alarm shall be both visible and audible and shall provide warning both inside and

outside the area where the gas is detected. The audible alarm shall be distinct from all
other alarms.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.
627. 2703.13.2.2 Shut off of gas supply. The gas detection system shall automatically close
the shutoff valve at the source on gas supply piping and tubing related to the system
being monitored for which gas is detected when a short-term hazard condition is
detected. Automatic closure of shutoff valves shall comply with the following:
1. Where the gas-detection sampling point initiating the gas detection system alarm is
within a gas cabinet or exhausted enclosure, the shutoff valve in the gas cabinet or
exhausted enclosure for the specific gas detected shall automatically close.
2. Where the gas-detection sampling point initiating the gas detection system alarm is
within a room and compressed gas containers are not in gas cabinets or exhausted
enclosure, the shutoff valves on all gas lines for the specific gas detected shall
automatically close.
3. Where the gas-detection sampling point initiating the gas detection system alarm is
within a piping distribution manifold enclosure, the shutoff valve supplying the manifold
for the compressed gas container of the specific gas detected shall automatically close.
Exception: Where the gas-detection sampling point initiating the gas detection system
alarm is at the use location or within a gas valve enclosure of a branch line downstream
of a piping distribution manifold, the shutoff valve for the branch line located in the
piping distribution manifold enclosure shall automatically close.
Reason: Modification to align with newly rewritten Section 916.




Chapter 28 Lumber Yard and Agro-Industrial, Solid Biomass and Woodworking
Facilities
628. 2801.1 Scope. The storage, manufacturing and processing of solid biomass feedstock,
timber, lumber, plywood, veneers, mulch, and agro-industrial byproducts shall be in
accordance with this chapter.
Reason: Added mulch to include scope in of chapter 28.
629. 2802.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:
AGRO-INDUSTRIAL.
BIOMASS.
COLD DECK.
FINES.
HOGGED MATERIALS.
PLYWOOD AND VENEER MILLS.
RAW PRODUCT.
SOLID BIOFUEL.
SOLID BIOMASS FEEDSTOCK.
STATIC PILES.
TIMBER AND LUMBER PRODUCTION FACILITIES.
TIPPING AREA.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added as it is an industry standard term.
630. 2803.8 Site identification. The facility’s name and address shall be posted at main fire
department entrance and clearly visible from the street. Twenty-four-hour emergency
contact telephone numbers shall be posted at the main entrance and clearly visible from
the street. Addresses shall be a minimum of 4 inches (102 mm) high, of contrasting
color to the background and readily visible at night.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Allows for operations to locate facility during emergency incident.
631. 2303.9 Material-handling equipment. Approved material handling equipment shall be
available for moving stored materials.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures the appropriate equipment is available onsite to handle
emergency situations.
632. 2807.2.1 Pile height indicators. Indicator posts taller than the highest point of each pile
shall be located at readily recognizable locations. The posts shall be marked at 5-foot
(1524 mm) increments and shall be provided to give visual height references at or near
the highest point(s) of each pile. The post(s) shall not be positioned so as to interfere
with access to the piles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures the appropriate equipment is available onsite to quickly and easily
evaluate pile height.



633. 2807.2.1.1 Clearance to property line. Piles shall not be stored within 0.75 times the
stack height or 8 feet (2438 mm) of the property line, whichever is greater, or shall
comply with Section 2807.
Reason: New to 2024. Added requirements so that they could apply to hogged
materials.
634. 2807.2.1.2 Clearance to important buildings. Piles shall not be stored within 0.75
times the stack height of any important building on site, or shall comply with Section
2807.
Reason: New to 2024. Added to define separation requirements of piles to buildings.
635. 2807.4 Material-handling equipment. Approved material-handling equipment shall be
readily available by contract to aid in the event of emergency for moving wood chips
and hogged material.
Material-handling equipment shall include:
1. Equipment to move stored material during a fire.
2. Water trucks.
3. Water pumps if using pond for any piece of water source.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Restores previous amendments ensuring enough space is provided to push
burning piles around to put out fires.
636. 2807.6 Static Pile Protection. Static piles shall be monitored by an approved means to
measure temperatures within the static piles. Internal pile temperatures shall be
monitored and recorded weekly. Such records shall be maintained. An operational
plan indicating procedures and schedules for the inspection, monitoring and restricting
of excessive internal temperatures in static piles shall be submitted to the fire code
official for review and approval.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures piles do not get too hot and possible begin to burn.
637. 2807.6.1 Internal temperature. If any location in a pile is found to have an internal
temperature of 160°F (71°C) or greater, immediate action must be taken to reduce the
temperature. If any location in a pile is found to have an internal temperature of 180ºF
(82ºC) or greater, the following procedures must immediately be taken:
1. The area with the high temperature shall be dug out of the main pile. This
overheated material shall be pushed out in the designated push-out area. The
material shall be not greater than 3 feet (914 mm) in depth in the push-out area.
2. Water shall be stationed closely to the affected area, prior to digging out the hotspot,
to immediately douse any flare-ups that may occur when air is added to overheated
area.
3. Continual temperature probing and removal of material greater than 180°F (82°C)
shall be conducted until all overheated material is separated into the push-out area.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures piles do not get too hot and possible begin to burn.
638. 2807.6.2 Delivery and tipping area. Feedstock and raw materials shall be placed into
designated tipping areas or separated piles upon delivery and shall comply with all

storage requirements for compost and mulch. Tipping areas shall comply with all of the
following:
1. Size. Tipping areas shall not exceed a maximum area of 50 feet (15 240 mm) by 50
(15 240 mm) feet.
2. Height. Material within a tipping area shall not exceed 12 feet (3658 mm) in height
at any time.
3. Separation. Tipping areas shall be separated from all piles and other tipping areas
by a fire access lane that is not less than 20 feet (6096 m) wide.
4. Raw Product. Raw product shall remain in tipping areas until deemed safe and no
longer incendiary.
5. Water System. A water system shall be available to wet down/cool the raw product
in case of fire within the tipping area.
6. Duration. Raw product shall be kept in tipping areas long enough to ensure no load
was delivered that is already over-heated. Raw product shall be less than 160ºF
before mixing with main pile.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures there enough room to properly work the piles.
639. 2807.6.3 Push-out or clear area. Approved push-out or clear areas shall be provided for
pile storage. Any pile in place exceeding thirty (30) days and when piles are over 100
cubic yards (76.5 m3) in size shall have a push out area. The intent is to provide areas to
spread piles and move unburned material away from a pile in the event of fire or hotspot
within the pile. Push-out/clear areas shall be located not more than 250 feet (76 200 mm)
from the pile and shall be not located within 20 feet (6096 mm) of any building, or other
combustibles. The push-out/clear area shall be sized to hold not less than a quarter of
the size of the single largest pile it serves at a maximum depth of 3 feet (914 mm). Water
shall be immediately available to aid in cooling.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures there enough room to properly work the piles.
640. 2807.6.4 Location. Exterior lumber storage shall not be located within 10 feet (3048
mm) of a property line.
Exceptions:
1. The separation distance is allowed to be reduced to 3 feet (914 mm) for storage not
exceeding 6 feet (1828 mm) in height.
2. The separation distance is allowed to be reduced where the fire code official
determines that no hazard to the adjoining property exists.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Addresses location not otherwise address in the fire code.
641. 2807.6.5 Fire emergency protection plan. The owner or operator shall prepare a fire
protection plan for any facilities processing and/or storing piles of combustible material
in excess of 6 feet (1828 mm) in height or 12 feet (3657 mm) in width, and all
commercial facilities. The fire protection plan shall address monitoring for, controlling


and extinguishing fires. The fire protection plan shall be submitted to the fire code
official.
Fire protection plans shall include the following:
1. A scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating property lines, buildings, access roads,
fire hydrants, location of tipping areas, salvage areas, pile height indicators, piles
and push-out areas.
2. Pile contents (hogged material, compost, tipping, manure, etc.) and maximum pile
dimensions of each pile.
3. Monitoring procedures and schedules for checking for pile temperature and moisture
content.
4. Fire suppression methods and emergency plans.
5. Other procedures and methods to reduce fire within piles or stacks.
6. Employee training.
7. Equipment and resources available on site, and through contract, for fire prevention
and suppression.
8. Thresholds for calling 911.
9. Location of fire alarm control panels.
10. Type of construction and presence of sprinkler protection for other buildings on the
site.
Written plans, in support of the fire protection plan, shall be made available upon
request by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures a plan for emergencies is created and maintained.
642. 2808.1 General. The storage and processing of mulch, wood chips, hogged materials,
fines, compost, solid biomass feedstock and raw product produced from yard waste,
debris and agro-industrial and recycling facilities shall comply with Sections 2808.2
through 2808.10.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Mulch is included in this category in Phoenix.
643. 2808.2.1 Delivery and tipping area. Feedstock and raw materials shall be placed into
designated tipping areas or separated piles upon delivery and shall comply with all
storage requirements for compost and mulch.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures there enough room to properly work the piles.
644. 2808.3.2 Pile height indicators. Indicator posts taller than the highest point of each pile
shall be located at readily recognizable locations. The posts shall be marked at 5-foot
(1524 mm) increments and shall give visual height references at or near the highest
point(s) of each pile. The post(s) shall not interfere with access to the piles.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures ease of monitoring and spot checking by inspectors and
Operations.


645. 2808.6.1 Internal temperature. If any location in a pile is found to have an internal
temperature of 160°F (71°C) or greater, immediate action must be taken to reduce the
temperature. If any location in a pile is found to have an internal temperature of 180ºF
(82ºC) or greater, the following procedures must immediately be taken:
1. The area with the high temperature shall be dug out of the main pile. This
overheated material shall be pushed out in the designated push-out area. The
material shall be not greater than 3 feet in depth in the push-out area.
2. Water shall be stationed closely to the affected area, prior to digging out the hotspot,
to immediately douse any flare-ups that may occur when air is added to overheated
area.
3. Continual temperature probing and removal of material greater than 180°F (82°C)
shall be conducted until all overheated material is separated into the push-out area.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Correlation between pile internal temperature and thermodynamics of the
decomposition of materials results in spontaneous combustion. Monitoring
temperatures reduces potential for fires.
646. 2808.7.1 Delivery and tipping area. Delivery and tipping areas shall be shown on the
approved facility site plan. Tipping areas shall comply with the following:
1. Size. Tipping areas shall not exceed a maximum area of 50 feet (15 240 mm) by 50
feet (15 240 mm).
2. Height. Material within a tipping area shall not exceed 5 feet (1524 mm) in height
at any time.
3. Separation. Tipping areas shall be separated from all piles and other tipping areas
by a fire access lane that is not less than 20 feet (6096 mm) wide.
4. Water system. A water system shall be available to wet down/cool the raw product
in case of fire within the tipping area.
5. Duration. Raw product shall be kept in tipping areas long enough to ensure no load
was delivered that is already over-heated. Raw product shall be less than 160°F
before mixing with main pile.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures there enough room to properly work the piles.
647. 2808.7.2 Push-out/clear area. Approved push-out or clear areas shall be provided for
temporary pile storage. Piles kept in place longer than 30 days or piles in excess of 100
cubic yards (76.5 m3) in size shall have a push-out area. The intent is to provide areas
to spread piles and move unburned material away from a pile in the event of fire or
hotspot within the pile.
Push-out/clear areas shall be located not more than 250 feet (76 200 mm) from the
pile and shall not be located within 20 feet (6096 mm) of any building or other
combustibles. The push-out/clear area shall be sized to hold not less than one-quarter
of the single largest pile it serves at a maximum depth of 3 feet (914 mm). Water shall
be immediately available to aid in cooling.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides fire protection not otherwise in the base code.



648. 2808.7.3 Fire hydrants. The fire code official may increase the distance required to a
fire hydrant as set forth in Section 507 where the conditions of this section are complied
with. The omitting of an on-site hydrant or increased overall distance to the nearest
hydrants will be evaluated with the application for permit.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports Operations.
649. 2808.9 Material-handling equipment. Approved material-handling equipment shall be
available by contract to aid in the event of emergency for moving wood chips and
hogged material. Equipment available shall include:
1. Equipment to move stored material during a fire.
2. Water trucks.
3. Water pumps if using pond for any piece of water source.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendment clarifies requirements for businesses to have approved fire
mitigation equipment available onsite.
650. 2808.10 Fire emergency protection plan. The owner or operator shall prepare a fire
protection plan for any facilities processing and/or storing piles of combustible material
in excess of 6 feet (1828 mm) in height or 12 feet (3657 mm) in width, and all
commercial facilities. The fire protection plan shall address monitoring for, controlling
and extinguishing fires. The fire protection plan shall be submitted to the fire code
official.
Fire protection plans shall include the following:
1. A scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating property lines, buildings, access roads,
fire hydrants, location of tipping areas, pile height indicators, piles and push-out
areas.
2. Pile contents (hogged material, compost, tipping, manure, etc.) and maximum pile
dimensions of each pile
3. Monitoring procedures and schedules for checking for pile temperature and moisture
content.
4. Fire suppression methods and emergency plans.
5. Other procedures and methods to reduce fire within piles.
6. Employee training.
7. Equipment and resources available on site, and through contract, for fire prevention
and suppression.
8. Thresholds for calling 911.
9. Reports and other justifications if requesting to exceed this standard.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Base code is removed an amendment added.
651. 2809.6 Location. Exterior lumber storage shall not be located within 10 feet (3048 mm)
of a property line.
Exception: The separation distance is allowed to be reduced to 3 feet (914 mm) for
storage not exceeding 6 feet (1828 mm) in height.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).

Reason: Coordinates with Zoning requirements.




Chapter 29 Manufacture of Organic Coatings
1. 2901.2 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Sections 105.5 and 105.6.
Reason: Added the reference to the requirement for Operating permit.




Chapter 30 Industrial Ovens
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at this
time.
Reason:




Chapter 31 Tents, Temporary Special Event Structures and other Membrane
Structures
652. 3103.5 Construction documents. A detailed site and floor plan for tents or membrane
structures with an occupant load of 50 or more shall be provided with each application for
approval. The tent or membrane structure floor plan shall indicate details of the means of
egress facilities, seating capacity, arrangement of the seating, location of illuminated exit
signs, no smoking signs, emergency lighting, and location and type of heating and electrical
equipment. The construction documents shall include an analysis of structural stability.
Water-filled vessels used to anchor a tent or membrane structure shall be in accordance with
Section 3103.8.1.
653. Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
654. 3103.8 Structural stability and anchorage required. Tents or membrane structures and their
appurtenances shall be designed and installed to withstand the elements of weather and
prevent collapsing. Documentation of structural stability shall be furnished to the fire code
official and demonstrate compliance with one of the following:
1. The tent staking or ballasting plan.
2. The manufacturer’s specifications.
3. The current IFAI Procedural Handbook for the Safe Installation & Maintenance of Tentage
and the IFAI Pullout Capacity of Tent Stakes.
4. Stamped engineering plans.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Policy June 15, 2002
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
655. 3107.1 Scope. Outdoor assembly events, concession stands, food booths and retail booths
shall comply with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
656. 3107.2.3.2 Distances between booths. Not less than 20 feet (6096 mm) shall be provided
between every 150 linear feet (45 720 mm) of booth space. Not less than 30 feet (9144 mm)
shall be provided between booths used for cooking and the vehicles, generators, or any other
internal combustion engines. Not less than 30 feet (9144 mm) shall be provided between
booths used for cooking and amusement rides or devices.
Exception: Hot dog carts that are licensed by the city for use in right-of-ways.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), 1705.4.2.2 Protection and
1705.4.4 General/electrical added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.



657. 3107.3 Occupancy and means of egress. The number and location of emergency egress and
escape routes shall be approved by the fire code official. Exits shall comply with Chapter 10,
be as remote from each other as practical and comply with Table 3107.3. The aggregate
clear width of exits shall be not less than 36 inches (914 mm) in width for each 500 persons
to be accommodated.
TABLE 3106.3
OUTDOOR EXITS TABLE
OCCUPANT LOAD MINIMUM NUMBER OF EXITS
1 to 500 2
501 to 1,000 3
1,001 to 1,500 4
Each additional 36 additional inches of exit
500 persons width
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), 1705.4.2.2 Protection and
1705.4.4 General/electrical added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
658. 3107.3.3 Signs. Exits shall be identified with signs that read “EXIT.” The signs shall be
weather-resistant with lettering on a contrasting background. The lettering shall be of
sufficient height and brush stroke to be immediately visible from 75 feet (22 860 mm).
Placement of the exit signs shall be approved by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
659. 3107.5.2 Protection. Cooking equipment using combustible oils or solids shall meet the
following:
1. A noncombustible lid shall be immediately available. The lid shall be of sufficient size
to cover the cooking well completely.
2. The equipment shall be placed on a noncombustible surface.
3. An approved portable fire extinguisher for protection from cooking grease fires shall
be provided at a location approved by the fire code official.
4. The cooking surface shall not exceed 288 square inches (1858 cm2).
5. The equipment shall be separated from each other by a horizontal distance of not less
than 2 feet (609 mm).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.



660. 3107.5.3.1 Maximum number and quantity. A total aggregate water capacity of not more
than 50 gallons (95 L) of LP-gas is permitted at one concession stand or booth used for
cooking.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
661. 3107.5.3.2 LP-gas low-pressure cylinder hoses. Hoses with a working pressure of 5 psig (34
kPa) shall be allowed where a fix regulator is set at 5 psi (34 kPa) and is connected directly
to the LP-gas cylinder. The hose shall not exceed 12 feet (3658 mm) unless approved by the
fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
662. 3107.5.3.3 LP-gas high-pressure cylinder hoses. Hoses shall be designed for a working
pressure of 350 psig (2413 kPa) with a safety factor of 5 to 1 and shall be continuously
marked with LP-gas, propane, 350 psi (2413 kPa) working pressure, and the manufacturer’s
name or trademark. Hose assemblies, after the application of couplings, shall have a design
capability of 700 psig (4826 kPa). Hoses shall not exceed 12 feet (3638 mm) unless approved
by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
663. 3107.5.4 Public isolation. Cooking appliances or devices shall be isolated from the public by
not less than 4 feet (1219 mm) or by a noncombustible three-sided barrier between the
equipment and devices and the public.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
664. 3107.6.4 Temporary water stations. When outdoor temperatures are expected to exceed
90°F (35°C), the event sponsor shall provide and maintain a minimum of one staffed water
station for each 1,000 in projected attendance, or as required by the fire code official. The
water station shall include adequate water supply, cups, and a means for rapid replenishing
of exhausted water. Each water station shall be located as far apart as practicable to allow
ease of access for event attendees.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides direction not otherwise provided in the base code.
665. SECTION 3109
MAZES
3109 Mazes. Mazes including, but not limited to, corn stalk or hedge mazes, shall be in
accordance with this section and Section 3106.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
666. 3109.1 Safe refuge areas. Safe refuge areas shall be established outside of the maze or
building and structure, and shall not be closer than 50 feet (15 240 mm).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
668. 3109.2 Paths. Paths throughout the maze shall be a minimum of 36 inches (914 mm) clear
and unobstructed width.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
669. 3109.3 Separation. Not less than 20 feet (6096 mm) shall be provided between mazes and
buildings and structures. The 20-foot (6096 mm) clearance shall be free from vegetation and
obstructions.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
670. 3109.4 Means of egress. Each exit shall be not less than 6 feet (1828 mm) wide.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
671. 3109.5 Travel distance. The maximum travel distance to reach an exit access shall not exceed
75 feet (22 860 mm). The travel distance shall be determined by using the maze path.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
672. 3109.6 Number of exits. The travel distance required to reach an exit access shall determine
the number of exits required. Locking devices shall remain unlocked on exits when the maze
is occupied.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
673. 3109.7 Exit signs. Signs shall be provided next to or above each exit. The lettering shall be
not less than 12 inches (305 mm) high with 2-inch (51 mm) brushstrokes. The signs shall
read “EXIT” with lettering in a color contrasting to the sign’s background.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
674. 3109.8 Security plan. The plan shall document who shall provide security (e.g., off-duty
police officers, sheriff’s posse, employees). All security personnel shall be provided with a
two-way radio and flashlight.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
675. 3109.9 Evacuation plans. The plan shall document the responsibilities of all on-site
employees. The plan shall also document how attendees will be evacuated and where they
will be evacuated.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
676. 3109.10 Maze rules. Rules shall be posted at the maze entrance.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).

Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
677. 3109.11 Employee responsibilities. Each employee shall be familiar with the evacuation plan
and with fire extinguisher locations. Documentation of training shall be provided to the fire
code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
678. 3109.12 Employee guides. An employee shall be responsible for guiding a group of not more
than 14 attendees through the maze. Each employee shall be provided with one flashlight
and a two-way radio. The employees shall be responsible for detecting and reporting fire or
smoke to a competent person posted at the maze main entrance and begin evacuation
procedures.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
679. 3109.13 Main entrance employee. Each maze shall be manned by an employee at the
entrance. The employee shall be capable of communicating with the employees and shall be
provided with a cellular telephone. When the main entrance employee receives a report of
smoke, fire or injury, the employee shall immediately call 911.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
680. 3109.14 Watering. Corn stalk and hedge mazes shall be provided with sufficient water and
at a frequency that prevents the vegetation from becoming dry or brittle. Failure to comply
with this provision creates an imminent hazard and the fire code official shall issue a stop
order.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.
681. 3109.15 Buildings and structures. Where buildings and structures are intended to be
occupied by attendees, the building and structure shall comply with Section 905 regarding
Class III standpipes.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: New to 2024. Mazes relocated to 3109, previously 3103. Provides direction not
otherwise provided in the base code.




Chapter 32 High-Pile Combustible Storage
682. 3201.1.1 Speculative building. Group S, F and M speculative buildings having an interior
clear height greater than 12 feet (3658 mm) where high-pile storage may accrue shall
comply with this chapter.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to clearly identify spaces being built without tenants and the
requirements for life safety systems.
683. 3201.3.2 Approved storage layout. A floor plan, of legible size, shall be provided,
mounted on a wall and protected from damage. The floor plan shall be mounted in an
approved location and show the following:
1. Locations, dimensions and rack layout of high-piled storage areas.
2. Design storage height for each storage area.
3. Types of commodities.
4. Commodity clearance between top of storage and the sprinkler deflector for each
storage arrangement.
5. Aisle dimensions between each storage array.
6. For palletized and solid-piled storage, the maximum pile volume for each storage
array.
7. Location and classification of commodities in accordance with Section 3203.
8. Location of required fire department access doors.
9. Location of valves controlling the water supply of ceiling and in-rack sprinklers.
10. Design criteria of the sprinkler system.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added to ensure the sprinkler system is designed to accommodate the
storage.
684. 3206.2.2 Groups F-1 and S-1 with a storage area greater than 500,000 square feet (46
451 m2). Where storage areas in Groups F-1 and S-1 are greater than 500,000 square
feet (46 451 m2), a technical report prepared by a professional registrant shall be
submitted for review and approval by the fire code official. Additional fire protection
and/or life safety systems may be required by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures life safety systems adequate for large spaces.
685. 3206.2.3 Storage height greater than 40 feet (12 192 mm). Where the designated
storage height is greater than 40 feet (12 192 mm), a technical report shall be prepared
by a professional registrant and shall be submitted to the Phoenix fire code official for
approval.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures life safety systems adequate for large spaces.
686. 3206.2.4 Additional hose connections. Additional fire department hose connections shall
be provided where required by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).

Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Ensures Operations has connections where needed to suppress fire.
687. 3206.4.2 General. Automatic sprinkler systems in Group F, M and S occupancies that
contain high-pile storage or high-challenge commodities over areas of not less than
2,500 square feet (232 m2), or hazardous materials stored more than one pallet high,
shall be in accordance with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides the most fire protection for buildings when the final use is
unknown at the time of construction.
688. 3206.4.2.1 Requirements for all plan submittals. See Design Documents in Section 903.3
for plan submittal requirements.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides the most fire protection for buildings when the final use is
unknown at the time of construction.
689. 3206.4.2.2 Minimum design requirements for speculative warehouses. The design of
automatic sprinkler systems for speculative Group M, S or F occupancies shall be based
on storage of a cartoned Class A nonexpanded plastic to the available storage height.
The storage height shall be determined by subtracting 48 inches (1219 mm) from the
highest point of the roof above each system for ESFR and 30 inches (762 mm) for area
density applications.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides the most fire protection for buildings when the final use is
unknown at the time of construction.
690. 3206.4.2.3 Minimum requirements for client-leased or occupant-owned buildings. The
design of an automatic sprinkler system for client-leased or occupant- owned buildings
containing high-pile storage shall be based on the requirements of NFPA 13, Chapter
12. The responsible fire protection engineer shall perform a survey of the building to
determine commodity classification, storage configuration, building height and other
information related to the development of an appropriate sprinkler system design. The
engineer shall also make reasonable efforts to meet with the building owner or operator
to understand seasonal or customer- related fluctuations to the stored commodities,
storage height and configuration.
The sprinkler design shall be based on the most demanding requirements determined
through the on-site survey and discussions with the building owner or operator. A
technical report shall clearly define the basis for determining the commodity and
sprinkler design selection, how the commodities will be isolated or separated, and the


referenced design document(s), including NFPA 13. If a specific fire test is used as the
basis of design, a copy of the fire test report shall be provided at the time of plan review.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides the most fire protection for buildings when the final use is
unknown at the time of construction.
691. 3206.4.2.4 Required information at plan submittal. All plans, hydraulic calculations and
technical reports shall be submitted with the plan submittal form. The individual
submitting the design package shall ensure that all of the required information
requested on the plan submittal form is included. The plan review fee shall be paid at
the time the plans are submitted. If the required information is not provided, the Fire
Department may charge a fee in accordance with the Fire Prevention Fee Schedule for
the handling and preliminary review of the plans.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides the most fire protection for buildings when the final use is
unknown at the time of construction.
692. 3206.4.2.5 Minimum plan information requirements. In addition to the requirements of
NFPA 13, the information listed in Sections 3206.4.1.6.1 and 3206.4.1.6.2 shall be included
in the plans or technical report.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides the most fire protection for buildings when the final use is
unknown at the time of construction.
693. 3206.4.2.6 Class I-IV and Group A plastic commodities.
1. An owner’s certificate in accordance with NFPA 13. The design criteria (e.g., NFPA
13, FM Global Data Sheet, or a specific fire test report).
2.A City of Phoenix Water Supply Flow & Pressure Test Report performed within 90
days of the plan submittal.
3.The type of design (e.g., Control Mode Density/Design Area Method; Specific
Application Control Mode Method; Suppression Mode Method), including appropriate
code references.
4.A description of the stored commodities and how the commodity classification was
determined.
5.A layout of the proposed storage arrangement. If the storage is in racks, a plan and
elevation detail illustrating rack heights, flue dimensions and arrangement. This
detail is not required for speculation warehouses.
6. The aisle dimensions between each storage array.


7.If a high-challenge commodity is separated using fire-resistive construction, the
boundary of the fire-resistive construction shall be illustrated.
8.A data sheet for the backflow preventer. If a data sheet is not available, the design
professional shall include a statement addressing the minimum required pressure
loss.
9. A data sheet for each installed automatic sprinkler.
10. A data sheet for each pipe hanger used to hang or support the sprinkler piping.
11. If a fire pump will be installed or used, the manufacturer’s factory test curve shall
be included in the submittal.
12. A cross-section view illustrating obstructions to the ceiling sprinklers (e.g., lights,
structural members, cable trays, electrical bus ducts, HVAC ductwork).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides the most fire protection for buildings when the final use is
unknown at the time of construction.
694. 3206.4.2.6.1 Hazardous materials. In addition to the requirements of Section
3206.4.1.6.1, the following information shall be included in a hazardous materials
technical report:
1. A hazardous materials inventory statement.
2. For flammable and combustible liquids, an analysis of the miscibility of Class I
liquids, the size and type of the packaging, the packaging materials of construction,
and whether the containers have a pressure relieving mechanism.
3. For Level 2 or 3 aerosols, a statement indicating that the aerosols are cartoned or
uncartoned.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides the most fire protection for buildings when the final use is
unknown at the time of construction.
695. 3206.4.2.7 Identification of sprinkler system capabilities and limitations. An adhesive
label shall be permanently installed at or adjacent to each sprinkler riser. Where a
building contains more than four risers, the sign shall be located at an approved location
inside the building. Where sprinkler risers are located outside of the building, the sign
shall be stamped metal. The minimum sign dimension is 6 inches high by 4 inches wide.
The sign shall specify the capabilities and limitations of the automatic sprinkler system.
The sign shall include the following information:
1. The NFPA standard used as the design basis, and what edition.
2. A statement indicating whether the sprinkler design uses the control mode density
area method, control mode specific application, suppression mode, or any
combination thereof.
3. When used, all of the storage conditions stipulated in NFPA 13 for Special Designs.


4. The maximum storage height.
5. The minimum required aisle width.
6. If storage is in racks, the maximum rack width and minimum transverse and
longitudinal flue widths.
7. Commodities that can be protected by the automatic sprinkler system.
8. Commodities that cannot be protected by the automatic sprinkler system.
9. Limits on storage heights of idle wood and plastic storage.
10. Limits on storage heights of miscellaneous Group A plastic, tire and rolled paper
storage.
11. Locations where in-rack sprinklers are required.
12. Locations where horizontal and/or vertical barriers are required.
13. Information explaining the manufacturer, sprinkler identification number, k-factor
and operating temperature of the overhead sprinklers protecting the high-pile
storage.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides the most fire protection for buildings when the final use is
unknown at the time of construction.




Chapter 33 Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition
696. 3301.3 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Sections 105.5 through 105.6.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Addendum adds requirement for construction and operational permits for fire
department access roads.
697. 3307.1.2 Fire apparatus access roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided prior to
introducing combustible materials on the construction site. Fire apparatus access roads on
construction sites shall not be obstructed.
Fire apparatus access is required within 150 feet (45 720 mm) of all points on the exterior
of the building.
Fire apparatus access roads during construction shall meet the requirements of fire
apparatus access roads in accordance with Section 503.
Exception: Stabilized edges, except where required by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [503.8]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes.
698. 3307.1.3.1 Surface. The unpaved surface of fire apparatus access roads shall include not
less than:
1. Six inches (152 mm) of native soil compacted to 95 percent of standard proctor density
(ASTM D698).
2. Four inches (102 mm) of aggregate base compacted to 100 percent of standard proctor
density
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [503.8]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes.
699. 3307.1.4 Curbs. Curbs are not required for fire apparatus access roads for sites under
construction.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [503.8]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes.
700. 3307.1.5 Engineering report. An engineer professional registrant shall prepare and seal the
soil compaction report ensuring the road will support the imposed live load, drainage,
stabilization and curbing. The report shall be available for review by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [503.8]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes.

701. 3307.1.6 Maintenance of fire apparatus access roads during construction. The owner shall
maintain the fire apparatus access roads as approved by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC). [503.8]
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes.
702. 3307.5.2 Detailed requirements. Standpipes shall be installed in accordance with the
provisions of Section 905.
Exception: Standpipes shall be either temporary or permanent in nature, and with or without
a water supply, provided that such standpipes comply with the requirements of Section 905
as to capacity, outlets, materials and pressure.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes.




Chapter 34 Tire Rebuilding and Tire Storage
703. 3401.3 Site plans. At the time of permit application for storing tires outdoors, a site plan
shall be submitted to the fire code official identifying the location and dimensions of tire
storage areas, tire pile dimensions and height, distance from buildings and property
lines, width and location of aisles, and fire apparatus access roads. See Section 105.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures piles are stored and maintained in compliance with code.
704. 3405.1 Individual piles. Tire storage shall be restricted to individual piles not exceeding
5,000 square feet (464.5 m2) of continuous area. Piles shall not exceed 10 feet (3048
mm) in height. Piles 2,501–4,999 square feet (232 m2–464.5 m2) shall comply with
Section 315.4.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Provides for consistent outcomes and is the maximum size pile for
Operations.
705. 3405.8 Dead-end aisles. No dead-end aisles shall be allowed within the facility.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Consistent with other outdoor storage of combustible materials.
706. 3405.9 Stacking. The method of stacking shall be solid piles in an orderly, stable array.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Consistent with other outdoor storage of combustible materials.




Chapter 35 Welding And Other Hot Work
707. 3501.2 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Section 105.5.
Exceptions:
1. Work conducted at one-and two-family dwellings.
Reason: Identifies exceptions to permit requirements
708 3501.2.1 Hot work safety measures. Where permits are not required, the person
conducting hot work operations shall be responsible for ensuring that such operations
are conducted in accordance with the safety requirements of this chapter.
Reason: Identifies exceptions to permit requirements
709. 3506.4 Emergency disconnect. A switch or circuit breaker shall be provided so that
fixed electric welders and control equipment can be disconnected from the supply
circuit. The disconnect shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 70 and marked
“EMERGENCY DISCONNECT.”
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), reference changed to
NFPA 70.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), referenced National
Electrical Code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC), referenced National
Electrical Code.
Reason: Provides support for operations.




Chapter 36 Marinas
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at
this time.
Reason:




Chapter 37 Combustible Fibers
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at this
time.
Reason:




Chapter 38 Higher Education Laboratories
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at this
time.
Reason:




Chapter 39 Processing and Extraction Facilities
710. 3905.1 Gas detection. For extraction processes utilizing flammable gases as solvents,
a gas detection system complying with Section 916 shall be provided. Spaces
containing extraction processes shall be provided with a gas detection system where
required by Section 916.
Reason: Modification to align with the newly rewritten Section 916.
711. 3905.1.1 Operation. Activation of the gas detection system shall result in all of the
following:
1. Initiation of distinct audible and visual alarm signals in the extraction room.
2. Deactivation of all heating systems located in the extraction room.
3. Activation of the mechanical ventilation system, where the system is interlocked
with gas detection.
4. De-energize all light switches and electrical outlets.
Reason: Modification to align with the newly rewritten Section 916.
712. 3905.1.2 Failure of the gas detection system. Failure of the gas detection system shall
result in deactivation of the heating system; activation of the mechanical ventilation
system where the system is interlocked with the gas detection system; and initiation
of a trouble signal to sound in an approved location.
Reason: Modification to align with the newly rewritten Section 916.




Chapter 40 Storage of Distilled Spirits and Wines
1. These chapters remain reserved and unchanged.
Reason:




Chapter 41 Temporary Heating and Cooking Operations
1. These chapters remain reserved and unchanged.
Reason:




Chapters 42-49 Reserved
1. These chapters remain reserved and unchanged.
Reason:




CH 50 Hazardous Materials - General Provisions
713. 5001.5 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Sections 105.6 through 105.7.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Accommodates Phoenix amendments.
714. 5001.5.1 Hazardous Materials Management Plan. Where required by the fire code official, an
application for a permit shall include a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP). The
HMMP shall include a facility site plan designating the following:
1. Access to each storage and use area.
2. Location of emergency equipment.
3. Location where liaison will meet emergency responders.
4. Facility evacuation meeting point locations.
5. The general purpose of other areas within the building.
6. Location of all above-ground and underground tanks and their appurtenances including,
but not limited to, sumps, vaults, below-grade treatment systems and piping.
7. The hazard classes in each area.
8. Locations of all control areas and Group H occupancies.
9. Emergency exits.
10. Maximum amount of each material stored or used in each area.
11. Range of container sizes.
12. Locations of emergency isolation and mitigation valves and devices.
13. Product conveying piping containing liquids or gases, other than utility-owned fuel gas
lines and low-pressure fuel gas lines.
14. On and off positions of valves for valves that are of the self-indicating type.
15. Storage plan showing the intended storage arrangement, including the location and
dimensions of aisles.
16. Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) studies. The HAZOP shall include process parameters,
process deviations, causes of process deviations, how the process will safely operate or stop
in the event of a process deviation, management of change, and the consequences of a
process deviation.
17. Chemical reactivity data. Data shall be provided to demonstrate that the process has
been evaluated to address any potential reactive chemical hazards such as distillations,
endothermic or exothermic reactions, or polymerizations.
18. Confidential business information shall be marked as proprietary and confidential.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC), access added #1, items 9-14
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 - (2006 IFC), items 9-11 added (now 16-18).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC), items 9-10 (now 16 and 17).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Supports operations.
715. 5001.5.2 Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement (HMIS). Where required by the fire code
official, an application for a permit shall include a Globally Harmonized System of
Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS) or an HMIS, Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) Title III, Tier II Report or other approved statement.

The HMIS shall include the following information:
1. Product name.
2. Component.
3. Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number.
4. Location where stored or used.
5. Container size.
6. Hazard classification.
7. Amount in storage.
8. Amount in use-closed systems.
9. Amount in use-open systems.
10. Manufacturer’s name.
11. Chemical trade name, trade names, hazardous ingredients.
12. The NFPA 704 hazard rating for the hazardous material.
13. Storage conditions related to the storage type, temperature and pressure.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC), items 3 and 5 and GHS added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 - (2006 IFC), item 4 added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC), item 4 added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added info to provide complete customer info. GHS amendment is kept as a viable
option for customers. The details are removed as they are provided in the GHS
documentation.
716. 5003.2.2.1 Design and construction. Piping, tubing, valves, fittings and related components
used for hazardous materials shall be in accordance with the following:
1. Pipin, tubing, valves, fittings and related components shall be designed and fabricated
from materials that are compatible with the material to be contained and shall be of
adequate strength and durability to withstand the pressure, structural and seismic stress and
exposure to which they are subject.
2. Piping and tubing shall be identified in accordance with ASME A13. Markings used for
piping systems shall consist of the content’s name and include a direction-of-flow arrow.
Markings shall be provided at each valve; at wall, floor or ceiling penetrations; at each
change of direction; and at a minimum of every 20 feet (6096 mm) or fraction thereof
throughout the piping run.
3. Manual valves or automatic remotely activated fail-safe emergency shutoff valves shall be
installed on supply piping and tubing and provided with ready access at the following
locations:
3.1. The point of use.
3.2. The tank, cylinder or bulk source.
4. Manual emergency shutoff valves and controls for remotely activated emergency shutoff
valves shall be identified and the location shall have access clearly visible and indicated by
means of a sign.
5. Backflow prevention or check valves shall be provided where the backflow of hazardous
materials could create a hazardous condition or cause the unauthorized discharge of
hazardous materials.
Exceptions:
1. Piping for inlet connections designed to prevent backflow.
2. Piping for pressure relief devices.
6. Where hazardous materials are stored outside of buildings in stationary, above-ground

tanks or pressure vessels and are piped into a building, an emergency shut-off valve shall be
installed at an approved location outside of the building.
7. Pressure tests of piping constructed of nonmetallic material used to convey hazardous
materials shall be limited to hydrostatic tests. Pneumatic pressure testing of nonmetallic
piping shall not be permitted.
8. Where gases or liquids having a hazard ranking of Health Class 3 or 4, Flammability Class
4, Reactivity Class 3 or 4, or Instability Class 3 or 4 in accordance with NFPA 704 are carried
in pressurized piping above 15 pounds per square inch (psig) (103 kPa), an approved means
of leak detection and emergency shutoff or excess flow control shall be provided. Where the
piping originates from within a hazardous material storage room or area, the excess flow
control shall be located within the storage room or area. Where the piping originates from a
bulk source, the excess flow control shall be located as close to the bulk source as practical.
Exceptions:
1. Piping for inlet connections designed to prevent backflow.
2. Piping for pressure relief devices.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5898 April 18, 2014 (2012 IFC amendment package). Item 8 added
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC), items 5 and 7 (reactivity) added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendments define requirements that need to be addressed during the planning
& construction phases.
717. 5003.2.4.2.2 Fabrication. Where used for the storage of hazardous materials, above-ground
storage tanks with a nominal capacity of 500 gallons or more that are constructed of
polyethylene shall be designed and fabricated in accordance with ASTM D1998-06, Standard
Specification for Polyethylene Upright Storage Tanks.
Aboveground storage tanks used for the storage of hazardous materials that are constructed
of fiber-reinforced plastic shall be designed and fabricated in accordance with ASTM D3299-
00, Standard Specification for Filament-Wound Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermoset Resin
Corrosion-Resistant Tanks, or ASTM D4097-01, Standard Specification for Contact-Molded
Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermoset Resin Corrosion-Resistant Tanks.
Exception: Above-ground tanks that are installed in vaults complying with Section 5303.16
or 5704.2.8 need not comply with location and protection requirements for outdoor storage.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides clarification of standards used to evaluate tank approval.
718. 5003.2.10 Pressure vessels. Stationary pressure vessels designed for the storage of
hazardous materials shall be in accordance with this section.
Where a stationary pressure vessel designed for the storage of hazardous materials is
governed by another standard or section, the applicable requirements for the design and
construction of the container and its appurtenances shall take precedence.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).

Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendments adopted as not otherwise addressed in the code.
719. 5003.2.10.1 Construction. Stationary pressure vessels shall be designed, constructed, and
certified as being compliant with ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code 2007, Section VIII,
Division 1 or 2. An ASME U-1 report shall be provided to the Fire Department for any new
pressure vessel installation. The Fire Department is authorized to require an ASME U-1
report for an installation of an existing pressure vessel being installed at a new location.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendments adopted as not otherwise addressed in the code.
720. 5003.2.10.2 Repair. Where a stationary pressure vessel is repaired or is modified, an ASME
R-1 report shall be made available to the Fire Department. Upon completion of the repairs or
modifications to a pressure vessel, a nameplate indicating the nature of the work shall be
affixed to the pressure vessel. The repair nameplate shall be affixed near the original
nameplate.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendments adopted as not otherwise addressed in the code.
721. 5003.2.10.3 Removal of noncertified pressure vessels. If a nameplate stating that the
pressure vessel has been constructed in accordance with the ASME Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Code is not attached to a pressure vessel, the fire code official is authorized to have
the pressure vessel removed from service.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendments adopted as not otherwise addressed in the code.
722. 5003.2.10.4 Pressure relief devices. Pressure relief devices shall be provided to protect
pressure vessels and systems containing compressed gases from rupturing in accordance
with this section. Pressure relief devices shall be designed in accordance with nationally
recognized standards. See Chapter 45, CGA Standard S-1.3 or the ASME Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendments adopted as not otherwise addressed in the code.
723. 5003.2.10.4.1 Pressure vessels. Stationary pressure vessels shall be provided with one or
more pressure relief devices.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendments adopted as not otherwise addressed in the code.
724. 5003.2.10.4.2 Disabling relief devices. A pressure relief device shall not be disabled or
tampered with. Disabling includes the installation of a shut-off valve between the pressure
vessel and the pressure relief device. A pressure relief device arranged such that operation
of the shut-off valve removes one relief device from service but places another relief device
in service is not considered disabling.
Tampering includes the removal of a wire seal on an adjustable pressure relief device. If a
relief device is tampered with, the valve shall be repaired or replaced. If a pressure relief
device is disabled, the fire department is authorized to remove the pressure vessel from
service until the relief device is repaired or replaced.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendments adopted as not otherwise addressed in the code.
725. 5003.2.10.5 Indoor pressure vessels. A stationary pressure vessel located inside of a building
shall meet the following requirements:
1. The pressure relief device shall be terminated outside of the building.
1.1. The termination points of exhaust outlets and ducts discharging to the outdoors shall be
located a minimum of 10 feet from property lines and operable openings into the building, 3
feet above the roof line and 10 feet above adjoining grade.
2. The diameter of the discharge piping shall be equal or greater in diameter than the
diameter of the pressure relief device discharge opening.
3. Where multiple pressure relief devices are terminated into a single discharge relief
manifold, the cross-sectional area of the manifold shall equal or exceed the sum of the
pressure relief device discharge openings.
4. A pressure relief device shall not support discharge piping.
5. The discharge piping shall be protected from water resulting from rain or condensation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).

Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendments adopted as not otherwise addressed in the code.
726. 5003.3.1.4 Responsibility for cleanup. The person, firm or corporation responsible for an
unauthorized discharge shall institute and complete all actions necessary to remedy the
effects of such unauthorized discharge, whether sudden or gradual, without cost to the
jurisdiction. Where deemed necessary by the fire code official, cleanup can be initiated by
the fire department or by an authorized individual or firm. Costs associated with such
cleanup shall be borne by the owner, operator or other person responsible for the
unauthorized discharge. If the person, firm or corporation responsible for an unauthorized
discharge is undetermined or unable to be contacted, then the property owner shall institute
and complete all actions necessary to remedy the effects of such unauthorized discharge,
whether sudden or gradual, at no cost to the jurisdiction.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4160 March 12, 1999 - (1997 UFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Clarification of property owner’s ultimate responsibility for cleanup.
727. 5003.9.8 Separation of incompatible materials. Incompatible materials in storage and
storage of materials that are incompatible with materials in use shall be separated where the
stored materials are in containers having a capacity of more than 5 pounds (2 kg), 0.5 gallon
(2 L) or any amount of compressed gases. Separation shall be accomplished by:
1. Segregating incompatible materials in storage by a distance of not less than 20 feet (6096
mm).
2. Isolating incompatible materials in storage by a non-combustible partition extending not
less than 18 inches (457 mm) above and to the sides of the stored material.
Exception: In mercantile occupancies, noncombustible partitions for shelf storage shall be
limited to the depth of the shelf.
3. Storing liquid and solid materials in hazardous material storage cabinets.
4. Storing compressed gases in gas cabinets or exhausted enclosures in accordance with
Sections 5003.8.5 and 5003.8.6. Materials that are incompatible shall not be stored within
the same cabinet or exhausted enclosure.
5. A secondary containment or drainage system for each class of incompatible hazardous
materials stored in stationary or portable tanks.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Ensures that partitions are not wider than the shelves they serve.
728. 5003.11.1.1.11 Storage plan. A storage plan illustrating the intended storage arrangement,
including the location and dimensions of aisles, and storage racks protected with in-rack
sprinklers shall be provided.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC).

Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Adopted by ICC from Phoenix.
729. 5004.9.1 Emergency alarm design. The emergency alarm system shall be designed using the
manual fire alarm requirements of NFPA 72. Emergency alarm notification appliances shall
be yellow or amber in color. The audible emergency alarm signal shall be distinctly different
than the fire alarm signal.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides clarity for consistent outcomes.
729. 5005.1.12 Emergency isolation. Where gases or liquids having a hazard ranking of Health
Class 3 or 4, Flammability Class 4, Water Reactive Class 3 or 4 or Instability Class 3 or 4 in
accordance with NFPA 704 are carried in pressurized piping above 15 pounds per square
inch gauge (psig) 103 kPa), an approved means of leak detection and emergency shutoff or
excess flow control shall be provided. Where the piping originates from within a hazardous
material storage room or area, the excess flow control shall be located within the storage
room or area. Where the piping originates from a bulk source, the excess flow control shall
be located as close to the bulk source as practical.
Exceptions:
1. Piping for inlet connections designed to prevent backflow.
2. Piping for pressure relief devices.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Completes all hazard classes of extreme reactivity.
730. 5005.4.4 Dispensing, use and handling. Where hazardous materials having a hazard ranking
of 3 or 4 in accordance with NFPA 704 are transported through corridors, interior exit
stairways or ramps or exit passageways, there shall be an emergency telephone system, a
local manual alarm station or an approved alarm-initiating device at not more than 150-foot
(45720 mm) intervals and at each exit and exit access doorway throughout the transport
route. The signal shall be relayed to an approved central, proprietary or remote station
service or constantly attended on-site location and shall initiate a local audible alarm.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 - (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 - (2006 IFC), expanded to current version.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 - (2003 IFC), added NFPA 704 requirement.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 June 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6677 March 4, 2020 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6854 June 2, 2021 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-7242 April 3, 2024 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Revert to base code.




Chapter 51 Aerosols
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at
this time.
Reason:




Chapter 52 Reserved
1. Ch 52 is reserved and remains unchanged.
Reason:




Chapter 53 Compressed Gases
731. 5301.1 Scope. Storage, use and handling of compressed gases in compressed gas
containers, cylinders, tanks and systems shall comply with this chapter and NFPA 55,
including those gases regulated elsewhere in this code. Partially full compressed gas
containers, cylinders or tanks containing residual gases shall be considered as full for the
purposes of the controls required.
Liquefied natural gas for use as a vehicular fuel shall also comply with NFPA 52 and NFPA
59A.
Compressed gases classified as hazardous materials shall also comply with Chapter 50 for
general requirements and chapters addressing specific hazards, including Chapters 58
(Flammable Gases), 60 (Highly Toxic and Toxic Materials), 63 (Oxidizers, Oxidizing Gases
and Oxidizing Cryogenic Fluids) and 64 (Pyrophoric Materials).
Compressed hydrogen (CH2) shall also comply with the applicable portions of Chapters 23
and 58 of this code, the International Fuel Gas Code and NFPA 2.
Cutting and welding gases shall also comply with Chapter 35.
Exceptions:
1. Gases used as refrigerants in refrigeration systems (see Section 605).
2. Compressed natural gas (CNG) for use as a vehicular fuel shall comply with Chapter
23, NFPA 52 and the International Fuel Gas Code.
3. Cryogenic fluids shall comply with Chapter 55.
4. LP-gas shall comply with Chapter 61 and the International Fuel Gas Code.
5. Insulated liquid carbon dioxide systems shall comply with NFPA 55 and the Phoenix
Fire Code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Added to clarify that liquefied carbon dioxide is a compressed gas and these
standards apply.
732. 5301.2 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Section 105.5 and 105.6
Reason: Add 105.6 for the operational permits requirement.
733. 5303.4.3 Piping systems identification. Piping systems shall be marked in accordance with
ASME A13.1. Markings used for piping systems shall consist of the content’s name and
include a direction-of-flow arrow. Markings shall be provided at each valve; at wall, floor
or ceiling penetrations; at each change of direction; and at not less than every 20 feet
(6096 mm) or fraction thereof throughout the piping run. Piping contents and direction of
flow shall be identified in accordance with Chapter 50.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Add clarity to the labeling of the piping.
734. 5303.16.2 Design and construction. The vault shall completely enclose generation,
compression, storage or dispensing equipment located in the vault. There shall not be
openings in the vault enclosure except those necessary for vault ventilation and access,
inspection, filling, emptying or venting of equipment in the vault. The walls and floor of the
vault shall be constructed of reinforced concrete not less than 6 inches (152 mm) thick.
The top of an above-grade vault shall be constructed of noncombustible material and shall


be designed to be weaker than the walls of the vault to ensure that the thrust of any
explosion occurring inside the vault is directed upward.
The top of an at- or below-grade vault shall be designed to relieve safely or contain the
force of an explosion occurring inside the vault in accordance with NFPA 68 Guide for
Venting Deflagrations. The top and floor of the vault and the tank foundation shall be
designed to withstand the anticipated loading, including loading from vehicular traffic,
where applicable. The walls and floor of a vault installed below grade shall be designed to
withstand anticipated soil and hydrostatic loading. Vaults shall be designed to be wind and
earthquake resistant, in accordance with the International Building Code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Reason: This added as the appropriate standard for explosion control.
735. 5307.1 General. Compressed gases in storage or use not regulated by the material-specific
provisions of Chapters 6, 54, 55, and 60 through 67, including asphyxiant, irritant and
radioactive gases, shall comply with this section in addition to other requirements of this
chapter. Compressed gases of quantities in excess of limits set forth in table 105.5.9 shall
comply with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors. Change made to permittable qty.
736. 5307.1.1 Equipment. The storage, use and handling of liquid carbon dioxide shall be in
accordance with Chapter 53 and the applicable requirements of NFPA 55. Insulated
liquid carbon dioxide systems shall have pressure relief devices vented in accordance
with NFPA 55.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
737. 5307.1.2 Protection from damage. Carbon dioxide and other simple asphyxiant gas
systems shall be installed so the storage tanks, cylinders, piping fittings, detection and
notification devices are protected from damage by occupants or equipment during
normal facility operations, in accordance with Sections 5303.5 and 5303.6.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
738. 5307.3.1.1. Exhaust. The mechanical exhaust ventilation system shall be designed at a
rate not less than one cubic foot per minute, per square foot of floor area, within the
area inside the structure where the ASME vessel or DOT cylinders are located. The
ventilation system shall be designed to operate at a negative pressure in relation to the
surrounding area.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
739. 5307.3.1.2 Exhaust intake. The exhaust intake shall be taken from a point within 12
inches (305mm) of the floor. The exhaust system intake shall be located not less than
2 feet away from any gas detector or located on the opposite wall of any gas detector.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more

direction to our contractors.
740. 5307.3.1.3 Exhaust termination. The termination point of exhaust outlets and ducts
discharging to the outdoors shall be located not less than 10 feet from property lines, 3
feet above the roof line, 10 feet from operable openings into the building and 10 feet
above adjoining grade.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
741. 5307.3.1.4 Automatic activation. The exhaust system shall automatically activate when
either of the following thresholds is reached:
1. The concentration of carbon dioxide reaches 3 percent (30,000 ppm).
2. The concentration of oxygen reaches 19.5 percent in an oxygen deficient environment.
Exception: Continuous ventilation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
742. 5307.3.1.5 Manual activation. A manual activation switch shall be provided at the
entrance of the area where the ASME vessel or DOT cylinders are located. This manual
activation switch shall be clearly marked with its function.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
743. 5307.4.2.1 Equipment venting. On all new and existing installations, emergency relief
vents, burst disks and pump vents shall be terminated outside the building and not less
than 10 feet from openings into the building or property lines.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
744. 5307.4.3 Gas detection system. A gas detection system complying with Section 916
shall be provided. in rooms or indoor areas in which the carbon dioxide enrichment
process is located, in rooms or indoor areas in which container systems are located,
and in other areas where carbon dioxide is expected to accumulate. Carbon dioxide
sensors shall be provided within 12 inches (305 mm) of the floor in the area where the
gas is expected to accumulate or leaks are most likely to occur. The system shall be
designed as follows:
1. Activates a low-level alarm upon detection of a carbon dioxide concentration of
5,000 ppm (9000 mg/m3).
2. Activates a high-level alarm upon detection of a carbon dioxide concentration of
30,000 ppm (54 000 mg/m3).
Reason: Reference to section 916 to consolidate all gas detection to section 916.
745. 5307.4.8 Records. Records of inspections and maintenance shall be available for
review upon request by the Phoenix Fire Department.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
746. 5307.4.9 Tank and piping requirements. Piping systems shall be designed, constructed
and tested in accordance with ASME/ANSI B31.3, Process Piping Code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more

direction to our contractors.
747. 5307.4.9.1 Piping and marking. Piping and tubing shall be identified in accordance with
ASME A13.1 to indicate the material conveyed. Markings used for piping systems shall
consist of the content’s name and include a direction-of-flow arrow. Markings shall be
provided at each valve; at wall, floor or ceiling penetrations; at each change of
direction; and repeated at not less than every 20 feet (6096 mm) or fraction thereof
throughout the piping run.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
748. 5307.4.9.2 Piping design. Gas piping systems shall be designed as follows:
1. Piping systems shall be designed to a bursting pressure of not less than four times the
system design pressure.
All fittings used in the piping system shall be designed for a working pressure not to
exceed 125 percent of designed pressure of the hose.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
749. 5307.4.9.3 Piping materials. Carbon dioxide gas piping systems shall be of listed and
approved materials for each specific gas in use. Rigid plastic piping shall not be allowed.
Exception: Nonlisted materials require a special report by an Arizona registered engineer
on the piping material, which shall be submitted to the fire code official for approval.
A special report on the piping material shall not be required if the piping material has
been listed by a third-party testing group such as UL or FM for the intended use.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.
750. 5307.4.9.4 Leak tests. All piping systems shall be leak tested in accordance with the
following:
1. Piping systems shall be tested by a pneumatic pattern at a pressure equal to the
working pressure for 15 minutes or as long as it takes to check each joint. The test medium
shall be carbon dioxide.
2. Soap testing of all fittings shall be witnessed at time of inspection.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 - (2018 IFC).
Reason: Phoenix amendments are more specific than base code, providing more
direction to our contractors.




Chapter 54 Corrosive Materials
751. 5403.3 Gas Detection. Corrosive gas detection shall be in accordance with Section 916.
Reason: New to 2024. Add a reference to a common gas detection section rather than
duplicate the requirements in each individual chapter.




Chapter 55 Cryogenic Fluids
752. 5504.2.3 Oxygen detection. Oxygen detection shall be provided in accordance with section
916.
Reason: New to 2024. All gas detection has been consolidated to section 916.
753. 5505.2 Indoor use. Indoor use of cryogenic fluids shall comply with the material-specific
provisions of Sections 5501.1 and 5504.2.3.
Reason: Change made due to gas detection requirements moving to section 916.




Chapter 56 Explosives and Fireworks
754. 5601.1.3 Fireworks. The possession, manufacture, storage, sale, handling and use of
fireworks are prohibited.
Exceptions:
1. Storage and handling of fireworks as allowed in Section 5604.
2. Manufacture, assembly and testing of fireworks as allowed in Section 5605.
3. The use of fireworks for fireworks displays as allowed in Section 5608.
4. The possession, storage, sale, handling and use of specific types of Division 1.4G
fireworks where allowed by applicable laws, ordinances and regulations, provided
that such fireworks and facilities comply with NFPA 1124, CPSC 16 CFR Parts 1500
and 1507, and DOTn 49 CFR Parts 100–185, as applicable for consumer fireworks.
5. The use and sales of consumer fireworks is prohibited except in accordance with
the dates allowed in the Arizona Revised Statutes.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Amended by Regulation 5601.1.3 June 2, 2014, Item #5
Reason: Added to address change in State law.
755. 5601.2.3.1 Zoning. Zoning approval shall be obtained prior to issuance of permit.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Coordinated effort with Planning & Development & Zoning Departments.
758. 5607.1 General. Blasting operations shall be conducted only by approved, competent
operators familiar with the required safety precautions and the hazards involved and in
accordance with the provisions of NFPA 495. The certificate of fitness cardholder shall
be in attendance when the explosive materials arrive at the site and shall remain in
attendance until the blasting operation is completed.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Identifies Phoenix responsible party.
759. 5607.1.1 Pre-blast surveys. Prior to the discharge of explosive materials, a pre-blast
survey of all structures or buildings within a 500-foot (152 m) radius of the blast site
shall be conducted documenting existing structural damage.
The contractor shall make not fewer than four attempts to contact the owner or operator
of a structure or building in the pre-blast survey area. Not fewer than two of the contacts
shall be made between 6 p.m. and 8 p.m. If unsuccessful, a statement on contractor
letterhead detailing the address, dates, times and the name of the person(s) attempted
to be contacted shall be submitted to the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).

Adopted by Regulation R7703 April 1, 2002 – (1997 UFC) adopts 300-foot radius.
Reason: City Council Report 152131 indicates blasting permit requirements began
in 1989.
760. 5607.1.2 Neighborhood notification. Where required by the fire code official, the
blasting contractor shall provide written notification to the owner or occupant of each
building or structure within a 500-foot (152 m) radius of the use site. The notification
shall be required at a time interval specified by the fire code official but not less than
24 hours prior to the discharge of explosive materials.
Where access to the property is denied, a statement on contractor letterhead
detailing the name of the person denying access, the address, dates, times and the
name of the person attempting to make the contacts shall be submitted to the fire
code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Regulation R7703 April 1, 2002 – (1997 UFC) adopts 300-foot radius.
Reason: City Council Report 152131 indicates blasting permit requirements began
in 1989.
761. 5607.1.3 Monitoring. Seismic (ground vibration) and air blast monitoring shall be
conducted where building or structures are located within a 500-foot (152 m) radius of
the blast site. The monitoring shall be conducted at the closest building or structure.
Where seismic and air blast monitoring are required, the maximum allowable values
shall be in accordance with NFPA 495.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Regulation R7703 April 1, 2002 – (1997 UFC) adopts 300-foot radius.
Reason: City Council Report 152131 indicates blasting permit requirements began
in 1989.
762. 5607.1.4 Traffic barricading. Traffic barricading shall be provided where required by the
fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Regulation R7703 April 1, 2002 – (1997 UFC) adopts 300-foot radius.
Reason: City Council Report 152131 indicates blasting permit requirements began
in 1989.
763. 5607.1.5 Standby personnel and equipment. The fire code official is authorized to
require standby personnel and fire equipment.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).

Adopted by Regulation R7703 April 1, 2002 – (1997 UFC) adopts 300-foot radius.
Reason: City Council Report 152131 indicates blasting permit requirements began
in 1989.
764. 5607.1.6 Blast log. A blast log shall be maintained by the certificate of fitness
cardholder. When requested, a copy of the blast log shall be submitted to the fire code
official. Failure to submit the blast log may cause the fire code official to revoke the
permit until code compliance is achieved.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Regulation R7703 April 1, 2002 – (1997 UFC) adopts 300-foot radius.
Reason: City Council Report 152131 indicates blasting permit requirements began
in 1989.
765. 5607.1.7 Post blast survey. Where required by the fire code official, a post-blast survey
of all structures or buildings within a 500-foot (152 m) radius of the blast site shall be
conducted documenting structural damage.
The contractor shall make not fewer than four attempts to contact the owner or operator
of a structure or building in the pre-blast survey area. Not fewer than two of the contacts
shall be made between 6 p.m. and 8 p.m. If unsuccessful, a statement on contractor
letterhead detailing the address, dates, times and the name of the person(s) attempted
to be contacted shall be submitted to the fire code official.
Where access to the property is denied, a statement on contractor letterhead detailing
the name of the person denying access, the address, dates, times and the name of the
person attempting to make the contacts shall be submitted to the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Regulation R7703 April 1, 2002 – (1997 UFC) adopts 300-foot radius.
Reason: City Council Report 152131 indicates blasting permit requirements began in
1989.
766. 5607.1.8 Signage. Signs reading “BLASTING ZONE AHEAD” and “TURN OFF TWO-WAY
RADIOS” shall be provided where explosive material use is proposed within 1,000 feet
(305 m) of public right-of-ways.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Alerts the public of location of blastings zones. Remainder of section
renumbered.
767. 5607.4 Restricted hours. Surface-blasting operations shall only be conducted during
daylight hours Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. or as approved by the fire code
official. Other blasting shall be performed during daylight hours unless otherwise
approved by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Coordinates with City of Phoenix business hours.
768. 5607.5 Utility notification. Where blasting is being conducted within an 800-foot (243
840 mm) radius of utility lines or rights-of-way, the blaster shall notify the appropriate
representatives of the utilities not less than 24 hours in advance of blasting, specifying
the location and intended time of such blasting. Verbal notices shall be confirmed with
written notice.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
verbal notices removed.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Defines “vicinity” as used in the base code.
769. 5608.1 General. Outdoor fireworks displays, use of pyrotechnics before a proximate
audience and pyrotechnic special effects in motion picture, television, theatrical and group
entertainment productions shall comply with Sections 5608.2 through 5608.10 and NFPA
1123 or NFPA 1126. The display of fireworks, including flame effects, proximate displays
and pyrotechnic special effects inside structures(s) or building(s), shall not be allowed
unless the structure or building is protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system in
accordance with this code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5082 January 30, 2008 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Added as response to the Station Fire, Rhode Island, 2003.
770. 5608.2 Permit application. Prior to issuing permits for a fireworks display, plans for the
fireworks display, inspections of the display site and demonstrations of the display
operations shall be approved. A plan establishing procedures to follow and actions to
be taken in the event that a shell fails to ignite in, or discharge from, a mortar or fails
to function over the fallout area or other malfunctions shall be provided to the fire code
official.
Permit applications for fireworks, bonfires, fire performers, outdoor assembly events,
vehicle displays, tents and other membrane structures, trade shows and exhibitions
shall be submitted 10 business days in advance of the event. This does not include City
of Phoenix holidays. Permit applications submitted fewer than 10 business days in
advance of the event shall be assessed a penalty fee of $25 per day.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Standard event permit procedures.
771. 5608.6 Installation of mortars. Mortars for firing fireworks shells shall be installed in
accordance with NFPA 1123 and shall be positioned so that shells are propelled away
from spectators and over the fallout area. Mortars shall not be angled toward the
spectator viewing area, buildings or any public right-of-way open for use during the
display. Prior to placement, mortars shall be inspected for defects, such as dents, bent
ends, damaged interiors and damaged plugs. Defective mortars shall not be used.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).

Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added for clarity.
772. 5608.8 Tour shows or displays. A certificate of fitness cardholder shall be required to
be employed to supervise all aspects of a pyrotechnic demonstration or display.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
773. 5608.9 Materials to be discharged. The certificate of fitness cardholder shall submit an
inventory of pyrotechnic materials to be discharged to the fire code official for approval.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
774. 5608.10 Setup. The setup of pyrotechnics or pyrotechnic devices shall not begin until
an approved certificate of fitness cardholder who shall be responsible for all aspects of
a demonstration or display is on site.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
775. 5608.11 Standby personnel and equipment. Where necessary for the preservation of
life or property, the fire code official is authorized to require the attendance of standby
personnel and fire equipment.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.

776. 5608.12 Street closures. Public right-of-ways shall be closed to through traffic when
deemed necessary by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
777. 5608.13 Cables. Cables installed above spectators and used for articles, items or devices
that when discharged emit sparks, smoke or open flame, shall be constructed to support
the devices according to the manufacturer’s specifications.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
778. 5608.14 Smoke control. When pyrotechnic material is fired within a building, the
quantity of smoke developed shall not obscure the visibility of exit signs or paths of
egress travel.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
779. 5608.15 Electrical firing units.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
780. 5608.15.1 Wiring. Electrical wiring associated with an electrical firing unit shall be
prevented from contacting metal objects in contact with the ground.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control

added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
781. 5608.15.2 Connection to power supply. Firing circuits shall not be connected to any
power supply until all pyrotechnic devices are connected to firing leads and are cleared
for actual firing.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
782. 5608.16 Demonstration and approval. Where required by the fire code official, a
demonstration shall be conducted by an approved certificate of fitness cardholder to
demonstrate the safe use of fireworks and pyrotechnic materials. Once approved, no
changes shall be made in the program except to delete or decrease the size of an
approved display. When deemed necessary, the fire code official reserves the right to
require additional demonstrations.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
783. 5608.17 Crowd control. Onlookers shall be kept at a safe distance from the area where
the outdoor fireworks, theatrical or pyrotechnic special effects material is discharged
until the area is cleared by the pyrotechnic operator. The amount of crowd managers
shall be in accordance with Section 403.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), cables and smoke control
added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), cables and smoke
control added.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package),
tours, materials, setup, standby personnel and street closures added.
Reason: Added for clarity.
784. 5608.18 Fireworks display supervision. Whenever in the opinion of the fire code
official or the operator a hazardous condition exists, the fireworks display shall be
discontinued immediately until such time as the dangerous situation is corrected.

Reason: Renumbered for clarity.
785. 5608.19 Post-fireworks display inspection. After the fireworks display, the firing crew
shall conduct an inspection of the fallout area for the purpose of locating unexploded
aerial shells or live components. This inspection shall be conducted before public
access to the site shall be allowed. Where fireworks are displayed at night and it is
not possible to inspect the site thoroughly, the operator or designated assistant shall
inspect the entire site at first light.
A report identifying any shells that fail to ignite in, or discharge from, a mortar or fail
to function over the fallout area or otherwise malfunction, shall be filed with the fire
code official.
Reason: Renumbered for clarity.
786. 5608.20 Disposal. Any shells found during the inspection required in Section 5608.19
shall not be handled until not less than 15 minutes have elapsed from the time the
shells were fired. The fireworks shall then be doused with water and allowed to
remain for not less than 5 additional minutes before being placed in a plastic bucket
or fiberboard box. The disposal instructions of the manufacturer as provided by the
fireworks supplier shall then be followed in disposing of the fireworks in accordance
with Section 5604.10.
Reason: Renumbered for clarity.
787. 5608.20.1 Disposal responsibility. Disposal of shells is the responsibility of the certificate
of fitness cardholder.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Reason: Added for clarity, not addressed in code.
789. 5608.21 Static electricity. Prior to handling pyrotechnic materials or compounding
binary explosives, the certificate of fitness cardholder shall determine the methods to
be utilized to eliminate static electricity and verify that all precautions are taken in
accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added for clarity, not addressed in code.
790. 5607.9.1 Loading of holes. Explosive materials shall not be loaded into the ground
until permission is granted by the fire code official. Explosive materials shall not be
left in the ground overnight unless approved by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5015 October 31, 2007 (2006 IFC amendment package).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Regulation R7703 April 1, 2002 – (1997 UFC) adopts 300-foot radius.
Reason: City Council Report 152131 indicates blasting permit requirements began
in 1989.




Chapter 57 Flammable and Combustible Liquids
791. 5701.1 Scope and application. Prevention, control and mitigation of dangerous conditions
related to storage, use, dispensing, mixing and handling of flammable and combustible
liquids shall be in accordance with Chapter 50 and this chapter. Prior to the installation or
modification of piping, plans for systems containing flammable and combustible liquids
shall be submitted to the Phoenix Fire Department for review and approval. A registered
professional engineer shall seal and sign the construction documentation.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added language to require plan review and acceptance of these hazardous
systems
792. 5702.1 Definitions. The following terms are defined in Chapter 2:
CELLULAR BASE STATIONS.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Response to cellular failure after hurricane Katrina
793. 5703.5.2 Location. Signs shall be posted in locations as required by the fire code official.
Piping containing flammable liquids shall be identified in accordance with ASME A13.1
and Chapter 50.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Added for clarity and Phoenix requirements.
794. 5704.2.7 Design, fabrication and construction requirements for tanks. Tanks shall not
be allowed to be installed inside the City of Phoenix limits when their height exceeds 66
feet (20 117 mm) measured from the lowest level of the Fire Department access road.
The design, fabrication and construction of tanks shall comply with NFPA 30. Each tank
shall bear a permanent nameplate or marking indicating the standard used as the basis
of design.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Regulation 5704.2.7 effective August 2, 2014.
Reason: Not otherwise addressed by code. Tank farm and other large tank
locations.
795. 5704.2.7.3.1 Vent lines. Vent lines from tanks shall not be used for purposes other than
venting unless approved. Vent lines shall be constructed of noncombustible materials.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed by code. Tank farm and other large tank
locations.
796. 5704.2.7.4 Emergency venting. Stationary, above-ground tanks shall be equipped with
additional venting that will relieve excessive internal pressure caused by exposure to
fires. Emergency vents for Class I, II and IIIA liquids shall not discharge inside buildings.

The venting shall be installed and maintained in accordance with Section 22.7 of NFPA
30.
This requirement shall also apply to each compartment of a compartmented tank, the
interstitial space (annulus) of a secondary containment-type tank, and the enclosed space
of tanks of closed-top dike construction.
This requirement shall also apply to spaces or enclosed volumes, such as those intended
for insulation, membranes, or weather shields, that can contain liquid because of a leak
from the primary vessel and can inhibit venting during fire exposure. The insulation,
membrane or weather shield shall not interfere with emergency venting.
Emergency vents shall not be modified, obstructed or otherwise altered such that the
required area of opening for the required flow rate is reduced.
Exceptions:
1. Emergency vents on protected above-ground tanks complying with UL 2085
containing Class II or IIIA liquids are allowed to discharge inside the building.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), exception #1 amended and
#2 added to base code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), exception #1 added to
base code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed by code. Tank farm and other large tank
locations.
797. 5704.2.9.2.1 Required foam fire protection systems. Where required by the fire code
official, foam fire protection shall be provided for above-ground tanks, other than
pressure tanks, where the tank has a diameter of 30 feet or more, or a height of 20 feet
or more, and the tank is in accordance with one of the following:
1. Used for the storage of flammable & combustible liquids.
2. Used for in-process products and is located within 100 feet (30 480 mm) of a fired
still, heater, related fractioning or processing apparatus or similar device at a
processing plant or petroleum refinery as herein defined.
3. Considered by the fire code official as posing an unusual exposure hazard because of
topographical conditions; nature of occupancy, proximity on the same or adjoining
property, and height and character of liquids to be stored; degree of private fire
protection to be provided; and facilities of the fire department to cope with flammable
liquid fires.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC), fixed added and number
item #1 amended.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Based on the ability of Operations to fight fires at storage tank locations,
adopted at the direction of City Council.
798. 5704.2.9.2.2.1 Foam storage. Where foam fire protection is required, foam-producing
materials shall be stored on the premises. Adequate loading and transportation facilities
shall be provided. The time required to deliver such materials to the required location

in the event of fire shall be consistent with the hazards and fire scenarios for which the
foam supply is intended.
Exception: Storage of foam-producing materials off the premises is allowed as follows:
1. Such materials stored off the premises shall be of the proper type suitable for use
with the equipment at the installation where required.
2. Such materials shall be readily available at the storage location at all times.
3. Adequate loading and transportation facilities shall be provided.
4. The time required to deliver such materials to the required location in the event of
fire shall be consistent with the hazards and fire scenarios for which the foam supply
is intended.
5. At the time of a fire, these off-premises supplies shall be accumulated in sufficient
quantities before placing the equipment in operation to ensure foam production at an
adequate rate without interruption until extinguishment is accomplished.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Based on the ability of Operations to fight fires at storage tank locations.
799. 5704.2.9.6.1 Locations where above-ground tanks are prohibited. Storage of Class I and
II liquids in above-ground tanks outside of buildings is prohibited within the limits
established by law as set forth in the fire code adoption ordinance or other regulation
adopted by the City of Phoenix.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Supports Zoning department.
800. 5704.2.9.7.10 Additional requirements for field-erected storage tanks. In addition to the
requirements of API 620 or API 650, field-erected storage tanks shall also meet the
following requirements:
1. Diameter. The diameter of a field-erected storage tank shall not exceed 30 feet.
Exception: A tank over 30 feet in diameter provided with foam chambers
connected to a fixed, manual foam pump system supplied by a dedicated foam
storage tank.
2. Man-way openings. A field-erected tank with a diameter of 30 feet or more shall
be constructed with a minimum of two man-way openings. The minimum diameter
of a man-way opening shall be 36 inches.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed by code. Tank farm and other large tank
locations.
801. 5704.2.14.1 Removal. Removal of above-ground and underground tanks shall be in
accordance with all of the following:
1.Flammable and combustible liquids shall be removed from the tank and connected
piping.
2. Piping at tank openings that is not to be used further shall be disconnected.
3. Piping shall be removed from the ground.
Exception: Piping is allowed to be abandoned in place where the fire code official
determines that removal is not practical. Abandoned piping shall be capped and
safeguarded as required by the fire code official.
4. Tank openings shall be capped or plugged, leaving a 1/8-inch to 1/4-inch-diameter
(3.2 mm to 6.4 mm) opening for pressure equalization.
5. Tanks shall be purged of vapor and inerted prior to removal.
6. All exterior above-grade fill and vent piping shall be permanently removed.
Exception: Piping associated with bulk plants, terminal facilities and refineries.
7. The fire code official shall witness the removal of the tank.
8. Where tanks cannot be removed from the site within 24 hours after inerting, the
tanks shall be safeguarded in accordance with the following:
8.1 The tanks shall be stored within a secured area approved by the fire code
official.
8.2. The fire code official shall witness the re-inerting of the tank. See Section
5704.2.14.5.
9. Tanks shall be safely transported to a location that is not accessible to the public
and shall not pose a hazard to pedestrians or vehicle traffic.
10. Backfill for underground tanks shall not be removed until the tank has been rinsed
and inerted in accordance with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), item #6 added to base
code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Permit added to increase safety during removal. Multiple deaths occurred
prior.
802. 5704.2.14.3 Liquid removal (pump out) operations. Flammable and combustible liquids
shall be removed from the tank and connected piping as follows:
1. Not fewer than two people shall conduct the pump-out operation. One person shall
be responsible for the safe operation of the pump; the second person shall observe
the filling of the tank vehicle at the dome cover.
2. Bonding straps shall be installed between the storage tank and the tank vehicle.
2.1. The tank vehicle shall be grounded.
3. A minimum of one 80-B:C fire extinguisher shall be provided at the pump-out site.
The fire extinguisher shall be located not more than 50 feet (15 240 mm) away
from, nor closer than 20 feet (6096 mm) to, the fuel removal apparatus.
4. The amount in the tank after the pump-out shall not register more than 2 inches
(51 mm) on the stick or 60 gallons (227 L), whichever is less.
5. Open flames, hot work, energized electrical circuits or other sources of ignition
shall not be permitted within 25 feet (7620 mm) of the tank vehicle or the liquid
transfer hose.

Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), item #6 added to base
code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Permit added to increase safety during removal. Multiple deaths occurred
prior.
803. 5704.2.14.4 Tank inertion. Tanks shall be purged of vapor and inerted as follows:
1. Documentation shall be provided to the fire department demonstrating compliance
with this section. Documentation shall include, but not be limited to:
1.1 Receipt with date.
1.2 Quantity of required amount of dry ice or other product approved the fire
code official.
1.3 Calculation of required amount of dry ice or other product approved by the
fire code official.
2. Not less than 12 hours prior to excavation and 24 hours prior to removal, tanks
shall be inerted of vapors as follows:
2.1. For every 1,000 gallons (3785 L) of tank capacity, 25 pounds (11.34 kg)
of dry ice shall be inserted into the tank. The tank shall be capped and vapors
shall vent through existing connected normal vent line(s). Normal vent line(s)
shall extend above grade at least 12 feet (3658 mm) or 2 feet (610 mm)
above the building roof, whichever is higher, and shall be at least 20 feet
(6096 mm) from building openings, air intakes or coolers.
2.1.1. Other products approved for inerting shall be approved by the fire
code official.
2.2. During excavation, the pump, tank fill risers, gauge risers, vents and all
other related product lines, electrical conduit and appurtenant equipment
shall be disconnected and removed. Product lines shall be disconnected and
capped if intended for further use, or removed in their entirety.
2.3. Tank openings shall be capped or plugged except for normal vent line(s).

Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), item #6 added to base
code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Permit added to increase safety during removal. Multiple deaths occurred
prior.
804. 5704.2.14.5 Tank removal. Tank removals shall be in accordance with the following:
1. Contractor may excavate up to one-half the depth of the tank, not exceeding 5 feet
(1524 mm) in depth, without installing any straps or hooks to the tank prior to the
arrival of the fire code official.
2. Contractor shall ensure the lower explosive limit within the tank is 10 percent or
less of the product’s lower explosive limit or less than 7-percent oxygen.


3. The fire code official shall verify and document that the lower explosive limits is 10
percent or less of the product’s lower explosive limit or less than 7-percent oxygen.
4. The fire code official shall witness the removal of the tank.
5. Where tanks cannot be removed from the site within 24 hours after inerting, the
tank shall be in accordance with the following:
5.1. The tank shall be stored within a secured area approved by the fire code
official.
5.2. The fire code official shall witness the re-inertion of the tank (see Section
5704.2.14.4).
6. Tanks shall be safely transported to a location that is not accessible to the public
and shall not pose a hazard to pedestrians or vehicle traffic.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Permit added to increase safety during removal. Multiple deaths occurred
prior.
805. 5704.5.14.6 Tank rinsing. In addition to tank inerting, storage tanks shall be rinsed free
of petroleum product. Not fewer than three applications of an approved rinsing agent
shall be performed. All internal surfaces shall be rinsed. Documentation shall be provided
to the fire department demonstrating compliance with this section. An approved rinsing
agent shall be removed from property and disposed of in accordance with Federal, State,
County and local requirements.
To prevent the tank from moving, backfill for underground tanks shall not be removed
until the tank has been rinsed and inerted in accordance with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 August 1, 2007 – (2006 IFC), item #6 added to base
code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Permit added to increase safety during removal. Multiple deaths occurred
prior.
806. 5704.2.15.1 Field-erected storage tanks. The inspection, maintenance, repair, alteration
or reconstruction of a field-erected storage tank shall be in accordance with API 653.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed by code. Tank farm and other large tank
locations.
807. 5704.3.4.2 Occupancy quantity limits. The following limits for quantities of stored
flammable or combustible liquids shall not be exceeded:
1. Group A occupancies: Quantities in Group A occupancies shall not exceed that
necessary for demonstration, treatment, laboratory work, maintenance
purposes and operation of equipment, and shall not exceed quantities set forth
in Table 5003.1.1(1).


2. Group B occupancies: Quantities in drinking, dining, office and school uses
within Group B occupancies shall not exceed that necessary for demonstration,
treatment, laboratory work, maintenance purposes and operation of
equipment, and shall not exceed quantities set forth in Table 5003.1.1(1).
3. Group E occupancies: Quantities in Group E occupancies shall not exceed that
necessary for demonstration, treatment, laboratory work, maintenance
purposes and operation of equipment, and shall not exceed quantities set forth
in Table 5003.1.1(1).
4. Group F occupancies: Quantities in dining, office, and school uses within Group
F occupancies shall not exceed that necessary for demonstration, laboratory
work, maintenance purposes and operation of equipment, and shall not exceed
quantities set forth in Table 5003.1.1(1).
5. Group I occupancies: Quantities in Group I occupancies shall not exceed that
necessary for demonstration, laboratory work, maintenance purposes and
operation of equipment, and shall not exceed quantities set forth in Table
5003.1.1(1).
6. Group M occupancies: Quantities in dining, office, and school uses within Group
M occupancies shall not exceed that necessary for demonstration, laboratory
work, maintenance purposes and operation of equipment, and shall not exceed
quantities set forth in Table 5003.1.1(1). The maximum allowable quantities
for storage in wholesale and retail sales areas shall be in accordance with
Section 5704.3.4.1.
7. Group R occupancies: Quantities in Group R occupancies shall not exceed that
necessary for maintenance purposes and operation of equipment, and shall not
exceed quantities set forth in Table 5003.1.1(1).
8. Group S occupancies: Quantities in dining and office uses within Group S
occupancies shall not exceed that necessary for demonstration, laboratory
work, maintenance purposes and operation of equipment, and shall not exceed
quantities set forth in Table 5003.1.1(1) 5704.3.4.2.
TABLE 5704.3.4.2
R-3 OCCUPANCIES


QUANTITY
LIQUID
CLASS Gallons Liters
I and II 10 38
IIIA 60 227
IIIB 120 454



Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Address biofuels after explosion in Phoenix.



808. 5706.1 General. This section shall cover the provisions for special operations that
include, but are not limited to, storage, use, dispensing, mixing or handling of flammable
and combustible liquids. The following special operations shall be in accordance with
Sections 5701, 5703, 5704 and 5705, except as provided in Section 5706.
1. Storage and dispensing of flammable and combustible liquids on farms and
construction sites.
2. Well drilling and operating.
3. Bulk plants or terminals.
4. Bulk transfer and process transfer operations utilizing tank vehicles and tank cars.
5. Tank vehicles and tank vehicle operation.
6. Refineries.
7. Vapor recovery and vapor-processing systems.
8. Above-ground fuel storage tanks for generators at cellular base stations.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: This is considered a special operation.
809. 5706.2.4.4 Locations where above-ground tanks are prohibited. The storage of Class I
and II liquids in above-ground tanks is prohibited within the limits established by law as
the limits of districts in which such storage is prohibited in the City of Phoenix.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Add greater detail for Phoenix
810. 5706.9 Location of fuel tanks of sub-based generators. Above-ground fuel storage tanks
for generators shall be located with respect to distances to lot lines of adjoining property
that can be built on, the nearest side of any public way or from the nearest important
building on the same property in accordance with Tables 5705.3.4(1) and 5705.3.4(2).
Exceptions:
1. For existing cellular base stations installed prior to October 2, 2007 by Appeal to
the Fire Marshal, the minimum separation between the generator fuel tank and
the equipment building it serves may be reduced to not less than 3 feet if the
generator fuel tank is a UL 142 tank with integral secondary containment with a
capacity of 275 gallons (1041 Liters) or less.
2. For existing cellular base stations installed prior to October 2, 2007 by Appeal to
the Fire Marshal, a minimum separation distance between the generator fuel tank
and the equipment building it serves is not required if the generator fuel tank is
a UL 2080 Fire Resistant Tank, UL 2085 Protected Tank or a vaulted tank with
integral secondary containment and having a capacity of 275 gallons (1041
Liters) or less.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Amendment added to provide options for remote sub-base fuel tanks.




Chapter 58 Flammable Gases and Flammable Cryogenic Fluids
811 . 5808.5 Gas detection system. Hydrogen fuel gas rooms shall be provided with a gas
detection system in accordance with Section 916, 5808.5.1 and 5808.5.2.
Reason: New to 2024. Reference to section 916 to consolidate all gas detection to section
916.
812 . 5808.5.1 System activation. Activation of a gas detection system alarm shall result in both
of the following:
1. Initiation of distinct audible and visible alarm signals both inside and outside of the
hydrogen fuel gas room.
2. Automatic activation of the mechanical exhaust ventilation system.
Reason: Gas detection functionality consolidated to Section 916.
813 . 5808.5.2 Failure of the gas detection system. Failure of the gas detection system shall
automatically activate the mechanical exhaust ventilation system, stop hydrogen
generation and cause a trouble signal to sound at an approved location.
Reason: Gas detection functionality consolidated to Section 916.
814 . 5806.2 Limitations. Storage of flammable cryogenic fluids in stationary containers outside
of buildings is prohibited within the limits established by law as set forth in the fire code
adoption ordinance or other regulation adopted by the jurisdiction City of Phoenix.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Added Phoenix specific language to base language for clarity.




Chapter 59 Flammable Solids
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at
this time.
Reason: N/A




Chapter 60 Highly Toxic and Toxic Materials
815. 6005.3.1 Cabinets. Ozone cabinets shall be constructed of approved materials and
compatible with ozone. Cabinets shall display an approved sign stating: OZONE GAS
GENERATOR—HIGHLY TOXIC—OXIDIZER, and an NFPA 704 diamond in accordance
with Chapter 50.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adds 704 Diamond requirement.
Reason: Specifies the required sign.
816. 6004.2.2.10 Gas detection system. A gas detection system shall be provided where
required by Section 916. complying with Section 916 shall be provided to detect the
presence of gas at or below the PEL or ceiling limit of the gas for which detection is
provided. The system shall be capable of monitoring the discharge from the
treatment system at or below one-half the IDLH limit and shall initiate a response in
accordance with Sections 6004.2.2.10.1 through 6004.2.2.10.3 if the gas detection
alarm is activated.
Exception: A gas detection system is not required for toxic gases when the
physiological warning threshold level for the gas is at a level below the accepted PEL
for the gas.
Reason: Modification to align with the newly rewritten Section 916.
817. 6004.2.2.10.1 Alarms. The gas detection system shall initiate a local alarm and
transmit a signal to a constantly attended control station when a short-term hazard
condition is detected. The alarm shall be both audible and visible and shall provide
warning both inside and outside the area where gas is detected. The audible alarm
shall be distinct from all other alarms.
Exception: Signal transmission to a constantly attended control station is not
required where not more than one cylinder of highly toxic or toxic gas is stored.
Reason: Modification to align with the newly rewritten Section 916.
818. 6004.2.2.10.2 Shut off of gas supply. The gas-detection system shall automatically
close the shutoff valve at the source on gas supply piping and tubing related to the
system being monitored for whichever gas is detected.
Exception: Automatic shutdown is not required for reactors utilized for the
production of highly toxic or toxic compressed gases where such reactors are:

1. Operated at pressures less than 15 pounds per square inch (psig).
1. Constantly attended.
2. Provided with emergency shutoff valves that have ready access.
Reason: Modification to align with the newly rewritten Section 916.
819. 6004.2.2.10.3 Valve closure. Automatic closure of shutoff valves shall be in
accordance with the following:
1. Where the gas-detection sampling point initiating the gas detection system alarm
is within a gas cabinet or exhausted enclosure, the shutoff valve in the gas cabinet
or exhausted enclosure for the specific gas detected shall automatically close.
2. Where the gas-detection sampling point initiating the gas detection system alarm
is within a gas room and compressed gas containers are not in gas cabinets or
exhausted enclosures, the shutoff valves on all gas lines for the specific gas detected

shall automatically close.
3. Where the gas-detection sampling point initiating the gas detection system alarm
is within a piping distribution manifold enclosure, the shutoff valve for the
compressed container of specific gas detected supplying the manifold shall
automatically close.
Exception: Where the gas-detection sampling point initiating the gas-detection
system alarm is at a use location or within a gas valve enclosure of a branch line
downstream of a piping distribution manifold, the shutoff valve in the gas valve
enclosure for the branch line located in the piping distribution manifold enclosure
shall automatically close.
Reason: Modification to align with the newly rewritten Section 916.




Chapter 61 Liquified Petroleum Gases
820 . 6101.2 Permits. Permits shall be required as set forth in Sections 105 through 106.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Covers all permits required.
821 . 6101.3 Construction documents. Where an LP-gas container is more than 125 gallons (473 L)
in water capacity, the installer shall submit construction documents for such installation.
Two sets of accurate plans shall be submitted to the fire code official for approval to
conduct LP-gas cylinder exchange for resale. The plans shall identify, but not be limited to,
the location of the rack, distances to sources of ignition and exit doors, vehicle parking
spaces, and the zoning districts and the name of occupancies adjoining the installation site.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Codifies existing requirement for plan submittal. Changed from OTC permit to
required plan review due to the nature and hazard of the product.
822 . 6104.3.3 Screen walls. Screen walls constructed around LP-gas cylinders or containers shall
be in accordance with Sections 6104.3.3.1 and 6104.3.3.2. Screen walls shall not be
constructed around containers with a water capacity greater than 2,000 gallons (7570 L).
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides guidance missing from Zoning requirements for screen walls.
823 . 6104.3.3.1 Construction. The walls shall be of noncombustible construction. Not more than
three walls shall be erected to screen LP-gas containers.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides guidance missing from Zoning requirements for screen walls.
824 . 6104.3.3.2 Height. The walls shall not exceed 4 feet (1219 mm) in height, and shall be 50-
percent open in the bottom 2 feet (610 mm) as calculated by the applicant.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Provides guidance missing from Zoning requirements for screen walls.
825 . 6106.1 Attendants. Dispensing of LP-gas shall be performed by a qualified attendant.
Persons who transfer liquid LP-gas shall be trained in proper handling procedures, including
the applicable requirements of NFPA 58. Refresher training shall be provided not less
frequently than every 3 years. The training shall be documented. Dispensing of LP-gas as a
motor vehicle fuel shall be in accordance with Chapter 23 of this code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Defines qualified attendant.
826 . 6109.15 LP-gas cylinder exchange for resale. In addition to other applicable requirements of
this chapter, facilities operating LP-gas cylinder exchange stations that are open to the public
shall comply with the following requirements.
1. Cylinders shall be secured in a lockable, ventilated metal cabinet or other approved
outdoor enclosure.
2. Cylinders shall be available only by authorized personnel or by use of an automated
exchange system in accordance with Section 6109.15.1.
3. A sign shall be posted on the entry door of the business operating the cylinder exchange
stating “DO NOT BRING LP-GAS CYLINDERS INTO THE BUILDING” or similar approved
wording.
4. An emergency contact information sign shall be posted within 10 feet (3048 mm) of the
cylinder storage cabinet. The content, lettering, size, color and location of the required
sign shall be as required by the fire code official.
5. LP-gas cylinder exchange for resale shall only be conducted outdoors.
6. Individual LP-gas containers do not exceed 20-pound propane capacity.
7. The containers are not connected for use.
8. LP-gas exchange programs shall be conducted in zoning districts approved by the
jurisdiction.
9. Approved racks shall be installed not less than 10 feet from any entrance or exit from a
building or other building openings intended to be used for the safe egress of people.
10. Each rack shall be secured to prevent the rack from falling over.
11. Storage racks shall be protected against vehicle impact in accordance with one of the
following:
11.1. Section 312.
11.2. A parking block 6 feet (1829 mm) in length, installed in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions, shall be allowed in parking spaces located horizontal
to the rack where:
11.2.1. A sidewalk curb 6 inches (152.4 mm) in height (measured vertical from
grade level) is not available.
11.2.2. The front of the rack is not less than 4 feet (1219 mm) from the curb
edge.
Exception: Where a rack is located and maintained behind a pillar or other stationary object,
additional vehicular protection shall not be required.
12. A minimum 20:BC rated fire extinguisher shall be installed within 50 feet of storage racks.
The extinguisher shall be visible and accessible at all times.
13. An approved fire hydrant shall be installed within 350 feet of the LP-gas storage
containers.
14. Electrical equipment inside of or within 5 feet (1524 mm) of a cabinet storing cylinders,
including but not limited to electronics associated with vending operations, shall comply
with the requirements for Class I, Division 2 equipment in accordance with NFPA 70.
15. “No smoking” signs shall be posted near the storage racks so as to be immediately visible
to the public.

Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Codifies a regulation that began in 1997.
827 . 6109.15.1 Automated cylinder exchange stations. Cylinder exchange stations that include
an automated vending system for exchanging cylinders shall comply with Section 6109.15
and the following additional requirements:
1. The vending system shall only permit access to a single cylinder per individual transaction.
2. Cabinets storing cylinders shall be designed such that cylinders can only be placed inside
when they are oriented in the upright position.
3. Devices operating door releases for access to stored cylinders shall be permitted to be
pneumatic, mechanical or electrically powered.


4. Electrical equipment inside of or within 5 feet (1524 mm) of a cabinet storing cylinders,
including but not limited to electronics associated with vending operations, shall comply with
the requirements for Class I, Division 2, equipment in accordance with NFPA 70.
5. A manual override control shall be permitted for use by authorized personnel. On newly
installed cylinder exchange stations, the vending system shall not be capable of returning to
automatic operation after a manual override until the system has been inspected and reset
by authorized personnel.
6. Inspections shall be conducted by authorized personnel to verify that all cylinders are
secured, access doors are closed and the station has no visible damage or obvious defects
that necessitate placing the station out of service. The frequency of inspections shall be as
specified by the fire code official.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Add exchange requirements to the automatic exchange environment.
828 . SECTION 6112
LP-GAS FLAME EFFECTS
6112.1 Flame effects before an audience. LP-gas cylinders used for flame effects before an
audience are prohibited.
Exception: LP-gas cylinders may be used for flame effects before an audience where the
following conditions are met:
1. Approval from the fire code official.
2. Compliance with NFPA 160 Standard for Flame Effects Before an Audience.
3. In accordance with any current Life Safety report, and
4. Compliance with the requirements of this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
829 . 6112.2 Submittal. The plan for the use of flame effects shall be submitted in writing to the fire
code official. The plan shall include the following:
1. The name of the person, group or organization responsible for the production.
2. The dates and times of the production.
3. The location of the production.
4. The design criteria in Appendix B of NFPA 160.
5. The flame effect classification.
6. A site plan showing the following:
6.1. A narrative description of the flame effect.
6.2. The location of flame effect devices to be fired and their controls and control
sequence.
6.3. The area affected by the flame effect device.
6.4. The location of the audience.
6.5. The fuels used and their estimated consumption.
6.6. Air for combustion and ventilation for indoor effects.
6.7. Flammable materials piping.
6.8. Storage and holding areas and their capacities.

6.9. Supplemental fire protection features.
6.10. Emergency response procedures.
6.11. Means of egress.
7. A current safety data sheet (SDS) for the materials (fuels) consumed in the flame effect.
8. Documentation that the combustible materials used for construction of the flame effects
have been rendered flame retardant.
9. The name of the effects operator.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
830 . 6112.3 Cylinder volume. Cylinders shall be limited to a maximum volume of 20 pounds
(18L) of propane and shall only be used for vapor service.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
831 . 6112.4 Cylinder limit. Not more than three cylinders shall be connected to any flame effect
apparatus.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
832 . 6112.5 Cylinder hoses. Hoses shall be designed for a working pressure of 350 psig (6 kPa)
with a safety factor of 5 to 1 and shall be continuously marked with “LP-GAS, PROPANE,
350 PSI WORKING PRESSURE” and the manufacturer’s name or trademark. Hose
assemblies, after the application of couplings, shall have a design capability of 700 psig.
Hose assemblies shall be leak tested at the time of installation at not less than the
operating pressure of the system in which they are installed.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
833 . 6112.6 Manifolded cylinder connections. Where a flame effect requires two or more cylinders,
the cylinders shall be connected to the flame effect apparatus as follows:
1. A check valve shall be installed directly downstream of each cylinder valve,
2. The manifold shall be constructed of piping complying with NFPA 58.
3. Hoses connecting the manifold to the apparatus shall comply with Section 6112.3.4.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
834 . 6112.7 Cylinder connection. Cylinders shall not be connected or disconnected during the
flame effect or performance.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
835 . 6112.8 Idle cylinders. Cylinders in storage awaiting use shall be stored outside of Group A
occupancies.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
.
836 6112.9 Inspection. Visual inspection shall be performed in accordance with the following:
1. The cylinder is inspected for exposure to fire, dents, cuts, gouges and corrosion in
accordance with CGA C-6, Standard for Visual Inspection of Steel Compressed Gas Cylinders,
except that paragraph 4.2.1.1(1) of that standard (which requires tare weight verification) shall
not be part of the required inspection criteria.
2. The cylinder protective collar (where utilized) and the foot ring are intact and firmly
attached.
3. The cylinder is painted or coated to retard corrosion.
4. The cylinder pressure relief valve has no visible damage, corrosion of operating
components, or obstructions.
5. There is no leakage from the cylinder or its appurtenances that is detectable without the
use of instruments.
6. The cylinder is installed on a firm foundation and is not in contact with the soil.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
837 . 6112.10 Documentation. The results of the visual inspection shall be documented and a
record of the inspection shall be maintained for a 5-year period.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.
838 . 6112.11 Cylinder marking. A cylinder that passes the visual examination shall be marked in
accordance with DOT requirements.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Reason: Adds requirements not otherwise addressed in the base code.




Chapter 62 Organic Peroxides
839. 6201.2 Permits. Permits shall be required for organic peroxides as set forth in Sections
105.5 and 105.6.
Reason: New to 2024. Reference updated to include operational permit
requirement and to align with base IFC numbering.




Chapter 63 Oxidizers, Oxidizing Gases and Oxidizing Cryogenic Fluids
840. 6303.1.4 Portable fire extinguishers. Water portable fire extinguishers with a rating of not
less than 2A shall be provided in areas where oxidizers that can release chlorine are stored.
The placement and use of dry chemical extinguishers containing ammonium compounds
(Class A:B:C) is prohibited in areas where oxidizers that can release chlorine are stored.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: General safety requirement not addressed by base code.
841. 6303.3 Oxidizing gas detection. Gas detection shall be in accordance with Section 916.
Reason: New to 2024. Reference to section 916 to consolidate all gas detection to
section 916.
842. 6304.3 Calcium hypochlorite. The storage of calcium hypochlorite with a chlorine content of
50 percent or more (CAS number 7778-54-3) shall be in accordance with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed in the base code.
843. 6304.3.1 Temperature control. Calcium hypochlorite shall be provided with a means of
temperature control that maintains the storage room or area at a temperature of 85°F or
less. An audible and visual temperature control alarm shall be provided at a constantly
attended location. The alarm shall activate in the event that the temperature in the storage
room or area exceeds 85°F for more than one 30-minute period in a 24-hour period.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed in the base code.
844. 6304.3.2 Fire protection. Storage of calcium hypochlorite shall be protected in accordance
with the applicable sections of NFPA 400.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed in the base code.
845. 6304.4 Requirements for hydrogen peroxide. The storage of hydrogen peroxide with a
concentration greater than 27.5 percent shall be in accordance with this section.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed in the base code.
846. 6304.4.1 Pallets. Hydrogen peroxide stored in drums shall not be stored on wooden pallets.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed in the base code.
847. 6304.4.2 Dedicated equipment. Equipment used for storage, use, dispensing and handling
shall be specifically dedicated for hydrogen peroxide service.
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Reason: Not otherwise addressed in the base code.




Chapter 64 Pyrophoric Materials
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at this
time.
Reason:




Chapter 65 Pyroxylin (Cellulose Nitrate) Plastics
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at this
time.
Reason:




Chapter 66 Unstable (Reactive) Materials
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at this
time.
Reason:




Chapter 67 Water-Reactive Solids and Liquids
1. Amendments to this chapter are not applicable, no new amendments are proposed at this
time.
Reason:




Chapter 68-79 Reserved
1. Chapters 68-79 are reserved and remain unchanged.
Reason:




Chapter 80 Reference Standards
848 . NFPA
13-25: Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems
903.1, 903.1.9, 903.2.13, 903.3.1.1, 903.3.2, 903.3.5.3, 903.3.5.5.1, 903.3.5.6, 903.3.5.7,
903.3.5.8, 903.3.8.2, 903.3.8.5, 904.1.1, 904.12, 905.3.4, 907.6.4, 914.3.2, 1019.3,
1103.4.8, 1206.2.11.1, 1206.3.5.1, 3201.1, 3204.2, Table 3206.2, 3206.4.1, 3206.4.1.4,
3206.4.1.6, 3204.4.1.6.1, 3206.4.1.7, 3206.10, 3207.2, 3207.2.1, 3208.2.2, 3208.2.2.1,
3208.4, 3210.1, 3401.1, 5104.1, 5104.1.1, 5106.5.7, 5704.3.3.9, Table 5704.3.6.3(7),
5704.3.7.5.1, 5704.3.8.4

13R-25: Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Low-Rise Residential
Occupancies
903.3.1.2, 903.3.5.2, 903.4

13D-25: Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-family
Dwellings and Manufactured Homes
903.1, 903.1.9, 903.3.1.3, 903.3.1.3.4, 903.3.3.1.3.3, 903.5.5.1, 903.6.5.3

14-24: Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems 905.2, 905.3.4,
905.4.2, 905.6.2, 905.8

20—25: Standard for the Installation of Stationary Pumps for Fire Protection
913.1, 913.2, 913.5.1


68-23: Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting
1206.2.11.6, 5303.16.2

72—25: National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code
508.1.6, Table 901.6.1, 903.4.1, 904.3.5, 907.1.2, 907.2, 907.2.6, 907.2.9.3, 907.2.10,
907.2.12.2, 907.3, 907.3.3, 907.3.4, 907.5.2.1.2, 907.5.2.2, 907.5.2.2.5, 907.6, 907.6.1,
907.6.2, 907.6.6, 907.7, 907.7.1, 907.7.2, 907.8, 907.8.2, 907.8.5, 917.1, 1103.3.2,
1203.2.4, 2810.11

418-24: Standard for Heliports
2007.6

705-23: Recommended Practice for a Field Flame Test for Textiles and Films
807.3.1

1981-19: Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for
Emergency Services
918.7.5

1989-19: Standard on Breathing Air Quality for Emergency Services Respiratory Protection.
Table 901.6.1, Appendix L
Adopted by Ordinance G-6601 July 19, 2019 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Updating current fire code adopted NFPA Standards to currently published
editions. Allows use of latest testing, technology and code developments. Improves cross
reference compatibility of codes. Changed NFPA 14 reference edition due to inaccuracy.
849 . OSHA 29 CFR 1910 & 1926
CH2; Table 5604.3, CH 60, Appendix H
Adopted by Ordinance G-67242 May 4, 2024 – (2018 IFC).
Reason: Previously approved amendment includes OSHA as reference standards for
instances where matters enforceable under the fire code are absent. HMMP and HMIS




Appendix A
850. A101.1 Scope. A board of appeals shall be established within the jurisdiction for the purpose
of hearing applications for modification of the requirements of this code pursuant to the
provisions of Section 112 of the Phoenix Fire Code. The board shall be established and
operated in accordance with this section, and shall be authorized to hear evidence from
appellants and the Fire Marshal pertaining to the application and intent of this code for the
purpose of issuing orders pursuant to these provisions. To determine the suitability of
alternate materials and types of construction and to pro- vide reasonable interpretations of
the provisions of this Code, there shall be and hereby is created a Fire Safety Advisory Board,
hereinafter called “the Board.”
Reason: Clarifies provision specific to the Phoenix amended base Fire Code. Included
Phoenix specific title for whom the fire code official is, which is the Fire Marshal in the City of
Phoenix.
851. A101.2 Application for appeal. Any person shall have the right to appeal a decision of the Fire
Marshal to the board. An application for appeal shall be based on a claim that the intent of
this code or the rules legally adopted hereunder have been incorrectly interpreted, the
provisions of this code do not fully apply or an equally good or better form of construction is
proposed. The application shall be filed on a form obtained from the Fire Marshal within 20
days after the notice was served.
Reason: Clarifies provision specific to the Phoenix amended base Fire Code. Included Phoenix
specific title for whom the fire code official is, which is the Fire Marshal in the City of Phoenix.
852. A101.3 Membership of board. The board shall consist of five voting members appointed by the
chief appointing authority of the jurisdiction. Each member shall serve for 4 years or until a
successor has been appointed. Members shall not be reappointed to serve more than two
consecutive full terms. The board member’s terms shall be staggered at intervals, so as to
provide continuity. The fire code official shall be an ex officio member of said board but shall
not vote on any matter before the board. The membership of the board shall consist of up to
13 members. A majority shall be residents of the City of Phoenix, all shall be citizens of the
United States, and the board’s makeup shall represent the following industries, trades and
professions: Fire-protection systems contractor; architect; realtor; developer; petroleum
industry; liquefied petroleum gas industry; property insurance; fire-protection engineering;
owner or manager of a business that would not qualify for membership in another industry;
health care industry; special events coordinator; construction contractor; and resident of the
the appointing authority’s discretion. The Fire Marshal shall be an ex officio member of said
Board but shall have no vote on any matter before the Board. The Board shall adopt rules of
procedure for conducting its business, and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to
the appellant with a duplicate copy to the Fire Marshal.
Reason: Clarifies duration of participation of board member. Includes Phoenix specific
requirements for whom the board reports to and defines board member limits.
853. A101.3.5 Secretary. The Fire Marshal shall designate a qualified clerk to serve as secretary to
the board. The secretary shall file a detailed record of all proceedings, which shall set forth
the reasons for the board’s decision, the vote of each member, the absence of a member and
any failure of a member to vote.
Reason: Added Fire Marshal as necessary for reference to the fire code official in the City of
Phoenix


854. 101.3.9 Duties and responsibilities. It shall be the duty of the Board to hear appeals to
decisions of the Fire Marshal and submit findings to the City Council. The Board may also
submit to the Fire Marshal recommendations on matters pertaining to the Phoenix Fire Code,
or ordinance provisions and amendments. The duties and powers of the Board shall be
in advisory capacity only.
Adopted by Ordinance G-5808 July 1, 2013 – (2012 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4919 June 20, 2007 – (2006 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-4777 March 13, 2006 – (2003 IFC).
Adopted by Ordinance G-3784 August 6, 1994 – 14-member board by base code.
Adopted by Ordinance G-3361 September 26, 1990 – 8-member Board by base code,
replaces hotel/motel representative to real estate.
Adopted by Ordinance G-2221 September 1, 1981 – 7-member board with BOMA member.
Adopted by Ordinance G- October 13, 1976 – 7-member board with BOMA member.
Adopted by Ordinance G-1141 January 25, 1972 – 5-member board.
Reason: Authorizes the City of Phoenix to establish a Fire Safety Advisory Board. Provides a
cross section of key stakeholders and limits the influence of individual members which allows
for civilian oversite. 2018 Amendment moved to Appendix A to maintain established duties
and responsibilities.
855. A101.5.1 Open hearing. All hearings before the board shall be open to the public. The
appellant, the appellant’s representative, the Fire Marshal and any person whose interests are
affected shall be given an opportunity to be heard.
Reason: Added Fire Marshal as necessary for reference to the fire code official in the City of
Phoenix.
856. A101.7.1 Resolution. The decision of the board shall be by resolution. Every decision shall be
promptly filed in writing in the office of the Fire Marshal official within three days and shall be
open to the public for inspection. A certified copy shall be furnished to the appellant or the
appellant’s representative and to the Fire Marshal.
Reason: Capitalized B in board as established in A101.1. Added Fire Marshal as necessary
for reference to the fire code official in the City of Phoenix.
857. A101.7.1 Resolution. The decision of the board shall be by resolution. Every decision shall be
promptly filed in writing in the office of the Fire Marshal within three days and shall be open
to the public for inspection. A certified copy shall be furnished to the appellant or the
appellant’s representative and to the fire code official.
Reason: Added Fire Marshal as necessary for reference to the fire code official in the City of
Phoenix.
858. A101.7.2 Administration. The Fire Marshal shall take immediate action in accordance with the
decision of the board.
Reason: Added Fire Marshal as necessary for reference to the fire code official in the City of
Phoenix.




Appendix B
859. B103.4 Outside storage use. The Fire Marshal is authorized to require a fire flow of not less than 2,000 gpm where combustible
materials, hazard materials and other items are stored or used outside.
REASON: Allows the Fire Marshal to approved a minimum fire flow for outside storage.
860. TABLE B105.2
REQUIRED FIRE FLOW FOR BUILDINGS OTHER THAN ONE- AND
TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, GROUP R-3 AND R-4 BUILDINGS AND TOWNHOUSES


AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM MINIMUM FIRE FLOW FLOW DURATION
(Design Standard) (gallons per minute) (hours)
No automatic sprinkler system Value in Table B105.1(2) Duration in Table B105.1(2)
Section 903.3.1.1 of the International Fire Code 50% of the value in Table B105.1(2)a Duration in Table B105.1(2) at the reduced flow rate
Section 903.3.1.2 of the International Fire Code 50% of the value in Table B105.1(2)b Duration in Table B105.1(2) at the reduced flow rate

For SI: 1 gallon per minute = 3.785 L/m.
a. The reduced fire flow shall be not less than 1,000 gallons per minute.
b. The reduced fire flow shall be not less than 1,500 gallons per minute.

REASON: A greater reduction to the fire flow is allowed through this Phoenix amendment.
861. B105.2 Buildings other than one- and two-family dwellings, Group R-3 and R-4 buildings and townhouses. The minimum fire-flow
and flow duration for buildings other than one- and two-family dwellings, Group R-3 and R-4 buildings and townhouses shall be
as specified in Tables B105.2 and B105.1(2).
Exception: A reduction in required fire-flow of up to 50 percent, as approved, is allowed when the building is provided with an
approved NFPA 13 automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1. The resulting fire-flow shall not be
less than 1,500 gallons per minute (5678 L/min) for the prescribed duration as specified in Table B105.1. No reductions are
allowed for NFPA 13D or 13R systems other than R-3 single-family homes.

862. B106.2. See Chapter 5 of this code for additional requirements.
REASON:




Appendix D
863. D101.1 Scope. Fire apparatus access roads shall be in accordance with this appendix and
all other applicable requirements of the International Fire Code. The Phoenix Fire
Department Access and Identification Detail Manual shall be referred to for specific
details that the Phoenix Fire Department Fire Prevention office has approved for both new
and existing buildings located within the City of Phoenix. These details can be used by
design professionals and contractors. These details can be modified and reviewed and
approved.
Reason: Removed Appendix D’s contents (Fire Department Details) from the adopted
Fire Code and create a standalone “Phoenix Fire Department Access and Identification
Detail Manual.” Appendix D will now refer to this document for Phoenix Fire Department
approved details.




Appendix E
1. No additional amendments are proposed for this appendix at this time.
REASON: N/A




Appendix F
1. No additional amendments are proposed for this appendix at this time.
REASON: N/A




Appendix G
1. No additional amendments are proposed for this appendix at this time.
REASON: N/A




Appendix H
1. No additional amendments are proposed for this appendix at this time.
REASON: N/A




Appendix I
1. No additional amendments are proposed for this appendix at this time.
REASON: N/A




Appendix L
1. No additional amendments are proposed for this appendix at this time.
REASON: N/A




Appendix M
1. No additional amendments are proposed for this appendix at this time.
REASON: N/A




Appendix N
864. ◆ N101.2 Permit required. An operational permit for trade shows and exhibitions
shall be required as set forth in Section 105.5.15.
Reason: Shown for policy diamond as there is a policy trade shows.
865. N101.4 Travel distance. The maximum travel distance from any point in an exhibit to
an exit access shall not exceed 50 feet (15 240 mm).
Reason:
866. N101.5 Aisle width. Minimum aisle width in a trade show or exhibition shall comply
with the following:

SQUARE FOOTAGE OF TRADE
SHOW OR EXHIBITION
MINIMUM AISLE
WIDTH
MINIMUM AISLE
WIDTH

Greater than 15,000 square feet (1393 m2) 10 feet (3048 mm)

5,000 square feet (465 m2) to 15,000 square feet (1393 m2) 8 feet (2438 mm)

Less than 5,000 square feet (465 m2) 6 feet (1829 mm)
Reason: Phoenix specific aisle width requirements
867. N101.6 Obstructions. Aisles shall be kept clear of all obstructions, including but
not limited to, fixtures and displays of goods for sale, chairs, tables, product,
displays, vehicles and trailer tongues.
Reason:
868. N101.7 Exit signs. Exit signs shall be visible from all locations in the occupancy.
Reason:
869. N101.8 Storage of combustible materials. Storage of combustible materials behind
exhibits, booths or tents is prohibited. Combustible materials, including but not
limited to wood crates, paper and cardboard boxes, shall be stored outside the
building in an approved area or in a storeroom having a fire-resistance rating of not
less than one hour and protected by an approved automatic fire-extinguishing system.
Reason:
870. N105.6 Fire alarm and detection. Each multiple-level booth with a floor area
exceeding 120 square feet (11.1 m 2 ) on any level shall be provided with a single-
station, battery-powered smoke alarm.
Reason:
871. N106.1 Automatic sprinkler systems. An approved automatic sprinkler system in
accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of this code shall be provided in covered booths
exceeding 400 square feet (37.2 m 2 ) in floor area per level.
Reason:
872. N106.2 Fire alarm and detection. Each covered booth with a floor area exceeding 120
square feet (11.1 m 2 ) on any level shall be provided with a single-station,
battery-powered smoke alarm.




Appendix N
1. No additional amendments are proposed for this appendix at this time.
REASON: N/A







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Project Distribution Design and Construction Contract 4226185 for
City Project FD57100031 Fire Station 15 (Ordinance S-52502) - District 5

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Distribution
Design and Construction Contract with Salt River Project (SRP) for the design and
construction of electrical facilities for the new Fire Station 15. Further request to grant
an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item in
an amount not to exceed $30,376.55.

Summary
The City is constructing Fire Station 15 located at 4900 N. 45th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ
85031. This agreement represents the cost for SRP to design and construct new
electrical services for the fire station.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement will begin on or about December 17, 2025, and will expire
when the project is complete and accepted.

Financial Impact
Funding in the amount of $30,376.55 is available through the Fire Department's
Capital Improvement Program budget.

Location
4900 N. 45th Avenue
Council District 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher, Assistant City Manager Lori
Bays, the Fire and Street Transportation departments and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Extend Contract with Peraton, Inc. for Fire Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD)
Upgrade Project (Ordinance S-52513) - Citywide

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to extend Contract
152571, and extend the original Payment Ordinance S-46540 with Peraton, Inc. for the
Fire Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) Upgrade Project. Further request authorization
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
On April 15, 2020, City Council approved the Phoenix Fire Department (PFD) to enter
into a contract with Peraton, Inc. (formerly Northrop Grumman) for the Fire Computer
Aided Dispatch (CAD) Upgrade Project. PFD currently relies on a CAD system that
provides regional dispatch management for 29 jurisdictions and two private ambulance
companies. To keep pace with the growing demand for services, PFD must upgrade
the CAD system in order to maintain service levels and meet response time standards
established by the National Fire Protection Association.

The current Fire CAD Upgrade Project contract is scheduled to expire on August 16,
2028. Due to delays with the project implementation, the contract period of service will
need to be extended through July 2, 2030.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement with Peraton, began on or about June 1, 2020, through
August 16, 2028. Upon approval, the contract term will be extended through July 2,
2030.

Financial Impact
No additional funding is required.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This contract was originally approved by the City Council on April 15, 2020.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.






Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Amend City Code Section 36-128 Crossing or Stopping in a Roadway
(Ordinance G-7468) - Citywide

Request City Council approval to amend Phoenix City Code Section 36-128 pertaining
to crossing or stopping in a roadway, to revise paragraph C to remove the requirement
that pedestrians be given a warning prior to being cited for a civil violation.

Summary
This portion of the Phoenix City Code pertains to pedestrians and their ability to cross
or stop in a roadway. This request is to revise paragraph C and to remove the
requirement for a pedestrian to be given a warning prior to being issued a citation for a
civil violation. A pedestrian who stops in the median must cross the roadway at the
next pedestrian signal, or in the absence of a pedestrian signal, when traffic has
cleared or yielded. See Attachment A.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact for the City.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This portion of the Phoenix City Code was last amended by the City Council on
November 19, 2014.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher, Assistant City Manager Lori Bays
and the Street Transportation and Police departments.





ATTACHMENT A



ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 36, ARTICLE X,
SECTION 36-128 RELATING TO CROSSING OR
STOPPING IN A ROADWAY TO REMOVE REQUIREMENT
THAT PEDESTRIAN RECEIVE A WARNING BEFORE
BEING ISSUED A CITATION FOR A CIVIL VIOLATION.

_______________

T
WHEREAS, in May 2014, in response to health and safety concerns,



AF
specifically the number of vehicle crashes involving pedestrians with injuries and

fatalities, resulting from pedestrians improperly standing or remaining in roadway traffic

islands and medians, the Council of the City of Phoenix passed Ordinance G-5960




D
amending Phoenix City Code Section 36-128 (Crossing a Roadway) to also prohibit a




R
pedestrian from stopping or remaining in a roadway traffic island or median, except for

the purpose of legally crossing the roadway, and further designating the first violation a

civil traffic offense and the second and all subsequent violations a class 1

misdemeanor. The amendment further required that before any pedestrian is cited for a

civil violation, the pedestrian must be given a warning by law enforcement.

WHEREAS, City staff has determined that a warning requirement does not

effectively address the health and safety requirements because it is often not possible

to ensure that pedestrians are not stopping or remaining in the roadway.




WHEREAS, City staff has recommended amending Section 36-128 to

remove the warning requirement to allow law enforcement to address stopping and

standing in a median and to further the objective of protecting the health and safety of

pedestrians and drivers in the City.



NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF PHOENIX as follows:

SECTION 1. The Phoenix City Code, Chapter 36, Article X, Section 128,

is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 36-128. Crossing or stopping in a roadway. T
A.


AF
Except in a crosswalk, no pedestrian shall cross a roadway at any place

other than by a route at right angles to the curb or by the shortest route to

the opposite curb. A pedestrian shall not cross a roadway where

prohibited by appropriate signs, markings, devices or by law.


D
B.


R No pedestrian may stop or remain in the portion of the roadway designed

for vehicular use or in a painted or raised traffic island or median not

designated for use by pedestrians except to wait to cross the roadway at

the next pedestrian signal or, in the absence of a pedestrian signal, when

traffic has cleared or yielded.

C. Before any pedestrian is cited for a civil violation of this section, the

pedestrian must be given a warning by law enforcement. The first violation of this

section after the warning is given is a civil traffic offense and a second and all

subsequent violations of this section is a Class 1 misdemeanor.



2 Ordinance G-

PASSED by the City Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of December

2025.


____________________________________
MAYOR

____________________________________
Date

ATTEST:


_____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney
T
AF
BY: _________________________________

_________________________________




D
REVIEWED BY:




R
____________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager
DJB:tl:(LF24-2566): 12/17/25: 4930-1775-1422




2 Ordinance G-




Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
PowerDMS Contract - RFA-25-0722 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-52511) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
PowerDMS, Inc. to continue the use of PowerReady and PowerDMS for the Phoenix
Police Department. Further request an exception to the indemnity and assumption of
liability provisions of Phoenix City Code Section 42-18. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the
contract will not exceed $1,021,526.

Summary
This contract will provide PowerReady and PowerDMS. PowerReady is a training
management platform for public safety agencies designed to streamline police recruit
and officer training. It automates documentation, tracks progress with real-time
dashboards and integrates training with policies and key documents.

PowerDMS is a cloud-based system that manages the Phoenix Police Department's
policies and accreditation. It distributes updates to staff and includes a public-facing
feature to share policy changes with the community.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition. Research was conducted by the Phoenix
Police Department, and it was determined that PowerDMS, Inc., is the exclusive
provider of the PowerDMS public safety workforce platform. Although there are
alternative platforms available, continued use of PowerDMS is essential. PowerDMS is
already fully implemented and serves as the department's central system for housing
all policies, operation orders, Arizona Law Enforcement Accreditation Program
standards, and other essential documents. It is also the platform required to maintain
national accreditation standards. In addition, PowerFTO (PowerReady) has been the
foundation of PD's FTO program for several years and integral to ensuring



consistency, documentation accuracy, and training continuity. Continued use of this
platform is necessary to support standardized field training, maintain compliance, and
uphold both officer and public safety.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about January 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no
options to extend the term.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $1,021,526 for the five-year term.
Funding is available in the Police Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Airport Advertising Revenue Contract Solicitation Request to Issue - District 8

Request the City Manager, or his designee, to authorize the Aviation Department to
issue a Revenue Contract Solicitation (RCS) for a qualified airport advertising
company to develop and manage a comprehensive airport-wide advertising program at
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, Phoenix
Goodyear Airport, Rental Car Center, and other areas (collectively, Airports). The
Aviation Department is also requesting authorization to extend the term of Terminal
Advertising Concession Lease Agreement 135006 (Lease) on a month-to-month basis,
if necessary, until performance begins under the new advertising concession lease
resulting from the RCS.

Summary
The Aviation Department currently contracts with Lamar Alliance Airport Advertising
Company to operate the advertising concession program at the Airports under the
Lease, which will expire in May 2026.

The Aviation Department is seeking an Airport advertising concessionaire to develop,
operate, and manage a comprehensive airport-wide advertising program
encompassing both indoor and outdoor spaces and sponsorship opportunities. The
goals of the Airport advertising program are to:

· Showcase the unique identity of Phoenix, its surrounding communities, and local
cultural heritage.
· Promote a diverse mix of regional and national brands to the traveling public.
· Generate increased revenues for the Aviation Department through innovative
advertising solutions.

In alignment with airport industry best practices, the selected advertising
concessionaire is expected to provide state-of-the-art technology and equipment that
create distinctive engagement opportunities with airport travelers and enhance the
overall passenger experience. The envisioned program will reflect evolving standards
of public space advertising within the Airports' environments.




Procurement Information
The Aviation Department will issue an RCS to select a qualified airport advertising
concessionaire to develop, create, and manage the Airport Advertising Program. The
selected concessionaire will be responsible for the installation, maintenance, and
operation of all advertising equipment and associated infrastructure.

Respondents deemed responsive and responsible will be evaluated based on the
following proposed evaluation criteria:

· Qualifications and Experience of the Respondent
· Advertising Display Program
· Business, Marketing, and Operations Plans
· Transition and Mobilization Plan
· Sponsorship Program Methodology
· Financial Return to the Aviation Department

The highest ranked respondent will be recommended for the Airport Advertising
concession lease award.

The Aviation Department intends to issue the RCS in Spring 2026. The City's
Transparency Policy will be in effect upon the release of the RCS and throughout the
solicitation process.

Contract Term
The proposed term of the new Airport Advertising concession lease will be seven years
with one, three-year option to extend the term at the sole discretion of the Aviation
Director.

Financial Impact
Rent will be based on the Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) or a percentage of gross
sales from the advertising concession program, whichever is greater. MAG and the
percentage of gross sales will be finalized when the RCS is published.

Public Outreach
This RCS process will include all standard and required outreach efforts and conduct
targeted outreach efforts to attract interest.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board Business and Development Subcommittee
approved this item on October 3, 2025, by a vote of 3-0.


The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board approved this item on October 16, 2025, by a
vote of 6-0.
The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee approved this item on
November 19, 2025, by a vote of 4-0.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Amber Williamson and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 4 Baggage Handling System
Upgrades - Construction Manager at Risk Services Amendment - AV21000109
(Ordinance S-52495) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Agreement 157694
with The Weitz Company, LLC to provide additional construction services for the
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 4 Baggage Handling System
Upgrades project. Further request to authorize the execution of amendments to the
Agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority provided
below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional fee for services included in the amendment will not exceed $26 million.

Summary
The purpose of the project is to modernize the Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport Terminal 4 (T4) Baggage Handling System (BHS). The project is necessary
because the BHS used by American Airlines and the various Common Use systems
are largely obsolete and operating on controls using technology at end of life at more
than 25 years old. The scope of the amendment is part of the larger effort of Terminal 4
BHS modernization.

The amendment is necessary for additional Construction Phase Services for the
modernization of the T4 North Concourse 4 Recheck BHS. The amendment will
provide additional funds to the Agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the Agreement remains unchanged. Work scope identified and
incorporated into the Agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the
parties, and work may extend past the termination of the Agreement. No additional
changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
· The initial Agreement for Construction Manager at Risk Services was approved for
an amount not to exceed $300,000, including all subcontractor and reimbursable
costs.
· An amendment to the Agreement for Construction Manager at Risk Services was


approved for an additional amount not to exceed $8.2 million, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
· An amendment to the Agreement for Construction Manager at Risk Services was
approved for an additional amount not to exceed $48.1 million, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs.
· The amendment will increase the cost of the Agreement by $26 million for a new
total amount not to exceed $82.6 million, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.

Funding for the amendment is available in the Aviation Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to Agreement limits for all rendered Agreement services,
which may extend past expiration or termination of the Agreement.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction and Construction Services
Agreement 157694 (Ordinance S-49323) on January 25, 2023.
· Architectural Services Agreement 157695 (Ordinance S-49328) on January 25,
2023.
· Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction and Construction Services
Amendment to Agreement 157694 (Ordinance S-50050) on July 3, 2023.
· Architectural Services Amendment to Agreement 157695 (Ordinance S-50048) on
July 3, 2023.
· Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction and Construction Services
Amendment to Agreement 157694 (S-50915) on May 29, 2024.

Location
2485 E. Buckeye Road, Phoenix, AZ
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher, Deputy City Manager Amber
Williamson, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Streetlight Maintenance Services - RFP 63-0037 - Amendment (Ordinance S-
52487) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
contract 149070 with Power Tech Contracting, LLC, to increase the contract capacity
and extend the contract term. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$1,304,000.

Summary
This agreement provides streetlight maintenance services for all new and existing
poles and fixtures in the Arizona Public Service (APS) and Salt River Project (SRP)
service areas throughout the City. Power Tech Contracting, LLC provides all
equipment, labor, materials, traffic control, and services necessary to remove, relocate,
upgrade, and install new streetlights and associated equipment, as well as perform
routine and non-routine maintenance of existing streetlights. A six-month extension is
being requested to support the completion of ongoing projects and align the contract
term with the end of the fiscal year.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through June 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $1,304,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $21,476,425. Funds are available in the Street Transportation
Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Streetlight Maintenance Services Contract 149070-004 (Ordinance S-51525) on
December 18, 2024.
· Streetlight Maintenance Services Contract 149070-003 (Ordinance S-50378) on
December 6, 2023.
· Streetlight Maintenance Services Contract 149070-002 (Ordinance S-48847) on
July 1, 2022.


· Streetlight Maintenance Services Contract 149070-001 (Ordinance S-46998) on
October 21, 2020.
· Streetlight Maintenance Services Contract 149070-000 (Ordinance S-45231) on
December 12, 2018.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Street Transportation
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Project Construction Services Agreement - ST89340634 (Ordinance S-
52500) - Districts 4 & 5

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Construction
Services Agreement with Salt River Project (SRP) for the construction of irrigation
facilities to be relocated to accommodate improvements for City Project ST89340634 -
35th Avenue; Interstate 10 to Camelback Road. Further request to grant an exception
pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents
pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions
that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. Further request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item in an
amount not to exceed $4,110,335.

Summary
The City is constructing vehicular and pedestrian improvements such as traffic signal
and intersection modernization, raised medians, streetlighting, fiber installation,
replacing pavement and other necessary work as part of an award through the U.S.
Department of Transportation's (USDOT) Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage
Development (BUILD) grant program. This construction agreement represents the cost
for SRP to relocate irrigation facilities to accommodate improvements for the project.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement will begin on or about December 17, 2025, and will expire
when the project is completed and accepted.

Financial Impact
The agreement will not exceed $4,110,335. Funding is available in the Street
Transportation Department's Capital Improvement Program budget.

Location
35th Avenue from Interstate 10 to Camelback Road.
Council Districts: 4 and 5






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher and the Street Transportation
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
10 Locations in Phoenix (HAWK SIGNAL) - Design-Bid-Build Services -
ST89330252 (Ordinance S-52504) - Districts 2, 3, 4, 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept AJP Electric, Inc., as
the lowest-priced, responsive, and responsible bidder and to enter into an agreement
with AJP Electric, Inc. for Design-Bid-Build Services for the 10 Locations in Phoenix
High Intensity Activated Crosswalks (HAWK Signal) project. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for
services will not exceed $5,653,155.40.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to install new HAWK signals at 10 locations Citywide.

AJP Electric, Inc.’s services include, but are not limited to: removal of existing
sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and curb ramps; construction of new sidewalks, curbs
and gutters, and ramps to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act requirements;
catch basin and fire hydrant relocations; provide and install HAWK signals
(foundations, poles, mast arms, signals, electrical components and all fixtures and
equipment); adjustment of existing utilities; crack seal and micro seal; and
miscellaneous work.

The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. One bid was received on October 7,
2025, and was sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine
subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program requirements.

The opinion of probable cost and the lowest responsive and responsible bidder is
listed below:

Opinion of Probable Cost: $5,969,696
AJP Electric, Inc.: $5,653,155.40

The bid award amount is within the total budget for this project.




Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 420 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for AJP Electric, Inc., will not exceed $5,653,155.40, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

This project will utilize federal funds and is subject to the requirements of 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 26 and the U.S. Department of Transportation DBE program.
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Location
Council Districts: 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher, the Street Transportation
Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
35th Avenue Safety Corridor Federal Highway Administration Surface
Transportation Block Grant - Design-Bid-Build Services - ST89340634
(Ordinance S-52505) - Districts 4 & 5

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept Combs Construction
Company, Inc., as the lowest-priced, responsive, and responsible bidder and to enter
into an agreement with Combs Construction Company, Inc., for Design-Bid-Build
Services for the 35th Avenue Safety Corridor Federal Highway Administration Surface
Transportation Block Grant Design-Bid-Build project. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not
exceed $30,051,095.10.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to implement critical safety enhancements for
pedestrians and vehicles along the 35th Avenue corridor from Interstate 10 (I-10) to
Camelback Road.

Combs Construction Company, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to:
installation of three pedestrian hybrid beacons, modernization of approximately eight
intersections with upgrades to signals and light emitting diode street lighting corridor-
wide, construction of raised medians, pavement restoration, and the installation of a
broadband fiber network to facilitate intelligent and connected transportation systems.

The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Two bids were received on November
4, 2025. They were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine
subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program requirements. A
DBE goal has not been established for this project.

The opinion of probable cost and the two lowest responsive and responsible bidders
are listed below:

Opinion of Probable Cost: $28,064,167.00
Combs Construction Company, Inc.: $27,319,177.40



Hunter Contracting Co.: $31,796,354.32

Due to volatile material costs and increased labor prices in the construction industry, a
10 percent contingency is being requested to allow for project uncertainties. The initial
contract will be executed at the bid amount of $27,319,177.40. Use of ten percent
contingency above the amount will not be allowed without prior written approval of the
Street Transportation Department Director and the City Engineer. The bid award
amount is within the project's total budget.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 625 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The initial agreement value for Combs Construction Company, Inc., will not exceed
$27,319,177.40, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

This project will utilize federal funds. Funding is available in the Street Transportation
Department's Capital Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research
Department will separately review and approve funding availability prior to execution of
any amendments. Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all agreement-
rendered services, which may extend past the agreement termination.

Location
35th Avenue - I-10 to Camelback Road
Council Districts: 4 and 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher, the Street Transportation
Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Project Distribution Design and Construction Contract 4226187 for
City Project FD57100031- Fire Station 15 (Ordinance S-52506) - District 5

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Distribution
Design and Construction Contract (4226187) with Salt River Project (SRP) for the
relocation of existing electrical services to serve new Fire Station 15. Further request
to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item in
an amount not to exceed $273,511.99.

Summary
The City is constructing Fire Station 15 located at 4900 N. 45th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ
85031. This agreement represents the cost for SRP to relocate existing services in
conflict with the new facility and to serve the new Fire Station.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement will begin on or about December 17, 2025, and will expire
when the project is complete and accepted.

Financial Impact
Funding in the amount of $273,511.99 is available through the Fire Department's
Capital Improvement Program budget.

Location
4900 N. 45th Avenue
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Ed Zuercher, Assistant City Manager Lori Bays
and the Fire and Street Transportation departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 250017 - 27 W. Madison Street (Resolution
22352) - District 7

Abandonment: 250017
Project: 00-1527
Applicant: Nick Wood
Request: To abandon an ingress/egress easement located within the surface parking
lot of 27 West Madison Street
Date of Decision: July 3, 2025

Location
Generally located at 27 W. Madison Street
Council District: 7

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the City,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

No consideration fee was required as part of this submittal, although filing fees were
paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 240011 - 315 W. Watkins Street (Resolution
22353) - District 8

Abandonment: 240011
Project: 20-2744
Applicant: Jeff Baran
Request: To abandon a forty-eight foot wide public utility easement that is located on a
property at 315 West Watkins Street
Date of Decision: April 18, 2025

Location
Generally located at 315 W. Watkins Street
Council District: 8

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the City,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

No consideration fee is required as part of this submittal, although filing fees were
paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 250019 - 4125 E. Baseline Road (Resolution
22349) - District 8

Abandonment: 250019
Project: 23-259
Applicant: SAFStor
Request: To abandon an irregular shaped drainage easement that extends north to
south on the east side of the property, located at 4125 E. Baseline Road.
Date of Decision: July 24, 2025

Location
Generally located at 4125 E. Baseline Road
Council District: 8

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the City,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

No consideration fee was required as part of this submittal, although filing fees were
paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1298 (Ordinance G-
7462) - District 3

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1298. This
amendment reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions
previously approved by City Council with Z-SP-33-70 and the entitlements are fully
vested.

Summary
To rezone a parcel located approximately 200 feet west of the northwest corner of
19th Avenue and Dunlap Avenue
Application No.: Z-SP-33-70
Zoning: R1-6 SP, R-3 SP, R-5 SP, C-2 SP
Owner: Royal Palm Owner LLC
Acreage: R1-6 SP (0.79 ac.), R-3 SP (6.2 ac.), R-5 SP (2.44 ac.), C-2 SP (7 ac.)

Location
Approximately 200 feet west of the northwest corner of 19th Avenue and Dunlap
Avenue
Address: 1950 W. Dunlap Avenue
Council District: 3

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL SUPPLEMENTARY
ZONING MAP 1298.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1298, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of December,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager



DI:arm:LF25-2481:12-17-2025







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Ordinance Amending Appendix A.2 of Phoenix City Code Chapter 9 and
Appendix A of Chapter 15 (Ordinance G-7465) - Citywide

Request to amend Chapter 9, Building and Chapter 15, Fire Prevention to update the
user fee schedules applicable to plan review, inspections services, and Hazardous
Material Annual Assessments provided by the Planning and Development (PDD) and
Phoenix Fire Departments (PFD).

Summary
The PDD and PFD are essential partners in providing plan review and inspection
services that protect the general public and emergency response personnel by
ensuring adopted building-safety standards are upheld. The City’s plan review and
inspection services are funded with user fees charged to customers that utilize these
services. User fees are derived from a fully loaded average hourly rate that was set at
$150 per hour in 2010 and 2013 for PDD and PFD, respectively. This proposal
increases the hourly rate used for fee setting by PDD and PFD to $195 per hour,
updates the Fire Prevention Code to include new fees associated with new permit
requirements pursuant to the proposed 2024 Phoenix Fire Code, and increases the
Hazardous Annual Assessment Program fees to provide sufficient resources to meet
growing demands. The proposed fee increases are necessary to cover annual
operating expenses at current service levels.

The Planning and Development Proposed Fee Schedule Amendment and Justification
Report is available online at:
www.phoenix.gov/administration/departments/pdd/tools-resources/fees

The Fire Prevention Proposed Fee Schedule Amendment and Justification Report is
available online at:
www.phoenix.gov/administration/departments/fire/safety-prevention

Previous Council Action
Recommended approval by the Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Council
Subcommittee on November 19, 2025.




Unanimous support from the Fire Safety Advisory Board on November 13, 2025.

Unanimous support from the Development Advisory Board on October 30, 2025.

Concurrence
This Ordinance is recommended concurrently with a Resolution adopting the 2024
International Fire Code with City of Phoenix Amendments.

Public Outreach
A 15-Day Notice of Intent (NOI) to consider this proposal was posted to the City's
website on or before December 2, 2025.

A 60-Day NOI was posted to the City’s website on October 17, 2025 in accordance
with 13 A.R.S. 9-499.15.

The 15-Day and 60-Day NOI postings are available online at:
www.phoenix.gov/administration/departments/communications/public-notice-tax-fee-
changes

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays, Deputy City Manager Alan
Stephenson and the Fire and Planning and Development departments.





ATTACHMENT A




CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT




DRAFT FEE SCHEDULE
10/17/2025
(Revision 11/26/2025)
Phoenix City Code, Chapter 9, Appendix A.2




Planning & Development Department (602) 262-7811
200 W Washington St. - 3rd Floor - Phoenix, AZ 85003


Planning & Development Services Department
FEE SCHEDULE
TABLE OF CONTENTS



SITE PLANNING FEES ……………………………………………………………………. 5

SITE PLAN REVIEW FEES ………………………………………………………………... 6
Site Plan Conceptual Review Services ………………………………………………………………. 6
Site Plan Base Review Services ………………………………………………………………………. 6
Master Plan Review Services …………………………………………………………………………… 6
Site Plan Review Fee – Land Use Table C-1…………………………………………………………. 7
Site Plan Review Complexity Surcharge Table C-2 …………………………………………………. 7

ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN REVIEW AND PERMIT FEES ……………………………. 8
Hillside Development Review and Permits ……………………………………………………………. 8
Landscape Plan Review …………………………………………………………………………………. 8
Optional Landscape Plan Review Services …………………………………………………………… 8
Environmentally Sensitive Lands Plan Review and Permits ………………………………………… 8
Plan Review of Corrections to Environmental Plans …………………………………………………. 9

SUBDIVISION AND PROPERTY DIVISION PLAN REVIEW FEES ………………….. 10
Preliminary Subdivision Plan review Fees …………..………………………………………………… 10
Property Division - Parcel Combinations and Lot Splits ……………………………………………… 10
Model Home Complex Review ………………………………………………………………………….. 10

SITE PLANNING MISCELLANEOUS FEES …………………………………………….. 11
Miscellaneous Reviews ………………………………………………………………………………….. 11
Property Dedications …………………………………………………………………………………….. 11
Plan Review of Correction to Site Plans ……………………………………………………………….. 11
Amendments to Final Site Plans ……………………………………………………………………….. 12
Site Permit on Commercial Buildings ………………………………………………………………….. 12
Appeals ………………………………..………………………………………………………………….. 12

SIGN FEES ………………………………………………………………………………….. 14
SIGN PLAN REVIEW FEES ……………………………………………………………….. 15
Sign Plan Review ………………………………………………………………………………………… 15
Optional Plan Review Services …………………………………………………………………………. 15
Comprehensive Sign Plans ……………………………………………………………………………... 15
Appeals and Modifications ………………………………………………………………………………. 16
Plan Review of Corrections to Plans …………………………………………………………………… 16

SIGN PERMIT FEES ……………………………………………………………………….. 17
Sign Permits ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17
Re- Inspection Fee for Sign Permits …………………………………………………………………… 17
Permit Time Extension and Reinstatement …………………………………………………………… 18



Appendix A.2 Page 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SIGNS MISCELLANEOUS FEES.………………………………………………………… 19
Investigation Fee for Work Done Without a Permit …………………………………………..………. 19
Removal of Illegal Sign ……………………………………………………………………………….…. 19
Staff Consultation and Research …………………………………………………………………….…. 19
Miscellaneous Inspection Services …………………………………………………………………….. 19

CIVIL ENGINEERING FEES ………………………………………………………………. 20
CIVIL ENGINEERING ABANDONMENT FEES ………………………………………… 21
Abandonment Application Fees and Consideration ………………………………………………….. 21
Abandonment Appeals and Extensions ……………………………………………………………….. 21

CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW FEES …………………………………………… 22
Basic Plan Review Services ……………………………………………………………………………. 22
Sewer and Water Line Plan Review ………………………………………………………………….… 22
Final Subdivision Plat Review ……………………………………………………………………….….. 23
Optional Plan Review Services …………………………………………………….……………….…. 23
Plan Review of Corrections to Plans …………………………………………………………………… 23

CIVIL ENGINEERING PERMIT FEES ……………………………………………………. 24
ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS ………………………………………………………………. 24
Grading and Drainage, Stockpile, Engineered Fill, or Storm Water Permit ……………….………. 24
Haul Permit ……………………………………………………………………………………….………. 24
Landscape Permit ………………………………………………………………….…………….………. 25
Permit Time Extension and Reinstatement …………………………………………………………… 25

RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS ……………………………………………………… 26
Right-of-Way Permits ……………………………………………………………………………………. 26
Civil Engineering Valuation Based Permits ……………………………………………………………. 27
Permit Time Extension and Reinstatement ……………………………………………………….…… 27

CIVIL ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEES ……………………………………………… 28
Re-Inspection Fee for All Construction Permits ………………………………………………………. 28
After-Hours Inspection Request ………………………………………………………………………… 28

CIVIL ENGINEERING MISCELLANEOUS FEES ………………………………………. 29
Investigation Fee for Work Done Without a Permit …………………………………………………... 29
Civil Engineering Appeals ………………………………………………………………………………… 29

BUILDING SAFETY FEES ………………………………………………………………… 30

BUILDING SAFETY PLAN REVIEW FEES ……………………………………………… 31
Basic Plan Review Services ……………………………………………………………………………. 31
Phased, Partial, and Deferred Submittal Plan Review ………………………………………………... 32
Optional Plan Review Services ………………………………………………………………….………. 33
Self-Certification Program ……………………………………………………………………….………. 34
Plan Review of Corrections to Plans …………………………………………………………………… 34

Appendix A.2 Page 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
BUILDING SAFETY PERMIT FEES……………………………………….……………… 35
New Construction, Additions, and Remodel Existing Building Permits…………….….……………. 35
Phased, Partial, and Deferred Submittal Permits…………………….…………………………….…. 36
Additional Utility Meter Fees…...………………………………………………………………………... 36
Manufacturing Building……………………………………………………...…………….…….…....…. 36
Demolition Permits and Move-off Permits…………………………………………….……….….….… 36
Permit Time Extension…………………………………………………………………………….……… 37
Permit Reinstatement…………………………………………………………………………….….…… 37
BUILDING SAFETY INSPECTIONS FEES…….………………………………………… 38
Re-inspection Fee for All Construction Permits...…………………………………………….…….…. 38
After-Hour Inspection Request ……………………………………………….…..………………….…. 38
Conditional Utility Clearances…………………………………………………………………………… 38
Temporary Power………………………………………………………………………………………… 39
Certificate of Occupancy…………………………………………………………………………….…… 39
Periodic Safety Inspections – Elevators, Dumbwaiters and Escalators………………….…………. 39
Refrigeration System Periodic Inspections………………………………………………….…………. 39
Annual Facilities Permit……………………………………………………………………………….…. 40
Building Maintenance Registration Fees………………………………………………………………. 40
Journeyman Licenses……………………………………………………………………………………. 41
BUILDING SAFETY MISCELLANEOUS FEES……………………….………………… 42
Alternate Methods, Materials and Equipment...……………………………………………….…….…. 42
Residential Solar Photovoltaic System Permits………………………….………………….….……… 42
Solar Water Heaters…………. …………………………………………………………………….…….. 42
Appeals, Modifications and Formal Interpretations……………………………………………….……. 43
Fees for Work Done Without a Permit…………………………………………………….……….…… 43
Miscellaneous Inspection Services……………………………………………….………………….…. 44
PARKLET……………………………………………………………………………….……. 45
Initial Parklet Construction Fees…………………………………………………………….…….……. 45
Ongoing Annual Fees………………………………………………………………………………….………. 45

MISCELLANEOUS FEES………….………………………………………….…….……… 46
Letter Agreements……………………………………………………………….…………….…………….…. 46
Extended Construction Work Hours Permit……………………….……………………………………. 46
General Hourly Rates……………………….………………………………………………………….… 46
Record Change Fees………………………………………………………………………………….…. 46
Refund Request Processing Fee………………………………………………………………………… 47
Copies………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 47
Technical Publications for Sale………………………………………….…………………………….... 47
Infill Waivers…………………………………………………………………………………………….…. 47
GLOSSARY....…………………………………………………….……………….………… 48




Appendix A.2 Page 4

SITE PLANNING FEES

Site Planning Fees are divided into five categories. These five areas are Site Plan Review, Master Plan
Review, Environmental Review and Permits, Subdivision and Property Review, and Miscellaneous fees.
These five areas are further defined by the following:

• Site Plan Review Fees

Site Plan Review fees are generally based on the proposed land use and acreage of the site under the
development proposal. Additional development fees may be added to the development project if the
property is encumbered by conditional zoning, environmentally sensitive lands impacts, master plans,
and/or is a Planned Residential Development (PRD). Generally, all site plan review fees are calculated
with a base fee plus a quantity charge (acreage, square footage, dwelling units, etc.). Site Inspection
costs are recovered along with building permit fees at the time the building permit is issued.

• Master Plan Review Fees

Master Plan Review Fees are based upon the additional time the Planning & Development Department
requires to review the initial master plans, as well as the additional time required to ensure compliance
with approved Master Plans during the Site, Civil, and Environmental Plan Review stages of an
individual development. The term “master plan” applies to those additional plans required by Planned
Community Districts, some Planned Unit Developments, some Specific Plan areas, and other similar
plans stipulated by zoning.

• Environmental Plan Review and Permit Fees

Environmental review fees are based on flat fees and/or a per sheet basis. Inspection permits are
based on land area under consideration.

• Subdivision and Property Division Review Fees

Subdivision review fees are based on a base fee and the number of lots proposed for division. Additional
development fees may be added to the development project if the property is encumbered by conditional
zoning, community interest, significant infrastructure impact, master plans, and/or development
phasing.

• Miscellaneous Fees

Miscellaneous Fees are those fees that do not fall under any other Site, Environmental, or Subdivision
and Property Division activities.




Time Limitations for Landscape Permits
The expiration, extension and reinstatement of Landscape permits will follow the same guidelines as those
indicated in the Phoenix Building Construction Code Administrative Provisions for Building permits.




Appendix A.2 Page 5

SITE PLAN REVIEW FEES
1. Site Plan Conceptual Review Services

a. Development Proposal Pre-Application Initial Meeting
(formal review of conceptual development proposal) ……. $1,200 $1,560

b. Follow-up Pre-Application Meeting ………………………… $600 $780


c. Fact-Finding Requests
Written Response Only ……………………………………... $300 $390

Written Response & Meeting with Staff …………………… $600 $780

2. Site Plan Base Review Services

a. Minor Site Plan Review ……………………………………... 30% of site plan review fee Table C-1

b. Preliminary Site Plan (multi-disciplinary review) Site plan review fee from Table C-1

Plus Table C-2

c. Major Revision to approved Preliminary Site Plan ……….. 50% of site plan review fee from Table
C-1 Plus Table C-2

d. Minor Revision to approved Preliminary Site Plan ……….. $150 $195 per hour (minimum $300 $390,
maximum $1,200 $1,560)

e. Extension of Preliminary Site Plan approval ……………… $150 $195 per hour (minimum $300 $390,
maximum $1,200 $1,560)

Minor and Preliminary Site Plan review fees include the first two reviews of a Final Site Plan after
Preliminary approval. For additional Site Plan review fees, see Site Planning Miscellaneous Fees.


3. Master Plan Review Services

a. Initial Review of Master Plans ……………………………… $300 $390 per plan, plus $150 $195 per
hour for all review time beyond 2nd correction

b. Amendments to Approved Master Plans
Minor ………………………………………………………….. $150 $195 per plan

Major ………………………………………………………….. $300 $390 per plan plus $150 $195 per
hour for all review time beyond 2nd correction




Appendix A.2 Page 6

TABLE C-1: SITE PLAN REVIEW FEE

Land Use Category Plan Review Fee

C Commercial/Office $5,200 base fee plus $360 per acre or portion thereof


OR Residential/Office $1,305 base fee plus $96 per acre or portion thereof

I Industrial $3,800 base fee plus $140 per acre or portion thereof

M Multi-Family Residential
3-25 Dwelling Units $2,500 base fee plus $40 per dwelling unit
26-200 Dwelling Units $3,500 base fee plus $25 per dwelling unit
201+ Dwelling Units $7,000 base fee plus $10 per dwelling unit

P Public/Quasi-Public $2,550 base fee plus $210 per acre or portion thereof
Includes Private Schools,
Group/Recovery Homes, Nursery
Schools, Bed & Breakfast, Churches/
Retreat Facilities, Communication
Facilities, Well Sites, Fire Stations,
Museums/Libraries, etc.

Parking
ST Structure $3,000 base fee
$1,200 base fee
SU Surface
L. Open Land Use $2,000 base fee plus $20 per acre
Golf Course, Park, Recreational Facility,
Mining, Agriculture, Plant Nursery, etc.

R Single Family Residential $1,300 base fee plus preliminary plat fee
Planned Residential Development Option, (see preliminary subdivision plat review fees for base fees)
or other option requiring a Final Site Plan
or Setback Exhibit.



TABLE C-2: SITE PLAN REVIEW COMPLEXITY SURCHARGE

COMPLEXITY SURCHARGE

Zoning or Environmental Impact 25% of base review fee
(Complex zoning, stipulations, regulatory zoning
overlays, PUD requirements, Hillside review, Edge
Treatment, and/or Wash/Desert preservation to be
enforced by DSD)

Master Plan Requirements 10% of base review fee
(For sites located within Master Planned Areas)

Subdivisions Subject to Single-Family Design $25 Per Lot
Review
(as required by Design Review Guidelines, zoning
standards, or by zoning stipulation)

Appendix A.2 Page 7

ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN REVIEW AND PERMIT FEES
1. Hillside Development Review and Permits

a. Slope Category Analysis

Individual lots and all commercial/industrial properties ….. $750 $975 plus $16 per acre or fraction
thereof

Residential subdivisions …………………………………….. $1,500 $1,950 plus $16 per acre or
fraction thereof

b. Hillside Review of Single-Family, Subdivision or
Commercial Plans …………………………………………… $600 $780 plus $16 per acre or fraction
thereof

c. Hillside Review for swimming Pools ……………………….. $300 $390

d. Hillside Permit ………………………………………………... $300 $390

2. Landscape Plan Review

a. Minor Landscape Plan Review …………………………….. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)
Charge based on one over-the-counter review

b. Major Landscape Plan Review …………………………….. $405 per sheet
Charge based on number of sheets

c. Revision to Approved Landscape Plan ……………………. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195

3. Optional Landscape Plan Review Services

a. Expedited Plan Review – Initial Review …………………… 3-times basic plan review fee
Availability limited and subject to Planning & Development Director’s approval.

b. Expedited Plan Review – 2nd Review Only 1-time basic plan review fee

Availability limited and subject to Planning & Development Director’s approval.

4. Environmentally Sensitive Lands Plan Review and Permits

a. Landscape Inventory Plan Review
Minimum scale 1:40 ………………………………………. $600 $780 first sheet
$300 $390 each additional sheet




Appendix A.2 Page 8

b. Landscape Salvage and Construction Fence Plan Review $600 $780 first sheet
$300 $390 each additional sheet

c. Combination Landscape Inventory, Salvage and
Construction Fence Plan Review …………………….. $300 $390 first sheet
$150 $195 each additional sheet

d. Environmentally Sensitive Land Review of Single Lot $300 $390

Landscape Inventory/Salvage/Nursery and Construction
e. Fence Preservation Inspection Permit for Single or
Subdivided Property

Residential/Commercial/Industrial ……………………… $150 $195 per hour per site visit,
minimum $300 $390 (2-hours)

f. Clearing and Grubbing Permit ……………………………… $300 $390 plus $10 per acre or fraction
thereof

g. Revisions to Environmentally Sensitive Lands Plans ……. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150
$195 (1-hour) $300 $390 each additional sheet


5. Plan Review of Corrections to Environmental Plans


a. First Correction (2nd Review) ……………………………….. No additional fee, provided that the only
changes made are those needed to
address the required corrections

b. Second Correction (3rd Review) ……………………………. 20% of the current plan review fee, as
calculated at the current fee schedule
rate, minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)

c. Re-submittal which includes design changes unrelated to
City-required corrections ……………………………………. 20% of the current plan review fee, as
calculated at the current fee schedule
rate, minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)

Plans not approvable after second correction (3rd review) require a new submittal and payment of full
plan review fees.




Appendix A.2 Page 9

SUBDIVISION AND PROPERTY DIVISION PLAN REVIEW FEES
1. Preliminary Subdivision Plan Review Fees

a. Plats

Preliminary Plat ………………………………………………. $2,500 base plus $40 per lot plus
Review Complexity Surcharge
See Civil Engineering fees for Final Plat Fee

b. Revised Preliminary Plat or Update to Expired Plan …….. $1,250 base, plus $20 per lot
No additional surcharge

2. Property Division - Parcel Combinations and Lot Splits

a. Parcel Combination

Single-Family Residential …………………………………... $300 $390

Multi-Family and Non-Residential Land Use ……………… $1,050 $1,365

b. Lot Division

Single-Family Residential (excluding Hillside) ……………. $600 $780

Hillside, Multi-Family and Non-Residential Land Use……. $1,200 $1,560

c. Amendment to Lot Division Application …………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)

d. Extension to Expired Lot Division Application ……………. $300 $390

3. Model Home Complex Review .

Model Home Complex Plan Review ……………………………. $450 $585

See Building Safety Fees for Single-Family Building Plan Review and Permit Issuance Fees.




Appendix A.2 Page 10

SITE PLANNING MISCELLANEOUS FEES

1. Miscellaneous Reviews

a. Staff Consultation and Research …………………………... $150 $195 per hour per discipline,
minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)


b. Fact-Finding Requests

Written Response Only …………………………………...... $300 $390

Written Response & Meeting with Staff ………………….. $600 $780

c. Over-the-Counter Plan Review …………………………….. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)

d. Time Extension for Preliminary Site Plan or Plat ………… $150 $195 per hour (minimum $300 $390
maximum $1,200 $1,560)

Civil Engineering field review may be required for some developments. See Civil Engineering
section for appropriate services and fees.

2. Property Dedications

a. Right-of-Way and Easement Dedications

Single-Family Residential …………………………………… No Charge

Non-Residential ……………………………………………… $1,200 $1,560 per property




3. Plan Review of Corrections to Site Plans

a. First Correction (2nd Review) ……………………………….. No additional fee provided that the only
changes made are those needed to
address the required corrections

b. Second Correction (3rd Review) ……………………………. 20% of preliminary site plan review fee,
as calculated at the current fee
schedule rate, minimum $150 $195 (1-
hour)




Appendix A.2 Page 11

c. Re-submittal which includes design changes unrelated
to City required corrections …………………………………. 20% of preliminary site plan review fee,
as calculated at the current fee
schedule rate, minimum $150 $195 (1-
hour)


Plans not approvable after second correction (3rd review) require a new submittal and payment of full
plan review fees.

4. Amendments to Final Site Plans

a. Minor Amendment …………………………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)

b. Major Amendment
(requiring revised Preliminary Approval) ………………….. 50% of site plan review fee from Table
C-1 and Table C-2

c. Extension of Final Site Plan approval
(no significant changes to plans) …………………………... $150 $195 per hour, (minimum $300
$390, maximum $1,200 $1,560)




5. Site Permit on Commercial Buildings

Inspections for Landscape, ADA Requirements, Design
Review and Parking/Striping ……………………………….. $750 $975

6. Appeals

a. Appeal to Subdivision Committee ………………………….. $600 $780 first appeal item plus
$300 $390 each additional appeal item

b. Appeal to City Manager Representative
(i.e. Hillside Grading Waiver) ………………………………. $600 $780 first appeal item plus
$300 $390 each additional appeal item

c. Appeal to Design Review Appeals Board …………………. $600 $780 first appeal item plus
$300 $390 each additional appeal item

d. Appeal to Development Advisory Board …………………... $600 $780 first appeal item plus
$300 $390 each additional appeal item

e. Appeal to City Council ………………………………………. $600 $780 first appeal item plus
$300 $390 each additional appeal item




Appendix A.2 Page 12

f. Appeal to Single-Family Architectural Appeals Board …... $600 $780 first appeal item plus
$300 $390 each additional appeal
item

g. Appeal to Proportionality Hearing Officer …………………. No fee




Appendix A.2 Page 13

SIGN FEES
Sign Fees are divided into three categories. These three areas include Sign Plan Review, Permits/
Inspections, and Miscellaneous fees. These three areas are further defined by the following:

• Sign Plan Review Fees

Sign Plan Review fees are based on the typical staff effort (time) to review sign applications for permits. The
schedule includes plan review options including Design Review for additional height and area of a proposed
sign, a Comprehensive Sign Plan, as well as procedures for Variance to Sign Code and Use Permit
approvals.

• Sign Permit Fees/Inspections

Sign Inspections are financed by sign permits. Permit fees for signs are based on the typical staff effort
(time) for travel and site visit. Fees are adjusted accordingly based on applications for wall mounted signs,
ground (monument) signs or billboards due to the variation in inspection complexity. An electric component
inspection fee is charged to applications which do not include a UL Listing and warrant staff review of
electrical components of the sign.

• Miscellaneous Fees

Miscellaneous Fees are those fees that do not fall under any other Sign activities.




Appendix A.2 Page 14

SIGN PLAN REVIEW FEES

1. Sign Plan Review

a. Over the Counter – 1 to 2 signs ……………………………. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)
b. Office (Non-billboard signs) ………………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)
c. Field (Non-billboard signs) ………………………………….. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)
d. Office (Billboard signs) ……………………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $300 $390
(2-hours)
e. Field (Billboard signs) ……………………………………….. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $300 $390
(2-hours)
f. Design Review ……………………………………………….. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)
g. Sign Engineering Plan Review ……………………………... $150 $195 per hour, minimum $300 $390
(2-hours)
h. Plan Review Services Not Otherwise Listed ……………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)

2. Optional Plan Review Services

a. Expedited Plan Review – Initial Review …………………… 3-times basic plan review fee

Availability limited and subject to the Planning & Development Director’s approval.

b. Expedited Plan Review – 2nd Review Only ……………….. 1-time basic plan review fee

Availability limited and subject to the Planning & Development Director’s approval.


3. Comprehensive Sign Plans

a. Comprehensive Sign Plan Application …………………….. $1,710



b. Major Amendment to Comprehensive Sign Plan ………… $1,080



c. Minor Amendment to Comprehensive Sign Plan ………… $270




Appendix A.2 Page 15

d. Variance in Conjunction with Comprehensive Sign Plan ... $270

These fees recover service cost in both Development and Planning Divisions.


4. Appeals and Modifications

a. Appeal to Design Review Appeals Board …………………. $1,200 $1,560 first appeal item plus
$600 $780 for each additional appeal
item

b. Variance and Use Permit Applications ……………………. $1,080


c. Variance and Use Permit Application Extension …………. $270


d. Variance and Use Permit Hearing Continuance …………. $540


e. Appeal to Board of Adjustment …………………………….. $1,080


f. Appeal for Comprehensive Sign Plans ……………………. $1,710



These fees recover service cost in both Development and Planning Divisions.




5. Plan Review of Corrections to Plans


a. First Correction (3rd Review) ……………………………….. No additional fee provided that the only
changes made are those needed to
address the required corrections

b. Second Correction (3rd Review) ……………………………. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)

c. Re-submittal which includes design changes unrelated to
City required corrections ……………………………………. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)

Plans not approvable after second correction (3rd review) require a new submittal and payment of full
plan review fees.




Appendix A.2 Page 16

SIGN PERMIT FEES
1. Sign Permits

a. Basic Sign Permit

1) Wall, marquee, projecting, roof, painted wall, flag &
gasoline pump, per complex, and window signs ….. $75 $98 per sign


2) Ground and Combination Signs
Base ground signs (includes subdivision temporary
construction and real estate) ………………………… $150 $195 per sign


Each additional sign cabinet on the same sign
structure ………………………………………………… $75 $98 each


A permit fee will be charged for each separate structure used in the erection of double face “v” shape
signs.

3) Billboards ……………………………………………… $600 $780 per face

b. For Electric Signs …………………………………………… Add $150 $195 per hour

c. Electric Component Inspection …………………………… $150 $195 per sign

d. Temporary Event Sign Permit ……………………………… $150 $195 per event

e. Directional Signs …………………………………………… $75 $98 per sign

2. Re-inspection Fee for Sign Permits

a. Initial Inspection ……………………………………………… No additional charge (included with
permit fee)
If corrections are required, first re-inspection to verify
corrections …………………………………………………… No additional charge (included with
permit fee)

b. Re-inspection fees (payable before re-inspections will be
made)

- For any inspection called before work was ready
for that inspection ………………………………… $150 $195 each

- For any inspection that cannot be made on date
requested due to no access ……………………… $150 $195 each

- Second and subsequent re-inspections required
(Failure to correct deficiencies) …………………. $150 $195 each




Appendix A.2 Page 17

3. Permit Time Extension and Reinstatement

One-time Permit Extension or Reinstatement ……………. 50% of current permit fee

Application and payment must be received prior to the expiration date of the permit.




Appendix A.2 Page 18

SIGNS MISCELLANEOUS FEES

1. Investigation Fee for Work Done Without a Permit

Investigation Fee ……………………………………………… $250 or the permit fee, whichever is
greater, but do not exceed $2,500 for
every day or portion of a day from the
time unpermitted work began until a
permit is obtained.


2. Removal of Illegal Sign

Removal Fee ………………………………………………… $75 $98 per sign


3. Staff Consultation and Research

Staff Consultation and Research ……………………………. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)


4. Miscellaneous Inspection Service

Inspection Fee ………………………………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)




Appendix A.2 Page 19

CIVIL ENGINEERING FEES
Civil Engineering Fees are divided into three categories. These three areas are Abandonment of Right-of-Way
reviews and hearings, on-site and off-site engineering plan review, and on-site and off-site engineering permit
issuance. These three areas are further defined by the following:

• Abandonment of Right-of-Way Fees:

Abandonment fees are based on the staff work effort to review a proposal to abandon right-of-way for
feasibility and preparation for public hearing, if applicable. The Abandonment Process includes both a formal
and an informal method of considering the feasibility of the removal of public right-of-way from City jurisdiction
(see Fee Schedule Glossary of Terms for definition of Formal and Informal).

• Engineering Plan Review Fees:

Engineering Plan Review fees are based on the number of sheets submitted for review and approval.
Each type of improvement plan (i.e., grading and drainage, public water, public sewer, and right-of-way
improvements) is deemed a separate submittal. With the exception of Grading and Drainage review,
engineering plan review typically involves work within the public right-of-way. Sheet sizes are set by a
standard scale requirement.

• Engineering Permit Fees:

Engineering permit fees are based on quantity of construction materials or the valuation of the project. Some
examples of quantities of construction materials would include length of water pipe, sewer pipe, quantity of
soil moved, and quantity of street construction.


• Miscellaneous Fees

Miscellaneous fees are those fees that do not fall under any other Civil Engineering activities.




Time Limitations for Civil Engineering Permits
The expiration, extension and reinstatement of Civil Engineering permits will follow the same guidelines as
those indicated in the Phoenix Building Construction Code Administrative Provisions for Building permits.




Appendix A.2 Page 20

CIVIL ENGINEERING ABANDONMENT FEES

1. Abandonment Application Fees and Consideration

a. Formal Application Fee

Any street or alley …………………………………………… $1,930


Individual single-family zoned property owner …………… $1,075


b. Informal Application Fee …………………………………… $875


c. Abandonment Consideration Fee

1) Abandoned ROW adjacent to property not zoned
Single family residential ……………………………… $500 or Fair Market Value (*) whichever
is greater


2) Property zoned single family residential, per square
Foot of abandoned ROW …………………………… $1.00 per square foot for the first 500
square feet, $0.10 per square foot
thereafter; or fair market value at the
option of the Planning & Development
Director or Designee. (**)

d. Complexity surcharge for title and research issues ……… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour) as determined by City Real Estate staff.

(*) If the area to be abandoned is within or adjacent to a redevelopment area established pursuant
A.R.S. §§ 36-1471 et.seq., consideration may be given to the restrictions upon the property and the
covenants, conditions and obligations assumed by the redeveloper in the determination of fair market
value.

(**) For the area to be abandoned, consideration may be given to the transfer of ongoing property
maintenance responsibilities for said abandoned right-of-way with the maintenance consideration off-
setting any other form of financial consideration as determined by the Planning & Development Director,
or Designee.




2. Abandonment Appeals and Extensions

a. Appeal of Abandonment or Waiver to City Council ……… $1,050 $1,365

b. Extension of Time on Abandonment or Waiver ………….. $300 $390




Appendix A.2 Page 21

CIVIL ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW FEES

1. Basic Plan Review Services

a. Grading & Drainage, Paving, Concrete, & Fire Line

1) Single Residential Lot Field Review ……………… $180 per lot


2) All Other Field Reviews …………………………… $270 per project


3) First Office Review ………………………………… $405 per sheet (24” X 36”)

4) Combination Office Reviews ……………………… $540 per sheet
This includes Grading & Drainage and Paving & Concrete.

5) Water & Sewer Combination Plan Review $540 per sheet


6) Analysis of Master Drainage or Storm
Management Report ………………………………… $540 per report
Analysis required when off-site drainage affects the proposed development site

7) Storm Water Management Review ……………… $405 per sheet


b. Right-of-Way Construction

1) First Review ………………………………………….. $405 per sheet (24” X 36”)

c. Small Plan Review …………………………………………… $180 per sheet (81/2 X 11)
This includes Fire Hydrant plan review and Sewer Tap into Manhole by Contractor [S-512]

d. Plan Review Services Not Otherwise Listed ……………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)


2. Sewer and Water Line Plan Review

a. Sewer Line Plan Review …………………………………… $405 per sheet


b. Water Line Plan Review …………………………………… $405 per sheet


c. Preliminary Design Review ………………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)




Appendix A.2 Page 22

3. Final Subdivision Plat Review

a. Multiple Dedications ………………………………………… $1,350 per map of dedication

b. Replat for Lot Line Modification …………………………… $630

c. Final Plat ……………………………………………………… $1,250 base plus $12 per lot
See Site Planning fees for Preliminary Plat fee.


4. Optional Plan Review Services

a. Expedited Plan review – Initial Review …………………… 3-times basic plan review fee
Availability limited and subject to the Planning & Development Director’s approval.

b. Expedited Plan Review – 2nd Review Only ………………… 1-time basic plan review fee
Availability limited and subject to the Planning & Development Director’s approval.

c. Staff consultation and Research ……………………………. $150 $195 per hour, per discipline,
minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)


d. Revisions to Approved Plans …………………………… $405 per sheet


e. Revisions to Approved Small Plans (8-1/2x11)…………… $180 per sheet


Plan Review of Changes Made to Approved Civil Engineering Plans Before or After a permit is
issued. Revisions which expand the scope of a permit require a new permit and fees.
f. One-time Extension of Plan Review ……………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $300 $390
(2-hour)


5. Plan Review of Corrections to Plans

a. First Correction – 2nd Review) ……………………………… No additional fee, provided that the
only changes made are those needed
to address the required corrections

b. Second correction (3rd Review) …………………………… 20% of current plan review fee, as
calculated at the current fee schedule
rate, minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)

c. Re-submittal which includes design changes unrelated to
City-required corrections …………………………………… 20% of current plan review fees, as
calculated at the current fee schedule
rate, minimum $150 $195(1-hour)
Plans not approvable after second corrections (3rd review) require a new submittal and payment of
full plan review fees.




Appendix A.2 Page 23

CIVIL ENGINEERING PERMIT FEES

A. On-Site Improvements
Improvements that require work on private property are called on-site improvements. On-site
improvements generally include the items listed below.


1. Grading and Drainage*, Stockpile, Engineered Fill, or Storm Water Permits




a. 1 to 300 cubic yards……………………………………….. $390


c b 1 301 to 1,000 cubic yards ……………………………… $100 for the first 100 cubic yards plus
$100 for each additional 100 cubic yards
or fraction thereof

b c 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards ……………………………… $1,000 for the first 1,000 cubic yards
plus $100 for each additional 1,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof

c d. 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards …………………………… $1.900 for the first 10,000 cubic yards
plus $148 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof

d e 100,001 cubic yards or more ……………………………… $3,232 for the first 100,000 cubic yards
plus $148 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof

ef Storm Water Management Permit ………………………… $450 per project, plus $25 per acre or
fraction thereof

Notwithstanding the above fee schedule, the minimum permit fee shall be $150 $195 for residential
single lot construction and $300 $390 for all other construction.

* $150 $195 charge for 1-hour of As-Built Review costs will be added to all grading and drainage permits.


2. Haul Permit


a. 1 to 10,000 cubic yards …………………………………… No permit required

b. 10,000 to 100,000 cubic yards …………………………… $400 for the first 10,000 cubic yards plus
$88 for each additional 10,000 cubic
yards or fraction thereof

c. 100,001 cubic yards or more ……………………………… $1,192 for the first 100,000 cubic yards
plus $88 for each additional 10,000
cubic yards or fraction thereof




Appendix A.2 Page 24

3. Landscape Permit

d. Subdivision Landscape and Amenity Permit Common $300 $390 plus $150 $195 per
Tract Open Space …………………………………………… acre or fraction thereof




4. Permit Time Extension and Reinstatement

One-time Permit Extension or Reinstatement …………… 50% of current permit fee

Application and payment must be received prior to expiration date of the permit.




Appendix A.2 Page 25

B. Right-Of-Way Improvements
Improvements that require work outside private property lines are called right-of-way improvements. Right-of-
Way improvements include concrete, paving, water, sewer, landscaping, and related incidentals as listed
below.

1. Right-of-Way Permits


a. Concrete* …………………………………………………… $44 per 100 Linear Feet or fraction
thereof


b. Paving* ……………………………………………………… $48 per 100 Square Yard or fraction
thereof plus $240 for City lab tests on all
paving permits greater than $500


c. Water* ………………………………………………………… $220 per 100 Linear Feet or fraction
thereof


d. Sewer* ……………………………………………………… $183 per 100 Linear Feet or fraction
thereof


e. Trenching …………………………………………………… $33 per 100 Linear Feet or fraction
thereof


Notwithstanding the above fee schedule, the minimum permit fee shall be $150 $195 for residential
single lot construction and $300 $390 for all other construction.

* $150 $195 charge for 1-hour of As-Built Review costs will be added to all concrete, paving, water and
sewer permits.

EXCEPTION:
Plans requiring water or sewer lines larger than 12” in diameter are reviewed and permitted by the
Water Department, not Planning & Development. Fees for those plans are determined by the Water
Department and based on valuation of the project, not linear feet as noted above.




Appendix A.2 Page 26

2. Civil Engineering Valuation Based Permits


Permit fees for Drainage Facilities, Landscaping, and all other right-of-way projects not listed above
are based on the valuation of the project.


TABLE D-1: CIVIL ENGINEERING VALUATION-BASED PERMIT FEE



Project Valuation Permit Fee


$1 - $5,000 $300 $390 Base fee only*

$5,001 - $10,000 $255 Base Fee plus $51 $332 Base fee plus $66
for each $1,000 or fraction thereof on the total
amount of the project valuation*

$10,001 - $50,000 $480 $624 Base fee plus $46 $60 for each $1,000
or fraction thereof on the total amount of the project
valuation*

$50,001 - $100,000 $2,320 $3,016 Base fee plus $44 $57 for each
$1,000 or fraction thereof on the total amount of the
project valuation*

$100,001 - $500,000 $4,520 $5,876 Base fee plus $42 $55 for each
$1,000 or fraction thereof on the total amount of the
project valuation*

$500,001 - $1,000,000 $21,320 $27,716 Base fee plus $40 $52 for each
$1,000 of fraction thereof on the total amount of the
project valuation*

Over $1,000,000 $41,320 $53,716 Base fee plus $38 $49 for each
$1,000 or fraction thereof on the total amount of the
project valuation*

• A $150 $195 charge for one hour of As-Built Review costs will be added to all drainage facilities
permits and on landscape permits for work that will be publicly maintained.

EXAMPLE OF A PERMIT FEE CALCULATION:
The following is an example of a permit fee calculation assuming a total project valuation of $150,500:
$4,520 $5,876 base fee plus $6,342 $8,305 (151 X $55) on the project valuation = Total permit fee cost of
$10,862 $14,181.


3. Permit Time Extension and Reinstatement .


One-time Permit Extension or Reinstatement …………… 50% of current permit fee

Appendix A.2 Page 27

Application and payment must be received prior to expiration date of the permit.




CIVIL ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEES

1. Re-inspection Fee for All Construction Permits


a. Initial Inspection ……………………………………………… No additional charge (included with
permit fee)

If corrections are required, first re-inspection to verify
corrections …………………………………………………… No additional charge (included with
permit fee)

b. Re-inspection fees

Fee must be paid before re-inspections will be made.

- For any inspection called before work was ready for that
inspection …………………………………………………… $150 $195 each

- For any inspection that cannot be made on date
requested due to no access……………………………… $150 $195 each

- Second and subsequent re-inspections required for
Failure to correct deficiencies …………………………… $150 $195 each



2. After-Hour Inspection Request


a. Inspection requests scheduled within 2-hours before or
after current PDD inspection hours ……………………… $150 $195 per inspector per hour,
minimum $300 $195 per request (2-hours)

b. Inspection requests scheduled more than 2-hours before
or after current PDD inspection hours or any time on
Saturdays, Sundays, or Holidays ………………………… $150 $195 per inspector per hour,
minimum $450 $585 per request (3-hours)




Appendix A.2 Page 28

CIVIL ENGINEERING MISCELLANEOUS FEES

1. Investigation Fee for Work Done Without a Permit


Investigation Fee …………………………………………….. $250 or the permit fee, whichever is
greater, but not to exceed $2,500 for
every day or portion of a day from the
time unpermitted work began until a
permit is obtained



2. Civil Engineering Appeals


a. Appeal to Technical Review Committee …………………… $600 $780 first appeal item plus
$300 $390 each additional appeal item

b. Appeal to the City Manager Representative ……………… $600 $780 first appeal item plus
$300 $390 each additional appeal item

c. Appeal to the Development Advisory Board ……………… $600 $780 first appeal item plus
$300 $390 each additional appeal item




Appendix A.2 Page 29

BUILDING SAFETY FEES
Building Safety Fees are divided into four categories. These four areas include Building Plan Review,
Permits/Inspections, Existing AFP Sites, and Miscellaneous fees. These areas are further defined by the following:

• Building Plan Review Fees

Plans review fees pay for the review of plans to determine compliance with applicable codes and ordinances.
Building Plan Review fees are based on a percentage of the calculated building permit fee with a minimum
charge for each application.

• Building Permit Fees/Inspections

Building inspections are financed by building permit fees. Permit fees for new construction and additions are
based on the valuation of the project. In addition to the basic level of inspection services, additional inspection
services are available through prior arrangement with the Planning and Development Department and with
payment of the appropriate fee. These services include overtime inspections, re-inspection, optional (non-
required) inspections and requests for time-specific inspections.

• Existing AFP Sites

For increases in square footage at existing AFP sites, plan review fees will be based on the valuation tables
using the square footage calculation. The permit fees will follow the AFP fee schedule and be charged on an
hourly basis to reflect services provided. AFP permits will be issued through the AFP office upon completion
of plan review.

• Miscellaneous Fees

Miscellaneous fees are those fees that do not fall under any other Building Safety activities.




Project Valuation
Some Planning & Development permit fees are based on project valuation. Project valuation is the higher of the
minimum project valuation as calculated by Planning & Development, or the project valuation as provided by the
applicant.




Time Limitations for Building Safety Permits
The expiration, extension and reinstatement of Building Safety Permits are detailed in the Phoenix Building
Construction Code Administrative Provisions.




Appendix A.2 Page 30

BUILDING SAFETY PLAN REVIEW FEES
1. Basic Plan Review Services

a. General Plan Review – All Occupancy Types

1) Residential with project valuations of $50K or less … 100% of the permit fee, minimum $150
$195 (1-hour)


2) Residential with project valuations of over $50K …… 80% of the permit fee, minimum $150
$195 (1-hour)


3) Commercial with project valuations of $50K or less … 100% of the permit fee, minimum $150
$195 (1-hour)


4) Commercial with project valuations of over $50K …… 80% of the permit fee, minimum $150
$195 (1-hour)


Applies to all permits (see permit fee Table A) where valuation exceeds $5,000 and a plan review is
required.

b. Project valuation less than $5,000 with counter review of
15 minutes or less …………………………………………… No plan review fee

c. Standard Plans – All Occupancy Types Including
Residential

1) Base Plan Only ………………………………………… Residential – 80% of the permit fee
minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)

Commercial – 80% of the permit fee


2) Base Plan plus Variations submitted in same plan set Residential – $150 $195 per variation

Commercial – 80% of the permit fee,
minimum $150 $195 (1-hour) for the
base plan, plus $150 $195 per hour
to review the variations, minimum
$150 $195 (1-hour)

d. Single-Family Design Review ……………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $75 $98
(1/2-hour)

e. Plot Plan Review

1) Residential Addition Plot Plan Review ………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $75 $98
(1/2-hour)

2) Single-Family and Duplex Dwellings ………………… $75 $98 per permit




Appendix A.2 Page 31

3) All Other Occupancy Types …………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum
$300 $390 (2-hours) per permit


f. Engineering Plan Review of Building Components ……… $150 $195 per hour, minimum
$300 $390 (2-hours)


g. Fire Life Safety Plan Review ………………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum
$900 $1,170 (6-hours)


h. Demolition Application Fee for Projects referenced……….. $300 $390
in PBCC 105.3.1.1

$150 $195 per hour, minimum $150
i. Plan Review Services Not Otherwise Listed ……………… $195 (1-hour)


2. Phased, Partial, and Deferred Submittal Plan Review


a. Cases where the applicant decides to separate a project into phased permits after initial plan review
submittal for a single building permit:

1) Initial Plan Review Application ………………………… Commercial – 80% of the permit fee for
the whole building

2) Additional review time required to separate plans,
coordinate partial plans, re-review and set up phased
permitting ………………………………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)

3) Subsequent Plan Review Submittals ………………… 160% of the permit fee based on the
valuation of each submittal

b. Cases where the applicant initially requests plan review and permitting of a building in multiple
phases, i.e., shell buildings, structural only:

1) Initial plan review submittal and review time to set up
phased permitting ……………………………………… 160% of the permit fee based on the
valuation of the work included in the
submittal

2) Subsequent Plan review Submittals ………………… 160% of the permit fee based on the
valuation of the work included in the
submittal

c. Deferred Components

Major Office Reviews…………………………………………. Commercial – 80% of the permit fee
based on the valuation of each
component or each submittal, minimum
$300 $390 (2-hours) per submittal




Appendix A.2 Page 32

Minor Field Reviews ………………………………………….. Commercial - $150 $195 per hour,
minimum $300 $390 (2-hours)

Residential - $150 $195 per hour,
minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)


3. Optional Plan Review Services

a. Permits By Appointment (PBA) …………………………… Commercial – 80% of the permit fee,
minimum $150 $195 per hour, per
discipline

b. Permits By Inspection (PBI) ………………………………… Commercial – 80% of the permit fee,
minimum $150 $195 per hour, per
discipline

Residential – 80% of the permit fee,
minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)

c. Expedited Plan Review – Initial Review …………………… 3-times basic plan review fee
Availability limited and subject to the Planning & Development Director’s approval.

d. Expedited Plan Review – 2nd Review Only ………………… 1 time basic plan review fee
Availability limited and subject to the Planning & Development Director’s approval.

e. Staff Consultation and Research …………………………… $150 $195 per hour, per discipline,
minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)

f. Revisions to Approved Plans $150 $195 per hour, minimum
$300 $390 (2- hours)

Revisions which expand the scope of a permit require a new permit and fees.

g. Application for one-time Time Extension ……………………. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $300 $390
(2-hours)




Appendix A.2 Page 33

4. Self-Certification Program

a. Self-Certification Class (Valid for 3-years) ………………… $1,500 $1,950

b. Intake Meeting Fee …………………………………………… $300 $390 flat fee and $150 $195 per
additional hour

Charge flat fee in Intake Meeting fee code, and additional hour(s) if any, in Staff fee code,
accordingly.

c. Intake of Deferred Submittal …………………………...... $300 $390 flat fee and $150 $195 per
additional hour
d. Intake of Plan Revisions …………………………………… $150 $195

d. Permit Fee …………………………………………………… Per Planning & Development
Department Fee Schedule

e. Program Administration Surcharge ………………………… 10% of the permit fee, minimum $150
$195

f. Administrative Review for Reinstatement to Program
(Equivalent to Formal Appeal to Building Official) ………… Per Planning & Development
Department Fee Schedule

5. Plan Review of Corrections to Plans

a. First correction (2nd Review) ………………………………… No additional fee, provided that the only
changes made are those needed to
address the required corrections

b. Second Correction (3rd Review) …………………………… 20% of the current plan review fee,
minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)

c. Re-submittal which includes design changes
unrelated to City required corrections ……………………… 20% of the current plan review fee,
minimum $150 $195 (1-hour)
Plans not approvable after second correction (3rd review) require a new submittal and payment of full plan
review fees.




Appendix A.2 Page 34

BUILDING SAFETY PERMIT FEES
1. New Construction, Additions and Remodel Existing Building Permits

Permit fees are based on the valuation (building square footage times standard rate for occupancy) of each
building or building addition. For fee calculation purposes, building square footage shall be the total area of all
floors under roof and enclosed within the outer surface of the outside enclosing walls or columns. Building
square footage includes roofed patios or porches, bay windows, basements, mezzanine and penthouses or
other mechanical spaces. Building square footage does not include roof eaves or overhangs not exceeding 3
feet in depth, courts or light shafts open at the top or unroofed patios or porches. The fees for each separate
building shall be separately calculated.

Minimum valuation of the work shall be determined by the Building Official based on nationally recognized
standards and shall include the value of materials, labor, overhead, and profit.




TABLE A: BUILDING SAFETY VALUATION-BASED PERMIT FEE


Project Valuation Permit Fee

$1 - $1,000 $75 $98 Minimum for Residential Water Heaters and Fences*


$1 - $1,000 $150 $195 Base fee only*

$1,001 - $10,000 $150 $195 on first $1,000, plus $9 $12 for each additional
$1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $10,000

$10,001 - $50,000 $231 $303 on first $10,000 plus $8 $10 for each additional
$1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000

$50,001 - $200,000 $551 $703 on first $50,000 plus $7 $9 for each additional
$1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including $200,000

$200,001 - $1,000,000 $1,601 $2,053 on first $200,000 plus $7 $9 for each
additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, to and including
$1 000 000
$1,000,001 - $10,000,000 $7,201 $9,253 on first $1,000,000 plus $4 $5 for each
additional
Over $10,000,000 $43,201 $54,253 on first $10,000,000 plus $4 $5 for each
additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, on the total amount of
the project valuation

Swimming pools are subject to a minimum permit fee of $180 $234. A $30 aquatics program surcharge
is also added to every swimming pool permit in accordance to Ordinance G-3114.
* Permits with project valuations of $1 - $1,000 include a maximum of two inspections, including
reinspections. If additional inspections are needed they are charged at $150 $195 per inspection.




Appendix A.2 Page 35

EXAMPLE OF A PERMIT FEE CALCULATION:
The following is an example of a permit fee calculation assuming a total project valuation** of $250,500:
$1,601 $2,053 base fee plus $357 $459 (51 X $7 $9) on the project valuation = Total permit fee cost of $1,958
$2,512


** Project valuation is based on the higher of the project valuation as calculated by Planning &
Development or the project valuation as provided by the applicant.

2. Phased, Partial, and Deferred Submittal Permits

Initial permit and subsequent permits ……………………… 200% of permit fee based on valuation
of permitted work

Projects built with phased or partial permits require significantly more coordination time for the inspection
process than do projects built under a single permit. If a project coordination time exceeds 5-hours per
permit, additional fees at $150 $195 per hour will be charged.


3. Additional Utility Meter Fees ...

a. First Gas, Electric, or Water Meter ………………………… No additional fee (included with the
permit fee for one meter of each type)

b. Each Additional Meter per Utility …………………………… $75 $98 each



4. Manufactured Building

a. Single-Family manufactured Home or Mobile Home …… $150 $195

b. Factory-built buildings Other than Single-Family ………… Fee based on valuation of work, Table
A, minimum $300 $390 per permit


5. Demolition Permits and Move-off Permits

a. Single-Family residential Structure
(Including single-Family accessory buildings) …………… $75 $98

b. All Structures Other than Single-Family …………………… $300 $390 plus $6 per 1,000 sq. ft. or
fraction thereof

c. Optional Pre-move Inspection ……………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $300 $390 (2-
hours)




Appendix A.2 Page 36

6. Permit Time Extension

One-time Permit Extension ……………………………………… 50% of current permit fee
Application and payment must be received prior to expiration date of the permit.

7. Permit Reinstatement

Permit Reinstatement within 1-year of Expiration ……………… 50% of current permit fee




Appendix A.2 Page 37

BUILDING SAFETY INSPECTION FEES

1. Re-inspection Fee for All Construction Permits

a. Initial Inspection ……………………………………………… No additional charge (included with
permit fee)

If corrections are required, first re-inspection to verify
corrections …………………………………………………… No additional charge (included with
permit fee)

b. Re-inspection Fees
Fees must be paid before re-inspections will be made.

- For any inspection called before work was ready for that
inspection …………………………………………………… $150 $195 each

- For any inspection that cannot be made on date
requested due to no access …………………………….. $150 $195 each

- Second and subsequent re-inspections required for
failure to correct deficiencies ………………………………. $150 $195 each


2. After-Hour Inspection Request

a. Inspection requests scheduled within 2-hours before or
after current PDD inspection hours ………………………... $150 $195 per hour, minimum $300 $390
per request , per permit (2-hours)

b. Inspection requests scheduled more than 2-hours before
or after current PDD inspection hours or any time on
Saturdays, Sundays, or Holidays …………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $450 $585
per request, per permit (3-hours)



3. Conditional Utility Clearances (Non-refundable Fee)

Application Fee …………………………………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)




Appendix A.2 Page 38

4. Temporary Power

Inspection Fee …………………………………………………….. $150 $195 each


5. Certificate of Occupancy (Non-refundable Fee)

a. Certificate of Occupancy issued at conclusion of all code-
required construction ………………………………………… No additional charge (included with
permit fee)

b. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy ……………………… $600 $780 per request
For up to 180-days, not to exceed the expiration date of the permit. No renewals or extension
allowed.

c. Partial Certificate of Occupancy …………………………… $600 $780 per request

d. Request for a Change-in-Use Certificate of Occupancy without Construction

Step 1 – Plan Review Required …………………………… $150 $195 per hour Plan Review Fee,
minimum $300 $390 (2-hours)

Step 2 – Field Inspection Required ………………………… $150 $195 per hour for inspection services,
minimum $300 $390 (2-hours)


6. Periodic Safety Inspections - Elevators, Dumbwaiters and Escalators

a. Powered Elevator (per car) ………………………………… $100 plus $10 per each landing


b. Escalators, Moving Walks, Inclined Lifts, and Powered
Dumbwaiters ……………………………………… $120 each


c. Staff Consultation and Research and Testing Observation $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)

For installation, repair, or replacement work, see Permit Fee Table A.


7. Refrigeration System Periodic Inspections


Refrigeration System Inspections ……………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $300 $390
(2-hours)

For installation, repair, or replacement work, see Permit Fee Table A.




Appendix A.2 Page 39

8. Annual Facilities Permit (AFP)

a. Application Fee ……………………………………………… $500 per facility location for assessing the
location’s initial eligibility for the Annual
Facilities Permit program


b. Initial Registration and Annual Renewal ………………… $750 $975 for all facility locations
under the same ownership and
responsible engineer


c. All plan review and inspection services including
scheduled meeting hours ………………………………….. $190 $195 per hour, minimum $190 $195
(1-hour)




NOTE: for increases in square footage at existing AFP sites, plan review fees will be based on the
valuation tables using the square footage calculation. The permit fees will follow the AFP fee
schedule and be charged on an hourly basis to reflect services provided. AFP permits will be issued
through the AFP office upon completion of plan review.

d. After-Hour Inspection Request

- Inspection requests scheduled within 2-hours before or
after current PDD inspection hours …………………….. $190 $195 per hour, minimum $380 $390
per request (2-hours)

- Inspection requests scheduled more than 2-hours
before or after current PDD inspection hours or any
time on Saturdays, Sundays, or Holidays ……………… $190 $195 per hour, minimum $570 $585
per request (3-hours)


9. Building Maintenance Registration Fees

a. Supervisor’s License Application/Test Fee ……………… $75 $98


b. Facility Registration Fee (per year)


- One Supervisor Class …………………………………… $300 $390 per year
- Two or Three Supervisor Classes ……………………… $600 $780 per year

c. Inspection Fee ……………………………………………… $190 $195 per hour, minimum $190 $195
(1-hour)




Appendix A.2 Page 40

10. Journeyman Licenses

a. Apprentice – Initial Registration Fee and Annual
Renewal Fee ………………………………………………. $20


b. Journeyman – Initial Registration and Test Fee ………… $50


c. Journeyman – Renewal Registration and Test Fee …… $40




Appendix A.2 Page 41

BUILDING SAFETY MISCELLANEOUS FEES

1. Alternative Methods, Materials and Equipment

Application Fee ………………………………………………….. $150 $195 per hour, minimum $900 $1,170
(6-hours)



2. Residential Solar Photovoltaic System Permits

a. Non-Standard Residential Solar Photovoltaic Permit ………… Based on Project Valuation
Table A

b. Residential Solar Photovoltaic System Permit – Fixed Fee Options

1) Option A – Over the Counter Review ……………… $600 - $780 Plan Review and 3-
inspections

2) Option B – Over the Counter Review ……………… $450 – $585 Plan Review and 2-
inspections

3) Option C – No Plan Review ………………………… $375 – $488 Administrative Fee
and 2- inspections


4) Option D – Over the Counter Review ……………… $300 – $390 Plan Review and 1-
inspection

5) Option E – No Plan Review ………………………… $225 – $293 Administrative Fee
and 1- inspection


The firms desiring to use these fixed-fee options will make an application through a process developed by
the Planning & Development Department. The Department will determine the firms that qualify for the
options noted herein.


3. Solar Water Heaters

a. Commercial ………………………………………………… Permit fee per Planning & Development
Department Fee Schedule

b. Residential …………………………………………………… Permit fee per Planning & Development
Department Fee Schedule




Appendix A.2 Page 42

4. Appeals, Modifications, and Formal Interpretations

a. Administrative Hearing with the City Manager Representative (Building Official)
Requests for code modifications, formal appeals, or formal interpretations.

1) Single-Family Property or Project (R-3
(R-3 Occupancy) ………………………....................... $300 $390

2) Non-Single Family Property or Project ………………. $450 $585

b. Lot combination, building code covenant and non-build easement modification requests

1) Single-Family Residential …………………………….. $300 $390

2) Multi-Family and nonresidential ……………………… $1,500 $1,950

c. Appeal to Development Advisory Board …………………. $600 $780 first appeal item plus $300 $390
each additional appeal item


5. Fees for Work Done Without a Permit

a. Investigation Fee …………………………………………… $250 or the permit fee, whichever is
greater, but not to exceed $2,500 for
every day or portion of a day from the
time unpermitted work began until a
permit is obtained

b. Investigation Fee (Section 114) …………………………… $250 or the permit fee per Table A,
whichever is greater

c. Job Site Meeting (Section 114) …………………………… $150 $195 per hour per inspection
discipline, minimum $300 $390 (2-hours) per inspection discipline

d. Permit Fee (Section 114) ………………………………… 2-times the permit fee per Table A,
except for Residential Demolition permits




Appendix A.2 Page 43

6. Miscellaneous Inspection Services

a. Miscellaneous Inspection Fee …………………………… $150 $195 per hour, minimum $150 $195
(1-hour)

b. Generators at Temporary Events
(Connected generators for Temporary Events)

Weekday Inspection ……………………………………… $150 $195 for the 1st generator and $75
$98 for each additional generator

After Hours, Weekend, or Holiday Inspection …………… $150 $195 for the 1st generator and $75
$98 for each additional generator, minimum $450 $585 (3-hours)

c. Backflow Prevention Devices ……………………………… $150 $195 for the 1st backflow device and
$75 $98 for each additional backflow device




Appendix A.2 Page 44

PARKLET

1. Initial Parklet Construction Fees

Base fee for all Parklet permits
Planning and Development Department …...…………………………………………………$250


Street Transportation Department ……………………………………………………………$250


Include plan review, construction permit, revocable permit

Annual rental fee for Private Parklet …………………………………………………… $10/square foot


Parking meter removal fee ……………………………………………………………… $300 per meter


Additional costs* (if applicable)……………………………………………………………… $150 to $ 500


*any sign changes, striping, loading zone, landscape, etc. that must be done to accommodate Parklet


Cash bond for emergency removal of Parklet)……………………………………………… $ 500


2. Ongoing Annual Fees


Annual revocable permit fee ……………………………………………………………………$380




Annual rental fee for private parklet ……………………………………………………………$10/square foot




MISCELLANEOUS FEES
Fees listed below are charged for providing miscellaneous goods and services such as code consultation;
investigation of alternate materials; plan review or inspections services not specifically listed in this code; staff
research or retrieval of records; providing copies of records or department documents; sale of code books,
Appendix A.2 Page 45

checklists or technical documents; recovering the cost of postage or handling services; and the cost of providing
special functions such as educational seminars given for trade or industry groups. Administrative service fees
shall be based on the department’s hourly rate for professional services as set forth in the fee schedule. The
retail charge for the sale of books or supplies shall be set to recover purchase costs plus overhead expenses as
determined by the department.


1. Letter Agreements

Letter Agreements ………………………………………………… $150 $195 per hour for staff research and
separation, minimum $300 $390 (2-hours)


2. Extended Construction Work Hours Permit

Extended Construction Work hours Permit …………………… $300 $390 for initial permit

Renewal …………………………………………………………… $150 $195 each




3. General Hourly Rates

a. General hourly rate for Plan Review Services …………… $150 $195 per hour

See section for fee minimum charge.

b. General hourly Rate for Inspection Services ……………… $150 $195 per hour

See section for fee minimum charge.

c. General hourly Rate for Administrative/Clerical Services … $75 $98 per hour, minimum $18.75 $24
(1/4-hour)

Hourly rate services listed in the fee schedule shall be calculated in intervals of not less than 15
minutes subject to the minimum number of hours specified.

4. Record Change Fee

a. Permit Record Change ……………………………………… $37.50 $49 per permit


b. Address Change ……………………………………………… $37.50 $49 per permit


c. All Other Record Changes …………………………………... See General Hourly Rates Above




Appendix A.2 Page 46

5. Refund Request Processing Fee

Any refundable Planning & Development Fee ………………….. 20% of fee paid, minimum $150 $195 (1-
hour)

Development Occupational Fee and Water Resource
Acquisition Fee Refunds ………………………………………….. $150 $195 per hour engineering charge,
minimum $150 $195 per request (1-hour)

When staff error results in and overcharge of a fee, 100% of the overcharged amount will be refunded.


6. Copies

Copies ……………………………………………………………… See Publication Listing

Research Time related to making copies ……………………… $75 $98 per hour, minimum $18.75 $24
(1/4-hour)




7. Technical Publications for Sale

Technical Publications for Sale ………………………………… See Publication Listing


8. Infill Waivers

Notwithstanding any other provision or requirement in the Phoenix City Code, the Planning &
Development Director or his/her designee shall not collect new construction plan review or permit fees if
the waiver of said fees is authorized as part of the City’s Infill Housing Program. The amount of such
fees shall be transferred from other City funds to the Planning & Development Department account.




Appendix A.2 Page 47

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ABANDONMENT A fee charged as public compensation to vacate public right-of- way
CONSIDERATION FEE: for private interest. This fee is collected as a condition of right-of-way
abandonment approval if the property being abandoned can be
utilized for private development purposes. The fee collected is used
to offset administrative costs for processing applications to dedicate
right-of-way.


ABANDONMENT, FORMAL: The process in accordance with State of Arizona imposed open
meeting laws for public hearings related to the vacation of the public
interest in previously purchased or dedicated right-of-way, either in full
or retaining utility easements.

ABANDONMENT, INFORMAL: The process of the vacation of the public interest in previously
purchased or dedicated right-of-way, either in full or retaining utility
easements, which right-of-way or easements are completely
encompassed by a single property owner.

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF The time spent by administrative staff to retrieve and/or photocopy a
SERVICES: request by the applicant to obtain development information.



APPEAL, A formal appeal requested by the applicant of a site plan or
a technical appeal. All Decisions by City Council are final.


APPEAL, A formal appeal requested by the applicant of a site plan or
City Manager Representative: subdivision regarding a technical review decision made by the
Planning & Development Department. Technical appeals relate to
items such as right-of-way improvement, grading, dedications and are
heard by the City Manager Representative within 30 days from the
date the appeal is filed. Decisions can be appealed to the DAB and


APPEAL, (DRAB): A formal appeal requested by the applicant of a site plan or
Design Review Appeals Board subdivision regarding a design review decision made by the Planning
& Development Department regarding whether a design review
presumption has been met or not. Design review appeals are heard
by the DRAB within 30 days from the date the appeal is filed. All
decisions from the DRAB are final.


APPEAL, PROPORTIONALITY: A formal appeal provided for in State law pertaining to the scope of
right-of-way dedication and improvements required as a condition of
permit approval.


AT-RISK GRADING A permit authorized to commence grading operations when grading
AND DRAINAGE PERMIT: plan review is substantially completed, but prior to final plan approval.
Submittal of water and sewer plans, where required, is a pre-requisite
to issuance of an at-risk grading permit.


Appendix A.2 Page 48

BASIC SIGN INSPECTION FEES: Sign inspection fees are divided into three groups: Group A
includes wall, marquee, projecting and roof signs and painted wall
and window signs; Group B includes all ground and combination
signs; and Group C includes billboards.


CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: Legal authority to occupy and use a building or parcel of property.
Indicates the project has been completed and found to be in
substantial compliance with all applicable City codes and ordinances.



CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY When all life safety issues have been addressed and substantial
(TEMPORARY) compliance has been met, a temporary certificate of occupancy is
issued after the appropriate payment of fees has been made to the
City. The project is then monitored to ensure total compliance has
been achieved.



CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY When a portion of a structure is entirely complete, along with the
(PARTIAL): corresponding approval of zoning stipulations, a partial Certificate of
Occupancy is issued. The unfinished portions must be completed to a
point where it will not constitute a hazard to the occupied portion of the
structure.


CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY A comprehensive review and agreement between the Applicant and
PHASING: City staff related to the proposed sequencing of completion and
occupancy of multiple buildings on the same site. This plan most
typically occurs on multi-family residential and commercial shopping
center projects.



COMMUNITY INTEREST: Private citizens who express interest or concern regarding the impacts
of the development proposal during the rezoning process and have
indicated their interest as a matter of record to staff. This interest or
concern is entertained through the site planning, or subdivision review
process in accordance with notification requirements imposed by the
Zoning Ordinance.



COMPLEX ZONING STIPULATIONS: Projects with zoning complexity are those which require additional
staff time to administer, interpret, apply and confirm compliance with
zoning ordinance standards, stipulations or rezoning and/or zoning
adjustment. This may involve notification and review of plans by
members of the public, Village Planning Committees, the Planning
Hearing Officer, the Zoning Administrator, or other review boards and
bodies. Projects with zoning complexity can be located in regulatory
zoning overlay districts, the downtown urban form code area, Planned
Unit Developments (PUDs), hillside development areas, or
environmentally sensitive areas.



CONCRETE PERMIT: Permit includes the inspection of concrete driveway, concrete
sidewalk, concrete valley gutter and apron, curb & gutter, concrete
sidewalk ramp, and curb return. (Other items to be added from the
misc. category.)
Appendix A.2 Page 49

CONDITIONAL ZONING: Zoning approval conditions (stipulations) which have been imposed by
be clearly addressed on the initial development plans or a plan review
surcharge will be assessed.



CONSULTATION AND RESEARCH: The time spent by staff to research a written request by the applicant
to obtain technical development and/or construction code information
about a particular site, proposed site plan, proposed subdivision, or
building. The request includes specific questions the applicant may
have about the site planning, project engineering and/or building
safety review process. The questions will be addressed in written
form. Hourly rate services listed in the fee schedule shall be
calculated in intervals of not less than 15 minutes subject to the
minimum number of hours specified.



DEVELOPMENT PLAN ROUTING: As projects are formally submitted for review by the Planning &
Development Department, the projects are circulated to relevant
Divisions and Departments throughout the City, and to affected
community agencies outside of the City, for review and comment prior
to approval.

DISCIPLINES: Disciplines are defined for fee assessment purposes as architectural,
structural, plumbing/mechanical, electrical, fire/life safety, industrial
waste, traffic and parking, landscaping, grading and drainage, design
review, and water and sewer utilities review.



DRAINAGE FACILITIES PERMIT: Permit includes the inspection of storm drain pipe, storm drain man
holes, concrete box culvert, catch basin, sidewalk scupper, cutoff wall,
flood wall, and head wall.



DRAINAGE REPORT: An analysis of storm water flows that influence a development
proposal or properties within the vicinity of the development proposal.



DRAINAGE REPORT, Where a conceptual drainage report is required at the Pre-Application
CONCEPTUAL: Conferences, the engineer will determine the type of report based on
complexity and indicate the corresponding fee based on review time
(small, medium, large).



ELECTRIC COMPONENT An electrical component inspection fee charged per sign per
INSPECTION FEE: inspection visit whenever an electrified sign includes components that
are not approved by a recognized listing and labeling agency. The
electrical component inspection fee is in addition to the electric sign
inspection fee.



ELECTRIC SIGN INSPECTION FEE: An electrical inspection fee will be charged for each sign which is
illuminated, motorized, or otherwise connected to electricity for any
purpose.
Appendix A.2 Page 50

ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE An effort on behalf of the City and the property owner to preserve the
LANDS IMPACT: integrity of the natural desert environment, by saving in their natural
state, washes, hillsides, and significant stands of vegetation. The
requirement for preservation is set by the City Council through Zoning
Stipulations and/or the City Design Review Program.



FEE REFUNDS: Requests for refund of Planning & Development plan review, permit or
inspection fees.



FINAL PLAT PHASING: A proposal by the Applicant to split the preliminary subdivision
approval into two or more final plats which are recorded
independently. This approach requires a systematic and
comprehensive review of the sequence of infrastructure review and
permitting.



FLAG AND GASOLINE PUMP-TOP An inspection fee charged per visit for one or more flags or gasoline
SIGN INSPECTION FEE: pump-top signs at a location.




FUNCTIONAL SEGMENT: A Functional Segment is a portion of a Planned Community District (or
other area requiring the creation of Master Plans) that is permitted to
have a separate and independent set of Master Plans.


HAUL PERMIT: A permit issued for transporting soil in excess of 10,000 cubic yards
via City streets. Special traffic regulations, haul routes and work hours
may apply.



HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT: Any development project that occurs on slopes exceeding 10%.


INSPECTION HOURS: Inspections are normally provided Monday through Friday on regular
City business days. Inspections must be requested before 2:00 p.m.
the business day preceding the requested inspection. Additional
inspection fees will be assessed for overtime inspections (early
morning, evenings, weekends, and holidays) as well as time-specific
inspections or inspectors to be available on stand-by.

Inspection hours are established by the Planning & Development
Department and are subject to change. Regular hours are generally
from 6:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., and summer hours 6:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.


A service fee will be charged for services related to optional inspection
INSPECTIONS, OPTIONAL: requests such as requests for pre-move inspections, walk-through
inspections, or punch list inspections.


INVESTIGATION FEE: Penalty fee charged for any work started without a permit.
Appendix A.2 Page 50

LAND DIVISION A process whereby the division of a property that is two and a half
(LOT DIVISION/LOT SPLIT): acres or less must be reviewed and meet minimum size and
configuration requirements as well as infrastructure requirements to
support the new parcels.


LANDSCAPE - Review of planting, irrigation and appropriate detail sheets for small
INTERMEDIATE PLAN: development sites with street frontage less than 100 feet or 200 feet if
on a street corner. The site must not be encumbered by major site
plan issues.



LANDSCAPE On sites that require landscape preservation, a protective fence
PRESERVATION FENCING: (typically a temporary chain link fence) must be erected around all
areas to be protected in order to prevent damaging the landscape
during construction.


LANDSCAPE - MAJOR PLAN: Review of planting, irrigation and appropriate detail sheets for projects
which involve a scope of work that exceeds that defined by the Minor
or Intermediate Landscape Plans.


LANDSCAPE - MINOR PLAN: Review of planting, irrigation and appropriate detail sheets for small
development sites with less than 1000 square feet of total landscape
area. The site shall not be encumbered by major site plan issues.
Planting, irrigation and details should be on one sheet and may be
placed directly on the project Site Plan. This review is typically
processed over the development counter.

MASTER PLAN: A Master Plan is a regulatory document which is used to guide the
development of individual parcels within a particular Master Planned
Area (such as within a Planned Community District or Specific Plan
Area). A master plan may illustrate approved land uses and
environmental requirements (such as on a Master Development Plan,
Master Open Space and Trails Plan, Master Landscape Plan, and/or
Master Drainage Plan), or it may illustrate the required infrastructure
phasing and installation requirements (such as on a Master Street
Plan, Mater Water Plan, and/or Master Trails Plan).


MAP OF DEDICATION: An engineered map showing streets, alleys and easements to be
dedicated for public use.



MINOR ENGINEERING Engineering review of off-site construction consisting of driveway cut
PLAN REVIEW: details, limited scope street construction including sidewalk, curb and
gutter, and landscaping, as well as on-site construction related to
limited scope review of grading and retention calculations.



A review giving input from more than one specialty, trade, or area of
MULTI-DISCIPLINE: expertise.




Appendix A.2 Page 51

PARCEL SPLIT: A process whereby the division of a property that is greater than two
and a half acres must be reviewed and approved for incorporation into
the City’s Geographic Information System property ownership data
layer.


PAVEMENT CUT SURCHARGE: A fee charged for the trenching in the public right-of-way where
pavement is less than 30 months old.


PAVING PERMIT: Permit includes the inspection of asphalt concrete (A.C.), alley
surfacing (A.B.C.) temporary driveway (A.C.), dust palliative,
raise/lower manhole cover, raise/lower valve box cover, install survey
monument, AC thickened edge, grader ditch, paving replacement and
seal coat.



PHASING, CONSTRUCTION: Submittal of construction plan packages related to the stages of
building construction (i.e., foundation, framing, plumbing, etc.) A
single phase shall be considered development proposals which are
submitted as a single construction document package. Multiple
phases shall be considered development proposals which utilize more
than one construction document package.



PHASING, SITE: Development of a single site over time. Temporary improvements
such as dust proofing and/or landscaping may be required on future
phases.



PLAN REVIEW: The process of reviewing the applicant’s construction plans for
building code compliance.



PLAN REVIEW REVISIONS: Changes made to a plan once the plan has been approved.



PLANNED RESIDENTIAL A group of dwelling units with common areas which are designed as
DEVELOPMENT OPTION: an integrated functional unit. Planned residential developments permit
considerable flexibility in the selection of building setbacks and
heights, lot area and lot coverage. This type of development option
requires the review and approval of both a Site Plan and a Subdivision
Plat.



PLAT, FINAL: A map dividing property and dedicating public right-of-way in final form
with all required owner signatures that is ready for City Council
approval and recording.



PLAT, MINOR: A subdivision plat with 20 or less proposed lots and meeting the
criteria of Section 32-14(h) of the City of Phoenix Subdivision
Ordinance that is unencumbered by issues of zoning, drainage and
off-site improvements.


Appendix A.2 Page 52

PLAT, PRELIMINARY: A map indicating the division of private property and right-of-way to be
dedicated to the public.



PLAT, SIMPLE: A simple plat of 4 lots or less which bypasses the preliminary review
phase of the development review process. The minor plat process
includes only the preapplication review and the final plat review.



PREAPPLICATION MEETING: Initial meeting between the Development Review Team and the
applicant to discuss basic development review requirements for a
proposed site plan or subdivision. This meeting includes written notes
from all disciplines and a mark-up drawing of the proposed plan
submitted.



PRELIMINARY APPROVAL An official meeting between the Development Review Team and the
MEETING: applicant to discuss formal requirement for the proposed site plan or
subdivision. This meeting includes a formal report and official mark-up
drawing listing all requirements for site plan or subdivision approval.
All stipulation listed in this review are required to receive final
approval.



PRELIMINARY WATER OR Staff consultation to determine if existing water or sewer system has
SEWER DESIGN: the capacity and adjacency to support additional development.



RE-INSPECTIONS: Additional visits to a development site caused by scheduling an
inspection before the work is ready to be inspected, or by failure to
complete required conditions; or by failure to provide access to an
inspection site (locked gates or doors).



REMOVAL OF ILLEGAL SIGN: Signs placed illegally within public property right-of-way must be
removed by sign enforcement personnel. The first time a sign or signs
are removed from public property, the person or business identified on
the sign will be given a notice of violation. If the same or similar signs
identifying the same person or business are again removed from
public property, such person or business will be charged a disposal
fee.


SEWER PERMIT: Permission to install sewer in public right-of-way to City specifications.
Permit includes the inspection of City sewer lines, and sewer
manholes.



SIGN PLAN REVIEW - MINOR: A fee charged for over-the-counter review of 1 to 2 signs for each sign
application submitted.


SIGN PLAN REVIEW - MAJOR: A fee charged for the review of each sign application submitted
(excluding the over-the-counter review of 1 to 2 signs).
Appendix A.2 Page 53

SIGN DESIGN REVIEW FEE: An additional fee for the review of proposed signs which request
height and area bonuses by incorporating design review elements.


SIGN ENGINEERING PLAN REVIEW: A fee charged for the review of engineering plans, drawings and
specifications submitted to establish formal or modified construction
standards or to review plans for sign structures for which there are no
existing standards.

SIGN PLAN REVIEW - FIELD: A site inspection fee charged for all sign applications submitted
without a photo(s) that clearly depicts the site of the proposed sign
construction and affected adjacent sites or where Planning &
Development Department’s staff determines that the type of sign or a
condition at the site warrants a site inspection.

SIGN RECORD CHANGE FEE: A fee charged per request for any change to a sign permit.
SIGN RE-INSPECTION A re-inspection fee charged for each inspection after the second made
AND REPROCESSING: to determine compliance in conjunction with any correction notice
given during construction or erection of a sign, or correction of
situations identified in any notice of violation.

SIGN WORK WITHOUT A PERMIT: Whenever any sign is erected, moved, altered or repaired without a
required sign permit, an investigation fee in addition to the permit fee
shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or subsequently
issued.

SINGLE DISCIPLINE REVIEW: A review which involves only one development review discipline such
as planning, traffic engineering, civil engineering, fire, etc.


SITE PLAN - INTERMEDIATE: A small scope site plan or subdivision that requires a review, but
requires minimal or no development plan routing and may not require
a review meeting. Typically, there are no complicated development
issues associated with these projects. The written report and mark-up
drawing can be mailed directly to the applicant.
SITE PLAN - When significant changes (typically involving changes to site access,
MAJOR AMENDMENT/REVISION: infrastructure, circulation and parking) are requested to an approved
site plan or subdivision, an amended plan is submitted for review and
approval. The plan is routed to appropriate departments for review
and comment, and the revised plan may then be approved as an
amendment to the original plan.


SITE PLAN - MINOR: A site plan that requires minimal review through the development
review process based on the scale or impact of the project. Typically,
these projects involve a scope of work which has a structure less than
25,000 square feet (industrial) or 10,000 square feet (commercial),
they consist of a single phase, all zoning stipulations and ordinance
conditions are addressed on the submittal, the site has no significant
drainage or traffic/access issues, citizen issues are resolved and any
additional development processes (i.e., Zoning variance, right-of-way
abandonment, right-of-way or easement dedications, etc.) have been




Appendix A.2 Page 54

completed or submitted for review with no major issues.


SITE PLAN - When minor changes (not density, traffic, or additional acres) are
MINOR AMENDMENT/REVISION: requested to an approved site plan or subdivision, an amended plan is
submitted for review and approval. The plan is typically reviewed and
approved as an amendment to the original plan.


SPECIAL STUDY/ A request to research or study a development related issue not in
RESEARCH REQUEST: direct conjunction with a specific development proposal being
reviewed.


STREET NAMING AND The process of assigning street address numbers to a parcel that is
ADDRESSING: consistent with the metropolitan methodology imposed by Maricopa
Association of Governments for purposes of efficient postal delivery,
emergency response and way finding by citizens and visitors.



SUBDIVISION: The division of a lot, tract, or parcel of land into two or more lots,
tracts, parcels, or other divisions of land for sale, development, or
lease.


TEMPORARY EVENT SIGNS: A fee charged for each temporary sign permit. A temporary sign
permit is required for temporary events, grand openings, temporary
business identification, and temporary business identification during
construction, and temporary signs for places of worship. No sign
inspection fee is required.


TIME EXTENSION: A fee paid to place a development proposal on hold for the purposes
of resolving outstanding issue(s) which would prevent staff from
granting preliminary Site Plan or Subdivision approval in accordance
with conditions of the Zoning Ordinance. Some examples include lack
of completion of zoning or zoning variance processes and significant
infrastructure issues which would prevent moving forward with
construction plans.

TIME EXTENSION OF PLANS A fee charged for the review of approved development plans which
REVIEW: have not progressed to permits and which have exceeded plan review
time limits imposed by various City ordinances.


TRAFFIC AND Development proposals which require extensive research and
INFRASTRUCTURE IMPACT: possible staff designed infrastructure alternatives for consideration.
Typical applications relate to trip generation analysis and traffic
impact, infrastructure capacity analysis in association with water or
sewer service studies and/or pedestrian circulation studies.


WATER PERMIT: Permit includes the inspection of water main extensions, water line
taps, and fire line/hydrant.


This publication can be made available in alternate formats (Braille, large print, computer diskette, or audiotape) upon request. Contact
the Planning & Development Department at (602) 262-7811 (voice) or (602) 534-5500 (TTY).


Appendix A.2 Page 55

Fire
Fire Prevention
Prevention Fee
Fee Schedule
Schedule
Proposed Adjustments
Proposed Adjustments




Phoenix Fire
Phoenix Fire Department
Department -- Fire
Fire Prevention
Prevention Section
Section -- 150
150 S
S 12
12th
th
St. -- Phoenix,
St. Phoenix, AZ
AZ 85034
85034 696
Fire Prevention
Fire Prevention Fee
Fee Schedule
Schedule
Proposed Adjustments
Proposed Adjustments




Section 1
Section 1
Summary of
Summary of Changes
Changes




Phoenix Fire
Phoenix Fire Department
Department -- Fire
Fire Prevention
Prevention Section
Section -- 150
150 S
S 12
12th
th
St. -- Phoenix,
St. Phoenix, AZ
AZ 85034
85034 697
FIRE DEPARTMENT

FIRE PREVENTION SECTION
PROPOSED USER FEE UPDATE – HOURLY RATE INCREASE, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FEE INCREASE, AND FEES RELATED TO THE ADOPTION OF
THE 2024 PHOENIX FIRE CODE

OVERVIEW
The mission of the City of Phoenix Fire Department’s Fire Prevention Section is to reduce the risk of fire,
hazardous materials events, and other dangers within our community. To accomplish this mission, the
Fire Marshal’s Office utilizes the Phoenix Fire Code, based on a nationally recognized model code, to
help safeguard lives, property, and first responders from these risks and hazards. Through plan reviews,
inspections, assessments, and strong partnerships with the community, development sector, local
industries, and other stakeholders, Fire Prevention promotes safe, sustainable growth across our
community.

The Phoenix Fire Code and the Fire Prevention Fee Schedule together provide the foundation and
resources necessary to achieve this mission. These fees directly support critical activities that allow the
Fire Prevention Section to maintain effective risk reduction programs, uphold national life safety
standards, and continue serving our community at the highest level.

Many of the fees within the Fire Prevention Fee Schedule have not been adjusted in more than two
decades. As a result, they no longer align with current economic conditions, organizational costs, or
inflationary trends. In addition, the 2024 employee compensation package approved by the City Council
further increased operational costs within the Fire Prevention Section. The combination of outdated fee
structures and modern cost realities has created a widening gap between the resources required to
maintain essential fire prevention services and the revenue generated to support these services.

The goal of these proposed fee adjustments is to ensure that essential community risk reduction programs
and prevention efforts are not reduced, delayed, or diverted because of these increased costs. Maintaining
alignment between operational expenses and fee recovery is vital to sustaining the personnel, tools, and
technology necessary to keep Phoenix safe as the city continues to grow.

BACKGROUND
The current Fire Prevention hourly rate of $150 was last formally studied in 2011 and adjusted in 2013.
Since that time, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (CPI for the
Phoenix metropolitan area has increased by more than 45%, reflecting an average annual inflation rate of
approximately 3.49%. The CPI measures the average change in prices paid by consumers for goods and
services over time, reflecting inflation. It’s calculated by the U.S.

Bureau of Labor Statistics and is specific to regions like the Phoenix metro area. CPI is used to help
evaluate fee adjustments by showing how much service delivery costs have increased due to inflation.
During this same period, the Employee Cost Index, which measures changes in wages and benefits, has
risen at a comparable rate. These combined economic trends highlight the growing disparity between the
costs necessary to sustain Fire Prevention operations and the static fee structure that has remained
unchanged for more than a decade.






FIRE DEPARTMENT

Similarly, the annual assessment fees for hazardous materials facilities were last adjusted in 2003. In the
more than twenty years since that adjustment, the CPI for the Phoenix metropolitan area has increased by
approximately 78%, while these fees have remained unchanged. This prolonged stagnation has eroded the
fee’s ability to recover actual program costs, placing additional strain on Fire Prevention resources needed
to manage hazardous materials oversight, inspections, and compliance activities that directly protect both
the community and first responders.

The adoption and associated fee changes of the new Phoenix Fire Code are vital to ensuring the city
remains aligned with current national life safety standards, evolving technologies, and modern
construction practices. The updated code strengthens the city’s ability to protect life and property through
enhanced requirements, improved enforcement tools, and new provisions addressing emerging hazards
such as energy storage systems, high-rise infrastructure, and advanced building systems. It improves
consistency with partner agencies like the Planning and Development Department, supports efficiency in
permitting and inspections, and promotes better data collection for community risk reduction. Most
importantly, adopting the new code reflects Phoenix’s continued commitment to proactive community
risk reduction, firefighter safety, and community resilience in a rapidly growing and changing urban
environment.

PROPOSALS
The Phoenix Fire Department is proposing three strategic update categories to the Fire Prevention Fee
Schedule to ensure the continued delivery of high-quality, community-focused fire prevention services.
These proposed changes are necessary not only to maintain cost recovery in the face of rising operational
expenses and inflationary growth but also to build long-term financial resiliency and expand our capacity
to meet the demands of a growing community.

As Phoenix continues to experience rapid development and increasing complexity in fire and life safety
needs, it is critical that our Fire Prevention Section remains equipped with the personnel, tools, and
resources required to protect lives, property, and first responders. These adjustments will help close the
widening gap between service costs and revenue, sustain essential risk reduction programs, and support
the department’s ability to adapt and scale alongside the city’s growth.

This proposal reflects our commitment to responsible fiscal stewardship, operational excellence,
developmental growth, and the safety of the Phoenix community, today and into the future.

Hourly Rate Adjustment: The Fire Department proposes raising the Fire Prevention hourly rate used for
plan reviews, inspections, and similar activities from $150 to $195 per hour, representing a 30% increase
that remains below the inflation rate. This proposed rate is consistent with the rate increase being
proposed by the City’s Planning and Development Department (PDD) and supports Fire Prevention
resiliency. It is important to note that the cost of staffing and performing inspections is comparable
between Fire Prevention and PDD, as both departments utilize parallel processes, apply interrelated
codes, and work collaboratively in support of the development community and overall community risk
reduction. PDD recently completed a comprehensive rate study that determined this rate level, and Fire
Prevention’s adjustment mirrors that study to achieve a similar recovery rate for fire prevention activities
of comparable nature and complexity. This action also supports alignment of development sector fees, as
PDD life safety systems permitting fees are established through the Fire Prevention Fee Schedule.





FIRE DEPARTMENT




Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent. Increase
Hourly Rate $150 Up to $195 Up to 30%
Fiscal Year Base Projected Revenue Proposed Rate Percent Increase Projected Revenue
FY24-25 $2,551,456 (actuals) $150.00 N/A $2,551,456 (actuals)
FY25-26 $2,627,999 $195.00 30.0% $3,022,198 (½ FY)
FY26-27 $2,706,839 $195.00 30.0% $3,518,890
FY27-28 $2,788,044 $195.00 30.0% $3,624,457



HOURLY RATE ADJUSTMENT
REVENUE PROJECTION
Base Projection at $150 Proposed Rate Adjustment at $195

$4,000,000

$3,500,000

$3,000,000

$2,500,000

$2,000,000
FY24-25 (ACTUALS) FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28






FIRE DEPARTMENT

Hazardous Materials Annual Assessment Fee Adjustment: The second strategic proposal is to adjust the
Fire Prevention Annual Hazardous Materials Assessment Fees to align with program and staff cost
increases, as well as cumulative 78.25% CPI growth since 2003, when they were last adjusted. These
annual fees directly fund the personnel and resources needed to manage the citywide hazardous materials
program. This includes regular inspections, permit compliance, and ongoing engagement with facility
representatives to achieve and maintain code compliance and first responder awareness, ultimately
enhancing safety for both the community and first responders. The City of Phoenix’s Budget and
Research Department has reviewed and agrees with this fee increase proposal.


Current Fee Proposed Fee Adjustment
Group 1 $400.00 $710.00
Group 2 $800.00 $1,425.00
Group 3 $1,250.00 $2,225.00
Group 4 $800.00 / $1,650.00 $1,425.00 / $2,940.00
Group 5 $550.00 + $125.00 each tank $980.00 + $220.00 each tank


Fiscal Year Base Projected Revenue Percent Increase Projected Revenue
FY24-25 $1,425,043 (actuals) N/A $1,425,043 (actuals)
FY25-26 $1,496,295 78% $2,079,850 (½ FY)
FY26-27 $1,571,109 78% $2,796,574
FY27-28 $1,649,665 78% $2,936,403



HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT REVENUE PROJECITON
Base Projection Proposed Rate Adjustment

$3,500,000

$3,000,000

$2,500,000

$2,000,000

$1,500,000

$1,000,000
FY24-25 (ACTUALS) FY25-26 FY26-27 FY27-28






FIRE DEPARTMENT


Adoption of the 2024 Phoenix Fire Code and Associated Fees: The 2024 International Fire Code
introduced several new operational permits at the national level. These new permits are now being
proposed for local incorporation, which will include corresponding fees that reflect the time, technical
expertise, and resources required for their review, inspection, and administration. In addition, Fire
Prevention is proposing new and modified fees to support consulting and technical assistance services that
enhance customer project success. These services provide opportunities for early collaboration, helping
applicants better understand complex code requirements, develop and implement alternate means and
methods, and ultimately achieve compliance more efficiently. Adjustments are also being proposed to
state-licensed facility fee structures to streamline both customer and staff processing. These updates will
improve clarity and transparency for customers by helping them easily identify which fees apply to their
operations, while also reducing administrative workload and simplifying the overall permitting and
inspection process.


Activity Description Current Fee Proposed Fee
Appeals to the Fire Marshal (When Additional Time N/A Minimum
Required) $195* (1 hour)
Staff Consultation and Research Fee N/A Minimum
$195* (1 hour)
Indoor Plant Cultivation Operational Permit New Permit Minimum
$390* (2 hours)
Lithium batteries Operational Permit New Permit Minimum
$390* (2 hours)
Temporary heating or cooking in tents or membrane New Permit Minimum
structure Operational Permit $195* (1 hour)
Temporary heating or cooking in wildfire risk area New Permit Minimum
Operational Permit $195* (1 hour)
Temporary heating for construction site Operational Permit New Permit Minimum
$195* (1 hour)
Assisted Living Facilities, Behavioral Health Care Minimum $150 (1 Minimum $150
Facilities, Developmentally Disabled Group Care Homes, hour)- $390* (1 2
and Juvenile Home Operational permits $10 per hour)-
licensed resident/bed $10 per
licensed
resident/bed
*Rate based on proposed hourly rate increase






FIRE DEPARTMENT
CLOSING SUMMARY
The proposed updates to the Fire Prevention Fee Schedule are essential to maintaining the City of
Phoenix Fire Department’s ability to deliver high-quality, community-focused risk reduction services.
These strategic adjustments, including an increase to the Fire Prevention hourly rate, updates to the
Hazardous Materials Annual Assessment Fees, and the adoption of new and revised operational permit
fees, are grounded in economic data, operational needs, and alignment with citywide development
practices.

By addressing long-standing gaps between service costs and fee recovery, these changes will enable the
Fire Prevention Section to manage growing demands, uphold national safety standards, and support
developmental growth. The proposals also enhance and streamline administrative processes, improving
customer service through clearer fee structures and expanded technical support offerings. Together, these
efforts reinforce the department’s commitment to protecting lives, property, and first responders while
fostering a safer and more resilient Phoenix.






Fire Prevention
Fire Prevention Fee
Fee Schedule
Schedule
Proposed Adjustments
Proposed Adjustments




Section 2
Section 2
Proposed Fee
Proposed Fee Schedule
Schedule




Phoenix Fire
Phoenix Fire Department
Department -- Fire
Fire Prevention
Prevention Section
Section -- 150
150 S
S 12
12th
th
St. -- Phoenix,
St. Phoenix, AZ
AZ 85034
85034 704
FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025


DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
10/17/2025
PHOENIX CITY CODE, CHAPTER 15, APPENDIX A
CURRENT ORD. NO. G-7242, § 1, 2024




For questions or comments on this draft fee schedule, please contact Eric Williams, Assistant Fire
Marshal, Phoenix Fire Department - (602) 206-5120 eric.williams@phoenix.gov




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 1 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025


ADM IN ISTRATIVE AND GENERAL FEES ADDI TI ONAL
FEE FEES OR
NOTES
FEE NAME FEE DESCRIPTION

Base Time for Operating & The base time for plan review, permits and inspections is indicated with each permit;
New Construction Permits additional time to complete the work or review additional system features will be assessed
at the hourly rate and added to the base time. Fees shall be calculated on the base hours
of completion plus additional time to complete. Fees shall be cumulative.

Base time 1 hour, rate is $150 $195, per hour.
Permit And Inspection Fees Permit and inspection fees are based on the average time to complete the type of work
specified. The minimum time assessments for work will be indicated with each permit
requirement in this chapter; additional time to complete the work will be assessed at the
hourly rate.
After Hours Inspections After-hours inspections shall be billed a minimum 3 hrs. at the hourly rate. Additional
time needed to complete the inspection will be billed at the hourly rate. Special Event
permits (Pyrotechnic, bonfire, indoor/outdoor assembly, fire performer, vehicle display
inside an assembly, amusement building, trade show, and tent) include 3 hours overtime
in the permit fee. Additional time required will be billed at the established rate.

Minimum 3 hours, $450 $585.
Appeals To the Fire Marshal An appeal form must be filled out in its entirety and $250 After 2 hours of
accompanied by payment before an appointment will required staff
be made for an appeal to the Fire Marshal. processing and
review time,
additional time
required may
result in an
additional fee
charged at the
hourly rate of
$195
Appeals To the Fire Safety An Appeal to the Fire Safety Advisory Board must be $50
Advisory Board made within 30 days of denial of an Appeal to the Fire
code official must have been submitted and denied
before an appeal to the Fire Safety Advisory Board
can be requested.
Area Assessment Fee Facilities more than 250,000 square feet (23 225 m2) Varies See Table:
shall be assessed an additional fee calculated on the Area
total area of the site. The assessment fee shall be Assessment
calculated in intervals of 250,000 square feet (23 225 Fees
m2).



Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 2 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Business Certificates A business certificate is required for companies to $150 New and Fee is per
install, modify, repair, remove or test fire protection Renewal system
equipment within the jurisdiction. See Section 105.9.

Certificate Of Fitness A certificate is required for individuals using explosive $150 New and
materials, conducting pyrotechnic fireworks or flame Renewal
effects within the jurisdiction. See Section 105.11.

Competent Party Certificate A Competent party certificate shall be required by the Not issued
fire code official for persons who supervise the onsite
installation, modification, alteration, addition to,
testing, repairing or servicing any fire alarm system,
sprinkler system, standpipe system, fire main, fire
pump or any other fire-extinguishing or detection
system, device or appliance.
Copy Research Fee Commercial Records research fee $29 Per
Address
Copy Per Page Print Fee Print fee per page $.24 Per page

Engineering Interpretation To request an engineering interpretation of a code $250 per
section. request
Staff Consultation and Staff consultation and/or research time shall be billed Minimum
Research Fee at the hourly rate, with a minimum of 1 hour $195 (1
hour)
Fee Group 1 Assessment Assessments will be based on the highest hazard. $400 $710 See Table:
Group H occupancies shall be classified as fee Group 3 Annually Hazardous
Materials
Assessmen
t
Classification
Fee Group 2 Assessment Assessments will be based on the highest hazard. $800 $1,425 See Table:
Group H occupancies shall be classified as fee Group 3 Annually Hazardous
Materials
Assessmen
t
Classification
Fee Group 3 Assessment Assessments will be based on the highest hazard. $1,250 See Table:
Group H occupancies shall be classified as fee Group 3 $2,225 Hazardous
Annually Materials
Assessmen
t
Classification




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 3 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Fee Group 4 Assessment Group M occupancies that store flammable or $800 $1,425 See Table:
combustible liquids in quantities that are greater than Annually Hazardous
the amounts in Table 5003.1.1(1) and less than or equal Materials
to the allowable quantities in Table 5704.3.4.1 Assessment
Classificatio
Group M occupancies that store hazardous materials in n
quantities that are greater than the amounts in Tables
5003.1.1(1) and 5003.1.1(2) and less than or equal to
the allowable quantities in Table 5003.11.1
Fee Group 4 Assessment Group M occupancies with more than 2,500 square feet $1,650
(232 square meters) of high-piled combustible storage $2,940
and that store flammable or combustible liquids in Annually
quantities that are greater than the amounts in Table
5003.1.1(1) and less than or equal to the allowable
amounts in Table 5704.3.4.1
Group M occupancies with more than 2,500 square feet
(232 square meters) of high-piled combustible storage
and that store hazardous materials in quantities that are
greater than the amounts in Tables 5003.1.1(1) and
5003.1.1(2) and less than or equal to the allowable
amounts in Table 5003.11.1
Fee Group 5 Stationary A Group 5 facility is any: Business, factory, $980 first tank $125 $220
Aboveground Storage Tank institutional, storage or hazardous occupancy that Annually Each
Assessment also has storage of hazardous materials in stationary Additional
above-ground storage tanks, stationary cryogenic Tank
tanks or stationary pressure vessels having a capacity Annually
of greater than 60 gallons
• Every tank of a specific hazard class of
chemical shall be assessed a fee.
• Tanks that are connected as part of a system
will be individually assessed a fee.
• This assessment fee shall include tanks
storing hazardous wastes. Exception: Tanks
used as part of a hazardous waste treatment
system.
• LP gas in portable containers or stationary
tanks shall be assigned a fee group based on
the aggregate quantity exceeding 2,000
gallons (7570 L) water capacity (WC).
Exceptions: Stationary pressure vessels
containing LP gas are not assigned a fee
group.
There is no Group 5 fee for above-ground storage
tanks containing Class III-B combustible liquids or
waste oil.


Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 4 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Agro-Industrial, Solid Biomass Facilities that store, use, or handle agro-industrial Varies; based See Table: Agro
Facilities and Pallet Yard product or pallets represent a special hazard as on material size Industrial, Solid
Assessment Fees determined by the fire code official and shall be levied Biomass, and
annual assessment fees based on the aggregate Pallet Fee
quantity of materials. Agro-industrial, solid biomass Assessment
facilities and pallet yards storing in excess of 3,000 Table
square feet (278 square meters) shall be assessed
annual assessment fees
Fire Watch and Standby Fees When fire department personnel are required by this Minimum $450
code to stand fire watch, the individual required for $585 (3
providing such service shall pay a 3-hour minimum hour)
fee. Additional time needed will be billed at the
hourly rate, per person.
General Fire Inspection A general inspection may be requested and Minimum $150
conducted for a fee. $195 (1
hour)
Investigations Fee When the fire code official determines that 300% of Permit
(Unpermitted Work, construction was started or completed without the Fee
construction or operation) applicable Fire Prevention permit and the required
fees were not paid, an additional fee equal to 300
percent of the cost of the required construction
permit and inspection fees shall be assessed for the
work.
Reinspection Fees A reinspection fee may be assessed: 1. Corrections Minimum $150
called for are not made or, 2. The items that were $195 (1
identified during the first inspection are not corrected hour)
at the time of the reinspection, 3. For failure to
provide access on the date for which inspection is
requested. 4. Additional inspections required.
Special Event Late Fees Permit applications for bonfires, fire performers, $25 Per day
assembly events, vehicle displays, tents and other within 10
membrane structures, fireworks and trade shows and business days
exhibitions shall be submitted not fewer than 10 of the event
business days in advance of the event. This does not inspection
include City of Phoenix holidays. Permit applications
submitted fewer than 10 business days in advance of
the event shall be assessed a penalty fee.

Special Hazards Facilities represent special hazard as determined by See “Area
the fire code official shall be assessed an area Assessment
assessment fee in accordance with Table 8107.1. Fee Table”

Technical Report Review Fee A technical report review, or other test used as the Minimum $750
basis of fire design $975 (5
hour)

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 5 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Work Without a Permit Conducting permittable work without a valid permit 300% of permit
Penalty fee

OPERATIONAL USE PERMITS ADDITION AL
FEE
FEES OR
PERMIT N AME PERMIT DE SCRIPTION NOTES
Aerosols To manufacture, store or handle an aggregate Minimum $300
quantity of Level 2 or Level 3 aerosol products in $390 (2
excess of 500 pounds (227 kg) net weight. hours)

Agro-Industrial and Solid To use, store or handle agro-industrial product, chips, Minimum $300
Biomass Facilities hogged material in excess of 2,500 cubic feet (71m3 ). $390 (2
hours)
Amusement Buildings To operate special amusement buildings and haunted Minimum $600
houses. $780 (4
hours)
Ammunition An operating permit is required to manufacture or Minimum $300
reload any amount of small arms ammunition for $390 (2
resale, or to manufacture or reload any amount of hours)
military, specialty, or custom ammunition.
Assisted Living Facilities To operate an assisted living facility. This includes Minimum $150 + $10 per
assisted living homes R-3 (1–5 beds), R-4 (6–10 beds), $390 (1 2 licensed
assisted living centers (11 or more beds), supervisory hour) resident/be
care and adult foster care d
Aviation Facility To use a Group H or Group S occupancy for aircraft Minimum $150
servicing or repair and aircraft fuel servicing vehicles. $195 (1 hour)
Behavioral Health Care An operational permit shall be required to conduct a Minimum $150 + $10 per
Facilities behavioral health care facility $390 (1 2 licensed
hour) resident/be
d
Blasting Blasting operations Minimum $450
$585
(3 hours)
Bonfire Or Open Burning To conduct a bonfire or open burning Minimum $150 Late fees of
$195 (1 $25 per day if
hour) submitted
within 10 city
business days
Carbon Dioxide Liquid For the storage, use or handling of carbon dioxide in Minimum $300
Systems excess of the amounts listed in table 105.6.8. $390 (2
hours)
Cellulose Nitrate Film To store, handle or use cellulose nitrate film in a Minimum $300
Group A occupancy $390 (2
hours)

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 6 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Combustible Dust Producing To operate a grain elevator, flour starch mill, feed Minimum $300
Operation mill, or a plant pulverizing aluminum, coal, cocoa, $390 (2
spices or sugar, or other operations producing hours)
combustible dusts as defined in Chapter 2.
Combustible Fiber Producing An operational permit is required for the storage and Minimum $300
Operation handling of combustible fibers in quantities greater $390 (2
than 100 cubic feet (2.8 m3). hours)
Compressed Gas For the storage, use or handling at normal Minimum $300
temperature and pressure (NTP) of compressed gases $390 (2
in excess of the amounts listed in table 105.6.8. hours)
Exceptions:
1. Vehicles equipped for and using compressed gas as
a fuel for propelling vehicles.
2. Carbon dioxide, see Carbon Dioxide
Correctional Facilities To conduct a correctional facility. Minimum $300
$390 (2
hours)
Covered and Open Mall To operate a covered or open mall. Minimum
Buildings $1,200 $1,560
(8 hours)
Cryogenic Fluids To produce, store, transport on site, use, handle or Minimum $300
dispense cryogenic fluids in excess of the amounts $390 (2
listed in Table 105.6.10 Exception: Permits are not hours)
required for vehicles equipped for and using cryogenic
fluids as a fuel for propelling the vehicle or
for refrigerating the lading.
Daycare Facilities An operational permit is required to operate a Minimum $150 Minimum
commercial daycare facility for children or adults (6 or $195 (1 hour) $300 $390 (2
more). for hours) for 51
6-50 persons or more
persons
Developmentally Disabled An operational permit is required to operate a Minimum $150 + $10 per
Group Care Homes developmentally disabled group home. $390 (1 2 hour) licensed
resident/bed
Dry Cleaning To engage in the business of dry cleaning or to change Minimum $150
to a more hazardous cleaning solvent used in existing $195 (1 hour)
dry-cleaning equipment
Educational Facility An operational permit is required for public and Minimum $150
private schools K through 12. $195 (1 hour)
Exhibits and Trade Shows To conduct an exhibit or trade show. Minimum $300 Late fees of
(Special Event) $390 (2 hours) $25 per day
Up to 4,500 sqft. if submitted
within 10
city business
days

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 7 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Exhibits 4,501 sqft or greater. Minimum $450
$585
(3 hours)
Explosives For the manufacture, storage, handling, sale or use of Minimum $150
any quantity of explosives, or explosive materials. $195 (1
hour)
Firework Displays - indoor To conduct a firework display. Indoor firework Minimum $600 Late fees of
(Special Event) permits are valid for up to 14 calendar days or 14 $780 $25 per day
performances from start of event provided no (4 hour) if submitted
changes are made to the “required information.” within 10
city business
days
Firework Displays Additional 14 calendar days or 14 performances Minimum $150
(Additional Performances) provided no changes are made to the “required $195 (1 hour)
information.”
Firework Displays - outdoor To conduct a firework display. Minimum $600 Additional
(Special Event) $780 displays
(4 hour) Minimu
m
$150 $195 (1
hour)
Firework Sales - indoor Display and/or sales of consumer fireworks. Minimum $300
$390 (2
hours)
Firework Sales - outdoor Display and/or sales of consumer fireworks. Sales Minimum $300
conducted under tents may require separate tent $390 (2 hours)
permit.
Firework Sales – wholesale To conduct wholesale sales of fireworks. Minimum $300
$390 (2 hours)
Flammable/Combustible For finishing or surfacing operations exceeding 350 Minimum $300
Finish Operations square feet (33 m2) using Class I or Class II liquids. $390 (2
hours)
Flammable/Combustible To manufacture, store, handle Class IIIB liquids Minimum $300
Liquids, Class IIIB (biofuels) in tanks or portable tanks for fueling motor $390 (2
vehicles at motor fuel-dispensing facilities or where hours)
connected to fuel-burning equipment.
Exception: Fuel oil and used motor oil used for space
heating or water heating
Flammable/Combustible To manufacture, store, handle flammable / Minimum $300
Liquids combustible liquids in accordance with Section $390 (2
105.6.16. Exception: Fuel oil and used motor oil used hours)
for space heating or water heating.




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 8 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Flammable/Combustible To remove Class I or II liquids from an underground Minimum $300
Liquids Tank, Defuel/Pump- storage tank used for fueling motor vehicles by any $390 (2
Out means other than the approved, stationary on-site hours)
OTC pumps normally used for dispensing purposes.
Flammable /Combustible To include change of contents, tank re-lining, tank Minimum $300
Liquid, Tank Modification, cutting, or tank repair. $390 (2
OTC hours)
Flammable/Combustible To abandon an underground or above-ground Minimum $300
Liquids Tank, Abandon, flammable / combustible liquids tank. $390 (2
OTC hours)
Flammable/Combustible To place out of service for up to one year an Minimum $300
Liquids Tank, Place Out of underground or above-ground $390 (2
Service flammable/combustible liquids tank for more than 90 hours)
OTC days.
Flammable/Combustible To remove a flammable/combustible tank. Inerting of Minimum $300
Liquids, Tank Removal, the tank is included in removal fee. $390 (2
OTC hours)
Flammable/Combustible To slurry fill an underground tank Minimum $300
Liquids Tank, Slurry Fill, $390 (2
OTC hours)
Flammable/Combustible To utilize a site for the dispensing of liquid fuels Minimum $300
Liquids Mobile Fueling from tank vehicles into the fuel tanks of motor $390 (2
Operations vehicles, marine craft and other special equipment hours)
at commercial, industrial, governmental or
manufacturing establishments in accordance with
Section 5706.5.4 or, where required by the fire code
official, to utilize a site for on-demand mobile
fueling operations in accordance with Section
5707.
Floor Finishing To use Class I or II liquids for resurfacing operations Minimum $150
exceeding 350 square feet (33 m2). $195 (1
hour)
Fruit And Crop Ripening To operate a fruit- or crop-ripening facility or conduct Minimum $150
a fruit-ripening process using ethylene gas. $195 (1
hour)
Fumigation And Insecticidal To operate a business of fumigation or insecticidal Minimum $150
Fogging fogging, and to maintain a room, vault or chamber in $195 (1
which a toxic or flammable fumigant is used. hour)
Hazardous Materials To store, transport on site, dispense, use or handle Minimum $150
hazardous materials in excess of the amounts listed in $195 (1
Table 8107.1. hour)
HPM Facilities To store, handle or use hazardous production Minimum $150
materials. $195 (1
hour)

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 9 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
High-Piled Combustible To use a building or portion thereof with more than Minimum $150
Storage 500 square feet (46 m2), including aisles, of high piled $195 (1
storage. hour)
Hospital and Nursing Homes An operational permit is required to operate a Minimum $150 + $10 per
hospital or nursing home. $390 (1 2 licensed
hour) resident/be
d
Hot Work Operations To conduct hot work operations Minimum $150
$195 (1
hour)
Hot Work Program Where approved, users may issue a permit to carry Minimum $300
out hot work based on approved program. $390 (2
hours)
Indoor Public Assembly To conduct a temporary assembly event indoors Minimum $300 Late fees of
(Special Event) $390 (2 $25 per day if
hours) submitted
within 10 city
business days
Indoor plant cultivation An operational permit is required for plant cultivation Minimum $390
where a carbon dioxide (CO2) enriched environment is (2 hours)
created.


Industrial Ovens To operate industrial ovens Minimum $150
$195 (1
hour)
Juvenile Group Home An operational permit is required to operate a Minimum $150 + $10 per
juvenile group home. $195 (1 licensed
hour) resident/be
d
Lithium batteries An operational permit is required for an Minimum $390
accumulation of more than 15 cubic feet (0.42 m) of (2 hours)
lithium-ion and lithium metal batteries, where
required by Section 320.2
Lumber Yards and To store or process lumber exceeding 100,000 board Minimum $450
Woodworking Facilities feet (8,333 ft3) (236 m3). $585
(3 hours)
Liquid-, Gas-Fueled or Electric To display, or demonstrate liquid, or gas-or fueled Minimum $300
Vehicles or Equipment In vehicles or electric vehicles or equipment in buildings $390 (2
Buildings Exception: Auto dealerships and Group R-3. hours)




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 10 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025

Liquefied Petroleum Gas To store and use of LP-gas. Minimum $300
(LP-Gas) Exception: $390 (2 hours)
1. A permit is not required for individual containers
with a 500-gallon (1893 L) water capacity or less or
multiple container systems having an aggregate
quantity not exceeding 500 gallons (1893 L),
serving occupancies in Group R-3.
2. Vapor service less than 2,000 gallons (7570 L)
water capacity.
3. Operation of cargo tankers that transport LP gas.
Magnesium To melt, cast, heat treat or grind more than 10 Minimum $150
pounds (4.54 kg) of magnesium $195 (1
hour)
Medical Facility An operational permit is required to operate a State Minimum $150
of Arizona Department of Health Services (DHS) $195 (1
Licensed patent treatment medical facility. hour)
Miscellaneous Combustible To store in any building or on any premises in excess Minimum $300
Storage of 2,500 cubic feet (71 m3) gross volume of $390 (2
combustible empty packing cases, boxes, barrels or hours)
similar containers, combustible pallets, rubber tires,
rubber, cork or similar combustible material.
Mobile Food Preparation To operate mobile food preparation vehicles Minimum $150
Vehicles equipped with appliances that produce smoke $195 (1
or grease-laden vapors. hour)
Motor Fuel-Dispensing To operate automotive, marine and fleet motor fuel Minimum $150
Facilities dispensing facilities. $195 (1
hour)
Fire Performers To conduct a fire performance. Minimum $150 Late fees of
(Special Event) $195 (1 $25 per day if
hour) submitted
within 10 city
business days
Open Flames or Candles To use candles or open flames in connection with Minimum $150
assembly areas, dining areas of restaurants, or $195 (1
drinking establishments. hour)
Open Flames and Torches To remove paint with a torch; or to use a torch Minimum $150
or open-flame device in a wildfire risk area. .. $195 (1
hour)
Organic Coatings For any organic-coating manufacturing operation Minimum $150
producing more than 1 gallon (4 L) of an organic $195 (1
coating in one day. hour)




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 11 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Outdoor Assembly Events To conduct public or private events outdoors, having Minimum $450 Late fees of
(Special Event) a projected attendance of 1,000 or more persons or $585 (3 $25 per day if
confining 50 or more persons by temporary hours) submitted
installation of fencing. within 10
city business
days
Places of Assembly To operate a place of assembly Minimum $150
$195 (1
hour)
Plant Extraction Systems An operational permit is required to use plant Minimum $300
extraction systems. $390 (2 hours)
Private Fire Hydrants An operational permit is required for the removal Minimum $150
from service, use or operation of private fire $195 (1 hour)
hydrants.
Pyroxylin Plastics To store or handle more than 25 pounds (11 kg) of Minimum $150
cellulose nitrate (pyroxylin) plastics, and for the $195 (1 hour)
assembly or manufacture of articles involving
pyroxylin plastics.
Refrigeration Equipment To operate to operate a mechanical refrigeration unit Minimum $150
or system regulated by Chapter 6. $195 (1 hour)
Repair Garages To operate repair garages Minimum $150
$195 (1 hour)
Rooftop Heliports To operate a rooftop heliport. Minimum $150
$195 (1 hour)
Spraying, Dipping or Powder To conduct a spraying, dipping or powder coating Minimum $300
Coating Operations operation utilizing flammable or combustible liquids, $390 (2 hours)
or the application of combustible powders
Temporary heating or cooking An operational permit is required to operate Minimum $195
in tents or membrane temporary heating or cooking equipment within tents (1 hour)
structures or membrane structures.
Temporary heating or cooking Where required by local regulations, an operational Minimum $195
in wildfire risk areas permit is required to operate temporary heating or (1 hour)
cooking equipment in wildfire risk areas.

Temporary heating for An operational permit is required to operate Minimum $195
construction sites temporary heating equipment in structures during the (1 hour)
course of construction, alteration or demolition.
Temporary Membrane To operate an air-supported temporary membrane Minimum $300 Late fees of
Structures and Tents structure, or a tent having with sidewalls with an $390 (2 hours) $25 per day if
(First Tent) area in excess of 800 square feet (74 m2), and tents submitted
(Special Event) with no walls in excess of 1,200 square feet (111m2) within 10 city
aggregate. business days




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 12 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
(Each Additional Tent at Same To operate an air-supported temporary membrane Minimum $300 Late fees of
Location) structure, a temporary special event structure or a $390 (2 $25 per day
(Special Event) tent having with sidewalls with an area in excess of hours)Each if submitted
800 square feet (74 m2), or 1,200 square feet (111m2) additional within 10
aggregate. Minimum $150 city business
$195 (1 hour)
days
Tire Rebuilding Plant To establish, conduct and maintain a tire rebuilding Minimum $450
plant $585
(3 hours)
Tires, Storage To establish, conduct or maintain storage of used, or Minimum $450
scrap tires and tire byproducts that exceeds 2,500 $585
cubic feet (71 m) of total volume of scrap tires, and (3 hours)
for indoor storage of tires and tire byproducts.
Waste Handling or Recycling To conduct wrecking yards, junk yards, and waste Minimum $450
Operations, Commercial material-handling facilities, and recycling facilities. $585
(3 hours)
Wrecking Yard, Salvage or To operate a wrecking yard, salvage, or junk yard. Minimum $450
Junkyard Operations $585
(3 hours)
Wood Products To store chips, hogged material, lumber or plywood in Minimum $450
excess of 200 cubic feet (6 m3). $585
(3 hours)
INSTALLATION M O D IF I C A T I
CON STRUCTION PERMITS FE E O N FE E


PERMIT NAME PERMIT DESCRIPTION

Construction Permit Time Extent construction permit an additional 180 days.
No Fee
Extensions
Construction Permit Construction permits shall automatically become 50% of the
Reinstate After Expiration invalid in accordance with Section 105.3.1 unless the remaining work
work authorized by such permit is commenced to inspect
within 180 days. Reinstatement fee applies.
Life Safety Report A life safety report review. Minimum $900
$1,170 (6
hour)
Maintenance Correction Inspections to ensure repairs have been completed Minimum $150
Inspections as a result of deficiency reports shall be assessed at $195 (1
the hourly rate, for a minimum of 1 hour)
hour.
Revisions to Approved Plans Revisions that are made to an approved plan that Minimum $150 Based on
has not been field approved by the fire code official $195 (1 time to
shall require a new plan review. hour) review
altered
content

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 13 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Plan Resubmittals If a plan cannot be approved after two reviews, it will 0% to 50%
be denied. The resubmittal fee shall be 0 to 50 percent percent of the
of the original submittal fee depending on the amount original
of and nature of the additional review submittal fee
required.
Expedited Inspection/Plan Request to expedite (move to the front) a plan Add Minimum
Review review or inspection (first plan review or inspection. $450 $585
Does not apply to subsequent reviews (3 hours)
or reinspection’s)
Access To install premises identification, fire lane marking, Minimum $300 Minimum
Plan Review identification of fire protection equipment, and $390 (2 $150
stairwell identification. hours) $195 (1
hour)
Access To install premises identification, fire lane marking, Minimum $300
Inspection identification of fire protection equipment, and $390 (2
stairwell identification. hours)
Access To install premises identification, fire lane marking, Each Additional
Inspection identification of fire protection equipment, and Building @
(Each Additional) stairwell identification. Minimum $75
$97.50
(0.5 hour)
Address Directories To install or modify address directories
Minimum $150
Plan Review
$195 (1
hour)
Address Directories To install or modify address directories Minimum $75
Inspections $97.50 (0.5
hour)
Automatic Hoods To install an automatic extinguishing hood. Systems Minimum $300 Minimum
Plan Review shall be charged per manual pull. $390 (2 $150
hours) $195 (1
hour)
Automatic Hoods To install an automatic extinguishing hood. Systems Minimum $225 Minimum
Inspection shall be charged per manual pull. $292.50 (1.5 $225
hours) $292.50
(1.5 hours)




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 14 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025

Automatic Sprinkler Systems
Automatic sprinkler system, To install or modify a NFPA 13 automatic sprinkler Minimum $375 21-200 head
NFPA 13 & 13R Plan Review system. Plan review is for the first 40,000 square feet $487.50 (2.5 Minimum
(3716 m2) of one building with 1 -- 2 calculations, up hours) $300 $390 (2
to 3 stories above or below grade hours)

Each
additional
200 heads
Minimum
$375 $487.50
(2.5 hours)
Each additional 40,000 sq ft (3716 m2) Add Minimum
$150 $195 (1
hour)
Additional calculations/design area Add Minimum
$150 $195 (1
hour)
Each additional building using the same fire protection Add Minimum
design plan shall be charged a separate inspection fee $150 $195 (1
hour)
Each Water tank Add Minimum
$150 $195 (1
hour)
High challenge commodity above Group A plastic Add minimum
being stored $600 $ 780 (4
hour)
Standpipe Minimum $375
$487.50 (2.5
hours)
NFPA 13 & 13R sprinkler system To install or modify a NFPA 13 automatic sprinkler Minimum $300 21-200 head
Inspection system. Plan review is for the first 40,000 square feet $390 (2 Minimum
(3716 m2) of one building with 1 -- 2 calculations, up hours) $300 $390 (2
hours)
to 3 stories above or below grade.
Each additional
200 heads
Minimum $375
$487.50 (2.5
hours)
Each additional 40,000 square feet (3716 m2) in the Add Minimum
same building $150 $195 (1
hour)
Each additional building using the same fire protection Minimum $300
design plan shall be charged a separate inspection fee $390 (2 hours)

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 15 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Each Water tank Add Minimum
$150 $195 (1
hour)
Inspection of high challenge commodity above Add Minimum
Group A plastic being stored $150 $195 (1
hour)
Inspection of standpipe Add Minimum
$150 $195 (1
hour)
Pressure-Reducing Valves To install each model of pressure-reducing valve Add minimum
Plan Review (PRV). $75 $97.50 (.5
hour)
Pressure-Reducing Valves To install each model of pressure-reducing valve Add minimum
Inspection (PRV). $75
$97.50
(.5 hour)
NFPA 13 In-rack sprinkler To install or modify an in-rack sprinkler system. Minimum $300
system $390 (2 hours)
Plan Review
NFPA 13 In-rack sprinkler To install or modify an in-rack sprinkler system. Minimum $150
system $195 (1
Inspection hour)
NFPA 13 & 13R sprinkler To change 1- 20 heads, without change of supply Minimum $225
system pipe or hazard. Without hard lid. $292.50 (1.5
OTC Modifications hours)
NFPA 13 & 13R sprinkler To change 1- 20 heads, without change of supply Minimum $150
system pipe or hazard. With hard lid. $195 (1
OTC Modifications hour)
NFPA 13 & 13R sprinkler To change 1- 20 heads, without change of supply Minimum $150
system pipe or hazard. With flex heads. $195 (1
OTC Modifications Flex heads, applicable when the equivalent length hour)
of the flex head used is 28 feet (8534 mm) or less
or the facility is going from a higher hazard density
to light hazard or has a fire pump. Without these
contingencies the system shall be hydraulically
calculated and submitted as plan review.
NFPA 13 & 13R sprinkler To modify a system that does not include a change Minimum $300
system modification or addition of sprinkler heads including, but are $390 (2
Plan Review not limited to: hours)
1. . Adding reinforcing mains to an existing system
in order to increase the available delivered
density.
2. Rerouting piping to accommodate other
building changes, such as duct or structural
elements.
Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 16 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025

NFPA 13 & 13R sprinkler To modify a system that does not include a change Minimum $300
system modification or addition of sprinkler heads including, but are $390 (2
Inspection not limited to: hours)
1. . Adding reinforcing mains to an existing system
in order to increase the available delivered
density.
2. Rerouting piping to accommodate other
building changes, such as duct or structural
elements.
3. Changing the size of the system riser to
increase delivered density.
NFPA 13D To install or modify a NFPA 13D automatic Minimum $300 Minimum $150
Plan Review sprinkler system. $390 (2 $195 (1
hours) hour)
NFPA 13D Additional calculations/design areas Add Minimum Minimum $150
Plan Review $150 $195 (1 $195 (1
hour) hour)
NFPA 13D Water tank Add Minimum Minimum $150
Plan Review $150 $195 (1 $195 (1
hour) hour)
NFPA 13D To install or modify a NFPA 13D automatic Minimum $300 Minimum $150
Inspection sprinkler system. $390 (2 $195 (1
hours) hour)
NFPA 13D – Voluntary To review a voluntarily installed residential Minimum $150 Minimum $150
System sprinkler system. $195 (1 $195 (1
Plan Review hour) hour)
NFPA 13D – Voluntary Water tank Add Minimum
System $150 $195 (1
Plan Review hour)
NFPA 13D – Voluntary To review a voluntarily installed residential Minimum $150
System sprinkler system. $195 (1
Inspection hour)
NFPA 13D Standard Plot To request a plot plan for initial approval. Minimum $150
Plans $195 (1
Plan Review hour)
NFPA 13D Standard Plot To request a permit using a previously approved Minimum $150
Plans plan. Initial review or previously approved. $195 (1
Plan Review hour)
NFPA 13D Standard Plot To request a permit using a previously approved Minimum $300
Plans plan. Initial review or previously approved. $390 (2
Inspection hours)




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 17 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025

NFPA 13 Fire Pump and To install or modify fire pumps and related fuel Minimum $600 Minimum $375
Related Equipment tanks, jockey pumps, controllers and generators. $780 (4 $487.50 (2.5
Plan Review hour) hours)
NFPA 13 Fire Pump and To install or modify fire pumps and related fuel Minimum $600 Minimum $375
Related Equipment tanks, jockey pumps, controllers and generators. $780 (4 $487.50 (2.5
Inspection hour) hours)
Non-Water-Based (Special) To install or modify install a non-water based Minimum $375 Minimum $300
Extinguishing Systems automatic extinguishing system including but not $487.50 (2.5 $390 (2
(Foam) limited to, Halon, dry chemical, carbon dioxide, hours) hours)
Plan Review FM200.
Non-Water-Based (Special) To install or modify install a non-water based Minimum $375
Extinguishing Systems automatic extinguishing system including but not $487.50 (2.5
(Foam) limited to, Halon, dry chemical, carbon dioxide, hours)
Inspection FM200.
Pre-action System To install or modify a pre-action system -- Does not Minimum $375 Minimum $300
Plan Review include any detection or fire alarm equipment. $487.50 (2.5 $390 (2
hours) hours)
Pre-action System To install or modify a pre-action system -- Does not Minimum $375
Inspection include any detection or fire alarm equipment. $487.50 (2.5
hours)
Water-Based Extinguishing To install or modify a water-based extinguishing Minimum $600 Minimum $300
System (Deluge) system (deluge) that does not include detection or $780 (4 $390 (2
Plan Review fire alarm equipment. hour) hours)
Water-Based Extinguishing To install or modify a water-based extinguishing Minimum $300
System (Deluge) system (deluge) that does not include detection or $390 (2
Inspection fire alarm equipment. hours)
Battery Systems, Electrical To install electrical energy storage systems Minimum $300
Energy Storage Systems to regulated by Section 1206.4 with a capacity of $390 (2
Include Lithium Ion Battery more than 3 kWh to 27 kWh in an R-3 or R-4 hours)
Systems occupancy.
Over The Counter Permit
(OTC)
Battery Systems, Electrical To install or modify electrical energy storage
Energy Storage Systems to systems as regulated by Section 1206.2 and
Minimum $300 Minimum $150
Include Lithium-Ion Battery 1206.4
$390 (2 $195 (1
Systems
hours) hour)
Plan Review
Battery Systems, Electrical To install or modify electrical energy storage Minimum $150
Energy Storage Systems to systems as regulated by Section 1206.2 and $195 (1
Include Lithium-Ion Battery 1206.4 hour)
Systems
Inspection



Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 18 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025

Capacitor Energy Storage To install a capacitor energy storage system in Minimum $300 Minimum $150
System excess of 3 kWh in accordance with Section $390 (2 $195 (1
Plan Review 1206.3. hours) hour)
Capacitor Energy Storage To install a capacitor energy storage system in Minimum $150 Minimum $150
System excess of 3 kWh in accordance with Section $195 (1 hour) $195 (1 hour)
Inspection 1206.3.
Carbon Dioxide To install or modify a liquefied carbon dioxide Minimum $450 Minimum $300
Compressed Gas Systems, compressed gas system $585 $390 (2
Liquefied (3 hours) hours)
Plan Review
Carbon Dioxide To install or modify a liquefied carbon dioxide Minimum $300
Compressed Gas Systems, compressed gas system $390 (2
Liquefied hours)
Inspection
Carbon Dioxide To install or modify a high-pressure carbon dioxide Minimum $450 Minimum $300
Compressed Gas Systems, compressed gas system $585 $390 (2
High Pressure (3 hours) hours)
Plan Review
Carbon Dioxide To install or modify a high-pressure carbon dioxide Minimum $300
Compressed Gas Systems, compressed gas system $390 (2
High Pressure hours)
Inspections
Combustible Dust or Fiber To install, modify or alter combustible dust or Minimum $300 Minimum $225
Collection System fiber collection system $390 (2 $292.50 (1.5
Plan Review hours) hours)
Combustible Dust or Fiber To install, modify or alter combustible dust or Minimum $150
Collection System fiber collection system $195 (1
Inspection hour)
Compressed Gas To install or modify a compressed gas system. Minimum $450 Minimum $300
(Fee Per Gas System) Note: Fee includes all systems and tanks installed $585 $390 (2
Plan Review at one site provided plans are submitted and (3 hours) hours)
inspections are conducted concurrently.
Each additional system Each gas constitutes a separate system. Minimum $150 Minimum $150
$195 (1 $195 (1
hour) hour)
Compressed Gas To install or modify a compressed gas system. Minimum $300
(Fee Per Gas System) Note: Fee includes all systems and tanks installed $390 (2
Inspection at one site provided plans are submitted and hours)
inspections are conducted concurrently. Each gas
constitutes a separate system.
Compressed Gas, Medical To install or modify a compressed gas system Minimum $300 Minimum $150
Plan Review $390 (2 $195 (1
hours) hour)


Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 19 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Compressed Gas, Medical To install or modify a compressed gas system Minimum $300
Inspection $390 (2
hours)
Cryogenics Fluid Systems For installation of or alteration to outdoor Minimum $450 Minimum $300
Plan Review stationary cryogenic fluid storage systems where $585 $390 (2
the system capacity exceeds the amounts listed in (3 hours) hours)
Table 105.6.10.
Cryogenics Fluid Systems For installation of or alteration to outdoor Minimum $300
Inspections stationary cryogenic fluid storage systems where $390 (2 hours)
the system capacity exceeds the amounts listed in
Table 105.6.10.
Emergency Responder To install or modify an emergency responder radio Minimum $300 Minimum $300
Radio Systems coverage systems and related equipment $390 (2 $390 (2
Plan Review hours) hours)
Emergency Responder To install or modify an emergency responder radio Minimum $600
Radio Systems coverage systems and related equipment $780 (4
Inspections hour)

NFPA 72 Fire Alarm Systems
Fire Alarm System To install or modify a fire alarm and detection Minimum $375 Minimum $300
Plan Review systems and related equipment per building for $487.50 (2.5 $390 (2
evacuation alarm. For the first 40,000 square hours) hours)
feet.
Each additional 40,000 square feet Minimum $300
$390 (2 hours)

Additional buildings w/ monitoring only Add Minimum Minimum $150
$150 $195 (1 $195 (1
hour) hour)
Detection Devices To install or modify 1-10 flame detection, beam Add Minimum
Plan Review detection, smoke and heat detectors or duct $150 $195 (1
detectors devices. hour)
Each additional 1-10 devices. Add Minimum
$300 $390 (2
hours)
Fire Alarm System Inspection for monitoring only. Minimum $150
Inspection $195 (1
hour)
To install or modify a fire alarm and detection Add Minimum
systems and related equipment per building for $375 $487.50
evacuation alarm. For the first 40,000 square feet. (2.5 hours)
Inspection first 40,000 square feet Add Minimum
$375 $487.50
(2.5 hours)


Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 20 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Each additional 40,000 square feet Add minimum
$375 $487.50
(2.5 hour)
Detection Devices To install or modify 1-10 flame detection, beam Minimum $300
Inspection detection, smoke and heat detectors or duct $390 (2 hours)
detectors devices.
Each additional 1-10 devices. Minimum $300
$390 (2 hours)
Smoke Detection To install or modify smoke area detection Minimum $150
Throughout throughout based on square footage. $195 (1 hour)Plus
50%
Fire Alarm System To modify an existing fire alarm system first 1-5 Minimum $300
Modification OTC devices. $390 (2 hours)

Fire Alarm System To modify an existing fire alarm system. First 1-10 Minimum $300
Modification w/ Plan Review devices. $390 (2
hours)
Each additional 25 devices Minimum $150
$195 (1 hour)
Fire Alarm, Panel To calculate fees, use the fee schedule for new fire
Replacement alarm installations. When the fire alarm control
panel fails, the entire panel shall be replaced and
installed in accordance with Section 907.5.
Where required, a separate permit shall be
obtained for supervisory off-premise fire alarm
transmitters.

Note: Alarm panel replacement does not require
complete system upgrade, if all common spaces
are upgraded to minimum code requirements for,
audibility and visibility compliance throughout and
adaptability in all living spaces.
Supervising station alarm To install or modify a fire alarm communication Minimum $300 Minimum $150
systems terminal transmitting supervisory signals between $390 (2 $195 (1
Plan Review the protected premises and a continuously hours) hour)
attended supervising station facility.
Supervising station alarm To install or modify a fire alarm communication Minimum $225
systems terminal transmitting supervisory signals between $292.50
Inspection the protected premises and a continuously (1.5 hour)
attended supervising station facility. – Per 4 risers.
Supervising station alarm To install, reprogram or change monitoring. Minimum $300
systems, OTC Includes a maximum of 8 devices being $390 (2 hours)
supervised.


Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 21 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025

Fire Alarm System Special To tie-in each floor to fire alarm panel only. Minimum $450
Egress Control Device Tie-In $585
Plan Review (3 hours)
Fire Alarm System Special To tie-in each floor to fire alarm panel only. Minimum $150
Egress Control Device Tie-In $195 (1
Inspection hour)
Fire Apparatus Alternative To install or modify alternative surface fire Minimum $300 Minimum $150
Surface Access Road apparatus access roads (fire lane). $390 (2 $195 (1
Plan Review hours) hour)
Fire Apparatus Alternative To install or modify alternative surface fire Minimum $150
Surface Access Road apparatus access roads (fire lane). $195 (1
Inspection hour)
Firefighter Breathing Air To install or modify a firefighter breathing air Minimum $150 Minimum $150
Systems system $195 (1 $195 (1
Plan Review hour) hour)
Firefighter Breathing Air To install or modify a firefighter breathing air Minimum $900 Minimum $450
Systems. system $1,170 (6 $585 (3
Inspection hours) hours)
To permanently remove any fire protection Minimum $150
Fire Protection System system. Permit is not required for removal when a $195 (1
Removal permit has been issued for installation of hour)
Plan Review replacement system, or entire building is being
demolished.
To permanently remove any fire protection Minimum $150
Fire Protection System system. Permit is not required for removal when a $195 (1
Removal permit has been issued for installation of hour)
Inspection replacement system, or entire building is being
demolished.
Flammable/Combustible To temporarily or permanently install or modify Minimum $600 Minimum $375
Liquids, Aboveground Tank Class I, II, IIIA or IIIB flammable/combustible $780 (4 $487.50 (2.5
Plan Review liquids storage tank or pressure vessel with: A hour) hours)
nominal capacity of 125 gallons (473 L) outside a
building, or 2. Any size tank inside a building, or 3.
Class IIIB liquids with a nominal capacity of 1,000
gallons (3785 L) or more.
Flammable/Combustible To temporarily or permanently install or modify Minimum $300
Liquids, Aboveground Tank Class I, II, IIIA or IIIB flammable/combustible $390 (2
Inspection liquids storage tank or pressure vessel with: A hours)
nominal capacity of 125 gallons (473 L) outside a
building, or 2. Any size tank inside a building, or 3.
Class IIIB liquids with a nominal capacity of 1,000
gallons (3785 L) or more.




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 22 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Flammable/Combustible To temporarily or permanently install or modify Minimum $1200
Liquids, Aboveground Tank Class I, II, IIIA or IIIB flammable/combustible $1,560 (8
With Fixed Fire Protection liquids storage tank or pressure vessel with: hour)
Plan Review
1. A nominal capacity of 125 gallons (473 L)
outside a building, or
2. Any size tank inside a building, or
3. Class IIIB liquids with a nominal capacity of
1,000 gallons (3785 L) or more.
Flammable/Combustible To temporarily or permanently install or modify Minimum $600
Liquids, Aboveground Tank Class I, II, IIIA or IIIB flammable/combustible $780 (4 hour)
With Fixed Fire Protection liquids storage tank or pressure vessel with:
Inspection A nominal capacity of 125 gallons (473 L) outside a
building, or
2. Any size tank inside a building, or
3. Class IIIB liquids with a nominal capacity of
1,000 gallons (3785 L) or more.
Flammable /Combustible To temporarily or permanently install or modify a Minimum $600 Minimum $375
Liquid, Underground Tanks flammable/combustible liquids tank or pressure $780 (4 hour) $487.50 (2.5
Plan Review vessel underground and any required piping, hours)
valves and dispensing equipment. This shall
include all flammable/combustible liquids tanks
and required piping, valves, and dispensing
equipment. Tank may be above ground or
underground type.
Flammable /Combustible To temporarily or permanently install or modify a Minimum $375 Minimum $300
Liquid, Underground Tanks flammable/combustible liquids tank or pressure $487.50 $390 (2 hours)
Inspections vessel underground and any required piping, (2.5 hour)
valves and dispensing equipment. This shall
include all flammable/combustible liquids tanks
and required piping, valves, and dispensing
equipment. Tank may be above ground or
underground type.
Flammable/Combustible To install or modify refineries, distilleries, plants, Minimum $600 $780 Minimum $375
Liquids, Facility terminals, wells, equipment and similar facilities (4 hours) $487.50 (2.5
Construction where flammable/ combustible liquids are hours)
Plan Review produced, processed, transported, stored,
dispensed or used
Flammable/Combustible To install or modify refineries, distilleries, plants, Minimum $300
Liquids, Facility terminals, wells, equipment and similar facilities $390 (2 hours)
Construction where flammable/ combustible liquids are
Inspection produced, processed, transported, stored,
dispensed or used
Flammable/Combustible To install or modify a pipeline for the Minimum $600 Minimum $375
Liquids, Pipelines transportation of flammable or combustible $780 (4 hour) $487.50 (2.5
Plan Review liquids hours)
Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 23 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Flammable/Combustible To install or modify a pipeline for the Minimum $300
Liquids, Pipelines transportation of flammable or combustible $390 (2 hours)
Inspection liquids
Flammable - Combustible To change out a F/C dispenser at a motor vehicle Minimum $300
Dispenser Change Out fueling site. Does not include any work below $390 (2 hours)
OTC sheer valve (process piping/sumps/etc.) or
emergency shutoff switch relocation. All work that
is below sheer valve and/or affects piping will
require plan review.
Fuel Cell Power Systems Minimum $300 Minimum $150
To install stationary fuel cell power systems in
Plan Review $390 (2 hours) $195 (1 hour)
accordance 1205.2.
Fuel Cell Power Systems Minimum $150 Minimum $150
To install stationary fuel cell power systems in
Inspection $195 (1 hour) $195 (1 hour)
accordance 1205.2.

Gas Detection Systems To install or modify a gas detection system Minimum $300 Minimum $150
Plan Review $390 (2 $195 (1
hours) hour)
Gas Detection Systems To install or modify a gas detection system Minimum $300 Minimum $150
Inspection $390 (2 hours) $195 (1 hour)

Gates and Barricades To install or modify automatic fire apparatus Minimum $225
Across Fire Apparatus access gates and their appurtenances or barricade $292.50 (1.5
Access Roads across a fire apparatus access road. This also hours)
Automatic Gates includes gates for auxiliary access openings, fee is
Plan Review per gate
Gates and Barricades To install or modify automatic fire apparatus Minimum $225
Across Fire Apparatus access gates and their appurtenances or barricade $292.50 (1.5
Access Roads across a fire apparatus access road. This also hours)
Automatic Gates includes gates for auxiliary access openings, fee is
Inspection per gate
(Each Additional Gate) To install or modify automatic fire apparatus Minimum $150
Inspection access gates and their appurtenances or barricade $195 (1
across a fire apparatus access road. This also hour)
includes gates for auxiliary access openings, fee is
per gate
Gates and Barricades To install or modify automatic fire apparatus Minimum $150
Across Fire Apparatus access gates and their appurtenances or barricade $195 (1
Access Roads across a fire apparatus access road. This also hour)
Manual Gates includes gates for auxiliary access openings, fee is
Plan Review per gate




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 24 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025

Gates and Barricades To install or modify automatic fire apparatus Minimum $150
Across Fire Apparatus access gates and their appurtenances or barricade $195 (1 hour)
Access Roads across a fire apparatus access road. This also
Manual Gates includes gates for auxiliary access openings, fee is
Inspection per gate
Manual Gates To install or modify automatic fire apparatus Minimum $75
(Each Additional Gate) access gates and their appurtenances or barricade $97.50
Inspection across a fire apparatus access road. This also (0.5 hour)
includes gates for auxiliary access openings, fee is
per gate.
Hazardous Materials Tank To place abandon, remove, close, temporary Minimum $300
Abandon, Remove, Close, close, or place out of service hazardous materials $390 (2
Temporary Close, Or Place tank OTC hours)
Out of Service
OTC
Hazardous Materials Tank, To install or modify a hazardous materials storage Minimum $600 Minimum $300
Cabinet & Enclosure Install tank, cabinet, enclosure, gas rooms or drainage $780 (4 $390 (2
or Modify and containment areas. This permit includes all hour) hours)
Plan Review hazardous materials container and tanks, required
piping, valves and dispensing equipment
Hazardous Materials Tank, To install or modify a hazardous materials storage Minimum $450 Minimum $150
Cabinet & Enclosure Install tank, cabinet, enclosure, gas rooms or drainage $585 (3 hours) $195 (1
or Modify and containment areas. This permit includes all hour)
Inspection hazardous materials container and tanks, required
piping, valves and dispensing equipment
Heliport To install or modify install a heliport. Minimum $300
Plan Review $390 (2
hours)
Heliport To install or modify install a heliport. Minimum $300
Inspection $390 (2
hours)
High-Piled Combustible To install or modify a structure exceeding 500 Minimum $600 Minimum $300
Storage square feet (46 m2), including aisles, for high-piled $780 (4 $390 (2
Plan Review combustible storage hours) hours)
High-Piled Combustible To install or modify a structure exceeding 500 Minimum $300 Minimum $300
Storage square feet (46 m2), including aisles, for high-piled $390 (2 $390 (2
Inspection combustible storage hours) hours)
Hydrant, Private Water Water flow tests on private hydrants, to be use in Minimum $450
Flow Test the design of fire protection systems, shall be $585 (3
OTC witnessed by the Phoenix Fire Department. This hours)
fee includes one inspection only
To install a temporary above-ground fire hydrant Minimum $450
Hydrants, Temporary
and fire line. $585 (3
Plan Review
hours)

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 25 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Hydrants, Temporary. To install a temporary above-ground fire hydrant Minimum $150
Per Hydrant or Each 500 Ft and up to 500 feet (152 m) of fire line. $195 (1
Of Fire Line hour)
Inspection
Industrial Oven To install or modify an industrial oven Minimum $300
Plan Review $390 (2
hours)
Industrial Oven To install or modify an industrial oven Minimum $150
Inspection $195 (1 hour)

Liquefied Petroleum Gas To install or modify install, alter or modify Minimum $150
OTC portable containers of less than 125-gallon (473 L) $195 (1 hour)
aggregate water capacity used exclusively for
vapor service, or any size tank used for liquid
service.
Liquefied Petroleum Gas, To flare-off a liquefied petroleum tank 125-gallon Minimum $300
Flare Off (473 L) or greater aggregate water capacity $390 (2 hours)
OTC
Liquefied Petroleum Gas, To install or modify install a liquefied petroleum Minimum $300 Minimum $225
Under or Above Ground gas (LPG), tank under or above ground 126 gallons $390 (2 hours) $292.50
Plan Review to 1999 gallons aggregate water capacity. (1.5 hour)
Liquefied Petroleum Gas, To install or modify install a liquefied petroleum Minimum $150
Under or Above Ground gas (LPG), tank under or above ground 126 gallons $195 (1 hour)
Inspection to 1999 gallons aggregate water capacity.
Liquefied Petroleum Gas, To install, modify or alter of LP-gas containers with (ADD) Minimum
Under or Above Ground an aggregate water capacity of 2,000 gallons $600 $780 (4
With Fixed Fire Protection (7570 L) or more. hour)
Liquefied Petroleum Gas, To install, modify or alter of LP-gas containers with Minimum $600 Minimum $300
2,000 Gallons an aggregate water capacity of 2,000 gallons $780 (4 $390 (2
Plan Review (7570 L) or more. hour) hours)
Liquefied Petroleum Gas, To install, modify or alter of LP-gas containers with Minimum $300 Minimum $300
2,000 Gallons an aggregate water capacity of 2,000 gallons $390 (2 hours) $390 (2 hours)
Inspection (7570 L) or more.
Liquefied Petroleum Gas, Liquefied petroleum gas, exchange program Minimum $150
Exchange Program $195 (1 hour)
Plan Review
Liquefied Petroleum Gas, Liquefied petroleum gas, exchange program Minimum $150
Exchange Program $195 (1 hour)
Inspection
Motor Vehicle Repair A construction permit is required to install or Minimum $300 Minimum $150
Rooms and Booths modify a motor vehicle repair room or booth. $390 (2 hours) $195 (1 hour)
Plan Review



Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 26 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Motor Vehicle Repair A construction permit is required to install or Minimum $150
Rooms and Booths modify a motor vehicle repair room or booth. $195 (1 hour)
Inspection
Plant Extraction Systems To install or modify a plant extraction system Minimum $600 Minimum $300
Plan Review $780 (4 hour) $390 (2 hours)

Plant Extraction Systems To install or modify a plant extraction system Minimum $450 $585 Minimum $300
Inspection (3 hours) $390 (2 hours)

Refrigeration System To install, modify or alter a refrigeration system Minimum $600 Minimum $300
Plan Review $780 (4 $390 (2
hour) hours)
Refrigeration System To install, modify or alter a refrigeration system Minimum $600
Inspection $780 (4
hour)
Smoke Control or Smoke To install or modify install a smoke control or Minimum $600 Minimum $300
Exhaust smoke exhaust system $780 (4 $390 (2
Plan Review hour) hours)
Smoke Control or Smoke To install or modify install a smoke control or Minimum $900 Minimum $450
Exhaust smoke exhaust system $1,170 (6 $585 (3
Inspection hours) hours)
Smoke & Heat Vents To install or modify smoke and heat vents. Minimum $300
Plan Review First 1-40 Vents Modification requires new plan submittal $390 (2
hours)
Smoke & Heat Vents To install or modify smoke and heat vents. Minimum $150
Plan Review Each Additional Modification requires new plan submittal $195 (1
40 Vents hour)
Smoke & Heat Vents To install or modify smoke and heat vents. Minimum $375
Inspection First 1-40 Vents Modification requires new plan submittal $487.50 (2.5
hours)
Smoke & Heat Vents To install or modify smoke and heat vents. Minimum $150
Inspection Each Additional Modification requires new plan submittal $195 (1
40 Vents hour)
Smoke Removal Systems A construction permit is required to install, alter Minimum $600 Minimum $300
Plan Review or modify a mechanical smoke removal system $780 (4 $390 (2
hour) hours)
Smoke Removal Systems A construction permit is required to install, alter Minimum $900
Inspection or modify a mechanical smoke removal system $1,170 (6
hours)
Solar Photovoltaic Power To install or modify install a solar photovoltaic Minimum $300
Systems power system. To install or modify install a $390 (2
Plan Review Residential residential solar photovoltaic power system with hours)
an alternating current nameplate rating in greater
than 15 kW
Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 27 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Solar Photovoltaic Power To install or modify install a solar photovoltaic Minimum $150
Systems power system. To install or modify install a $195 (1
Inspection Residential residential solar photovoltaic power system with hour)
an alternating current nameplate rating in greater
than 15 kW
Solar Photovoltaic Power To install or modify install a solar photovoltaic Minimum $300
Systems power system. To install or modify install a $390 (2
Plan Review Commercial residential solar photovoltaic power system with hours)
an alternating current nameplate rating in greater
than 15 kW
Solar Photovoltaic Power To install or modify install a solar photovoltaic Minimum $225
Systems power system. To install or modify install a $292.50 (1.5
Inspection Commercial residential solar photovoltaic power system with hours)
an alternating current nameplate rating in greater
than 15 kW
Solar Photovoltaic Power To install or modify install a residential solar Minimum $300
Systems photovoltaic power system with an alternating $390 (2
OTC current nameplate rating of 3 kW to 15 kW in an hours)
R-3 or R-4 occupancy or the installation of a
residential solar photovoltaic system for a water
heater with a system size of 30kWth (462 square
feet (49.9 M2) of collector) or less in an R-3 or R-4
occupancy
Solar Photovoltaic Power To install or modify a residential solar photovoltaic Minimum $300
System and Electrical power system with an alternating current $390 (2
Energy Storage Systems nameplate rating of 3 kW - 15 kW alternating hours)
Combo current nameplate rating and battery energy
OTC storage system with 3 kWh - 27 kWh capacity.
To install or modify a residential solar photovoltaic Minimum $300
Solar Photovoltaic Power power system with an alternating current $390 (2
System and Electrical nameplate rating of greater than 15 kW hours)
Energy Storage Systems alternating current nameplate rating and battery
Combo energy storage system with a greater than 27 kWh
Plan Review capacity.

Solar Photovoltaic Power
System and Electrical To install or modify a residential solar photovoltaic
Energy Storage Systems power system with an alternating current Minimum $150
Combo nameplate rating of greater than 15 kW $195 (1
Inspection alternating current nameplate rating and battery hour)
energy storage system with a greater than 27 kWh
capacity.




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 28 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025

Spraying, Dipping or To install or modify install a spray booth, spray Minimum $600 Minimum $300
Powder Coating, room, spray area, dip tank, or powder coating $780 (4 $390 (2
Construction booth, room or area. Note: Fee includes the fire hour) hours)
Plan Review protection system if submitted with the spray
booth, spray room or spray area plan.
Spraying, Dipping or To install or modify install a spray booth, spray Minimum $300
Powder Coating, room, spray area, dip tank, or powder coating $390 (2
Construction booth, room or area. Note: Fee includes the fire hours)
Inspection protection system if submitted with the spray
booth, spray room or spray area plan.
Standpipe Outlets To install or modify install standpipe system (not Minimum $300
Plan Review part of a sprinkler system) $390 (2
hours)
Standpipe Outlets To install or modify install standpipe system (not Minimum $375
Inspection part of a sprinkler system) $487.50
(2.5 hour)
Standpipe Outlets Each Additional Floor Level Outlet (Add) Minimum
$150 $195 (1
hour)
Note: Any requirement for a
new riser, main or branch-
line piping shall be
considered a new
installation.
Stub-Out, Water Supply Stub-outs which are installed and tested as part of Minimum $300
(Fire Line), Underground or the underground fire line are included in the fire $390 (2 hours)
Hydrant Relocation protection system lead-in. When permitted
OTC separately from the building’s underground fire
line, a separate over-the-counter permit is
required for each stub-out, including hydrant
movement up to 20 feet. Stub-outs shall not
extend more than 10 feet (3048 mm) from outside
the building to 6 inches (150 mm) above the
finished floor and contain not more than one 90°
(1.57 rad) bend.
Water Supply (Fire Line), To install or modify install underground fire lines Minimum $450 $585 Minimum $225
Underground or Hydrant, which serve fire protection systems or hydrants or (3 hours) $292.50 (1.5
or Private Hydrant any combination thereof, includes modifications hours)
Plan Review include moving pipelines or relocating taps or
changes to, 1-4 connections.
Water Supply (Fire Line), To install or modify install underground fire lines Minimum $150 Minimum $300
Underground or Hydrant, which serve fire protection systems or hydrants or $195 (1 hour) $390 (2 hours)
or Private Hydrant any combination thereof, includes modifications
Inspection include moving pipelines or relocating taps or
changes to, 1-4 connections.

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 29 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Water Supply (Fire Line), Each additional 1-4 connections. Add Minimum
Underground or Hydrant, $150 $195 (1
or Private Hydrant hour)
Plan Review Each Additional
1-4 Connection
Water Supply (Fire Line), Each additional 1-4 connections. Add minimum
Underground or Hydrant, $75 $97.50 (0.5
Or Private Hydrant hour)
Inspection




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 30 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025


Agro-industrial, Solid Biomass Facilities and Pallet Yard Assessment Fees Table

Outside storage of 3,000 square feet (278 square meters) or less $0

Outside storage of 3001 to 15,000 square feet (278 to 1393 M2) $400

Outside storage of 15,001 to 30,000 square feet (1393 to 2787 M2) $800

Outside storage of 30,001 square feet (2787 M2) or more $1250




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 31 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025


Hazardous Materials Assessment Classifications Table a, b
HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FEE GROUP 1 FEE GROUP 2 FEE GROUP 3 & “H”
Occupancies
Aerosols—Level 2 and 3 500 – 2,500 lbs. 2,501 – 12,000 lbs. > 12,000 lbs.
Combustible Liquids—Class II 60 – 120 gallons 121 – 480 gallons > 480 gallons
Combustible Liquids—Class III-A 60 – 330 gallons 331 – 1,320 gallons > 1,320 gallons
Compressed Gas—Corrosive 200 – 810 ft 3
811 – 3,240 ft 3
> 3,240 ft3
Compressed Gas—Flammable
200 – 750 ft3 751 – 3,000 ft3 > 3,000 ft3
(except cryogenic fluids and LPG)
Compressed Gas—Highly toxic Up to 20 ft3 21 – 80 ft3 > 80 ft3
Compressed Gas—Liquefied
60 – 120 gallons 121 – 240 gallons > 240 gallons
Compressed Gas Inert and simple
Compressed Gas— 6,000 – 12,000 ft3 12,001 – 24,000 ft3 > 24,000 ft3
Inert and simple asphyxiant
Compressed Gas—Oxidizing 504 – 1,500 ft3 1,501 – 6,000 ft3 > 6,000 ft3
(including oxygen)
Compressed Gas—Pyrophoric Up to 20 ft3 21 – 80 ft3 > 80 ft3
Compressed Gas—Toxic Up to 810 ft3 811 – 3,240 ft3 > 3,240 ft3
Cryogens—Flammable 60 – 500 gallons (outdoors) > 500 gallons (outdoors) Not Applicable
(see Fee Group 5)
> 1 gallon (indoors)
> 120 gallons (indoors)
Cryogens—Inert > 60 –120 gallons (indoors) Not Applicable
> 1,000 gallons
500 – 1,000 gallons
(outdoors)
(outdoors)
Cryogens—Oxidizing (includes 11 – 50 gallons (indoors) > 50 gallons (indoors)
oxygen) 51 – 500 gallons (outdoors) > 500 gallons (outdoors) Not Applicable

Cryogens—Physical or health 11 – 50 gallons (indoors) > 50 gallons (indoors)
hazard not indicated above 51 – 500 gallons (outdoors) > 500 gallons (outdoors) Not Applicable

Corrosive materials
Gases (not defined as a compressed 200 – 810 ft3 811 – 3,240 ft3 > 3,240 ft3
Liquids 55 – 500 gallons 501 – 2,000 gallons > 2,000 gallons
Solids 1,000 – 2,000 lbs. 2,001 – 4,000 lbs. > 4,000 lbs.
Explosive materials
Consumer fireworks warehouse > 1,000 lbs. (gross weight) Not Applicable Not Applicable
Explosive materials 1 – 2 1bs. 3 – 4 lbs. > 4 lbs.

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 32 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Flammable materials

Gases (not defined as a compressed 200 – 750 ft3 751 – 3,000 ft3 > 3000 ft3
Liquids—Flammable Class I-A 10 – 30 gallons 3 1– 120 gallons > 120 gallons
Liquids—Flammable Class I-B 30 – 60 gallons 61 – 240 gallons > 240 gallons
Liquids—Flammable Class I-C 30 – 90 gallons 91 – 360 gallons > 360 gallons
Solids 100 – 125 lbs. 126 – 500 lbs. > 500 lbs.
Highly toxic materials
Gases (not defined as a compressed 1 –20 ft3 21 – 80 ft3 > 80 ft3
Liquids Up to 1 gallon 1 – 4 gallons > 4 gallons
Oxidizing gases
Gases (not defined as a 504 – 1,500 ft3 1,501 – 6,000 ft3 > 6,000 ft3
compressed
Oxidizing Materials - Liquids
Class 4 Up to ½ gallon ½ – 1 gallon > 1 gallon
Class 3 1 – 4 gallons 5 – 16 gallons > 16 gallons
Class 2 10 – 25 gallons 26 – 400 gallons > 400 gallons
Class 1 55 – 800 gallons 801 – 6,400 gallons > 6,400 gallons
Oxidizing Materials - Solids
Class 4 1 – 2 lbs. 3 – 8 lbs. > 8 lbs.
Class 3 10 – 40 lbs. 41 – 160 lbs. > 160 lbs.
Class 2 10 – 250 lbs. 251 – 4,000 lbs. > 4,000 lbs.
Class 1 500 – 8,000 lbs. 8,001 – 64,000 lbs. > 64,000 lbs.
Organic Peroxides—Liquids
Class I Up to ½ gallon ½ – 4 gallons > 4 gallons
Class II Up to 5 gallons 5 – 40 gallons > 40 gallons
Class III 1 – 10 gallons 11 – 100 gallons > 100 gallons
Class IV 2 – 20 gallons 21 – 200 gallons > 200 gallons
Class V Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
Organic Peroxides—Solids
Class I 1 – 5 lbs. 6 – 40 lbs. > 40 lbs.
Class II 1 – 50 lbs. 51 – 400 lbs. > 400 lbs.
Class III 10 – 100 lbs. 101 – 1,000 lbs. > 1,000 lbs.
Class IV 20 – 200 lbs. 201 – 2,000 lbs. > 2,000 lbs.
Class V Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
Pyrophoric materials
Gases 1–50 ft3 51–100 ft3 > 100 ft3

Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 33 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025
Liquids Up to ½ gallon ½ – 1 gallon > 1 gallon
Solids 1 – 4 lbs. 5 – 16 lbs. > 16 lbs.
Toxic materials

Gases 1 – 810 ft3 811 – 3,240 ft3 > 3,240 ft3
Liquids 10 – 50 gallons 51 – 200 gallons > 200 gallons
Solids 100 – 500 lbs. 501 – 2,000 lbs. > 2,000 lbs.
Unstable (reactive) materials—Liquids
Class 4 Up to ½ gallon ½ – 1 gallon > 1 gallon
Class 3 Up to ½ gallon ½ – 1 gallon > 1 gallon
Class 2 5–10 gallons 11 – 20 gallons > 20 gallons
Class 1 10–50 gallons 51 – 200 gallons > 200 gallons
Unstable (reactive) materials—Solids
Class 4 Up to 1 lb. 1 – 4 lbs. > 4 lbs.
Class 3 Up to 5 lbs. 5 – 10 lbs. > 10 lbs.
Class 2 50 – 100 lbs. 101 – 200 lbs. > 200 lbs.
Class 1 100 – 500 lbs. 510 – 2000 lbs. > 2000 lbs.
Water-reactive materials—Liquids
Class 3 Up to ½ gallon ½ –1 gallon > 1 gallon
A. Assessments will be based on the highest quantity of the most hazardous materials
on site.
B. Group H occupancies shall be classified as Fee Group 3.




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 34 of 35

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DRAFT FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULE
Draft Fee Schedule 10/17/2025


Area Assessment Fee Table
(Applies to Fee Groups 1, 2 or 3 only)
Per Phoenix Fire Code section 106.10; Facilities and sites with total areas of more than 250,000 square
feet (23,225 square meters) shall be levied an area assessment fee in addition to their annual
assessment fee.
The Area Assessment will be the fee group annual assessment for the first 250,000 square feet
(23,225 square meters), plus 50 percent of the annual assessment fee for each additional
250,000 square feet (23,225 square meters).
Area assessment fee by fee group
Site area (ft2) Site area (acres)
Fee Group 1 Fee Group 2 Fee Group 3
250,001–500,000 5.7–11.5 $600 $1,065 $1,200 $1,875 $3,337.50
$2,137.50
500,001–750,000 11.5–17.2 $800 $1,420 $1,600 $2,850 $2,500 $4,450
750,001–1,000,000 17.2–23.0 $1,000 $1,775 $2,000 $3,125 $5,562.50
$3,562.50
1,000,001–1,250,000 23.0 –28.7 $1,200 $2,130 $2,400 $4,275 $3,750 $6,675.50
1,250,001–1,500,000 28.7–34.4 $1,400 $2,485 $2,800 $4,375 $7,787.50
$4,987.50
1,500,001–1,750,000 34.4–40.2 $1,600 $2,840 $3,200 $5,700 $5,000 $ 8,900
1,750,000–2,000,000 40.2–46.0 $1,800 $3,195 $3,600 $5,625 $10,012.50
$6,412.50
2,000,001–2,250,000 46.0–51.7 $2,000 $ 3,550 $4,000 $7125 $6,250 $11,125
2,250,001–2,500,000 51.7–57.4 $2,200 $3,905 $4,400 $6,875 $12,237.50
$7,837.50
Each Additional 250,000 5.7 +$200 $355 +$400 $712.50 +$625 $1,112.5




Phoenix Fire Department, Fire Prevention Section, 150 South 12th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Pfd.prevention@phoenix.gov 602-262-6771 Page 35 of 35




Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Approval of Phil Gordon Threatened Building Grant - Seven Homes in the
Coronado Historic District (Ordinance S-52508) - District 4

This report requests the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into the necessary
agreements and conveyances with Imagine Coronado, LLC, related to a Historic
Preservation Phil Gordon Threatened Building grant of up to $500,000 to assist with
the rehabilitation of seven homes in the Coronado Historic District located at 1622,
1626, 1630, 1634, 1638, 1642, and 1646 N. 11th Street. Further request for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The seven homes are contributors to the Coronado Historic District and were
constructed between 1925 and 1927. All consist of modest brick bungalow style
dwellings except for 1630 N. 11th Street, which is of wood frame and siding
construction; with its pyramidal roof, it is more simply classified as a vernacular
cottage.

The former property owner owned the entire block between Coronado and
McDowell roads and 11th and Dayton streets, which included the seven homes.
The larger property was the subject of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezoning
case in 2023. As part of this case, the lot depth of the historic residential properties
was reduced by 38 feet with the historic preservation (HP) overlay reduced by the
same amount to facilitate a new mixed use development to the west. The
recordation of perpetual conservation easements for the remaining 101-foot
portions of the seven residential properties with the HP overlay was included as a
stipulation of the zoning case. That stipulation has been met. The homes have sat
vacant since the rezoning case of 2023.

The broader development did not come to fruition. The property owner recently sold
the seven homes, including the original 38 rear feet, to the applicant so that each lot
returned to its original 139-foot depth.

The new owner, Imagine Coronado, LLC, submitted a threatened building grant
application on September 30, 2025, requesting $500,000 in funding. The owners


are seeking funding assistance for the following eligible work items:

1. Foundation and joist repair.
2. Subfloor framing.
3. Porch rehabilitation.
4. Window and door repair and replacement.
5. New roofing.
6. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements.
7. Selective demolition.
8. Masonry repair.
9. Exterior woodwork repair.
10. Chimney repair/cleaning.
11. Exterior painting.

The cost of the entire rehabilitation project is estimated at $2.49 million.

Staff recommends allocating the use of $500,000 in available Phil Gordon
Threatened Building grant funds for this project.

If approved, the grant funds will be disbursed to the applicant on a reimbursement
basis as work is completed and expenses verified.

Financial Impact
The requested amount is $500,000. In exchange for the grant funds, the City will
receive a 40-year conservation easement on the rear 38 feet of the property (with
the perpetual easements remaining in place on the front 101 feet of the property).
The easement will require the property be preserved, insured, and maintained in
good repair once rehabilitation is completed.

Concurrence
The Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval of this item on
October 20, 2025, by a 7-0 vote.

The Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee recommended
approval of this item on November 19, 2025, by a 4-0 vote.

Location
1622, 1626, 1630, 1634, 1638, 1642, and 1646 N. 11th Street. Council District: 4




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Approval of Phil Gordon Threatened Building Grant - Dr. J. Eugene and R.
Thomasena Grigsby House - 1117 N. 9th Street (Ordinance S-52507) - District

This report requests the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into the necessary
agreements and conveyances with Greg Esser and Cindy Dach related to a Historic
Preservation Phil Gordon Threatened Building grant of up to $200,000 to assist with
the rehabilitation of the historic Dr. J Eugene and R. Thomasena Grigsby House
located at 1117 N. 9th Street. Further request for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item.

Summary
Located within the North Garfield Historic District, the Dr. J. Eugene and R.
Thomasena Grigsby House was constructed in 1919 and acquired by the Grigsbys
in the mid-1950s. In 1957, the Grigsbys infilled the front porch of the bungalow
dwelling to create a "Front Porch Gallery" and in 1963 hired architect Joe B. Wong
to design a rear slump block addition to serve as an art studio and archive for Dr.
Grigsby, a prolific and nationally prominent artist.

The Grigsbys were both distinguished artists and civil rights leaders who received
many honors and awards during their lifetimes. They were founders of the Garfield
Organization, Artists of the Black Community (ABC), the Coalition of Black
Organizations and Others for Artists (COBA), as well as other arts and cultural
organizations and were supporters of the Phoenix Art Museum, Black Theatre
Troupe, and many others. Both Dr. and Mrs. Grigsby lived out their lives residing at
the property. Mrs. Grigsby passed away in 2008 at the age of 89, and Dr. Grigsby
passed away in 2013 at the age of 94.

In 2004, the property was recognized as significant in the African American Historic
Property Survey for its association with the Grigsbys. However, the association with
the Grigsbys and the alterations they made to the property were not yet 50 years
old, so the survey recommended the property be re-evaluated at a future date.
Today, the association is 50 years old and the front porch enclosure has been
reversed, so the property is now deemed individually eligible for its association with


the Grigsbys and may be reclassified as a contributor to the North Garfield Historic
District.

In April 2025, the property was sold to a development group that intended to demolish
the home after a long period of deferred maintenance. Artists and preservation
advocates Greg Esser and Cindy Dach, who own the home next to the subject
property, purchased it directly from the development group in order to preserve and
restore it.

The owners submitted a threatened building grant application on September 9,
2025 requesting $200,000 in funding. The owners are seeking funding assistance
for the following eligible work items:

1. Selective demolition.
2. Asbestos abatement.
3. Roof repairs.
4. Window and door repair and replacement.
5. Porch rehabilitation.
6. Americans with Disability Act (ADA) improvements.
7. Historic outbuilding rehabilitation.

The cost of the entire rehabilitation project is estimated at $600,578.56.

Staff recommends allocating the use of $200,000 which is available from the 2023
General Obligation Bond Program - Historic Preservation.

If approved, the grant funds will be disbursed to the applicant on a reimbursement
basis as work is completed and expenses verified.

Financial Impact
The requested amount is $200,000. In exchange for the grant funds, the City will
receive a 30-year conservation easement. The easement will require the property
be preserved, insured, and maintained in good repair once rehabilitation is
completed.

Concurrence
The Historic Preservation Commission recommended approval of this item on
October 20, 2025, by a 7-0 vote.




The Transportation, Infrastructure and Planning Subcommittee recommended
approval of this item on November 19, 2025, by a 4-0 vote.

Location
1117 N. 9th Street
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning
and Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Modification of Stipulation Request for Ratification of October 15, 2025, Planning
Hearing Officer Action - PHO-1-25--Z-117-98-6 - Northeast Corner of 48th Street
and Holly Street - District 6

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to approve the
Planning Hearing Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council
on matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on October 15, 2025. This ratification
requires formal action only.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-25--Z-117-98-6
Existing Zoning: R-3 SP, C-O/G-O HGT/WVR
Acreage: 2.83

Owner: Harry Antram, Diocese of Phoenix Catholic Cemeteries and Funeral Homes
Applicant/Representative: Madison Leake, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

Proposal:
1. Request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance with the site plan
date stamped February 1, 1999.

VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee heard this request on
October 7, 2025, and recommended approval by a vote of 15-0.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer took the case under advisement. On
November 13, 2025, the Planning Hearing Officer took the case out from under
advisement and recommended approval with an additional stipulation.

Location
Northeast corner of 48th Street and Holly Street
Council District: 6
Parcel Address: 2033 N. 48th Street

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.


ATTACHMENT A
Stipulations – PHO-1-25--Z-117-98-6

Location: Northeast corner of 48th Street and Holly Street

STIPULATIONS:

1. That THE development SHALL be in general conformance WITH to the
site plan dated STAMPED OCTOBER 16, 2025, February 1, 1999, as may
be modified by the following stipulations, Ordinance requirements and
Development Services Department site plan review. AS MODIFIED BY
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

2. That The height of the building be limited to 34 feet.

3. That Any walls along the west and south property lines SHALL be
constructed of stone masonry and steel pickets to match the character of
existing fencing on the cemetery property.

4. That Any fence constructed along the east property line SHALL be
constructed of wood, or with chain link in conjunction with a landscaped
hedge which will serve to screen the cemetery property.

5. That Signage SHALL be limited to that allowed under the R-5 district
standards.

6. That The building SHALL be designed to complement the residential
character of the area, with such design to be approved through
PLANNING AND Development Services Department review.

7. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Modification of Stipulation Request for Ratification of October 15, 2025, Planning
Hearing Officer Action - PHO-1-25--Z-SP-29-98-6 - Northeast Corner of 48th
Street and Holly Street - District 6

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to approve the
Planning Hearing Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council
on matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on October 15, 2025. This ratification
requires formal action only.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-25--Z-SP-29-98-6
Existing Zoning: R-3 SP, C-O/G-O HGT/WVR
Acreage: 2.83

Owner: Harry Antram, Diocese of Phoenix Catholic Cemeteries and Funeral Homes
Applicant/Representative: Madison Leake, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

Proposal:
1. Request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding general conformance with the site plan
date stamped February 1, 1999.

VPC Action: The Camelback East Village Planning Committee heard this request on
October 7, 2025, and recommended approval by a vote of 15-0.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer took the case under advisement. On
November 13, 2025, the Planning Hearing Officer took the case out from under
advisement and recommended approval with an additional stipulation.

Location
Northeast corner of 48th Street and Holly Street
Council District: 6
Parcel Address: 2033 N. 48th Street

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.


ATTACHMENT A
Stipulations – PHO-1-25--Z-SP-29-98-6

Location: Northeast corner of 48th Street and Holly Street

STIPULATIONS:

1. That THE development SHALL be in general conformance WITH to the
site plan dated STAMPED OCTOBER 16, 2025, February 1, 1999, as may
be modified by the following stipulations, Ordinance requirements and
Development Services Department site plan review. AS MODIFIED BY
THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

2. That The height of the building be limited to 34 feet.

3. That Any walls along the west and south property lines SHALL be
constructed of stone masonry and steel pickets to match the character of
existing fencing on the cemetery property.

4. That Any fence constructed along the east property line SHALL be
constructed of wood, or with chain link in conjunction with a landscaped
hedge which will serve to screen the cemetery property.

5. That Signage SHALL be limited to that allowed under the R-5 district
standards.

6. That The building SHALL be designed to complement the residential
character of the area, with such design to be approved through
PLANNING AND Development Services Department review.

7. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 19 AND DECEMBER 3, 2025) - Authorization to
Grant Sheely Ted D / ET AL c/o William Sheely / ET AL (Sheely Center) a Binding
Waiver of Enforcement (Waiver) of the Special Permit Provisions for Data
Centers (Ordinance S-52435) - District 5

Request authority to grant Sheely Ted D / ET AL c/o William Sheely / ET AL (Sheely
Center) a Binding Waiver of Enforcement (Waiver) of the Special Permit Provisions for
Data Centers under Ordinance G-7396. The Council is considering the Planning
Hearing Officer's recommendation regarding rezoning application PHO-1-25--Z-29-12-
7(5) for this development by a public hearing held on the same council agenda as this
item. This item must be heard following that hearing.

Summary
Following the City of Phoenix’s adoption of Ordinance G-7396 on July 2, 2025, which
established a regulatory framework for data centers, Sheely Center submitted a
demand to the City under A.R.S. § 12-1134, asserting that the ordinance diminished
the fair market value of its property located at Parcel No. 102-34-002E.

Parcel Address: 2209 N. 99th Ave.
Owner: Sheely Ted D / ET AL c/o William Sheely / ET AL (Sheely Center)
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, P.L.C. and Andrew Gould,
Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak PLLC

Pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1134(E), Ordinance G-7396 authorizes the City Council, in its
sole discretion, to grant binding waivers of the special permit requirements for data
centers. In accordance with this provision, Sheely Center has formally requested such
a waiver. The special permit requirements set forth in Ordinance G-7396 were enacted
by the City Council to address public health and safety concerns and to mitigate
adverse secondary impacts on surrounding neighborhoods, businesses, and residents.

The purpose of the City's requirements are to protect public health and safety.
Therefore, the waiver requires the proposed data center to address and mitigate
potential health and safety impacts on neighboring properties, including, among other
things, fire and public safety threats, hazardous materials, energy use, water use, and
noise pollution. The waiver describes requirements for each category to comply with



Ordinance G-7396. At the City’s request, Sheely Center has submitted detailed
information and committed to measures designed to mitigate the potential impacts of
its proposed data center. Specific requirements will be outlined in the Waiver which will
be available to the public 24 hours prior to the meeting. The requirements may be
modified after the waiver is published.

The Planning and Development Department reviewed these submissions and
determined that the waiver request meets all the submittal requirements. They found
that Sheely Center’s mitigation commitments appear to adequately address the
ordinance’s public health and safety objectives. The City Manager reviewed and
makes a recommendation to approve the attached Waiver request.

Location
Southeast corner of 99th Avenue and Thomas Road
Council District: 5
Parcel Address: 2209 N. 99th Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Law
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM NOVEMBER 19 AND DECEMBER 3, 2025) - Public Hearing
and Ordinance Adoption - Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning
Application PHO-1-25--Z-29-12-7(5) - Southeast Corner of 99th Avenue and
Thomas Road (Ordinance G-7451) - District 5

Request to hold a public hearing and authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to
consider the Planning Hearing Officer's recommendation by the City Council on
matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on June 18, 2025.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-25--Z-29-12-7(5)
Existing Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 197.0

Owner: Sheely Ted D / ET AL c/o William Sheely / ET AL
Applicant / Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, P.L.C.

Proposal:
1. Request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding the site plan within the development
narrative.

VPC Action: The Maryvale Village Planning Committee heard this request on June 12,
2025 and recommended approval with a vote of 12-1.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer recommended approval with a modification
and an additional stipulation.

Location
Southeast corner of 99th Avenue and Thomas Road
Council District: 5
Parcel Address: 2209 N. 99th Ave.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.



ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STIPULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO REZONING APPLICATION Z-29-12-7(5)
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY ORDINANCE G-5779.

____________




BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning stipulations applicable to the site located at the

southeast corner of 99th Avenue and Thomas Road in a portion of Section 33,

Township 2 North, Range 1 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit A and

depicted in Exhibit B, are hereby modified to read as set forth below.

STIPULATIONS:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sheely Center PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council
approval of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be
consistent with THE Development Narrative date stamped JUNE 6, 2025
September 27, 2012, as modified by the following stipulations.

2. The applicant shall submit a revised Traffic Impact Study to the Street
Transportation Department and Planning and Development Department
prior to preliminary site plan approval. The applicant shall be responsible
for any dedications and required improvements adjacent to the boundaries
of the subject property as recommended by the traffic study, as approved
by the Street Transportation Department and Planning and Development
Department.



3. ALL STREETS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT,
SHALL BE DEDICATED AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE APPROVED
SHEELY FAMRS MASTER STREET PLAN. The applicant shall submit a
street alignment plan for public streets (design and alignment for all
arterial and collector streets), prior to preliminary site plan approval, for
review and approval by the Street Transportation Department and
Planning and Development Department.

4. Access to McDowell Road shall be reviewed by ADOT, Maricopa County,
city of Tolleson, and the city of Phoenix. Notification of such review shall
be submitted to the Street Transportation Department and the Planning
and Development Department prior to preliminary site plan approval.

5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscape and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall
comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

6. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.

SECTION 2. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district granted pursuant to Ordinance G-5779, this portion of the rezoning is now

subject to the stipulations approved pursuant to Ordinance G-5779 and as modified in

Section 1 of this Ordinance. Any violation of the stipulation is a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Building permits shall not be issued for the subject site

until all the stipulations have been met.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or

portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the

validity of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 19th day of November

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR
________________________________
Date

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By: _________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager


Exhibits:
A - Legal Description (4 Pages)
B - Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PHO-1-25--Z-29-12-7(5)


The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Maricopa, State of
Arizona, and is described as follows:

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-29-
12-7(5)

THAT PART OF PARCELS 1, 2 AND 3 LYING WEST OF THE WESTERLY
LINE OF THAT PROPERTY CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF ARIZONA BY
DEED RECORDED JULY 31, 1998 IN 98-663064 AND NORTH OF THE
NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT
MAIN CANAL.

PARCEL NO. 1:

THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH,
RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN,
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA:

EXCEPT THE NORTH 33 FEET AND THE WEST 70 FEET; AND

EXCEPT A TRIANGULAR SHAPED PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS
BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE NORTH 200.00 FEET AND THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 70 FEET OF
SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33;

THENCE EASTERLY 5 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE
NORTH 200.00 FEET TO A POINT;

THENCE IN A SOUTH-SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT ON THE
EAST LINE OF THE WEST 70 FEET THAT IS 600 00 FEET SOUTHERLY
FROM SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION;

THENCE NORTHERLY TO SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION; AND EXCEPT A
PARCEL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE NORTH 33 FEET AND THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 75 FEET OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33;

THENCE EASTERLY 35 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 33
FEET TOA POINT;




THENCE IN A SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT ON SAID EAST
LINE OF THE WEST 75 FEET THAT IS 35 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM SAID
POINT OF INTERSECTION;

THENCE NORTHERLY TO SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION, AND EXCEPT
THE EAST 5 FEET OF THE WEST 75 FEET OF THE SOUTH 167.00 FEET OF
THE NORTH 200.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 33.

PARCEL NO 2:

THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE
AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA;

EXCEPT THE SOUTH 100 FEET OF THE WEST 298.72 FEET OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33, AS CONVEYED TO THE
ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT, BY THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED
IN BOOK 218 OF DEEDS, PAGE 366, RECORDS OF MARICOPA COUNTY,
ARIZONA; AND INSTRUMENT 84-3648, AND

EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCH EXTENDING FROM NORTH TO
SOUTH BOUNDARIES OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION
33; ALONG AND IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE EAST LINE THEREOF AS
CONVEYED TO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THAT CERTAIN DEED
RECORDED IN BOOK 175 OF DEEDS, PAGE 429, RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, AND

EXCEPT THE WEST 65 FEET.

PARCEL NO 3:

PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION
33, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER
BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT FROM WHICH THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 33 BEARS SOUTH 88 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 30 SECONDS
WEST 120 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH O DEGREES 11 MINUTES WEST 367 70 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 44 DEGREEES 36 MINUTES EAST 189.60 FEET;




THENCE SOUTH 27 DEGREES 23 MINUTES EAST 88 90 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH O DEGREES 01 MINUTES EAST 416.71 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 44 DEGREES 18 MINUTES EAST 246.60 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 56 DEGREES 58 MINUTES EAST 54.85 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES EAST 2070.23 FEET,
THENCE NORTH O DEGREES 12 MINUTES EAST 50 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 00 MINUTES EAST 60 FEET (FROM WHICH
POINT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS
SOUTH 0 DEGREES 12 MINUTES WEST 160 FEET);

THENCE NORTH O DEGREES 12 MINUTES EAST ALONG THE MIDSECTION
LINE OF SAID SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 1170 FEET TO NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 33;

THENCE SOUTH 88 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 30 SECONDS WEST
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33 A DISTANCE OF 2525.89 FEET TO THE
PLACE OF BEGINNING,

EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCH LYING IMMEDIATELY WEST OF THE
EAST LINE CONVEYED TO UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY DEED
RECORDED IN BOOK 175 OF DEEDS, PAGE 429, RECORDS OF
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA; AND

EXCEPT THE EAST 90 FEET OF THE WEST 298.72 FEET OF THE SOUTH
HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33, LYING
NORTH OF THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE
ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT MAIN CANAL;

ALSO BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE EAST LINE
OF THE WEST 208.72 FEET AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF
OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33;

THENCE WEST 75 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH
HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; 75 FEET TO A POINT;

THENCE WEST 75 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH
HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, 75 FEET TO A POINT;

THENCE IN A SOUTHEASTERLY DIRECTION TO A POINT ON SAID EAST
LINE OF THE WEST 208.72 FEET THAT IS 75 FEET SOUTHERLY FROM
SAID POINT OF INTERSECTION;




THENCE NORTHERLY TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION.

PARCEL NO. 4:

THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE­
QUARTER (S½ OF SW¼) OF SECTION THIRTY-THREE (33), TOWNSHIP
TWO (2) NORTH, RANGE ONE (1) EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER
BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

PARCEL A

THAT PART OF THE WEST 208 72 FEET OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF
THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER (S½ OF SW¼) OF SAID SECTION 33,
LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND NINETY (90) FEET WIDE ON A CENTER
LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

USING AS A BASE THE SOUTH ONE-HALF (S½) OF THE WEST LINE OF
SECTION THIRTY-THREE (33), TOWNSHIP TWO (2) NORTH, RANGE ONE
(1) EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, WITH AN
ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 0'04' EAST;

BEGINNING AT A POINT 256.9 FEET EAST OF AND 308.7 FEET NORTH OF
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33, AND RUNNING
THENCE NORTH 0'06' WEST 453 7 FEET TO A POINT;

THENCE NORTH 45'06' WEST 247.6 FEET TO A POINT;

THENCE PARALLEL TO AND 78.0 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID
SECTION 33, NORTH 0'04 EAST 476.0 FEET;

EXCEPT THE WEST SIXTY-FIVE (65) FEET OF SAID SECTION 33.

PARCEL B·

THAT PART OF THE WEST 208.72 FEET OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THE
SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER (S½ OF SW¼) OF SAID SECTION 33, LYING
NORTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 717.44 FEET OF SAID
SECTION 33 AND WEST OF PARCEL A AS DESCRIBED ABOVE:

EXCEPT THE WEST SIXTY-FIVE (65) FEET OF SAID SECTION 33




ATTACHMENT B




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
PHO-1-25—Z-29-12-7(5)

Date of VPC Meeting June 12, 2025
Date of Planning June 18, 2025
Hearing Officer Hearing
Request Modification of Stipulation 1 regarding modifications to
the conceptual site plan and updated imagery within
the development narrative.
Location Southeast corner of 99th Avenue and Thomas Road
VPC Recommendation Approval
VPC Vote 12-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

One member of the public registered to speak on this item.

Staff Background Presentation

Matteo Moric, staff, identified the location of the Sheely Center Planned Unit
Development (PUD) and shared a slide showing images from the PUD narrative
including the Conceptual Site Plan, Building Height Zones and Birdseye Perspective.
Mr. Moric stated the intent of the PUD is to have a mixed-use project with housing,
retail, entertainment, hotels, employment centers which include many specialized jobs.

Applicant Presentation

Jason Morris with Withey Morris Baugh, PLC, said the project was a culmination of
over 25 years and indicated what was being presented was largely built. Mr. Morris said
the Sheely Farms project originally came to the City in the early 2000’s. Mr. Morris
noted the site plan and PUD matched what was going on in the early 2000’s. Mr. Morris
said it was designed for all mixed-use developments but there were major amendments
which had changed the plans over time. Mr. Morris noted today’s portion of the project
was the last part and it included the commerce park, manufacturing, commercial, and
business park area. Mr. Morris added staff had told him over the previous six months
that if the PUD would be amended it would make sense to bring the entire Sheely
Center PUD up to date, so it would reflect what was already built. Mr. Morris said the
project includes the residential component, Sprouts anchored shopping center, and the
area immediately south of Thomas Road which was being constructed as commercial.
200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 763
Maryvale Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
PHO-1-25—Z-29-12-7(5)


Mr. Morris provided background on the developer, IDM Companies, and described a
main technology center they constructed out-of-state and felt they wanted to replicate it
in a smaller version at this site. Mr. Morris hoped this was the last amendment to the
Sheely Center PUD. Mr. Morris said that none of the underlying zoning and all the uses
as part of the original PUD are still in place. Mr. Morris said the proposal includes data
planning and tech, light manufacturing, business park and some of them could be office
showrooms and Mr. Morris equated it with a project at the Airpark area in Scottsdale.

Mr. Morris stated no changes are proposed to the narrative text, permitted uses or
development standards. Mr. Morris stated one of the buildings proposed has a
governmental service aspect with data planning analysis and a data center component.
Mr. Morris said he went to the City Council Office and stated with this type of project
there is lots of open space because of the nature of this type of development and the
required separation of other uses so they thought of creating a park.

Mr. Morris showed the weekday total trip comparison data as 93,333 in the current plan
versus the proposal of 20,087. Mr. Morris said the summary of benefits changes from a
vertical mixed-use to horizontal mixed-use project; maintaining employment and
commercial objectives of the PUD in a campus-like setting; providing public amenities,
meaningful enhancements to the social fabric through new connections; generating new
jobs; and activating an underutilized site.

Mr. Morris said there were soccer fields, and a park proposed per a request by the City
Council, and it was suggested to be closer to the retail by Thomas Road. Mr. Morris
added they would create walking paths to take people to the retail component and the
idea is to build and maintain fields which will be controlled.

Questions from the Committee/Applicant Response

Committee Member Jimenez asked if there was a fee for the league. Mr. Morris
responded no fee as it was through the charity itself.

Committee Member Ramirez asked if there was enough parking and said she did not
think it was enough parking for two fields as she had noticed parking was the biggest
issue for these types of fields. Mr. Morris said they created a little more room adjacent
to the fields for overflow parking but there would be a cross-access agreement with all
the retail uses for this reason.

Committee Member Ewing asked what makes the traffic less. Mr. Morris said the
traffic is less because the building itself changed and the original plan asked for very
traditional office square footage and the original offices were 3.8 million square feet and
it would be reduced down to about one half a million square feet which was the biggest
change. Mr. Ewing asked if the soccer fields were turf or grass. Mr. Morris said it was
more likely that they would be doing turf, but this decision had not been finalized.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 764
Maryvale Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
PHO-1-25—Z-29-12-7(5)


Committee Member DuBose said turf is really hot and people could not stand on it
during the summer. Mr. DuBose asked about the current soccer fields that were on the
site. Vice Chair Derie said the original soccer fields moved up north near the Cardinals
Stadium. Vice Chair Derie reminded the group of the concert venue at the property. Mr.
Morris said the Sheely family ran those venues and said the biggest change was when
they built the 101 Freeway in the City they did not sleeve water across to the west side.
Mr. Morris explained how water was needed to develop on the west side of the freeway

Committee Member Acevedo asked if the soccer fields would have public restrooms.
Mr. Morris said the restroom facilities could not be open all the time as they would be
opened and closed with the soccer fields and would be fenced off and controlled by the
soccer club. Vice Chair Derie said this would be like the same situation with the City
park where the restrooms would be locked. Committee Member Galaviz expressed
concerns for the homeless.

Committee Member Norgaard questioned what the change in the number of buildings
and employment would be from the current PUD to now. Mr. Morris said somewhere in
the magnitude of 60 buildings less. Mr. Morris said compared to the conceptual site plan
there would be less employment but felt the conceptual site plan would probably not be
applicable to today’s market.

Mr. Morris said that this proposal was not a pure data center as these were also training
centers. Mr. Morris indicated that there would be over 200 personnel per building as
they would be used for manufacturing, light assembly, and some showrooms and office.

Committee Member DuBose asked about the Sprouts. Mr. Morris said the Sheely’s
owned the farm and were not developers. Vice Chair Derie said Sheely Farms
originally included the eastern side of the 101 Freeway, which developed more quickly
because there was water.

Mr. Morris said the Council District was trying to push ownership versus rental.

Public Comments

Saul Perea, resident, asked how many of the jobs were for the local community and if it
would benefit everyone in the community. Mr. Perea said many of the community
colleges provide standardized job training. Mr. Perea felt there was nothing
guaranteeing jobs benefiting the local community in the long term. Mr. Perea added that
he wanted to know if the jobs would be for U.S. military veterans. Mr. Perea also added
about incorporating solar panels and shade for the parking.

Chair Barba said he wished there were pathways to jobs and as far as green space felt
the project was pretty green.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 765
Maryvale Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
PHO-1-25—Z-29-12-7(5)


Mr. Morris said in terms of employees they were moving a large number of them from
Glendale to Phoenix so it would be net new employees. Mr. Morris said they would
follow the employment practices of the U.S. Government.

Mr. Morris added there would be shaded pathways from the retail to the soccer fields
and noted the open space would be unpaved and walkable and parts of it would be lit
with small ankle lighting.

Chair Barba said he hopes there would be pathways for people in Maryvale to get high
school students into these high paying jobs now that it would be in their backyard.

Committee Member Acevedo asked if they do anything about getting Maryvale
residents training and jobs to support the community.

Mr. Morris said IDM Cares, the charitable organization associated with the developer
does not do job training.

Floor/Public Comment Closed: Motion, Discussion, and Vote

Motion
Committee Member Jimenez motioned to approve PHO-1-25—Z-29-12-7(5).
Committee Member Ewing seconded the motion.

Vote
12-1, Motion to recommend approval of PHO-1-25—Z-29-12-7(5) passes, with
Committee Members Acevedo, Alonzo, Demarest, DePascal, DuBose, Ewing, Galaviz,
Jimenez, Ramirez, Weber, Derie and Barba in favor; and Norgaard in opposition.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 766
ATTACHMENT C
REPORT OF PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION
Byron Easton, Planner III, Hearing Officer
Teresa Garcia, Planner I, Assisting

June 18, 2025

ITEM NO: 1
DISTRICT NO. 5
SUBJECT:

Application #: PHO-1-25--Z-29-12-7(5)
Location: Southeast corner of 99th Avenue and Thomas Road
Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 197.0
Request: 1) Request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding the updated
imagery within the development narrative.
Applicant: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC
Owner: Sheely Ted D / ET AL C/O William Sheely / ET AL
Representative: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC

ACTIONS:

Planning Hearing Officer Recommendation: The Planning Hearing Officer
recommended approval with a modification and an additional stipulation.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation: The Maryvale Village
Planning Committee heard this request on June 12, 2025 and recommended
approval with a vote of 12-1.

DISCUSSION:

Jason Morris, representative with Withey Morris Baugh PLC, introduced the
subject site and explained that zoning history. He stated that the North Gateway
Village Planning Committee (VPC) recommended approval by a vote of 12-1 and
this PHO Hearing is the result of a great deal of planning between the applicant
and City Council District office to update the PUD to conform with present market
conditions and the shared vision between the developer and the City. He stated
that the PUD has changed significantly since being approved in the 90’s and
early 2000’s and all stakeholders have agreed that the renderings must be
updated to support and reflect the new proposed development plan. There would
be no change to the underlying uses that are contained in the PUD.

Mr. Morris went on to explain the history of the Sheely Center PUD, including
some of the difficulties that were present that prevented development of the site.
IBM developed some of the infrastructure, including bringing water to the site.
He continued to explain the updates to the site, including replacing much of the



Planning Hearing Officer Summary of June 18, 2025
Application PHO-1-25--Z-29-12-7(5)
Page 2

office uses with more mixed-use, including retail/commercial, multi-family, an as-
built, garden-style multi-family development, commerce park uses, and a 58,256
square foot Sprouts grocery shopping center. In addition, new public amenities
are included in the exhibits, featuring two standard soccer fields, a park and
trails.

Byron Easton, Planning Hearing Officer, asked if Mr. Morris could speak about
the large buildings located at the north of the site. Mr. Morris explained that the
large buildings will be aligned with employment uses and will include a
government building. Mr. Morris followed up with an explanation of the proposed
vs. existing exhibits in the PUD including renderings and elevations

Mr. Easton asked if the applicant would have to go through PUD Amendment
process in addition to the PHO. Mr. Morris stated that they will not be required to
go through a PUD Amendment. Mr. Easton asked if in addition to the renderings,
the site plan is being replaced in the PUD Narrative. Mr. Morris stated that yes,
replacing the existing site plan with a revised conceptual site plan is part of the
request.

Mr. Easton, Planning Hearing Officer, explained that the request was approved
by the Village Planning Committee with a vote of 12-1 and he voiced his support
for the request and the various mix of uses that are being proposed. He
recommended approval.

FINDINGS:

1) The request to modify Stipulation 1 regarding updating the imagery,
including renderings and the site plan contained in the PUD Narrative, is
recommended to be approved. The modification will include an updated
stamp date to be consistent with the latest version of these exhibits.

The Sheely Center PUD, originally approved in 2013, was approved as
mixed-use in nature and this proposal still reflects that intent. Although
the site has been partially developed it has been re-designed as a
horizontal mixed-use development in replacement of the originally
planned, vertical mixed-use development. The original conceptual site
plan for the Sheely Center PUD feature a more intense, urban, office
centric design that has not come to fruition and is inconsistent with market
demands. The applicant’s request is limited to updating the exhibits within
the PUD and will not change the uses allowed within the original PUD
Narrative.

2) Stipulation 3 is recommended to be modified by replacing the existing
language with updated language consistent with recommendation from the
Streets Transportation Department. The stipulation now references a
Master Street Plan that has been completed and approved by STD. The



Planning Hearing Officer Summary of June 18, 2025
Application PHO-1-25--Z-29-12-7(5)
Page 3

updated stipulation acknowledges the Master Street Plan and requires
compliance with the Plan.

3) The applicant did not submit a Proposition 207 waiver of claims prior to
the Planning Hearing Officer hearing. Submittal of this form is an
application requirement. An additional stipulation is recommended to
require the applicant to record this form and deliver it to the City to be
included in the rezoning application file for record.

STIPULATIONS:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the Sheely Center PUD reflecting
the changes approved through this request shall be submitted to the
Planning and Development Department within 30 days of City Council
approval of this request. The updated Development Narrative shall be
consistent with THE Development Narrative date stamped JUNE 6, 2025
September 27, 2012, as modified by the following stipulations.

2. The applicant shall submit a revised Traffic Impact Study to the Street
Transportation Department and Planning and Development Department
prior to preliminary site plan approval. The applicant shall be responsible
for any dedications and required improvements adjacent to the boundaries
of the subject property as recommended by the traffic study, as approved
by the Street Transportation Department and Planning and Development
Department.

3. ALL STREETS, WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT,
SHALL BE DEDICATED AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE APPROVED
SHEELY FARMS MASTER STREET PLAN. The applicant shall submit a
street alignment plan for public streets (design and alignment for all
arterial and collector streets), prior to preliminary site plan approval, for
review and approval by the Street Transportation Department and
Planning and Development Department.

4. Access to McDowell Road shall be reviewed by ADOT, Maricopa County,
city of Tolleson, and the city of Phoenix. Notification of such review shall
be submitted to the Street Transportation Department and the Planning
and Development Department prior to preliminary site plan approval.

5. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscape and other incidentals as per plans approved by
the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall
comply with all ADA accessibility standards.




Planning Hearing Officer Summary of June 18, 2025
Application PHO-1-25--Z-29-12-7(5)
Page 4

6. PRIOR TO FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL, THE LANDOWNER SHALL
EXECUTE A PROPOSITION 207 WAIVER OF CLAIMS FORM. THE
WAIVER SHALL BE RECORDED WITH THE MARICOPA COUNTY
RECORDER'S OFFICE AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE REZONING APPLICATION FILE FOR RECORD.


Upon request, this publication will be made available within a reasonable length
of time through appropriate auxiliary aids or services to accommodate an
individual with a disability. This publication may be made available through the
following auxiliary aids or services: large print, Braille, audiotape or computer
diskette. To request a reasonable accommodation, please contact Saneeya Mir
at saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov or (602) 686-6461 or TTY: 7-1-1.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-NG-1-
24-1 - Southwest Corner of I-17 and Loop 303 (Resolution 22350) - District 1

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation on 7,377.83
acres to plan for development of a large master planned community with a mix of
commercial, commerce park, industrial, residential densities and open space for
preservation; expansion of the infrastructure limit line; and an update to the City Trails
System Map to several trail alignments and types within the application area (proposed
NorthPark development). This is a companion case to GPA-NG-2-24-1 and Z-139-24-1
and should be heard first, followed by GPA-NG-2-24-1 and Z-139-24-1.

Summary
Application: GPA-NG-1-24-1
Current Designation: 112.40 acres of Undesignated Area, 172.22 acres of
Floodplain, 193.22 acres of Preserves / Floodplain, 46.78 acres of Parks/Open Space
- Publicly Owned, 2,659.91 acres of Parks/Open Space - Future 1 dwelling unit per
acre (du/ac), 24.10 acres of Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 du/ac / Residential 1 to 2
du/ac, 51.04 acres of Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5
du/ac, 20.61 acres of Preserves / Mixed Use (Area C & D only), 1,341.33 acres of
Residential 0 to 2 du/ac, 189.76 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac, 1,385.16 acres of
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac, 0.94 acres of Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, 306.67 acres of
Residential 5 to 15 du/ac, 101.91 acres of Residential 15+ du/ac, 544.28 acres of
Mixed Use (North Gateway and Northwest Area only), 88.03 acres of Commercial, and
139.47 acres of Commercial / Commerce/Business Park
Proposed Designation: 2,283.14 acres of Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned,
70.08 acres of Parks/Open Space - Privately Owned, 381.25 acres of Residential 2 to
3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, 1,670.37 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac /
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, 341.83 acres of Residential 3.5
to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+
du/ac, 596.55 acres of Floodplain / Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned, 24.57 acres
of Floodplain / Parks/Open Space - Privately Owned, 86.44 acres of Floodplain /
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, 41.01
acres of Floodplain / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Residential



10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+ du/ac, 40.17 acres of Floodplain / Mixed Use, 3.68
acres of Floodplain / Commercial, 72.91 acres of Floodplain / Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park, 299.42 acres of Mixed Use, 225.27 acres of Commercial,
827.01 acres of Commercial / Commerce/Business Park, and 414.10 acres of
Transportation (non-land use map designation)
Acreage: 7,377.83
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Map, Infrastructure Limit
Line, and Trails System Map

Owner: Arizona State Land Department c/o Mark Edelman
Applicant: Mike Hifler, Pulte Homes
Representative: Carolyn Oberholtzer, BFSO

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this item on October
9, 2025, for information only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this item on
November 13, 2025, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a
vote of 7-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on December 4, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the North Gateway Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 8-0-1.

Location
Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303
Council District: 1
Parcel Address: N/A

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2025
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-NG-1-24-1,
CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION,
INFRASTRUCTURE LIMIT LINE, AND THE CITY TRAILS
NETWORK MAP FOR THE SITE DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2025 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 22191, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-NG-1-24-1. The 7,377.83

acres located at the southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303 is designated as 2,283.14

acres of Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned, 70.08 acres of Parks/Open Space –

Privately Owned, 381.25 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre (du/ac) /

Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, 1,670.37 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential

3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, 341.83 acres of Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac /

Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+ du/ac, 596.55

acres of Floodplain / Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned, 24.57 acres of Floodplain /

Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned, 86.44 acres of Floodplain / Residential 2 to 3.5

du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, 41.01 acres of Floodplain

/ Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac /

-1- Resolution

Residential 15+ du/ac, 40.17 acres of Floodplain / Mixed Use, 3.68 acres of Floodplain

/ Commercial, 72.91 acres of Floodplain / Commercial / Commerce/Business Park,

299.42 acres of Mixed Use, 225.27 acres of Commercial, 827.01 acres of Commercial

/ Commerce/Business Park, and 414.10 acres of Transportation.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2025 Phoenix General Plan to reflect the land use classification,

infrastructure limit line, and trails system changes as shown below:




-2- Resolution


Land Use Proposed Change:




-3- Resolution


-4- Resolution


Infrastructure Limit Line Proposed Change:




Trails System Proposed Change:




-5- Resolution


PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of December

2025.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney



By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager




-6- Resolution


ATTACHMENT B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
November 10, 2025

Application: GPA-NG-1-24-1

Applicant: Mike Hifler, Pulte Homes

Representative: Carolyn Oberholtzer, BFSO

Owner: Arizona State Land Department c/o Mark Edelman

Location: Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303

Acreage: 7,377.83 acres

Current Plan Designation: Undesignated Area (112.40 acres)
Floodplain (172.22 acres)
Preserves / Floodplain (193.22 acres)
Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned (46.78 acres)
Parks/Open Space – Future 1 dwelling unit per acre
(du/ac) (2,659.91 acres)
Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 du/ac / Residential 1
to 2 du/ac (24.10 acres)
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential
3.5 to 5 du/ac (51.04 acres)
Preserves / Mixed Use (Area C & D only) (20.61
acres)
Residential 0 to 2 du/ac (1,341.33 acres)
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac (189.76 acres)
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac (1,385.16 acres)
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac (0.94 acres)
Residential 5 to 15 du/ac (306.67 acres)
Residential 15+ du/ac (101.91 acres)
Mixed Use (North Gateway and Northwest Area
only) (544.28 acres)
Commercial (88.03 acres)
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park (139.47
acres)




Staff Analysis
GPA-NG-1-24-1


Requested Plan Designation: Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned (2,283.14
acres)
Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned (70.08 acres)
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5
du/ac (381.25 acres)
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5
du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac (1,670.37 acres)
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
/ Residential 10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+ du/ac
(341.83 acres)
Floodplain / Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned
(596.55 acres)
Floodplain / Parks Open Space – Privately Owned
(24.57 acres)
Floodplain / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential
3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac (86.44
acres)
Floodplain / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential
5 to 10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac /
Residential 15+ du/ac (41.04 acres)
Floodplain / Mixed Use (40.17 acres)
Floodplain / Commercial (3.68 acres)
Floodplain / Commercial / Commerce/Business Park
(72.91 acres)
Mixed Use (299.42 acres)
Commercial (225.27 acres)
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park (827.01
acres)
Transportation (non-land use map designation)
(414.10 acres)

Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment to the Land Use
Map, Infrastructure Limit Line, and Trails System
Map

North Gateway Village Planning November 13, 2025
Committee Meeting Date:

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The proposal includes a mix of uses that balance residential, commercial, open
space, and employment uses.




Staff Analysis
GPA-NG-1-24-1


2) Increased residential density will support existing and future employment and
commercial uses in the surrounding area.

3) The companion rezoning case, Z-139-24-1, proposes development that is
compatible with land uses in the surrounding area.

4) The proposed update to the City Trail System Map provides urban trail
connectivity throughout the proposed NorthPark development and beyond.

5) Removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay will allow for continued
collaboration between the City of Phoenix, Arizona State Land Department and
private development regarding infrastructure financing and installation.

BACKGROUND

The subject site (General Plan Amendment area) is 7,377.83 acres and is located at the
southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303. The subject site is currently vacant land. The
companion rezoning case Z-139-24-1 is requesting to rezone the site from 6,381.49
acres of S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the
NorthPark PUD to allow a master planned community including open space, residential,
mixed use, commercial, commerce park, and industrial. The General Plan Land Use
Map designations of the subject site are 112.40 acres of Undesignated Area, 172.22
acres of Floodplain, 193.22 acres of Preserves / Floodplain, 46.78 acres of Parks/Open
Space – Publicly Owned, 2,659.91 acres of Parks/Open Space – Future 1 dwelling unit
per acre (du/ac), 24.10 acres of Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 du/ac / Residential 1 to 2
du/ac, 51.04 acres of Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac,
20.61 acres of Preserves / Mixed Use (Area C & D only), 1,341.33 acres of Residential
0 to 2 du/ac, 189.76 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac, 1,385.16 acres of Residential 2
to 5 du/ac, 0.94 acres of Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, 306.67 acres of Residential 5 to 15
du/ac, 101.91 acres of Residential 15+ du/ac, 544.28 acres of Mixed Use (North
Gateway and Northwest Area only), 88.03 acres of Commercial, and 139.47 acres of
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park. The proposed General Plan Amendment is to
designate the site as 2,283.14 acres of Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned, 70.08
acres of Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned, 381.25 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5
du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, 1,670.37 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac /
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, 341.83 acres of Residential 3.5 to
5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+ du/ac,
596.55 acres of Floodplain / Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned, 24.57 acres of
Floodplain / Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned, 86.44 acres of Floodplain /
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, 41.01
acres of Floodplain / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Residential
10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+ du/ac, 40.17 acres of Floodplain / Mixed Use, 3.68
acres of Floodplain / Commercial, 72.91 acres of Floodplain / Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park, 299.42 acres of Mixed Use, 225.27 acres of Commercial,
827.01 acres of Commercial / Commerce/Business Park, and 414.10 acres of



Staff Analysis
GPA-NG-1-24-1


Transportation (non-land use map designation).

The request also includes an update to the City Trail System Map to create a network of
urban multi-use trails (MUTs) and shared-use paths (SUPs) throughout the proposed
NorthPark development. The trail network will connect all parts of the NorthPark
community together and will connect to other designated MUTs and SUPs outside of
the NorthPark boundary. The trail network will connect to the future pedestrian/bicycle
bridge over the Loop 303 freeway, which will connect to the future Halo Vista
development to the north. The SUP connection will then connect to the future
pedestrian/bicycle bridge over the I-17 freeway, which will connect east to the North
Gateway Village Core.

The request also includes an update to the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay and the
Infrastructure Limit Line. The North Black Canyon Corridor Plan, adopted by the
Phoenix City Council in 1999, established the Infrastructure Limit Line to guide initial
growth and development within a concentrated area along the Interstate 17 corridor, to
discourage leapfrog development, and to preserve the natural desert character of the
area. As time progressed, General Plan Amendments have been processed
concurrently with rezoning requests to expand the Infrastructure Limit Line and allow for
new land areas to be developed. The request will remove the Infrastructure Phasing
Overlay from the entire area bounded by the Loop 303, the I-17, the Central Arizona
Project (CAP) canal, and western City limits and will expand the Infrastructure Limit Line
to this area.

The Arizona State Land Department and the City have been working to master plan,
and zone the land area north of the Central Arizona Project and west of Interstate 17
known as Biscuit Flats since the early 2000’s. The Arizona State Land Department
(ASLD) manages this land to generate revenue for Arizona’s K-12 public schools and
12 other Trust beneficiaries. The City is required to designate a minimum of 1 du/acre
on all ASLD lands and cannot legally designate ASLD lands for preservation without
their consent. Planning and Development Department staff worked with ASLD staff and
their consultant team to master plan this project in order to develop the land in a manner
that provides for employment and retail land as well as a diversity of housing types.
Another critical benefit of master planning and zoning the land in this manner is that
ASLD is able to dedicate the land shown as Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned to the
City for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve without having to purchase the land. ASLD is
only legally permitted to do that when the adjoining land is master planned and zoned to
increase the value of their adjacent land. In this manner, ASLD maintains their fiduciary
responsibility to their beneficiaries and the City avoids costly land purchases that
deplete the Parks and Preserve Initiative funding. This allows for that funding to be
utilized to improve more parks and preserve lands throughout the City. Staff from the
Parks and Recreation as well as the Planning and Development Department worked
with ASLD to agree upon the proposed designation area of approximately 2,100 acres
of Public Open Space for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve. In addition, the masterplan
requires an additional 95 acres of Parks/Open Space- Privately Owned land



Staff Analysis
GPA-NG-1-24-1


preservation which will be maintained by a future HOA that will be formed at the time of
parcel development.

This request also includes areas proximate to the site, but not within the companion
rezoning case boundaries. These are clean up items to the General Plan Land Use Map
for locations that were either previously undesignated, updated to match parcel lines or
within current preserve areas. This includes approximately 375.51 acres to be
designated as Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned, 232.92 acres to be designated as
Floodplain / Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned, and 1.84 acres to be designated as
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac to Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac.

SURROUNDING LAND USES

NORTH
To the north is designated as Floodplain, Residential 2 to 5 dwelling unit per acre
(du/ac), Commercial, Parks/Open Space – Future 1 du/ac, and Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park.

SOUTH
To the south is designated as Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac, Public / Quasi –Public,
Residential 0 to 2 du/ac, Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned, and Residential 2 to 5
du/ac.

EAST
To the east is designated as Parks / Open Space / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, Preserves
/ Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac or Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, Preserves / Floodplain,
Public/Quasi-Public, Floodplain, Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac.

WEST
To the west is within City of Peoria jurisdiction, designated as ASLD Special Land Use,
Park / Open Space, Waterways, and Traditional Residential.

RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Communities
should consist of a mix of land uses to provide housing, shopping, dinning and
recreational options for residents.

The proposal includes a variety of land uses including residential, commercial, open
space, and employment uses. The NorthPark community will act as its own center
where a mix of activities take place.

STRENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY CORE VALUE; JOB CREATION
(EMPLOYERS); LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support General Plan Land Use Map and



Staff Analysis
GPA-NG-1-24-1


zoning changes that will facilitate the location of employment generating uses in
each of the designated employment centers.

The proposal includes Commercial / Commerce/Business Park, which will allow for
additional employment uses within the NorthPark community and a technology corridor.

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; CANALS AND TRAILS; DESIGN
PRINCIPLE: Plan, design, and develop pedestrian linkages between parks, open
spaces, village cores, neighborhood shopping centers, neighborhood schools,
and neighboring municipalities.

The proposed update to the City Trail System Map will provide pedestrian linkages
throughout the NorthPark community between neighborhoods, parks, open spaces,
shopping center, schools, and to the neighboring City of Peoria municipality to the west.
Additionally, the proposed urban trail system will connect to the proposed Halo Vista
development to the north via a future pedestrian/bicycle bridge over the Loop 303
freeway, and to the North Gateway Village Core to the east via a future
pedestrian/bicycle bridge over the I-17 freeway.

BUILD THE MOST SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; DESERT
LANDSCAPE; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote land uses that preserve Phoenix’s
natural open spaces.

The proposal designates thousands of acres as Parks/Open Space to preserve natural
open spaces.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY

At the time this staff report was written, staff has received 199 letters of opposition or
concerns and nine general inquiries. Concerns include density, traffic, crime, safety,
water, proposed industrial uses, environmental impact, potential for nuisances, the heat
island effect, loss of recreational space, loss of wildlife habitat, wildlife displacement,
and loss of the Sonoran Preserve. Additionally, staff has received four letters of support.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-NG-1-24-1. The request aligns with multiple goals
and policies of the General Plan and will result in land use designations that will
maximize the property’s location adjacent to an employment corridor, freeways, and
open space. Along with the companion rezoning case, Z-139-24-1, the General Plan
Amendment will allow a compatible mix of land uses that will provide additional
residential, commercial, open space, and employment to the North Gateway
community. Additionally, the update to the City Trail System Map provide enhanced
multi-modal connectivity throughout the NorthPark community.




Staff Analysis
GPA-NG-1-24-1


Writer
Adrian Zambrano
November 10, 2025

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Maps (6 pages)
Community Correspondence (538 pages)




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-NG-1-24-1 (LAND USE) ACRES: 7,377.83 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: NORTH GATEWAY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 11/6/2025
APPLICANT: HILGARTWILSON, LLC
EXISTING:
See page 2 for Existing Designations


CAREFREE HWY
£
¤ 74




w
v 51ST AVE 43RD AVE
DOVE VALLEY RD


SONORAN DESERT DR




DIXILETA DR




67TH AVE Centra
lA rizon a P rojec
tC anal
§
¨
¦




Proposed Change Area Preserves / Residential 5 Residential 2 to 5 du/ac Commercial / Residential
Undesignated Area to 10 du/ac or Residential 5 to 10 du/ac /
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
10 to 15 du/ac Residential 10 to 15 du/
Floodplain Residential 5 to 10 du/ac ac
Preserves / Residential
Preserves / Floodplain 15+ du/ac Residential 5 to 15 du/ac Commercial / Residential
Parks/Open Space - Preserves / Mixed Use 15+ du/ac
Residential 15+ du/ac
Publicly Owned (Area C and D only) Commercial /
Residential 15+ du/ac / Commerce / Business
Parks/Open Space / Preserves / Mixed Use / Commerce / Business
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac Commercial / Residential Park
Park
Parks/Open Space - 5 to 10 du/ac / Commerce / Business
Residential 10 to 15 du/ Mixed Use (North Park
Future 1 du/ac Gateway and Northwest
ac
Public/Quasi-Public Area only)
Preserves / Mixed Use /
Preserves / Residential 0 Commercial / Commerce Commercial
Transportation
to 1 du/ac / Residential 1 Commercial / Residential
to 2 du/ac Preserves / Commercial Arterial and Collector
5 to 10 du/ac Streets
Preserves / Residential 2 Residential 0 to 2 du/ac
Infrastructure Limit Line
to 3.5 du/ac or Residential 1 to 2 du/ac
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac Freeways
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac



GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-NG-1-24-1 (LAND USE) ACRES: 7,377.83 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: NORTH GATEWAY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 11/6/2025
APPLICANT: HILGARTWILSON, LLC
EXISTING:


Undesignated Area ( 112.40 +/- Acres)
Floodplain ( 172.22 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Floodplain ( 193.22 +/- Acres)
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned ( 46.78 +/- Acres)
Parks/Open Space - Future 1 du/ac ( 2659.91 +/- Acres)
Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 du/ac / ( 24.10 +/- Acres)
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / ( 51.04 +/- Acres)
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Preserves / Mixed Use (Area C & D only) ( 20.61 +/- Acres)
Residential 0 to 2 du/ac ( 1341.33 +/- Acres)
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac ( 189.76 +/- Acres)
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac ( 1385.16 +/- Acres)
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 0.94 +/- Acres)
Residential 5 to 15 du/ac ( 306.67 +/- Acres)
Residential 15+ du/ac ( 101.91 +/- Acres)
Mixed Use (North Gateway and Northwest ( 544.28 +/- Acres)
Area only)
Commercial ( 88.03 +/- Acres)
Commercial / Commerce / Business Park ( 139.47 +/- Acres)


GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-NG-1-24-1 (LAND USE) ACRES: 7,377.83 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: NORTH GATEWAY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 11/6/2025
APPLICANT: HILGARTWILSON, LLC
PROPOSED:
See page 4 for Proposed Designations


CAREFREE HWY
£
¤74




w
v 51ST AVE 43RD AVE
DOVE VALLEY RD


SONORAN DESERT DR
Þ
n
Þn
DIXILETA DR

n


67TH AVE Centra
lA rizon a P rojec
tC anal
§
¨
¦




Proposed Change Area Floodplain / Mixed Use
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Floodplain / Commercial
Parks/Open Space - Privately Owned
Floodplain / Commercial / Commerce / Business Park
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac
Mixed Use
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/
Commercial
ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Commercial / Commerce / Business Park
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+ du/ac
Floodplain / Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned
Transportation
Floodplain / Parks/Open Space - Privately Owned Arterial and Collector Streets
Floodplain / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential (Proposed by GPA-NG-2-24-1)
3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac Infrastructure Limit Line
Freeways
Floodplain / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5
to 10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac / Residential Þ Park
15+ du/ac
n School
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-NG-1-24-1 (LAND USE) ACRES: 7,377.83 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: NORTH GATEWAY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 11/6/2025
APPLICANT: HILGARTWILSON, LLC
PROPOSED:


Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned ( 2283.14 +/- Acres)
Parks/Open Space - Privately Owned ( 70.08 +/- Acres)
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac ( 381.25 +/- Acres)
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / ( 1670.37 +/- Acres)
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / ( 341.83 +/- Acres)
Residential 10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+ du/ac
Floodplain / Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned ( 596.55 +/- Acres)
Floodplain / Parks/Open Space - Privately Owned ( 24.57 +/- Acres)
Floodplain / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to ( 86.44 +/- Acres)
5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
Floodplain / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to ( 41.04 +/- Acres)
10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+
du/ac
Floodplain / Mixed Use ( 40.17 +/- Acres)
Floodplain / Commercial ( 3.68 +/- Acres)
Floodplain / Commercial / Commerce / Business Park ( 72.91 +/- Acres)
Mixed Use ( 299.42 +/- Acres)
Commercial ( 225.27 +/- Acres)
Commercial / Commerce / Business Park ( 827.01 +/- Acres)
Transportartion ( 414.10 +/- Acres)



GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-NG-1-24-1 (TRAILS) ACRES: 7,377.83 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: NORTH GATEWAY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 11/6/2025
APPLICANT: HILGARTWILSON, LLC
EXISTING:

Trails




CAREFREE HWY
£
¤



Multi-Use Trail
Shared-Use Path w
v 51ST AVE 43RD AVE
DOVE VALLEY RD


Freeways SONORAN DESERT DR

Arterial and Collector Streets
Proposed Change Area
DIXILETA DR




67TH AVE Centr
al A rizon
a Pro
ject C
anal
§
¨
¦




PROPOSED CHANGE:


Trails



CAREFREE HWY
£
¤




w
v 51ST AVE 43RD AVE
DOVE VALLEY RD
Multi-Use Trail
SONORAN DESERT DR
Shared-Use Path
Freeways
Arterial and Collector Streets DIXILETA DR

(Proposed by GPA-NG-2-24-1)
Proposed Change Area
67TH AVE Centra
l Ariz
ona Proje
ct Canal
§
¨
¦




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-NG-1-24-1 (INFRASTRUCTURE) ACRES: 7,377.83 +/- REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: NORTH GATEWAY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 11/6/2025
APPLICANT: HILGARTWILSON, LLC
EXISTING:

Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Infrastructure Limit Line ( 8447.39 +/- Acres)



CAREFREE HWY
£
¤



Freeways
Infrastructure Limit Line w
v 51ST AVE 43RD AVE
DOVE VALLEY RD


Infrastructure Phasing SONORAN DESERT DR
Overlay
Arterial and Collector Streets
DIXILETA DR




67TH AVE Centr
al A rizon
a Pro
ject C
anal
§
¨
¦




PROPOSED CHANGE:

Infrastructure Phasing Overlay Removal and
Infrastructure Limit Line Expansion
( 15842.93 +/- Acres)

CAREFREE HWY
£
¤




v
w 51ST AVE 43RD AVE
DOVE VALLEY RD
Freeways
SONORAN DESERT DR
Infrastructure Limit Line
Infrastructure Phasing Overlay
Arterial and Collector Streets DIXILETA DR

(Proposed by GPA-NG-2-24-1)


67TH AVE Centra
l Ariz
ona Proje
ct Canal
§
¨
¦




ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1
INFORMATION ONLY



Date of VPC Meeting October 9, 2025
Request From Undesignated Area, Floodplain, Preserves/Floodplain,
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned, Parks/Open
Space - Future 1 dwelling unit per acre (du/ac),
Public/Quasi-Public, Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 /
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac, Preserves / Residential 2 to
3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, Preserves / Mixed Use
(Area C & D only), Residential 0 to 2 du/ac, Residential
2 to 3.5 du/ac, Residential 2 to 5 du/ac, Residential 3.5
to 5 du/ac, Residential 5 to 15 du/ac, Residential 15+
du/ac, Mixed Use (North Gateway and Northwest Area
only), Commercial, Commercial / Commerce/Business
Park
Request To Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned, Parks/Open
Space - Privately Owned, Parks/Open Space - Publicly
Owned / Floodplain, Parks/Open Space - Privately
Owned / Floodplain, Residential 2 to 5, Residential 2 to
3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac /
Floodplain, Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 /
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, Residential 3.5 to 5 /
Residential 5 to 10 / Residential 10 to 15 / Residential
15+ du/ac / Floodplain, Residential 3.5 to 5 /
Residential 5 to 10 / Residential 10 to 15 / Residential
15+ du/ac, Floodplain / Mixed Use, Mixed Use,
Commercial / Floodplain, Commercial, Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park, Transportation; expansion
of the infrastructure limit line; and an update to the City
Trails System Map to several trail alignments and
types within the application area (proposed NorthPark
development)
Proposal Minor General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Map,
Infrastructure Limit Line, and Trails System Map
Location Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 794
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1 – Info Only

VPC DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item 4 (GPA-NG-1-24-1), Agenda Item 5 (GPA-NG-2-24-1), and Agenda Item 6
(Z-139-24-1) are companion cases and were heard concurrently.

15 members of the public registered to speak on this item in opposition, eight members
of the public registered in opposition but did not wish to speak, and 19 members of the
public registered in opposition to donate their time to Amanda McGowan with the
Stetson Valley Owners Association. One member of the public registered to speak on
this item in support. Six members of the public registered to speak on this item in a
neutral position.

Committee Member Scott McGill left during this item, bringing the quorum to nine
members.

Applicant Presentation:
Carolyn Oberholtzer, with Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, introduced herself
and the development team, and provided an overview of the history of the property. Ms.
Oberholtzer summarized the purpose of State Trust Land. Ms. Oberholtzer provided
background on the Stetson Hills master-planned community, the North Phoenix 3,500
PUD (Planned Unit Development), the proposed Halo Vista development, and the
proposed Vestar developments nearby. Ms. Oberholtzer summarized the proposed
regulatory framework of the NorthPark PUD, including Master Development Parcels
(MDPs) and Land Use Districts (LUDs). Ms. Oberholtzer displayed and explained the
proposed General Plan Land Use Map. Ms. Oberholtzer summarized changes made to
the applications, noting that there was a reduction in the overall maximum density. Ms.
Oberholtzer summarized the modifications made to arterial and collector street cross
sections, highlighting multi-modal improvements. Ms. Oberholtzer summarized multi-
modal trails and paths that would be provided throughout the site.

Dawn Cartier, with CivTech Inc., introduced herself and provided an overview of the
traffic study. Ms. Cartier summarized what internal capture and community capture are
in the traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted that a lot of trips would be inside of the community,
but these internal trips were limited to 13 percent in the traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted
that the majority of work trips would only be about three miles from homes. Ms. Cartier
noted that the traffic study is based on the maximum zoning entitlement, which is twice
the number of trips than are planned for actual development.

Ms. Oberholtzer summarized community outreach efforts.

Questions from Committee:
Committee Member Scott McGill asked what the traffic counts are on 67th Avenue
and 51st Avenue. Committee Member McGill asked if the streets in the Stetson Valley
community are completed up until the dead-end at the canal. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded affirmatively and noted that Ms. Cartier should have those numbers but
would have to look them up. Committee Member McGill asked how long the streets
have been in place. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that it was shown on the master plan for

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 795
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1 – Info Only

Stetson back in 1988. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the alignment changed slightly after
rezoning, but the crossing over the canal has always been planned and has been
shown on the Street Classification Map over the last few decades. Committee Member
McGill stated that he has lived in North Phoenix for over 23 years, and he has never
seen where those streets have crossed over yet, but he has always been curious when
they would. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the street cross section for 51st Avenue
includes two travel lanes in both directions, and it includes a potential future travel lane
in both directions if needed, which would cut into the median.

Chair Julie Read stated that there should have been a disclosure within the mortgage
statement with the approved master street plan attached for homes sold in Stetson
Valley.

Committee Member Aaron Stein asked if there if there is a traffic model that
forecasts travel patterns along 51st Avenue. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the
anticipated phasing of the project is that the Innovation Corridor LUD would develop
first. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that when any MDP comes in, an updated Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) will be needed that will determine what improvements needs to occur
with that phase. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the connection over 51st Avenue would
likely not need to occur until MDP.5 is built, which would be for single-family homes.

Ms. Cartier stated that because this area is large, they have been working with the
agency. Ms. Cartier stated that MAG runs a regional traffic demand model. Ms. Cartier
stated that they had MAG run information for them, which is the predicted model that
they have been using. Ms. Cartier noted that the MAG model is highly focused on the
Loop 303, Interstate 17, and access to the freeways. Ms. Cartier stated that people
want to get to the roads where they can move the fastest.

Committee Member Will Manion asked if there were any studies done on the
semitruck traffic along 51st Avenue. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that semitruck traffic
would likely be related to the Innovation Corridor LUD. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the
trip patterns are largely to the freeways and there will be ways through design to
facilitate trips towards the freeways. Ms. Oberholtzer added that the City could
establish certain routes as semitruck routes or not. Committee Member Manion asked
if there is a change coming to the Dixileta Drive and Interstate 17 intersection with the
anticipated traffic. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that there would be an extension of the
frontage roads to the north and south, but the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) does not have any plans to change that intersection. Ms. Oberholtzer added
that there would be free flowing ramps to access the Interstate 17 from the Loop 303,
and vice versa.

Committee Member Paul Carver stated that the reduction of density of approximately
4,000 dwelling units is a lot less traffic, more open space, and less kids that the school
district would need to accommodate. Committee Member Carver asked if certain
improvements would be funded by the City or by the developer. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded that if the demand is being generated by a development, then the traffic

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 796
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1 – Info Only

mitigation improvement is assigned to be funded by the developer. Ms. Oberholtzer
stated that today, if there is an existing need for a certain improvement, that would not
be the responsibility of the developer since it is an existing need.

Committee Member Chandra McCarty thanked the applicant for the 2,100 acres of
open space being donated to the City.

Committee Member Kylie Kennelly stated that there were concerns that the area
being donated for Sonoran Preserve is too steep and may be challenging for elderly or
small children to enjoy as they have been able to in the past. Committee Member
Kennelly asked for an explanation of the trail system. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that
the property is State Trust Land and accessing the property is fundamentally
trespassing. Ms. Oberholtzer added that people can obtain a recreational permit to
access the property, but there is no designated public access. Ms. Oberholtzer stated
that there will be a trail along the canal, which will provide public access into the
Sonoran Preserve. Ms. Oberholtzer added that there will be trailheads to provide
access along other areas as well and noted that there would be trail types for all types
of users. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that there will still be areas that are flat that would be
accessible. Committee Member Kennelly asked for the applicant to explain the 20
percent internal capture rate that was cited by the community, as well as the total
number of trips.

Ms. Cartier responded that the City of Phoenix has a policy that has been in place for
about a year, to look at the maximum entitlement allowed. Ms. Cartier noted that the
TIA has to look at the most intense land uses and the maximum density that would be
permitted. Ms. Cartier stated that this policy does put the TIA in a strange position,
since it predicts a lot more traffic than is actually planned, but it is a requirement of the
City. Ms. Cartier stated that people that live inside of NorthPark that are traveling to
someplace also inside of NorthPark is about a half of the internal capture number. Ms.
Cartier stated that the other half of the number is internal trips for areas such as
shopping centers, and trips made within the shopping center.

Committee Member Andrea Crouch asked what the existing S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence) zoning district would permit. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that it essentially
permits one residential dwelling unit per acre along with some agricultural uses. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that all of State Trust Land in the City of Phoenix is given S-1
zoning when it is annexed into the City, before it gets rezoned. Committee Member
Crouch asked if 51st Avenue was established north of Happy Valley Road around
1989. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that she does not have any data predating that, but it has
been on the Street Classification Map since at least the 1990s.

Vice Chair Michelle Ricart asked if there is currently no Sonoran Preserve within the
NorthPark boundary. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the 1998 Sonoran Preserve
Master Plan recommended that certain areas of land be included in the future Sonoran
Preserve. Ms. Oberholtzer added that the plan included future plans to acquire the land
for Sonoran Preserve, which has never come to fruition in this area, since State Trust
Land is very expensive to buy. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that there was a State program

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 797
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1 – Info Only

called the Arizona Preserve Initiative that the State Legislature would fund, which
would provide 50 percent of the cost to assist Arizona communities with purchasing
State Trust Land for preservation. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the State Legislature has
not funded this program in several decades. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the land
designated as Sonoran Preserve within NorthPark will be a true donation of land to the
City for preservation. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that accessing State Trust
Land is technically trespassing without a recreational permit. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked if 51st Avenue north of Happy Valley
Road could be six lanes. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively, noting that it is 140
feet of right-of-way on the Street Classification Map, which would be enough room for
six lanes. Vice Chair Ricart asked if it was always planned for six lanes since the
Stetson community was built. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively. Vice Chair
Ricart asked for clarification that Stetson was also zoned S-1 because all of State Trust
Land is given S-1 zoning before being rezoned. Ms. Oberholtzer responded
affirmatively.

Committee Member McGill asked for clarification that State Trust Land is typically
rezoned before it is auctioned. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively.

Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that the Innovation Corridor LUD would be
constructed before homes within NorthPark, so prospective home purchasers would
know what is there. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively, noting that there is no
residential permitted within the Innovation Corridor LUD, nor in the Community Open
Space LUD or Community Commercial LUD, which both surround the Innovation
Corridor LUD, and would provide a significant buffer for any nearby residential. Vice
Chair Ricart asked what the timeframe is for the buildout of 51st Avenue. Ms.
Oberholtzer responded that if MDP.2 is built first, the likelihood is that 51st Avenue
would be completely built from the Loop 303 to Dixileta Drive, Dixileta Drive would be
built from 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue, and 43rd Avenue would be built from Dixileta
Drive to the Loop 303. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the fastest that development would
begin in MDP.2 is in about two years, since it is closer to existing infrastructure. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that MDP.5 is further from existing infrastructure, and it needs to
wait for completion of the sewer plant. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the extension of
51st Avenue south of Dixileta Drive would likely occur within four to six years. Vice
Chair Ricart asked if 67th Avenue would be constructed last. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded that when MDP.5 develops, it does go all the way to 67th Avenue, and
there is a bridge that would have to be built across the canal. Ms. Oberholtzer stated
that the timing of it would depend on the intensity of the development that happens on
the west side. Ms. Oberholtzer added that the phasing would be finalized with the
master plans. Vice Chair Ricart asked for Ms. Oberholtzer to explain who pays for
these roads. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that it would largely be paid by developers.
Ms. Oberholtzer added that there are certain freeway-adjacent improvements that are
programmed for ADOT to do, but all roads internal to the NorthPark boundary would be
constructed and funded by private developers. Vice Chair Ricart asked what the
distance requirement is for public hearing notifications.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 798
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1 – Info Only

Adrian Zambrano, staff, responded that it is a minimum of 600 feet from the property
for property owners and a minimum of one mile for registered neighborhood
organizations. Vice Chair Ricart asked if the applicant sent notifications beyond the
minimum radius.

Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the General Plan Amendment boundary is larger than
the PUD boundary, so the GPA boundary was used for public hearing notification of
the PUD rezoning. Vice Chair Ricart asked what the minimum requirement is for when
notification letters must be sent.

Mr. Zambrano responded that it is a minimum of 10 calendar days before the first
meeting.

Chair Read asked what the process is for the City to accept a TIA. Racelle Escolar,
staff, responded that for PUD rezoning cases, the applicant is required to submit the
TIA prior to or with the PUD submittal. Ms. Escolar stated that PUDs typically go
through multiple cycles of review, which allows the Street Transportation Department
time to review the TIA during the multiple cycles of PUD review. Ms. Escolar noted that
TIAs similarly go through multiple cycles of review. Chair Read asked for clarification if
it is common for there to be multiple revisions to a TIA. Ms. Escolar responded
affirmatively. Chair Read asked when TIAs typically are available for public records.
Ms. Escolar responded that a TIA would be publicly available when it is accepted by
the Street Transportation Department. Ms. Escolar stated that a TIA is typically
accepted by the time the PUD hearing draft is ready. Chair Read asked if the
Committee would not hear a case until the TIA is accepted by the City. Ms. Escolar
responded that there may be some flexibility, but they should be pretty close. Chair
Read asked if the City Council could approve a project if the TIA is not accepted by the
City. Ms. Escolar responded that it would likely need to be accepted by that time, and if
not, there would be several stipulations to address it. Chair Read asked how the
community obtained the TIA if it was not publicly available by the City yet.

Ms. Oberholtzer responded that she sent the draft TIA to community members that
asked for it in order to be fully transparent with the community. Chair Read asked for
clarification that traffic mitigation outside of the PUD boundary, such as along Happy
Valley Road, may be the responsibility of the developers in NorthPark if the generated
traffic from the development is contributing to traffic in that area. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded affirmatively, noting that the TIA is required to analyze maximum
entitlement, which creates traffic mitigation measures that may ultimately not be
needed. Ms. Oberholtzer highlighted traffic mitigation measures that are required as
part of the NorthPark TIA. Chair Read stated that she spoke with the director of the
Planning and Development Department and requested that the City add a stipulation
that would trigger public review and comment of site plans and elevations as each
parcel continues to develop, in order to provide the community with an opportunity to
provide comments, which has been done before with previous cases. Chair Read
requested that the applicant entertain some language that when 51st Avenue is
constructed south of Dixileta Drive into the Stetson Valley community, that traffic
mitigation within that area be prioritized and be constructed and paid for first.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 799
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1 – Info Only

Public Comments:
Amanda McGowan introduced herself as the president of the Stetson Valley Owners
Association neighboring the site to the south, opposed to the project. Ms. McGowan
stated that community members do not feel heard. Ms. McGowan stated that the
community knows that development is inevitable and noted that the current proposal
represented reckless growth. Ms. McGowan stated that Stetson Valley would be
immediately impacted by NorthPark since it is directly south of the site and 51st
Avenue would go through their community. Ms. McGowan expressed concerns
regarding the proposed density, industrial uses, lack of transparency from the
developer, public meetings being scheduled back to back, safety, and a flawed and
biased traffic study. Ms. McGowan stated that the community just recently found out
about the proposed industrial uses, noting that these uses belong north of the Loop
303 freeway. Ms. McGowan summarized concerns regarding the applicant’s traffic
study that was still being reviewed by the City. Ms. McGowan stated that she hopes the
City provides sufficient oversight of the traffic study before rezoning is approved. Ms.
McGowan then summarized concerns with pedestrian safety in the Stetson Valley
community. Ms. McGowan expressed appreciation for the separated bike lanes
proposed for NorthPark, noting that she wished that same kind of thought was given to
their neighborhood. Ms. McGowan noted that a HAWK (High Intensity Activated
CrossWalK) signal has been requested for a long time for the Stetson Valley Parkway
and Inspiration Mountain Parkway intersection due to safety issues. Ms. McGowan
then summarized concerns with the proposed Sonoran Preserve in NorthPark
deviating from the recommendations of the 1998 Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. Ms.
McGowan stated that the community would prefer to see all of the area around
Pyramid Peak preserved, as was recommended by the plan. Ms. McGowan concluded
with requests of the community for changes to the PUD before approving rezoning.

Randy Wilde introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Wilde echoed concerns regarding deviation from the land
recommended for Sonoran Preserve in the 1998 Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. Mr.
Wilde stated that State Trust Land can be accessed by the public for recreation with a
permit.

Don Diehn introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community, with
concerns. Mr. Diehn echoed concerns with traffic and safety. Mr. Diehn echoed
concerns with the Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway
intersection.

Mary Walls introduced herself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Walls stated that she has always known that 51st Avenue
would eventually cross the canal. Ms. Walls stated that Stetson Valley is a highly
populated residential area with high pedestrian activity. Ms. Walls requested that there
be safety mitigations included for 51st Avenue when it goes through the Stetson Valley
community.

Bob Jewell introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Jewell stated that he hopes the City could provide the

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 800
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1 – Info Only

community with some assurance that the first phase of development would be north of
Dixileta Drive, along the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Jewell expressed concerns with traffic
and requested that there be significant improvements made to Stetson Valley Parkway
before it connects across the canal to Dixileta Drive. Mr. Jewell stated that he felt a lot
better knowing that semitrucks will not be using Stetson Valley Parkway to build the
first phase of development.

Heidi Banister introduced herself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Banister echoed concerns with pedestrian safety due to the
six-lane roadway going through their residential community. Ms. Banister echoed
concerns with the proposed industrial uses and requested they be moved north of the
Loop 303 freeway.

Michael Lopez introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Lopez echoed concerns with the proposed industrial uses
south of the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Lopez echoed concerns with traffic.

George Middendorf introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, with concerns. Mr. Middendorf stated that he did not know that a chip plant
was going to be built south of the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Middendorf echoed concerns
with traffic, noting that traffic needs to be directed to the north end of the site and
everyday land uses need to be constructed on the north end to keep traffic to the north.
Mr. Middendorf echoed that the proposed industrial uses should be kept to the north of
the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Middendorf stated that offices should be built south of the
Loop 303 freeway instead.

Kenli Montoya introduced herself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Montoya echoed concerns with pedestrian and child safety,
noting a recent child fatality that occurred on Stetson Valley Parkway. Ms. Montoya
stated that the traffic from 51st Avenue going across the canal into their community
would put many children at risk due to the nearby school.

Eileen Baden introduced herself as a member of the Rio Vista Village Planning
Committee and president of the Friends of Daisy Mountain Trails organization, in a
neutral position. Ms. Baden stated that their organization works on trail connections up
in this area. Ms. Baden expressed concerns with wildfires, noting that multi-use trails
could act as firebreaks. Ms. Baden stated that she would like to see the proposed
pathways in the project increased from seven feet to eight feet or 10 feet, so
emergency responders could use them as well.

Ed McKelvey introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in Peoria and member of the
West Valley Trail Alliance organization, in support of the project. Mr. McKelvey stated
that he has enjoyed this piece of Sonoran Desert for many years via a recreational
permit. Mr. McKelvey acknowledged that the Arizona State Land Department has a
mandate to sell its land for the highest and best use. Mr. McKelvey expressed
appreciation for how much thought has gone into this project and for the applicant’s
commitment to protect as much open space as they are committing to. Mr. McKelvey

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 801
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1 – Info Only

stated that his primary concern is with the proposed industrial uses south of the Loop
303 freeway and increased industrial water usage.

Eric Thompson introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Thompson echoed concerns with the proposed industrial
uses and industrial water usage. Mr. Thompson requested a roundabout at 51st
Avenue and Dixileta Drive to prevent semitrucks from going through their community.
Mr. Thompson expressed concerns with police, fire, and emergency response times
being impacted by this development. Mr. Thompson added that it took 17 years for a
school to be built within the Stetson Valley community, noting that the developers need
to help fund the schools, since the State does not have sufficient funding. Mr.
Thompson expressed concerns with hazardous waste.

Michael Abad introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Abad echoed concerns with traffic and loss of Sonoran
Desert. Mr. Abad expressed concerns with wildlife displacement and industrial
contamination.

Applicant Response:
Not heard.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 802
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1


Date of VPC Meeting November 13, 2025
Request From Undesignated Area, Floodplain, Preserves/Floodplain,
Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned, Parks/Open
Space - Future 1 dwelling unit per acre (du/ac),
Public/Quasi-Public, Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 /
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac, Preserves / Residential 2 to
3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, Preserves / Mixed Use
(Area C & D only), Residential 0 to 2 du/ac, Residential
2 to 3.5 du/ac, Residential 2 to 5 du/ac, Residential 3.5
to 5 du/ac, Residential 5 to 15 du/ac, Residential 15+
du/ac, Mixed Use (North Gateway and Northwest Area
only), Commercial, Commercial / Commerce/Business
Park
Request To Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned, Parks/Open
Space - Privately Owned, Parks/Open Space - Publicly
Owned / Floodplain, Parks/Open Space - Privately
Owned / Floodplain, Residential 2 to 5, Residential 2 to
3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac /
Floodplain, Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 /
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, Residential 3.5 to 5 /
Residential 5 to 10 / Residential 10 to 15 / Residential
15+ du/ac / Floodplain, Residential 3.5 to 5 /
Residential 5 to 10 / Residential 10 to 15 / Residential
15+ du/ac, Floodplain / Mixed Use, Mixed Use,
Commercial / Floodplain, Commercial, Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park, Transportation; expansion
of the infrastructure limit line; and an update to the City
Trails System Map to several trail alignments and
types within the application area (proposed NorthPark
development)
Proposal Minor General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Map,
Infrastructure Limit Line, and Trails System Map
Location Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 7-0


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 803
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1


VPC DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item 3 (GPA-NG-1-24-1), Agenda Item 4 (GPA-NG-2-24-1), and Agenda Item 5
(Z-139-24-1) are companion cases and were heard concurrently.

34 members of the public registered to speak on this item in opposition or with concerns
and 28 members of the public registered in opposition or with concerns but did not wish
to speak. One member of the public registered in opposition to donate time to Tammy
Weaver. One member of the public registered in opposition to donate time to Amanda
McGowan. One member of the public registered in opposition to donate time to Carter
Huber. Three members of the public registered to speak on this item in support. One
member of the public registered in support but did not wish to speak. One member of
the public registered to speak in a neutral position.

GPEC/CEDD, ASLD, and Staff Presentation:
Christine Mackay, with the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, introduced herself and
provided an overview of economic strengths of Phoenix. Ms. Mackay discussed the
past, present, and future of the Phoenix economy. Ms. Mackay discussed economic and
infrastructure history in Phoenix. Ms. Mackay shared target industries for the Phoenix
economy. Ms. Mackay discussed the national security rationale for bringing back
semiconductor manufacturing to the United States. Ms. Mackay discussed the
economic impact of the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)
investment in the United States and the proposed Halo Vista development. Ms. Mackay
then discussed the economic impact of the Intel campus in the City of Chandler.

Mark Edelman, with the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD), introduced himself
and provided an overview of the historic background of ASLD. Mr. Edelman discussed
the legal requirements of State Trust Land. Mr. Edelman displayed the State Trust Land
in the North Gateway Village and shared other areas to the south that originated as
State Trust Land.

Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided an overview of General Plan Amendment case GPA-
NG-1-24-1, including the location of the request, the proposal, surrounding General
Plan Land Use Map designations, and the existing and proposed General Plan Land
Use Map designations. Mr. Zambrano noted that the request also includes an update to
the City Trails Network Map, the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay, and Infrastructure Limit
Line, and displayed the existing and proposed maps. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff
findings and stated that staff recommends approval. Mr. Zambrano then provided an
overview of General Plan Amendment case GPA-NG-2-24-1, noting what the request is.
Mr. Zambrano shared background on 51st Avenue and then displayed the existing and
proposed Street Classification Map. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff findings and stated
that staff recommends approval. Mr. Zambrano then provided an overview of rezoning
case Z-139-24-1, including the proposal and surrounding zoning and land uses. Mr.
Zambrano discussed the proposed PUD, including the regulatory framework of Master
Development Parcels (MDPs) and Land Use Districts (LUDs), the proposed
development standards, and the proposed design guidelines. Mr. Zambrano stated that

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 804
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1

as noted in the staff report, the proposal supports efforts from various adopted plans,
policies, and initiatives. Mr. Zambrano summarized community input that staff has
received. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff findings and stated that staff recommends
approval subject to stipulations. Mr. Zambrano shared the recommended stipulations
and next steps for public hearings.

Applicant Presentation:
Carolyn Oberholtzer, with Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, introduced herself
and provided an overview of changes made to the application. Ms. Oberholtzer
discussed the Innovation Corridor LUD. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed community
outreach. Ms. Oberholtzer noted that advance notice was given to the press and the
community when TSMC joined the application. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed letters of
support received. Ms. Oberholtzer displayed and discussed the existing and proposed
General Plan Land Use Map and City Trails System Map. Ms. Oberholtzer displayed
and discussed the proposed Master Open Space, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trails Plan
and the Master Edge Treatment Plan. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed the slope of the
proposed Sonoran Preserve, noting that half of the area is at or below the 10 percent
slope line. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed the maximum density allowed within the MDPs.
Ms. Oberholtzer discussed the Foothills Residential LUD, noting that it allows a lower
density than the existing Stetson Valley community to the south. Ms. Oberholtzer then
discussed viewsheds, noting that views of Pyramid Peak will be maintained.

Dawn Cartier, with CivTech Inc., introduced herself and provided an overview of the
traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted that the traffic study outlook is to 2050 and evaluates the
complete buildout of NorthPark, including future growth in the surrounding area. Ms.
Cartier stated that the traffic study is based on the maximum entitlement, and not the
targeted entitlements that will likely develop. Ms. Cartier summarized changes made to
the traffic study and updated recommendations from the traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted
that future development will be required to do another traffic study that will evaluate the
actual development occurring at that time.

Questions from Committee:
Committee Member Aaron Stein asked what the minimum density requirement is of
State Trust Land before auction. Mr. Edelman responded that State Trust Land may
not be assigned a density lower than one dwelling unit per acre or an equivalent
economically viable land use.

Vice Chair Michelle Ricart asked if this is why the State Trust Land is currently zoned
for one dwelling unit per acre. Mr. Edelman responded that the S-1 zoning district is
the City of Phoenix base zoning of the land, which happens to be one dwelling unit per
acre. Mr. Edelman stated that all land comes into the City of Phoenix with S-1 zoning if
it is not already zoned with a higher density in the County. Mr. Edelman stated that he
believes the S-1 zoning district is a transitional zoning district assigned to all land if it is
not already zoned for a higher intensity. Mr. Edelman asked City staff to confirm.

Joshua Bednarek, with the Planning and Development Department, confirmed that
Mr. Edelman was correct.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 805
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1

Vice Chair Ricart asked if there was a pending auction for the State Trust Land by the
Sandra Day O’Connor High School. Mr. Edelman responded affirmatively. Vice Chair
Ricart asked if the auction for MDP.2 is scheduled for January 2026. Mr. Edelman
responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification if the minimum
opening bid is $197 million. Mr. Edelman responded that he would need to verify it and
noted that it is available on their website. Mr. Edelman stated that it sounds like a
reasonable number. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that multiple people could
bid on it. Mr. Edelman responded affirmatively, noting that it is an open bid process.
Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that the minimum bid is the appraised price. Mr.
Edelman responded affirmatively, noting that the Commissioner can set a higher price,
but may not set a lower price. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that the State
Trust Land by the Sandra Day O’Connor High School is set for auction later in the
month. Mr. Edelman responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked if the land could
be developed. Mr. Edelman responded that the parcel has no legal access and it is not
a developable parcel.

Committee Member Scott McGill asked the applicant to speak on the environmental
concerns related to vapors being released in the air from the chip plants, concerns
related to water use of the chip plants, and the amount of water being recycled from
the chip plants. Ms. Oberholtzer introduced Rafael Velazquez, the Environment,
Health, and Safety Manger with TSMC, to respond to Committee Member McGilll’s
question.

Rafael Velazquez, with TSMC, responded that the chip plants include stacks and
cooling towers. Mr. Velazquez stated that vapors will be seen coming from the cooling
towers on cold days. Mr. Velazquez stated that for the emission stacks, they go
through a very rigorous process with Maricopa County. Mr. Velazquez stated that they
have to meet certain requirements of Maricopa County and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). Mr. Velazquez stated that they have to meet certain air
quality standards before they are allowed to build an emission unit. Mr. Velazquez
stated that they have to do modeling for all their emission units to make sure that
nothing leaves their property line that could be harmful to the environmental and to
individuals in the area. Mr. Velazquez stated that their abatement has to meet a certain
threshold, which is governed and regulated by Maricopa County. Mr. Velazquez stated
that Maricopa County has the permits available for public records. Mr. Velazquez
stated that they use a lot of water and they have a water reclamation facility, noting that
about 65 percent of their water is currently recycled. Mr. Velazquez added that the
water they use has to be cleaned to ultra-pure levels, noting that the water is purposely
recycled because it costs a lot to clean it. Mr. Velazquez stated that their goal is to
recycle over 90 percent of their water.

Committee Member Stein asked for clarification on restrictions for semitruck traffic
going southbound on 51st Avenue. Mr. Zambrano responded that the Street
Transportation Department added a stipulation that would require large truck traffic to
be directed to the Loop 303 freeway through on-site access control restrictions to
discourage southbound access onto 51st Avenue.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 806
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1

Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that there is a stipulation for a traffic signal at
the intersection of Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway. Mr.
Zambrano responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked the applicant to speak on
the school sites that are planned.

Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the Deer Valley Unified School District (DVUSD) has
funds for two K-8 elementary school sites and one 80-acre high school site with a
performing arts center. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that Stipulation No. 29 covers the
reservation of land for these school sites.

Public Comments:
Tammy Weaver introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Weaver stated that subsidies were used to pay
for infrastructure, including a sewer line that now goes through their community. Ms.
Weaver expressed concerns with the use of nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) and
public trust. Ms. Weaver expressed concerns with water. Ms. Weaver stated that the
subsidies could have been used to help small businesses. Ms. Weaver expressed
concerns with conflicts of interests of Committee members, noting that she has filed six
ethics inquiries. Ms. Weaver expressed concerns with density, traffic, health, and
safety. Ms. Weaver stated that there have been lawsuits against Pulte Homes for home
defects, noting concerns with construction integrity. Ms. Weaver expressed concerns
with the proposed Sonoran Preserve area and requested that the original area
designated by the City be preserved.

Tom Grant introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Grant disagreed that industry and manufacturing are a part
of innovation corridors, noting that they typically include research institutions and talent
located near universities and research centers. Mr. Grant expressed concerns with the
proposed industrial uses. Mr. Grant requested that an environmental study be
conducted.

Brittany Szemerei introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Szemerei expressed concerns with traffic,
wildlife habitat, the number of years before the proposed schools are built, and current
school capacity. Ms. Szemerei noted that several of her neighbors did not attend the
meeting because they did not feel as though their voices would be heard.

Todd Brown introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Brown expressed concerns with traffic and
safety, noting that the traffic will be coming through their neighborhood when 51st
Avenue connects over the canal.

Kasha Brown introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Brown expressed concerns with pedestrian
safety at the Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway intersection.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 807
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1

Jason Weaver introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Weaver expressed concerns with applicant
transparency, the proposed industrial uses, pollution, traffic, water, and higher
electricity and water rates.

Steve Kimmel introduced himself as a concerned resident of the City of Glendale,
opposed to the project. Mr. Kimmel expressed concerns with the proposed public
access on high slopes to access the proposed Sonoran Preserve. Mr. Kimmel
requested that the open space be expanded to more flatland areas for public access.

Mary Walls introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Walls expressed concerns with pedestrian safety and
traffic on Stetson Valley Parkway, the proposed industrial uses, toxins, and health.

Joetta Chapman introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Chapman expressed concerns with toxins,
environmental impact, water, and health.

Shawn McGowan introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. McGowan expressed concerns with applicant
transparency, lack of representation on the Committee, perceived Committee member
conflicts of interest, and funding of infrastructure to support TSMC using taxpayer
funds.

Don Diehn introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Diehn expressed concerns with deviation from the 1998
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, the proposed industrial uses and distance from
existing and future residential, existing school capacity, water supply, and water
contamination.

Suzanne Klapp introduced herself as a representative of the Friends of Deer Valley
organization, in support of the project. Ms. Klapp stated that the proposal is a well-
balanced mixed-use master-planned development. Ms. Klapp stated that the proposal
balances development, open space, and economic opportunity, noting that it includes
one of the largest additions to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. Ms. Klapp stated that
the proposal includes an extensive trail system and hundreds of acres of community
parks. Ms. Klapp added that the Innovation Corridor will be a major economic asset
with high-quality employment uses that will result in less regional commuting and a
stronger tax base to support City services.

Josh Hansma introduced himself as a representative of the Friends of Deer Valley
organization, in support of the project. Mr. Hansma read a letter from Friends of Deer
Valley, noting that the proposal is a thoughtful and sustainable plan that aligns with
their mission to advance balanced development and to support the Deer Valley region,
nearby employment centers, and neighborhoods.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 808
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1

Roberta Pershing introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, in a neutral position. Ms. Pershing expressed concerns with traffic and lack
of representation on the Committee.

Amanda McGowan introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. McGowan expressed concerns with funding of
infrastructure to support TSMC using taxpayer funds that could have been used to
purchase Sonoran Preserve, safety, pollution, perceived Committee member conflicts
of interest, lack of representation on the Committee, and the proximity of the proposed
industrial uses to residential.

Ann Renee Wilsey introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Wilsey expressed concerns with the traffic
impact on Stetson Valley Parkway, proximity of the proposed industrial uses to
residential, and the connection of Stetson Valley Parkway to the Loop 303 freeway.

Jim Umlauf introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Umlauf expressed concerns with the proposed industrial
uses south of Loop 303, the proposed Sonoran Preserve area, and the 51st Avenue
connection over the canal.

Danny Weiss introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Weiss expressed concerns with perceived
Committee member conflicts of interest.

Sam Bonge introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Bonge expressed concerns with traffic, safety, the 51st
Avenue connection over the canal connecting to the Loop 303 freeway, and pollution.

Jo Lambiase introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Hills community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Lambiase expressed concerns with TSMC locating south
of the Loop 303 freeway, the 51st Avenue connection over the canal, and traffic.

Randy Briggs introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Sonoran Mountain
Ranch community in the City of Peoria, opposed to the project. Mr. Briggs expressed
concerns with traffic, speeding, safety, and cellphone service.

Tom Young introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Young express concerns with traffic, safety, chemicals from
chip plants, health, perceived Committee member conflicts of interest, and the traffic
study.

Robert Baxter introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, with concerns. Mr. Baxter expressed concerns with the traffic study. Mr.
Baxter stated that 51st Avenue should not connect over the canal until MDP.5 is built
out, and schools and infrastructure are built.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 809
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1

Raymond Keeler introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Hills
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Keeler expressed concerns with 51st Avenue
connecting over the canal and water. Mr. Keeler proposed the 51st Avenue bridge be
limited to pedestrians and bicyclists.

Ed Ross introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Ross expressed concerns with health and safety.

Scott Spexarth introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Spexarth expressed concerns with 51st
Avenue connecting over the canal and deviation from the 1998 Sonoran Preserve
Master Plan.

Madhuri Jha introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
with concerns. Ms. Jha expressed concerns with air pollution, water pollution, noise
pollution, safety, and quality of life.

John Linam introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Pyramid Peak community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Linam expressed concerns with traffic, 67th Avenue and
51st Avenue connecting to the Loop 303 and over the canal, the traffic study, and
safety.

Tessa St. Cyr introduced herself as a nearby neighbor, opposed to the project. Ms. St.
Cyr expressed concerns with the location of the TSMC expansion, the proposed
industrial uses, contamination, health, and water.

Yolanda Usery introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Usery expressed concerns with traffic and 51st
Avenue connecting to the Loop 303 and over the canal.

Michael Murphy introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Murphy expressed concerns with traffic, safety,
the location of the proposed industrial uses, and 51st Avenue connecting over the
canal.

Carter Huber introduced himself as a concerned resident in the City of Peoria,
opposed to the project. Mr. Huber expressed concerns with deviation from the 1998
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, water, exemption from federal environmental
regulations, traffic, health, and safety.

George Middendorf introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Middendorf expressed concerns with lack of
representation on the Committee, location of the TSMC expansion, health, and safety.

Michael Robbins introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Robbins expressed concerns with health,


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 810
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1

safety, the location of the TSMC expansion, and the proposed Sonoran Preserve
slope.

Mark Cole introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Pyramid Heights community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Cole expressed concerns with traffic, pollution, the
proposed Sonoran Preserve, and perceived Committee member conflicts of interest.

Wendie Brown introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Sonoran Mountain
Ranch community in the City of Peoria, opposed to the project. Ms. Brown expressed
concerns with the proposed Sonoran Preserve, water, traffic, heat, pollution, and
health.

Sam Rueb introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Rueb expressed concerns with the proposed Sonoran
Preserve, the slope of the proposed Sonoran Preserve, the location of the TSMC
expansion, contamination, health, and safety.

Applicant Response:
Ms. Oberholtzer stated that they have had an active project website that has always
had the application materials available in order to be transparent. Ms. Oberholtzer
stated that Stetson Valley and Sonoran Mountain Ranch were originally planned with
51st Avenue and 67th Avenue connecting across the canal. Ms. Oberholtzer stated
that these plans were put into place many decades ago and never came to fruition due
to the recession. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that there is an approved traffic study. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that they have made changes to address community concerns,
including moving density away from 51st Avenue and including larger streets in other
areas to keep 51st Avenue as a total of four lanes for as long as possible. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that MDP.2 along the Loop 303 freeway would be the first to
develop, noting that 51st Avenue would not connect over the canal for many years. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that MDP.5 would develop after MDP.2, but not right away. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that the proposal has been evaluated using all of the City’s current
standards that apply to new development, which will correct issues from the past. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that TSMC and the surrounding area is a major employment center,
and there is no northbound or southbound connection to it. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that
these connections are necessary to increase the safety network, noting that there will
be new public facilities including a fire station, police station, and a library. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that there will be some traffic going southbound, but there will be
much more traffic from the community going northbound to access all of the new areas
to shop, work, and live.

Committee Discussion:
None.

MOTION – GPA-NG-1-24-1:
Committee Member Aaron Stein motioned to recommend approval of GPA-NG-1-24-
1, per the staff recommendation. Committee Member Scott McGill seconded the
motion.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 811
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-1-24-1

VOTE – GPA-NG-1-24-1:
7-0; the motion to recommend approval of GPA-NG-1-24-1 per the staff
recommendation passed with Committee members Crouch, Kennelly, McCarty, McGill,
Salow, Stein, and Ricart in favor.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 812
ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
December 4, 2025

ITEM NO: 10
DISTRICT NO.: 1
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-NG-1-24-1
(Companion Cases GPA-NG-2-24-1 and Z-139-24-1)
Request: Land Use Map and Infrastructure Limit Line Amendment, and Trail Map
Amendment including updates to several trail alignments and types
within the application area (proposed NorthPark development)
Location: Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303
From: Undesignated Area, Floodplain, Preserves/Floodplain, Parks/Open
Space - Publicly Owned, Parks/Open Space - Future 1 dwelling unit per
acre (du/ac), Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 / Residential 1 to 2 du/ac,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, Preserves /
Mixed Use (Area C & D only), Residential 0 to 2 du/ac, Residential 2 to
3.5 du/ac, Residential 2 to 5 du/ac, Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac,
Residential 5 to 15 du/ac, Residential 15+ du/ac, Mixed Use (North
Gateway and Northwest Area only), Commercial, Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park
To: Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned, Parks/Open Space - Privately
Owned, Residential 2 to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, Residential 2
to 3.5 / Residential 3.5 to 5 / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, Residential 3.5
to 5 / Residential 5 to 10 / Residential 10 to 15 / Residential 15+ du/ac,
Floodplain / Parks/Open Space - Publicly Owned, Floodplain /
Parks/Open Space - Privately Owned, Floodplain / Residential 2 to 3.5 /
Residential 3.5 to 5 / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, Floodplain / Residential
3.5 to 5 / Residential 5 to 10 / Residential 10 to 15 / Residential 15+
du/ac, Floodplain / Mixed Use, Floodplain / Commercial, Floodplain /
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park, Mixed Use, Commercial,
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park, and Transportation; and
expansion of the infrastructure limit line
Acreage: 7,377.83
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Map, Infrastructure
Limit Line, and Trails System Map
Applicant: Mike Hifler, Pulte Homes
Owner: Arizona State Land Department c/o Mark Edelman
Representative: Carolyn Oberholtzer, BFSO

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
North Gateway 10/9/2025 Information only.
North Gateway 11/13/2025 Approval. Vote: 7-0.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the North Gateway Village Planning
Committee recommendation.



Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Gorraiz made a MOTION to approve GPA-NG-1-24-1, per the
North Gateway Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Gorraiz
Second: Hu
Vote: 8-0-1 (Matthews abstained)
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposal includes a mix of uses that balance residential, commercial, open space,
and employment uses.

2. Increased residential density will support existing and future employment and
commercial uses in the surrounding area.

3. The companion rezoning case, Z-139-24-1, proposes development that is compatible with
land uses in the surrounding area.

4. The proposed update to the City Trail System Map provides urban trail connectivity
throughout the proposed NorthPark development and beyond.

5. Removal of the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay will allow for continued collaboration
between the City of Phoenix, Arizona State Land Department and private development
regarding infrastructure financing and installation.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Saneeya Mir at 602-686-6461, saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Resolution Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-NG-2-
24-1 - Southwest Corner of I-17 and Loop 303 (Resolution 22351) - District 1

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related resolution if
approved. Request to amend the Street Classification Map to update several arterial
street alignments within the application area (proposed NorthPark development). This
is a companion case to GPA-NG-1-24-1 and Z-139-24-1 and should be heard after
GPA-NG-1-24-1, and followed by Z-139-24-1.

Summary
Application: GPA-NG-2-24-1
Request: Amendment to the Street Classification Map to update several arterial street
alignments within the application area (proposed NorthPark development)

Owner: Arizona State Land Department c/o Mark Edelman
Applicant: Mike Hifler, Pulte Homes
Representative: Carolyn Oberholtzer, BFSO

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Info: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this item on October
9, 2025, for information only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this item on
November 13, 2025, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a
vote of 7-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on December 4, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the North Gateway Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 8-0-1.

Location
Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303
Council District: 1
Parcel Address: N/A





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2025
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-NG-2-24-1,
CHANGING THE STREET CLASSIFICATION MAP FOR THE
SITE DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2025 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 22191, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-NG-2-24-1.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2025 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this Street Classification Map

changes as shown below:




-1- Resolution

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of December

2025.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




-2- Resolution


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney



By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager




-3- Resolution


ATTACHMENT B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
November 10, 2025

Application: GPA-NG-2-24-1

Applicant: Mike Hifler, Pulte Homes

Representative: Carolyn Oberholtzer, BFSO

Owner: Arizona State Land Department c/o Mark Edelman

Location: Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303

Request: Amendment to the Street Classification Map to
update several arterial street alignments within the
application area (proposed NorthPark development)

North Gateway Village Planning November 13, 2025
Committee Meeting Date:

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The proposed alignments of the arterial streets within the proposed NorthPark
development area are generally consistent with previous alignments.

2) The proposed termination of Dixileta Drive at 67th Avenue will not affect street
connectivity of Dixileta Drive within the City of Peoria to the west.

BACKGROUND

The Street Classification Map was first adopted in 1961. The Street Classification Map
was last updated in 2018 with additions and deletions of new platted roadways. The
Street Classification Map provides information on the City’s street network, identifying
the alignment and minimum right-of-way standards for existing and planned streets.

This request is part of the proposed NorthPark development, which has a companion
General Plan Amendment case to amend the General Plan Land Use Map, City Trail
System Map, and the Infrastructure Limit Line (GPA-NG-1-24-1); and a companion




Staff Analysis
GPA-NG-2-24-1


rezoning case to rezone the site to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for a master
planned community including open space, residential, mixed use, commercial,
commerce park, and industrial (Z-139-24-1).

The request includes minor realignments of Dixileta Drive, 43rd Avenue, 51st Avenue,
and 67th Avenue. Additionally, the request proposes to terminate Dixileta Drive at 67th
Avenue, rather than continuing further west. The City of Peoria General Plan 2040
envisions Dixileta Drive terminating at Lake Pleasant Parkway on the City of Peoria
side, so there will be no need for connecting Dixileta Drive between jurisdictions.

The proposal maintains the major arterial street designations for 43rd Avenue, 51st
Avenue, 67th Avenue, and Dixileta Drive. All these major streets, except for 67th
Avenue, are classified on the Street Classification Map as a Cross Section A, which
calls for 140 feet of total right-of-way, including a median and three travel lanes in either
direction (six total), and detached sidewalks. Sixty Seventh Avenue is classified on the
Street Classification Map as a Cross Section B, which calls for 130 feet of total right-of-
way, including a median and three travel lanes in either direction (six total), and
detached sidewalks.

As shown on the 1997 Street Classification Map, 51st Avenue was designated as a
major arterial street, running north-south through the proposed site and connecting
south, over the CAP canal, to Happy Valley Road. In the 2004 Approved Master Streets
Plan for Stetson Valley (the subdivision south of the subject site), the plans reference
51st Avenue at ultimate build out as described in Cross Section A, with three travel
lanes in either direction and a median, and a future connection crossing the CAP canal.




Source: Street Transportation Department




Staff Analysis
GPA-NG-2-24-1




2004 Approved Stetson Valley Master Street Plan
Source: Planning and Development Department

RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS- TRAFFIC; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Provide access
by major streets, with internal circulation handled by a local street system that
discourages through-traffic and provides safe pedestrian travel. Use local and
collector streets, plus feeder bus lines, to bring people into the cores, centers or
corridors.

The proposal will provide an adequate system of major streets for the flow of traffic in
the area. The companion rezoning case, Z-139-24-1, requires detached sidewalks
along all major streets for safe pedestrian travel. Additionally, the companion General
Plan Amendment, GPA-NG-1-24-1, includes an update to the City Trail System Map to
provide a robust urban trail system throughout the proposed NorthPark development
that would provide safe multi-modal travel.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; CONNECTED NEIGHBORHOODS; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Design and
connect neighborhoods via streets, sidewalks and trails, and discourage the
abandonment of streets, sidewalks and alleys that compromise connectivity.

The companion cases Z-139-24-1 and GPA-NG-1-24-1 include a robust network of
multi-use trails, shared-use paths, separated bike lanes, and detached sidewalks to
support and encourage connectivity and multi-modal transportation throughout the
proposed NorthPark development.




Staff Analysis
GPA-NG-2-24-1


COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
At the time this staff report was written, staff has received 199 letters of opposition or
concerns and nine general inquiries. Concerns include density, traffic, crime, safety,
water, proposed industrial uses, environmental impact, potential for nuisances, the heat
island effect, loss of recreational space, loss of wildlife habitat, wildlife displacement,
and loss of the Sonoran Preserve. Additionally, staff has received four letters of support.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-NG-2-24-1. The request will further the goals of the
General Plan and is consistent with the transportation needs of the surrounding area.

Writer
Adrian Zambrano
November 10, 2025

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Map
Community Correspondence (538 pages)




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF PHOENIX X PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT X 200 W WASHINGTON ST X PHOENIX, AZ X 85003X (602) 262-6882
APPLICATION NO: GPA-NG-2-24-1 ACRES: N/A REVISION DATE:
VILLAGE: NORTH GATEWAY COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1 11/4/2025
APPLICANT: HILGARTWILSON, LLC
EXISTING:
Street Alignment




!!
(( (!
(
51st Ave




!(
((




(!
(!
(! (!
(! (!
43rd Ave !(
( CAREFREE HWY

£
¤


(!
! 74




!(
!(
( (!
!! (!
(! ( ((
(! !(
!(!




(
(!
! (!
(( (!
!! (!
(! !
!(
((
( !(
!(!((!
!! (!
(!




(!
!(
(
(!
(!
(! (
67th Ave
(!(




(!
!(
(!(!
!




!
(!
!!
(!
(!
(!
!(
!(
( (!
!!
Dixileta Dr




!(
(!
! (!(




!(
DOVE VALLEY RD




!(
!(
(




(!
!(
!




!(
§
¨
¦


!(
v
w 43RD AVE




!(




!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!!
((
! !
(!
! (
(!
! ( Major Arterial
(! (!
! (
!!
( !(
ILETA DIX
(!
((!
(!
! (!
(( !( DR


!
((
!(!( !(
!
Arterial !(
! !(
( !(
! !
((
! !(
( !(
!(!(
!


(!
( 51ST AVE
Collector

67TH AVE
!(
( !(
!(!!
Minor Collector


(!
(
!!
( (! !
(
!
( !(
((
! !
!(
!
(
( !!
(!( !
(
!
( !!
( (!
(! (!
(! (!
(! (!
(!
!
( (!
(! (!
!
(!
( (!
(! (!
(! (!
(! (
PROPOSED CHANGE:
Revised Street Alignment




!(
(( !
!(
((
(!
51st Ave




(!
(! (!
(! (!
!(
( CAREFREE HWY

£
¤


(!
! !(
( (!
!! (!
(! ( (!
! (!
(( (!
!! (!
(! !
!(
((
( !(
!(!((!
!! (!
(!74((
(! !(
!(!



(!

!(
43rd Ave



(! (

(
(!
(!


(!
(! (!
(!(



(!(!


(!
(!
!
!



!!

!
( !!
( !
(!

!!
(!
67th Ave




!
( ( ( (
Dixileta Dr (!
! (!(




!
DOVE VALLEY RD
!(
( !




!!
(( (!
(


!!
!!
(




((
((




(!
! w
v §
¨
¦

!(
!(




!(
!!
!!
!(
( !! ((




((((
((
! !

!
((
43RD AVE
DIX (!
! (




(!
(!(




!(
ILETA



!
!
(! ( Major Arterial
(! !(
(




!(
! !(
! DR




!(
!!
( !
( !(




!(
!(




!(
(!
((!
(!
! (! !(
((




!(!(
!(
!(!(




!(
!(!!
!
!(
( !

!(
!(!

((
Arterial

!(
( !(
!(
( !(
!(



(!
!(
!(

(
!!
!(

!
(!(!
((!(
!(! !
((
!

!(
!(
!(
( !(
!(!(
!


!!
Collector

!!
((((
!!
Minor Collector 67TH AVE 51ST AVE




(!
(
!!
( (! !
(
!
( !(
((
! !
!(
!
(
( ((
!! !
!
(
!
( (! (!
(! (!
(! (!
(! ( 824
!!
( (!
(! (!
(! (!
(! (!
(!
!
( (!
(! !
(!
(
ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1
INFORMATION ONLY



Date of VPC Meeting October 9, 2025
Request Request to amend the Street Classification Map to
update several arterial street alignments within the
application area
Location Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303

VPC DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item 4 (GPA-NG-1-24-1), Agenda Item 5 (GPA-NG-2-24-1), and Agenda Item 6
(Z-139-24-1) are companion cases and were heard concurrently.

15 members of the public registered to speak on this item in opposition, eight members
of the public registered in opposition but did not wish to speak, and 19 members of the
public registered in opposition to donate their time to Amanda McGowan with the
Stetson Valley Owners Association. One member of the public registered to speak on
this item in support. Six members of the public registered to speak on this item in a
neutral position.

Committee Member Scott McGill left during this item, bringing the quorum to nine
members.

Applicant Presentation:
Carolyn Oberholtzer, with Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, introduced herself
and the development team, and provided an overview of the history of the property. Ms.
Oberholtzer summarized the purpose of State Trust Land. Ms. Oberholtzer provided
background on the Stetson Hills master-planned community, the North Phoenix 3,500
PUD (Planned Unit Development), the proposed Halo Vista development, and the
proposed Vestar developments nearby. Ms. Oberholtzer summarized the proposed
regulatory framework of the NorthPark PUD, including Master Development Parcels
(MDPs) and Land Use Districts (LUDs). Ms. Oberholtzer displayed and explained the
proposed General Plan Land Use Map. Ms. Oberholtzer summarized changes made to
the applications, noting that there was a reduction in the overall maximum density. Ms.
Oberholtzer summarized the modifications made to arterial and collector street cross
sections, highlighting multi-modal improvements. Ms. Oberholtzer summarized multi-
modal trails and paths that would be provided throughout the site.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 825
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1 – Info Only

Dawn Cartier, with CivTech Inc., introduced herself and provided an overview of the
traffic study. Ms. Cartier summarized what internal capture and community capture are
in the traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted that a lot of trips would be inside of the community,
but these internal trips were limited to 13 percent in the traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted
that the majority of work trips would only be about three miles from homes. Ms. Cartier
noted that the traffic study is based on the maximum zoning entitlement, which is twice
the number of trips than are planned for actual development.

Ms. Oberholtzer summarized community outreach efforts.

Questions from Committee:
Committee Member Scott McGill asked what the traffic counts are on 67th Avenue
and 51st Avenue. Committee Member McGill asked if the streets in the Stetson Valley
community are completed up until the dead-end at the canal. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded affirmatively and noted that Ms. Cartier should have those numbers but
would have to look them up. Committee Member McGill asked how long the streets
have been in place. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that it was shown on the master plan for
Stetson back in 1988. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the alignment changed slightly after
rezoning, but the crossing over the canal has always been planned and has been
shown on the Street Classification Map over the last few decades. Committee Member
McGill stated that he has lived in North Phoenix for over 23 years, and he has never
seen where those streets have crossed over yet, but he has always been curious when
they would. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the street cross section for 51st Avenue
includes two travel lanes in both directions, and it includes a potential future travel lane
in both directions if needed, which would cut into the median.

Chair Julie Read stated that there should have been a disclosure within the mortgage
statement with the approved master street plan attached for homes sold in Stetson
Valley.

Committee Member Aaron Stein asked if there if there is a traffic model that
forecasts travel patterns along 51st Avenue. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the
anticipated phasing of the project is that the Innovation Corridor LUD would develop
first. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that when any MDP comes in, an updated Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) will be needed that will determine what improvements needs to occur
with that phase. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the connection over 51st Avenue would
likely not need to occur until MDP.5 is built, which would be for single-family homes.

Ms. Cartier stated that because this area is large, they have been working with the
agency. Ms. Cartier stated that MAG runs a regional traffic demand model. Ms. Cartier
stated that they had MAG run information for them, which is the predicted model that
they have been using. Ms. Cartier noted that the MAG model is highly focused on the
Loop 303, Interstate 17, and access to the freeways. Ms. Cartier stated that people
want to get to the roads where they can move the fastest.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 826
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1 – Info Only

Committee Member Will Manion asked if there were any studies done on the
semitruck traffic along 51st Avenue. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that semitruck traffic
would likely be related to the Innovation Corridor LUD. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the
trip patterns are largely to the freeways and there will be ways through design to
facilitate trips towards the freeways. Ms. Oberholtzer added that the City could
establish certain routes as semitruck routes or not. Committee Member Manion asked
if there is a change coming to the Dixileta Drive and Interstate 17 intersection with the
anticipated traffic. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that there would be an extension of the
frontage roads to the north and south, but the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) does not have any plans to change that intersection. Ms. Oberholtzer added
that there would be free flowing ramps to access the Interstate 17 from the Loop 303,
and vice versa.

Committee Member Paul Carver stated that the reduction of density of approximately
4,000 dwelling units is a lot less traffic, more open space, and less kids that the school
district would need to accommodate. Committee Member Carver asked if certain
improvements would be funded by the City or by the developer. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded that if the demand is being generated by a development, then the traffic
mitigation improvement is assigned to be funded by the developer. Ms. Oberholtzer
stated that today, if there is an existing need for a certain improvement, that would not
be the responsibility of the developer since it is an existing need.

Committee Member Chandra McCarty thanked the applicant for the 2,100 acres of
open space being donated to the City.

Committee Member Kylie Kennelly stated that there were concerns that the area
being donated for Sonoran Preserve is too steep and may be challenging for elderly or
small children to enjoy as they have been able to in the past. Committee Member
Kennelly asked for an explanation of the trail system. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that
the property is State Trust Land and accessing the property is fundamentally
trespassing. Ms. Oberholtzer added that people can obtain a recreational permit to
access the property, but there is no designated public access. Ms. Oberholtzer stated
that there will be a trail along the canal, which will provide public access into the
Sonoran Preserve. Ms. Oberholtzer added that there will be trailheads to provide
access along other areas as well and noted that there would be trail types for all types
of users. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that there will still be areas that are flat that would be
accessible. Committee Member Kennelly asked for the applicant to explain the 20
percent internal capture rate that was cited by the community, as well as the total
number of trips.

Ms. Cartier responded that the City of Phoenix has a policy that has been in place for
about a year, to look at the maximum entitlement allowed. Ms. Cartier noted that the
TIA has to look at the most intense land uses and the maximum density that would be
permitted. Ms. Cartier stated that this policy does put the TIA in a strange position,
since it predicts a lot more traffic than is actually planned, but it is a requirement of the
City. Ms. Cartier stated that people that live inside of NorthPark that are traveling to
someplace also inside of NorthPark is about a half of the internal capture number. Ms.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 827
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1 – Info Only

Cartier stated that the other half of the number is internal trips for areas such as
shopping centers, and trips made within the shopping center.

Committee Member Andrea Crouch asked what the existing S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence) zoning district would permit. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that it essentially
permits one residential dwelling unit per acre along with some agricultural uses. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that all of State Trust Land in the City of Phoenix is given S-1
zoning when it is annexed into the City, before it gets rezoned. Committee Member
Crouch asked if 51st Avenue was established north of Happy Valley Road around
1989. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that she does not have any data predating that, but it has
been on the Street Classification Map since at least the 1990s.

Vice Chair Michelle Ricart asked if there is currently no Sonoran Preserve within the
NorthPark boundary. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the 1998 Sonoran Preserve
Master Plan recommended that certain areas of land be included in the future Sonoran
Preserve. Ms. Oberholtzer added that the plan included future plans to acquire the land
for Sonoran Preserve, which has never come to fruition in this area, since State Trust
Land is very expensive to buy. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that there was a State program
called the Arizona Preserve Initiative that the State Legislature would fund, which
would provide 50 percent of the cost to assist Arizona communities with purchasing
State Trust Land for preservation. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the State Legislature has
not funded this program in several decades. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the land
designated as Sonoran Preserve within NorthPark will be a true donation of land to the
City for preservation. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that accessing State Trust
Land is technically trespassing without a recreational permit. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked if 51st Avenue north of Happy Valley
Road could be six lanes. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively, noting that it is 140
feet of right-of-way on the Street Classification Map, which would be enough room for
six lanes. Vice Chair Ricart asked if it was always planned for six lanes since the
Stetson community was built. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively. Vice Chair
Ricart asked for clarification that Stetson was also zoned S-1 because all of State Trust
Land is given S-1 zoning before being rezoned. Ms. Oberholtzer responded
affirmatively.

Committee Member McGill asked for clarification that State Trust Land is typically
rezoned before it is auctioned. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively.

Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that the Innovation Corridor LUD would be
constructed before homes within NorthPark, so prospective home purchasers would
know what is there. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively, noting that there is no
residential permitted within the Innovation Corridor LUD, nor in the Community Open
Space LUD or Community Commercial LUD, which both surround the Innovation
Corridor LUD, and would provide a significant buffer for any nearby residential. Vice
Chair Ricart asked what the timeframe is for the buildout of 51st Avenue. Ms.
Oberholtzer responded that if MDP.2 is built first, the likelihood is that 51st Avenue
would be completely built from the Loop 303 to Dixileta Drive, Dixileta Drive would be
built from 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue, and 43rd Avenue would be built from Dixileta

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 828
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1 – Info Only

Drive to the Loop 303. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the fastest that development would
begin in MDP.2 is in about two years, since it is closer to existing infrastructure. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that MDP.5 is further from existing infrastructure, and it needs to
wait for completion of the sewer plant. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the extension of
51st Avenue south of Dixileta Drive would likely occur within four to six years. Vice
Chair Ricart asked if 67th Avenue would be constructed last. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded that when MDP.5 develops, it does go all the way to 67th Avenue, and
there is a bridge that would have to be built across the canal. Ms. Oberholtzer stated
that the timing of it would depend on the intensity of the development that happens on
the west side. Ms. Oberholtzer added that the phasing would be finalized with the
master plans. Vice Chair Ricart asked for Ms. Oberholtzer to explain who pays for
these roads. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that it would largely be paid by developers.
Ms. Oberholtzer added that there are certain freeway-adjacent improvements that are
programmed for ADOT to do, but all roads internal to the NorthPark boundary would be
constructed and funded by private developers. Vice Chair Ricart asked what the
distance requirement is for public hearing notifications.

Adrian Zambrano, staff, responded that it is a minimum of 600 feet from the property
for property owners and a minimum of one mile for registered neighborhood
organizations. Vice Chair Ricart asked if the applicant sent notifications beyond the
minimum radius.

Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the General Plan Amendment boundary is larger than
the PUD boundary, so the GPA boundary was used for public hearing notification of
the PUD rezoning. Vice Chair Ricart asked what the minimum requirement is for when
notification letters must be sent.

Mr. Zambrano responded that it is a minimum of 10 calendar days before the first
meeting.

Chair Read asked what the process is for the City to accept a TIA. Racelle Escolar,
staff, responded that for PUD rezoning cases, the applicant is required to submit the
TIA prior to or with the PUD submittal. Ms. Escolar stated that PUDs typically go
through multiple cycles of review, which allows the Street Transportation Department
time to review the TIA during the multiple cycles of PUD review. Ms. Escolar noted that
TIAs similarly go through multiple cycles of review. Chair Read asked for clarification if
it is common for there to be multiple revisions to a TIA. Ms. Escolar responded
affirmatively. Chair Read asked when TIAs typically are available for public records.
Ms. Escolar responded that a TIA would be publicly available when it is accepted by
the Street Transportation Department. Ms. Escolar stated that a TIA is typically
accepted by the time the PUD hearing draft is ready. Chair Read asked if the
Committee would not hear a case until the TIA is accepted by the City. Ms. Escolar
responded that there may be some flexibility, but they should be pretty close. Chair
Read asked if the City Council could approve a project if the TIA is not accepted by the
City. Ms. Escolar responded that it would likely need to be accepted by that time, and if
not, there would be several stipulations to address it. Chair Read asked how the
community obtained the TIA if it was not publicly available by the City yet.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 829
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1 – Info Only

Ms. Oberholtzer responded that she sent the draft TIA to community members that
asked for it in order to be fully transparent with the community. Chair Read asked for
clarification that traffic mitigation outside of the PUD boundary, such as along Happy
Valley Road, may be the responsibility of the developers in NorthPark if the generated
traffic from the development is contributing to traffic in that area. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded affirmatively, noting that the TIA is required to analyze maximum
entitlement, which creates traffic mitigation measures that may ultimately not be
needed. Ms. Oberholtzer highlighted traffic mitigation measures that are required as
part of the NorthPark TIA. Chair Read stated that she spoke with the director of the
Planning and Development Department and requested that the City add a stipulation
that would trigger public review and comment of site plans and elevations as each
parcel continues to develop, in order to provide the community with an opportunity to
provide comments, which has been done before with previous cases. Chair Read
requested that the applicant entertain some language that when 51st Avenue is
constructed south of Dixileta Drive into the Stetson Valley community, that traffic
mitigation within that area be prioritized and be constructed and paid for first.

Public Comments:
Amanda McGowan introduced herself as the president of the Stetson Valley Owners
Association neighboring the site to the south, opposed to the project. Ms. McGowan
stated that community members do not feel heard. Ms. McGowan stated that the
community knows that development is inevitable and noted that the current proposal
represented reckless growth. Ms. McGowan stated that Stetson Valley would be
immediately impacted by NorthPark since it is directly south of the site and 51st
Avenue would go through their community. Ms. McGowan expressed concerns
regarding the proposed density, industrial uses, lack of transparency from the
developer, public meetings being scheduled back to back, safety, and a flawed and
biased traffic study. Ms. McGowan stated that the community just recently found out
about the proposed industrial uses, noting that these uses belong north of the Loop
303 freeway. Ms. McGowan summarized concerns regarding the applicant’s traffic
study that was still being reviewed by the City. Ms. McGowan stated that she hopes the
City provides sufficient oversight of the traffic study before rezoning is approved. Ms.
McGowan then summarized concerns with pedestrian safety in the Stetson Valley
community. Ms. McGowan expressed appreciation for the separated bike lanes
proposed for NorthPark, noting that she wished that same kind of thought was given to
their neighborhood. Ms. McGowan noted that a HAWK (High Intensity Activated
CrossWalK) signal has been requested for a long time for the Stetson Valley Parkway
and Inspiration Mountain Parkway intersection due to safety issues. Ms. McGowan
then summarized concerns with the proposed Sonoran Preserve in NorthPark
deviating from the recommendations of the 1998 Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. Ms.
McGowan stated that the community would prefer to see all of the area around
Pyramid Peak preserved, as was recommended by the plan. Ms. McGowan concluded
with requests of the community for changes to the PUD before approving rezoning.

Randy Wilde introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Wilde echoed concerns regarding deviation from the land
recommended for Sonoran Preserve in the 1998 Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. Mr.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 830
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1 – Info Only

Wilde stated that State Trust Land can be accessed by the public for recreation with a
permit.

Don Diehn introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community, with
concerns. Mr. Diehn echoed concerns with traffic and safety. Mr. Diehn echoed
concerns with the Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway
intersection.

Mary Walls introduced herself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Walls stated that she has always known that 51st Avenue
would eventually cross the canal. Ms. Walls stated that Stetson Valley is a highly
populated residential area with high pedestrian activity. Ms. Walls requested that there
be safety mitigations included for 51st Avenue when it goes through the Stetson Valley
community.

Bob Jewell introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Jewell stated that he hopes the City could provide the
community with some assurance that the first phase of development would be north of
Dixileta Drive, along the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Jewell expressed concerns with traffic
and requested that there be significant improvements made to Stetson Valley Parkway
before it connects across the canal to Dixileta Drive. Mr. Jewell stated that he felt a lot
better knowing that semitrucks will not be using Stetson Valley Parkway to build the
first phase of development.

Heidi Banister introduced herself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Banister echoed concerns with pedestrian safety due to the
six-lane roadway going through their residential community. Ms. Banister echoed
concerns with the proposed industrial uses and requested they be moved north of the
Loop 303 freeway.

Michael Lopez introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Lopez echoed concerns with the proposed industrial uses
south of the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Lopez echoed concerns with traffic.

George Middendorf introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, with concerns. Mr. Middendorf stated that he did not know that a chip plant
was going to be built south of the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Middendorf echoed concerns
with traffic, noting that traffic needs to be directed to the north end of the site and
everyday land uses need to be constructed on the north end to keep traffic to the north.
Mr. Middendorf echoed that the proposed industrial uses should be kept to the north of
the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Middendorf stated that offices should be built south of the
Loop 303 freeway instead.

Kenli Montoya introduced herself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Montoya echoed concerns with pedestrian and child safety,
noting a recent child fatality that occurred on Stetson Valley Parkway. Ms. Montoya


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 831
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1 – Info Only

stated that the traffic from 51st Avenue going across the canal into their community
would put many children at risk due to the nearby school.

Eileen Baden introduced herself as a member of the Rio Vista Village Planning
Committee and president of the Friends of Daisy Mountain Trails organization, in a
neutral position. Ms. Baden stated that their organization works on trail connections up
in this area. Ms. Baden expressed concerns with wildfires, noting that multi-use trails
could act as firebreaks. Ms. Baden stated that she would like to see the proposed
pathways in the project increased from seven feet to eight feet or 10 feet, so
emergency responders could use them as well.

Ed McKelvey introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in Peoria and member of the
West Valley Trail Alliance organization, in support of the project. Mr. McKelvey stated
that he has enjoyed this piece of Sonoran Desert for many years via a recreational
permit. Mr. McKelvey acknowledged that the Arizona State Land Department has a
mandate to sell its land for the highest and best use. Mr. McKelvey expressed
appreciation for how much thought has gone into this project and for the applicant’s
commitment to protect as much open space as they are committing to. Mr. McKelvey
stated that his primary concern is with the proposed industrial uses south of the Loop
303 freeway and increased industrial water usage.

Eric Thompson introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Thompson echoed concerns with the proposed industrial
uses and industrial water usage. Mr. Thompson requested a roundabout at 51st
Avenue and Dixileta Drive to prevent semitrucks from going through their community.
Mr. Thompson expressed concerns with police, fire, and emergency response times
being impacted by this development. Mr. Thompson added that it took 17 years for a
school to be built within the Stetson Valley community, noting that the developers need
to help fund the schools, since the State does not have sufficient funding. Mr.
Thompson expressed concerns with hazardous waste.

Michael Abad introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Abad echoed concerns with traffic and loss of Sonoran
Desert. Mr. Abad expressed concerns with wildlife displacement and industrial
contamination.

Applicant Response:
Not heard.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 832
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1


Date of VPC Meeting November 13, 2025
Request Request to amend the Street Classification Map to
update several arterial street alignments within the
application area
Location Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 7-0

VPC DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item 3 (GPA-NG-1-24-1), Agenda Item 4 (GPA-NG-2-24-1), and Agenda Item 5
(Z-139-24-1) are companion cases and were heard concurrently.

34 members of the public registered to speak on this item in opposition or with concerns
and 28 members of the public registered in opposition or with concerns but did not wish
to speak. One member of the public registered in opposition to donate time to Tammy
Weaver. One member of the public registered in opposition to donate time to Amanda
McGowan. One member of the public registered in opposition to donate time to Carter
Huber. Three members of the public registered to speak on this item in support. One
member of the public registered in support but did not wish to speak. One member of
the public registered to speak in a neutral position.

GPEC/CEDD, ASLD, and Staff Presentation:
Christine Mackay, with the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, introduced herself and
provided an overview of economic strengths of Phoenix. Ms. Mackay discussed the
past, present, and future of the Phoenix economy. Ms. Mackay discussed economic and
infrastructure history in Phoenix. Ms. Mackay shared target industries for the Phoenix
economy. Ms. Mackay discussed the national security rationale for bringing back
semiconductor manufacturing to the United States. Ms. Mackay discussed the
economic impact of the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)
investment in the United States and the proposed Halo Vista development. Ms. Mackay
then discussed the economic impact of the Intel campus in the City of Chandler.

Mark Edelman, with the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD), introduced himself
and provided an overview of the historic background of ASLD. Mr. Edelman discussed
the legal requirements of State Trust Land. Mr. Edelman displayed the State Trust Land


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 833
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1

in the North Gateway Village and shared other areas to the south that originated as
State Trust Land.

Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided an overview of General Plan Amendment case GPA-
NG-1-24-1, including the location of the request, the proposal, surrounding General
Plan Land Use Map designations, and the existing and proposed General Plan Land
Use Map designations. Mr. Zambrano noted that the request also includes an update to
the City Trails Network Map, the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay, and Infrastructure Limit
Line, and displayed the existing and proposed maps. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff
findings and stated that staff recommends approval. Mr. Zambrano then provided an
overview of General Plan Amendment case GPA-NG-2-24-1, noting what the request is.
Mr. Zambrano shared background on 51st Avenue and then displayed the existing and
proposed Street Classification Map. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff findings and stated
that staff recommends approval. Mr. Zambrano then provided an overview of rezoning
case Z-139-24-1, including the proposal and surrounding zoning and land uses. Mr.
Zambrano discussed the proposed PUD, including the regulatory framework of Master
Development Parcels (MDPs) and Land Use Districts (LUDs), the proposed
development standards, and the proposed design guidelines. Mr. Zambrano stated that
as noted in the staff report, the proposal supports efforts from various adopted plans,
policies, and initiatives. Mr. Zambrano summarized community input that staff has
received. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff findings and stated that staff recommends
approval subject to stipulations. Mr. Zambrano shared the recommended stipulations
and next steps for public hearings.

Applicant Presentation:
Carolyn Oberholtzer, with Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, introduced herself
and provided an overview of changes made to the application. Ms. Oberholtzer
discussed the Innovation Corridor LUD. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed community
outreach. Ms. Oberholtzer noted that advance notice was given to the press and the
community when TSMC joined the application. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed letters of
support received. Ms. Oberholtzer displayed and discussed the existing and proposed
General Plan Land Use Map and City Trails System Map. Ms. Oberholtzer displayed
and discussed the proposed Master Open Space, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trails Plan
and the Master Edge Treatment Plan. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed the slope of the
proposed Sonoran Preserve, noting that half of the area is at or below the 10 percent
slope line. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed the maximum density allowed within the MDPs.
Ms. Oberholtzer discussed the Foothills Residential LUD, noting that it allows a lower
density than the existing Stetson Valley community to the south. Ms. Oberholtzer then
discussed viewsheds, noting that views of Pyramid Peak will be maintained.

Dawn Cartier, with CivTech Inc., introduced herself and provided an overview of the
traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted that the traffic study outlook is to 2050 and evaluates the
complete buildout of NorthPark, including future growth in the surrounding area. Ms.
Cartier stated that the traffic study is based on the maximum entitlement, and not the
targeted entitlements that will likely develop. Ms. Cartier summarized changes made to
the traffic study and updated recommendations from the traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 834
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1

that future development will be required to do another traffic study that will evaluate the
actual development occurring at that time.

Questions from Committee:
Committee Member Aaron Stein asked what the minimum density requirement is of
State Trust Land before auction. Mr. Edelman responded that State Trust Land may
not be assigned a density lower than one dwelling unit per acre or an equivalent
economically viable land use.

Vice Chair Michelle Ricart asked if this is why the State Trust Land is currently zoned
for one dwelling unit per acre. Mr. Edelman responded that the S-1 zoning district is
the City of Phoenix base zoning of the land, which happens to be one dwelling unit per
acre. Mr. Edelman stated that all land comes into the City of Phoenix with S-1 zoning if
it is not already zoned with a higher density in the County. Mr. Edelman stated that he
believes the S-1 zoning district is a transitional zoning district assigned to all land if it is
not already zoned for a higher intensity. Mr. Edelman asked City staff to confirm.

Joshua Bednarek, with the Planning and Development Department, confirmed that
Mr. Edelman was correct.

Vice Chair Ricart asked if there was a pending auction for the State Trust Land by the
Sandra Day O’Connor High School. Mr. Edelman responded affirmatively. Vice Chair
Ricart asked if the auction for MDP.2 is scheduled for January 2026. Mr. Edelman
responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification if the minimum
opening bid is $197 million. Mr. Edelman responded that he would need to verify it and
noted that it is available on their website. Mr. Edelman stated that it sounds like a
reasonable number. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that multiple people could
bid on it. Mr. Edelman responded affirmatively, noting that it is an open bid process.
Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that the minimum bid is the appraised price. Mr.
Edelman responded affirmatively, noting that the Commissioner can set a higher price,
but may not set a lower price. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that the State
Trust Land by the Sandra Day O’Connor High School is set for auction later in the
month. Mr. Edelman responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked if the land could
be developed. Mr. Edelman responded that the parcel has no legal access and it is not
a developable parcel.

Committee Member Scott McGill asked the applicant to speak on the environmental
concerns related to vapors being released in the air from the chip plants, concerns
related to water use of the chip plants, and the amount of water being recycled from
the chip plants. Ms. Oberholtzer introduced Rafael Velazquez, the Environment,
Health, and Safety Manger with TSMC, to respond to Committee Member McGilll’s
question.

Rafael Velazquez, with TSMC, responded that the chip plants include stacks and
cooling towers. Mr. Velazquez stated that vapors will be seen coming from the cooling
towers on cold days. Mr. Velazquez stated that for the emission stacks, they go
through a very rigorous process with Maricopa County. Mr. Velazquez stated that they

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 835
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1

have to meet certain requirements of Maricopa County and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). Mr. Velazquez stated that they have to meet certain air
quality standards before they are allowed to build an emission unit. Mr. Velazquez
stated that they have to do modeling for all their emission units to make sure that
nothing leaves their property line that could be harmful to the environmental and to
individuals in the area. Mr. Velazquez stated that their abatement has to meet a certain
threshold, which is governed and regulated by Maricopa County. Mr. Velazquez stated
that Maricopa County has the permits available for public records. Mr. Velazquez
stated that they use a lot of water and they have a water reclamation facility, noting that
about 65 percent of their water is currently recycled. Mr. Velazquez added that the
water they use has to be cleaned to ultra-pure levels, noting that the water is purposely
recycled because it costs a lot to clean it. Mr. Velazquez stated that their goal is to
recycle over 90 percent of their water.

Committee Member Stein asked for clarification on restrictions for semitruck traffic
going southbound on 51st Avenue. Mr. Zambrano responded that the Street
Transportation Department added a stipulation that would require large truck traffic to
be directed to the Loop 303 freeway through on-site access control restrictions to
discourage southbound access onto 51st Avenue.

Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that there is a stipulation for a traffic signal at
the intersection of Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway. Mr.
Zambrano responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked the applicant to speak on
the school sites that are planned.

Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the Deer Valley Unified School District (DVUSD) has
funds for two K-8 elementary school sites and one 80-acre high school site with a
performing arts center. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that Stipulation No. 29 covers the
reservation of land for these school sites.

Public Comments:
Tammy Weaver introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Weaver stated that subsidies were used to pay
for infrastructure, including a sewer line that now goes through their community. Ms.
Weaver expressed concerns with the use of nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) and
public trust. Ms. Weaver expressed concerns with water. Ms. Weaver stated that the
subsidies could have been used to help small businesses. Ms. Weaver expressed
concerns with conflicts of interests of Committee members, noting that she has filed six
ethics inquiries. Ms. Weaver expressed concerns with density, traffic, health, and
safety. Ms. Weaver stated that there have been lawsuits against Pulte Homes for home
defects, noting concerns with construction integrity. Ms. Weaver expressed concerns
with the proposed Sonoran Preserve area and requested that the original area
designated by the City be preserved.

Tom Grant introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Grant disagreed that industry and manufacturing are a part
of innovation corridors, noting that they typically include research institutions and talent

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 836
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1

located near universities and research centers. Mr. Grant expressed concerns with the
proposed industrial uses. Mr. Grant requested that an environmental study be
conducted.

Brittany Szemerei introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Szemerei expressed concerns with traffic,
wildlife habitat, the number of years before the proposed schools are built, and current
school capacity. Ms. Szemerei noted that several of her neighbors did not attend the
meeting because they did not feel as though their voices would be heard.

Todd Brown introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Brown expressed concerns with traffic and
safety, noting that the traffic will be coming through their neighborhood when 51st
Avenue connects over the canal.

Kasha Brown introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Brown expressed concerns with pedestrian
safety at the Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway intersection.

Jason Weaver introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Weaver expressed concerns with applicant
transparency, the proposed industrial uses, pollution, traffic, water, and higher
electricity and water rates.

Steve Kimmel introduced himself as a concerned resident of the City of Glendale,
opposed to the project. Mr. Kimmel expressed concerns with the proposed public
access on high slopes to access the proposed Sonoran Preserve. Mr. Kimmel
requested that the open space be expanded to more flatland areas for public access.

Mary Walls introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Walls expressed concerns with pedestrian safety and
traffic on Stetson Valley Parkway, the proposed industrial uses, toxins, and health.

Joetta Chapman introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Chapman expressed concerns with toxins,
environmental impact, water, and health.

Shawn McGowan introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. McGowan expressed concerns with applicant
transparency, lack of representation on the Committee, perceived Committee member
conflicts of interest, and funding of infrastructure to support TSMC using taxpayer
funds.

Don Diehn introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Diehn expressed concerns with deviation from the 1998
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, the proposed industrial uses and distance from


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 837
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1

existing and future residential, existing school capacity, water supply, and water
contamination.

Suzanne Klapp introduced herself as a representative of the Friends of Deer Valley
organization, in support of the project. Ms. Klapp stated that the proposal is a well-
balanced mixed-use master-planned development. Ms. Klapp stated that the proposal
balances development, open space, and economic opportunity, noting that it includes
one of the largest additions to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. Ms. Klapp stated that
the proposal includes an extensive trail system and hundreds of acres of community
parks. Ms. Klapp added that the Innovation Corridor will be a major economic asset
with high-quality employment uses that will result in less regional commuting and a
stronger tax base to support City services.

Josh Hansma introduced himself as a representative of the Friends of Deer Valley
organization, in support of the project. Mr. Hansma read a letter from Friends of Deer
Valley, noting that the proposal is a thoughtful and sustainable plan that aligns with
their mission to advance balanced development and to support the Deer Valley region,
nearby employment centers, and neighborhoods.

Roberta Pershing introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, in a neutral position. Ms. Pershing expressed concerns with traffic and lack
of representation on the Committee.

Amanda McGowan introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. McGowan expressed concerns with funding of
infrastructure to support TSMC using taxpayer funds that could have been used to
purchase Sonoran Preserve, safety, pollution, perceived Committee member conflicts
of interest, lack of representation on the Committee, and the proximity of the proposed
industrial uses to residential.

Ann Renee Wilsey introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Wilsey expressed concerns with the traffic
impact on Stetson Valley Parkway, proximity of the proposed industrial uses to
residential, and the connection of Stetson Valley Parkway to the Loop 303 freeway.

Jim Umlauf introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Umlauf expressed concerns with the proposed industrial
uses south of Loop 303, the proposed Sonoran Preserve area, and the 51st Avenue
connection over the canal.

Danny Weiss introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Weiss expressed concerns with perceived
Committee member conflicts of interest.

Sam Bonge introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Bonge expressed concerns with traffic, safety, the 51st
Avenue connection over the canal connecting to the Loop 303 freeway, and pollution.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 838
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1

Jo Lambiase introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Hills community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Lambiase expressed concerns with TSMC locating south
of the Loop 303 freeway, the 51st Avenue connection over the canal, and traffic.

Randy Briggs introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Sonoran Mountain
Ranch community in the City of Peoria, opposed to the project. Mr. Briggs expressed
concerns with traffic, speeding, safety, and cellphone service.

Tom Young introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Young express concerns with traffic, safety, chemicals from
chip plants, health, perceived Committee member conflicts of interest, and the traffic
study.

Robert Baxter introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, with concerns. Mr. Baxter expressed concerns with the traffic study. Mr.
Baxter stated that 51st Avenue should not connect over the canal until MDP.5 is built
out, and schools and infrastructure are built.

Raymond Keeler introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Hills
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Keeler expressed concerns with 51st Avenue
connecting over the canal and water. Mr. Keeler proposed the 51st Avenue bridge be
limited to pedestrians and bicyclists.

Ed Ross introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Ross expressed concerns with health and safety.

Scott Spexarth introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Spexarth expressed concerns with 51st
Avenue connecting over the canal and deviation from the 1998 Sonoran Preserve
Master Plan.

Madhuri Jha introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
with concerns. Ms. Jha expressed concerns with air pollution, water pollution, noise
pollution, safety, and quality of life.

John Linam introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Pyramid Peak community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Linam expressed concerns with traffic, 67th Avenue and
51st Avenue connecting to the Loop 303 and over the canal, the traffic study, and
safety.

Tessa St. Cyr introduced herself as a nearby neighbor, opposed to the project. Ms. St.
Cyr expressed concerns with the location of the TSMC expansion, the proposed
industrial uses, contamination, health, and water.

Yolanda Usery introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Usery expressed concerns with traffic and 51st
Avenue connecting to the Loop 303 and over the canal.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 839
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1

Michael Murphy introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Murphy expressed concerns with traffic, safety,
the location of the proposed industrial uses, and 51st Avenue connecting over the
canal.

Carter Huber introduced himself as a concerned resident in the City of Peoria,
opposed to the project. Mr. Huber expressed concerns with deviation from the 1998
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, water, exemption from federal environmental
regulations, traffic, health, and safety.

George Middendorf introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Middendorf expressed concerns with lack of
representation on the Committee, location of the TSMC expansion, health, and safety.

Michael Robbins introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Robbins expressed concerns with health,
safety, the location of the TSMC expansion, and the proposed Sonoran Preserve
slope.

Mark Cole introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Pyramid Heights community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Cole expressed concerns with traffic, pollution, the
proposed Sonoran Preserve, and perceived Committee member conflicts of interest.

Wendie Brown introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Sonoran Mountain
Ranch community in the City of Peoria, opposed to the project. Ms. Brown expressed
concerns with the proposed Sonoran Preserve, water, traffic, heat, pollution, and
health.

Sam Rueb introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Rueb expressed concerns with the proposed Sonoran
Preserve, the slope of the proposed Sonoran Preserve, the location of the TSMC
expansion, contamination, health, and safety.

Applicant Response:
Ms. Oberholtzer stated that they have had an active project website that has always
had the application materials available in order to be transparent. Ms. Oberholtzer
stated that Stetson Valley and Sonoran Mountain Ranch were originally planned with
51st Avenue and 67th Avenue connecting across the canal. Ms. Oberholtzer stated
that these plans were put into place many decades ago and never came to fruition due
to the recession. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that there is an approved traffic study. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that they have made changes to address community concerns,
including moving density away from 51st Avenue and including larger streets in other
areas to keep 51st Avenue as a total of four lanes for as long as possible. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that MDP.2 along the Loop 303 freeway would be the first to
develop, noting that 51st Avenue would not connect over the canal for many years. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that MDP.5 would develop after MDP.2, but not right away. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that the proposal has been evaluated using all of the City’s current

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 840
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-NG-2-24-1

standards that apply to new development, which will correct issues from the past. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that TSMC and the surrounding area is a major employment center,
and there is no northbound or southbound connection to it. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that
these connections are necessary to increase the safety network, noting that there will
be new public facilities including a fire station, police station, and a library. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that there will be some traffic going southbound, but there will be
much more traffic from the community going northbound to access all of the new areas
to shop, work, and live.

Committee Discussion:
None.

MOTION – GPA-NG-2-24-1:
Committee Member Scott McGill motioned to recommend approval of GPA-NG-2-24-
1, per the staff recommendation. Committee Member Aaron Stein seconded the
motion.

VOTE – GPA-NG-2-24-1:
7-0; the motion to recommend approval of GPA-NG-2-24-1 per the staff
recommendation passed with Committee members Crouch, Kennelly, McCarty, McGill,
Salow, Stein, and Ricart in favor.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 841
ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
December 4, 2025

ITEM NO: 11
DISTRICT NO.: 1
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-NG-2-24-1
(Companion Cases GPA-NG-1-24-1 and Z-139-24-1)
Request: Street Classification Map Amendment
Location: Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303
Proposal: Amendment to the Street Classification Map to update several arterial
street alignments within the application area (proposed NorthPark
development)
Applicant: Mike Hifler, Pulte Homes
Owner: Arizona State Land Department c/o Mark Edelman
Representative: Carolyn Oberholtzer, BFSO

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
North Gateway 10/9/2025 Information only.
North Gateway 11/13/2025 Approval. Vote: 7-0.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the North Gateway Village Planning
Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Vice-Chairperson Boyd made a MOTION to approve GPA-NG-2-24-1, per the
North Gateway Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Boyd
Second: Jaramillo
Vote: 8-0-1 (Matthews abstained)
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposed alignments of the arterial streets within the proposed NorthPark
development area are generally consistent with previous alignments.

2. The proposed termination of Dixileta Drive at 67th Avenue will not affect street
connectivity of Dixileta Drive within the City of Peoria to the west.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Saneeya Mir at 602-686-6461, saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Hearing and Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-139-24-1
(NorthPark PUD) - Southwest Corner of I-17 and Loop 303 (Ordinance G-7463) -
District 1

Request to amend the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the
S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) to allow a master
planned community including residential, mixed use, commercial, commerce park,
industrial and over 2,200 acres of open space that will be included in the Sonoran
Preserve. This is a companion case and must be heard following GPA-NG-1-24-1 and
GPA-NG-2-24-1.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: PUD
Acreage: 6,381.49
Proposal: PUD for a master planned community including open space, residential,
mixed use, commercial, commerce park, and industrial

Owner: Arizona State Land Department c/o Mark Edelman
Applicant: Mike Hifler, Pulte Homes
Representative: Carolyn Oberholtzer, BFSO

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Info: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee meeting heard this item on
October 9, 2025, for information only.
VPC Action: The North Gateway Village Planning Committee heard this item on
November 13, 2025, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a
vote of 7-0.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on December 4, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the staff memo dated December 4, 2025, by a vote of 8-0
-1.

Location
Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303



Council District: 1
Parcel Address: N/A

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-139-24-1) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE) TO PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 6,381.49-acre site located at the southwest

corner of I-17 and Loop 303 in portions of Sections 13, 14 and 24 of Township 5 North,

Range 1 East; and portions of Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29, 30, and

32 of Township 5 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit “A”, is

hereby changed from “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence) to “PUD” (Planned Unit

Development).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B”.




SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,

violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the NorthPark PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add
the following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date].

b. Page 24, Section 3 Process and Procedures, 3.4.b MDP and Functional
Segment Master Plans, second paragraph (before flow chart), revise as
follows: As each subsequent MDP and functional segment plan is
competed or amended, overall conceptual master plans shall be updated
accordingly. Each portion of functional segment or MDP plan can revise
the prior approved plan.

c. Page 28, Section 4 Land Use Plan, 4.4 Land Use Districts, Table 3: MDP
Land Use Allocation Table (gross acres): Update the Community Open
Space and Traditional Neighborhood entries under MDP.5 to reflect the
Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned parcel south of Dixileta Drive and
west of 51st Avenue, as depicted on Exhibit 5: Proposed General Plan
Land Use Map, designated as Community Open Space, and update
corresponding numbers in the total acreage row and the total site column.

d. Page 29, Section 4 Land Use Plan, Exhibit 8A: Land Use Districts: Add the
area designated as Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned south of Dixileta
Drive and west of 51st Avenue, as depicted on Exhibit 5: Proposed
General Plan Land Use Map, as Community Open Space.

e. Page 33, Section 4 Land Use Plan, Exhibit 8C: Community Open Space
(COS): Update exhibit and table to include the area designated as
Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned south of Dixileta Drive and west of
51st Avenue, as depicted on Exhibit 5: Proposed General Plan Land Use
Map.




f. Page 35, Section 4 Land Use Plan, Exhibit 8E: Traditional Neighborhood
(TN): Update exhibit and table to remove the area designated as
Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned south of Dixileta Drive and west of
51st Avenue, as depicted on Exhibit 5: Proposed General Plan Land Use
Map.

g. Page 45, Section 4 Land Use Plan, Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan: Update
as follows:

Locate the NorthVista Multi-Modal Corridor and Loop 303
i.
Pedestrian and Bike Bridge on the east side of the wash.

Add a minor public trailhead on the east side of 67th Avenue,
ii. south of Dixileta Drive and north of the enhanced pedestrian and
bike crossing along the CAP Canal.

Update legend to include labels which differentiate which color
iii. (light blue or dark blue) is indicative of the sidewalk and the
raised and protected bike lane.

Update legend to change “6-foot Protected Bike Lane (Both
iv. Sides)” to “6-foot Separated and Elevated Bike Lane (Both
Sides)”

h. Page 46, Section 4 Land Use Plan, 4.7.b Trails and Paths, Shared-Use
Paths and Multi-Use Trails, second paragraph, 1st sentence, revise and
add the following: Shared-Use Paths will be a minimum 10-foot concrete
within a 20-foot public Sidewalk Easement (S.W.E) where adjacent to
roads, or a 25-foot Public Trail Easement where adjacent to open space or
wash corridors. Where a Shared-Use Path is within right-of-way, the 20-
foot public Sidewalk Easement (S.W.E) width shall be ultimately reviewed
and approved by the Street Transportation Department and Planning and
Development Department during review of the applicable master
development parcel master plan review.

i. Page 46, Section 4 Land Use Plan, 4.7.b Trails And Paths, Shared-Use
Paths and Multi-Use Trails, second paragraph, add as last sentence:
Where a Multi-Use Trail crosses arterial or collector roadways at non-
signalized intersections, alternative crossing types such as grade-
separated crossings, HAWK crossings or other appropriate crossing types
utilized by the City of Phoenix shall be constructed, as required by the
Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.




j. Page 46, Section 4 Land Use Plan, 4.7.b Trails and Paths, NorthPark
Loop, second paragraph, second sentence, revise to: Where the
NorthPark Loop crosses arterial or collector roadways at non-signalized
intersections, alternative crossing types such as grade-separated
crossings, HAWK crossings of other appropriate crossing types utilized by
the City of Phoenix shall be constructed, as required by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.

k. Page 47, Section 4 Land Use Plan, 4.7.b Trails and Paths, CAP Trail, add
as last sentence: Where the cap trail crosses an arterial roadway at non-
signalized intersections, alternative crossing types such as grade-
separated crossings, HAWK crossings or other appropriate crossing types
utilized by the City of Phoenix shall be constructed, as required by the
Street Transportation Department, the Planning and Development
Department, and the Central Arizona Project.

l. Page 47, Section 4 Land Use Plan, 4.7.b Trails and Paths, NorthVista
Multi-Modal Corridor: Delete end of first sentence “and coupled with the
Community Park property”.

m. Page 58 Section 5 List of Uses, 5.2 Permitted Uses, 5.2.d Traditional
Neighborhood (TN): Move “6. Privately owned or operated parks,
playgrounds and other recreational uses” below the list of Local Services
use restrictions. Renumber local services use restrictions from “a” to “b”.

n. Page 63, Section 5 List of Uses, 5.2 Permitted Uses, 5.2.i Innovation
Corridor (IC), item 2.a: Revise percentage to 60%.

o. Page 63, Section 5 List of Uses, 5.2 Permitted Uses, 5.2.i Innovation
Corridor (IC), item 2.c: Revise to: Such uses shall require a minimum
property setback of 50 feet from the Loop 303 freeway, 51st Avenue, 43rd
Avenue, and Dixileta Drive.

p. Page 67, Section 5 List of Uses, 5.3 Accessory Uses, 5.3.d Innovation
Corridor (IC): Delete item 1 in its entirety and renumber remaining items.

q. Page 67, Section 5 List of Uses, 5.3 Accessory Uses, 5.3.d Innovation
Corridor (IC), item 3.a.i: Revise to: Such uses are not permitted east of
43rd Avenue.

r. Page 67, Section 5 List of Uses, 5.3 Accessory Uses, 5.3.d Innovation
Corridor (IC), item 3.a.ii: Revise to: Such uses shall require a minimum
property setback of 50 feet from the Loop 303 freeway, 51st Avenue, 43rd
Avenue, and Dixileta Drive.




s. Page 67, Section 5 List of Uses, 5.3 Accessory Uses, 5.3.d Innovation
Corridor (IC), item 3.a.iii: Revise to: Such uses shall be screened from
public streets by a decorative solid fence or wall.

t. Page 67, Section 5 List of Uses, 5.3 Accessory Uses, 5.3.d Innovation
Corridor (IC), item 3.b.ii and item 3.b.iii: Delete these items and renumber
all remaining items.

u. Page 67, Section 5 List of Uses, 5.3 Accessory Uses, 5.3.d Innovation
Corridor (IC), item 3.b.iv: Revise to: Such uses shall be setback a
minimum of 50 feet from property lines.

v. Page 67, Section 5 List of Uses, 5.3 Accessory Uses, 5.3.d Innovation
Corridor (IC), item 3.b.v: Revise to: Such uses shall be screened from
public streets by a decorative solid fence or wall.

w. Page 77, Section 6 Development Standards, 6.1 Development Standards
of General Applicability, 6.1.f Development Standards: Innovation Corridor,
Maximum Building Height: Revise to: 56 and 4 stories; Heights up to 110
feet shall be permitted when located a minimum of 500 feet from Dixileta
Drive; Non-habitable mechanical equipment and structures that may
include, but are not limited to, elements such as air separators, exhaust
pipes, and gas processing equipment are permitted up to 225 feet in
height for a maximum of 25% of the roof area.

x. Page 82, Section 6 Development Standards, 6.4 Elevated and Protected
Bike Lanes and Streetscape Zone, second paragraph, first sentence,
revise to: The circulation network, with the primary objective of managing
vehicle movement within and through the community, will also prioritize
alternative transportation options by including separated and elevated
bicycle lanes, detached sidewalks, and thoughtful integration with the
comprehensive trail and path network within the overall community.

y. Page 82, Section 6 Development Standards, 6.4 Elevated and Protected
Bike Lanes and Streetscape Zone, second paragraph, last sentence,
revise to: All street sections included in this PUD are conceptual and
subject to change, exclusive of the inclusion of the elevated and separated
bike lanes.

z. Page 82, Section 6 Development Standards, 6.4 Elevated and Protected
Bike Lanes and Streetscape Zone, 6.4.a Arterial Streets, Arterial Street
Landscape Setback, Trail and Path Requirements, second sentence,
revise to: This may overlap with any required M.U.T.E./S.U.P.E./P.U.E.s




aa. Page 86, Section 6 Development Standards, Table 7 Streetscape, Both
Sides of All Arterial Streets (Dixileta Drive, 43rd Avenue, 51st Avenue,
67th Avenue), 1. Bike Lanes, subsection d., revise to: Separated from
back of curb by a minimum 8-foot-wide landscape strip

bb. Page 86, Section 6 Development Standards, Table 7 Streetscape, Both
Sides of All Arterial Streets (Dixileta Drive, 43rd Avenue, 51st Avenue,
67th Avenue), 3. Detached Sidewalks, revise title to: Detached Sidewalks
(where SUP is designated and provided in place of a sidewalk, no
additional sidewalk is required, but the SUP shall also be subject to these
standards):

cc. Page 86, Section 6 Development Standards, Table 7 Streetscape, Both
Sides of All Arterial Streets (Dixileta Drive, 43rd Avenue, 51st Avenue,
67th Avenue), 3. Detached Sidewalks, subsection a., revise to: Minimum
Width: 6 feet; Shared-Use Path 10 feet.

dd. Page 86, Section 6 Development Standards, Table 7 Streetscape, Both
Sides of All Arterial Streets (Dixileta Drive, 43rd Avenue, 51st Avenue,
67th Avenue), 3. Detached Sidewalks, subsection b., revise to: Landscape
Strip Width (located between back of bike lane and sidewalk/SUP):
Minimum 5 feet

ee. Page 87, Section 6 Development Standards, Table 7 Streetscape, Both
Sides of All Collector Streets, 1. Bike Lanes, subsection d., revise to:
Separated from back of curb by a minimum 7-foot-wide landscape strip.

ff. Page 87, Section 6 Development Standards, Table 7 Streetscape, Both
Sides of All Collector Streets, 3. Detached Sidewalks, subsection b., revise
to: Landscape Strip Width (located between back of bike lane and
sidewalk): Minimum 5 feet

gg. Page 89, Section 6 Development Standards, 6.6 Fences and Walls, b.
Residential Development, item i: Delete and renumber remaining items.

hh. Page 91, Section 6 Development Standards, 6.7 Amenities, b. NorthVista
Multi-Modal Corridor to Loop 303 Crossing, first sentence: Update “MDP.2”
with “MDP.1”.

ii. Page 93, Section 6 Development Standards, 6.9 Hillside Development:
Delete the third sentence.




jj. Page 105, Section 7 Design Guidelines, 7.3 North Black Canyon Overlay
District (NBCOD) Design Guideline Conformance, 7.3.a Modified Design
Guidelines, II. Design guidelines common to all development areas
(residential and commercial), E. Streetscape, update item 1 to: 51st
Avenue, 43rd Avenue and Dixileta Road are planned as major arterial
streets requiring a minimum 140 feet of right-of-way for 6 lanes, with
elevated and separated bicycle lanes and a sidewalk set back from the
curb. 67th Avenue shall be designed to include similar improvements
within a minimum 130 feet of right-of-way. Public trails and shared-use
paths are identified on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan, of the PUD.

kk. Page 106, Section 7 Design Guidelines, 7.3 North Black Canyon Overlay
District (NBCOD) Design Guideline Conformance, 7.3.a Modified Design
Guidelines, II. Design guidelines common to all development areas
(residential and commercial), E. Streetscape, update item 10 to: Public
multi-use trails or shared-use paths are identified and are to be provided in
conformance with Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD, in addition to
the required sidewalk (except where shared-use paths are provided in lieu
of a sidewalk), with the exact alignment to be approved by the City.
Additional public shared-use paths or trails may be established along
collector roadways through the master planning and administration
processes in Section 3.4 of this narrative.

ll. Page 107, Section 7 Design Guidelines, 7.4 NorthPark Design Guidelines,
a. Arterial Road Bridge Crossings, add item at the end numbered viii, as
follows: All arterial road bridge crossings shall comply with City of Phoenix
adopted standards and as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.

mm. Page 113, Section 7 Design Guidelines, 7.4 NorthPark Design Guidelines,
b. Site Design/Development, v. Trails/Paths, 1. Multi-Use Trails, Shared-
Use Paths, and Pedestrian Walkways, Subsection b., revise to: All Shared-
Use Paths (SUPs) shall be located within minimum 20-foot-wide sidewalk
easements (S/W E) and Multi-Use Trails(MUTs) shall be located within
minimum 30-foot-wide Multi-Use Trail Easements (MUTEs), in accordance
with the MAG supplemental detail, and as approved or modified by the
Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.

nn. Page 114, Section 7 Design Guidelines, 7.4 NorthPark Design Guidelines,
b. Site Design/Development, v. Trails/Paths, 1. Multi-Use Trails, Shared-
Use Paths, and Pedestrian Walkways, subsection i., revise to: Where SUP
and MUT alignments cross streets, entryways, or commercial driveways,
the use of bollards or other similar elements shall be provided to ensure for
safe crossing zones. No bollards may be located within public right-of-way
and shall meet ADA accessibility standards.




oo. Page 115, Section 7 Design Guidelines, 7.4 NorthPark Design Guidelines,
b. Site Design/Development, v. Trails/Paths, 1. Multi-Use Trails, Shared-
Use Paths, and Pedestrian Walkways, subsection o., revise to: Where
primary pedestrian pathways cross drive aisles, parking areas, or streets,
they shall be constructed of stamped or colored concrete, brick, pavers, or
an alternative decorative material that visually contrasts the parking aisle,
drive aisle, or street surface, as reviewed and approved by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.

pp. Page 115, Section 7 Design Guidelines, 7.4 Northpark Design Guidelines,
b. Site Design/Development, v. Trails/Paths, 2. NorthPark Loop, Exhibit
13: NorthPark Loop: Locate NorthVista Multi-Modal Corridor on the east
side of the wash.

qq. Page 116, Section 7 Design Guidelines, 7.4 NorthPark Design Guidelines,
b. Site Design/Development, v. Trails/Paths, 2. NorthPark Loop,
subsection g., revise to: Where the Loop crosses streets, entryways, or
commercial driveways, the use of bollards or other similar elements shall
be provided to ensure for safe crossing zones. Path alignment may also
jog in order to slow speeds and ensure pedestrians and bicyclists look
towards vehicle traffic prior to crossing. No bollards may be located within
public right-of-way and shall meet Ada accessibility standards.

rr. Page 118, Section 7 Design Guidelines, 7.4 Northpark Design Guidelines,
b. Site Design/Development, vi. Parking/Circulation, 3. Access/Circulation,
c. Traffic Calming, subsection i., revise to: Traffic calming measures shall
be provided on private property at entries and exits along arterial and
collector streets to slow down vehicular speeds as they approach
sidewalks, pathways, and trails.

ss. Appendix E: Other Master Plans: Update the Master Development &
Phasing Plan and the Master Open Space, Pedestrian, Bicycle & Trails
Plan per the stipulations above.




2. Overall PUD, Conceptual Master Development Parcel (CMDP), plans for the
entire NorthPark PUD, per the requirements of the Planned Community District
(PCD) per Section 636 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance as it relates to the
NorthPark scale community serving infrastructure, shall be submitted to the City
for review and approval prior to submitting Planned Community District (PCD) or
Functional Segment (FS) master plans for any MDP, except for MDP.2.
Submitted PCD of FS master plans must be in general conformance with the
CMDP and approved before submitting any Preliminary Site Plans, for land within
that MDP, as approved by the Planning and Development Department. The PCD
and/or FS master plans shall meet the full requirements of Section 636 regarding
master plans and must be in general conformance with the CMDP. Some MDPs
will require review with and/or approval by other departments or agencies as
applicable for those specific plans or MDP areas. The CMDP may be updated to
reflect more refined PCD or FS master plans of the various MDP areas as the
area develops.

a. The Master Development Plan shall also include a tracking table for the
following items:

i. Locations, minimum acreages, and maximum acreages of the local
services use within the Foothills Residential, Traditional
Neighborhood, and Neighborhood Village Land Use Districts (LUDs).

ii. The minimum number of units for the Lifestyle Mixed-Use (LMU) and
Freeway Mixed-Use (FMU) LUDs, and the minimum square footage
of commercial uses in the LMU LUD and FMU LUD.

iii. The minimum area required for vertical mixed-use (residential and
commercial) in the LMU LUD and FMU LUD.

b. The locations of the public bicycle repair stations (“fix it stations”) shall be
identified on all master plans, as required by the PUD.

c. The locations of the proposed Sonoran Preserve and preserved natural
wash/floodplain corridors, shall be identified on the master plans, as
required by the PUD.

d. The locations of the public regional park and public community park shall
be identified on the master plans.

e. The locations of neighborhood parks shall be identified on MDP master
plans and pocket parks shall be identified on Functional Segment master
plans.

f. Locations of Monarch Butterfly gardens, as required by the PUD, shall be
identified and provided within each MDP.




g. For MDPs that include school sites for reservation for the Deer Valley
Unified School District (DVUSD), the locations of the three school sites, in
locations and acreage to be approved or modified by DVUSD, shall be
identified and shown on the CMDP and the as refined on the PCD or FS
master plans.

h. Location of a fire/mini police station, in a location and acreage to be
approved or modified by the Fire Department and Police Department, shall
be identified and shown on the CMDP and then refined on the PCD or FS
master plans.

i. Gateway monuments and project gateway design for entrances into the
NorthPark community shall be identified on the PCD or FS master plans,
as required by the PUD.

3. A Master Streets Plan shall be submitted and approved for the overall North Park
PUD prior to, or concurrent with the initial Conceptual Master Development
Parcel (CMDP) submission, excluding MDP.2. No preliminary approval of plans
shall be granted within an MDP without an approved MDP Traffic Impact Analysis
and associated MDP and/or PCD or FS Master Street Plans.

In addition to the Master Street Plan requirements set forth in the North Park
PUD, the following information shall also be required:

a. A separate signing and striping plan shall be reviewed and approved by
the Street Transportation Department for the separated and elevated
bicycle facilities, as required by Section 6, Table 7 of the PUD.

b. Protected bicycle intersection designs shall be incorporated within each
MDP and guided by NACTO national standards, as approved by the Street
Transportation Department.

c. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) shall be approved for any new submission
or modification to the overall North Park PUD, Master Development Parcel,
or Functional Segment Master Plan along with corresponding updated
Master Streets Plans.

d. Where an arterial or collector street crosses a wash or floodplain corridor,
a 100-year storm dry crossing shall be constructed per the City of Phoenix
storm water design manual, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.




4. A Master Trails Plan shall be submitted and approved to the Planning and
Development and Street Transportation Departments for the overall North Park
PUD prior to, or concurrent with the initial Conceptual Master Development
Parcel submission, excluding MDP.2. The Master Trails Plan shall incorporate
the following elements:

a. All trails and paths identified on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan shall be
publicly accessible through public access easement dedications.

b. Multi-Use Trails, Shared-Use Path, and NorthPark Loop crossings at
arterial and collector streets that are away from signalized intersection
shall be identified and above or below grade crossings, HAWKS or similar
pedestrian activated crossings shall be assigned and constructed, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

c. Standard details shall be provided for the NorthPark Loop, including
connections that cross wash corridors, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

d. Locations of neighborhood and singletrack trails, as required by the PUD,
shall be identified and provided on Functional Segment master plans.

e. Location of the NorthVista Multi-Modal Path Corridor within MDP.1,
generally located east of 43rd Avenue and north of Dixileta Drive,
connecting to the future pedestrian/bicycle bridge over the Loop 303
freeway, shall be identified on the MDP master plans, as required by the
PUD, and shall be provided along the western edge of the 100-year
floodplain corridor, outside of the floodplain boundary.

f. Location of a minor trailhead east of 67th Avenue, south of Dixileta Drive.

5. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone A, Zone AE,
and Zone AE floodway, on panels 1255L, 0840L, and 0845L of Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (FIRM) with an effective date of October 16, 2013 and 1260M revised
on September 18, 2020. The following requirements shall apply, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

a. The Architect and Engineer are required to show the floodplain boundary
limits on the Site Plan and Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that
impacts to the proposed facilities are adequately addressed, following
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph
60.3). This includes, but is not limited to, provisions in the latest versions of
the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.




b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of the Street Transportation Department
for review and approval of floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or CLOMR prior
to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit.

d. A LOMR application shall be submitted to the Floodplain Management
section of the Street Transportation Department for review and approval
prior to issuance of vertical construction permits.

e. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved LOMR-F or LOMR prior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The developer shall reserve approximately 7 acres, generally located at the
northwest corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, for a future fire/mini police
station, as approved or modified by the Fire Department, Police Department, and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be reserved, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Fire Department, the Police
Department, and the Planning and Development Department.

7. The developer shall reserve approximately 4 acres of the Community Open
Space Land Use District, generally located east of 43rd Avenue and north of
Dixileta Drive, generally shown on Exhibit 8C: Community Open Space of the
PUD Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, to the City of
Phoenix for a future public library, as approved or modified by the Library
Department and the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage
and configuration of the property to be conveyed, along with timing of the
conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Library
Department, and the Planning and Development Department.

8. The area designated as Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned, generally located
west of the southwest corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, as generally
depicted on Exhibit 5: Proposed General Plan Land Use Map of the PUD
Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, shall be preserved as
permanent undisturbed open space and shall be privately maintained. The area
may include passive recreational features such as trails, seating nodes, or other
elements, provided such improvements are consistent with the intent to maintain
the area as undisturbed open space, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.




9. The developer shall convey approximately 2,100 acres, generally shown on
Exhibit 8B: Natural Open Space of the PUD Development Narrative date
stamped November 6, 2025, to the City of Phoenix for inclusion in the Sonoran
Preserve, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be conveyed, along with timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.

10. The developer shall convey approximately 208 acres, generally shown on Exhibit
8C: Community Open Space of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped
November 6, 2025, to the City of Phoenix for a future public regional park and
community park, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation
Department and the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage
and configuration of the property to be conveyed, along with the timing of the
conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and
Recreation Department, and the Planning and Development Department.

11. The developer shall convey approximately 3 acres with less than 10% slope for
each minor trailhead generally shown on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the
PUD Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, for future minor
trailheads, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be conveyed, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.

12. The developer shall convey approximately 5 acres with less than 10% slope for
the major trailhead generally shown on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD
Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, for a future major
trailhead, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be conveyed, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.

13. At the time of conveyance of land for the major trailhead generally shown on
Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped
November 6, 2025, the major trailhead acreage shall be large enough to
accommodate a minimum of 200 parking spaces and other amenities (restrooms,
ramadas, pedestrian connections, etc.), as approved or modified by the Parks
and Recreation Department and the Planning and Development Department.




14. All multi-use trails (MUTs), shared-use paths (SUPs), and the NorthPark Loop, as
depicted on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD Development Narrative
hearing draft date stamped November 6, 2025, shall be constructed outside of
proposed Sonoran Preserve lands. Prior to final site plan approval of any
development east of 51st Avenue and south of Dixileta Drive, the proposed
NorthPark Loop bisecting the Preserve from east to west, south of Mount Ochoa,
shall be constructed by the developer as part of the overall development, in
accordance with the requirements in the PUD, as approved or modified by the
Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning and Development
Department. Upon completion of the NorthPark Loop through the Preserve and
Parks and Recreation Department ownership of the land, the Parks and
Recreation Department will take over maintenance of that portion of the
NorthPark Loop that lies within the Preserve within this one area south of Mount
Ochoa.

15. The proposed arterial streets (43rd Avenue, 51st Avenue, 67th Avenue, and
Dixileta Drive) shall accommodate transit. Bus pads, conforming with City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1260, shall be located every one-quarter mile on both
directions of the proposed streets. At intersections, there shall be bus bays that
conform with Standard Detail P1256. The pads and bays shall be located from
intersections according to Standard Detail P1258.

16. The overall North Park PUD Master Street Plan shall identify and assign 25%
private contribution, not to exceed $2,500,000, as determined by the Street
Transportation Department, for the total cost of the multi-modal bridge crossing
over the Loop 303 freeway from the NorthVista Multi-Modal Path Corridor, as
identified in the PUD. The City acknowledges this contribution may be made by a
special taxing district, if approved by the City Council.

17. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 43rd
Avenue from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to Dixileta Drive. 43rd Avenue
shall be assigned and constructed as required per the approved Master
Development Parcel (MDP) Master Street Plans and accepted MDP Traffic
Impact Analysis (TIA), as approved by the Street Transportation Department and
the Planning and Development Department.

18. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 51st
Avenue from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to the existing Stetson Valley
Parkway, south of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal. 51st Avenue shall be
assigned and constructed per the approved Conceptual Master Development
Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA), and in compliance with CAP requirements. The PCD or FS Master
Street Plans and TIA’s for each MDP shall establish assignment of MDP funding
and/or construction of improvements over the CAP canal, as approved by the
Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.




19. A minimum of 130 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 67th
Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to the
existing 67th Avenue, south of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal. 67th
Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway shall be constructed per the approved
Conceptual Master Development Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the
accepted MDP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), and in compliance with CAP
requirements. The PCD or FS Master Street Plans and TIA’s for each MDP shall
establish assignment of MDP funding and/or construction of improvements over
the CAP canal, as approved by the Street Transportation Department and the
Planning and Development Department.

20. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of
Dixileta Drive from the Interstate 17 interchange to the 67th Avenue/Pyramid
Peak Parkway. Dixileta Drive shall be constructed per the approved Conceptual
Master Development Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), as approved by the Street Transportation
Department and the Planning and Development Department.

21. The overall North Park PUD Conceptual Master Street Plan and subsequent PCD
or FS Master Street Plan(s) shall identify and assign all modifications and
improvements required for the Dixileta and I-17 traffic interchange, as approved
by the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Street Transportation
Department.

22. The overall North Park PUD Conceptual Master Street Plan and subsequent PCD
or FS Master Street Plan(s) shall identify and assign all modifications and
improvements required for the 67th Avenue and Loop 303 traffic interchange, as
approved by the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Street
Transportation Department.

23. Master Development Parcel 2 shall direct large truck traffic to the 303 Freeway
through on-site access control restrictions to discourage south bound access
onto 51st Avenue.

24. Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and assign a traffic
signal to be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the intersection of Stetson
Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway/Cortopassi Pass, as approved
by the Street Transportation Department.

25. Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and assign a traffic
signal to be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the intersection of Stetson
Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway(north)/Tombstone Trail, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department. A pedestrian signalized
crossing (e.g. HAWK) may be considered as an interim condition prior to full
signalization of the intersection being warranted.




26. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in
the accepted PUD, and subsequent Conceptual Master Development Plan and
PCD or FS Segment Traffic Impact Analyses.

27. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

28. Prior to the submittal of PCD or FS master plans for Master Development Parcels
1, 3 and 6, as depicted on Exhibit 7: Master Development Parcel Map of the PUD
Development Narrative hearing draft date stamped November 6, 2025, the
applicant shall engage with the Deer Valley Unified School District regarding the
plan of development.

29. A minimum of three public school sites at locations acceptable to the school
district and the Street Transportation Department shall be reserved for one year
from the date of approval of the PCD or FS master plans; for a maximum 80-acre
high school site in Master Development Parcel 1, for a maximum 20-acre K-8 site
in Master Development Parcel 3, and for a maximum 20-acre K-8 site in Master
Development Parcel 6, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department and Deer Valley Unified School District.

30. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

31. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

32. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

33. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.




SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of December,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Ed Zuercher, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description (8 Pages)
B – Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-139-24-1

A parcel of land situated within portions of Sections 13, 14 and 24, Township 5 North,
Range 1 East and portions of Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 28, 29, 30, and
32, Township 5 North, Range 2 East of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa
County, Arizona, being more particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Section 27, monumented by a 2-inch aluminum
cap stamped 29891, 2001;

THENCE South 00°06'42" East (as the Basis of Bearings) along the easterly line of the
Northeast quarter of said Section 27, a distance of 2645.93 feet to the East quarter
of said Section 27, monumented by a 2-inch aluminum cap stamped 29891;

THENCE South 00°01'40" West along the easterly line of the Southeast quarter of said
Section 27, a distance of 1069.05 feet to the northerly line of the Central Arizona
Project right of way reservation;

THENCE the following Six (6) courses along the northerly line of the Central Arizona
Project right of way reservation;

THENCE North 77°04'23" West, 311.84 feet;

THENCE South 70°48'58" West, 2109.14 feet;

THENCE South 53°33'36" West, 1192.13 feet;

THENCE North 74°25'21" West, 1490.75 feet;

THENCE South 67°58'53" West, 647.76 feet to the easterly line of the Southeast
quarter of Section 28;

THENCE South 00°09'02" East along said easterly line, 433.84 feet to the Southeast
corner of said Section 28, monumented by a 3-inch aluminum cap stamped 29891,
2001;

THENCE North 89°45'03" West along the southerly line of the Southeast quarter of
said Section 28, a distance of 2646.87 feet to the South quarter corner of said Section
28, monumented by a 2-inch aluminum cap stamped 29891, 2001;

THENCE North 89°45'12" West along the southerly line of the Southwest quarter of
said Section 28, a distance of 2661.05 feet to the Southwest corner of said Section
28, monumented by an aluminum cap stamped 39325, 2013;




THENCE South 89°50'45" West along the southerly line of the Southeast quarter of
Section 29, a distance of 32.61 feet to the northerly line of the Central Arizona Project
right of way reservation;

THENCE the following Ten (10) courses along the northerly line of the Central Arizona
Project right of way reservation;

THENCE South 00°25'21" East, 1339.82 feet;

THENCE South 66°45'21" West, 1357.11 feet;

THENCE North 87°44'42" West, 608.05 feet;

THENCE North 66°34'09" West, 1098.32 feet;

THENCE North 40°35'21" West, 225.94 feet;

THENCE North 66°32'21" West, 1846.63 feet;

THENCE North 23°23'00" East, 250.00 feet;

THENCE North 66°32'21" West, 399.66 feet;

THENCE North 89°56’21” West, 296.59 feet to the westerly line of the Northwest
quarter of Section 32;

THENCE North 00°44’12” West along said westerly line, 97.83 feet to the Southwest
corner of Section 29;

THENCE North 00°24’11” West along the westerly line of the Southwest quarter of
Section 29 and the easterly line of that property described in Deed recorded at
Instrument Number 2012-0632438, Maricopa County Recorder’s Office, Maricopa
County, Arizona, 1323.21 feet;

THENCE leaving said Westerly line South 89°32’20” West along the northerly line of
said property, 2179.99 feet to the northerly line of the Central Arizona Project right of
way reservation;

THENCE North 39°43'40" West along the northerly line of the Central Arizona Project
right of way reservation, 1685.88 feet;

THENCE North 43°04'31" West along the northerly line of the Central Arizona Project
right of way reservation, 2592.13 feet to the westerly line of the Northwest quarter of
Section 30;

THENCE North 00°06'02" East along the westerly line of the Northwest quarter of said




Section 30, a distance of 686.65 feet to the Southwest corner of Section 19,
monumented by a 2-inch aluminum cap stamped 29891, 2001;

THENCE North 00°18'40" East along the westerly line of the Southwest quarter of said
Section 19, a distance of 2627.59 feet to the West quarter corner of said Section 19,
monumented by a 2-inch aluminum cap stamped 29891, 2001, said point also being
the East quarter corner of Section 24, Township 5 North, Range 1 East of the Gila and
Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona;

THENCE North 89°33'45" West along the southerly line of the Northeast quarter of
said Section 24, a distance of 2655.49 feet to the Center of said Section 24;

THENCE North 00°05'20" West along the westerly line of the Northeast quarter of said
Section 24, a distance of 2648.38 feet to the North quarter corner of said Section 24
monumented by a 2-inch aluminum cap stamped 29891, 2001, said point also being
the South quarter corner of Section 13;

THENCE North 89°45'52" West along the southerly line of the Southwest quarter of
said Section 13, a distance of 2137.41 feet to the northerly line of the Central Arizona
Project right of way reservation;

THENCE North 23°55'10" West along the northerly line of the Central Arizona Project
right of way reservation, 1177.53 feet;

THENCE North 63°00’22” West along the northerly line of the Central Arizona Project
right of way reservation to the westerly Phoenix City limits boundary line, 2008.76 feet;

THENCE the following courses along the westerly Phoenix City limits boundary line;

THENCE North 30°42’00” East, 113.93 feet;

THENCE North 55°34’54” East, 446.08 feet;

THENCE North 27°33’10” East, 88.39 feet;

THENCE North 16°30’16” East, 93.95 feet;

THENCE North 13°51’05” East, 256.18 feet;

THENCE North 30°15’23” East, 94.67 feet;

THENCE North 06°00’33” East, 130.19 feet;

THENCE North 04°29’05” West, 174.30 feet;

THENCE North 15°43’55” West, 251.33 feet;




THENCE North 20°33’21” East, 116.45 feet;

THENCE North 27°21’00” East, 44.98 feet to the southerly right of way line of ADOT
Loop 303 as described in the Right-of-Way plans of the Bob Stump Memorial Parkway
Happy Valley Road – I-17 303L MA 025 H5946 01R S 303-A-700, Dated September,
2012 and also as described in the Right-of-Way plans of the Bob Stump Memorial
Parkway 51ST Avenue & 43RD Avenue T.I’S 303L MA 136 F0424 303-A(228)T Dated
October, 2024.

THENCE the following courses along said southerly right of way line of ADOT Loop 303
until otherwise noted;

THENCE North 89°16'02" East, 276.50 feet;

THENCE South 00°43'58" East, 132.78 feet;

THENCE North 86°08'00" East, 295.45 feet;

THENCE North 03°52'00" West, 36.50 feet;

THENCE North 86°08'00" East, 1046.82 feet;

THENCE South 03°52'01" East, 80.00 feet;

THENCE North 86°08'00" East, 301.20 feet;

THENCE North 88°59'15" East, 99.78 feet;

THENCE North 01°33'48" West, 80.00 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve,
concave northerly, whose radius bears North 00°56'27" West, 5933.89 feet;

THENCE easterly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of 13°35'28", an
arc length of 1407.57 feet to a non-tangent line;

THENCE South 15°09'51" East, 77.00 feet;

THENCE North 74°07'34" East, 183.06 feet;

THENCE North 15°56'47" West, 77.00 feet;

THENCE North 74°03'13" East, 894.14 feet;

THENCE North 78°29'42" East, 1446.81 feet;

THENCE South 15°40'00" East, 50.00 feet;




THENCE North 78°17'53" East, 101.24 feet;

THENCE North 15°40'00" West, 50.00 feet;

THENCE North 78°22'59" East, 339.85 feet;

THENCE South 52°37'18" East, 130.23 feet;

THENCE South 00°06'58" East, 201.60 feet;

THENCE South 89°59'59" East, 199.45 feet;

THENCE North 00°00'00" East, 273.00 feet;

THENCE North 42°02'14" East, 175.51 feet;

THENCE North 79°20'19" East, 796.61 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve,
concave southerly, whose radius bears South 04°54'38" East, 3752.45 feet;

THENCE easterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of 20°24'29",
an arc length of 1336.58 feet to a non-tangent line;

THENCE South 72°50'39" East, 269.94 feet;

THENCE South 72°50'39" East, 694.21 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve,
concave southerly, whose radius bears South 12°53'35" West, 5347.61 feet;

THENCE easterly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of 11°09'26",
an arc length of 1336.58 feet to a non-tangent line;

THENCE South 31°28'09" West, 86.85 feet;

THENCE South 58°27'40" East, 1173.62 feet;

THENCE South 55°59'46" East, 1086.20 feet;

THENCE South 56°00'00" East, 1977.10 feet;

THENCE South 48°21’12” East, 1,232.07 feet;

THENCE South 59°59’53” East, 359.66 feet;

THENCE South 22°29’53” East, 79.32 feet;

THENCE South 15°00’07” West, 83.26 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve




concave easterly whose radius bears South 74°59’53” East, 2,104.66 feet;

THENCE southerly along said curve to the left, through a central angle of 5°56’54, an
arc length of 218.40 feet to a non-tangent line;

THENCE South 80°56’47” East, 231.26 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve
concave easterly whose radius bears South 81°17’40” East, 1,677.26 feet

THENCE northerly along said curve to the right, through a central angle of 6°18’41”,
an arc length of 194.52 feet to a non-tangent line;

THENCE North 15°00’07” East 59.97 feet;

THENCE North 64°34’50” East, 105.81 feet;

THENCE South 66°46’17” East, 504.64 feet;

THENCE South 74°24’07” East, 402.59 feet;

THENCE South 69°00’44” East, 323.78 feet;

THENCE South 77°45'22" East, 671.06 feet;

THENCE South 19°37'06" East, 142.71 feet;

THENCE North 70°25'49" East, 99.97 feet;

THENCE North 19°37'06" West, 90.07 feet;

THENCE North 85°24'18" East, 903.48 feet;

THENCE South 00°11'23" East, 76.75 feet;

THENCE North 89°51'43" East, 100.00 feet;

THENCE North 00°11'25" West, 84.63 feet;

THENCE North 85°24'18" East, 630.86 feet;

THENCE South 86°53'33" East, 93.69 feet;

THENCE South 86°56'58" East, 2599.77 feet;

THENCE South 42°10'50" East, 127.09 feet;

THENCE South 01°26'33" West, 237.91 feet;




THENCE South 88°31'59" East, 205.00 feet;

THENCE North 01°26'27" East, 237.09 feet;

THENCE North 44°19'22" East, 160.86 feet;

THENCE North 86°57'15" East, 537.78 feet;

THENCE South 81°53'44" East, 228.25 feet;

THENCE North 85°56'29" East, 62.16 feet;

THENCE South 00°02'45" West, 72.36 feet;

THENCE South 89°54'11" East, 100.00 feet;

THENCE North 00°02'43" East, 79.62 feet;

THENCE North 85°56'29" East, 284.73 feet;

THENCE North 89°50'43" East, 1152.10 feet;

THENCE South 87°26'41" East, 724.71 feet;

THENCE South 00°01'20" West, 59.88 feet;

THENCE South 89°55'34" East, 100.00 feet;

THENCE North 00°01'20" East, 55.44 feet;

THENCE South 87°26'10" East, 1769.71 feet to the westerly right of way line of ADOT
Interstate 17;

THENCE the following Ten (10) courses along the westerly right of way line of ADOT
Interstate 17;

THENCE North 89°35'09" East, 439.46 feet;

THENCE South 81°46'01" East, 284.24 feet;

THENCE South 59°20'45" East, 442.45 feet;

THENCE South 31°13'22" East, 431.10 feet;

THENCE South 13°06'44" East, 562.38 feet;




THENCE South 17°25'14" East, 1157.34 feet;

THENCE South 13°04'46" East, 1358.58 feet;

THENCE South 03°21'53" East, 1146.66 feet;

THENCE South 77°34'52" West, 284.49 feet;

THENCE South 00°19'47" East, 120.18 feet to the northerly line of the Northwest
quarter of Section 26;

THENCE South 89°45'17" West along said northerly line, 1863.53 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.

The above-described parcel of land contains 276,923,677 Square Feet or 6,357.2929
acres and being subject to any easements, restrictions, rights-of-way of record or
otherwise.




ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

North Gateway Village Planning November 13, 2025
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 4, 2025
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) (6,381.49
acres)
Request To: PUD (Planned Unit Development) (6,381.49
acres)
Proposal: PUD for a master planned community including
open space, residential, mixed use,
commercial, commerce park, and industrial
Location: Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303
Owner: Arizona State Land Department c/o Mark
Edelman
Applicant: Mike Hifler, Pulte Homes
Representative: Carolyn Oberholtzer, BFSO
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity
Existing:
Undesignated Area (112.40 acres)
Floodplain (172.22 acres)
Preserves / Floodplain (193.22 acres)
Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned
(46.78 acres)
Parks/Open Space – Future 1 dwelling
unit per acre (du/ac) (2,659.91 acres)
General Plan Land Use Map Designation Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 du/ac /
Residential 1 to 2 du/ac (24.10 acres)
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac /
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac (51.04 acres)
Preserves / Mixed Use (Area C & D only)
(20.61 acres)
Residential 0 to 2 du/ac (1,341.33 acres)
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac (189.76 acres)
Residential 2 to 5 du/ac (1,385.16 acres)




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac (0.94 acres)
Residential 5 to 15 du/ac (306.67 acres)
Residential 15+ du/ac (101.91 acres)
Mixed Use (North Gateway and
Northwest Area only) (544.28 acres)
Commercial (88.03 acres)
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park
(139.47 acres)
Proposed (GPA-NG-1-24-1):
Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned
(2,283.14 acres)
Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned
(70.08 acres)
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential
3.5 to 5 du/ac (381.25 acres)
Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential
3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac
(1,670.37 acres)
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5
to 10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac /
Residential 15+ du/ac (341.83 acres)
Floodplain / Parks/Open Space –
Publicly Owned (596.55 acres)
Floodplain / Parks Open Space –
Privately Owned (24.57 acres)
Floodplain / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac /
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5
to 10 du/ac (86.44 acres)
Floodplain / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac /
Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Residential 10
to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+ du/ac
(41.04 acres)
Floodplain / Mixed Use (40.17 acres)
Floodplain / Commercial (3.68 acres)
Floodplain / Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park (72.91 acres)
Mixed Use (299.42 acres)
Commercial (225.27 acres)
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park
(827.01 acres)
Transportation (non-land use
designation) (414.10 acres)




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

Major
Dixileta Drive 0-foot full width street
Arterial
67th Avenue /
Major
Pyramid Peak 0-foot full width street
Arterial
Parkway
Street Classification Major
51st Avenue 0-foot full width street
Map Designation Arterial
Major
43rd Avenue 0-foot full width street
Arterial
Interstate 17 Freeway Varies
Loop 303 Freeway Varies
CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; DIVERSE NEIGHBORHOODS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Communities
should consist of a mix of land uses to provide housing, shopping, dinning and
recreational options for residents.

The proposal includes a variety of land uses including residential, commercial, open
space, and employment uses. The NorthPark community will act as its own center
where a mix of activities take place.

CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; CORES, CENTERS & CORRIDORS;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Promote development in compact cores, centers and
corridors that are connected by roads and transit, and are designed to encourage
walking and bicycling.

The PUD proposes enhanced development standards and design guidelines that will
encourage walking and bicycling, including detached sidewalks, raised and separated
bike lanes, a network of urban multi-use trails and shared-use paths, increased shade
standards, and Walkable Urban Code standards.

CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; OPPORTUNITY SITES; LAND USE
PRINCIPLE: Encourage development of the taller and larger buildings in Areas of
Change away from single-family and low-rise, multifamily housing.

The PUD proposes to only allow most development south of Dixileta Drive to be of a
similar scale and character to the existing single-family residential subdivisions south of
the canal. The PUD will allow taller and larger buildings north of Dixileta Drive, away
from the existing single-family residential subdivisions to the south.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

CONNECT PEOPLE & PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN PRINCIPLE:
Development should include convenient bicycle parking.

The PUD proposes required bicycle parking in accordance with the Walkable Urban
Code requirements.

STRENGTHEN OUR LOCAL ECONOMY CORE VALUE; JOB CREATION
(EMPLOYERS); LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Support General Plan Land Use Map and
zoning changes that will facilitate the location of employment generating uses in
each of the designated employment centers.

The PUD will allow for additional employment uses adjacent to the designated North
Black Canyon Major Employment Corridor and adjacent to the Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company (TSMC), a major employer.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS – POLICE; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Locate
police, fire and paramedic facilities to provide efficient emergency service to
neighborhood residents.

As stipulated, the development will convey land for a future police station and fire
station within the NorthPark development.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; HEALTHY NEIGHBORHOODS; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Plan and design
communities and neighborhoods to be pedestrian friendly and walkable.

The PUD includes Walkable Urban Code standards for a majority of the Land Use
Districts within the PUD, so NorthPark is a pedestrian friendly and walkable community.

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; ARTS & CULTURE; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Encourage the provision of
art in all new development for both public and private.

The PUD includes amenity standards that require art to be incorporated in all
commercial or employment developments larger than five acres, and for all multifamily
residential developments with more than 250 units.

BUILD THE MOST SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; DESERT
LANDSCAPE; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Promote land uses that preserve Phoenix’s
natural open spaces.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

The PUD includes the Natural Open Space (NOS) Land Use District (LUD), which
restricts uses to permanent natural open space, recreational uses, trailheads, and
accessory uses to trailheads for the proposed Sonoran Preserve areas.

BUILD THE MOST SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; RIVERS,
WASHES & WATERWAYS; LAND USE PRINCIPLE: Preserve natural washes
coming from the preserves and promote access and views of the preserves by
the public.

The PUD includes provisions that require Deadman Wash to be preserved. Additionally,
the PUD proposes to preserve several floodplain drainageways in a natural state.

BUILD THE MOST SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; TREE & SHADE;
DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The PUD proposes enhanced landscape standards and shade standards that require
shade trees to be planted along pedestrian pathways and bike lanes to provide shade.


Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan – See Background Item No. 9.

Sonoran Preserve Master Plan – See Background Item No. 10.

North Black Canyon Corridor Plan– See Background Item No. 11.

North Black Canyon Overlay District – See Background Item No. 12.

Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan – See Background Item No. 13.

Complete Streets Design Guidelines – See Background Item No. 14.

Zero Waste PHX – See Background Item No. 15.

Housing Phoenix Plan – See Background Item No. 16.

Monarch Butterfly Pledge – See Background Item No. 17.

Phoenix Climate Action Plan – See Background Item No. 18.

Transportation Electrification Action Plan – See Background Item No. 19.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

Conservation Measures for New Development – See Background Item No. 20.

Shade Phoenix Plan – See Background Item No. 21.



Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Vacant land S-1
Vacant land,
North (across Loop
semiconductor S-1, PUD
303 freeway)
manufacturing
East (across I-17 PCD NBCOD (Approved S-1 PCD
Vacant land
freeway) NBCOD)
Middle Mountain and
East R1-18 and R-3
drainage tract
South Vacant land and canal S-1 and PAD (City of Peoria)
S-1, PAD (City of Peoria) and AG
West Vacant land
(City of Peoria)

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 6,381.49 acres located at the southwest corner of I-17
and Loop 303 from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to PUD (Planned Unit
Development) for the NorthPark PUD to allow a master planned community
including open space, residential, mixed use, commercial, commerce park, and
industrial.

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION
2. The General Plan Land Use Map designations for the subject site are 112.40
acres of Undesignated Area, 172.22 acres of Floodplain, 193.22 acres of
Preserves / Floodplain, 46.78 acres of Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned,
2,659.91 acres of Parks/Open Space – Future 1 dwelling unit per acre (du/ac),
24.10 acres of Preserves / Residential 0 to 1 du/ac / Residential 1 to 2 du/ac,
51.04 acres of Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac,
20.61 acres of Preserves / Mixed Use (Area C & D only), 1,341.33 acres of
Residential 0 to 2 du/ac, 189.76 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac, 1,385.16
acres of Residential 2 to 5 du/ac, 0.94 acres of Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, 306.67
acres of Residential 5 to 15 du/ac, 101.91 acres of Residential 15+ du/ac, 544.28
acres of Mixed Use (North Gateway and Northwest Area only), 88.03 acres of
Commercial, and 139.47 acres of Commercial / Commerce/Business Park.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

The proposal for PUD zoning and its proposed Land Use Districts (LUDs) are
inconsistent with the General Plan Land Use Map; thus, a General Plan
Amendment is required. The companion General Plan Amendment (Case No.
GPA-NG-1-24-1) is proposing to amend the General Plan Land Use Map
designations to 2,283.14 acres of Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned, 70.08
acres of Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned, 381.25 acres of Residential 2 to
3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, 1,670.37 acres of Residential 2 to 3.5
du/ac / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, 341.83 acres of
Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac
/ Residential 15+ du/ac, 596.55 acres of Floodplain / Parks/Open Space –
Publicly Owned, 24.57 acres of Floodplain / Parks/Open Space – Privately
Owned, 86.44 acres of Floodplain / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac / Residential 3.5 to
5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac, 41.01 acres of Floodplain / Residential 3.5 to
5 du/ac / Residential 5 to 10 du/ac / Residential 10 to 15 du/ac / Residential 15+
du/ac, 40.17 acres of Floodplain / Mixed Use, 3.68 acres of Floodplain /
Commercial, 72.91 acres of Floodplain / Commercial / Commerce/Business Park,
299.42 acres of Mixed Use, 225.27 acres of Commercial, 827.01 acres of
Commercial / Commerce/Business Park, and 414.10 acres of Transportation
(non-land use designation).

To the north is designated as Floodplain, Residential 2 to 5 dwelling unit per acre
(du/ac), Commercial, Parks/Open Space – Future 1 du/ac, and Commercial /
Commerce/Business Park.

To the south is designated as Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac, Public / Quasi – Public,
Residential 0 to 2 du/ac, Parks/Open Space – Publicly Owned, and Residential 2
to 5 du/ac.

To the east is designated as Parks/Open Space / Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac,
Preserves / Residential 2 to 3.5 du/ac or Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac, Preserves /
Floodplain, Public / Quasi-Public, Floodplain, and Residential 3.5 to 5 du/ac.

To the west is within City of Peoria jurisdiction, designated as ASLD Special
Land Use, Park / Open Space, Waterways, and Traditional Residential.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025




Existing General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025




Proposed General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING
3. To the north of the subject site, across the Loop 303 freeway, is vacant land and
semiconductor manufacturing, zoned S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) and PUD
(Planned Unit Development). To the east, across the I-17 freeway, is vacant
land, zoned PCD NBCOD (Approved S-1 PCD NBCOD) (Planned Community
District, North Black Canyon Overlay District, Approved Ranch or Farm
Residence, Planned Community District, North Black Canyon Overlay District).
To the east is Middle Mountain and a drainage tract for a subdivision, zoned R1-
18 (Single-Family Residence District) and R-3 (Multifamily Residence District).



Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

To the south is vacant land and the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal, zoned
S-1 and PAD (Planned Area Development) within the City of Peoria jurisdiction.
To the west is vacant land, zoned S-1, and PAD (Planned Area Development),
and AG (General Agricultural) within the City of Peoria jurisdiction.

PROPOSAL
4. The proposal was developed utilizing the PUD zoning district. The Planned Unit
Development (PUD) is intended to create a built environment that is superior to
that produced by conventional zoning districts and design guidelines. Using a
collaborative and comprehensive approach, an applicant authors and proposes
standards and guidelines that are tailored to the context of a site on a case-by-
case basis. Where the PUD Development Narrative is silent on a requirement,
the applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions will be applied.

5. The PUD proposes standards that support the vision of a built environment that
is superior to that produced by conventional zoning districts and design
guidelines, including detached sidewalks, raised and separated bike lanes, an
urban trail and path network, enhanced landscaping requirements, enhanced
shading requirements, incorporation of Walkable Urban Code standards,
incorporation of art and other amenities, enhanced open space requirements,
incorporation of compliance with the North Black Canyon Overlay District
(NBCOD), and enhanced design standards. This case is running concurrently
with an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map, the City Trails Network
Map, and the Infrastructure Limit Line (GPA-NG-1-24-1) and an amendment to
the Street Classification Map (GPA-NG-2-24-1).

Land Use Plan
The PUD proposes a regulatory framework that creates six Master Development
Parcels (MDPs) and nine distinct Land Use Districts (LUDs) dispersed
throughout the MDPs, each with their own set of permitted uses. Some
references are made to zoning districts in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance for
permitted uses, and in other instances, permitted uses are explicitly listed out in
the PUD Development Narrative. The nine LUDs of the PUD are:
• Natural Open Space (NOS)
o This LUD encompasses the area of the proposed Sonoran
Preserve that will be conveyed to the City of Phoenix Parks and
Recreation Department.
• Community Open Space (COS)
o This LUD encompasses the areas that will be conveyed to the City
of Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department for a future public
regional park and community park. This LUD also includes an area
that will be preserved as permanent undisturbed open space




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

through a subdivision tract, an area that may include a future public
or private park, and a future public library.
• Foothills Residential (FR)
o This LUD is intended to allow lower-density residential, similar to
the R1-10 zoning district.
• Traditional Neighborhood (TN)
o This LUD is intended to allow traditional single-family residential
neighborhoods, similar to the R-2 zoning district, with some limited
neighborhood commercial uses.
• Neighborhood Village (NV)
o This LUD is intended to allow higher-density residential
development, similar to the R-5 zoning district.
• Lifestyle Mixed-Use (LMU)
o This LUD is intended to allow higher-intensity mixed-use
development and is envisioned to be similar in character to the
Kierland Commons development.
• Community Commercial (CC)
o This LUD is intended to allow commercial uses similar to the C-1
(Neighborhood Retail) zoning district.
• Freeway Mixed-Use (FMU)
o This LUD is intended to allow higher-intensity mixed-use
development and allows other uses that are more compatible
adjacent to a freeway.
• Innovation Corridor (IC)
o This LUD is intended to allow a mix of commercial and employment
uses. Some limited industrial uses are also permitted.

6. List of Uses
The PUD proposes different permitted uses for each LUD, as follows:
• Natural Open Space (NOS)
o The NOS LUD only allows permanent natural open space,
recreational uses, trailheads, and accessory uses to trailheads. The
NOS LUD prohibits all residential, commercial, office, and industrial
uses, and data centers.
• Community Open Space (COS)
o The COS LUD only allows what the NOS LUD allows, in addition to
paved or unpaved trails or paths, access driveways and parking
areas for associated uses, permanent drainage facilities, and
recreational facilities. Additionally, all parks, recreational uses, and




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

related buildings or facilities may also be private. The COS LUD
prohibits all residential, commercial, office, and industrial uses, and
data centers.
• Foothills Residential (FR)
o The FR LUD allows all uses as permitted in the R1-10 zoning
district in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, with limited commercial
uses allowed as accessory to a trailhead, with restrictions. A private
community center is also permitted within this LUD. Residential
accessory uses permitted are as permitted for the R1-10 zoning
district per Section 608 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
Temporary uses are as permitted per Section 708 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance, except that community or special events,
promotional events, and farmers markets are permitted subject to
an administrative temporary use permit (ATUP) and subject to the
requirements set forth in Section 708.C of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance. The FR LUD prohibits adult uses, data centers,
multifamily residential, and single-family attached.
• Traditional Neighborhood (TN)
o The TN LUD allows all uses as permitted in the R-2 zoning district
in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, with limited neighborhood-
serving commercial uses allowed, with restrictions. The TN LUD
also allows a private community center and resort uses per the RH
(Resort District) zoning district of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
Residential accessory uses are as permitted per Section 608 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Temporary uses are as permitted per
Section 708 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, except that
community or special events, promotional events, and farmers
markets are permitted subject to an administrative temporary use
permit (ATUP) and subject to the requirements set forth in Section
708.C of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. The TN LUD prohibits
adult uses, data centers, and multifamily residential.
• Neighborhood Village (NV)
o The NV LUD allows all uses as permitted in the R-5 zoning district
in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, with limited neighborhood-
serving commercial uses allowed, with restrictions. The NV LUD
also allows a private community center and resort uses per the RH
(Resort District) zoning district of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
Residential accessory uses are as permitted per Section 608 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Temporary uses are as permitted per




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

Section 708 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, except that
community or special events, promotional events, and farmers
markets are permitted subject to an administrative temporary use
permit (ATUP) and subject to the requirements set forth in Section
708.C of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. The NV LUD prohibits
adult uses and data centers.
• Lifestyle Mixed-Use (LMU)
o The LMU LUD allows all uses as permitted in the R-5 and C-1
zoning districts of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, in addition to
entertainment uses including bowling alleys, family game centers,
motion picture theaters, pool and billiard halls, and bars and
cocktail lounges. Temporary uses are as permitted per Section 708
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. The LMU LUD prohibits adult
uses, data centers, and uses that do not foster a walkable, mixed-
use environment, including all drive-throughs, retail of automobile
parts and supplies, auto title loan establishments, car washes, auto
driving schools, freight traffic service offices, gas stations, self-
service storage warehouses, automobile service stations, single-
family detached, and customer parking lots.
• Community Commercial (CC)
o The CC LUD allows all uses as permitted in the C-1 zoning district
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, in addition to some limited C-2
zoning district uses. Temporary uses are as permitted per Section
708 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. The CC LUD prohibits adult
uses, data centers, nursery schools north of Dixileta Drive, all
residential, and self-service storage warehouses.
• Freeway Mixed-Use (FMU)
o The FMU LUD allows all uses as permitted in the C-1 zoning district
of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, in addition to some limited C-2
zoning district uses. Temporary uses are as permitted per Section
708 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. The FMU LUD prohibits
adult uses, data centers, and uses that do not foster a walkable,
mixed-use environment, including retail of automobile parts and
supplies, auto title loan establishments, car washes, drive-throughs
within 300 feet of the NV LUD or existing residential development,
auto driving schools, freight traffic service offices, gas stations
within 300 feet of the NV LUD or existing residential development,
customer parking lots, self-service storage warehouses, automobile
service stations, and single-family detached.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

• Innovation Corridor (IC)
o The IC LUD allows all uses as permitted in the CP/GCP
(Commerce Park District, General Commerce Park Option) zoning
district of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, in addition to one A-2
(Industrial District) zoning district use (basic compounding and
processing of raw materials), with some limitations. The IC LUD
also allows restaurants, bars, and cocktail lounges, and packaged
liquor sales as an accessory use. Data centers, wholesale and
retail sales, and extensive outside uses are also permitted as
accessory uses within the IC LUD, with limitations. Temporary uses
are as permitted per Section 708 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.
The IC LUD prohibits adult uses, commercial loading of small arms
ammunition, data centers as a primary use, residential, nursery
schools, and self-service storage warehouses.

7. Development Standards
The PUD separates development standards into separate tables for single-family
detached, single-family attached, multi-family residential, the LMU and FMU
LUDs, commercial and office uses, the IC LUD, and resort uses. The proposed
PUD development standards tables mainly mimic the proposed modified
development standards tables in the Middle Housing Text Amendment (Z-TA-1-
25-Y), with some exceptions. Some proposed development standards tables also
mimic existing development standards in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. The
applicable LUDs are listed within each development standards table in columns
that list the standards for its respective LUD. The proposed development
standards are as follows:
• Single-Family Residential, Detached
o This table is limited to any single-family detached development in
the FR LUD, TN LUD, and NV LUD.
o The development standards for the FR LUD mimic the Planned
Residential Development (PRD) option development standards for
the R1-10 zoning district, as proposed in Z-TA-1-25-Y, except for
the following:
 Maximum garage widths based on lot widths are added to
the table.
 A larger landscape setback of 30 feet, instead of 15 feet, is
required when adjacent to arterial or collector streets.
 A decreased maximum building height of two stories and 30
feet, instead of three stories and 30 feet, is allowed.
 Increased maximum lot coverage of 70 percent, instead of
60 percent, is allowed.



Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

 Increased minimum common open space of 10 percent,
instead of five percent, is required.
 Walkable Urban (WU) Code standards are required for the
community to be pedestrian friendly and walkable.
o The development standards for the TN LUD and NV LUD mimic the
PRD option development standards for the R1-6 zoning district, as
proposed in Z-TA-1-25-Y, except for the following:
 Maximum garage widths based on lot widths are added to
the table.
 A larger landscape setback of 30 feet, instead of 15 feet, is
required when adjacent to arterial or collector streets.
 An increased maximum building height of three stories and
42 feet, instead of three stories and 30 feet, is allowed.
 Maximum building height is restricted to two stories and 30
feet for the first 150 feet from the development perimeter,
which height may be increased one foot for each five feet in
additional setback, up to the maximum permitted building
height.
 Increased maximum lot coverage of 70 percent, instead of
60 percent, is allowed.
 Increased minimum common open space of 10 percent,
instead of five percent, is required.
 WU Code standards are required for the community to be
pedestrian friendly and walkable.
• Single-Family Residential, Attached
o This table is limited to any single-family attached development in
the TN LUD and NV LUD.
o The development standards for the TN LUD mimic the PRD option
development standards for the R-2 zoning district, as proposed in
Z-TA-1-25-Y, except for the following:
 Maximum garage widths based on lot widths are added to
the table.
 An increased minimum development perimeter building
setback of 30 feet, instead of 20 feet, is required adjacent to
perimeter streets of a subdivision.
 An increased minimum perimeter street landscape setback
of 30 feet, instead of 15 feet, is required adjacent to arterial
or collector streets along the perimeter of a subdivision.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

 Increased maximum lot coverage of 70 percent, instead of
60 percent, is allowed.
 Increased minimum common open space of 10 percent,
instead of five percent, is required.
 WU Code standards are required for the community to be
pedestrian friendly and walkable.
• Multi-Family Residential
o This table is limited to any multifamily residential development in
the NV LUD.
o The development standards for the NV LUD mimic the PRD option
development standards for the R-5 zoning district, as proposed in
Z-TA-1-25-Y, except for the following:
 An increased minimum development perimeter building
setback of 30 feet, instead of 20 feet, is required adjacent to
perimeter streets of a development.
 An increased minimum perimeter street landscape setback
of 30 feet, instead of 15 feet, is required adjacent to
perimeter streets of a development.
 An increased minimum perimeter property line landscape
setback of 10 feet, instead of five feet, is required along
property lines not adjacent to a street.
 An increased maximum building height of five stories and 60
feet, instead of four stories and 48 feet, is allowed.
 Increased maximum lot coverage of 70 percent, instead of
60 percent, is allowed.
 Increased minimum common open space of 10 percent,
instead of five percent, is required.
 WU Code standards are required for the community to be
pedestrian friendly and walkable.
• Mixed-Use Land Use Districts
o This table is limited to all development in the LMU LUD and FMU
LUD.
o The development standards for both LUDs mimic the PRD option
development standards for the R-5 zoning district, as proposed in
Z-TA-1-25-Y, except for the following:
 An increased minimum development perimeter building
setback of 30 feet, instead of 20 feet, is required adjacent to
perimeter streets of a development.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

 An increased minimum perimeter street landscape setback
of 30 feet, instead of 15 feet, is required adjacent to
perimeter streets of a development.
 An increased maximum building height of six stories and 80
feet, instead of four stories and 48 feet, is allowed.
 Increased maximum lot coverage of 70 percent, instead of
60 percent, is allowed.
 Increased minimum common open space of 10 percent,
instead of five percent, is required.
 WU Code standards are required for the community to be
pedestrian friendly and walkable.
• Commercial, Large Scale Commercial Retail, and Office Uses
o This table is limited to any commercial and office development in
the FR LUD, TN LUD, NV LUD, and CC LUD and large scale
commercial retail development in the CC LUD.
o The minimum development perimeter building setback for all LUDs
is 30 feet adjacent to a street.
o The minimum development perimeter building setback for all LUDs
for property lines not adjacent to a street mimics the commercial
zoning districts’ tables in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance based on
building height, except that the adjacent zoning districts are
replaced with LUDs of the PUD.
o The minimum development perimeter street landscape setback for
all LUDs is 30 feet adjacent to a street.
o The minimum development perimeter property line landscape
setback for all LUDs is 10 feet for property lines not adjacent to a
street.
o The maximum building height is two stories or 30 feet for the FR
LUD and TN LUD, four stories or 56 feet for the NV LUD, and the
CC LUD allows four stories or 56 feet, up to 80 feet for hotel uses,
and up to 80 feet for all other uses with a use permit and site plan.
o The maximum lot coverage allowed is 50 percent for all LUDs.
o WU Code standards are required for the community to be
pedestrian friendly and walkable.
o Large Scale Commercial Retail in the CC LUD will follow these
same development standards instead of the development
standards listed in the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance within the
commercial zoning districts.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

• Innovation Corridor
o This table is limited to all development in the IC LUD.
o The development standards mimic the development standards
within the North Phoenix 3,500 PUD (Z-37-20-1), with some
modifications. The proposed development standards are as follows:
 Minimum Development Perimeter Building Setbacks
• Adjacent to Street on Perimeter of IC LUD: 30 feet
• Adjacent to Street on Interior of IC LUD: 10 feet
• Not Adjacent to Street on Perimeter of IC LUD: 30
feet
• Not Adjacent to Street on Interior of IC LUD: 10 feet
 Minimum Development Perimeter Street Landscape Setback
• Adjacent to Street on Perimeter of IC LUD: 30 feet
• Adjacent to Arterial Street on Interior of IC LUD: 30
feet
• Adjacent to Street on Interior of IC LUD: 10 feet
 Minimum Development Perimeter Property Line Landscape
Setback
• Not Adjacent to Street on Perimeter of IC LUD: 30
feet
• Not Adjacent to Street on Interior of IC LUD: 10 feet
 Maximum Building Height
• 56 feet and four stories; heights up to 80 feet with use
permit and site plan; non-habitable mechanical
equipment and structures that may include, but are
not limited to, elements such as air separators,
exhaust pipes, and gas processing equipment are
permitted up to 225 feet in height for a maximum of
25 percent of the roof area
 Maximum Lot Coverage
• 100%
 Minimum Open Space
• 10 percent of the net site area shall be provided as
open space. Open space may take the form of active
or passive open space and should prioritized
preservation of the site’s natural features and
character.
• Resort Uses




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

o This table is limited to resort uses in the TN LUD and NV LUD.
o The development standards in this table applicable to both LUDs
mimic the RH (Resort District) zoning district development
standards, per Section 629 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance,
except for the following:
 A decreased minimum development perimeter building
setback of 30 feet, instead of 40 feet, is required along
property lines adjacent to streets.
 A minimum development perimeter street landscape setback
of 30 feet is required along all property lines adjacent to
streets.
 A minimum development perimeter property line landscape
setback of 25 feet is required along all property lines not
adjacent to a street.
 WU Code standards are required for the community to be
pedestrian friendly and walkable.

Development Standards for Master Plan Tracking
The PUD also includes a development standards section for master plan
tracking, including the following:
• A maximum of 15,150 dwelling units for the PUD.
• A maximum of 4,150 dwelling units for MDP.1, zero dwelling units for
MDP.2, 2,700 dwelling units for MDP.3, 1,000 dwelling units for MDP.4,
5,000 dwelling units for MDP.5, and 2,300 dwelling units for MDP.6.
• Maximum density (dwelling units/gross acre) both including and excluding
areas that do not permit residential (the IC LUD, NOS LUD, COS LUD,
and CC LUD) into the gross area of each MPD and the PUD.
• A minimum of 400 dwelling units and 100,000 square feet of commercial
required for the LMU LUD, and a minimum of 900 dwelling units and
100,000 square feet of commercial for the MDP.1 FMU LUD.
• A requirement for a minimum of 50 percent of the LMU LUD to be
developed as vertical mixed-use.
• A requirement for a minimum of 25 percent of the FMU LUD to be
developed as vertical mixed-use.
• The TN LUD requires a minimum of two gross acres and a maximum of
10 gross acres of the Local Services use to be located and dispersed
within MDP.4 and MDP.6, and a minimum of 5 gross acres and a
maximum of 10 gross acres of the Local Services use within MDP.5.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

Landscape Standards
The PUD proposes robust landscaping standards, including the following:
• A requirement for plant palettes to provide a minimum of five tree species,
a minimum of three shrub species, a minimum of three groundcover
species, a minimum of three accent species, and no one plant species to
comprise of more than 35 percent of the total quantity of plants provided,
to promote biodiversity.
• Minimum two-inch caliper, large canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on
center in landscape areas.
• A minimum of five, five-gallon shrubs per tree.
• A minimum of 75 percent live coverage in landscape areas adjacent to
multi-use trails (MUTs), shared-use paths (SUPs), the NorthVista Multi-
Modal Corridor, the NorthPark Loop, and landscape setbacks adjacent to
arterial and collector streets.
• A minimum of 50 percent live coverage in all other landscape areas.
• A minimum of 10 percent of interior surface parking area for residential
are to be landscaped, instead of five percent, and a minimum of 15
percent for non-residential, instead of 10 percent.
• Landscape planters in surface parking areas approximately every 85 feet,
instead of every 110 feet.
• A minimum of one, large canopy, shade tree per landscape planter.

Elevated and Protected Bike Lanes and Streetscape Zone
The PUD proposes to modify all arterial and collector street cross sections to
provide wider detached, tree-shaded sidewalks and wider bike lanes that are
separated from driving lanes by a landscape strip and shaded by trees.
Additionally, a 10-foot-wide tree-shaded SUP will replace the sidewalk for most
sections of the arterial streets and a 10-foot-wide MUT will be located within an
easement adjacent to the right-of-way for the east side of 43rd Avenue. All local
streets and private accessways will also include detached, shaded sidewalks on
both sides of the streets.

Vehicular and Bicycle Parking Standards
The PUD includes electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure, bicycle parking,
and e-bike charging infrastructure requirements for all development in NorthPark.
Vehicular parking is proposed to comply with Section 702 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, except for the following:
• A reduction in parking of up to 25 percent based on a shared parking
model may be granted by the Planning and Development Department.
Parking reductions greater than 25 percent and based on a shared




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

parking model must obtain a use permit in accordance with the standards
and procedures of Section 307.
• The Incentive Options outlined in Section 702.D.1 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance still apply and will be measured from minimum requirements
established by the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance.

Fences and Walls
The PUD proposes all fences and walls to comply with Section 703 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, except for the following modifications:
• Fencing with sufficient openings to allow the regular passage of wildlife is
required when adjacent to the Sonoran Preserve.
• Freestanding perimeter solid walls are prohibited where located adjacent
to the Sonoran Preserve edge.
• Fences or freestanding walls within or bounding a required rear or side
yard of a residence abutting a collector street are permitted up to six feet
and four inches in height.
• Columns are permitted to exceed the maximum wall height by up to six
inches.
• Rear yard walls for multifamily build-to-rent developments that are not
subdivided are permitted up to 6 feet in height within the perimeter
property line landscape setback, subject to the landscape setbacks being
dedicated as landscape easements.
• Increased retaining wall height is permitted within 50 feet of a
development perimeter or Sonoran Preserve edge.
• Increased retaining wall height is allowed within the front or street side
yards.

Amenities
The PUD proposes the following amenities:
• Land will be conveyed to the City for a future regional park and community
park.
• Neighborhood Parks
o A minimum of one neighborhood park is required to be provided in
each of MDP.1 and MDP.3 through MDP.6.
o The Amenities section provides a table of amenities to choose
from, of which a minimum of three active and three passive
amenities will be required in each neighborhood park.
• Pocket Parks




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

o A minimum of one pocket park is required to be provided for every
500 dwelling units in MDP.1 and MDP.3 through MDP.6.
o The Amenities section provides a table of amenities to choose
from, of which a minimum of one active and one passive amenity
will be required in each pocket park.
• NorthVista Multi-Modal Corridor to Loop 303 Crossing
o This section includes minimum trail and path widths, minimum
easement widths, and standards for the multi-modal corridor east of
43rd Avenue, that will connect to the pedestrian and bicycle bridge
over the Loop 303 freeway.
• Bicycle Repair Stations
o Bicycle repair stations will be required for each multifamily
residential development, adjacent to SUPs and MUTs for every one
mile, at intersections of SUPs and MUTs, and at all private
community centers.
• Office Development Employee Resting Areas
o For office developments, outdoor employee resting areas with
seating and shade of no less than 400 square feet, or two 200-
square-foot areas, are required for each individual office
development.
• Art Installations
o The PUD requires all commercial, employment, and multifamily
residential developments of a certain size in NorthPark to provide a
minimum amount of art installations, which must be mainly visible
from arterial or collector street frontages, or within public spaces.
The PUD provides guidelines that the art should incorporate.

Lighting
The PUD proposes compliance with all Phoenix Zoning Ordinance and Phoenix
City Code requirements related to lighting. Additionally, the PUD restricts lighting
levels to 2,700 kelvins.


Hillside Development
The PUD proposes that all hillside development within NorthPark comply with the
Hillside Ordinance requirements, per Section 710 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance.

Shading
The PUD proposes enhanced shading standards, as follows:




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

• Minimum 75 percent shade for all public or private sidewalks and shared-
use paths, multi-use trails and neighborhood trails, public and private
pedestrian pathways and the NorthPark Loop, gathering areas, bike lanes,
public and private bicycle parking and repair stations, corners of traffic
signals to allow pedestrians to wait comfortably for the signal to change,
and transit stops.
• Minimum 50 percent shade for improved open space and usable public
space.
• Minimum 25 percent shade for surface parking areas, of which must be
achieved by solar panel shade structures in MDP.2.

8. Design Guidelines and Standards
The PUD proposes compliance with all development comply with Section 507
Tab A (Guidelines for Design Review) and Section 654 (North Black Canyon
Overlay District) of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, except as modified by the
PUD. The PUD Design Guidelines section is broken up into three sections:
Section 507 Tab A modified and elevated design guidelines, North Black Canyon
Overlay District modified and elevated design guidelines, and NorthPark design
guidelines. The PUD proposes to enhanced several design guidelines in the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance by elevating them from Considerations (C) and
Presumptions (P) to requirements of the PUD. Additionally, several design
guidelines from the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance are proposed to be modified. The
PUD also includes custom design guidelines specific to development within
NorthPark, including:
• Arterial street thematic bridge crossing design guidelines.
• Grading and Drainage design guidelines.
• Water consumption design guidelines.
• Landscape architecture design guidelines.
• Open space/amenities design guidelines.
• Trails/paths design guidelines.
• Parking/circulation design guidelines.
• Walls/fencing design guidelines.
• Monument signage design guidelines.
• Site lighting and pedestrian lighting design guidelines.
• Hillside development design guidelines.
• Architectural design guidelines.
• Freeway noise mitigation design guidelines.
• LMU LUD and FMU LUD design guidelines.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

Since there are many standards found throughout the PUD Development
Narrative that will need to be included, designed or tracked through master plans,
staff recommends Stipulation No. 2, in order to ensure each of these items are
included in and tracked through the master plans.

The companion case GPA-NG-1-24-1 will amend the City Trails Network Map to
create a robust network of urban Multi-Use Trails (MUTs) and Shared-Use Paths
(SUPs). Where these trails or paths are designated, the developer will be
required to make them publicly accessible through a public access easement.
This is addressed in Stipulation No. 4.

PLANS, OVERLAYS, AND INITATIVES
9. Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan
In November 1987, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Peripheral Areas C and
D General Plan. In the Phoenix General Plan 1985-2000, four peripheral
planning areas were identified and designated for special study independent of
the process that led to the development of the General Plan. Two of these areas,
consisting of approximately 111 largely undeveloped square miles, are in the far
north and are generally referred to as the land above the Central Arizona Project
(CAP) canal. These areas have been designated Peripheral Areas C and D,
generally bounded by Carefree Highway on the north, the Scottsdale corporate
boundary on the east, the CAP and Jomax Road on the south, and 67th Avenue
on the west. Jomax Road is the dividing line between Area C on the south and
Area D on the north. The plan is an amendment to the Phoenix General Plan that
provides recommendations regarding land use and development characteristics
to build-out of the planning area. The plan is intended to be consistent with and
build on the goals and policies identified in the General Plan. The plan contains
seven goals that reflect the multiple facets of the broad public interest in
providing for development of these sensitive lands in an orderly and efficiency
manner while respecting their unique and special characteristics.

The subject site is within Area D of the plan. The PUD is consistent with the
following goals from the plan:

• Goal 1: Continue the Urban Village pattern.

The PUD will continue development of the North Gateway Village, an
established Urban Village in the City of Phoenix.

• Goal 2: Preserve environmental amenities.

As stipulated, approximately 2,100 acres of the PUD gross area will be
conveyed to the City of Phoenix for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025


• Goal 3: Provide supporting infrastructure in an orderly manner.

NorthPark will be master planned and phased, including infrastructure
improvements as development progresses.

• Goal 4: Assure a fiscally sound land use mix.

The PUD proposes a mix of land uses, including residential, commercial,
and employment uses.

• Goal 5: Achieve a balance of residential and employment opportunities.

The PUD proposes both residential and employment districts, which will
help to reduce employee commute times to nearby employers.

• Goal 6: Conserve water.

The PUD incorporates design guidelines that address water conservation
for all development in NorthPark.

• Goal 7: Assure development under environmentally conscious design
standards.

The PUD incorporates and builds on the NBCOD design standards in
order to be environmentally conscious.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025




Peripheral Areas C and D General Plan Planning Area Boundary Map
Source: Planning and Development Department

10. Sonoran Preserve Master Plan
In February 1998, the Phoenix
Sonoran Preserve Master
Plan. The planning process for
the Sonoran Preserve
incorporates traditional
planning processes (inventory
and analysis) with landscape
ecological theory. The
Sonoran Preserve Master
Plan attempts to develop a
system that functions
biologically – maintaining
species diversity and
ecological processes – while
providing a recreational
resource. The master plan
creates a framework for a
preserve system that builds on
Phoenix’s history of setting
aside significant Sonoran
Desert land for recreation,
open space, environmental
education, and preservation of 1998 Sonoran Preserve Master Plan
Source: Parks and Recreation Department
native flora and fauna. The
plan includes approximately 21,500 acres in North Phoenix and 1,000 acres




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

adjacent to South Mountain Park that were recommended for preservation.
Approximately 80 percent, or 16,800 acres, of the land recommended for
preservation are owned by the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD), with
approximately 15,000 acres of these lands within 1998 City limits. Trust Lands
owned by ASLD will require acquisition through the Arizona Preserve Initiative.
The other 20 percent, or 4,700 acres, are privately held lands. The plan
recommends that privately-owned lands targeted for preservation be acquired
primarily through the development process. The Parks and Recreation
Department is also working on an update to the Sonoran Preserve Master Plan,
but an update to the master plan has not yet been adopted by the Phoenix City
Council.

The 1998 Sonoran Preserve Master Plan recommended approximately 2,150
acres of land within the NorthPark PUD boundary to be designated as Sonoran
Preserve. The PUD includes approximately 2,100 acres of land that will be
conveyed to the City as Sonoran Preserve. Additionally, there will be
approximately 32 acres of land, generally located west of the southwest corner of
51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, that will be dedicated through a subdivision tract
to be preserved as permanent undisturbed open space and privately maintained.
These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 8 and 9.

11. North Black Canyon Corridor Plan
The subject site is within the North
Black Canyon Corridor Plan. The
Phoenix City Council adopted the
Corridor Plan in 1999 to guide
growth and development within a
concentrated area along the
Interstate 17 corridor, to
discourage leapfrog development,
and to preserve the natural desert
character of the area. In an effort to
guide growth and development
within a concentrated area and
discourage leapfrog development,
the North Black Canyon Corridor
Plan established the Infrastructure
Limit Line and Infrastructure
Phasing Overlay. The proposal is
consistent with the following goals
from the plan:
North Black Canyon Corridor Plan
• Goal 1: Promote the North Infrastructure Limit Line and Phasing Overlay Map
Black Canyon Corridor as a Source: Planning and Development Department
regional employment center.



Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025


The PUD will add to existing and future employment uses along the Loop
303 freeway.

• Goal 2: Achieve a balance between employment and housing.

The PUD will add to the variety of housing options within the North Black
Canyon Corridor and surrounding employers.

• Goal 4: Preserve North Sonoran desert amenities and use these features
to define community form and identity.

As stipulated, approximately 2,100 acres of the PUD gross area will be
conveyed to the City of Phoenix for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve

12. North Black Canyon Overlay District
The subject site is located adjacent to the North Black Canyon Overlay District
(NBCOD). The City Council adopted the NBCOD in 2001 in order to implement
the designs and concepts of the North Black Canyon Corridor Plan (NBCCP).
The NBCOD ensures development is compatible with the desert environment by
providing comprehensive design guidelines. The NBCOD, when originally
adopted, aligned with the Infrastructure Limit Line of the NBCCP. The subject site
is located within the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay of the NBCCP. The NBCCP
envisioned the Infrastructure Limit Line expanding into the Infrastructure Phasing
Overlay areas in the future when development and infrastructure would allow.
Although the subject site is outside of the originally adopted boundary of the
NBCOD, as the Infrastructure Limit Line expands beyond its original boundary,
development within that expanded area should still comply with the NBCOD
since it still falls within the NBCCP boundary and the designs and concepts of the
NBCCP should be implemented. In order to address this, the PUD requires all
development to comply with the NBCOD and builds upon the NBCOD design
guidelines by elevating some Presumptions (P) in Section 654 of the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance to requirements of the PUD. Additionally, a total of eight of the
NBCOD design guidelines are proposed to be modified in the PUD.

13. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its Bikeway System and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-
term bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of
destinations. In order to address the goals of this plan, the PUD requires the
following:
• Bicycle parking be provided in accordance with the City’s Walkable Urban
(WU) Code, installed per the requirements in the WU Code and located




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

near building entrances and open space/amenity areas.
• Multifamily residential required bicycle parking be secured.
• Multifamily residential and single-family residential provide guest bicycle
parking at a minimum rate of 0.05 spaces per dwelling unit, up to a
maximum of 50 spaces required.
• A minimum of one bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) be provided and
maintained on site for each individual multifamily residential development.
• A minimum of one public bicycle repair station be provided within each
Neighborhood Park.
• Public bicycle repair stations be provided adjacent to SUP and MUTs a
minimum of every one mile.
• Bicycle repair stations be located at all community centers.
• On all arterial and collector streets, bicycle lanes be raised and a minimum
of seven feet wide, separated by minimum eight-foot-wide landscape
strips located between the driving lane and bicycle lane.

14. Complete Streets Design Guidelines
In 2018, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Design
Guidelines. The design guidelines are intended to promote improvements that
provide an accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all
modes, such as bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. In order to address
these design guidelines, the PUD requires the following:
• Detached and shaded sidewalks on all streets.
• Raised, separated, and shaded bicycle lanes on all streets.
• A network of shaded multi-use trails and shared-use paths.

Additionally, the Public Transit Department requested that all arterial streets
accommodate transit. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 15.

15. Zero Waste PHX
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal
to become a zero-waste city, as part of the City’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs. Section 716 of the
Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage the provision of
recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use developments
meeting certain criteria. The PUD addresses this goal by requiring that waste
stations, including a landfill receptacle, composting receptacle, and recycling
receptacle, with informational signs indicating what type of waste should go in
which receptacle, be provided at all building entrances/exits (except for
emergency only exits) and be allocated throughout the site in common open
space areas and along sidewalks, multi-use trails, shared-use paths, the



Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

NorthPark Loop, and pedestrian pathways, at convenient locations typically
within a quarter mile of each other. Additionally, the PUD requires recycling
containers to be provided for each garbage container provided.

16. Housing Phoenix Plan
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing
with a vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased
housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s
rapid population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for
additional housing units.

The proposed development supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating
50,000 housing units by 2030 by contributing to a variety housing types that will
address the supply shortage at a more rapid pace while using vacant land in a
more sustainable fashion.

17. Monarch Butterfly Pledge
In April 2021, Mayor Kate Gallego signed the National Wildlife Federation’s
Mayor’s Monarch Pledge. This pledge commits the city to take action to support
the monarch butterfly population. In the United States, loss of milkweed habitat is
a major factor in the decline of the monarchs. Arizona has at least 29 species of
milkweed native to the state. Adult monarchs feed on the nectar of many flowers,
but they breed only where milkweeds are found. In order to support the monarch
butterfly population, the PUD requires the following:
• Each Master Development Parcel include a minimum of one programmed
demonstration garden element that includes milkweed and other species
that promote the proliferation of Monarch Butterfly populations.
• A minimum of 10 percent of the required shrubs be a milkweed or other
native nectar species and be planted in groups of three or more.

18. Phoenix Climate Action Plan
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan.
The Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse
gas emissions reductions and resiliency goals from local operations and
community activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. This
plan contains policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy, transportation,
waste management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and water. Goal W2
(Water), Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the Greater Phoenix
Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative
Stormwater Management to benefit the environment, promote water
conservation, reduce urban heat, improve the public health, and create additional
green spaces. In order to address this goal, the PUD requires a minimum of two
green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater management to




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

be implemented for each individual development.

19. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation
Electrification Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of
transportation is both a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for
better air quality, a reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle
operating and maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are
signaling strong future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile
manufacturers have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within
the coming decade. This Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a
future filled with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and
outlines a roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs
of 280,000 EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan to accelerate public
adoption of electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily
charging infrastructure recommends a standard stipulation for rezoning cases to
provide EV charging infrastructure. In order to address the goals of this plan, the
PUD requires the following:
• For single-family residential development, all garages include EV Capable
infrastructure.
• For multifamily residential development with less than 50 dwelling units, a
minimum of 10 percent of the required vehicle parking spaces include EV
Ready infrastructure.
• For multifamily residential development over 50 dwelling units, a minimum
of 10 percent of the required vehicle parking spaces include EV Installed
infrastructure.
• For commercial development with less than 50,000 square feet of new
building area or less than 100 new parking spaces, a minimum of 10
percent of the required vehicle parking spaces include EV Ready
infrastructure and a minimum of five percent include EV Capable
infrastructure.
• For commercial development with over 50,000 square feet of new building
area or more than 100 new parking spaces, a minimum of five percent of
the required vehicle parking spaces include EV Installed infrastructure.
• For commercial development, a minimum of 10 percent of the required
ADA vehicle parking spaces include EV Installed infrastructure.
• For industrial and commerce park development, a minimum of 10 percent
of the parking spaces for fleet truck parking include EV Capable
infrastructure.
• For industrial and commerce park development, a minimum of five percent
of the required vehicle parking spaces include EV Installed infrastructure.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

• For parking garages, a minimum of 20 percent of the vehicle parking
spaces include EV Capable infrastructure.
• A minimum of 10 percent of the required bicycle parking spaces include
standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities.

20. Conservation Measures for New Development
In June 2023, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Conservation Measures for
New Development policy as part of a resolution addressing the future water
consumption of new development (Resolution 22129). This resolution addresses
the future water consumption of new development to support one of the City’s
Five Core Values in the General Plan which calls for Phoenix to “Build the
Sustainable Desert City”. The Conservation Measures for New Development
policy includes direction to develop standard stipulations for all rezoning cases
that will address best practices related to water usage in nine specific categories.
In order to address this policy, the PUD requires the following:
• Single-family residential subdivisions provide documentation that
demonstrates participation in the Environmental Protection Agency’s
WaterSense certification program, or an equivalent program.
• Single-family residential subdivisions submit a WaterSense inspection
report from a third-party verifier that demonstrates successful participation
in the Environmental Protection Agency’s WaterSense certification
program, or an equivalent program.
• For common areas of all development, natural turf only be utilized for
required retention areas and functional turf areas located on properties for
uses such as parks, schools, and residential common areas.
• Natural turf only be utilized on individual single-family lots (behind the front
yard).
• A leak detection device be installed for the irrigation system of landscape
areas larger than 10,000 square feet.
• A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management be implemented for each individual
development.
• For office and commercial developments, documentation be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the City of Phoenix
Businesses Water Efficiency Program for a minimum of 20 years.
• For industrial and multifamily residential developments, documentation be
provided that demonstrates a commitment to participate in the City of
Phoenix Water Efficiency Program.
• For single-family subdivisions, participation in the City of Phoenix
Homeowner’s Association Water Efficiency Program be incorporated into
the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for the subdivision, prior to
final site plan approval.
• For single-family subdivisions with lots not exceeding 6,000 square feet, if
a community pool is proposed, swimming pools be prohibited on individual



Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

single-family lots.
• For all single-family lots, swimming pools on individual single-family lots
be limited to 600 square feet in size.
• Any wet-cooling systems be designed and installed per the standards in
the latest adopted version of the International Green Construction Code
(IGCC) (or State equivalent code).
• For common areas of all development, only landscape materials listed in
Appendix A of the North Black Canyon Overlay District (NBCOD), per
Section 654 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance, be utilized.
• For single-family residential subdivisions, only landscape materials listed
in Appendix A of the NBCOD, shall be utilized in common areas and
withing the front yard of individual residential lots.
• A minimum of 25 percent of surface parking areas be shaded by
structures or shade trees.

Additionally, approximately 2,100 acres will be preserved as permanent
undisturbed open space. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 8 and 9.

21. Shade Phoenix Plan
In November 2024, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Shade Phoenix Plan.
The Shade Phoenix Plan prioritizes increasing shade coverage throughout the
City to improve health and quality of life. Investing in shade can address the
urban heat island effect, clean the air, preserve Sonoran vegetation, and prevent
health complications related to prolonged exposure to heat. The Shade Phoenix
Plan provides numerous strategies to increase shade including expanding and
maintaining existing shade, strengthening tree code enforcement, and
developing shade stipulations in rezoning cases. In order to address the goals of
this plan, the PUD requires the following:
• Minimum 75 percent shade for all public and private sidewalks and
shared-use paths.
• Minimum 75 percent shade for multi-use trails, neighborhood trails, and
bike lanes.
• Minimum 75 percent shade for public and private pedestrian pathways
and paseos (of 75 percent, a minimum of 50 percent be achieved by
shade trees).
• Minimum 50 percent shade for improved open space, usable public space,
and gathering areas.
• Minimum 75 percent shade for corners of traffic signals to allow for
pedestrians to wait comfortably for the signal to change, subject to sight
visibility requirements.
• Minimum 75 percent shade for transit stops, achieved by shade trees on
both sides and behind the transit stop.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

• Minimum 25 percent shade for surface parking areas in Master
Development Parcel 1 (MDP.1) and MDP.3 through MDP.6, achieved by
shade trees.
• Minimum 25 percent shade for surface parking areas in MDP.2, achieved
by solar panel shade structures.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY
22. At the time this staff report was written, staff has received 199 letters of
opposition or concerns and nine general inquiries. Concerns include density,
traffic, crime, safety, water, proposed industrial uses, environmental impact,
potential for nuisances, the heat island effect, loss of recreational space, loss of
wildlife habitat, wildlife displacement, and loss of the Sonoran Preserve.
Additionally, staff has received four letters of support.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
23. Fire Department
The Fire Department provided a memo, attached an as exhibit, highlighting the
critical need for reserving land for a future fire station and the 51st Avenue
connection over the Central Arizona Project (CAP) Canal to support effective fire
department service delivery and emergency management. This is addressed in
Stipulation No. 6.

24. Police Department
The Police Department requested that land generally located at the northwest
corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive be reserved for a future police station.
This is addressed in Stipulation No. 6.

25. Floodplain Management
The Floodplain Management section of the Office of the City Engineer
commented that the subject parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)
called Zone A, Zone AE, and Zone AE floodway, on panels 1255L, 0840L, and
0845L of Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) with an effective date of October
16, 2013, and 1260M with an effective date of September 18, 2020. The
Architect and Engineer are required to show the floodplain boundary limits on the
Site Plan and Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that impacts to the
proposed facilities have been considered, following the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3), including, but not limited
to, provisions in the latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix
City Code. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan needs to be submitted to
the Floodplain Management section of the Street Transportation Department for
review and approval of Floodplain requirements. FEMA approved CLOMR-F or
CLOMR is required prior to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit. A LOMR
application must be submitted to Floodplain Management prior to issuance of
vertical construction permits. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 5.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025


26. Library Department
The Library Department requested that a minimum of four acres be reserved for
a future public library. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 7.

27. Parks and Recreation Department
The Parks and Recreation Department identified the area designated as
Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned, generally located west of the southwest
corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, as generally depicted on Exhibit 5:
Proposed General Plan Land Use Map of the PUD Development Narrative date
stamped November 6, 2025, as an area to be preserved. However, connecting
this area to the future Sonoran Preserve dedicated area would cut off east-west
access through Master Development Parcel 5 (MDP.5). The Arizona State Land
Department agreed with the Parks and Recreation Department that this area
would remain undeveloped but would be preserved through dedication of a
subdivision tract, rather than conveyed to the City as Sonoran Preserve. This is
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 8 and 9.

Additionally, the Parks and Recreation Department requested the following:
• Land reserved in COS LUD, generally located northwest of the northwest
corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, for a future regional park.
• Land reserved in COS LUD, generally located east of the northeast corner
43rd Avenue and Dixileta Drive, for a future public community park.
• Conveyance to the City of the NOS LUD for Sonoran Preserve.
• Conveyance to the City of a minimum of three acres with less than 10%
slope for each minor trailhead in general locations as depicted on the
Master Trails Plan.
• Conveyance to the City of a minimum of 5 acres with less than 10% slope
for the major trailhead in the general location as depicted on the Master
Trails Plan.
• That a minimum of 200 parking spaces and other amenities are possible
within the acreage dedicated for the major trailhead, as approved or
modified by the Parks and Recreation Department.
• That all trails and paths be constructed outside of proposed Sonoran
Preserve lands, with one exception. South of Mount Ochoa, the NorthPark
Loop bisecting the Preserve from east to west shall be constructed by the
developer as part of the overall development. Upon completion of the
NorthPark Loop through the Preserve and Parks and Recreation
Department ownership of the land, the Parks and Recreation Department
will take over maintenance of that portion of the NorthPark Loop that lies
within the Preserve within this one exception area south of Mountain




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

Ochoa.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 8 through 14.

28. Public Transit
The Public Transit Department requested that the proposed arterial streets (43rd
Avenue, 51st Avenue, 67th Avenue, and Dixileta Drive) accommodate transit,
including bus pads located every quarter mile on both directions of the proposed
streets, and bus bays at intersections. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 15.

29. Street Transportation Department
The Street Transportation Department requested the following:

• That a Master Street Plan be submitted and approved for the overall
NorthPark PUD prior to, or concurrent with the initial Conceptual Master
Development Parcel (CMDP) submission, excluding MDP.2, and no
preliminary approval of plans be granted within an MDP without an
approved MDP Traffic Impact Analysis and associated MDP and/or PCD
(Planned Community District) or Functional Segment (FS) Master Street
Plans, including a separate signing and striping plan for the separated and
elevated bicycle facilities, protected bicycle intersection designs, and a
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) be approved for any new submission or
modification to the overall NorthPark PUD, Master Development Parcel, or
Functional Segment Master Plan along with corresponding updated
Master Streets Plans, and that that 100-year storm dry crossings be
constructed for arterial and collector streets where they cross a wash or
floodplain corridor.
• That a Master Trails Plan be submitted to and approved by the Planning
and Development and Street Transportation Departments for the overall
NorthPark PUD prior to, or concurrent with, the Conceptual Master
Development Parcel submission, excluding MDP.2, including the
following:
o That all trails and paths identified in Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan
be publicly accessible through public access easement dedications.
o That multi-use trails, shared-use paths, and NorthPark Loop
crossings at arterial and collector streets that are away from
signalized intersections be identified and above or below grade
crossings, HAWKs, or similar pedestrian activated crossings be
assigned and constructed.
o That standard details be provided for the NorthPark Loop.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

o That locations of the neighborhood trails, singletrack trails, the
NorthVista Multi-Modal path Corridor, and a minor trailhead east of
67th Avenue, south of Dixileta Drive, be shown on the
corresponding Planned Community District (PCD) or Functional
Segment (FS) master plans .
• That the overall NorthPark PUD Master Street Plan identify and assign
25% private contribution for the total cost of the multi-modal bridge
crossing over the Loop 303 freeway from the NorthVista Multi-Modal
Corridor.
• Dedication of the full width of 43rd Avenue from the Loop 303 to Dixileta
Drive. 43rd Avenue shall be assigned and constructed as required per the
approved Master Development Parcel (MDP) Master Street Plans and
accepted MDP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), as approved by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.
• Dedication of the full width of 51st Avenue from the Loop 303 to the
existing Stetson Valley Parkway alignment, south of the Central Arizona
Project (CAP) canal. 51st Avenue shall be assigned and constructed per
the approved Conceptual Master Development Parcel (CMDP) Master
Street Plans and the accepted MDP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), and in
compliance with CAP requirements. The PCD or FS Master Street Plans
and TIA’s for each MDP shall establish assignment of MDP funding and/or
construction of improvements over the CAP canal, as approved by the
Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.
• Dedication of the full width of 67th Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway from
the Loop 303 to the existing 67th Avenue, south of the CAP canal. 67th
Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway shall be constructed per the approved
Conceptual Master Development Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and
the accepted MDP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), and in compliance with
CAP requirements. The PCD or FS Master Street Plans and TIA’s for
each MDP shall establish assignment of MDP funding and/or construction
of improvements over the CAP canal, as approved by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.
• Dedication of the full width of Dixileta Drive from the I-17 to the 67th
Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway alignment. Dixileta Drive shall be
constructed per the approved Conceptual Master Development Parcel




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

(CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA).
• Identification and assignment of all modifications and improvements
required for the Dixileta Drive and I-17 traffic interchange.
• Identification and assignment of all modifications and improvements
required for the 67th Avenue and Loop 303 traffic interchange.
• That MDP.2 direct large truck traffic to the Loop 303 freeway through on-
site access control restrictions to discourage southbound access onto 51st
Avenue.
• That Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and
assign a traffic signal to be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the
intersection of Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain
Parkway/Cortopassi Pass, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.
• That Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and
assign a traffic signal to be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the
intersection of Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain
Parkway(north)/Tombstone Trail, as approved by the Street
Transportation Department. A pedestrian signalized crossing (e.g. HAWK)
may be considered as an interim condition prior to full signalization of the
intersection being warranted.
• That all mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as
identified in the accepted PUD, and subsequent Conceptual Master
Development Plan and PCD or FS Segment Traffic Impact Analyses.
• That all streets within and adjacent to the development be constructed
with all required elements and comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 3, 4, and 16 through 27.

OTHER
30. Deer Valley Unified School District
The Deer Valley Unified School District (DVUSD) requested that prior to the
submittal of PCD or FS master plans for Master Development Parcels 1, 3 and 6,
the applicant shall engage with the school district regarding the plan of
development. Additionally, DVUSD requested that a minimum of three public
school sites at locations acceptable to the school district and the Street
Transportation Department be reserved for one year from the date of approval of
the PCD or FS master plans in Master Development Parcels 1, 3, and 6. This is
addressed in Stipulation Nos. 28 and 29.

31. For single-family residential development, the developer shall provide a



Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

hydraulic/hydrologic analysis of offsite storm water flows, when present, at the
time of preliminary site plan submittal for verification of required infrastructure in
regard to lot space and density.

32. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive.
If further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site
and immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous
archaeological projects have been conducted within this project area, it is
recommended that archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted.
Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based
upon the results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this
determination in consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event
archaeological materials are encountered during construction, all ground
disturbing activities must cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery and the
time to properly assess the materials. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 30
through 32.

33. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution
in Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required
by the rezoning application process. Staff recommends a stipulation to require
the form be completed and submitted prior to final site plan approval. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 33.

34. Development and use of the site is subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements.
Other formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and
abandonments, may be required.

Findings

1. The proposal is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designations (GPA-NG-1-24-1).

2. The proposal will add to the variety of land uses and housing options adjacent to
the North Black Canyon Major Employment Corridor and within the North
Gateway Village.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, overlays, and
initiatives, including the North Black Canyon Corridor Plan, the North Black
Canyon Overlay District, the Monarch Butterfly Pledge initiative, the Shade
Phoenix Plan, the Complete Streets Guiding Principles policy, the
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, the Transportation Electrification Action
Plan, the Phoenix Climate Action Plan, and the Conservation Measures for New
Development policy.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025


Stipulations

1. An updated Development Narrative for the NorthPark PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date]. Change “4th Submittal”
to “Hearing Draft Submittal”.

2. Overall PUD, Conceptual Master Development Parcel (CMDP), plans for the
entire NorthPark PUD, per the requirements of the Planned Community District
(PCD) per Section 636 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance as it relates to the
NorthPark scale community serving infrastructure, shall be submitted to the City
for review and approval prior to submitting Planned Community District (PCD) or
Functional Segment (FS) master plans for any MDP, except for MDP.2. Submitted
PCD of FS master plans must be in general conformance with the CMDP and
approved before submitting any Preliminary Site Plans, for land within that MDP,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department. The PCD and/or FS
master plans shall meet the full requirements of Section 636 regarding master
plans and must be in general conformance with the CMDP. Some MDPs will
require review with and/or approval by other departments or agencies as
applicable for those specific plans or MDP areas. The CMDP may be updated to
reflect more refined PCD or FS master plans of the various MDP areas as the
area develops.

a. The Master Development Plan shall also include a tracking table for the
following items:

i. Locations, minimum acreages, and maximum acreages of the local
services use within the Foothills Residential, Traditional
Neighborhood, and Neighborhood Village Land Use Districts (LUDs).

ii. The minimum number of units for the Lifestyle Mixed-Use (LMU) and
Freeway Mixed-Use (FMU) LUDs, and the minimum square footage of
commercial uses in the LMU LUD and FMU LUD.

iii. The minimum area required for vertical mixed-use (residential and
commercial) in the LMU LUD and FMU LUD.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

b. The locations of the public bicycle repair stations (“fix it stations”) shall be
identified on all master plans, as required by the PUD.

c. The locations of the proposed Sonoran Preserve and preserved natural
wash/floodplain corridors, shall be identified on the master plans, as
required by the PUD.

d. The locations of the public regional park and public community park shall be
identified on the master plans.

e. The locations of neighborhood parks shall be identified on MDP master
plans and pocket parks shall be identified on Functional Segment master
plans.

f. Locations of Monarch Butterfly gardens, as required by the PUD, shall be
identified and provided within each MDP.

g. For MDPs that include school sites for reservation for the Deer Valley
Unified School District (DVUSD), the locations of the three school sites, in
locations and acreage to be approved or modified by DVUSD, shall be
identified and shown on the CMDP and the as refined on the PCD or FS
master plans.

h. Location of a fire/mini police station, in a location and acreage to be
approved or modified by the Fire Department and Police Department, shall
be identified and shown on the CMDP and then refined on the PCD or FS
master plans.

i. Gateway monuments and project gateway design for entrances into the
NorthPark community shall be identified on the PCD or FS master plans, as
required by the PUD.

3. A Master Streets Plan shall be submitted and approved for the overall North Park
PUD prior to, or concurrent with the initial Conceptual Master Development Parcel
(CMDP) submission, excluding MDP.2. No preliminary approval of plans shall be
granted within an MDP without an approved MDP Traffic Impact Analysis and
associated MDP and/or PCD or FS Master Street Plans.

In addition to the Master Street Plan requirements set forth in the North Park
PUD, the following information shall also be required:

a. A separate signing and striping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Street Transportation Department for the separated and elevated bicycle
facilities, as required by Section 6, Table 7 of the PUD.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

b. Protected bicycle intersection designs shall be incorporated within each MDP
and guided by NACTO national standards, as approved by the Street
Transportation Department.

c. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) shall be approved for any new submission or
modification to the overall North Park PUD, Master Development Parcel, or
Functional Segment Master Plan along with corresponding updated Master
Streets Plans.

d. Where an arterial or collector street crosses a wash or floodplain corridor, a
100-year storm dry crossing shall be constructed per the City of Phoenix
storm water design manual, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. A Master Trails Plan shall be submitted and approved to the Planning and
Development and Street Transportation Departments for the overall North Park
PUD prior to, or concurrent with the initial Conceptual Master Development Parcel
submission, excluding MDP.2. The Master Trails Plan shall incorporate the
following elements:

a. All trails and paths identified on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan shall be
publicly accessible through public access easement dedications.

b. Multi-Use Trails, Shared Use Path, and NorthPark Loop crossings at arterial
and collector streets that are away from signalized intersection shall be
identified and above or below grade crossings, HAWKS or similar
pedestrian activated crossings shall be assigned and constructed, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

c. Standard details shall be provided for the NorthPark Loop, including
connections that cross wash corridors, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

d. Locations of neighborhood and singletrack trails, as required by the PUD,
shall be identified and provided on Functional Segment master plans.

e. Location of the NorthVista Multi-Modal Path Corridor within MDP.1,
generally located east of 43rd Avenue and north of Dixileta Drive,
connecting to the future pedestrian/bicycle bridge over the Loop 303
freeway, shall be identified on the MDP master plans, as required by the
PUD, and shall be provided along the western edge of the 100-year
floodplain corridor, outside of the floodplain boundary.

f. Location of a minor trailhead east of 67th Avenue, south of Dixileta Drive.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

5. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone A, Zone AE,
and Zone AE floodway, on panels 1255L, 0840L, and 0845L of Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (FIRM) with an effective date of October 16, 2013 and 1260M revised
on September 18, 2020. The following requirements shall apply, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

a. The Architect and Engineer are required to show the floodplain boundary
limits on the Site Plan and Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that
impacts to the proposed facilities are adequately addressed, following
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph
60.3). This includes, but is not limited to, provisions in the latest versions of
the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of the Street Transportation Department for
review and approval of floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or CLOMR prior
to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit.

d. A LOMR application shall be submitted to the Floodplain Management
section of the Street Transportation Department for review and approval
prior to issuance of vertical construction permits.

e. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved LOMR-F or LOMR prior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The developer shall reserve approximately 7 acres, generally located at the
northwest corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, for a future fire/mini police
station, as approved or modified by the Fire Department, Police Department, and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be reserved, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Fire Department, the Police
Department, and the Planning and Development Department.

7. The developer shall reserve approximately 4 acres of the Community Open Space
Land Use District, generally located east of 43rd Avenue and north of Dixileta
Drive, generally shown on Exhibit 8C: Community Open Space of the PUD
Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, to the City of Phoenix
for a future public library, as approved or modified by the Library Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be conveyed, along with timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Library Department, and the Planning
and Development Department.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

8. The area designated as Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned, generally located
west of the southwest corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, as generally
depicted on Exhibit 5: Proposed General Plan Land Use Map of the PUD
Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, shall be preserved as
permanent undisturbed open space and shall be privately maintained. The area
may include passive recreational features such as trails, seating nodes, or other
elements, provided such improvements are consistent with the intent to maintain
the area as undisturbed open space, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

9. The developer shall convey approximately 2,100 acres, generally shown on
Exhibit 8B: Natural Open Space of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped
November 6, 2025, to the City of Phoenix for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve,
as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and the
Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration of
the property to be conveyed, along with timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.

10. The developer shall convey approximately 208 acres, generally shown on Exhibit
8C: Community Open Space of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped
November 6, 2025, to the City of Phoenix for a future public regional park and
community park, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation
Department and the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage
and configuration of the property to be conveyed, along with the timing of the
conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and
Recreation Department, and the Planning and Development Department.

11. The developer shall convey approximately 3 acres with less than 10% slope for
each minor trailhead generally shown on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the
PUD Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, for future minor
trailheads, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be conveyed, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.

12. The developer shall convey approximately 5 acres with less than 10% slope for
the major trailhead generally shown on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD
Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, for a future major
trailhead, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be conveyed, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025


13. At the time of conveyance of land for the major trailhead generally shown on
Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped
November 6, 2025, the major trailhead acreage shall be large enough to
accommodate a minimum of 200 parking spaces and other amenities (restrooms,
ramadas, pedestrian connections, etc.), as approved or modified by the Parks and
Recreation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

14. All multi-use trails (MUTs), shared-use paths (SUPs), and the NorthPark Loop, as
depicted on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD Development Narrative
hearing draft date stamped November 6, 2025, shall be constructed outside of
proposed Sonoran Preserve lands. Prior to final site plan approval of any
development east of 51st Avenue and south of Dixileta Drive, the proposed
NorthPark Loop bisecting the Preserve from east to west, south of Mount Ochoa,
shall be constructed by the developer as part of the overall development, in
accordance with the requirements in the PUD, as approved or modified by the
Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning and Development
Department. Upon completion of the NorthPark Loop through the Preserve and
Parks and Recreation Department ownership of the land, the Parks and
Recreation Department will take over maintenance of that portion of the NorthPark
Loop that lies within the Preserve within this one area south of Mount Ochoa.

15. The proposed arterial streets (43rd Avenue, 51st Avenue, 67th Avenue, and
Dixileta Drive) shall accommodate transit. Bus pads, conforming with City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1260, shall be located every one-quarter mile on both
directions of the proposed streets. At intersections, there shall be bus bays that
conform with Standard Detail P1256. The pads and bays shall be located from
intersections according to Standard Detail P1258.

16. The overall North Park PUD Master Street Plan shall identify and assign 25%
private contribution, as determined by the Street Transportation Department, for
the total cost of the multi-modal bridge crossing over the Loop 303 freeway from
the NorthVista Multi-Modal Path Corridor, as identified in the PUD.

17. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 43rd
Avenue from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to Dixileta Drive. 43rd Avenue
shall be assigned and constructed as required per the approved Master
Development Parcel (MDP) Master Street Plans and accepted MDP Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA), as approved by the Street Transportation Department and the
Planning and Development Department.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

18. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 51st
Avenue from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to the existing Stetson Valley
Parkway, south of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal. 51st Avenue shall be
assigned and constructed per the approved Conceptual Master Development
Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA), and in compliance with CAP requirements. The PCD or FS Master
Street Plans and TIA’s for each MDP shall establish assignment of MDP funding
and/or construction of improvements over the CAP canal, as approved by the
Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.

19. A minimum of 130 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 67th
Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to the
existing 67th Avenue, south of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal. 67th
Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway shall be constructed per the approved Conceptual
Master Development Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), and in compliance with CAP requirements. The PCD
or FS Master Street Plans and TIA’s for each MDP shall establish assignment of
MDP funding and/or construction of improvements over the CAP canal, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department and the Planning and
Development Department.

20. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of
Dixileta Drive from the Interstate 17 interchange to the 67th Avenue/Pyramid Peak
Parkway. Dixileta Drive shall be constructed per the approved Conceptual Master
Development Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP Traffic
Impact Analysis (TIA), as approved by the Street Transportation Department and
the Planning and Development Department.

21. The overall North Park PUD Conceptual Master Street Plan and subsequent PCD
or FS Master Street Plan(s) shall identify and assign all modifications and
improvements required for the Dixileta and I-17 traffic interchange, as approved
by the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Street Transportation
Department.

22. The overall North Park PUD Conceptual Master Street Plan and subsequent PCD
or FS Master Street Plan(s) shall identify and assign all modifications and
improvements required for the 67th Avenue and Loop 303 traffic interchange, as
approved by the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Street
Transportation Department.

23. Master Development Parcel 2 shall direct large truck traffic to the 303 Freeway
through on-site access control restrictions to discourage south bound access onto
51st Avenue.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025

24. Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and assign a traffic
signal to be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the intersection of Stetson
Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway/Cortopassi Pass, as approved
by the Street Transportation Department.

25. Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and assign a traffic
signal to be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the intersection of Stetson
Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway(north)/Tombstone Trail, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department. A pedestrian signalized
crossing (e.g. HAWK) may be considered as an interim condition prior to full
signalization of the intersection being warranted.

26. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in the
accepted PUD, and subsequent Conceptual Master Development Plan and PCD
or FS Segment Traffic Impact Analyses.

27. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

28. Prior to the submittal of PCD or FS master plans for Master Development Parcels
1, 3 and 6, as depicted on Exhibit 7: Master Development Parcel Map of the PUD
Development Narrative hearing draft date stamped November 6, 2025, the
applicant shall engage with the Deer Valley Unified School District regarding the
plan of development.

29. A minimum of three public school sites at locations acceptable to the school
district and the Street Transportation Department shall be reserved for one year
from the date of approval of the PCD or FS master plans; for a maximum 80-acre
high school site in Master Development Parcel 1, for a maximum 20-acre K-8 site
in Master Development Parcel 3, and for a maximum 20-acre K-8 site in Master
Development Parcel 6, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department and Deer Valley Unified School District.

30. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

31. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.




Staff Report: Z-139-24-1
November 10, 2025


32. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

33. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.



Writer
Adrian Zambrano
November 10, 2025

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Zoning Sketch Map
Aerial Sketch Map
Fire Department Memo
Community Correspondence (538 pages)
NorthPark PUD Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025




S-1*
C-
PC 2
D*
D*
PC
FH

PCD* PC
D*
C-2 PCD PCD* R1-8
FH PCD
NBCOD* NBCOD*
PCD*
Z-70-05
R1-8 PCD* PCD*
C-2 PCD * Z-129-99

PCD*
Z-117-05 PCD*


FH PCD NBCOD*
PCD* C-2




PUD*
HGT/WVR
DNS/WVR




D*
PCD*




C-2 PC
DOVE VALLEY RD C-2


R-3 PCD*
HGT/WVR
PCD*




43RD AVE
PUD* PUD*
FH PCD*
S-1 C-2 M-R*
C-2 M-R C-2 M-R PUD
C-2* NBCOD*
NBCOD* NBCOD*
-2*




51ST AVE
C




w
v
C-2 HGT/WVR
FH
C-2 HGT/WVR

DNS/WVR

NBCOD*
DNS/WVR
CP/GCP
NBCOD*
NBCOD*
M-R
C-2 NBCOD*
HGT/WVR
DNS/WVR*

S-1* C-2 C-2 HGT/WVR
C-2
DNS/WVR*
NBCOD*


§
¨
¦
M-R*

17 R-3A
NBCOD*
R-4* R-3*
SONORANC-2*
DESERT DR
S-1 PCD* PCD*
S-1 Z-34-01
North Black Canyon
lA
ra
Corridor Plan and
nt Overlay District
Ce C-2/C-P/M-R PCD*
Z-34-01
a

S-1 PCD*
on
FH PCD*
ri z
PCD*
Proj
ec t
n DIXILETA DR
Ca R1-6* S-1 PCD*
al Z-34-01


R-3A*
R1-18*


67TH AVE
R1-6 PCD *
City * Z-109-97
of R-3 PCD* R1-6 PCD
R1-10*
Z-109-97
Peoria
S-1 PCD
D*
3A PC R-3A*
R1-6* Z-109-97

R1-8* R- D*
R1-8 R-3A
PRD* R1-10* R1-8*
S-1
PC
DYNAMITE BLVD S-1 PCD

R1-6*
R1-10* Z-109-97




37TH AVE
R1-18*
PLU R-3A*
R1-10*


R1-8 PRD* MR S-1 S-1
D R-3 PCD
R1-10 PRD* S-1 RE-35 * Z-109-97
R1-8 * R1-8*


R1-8 PCD*
R1-6 PCD* Z-147-05 PUD
Z-131-04 C-2
SP*
R1-8
S-1
S-1 R1-6
S-1 SP R1-8* R1-18
SP
S-1 R1-10* PCD R1-18 PRD* Z-SP-27-92
PRD* Z-41-02
SP*
* R1 R1-18* S-1 SP R1-6 PCD
S-1 PC -6 Z-SP-28-92 Z-77-99
PR
-6 D*
R1-8 R1-6
R1-18*
D*
R1 *
R-3A*

R1-8 PRD*
PRD*
-8
S-1 D R-3 S-1 CP/GCP *
R1
PC CD* PCD* S-1 S-1 SP Z-9-06
RE-43 S-1 PCD* S-1 PCD RE-43
R1-6 1-18 RE-43 PCD RE-43 Z-78-88 S-1
S- P
1P
R-2 Z-SP-25-92


S-1 PCD*
S-1* S-1*
R1-8*
PUD*
CD -6 S-1 PCD
S-1 PCD PCD*
R* PCD R1 D* Z-78-88
Z-78-88 S-1
*-6
R1 D*
PC S-1 Z-78-88 S-1
R1-8* S
PC -1 PC R1-8 R1-18 PCD* RH PCD * RE-43 C-2
D* 2
R- * R PCD* S-1 R1-8 PCD*
PCD
PC 1-6
Z-78-88 M-R PCD*




¯
D*



51ST AVE



PYRAMID PEAK PKY
Miles 19TH AVE
0 0.4 0.8 1.6 I-17

NORTH GATEWAY VILLAGE Z-139-24-1 CAREFREE HWY
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1
DOVE VALLEY RD
DYNAMITE BLVD




REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: RVI Planning
FROM: S-1 ( 6381.49 ac.)
DATE:
10/2/2024
APPLICATION NO: Z-139-24-1 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET 9/18/2025
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
PUD ( 6381.49 ac.)
QS 50-15; QS 50-16; QS 51-13 to 51-20; P-4; P-5; P-6; Q-4;
6381.49 Acres QS 52-13 to 52-20; QS 53-12 to 53-21;
QS 54-12 to 54-21; QS 55-10 to 55-17;
QS 56-10 to 56-15;
Q-5; Q-6; R-5
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
S-1 6,381 N/A
PUD 15,150 N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 919
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-139-24\Z-139-24_Rezoning_Sketch_Map.aprx
S-1*
C-
PC 2
D*
D*
PC
FH

PCD* PC
D*
C-2 PCD PCD* R1-8
FH PCD
NBCOD* NBCOD*
PCD*
Z-70-05
R1-8 PCD* PCD*
C-2 PCD * Z-129-99

PCD*
Z-117-05 PCD*


FH PCD NBCOD*
PCD* C-2




PUD*
HGT/WVR
DNS/WVR




D*
PCD*




C-2 PC
DOVE VALLEY RD C-2


R-3 PCD*
HGT/WVR
PCD*




43RD AVE
PUD* PUD*
FH PCD*
S-1 C-2 M-R*
C-2 M-R C-2 M-R PUD
C-2* NBCOD*
NBCOD* NBCOD*
-2*




51ST AVE
C




w
v
C-2 HGT/WVR
FH
C-2 HGT/WVR

DNS/WVR

NBCOD*
DNS/WVR
CP/GCP
NBCOD*
NBCOD*
M-R
C-2 NBCOD*
HGT/WVR
DNS/WVR*

S-1* C-2 C-2 HGT/WVR
C-2
DNS/WVR*
NBCOD*


§
¨
¦
M-R*

17 R-3A
NBCOD*
R-4* R-3*
SONORANC-2*
DESERT DR
S-1 PCD* PCD*
S-1 Z-34-01
North Black Canyon
lA
ra
Corridor Plan and
nt Overlay District
Ce C-2/C-P/M-R PCD*
Z-34-01
a

S-1 PCD*
on
FH PCD*
ri z
PCD*
Proj
ec t
n DIXILETA DR
Ca R1-6* S-1 PCD*
al Z-34-01


R-3A*
R1-18*


67TH AVE
R1-6 PCD *
City * Z-109-97
of R-3 PCD* R1-6 PCD
R1-10*
Z-109-97
Peoria
S-1 PCD
D*
3A PC R-3A*
R1-6* Z-109-97

R1-8* R- D*
R1-8 R-3A
PRD* R1-10* R1-8*
S-1
PC
DYNAMITE BLVD S-1 PCD

R1-6*
R1-10* Z-109-97




37TH AVE
R1-18*
PLU R-3A*
R1-10*


R1-8 PRD* MR S-1 S-1
D R-3 PCD
R1-10 PRD* S-1 RE-35 * Z-109-97
R1-8 * R1-8*


R1-8 PCD*
R1-6 PCD* Z-147-05 PUD
Z-131-04 C-2
SP*
R1-8
S-1
S-1 R1-6
S-1 SP R1-8* R1-18
SP
S-1 R1-10* PCD R1-18 PRD* Z-SP-27-92
PRD* Z-41-02
SP*
* R1 R1-18* S-1 SP R1-6 PCD
S-1 PC -6 Z-SP-28-92 Z-77-99
PR
-6 D*
R1-8 R1-6
R1-18*
D*
R1 *
R-3A*

R1-8 PRD*
PRD*
-8
S-1 D R-3 S-1 CP/GCP *
R1
PC CD* PCD* S-1 S-1 SP Z-9-06
RE-43 S-1 PCD* S-1 PCD RE-43
R1-6 1-18 RE-43 PCD RE-43 Z-78-88 S-1
S- P
1P
R-2 Z-SP-25-92


S-1 PCD*
S-1* S-1*
R1-8*
PUD*
CD -6 S-1 PCD
S-1 PCD PCD*
R* PCD R1 D* Z-78-88
Z-78-88 S-1
*-6
R1 D*
PC S-1 Z-78-88 S-1
R1-8* S
PC -1 PC R1-8 R1-18 PCD* RH PCD * RE-43 C-2
D* 2
R- * R PCD* S-1 R1-8 PCD*
PCD
PC 1-6
Z-78-88 M-R PCD*




¯
D*



51ST AVE



PYRAMID PEAK PKY
Miles 19TH AVE
0 0.4 0.8 1.6 I-17

NORTH GATEWAY VILLAGE Z-139-24-1 CAREFREE HWY
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 1
DOVE VALLEY RD
DYNAMITE BLVD




REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: RVI Planning
FROM: S-1 ( 6381.49 ac.)
DATE:
10/2/2024
APPLICATION NO: Z-139-24-1 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET 9/18/2025
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
PUD ( 6381.49 ac.)
QS 50-15; QS 50-16; QS 51-13 to 51-20; P-4; P-5; P-6; Q-4;
6381.49 Acres QS 52-13 to 52-20; QS 53-12 to 53-21;
QS 54-12 to 54-21; QS 55-10 to 55-17;
QS 56-10 to 56-15;
Q-5; Q-6; R-5
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
S-1 6,381 N/A
PUD 15,150 N/A
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 920
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2024\Z-139-24\Z-139-24_Rezoning_Sketch_Map.aprx
FIRE DEPARTMENT
NORTH OPERATIONS DIVISION




To: Josh Bednarek, Director of the Ppnn[ng & Development Department
From Ray Ochoa, Assistant Fire Chief'\t'
Subj: Future Fire Station Land Acquisitioh & 51st Ave Connection and North Park Development

This memo outlines the critical need for identifying and reserving land for a future fire station,
while also establishing the SlstAvenue connection overthe CentralArizona Project (CAP)
Canalto support effective fire department service delivery and emergency management,
particularly in relation to the proposed North Park development.

The Planning and Development Department is currently processing the North Park rezoning
case, encompassing approximately 6,600 acres of land immediately north of the CAP Canal and
south of Loop 303, extending from lnterstate 17 to the western boundary with the City of Peoria.
This area represents one of the most significant future growth corridors in northwest Phoenix.

The Fire Department works closely with the Planning and Development Department to
anticipate future service needs based on projected growth and development patterns. As part of
this proactive approach, it is essential to identify and secure strategically located sites for future
fire stations. The request for the Arizona State Land Department to reserve land for a future fire
station, located west of the northwest corner of Dixiletta Drive and 51st Avenue, represents a
critical step. This proposed location will provide improved emergency response coverage for
both the new development and the surrounding neighborhoods south of the CAP.

lmproving access and connectivity in the area will be crucial for delivering effective fire service.
Due to existing topography and a limited number of canal crossings, two arterial roadways-
51st Avenue and 67th Avenue-are planned to provide essential north-south connectivity
between existing development south of the CAP and the planned communities to the north.
Given the limited number of arterial routes and the scale of the proposed North Park area, the
51"1Avenue connection is essential for fire service delivery, with key considerations including:

1. Primarv and Secondary Access for Emeroencv Response
The current location of fire stations ensures adequate response times for incidents
occurring south of the CAP, particularly when a single-unit response is required.
However, during simultaneous or large-scale emergencies such as structure fires, major
vehicle accidents, or wildland fires, additional support from surrounding stations




FIRE DEPARTMENT
NORTH OPERATIONS DIVISION



becomes necessary. The 51st Avenue corridor provides a vital primary and/or secondary
access route for emergency response units serving both existing neighborhoods
(including Stetson Valley and Stetson Hills) and the planned North Park community.
Without this connection, fire department response units would be forced to rely
exclusively on limited alternate routes to the east and west, resulting in significant
increases in emergency response times, a factor that can directly affect life safety
outcomes.


2. Evacuation and Larqe-Scale Emergencv Operations
Multiple arterial crossings provide critical egress and ingress for both public evacuation
and emergency personnel response during large-scale incidents such as wildfires,
flooding, or hazardous materials events.

As the North Park area builds out, emergency service demands will increase substantiatty. The
identification and reservation of land for a future fire station, in addition to the 51st Avenue CAP
crossing, is therefore a critical public safety infrastructure investment that will ensure the Fire
Department's ability to meet established emergency response standards for both current
residents and future development within northwest Phoenix.

Please let me know if you have any questions




ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1
INFORMATION ONLY



Date of VPC Meeting October 9, 2025
Request From S-1
Request To PUD
Proposal Master planned community including open space,
residential, mixed use, commercial, commerce park,
and industrial
Location Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303

VPC DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item 4 (GPA-NG-1-24-1), Agenda Item 5 (GPA-NG-2-24-1), and Agenda Item 6
(Z-139-24-1) are companion cases and were heard concurrently.

15 members of the public registered to speak on this item in opposition, eight members
of the public registered in opposition but did not wish to speak, and 19 members of the
public registered in opposition to donate their time to Amanda McGowan with the
Stetson Valley Owners Association. One member of the public registered to speak on
this item in support. Six members of the public registered to speak on this item in a
neutral position.

Committee Member Scott McGill left during this item, bringing the quorum to nine
members.

Applicant Presentation:
Carolyn Oberholtzer, with Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, introduced herself
and the development team, and provided an overview of the history of the property. Ms.
Oberholtzer summarized the purpose of State Trust Land. Ms. Oberholtzer provided
background on the Stetson Hills master-planned community, the North Phoenix 3,500
PUD (Planned Unit Development), the proposed Halo Vista development, and the
proposed Vestar developments nearby. Ms. Oberholtzer summarized the proposed
regulatory framework of the NorthPark PUD, including Master Development Parcels
(MDPs) and Land Use Districts (LUDs). Ms. Oberholtzer displayed and explained the
proposed General Plan Land Use Map. Ms. Oberholtzer summarized changes made to
the applications, noting that there was a reduction in the overall maximum density. Ms.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 923
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1 – Info Only

Oberholtzer summarized the modifications made to arterial and collector street cross
sections, highlighting multi-modal improvements. Ms. Oberholtzer summarized multi-
modal trails and paths that would be provided throughout the site.

Dawn Cartier, with CivTech Inc., introduced herself and provided an overview of the
traffic study. Ms. Cartier summarized what internal capture and community capture are
in the traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted that a lot of trips would be inside of the community,
but these internal trips were limited to 13 percent in the traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted
that the majority of work trips would only be about three miles from homes. Ms. Cartier
noted that the traffic study is based on the maximum zoning entitlement, which is twice
the number of trips than are planned for actual development.

Ms. Oberholtzer summarized community outreach efforts.

Questions from Committee:
Committee Member Scott McGill asked what the traffic counts are on 67th Avenue
and 51st Avenue. Committee Member McGill asked if the streets in the Stetson Valley
community are completed up until the dead-end at the canal. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded affirmatively and noted that Ms. Cartier should have those numbers but
would have to look them up. Committee Member McGill asked how long the streets
have been in place. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that it was shown on the master plan for
Stetson back in 1988. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the alignment changed slightly after
rezoning, but the crossing over the canal has always been planned and has been
shown on the Street Classification Map over the last few decades. Committee Member
McGill stated that he has lived in North Phoenix for over 23 years, and he has never
seen where those streets have crossed over yet, but he has always been curious when
they would. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the street cross section for 51st Avenue
includes two travel lanes in both directions, and it includes a potential future travel lane
in both directions if needed, which would cut into the median.

Chair Julie Read stated that there should have been a disclosure within the mortgage
statement with the approved master street plan attached for homes sold in Stetson
Valley.

Committee Member Aaron Stein asked if there if there is a traffic model that
forecasts travel patterns along 51st Avenue. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the
anticipated phasing of the project is that the Innovation Corridor LUD would develop
first. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that when any MDP comes in, an updated Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA) will be needed that will determine what improvements needs to occur
with that phase. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the connection over 51st Avenue would
likely not need to occur until MDP.5 is built, which would be for single-family homes.

Ms. Cartier stated that because this area is large, they have been working with the
agency. Ms. Cartier stated that MAG runs a regional traffic demand model. Ms. Cartier
stated that they had MAG run information for them, which is the predicted model that
they have been using. Ms. Cartier noted that the MAG model is highly focused on the

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 924
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1 – Info Only

Loop 303, Interstate 17, and access to the freeways. Ms. Cartier stated that people
want to get to the roads where they can move the fastest.

Committee Member Will Manion asked if there were any studies done on the
semitruck traffic along 51st Avenue. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that semitruck traffic
would likely be related to the Innovation Corridor LUD. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the
trip patterns are largely to the freeways and there will be ways through design to
facilitate trips towards the freeways. Ms. Oberholtzer added that the City could
establish certain routes as semitruck routes or not. Committee Member Manion asked
if there is a change coming to the Dixileta Drive and Interstate 17 intersection with the
anticipated traffic. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that there would be an extension of the
frontage roads to the north and south, but the Arizona Department of Transportation
(ADOT) does not have any plans to change that intersection. Ms. Oberholtzer added
that there would be free flowing ramps to access the Interstate 17 from the Loop 303,
and vice versa.

Committee Member Paul Carver stated that the reduction of density of approximately
4,000 dwelling units is a lot less traffic, more open space, and less kids that the school
district would need to accommodate. Committee Member Carver asked if certain
improvements would be funded by the City or by the developer. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded that if the demand is being generated by a development, then the traffic
mitigation improvement is assigned to be funded by the developer. Ms. Oberholtzer
stated that today, if there is an existing need for a certain improvement, that would not
be the responsibility of the developer since it is an existing need.

Committee Member Chandra McCarty thanked the applicant for the 2,100 acres of
open space being donated to the City.

Committee Member Kylie Kennelly stated that there were concerns that the area
being donated for Sonoran Preserve is too steep and may be challenging for elderly or
small children to enjoy as they have been able to in the past. Committee Member
Kennelly asked for an explanation of the trail system. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that
the property is State Trust Land and accessing the property is fundamentally
trespassing. Ms. Oberholtzer added that people can obtain a recreational permit to
access the property, but there is no designated public access. Ms. Oberholtzer stated
that there will be a trail along the canal, which will provide public access into the
Sonoran Preserve. Ms. Oberholtzer added that there will be trailheads to provide
access along other areas as well and noted that there would be trail types for all types
of users. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that there will still be areas that are flat that would be
accessible. Committee Member Kennelly asked for the applicant to explain the 20
percent internal capture rate that was cited by the community, as well as the total
number of trips.

Ms. Cartier responded that the City of Phoenix has a policy that has been in place for
about a year, to look at the maximum entitlement allowed. Ms. Cartier noted that the
TIA has to look at the most intense land uses and the maximum density that would be
permitted. Ms. Cartier stated that this policy does put the TIA in a strange position,

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 925
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1 – Info Only

since it predicts a lot more traffic than is actually planned, but it is a requirement of the
City. Ms. Cartier stated that people that live inside of NorthPark that are traveling to
someplace also inside of NorthPark is about a half of the internal capture number. Ms.
Cartier stated that the other half of the number is internal trips for areas such as
shopping centers, and trips made within the shopping center.

Committee Member Andrea Crouch asked what the existing S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence) zoning district would permit. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that it essentially
permits one residential dwelling unit per acre along with some agricultural uses. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that all of State Trust Land in the City of Phoenix is given S-1
zoning when it is annexed into the City, before it gets rezoned. Committee Member
Crouch asked if 51st Avenue was established north of Happy Valley Road around
1989. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that she does not have any data predating that, but it has
been on the Street Classification Map since at least the 1990s.

Vice Chair Michelle Ricart asked if there is currently no Sonoran Preserve within the
NorthPark boundary. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the 1998 Sonoran Preserve
Master Plan recommended that certain areas of land be included in the future Sonoran
Preserve. Ms. Oberholtzer added that the plan included future plans to acquire the land
for Sonoran Preserve, which has never come to fruition in this area, since State Trust
Land is very expensive to buy. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that there was a State program
called the Arizona Preserve Initiative that the State Legislature would fund, which
would provide 50 percent of the cost to assist Arizona communities with purchasing
State Trust Land for preservation. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the State Legislature has
not funded this program in several decades. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the land
designated as Sonoran Preserve within NorthPark will be a true donation of land to the
City for preservation. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that accessing State Trust
Land is technically trespassing without a recreational permit. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked if 51st Avenue north of Happy Valley
Road could be six lanes. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively, noting that it is 140
feet of right-of-way on the Street Classification Map, which would be enough room for
six lanes. Vice Chair Ricart asked if it was always planned for six lanes since the
Stetson community was built. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively. Vice Chair
Ricart asked for clarification that Stetson was also zoned S-1 because all of State Trust
Land is given S-1 zoning before being rezoned. Ms. Oberholtzer responded
affirmatively.

Committee Member McGill asked for clarification that State Trust Land is typically
rezoned before it is auctioned. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively.

Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that the Innovation Corridor LUD would be
constructed before homes within NorthPark, so prospective home purchasers would
know what is there. Ms. Oberholtzer responded affirmatively, noting that there is no
residential permitted within the Innovation Corridor LUD, nor in the Community Open
Space LUD or Community Commercial LUD, which both surround the Innovation
Corridor LUD, and would provide a significant buffer for any nearby residential. Vice
Chair Ricart asked what the timeframe is for the buildout of 51st Avenue. Ms.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 926
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1 – Info Only

Oberholtzer responded that if MDP.2 is built first, the likelihood is that 51st Avenue
would be completely built from the Loop 303 to Dixileta Drive, Dixileta Drive would be
built from 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue, and 43rd Avenue would be built from Dixileta
Drive to the Loop 303. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the fastest that development would
begin in MDP.2 is in about two years, since it is closer to existing infrastructure. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that MDP.5 is further from existing infrastructure, and it needs to
wait for completion of the sewer plant. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that the extension of
51st Avenue south of Dixileta Drive would likely occur within four to six years. Vice
Chair Ricart asked if 67th Avenue would be constructed last. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded that when MDP.5 develops, it does go all the way to 67th Avenue, and
there is a bridge that would have to be built across the canal. Ms. Oberholtzer stated
that the timing of it would depend on the intensity of the development that happens on
the west side. Ms. Oberholtzer added that the phasing would be finalized with the
master plans. Vice Chair Ricart asked for Ms. Oberholtzer to explain who pays for
these roads. Ms. Oberholtzer responded that it would largely be paid by developers.
Ms. Oberholtzer added that there are certain freeway-adjacent improvements that are
programmed for ADOT to do, but all roads internal to the NorthPark boundary would be
constructed and funded by private developers. Vice Chair Ricart asked what the
distance requirement is for public hearing notifications.

Adrian Zambrano, staff, responded that it is a minimum of 600 feet from the property
for property owners and a minimum of one mile for registered neighborhood
organizations. Vice Chair Ricart asked if the applicant sent notifications beyond the
minimum radius.

Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the General Plan Amendment boundary is larger than
the PUD boundary, so the GPA boundary was used for public hearing notification of
the PUD rezoning. Vice Chair Ricart asked what the minimum requirement is for when
notification letters must be sent.

Mr. Zambrano responded that it is a minimum of 10 calendar days before the first
meeting.

Chair Read asked what the process is for the City to accept a TIA. Racelle Escolar,
staff, responded that for PUD rezoning cases, the applicant is required to submit the
TIA prior to or with the PUD submittal. Ms. Escolar stated that PUDs typically go
through multiple cycles of review, which allows the Street Transportation Department
time to review the TIA during the multiple cycles of PUD review. Ms. Escolar noted that
TIAs similarly go through multiple cycles of review. Chair Read asked for clarification if
it is common for there to be multiple revisions to a TIA. Ms. Escolar responded
affirmatively. Chair Read asked when TIAs typically are available for public records.
Ms. Escolar responded that a TIA would be publicly available when it is accepted by
the Street Transportation Department. Ms. Escolar stated that a TIA is typically
accepted by the time the PUD hearing draft is ready. Chair Read asked if the
Committee would not hear a case until the TIA is accepted by the City. Ms. Escolar
responded that there may be some flexibility, but they should be pretty close. Chair
Read asked if the City Council could approve a project if the TIA is not accepted by the

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 927
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1 – Info Only

City. Ms. Escolar responded that it would likely need to be accepted by that time, and if
not, there would be several stipulations to address it. Chair Read asked how the
community obtained the TIA if it was not publicly available by the City yet.

Ms. Oberholtzer responded that she sent the draft TIA to community members that
asked for it in order to be fully transparent with the community. Chair Read asked for
clarification that traffic mitigation outside of the PUD boundary, such as along Happy
Valley Road, may be the responsibility of the developers in NorthPark if the generated
traffic from the development is contributing to traffic in that area. Ms. Oberholtzer
responded affirmatively, noting that the TIA is required to analyze maximum
entitlement, which creates traffic mitigation measures that may ultimately not be
needed. Ms. Oberholtzer highlighted traffic mitigation measures that are required as
part of the NorthPark TIA. Chair Read stated that she spoke with the director of the
Planning and Development Department and requested that the City add a stipulation
that would trigger public review and comment of site plans and elevations as each
parcel continues to develop, in order to provide the community with an opportunity to
provide comments, which has been done before with previous cases. Chair Read
requested that the applicant entertain some language that when 51st Avenue is
constructed south of Dixileta Drive into the Stetson Valley community, that traffic
mitigation within that area be prioritized and be constructed and paid for first.

Public Comments:
Amanda McGowan introduced herself as the president of the Stetson Valley Owners
Association neighboring the site to the south, opposed to the project. Ms. McGowan
stated that community members do not feel heard. Ms. McGowan stated that the
community knows that development is inevitable and noted that the current proposal
represented reckless growth. Ms. McGowan stated that Stetson Valley would be
immediately impacted by NorthPark since it is directly south of the site and 51st
Avenue would go through their community. Ms. McGowan expressed concerns
regarding the proposed density, industrial uses, lack of transparency from the
developer, public meetings being scheduled back to back, safety, and a flawed and
biased traffic study. Ms. McGowan stated that the community just recently found out
about the proposed industrial uses, noting that these uses belong north of the Loop
303 freeway. Ms. McGowan summarized concerns regarding the applicant’s traffic
study that was still being reviewed by the City. Ms. McGowan stated that she hopes the
City provides sufficient oversight of the traffic study before rezoning is approved. Ms.
McGowan then summarized concerns with pedestrian safety in the Stetson Valley
community. Ms. McGowan expressed appreciation for the separated bike lanes
proposed for NorthPark, noting that she wished that same kind of thought was given to
their neighborhood. Ms. McGowan noted that a HAWK (High Intensity Activated
CrossWalK) signal has been requested for a long time for the Stetson Valley Parkway
and Inspiration Mountain Parkway intersection due to safety issues. Ms. McGowan
then summarized concerns with the proposed Sonoran Preserve in NorthPark
deviating from the recommendations of the 1998 Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. Ms.
McGowan stated that the community would prefer to see all of the area around
Pyramid Peak preserved, as was recommended by the plan. Ms. McGowan concluded
with requests of the community for changes to the PUD before approving rezoning.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 928
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1 – Info Only

Randy Wilde introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Wilde echoed concerns regarding deviation from the land
recommended for Sonoran Preserve in the 1998 Sonoran Preserve Master Plan. Mr.
Wilde stated that State Trust Land can be accessed by the public for recreation with a
permit.

Don Diehn introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community, with
concerns. Mr. Diehn echoed concerns with traffic and safety. Mr. Diehn echoed
concerns with the Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway
intersection.

Mary Walls introduced herself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Walls stated that she has always known that 51st Avenue
would eventually cross the canal. Ms. Walls stated that Stetson Valley is a highly
populated residential area with high pedestrian activity. Ms. Walls requested that there
be safety mitigations included for 51st Avenue when it goes through the Stetson Valley
community.

Bob Jewell introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Jewell stated that he hopes the City could provide the
community with some assurance that the first phase of development would be north of
Dixileta Drive, along the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Jewell expressed concerns with traffic
and requested that there be significant improvements made to Stetson Valley Parkway
before it connects across the canal to Dixileta Drive. Mr. Jewell stated that he felt a lot
better knowing that semitrucks will not be using Stetson Valley Parkway to build the
first phase of development.

Heidi Banister introduced herself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Banister echoed concerns with pedestrian safety due to the
six-lane roadway going through their residential community. Ms. Banister echoed
concerns with the proposed industrial uses and requested they be moved north of the
Loop 303 freeway.

Michael Lopez introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Lopez echoed concerns with the proposed industrial uses
south of the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Lopez echoed concerns with traffic.

George Middendorf introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, with concerns. Mr. Middendorf stated that he did not know that a chip plant
was going to be built south of the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Middendorf echoed concerns
with traffic, noting that traffic needs to be directed to the north end of the site and
everyday land uses need to be constructed on the north end to keep traffic to the north.
Mr. Middendorf echoed that the proposed industrial uses should be kept to the north of
the Loop 303 freeway. Mr. Middendorf stated that offices should be built south of the
Loop 303 freeway instead.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 929
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1 – Info Only

Kenli Montoya introduced herself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Montoya echoed concerns with pedestrian and child safety,
noting a recent child fatality that occurred on Stetson Valley Parkway. Ms. Montoya
stated that the traffic from 51st Avenue going across the canal into their community
would put many children at risk due to the nearby school.

Eileen Baden introduced herself as a member of the Rio Vista Village Planning
Committee and president of the Friends of Daisy Mountain Trails organization, in a
neutral position. Ms. Baden stated that their organization works on trail connections up
in this area. Ms. Baden expressed concerns with wildfires, noting that multi-use trails
could act as firebreaks. Ms. Baden stated that she would like to see the proposed
pathways in the project increased from seven feet to eight feet or 10 feet, so
emergency responders could use them as well.

Ed McKelvey introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in Peoria and member of the
West Valley Trail Alliance organization, in support of the project. Mr. McKelvey stated
that he has enjoyed this piece of Sonoran Desert for many years via a recreational
permit. Mr. McKelvey acknowledged that the Arizona State Land Department has a
mandate to sell its land for the highest and best use. Mr. McKelvey expressed
appreciation for how much thought has gone into this project and for the applicant’s
commitment to protect as much open space as they are committing to. Mr. McKelvey
stated that his primary concern is with the proposed industrial uses south of the Loop
303 freeway and increased industrial water usage.

Eric Thompson introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Thompson echoed concerns with the proposed industrial
uses and industrial water usage. Mr. Thompson requested a roundabout at 51st
Avenue and Dixileta Drive to prevent semitrucks from going through their community.
Mr. Thompson expressed concerns with police, fire, and emergency response times
being impacted by this development. Mr. Thompson added that it took 17 years for a
school to be built within the Stetson Valley community, noting that the developers need
to help fund the schools, since the State does not have sufficient funding. Mr.
Thompson expressed concerns with hazardous waste.

Michael Abad introduced himself as a neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Abad echoed concerns with traffic and loss of Sonoran
Desert. Mr. Abad expressed concerns with wildlife displacement and industrial
contamination.

Applicant Response:
Not heard.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 930
Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1


Date of VPC Meeting November 13, 2025
Request From S-1
Request To PUD
Proposal PUD to allow a master planned community including
open space, residential, mixed use, commercial,
commerce park, and industrial
Location Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 7-0

VPC DISCUSSION:

Agenda Item 3 (GPA-NG-1-24-1), Agenda Item 4 (GPA-NG-2-24-1), and Agenda Item 5
(Z-139-24-1) are companion cases and were heard concurrently.

34 members of the public registered to speak on this item in opposition or with concerns
and 28 members of the public registered in opposition or with concerns but did not wish
to speak. One member of the public registered in opposition to donate time to Tammy
Weaver. One member of the public registered in opposition to donate time to Amanda
McGowan. One member of the public registered in opposition to donate time to Carter
Huber. Three members of the public registered to speak on this item in support. One
member of the public registered in support but did not wish to speak. One member of
the public registered to speak in a neutral position.

GPEC/CEDD, ASLD, and Staff Presentation:
Christine Mackay, with the Greater Phoenix Economic Council, introduced herself and
provided an overview of economic strengths of Phoenix. Ms. Mackay discussed the
past, present, and future of the Phoenix economy. Ms. Mackay discussed economic and
infrastructure history in Phoenix. Ms. Mackay shared target industries for the Phoenix
economy. Ms. Mackay discussed the national security rationale for bringing back
semiconductor manufacturing to the United States. Ms. Mackay discussed the
economic impact of the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)
investment in the United States and the proposed Halo Vista development. Ms. Mackay
then discussed the economic impact of the Intel campus in the City of Chandler.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 931
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1

Mark Edelman, with the Arizona State Land Department (ASLD), introduced himself
and provided an overview of the historic background of ASLD. Mr. Edelman discussed
the legal requirements of State Trust Land. Mr. Edelman displayed the State Trust Land
in the North Gateway Village and shared other areas to the south that originated as
State Trust Land.

Adrian Zambrano, staff, provided an overview of General Plan Amendment case GPA-
NG-1-24-1, including the location of the request, the proposal, surrounding General
Plan Land Use Map designations, and the existing and proposed General Plan Land
Use Map designations. Mr. Zambrano noted that the request also includes an update to
the City Trails Network Map, the Infrastructure Phasing Overlay, and Infrastructure Limit
Line, and displayed the existing and proposed maps. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff
findings and stated that staff recommends approval. Mr. Zambrano then provided an
overview of General Plan Amendment case GPA-NG-2-24-1, noting what the request is.
Mr. Zambrano shared background on 51st Avenue and then displayed the existing and
proposed Street Classification Map. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff findings and stated
that staff recommends approval. Mr. Zambrano then provided an overview of rezoning
case Z-139-24-1, including the proposal and surrounding zoning and land uses. Mr.
Zambrano discussed the proposed PUD, including the regulatory framework of Master
Development Parcels (MDPs) and Land Use Districts (LUDs), the proposed
development standards, and the proposed design guidelines. Mr. Zambrano stated that
as noted in the staff report, the proposal supports efforts from various adopted plans,
policies, and initiatives. Mr. Zambrano summarized community input that staff has
received. Mr. Zambrano shared the staff findings and stated that staff recommends
approval subject to stipulations. Mr. Zambrano shared the recommended stipulations
and next steps for public hearings.

Applicant Presentation:
Carolyn Oberholtzer, with Bergin, Frakes, Smalley & Oberholtzer, introduced herself
and provided an overview of changes made to the application. Ms. Oberholtzer
discussed the Innovation Corridor LUD. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed community
outreach. Ms. Oberholtzer noted that advance notice was given to the press and the
community when TSMC joined the application. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed letters of
support received. Ms. Oberholtzer displayed and discussed the existing and proposed
General Plan Land Use Map and City Trails System Map. Ms. Oberholtzer displayed
and discussed the proposed Master Open Space, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trails Plan
and the Master Edge Treatment Plan. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed the slope of the
proposed Sonoran Preserve, noting that half of the area is at or below the 10 percent
slope line. Ms. Oberholtzer discussed the maximum density allowed within the MDPs.
Ms. Oberholtzer discussed the Foothills Residential LUD, noting that it allows a lower
density than the existing Stetson Valley community to the south. Ms. Oberholtzer then
discussed viewsheds, noting that views of Pyramid Peak will be maintained.

Dawn Cartier, with CivTech Inc., introduced herself and provided an overview of the
traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted that the traffic study outlook is to 2050 and evaluates the
complete buildout of NorthPark, including future growth in the surrounding area. Ms.
Cartier stated that the traffic study is based on the maximum entitlement, and not the

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 932
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1

targeted entitlements that will likely develop. Ms. Cartier summarized changes made to
the traffic study and updated recommendations from the traffic study. Ms. Cartier noted
that future development will be required to do another traffic study that will evaluate the
actual development occurring at that time.

Questions from Committee:
Committee Member Aaron Stein asked what the minimum density requirement is of
State Trust Land before auction. Mr. Edelman responded that State Trust Land may
not be assigned a density lower than one dwelling unit per acre or an equivalent
economically viable land use.

Vice Chair Michelle Ricart asked if this is why the State Trust Land is currently zoned
for one dwelling unit per acre. Mr. Edelman responded that the S-1 zoning district is
the City of Phoenix base zoning of the land, which happens to be one dwelling unit per
acre. Mr. Edelman stated that all land comes into the City of Phoenix with S-1 zoning if
it is not already zoned with a higher density in the County. Mr. Edelman stated that he
believes the S-1 zoning district is a transitional zoning district assigned to all land if it is
not already zoned for a higher intensity. Mr. Edelman asked City staff to confirm.

Joshua Bednarek, with the Planning and Development Department, confirmed that
Mr. Edelman was correct.

Vice Chair Ricart asked if there was a pending auction for the State Trust Land by the
Sandra Day O’Connor High School. Mr. Edelman responded affirmatively. Vice Chair
Ricart asked if the auction for MDP.2 is scheduled for January 2026. Mr. Edelman
responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification if the minimum
opening bid is $197 million. Mr. Edelman responded that he would need to verify it and
noted that it is available on their website. Mr. Edelman stated that it sounds like a
reasonable number. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that multiple people could
bid on it. Mr. Edelman responded affirmatively, noting that it is an open bid process.
Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that the minimum bid is the appraised price. Mr.
Edelman responded affirmatively, noting that the Commissioner can set a higher price,
but may not set a lower price. Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that the State
Trust Land by the Sandra Day O’Connor High School is set for auction later in the
month. Mr. Edelman responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked if the land could
be developed. Mr. Edelman responded that the parcel has no legal access and it is not
a developable parcel.

Committee Member Scott McGill asked the applicant to speak on the environmental
concerns related to vapors being released in the air from the chip plants, concerns
related to water use of the chip plants, and the amount of water being recycled from
the chip plants. Ms. Oberholtzer introduced Rafael Velazquez, the Environment,
Health, and Safety Manger with TSMC, to respond to Committee Member McGilll’s
question.

Rafael Velazquez, with TSMC, responded that the chip plants include stacks and
cooling towers. Mr. Velazquez stated that vapors will be seen coming from the cooling

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 933
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1

towers on cold days. Mr. Velazquez stated that for the emission stacks, they go
through a very rigorous process with Maricopa County. Mr. Velazquez stated that they
have to meet certain requirements of Maricopa County and the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). Mr. Velazquez stated that they have to meet certain air
quality standards before they are allowed to build an emission unit. Mr. Velazquez
stated that they have to do modeling for all their emission units to make sure that
nothing leaves their property line that could be harmful to the environmental and to
individuals in the area. Mr. Velazquez stated that their abatement has to meet a certain
threshold, which is governed and regulated by Maricopa County. Mr. Velazquez stated
that Maricopa County has the permits available for public records. Mr. Velazquez
stated that they use a lot of water and they have a water reclamation facility, noting that
about 65 percent of their water is currently recycled. Mr. Velazquez added that the
water they use has to be cleaned to ultra-pure levels, noting that the water is purposely
recycled because it costs a lot to clean it. Mr. Velazquez stated that their goal is to
recycle over 90 percent of their water.

Committee Member Stein asked for clarification on restrictions for semitruck traffic
going southbound on 51st Avenue. Mr. Zambrano responded that the Street
Transportation Department added a stipulation that would require large truck traffic to
be directed to the Loop 303 freeway through on-site access control restrictions to
discourage southbound access onto 51st Avenue.

Vice Chair Ricart asked for clarification that there is a stipulation for a traffic signal at
the intersection of Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway. Mr.
Zambrano responded affirmatively. Vice Chair Ricart asked the applicant to speak on
the school sites that are planned.

Ms. Oberholtzer responded that the Deer Valley Unified School District (DVUSD) has
funds for two K-8 elementary school sites and one 80-acre high school site with a
performing arts center. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that Stipulation No. 29 covers the
reservation of land for these school sites.

Public Comments:
Tammy Weaver introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Weaver stated that subsidies were used to pay
for infrastructure, including a sewer line that now goes through their community. Ms.
Weaver expressed concerns with the use of nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) and
public trust. Ms. Weaver expressed concerns with water. Ms. Weaver stated that the
subsidies could have been used to help small businesses. Ms. Weaver expressed
concerns with conflicts of interests of Committee members, noting that she has filed six
ethics inquiries. Ms. Weaver expressed concerns with density, traffic, health, and
safety. Ms. Weaver stated that there have been lawsuits against Pulte Homes for home
defects, noting concerns with construction integrity. Ms. Weaver expressed concerns
with the proposed Sonoran Preserve area and requested that the original area
designated by the City be preserved.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 934
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1

Tom Grant introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Grant disagreed that industry and manufacturing are a part
of innovation corridors, noting that they typically include research institutions and talent
located near universities and research centers. Mr. Grant expressed concerns with the
proposed industrial uses. Mr. Grant requested that an environmental study be
conducted.

Brittany Szemerei introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Szemerei expressed concerns with traffic,
wildlife habitat, the number of years before the proposed schools are built, and current
school capacity. Ms. Szemerei noted that several of her neighbors did not attend the
meeting because they did not feel as though their voices would be heard.

Todd Brown introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Brown expressed concerns with traffic and
safety, noting that the traffic will be coming through their neighborhood when 51st
Avenue connects over the canal.

Kasha Brown introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Brown expressed concerns with pedestrian
safety at the Stetson Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway intersection.

Jason Weaver introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Weaver expressed concerns with applicant
transparency, the proposed industrial uses, pollution, traffic, water, and higher
electricity and water rates.

Steve Kimmel introduced himself as a concerned resident of the City of Glendale,
opposed to the project. Mr. Kimmel expressed concerns with the proposed public
access on high slopes to access the proposed Sonoran Preserve. Mr. Kimmel
requested that the open space be expanded to more flatland areas for public access.

Mary Walls introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Walls expressed concerns with pedestrian safety and
traffic on Stetson Valley Parkway, the proposed industrial uses, toxins, and health.

Joetta Chapman introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Chapman expressed concerns with toxins,
environmental impact, water, and health.

Shawn McGowan introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. McGowan expressed concerns with applicant
transparency, lack of representation on the Committee, perceived Committee member
conflicts of interest, and funding of infrastructure to support TSMC using taxpayer
funds.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 935
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1

Don Diehn introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Diehn expressed concerns with deviation from the 1998
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, the proposed industrial uses and distance from
existing and future residential, existing school capacity, water supply, and water
contamination.

Suzanne Klapp introduced herself as a representative of the Friends of Deer Valley
organization, in support of the project. Ms. Klapp stated that the proposal is a well-
balanced mixed-use master-planned development. Ms. Klapp stated that the proposal
balances development, open space, and economic opportunity, noting that it includes
one of the largest additions to the Phoenix Sonoran Preserve. Ms. Klapp stated that
the proposal includes an extensive trail system and hundreds of acres of community
parks. Ms. Klapp added that the Innovation Corridor will be a major economic asset
with high-quality employment uses that will result in less regional commuting and a
stronger tax base to support City services.

Josh Hansma introduced himself as a representative of the Friends of Deer Valley
organization, in support of the project. Mr. Hansma read a letter from Friends of Deer
Valley, noting that the proposal is a thoughtful and sustainable plan that aligns with
their mission to advance balanced development and to support the Deer Valley region,
nearby employment centers, and neighborhoods.

Roberta Pershing introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, in a neutral position. Ms. Pershing expressed concerns with traffic and lack
of representation on the Committee.

Amanda McGowan introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. McGowan expressed concerns with funding of
infrastructure to support TSMC using taxpayer funds that could have been used to
purchase Sonoran Preserve, safety, pollution, perceived Committee member conflicts
of interest, lack of representation on the Committee, and the proximity of the proposed
industrial uses to residential.

Ann Renee Wilsey introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Wilsey expressed concerns with the traffic
impact on Stetson Valley Parkway, proximity of the proposed industrial uses to
residential, and the connection of Stetson Valley Parkway to the Loop 303 freeway.

Jim Umlauf introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Umlauf expressed concerns with the proposed industrial
uses south of Loop 303, the proposed Sonoran Preserve area, and the 51st Avenue
connection over the canal.

Danny Weiss introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Weiss expressed concerns with perceived
Committee member conflicts of interest.


200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 936
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1

Sam Bonge introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Bonge expressed concerns with traffic, safety, the 51st
Avenue connection over the canal connecting to the Loop 303 freeway, and pollution.

Jo Lambiase introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Hills community,
opposed to the project. Ms. Lambiase expressed concerns with TSMC locating south
of the Loop 303 freeway, the 51st Avenue connection over the canal, and traffic.

Randy Briggs introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Sonoran Mountain
Ranch community in the City of Peoria, opposed to the project. Mr. Briggs expressed
concerns with traffic, speeding, safety, and cellphone service.

Tom Young introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Young express concerns with traffic, safety, chemicals from
chip plants, health, perceived Committee member conflicts of interest, and the traffic
study.

Robert Baxter introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, with concerns. Mr. Baxter expressed concerns with the traffic study. Mr.
Baxter stated that 51st Avenue should not connect over the canal until MDP.5 is built
out, and schools and infrastructure are built.

Raymond Keeler introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Hills
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Keeler expressed concerns with 51st Avenue
connecting over the canal and water. Mr. Keeler proposed the 51st Avenue bridge be
limited to pedestrians and bicyclists.

Ed Ross introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Ross expressed concerns with health and safety.

Scott Spexarth introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Spexarth expressed concerns with 51st
Avenue connecting over the canal and deviation from the 1998 Sonoran Preserve
Master Plan.

Madhuri Jha introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
with concerns. Ms. Jha expressed concerns with air pollution, water pollution, noise
pollution, safety, and quality of life.

John Linam introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Pyramid Peak community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Linam expressed concerns with traffic, 67th Avenue and
51st Avenue connecting to the Loop 303 and over the canal, the traffic study, and
safety.

Tessa St. Cyr introduced herself as a nearby neighbor, opposed to the project. Ms. St.
Cyr expressed concerns with the location of the TSMC expansion, the proposed
industrial uses, contamination, health, and water.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 937
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1

Yolanda Usery introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Ms. Usery expressed concerns with traffic and 51st
Avenue connecting to the Loop 303 and over the canal.

Michael Murphy introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Murphy expressed concerns with traffic, safety,
the location of the proposed industrial uses, and 51st Avenue connecting over the
canal.

Carter Huber introduced himself as a concerned resident in the City of Peoria,
opposed to the project. Mr. Huber expressed concerns with deviation from the 1998
Sonoran Preserve Master Plan, water, exemption from federal environmental
regulations, traffic, health, and safety.

George Middendorf introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Middendorf expressed concerns with lack of
representation on the Committee, location of the TSMC expansion, health, and safety.

Michael Robbins introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley
community, opposed to the project. Mr. Robbins expressed concerns with health,
safety, the location of the TSMC expansion, and the proposed Sonoran Preserve
slope.

Mark Cole introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Pyramid Heights community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Cole expressed concerns with traffic, pollution, the
proposed Sonoran Preserve, and perceived Committee member conflicts of interest.

Wendie Brown introduced herself as a nearby neighbor in the Sonoran Mountain
Ranch community in the City of Peoria, opposed to the project. Ms. Brown expressed
concerns with the proposed Sonoran Preserve, water, traffic, heat, pollution, and
health.

Sam Rueb introduced himself as a nearby neighbor in the Stetson Valley community,
opposed to the project. Mr. Rueb expressed concerns with the proposed Sonoran
Preserve, the slope of the proposed Sonoran Preserve, the location of the TSMC
expansion, contamination, health, and safety.

Applicant Response:
Ms. Oberholtzer stated that they have had an active project website that has always
had the application materials available in order to be transparent. Ms. Oberholtzer
stated that Stetson Valley and Sonoran Mountain Ranch were originally planned with
51st Avenue and 67th Avenue connecting across the canal. Ms. Oberholtzer stated
that these plans were put into place many decades ago and never came to fruition due
to the recession. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that there is an approved traffic study. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that they have made changes to address community concerns,
including moving density away from 51st Avenue and including larger streets in other
areas to keep 51st Avenue as a total of four lanes for as long as possible. Ms.

200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 938
North Gateway Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-139-24-1

Oberholtzer stated that MDP.2 along the Loop 303 freeway would be the first to
develop, noting that 51st Avenue would not connect over the canal for many years. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that MDP.5 would develop after MDP.2, but not right away. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that the proposal has been evaluated using all of the City’s current
standards that apply to new development, which will correct issues from the past. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that TSMC and the surrounding area is a major employment center,
and there is no northbound or southbound connection to it. Ms. Oberholtzer stated that
these connections are necessary to increase the safety network, noting that there will
be new public facilities including a fire station, police station, and a library. Ms.
Oberholtzer stated that there will be some traffic going southbound, but there will be
much more traffic from the community going northbound to access all of the new areas
to shop, work, and live.

Committee Discussion:
None.

MOTION – Z-139-24-1:
Committee Member Scott McGill motioned to recommend approval of Z-139-24-1, per
the staff recommendation. Committee Member Andrea Crouch seconded the motion.

VOTE – Z-139-24-1:
7-0; the motion to recommend approval of Z-139-24-1 per the staff recommendation
passed with Committee members Crouch, Kennelly, McCarty, McGill, Salow, Stein, and
Ricart in favor.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 939
ATTACHMENT D




To: City of Phoenix Planning Commission Date: December 4, 2025

From: Racelle Escolar, AICP
Principal Planner

Subject: ITEM NO. 12 (Z-139-24-1, NORTHPARK PUD) – SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF I-17 AND LOOP 303

Rezoning Case No. Z-139-24-1 is a request to rezone 6,381.49 acres located at the
southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303 from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to PUD
(Planned Unit Development) for the NorthPark PUD to allow a master planned
community including open space, residential, mixed use, commercial, commerce park,
and industrial.

The North Gateway Village Planning Committee (VPC) heard this request on October 9,
2025 for information only. The North Gateway VPC heard this request on November 13,
2025 and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-0.

Stipulation No. 1.a has been modified and Stipulation Nos. 1.b through 1.ss have been
added to address typographical errors and consistency with exhibits, provide
clarification, and address outstanding staff comments.

In addition, the applicant has been working with the Planning and Development and
Street Transportation Departments regarding the multi-modal bridge crossing the Loop
303 freeway. Staff recommends a modification to Stipulation No. 16 to address the
contribution amount.

After the staff report was published and before the VPC meeting, staff received 44
letters of opposition and 64 letters of support. After the VPC meeting, staff received 32
letters of opposition, 28 letters of support, and one general inquiry. Links to the
correspondence are listed at the end of this memo.

Staff recommends approval, per the modified stipulations in BOLD font below:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the NorthPark PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and
Development Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request.
The updated Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development
Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, as modified by the following
stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date]. Change “4th Submittal”
to “Hearing Draft Submittal”.
Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025


b. PAGE 24, SECTION 3 PROCESS AND PROCEDURES, 3.4.B MDP AND
FUNCTIONAL SEGMENT MASTER PLANS, SECOND PARAGRAPH
(BEFORE FLOW CHART), REVISE AS FOLLOWS: AS EACH
SUBSEQUENT MDP AND FUNCTIONAL SEGMENT PLAN IS
COMPETED OR AMENDED, OVERALL CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLANS
SHALL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. EACH PORTION OF
FUNCTIONAL SEGMENT OR MDP PLAN CAN REVISE THE PRIOR
APPROVED PLAN.

c. PAGE 28, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.4 LAND USE DISTRICTS,
TABLE 3: MDP LAND USE ALLOCATION TABLE (GROSS ACRES):
UPDATE THE COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE AND TRADITIONAL
NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRIES UNDER MDP.5 TO REFLECT THE
PARKS/OPEN SPACE – PRIVATELY OWNED PARCEL SOUTH OF
DIXILETA DRIVE AND WEST OF 51ST AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON
EXHIBIT 5: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP,
DESIGNATED AS COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE, AND UPDATE
CORRESPONDING NUMBERS IN THE TOTAL ACREAGE ROW AND
THE TOTAL SITE COLUMN.

d. PAGE 29, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, EXHIBIT 8A: LAND USE
DISTRICTS: ADD THE AREA DESIGNATED AS PARKS/OPEN SPACE –
PRIVATELY OWNED SOUTH OF DIXILETA DRIVE AND WEST OF 51ST
AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 5: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE MAP, AS COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE.

e. PAGE 33, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, EXHIBIT 8C: COMMUNITY
OPEN SPACE (COS): UPDATE EXHIBIT AND TABLE TO INCLUDE THE
AREA DESIGNATED AS PARKS/OPEN SPACE – PRIVATELY OWNED
SOUTH OF DIXILETA DRIVE AND WEST OF 51ST AVENUE, AS
DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 5: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP.

f. PAGE 35, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, EXHIBIT 8E: TRADITIONAL
NEIGHBORHOOD (TN): UPDATE EXHIBIT AND TABLE TO REMOVE
THE AREA DESIGNATED AS PARKS/OPEN SPACE – PRIVATELY
OWNED SOUTH OF DIXILETA DRIVE AND WEST OF 51ST AVENUE,
AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 5: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE
MAP.

g. PAGE 45, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, EXHIBIT 10: MASTER TRAILS
PLAN: UPDATE AS FOLLOWS:

LOCATE THE NORTHVISTA MULTI-MODAL CORRIDOR AND
I. LOOP 303 PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE BRIDGE ON THE EAST
SIDE OF THE WASH.
Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025


ADD A MINOR PUBLIC TRAILHEAD ON THE EAST SIDE OF
67TH AVENUE, SOUTH OF DIXILETA DRIVE AND NORTH OF
II.
THE ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE CROSSING ALONG
THE CAP CANAL.

UPDATE LEGEND TO INCLUDE LABELS WHICH
DIFFERENTIATE WHICH COLOR (LIGHT BLUE OR DARK
III.
BLUE) IS INDICATIVE OF THE SIDEWALK AND THE RAISED
AND PROTECTED BIKE LANE.

UPDATE LEGEND TO CHANGE “6-FOOT PROTECTED BIKE
IV. LANE (BOTH SIDES)” TO “6-FOOT SEPARATED AND
ELEVATED BIKE LANE (BOTH SIDES)”

h. PAGE 46, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS,
SHARED-USE PATHS AND MULTI-USE TRAILS, SECOND
PARAGRAPH, 1ST SENTENCE, REVISE AND ADD THE FOLLOWING:
SHARED-USE PATHS WILL BE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT CONCRETE
WITHIN A 20-FOOT PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT (S.W.E) WHERE
ADJACENT TO ROADS, OR A 25-FOOT PUBLIC TRAIL EASEMENT
WHERE ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE OR WASH CORRIDORS. WHERE
A SHARED-USE PATH IS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE 20-FOOT
PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT (S.W.E) WIDTH SHALL BE
ULTIMATELY REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DURING REVIEW OF THE
APPLICABLE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER PLAN
REVIEW.

i. PAGE 46, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS,
SHARED-USE PATHS AND MULTI-USE TRAILS, SECOND
PARAGRAPH, ADD AS LAST SENTENCE: WHERE A MULTI-USE TRAIL
CROSSES AN ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR ROADWAYS AT NON-
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS, ALTERNATIVE CROSSING TYPES
SUCH AS GRADE-SEPARATED CROSSINGS, HAWK CROSSINGS OR
OTHER APPROPRIATE CROSSING TYPES UTILIZED BY THE CITY OF
PHOENIX SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, AS REQUIRED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.




Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

j. PAGE 46, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS,
NORTH PARK LOOP, SECOND PARAGRAPH, SECOND SENTENCE,
REVISE TO: WHERE THE NORTHPARK LOOP CROSSES ARTERIAL
OR COLLECTOR ROADWAYS AT NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS,
ALTERNATIVE CROSSING TYPES SUCH AS GRADE-SEPARATED
CROSSINGS, HAWK CROSSINGS OF OTHER APPROPRIATE
CROSSING TYPES UTILIZED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED, AS REQUIRED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.

k. PAGE 47, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS,
CAP TRAIL, ADD AS LAST SENTENCE: WHERE THE CAP TRAIL
CROSSES AN ARTERIAL ROADWAY AT NON-SIGNALIZED
INTERSECTIONS, ALTERNATIVE CROSSING TYPES SUCH AS
GRADE-SEPARATED CROSSINGS, HAWK CROSSINGS OR OTHER
APPROPRIATE CROSSING TYPES UTILIZED BY THE CITY OF
PHOENIX SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, AS REQUIRED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, AND THE CENTRAL ARIZONA
PROJECT.

l. PAGE 47, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS,
NORTHVISTA MULTI-MODAL CORRIDOR: DELETE END OF FIRST
SENTENCE “AND COUPLED WITH THE COMMUNITY PARK
PROPERTY”.

m. PAGE 58, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.2 PERMITTED USES, 5.2.D
TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD (TN): MOVE “6. PRIVATELY OWNED
OR OPERATED PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS AND OTHER
RECREATIONAL USES” BELOW THE LIST OF LOCAL SERVICES USE
RESTRICTIONS. RENUMBER LOCAL SERVICES USE RESTRICTIONS
FROM “A” TO “B”.

n. PAGE 63, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.2 PERMITTED USES, 5.2.I
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 2.A: REVISE PERCENTAGE TO
60%.

o. PAGE 63, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.2 PERMITTED USES, 5.2.I
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 2.C: REVISE TO: SUCH USES
SHALL REQUIRE A MINIMUM PROPERTY SETBACK OF 50 FEET
FROM THE LOOP 303 FREEWAY, 51ST AVENUE, 43RD AVENUE, AND
DIXILETA DRIVE.

p. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC): DELETE ITEM 1 IN ITS ENTIRETY AND
RENUMBER REMAINING ITEMS.
Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025


q. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.A.I: REVISE TO: SUCH USES
ARE NOT PERMITTED EAST OF 43RD AVENUE.

r. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.A.II: REVISE TO: SUCH USES
SHALL REQUIRE A MINIMUM PROPERTY SETBACK OF 50 FEET
FROM THE LOOP 303 FREEWAY, 51ST AVENUE, 43RD AVENUE, AND
DIXILETA DRIVE.

s. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.A.III: REVISE TO: SUCH USES
SHALL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC STREETS BY A DECORATIVE
SOLID FENCE OR WALL.

t. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.B.II AND ITEM 3.B.III: DELETE
THESE ITEMS AND RENUMBER ALL REMAINING ITEMS.

u. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.B.IV: REVISE TO: SUCH USES
SHALL BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET FROM PROPERTY
LINES.

v. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.B.V: REVISE TO: SUCH USES
SHALL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC STREETS BY A DECORATIVE
SOLID FENCE OR WALL.

w. PAGE 77, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.1
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY, 6.1.F
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: INNOVATION CORRIDOR, MAXIMUM
BUILDING HEIGHT: REVISE TO: 56 AND 4 STORIES; HEIGHTS UP TO
110 FEET SHALL BE PERMITTED WHEN LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 500
FEET FROM DIXILETA DRIVE; NON-HABITABLE MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT AND STRUCTURES THAT MAY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT
LIMITED TO, ELEMENTS SUCH AS AIR SEPARATORS, EXHAUST
PIPES, AND GAS PROCESSING EQUIPMENT ARE PERMITTED UP TO
225 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR A MAXIMUM OF 25% OF THE ROOF AREA.




Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

x. PAGE 82, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.4 ELEVATED
AND PROTECTED BIKE LANES AND STREETSCAPE ZONE, SECOND
PARAGRAPH, FIRST SENTENCE, REVISE TO: THE CIRCULATION
NETWORK, WITH THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF MANAGING VEHICLE
MOVEMENT WITHIN AND THROUGH THE COMMUNITY, WILL ALSO
PRIORITIZE ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS BY
INCLUDING SEPARATED AND ELEVATED BICYCLE LANES,
DETACHED SIDEWALKS, AND THOUGHTFUL INTEGRATION WITH
THE COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL AND PATH NETWORK WITHIN THE
OVERALL COMMUNITY.

y. PAGE 82, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.4 ELEVATED
AND PROTECTED BIKE LANES AND STREETSCAPE ZONE, SECOND
PARAGRAPH, LAST SENTENCE, REVISE TO: ALL STREET SECTIONS
INCLUDED IN THIS PUD ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO
CHANGE, EXCLUSIVE OF THE INCLUSION OF THE ELEVATED AND
SEPARATED BIKE LANES.

z. PAGE 82, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.4 ELEVATED
AND PROTECTED BIKE LANES AND STREETSCAPE ZONE, 6.4.A
ARTERIAL STREETS, ARTERIAL STREET LANDSCAPE SETBACK,
TRAIL AND PATH REQUIREMENTS, SECOND SENTENCE, REVISE TO:
THIS MAY OVERLAP WITH ANY REQUIRED M.U.T.E./S.U.P.E./P.U.ES

aa. PAGE 86, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7
STREETSCAPE, BOTH SIDES OF ALL ARTERIAL STREETS (DIXILETA
DRIVE, 43RD AVENUE, 51ST AVENUE, 67TH AVENUE), 1. BIKE
LANES, SUBSECTION D., REVISE TO: SEPARATED FROM BACK OF
CURB BY A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP

bb. PAGE 86, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7
STREETSCAPE, BOTH SIDES OF ALL ARTERIAL STREETS (DIXILETA
DRIVE, 43RD AVENUE, 51ST AVENUE, 67TH AVENUE), 3. DETACHED
SIDEWALKS, REVISE TITLE TO: DETACHED SIDEWALKS (WHERE
SUP IS DESIGNATED AND PROVIDED IN PLACE OF A SIDEWALK, NO
ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED, BUT THE SUP SHALL ALSO
BE SUBJECT TO THESE STANDARDS):

cc. PAGE 86, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7
STREETSCAPE, BOTH SIDES OF ALL ARTERIAL STREETS (DIXILETA
DRIVE, 43RD AVENUE, 51ST AVENUE, 67TH AVENUE), 3. DETACHED
SIDEWALKS, SUBSECTION A., REVISE TO: MINIMUM WIDTH: 6 FEET;
SHARED USE PATH 10 FEET.




Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

dd. PAGE 86, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7
STREETSCAPE, BOTH SIDES OF ALL ARTERIAL STREETS (DIXILETA
DRIVE, 43RD AVENUE, 51ST AVENUE, 67TH AVENUE), 3. DETACHED
SIDEWALKS, SUBSECTION B., REVISE TO: LANDSCAPE STRIP
WIDTH (LOCATED BETWEEN BACK OF BIKE LANE AND
SIDEWALK/SUP): MINIMUM 5 FEET

ee. PAGE 87, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7
STREETSCAPE, BOTH SIDES OF ALL COLLECTOR STREETS, 1. BIKE
LANES, SUBSECTION D., REVISE TO: SEPARATED FROM BACK OF
CURB BY A MINIMUM 7-FOOT-WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP.

ff. PAGE 87, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7
STREETSCAPE, BOTH SIDES OF ALL COLLECTOR STREETS, 3.
DETACHED SIDEWALKS, SUBSECTION B., REVISE TO: LANDSCAPE
STRIP WIDTH (LOCATED BETWEEN BACK OF BIKE LANE AND
SIDEWALK): MINIMUM 5 FEET

gg. PAGE 89, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.6 FENCES AND
WALLS, B. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, ITEM I: DELETE AND
RENUMBER REMAINING ITEMS.

hh. PAGE 91, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.7 AMENITIES, B.
NORTHVISTA MULTI-MODAL CORRIDOR TO LOOP 303 CROSSING,
FIRST SENTENCE: UPDATE “MDP.2” WITH “MDP.1”.

ii. PAGE 93, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.9 HILLSIDE
DEVELOPMENT: DELETE THE THIRD SENTENCE.

jj. PAGE 105, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.3 NORTH BLACK
CANYON OVERLAY DISTRICT (NBCOD) DESIGN GUIDELINE
CONFORMANCE, 7.3.A MODIFIED DESIGN GUIDELINES, II. DESIGN
GUIDELINES COMMON TO ALL DEVELOPMENT AREAS
(RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL), E. STREETSCAPE, UPDATE ITEM
1 TO: 51ST AVENUE, 43RD AVENUE AND DIXILETA ROAD ARE
PLANNED AS MAJOR ARTERIAL STREETS REQUIRING A MINIMUM
140 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 6 LANES, WITH ELEVATED AND
SEPARATED BICYCLE LANES AND A SIDEWALK SET BACK FROM
THE CURB. 67TH AVENUE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO INCLUDE
SIMILAR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN A MINIMUM 130 FEET OF RIGHT-
OF-WAY. PUBLIC TRAILS AND SHARED USE PATHS ARE IDENTIFIED
ON EXHIBIT 10: MASTER TRAILS PLAN, OF THE PUD.




Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

kk. PAGE 106, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.3 NORTH BLACK
CANYON OVERLAY DISTRICT (NBCOD) DESIGN GUIDELINE
CONFORMANCE, 7.3.A MODIFIED DESIGN GUIDELINES, II. DESIGN
GUIDELINES COMMON TO ALL DEVELOPMENT AREAS
(RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL), E. STREETSCAPE, UPDATE ITEM
10 TO: PUBLIC MULTI-USE TRAILS OR SHARED USE PATHS ARE
IDENTIFIED AND ARE TO BE PROVIDED IN CONFORMANCE WITH
EXHIBIT 10: MASTER TRAILS PLAN OF THE PUD, IN ADDITION TO
THE REQUIRED SIDEWALK (EXCEPT WHERE SHARED-USE PATHS
ARE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF A SIDEWALK), WITH THE EXACT
ALIGNMENT TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC
SHARED USE PATHS OR TRAILS MAY BE ESTABLISHED ALONG
COLLECTOR ROADWAYS THROUGH THE MASTER PLANNING AND
ADMINISTRATION PROCESSES IN SECTION 3.4 OF THIS
NARRATIVE.

ll. PAGE 107, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK
DESIGN GUIDELINES, A. ARTERIAL ROAD BRIDGE CROSSINGS, ADD
ITEM AT THE END NUMBERED VIII, AS FOLLOWS: ALL ARTERIAL
ROAD BRIDGE CROSSINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF PHOENIX
ADOPTED STANDARDS AND AS APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT.

mm. PAGE 113, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK
DESIGN GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V.
TRAILS/PATHS, 1. MULTI-USE TRAILS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, SUBSECTION B., REVISE TO: ALL
SHARED-USE PATHS (SUPS) SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN MINIMUM
20-FOOT-WIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENTS (S/W E) AND MULTI-USE
TRAILS(MUTS) SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN MINIMUM 30-FOOT-WIDE
MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENTS (MUTES), IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL, AND AS APPROVED OR
MODIFIED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

nn. PAGE 114, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK
DESIGN GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V.
TRAILS/PATHS, 1. MULTI-USE TRAILS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, SUBSECTION I., REVISE TO: WHERE SUP
AND MUT ALIGNMENTS CROSS STREETS, ENTRYWAYS, OR
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS, THE USE OF BOLLARDS OR OTHER
SIMILAR ELEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE FOR SAFE
CROSSING ZONES. NO BOLLARDS MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SHALL MEET ADA ACCESSIBILITY
STANDARDS.



Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

oo. PAGE 115, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK
DESIGN GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V.
TRAILS/PATHS, 1. MULTI-USE TRAILS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND
PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, SUBSECTION O., REVISE TO: WHERE
PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS CROSS DRIVE AISLES, PARKING
AREAS, OR STREETS, THEY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF STAMPED
OR COLORED CONCRETE, BRICK, PAVERS, OR AN ALTERNATIVE
DECORATIVE MATERIAL THAT VISUALLY CONTRASTS THE
PARKING AISLE, DRIVE AISLE, OR STREET SURFACE, AS REVIEWED
AND APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT
AND THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

pp. PAGE 115, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK
DESIGN GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V.
TRAILS/PATHS, 2. NORTHPARK LOOP, EXHIBIT 13: NORTHPARK
LOOP: LOCATE NORTHVISTA MULTI-MODAL CORRIDOR ON THE
EAST SIDE OF THE WASH.

qq. PAGE 116, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK
DESIGN GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V.
TRAILS/PATHS, 2. NORTHPARK LOOP, SUBSECTION G., REVISE TO:
WHERE THE LOOP CROSSES STREETS, ENTRYWAYS, OR
COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS, THE USE OF BOLLARDS OR OTHER
SIMILAR ELEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE FOR SAFE
CROSSING ZONES. PATH ALIGNMENT MAY ALSO JOG IN ORDER TO
SLOW SPEEDS AND ENSURE PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS LOOK
TOWARDS VEHICLE TRAFFIC PRIOR TO CROSSING. NO BOLLARDS
MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SHALL MEET
ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

rr. PAGE 118, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK
DESIGN GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, VI.
PARKING/CIRCULATION, 3. ACCESS/CIRCULATION, C. TRAFFIC
CALMING, SUBSECTION I., REVISE TO: TRAFFIC CALMING
MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AT
ENTRIES AND EXITS ALONG ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR STREETS
TO SLOW DOWN VEHICULAR SPEEDS AS THEY APPROACH
SIDEWALKS, PATHWAYS, AND TRAILS.

ss. APPENDIX E: OTHER MASTER PLANS: UPDATE THE MASTER
DEVELOPMENT & PHASING PLAN AND THE MASTER OPEN SPACE,
PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE & TRAILS PLAN PER THE STIPULATIONS
ABOVE.




Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

2. Overall PUD, Conceptual Master Development Parcel (CMDP), plans for the
entire NorthPark PUD, per the requirements of the Planned Community District
(PCD) per Section 636 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance as it relates to the
NorthPark scale community serving infrastructure, shall be submitted to the City
for review and approval prior to submitting Planned Community District (PCD) or
Functional Segment (FS) master plans for any MDP, except for MDP.2. Submitted
PCD of FS master plans must be in general conformance with the CMDP and
approved before submitting any Preliminary Site Plans, for land within that MDP,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department. The PCD and/or FS
master plans shall meet the full requirements of Section 636 regarding master
plans and must be in general conformance with the CMDP. Some MDPs will
require review with and/or approval by other departments or agencies as
applicable for those specific plans or MDP areas. The CMDP may be updated to
reflect more refined PCD or FS master plans of the various MDP areas as the
area develops.

a. The Master Development Plan shall also include a tracking table for the
following items:

i. Locations, minimum acreages, and maximum acreages of the local
services use within the Foothills Residential, Traditional
Neighborhood, and Neighborhood Village Land Use Districts (LUDs).

ii. The minimum number of units for the Lifestyle Mixed-Use (LMU) and
Freeway Mixed-Use (FMU) LUDs, and the minimum square footage of
commercial uses in the LMU LUD and FMU LUD.

iii. The minimum area required for vertical mixed-use (residential and
commercial) in the LMU LUD and FMU LUD.

b. The locations of the public bicycle repair stations (“fix it stations”) shall be
identified on all master plans, as required by the PUD.

c. The locations of the proposed Sonoran Preserve and preserved natural
wash/floodplain corridors, shall be identified on the master plans, as
required by the PUD.

d. The locations of the public regional park and public community park shall be
identified on the master plans.

e. The locations of neighborhood parks shall be identified on MDP master
plans and pocket parks shall be identified on Functional Segment master
plans.

f. Locations of Monarch Butterfly gardens, as required by the PUD, shall be
identified and provided within each MDP.

Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

g. For MDPs that include school sites for reservation for the Deer Valley
Unified School District (DVUSD), the locations of the three school sites, in
locations and acreage to be approved or modified by DVUSD, shall be
identified and shown on the CMDP and the as refined on the PCD or FS
master plans.

h. Location of a fire/mini police station, in a location and acreage to be
approved or modified by the Fire Department and Police Department, shall
be identified and shown on the CMDP and then refined on the PCD or FS
master plans.

i. Gateway monuments and project gateway design for entrances into the
NorthPark community shall be identified on the PCD or FS master plans, as
required by the PUD.

3. A Master Streets Plan shall be submitted and approved for the overall North Park
PUD prior to, or concurrent with the initial Conceptual Master Development Parcel
(CMDP) submission, excluding MDP.2. No preliminary approval of plans shall be
granted within an MDP without an approved MDP Traffic Impact Analysis and
associated MDP and/or PCD or FS Master Street Plans.

In addition to the Master Street Plan requirements set forth in the North Park
PUD, the following information shall also be required:

a. A separate signing and striping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Street Transportation Department for the separated and elevated bicycle
facilities, as required by Section 6, Table 7 of the PUD.

b. Protected bicycle intersection designs shall be incorporated within each MDP
and guided by NACTO national standards, as approved by the Street
Transportation Department.

c. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) shall be approved for any new submission or
modification to the overall North Park PUD, Master Development Parcel, or
Functional Segment Master Plan along with corresponding updated Master
Streets Plans.

d. Where an arterial or collector street crosses a wash or floodplain corridor, a
100-year storm dry crossing shall be constructed per the City of Phoenix
storm water design manual, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. A Master Trails Plan shall be submitted and approved to the Planning and
Development and Street Transportation Departments for the overall North Park
PUD prior to, or concurrent with the initial Conceptual Master Development Parcel
submission, excluding MDP.2. The Master Trails Plan shall incorporate the
following elements:
Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025


a. All trails and paths identified on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan shall be
publicly accessible through public access easement dedications.

b. Multi-Use Trails, Shared Use Path, and NorthPark Loop crossings at arterial
and collector streets that are away from signalized intersection shall be
identified and above or below grade crossings, HAWKS or similar
pedestrian activated crossings shall be assigned and constructed, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

c. Standard details shall be provided for the NorthPark Loop, including
connections that cross wash corridors, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

d. Locations of neighborhood and singletrack trails, as required by the PUD,
shall be identified and provided on Functional Segment master plans.

e. Location of the NorthVista Multi-Modal Path Corridor within MDP.1,
generally located east of 43rd Avenue and north of Dixileta Drive,
connecting to the future pedestrian/bicycle bridge over the Loop 303
freeway, shall be identified on the MDP master plans, as required by the
PUD, and shall be provided along the western edge of the 100-year
floodplain corridor, outside of the floodplain boundary.

f. Location of a minor trailhead east of 67th Avenue, south of Dixileta Drive.

5. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone A, Zone AE,
and Zone AE floodway, on panels 1255L, 0840L, and 0845L of Flood Insurance
Rate Maps (FIRM) with an effective date of October 16, 2013 and 1260M revised
on September 18, 2020. The following requirements shall apply, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

a. The Architect and Engineer are required to show the floodplain boundary
limits on the Site Plan and Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that
impacts to the proposed facilities are adequately addressed, following
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph
60.3). This includes, but is not limited to, provisions in the latest versions of
the Floodplain Ordinance of the Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the
Floodplain Management section of the Street Transportation Department for
review and approval of floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or CLOMR prior
to issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit.



Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

d. A LOMR application shall be submitted to the Floodplain Management
section of the Street Transportation Department for review and approval
prior to issuance of vertical construction permits.

e. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved LOMR-F or LOMR prior to
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The developer shall reserve approximately 7 acres, generally located at the
northwest corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, for a future fire/mini police
station, as approved or modified by the Fire Department, Police Department, and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be reserved, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Fire Department, the Police
Department, and the Planning and Development Department.

7. The developer shall reserve approximately 4 acres of the Community Open Space
Land Use District, generally located east of 43rd Avenue and north of Dixileta
Drive, generally shown on Exhibit 8C: Community Open Space of the PUD
Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, to the City of Phoenix
for a future public library, as approved or modified by the Library Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be conveyed, along with timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Library Department, and the Planning
and Development Department.

8. The area designated as Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned, generally located
west of the southwest corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, as generally
depicted on Exhibit 5: Proposed General Plan Land Use Map of the PUD
Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, shall be preserved as
permanent undisturbed open space and shall be privately maintained. The area
may include passive recreational features such as trails, seating nodes, or other
elements, provided such improvements are consistent with the intent to maintain
the area as undisturbed open space, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

9. The developer shall convey approximately 2,100 acres, generally shown on
Exhibit 8B: Natural Open Space of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped
November 6, 2025, to the City of Phoenix for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve,
as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and the
Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration of
the property to be conveyed, along with timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.




Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

10. The developer shall convey approximately 208 acres, generally shown on Exhibit
8C: Community Open Space of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped
November 6, 2025, to the City of Phoenix for a future public regional park and
community park, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation
Department and the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage
and configuration of the property to be conveyed, along with the timing of the
conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and
Recreation Department, and the Planning and Development Department.

11. The developer shall convey approximately 3 acres with less than 10% slope for
each minor trailhead generally shown on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the
PUD Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, for future minor
trailheads, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be conveyed, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.

12. The developer shall convey approximately 5 acres with less than 10% slope for
the major trailhead generally shown on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD
Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, for a future major
trailhead, as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and
the Planning and Development Department. The final acreage and configuration
of the property to be conveyed, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be
mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks and Recreation Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.

13. At the time of conveyance of land for the major trailhead generally shown on
Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped
November 6, 2025, the major trailhead acreage shall be large enough to
accommodate a minimum of 200 parking spaces and other amenities (restrooms,
ramadas, pedestrian connections, etc.), as approved or modified by the Parks and
Recreation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

14. All multi-use trails (MUTs), shared-use paths (SUPs), and the NorthPark Loop, as
depicted on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD Development Narrative
hearing draft date stamped November 6, 2025, shall be constructed outside of
proposed Sonoran Preserve lands. Prior to final site plan approval of any
development east of 51st Avenue and south of Dixileta Drive, the proposed
NorthPark Loop bisecting the Preserve from east to west, south of Mount Ochoa,
shall be constructed by the developer as part of the overall development, in
accordance with the requirements in the PUD, as approved or modified by the
Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning and Development
Department. Upon completion of the NorthPark Loop through the Preserve and
Parks and Recreation Department ownership of the land, the Parks and
Recreation Department will take over maintenance of that portion of the NorthPark
Loop that lies within the Preserve within this one area south of Mount Ochoa.
Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025


15. The proposed arterial streets (43rd Avenue, 51st Avenue, 67th Avenue, and
Dixileta Drive) shall accommodate transit. Bus pads, conforming with City of
Phoenix Standard Detail P1260, shall be located every one-quarter mile on both
directions of the proposed streets. At intersections, there shall be bus bays that
conform with Standard Detail P1256. The pads and bays shall be located from
intersections according to Standard Detail P1258.

16. The overall North Park PUD Master Street Plan shall identify and assign 25%
private contribution, NOT TO EXCEED $2,500,000, as determined by the Street
Transportation Department, for the total cost of the multi-modal bridge crossing
over the Loop 303 freeway from the NorthVista Multi-Modal Path Corridor, as
identified in the PUD. THE CITY ACKNOWLEDGES THIS CONTRIBUTION MAY
BE MADE BY A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT, IF APPROVED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL.

17. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 43rd
Avenue from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to Dixileta Drive. 43rd Avenue
shall be assigned and constructed as required per the approved Master
Development Parcel (MDP) Master Street Plans and accepted MDP Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA), as approved by the Street Transportation Department and the
Planning and Development Department.

18. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 51st
Avenue from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to the existing Stetson Valley
Parkway, south of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal. 51st Avenue shall be
assigned and constructed per the approved Conceptual Master Development
Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP Traffic Impact
Analysis (TIA), and in compliance with CAP requirements. The PCD or FS Master
Street Plans and TIA’s for each MDP shall establish assignment of MDP funding
and/or construction of improvements over the CAP canal, as approved by the
Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.

19. A minimum of 130 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 67th
Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to the
existing 67th Avenue, south of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal. 67th
Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway shall be constructed per the approved Conceptual
Master Development Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), and in compliance with CAP requirements. The PCD
or FS Master Street Plans and TIA’s for each MDP shall establish assignment of
MDP funding and/or construction of improvements over the CAP canal, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department and the Planning and
Development Department.



Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

20. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of
Dixileta Drive from the Interstate 17 interchange to the 67th Avenue/Pyramid Peak
Parkway. Dixileta Drive shall be constructed per the approved Conceptual Master
Development Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP Traffic
Impact Analysis (TIA), as approved by the Street Transportation Department and
the Planning and Development Department.

21. The overall North Park PUD Conceptual Master Street Plan and subsequent PCD
or FS Master Street Plan(s) shall identify and assign all modifications and
improvements required for the Dixileta and I-17 traffic interchange, as approved
by the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Street Transportation
Department.

22. The overall North Park PUD Conceptual Master Street Plan and subsequent PCD
or FS Master Street Plan(s) shall identify and assign all modifications and
improvements required for the 67th Avenue and Loop 303 traffic interchange, as
approved by the Arizona Department of Transportation and the Street
Transportation Department.

23. Master Development Parcel 2 shall direct large truck traffic to the 303 Freeway
through on-site access control restrictions to discourage south bound access onto
51st Avenue.

24. Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and assign a traffic
signal to be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the intersection of Stetson
Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway/Cortopassi Pass, as approved
by the Street Transportation Department.

25. Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and assign a traffic
signal to be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the intersection of Stetson
Valley Parkway and Inspiration Mountain Parkway(north)/Tombstone Trail, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department. A pedestrian signalized
crossing (e.g. HAWK) may be considered as an interim condition prior to full
signalization of the intersection being warranted.

26. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in the
accepted PUD, and subsequent Conceptual Master Development Plan and PCD
or FS Segment Traffic Impact Analyses.

27. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.




Z-139-24-1
Planning Commission Backup Memo
December 4, 2025

28. Prior to the submittal of PCD or FS master plans for Master Development Parcels
1, 3 and 6, as depicted on Exhibit 7: Master Development Parcel Map of the PUD
Development Narrative hearing draft date stamped November 6, 2025, the
applicant shall engage with the Deer Valley Unified School District regarding the
plan of development.

29. A minimum of three public school sites at locations acceptable to the school
district and the Street Transportation Department shall be reserved for one year
from the date of approval of the PCD or FS master plans; for a maximum 80-acre
high school site in Master Development Parcel 1, for a maximum 20-acre K-8 site
in Master Development Parcel 3, and for a maximum 20-acre K-8 site in Master
Development Parcel 6, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department and Deer Valley Unified School District.

30. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

31. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

32. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot
radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

33. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.


Enclosed:
Correspondence received after staff report (213 pages)
Correspondence received after VPC meeting (106 pages)




ATTACHMENT E

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
December 4, 2025

ITEM NO: 12
DISTRICT NO.: 1
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-139-24-1 (NorthPark PUD) (Companion Cases GPA-NG-1-24-1 and
GPA-NG-2-24-1)
Location: Southwest corner of I-17 and Loop 303
From: S-1
To: PUD
Acreage: 6,381.49
Proposal: Planned Unit Development for a master planned community including
open space, residential, mixed use, commercial, commerce park, and
industrial
Applicant: Mike Hifler, Pulte Homes
Owner: Arizona State Land Department c/o Mark Edelman
Representative: Carolyn Oberholtzer, BFSO

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
North Gateway 10/9/2025 Information only.
North Gateway 11/13/2025 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 7-0.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff memo dated December 4,
2025.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Vice-Chairman Boyd made a MOTION to approve Z-139-24-1, per the staff
memo dated December 4, 2025.

Maker: Boyd
Second: James
Vote: 8-0-1 (Matthews abstained)
Absent: None
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposal is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designations (GPA-NG-1-24-1).

2. The proposal will add to the variety of land uses and housing options adjacent to the North
Black Canyon Major Employment Corridor and within the North Gateway Village.

3. As stipulated, the proposal supports efforts from various plans, overlays, and
initiatives, including the North Black Canyon Corridor Plan, the North Black Canyon Overlay
District, the Monarch Butterfly Pledge initiative, the Shade Phoenix Plan, the Complete

Streets Guiding Principles policy, the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan, the
Transportation Electrification Action Plan, the Phoenix Climate Action Plan, and the
Conservation Measures for New Development policy.

Stipulations:

1. An updated Development Narrative for the NorthPark PUD reflecting the changes
approved through this request shall be submitted to the Planning and Development
Department within 30 days of City Council approval of this request. The updated
Development Narrative shall be consistent with the Development Narrative date stamped
November 6, 2025, as modified by the following stipulations:

a. Front cover: Revise the submittal date information on the bottom to add the
following: City Council adopted: [Add adoption date]. Change “4th Submittal” to
“Hearing Draft Submittal”.

b. PAGE 24, SECTION 3 PROCESS AND PROCEDURES, 3.4.B MDP AND
FUNCTIONAL SEGMENT MASTER PLANS, SECOND PARAGRAPH (BEFORE
FLOW CHART), REVISE AS FOLLOWS: AS EACH SUBSEQUENT MDP AND
FUNCTIONAL SEGMENT PLAN IS COMPETED OR AMENDED, OVERALL
CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLANS SHALL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. EACH
PORTION OF FUNCTIONAL SEGMENT OR MDP PLAN CAN REVISE THE
PRIOR APPROVED PLAN.

c. PAGE 28, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.4 LAND USE DISTRICTS, TABLE 3:
MDP LAND USE ALLOCATION TABLE (GROSS ACRES): UPDATE THE
COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE AND TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRIES
UNDER MDP.5 TO REFLECT THE PARKS/OPEN SPACE – PRIVATELY
OWNED PARCEL SOUTH OF DIXILETA DRIVE AND WEST OF 51ST AVENUE,
AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 5: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP,
DESIGNATED AS COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE, AND UPDATE
CORRESPONDING NUMBERS IN THE TOTAL ACREAGE ROW AND THE
TOTAL SITE COLUMN.

d. PAGE 29, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, EXHIBIT 8A: LAND USE DISTRICTS:
ADD THE AREA DESIGNATED AS PARKS/OPEN SPACE – PRIVATELY
OWNED SOUTH OF DIXILETA DRIVE AND WEST OF 51ST AVENUE, AS
DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 5: PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP, AS
COMMUNITY OPEN SPACE.

e. PAGE 33, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, EXHIBIT 8C: COMMUNITY OPEN
SPACE (COS): UPDATE EXHIBIT AND TABLE TO INCLUDE THE AREA
DESIGNATED AS PARKS/OPEN SPACE – PRIVATELY OWNED SOUTH OF
DIXILETA DRIVE AND WEST OF 51ST AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 5:
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP.

f. PAGE 35, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, EXHIBIT 8E: TRADITIONAL
NEIGHBORHOOD (TN): UPDATE EXHIBIT AND TABLE TO REMOVE THE AREA
DESIGNATED AS PARKS/OPEN SPACE – PRIVATELY OWNED SOUTH OF
DIXILETA DRIVE AND WEST OF 51ST AVENUE, AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT 5:
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP.

g. PAGE 45, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, EXHIBIT 10: MASTER TRAILS PLAN:
UPDATE AS FOLLOWS:
LOCATE THE NORTHVISTA MULTI-MODAL CORRIDOR AND LOOP
I. 303 PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE BRIDGE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
WASH.

ADD A MINOR PUBLIC TRAILHEAD ON THE EAST SIDE OF 67TH
AVENUE, SOUTH OF DIXILETA DRIVE AND NORTH OF THE
II.
ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE CROSSING ALONG THE CAP
CANAL.

UPDATE LEGEND TO INCLUDE LABELS WHICH DIFFERENTIATE
III. WHICH COLOR (LIGHT BLUE OR DARK BLUE) IS INDICATIVE OF
THE SIDEWALK AND THE RAISED AND PROTECTED BIKE LANE.

UPDATE LEGEND TO CHANGE “6-FOOT PROTECTED BIKE LANE
IV. (BOTH SIDES)” TO “6-FOOT SEPARATED AND ELEVATED BIKE
LANE (BOTH SIDES)”

h. PAGE 46, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS, SHARED-
USE PATHS AND MULTI-USE TRAILS, SECOND PARAGRAPH, 1ST
SENTENCE, REVISE AND ADD THE FOLLOWING: SHARED-USE PATHS WILL
BE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT CONCRETE WITHIN A 20-FOOT PUBLIC SIDEWALK
EASEMENT (S.W.E) WHERE ADJACENT TO ROADS, OR A 25-FOOT PUBLIC
TRAIL EASEMENT WHERE ADJACENT TO OPEN SPACE OR WASH
CORRIDORS. WHERE A SHARED-USE PATH IS WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE
20-FOOT PUBLIC SIDEWALK EASEMENT (S.W.E) WIDTH SHALL BE
ULTIMATELY REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE STREET
TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT DURING REVIEW OF THE APPLICABLE MASTER
DEVELOPMENT PARCEL MASTER PLAN REVIEW.

i. PAGE 46, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS, SHARED-
USE PATHS AND MULTI-USE TRAILS, SECOND PARAGRAPH, ADD AS LAST
SENTENCE: WHERE A MULTI-USE TRAIL CROSSES ARTERIAL OR
COLLECTOR ROADWAYS AT NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS,
ALTERNATIVE CROSSING TYPES SUCH AS GRADE-SEPARATED
CROSSINGS, HAWK CROSSINGS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE CROSSING
TYPES UTILIZED BY THE CITY OF PHOENIX SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, AS
REQUIRED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

j. PAGE 46, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS,
NORTHPARK LOOP, SECOND PARAGRAPH, SECOND SENTENCE, REVISE
TO: WHERE THE NORTHPARK LOOP CROSSES ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR
ROADWAYS AT NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS, ALTERNATIVE
CROSSING TYPES SUCH AS GRADE-SEPARATED CROSSINGS, HAWK
CROSSINGS OF OTHER APPROPRIATE CROSSING TYPES UTILIZED BY THE
CITY OF PHOENIX SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, AS REQUIRED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.




k. PAGE 47, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS, CAP
TRAIL, ADD AS LAST SENTENCE: WHERE THE CAP TRAIL CROSSES AN
ARTERIAL ROADWAY AT NON-SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS, ALTERNATIVE
CROSSING TYPES SUCH AS GRADE-SEPARATED CROSSINGS, HAWK
CROSSINGS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE CROSSING TYPES UTILIZED BY THE
CITY OF PHOENIX SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED, AS REQUIRED BY THE
STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, THE PLANNING AND
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, AND THE CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT.

l. PAGE 47, SECTION 4 LAND USE PLAN, 4.7.B TRAILS AND PATHS,
NORTHVISTA MULTI-MODAL CORRIDOR: DELETE END OF FIRST SENTENCE
“AND COUPLED WITH THE COMMUNITY PARK PROPERTY”.

m. PAGE 58, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.2 PERMITTED USES, 5.2.D
TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD (TN): MOVE “6. PRIVATELY OWNED OR
OPERATED PARKS, PLAYGROUNDS AND OTHER RECREATIONAL USES”
BELOW THE LIST OF LOCAL SERVICES USE RESTRICTIONS. RENUMBER
LOCAL SERVICES USE RESTRICTIONS FROM “A” TO “B”.

n. PAGE 63, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.2 PERMITTED USES, 5.2.I
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 2.A: REVISE PERCENTAGE TO 60%.

o. PAGE 63, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.2 PERMITTED USES, 5.2.I
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 2.C: REVISE TO: SUCH USES SHALL
REQUIRE A MINIMUM PROPERTY SETBACK OF 50 FEET FROM THE LOOP
303 FREEWAY, 51ST AVENUE, 43RD AVENUE, AND DIXILETA DRIVE.

p. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC): DELETE ITEM 1 IN ITS ENTIRETY AND
RENUMBER REMAINING ITEMS.

q. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.A.I: REVISE TO: SUCH USES ARE NOT
PERMITTED EAST OF 43RD AVENUE.

r. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.A.II: REVISE TO: SUCH USES SHALL
REQUIRE A MINIMUM PROPERTY SETBACK OF 50 FEET FROM THE LOOP
303 FREEWAY, 51ST AVENUE, 43RD AVENUE, AND DIXILETA DRIVE.

s. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.A.III: REVISE TO: SUCH USES SHALL
BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC STREETS BY A DECORATIVE SOLID FENCE
OR WALL.

t. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.B.II AND ITEM 3.B.III: DELETE THESE
ITEMS AND RENUMBER ALL REMAINING ITEMS.

u. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.B.IV: REVISE TO: SUCH USES SHALL
BE SETBACK A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET FROM PROPERTY LINES.


v. PAGE 67, SECTION 5 LIST OF USES, 5.3 ACCESSORY USES, 5.3.D
INNOVATION CORRIDOR (IC), ITEM 3.B.V: REVISE TO: SUCH USES SHALL
BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC STREETS BY A DECORATIVE SOLID FENCE
OR WALL.

w. PAGE 77, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.1 DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY, 6.1.F DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS: INNOVATION CORRIDOR, MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:
REVISE TO: 56 AND 4 STORIES; HEIGHTS UP TO 110 FEET SHALL BE
PERMITTED WHEN LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 500 FEET FROM DIXILETA
DRIVE; NON-HABITABLE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND STRUCTURES
THAT MAY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, ELEMENTS SUCH AS AIR
SEPARATORS, EXHAUST PIPES, AND GAS PROCESSING EQUIPMENT ARE
PERMITTED UP TO 225 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR A MAXIMUM OF 25% OF THE
ROOF AREA.

x. PAGE 82, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.4 ELEVATED AND
PROTECTED BIKE LANES AND STREETSCAPE ZONE, SECOND
PARAGRAPH, FIRST SENTENCE, REVISE TO: THE CIRCULATION NETWORK,
WITH THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF MANAGING VEHICLE MOVEMENT
WITHIN AND THROUGH THE COMMUNITY, WILL ALSO PRIORITIZE
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS BY INCLUDING SEPARATED
AND ELEVATED BICYCLE LANES, DETACHED SIDEWALKS, AND
THOUGHTFUL INTEGRATION WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE TRAIL AND PATH
NETWORK WITHIN THE OVERALL COMMUNITY.

y. PAGE 82, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.4 ELEVATED AND
PROTECTED BIKE LANES AND STREETSCAPE ZONE, SECOND
PARAGRAPH, LAST SENTENCE, REVISE TO: ALL STREET SECTIONS
INCLUDED IN THIS PUD ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE,
EXCLUSIVE OF THE INCLUSION OF THE ELEVATED AND SEPARATED BIKE
LANES.

z. PAGE 82, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.4 ELEVATED AND
PROTECTED BIKE LANES AND STREETSCAPE ZONE, 6.4.A ARTERIAL
STREETS, ARTERIAL STREET LANDSCAPE SETBACK, TRAIL AND PATH
REQUIREMENTS, SECOND SENTENCE, REVISE TO: THIS MAY OVERLAP
WITH ANY REQUIRED M.U.T.E./S.U.P.E./P.U.E.S

aa. PAGE 86, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7 STREETSCAPE,
BOTH SIDES OF ALL ARTERIAL STREETS (DIXILETA DRIVE, 43RD AVENUE,
51ST AVENUE, 67TH AVENUE), 1. BIKE LANES, SUBSECTION D., REVISE TO:
SEPARATED FROM BACK OF CURB BY A MINIMUM 8-FOOT-WIDE
LANDSCAPE STRIP

bb. PAGE 86, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7 STREETSCAPE,
BOTH SIDES OF ALL ARTERIAL STREETS (DIXILETA DRIVE, 43RD AVENUE,
51ST AVENUE, 67TH AVENUE), 3. DETACHED SIDEWALKS, REVISE TITLE
TO: DETACHED SIDEWALKS (WHERE SUP IS DESIGNATED AND PROVIDED
IN PLACE OF A SIDEWALK, NO ADDITIONAL SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED, BUT
THE SUP SHALL ALSO BE SUBJECT TO THESE STANDARDS):




cc. PAGE 86, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7 STREETSCAPE,
BOTH SIDES OF ALL ARTERIAL STREETS (DIXILETA DRIVE, 43RD AVENUE,
51ST AVENUE, 67TH AVENUE), 3. DETACHED SIDEWALKS, SUBSECTION A.,
REVISE TO: MINIMUM WIDTH: 6 FEET; SHARED-USE PATH 10 FEET.

dd. PAGE 86, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7 STREETSCAPE,
BOTH SIDES OF ALL ARTERIAL STREETS (DIXILETA DRIVE, 43RD AVENUE,
51ST AVENUE, 67TH AVENUE), 3. DETACHED SIDEWALKS, SUBSECTION B.,
REVISE TO: LANDSCAPE STRIP WIDTH (LOCATED BETWEEN BACK OF BIKE
LANE AND SIDEWALK/SUP): MINIMUM 5 FEET

ee. PAGE 87, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7 STREETSCAPE,
BOTH SIDES OF ALL COLLECTOR STREETS, 1. BIKE LANES, SUBSECTION
D., REVISE TO: SEPARATED FROM BACK OF CURB BY A MINIMUM 7-FOOT-
WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP.

ff. PAGE 87, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, TABLE 7 STREETSCAPE,
BOTH SIDES OF ALL COLLECTOR STREETS, 3. DETACHED SIDEWALKS,
SUBSECTION B., REVISE TO: LANDSCAPE STRIP WIDTH (LOCATED
BETWEEN BACK OF BIKE LANE AND SIDEWALK): MINIMUM 5 FEET

gg. PAGE 89, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.6 FENCES AND
WALLS, B. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, ITEM I: DELETE AND RENUMBER
REMAINING ITEMS.

hh. PAGE 91, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.7 AMENITIES, B.
NORTHVISTA MULTI-MODAL CORRIDOR TO LOOP 303 CROSSING, FIRST
SENTENCE: UPDATE “MDP.2” WITH “MDP.1”.

ii. PAGE 93, SECTION 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, 6.9 HILLSIDE
DEVELOPMENT: DELETE THE THIRD SENTENCE.

jj. PAGE 105, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.3 NORTH BLACK CANYON
OVERLAY DISTRICT (NBCOD) DESIGN GUIDELINE CONFORMANCE, 7.3.A
MODIFIED DESIGN GUIDELINES, II. DESIGN GUIDELINES COMMON TO ALL
DEVELOPMENT AREAS (RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL), E.
STREETSCAPE, UPDATE ITEM 1 TO: 51ST AVENUE, 43RD AVENUE AND
DIXILETA ROAD ARE PLANNED AS MAJOR ARTERIAL STREETS REQUIRING
A MINIMUM 140 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR 6 LANES, WITH ELEVATED
AND SEPARATED BICYCLE LANES AND A SIDEWALK SET BACK FROM THE
CURB. 67TH AVENUE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO INCLUDE SIMILAR
IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN A MINIMUM 130 FEET OF RIGHT-OF-WAY. PUBLIC
TRAILS AND SHARED-USE PATHS ARE IDENTIFIED ON EXHIBIT 10: MASTER
TRAILS PLAN, OF THE PUD.




kk. PAGE 106, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.3 NORTH BLACK CANYON
OVERLAY DISTRICT (NBCOD) DESIGN GUIDELINE CONFORMANCE, 7.3.A
MODIFIED DESIGN GUIDELINES, II. DESIGN GUIDELINES COMMON TO ALL
DEVELOPMENT AREAS (RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL), E.
STREETSCAPE, UPDATE ITEM 10 TO: PUBLIC MULTI-USE TRAILS OR
SHARED-USE PATHS ARE IDENTIFIED AND ARE TO BE PROVIDED IN
CONFORMANCE WITH EXHIBIT 10: MASTER TRAILS PLAN OF THE PUD, IN
ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED SIDEWALK (EXCEPT WHERE SHARED-USE
PATHS ARE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF A SIDEWALK), WITH THE EXACT
ALIGNMENT TO BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC SHARED-
USE PATHS OR TRAILS MAY BE ESTABLISHED ALONG COLLECTOR
ROADWAYS THROUGH THE MASTER PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION
PROCESSES IN SECTION 3.4 OF THIS NARRATIVE.

ll. PAGE 107, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK DESIGN
GUIDELINES, A. ARTERIAL ROAD BRIDGE CROSSINGS, ADD ITEM AT THE
END NUMBERED VIII, AS FOLLOWS: ALL ARTERIAL ROAD BRIDGE
CROSSINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF PHOENIX ADOPTED
STANDARDS AND AS APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT.

mm. PAGE 113, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK DESIGN
GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V. TRAILS/PATHS, 1. MULTI-
USE TRAILS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS,
SUBSECTION B., REVISE TO: ALL SHARED-USE PATHS (SUPS) SHALL BE
LOCATED WITHIN MINIMUM 20-FOOT-WIDE SIDEWALK EASEMENTS (S/W E)
AND MULTI-USE TRAILS(MUTS) SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN MINIMUM 30-
FOOT-WIDE MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENTS (MUTES), IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE MAG SUPPLEMENTAL DETAIL, AND AS APPROVED OR MODIFIED
BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND THE PLANNING
AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

nn. PAGE 114, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK DESIGN
GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V. TRAILS/PATHS, 1. MULTI-
USE TRAILS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS,
SUBSECTION I., REVISE TO: WHERE SUP AND MUT ALIGNMENTS CROSS
STREETS, ENTRYWAYS, OR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS, THE USE OF
BOLLARDS OR OTHER SIMILAR ELEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO
ENSURE FOR SAFE CROSSING ZONES. NO BOLLARDS MAY BE LOCATED
WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SHALL MEET ADA ACCESSIBILITY
STANDARDS.

oo. PAGE 115, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK DESIGN
GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V. TRAILS/PATHS, 1. MULTI-
USE TRAILS, SHARED-USE PATHS, AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS,
SUBSECTION O., REVISE TO: WHERE PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS
CROSS DRIVE AISLES, PARKING AREAS, OR STREETS, THEY SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED OF STAMPED OR COLORED CONCRETE, BRICK, PAVERS,
OR AN ALTERNATIVE DECORATIVE MATERIAL THAT VISUALLY CONTRASTS
THE PARKING AISLE, DRIVE AISLE, OR STREET SURFACE, AS REVIEWED
AND APPROVED BY THE STREET TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT AND
THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.


pp. PAGE 115, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK DESIGN
GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V. TRAILS/PATHS, 2.
NORTHPARK LOOP, EXHIBIT 13: NORTHPARK LOOP: LOCATE NORTHVISTA
MULTI-MODAL CORRIDOR ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE WASH.

qq. PAGE 116, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK DESIGN
GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, V. TRAILS/PATHS, 2.
NORTHPARK LOOP, SUBSECTION G., REVISE TO: WHERE THE LOOP
CROSSES STREETS, ENTRYWAYS, OR COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS, THE
USE OF BOLLARDS OR OTHER SIMILAR ELEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED
TO ENSURE FOR SAFE CROSSING ZONES. PATH ALIGNMENT MAY ALSO
JOG IN ORDER TO SLOW SPEEDS AND ENSURE PEDESTRIANS AND
BICYCLISTS LOOK TOWARDS VEHICLE TRAFFIC PRIOR TO CROSSING. NO
BOLLARDS MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SHALL
MEET ADA ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS.

rr. PAGE 118, SECTION 7 DESIGN GUIDELINES, 7.4 NORTHPARK DESIGN
GUIDELINES, B. SITE DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT, VI. PARKING/CIRCULATION,
3. ACCESS/CIRCULATION, C. TRAFFIC CALMING, SUBSECTION I., REVISE
TO: TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES SHALL BE PROVIDED ON PRIVATE
PROPERTY AT ENTRIES AND EXITS ALONG ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR
STREETS TO SLOW DOWN VEHICULAR SPEEDS AS THEY APPROACH
SIDEWALKS, PATHWAYS, AND TRAILS.

ss. APPENDIX E: OTHER MASTER PLANS: UPDATE THE MASTER
DEVELOPMENT & PHASING PLAN AND THE MASTER OPEN SPACE,
PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE & TRAILS PLAN PER THE STIPULATIONS ABOVE.

2. Overall PUD, Conceptual Master Development Parcel (CMDP), plans for the entire
NorthPark PUD, per the requirements of the Planned Community District (PCD) per
Section 636 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance as it relates to the NorthPark scale
community serving infrastructure, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval
prior to submitting Planned Community District (PCD) or Functional Segment (FS) master
plans for any MDP, except for MDP.2. Submitted PCD of FS master plans must be in
general conformance with the CMDP and approved before submitting any Preliminary
Site Plans, for land within that MDP, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. The PCD and/or FS master plans shall meet the full requirements of Section
636 regarding master plans and must be in general conformance with the CMDP. Some
MDPs will require review with and/or approval by other departments or agencies as
applicable for those specific plans or MDP areas. The CMDP may be updated to reflect
more refined PCD or FS master plans of the various MDP areas as the area develops.

a. The Master Development Plan shall also include a tracking table for the following
items:

i. Locations, minimum acreages, and maximum acreages of the local services
use within the Foothills Residential, Traditional Neighborhood, and
Neighborhood Village Land Use Districts (LUDs).

ii. The minimum number of units for the Lifestyle Mixed-Use (LMU) and
Freeway Mixed-Use (FMU) LUDs, and the minimum square footage of
commercial uses in the LMU LUD and FMU LUD.


iii. The minimum area required for vertical mixed-use (residential and
commercial) in the LMU LUD and FMU LUD.

b. The locations of the public bicycle repair stations (“fix it stations”) shall be identified
on all master plans, as required by the PUD.

c. The locations of the proposed Sonoran Preserve and preserved natural
wash/floodplain corridors, shall be identified on the master plans, as required by
the PUD.

d. The locations of the public regional park and public community park shall be
identified on the master plans.

e. The locations of neighborhood parks shall be identified on MDP master plans and
pocket parks shall be identified on Functional Segment master plans.

f. Locations of Monarch Butterfly gardens, as required by the PUD, shall be identified
and provided within each MDP.

g. For MDPs that include school sites for reservation for the Deer Valley Unified
School District (DVUSD), the locations of the three school sites, in locations and
acreage to be approved or modified by DVUSD, shall be identified and shown on
the CMDP and the as refined on the PCD or FS master plans.

h. Location of a fire/mini police station, in a location and acreage to be approved or
modified by the Fire Department and Police Department, shall be identified and
shown on the CMDP and then refined on the PCD or FS master plans.

i. Gateway monuments and project gateway design for entrances into the NorthPark
community shall be identified on the PCD or FS master plans, as required by the
PUD.

3. A Master Streets Plan shall be submitted and approved for the overall North Park PUD
prior to, or concurrent with the initial Conceptual Master Development Parcel (CMDP)
submission, excluding MDP.2. No preliminary approval of plans shall be granted within an
MDP without an approved MDP Traffic Impact Analysis and associated MDP and/or PCD
or FS Master Street Plans.

In addition to the Master Street Plan requirements set forth in the North Park PUD, the
following information shall also be required:

a. A separate signing and striping plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Street
Transportation Department for the separated and elevated bicycle facilities, as
required by Section 6, Table 7 of the PUD.

b. Protected bicycle intersection designs shall be incorporated within each MDP and
guided by NACTO national standards, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.

c. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) shall be approved for any new submission or
modification to the overall North Park PUD, Master Development Parcel, or
Functional Segment Master Plan along with corresponding updated Master Streets
Plans.

d. Where an arterial or collector street crosses a wash or floodplain corridor, a 100-
year storm dry crossing shall be constructed per the City of Phoenix storm water
design manual, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A Master Trails Plan shall be submitted and approved to the Planning and Development
and Street Transportation Departments for the overall North Park PUD prior to, or
concurrent with the initial Conceptual Master Development Parcel submission, excluding
MDP.2. The Master Trails Plan shall incorporate the following elements:

a. All trails and paths identified on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan shall be publicly
accessible through public access easement dedications.

b. Multi-Use Trails, Shared-Use Path, and NorthPark Loop crossings at arterial and
collector streets that are away from signalized intersection shall be identified and
above or below grade crossings, HAWKS or similar pedestrian activated crossings
shall be assigned and constructed, as approved by the Street Transportation
Department.

c. Standard details shall be provided for the NorthPark Loop, including connections
that cross wash corridors, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

d. Locations of neighborhood and singletrack trails, as required by the PUD, shall be
identified and provided on Functional Segment master plans.

e. Location of the NorthVista Multi-Modal Path Corridor within MDP.1, generally
located east of 43rd Avenue and north of Dixileta Drive, connecting to the future
pedestrian/bicycle bridge over the Loop 303 freeway, shall be identified on the
MDP master plans, as required by the PUD, and shall be provided along the
western edge of the 100-year floodplain corridor, outside of the floodplain
boundary.

f. Location of a minor trailhead east of 67th Avenue, south of Dixileta Drive.

5. This parcel is in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) called Zone A, Zone AE, and Zone
AE floodway, on panels 1255L, 0840L, and 0845L of Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM)
with an effective date of October 16, 2013 and 1260M revised on September 18, 2020.
The following requirements shall apply, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

a. The Architect and Engineer are required to show the floodplain boundary limits on
the Site Plan and Grading and Drainage Plan and ensure that impacts to the
proposed facilities are adequately addressed, following National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) Regulations (44 CFR Paragraph 60.3). This includes, but is not
limited to, provisions in the latest versions of the Floodplain Ordinance of the
Phoenix City Code.

b. A copy of the Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted to the Floodplain
Management section of the Street Transportation Department for review and
approval of floodplain requirements.

c. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved CLOMR-F or CLOMR prior to
issuance of a Grading and Drainage permit.

d. A LOMR application shall be submitted to the Floodplain Management section of
the Street Transportation Department for review and approval prior to issuance of
vertical construction permits.

e. The developer shall provide a FEMA approved LOMR-F or LOMR prior to issuance
of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The developer shall reserve approximately 7 acres, generally located at the northwest
corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, for a future fire/mini police station, as approved
or modified by the Fire Department, Police Department, and the Planning and
Development Department. The final acreage and configuration of the property to be
reserved, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the
developer, the Fire Department, the Police Department, and the Planning and
Development Department.

7. The developer shall reserve approximately 4 acres of the Community Open Space Land
Use District, generally located east of 43rd Avenue and north of Dixileta Drive, generally
shown on Exhibit 8C: Community Open Space of the PUD Development Narrative date
stamped November 6, 2025, to the City of Phoenix for a future public library, as approved
or modified by the Library Department and the Planning and Development Department.
The final acreage and configuration of the property to be conveyed, along with timing of
the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Library Department,
and the Planning and Development Department.

8. The area designated as Parks/Open Space – Privately Owned, generally located west of
the southwest corner of 51st Avenue and Dixileta Drive, as generally depicted on Exhibit
5: Proposed General Plan Land Use Map of the PUD Development Narrative date
stamped November 6, 2025, shall be preserved as permanent undisturbed open space
and shall be privately maintained. The area may include passive recreational features
such as trails, seating nodes, or other elements, provided such improvements are
consistent with the intent to maintain the area as undisturbed open space, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

9. The developer shall convey approximately 2,100 acres, generally shown on Exhibit 8B:
Natural Open Space of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped November 6,
2025, to the City of Phoenix for inclusion in the Sonoran Preserve, as approved or
modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning and Development
Department. The final acreage and configuration of the property to be conveyed, along
with timing of the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the developer, the Parks
and Recreation Department, and the Planning and Development Department.

10. The developer shall convey approximately 208 acres, generally shown on Exhibit 8C:
Community Open Space of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped November 6,
2025, to the City of Phoenix for a future public regional park and community park, as
approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning and
Development Department. The final acreage and configuration of the property to be
conveyed, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the
developer, the Parks and Recreation Department, and the Planning and Development
Department.




11. The developer shall convey approximately 3 acres with less than 10% slope for each
minor trailhead generally shown on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD
Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, for future minor trailheads, as
approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning and
Development Department. The final acreage and configuration of the property to be
conveyed, along with the timing of the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the
developer, the Parks and Recreation Department, and the Planning and Development
Department.

12. The developer shall convey approximately 5 acres with less than 10% slope for the major
trailhead generally shown on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD Development
Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025, for a future major trailhead, as approved or
modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning and Development
Department. The final acreage and configuration of the property to be conveyed, along
with the timing of the conveyance, shall be mutually agreed upon by the developer, the
Parks and Recreation Department, and the Planning and Development Department.

13. At the time of conveyance of land for the major trailhead generally shown on Exhibit 10:
Master Trails Plan of the PUD Development Narrative date stamped November 6, 2025,
the major trailhead acreage shall be large enough to accommodate a minimum of 200
parking spaces and other amenities (restrooms, ramadas, pedestrian connections, etc.),
as approved or modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning and
Development Department.

14. All multi-use trails (MUTs), shared-use paths (SUPs), and the NorthPark Loop, as
depicted on Exhibit 10: Master Trails Plan of the PUD Development Narrative hearing
draft date stamped November 6, 2025, shall be constructed outside of proposed Sonoran
Preserve lands. Prior to final site plan approval of any development east of 51st Avenue
and south of Dixileta Drive, the proposed NorthPark Loop bisecting the Preserve from
east to west, south of Mount Ochoa, shall be constructed by the developer as part of the
overall development, in accordance with the requirements in the PUD, as approved or
modified by the Parks and Recreation Department and the Planning and Development
Department. Upon completion of the NorthPark Loop through the Preserve and Parks and
Recreation Department ownership of the land, the Parks and Recreation Department will
take over maintenance of that portion of the NorthPark Loop that lies within the Preserve
within this one area south of Mount Ochoa.

15. The proposed arterial streets (43rd Avenue, 51st Avenue, 67th Avenue, and Dixileta
Drive) shall accommodate transit. Bus pads, conforming with City of Phoenix Standard
Detail P1260, shall be located every one-quarter mile on both directions of the proposed
streets. At intersections, there shall be bus bays that conform with Standard Detail
P1256. The pads and bays shall be located from intersections according to Standard
Detail P1258.

16. The overall North Park PUD Master Street Plan shall identify and assign 25% private
contribution, NOT TO EXCEED $2,500,000, as determined by the Street Transportation
Department, for the total cost of the multi-modal bridge crossing over the Loop 303
freeway from the NorthVista Multi-Modal Path Corridor, as identified in the PUD. THE
CITY ACKNOWLEDGES THIS CONTRIBUTION MAY BE MADE BY A SPECIAL
TAXING DISTRICT, IF APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.




17. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 43rd Avenue
from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to Dixileta Drive. 43rd Avenue shall be assigned
and constructed as required per the approved Master Development Parcel (MDP) Master
Street Plans and accepted MDP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), as approved by the Street
Transportation Department and the Planning and Development Department.

18. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 51st Avenue
from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to the existing Stetson Valley Parkway, south of
the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal. 51st Avenue shall be assigned and constructed
per the approved Conceptual Master Development Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans
and the accepted MDP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), and in compliance with CAP
requirements. The PCD or FS Master Street Plans and TIA’s for each MDP shall
establish assignment of MDP funding and/or construction of improvements over the CAP
canal, as approved by the Street Transportation Department and the Planning and
Development Department.

19. A minimum of 130 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of 67th
Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway from the Loop 303 freeway interchange to the existing
67th Avenue, south of the Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal. 67th Avenue/Pyramid
Peak Parkway shall be constructed per the approved Conceptual Master Development
Parcel (CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA),
and in compliance with CAP requirements. The PCD or FS Master Street Plans and TIA’s
for each MDP shall establish assignment of MDP funding and/or construction of
improvements over the CAP canal, as approved by the Street Transportation Department
and the Planning and Development Department.

20. A minimum of 140 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for the full width of Dixileta Drive
from the Interstate 17 interchange to the 67th Avenue/Pyramid Peak Parkway. Dixileta
Drive shall be constructed per the approved Conceptual Master Development Parcel
(CMDP) Master Street Plans and the accepted MDP Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), as
approved by the Street Transportation Department and the Planning and Development
Department.

21. The overall North Park PUD Conceptual Master Street Plan and subsequent PCD or FS
Master Street Plan(s) shall identify and assign all modifications and improvements
required for the Dixileta and I-17 traffic interchange, as approved by the Arizona
Department of Transportation and the Street Transportation Department.

22. The overall North Park PUD Conceptual Master Street Plan and subsequent PCD or FS
Master Street Plan(s) shall identify and assign all modifications and improvements
required for the 67th Avenue and Loop 303 traffic interchange, as approved by the
Arizona Department of Transportation and the Street Transportation Department.

23. Master Development Parcel 2 shall direct large truck traffic to the 303 Freeway through
on-site access control restrictions to discourage south bound access onto 51st Avenue.

24. Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and assign a traffic signal to
be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the intersection of Stetson Valley Parkway
and Inspiration Mountain Parkway/Cortopassi Pass, as approved by the Street
Transportation Department.




25. Future PCD or FS Master Development Plans shall identify and assign a traffic signal to
be designed, fully funded, and constructed at the intersection of Stetson Valley Parkway
and Inspiration Mountain Parkway(north)/Tombstone Trail, as approved by the Street
Transportation Department. A pedestrian signalized crossing (e.g. HAWK) may be
considered as an interim condition prior to full signalization of the intersection being
warranted.

26. All mitigation improvements shall be constructed and/or funded as identified in the
accepted PUD, and subsequent Conceptual Master Development Plan and PCD or FS
Segment Traffic Impact Analyses.

27. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with paving, curb,
gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

28. Prior to the submittal of PCD or FS master plans for Master Development Parcels 1, 3
and 6, as depicted on Exhibit 7: Master Development Parcel Map of the PUD
Development Narrative hearing draft date stamped November 6, 2025, the applicant shall
engage with the Deer Valley Unified School District regarding the plan of development.

29. A minimum of three public school sites at locations acceptable to the school district and
the Street Transportation Department shall be reserved for one year from the date of
approval of the PCD or FS master plans; for a maximum 80-acre high school site in
Master Development Parcel 1, for a maximum 20-acre K-8 site in Master Development
Parcel 3, and for a maximum 20-acre K-8 site in Master Development Parcel 6, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department and Deer Valley Unified School
District.

30. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall conduct
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development area
for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing,
landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

31. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the Phase I data
testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist, determines
such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations.

32. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the developer
shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius of the
discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office to
properly assess the materials.

33. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 waiver of
claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's Office
and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for record.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Saneeya Mir at 602-686-6461, saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Consideration of a Citizen Petition Related to the Ethics Commission Inquiry
Process - Citywide

This report provides the City Council with information in response to a citizen petition
submitted by Tamara Weaver at the December 3, 2025, Formal City Council meeting
regarding the Ethics Commission Inquiry Process, Attachment A.

Summary
The petitioner requests the City Council to:
1. Immediately suspend the notarization requirement for ethics inquiries until such
times as clear public notice and reasonable alternatives are implemented.
2. Eliminate the requirement of in-person, daytime-only delivery and permit submission
by an online portal.
3. Remove or substantially revise all language threatening financial penalties for
complaints later determined to be without merit.
4. Direct the City Clerk and Ethics Commission to conduct a comprehensive review of
the ethics complaint process with meaningful public input and to propose revisions that
prioritize accessibility, equity and public trust.
5. Report back to the public within fifteen days on actions taken to implement these
reforms.

The City of Phoenix Ethics Commission (the “Commission”) held their first meeting in
March 2024. In April 2024, they approved the Commission’s Initial Rules of Procedure
and the Commission’s Bylaws. The Commission began reviewing eight outstanding
complaints previously submitted between 2019 and 2023. Prior to receiving the 21
Requests for Inquiry referenced in the petition, the Commission had planned to
conduct a comprehensive review of their processes, including the Rules of Procedure,
after resolving the first eight inquiries.

The petition asks the City Council to address alleged deficiencies in the current ethics
inquiry process administered by the Commission and the City Clerk Department. At the
most recent meeting of the Commission held on November 20, 2025, 21 ethics
Requests for Inquiry, submitted by members of the public only a few days prior to the
meeting, were tabled because they were not notarized. Rule 4(a) of the Commission’s
Rules of Procedure requires a Request for Inquiry be notarized. These Rules were



drafted by the City Manager’s Office in consultation with the Law Department in
January 2018 and approved by the Commission in April 2024 after individual
commissioners were seated.

The petitioner noted that, prior to the meeting, neither the official ethics inquiry form
available on the City’s website nor any accompanying instructions indicated that
notarization was required. The 21 inquiries are the first complaints received by the
Commission since they were seated in March 2024, and the absence of a notary
stamp on the inquiry form and corresponding instructions was a clerical error that has
since been corrected.

Additionally, the petitioner takes issue with the requirement that the notarized form
must be delivered in person to City Hall during regular business hours. Per the
instructions provided to the complainants by the City Clerk, in this instance they were
authorized to submit the notarized forms by email and had the option to either drop-off
or mail the original notarized forms to the City Clerk’s Office.

Lastly, the petitioner takes issue with language contained on the Request for Inquiry
form that anyone who files a frivolous complaint may be assessed a civil penalty. This
language mirrors the requirements provided in Phoenix City Code Section 2-53(O) and
in Rule 4(a) of the Commission’s Initial Rules of Procedure. Any change to this
language will require a change to the City Code and the Commission’s Initial Rules of
Procedure.

Options for Council Action
A. Accept the petition.
B. Deny the petition.
C. Refer the petition to the Ethics Commission for further consideration and
recommendation during the Commission's January meeting.

Staff recommends referring the Citizen Petition to the Ethics Commission for further
consideration and recommendation at their January meeting. Prior to receiving the 21
Requests for Inquiry referenced in the petition, the Commission had planned to
undertake a comprehensive review of their processes, including the Rules of
Procedure. Referring the petition would allow the Commission to continue their
planned review of the process improvements in coordination with the City Clerk and
Law Departments and, upon approval, present those recommended changes to City
Council for their review and consideration.






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the City Manager's
Office.





Attachment A

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

77 item(s)