← Back to meetings

Meeting Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee-5/21/2025 complete

2025-05-21 · Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee

Items: 108

Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee

View on Agenda Online ↗


Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ

Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.





ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: May 21, 2025
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Development Advisory Board

I recommend the following for appointment:

Olivia Rivera
Ms. Rivera is the Neighborhood Preservation Supervisor at the City of Phoenix. She
replaces Monique Sermeno as the Neighborhood Services Department Ex-Officio
Representative.

Neighborhood Block Watch Fund Oversight Committee

Councilwoman Pastor recommends the following for appointment:

Jennifer Wadsworth
Ms. Wadsworth is a retiree and a resident of District 4. She fills a vacancy for a term to
expire May 21, 2027.

Phoenix Business and Workforce Development Board

I recommend the following for appointment:

Kristin Emery
Ms. Emery is the Director of State and Local Government Affairs at Microsoft and a
resident of District 2. She fills a vacancy for a partial term to expire June 30, 2026.

Phoenix Women’s Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:




Teniqua Broughton
Ms. Broughton is the Executive Director of the State of Black Arizona and a resident of
District 4. She fills a vacancy for a term to expire May 21, 2028.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Red Lobster #6223 - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 328744.

Summary

Applicant
Richard Teel, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
12012 N. 28th Drive
Zoning Classification: RSC
Council District: 1

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was May 5, 2025. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,



grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with the applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal
and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Calabash Lounge - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 333722.

Summary

Applicant
George Makor, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
10802 N. 43rd Avenue, Ste.1
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business has plans
to open in June 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 26, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have a strong understanding of Arizona liquor laws and I am committed to full
compliance with all regulations. I have completed the required training and will ensure
that all staff are certified in responsible alcohol service. I have implemented clear
policies and procedures to promote responsible alcohol consumption and prevent
underage access. i am dedicated to maintaining a safe, professional, and well-
managed establishment that serves the community responsibly.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Issuing this liquor license will enhance the dining experience for our guests by
allowing them to enjoy alcoholic beverages responsibly with their meals. Our
establishment adds value to the community by offering a comfortable, welcoming
atmosphere and creating new job opportunities. We are committed to being a positive
presence in the neighborhood and contributing to the local economy through quality
service and community engagement.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Calabash Lounge - Data
Attachment B - Calabash Lounge - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: CALABASH LOUNGE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Liquor Store 9 4 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0

Restaurant 12 2 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 53.84 66.87

Violent Crimes 12.31 8.97 12.1
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 77

Total Violations 68 127




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

0923082 1878 140 45 415

1042033 720 25 4 111

1042034 1809 400 30 48

1042035 2021 532 19 141

1042041 1176 421 12 171

1042042 1877 498 17 349

1042051 1324 539 47 89

1042061 1490 436 6 152

1042271 1116 356 39 160

1042272 875 299 2 159

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: CALABASH LOUNGE
10802 N 43RD AVE




Date: 4/30/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Red Lobster #0354 - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 328744.

Summary

Applicant
Richard Teel, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4802 E. Cactus Road
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 3

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a restaurant.
This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was May 5, 2025. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,



grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal and
responsible alcohol sales and service.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Maguey Taco Bar - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 339722.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
12005 N. Tatum Boulevard, Ste. 12
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 3

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 31, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We train all of our employees in responsible liquor service. We also conduct regular
audits to ensure they comply.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“We would like the ability to serve our 21 and over patrons an adult beverage with their
meal if they choose to have one."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Maguey Taco Bar - Data
Attachment B - Maguey Taco Bar - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: MAGUEY TACO BAR
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Bar 6 4 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 9 4

Hotel 11 1 1

Restaurant 12 30 19


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 99.89 211.57

Violent Crimes 12.31 7.29 12.31
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 13

Total Violations 69 15




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1032052 1366 422 27 80

1032081 1370 464 39 45

1032082 1476 446 407 164

1032083 910 500 68 27

1032091 1078 337 13 65

1032092 313 141 131 14

1032104 969 134 63 49

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: MAGUEY TACO BAR
12005 N TATUM BLVD




Date: 4/8/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Carniceria Chihuahua - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 314956.

Summary

Applicant
Gustavo Lom, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
2522 N. 16th Street
Zoning Classification: C-2 CNSPD
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a specialty market. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 1, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am an entrepreneur and restauratuer with deep ties to the community. I have been
operating a restaurant in this area for over thirty years, during which time I have
developed a loyal customer base, created numerous jobs and opportunities for locals,
and provided stability and consistency in a rapidly changing area. My experience and
community connections make me an ideal operator to have a liquor license because I
understand both the reality of operating a business and the unique needs of this
neighborhood.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“I intend to open a carniceria at this location which will provide fresh, locally sourced
meats and dairy products to the community while also providing some grocery, pre-
made and hot food options. By granting me this license, the community will be
benefited by creating a 'one-stop-shop' where locals can complete all their shopping in
a locally based establishment without the difficulties that accompany visiting large
grocery stores. It will allow me to provide a greater range of products for the
community."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Carniceria Chihuahua - Data
Attachment B - Carniceria Chihuahua - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.






Liquor License Data: CARNICERIA CHIHUAHUA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 9 2

Liquor Store 9 5 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 11 3

Restaurant 12 19 4

Craft Distiller 18 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 139.14 163.16

Violent Crimes 12.31 32.27 38.64

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 109

Total Violations 69 170




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1106004 1350 265 59 196

1107012 1274 194 61 154

1116021 374 0 46 98

1116022 2191 365 78 589

1116023 1740 67 23 197

1117001 1240 396 65 217

1117002 1143 416 44 64

1117004 1426 315 66 49

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: CARNICERIA CHIHUAHUA
2522 N 16TH ST




Date: 4/8/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Durant's - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 334713.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
2611 N. Central Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2 HRI TOD-1
Council District: 4

This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This location was
previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application was May 10, 2025. However, the
applicant submitted a written request for more time.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Ocean 44 (Series 12)
4748 N. Goldwater Boulevard, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Steak 44 (Series 12)
5101 N. 44th Street, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 8
Liquor license violations: None

Michael Dominick's Lincoln Avenue Prime Steakhouse (Series 12)
15169 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. C100, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We are committed to responsible service, supporting the local economy through job
creation and community engagement.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Durant's has been a beloved part of Phoenix, AZ for 75 years, serving generations
with grea food and warm hospitality, As one of the longest standing establishments in
the area, our restaurant is not just a place to eat - it's a gathering spot that has hosted
countless celebration milestones, & everyday moments for our loyal patrons. A liquor
license will allow us to enhance the dining experience, remain competitive, & continue
attracting visitors to the area. This license will help us preserve the legacy while
providing an even better experience for our guests.”



Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Durant's - Data
Attachment B - Durant's - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: DURANT'S
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Bar 6 7 4

Beer and Wine Bar 7 9 3

Liquor Store 9 7 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 11 5

Hotel 11 1 1

Restaurant 12 47 19

Club 14 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 174.94 147.23

Violent Crimes 12.31 29.96 49.36

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 35

Total Violations 69 51




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1105013 486 47 63 125

1105022 2166 436 185 339

1117004 1426 315 66 49

1118001 962 221 108 264

1118002 846 361 100 89

1118003 1247 510 88 26

1118004 1423 507 117 200

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: DURANT'S
2611 N CENTRAL AVE




Date: 4/7/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Vinsar's Lounge - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 337348.

Summary

Applicant
Jared Repinski, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2801 N. Central Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2 HRI TOD-1
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 1, 2025

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been representing liquor licensed establishments in Arizona for over 15 years.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Tourism plays an important role in our local economy and liquor licensed
establishments (the sale of alcohol) is a very important aspect of tourism. Therefore, if
the City of Phoenix continues to lead the State of Arizona by approving quality and
diverse businesses (restaurants, bars, microbreweries, distilleries, hotels, resorts, golf
courses, special events, convenience / liquor / grocery stores & gas stations) similar to
this proposed liquor licensed business, all businesses will prosper.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Vinsar's Lounge - Data
Attachment B - Vinsar's Lounge - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: VINSARS LOUNGE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Bar 6 8 4

Beer and Wine Bar 7 8 4

Liquor Store 9 6 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 9 5

Hotel 11 2 1

Restaurant 12 40 19

Club 14 1 0



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 174.62 156.36

Violent Crimes 12.31 29.24 35.88

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 33

Total Violations 68 53




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1105013 486 47 63 125

1105022 2166 436 185 339

1106004 1350 265 59 196

1117004 1426 315 66 49

1118001 962 221 108 264

1118002 846 361 100 89

1118003 1247 510 88 26

1118004 1423 507 117 200

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: VINSARS LOUNGE
2801 N CENTRAL AVE




Date: 4/30/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - 7- Eleven #42391A - District 5

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 333825.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine

Location
9110 W. Thomas Road
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 5

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This business is under construction with plans to open in July 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 23, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

7- Eleven #21814L (Series 10)
885 E. 22nd Street, Tucson
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is an experienced licensee and is committed to upholding the highest
standards for business and maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers
and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and
service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“7-Eleven is a on-stop shop for convenience items. The store offers a wide variety
goods, including fresh and ready - to eat foods, home and personal care products,
snacks, and drinks. Applicant would like to offer beer and wine to customers 21 and
over.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - 7- Eleven #42391A - Data
Attachment B - 7- Eleven #42391A - Map




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: 7-ELEVEN #42391A
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Liquor Store 9 2 2

Restaurant 12 3 3



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 83.97 113.48

Violent Crimes 12.31 20.67 36.51

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 67

Total Violations 68 133


Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

0820091 2139 401 18 477

0820092 2788 421 21 98

0820161 0 0 0 0

0820162 4197 623 82 530

0820171 1887 192 18 229

0820172 0 0 0 0

0820181 2313 519 20 181

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: 7-ELEVEN #42391A
9110 W THOMAS RD




Date: 4/30/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Madison District Educational Foundation, Inc. -
District 6

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Matthew Gerber

Location
5601 N. 16th Street
Council District: 6

Function
Musical Theater Performance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
June 21, 2025 - 3 p.m. to 10 p.m. / 1,808 attendees
June 22, 2025 - Noon to 5:30 p.m. / 904 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Phoenix City Grille - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 329955.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
5816 N. 16th Street
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6

This request is for an acquisition of control of an existing liquor license for a bar. This
location is currently licensed for liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 23, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, consideration should be given only to the applicant's
personal qualifications.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the



applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is an experienced licensee and is committed to upholding the highest
standards to maintain compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be
trained in the techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Brunch & Sip - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 336349.

Summary

Applicant
Larry White, Jr., Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3714 E. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow outdoor dining and alcohol service. This business is
currently under construction and has plans to open in June 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 1, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.





Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Brunch & Sip (Series 12)
3950 E. Indian School Road, Ste. 100, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 52
Liquor license violations: None

Lo-Lo's Chicken & Waffles (Series 12)
1220 S. Central Avenue, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 32
Liquor license violations: None

Lolo's Chicken and Waffles (Series 12)
3133 N. Scottsdale Road, Scottsdale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: In November 2018, a fine of $750 was paid for accepting
unauthorized forms of identification and for selling, giving or furnishing an underage
person with alcohol.

Monroe's Hot Chicken (Series 12)
430 N. Scottsdale Road, Ste. 108, Tempe
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold several liquor licensce. We have had a liquor licensce since 2012.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be


substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"We a full service restaurant. We will create a beautiful establishment to dine and
enjoy delicious cuisine.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Brunch & Sip - Data
Attachment B - Brunch & Sip - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: BRUNCH & SIP
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 2 0

Bar 6 6 4

Beer and Wine Bar 7 6 1

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 8 2

Restaurant 12 36 15


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 104.06 116.56

Violent Crimes 12.31 12.73 11.46
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 53

Total Violations 67 71




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1082003 1237 375 35 61

1083013 1416 316 40 58

1083021 1269 360 68 58

1083022 1419 351 90 116

1109011 1092 393 51 29

1109021 2051 122 184 126

1109022 2584 472 149 528

1110001 1097 117 20 93

1110002 891 325 25 43

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: BRUNCH & SIP
3714 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD




Date: 5/5/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Voices of the Desert, Inc. - District 7

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Heidi Hamor

Location
1202 N. 3rd Street
Council District: 7

Function
Community Theater Show

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
June 6, 2025 - 8 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. / 75 attendees
June 7, 2025 - 8 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. / 100 attendees
June 8, 2025 - 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. / 150 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Club Contact - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 339484.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 6 - Bar

Location
747 W. Van Buren Street
Zoning Classification: DTC - Van Buren HP
Council District: 7

This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a bar. This location was
previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 27, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal and
responsible alcohol sales and service."

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Club Contact will feature a variety of craft cocktails and specialty drinks in a Sci-Fi
themed atmosphere. Applicant would like to offer guests 21 and over the opportunity to
purchase alcoholic beverages."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Club Contact - Data
Attachment B - Club Contact - Map


Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: CLUB CONTACT
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 0

Microbrewery 3 4 2

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 6 0

Bar 6 46 13

Beer and Wine Bar 7 10 2

Liquor Store 9 5 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 10 3

Hotel 11 7 1

Restaurant 12 96 15

Club 14 3 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 238.56 306.68

Violent Crimes 12.31 72.37 135.35

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 91

Total Violations 69 135




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1129002 671 102 83 94

1129003 1168 99 40 80

1129004 1279 82 91 706

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1131003 2654 2 355 297

1141001 2605 227 111 276

1142001 938 210 81 167

1143011 911 80 49 374

1143022 1217 30 68 366

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: CLUB CONTACT
747 W VAN BUREN ST




Date: 4/7/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Tacos La K'Lera - District 7

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 333941.

Summary

Applicant
Jose Valdez Gastelum, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3010 S. 99th Avenue, Ste. 102
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 7

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 1, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I understand and I'm committed to comply with all laws and regulations for the sales
and service of alcohol, ensuring the safety of people and prventing under age sales or
service to intoxicated persons.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“My establishmen will provide a safe, well managed enviroment for socializing, dining
and community engagement. The business will serve as a positive gathering/dining
space that aligns with community values.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Tacos La K'Lera - Data
Attachment B - Tacos La K'Lera - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: TACOS LA K'LERA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 2

Restaurant 12 3 3



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 43.49 93.63

Violent Crimes 12.31 6.66 11.14

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 11

Total Violations 69 13


Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

0822041 4129 587 27 251

0822042 1821 247 10 133

0822043 1777 335 21 249

0822121 2196 433 100 189

0822122 4628 632 13 316

0822132 3215 702 22 319

0822133 1937 491 4 0

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: TACOS LA K'LERA
3010 S 99TH AVE




Date: 4/8/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Daydreamer Coffee - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 340724.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
811 N. 3rd Street
Zoning Classification: DTC - Evans Churchill West
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is June 1, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“We are committed to serving our patrons responsibly. We will ensure all of our
employees handling alcohol will be Title 4 trained.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been open and operating for a few years. We would like to continue
to offer guests of the building and patrons a place to relax, enjoy great food and
specialty drinks."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Daydreamer Coffee - Data
Attachment B - Daydreamer Coffee - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: DAYDREAMER COFFEE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Producer 1 1 0

Microbrewery 3 5 3

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Government 5 7 6

Bar 6 48 15

Beer and Wine Bar 7 15 6

Liquor Store 9 6 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 14 5

Hotel 11 7 2

Restaurant 12 111 46

Club 14 2 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 266.77 366.02

Violent Crimes 12.31 59.58 77.28

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 60

Total Violations 67 88




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1130001 2898 331 199 515

1130002 1364 179 221 139

1131001 1929 146 155 743

1131002 2026 50 492 845

1131003 2654 2 355 297

1132021 740 87 52 190

1132022 1347 118 99 594

1132041 1507 221 53 310

1132042 506 63 11 131

1140003 1025 304 49 114

1141001 2605 227 111 276

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: DAYDREAMER COFFEE
811 N 3RD ST




Date: 5/1/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Sun Asian Kitchen - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 338729.

Summary

Applicant
Jiajia Xiang, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2070 E. Baseline Road, Ste. D112
Zoning Classification: C-2 BAOD
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 24, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations



on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Abacus Inn Chinese Cuisine (Series 12)
20329 N. 59th Avenue, Ste. A-10, Glendale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have managed many restaurants with liquor licenses. I bought my first restaurant a
year ago and it has been very successful. This will be my second restaurant with a
liquor license. I have been through liquor license training and have not had any
issues.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This location has been operating in the neighborhood for along time and has
developed a following in the neighborhood. We like to offer great food and friendly
faces.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Sun Asian Kitchen - Data
Attachment B - Sun Asian Kitchen - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.



Liquor License Data: SUN ASIAN KITCHEN
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 0

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 3

Restaurant 12 7 5

Club 14 1 0



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 119.05 249.78

Violent Crimes 12.31 12.39 15.28

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 24

Total Violations 69 34



Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1162033 3169 684 124 1054

1163002 2253 454 9 427

1163003 2202 607 24 318

1167371 1884 678 25 91

1167383 3038 901 29 0

Average 1601 393 60 177



Liquor License Map: SUN ASIAN KITCHEN
2070 E BASELINE RD




Date: 4/1/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Walmart Fuel Center #3771 - District 8

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 334380.

Summary

Applicant
John Curtis II, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
6128 S. 35th Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 8

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas. This
location was not previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim
permit. This business is currently under construction with plans to open in July 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is May 26, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the



applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted an extensive statement. A copy is available upon request to
the City Clerk's Office at 200 West Washington Street, 1st Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Walmart Fuel Center #3771 - Data
Attachment B - Walmart Fuel Center #3771 - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: WALMART FUEL CENTER #3771
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 2

Restaurant 12 4 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 154.08 387.68

Violent Crimes 12.31 21.12 32.9

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 22

Total Violations 67 40


Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1155002 1706 397 34 521

1166061 1648 264 13 559

1166063 2872 482 19 440

1166072 2014 304 5 239

1166121 3256 780 37 575

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: WALMART FUEL CENTER #3771
6128 S 35TH AVE




Date: 5/6/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Partnership for Economic Innovation (PEI) Annual Membership

For $50,000 in payment authority to pay the annual membership fee for the City
Manager's Office of Innovation and Information Technology Services Department for
The Connective, a Smart Cities initiative of the Partnership for Economic Innovation.
The City of Phoenix is a leading participant in The Connective with a mission to
transform Arizona into a top global market for innovation and establish the first Smart
Region. The Connective supports the City in scientific evaluations of initiatives, pilot
projects, and existing processes to reduce costs, improve performance, and advance
innovation across City departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Compex Legal Services, Inc.

For $30,000 in payment authority to pay outstanding invoices owed under Contract
153673 with Compex Legal Services, Inc. This additional payment authority will enable
the Law Department to pay outstanding invoices for this expired document retrieval
services contract. Although the requested payment authority is below the small dollar
purchase threshold, pursuant to the Administrative Regulation 3.10, Section 1,
Paragraph 6.A.3.e, the Law Department seeks the additional payment authority for
these funds because, upon approval, the revised aggregate value of the contract will
be $128,000.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Gillig, LLC

For $122,700 in payment authority to purchase two portable bus charging units for the
Public Transit Department. Portable charging units are needed as a component of the
support infrastructure for electric buses ordered by the Public Transit Department as
part of the Battery Electric Bus Pilot.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
GHD Services, Inc.

For $230,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about July 1,
2025, for a term of three years with GHD Services, Inc. to provide water systems
operation and maintenance services of equipment at the Arizona State Route 85
(SR85) Landfill for the Public Works Department. Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ) requires compliance with the State of Arizona
Administrative Code (AAC) Title 18 Chapter 5 which regulates water treatment plants
and water quality. Therefore, the City requires the services of a certified water
treatment system operator to operate and maintain the SR85 Landfill water treatment
systems to stay in compliance.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Ferguson US Holdings, Inc.

For $120,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about July 1,
2025, for a term of five years for Vitrified Clay Pipe for Water Services Department
(WSD). Vitrified clay pipe (VCP) and fittings are a key component utilized for repair
and replacement of the City's collection system of sewer mains. WSD staff will have
the ability to make repairs to small diameter VCP damaged by other utilities,
underground excavators and naturally occurring events by use of this contract.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Roosevelt Irrigation District

For $1,300,000 in payment authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 water rights settlement
claim costs for Contract 54170, for the Water Services Department (WSD). In 1998,
the City of Phoenix entered into a comprehensive settlement agreement with Salt
River Pima Maricopa Indian Community (SRPMIC), and others, to settle SRPMIC
water rights claims. Part of that settlement included an ongoing three-way water
exchange among the City of Phoenix, Salt River Project and the Roosevelt Irrigation
District. The City of Phoenix is responsible to pay a portion of costs associated with the
ongoing annual exchange.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Valley Water Users' Association Doing Business as Salt River Project

For $200,000 in payment authority for Agreement 107647 for delivery, ordering,
accounting, and reporting of the Peninsula-Horowitz Entitlement for Fiscal Year 2025-
26 for the Water Services Department. Peninsula, Horowitz, and Champion Irrigation
Districts are located in the southwest portion of the City of Phoenix and are in the initial
stages of conversion from farmland to urban usage. Under the agreement, the City
receives water from the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association, treats it, and
delivers to urban customers within these irrigation districts.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Valley Water Users' Association Doing Business as Salt River Project

For $3,100,000 in payment authority for Contract 59580 for the Water Transportation
Agreement to transfer water from the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association
(Association) to the City and for Salt and Verde Rivers water delivery pursuant to water
rights held by the City for Fiscal Year 2025-26 for the Water Services Department
(WSD). WSD treats and delivers water for lands within the Salt River Reservoir District
which have rights to the water stored and developed by the Association.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Valley Water Users' Association Doing Business as Salt River Project

For $6,500,000 in payment authority for Contract 100353 for water delivery and use
agreement with the Salt River Valley Water Users' Association (Association) to provide
wholesale water for resale by the Water Services Department within the Salt River
Reservoir District for Fiscal Year 2025-26. The water delivered to the city by the
Association from the Salt and Verde Rivers represents approximately 60 percent of the
City's water supply.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Doing Business
as Salt River Project

For $340,000 in payment authority for Contract 63846 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 for
annual operation and maintenance costs for the Granite Reef Underground Storage
Project (GRUSP) for the Water Services Department. GRUSP operates under an
Intergovernmental Agreement between Salt River Project and the cities of Chandler,
Gilbert, Phoenix, Mesa, Scottsdale, and Tempe. Phoenix owns 25.755 percent of the
underground water storage capacity of GRUSP and pays its proportional share of
GRUSP costs.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District Doing Business
as Salt River Project

For $240,000 in payment authority for Contract 53453 for operation and maintenance
of the Central Arizona Project Salt River Project interconnection facility for the Water
Services Department. The Intergovernmental Agreement between the Salt River Valley
Water Users' Association, the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power
District, cities of Chandler, Gilbert, Glendale, Mesa, Peoria, Phoenix, Scottsdale, and
Tempe allows the City of Phoenix to transport water from the Central Arizona Project
aqueduct to the Granite Reef Dam. The Water Services Department is responsible for
38.425 percent of the operating and maintenance expenses for Fiscal Year 2025-26.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
State of Arizona Doing Business as Arizona Department of Water Resources

For $50,000 in payment authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 to pay fees associated with
water storage permit applications, groundwater withdrawal, groundwater production,
long-term storage credit recovery, and dewatering for the Water Services and Parks
and Recreation departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Central Arizona Water Conservation District Doing Business as Central Arizona
Project

For $50,000,000 in payment authority for Contracts 132409 and108079 for Fiscal Year
2025-26 for delivery of Colorado river water to the City of Phoenix for the Water
Services Department. The agreement provides irrigation, municipal, and industrial
water to the City's service area.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Arizona Municipal Water Users Association - Annual Payment Authority

For $600,000 in payment authority for membership renewal to the Arizona Municipal
Water Users Association for the Water Services Department. Participation in the
Arizona Municipal Water Users Association provides Water Services staff access to a
variety of research and information addressing drinking water, wastewater, water
reclamation, watershed quality, and storm water issues. The item was approved by the
Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee on April 16, 2025.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Water Research Foundation - Annual Payment Authority

For $274,000 in payment authority for membership renewal for the Water Services
Department. The Foundation sponsors research to assist water utilities in providing
safe and affordable drinking water. A membership with the organization allows Water
Services staff access to the latest research and technical information used to address
drinking water, wastewater, and water reclamation issues. The item was approved by
the Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee on April 16, 2025.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Western Urban Water Coalition - Annual Payment Authority

For $44,000 in payment authority for Fiscal Year 2025-26 membership renewal for the
Water Services Department. The Western Urban Water Coalition is an organization of
the largest urban water utilities in the western United States. The membership helps
secure sound national water policies, programs, and regulations impacting the unique
challenges facing urban water supplies in the West. The item was approved by the
Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee on April 16, 2025.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
National Association of Clean Water Agencies - Annual Payment Authority

For $74,300 in payment authority for membership renewal for the Water Services
Department. The National Association of Clean Water Agencies conducts a financial
survey of the wastewater industry that Water Services staff uses to benchmark its
operations, provides information used to formulate policy recommendations on Clean
Water Act issues, and offers opportunities to collaborate with colleagues around the
country to help shape national policy. The item was recommended for approval by the
Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee on April 16, 2025.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM MARCH 26 AND APRIL 9, 2025) - Authorization to Amend
Ground Lease Agreement 9542 with Christown 1755, LLC to Modify the Term and
Expand the Premises (Ordinance S-51728) - District 4

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Lease Agreement 9542 with Christown 1755, LLC to modify the term and expand the
premises of the ground lease for the Yucca Library. Further request to authorize the
City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Additionally, request the City Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City
Code Section 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this
transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise
would be prohibited by Phoenix City Code Section 42-18, as tenancy agreements
include such provisions.

Summary
The City entered into a ground lease beginning September 8, 1960, Lease Agreement
9542, for 43,560 square feet of land located at 5648 N. 15th Avenue (Leased Site) for
the Yucca Library. The ground lease expires June 13, 2057. The City intends to
expand the library to include an approximate 10,000 square foot addition to the
existing building. To accommodate this addition, the Leased Site will expand to include
approximately 72,830 square feet of land, identified by Assessor Parcel Number 156-
35-004G, for a total of 116,390 square feet of land. Additionally, the lease term will be
amended to a 50-year term, beginning July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2075, for
continuation of municipal public library services and because of the capital investment
necessary for the addition.

Base rent will be $5,000 per month, plus applicable taxes, and will increase ten
percent every five years thereafter, which is within the range of market rents as
determined by the Real Estate Division. The City is responsible for all development
and construction costs for the expansion and for real estate taxes associated with
Leased Site. The City is responsible for ongoing maintenance and improvement costs,
including landscaping.






Contract Term
The contract term of the ground lease is 50 years beginning July 1, 2025, through
June 30, 2075.

Financial Impact
Rent during the first five years of the lease agreement is $60,000 per year, plus
applicable taxes, beginning July 1, 2025. Rent will increase ten percent every five
years.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Lease Agreement 9542, authorized by Ordinance 3825, was adopted October 25,
1966.

Location
5648 N. 15th Avenue
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library and
Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
This report transmits a balanced budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26. As
recommended in the report and presentation of the City Manager's Proposed
Budget on May 6, 2025, staff requests approval of the FY 2025-26 budget.

The FY 2025-26 proposed budget includes a projected one-time General Fund (GF)
surplus of $17 million. Due to significant economic uncertainty and volatility, slowing
revenue collections in the current fiscal year, possible further inflationary impacts on
costs to deliver services, unknown impacts from the current State legislative
session, and potential reductions in federal funding the City Manager recommends
the surplus be set-aside in reserve to be available if needed to balance the FY 2026
-27 budget. The proposed FY 2025-26 final budget also includes detailed schedules
for all City Funds (Schedules 1-11).

The City of Phoenix is committed to engaging residents in the budget process and this
year there were many opportunities to provide feedback outside of regularly scheduled
hearings to obtain feedback from residents on the proposed FY 2025-26 Trial Budget.
Information was made available on the City's website and through social media
platforms, the PAYS Newsletter, and via radio advertisements. Community members
also submitted feedback through phone and email directly to the Budget & Research
Department. The feedback from residents overall indicates support for the proposed
budget and requests for more City services in a variety of areas. Attachment C
includes information on the City's efforts to address many of the comments by
residents, a summary of comments by category, minutes of each budget hearing, and
all email and phone comments. The public can access more information on the FY
2025-26 Trial Budget, including video recordings of completed budget hearings, at
phoenix.gov/budget. Additionally, $2 million in available one-time American Rescue
Plan Act (ARPA) interest earnings will be allocated to the Housing Trust Fund with all
future available ARPA interest earnings dedicated to the trust.

Summary
The City of Phoenix continues to be an economic leader in the country due to diverse



business and economic opportunities, a strong job market and population growth.
Unfortunately, as presented at the February 25, 2025 Policy meeting, the GF budget
outlook reflected structural deficits over the next three fiscal years requiring difficult
and strategic decisions to balance the budget. The preliminary GF Status for FY 2025-
26 reflected a baseline deficit of $(36) million and the forecast reflected projected
shortfalls in FY 2026-27 of $(83) million and in FY 2027-28 of $(6) million primarily due
to the State's actions to eliminate residential rental sales tax in 2023 via Senate Bill
(SB) 1131 and to lower the individual income tax rate in 2021 to the flat tax of 2.5
percent (SB 1828). These actions by the State limit local control and will reduce
ongoing City revenues going forward. Staff completed the annual 7+5 technical
expenditure and revenue review process and adjustments were made to the FY 2025-
26 GF Status of approximately $(3) million primarily to reflect adjustments to property
tax and emergency transportation revenue estimates. The revised FY 2025-26 GF
Status presented to City Council on March 18 in the Trial Budget reflected a revised
projected deficit of $(39) million. Residents can review the February 25 and March 18

The City is required to adopt a balanced budget and the City Council demonstrated
strong leadership on March 18 to resolve the projected GF deficit by approving
proposed budget balancing strategies discussed further in this report. The strategies to
balance the budget were necessary to preserve existing GF programs and services,
offset the revenue losses caused by State legislative action, and provide additional
resources for critical priorities. The strategies result in a one-time projected FY 2025-
26 GF surplus of $17 million recommended by the City Manager to be set-aside and
available in the fund balance if necessary to balance the FY 2026-27 budget.

The FY 2025-26 proposed budget includes GF and Non-GF supplementals (
Attachment A) for the Fire Department to reduce emergency response times, for the
Office of Homeless Solutions to continue efforts helping the unsheltered population
and to address impacts of homelessness on neighborhoods, and to add resources to
the Water Services Department to reopen the Cave Creek Water Reclamation Plant. T
he FY 2025-26 budget also includes 38.6 ongoing full-time equivalent (FTE)
positions needed in the GF (10.6 FTE) and Non-GF departments (28.0 FTE), and
represents conversion of existing budgeted resources for critical position needs.
Funding for these positions has been identified and accounted for in department
operating budgets and therefore no additional funding is necessary. More
information on each position can be found in Attachment A.

Additionally, detailed budget information is included in this report on the FY 2025-26
proposed budget for all City funds (Schedules 1-11).




Proposed Strategies to Balance the GF Budget
The proposed FY 2025-26 Trial Budget presented on March 18 included strategies to
resolve projected GF budget shortfalls and protect existing programs and services.
More information on the FY 2025-26 Trial Budget can be found at
https://www.phoenix.gov/content/dam/phoenix/budgetsite/documents/2025-
26_Trial_Budget.pdf.

The budget balancing strategies approved by the City Council and included in the FY
2025-26 City Manager's Budget include:

· Increase the Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT) and Use Tax rate 0.5 percent effective
July 1, 2025, from 2.3 percent to 2.8 percent, as posted on the City's website.
www.phoenix.gov/Documents/2025-PHX-Tax-Notice-Info.pdf.
· Re-prioritize spending and reduce ongoing GF costs by $24 million with no direct
impacts to service delivery (Attachment B).
· Use of excise tax bond proceeds to pay for public safety and other GF capital needs
totaling $175 million to reduce the up front cost burden to the GF (approved by City
Council on April 9).
· Set-aside $92 million in FY 2025-26 to be available to balance FY 2026-27.
· Use of Non-GFs to reduce GF costs for major maintenance and citywide street
transportation and construction services.

The above strategies are estimated to offset the revenue losses caused by State
actions, protect existing programs and services, and provide additional resources for
critical additions to the GF budget detailed below and included in Attachment A.

Phoenix Fire Department (PFD)
The PFD provides lifesaving services to all Phoenix residents and visitors and includes
emergency medical and transportation services, all-hazards incident management,
property protection through fire suppression, and community risk reduction efforts. The
recent fire catastrophe in Los Angeles, CA serves as a reminder of the importance of
adequately resourcing the PFD to ensure sufficient levels of staffing, equipment and
facilities are ready to respond to emergencies. A critical measurement of the PFD
effectiveness in operations is emergency response time and is measured from the time
of dispatch of an emergency apparatus to when the unit arrives on scene. The
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) establishes the standard fire departments
utilize to measure performance. Currently, the PFD’s response times exceed the NFPA
established standards. While the department continuously evaluates innovative ways
to improve response times, additional resources are needed to increase the number of



fire stations and facilities, personnel, and equipment to keep pace with the significant
growth in geographic area and population the department must serve. Supplemental
needs for the Fire Department (Attachment A) include conversion of 32 grant funded
sworn positions to the GF estimated at $3 million in FY 2025-26 and $5 million
ongoing, add 24 sworn personnel to staff the new General Obligation Bond funded Fire
Station 15 at 45th Avenue and Camelback Road estimated at $2 million in FY 2025-26
and $4 million ongoing, and provide a dedicated $25 million in GF resources going
forward to add 134 sworn and 19 civilian personnel to reduce emergency response
times.

Once fully implemented, the estimated impact of additional sworn personnel will be an
improvement in localized and citywide fire response times based on 2024 incident data
at the 90th percentile. Fire critical emergency medical services (CEMS) response
times are projected to improve from 8 minutes and 30 seconds to 4 minutes and 25
seconds in the localized communities where the units will primarily serve. Fire
ambulance response times are projected to improve from 10 minutes and 42 seconds
to 4 minutes and 44 seconds in the localized communities. Based on the estimated
citywide impacts of the budget additions, Fire CEMS response times are projected to
improve from 7 minutes and 23 seconds to 7 minutes and 14 seconds. Based on the
estimated citywide impacts of the budget additions, Fire ambulance response times
are projected to improve from 9 minutes and 38 seconds to 9 minutes and 29 seconds.
These response times could vary based on any future adjustments to unit placement
and the hours of service to meet the community's needs. The additional sworn
personnel will staff new apparatus to be placed in service around the City, and new
Fire stations including Station 71 located at 60th Street and Mayo Boulevard, and
Station 93 at Metrocenter (location site to be determined). The additional apparatus
and fire stations will be funded by excise tax bond proceeds (approved by City Council
on April 9).

Office of Homeless Solutions (OHS)
The OHS has made tremendous progress in addressing homelessness over the last
two years. Investments in the infrastructure of the region’s homeless services system
have been monumental. As we move out of pandemic-era funding, OHS has unfunded
needs necessary to continue its momentum and ensure the transformational projects
and services implemented in the last two years can continue. Also important to note on
November 5, 2024, voters passed Proposition 312 Property Tax; Refund; Nuisance
Enforcement that allows property owners beginning in Tax Year 2025 to apply to the
Arizona Department of Revenue for a property tax refund if the owner documents
expenses caused by a city, town, or county that either (1) declines to enforce existing
laws prohibiting illegal camping, obstructing public thoroughfares, loitering,
panhandling, public urination or defecation, public consumption of alcoholic beverages


or use of illegal substances, or (2) maintains a public nuisance. The City is unable to
project the potential impacts to revenue or costs associated with Proposition 312 but
will have to identify a funding source. The passage of this proposition furthers the need
for the City of Phoenix to address and provide ongoing resources for homelessness.

GF resources will be needed in 2025-26 for homelessness with revised estimates at
$4.5 million due to the expiration of ARPA funding. Funding is necessary for a portion
of OHS operational costs, operational costs at an affordable housing site for very low-
income older adults, operational costs at three emergency shelters (Rio Fresco, North
Mountain Healing Center, and the temporary Washington Shelter) and heat relief
efforts. The need in 2026-27 and going forward is estimated at $26.0 million and will
fund a portion of OHS operational costs, the temporary Safe Outdoor Space,
operational support for five emergency shelters (Rio Fresco, North Mountain Healing
Center, the temporary Washington Shelter, Central Arizona Shelter Services, and the
Phoenix Navigation Center), some operational costs at the Key Campus and heat
relief efforts. Staff will continue to seek additional external funding for these programs,
and evaluate other City funding sources, which if received would offset the need for a
portion of the ongoing General Fund request.

As mentioned above the proposed strategies also included re-prioritizing $24 million in
the existing GF budget to create capacity to add the above critical supplementals.
More information on GF proposed cost reductions totaling $24 million is included in
Attachment B. The proposed reductions do not include any filled City positions, but
elimination of 18.2 vacant positions; and represent lowering costs for non-personal
related line items included various contractuals, commodities and minor capital outlay.
These reductions will not have a direct impact on service delivery.

The FY 2025-26 proposed budget also includes a Non-GF supplemental budget
addition for the Water Services Department to add $5.6 million for 28.0 FTE and 20
vehicles to reopen the Cave Creek Water Reclamation Plant. This addition would allow
the City to expand capacity for wastewater treatment and water purification, maintain
environmental and safety standards, and uphold technological process control and
security standards (Attachment A).

FY 2025-26 Final Proposed Budget
The proposed balanced FY 2025-26 GF budget is $2,193.6 million. This is a $61.8
million increase or 2.9 percent from the adopted FY 2024-25 GF Budget of $2,131.8
million. The final GF budget reflects adjustments from what was presented on May 6,
2025, to account for annual carryovers totaling $21.9 million for capital pay-as-you-go
projects made during the final capital budget review process. The carryovers are from
capital projects previously anticipated to occur in FY 2024-25 that will now occur in FY


2025-26. The increase also accounts primarily for higher costs associated with
employee salaries and fringe benefits, including health insurance and pension
(detailed in the Multi-year Forecast presented to City Council on Feb. 25, 2025), and a
higher contingency amount to achieve 4.75 percent of operating costs. Inflation also
continues to impact certain expenditure categories including the cost to replace
vehicles and to maintain facilities.

Projected GF resources are estimated at $2,193.6 million and includes the estimated
beginning balance of $210.1 million, estimated revenue of $1,936.9 million and net
interfund transfers and recoveries of $46.6 million, which include interfund transfers for
central services, in-lieu property taxes, debt service, infrastructure repayment
agreements, and resources to support the Public Safety Specialty Funds. GF revenues
of $1,936.9 million represent annual growth of 6.5 percent over FY 2024-25, and
includes the estimated revenue to be collected from the TPT and Use Tax rate
increase to 2.8 percent effective July 1, 2025 approved by City Council on March 18.
Revenue projections assume no further impact from the current legislative session and
are based on the most recent data available to formulate projections. Schedule 2
included in this report provides more information about City revenue estimates for all
funds and additional information can be found on the Budget and Research website at
phoenix.gov/budget.

For all funds, which includes General, Enterprise and Special Revenue funds such as
grants, and all debt service and pay-as-you-go capital costs, the proposed FY 2025-26
final budget is $7,860.9 million. The final proposed budget reflects adjustments from
what was presented on May 6, 2025, to account for changes from the final capital
budget review process. Changes were made to operating costs due to carryovers for
capital pay-as-you-go projects previously anticipated to occur in FY 2024-25 that will
now occur in FY 2025-26, updated cost estimates of capital projects, programming of
$175 million in 2025 excise tax bond funds approved by the City Council on April 9,
2025, and adjustments to capital expenditure estimates from bond funds to operating
funds for Water and Wastewater.

Details on the FY 2025-26 proposed final budget for all City funds is attached to this
report in Schedules 1-11 and include:

· Resources and expenditures by fund for FY 2023-24 actuals; FY 2024-25 estimate;
and FY 2025-26 proposed budget.
· Proposed revenues for all City funds by major source.
· Proposed operating expenditures by department, including fund source.
· Proposed debt service by program, source of funds, and expense type.



· Proposed interfund transfers.
· Proposed full-time equivalent (FTE) positions by department.
· Preliminary FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program resources and expenditures
by capital fund, program and fund source.
· Preliminary FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program by source of funds.
· Summary of proposed property tax levy and rate information.

Next Steps
The remaining key dates in this year's budget process are as follows:


Date Event
June 4, 2025 FY 2025-26 Tentative Budget Ordinance Adoption
June 18, 2025 FY 2025-26 Funding Plan and Final Budget Ordinance Adoption
July 2, 2025 FY 2025-26 Property Tax Levy Ordinance Adoption

On July 2, 2025, City Council is scheduled to adopt the property tax as the last step in
the legally required budget adoption process. Primary property tax revenues support
operating costs for GF programs and services, while secondary property taxes pay
debt service for capital projects for the General Obligation (GO) Bond Program.
Phoenix voters recently approved the 2023 GO Bond Program that includes 47
projects and will provide the resources needed for new parks and libraries, police and
fire stations, regional pools and splash pads, community centers, arts facility
improvements, and street and storm drain projects. More information on the 2023 GO
Bond Program can be found on our website at phoenix.gov/bond.

The total combined primary and secondary property tax rate for FY 2025-26, of
$2.0799, is unchanged from the FY 2024-25 combined rate. The proposed primary
property tax rate for FY 2025-26, of $1.2658 remains unchanged. The secondary
property tax rate remains unchanged at $0.8141. Although the primary property tax
rate remains unchanged from the prior fiscal year, the primary property tax revenue
estimate increases for FY 2025-26 to $222.7 million, which is $7.3 million or 3.4
percent more than the FY 2024-25 revenue estimate of $215.4 million, due to
increasing net assessed valuations (property values) and new construction.

Additionally, state law requires a Truth in Taxation hearing notice to property owners,
which requires notification any time the average primary property tax bill increases,
even if the tax rate is not increased. The law does not require notice on the City’s
secondary property tax. The hearing is scheduled to take place at the City Council
Formal meeting on June 18, 2025.



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and
Research Department.





ATTACHMENT A

2025-26

PROPOSED ADDITIONS
GENERAL AND NON-GENERAL FUNDS

View the Inventory of Programs published online for program details.

2025-26
Department/Program Total

GENERAL FUND
Set-Aside
1. General Fund set-aside of projected one-time surplus to be carried over and $17,000,000
available for potential labor increases, other community and Council priorities or
to balance the 2026-27 budget if needed due to economic declines or further
reductions to City revenues.

Total Set-Aside $17,000,000

Communications Office
1. Communication Outreach $0
Convert a temporary Management Assistant I position to ongoing status. This 1.0
position provides Spanish-language interpretation services at high-profile City
meetings and events and provides Spanish-language media outreach support.
Converting this position to ongoing status will provide the City's Spanish-speaking
community with high-quality, seamless interpretation services and support.

Total Communications Office $0
1.0

Environmental Programs
1. Food Systems $0
Convert a temporary Project Management Assistant and a temporary 2.0
Administrative Assistant I to ongoing status. These positions are needed to
administer ongoing food systems programs previously funded by American
Rescue Plan Act grants.

Total Environmental Programs $0
2.0

Finance
1. Banking and Cashiering $0
Convert a temporary Accountant III position to ongoing status in the Treasury 1.0
Banking & Cashiering Division paid for by the Water Services Department (WSD).
The position responsibilities include security administration of payment platforms,
ensuring proper integration with financial and customer billing systems used by
WSD.

Total Finance $0
1.0


2025-26
Department/Program Total

Fire
1. Fire Emergency Medical Services and Hazardous Incident Response $2,579,000
Add funding for 32 sworn firefighter positions previously funded by the SAFER 2021 0.0
grant. This funding will allow the department to maintain service delivery and reduce
the impact to daily constant staffing. Funding for the SAFER 2021 grant is estimated
to be fully expended in December 2025 and the full-year ongoing cost is $4,984,000.


2. Fire Emergency Medical Services and Hazardous Incident Response $2,039,000
Add funding for 24 sworn positions (4 Fire Captains, 4 Fire Engineers, and 16 24.0
Firefighters) to provide dedicated staffing for new Fire Station 15, located at 45th
Avenue and Camelback Road. Funding for the station is from the 2023 GO Bond
Program. Staff costs are anticipated to begin January 2026. The full year ongoing
cost is $4,187,000.

3. Various - Note: Items 3 & 4 include ongoing resources totaling $25 million dedicated $22,836,000
to the Fire Department to improve emergency response times. 134.0
Add funding for 134 new sworn positions (29 Fire Captains, 4 Fire Battalion Chiefs,
77 Firefighters, and 24 Fire Engineers) with the goal of reducing emergency
response times. Once fully implemented, the estimated impact will be an
improvement in localized and citywide fire response times based on 2024 incident
data at the 90th percentile. Fire critical emergency medical services (CEMS)
response times are projected to improve from 8 minutes and 30 seconds to 4
minutes and 25 seconds in the localized communities where the units will primarily
serve. Fire ambulance response times are projected to improve from 10 minutes and
42 seconds to 4 minutes and 44 seconds in the localized communities. Based on the
estimated citywide impacts of this budget addition, Fire CEMS response times are
projected to improve from 7 minutes and 23 seconds to 7 minutes and 14 seconds.
Based on the estimated citywide impacts of this budget addition, Fire ambulance
response times are projected to improve from 9 minutes and 38 seconds to 9
minutes and 29 seconds. These response times could vary based on any future
adjustments to unit placement and the hours of service to meet the community's
needs. The additional sworn personnel will staff new apparatus to be placed in
service, and new Fire stations including Station 71 located at 60th St. and Mayo
Blvd., and Station 93 at Metrocenter. The additional apparatus and fire stations will
be funded by excise tax bond proceeds.

4. Various $2,164,000
Add funding for 19 new civilian positions to support increased sworn Firefighter 19.0
staffing, facilities and calls for service. Included are one Fire Administrator, one
Supplies Clerk II*U2, one Building Maintenance Worker*U2, one Fire Equipment
Service Worker, three Human Resources Aides, three Administrative Aides, one
Administrative Assistant I, one Accountant I, two User Technology Specialists, one
Info Tech Analyst/Programmer II, one Special Projects Administrator, one Fire
Communications Shift Supervisor, one Fire Emergency Dispatcher, and one
Paramedic Training Coordinator. These positions will ensure the availability of
resources for logistical, information technology, and human resources assistance.

Total Fire $29,618,000
177.0


2025-26
Department/Program Total

Human Resources
1. Labor Relations $0
Convert a temporary full-time Deputy Human Resources Director position to 1.0
ongoing status. This position coordinates and supports citywide labor
negotiations, helping to facilitate effective relationships with labor groups and
efficient negotiation processes.

Total Human Resources $0
1.0

Human Services
1. Homeless Emergency Services $500,000
Add funding to create an operating reserve for the City-owned low-income senior 0.0
housing project being constructed along the Black Canyon Freeway. In 2023, the
Office of Homeless Solutions purchased a hotel located at 8130 N. Black Canyon
Boulevard with the aim of converting the hotel into permanent housing and
supportive services for seniors exiting homelessness. The project will generate
ongoing revenue through the collection of rents; however, the project requires
reserve funds to support operations during initial lease up and until revenue is
able to support the cost of operations and supportive services.

2. Homeless Emergency Services $3,926,000
Add funding for Office of Homeless Solutions (OHS) shelter operations needed 0.0
due to expiring American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. OHS recognizes the
need for diverse types of shelters throughout Phoenix to meet the individual
needs of people experiencing homelessness. This funding will be utilized to
support shelter operations throughout the city as needs are identified. For fiscal
year 2025-26, several shelters that were previously supported by expiring ARPA
funding will receive support, including: Rio Fresco, which provides 117 units of
shelter that can accommodate couples, pets, and individuals with substance use
disorder; North Mountain Healing Center, which provides congregate shelter for
up to 100 individuals and is limited to people experiencing homelessness within
1.5 miles of the site; and the Washington Shelter, which is a converted City-
owned office building that provides a 200-bed congregate shelter and wraparound
services, operated and provided by nonprofit partners. The anticipated ongoing
GF need to support OHS shelter operations and provide heat relief efforts upon
full expiration of ARPA funds is estimated at $26 million in FY 2026-27.


3. Homeless Emergency Services $150,000
Add funding to support Office of Homeless Solutions (OHS) operations due to the 0.0
expansion of department services and staffing. OHS has grown from nine to 34
full-time employees, resulting in increased operational expenses. These funds will
cover employee supplies and equipment, as well as third-party financial audit
costs related to the contracts the department oversees. Currently, OHS is
managing 26 American Rescue Plan Act contracts, which require audit services
to ensure compliance with federal regulations.


Total Human Services $4,576,000
0.0

2025-26
Department/Program Total



Law
1. Civil Division $0
Convert two temporary Assistant City Attorney IV positions to ongoing status. 2.0
These positions will be dedicated to matters related to GO Bond projects and the
Information Technology Services department.

Total Law $0
2.0

Neighborhood Services
1. Blight Reduction Program $0
Convert a temporary Special Projects Administrator position to ongoing status. 1.0
This position was created to oversee implementation of the Community Safety
Plans approved by Council in 2022 and to facilitate coordination of services
between departments. The Community Safety Plans leverage technology and
community-based resources to improve the safety and quality of life along the
19th and 27th Avenue and Hatcher and Bell Road corridors.

Total Neighborhood Services $0
1.0

Office of Arts and Culture
1. Administration $0
Convert a temporary part-time Administrative Assistant I position to ongoing 0.6
status. This position is the first contact point for customer service and supports
Arts and Culture programs by scheduling meetings, creating reports and
presentations, and responding to constituent inquiries, as well as supporting the
public arts, grants, and cultural facilities teams.

Total Office of Arts and Culture $0
0.6

Parks and Recreation
1. Administration $0
Convert a temporary Assistant Parks and Recreation Director position to ongoing 1.0
status. This position is responsible for management of several large department
divisions that provide programming to the community. Additionally, this position is
responsible for management of capital projects throughout the park system.

Total Parks and Recreation $0
1.0




2025-26
Department/Program Total

Police
1. Administration $0
Convert a temporary Senior Public Information Officer to ongoing status. This 1.0
position is responsible for strategic communications planning related to the
Department of Justice (DOJ) report, including collaboration with outside legal
counsel. The position also serves as the technical advisor and support for public-
facing communication and associated efforts, including support of Police and
other City executive staff in public interviews and communications.

Total Police $0
1.0


TOTAL PROPOSED GENERAL FUND ADDITIONS $51,194,000
187.6


PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTALS
NON-GENERAL FUND

Finance
1. Water and Wastewater Financial Planning $0
Convert a temporary Accountant III position to ongoing status in the Finance 1.0
Utilities Division paid for by the Water Services Department (WSD). The position
responsibilities include reviewing transactions and reports in the customer billing
system used by WSD.

Total Finance $0
1.0

Housing
1. Community Partnerships $0
Convert a temporary Project Manager position to ongoing status. This position 1.0
provides project management and coordination for the implementation of various
affordable housing development projects. It also ensures the City meets stringent
federal compliance requirements for grants awarded through the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOME Investment Partnerships
Program American Rescue Plan (HOME-ARP).

2. Housing Supportive Services $0
Convert two temporary Caseworker II positions to ongoing status. These positions 2.0
support the Family Self Sufficiency Program, which coordinates public and private
resources to help Housing Choice Voucher program participants, public housing
tenants, and tenants in the Section 8 Project-Based Rental Assistance program
achieve financial independence.

Total Housing $0
3.0




2025-26
Department/Program Total

Human Services
1. Head Start Birth to Five $0
Convert multiple temporary Family Resource Centers positions to ongoing status, 8.0
including one Caseworker III, three Caseworker Aide, and four Caseworker I
positions. These positions are funded by the First Things First grant, which the
department has received since 2017. The positions work in the department's
Education Division, providing early childhood support.

Total Human Services $0
8.0

Law
1. Civil Division $0
Convert a temporary Assistant City Attorney IV position to ongoing status. This 1.0
position will be dedicated to matters related to the employee pension fund.

Total Law $0
1.0

Police
1. Various $0
Convert three temporary grant positions to ongoing status, including a Police 3.0
Research Analyst supported by the Urban Area Security Initiative grant program,
and a Criminal Intelligence Analyst and Contracts Specialist I supported by the
Internet Crimes Against Children grant program. These positions oversee grant
management and administrative responsibilities, including coordinating task force
activities, scheduling task processing, collecting data, and submitting reports for
grant performance measures.

Total Police $0
3.0

Public Transit
1. Customer Service Centers $0
Convert two Supplies Clerk II positions from temporary to ongoing status. These 2.0
positions support expanded cash handling operations for public transit regional
partners.

2. Light Rail $0
Convert one Administrative Assistant II from temporary to ongoing status. This 1.0
position in the Light Rail Transit Division is responsible for assuring operational
policies and Light Rail facilities are meeting contractual terms.

Total Public Transit $0
3.0




2025-26
Department/Program Total

Retirement
1. Retirement Member Services $0
Add funding for a Retirement Assistant position to handle increasing workload and 1.0
continuing complexity of retirement program law. With 34% of active employees
reaching retirement eligibility in the next five years, this position will support
general City retirement by handling counseling appointments and retirement
estimates and processing retirement documents. The cost of this position will be
paid by the City of Phoenix Employees' Retirement System trust.

2. City of Phoenix Employees' Retirement System (COPERS) Investment $0
Management 1.0
Add funding for an Investment Manager position to provide guidance and
oversight of pension investments. This position will strengthen the COPERS
investment program, continuing to build a strong investment portfolio that will
meet funding requirements for long-term retirement plan protection. The cost of
this position will be paid by the COPERS trust.

3. Retirement Member Services $0
Add funding for a Curriculum and Training Coordinator position to review, assess, 1.0
and develop training and communication strategies to improve retirement
readiness information. This position will enhance efforts to communicate to all
members the importance and value of retirement benefits in a more transparent,
easy to understand, and accessible way. The cost of this position will be paid by
the COPERS trust.

Total Retirement $0
3.0

Street Transportation
1. Administration $0
Convert a temporary Special Projects Administrator position to ongoing status. 1.0
This position supports the Street Transportation Director's Office, providing
strategic oversight, project management, and coordination of departmental
initiatives, and serves as a critical liaison with internal stakeholders, government
agencies, and community partners.

2. Administration $0
Convert a temporary Accountant II position to ongoing status. This position 1.0
supports, invoices, and reconciles various revenue sources in the Street
Transportation Department, assisting with the oversight and generation of
invoices related to revenues collected from a variety of sources, including
damage claims, revocable permits, and fees for new programs.




2025-26
Department/Program Total

3. Administration $0
Convert a temporary Accountant II position to ongoing status. This position 1.0
supports and manages various grants and federal aid-funded projects, many of
which require quarterly reporting and other mandatory documentation of activities.
Duties handled by this position are expected to increase with the recent passage
of the Proposition 479 transportation initiative, which provides regional
transportation funds over the next 20 years.

4. Transportation Planning $0
Convert a temporary Management Assistant II position to ongoing status. This 1.0
position plays a crucial role in supporting the department's local, state, and
federal competitive grant applications and submissions. Grant opportunities have
increased in recent years, resulting in increases in grant planning efforts, Council
action requests, interdepartmental collaboration, and grant agreement
coordination.

Total Street Transportation $0
4.0

Water Services
1. Wastewater Treatment $5,578,000
Add funding for twenty-eight new positions, plus related vehicles, equipment, 28.0
contractual services, and commodities needed to re-open and expand the City's
Cave Creek Water Reclamation Plant. This addition would allow the City to
expand capacity for wastewater treatment and water purification, maintain
environmental and safety standards, and uphold technological process control
and security standards.

2. Administration $0
Convert two temporary full-time positions to ongoing status, including an 2.0
Administrative Assistant I and an Accountant I. The Administrative Assistant I
provides critical services to ensure compliance with Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) requirements and Department of Transportation
Commercial Drivers License federal regulations. The position also helps
coordinate department-wide Safety Standard Operating Procedures and
Environmental Compliance Procedures (ECP). The Accountant I assists with City
incentive programs for residents to install low-flow toilets, smart irrigation
controllers, and to replace turf with xeriscape landscaping. The position also
provides budget development support and produces regular position and financial
reporting for management.

Total Water Services $5,578,000
30.0


TOTAL PROPOSED NON-GENERAL FUND ADDITIONS $5,578,000
56.0




ATTACHMENT B

2025-26

PROPOSED REDUCTIONS
GENERAL FUND

View the Inventory of Programs published online for program details.

2025-26
Department/Program Total

Budget and Research
1. Centralized Budget and Position Control $(158,000)
Eliminate one vacant Budget and Research Analyst position which conducts (1.0)
detailed forecasting, position control, and revenue estimates. Responsibilities of
this position have been assigned to other department analysts.

Total Budget and Research $(158,000)
(1.0)

City Auditor
1. Audits $(73,000)
Reduce funding for the use of outside consultants to conduct specialized audits 0.0
resulting in one to two fewer specialized audits annually.

Total City Auditor $(73,000)
0.0

City Clerk

1. Official Records / Records Management / Various $(201,000)
Eliminate funding not used by the department for the acquisition and 0.0
implementation of a new Records Management System and reduce funding for
computer hardware maintenance, office equipment replacement and official
records and elections shredding services.

Total City Clerk $(201,000)
0.0

City Manager's Office
1. Administration of Policies and Objectives Set by Mayor and Council; Oversight of $(99,000)
Departments
Eliminate one vacant Management Fellow position. The City Manager’s Office (1.0)
would have three management fellow positions remaining to rotate through
various departments and assist with Council meetings and special projects.




2025-26
Department/Program Total

2. Administration of Policies and Objectives Set by Mayor and Council; Oversight of $(35,000)
Departments
Allocate partial costs for one Support Services Aide position to the Public Works 0.0
Solid Waste Division, allowing the PHX311 Information Center to continue to
timely respond to a high volume of resident inquiries and requests.

3. Administration of Policies and Objectives Set by Mayor and Council; Oversight of $(31,000)
Departments
Reduce the Office of Innovation discretionary budget designated for expanding 0.0
the office and various programs.

4. Administration of Policies and Objectives Set by Mayor and Council; Oversight of $(175,000)
Departments
Reduce Office of Accountability and Transparency (OAT) special contractual 0.0
services funding for future OAT expansion.


Total City Manager's Office $(340,000)
(1.0)

Communications Office
1. Communication Outreach to Diverse Communities and Niche Media $(122,000)
Reduce contractual funding for marketing and citizen outreach. This reduction 0.0
would result in less available resources to conduct marketing efforts such as
promoting City employment opportunities.

Total Communications Office $(122,000)
0.0

Community and Economic Development
1. Business Development $(182,000)
Eliminate one vacant Protocol Program Administrator position. Eliminating this (1.0)
position will require the department to forego adjustments to staff responsibilities
in the Business Development Program aimed at improving project staff and
department efficiency and effectiveness.

2. Business Retention and Expansion $(228,000)
Eliminate one vacant Deputy Economic Development Director position. The (1.0)
reduction requires the department to shift retention and expansion efforts to
another middle manager position.

3. Business Development $(22,000)
Reallocate an Aviation Marketing Supervisor position to an Economic 0.0
Development Specialist resulting in savings for the cost of the position. Due to
challenges filling this position, the department moved position responsibilities to
an Economic Development Program Manager.




2025-26
Department/Program Total

4. Various $(72,000)
Reduce funding for professional services, including Council-requested market- 0.0
area studies, due-diligence research for site acquisitions/dispositions, unplanned
special-event services and economic policy research. This reduction slightly
impacts the department's ability to respond to unforeseen needs.

Total Community and Economic Development $(504,000)
(2.0)

Equal Opportunity Department
1. Small and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (S/DBE) Programs $(46,000)
Increase Small and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program allocations to 0.0
the Aviation and Street Transportation Departments, generating savings to the
General Fund. These allocations are based on additional work Equal Opportunity
Department staff will provide to support the economic growth of local businesses
through administration of the Small Business Enterprise (SBE), Disadvantaged
Business Enterprise (DBE), and Airport Concessions Disadvantaged (ACDBE)
Business Enterprise programs.

Total Equal Opportunity Department $(46,000)
0.0

Finance
1. Financial Accounting and Reporting $(164,000)
Increase a flat rate assessment from the General Fund to the Sports Facility Fund 0.0
for financial reporting and oversight. Due to the Class and Comp Study, the
assessment increased by 20%. Additionally, due to organizational structure
changes, the assessment adds 20% of an Assistant Director and Fiscal Manager
position costs to the assessment.

2. Banking and Cashiering $(22,000)
Reduce banking services not needed due to higher than anticipated credits from 0.0
favorable Federal Reserve interest rates.

3. Debt and Investment Management $(226,000)
Eliminate one vacant Deputy Finance Director, in the Treasury and Debt (1.0)
Management Division, that has management and financial oversight over all City
banking activities; all City investment activities; and all City debt issuances,
monitoring, accounting, and reporting. Eliminating the position will require other
Deputy Finance Directors to oversee the area of Treasury and Debt Management.


4. Sales Tax Licensing and Accounting $(154,000)
Eliminate one vacant Senior Tax Auditor in the Tax Compliance and Education (1.0)
Audit Team. The position requires specialized knowledge of complex tax
regulations. Responsibilities would be assigned to other staff on the team
increasing respective workloads.




2025-26
Department/Program Total

5. Goods & General Services Procurement and Contract Management $(107,000)
Eliminate one vacant Buyer position in the Central Procurement Division. The (1.0)
position is tasked with researching procurement matters, assisting with the
administration of contracts, and handling small dollar purchases and informal
procurements. Responsibilities would be assigned to other staff in the division
increasing respective workloads.

6. Banking and Cashiering $(77,000)
Eliminate one vacant Account Clerk III in the Treasury and Debt Management (1.0)
division. The position serves as a Cashier in the 305 Finance Payment Center.
The position provides payment acceptance services to City residents and
businesses by accepting payments for City departments in-person, over-the-
phone, and by mail, in addition to providing Spanish language translation services
for customers. Responsibilities would be assigned to other staff in the division
increasing respective workloads.

7. Acquisition, Relocation and Title $(112,000)
Eliminate one vacant Property Specialist, in the Real Estate Division, tasked with (1.0)
leasing City properties for all departments. The position negotiates lease terms,
monitors compliance, and facilitates amendments and renewals. Responsibilities
would be assigned to other staff in the division increasing respective workloads.


8. Financial Accounting and Reporting $(109,000)
Eliminate one vacant Accountant II, in the Financial Accounting and Reporting (1.0)
Division, tasked with processing fixed assets and encumbrances citywide.
Responsibilities would be assigned to other staff in the division increasing
respective workloads.
$(119,000)
9. Risk Management (1.0)
Eliminate one vacant Accountant II in the Revenue & Risk Management division.
The division processes property/liability claims filed against the City, purchases
commercial insurance, and provides risk related consulting services to
departments. Responsibilities would be assigned to other staff in the division
increasing respective workloads.

Total Finance $(1,090,000)
(7.0)




2025-26
Department/Program Total

Fire
1. Various $(5,000,000)
Reduce funding for various non-personal services items including contractual 0.0
services, commodities, and capital outlay items. This reduction includes less
resources for emergency repairs, minor capital projects, technology equipment
replacements, and employee training and travel. While these reductions impact
the department by reducing budgeted resources, the impact is minimal and will
not impact fire service delivery.

Total Fire $(5,000,000)
0.0

Government Relations
1. Federal, State, Regional and Tribal Programs $(88,000)
Reduce funding for business travel and a lobbying firm contract that provides 0.0
supplemental support for federal legislative matters.

Total Government Relations $(88,000)
0.0

Human Resources
1. Safety & Workers Compensation $(147,000)
Generate savings to the General Fund by allocating the cost of a Program 0.0
Manager position in the Human Resources Safety Division to the Workers'
Compensation Trust fund. By charging this position to the trust, a portion of its
costs will be assessed to non-General Fund funding sources.

2. Benefits & Wellness $(200,000)
Reduce planned funding for an emergency back-up care program. This program 0.0
was planned to be added beginning in July 2025 to provide full-time employees
with up to five days of childcare assistance if their normal childcare was
unavailable.

3. Organizational & Learning Development $(30,000)
Reduce funding for the implementation of components of the City's Learning 0.0
Management System, PHXYou. This reduction would delay the migration of
Police, Fire, and other departments away from their internal learning systems to
PHXYou.

4. Labor Relations $(30,000)
Reduce funding for labor negotiation training. City code requires staff to 0.0
participate in labor negotiations with labor groups on a routine basis. This
reduction would decrease the amount of training able to be provided to City staff
on labor law and negotiations processes.




2025-26
Department/Program Total

5. Talent Acquisition & Management $(32,000)
Eliminate a vacant part-time Senior Human Resources Clerk position. (0.7)
Responsibilities would be assigned to other staff increasing respective workloads.


6. Talent Acquisition & Management $(50,000)
Reduce funding for advertising services for applicant recruitment. This would 0.0
reduce resources used for paid search engine optimization, banner ads, paid
social media ads, outdoor billboards, and other advertising functionality to attract
job applicants.

7. Classification and Compensation $(188,000)
Eliminate one vacant Human Resources Supervisor position. This position (1.0)
oversees a team of employees responsible for reviewing position classifications,
pay step placements, special merit recommendations, and classification and
compensation studies. Responsibilities would be assigned to other staff
increasing respective workloads.

Total Human Resources $(677,000)
(1.7)

Human Services
1. Strategic Initiatives $(76,000)
Eliminate a vacant Secretary III position from the Strategic Initiatives Division. (1.0)
This position provides administrative support within the division. Responsibilities
would be assigned to other staff increasing respective workloads.

Total Human Services $(76,000)
(1.0)

Information Technology Services
1. Various $(5,000,000)
Reduce funding for various non-personal service items including primarily staff 0.0
augmentation working to support technology modernization efforts, server and
storage environment, SharePoint migration, technical writing, service delivery,
projects for small departments, and other initiatives, telecommunications network
power supply and fiber management, and technology software and licensing for
management of mobile performance and implementing enhancements and/or
automation of software integration.

Total Information Technology Services $(5,000,000)
0.0




2025-26
Department/Program Total

Law
1 Various $(242,000)
Eliminate one vacant Legal Secretary*Lead and two Court/Legal Clerk II (3.0)
positions. The Legal Secretary*Lead position provides secretarial support for
three attorneys within the Community Prosecution and Appeals bureaus. The
Court/Legal Clerk II positions ensure files are complete, motions are filed, and
work requested by a Prosecutor or Legal Assistant is completed timely.
Responsibilities would be assigned to other staff increasing respective workloads.

Total Law $(242,000)
(3.0)

Library
1 Various $(249,000)
Reduce non-personal services funding for library materials and information 0.0
technology needs. This reduction would result in fewer new materials being
purchased, more wear and tear on current physical collections, and gradual
degradation of the audio visual capabilities of library public meeting room spaces.

Total Library $(249,000)
0.0

Municipal Court
1 Criminal and Civil Case Adjudication $(106,000)
Eliminate one vacant part-time pro tem City Judge position. This position makes (0.5)
judicial decisions in a criminal courtroom. This elimination would result in more
cases being moved to existing courtrooms and be scheduled further into the
future.

2. Interpreter Services - Management Services Division $(7,000)
Reduce funding for interpreter and translation services, which is used for services 0.0
for non-English speaking court participants.

3. Administration $(86,000)
Reduce funds for information technology training for staff and communications 0.0
equipment in courtrooms. This reduction will impact the team's ability to assist its
technical staff in keeping their skills current with the evolving technical toolsets
they must employ as part of their daily activities.

Total Municipal Court $(199,000)
(0.5)




2025-26
Department/Program Total

Neighborhood Services
1. Targeted Neighborhood Revitalization Programs $(741,000)
Replace funding in the General Fund for the Gated Alley Program with 0.0
Neighborhood Block Watch Program (NBWP) funds. In December 2024, the City
Council approved the use of $3 million in available NBWP funds for the program.
It is anticipated NBWP funds will be available going forward to continue the Gated
Alley Program as planned. Future use of additional funds will be brought to the

2. Targeted Neighborhood Revitalization Programs $(74,000)
Reduce funding for landscape maintenance. This service is scheduled monthly for 0.0
multiple city-owned properties located throughout Phoenix and ensures they
remain blight free and in compliance with City Code. With this reduction,
landscape maintenance will be completed 7 times per year, rather than 12 times
per year and is not expected to have a material impact.

3. Blight Reduction Program $(150,000)
Reduce funding for the Private Property Cleanup Program. The costs of the 0.0
program are less than originally estimated and the reduction is not expected to
result in adverse impacts to residents or service levels.

Total Neighborhood Services $(965,000)
0.0

Office of Arts and Culture
1. Public Art Program and Cultural Facilities Development and Property $(175,000)
Management Services
Reduce funding for maintenance of the City’s Municipal Arts Collection and for 0.0
facility maintenance for the Children's Museum of Phoenix, Phoenix Art Museum
and Phoenix Theatre.

Total Office of Arts and Culture $(175,000)
0.0

Parks and Recreation
1. Various $(2,000,000)
Reduce various non-personal services items primarily including park maintenance 0.0
and capital equipment replacement funding. This funding supports general park
and facility maintenance needs and also funds the replacement of aging or broken
equipment. While these reductions impact the department by reducing budgeted
resources it is not expected to impact park service delivery.

Total Parks and Recreation $(2,000,000)
0.0




2025-26
Department/Program Total

Phoenix Convention Center
1. General Fund Garages $(208,000)
Reduce funding for re-striping of parking stalls at the 305, Adams Street, and 0.0
2nd Avenue Garages.

Total Phoenix Convention Center $(208,000)
0.0

Police
1. Various $(6,000,000)
Reduce various non-personal services items primarily including approximately 0.0
$1.5 million in funding no longer needed due to the planned rollout of the new
Records Management System (RMS) beginning in June 2025. It also includes
reductions to training, technology, various police equipment, maintenance, and
supplies. While these reductions impact the department by reducing budgeted
resources, the impact is minimal and will not impact police service delivery.

Total Police $(6,000,000)
0.0

Public Works
1. Facilities Management and Maintenance $(500,000)
Eliminate non-critical minor maintenance projects for city facilities including 0.0
asphalt reconstruction, carpet replacement and flooring repair, illuminated strip
replacement, landscaping regrading and gravel replacement.

Total Public Works $(500,000)
0.0

Street Transportation
1. On-Street Parking Program $(87,000)
Eliminate one vacant Parking Meter Repair Supervisor position. This position has (1.0)
been vacant for an extended period of time due to hiring challenges, and its
elimination would have limited impact on current daily operations.

Total Street Transportation $(87,000)
(1.0)


TOTAL PROPOSED GENERAL FUND REDUCTIONS $(24,000,000)
(18.2)




ATTACHMENT C

Community Feedback on the FY 2025-26 Proposed Budget

Community feedback on the proposed budget is a critical component of the
annual budget process. Input from Phoenix residents can help the City
Council and departments to prioritize existing resources and to plan for the
future. Based on the feedback received, overall residents support the FY
2025-26 proposed budget. Multiple comments were received requesting
additional resources in the areas of homelessness, affordable housing, Fire
emergency services, street and bike improvements, summer heat relief for
vulnerable populations, legal support for eviction assistance and
continuation of the Gated Alley Program. The information below highlights
efforts to date in these areas and plans for the future.

Unfortunately, due to significant economic uncertainty and volatility, the
potential for further inflationary impacts on the cost of providing programs
and services to the community, and a slowdown in General Fund (GF)
revenue growth, the City Manager recommends setting aside the one-time
$17 million projected surplus. The set-aside will remain in the fund balance
in reserve and be available next fiscal year to balance the FY 2026-27
budget.
This attachment also includes feedback from residents received at the 12
community budget hearings held across the City from April 1-16 and
comments provided through email and phone directly to the Budget &
Research Department.
Homelessness
The Office of Homeless Solutions (OHS) has made tremendous progress in
addressing homelessness over the last two years. Investments in the
infrastructure of the region’s homeless services system have been
monumental. As we move out of pandemic-era funding, OHS has unfunded
needs necessary to continue its momentum and ensure the
transformational projects and services implemented in the last two years
can continue. Also important to note on November 5, 2024, voters passed
Proposition 312 Property Tax; Refund; Nuisance Enforcement that allows
property owners beginning in Tax Year 2025 to apply to the Arizona
Department of Revenue (ADOR) for a property tax refund if the owner
documents expenses caused by a city, town, or county that either (1)



declines to enforce existing laws prohibiting illegal camping, obstructing
public thoroughfares, loitering, panhandling, public urination or defecation,
public consumption of alcoholic beverages or use of illegal substances, or
(2) maintains a public nuisance. The City is unable to project the potential
costs or impacts to revenue associated with Proposition 312 as the number
of taxpayers who may file a claim with ADOR is not known. The passage of
this proposition furthers the need for the City of Phoenix to address and
provide ongoing resources for homelessness.

GF resources will be needed in FY 2025-26 for homelessness with
estimates at $4.5 million due to the expiration of American Rescue Plan Act
(ARPA) funding. The proposed GF budget includes a supplemental request
for OHS and more details can be found in Attachment A. Funding is
necessary for a portion of OHS operational costs, operational costs at an
affordable housing site for very low-income older adults, operational costs
at three emergency shelters (Rio Fresco, North Mountain Healing Center,
and the temporary Washington Shelter) and heat relief efforts. The need in
FY 2026-27 and going forward is estimated at $26.0 million and will fund a
portion of OHS operational costs, the temporary Safe Outdoor Space,
operational support for five emergency shelters (Rio Fresco, North
Mountain Healing Center, the temporary Washington Shelter, Central
Arizona Shelter Services, and the Phoenix Navigation Center), some
operational costs at the Key Campus and heat relief efforts. Staff will
continue to seek additional external funding for these programs, and
evaluate other City funding sources, which if received would offset the need
for a portion of the ongoing GF request.

Affordable Housing
The Housing Department continues to facilitate the creation and
preservation of affordable housing through a variety of programs for both
community and City of Phoenix projects. The Housing Department has
several housing projects planned and underway. The 2023 General
Obligation (GO) Bond Program is providing $54 million to support the
creation of 364 units to complete the final phase of the Edison-Eastlake
Choice Neighborhoods redevelopment initiative in addition to the
preservation of multiple City-owned multifamily properties. A total of $13
million in federal HOME Investment Partnership (HOME) and ARPA funds
is supporting the creation of an additional 212 affordable rental units on two
City-owned land projects that are currently underway. Additional affordable



and mixed-income projects are planned on City-owned land associated
with Housing Phoenix Plan efforts.
Funding has also been dedicated to support rental development projects
and provide affordable homeownership opportunities throughout the
community. Through gap financing programs, $10.9 million in HOME and
ARPA funds are being utilized to support the creation or preservation of
720 rental units with an additional $8.5 million, supporting 391 units, in
planned projects. Furthermore, $8.4 million of HOME-Recovery Plan Act
(HOME-ARP) funds are also dedicated to support 113 units of planned
permanent supportive rental housing. The Open Doors down payment
assistance and Community Land Trust programs, utilizing $1.3 million in
HOME and $5 million in APRA funds respectively, are underway and will
support an estimated 75 affordable homeownership opportunities.
Additionally, $2 million in available one-time ARPA interest earnings will be
allocated to a new Housing Trust Fund in FY 2025-26 with all future
available ARPA interest earnings dedicated to the trust.
Fire Emergency Services
The Phoenix Fire Department (PFD) provides lifesaving services to all
Phoenix residents and visitors and includes emergency medical and
transportation services, all-hazards incident management, property
protection through fire suppression, and community risk reduction efforts.
The recent fire catastrophe in Los Angeles, CA serves as a reminder of the
importance of adequately resourcing the PFD to ensure sufficient levels of
staffing, equipment and facilities are ready to respond to emergencies. A
critical measurement of the PFD effectiveness in operations is emergency
response time and is measured from the time of dispatch of an emergency
apparatus to when the unit arrives on scene. The National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) establishes the standard fire departments utilize to
measure performance. Currently, the PFD’s response times exceed the
NFPA established standards. While the department continuously evaluates
innovative ways to improve response times, additional resources are
needed to increase the number of fire stations and facilities, personnel, and
equipment to keep pace with the significant growth in geographic area and
population the department must serve. The proposed FY 2025-26 GF
budget includes additions for the Fire Department (Attachment A)
including conversion of 32 grant funded sworn positions to the GF
estimated at $3 million in FY 2025-26 and $5 million ongoing, add 24 sworn
personnel to staff the new GO Bond funded Fire Station 15 at 45th Avenue



and Camelback Road estimated at $2 million in FY 2025-26 and $4 million
ongoing, and provide a dedicated $25 million in GF resources going
forward to add 134 sworn and 19 civilian personnel to reduce emergency
response times.

Once fully implemented, the estimated impact of additional sworn
personnel will be an improvement in localized and citywide fire response
times based on 2024 incident data at the 90th percentile. Fire critical
emergency medical services (CEMS) response times are projected to
improve from 8 minutes and 30 seconds to 4 minutes and 25 seconds in
the localized communities where the units will primarily serve. Fire
ambulance response times are projected to improve from 10 minutes and
42 seconds to 4 minutes and 44 seconds in the localized communities.
Based on the estimated citywide impacts of the budget additions, Fire
CEMS response times are projected to improve from 7 minutes and 23
seconds to 7 minutes and 14 seconds. Based on the estimated citywide
impacts of the budget additions, Fire ambulance response times are
projected to improve from 9 minutes and 38 seconds to 9 minutes and 29
seconds. These response times could vary based on any future
adjustments to unit placement and the hours of service to meet the
community's needs. The additional sworn personnel will staff new
apparatus to be placed in service around the City, and new Fire stations
including Station 71 located at 60th Street and Mayo Boulevard, and
Station 93 at Metrocenter (location site to be determined). The additional
apparatus and fire stations will be funded by excise tax bond proceeds
(City Council approval on April 9).

Street and Bike Improvements
The Street Transportation Department understands residents’ request for
more bike lane infrastructure and street safety improvements. The
department recently completed the 3rd and 5th Avenue protected bike lane
project from McDowell Road to Thomas Road. Also, the 20th Street Bike
Corridor Improvements from Highland Avenue to the Grand Canal will start
construction in FY 2025-26. The department is also currently in the pre-
design phase of the 3rd Street from Roosevelt to Lincoln bike lanes and the
3rd Street multi-use path from Rio Salado to Lincoln Street. Currently there
is no funding for the final design and construction for either of these
projects. The City will continue to pursue regional and federal funding to
support these projects in anticipation of the Rio Salado Bicycle-Pedestrian



Bridge improvements scheduled for completion in 2029. One challenge
with these important downtown projects is the significant increase in
construction costs for vertical bike lane protection with no dedicated local
funding allocation.
The Street Transportation Department is also actively working on several
other items requested by the community. The Phoenix Active
Transportation Plan (ATP) is a policy-level plan intended to implement
Equitable, Safe, Connected, and Enjoyable Streets for all. The plan
includes recommendations in three key areas: network development, policy
updates and design guidance. The Phoenix Connected Active
Neighborhoods (PhxCAN) program is a vital part of implementing the ATP’s
network development element. The plan takes a community-focused
approach to enhance bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure across Phoenix,
starting with a detailed assessment of each of the 15 urban villages to
address transportation safety concerns, needs and wants. The first phase
of the program focuses on the South Mountain and Central City villages,
with a plan to target two villages annually. We anticipate implementing the
first phase projects in FY 2025-26.

Heat Relief Efforts
The City of Phoenix has continued to increase its investment in short- and
long-term strategies to provide heat relief and implement cooling strategies
in recent years. These strategies are documented in several plans adopted
by the City Council, including the 2025 Heat Response Plan, which was
approved in February 2025, and the Shade Phoenix Plan, approved in
November 2024. The Heat Response Plan presents the City’s efforts to
enhance public health and community resilience by alleviating adverse
effects of heat, with a focus on reducing heat-related illnesses and
fatalities. The Shade Phoenix Plan is a five-year plan that showcases the
City’s efforts to increase tree and shade coverage with a focus on places
throughout the City where shade is most important for safety and comfort
but currently lacking.
The 2025 Heat Response Plan builds on major new investments in short-
term heat relief that the City Council directed in 2024. In 2024, for the first
time, Phoenix operated a 24/7 heat respite and navigation center, an
overnight heat respite center, and extended the operating hours at three
public library locations that serve as cooling centers. These efforts included
a comprehensive staffing and security model designed to ensure that those



seeking immediate heat relief could be connected to a broader suite of
community services and resources. Overall, the extended hour and heat
relief sites accommodated more than 5,000 unique visitors through the
record-setting heat of summer 2024 and led to more than 900 placements
into additional resources including housing and shelter. In 2025, the City
will again operate a 24/7 heat respite and navigation center, moving to a
higher-capacity location in downtown Phoenix. The three libraries with
extended cooling center hours will provide full library services during the
extended hour periods this year. The 24/7 and extended hour locations are
funded with a combination of City of Phoenix ARPA resources, a grant from
the Maricopa County Department of Public Health, and the General Fund.
Examples of other initiatives in the 2025 Heat Response Plan include:
• The innovative cold water immersion program implemented by first
responders providing treatment to patients with severe heat illness,
which is leading to significantly improved health outcomes
• The implementation of the City’s cooling ordinance that establishes
indoor temperature requirements for rental properties with cooling
systems
• The implementation of the City’s heat safety ordinance for
employees of businesses with City contracts, subcontracts, leases,
subleases, licenses, and sublicenses
• Continued expansion of heat safety public education and
awareness campaigns
• Collaboration with a robust network of local and regional partners
including the Maricopa County Department of Public Health,
Maricopa Association of Governments, and Arizona Department of
Health Services

Longer-term strategies to increase tree and shade coverage throughout
Phoenix are documented in the Shade Phoenix Plan, which was
unanimously adopted by the City Council in November 2024. The Shade
Phoenix Plan describes 36 specific actions that address the four strategy
areas of expanding tree and shade coverage, maintenance and
preservation, community education and empowerment, and monitoring and
evaluation. Collectively, the actions represent more than $60 million in
allocated funding that will be spent over the next five years resulting in
more than 27,000 new trees, 550 new shade structures, as well as other
initiatives including workforce development and educational programs.
More than 50% of the total investment will be made in low- to moderate-



income communities and 85% will be made in low-, moderate- and middle-
income communities. Actions in the Shade Phoenix Plan are funded by a
combination of federal and philanthropic grants, the 2023 GO Bond
Program, and the General Fund.
Public Water Drinking Fountains
The Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department (PRD) is one of the largest
municipally managed parks systems in the country. Comprised of 188
parks located throughout the city, the parks system includes regional,
community, neighborhood, and mini parks as well as a variety of specialty
park areas including basins, wash areas, historic properties, and general
open space areas. Of the 188 parks, 168 are considered traditional parks
with amenities and 20 are specialty areas. Ninety-two percent of the
traditional parks have drinking fountains. Eighty-five percent of these
provide chilled drinking water. PRD manages 33 community and recreation
centers all of which contain drinking fountains which are publicly accessible
during operating hours. The department has a regular schedule to assess
and make repairs as necessary to ensure the availability of clean and
functional drinking water fountains for the community. Further, as existing
parks are renovated or new parks constructed, installation of chilled water
fountains is the department’s standard.
In addition to the public drinking fountains provided by the PRD, the Office
of Innovation launched a data-driven pilot in 2024 to expand free and
reliable access to chilled drinking water in public locations. Staff partnered
with the Water Services, Public Works departments, Parks and Recreation,
Downtown Phoenix, Inc. and HandsOn Greater Phoenix. The first three
pilot water stations were installed in front of City Hall, in the Marvin A.
Andrews Plaza, and across Washington Street in the Caesar Chavez
Plaza, and along the Sonoran Bicycle Pathway at Roosevelt Park, Third
Avenue and Roosevelt Street. Data and research show the desire for water
stations in proximity to public buildings, public gathering spaces, and public
transit stops. The custom-designed systems, which include heat mitigation
technologies and remote sensor technology to track usage and provide
leak detection, are currently being evaluated to inform the next phase of the
project. The three pilot locations have delivered the equivalent of more than
116,000 average bottles of drinking water since installation in 2024 and the
water temperature during last summer averaged between 69 and 73
degrees. Six additional units are in various stages of installation, with
funding from the Office of Innovation Fund, Gila River Indian Community



and Arizona Community Foundation. The scope of a citywide initiative to
expand access to chilled drinking water will require a multi-pronged funding
approach with a mix of General Funds, community partnerships,
department partnerships and grants. Currently, there is funding for the
purchase and installation of approximately 3-5 fountains in FY 2025-26 and
in FY 2026-27, including grant funding.
Tenant Eviction Assistance Program
In January 2025, the City of Phoenix Human Services Department (HSD)
launched the Eviction Legal Services program (ELS). The ELS program
assists Phoenix residents experiencing a current or past eviction crisis by
connecting them with a procured legal services provider. Eligible residents
may receive access to limited or full legal representation at court, mediation
outside of a courtroom proceeding, or post-eviction services to address
possible impediments to future renting opportunities. There is no cost to
residents for these services. This program is marketed through the City's
social media channels and water bills as well as direct marketing for those
who may be vulnerable, including at HSD's senior centers and family
service centers. Residents are also referred to the ELS program through
HSD's Landlord and Tenant Program and Community Services Program.
Approximately $1.2 million of ARPA interest funding is allocated to
ELS. Through this one-time funding source, the ELS program is expected
to operate through June 2026. HSD is exploring opportunities to continue
the program through other funding sources, including applying for
competitive grants.

Additionally, the HSD Landlord and Tenant Program provides education
and counseling on the Arizona Residential Landlord and Tenant (ARLTA)
and the Arizona Mobile Home Acts to tenants and landlords through in-
person and telephonic appointments. Landlord Tenant Counselors also
respond to hundreds of calls and emails received every week through a
dedicated phone line and email. Three counselors are assigned to this
program and are currently housed in the community at the Travis L.
Williams Family Services Center. The program conducts a minimum of six
workshops on ARLTA for community members each month. The program
is funded by the GF and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds. To date in FY 2024-25, more than 1,800 landlords and tenants have
met directly with Landlord Tenant Counselors in person or by phone to
receive education and counseling on ARLTA.




Gated Alley Program
As a resident-driven initiative, the Gated Alley Program (GAP) significantly
enhances neighborhood safety and quality of life. Demand for the program
has increased from 15 requests per month to 25 or more per month over
the past year. A recent review of Phoenix Police data showed a 14.3%
reduction in calls for service overall, and an incredible 31.1% reduction in
violent calls for service for properties adjacent to gated alleys over the year
prior to gating. The proposed FY 2025-26 annual $2.25 million allocation
from the Neighborhood Block Watch Program fund represents a significant
increase over the FY 2024-25 GF allocation and would allow Neighborhood
Services to gate approximately 200 alley segments per year. Funding for
future years is contingent on fund availability to be monitored by the
Phoenix Police, Neighborhood Services, and Budget and Research
departments and the City Manager’s Office.




Summary of Resident Comments by Category

Comments for additional funding/support of the budget:

(82) support maintaining current library funding.

(46) support funding for the Fire Department to reduce response times by building
additional stations and adding fire trucks and apparatus.

(36) support funding for legal assistance to assist individuals facing eviction.
(30) support funding for heat relief programs for the Maryvale community.

(22) support the Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT) increase to help fund fire, homeless
services and other important city services.
(20) support funding to address housing for the unhoused and homeless services.

(18) support Resolution for Thriving Communities plan proposed by community
organization Poder in Action.

(10) support continued funding for the Gated Alley Program.
(10) support funding for additional protected bike lanes in downtown Phoenix to include
3rd Street and 3rd Avenue.

(9) support funding for speed enforcement measures.

(8) support continued funding for Arts & Culture.

(8) support funding for Public Safety.

(6) support continued funding for Graffiti Busters.

(6) support funding for additional Police and Park Ranger patrols at Margaret T. Hance
Park due to increased crime and safety concerns.

(6) support funding for cooling centers.
(5) support funding for Veteran Services.
(4) support funding for the 3rd Street pedestrian bridge.
(4) support funding for affordable housing.
(4) support reduced funding to the Police Department.
(3) support funding for repairs to the Sunnyslope Community Center.
(3) support funding for enclosed community gardens.
(3) support funding for heat relief efforts.
(3) support funding for HAWK pedestrian crossings.
(3) support funding for roadway repairs and improvements.
(3) support funding for PHX C.A.R.E.S.
(2) support funding for Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects for street drainage.
(2) support funding for McDowell Road enhanced option E.
(2) support funding for services dedicated to supporting immigrant communities.



Comments for reduced funding/opposition of the budget:

(5) oppose city resources being used to harm immigrant communities.

(3) oppose the TPT increase.

(3) oppose reduced funding to the Police Department budget.

(2) oppose funding towards officer enforcement of homeless encampments that include
disposing of personal property.




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COMMUNITY-WIDE VIRTUAL/IN-PERSON
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
APRIL 1, 2025 at 6:00 PM

Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson opened the meeting at 6:05 pm and introduced
Spanish interpreters Mario Barajas and Elsie Duarte. Mr. Barajas provided instructions for
residents requiring Spanish-language interpretation during the hearing.

Councilwoman Kesha Hodge Washington spoke about the importance of community input in
the budget process and encouraged public participation.

Councilwoman Debra Stark thanked those attending and spoke about how public input
shapes the budget.

Ms. Erickson explained the purpose of the hearing, where to find additional information
about the budget, and how to make a public comment.

A short video on the proposed Trial Budget was played.

Councilwoman Laura Pastor stated she is attending the hearing to listen to public requests.

Ms. Erickson opened the floor for public comment.


1. Orla Bobo spoke about delayed response times due to an underfunding of the
Fire Department and requested additional funding.

2. Timothy Gammage thanked Council members for their support for the health
and safety of Phoenix residents and requested additional fire trucks and staff
at Stations 3 and 17.

3. Shirley Dieckman spoke about the importance of maintaining the Gated Alley
Program and the positive results the program has had in her neighborhood.

4. Joseph Dora spoke about the need to provide veteran services to the
community.

5. Maxell Ulin requested additional heat mitigation funding for City contract
workers.

6. John Walker thanked the City for the construction of bike lanes on 3rd Street
and 3rd Avenue. He requested protected bike lanes on each arterial road and
prioritization of the 3rd Street pedestrian bridge over the Rio Salado.

Councilwoman Debra Stark thanked the public for their comments.




Councilwoman Laura Pastor thanked those in attendance and for providing their feedback.

Councilwoman Kesha Hodge Washington thanked the public for their attendance and
engagement.

Ms. Erickson concluded the meeting at 6:29 pm.



Respectfully submitted,

Daniel Heidinger
Senior Budget and Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COUNCIL DISTRICT 4
STEELE INDIAN SCHOOL PARK, MEMORIAL HALL
APRIL 2, 2025 at 6:00 P.M.

Deputy City Manager John Chan opened the meeting at 6:04 p.m. and introduced Spanish-
language interpreter Elsie Duarte. Ms. Duarte provided instructions for residents requiring
Spanish-language interpretation during the hearing.

Mr. Chan noted the importance of City budget hearings, where to find additional information
on the proposed FY 2025-26 Trial Budget, additional ways to provide budget feedback, and
next steps in the budget process.

Mr. Chan requested the budget video presentation to be played.

Councilwoman Laura Pastor welcomed residents to the hearing, thanked City staff for
staffing the meeting, and thanked residents for attending the hearing.

Mr. Chan opened the floor for public comment.

1. Dafne Cortez expressed support for heat-relief investments in vulnerable areas,
especially in the Maryvale area.

2. Thomas Kendra spoke in favor of funding for veteran service officers who assist
veterans and their families in navigating federal VA benefits and services.

3. Joseph Dora commented in favor of allocating $350,000 in funding for veteran
service officers.

4. Dante Mitchell commented in favor of continued funding for arts and cultural
programs, 3rd Street protected bike lane access to the Salt River corridor, other
protected bike lanes, and alternatives to reverse traffic lanes on 7th Street and
7th Avenue.

5. Ben Lindquist spoke in favor of the Trial Budget and funding infrastructure and
resources to reduce Fire Department response times.

6. Angel Algarin expressed support for funding for public health, particularly for
HIV-related prevention and care.

7. John Walker commented in favor of increased funding for cycling infrastructure,
including the installation of a parallel street with protective bike infrastructure for
every major arterial road, extending protected bike infrastructure on 3rd Street
over the Rio Salado, and protected bike lanes along Virginia Avenue in Central
Phoenix. He thanked the City for progress on bike lanes, especially along 3rd
Street and 3rd and 5th Avenues in the Willow neighborhood.



8. Alejandra Bucon expressed support for maintaining current funding for Library
materials and needs.

9. Lara Sands spoke in favor of investing in additional high-quality bike
infrastructure such as protected bike lanes in the downtown area.

10. Terry Ballentine expressed support for allocating $400,000 for chapter service
officers associated with veteran organizations and a meeting space for chapter
service officers to meet with veterans and their families.

11. Dorian Vrenden spoke in favor of addressing gaps in outreach or safety net
programs, such as outdated or discontinued programs or under-staffed phone
lines, for individuals and families who are unhoused or are on the edge of being
unhoused.

12. Karen Fruse expressed support for maintaining current funding for Library
materials and needs.

13. Frank Urban commented in favor of improved Police interactions and the
treatment of seized property of unhoused people during encampment sweeps.
He also expressed support for increased funding for affordable housing.

14. Elizabeth Venable thanked Councilwoman Pastor and the City for investments
in housing and homelessness and expressed support for continued investments
to address homelessness.

15. Jean Paul Rwambali spoke in favor of funding for programs to assist people
experiencing homelessness.

16. Papy Idrissa commented in support of more resources to assist people who are
unhoused.

17. Tony Harris expressed support for more training and policies to improve Police
and Park Ranger interactions with unhoused people and treatment of seized
property during encampment sweeps. He also advocated for larger cooling
centers for summer months and funding for unhoused people to pay for
healthcare premiums.

18. Ricardo Palomera spoke in favor of maintaining current funding for Public Works
facilities management and maintenance, Parks and Recreation, Office of Arts
and Culture, Neighborhood Services Department’s landscape maintenance at
City-owned properties, Municipal Court’s interpreter and translation services,
and Library materials. He expressed support for some proposed position
reductions in the Trial budget, increased partnership with local public schools,
and funding for protected bike lanes.

19. Faith Kearns spoke in favor of keeping shelters and summer respite centers
open and increased funding for programs to assist people who are unhoused.



20. Belle Espinoza submitted a card in favor of expanded heat shelters, water
stations, housing, schools such as Isaac Middle school, and summer youth
programming. She submitted a second card that expressed support for
maintaining current funding for the Office of Accountability and Transparency
and Library materials and reduced funding for Police.

21. Karl Ford submitted a card in favor of veterans’ programs and Social Security
Disability Insurance.

22. Shalae Flores submitted a card in favor of reduced funding for Police in light of
social service needs.

Councilwoman Pastor thanked residents for participating in the hearing. She stated there
are many community needs and summarized the importance of the expressed needs at the
hearing.

She stated she would do what she can to support the request for veterans. Councilwoman
Pastor stated the City has taken the lead on programs to address homelessness and stated
that other cities need to take the lead as well.

Councilwoman Pastor adjourned the hearing at 7:15 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,


Genevieve Siri
Budget and Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING (SPANISH-LANGUAGE)
COUNCIL DISTRICTS 7 and 8
SOUTH MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY CENTER
APRIL 3, 2025 at 6:00 PM

Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua opened the meeting at 6:08 p.m. and introduced
interpreters Mario Barajas, Elsie Duarte, and Caprice Moreno. Mr. Barajas provided
instructions for residents requiring English-language interpretation during the hearing.

Mr. Paniagua introduced himself, then described the purpose of the hearing,
emphasized the importance of community input in the budget process, and described
how to make public comment.

A short video on the proposed Trial Budget was played.

Following the video, Mr. Paniagua opened the floor for public comment. There were no
public comments. Mr. Paniagua made closing remarks and adjourned the hearing at
6:20 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,


Stephanie Ramos
Budget & Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COUNCIL DISTRICT 1
DOUBLETREE BY HILTON PHOENIX NORTH
APRIL 4, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Assistant City Manager Lori Bays opened the meeting at 8:00 am and introduced Spanish
interpreter Mario Barajas. Mr. Barajas provided instructions for residents requiring Spanish-
language interpretation during the hearing.

Vice Mayor Ann O’Brien welcomed everyone and thanked them for attending to provide
feedback on the budget process. She noted the importance of this year’s budget and the
impact of State actions.

Ms. Bays introduced Budget and Research Director Amber Williamson and mentioned the
public could provide budget feedback to her as well.

A short video on the proposed Trial Budget was played.

Vice Mayor O’Brien opened the floor for public comment at 8:13 am.

1. Joe Moreno thanked Council for supporting the tax increase. He expressed
support for the Fire Department’s budget to help with response times.

2. Stan Bates spoke in favor of the budgets for the Fire Department, Police
Department, and Neighborhood Services Department and noted the
importance of maintaining the Gated Alley Program. He also requested all
Community Action Officer positions be restored.

Vice Mayor O’Brien thanked everyone for attending and provided information on
where to find additional material about the budget.

Ms. Bays concluded the meeting at 8:17 am.

Respectfully submitted,


Susannah Pietrzykowsky
Senior Budget and Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COMMUNITY-WIDE VIRTUAL/IN-PERSON
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
APRIL 5, 2025 at 10:30 AM

Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson opened the meeting at 10:37 a.m. and introduced
Spanish-language interpreter Mario Barajas.

Mr. Barajas welcomed attendees and explained he and Elsie Duarte would be assisting with
Spanish-language interpretation. He then provided instructions in Spanish for residents
requiring Spanish to English interpretation.

Mr. Stephenson explained the importance of incorporating feedback from the community,
listed important upcoming dates, as well as where to find additional information about the
budget process in both English and Spanish.

A short video on the proposed Trial Budget was played in English and then in Spanish.

Mr. Stephenson introduced Councilwoman Kesha Hodge Washington who spoke about the
importance of community input in the budget process.

Mr. Stephenson opened the floor for public comment:

1. Salvador Camacho expressed his appreciation to the City for making Public
Safety a priority, and his gratitude for the approval of the increased Transaction
Privilege and Use Tax (TPT). He spoke in favor of increased funding for the
Fire Department, noting the critical need to reduce response times.

2. Andrea Luna spoke in favor of identifying permanent funding in the City’s
General Fund to support the right to counsel to assist people who are facing
eviction. She noted the importance of investing in preventative efforts and how
investing in the right to counsel saves other City service dollars. She stated
that multiple other cities across the nation provide legal assistance to those
facing housing issues and requested Phoenix also provide these services.

3. Raj Arora spoke in favor of funding to support the right to counsel and for
education for individuals facing eviction. He noted the success of the pilot
program and the need for more resources for tenants.

4. Tony Canelo began his statement by reciting several inalienable rights and
Miranda rights, noting an individual’s right to an attorney. He spoke in favor of
increased funding for the right to counsel, and the need for legal support and
fair representation for tenants facing eviction.

5. Astrid Balzer spoke in favor of funding for the right to counsel, describing the
negative impact an eviction had on a friend of hers and others she knows.




6. Isaac Sundin spoke in favor of funding to implement a right to counsel ordinance
in Phoenix, noting how eviction rates are increasing each year and how difficult
it is to get back on your feet after being evicted.

7. Catherine Wilkins spoke in favor of funding for the right to counsel, noting that
people of all ages are affected by evictions. She described being subjected to a
large rent increase and feeling bullied out of her rental, stating how having
access to legal guidance during that time would have been helpful.

8. Yovanda Wilkins spoke in favor of funding to implement a right to counsel
ordinance. She described her mother’s eviction and the negative impact it had
on so many aspects of her mother’s life. She also stressed how keeping people
in their homes decreases the strain on public services.

9. David Shepard expressed concern about the discrepancy between legal
representation for landlords compared with tenants and spoke in favor of
funding for the right to counsel for individuals facing eviction.

10. Nancy Damone described her disabled sister’s challenges with paying rent and
being able to remain in her apartment. She also described how homelessness
creates disfunction in society and urged the City to allocate funding to support
the right to counsel.

11. Teena Jibilian expressed how homelessness is not a policing problem but rather
a housing problem. She urged the City to allocate funding to support a full right
to counsel program for its residents, stating the current tenant eviction
assistance project doesn’t go far enough.

12. Darren Jezick discussed the increased number of evictions and spoke in favor of
funding for the right to counsel. He stated increased funding should be allocated
to helping homeless individuals rather than the Police Department.

13. Nathan Hatch noted the record high number of evictions and how there is a
large discrepancy between landlords who have legal representation versus
tenants who do. He noted how other cities in the nation provide their residents
with the right to counsel and described savings identified in those cities. He
spoke in favor of the City of Phoenix allocating funding to provide legal services
to tenants.

14. Charlie Gentry discussed the need for permanent funding to support tenants’
rights to counsel. He described how important funding is to stop tenants from
being bullied and evicted, and asked the City Council to help protect them.

15. Akshara Sundararajan stated everyone should have the right to affordable
housing and provided statistics on the high number of eviction filings in
Maricopa County. She emphasized every resident of Phoenix matters and how
important it is for everyone to have the right to counsel.




16. Miesha Fish spoke in favor of allocating permanent annual funding for
community services and for the right to counsel. She described the challenges
she faced after being evicted.

17. Elizabeth Faiella described her history as a homeowner to then become
homeless. She stated having access to legal guidance would have been
helpful and she requested funding be allocated to support the right to counsel.

18. Orla Bobo submitted a comment in favor of increasing funding for public safety.

19. Susan Connelly spoke in favor of funding for the right to counsel to prevent
unfair evictions.

20. Juniper Brafford described the importance of having basic needs met and
spoke in favor of funding to assist those facing homelessness including funding
for the right to counsel.

21. Nora McInery spoke in favor of funding for the right to counsel for renters,
described the negative impact of being evicted, and noted the importance of
keeping people in their homes.

22. Carmen Terrell articulated how important it is to provide funding for the right to
counsel for tenants, for subsidized housing, and for supporting the Fire
Department, Water Services, and other critical services.

23. Frank Urban expressed frustration over experiences he had as a homeless
individual. He felt City staff did not provide adequate notice before being told to
move locations, and as a result his items were unfairly removed, destroyed, or
lost.

24. Barbara Jones spoke in favor of funding for the right to counsel, noting the
large number of pages in rental leases and the need for legal guidance and a
better understanding of tenants’ rights before signing.

25. Faith Kearns described the negative experiences she encountered with
Phoenix Police as a homeless person. She spoke in favor of continued funding
for shelters and heat relief centers.

26. Noelle Lewis spoke in favor of funding for legal representation for those facing
eviction.

27. Evelynne Castillo spoke in favor of the City adding permanent funding for the
right to counsel for tenants facing eviction and stated the City’s current eviction
assistance program needs to be expanded.

28. Anne Ender spoke in favor of funding for the Fire Department, felt the TPT
increase was acceptable, and stressed the importance of making public safety
a priority.



29. Elizabeth Venable stated she was happy with many of the City’s funding
allocations this year, including the amount allocated towards keeping shelter
facilities open. She requested continued improvements in the quality and
accessibility of shelters.

30. Papy Idrissa described his experiences as a homeless individual. He asked the
City to provide funding to help people like him.

31. Daniel Musafiri described his experiences as a homeless individual. He spoke in
favor of funding to support the homeless.

32. Gregoiare Mpakani described coming from the Democratic Republic of the
Congo to Arizona as a refugee but then had a medical issue which resulted in
his inability to pay rent then becoming evicted. He noted how rent amounts keep
increasing and requested funding to help the homeless.

33. Samuel Wathaiya stated homeless people aren’t homeless by choice and
emphasized they are not criminals. He asked police to focus on fighting crime,
not on ticketing the homeless.

34. Will Greene spoke in favor of funding the capital improvement plan program,
specifically the street transportation and drainage sections, including HAWK
pedestrian crossings.

35. Dany Tanga stated he was homeless due to eviction and asked for funding to
help the homeless who are struggling with housing issues and evictions.

36. Michelle Ashton stressed the need to increase awareness of the City’s eviction
assistance program.

37. Sterling Sourk spoke in favor of funding for street transportation and drainage,
as well as funding for more trees, Option E, Vision Zero, more HAWK
crosswalks, the extension of the 3rd Street bike lane, and more bike lanes in
Phoenix, with the goal of increased transportation diversity.

38. Melinda Riddle described how she often bikes to work, and she spoke in favor
of funding for the extension of the 3rd Street bike lane, as well as for the
McDowell Rd Enhanced Option E.

39. Victor Montoya provided an example of a law office that represented landlords
who illegally evicted tenants and spoke in favor of funding for the right to
counsel for tenants.

40. Karina Ramirez stated having the right to counsel would be an invaluable
resource to help keep people housed.

41. Nicole Rodriguez stated she supports funding for the right to counsel, Enhanced
Option E for McDowell Rd more HAWK crossings throughout the City, free public
transportation, and affordable housing.


42. Mary Gibbons recommended providing information on tenants’ rights to all
renters, access to online attorney services, counseling, education, and other
supportive services to help prevent evictions.

43. Adelaida Westbrooks submitted a comment in favor of funding for the right to
counsel and legal assistance for individuals facing housing-related issues.

44. Nancy Palmer registered to speak submitted a comment in favor of funding for
the right to counsel and legal assistance for individuals facing housing-related
issues.

45. Deborah Dillihant registered to speak in favor of funding for the right to counsel
and legal assistance for individuals facing housing-related issues.

Councilwoman Hodge Washington thanked the public for their attendance and engagement.
She described how she has attended eviction court proceedings and seen the imbalance in
power. She also informed attendees City staff were onsite and able to meet with them,
including staff from the Office of Homeless Solutions, Human Services, Neighborhood
Services, and Housing.

Mr. Stephenson concluded the meeting at 12:34 p.m.


Respectfully submitted,

Karen Kontak
Budget and Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COUNCIL DISTRICT 8
SOUTH MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY LIBRARY
APRIL 7, 2025 at 6:00 P.M.


City Manager Jeff Barton opened the meeting at 6:06 p.m. and introduced Spanish-
language interpreters Mario Barajas, Elsie Duarte and Caprice Moreno. Mr. Barajas
provided instructions for residents requiring Spanish-language interpretation during the
hearing.

Mr. Barton introduced Councilwoman Kesha Hodge Washington. Councilwoman Hodge
Washington thanked residents for attending the hearing and expressed appreciation for
residents’ time and input on the budget.

Mr. Barton noted the importance of City budget hearings, how to provide comments, where
to find additional information on the proposed FY 2025-26 Trial Budget, additional ways to
provide budget feedback, and next steps in the budget process.

Mr. Barton requested that the budget video presentation be played. He opened the floor for
public comments.

1. Christine Skowronek spoke in favor of parks, green infrastructure, heat
resiliency, public transit, and transportation programs that promote cleaner air
and pedestrian safety, especially in south and west Phoenix. She also
expressed gratitude for the proposed Trial Budget.

2. Ginnie Ann Sumner expressed support for efforts to address red light running
and speeding. She also commented in support of Graffiti Busters and its
volunteers. She recommended more publicity for the Blight Busters volunteer
and Graffiti Busters monthly report online and recommended a webpage that
provides information about nonprofit organizations focused on homeless
solutions.

3. Carlos A. Andrade commented in favor of funding for additional basketball
courts, horse-shoe pits, youth programs, restrooms, and water fountains at
Hayden Park to assist the youth in the area.

4. Tim Gammage spoke in favor of funding for additional Fire Department
resources, fire stations and ambulances in District 8 to reduce response times.
He thanked Councilwoman Hodge Washington for her support of the sales tax
and bond program and the City Manager for the proposed Trial Budget.

5. Kedrick Ellison commented in support of fully funding the Library with no
reduction.




6. Jess Bristow spoke in favor of capital improvement projects to improve parks,
public transit, and street infrastructure in south and west Phoenix. She also
expressed support for funding environmental programs, sustainable
transportation, cool corridors, trees, heat relief for transit riders, shade at bus
stops and light rail stations, electric buses, and pedestrian safety.

7. Jewel Clark submitted a card to support funding for water, sustainability and
shade, climate, affordable housing as opposed to market rate housing and
social justice.

8. Matt Shaughnessy submitted a card in favor of Fire crisis services.

9. Edward Joseph Wendler submitted a card in favor of additional dedicated public
parking spaces at the South Mountain Park Mormon Trailhead and parking at
32nd Street at South Mountain Devastator Trailhead to address insufficient
parking in the area.


Mr. Barton thanked residents for participating in the hearing. He announced upcoming
Council meetings on the budget and adjourned the hearing at 6:38 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,


Genevieve Siri
Budget and Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COUNCIL DISTRICT 5
MARYVALE COMMUNITY CENTER
APRIL 8, 2025 at 6:00PM

Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer opened the meeting at 6:09 pm and introduced
Councilmember Betty Guardado and Deputy Budget & Research Director Aaron Mertz.
Ms. Spencer then introduced Spanish interpreters Mario Barajas, Elsie Duarte, and
Caprice Moreno. Mr. Barajas provided instructions for residents requiring Spanish-
language interpretation during the hearing.

Councilmember Guardado thanked various neighborhood leaders and provided a
recap of new additions to the budget in recent years across various departments and
the community impact of these additions.

Ms. Spencer thanked residents for their attendance and explained the purpose of the
hearing, where to find additional information about the budget, and how to make a
public comment.

A brief video on the proposed Trial Budget was played in English and then in Spanish.

Councilmember Guardado opened the floor for public comment.

1. Jorge Castaneda spoke about speeding issues on Indian School Road
and requested photo enforcement cameras and other technology to
address the speeding. He also requested additional resources to
address issues related to a substance abuse clinic on 75th Avenue and
Indian School.

2. Marco Marcial spoke in support of the gated alleys program and thanked
residents for participating in the budget process.

3. Scott Crowley acknowledged the additional funding for the Fire
Department that was provided through the TPT rate increase. He also
advocated for additional resources for the Fire Department to reduce
response times.

4. Daniel Gonzales expressed gratitude for the TPT rate increase and the
additional resources that it provided to the Fire Department. He also
advocated for additional resources for the Fire Department to reduce
response times.

5. Monica Barriontos requested support for the Resolution for Thriving
Communities and explained the directives of the proposed resolution.




She expressed opposition to City resources being used to harm
immigrants in the community.

6. Laura Rodriguez requested support for the Resolution for Thriving
Communities and discussed concerns about the Police Department.

7. Lupita Mora requested support for the Resolution for Thriving
Communities. She expressed opposition to City resources being used to
harm immigrants in the community.

8. Yolanda Barrera requested support for the Resolution for Thriving
Communities. She expressed opposition to City resources being used to
harm immigrants in the community.

9. Mari Nori spoke about issues impacting her son in the justice system.
She expressed opposition to City resources being used to harm
immigrants in the community.

10. Estela Varela requested support for the Resolution for Thriving
Communities. She expressed opposition to City resources being used to
harm immigrants in the community.

11. Mike Nydes spoke in support of gated alleys and discussed the 1000th
gated alley that was recently installed in District 5. He encouraged
residents to support more gated alleys.

12. Shirley Dieckman thanked Councilmember Guardado for crime reduction
efforts in the 27th Avenue corridor and in Cielito Park. She spoke in
support of gated alleys and requested additional funding for the program.

13. Terry Lofius advocated for more resources for the Fire and Police
Departments. He also requested additional resources for automated
traffic enforcement to address red light running across the City.

14. Magdelena Marin spoke about heat related issues impacting Maryvale
residents. She advocated for more trees, green spaces, shade
structures, and parks to address the heat.

15. Amanda Kaminskas spoke about heat-related issues impacting the
unhoused community. She requested a Maryvale-specific heat plan and
additional resources including trees, shade structures, green spaces,
shaded bus stops, and other items to mitigate heat.

16. David Portugal expressed gratitude for the prioritizing of environmental
investments in the proposed budget. He advocated for more heat relief,
air quality, and equitable mobility resources in South & West Phoenix.




17. Dafne Cortez spoke about heat-related issues impacting Maryvale
residents. She requested a Maryvale-specific heat plan and additional
resources including heat resilient public spaces, shaded walkways,
cooler bus stops, and more walkable streets.

18. Rosina Uribe spoke about heat-related issues impacting Maryvale
residents. She requested a Maryvale-specific heat plan and additional
resources to gather the community, plant more trees, and make more
green spaces.

19. Samaria Winans spoke about heat-related issues impacting Maryvale
residents and requested additional resources including water fountains
and shade structures.

20. Josefa Ramirez requested additional resources to improve the aesthetics
of Maryvale.

21. Hernan Acosta expressed gratitude for the gated alley program and
thanked residents for attending the budget hearing. He also spoke about
the importance of parks in the neighborhood and advocated for
protecting these spaces.

22. Luis Avila spoke about the impact of climate change in Maryvale and
strategies to mitigate heat. He asked to partner with the City to develop a
Maryvale-specific heat plan.

23. Elsa Osorio requested support for undocumented immigrants in the
community.

24. Linda Blackford spoke in support of the gated alley program.

25. Kathy Stillman asked why there were fewer Phoenix police officers in
2025 than in 2008 despite growth in the City.

26. Jesse Ortega requested a Maryvale-specific heat plan and additional
resources including more shaded areas and green spaces.

27. Mary Blas spoke in support of block watch and expressed support for the
gated alley program. She discussed the success of gated alleys in her
neighborhood.

28. Elizabeth Aguilar expressed gratitude for gated alleys in her community.
She also requested funding for bike-friendly infrastructure at businesses
and other facilities along the Grand Canalscape.




Councilmember Guardado thanked residents for attending and adjourned the meeting
at 7:44pm.


Respectfully submitted,


James Nguyen
Senior Budget & Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COUNCIL DISTRICT 3
SUNNYSLOPE COMMUNITY CENTER
APRIL 10, 2025 at 8:30 AM

City Manager Jeff Barton opened the meeting at 8:34 am and introduced Spanish
interpreters Elsie Duarte and Oscar Monroy. Ms. Duarte provided instructions for residents
requiring Spanish-language interpretation during the hearing.

Mr. Barton introduced Councilwoman Debra Stark. Councilwoman Stark thanked residents
for attending and added that public input helps shape the budget.

Mr. Barton noted where to find additional information on the proposed FY 2025-26 Trial
Budget, additional ways to provide budget feedback, and the next steps in the budget
process.

Mr. Barton requested that the budget video presentation be played. He then opened the
floor for public comment at 8:44 am.

1. Masovi Perea supports prioritizing environmental investments such as reliable
and free electric transportation and additional trees for streets and parks.

2. Ginnie Ann Sumner spoke in favor of the 24/7 park ranger phone number,
traffic enforcement, and extended availability of the Graffiti Busters program.
She would like the City’s website to list contact information of supporting
organizations in increase collaboration. Ms. Sumner supports accomplishing
the PHX C.A.R.E.S program through Neighborhood Services and Office of
Homeless Solutions staff in place of contracting services through Community
Bridges, Inc. Ms. Sumner inquired about the status of recently approved
medical response vehicles.

3. Chris Murphy spoke in favor of the tax increase. He expressed support for the
Fire Department’s budget to help with response times.

4. Carson Murphy submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s
budget to help with response times.

5. Liam Bailey submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s budget
to help with response times.

6. Marcus Goodrich submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s
budget to help with response times.

7. Joe Moreno submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s budget
to help with response times.

8. Michael Duffy submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s
budget to help with response times.


9. Andre Williams expressed dissatisfaction with the growth of personal services
and contractual services in general government departments and spoke
against the approval of a transaction privilege tax increase.

10. Elizabeth Venable spoke in favor of the public comment process and Human
Services programs.

11. Adriana Garcia submitted a comment in support of funding for legal aid services
to prevent evictions and for street repairs in the Sunnyslope neighborhood.

12. Kevin Cronk submitted a comment in support of access to legal aid during
evictions, increased street repairs, and for walking and bike paths in the
Sunnyslope neighborhood.

Mr. Barton concluded the meeting at 9:03 am.

Several residents submitted comment cards after the conclusion of the meeting.

13. Mark Shafer submitted a comment in favor of affordable housing and
increased and improved heat relief.

14. Frank Urban submitted a comment opposing officer enforcement of homeless
areas.

15. Faith Kearns submitted a comment opposing officer enforcement of homeless
areas and the disposal of property.


Respectfully submitted,


Susannah Pietrzykowsky
Senior Budget and Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COUNCIL DISTRICT 7
DESERT WEST COMMUNITY CENTER
APRIL 10, 2025 at 6:00 PM

Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer opened the meeting at 6:02 pm. She introduced
Councilman Carlos Galindo-Elvira and Budget and Research Director Amber Williamson.

Ms. Spencer welcomed everyone and introduced Spanish interpreters Mario Barajas, Elsie
Duarte and Caprice Moreno. Mr. Barajas provided instructions for residents requiring
Spanish-language interpretation during the hearing.

Ms. Spencer thanked City staff and residents for attending.

Councilman Galindo-Elvira spoke about the importance of community input in the budget
process which will allow the City to meet the needs of residents and to provide the best
quality of service possible.

Ms. Spencer explained the purpose of the hearing, where to find additional information
about the budget, and how to make a public comment.

A short video on the proposed Trial Budget was played in English and Spanish.

Councilman Galindo-Elvira introduced District 7 Councilwoman Elect Anna Hernandez and
expressed his appreciation for her presence and thanked City staff.

Councilman Galindo-Elvira opened the floor for public comment.


1. Tim Gammage spoke in support of adding Fire Department resources and
emphasized the importance of reducing response times.

2. Patrick McDaniel expressed his support for the increase in Transaction
Privilege Tax (TPT) and the efforts taken by the City to reduce Fire
Department response times. He also noted his support for increases for the
Office of Homeless Solutions and requested that the City not make cuts to the
Office of Arts and Culture.

3. Beatriz Rojas Perez spoke in support of funding for environmental
investments and the cooling corridors program. She noted the importance of
providing tree and shade coverage for cooling relief on the streets in the West
and South sides of Phoenix, to aid in the health and safety of students when
using public transit.

4. Uriah Marshall submitted a public comment card in support of fire crisis
resources.




5. Luis Avila spoke about the desert community, climate change, water
shortages and his support for Heat Mitigation. He requested that there be
additional investment in the Heat Mitigation plan for the area of Maryvale
where it is most needed for residents.

6. Dafne Cortez spoke in support of heat response and mitigation in Maryvale.
She requested the need for more heat resilient public spaces such as shaded
walkways, cooler bus stops and safer more walkable streets.

Councilman Galindo-Elvira noted his recent work on heat mitigation
addressing issues with the Heat Respite Center for the unhoused, cooling
stations at libraries, and chilled water stations and tree planting in the West
part of the district of Maryvale. He stated he understands the need for more
shaded areas and tree canopies.

Councilwoman Elect Anna Hernandez commented on her support in the areas
of environmental climate solutions and gave her commitment to continue
working on the issue.

7. Raul Moreno thanked the City for prioritizing environmental investments and
expressed his support for electric buses. He requested there be more shade
areas, cleaner air and cooler transportation routes for students in Maryvale.

8. Rob Nolan thanked the City for the investment in fire prevention and
unhoused mitigation. He requested the prevention of cuts to the arts
maintenance budget and spoke in favor of funding arts and culture.

Councilman Galindo-Elvira commented on his visit to the Irish Cultural Center
and expressed his appreciation for the exhibit on the Irish Mexican
relationship.


Councilman Galindo-Elvira thanked the public for their comments and thanked
Councilwoman Elect Anna Hernandez for joining the hearing.

Ms. Spencer thanked the public for attending and providing comments. She concluded the
meeting at 6:41 pm.



Respectfully submitted,

Lisa Ballejos
Budget and Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COUNCIL DISTRICT 6
DEVONSHIRE SENIOR CENTER
APRIL 14, 2025 at 8:30 AM

Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson opened the meeting at 8:30 am and introduced
Spanish interpreters Mario Barajas and Elsie Duarte. Mr. Barajas provided instructions for
residents requiring Spanish-language interpretation during the hearing.

Mayor Kate Gallego spoke to the importance of passing a budget that meets the
community’s needs and expressed excitement for gathering community input in the process.

Councilman Kevin Robinson thanked the participation in the budget process and stressed
the importance of community input to be used to develop a budget that serves the
community.

Ms. Erickson explained the purpose of the hearing, where to find additional information
about the budget, and how to make a public comment.

A short video on the proposed Trial Budget was played.

Ms. Erickson opened the floor for public comment.

1. Margot Champagne requested the City avoid cutting the budget for Library
Services.

2. Alex Rangel thanked the City Council for adding resources to the Fire
Department in the budget.

3. Scott Crowley thanked the City Manager and City Council for additional
resources for the Fire Department and asked for greater funding for the Fire
Department.

4. Ginnie Ann Sumner asked for a Real Time Operation Center and more
motorcycle officers in the district and greater investment into the Graffiti
Removal program and PHX Community Action Response Engagement
Services (C.A.R.E.S.).

5. William Garbett expressed concern that increases to impact fees would
increase the cost of housing for residents and recommended using closed
public school sites for housing.

6. David Bickford requested additional investment to transportation infrastructure
such as light rail, bike lanes, and pedestrian walkways and asked for a
nationwide search for the Street Transportation Department Director.

7. Jay Plummer requested greater investment in bike lanes in the area.



8. Karen Klein spoke about the importance of maintaining the budget for senior
programs and parks.

9. Richie Robnett asked for greater resources for the Fire Department.

10. Bill Scheel spoke about the deteriorating conditions of Margaret T. Hance
Park and asked for a dedicated Park Ranger and more consistent
enforcement of rules at the park.

11. Isiah Thorlow submitted a comment card requesting more resources for the
Fire Department.

12. Remy Jordan submitted a comment card requesting more resources for the
Fire Department.

13. Alexis Salgado submitted a comment card requesting more resources for the
Fire Department.

14. Marcus Voltaire submitted a comment card stating there is a crisis at the City
that needs to be addressed.

15. Michael Johnson II submitted a comment card requesting more resources for
the Fire Department.

16. Artino Sims submitted a comment card requesting more resources for the Fire
Department.

17. LeeDell Bunton III submitted a submitted a comment card requesting more
resources for the Fire Department.

18. Patrick Cardenas submitted a comment card requesting more resources for
the Fire Department.

Councilman Kevin Robinson thanked the public for their comments.

Mayor Kate Gallego thanked the public for their participation and input.

Ms. Erickson concluded the meeting at 9:07 am.



Respectfully submitted,

Brian Seo
Management Fellow




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 and DISTRICT 3
PARADISE VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER
APRIL 14, 2025 at 6:00 PM

Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson opened the meeting at 6:00 pm and introduced
interpreter Mario Barajas. Mr. Barajas introduced the second interpreter, Elsie Duarte, and
provided instructions for residents requiring Spanish-language interpretation during the
hearing.

Ms. Erickson introduced Councilwoman Debra Stark who thanked residents for attending
and noted that the comments residents make help shape the budget. She referenced the
prior year budget hearing comments about cricket fields and now there are cricket fields in
the City of Phoenix. Councilwoman Stark opened the floor to Councilman Jim Waring who
thanked residents for attending.

Ms. Erickson noted where to find additional information on the proposed FY 2025-26 Trial
Budget, additional ways to provide budget feedback, and the next steps in the budget
process.

Ms. Erickson requested the budget video presentation to be played.

After the video, Ms. Erickson opened the floor for public comment.

1. Chris Murphy expressed support for the Fire Department’s budget to help with
response times.

2. Tim Knobbe expressed his support for the increase in Transaction Privilege Tax
(TPT) rate. He expressed support for the Fire Department’s budget to help with
response times.

3. Bill Scheel requested funding for a dedicated park ranger for Hance Park and
strict enforcement of park rules. He expressed support for the budgeted funding
for homelessness efforts.

4. Anne Ender expressed her support for the increase in the TPT rate but
advocated earmarking the funds to support the Fire Department. Ms. Ender
noted the poor condition of some public safety facilities.

5. LeeDell Bunton VI submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s
budget to help with response times.

6. Isaiah Vigil submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s budget to
help with response times.




7. Gabriel Santistevan submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s
budget to help with response times.

8. Abraham Gordillo-Aula submitted a comment in support of the Fire
Department’s budget to help with response times.

9. Michael Duffy submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s budget
to help with response times.

10. Bobby Holmes submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department’s
budget to help with response times.

11. Nancy Kroening provided a written comment about providing funds for memory
café programs. Comment attached to minutes.


Councilwoman Debra Stark thanked the public for coming.

Councilman Jim Waring thanked the public for coming and the comments today will
be compiled and given to Council.

Ms. Erickson concluded the hearing at 6:20 pm.


Respectfully submitted,


Christine Klich-Corbin
Budget and Research Analyst




SUMMARY MINUTES
COMMUNITY BUDGET HEARING
IN-PERSON (SPANISH-LANGUAGE)
MARYVALE COMMUNITY CENTER
APRIL 16, 2025 at 6:00 PM

Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua opened the hearing at 6:10 p.m. and introduced
interpreters Elsie Duarte and Caprice Moreno. Ms. Duarte provided instructions for residents
requiring English-language interpretation during the hearing. Mr. Paniagua introduced
Councilwoman Laura Paster, Councilwoman Betty Guardado, Councilman Carlos Galindo-
Elvira, and Councilwoman-elect Anna Hernandez.

Councilwoman Guardado recognized the importance of budget hearings and stated she and
her colleagues would be listening to the input from the hearing to make more informed
decision making.

Councilwoman-elect Hernandez thanked her colleagues for including her in the budget
hearings. She stated she will be listening to the concerns expressed during the hearing to
ensure the budget aligns with community priorities.

A short video on the proposed Trial Budget was played. Mr. Paniagua opened the floor to
public comment.

1. Scott Crowley expressed support for the Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT)
increase noting it will provide necessary resources to the Fire Department.

2. Dafne Cortez stated the Maryvale community has the highest temperatures in
the city during the summer months and advocated for more shade structures
at bus stops and along walkways. Ms. Cortez asked for the development of a
plan to ensure the hot temperatures are addressed.

3. Jorge Castaneda advocated for the implementation of speed radar
enforcement.

4. April McCue expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving Communities”
plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

5. Maria Neri stated her son has a mental disability and was sentenced to 17
years in prison with few opportunities to thrive. She asked the City to help in
whatever way they could.

6. Carrie Lorraine asked for an end to racial profiling and advocated for police
accountability.

7. Italia Cuevas expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving Communities”
plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

8. Beatriz Rodriguez expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving
Communities” plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.


9. Sonia Almaraz expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving Communities”
plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

10. Amanda Everett expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving
Communities” plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

11. Josefa Ramirez stated she would like to see the Maryvale community have
more shade and trees just like the cities of Tempe and Scottsdale.

12. Vanessa DiCarlo expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving
Communities” plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

13. Luis Avila stated the temperatures in Maryvale are 4-6 degrees higher than that
of other communities in Phoenix. He advocated for the development of a plan
to address this concern.

14. Laura Ramirez stated she is a veteran and after using a veteran crisis hotline
she had a negative experience with the Phoenix Police Department. As a result,
she is asking not to increase the Police Department budget.

15. Angelina Maciel expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving
Communities” plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

16. Elsa Osorio expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving Communities”
plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

17. Ruth Kentigian advocated for a water safety program to address drowning.

18. David Marroquin expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving
Communities” plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

19. Laura Rodriguez expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving
Communities” plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

20. Berta Rita expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving Communities” plan
proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

21. Jason Smith expressed appreciation for the TPT increase noting it will provide
the resources needed for the Fire Department to provide services to the
community.

22. Dorian spoke in favor of supporting the Fire Department but does not want to
increase the Police Department budget.

23. Tony Harris advocated for funding to support the Phoenix Fire Department to
ensure there is assistance for unsheltered residents when they need it. He
also advocated for the elimination of qualified immunity for police officers, to
allow victims of police brutality to get justice.



Councilwoman-Elect Hernandez stated there are policymakers working
towards repealing qualified immunity for police brutality.

24. John Paul Rwamboili asked for services dedicated to supporting immigrants to
ensure they thrive in the United States.

25. Kakozi Bitukeandja expressed concern regarding homeless shelters that are
at capacity and stated Police should consider a person’s situation before
issuing a ticket for public urination.

26. Sophia Carillo advocated funding public education programs.

27. Eddie Nunez asked for after-school transportation to community centers for
students.

28. Elizabeth Venable asked for services to be communicated to residents in
various languages to ensure those residents understand what is available.

29. Fidel Olguin thanked Councilwoman Guardado for addressing prostitution and
drug sales near his home, making it safe for his children to play outside.

30. Patricia Nunez expressed support for the “Resolution for Thriving
Communities” plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

31. Jacob Cortes submitted a comment in support of the Fire Department.

32. Hugo Lozada submitted a comment in opposition of deportation.

33. Alejandra Bucon submitted a comment in opposition to cutting the Library
Department budget.

34. Relcha Noir submitted a comment in support for the “Resolution for Thriving
Communities” plan proposed by the community organization Poder in Action.

35. Alicia Aquino Chavez submitted a comment in favor of increasing
speedbumps, gated alleys, and services to address homelessness.

36. Rosa Menjivar submitted a comment in favor of street safety by using speed
radar enforcement, increasing signage, and streetlights.

Councilwoman Guardado adjourned the hearing at 8:11 pm.

Respectfully submitted,

Destiny Dominguez
Management Fellow




VOICEMAIL, ELECTRONIC, AND WRITTEN BUDGET COMMENTS
January 18, 2025 – May 8, 2025, AND SOCIAL MEDIA STATISTICS

Emails

1. D Lynn Reece sent an email in support of the proposed Transaction Privilege Tax
(TPT) increase to support homeless services.
2. Rita Roundtree sent an email in support of the TPT increase to support homeless
services, specifically for tiny homes and soup kitchens to be built on vacant land.
3. Jill Coughlin sent an email in support of the TPT, but the tax should not exceed a
total of 9%.
4. Dorothy Williams sent an email opposed to the TPT increase.
5. Jeremiah Elam sent an email opposed to cuts to the police department budget.
6. Terri Rosko sent an email opposed to cuts to the police department budget.
7. Paula Miller sent an email in support of maintaining funding for the fire department.
8. Alejandra Bucon sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
9. Britanny Morris sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
10. Brandy Nelson sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
11. Kayla McEnroe sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
12. Harper Greer sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
13. Jeffrey Gamso sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
14. Amber Munig sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
15. Kathy Haake sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
16. Grace Laba sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
17. Marysol Pino sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
18. Marin Hubert sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
19. Hannah Pynn sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
20. Bailie Rivale sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
21. Gabie Rivas sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
22. Jacyln Search sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
23. Devinee Peebles sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
24. David Edelman sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.



25. David White sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
26. Rochelle Gates sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
27. Michelle Koch sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
28. Jennifer Robins sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
29. Barbara Kain sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
30. Lisa Katona sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
31. Stephanie George sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
32. Thomas Henningsen sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
33. Dorothy Rodriguez sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
34. Donn Kessler sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
35. Manya Paul sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
36. Torben Riise sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
37. Melissa Anderson sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
38. Megan Kelly sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
39. Cathey Anderson sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
40. Lois Flynn sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
41. Debra Hoelscher sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
42. Christine Gouker sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
43. Mary Doyle sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
44. Lee Bergmann sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
45. Erin Meade sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
46. Lisa Nathan sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
47. Martin Bakal sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
48. Steven Gaines Jr. sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
49. Gina Griffiths sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
50. Margaret Morse sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
51. Grayson Carter sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
52. Judy Whitehouse sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
53. Wendy Walther sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
54. Mary Allen sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.



55. Barbara Gering sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
56. Theresa Prebish sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
57. Samantha Torre sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
58. Patricia Anderson sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
59. Mary Ann Maher sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
60. Christine Berthlett sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
61. Nicole Sanderson sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
62. Lynda Ziskin sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
63. Angela Lober sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
64. Jessica Jones sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
65. Frances Hammond sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
66. Bram Jacobson sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
67. Monica Goddard sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
68. Kristen Vassar sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
69. Mary Lee sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
70. Erika George sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
71. James Conway sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
72. Bill Shepard sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
73. Victoria Castro-Corral sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
74. Elizabeth Kurtz sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
75. Anna Elbert sent an email in support of maintaining current library funding.
76. Mehdi Lasker sent an email in support of returning the rental tax and/or increasing
the property tax by 0.02% to create additional revenue for the city.
77. Kelle sent an email in support of funding to clean up trash from roadways, freeways
and highways and supports funding for more shade trees and tree maintenance.
78. Rogelio Tovar sent an email in support of funding for enclosed community garden
space.
79. Jeff Boyles sent an email in support of funding for an eclosed community garden
space.
80. Cindy Gentry sent an email in support of funding for an eclosed community garden
space.




81. Nancy Kroening sent an email in support of Memory Café programs at senior
centers.
82. Maria Vargas sent an email in support of additional funding for public safety to
attract new officers, improve training and enhance customer service.
83. Carole Stines sent an email opposed to additional funding for green spaces and
would rather see additional funding used on transit. Ms. Stines supports funding for
additional shade structures.
84. Maxwell Ulin sent an email in support of funding for heat protections city wide for
workers.
85. Jodie Langston sent an email in support of continued funding for Arts & Culture.
86. Mark Mettes sent an email in support of continued funding for Arts & Culture.
87. Jenny Holsman Tetreault sent an email in support of continued funding for Arts &
Culture.
88. Patrick McWhortor sent an email in support of continued funding for Arts & Culture.
89. Leah Fregulia sent an email in support of continued funding for Arts & Culture.
90. Cliff Couch sent an email opposed to funding for heat relief programs.
91. Kristen Heggli sent an email in support of additional funding for protected bike lanes
in the downtown area.
92. Christine McGaugh sent an email in support of funding to add park staff for safety,
specifically at Francisco Highland Park and South Mountain Preserve. Ms. McGaugh
also supports funding to hire additional officers, clean up roadways of debris and
trash and to house the unsheltered while offering drug treatment.
93. K Hill sent an email in support of funding for roadway repairs and improvements.
94. Andrea Luna Cervantes sent an email in support of funding for legal assistance for
individuals facing eviction.
95. Adriana Garcia sent an email in support of funding for legal assistance for individuals
facing eviction and for repairs/upgrades to Sunnyslope Community Center.
96. Nicholas Barnhiser sent an email in support of funding for protected bike lanes and a
safe “Miracle Mile” walking path.
97. Amber Voigt sent an email in support of taxing Waymo’s more because they are
dangerous and block traffic.
98. Norman Voigt sent an email in support of funding for a Sustainable Food Action
Plan.
99. Doris Morris sent an email in support of funding to make public safety a priority.



100. Robert Parker sent an email in support of funding for exercise equipment at Steele
Indian School Park.
101. Paula Miller sent an email in support of additional funding for the Fire Department.
102. Terri Rosko sent an email in support of additional funding for the Police Department.
103. Ginnie Ann Sumner sent an email in support of additional funding to expand PHX
C.A.R.E.S, Graffiti Busters, Office of Homeless Solutions and Public Safety. Ms.
Sumner would like to see funding to address speeding, red light runners and install
arm rest on public transit to deter sleeping and storage on buses. Ms. Sumner would
also like to see monthly reports for Graffiti Busters posted online.
104. Steve Hooker sent an email in support of additional funding for Public Safety and
support of creating entrance fees for city parks and/or rescue fees for individuals
visiting City of Phoenix Mountain Preserve areas.
105. Erik Howle sent an email in support of additional funding for security personnel at
Margaret T. Hance Park to create a safer and cleaner park for the community.
106. Cadel Grisinger sent an email in support of additional funding for security personnel
at Margaret T. Hance Park to create a safer and cleaner park for the community.
107. Reese Hanlin sent an email in support of additional funding for security personnel at
Margaret T. Hance Park to create a safer and cleaner park for the community.
108. Carol Finney sent an email in support of additional funding for security personnel at
Margaret T. Hance Park to create a safer and cleaner park for the community.
109. The Roosevelt Action Association sent a letter in support of additional funding for
dedicated police and park ranger presence at Margaret T. Hance Park. The letter is
attached.
110. Kazandra Zeleya sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
111. Jorge Ignacio Torres sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan
for Maryvale.
112. Priscilla Urrutia sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
113. Lidia Avila sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
114. Natividad Chavez sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
115. Maria Antonia Franco Sintes sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat
relief plan for Maryvale.



116. Jesse Ortega sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
117. Clarissa Vela sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
118. Lucille Ybarra sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
119. Vivian Corrales sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
120. Jamie Ybarra sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
121. Ken King sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
122. Amy Gonzalez sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
123. Carolyn Banks sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
124. Julianna Heredia sent an email in support of funding to develop a heat relief plan for
Maryvale.
Voicemails

1. Josephine Humes left a voicemail in support of additional green spaces and water
rebates for elderly homeowners on a fixed income.

2. Martin Bakal left a voicemail in support of maintaining current library funding.

3. Conie Cabot left a voicemail in support of funding initiatives to the public for
reporting parks employees that are not completing their tasks and supports parks
employees being mandated to keep a daily log of their work tasks, including lunch
and breaks. Ms. Cabot also would like to support better hiring practices for police
officers to include psychological evaluations for their mental and emotional state of
minds.

Social media statistics from March 17 to May 8, 2025:
6 City of Phoenix Facebook Posts
• 1,436 Impressions
• 12 Engagements




24 City of Phoenix Tweets (English/Spanish Accounts)
• 12,581 Impressions
• 123 Engagements


2 Nextdoor Posts
• 10,523 Impressions
• 11 Reactions

Flowpage (Trial Budget)
• 4,713 Pageviews

14 City of Phoenix YouTube
• 2,351 Views
• 18 Likes
• 72 Shares


Respectfully submitted,


Kari Lambert
Administrative Assistant II




April 16, 2025

Mayor Kate Gallego
and Councilmembers
200 W. Washington
Phoenix, AZ 85003

Subject: 2025-26 Budget

Dear Mayor:

On behalf of the Roosevelt Action Association, I am writing to request additional funding for
dedicated police and park ranger presence at Margaret T. Hance Park in downtown
Phoenix. Hance Park has been a jewel in our park system since it opened 30 years ago, but
recently has deteriorated significantly due to increased crime, drug use and vagrancy.

Hance Park is the site of many of our best-known regional events, such as Super Bowl
parties and Final Four festivities, and it is home to most of our significant cultural
institutions, such as the Irish Cultural Center, Japanese Friendship Garden, Burton Barr
Library, and the Arizona Jewish Historical Society.

But increasing crime, drug use, and vagrancy have made the park inhospitable to the
residents of the surrounding diverse, mixed-income neighborhood. A member of the
downtown tourism office recently noted that they can no longer recommend Hance Park to
out-of-town visitors because of the environment there!

Particular hotspots are the Central Avenue stairwells leading into the park and the recently
completed Republic Gardens, where large numbers of criminal drug users and dealers
occupy the stairs, benches, and play equipment all day long.

Hance Park does not have a dedicated police or park ranger presence. While roving police
officers and park rangers typically respond promptly to complaints, actual enforcement is
minimal because violators pick up and move temporarily to another spot in the park and
wait for the rangers and/police to leave on another call.

That’s why we need a dedicated park ranger and/or police officer at the park (at least one
full-time position) who can be the consistent eyes on the large group of regular violators,
write them up for park violations, and cite them for criminal behavior or trespass as
needed.

In addition, we need consistent and aggressive enforcement for violations of park rules and
city ordinances. We suggest additional training for park rangers and police officers on the




updated anti-camping ordinance, which is being violated on a daily basis but is rarely, if
ever, enforced.


We appreciate the efforts of the Human Services Department in conducting outreach to
individuals in the area who need housing and other services, and the increase in shelter
services over the past several years. We also support the additional funding in this year’s
budget for additional homeless services and shelter. We now need to address the problem
of those who refuse services for whatever reason and instead are engaged in criminal
activity and rules violations in our biggest and most beautiful downtown park.

This letter was reviewed, discussed, and unanimously approved by approximately 20
members of the Roosevelt Action Association at our regular monthly meeting held April 16,
2025. Please support our park and our neighborhood by providing dedicated police and/or
park presence to Hance Park. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Bill Scheel, President
Roosevelt Action Association

Cc: City Manager Jeff Barton




2023-24 SCHEDULE 1
RESOURCES AND EXPENDITURES BY FUND
ACTUAL
(In Thousands of Dollars)

Resources Expenditures
Beginning Recovery and Interfund Interfund Ending Fund
Fund Balance Revenue 1/ Proceeds Transfers-In Transfers-Out Total Operating Capital Debt Service Total Balance
General Funds
General Fund 222,931 412,862 7,321 1,480,237 (167,664) 1,955,688 1,631,085 31,090 - 1,662,175 293,513
Library - 45,868 61 9,023 (4,082) 50,869 49,893 975 - 50,869 -
Parks - 21,119 1,010 114,407 (9,314) 127,222 125,227 1,995 - 127,222 -
Cable Television - 7,058 8 752 (3,206) 4,611 4,611 - - 4,611 -
Total General Funds 222,931 486,906 8,400 1,604,419 (184,266) 2,138,390 1,810,817 34,061 - 1,844,878 293,513

Special Revenue Funds
Excise Tax - 2,191,877 - - (2,191,877) - - - - - -
Arizona Highway User Revenue 76,491 164,415 2,190 32,976 (30,144) 245,928 83,253 75,594 - 158,847 87,081
Capital Construction 27,988 1,146 231 7,328 - 36,693 124 10,669 - 10,793 25,900
City Improvement - 26 - 80,387 (1,022) 79,391 - - 79,391 79,391 -
Community Reinvestment 22,296 7,068 109 - (2,064) 27,410 2,934 3,120 - 6,055 21,356
Court Awards 2/ (104) 1,981 100 - - 1,977 2,752 - - 2,752 (775)
Development Services 68,650 82,099 156 86 (6,528) 144,463 83,462 25,148 - 108,609 35,854
Golf 4,945 13,249 34 - - 18,229 10,057 936 - 10,993 7,235
Neighborhood Protection - Block Watch 10,691 509 - 2,753 (7) 13,945 3,093 - - 3,093 10,852
Neighborhood Protection - Fire 5,126 147 - 13,762 (37) 18,999 13,597 - - 13,597 5,402
Neighborhood Protection - Police 9,611 233 6 38,530 (851) 47,529 39,295 - - 39,295 8,234
Parks and Preserves 116,985 5,588 379 55,051 (147) 177,856 6,638 79,255 - 85,893 91,963
Public Safety Enhancement - Fire 12,192 - 1 11,878 - 24,072 11,905 - - 11,905 12,167
Public Safety Enhancement - Police 13,732 - - 19,380 (514) 32,598 17,926 - - 17,926 14,671
Public Safety Expansion - Fire 20,475 803 - 22,019 (296) 43,001 17,971 - - 17,971 25,030
Public Safety Expansion - Police 25,860 65 8 88,070 (4,859) 109,144 85,766 - - 85,766 23,378
Regional Transit 3/ (4,892) 74,312 5 - - 69,425 65,636 6,036 - 71,671 (2,247)
Regional Wireless Cooperative 2,394 7,186 - - - 9,580 5,856 - - 5,856 3,723
Secondary Property Tax 100 134,481 - - (489) 134,092 - - 133,992 133,992 100
Sports Facilities 86,799 7,127 - 30,955 (15,781) 109,100 2,748 2,084 - 4,833 104,267
Transit 2000 4/ - (1) - - - (1) - - - - (1)
Transportation 2050 433,887 53,894 7,302 376,406 (126,379) 745,110 209,631 83,661 - 293,292 451,818
Other Restricted 207,720 37,458 766 56,174 (12,645) 289,474 60,944 5,437 - 66,381 223,093
Grants 5/ 47,815 401,742 8,648 2,832 (2,956) 458,082 392,242 77,438 - 469,680 (11,598)
Total Special Revenue Funds 1,188,762 3,185,405 19,933 838,589 (2,396,595) 2,836,095 1,115,830 369,377 213,383 1,698,590 1,137,505

Enterprise Funds
Aviation 654,306 607,505 7,606 17,571 (21,131) 1,265,857 321,670 93,327 96,730 511,727 754,130
Convention Center 128,949 38,792 860 144,647 (59,446) 253,803 59,215 7,402 17,480 84,097 169,706
Solid Waste 41,206 211,935 2,937 - (14,563) 241,514 170,574 7,189 9,580 187,344 54,170
Wastewater 242,631 306,280 3,357 130,010 (124,083) 558,196 138,272 88,645 88,906 315,822 242,373
Water 124,765 617,254 5,993 246,575 (258,445) 736,142 297,892 166,502 151,725 616,119 120,023
Total Enterprise Funds 1,191,857 1,781,766 20,754 538,803 (477,668) 3,055,512 987,623 363,065 364,422 1,715,109 1,340,403

Total Operating Funds 2,603,551 5,454,077 49,088 2,981,811 (3,058,529) 8,029,997 3,914,269 766,503 577,804 5,258,576 2,771,421

1/ General fund sales tax revenue is reflected as a transfer-in from the excise tax fund. Total transfer equates to $1,418.5 million, and is included in the General Funds revenue total of $1,905.4 million shown on
Schedule 2.
2/ The negative balance in Court Awards is due to the timing of reimbursement for approved Court Awards' eligible expenditures.
3/ The negative balance in Regional Transit is due to the timing of reimbursements for project costs from the regional transportation plan (Proposition 400).
4/ The negative revenue in Transit 2000 is due to a bad debt write-off from an aging account.
5/ The negative balance in Grants is due to the timing of posting revenues and expenditures.




2024-25 SCHEDULE 1
RESOURCES AND EXPENDITURES BY FUND
PROPOSED ESTIMATE
(In Thousands of Dollars)


Resources Expenditures
Beginning Recovery and Interfund Interfund Ending Fund
Fund Balance Revenue 1/ Proceeds Transfers-In Transfers-Out Total Operating Capital Debt Service Total Balance
General Funds
General Fund 293,513 420,354 10,600 1,378,707 (151,115) 1,952,057 1,692,602 49,311 - 1,741,914 210,144
Library - 45,659 - 9,699 (3,973) 51,385 50,640 746 - 51,385 -
Parks - 22,313 - 111,470 - 133,783 133,302 481 - 133,783 -
Cable Television - 6,176 - - (770) 5,406 5,406 - - 5,406 -
Total General Funds 293,513 494,502 10,600 1,499,875 (155,858) 2,142,632 1,881,950 50,538 - 1,932,488 210,144

Special Revenue Funds
Excise Tax - 2,073,213 - - (2,073,213) - - - - - -
Arizona Highway User Revenue 87,081 169,661 1,306 306 (3,531) 254,823 90,358 85,448 - 175,806 79,017
Capital Construction 25,900 1,117 139 8,332 (768) 34,721 140 8,958 - 9,098 25,622
City Improvement - - - 82,937 - 82,937 - - 82,937 82,937 -
Community Reinvestment 21,356 6,493 89 - (2,067) 25,870 2,315 5,764 - 8,079 17,791
Court Awards (775) 5,122 165 - - 4,512 4,512 - - 4,512 -
Development Services 35,854 80,603 11,708 - (6,683) 121,482 90,948 6,748 - 97,696 23,786
Golf 7,235 13,905 7 - - 21,148 11,931 - - 11,931 9,217
Neighborhood Protection - Block Watch 10,852 733 102 2,631 (7) 14,311 5,594 - - 5,594 8,717
Neighborhood Protection - Fire 5,402 120 - 13,148 (38) 18,632 14,917 - - 14,917 3,715
Neighborhood Protection - Police 8,234 222 47 44,321 (873) 51,950 41,001 - - 41,001 10,948
Parks and Preserves 91,963 5,615 2,894 52,603 (149) 152,926 7,980 70,415 - 78,396 74,530
Public Safety Enhancement - Fire 12,167 - - 13,401 - 25,568 13,345 - - 13,345 12,223
Public Safety Enhancement - Police 14,671 - 13 21,865 (15,612) 20,937 19,155 - - 19,155 1,782
Public Safety Expansion - Fire 25,030 969 - 21,043 (308) 46,735 23,928 - - 23,928 22,807
Public Safety Expansion - Police 23,378 238 5 87,910 (1,783) 109,747 104,125 - - 104,125 5,622
Regional Transit (2,247) 80,339 15 374 (373) 78,108 66,766 7,006 - 73,771 4,336
Regional Wireless Cooperative 3,723 6,778 - - - 10,501 4,888 1,925 - 6,813 3,688
Secondary Property Tax 100 138,549 - - (2,307) 136,341 - - 136,341 136,341 -
Sports Facilities 104,267 7,325 87 30,835 (36,647) 105,868 2,958 2,810 - 5,768 100,100
Transit 2000 (1) - - 1 - - - - - - -
Transportation 2050 451,818 49,333 8,355 361,141 (12,694) 857,953 264,917 148,589 - 413,506 444,446
Other Restricted 223,093 70,067 209 81,023 (2,122) 372,270 78,473 22,664 - 101,137 271,133
Grants (11,598) 542,176 16,509 690 (1,023) 546,754 391,788 106,769 - 498,557 48,197
Total Special Revenue Funds 1,137,505 3,252,578 41,650 822,559 (2,160,199) 3,094,094 1,240,039 467,096 219,279 1,926,414 1,167,680

Enterprise Funds
Aviation 754,130 659,994 4,135 16,135 (18,084) 1,416,311 411,297 142,740 96,727 650,764 765,546
Convention Center 169,706 39,054 679 85,637 (4,871) 290,206 75,568 6,112 23,690 105,371 184,835
Solid Waste 54,170 215,908 1,019 6,987 (14,525) 263,560 184,428 6,145 10,147 200,721 62,840
Wastewater 242,373 326,815 8,093 - (19,959) 557,323 151,281 81,893 62,987 296,161 261,162
Water 120,023 709,573 4,870 - (41,339) 793,127 326,692 136,438 146,153 609,282 183,844
Total Enterprise Funds 1,340,403 1,951,346 18,796 108,759 (98,778) 3,320,526 1,149,267 373,328 339,704 1,862,300 1,458,227

Total Operating Funds 2,771,421 5,698,426 71,047 2,431,193 (2,414,835) 8,557,252 4,271,256 890,962 558,983 5,721,201 2,836,050

1/ General fund sales tax revenue is reflected as a transfer-in from the excise tax fund. Total transfer equates to $1,324.8 million, and is included in the General Funds revenue total of $1,819.3 million shown on
Schedule 2.




2025-26 SCHEDULE 1
RESOURCES AND EXPENDITURES BY FUND
PROPOSED BUDGET
(In Thousands of Dollars)

Resources Expenditures
Beginning Recovery and Interfund Interfund Ending Fund
Fund Balance Revenue 1/ Proceeds Transfers-In Transfers-Out Total Operating Capital Debt Service Total Balance
General Funds
General Fund 210,144 426,563 5,359 1,511,379 (155,785) 1,997,660 1,927,633 70,027 - 1,997,660 -
Library - 47,193 - 9,167 (3,973) 52,387 51,366 1,020 - 52,387 -
Parks - 22,729 - 115,165 - 137,894 134,775 3,119 - 137,894 -
Cable Television - 5,472 - 142 - 5,614 5,614 - - 5,614 -
Total General Funds 210,144 501,957 5,359 1,635,854 (159,759) 2,193,555 2,119,388 74,167 - 2,193,555 -

Special Revenue Funds
Excise Tax - 2,329,412 - - (2,329,412) - - - - - -
Arizona Highway User Revenue 79,017 173,276 1,306 - (4,241) 249,358 97,066 131,352 - 228,418 20,940
Capital Construction 25,622 894 139 6,920 - 33,575 140 25,960 - 26,100 7,475
City Improvement - - 100 106,400 - 106,500 - - 106,500 106,500 -
Community Reinvestment 17,791 11,504 6 - (2,067) 27,233 2,771 5,315 - 8,086 19,147
Court Awards - 5,075 19 - - 5,094 3,154 - - 3,154 1,939
Development Services 23,786 84,032 156 - (6,683) 101,292 94,015 7,080 - 101,095 197
Golf 9,217 14,070 5 - - 23,292 12,571 2,000 - 14,571 8,721
Neighborhood Protection - Block Watch 8,717 437 - 3,202 (5) 12,350 5,689 - - 5,689 6,661
Neighborhood Protection - Fire 3,715 100 - 15,998 (24) 19,789 15,113 - - 15,113 4,676
Neighborhood Protection - Police 10,948 177 - 44,803 (3,838) 52,091 48,817 - - 48,817 3,274
Parks and Preserves 74,530 4,414 - 64,003 (98) 142,849 8,030 102,054 - 110,084 32,764
Public Safety Enhancement - Fire 12,223 - - 13,418 - 25,641 13,245 - - 13,245 12,396
Public Safety Enhancement - Police 1,782 - - 21,892 (4,112) 19,562 19,531 - - 19,531 31
Public Safety Expansion - Fire 22,807 775 - 25,603 (287) 48,897 24,763 - - 24,763 24,134
Public Safety Expansion - Police 5,622 25 - 107,903 (1,700) 111,850 106,162 - - 106,162 5,688
Regional Transit 4,336 67,217 5 - - 71,558 54,241 15,066 - 69,307 2,251
Regional Wireless Cooperative 3,688 7,494 - - - 11,182 5,696 2,192 - 7,888 3,294
Secondary Property Tax - 143,241 - 1,622 - 144,863 - - 144,863 144,863 -
Sports Facilities 100,100 6,655 - 32,810 (16,656) 122,909 12,206 8,531 - 20,737 102,172
Transportation 2050 444,446 53,520 1,530 439,091 (26,057) 912,530 359,492 395,422 - 754,914 157,616
Other Restricted 271,133 54,456 69 48,941 (9,812) 364,787 109,064 74,493 - 183,557 181,230
Grants 48,197 699,146 180 - (120) 747,403 492,427 218,733 - 711,160 36,243
Total Special Revenue Funds 1,167,680 3,655,917 3,515 932,606 (2,405,113) 3,354,606 1,484,194 988,199 251,363 2,723,755 630,851

Enterprise Funds
Aviation 765,546 663,361 2,768 19,139 (17,096) 1,433,718 462,077 638,870 91,464 1,192,412 241,306
Convention Center 184,835 40,013 669 103,475 (4,989) 324,002 87,859 10,285 23,683 121,828 202,174
Solid Waste 62,840 216,352 322 - (14,508) 265,006 195,717 10,877 14,690 221,283 43,722
Wastewater 261,162 338,782 2,035 - (21,025) 580,953 176,953 277,088 63,214 517,256 63,698
Water 183,844 782,974 2,556 - (32,844) 936,531 368,911 334,181 187,708 890,800 45,731
Total Enterprise Funds 1,458,227 2,041,482 8,350 122,614 (90,463) 3,540,210 1,291,517 1,271,302 380,760 2,943,579 596,631

Total Operating Funds 2,836,050 6,199,357 17,224 2,691,074 (2,655,335) 9,088,371 4,895,099 2,333,667 632,122 7,860,889 1,227,482

1/ General fund sales tax revenue is reflected as a transfer-in from the excise tax fund. Total transfer equates to $1,434.9 million, and is included in the General Funds revenue total of $1,936.9 million shown on
Schedule 2.




SCHEDULE 2
PROPOSED REVENUES BY MAJOR SOURCE
(In Thousands of Dollars)


Percent Increase/ Percent Increase/
2023-24 2024-25 Decrease from 2025-26 Decrease from
Revenue Source Actuals Estimate 2023-24 Actuals Budget 2024-25 Estimate


GENERAL FUND


Local Taxes and Related Fees
Local Sales Tax 1/ 707,310 695,243 -1.7% 819,157 17.8%
Privilege License Fees 3,469 3,367 -2.9% 1,838 -45.4%
Other General Fund Excise Taxes 19,575 19,759 0.9% 19,891 0.7%
Subtotal 730,354 718,369 -1.6% 840,886 17.1%


State Shared Revenues
Sales Tax 249,504 252,575 1.2% 262,745 4.0%
State Income Tax 435,754 351,016 -19.4% 328,334 -6.5%
Vehicle License Tax 83,823 88,000 5.0% 90,871 3.3%
Subtotal 769,082 691,591 -10.1% 681,950 -1.4%


Primary Property Tax 206,394 215,419 4.4% 222,719 3.4%


User Fees/Other Revenue
Licenses & Permits 2,882 2,887 0.2% 2,937 1.7%
Cable Communications 7,058 6,176 -12.5% 5,472 -11.4%
Fines and Forfeitures 8,800 8,515 -3.2% 8,525 0.1%
Court Default Fee 892 1,000 12.1% 1,005 0.5%
Fire 80,113 82,959 3.6% 87,502 5.5%
Hazardous Materials Inspection Fee 1,524 1,200 -21.3% 1,500 25.0%
Library Fees 481 424 -11.8% 425 0.1%
Parks and Recreation 8,343 8,699 4.3% 8,653 -0.5%
Planning 1,865 1,836 -1.6% 1,836 0.0%
Police 17,277 17,859 3.4% 17,177 -3.8%
Street Transportation 12,375 8,331 -32.7% 8,343 0.1%
Other Service Charges 52,491 50,248 -4.3% 44,229 -12.0%
Other 5,470 3,836 -29.9% 3,702 -3.5%
Subtotal 199,571 193,969 -2.8% 191,304 -1.4%

TOTAL GENERAL FUNDS 1,905,401 1,819,349 -4.5% 1,936,860 6.5%




SCHEDULE 2 (Continued)
PROPOSED REVENUES BY MAJOR SOURCE
(In Thousands of Dollars)


Percent Increase/ Percent Increase/
2023-24 2024-25 Decrease from 2025-26 Decrease from
Revenue Source Actuals Estimate 2023-24 Actuals Budget 2024-25 Estimate


SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
Neighborhood Protection 1/ 55,897 53,674 -4.0% 64,717 20.6%
2007 Public Safety Expansion 1/ 110,884 106,410 -4.0% 128,806 21.0%
Public Safety Enhancement 31,258 35,266 12.8% 35,310 0.1%
Parks and Preserves 1/ 60,594 58,218 -3.9% 68,417 17.5%
Transit 2000 2/ (1) - +100% - NA
1/
Transportation 2050 430,073 408,510 -5.0% 492,611 20.6%
Court Awards 1,981 5,122 +100% 5,075 -0.9%
Development Services 82,099 80,603 -1.8% 84,032 4.3%
Capital Construction 8,474 7,882 -7.0% 7,814 -0.9%
Sports Facilities 37,059 38,160 3.0% 39,466 3.4%
Arizona Highway User Revenue 164,415 169,661 3.2% 173,276 2.1%
Regional Transit Revenues 74,312 80,339 8.1% 67,217 -16.3%
Community Reinvestment 7,068 6,493 -8.1% 11,504 77.2%
Secondary Property Tax 134,481 138,549 3.0% 143,241 3.4%
Impact Fee Program Administration 901 801 -11.1% 790 -1.3%
Regional Wireless Cooperative 7,186 6,778 -5.7% 7,494 10.6%
Golf Courses 13,249 13,905 5.0% 14,070 1.2%
City Improvement Fund 26 - -100.0% - NA
Other Restricted Revenues 56,020 89,547 59.8% 74,557 -16.7%
Grants
Public Housing Grants 154,559 200,035 29.4% 239,048 19.5%
Human Services Grants 74,660 75,804 1.5% 101,901 34.4%
Community Development 23,364 21,299 -8.8% 37,897 77.9%
Criminal Justice 10,880 11,720 7.7% 10,553 -10.0%
Public Transit Grants 45,674 79,025 73.0% 122,688 55.3%
Other Grants 92,604 154,292 66.6% 187,059 21.2%
Subtotal - Grants 401,742 542,177 35.0% 699,145 29.0%


SUBTOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS 1,677,718 1,842,094 9.8% 2,117,540 15.0%


ENTERPRISE FUNDS
Aviation 607,505 659,994 8.6% 663,361 0.5%
Water System 617,254 709,573 15.0% 782,974 10.3%
Wastewater System 306,280 326,815 6.7% 338,782 3.7%
Solid Waste 211,935 215,908 1.9% 216,352 0.2%
Convention Center 1/ 127,984 124,691 -2.6% 143,488 15.1%


SUBTOTAL ENTERPRISE FUNDS 1,870,958 2,036,983 8.9% 2,144,957 5.3%
TOTAL ALL OPERATING FUNDS 5,454,077 5,698,426 4.5% 6,199,357 8.8%

1/
2025-26 Budget includes an increase of 0.5% to the City Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT) and Use Tax rates starting July 1, 2025.
2/
The negative revenue in Transit 2000 is due to a bad debt write-off from an aging account.




SCHEDULE 3
PROPOSED OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT1/
(In Thousands of Dollars)



Percent Change from
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2024-25
Actuals Budget Estimate Budget Budget Estimate

General Government
Mayor's Office 2,484 2,744 2,749 2,759 0.6% 0.4%
City Manager's Office 11,870 18,853 16,720 23,257 23.4% 39.1%
City Auditor 3,335 3,892 3,633 3,735 -4.0% 2.8%
Information Technology Services 85,803 105,485 104,417 99,121 -6.0% -5.1%
Equal Opportunity Department 3,598 4,322 4,265 4,355 0.8% 2.1%
City Clerk 7,510 9,019 6,219 8,533 -5.4% 37.2%
Human Resources 28,413 30,440 30,142 30,177 -0.9% 0.1%
Retirement 573 660 685 969 46.8% 41.5%
Phoenix Employment Relations Board 114 133 129 135 1.1% 4.8%
Law 10,238 11,173 12,034 12,889 15.4% 7.1%
Budget and Research 4,288 4,587 4,490 4,498 -1.9% 0.2%
Regional Wireless Cooperative 5,856 6,223 4,888 5,696 -8.5% 16.5%
Finance 31,303 39,166 42,688 42,145 7.6% -1.3%
Communications Office 4,629 5,081 5,406 5,614 10.5% 3.8%
Government Relations 1,675 1,761 1,775 1,760 -0.1% -0.9%

Total General Government 208,078 250,567 247,276 252,795 0.9% 2.2%


Public Safety
Police 930,032 981,055 979,238 1,027,528 4.7% 4.9%
Fire 543,385 561,651 555,709 603,410 7.4% 8.6%

Total Public Safety 1,473,417 1,542,706 1,534,947 1,630,938 5.7% 6.3%


Criminal Justice
City Prosecutor 22,024 25,178 23,098 24,085 -4.3% 4.3%
Municipal Court 38,670 41,010 41,580 43,050 5.0% 3.5%
Public Defender 6,491 6,902 6,896 7,087 2.7% 2.8%

Total Criminal Justice 67,185 73,089 71,574 74,222 1.5% 3.7%


Transportation
Street Transportation 112,695 121,044 120,500 104,196 -13.9% -13.5%
Aviation 321,144 410,809 410,692 431,460 5.0% 5.1%
Public Transit 309,807 350,032 348,296 420,213 20.0% 20.6%

Total Transportation 743,646 881,886 879,488 955,870 8.4% 8.7%




SCHEDULE 3 (Continued)
PROPOSED OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT1/
(In Thousands of Dollars)



Percent Change from
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2024-25
Actuals Budget Estimate Budget Budget Estimate

Community Development
Planning and Development 91,172 101,520 99,421 102,661 1.1% 3.3%
Housing 164,603 259,604 201,090 246,222 -5.2% 22.4%
Community and Economic Development 22,329 20,578 22,738 19,466 -5.4% -14.4%
Neighborhood Services 42,755 73,092 46,332 64,121 -12.3% 38.4%

Total Community Development 320,859 454,794 369,581 432,470 -4.9% 17.0%


Community Enrichment
Office of Arts and Culture 7,055 10,043 10,393 9,104 -9.3% -12.4%
Parks and Recreation 146,022 156,535 156,737 159,868 2.1% 2.0%
Library 51,499 52,776 52,918 52,484 -0.6% -0.8%
Phoenix Convention Center 62,684 81,480 79,772 87,510 7.4% 9.7%
Human Services 176,447 168,029 165,105 152,994 -8.9% -7.3%

Total Community Enrichment 443,707 468,863 464,925 461,960 -1.5% -0.6%


Environmental Services
Office of Sustainability 1,030 890 1,084 979 9.9% -9.8%
Environmental Programs 4,146 154,940 6,105 3,406 -97.8% -44.2%
Public Works 26,848 36,054 34,510 37,464 3.9% 8.6%
Solid Waste Disposal 170,358 188,516 184,196 194,487 3.2% 5.6%
Water Services 435,544 484,794 477,759 511,948 5.6% 7.2%

Total Environmental Services 637,926 865,195 703,655 748,283 -13.5% 6.3%


Non-Departmental Operating
Contingencies - 236,375 - 293,561 24.2% +100.0%
Other Non-Departmental2/ 19,451 15,000 (191) 45,000 200.0% +100.0%

Total Non-Departmental Operating 19,451 251,375 (191) 338,561 34.7% +100.0%


Total 3,914,269 4,788,475 4,271,256 4,895,099 2.2% 14.6%


1/ For purposes of this schedule, department budget allocations include Grants.


2/ Other Non-Departmental consists of Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF), unassigned vacancy savings,

and additional pension contribution.




SCHEDULE 4
2025-26 OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT1/
BY SOURCE OF FUNDS
(In Thousands of Dollars)

Special
General
Total Revenue Enterprise
Funds
Funds Funds

General Government
Mayor's Office 2,759 2,759 - -
City Manager's Office 23,257 12,638 10,314 305
City Auditor 3,735 3,735 - -
Information Technology Services 99,121 98,229 - 892
Equal Opportunity Department 4,355 3,718 637 -
City Clerk 8,533 8,532 - -
Human Resources 30,177 30,177 - -
Retirement 969 20 949 -
Phoenix Employment Relations Board 135 135 - -
Law 12,889 12,627 262 -
Budget and Research 4,498 4,498 - -
Regional Wireless Cooperative 5,696 - 5,696 -
Finance 42,145 32,460 7,833 1,852
Communications Office 5,614 5,609 5 -
Government Relations 1,760 1,760 - -

Total General Government 252,795 224,050 25,697 3,049


Public Safety
Police 1,027,528 799,844 227,684 -
Fire 603,410 521,286 82,124 -

Total Public Safety 1,630,938 1,321,130 309,808 -


Criminal Justice
City Prosecutor 24,085 22,645 1,440 -
Municipal Court 43,050 39,759 3,290 -
Public Defender 7,087 7,087 - -

Total Criminal Justice 74,222 69,491 4,731 -


Transportation
Street Transportation 104,196 1,902 102,294 -
Aviation 431,460 - - 431,460
Public Transit 420,213 - 420,213 -

Total Transportation 955,870 1,902 522,507 431,460




SCHEDULE 4 (Continued)
2025-26 OPERATING EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT1/
BY SOURCE OF FUNDS
(In Thousands of Dollars)

Special
General
Total Revenue Enterprise
Funds
Funds Funds

Community Development
Planning and Development 102,661 7,311 95,350 -
Housing 246,222 2,674 243,548 -
Community and Economic Development 19,466 10,221 8,493 752
Neighborhood Services 64,121 19,743 44,378 -

Total Community Development 432,470 39,949 391,769 752


Community Enrichment
Office of Arts and Culture 9,104 8,596 508 -
Parks and Recreation 159,868 134,775 25,093 -
Library 52,484 51,366 1,117 -
Phoenix Convention Center 87,510 4,035 765 82,711
Human Services 152,994 43,098 109,116 780

Total Community Enrichment 461,960 241,870 136,600 83,491


Environmental Services
Office of Sustainability 979 666 312 -
Environmental Programs 3,406 2,402 424 580
Public Works 37,464 37,367 97 -
Solid Waste Disposal 194,487 - - 194,487
Water Services 511,948 - 2,749 509,198

Total Environmental Services 748,283 40,435 3,582 704,265


Non-Departmental Operating
Contingencies 293,561 200,561 24,500 68,500
Other Non-Departmental2/ 45,000 (20,000) 65,000 -

Total Non-Departmental Operating 338,561 180,561 89,500 68,500


Total 4,895,099 2,119,388 1,484,194 1,291,517


1/ For purposes of this schedule, department budget allocations include Grants.


2/ Other Non-Departmental consists of unassigned vacancy savings and additional grant appropriation.




SCHEDULE 5
DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES
BY SOURCE AND USE OF FUNDS AND TYPE OF EXPENDITURE
(In Thousands of Dollars)

2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Actual Estimate Budget



Operating Funds
City Improvement
Economic Development 5,851 2,700 2,703
Finance and General Government 11,789 17,088 24,980
Fire 2,033 3,862 4,783
Housing 571 - -
Human Resources 642 182 185
Human Services 124 73 67
Information Technology 12,567 10,558 10,676
Issuance Costs - - 100
Municipal Court 6,313 6,449 6,428
Parks and Recreation 636 395 402
Police 2,033 2,857 2,651
Public Works 10,913 12,073 12,140
Sports Facilities 12,760 13,560 13,547
Street Transportation 13,159 13,142 27,837
Sub-Total City Improvement 79,391 82,937 106,500

Secondary Property Tax
ADA Improvements - 156 173
Cultural Facilities 12,670 6,565 10,957
Education & Economic Development 23,256 29,646 2,906
Environmental Improvement 541 1,001 1,045
Fire Protection 14,830 8,619 16,021
Freeway Mitigation 626 668 2,942
Historic Preservation 1,765 1,525 815
Housing - 1,702 1,891
Human Services & Senior Centers 559 786 86
Information Systems 123 158 -
Library 6,768 6,177 8,218
Maintenance Service Centers 377 473 522
Neighborhood Services 1,264 1,594 330
Other Debt Service - - 3,500
Parks & Mountain Preserves 16,644 25,518 17,589
Police 12,574 13,914 21,667
Police, Fire & Technology 12,769 16,239 2,338
Storm Sewers 17,779 8,876 32,479
Street Improvements 11,445 12,726 21,385
Sub-Total Secondary Property Tax 133,992 136,341 144,863

Aviation 96,730 96,727 91,464
Convention Center 17,480 23,690 23,683
Solid Waste 9,580 10,147 14,690
Wastewater 88,906 62,987 63,214
Water 151,725 146,153 187,708


Total Operating Funds 577,804 558,983 632,122




SCHEDULE 5 (Continued)
DEBT SERVICE EXPENDITURES
BY SOURCE AND USE OF FUNDS AND TYPE OF EXPENDITURE
(In Thousands of Dollars)

2023-24 2024-25 2025-26
Actual Estimate Budget



Bond Funds
Aviation 174 900 -
Convention Center - - 810
Transportation 2050 - - 900
Wastewater 809 - -
Water - - 900
Other 187 685 500
Total Bond Funds 1,171 1,585 3,110


Other Capital Funds
Capital Reserves 195 748 -
Customer Facility Charges 20,555 20,563 20,560
Federal, State and Other Participation 25,499 25,999 26,497
Passenger Facility Charges 56,761 56,764 56,767
Total Other Capital Funds 103,010 104,074 103,824


Total Debt Service 681,985 664,643 739,056



Type of Expenditure

Principal 365,412 341,491 366,566
Interest and Other 316,573 323,152 372,490

Total Debt Service Expenditures 681,985 664,643 739,056




SCHEDULE 6
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
FINANCED BY OPERATING FUNDS
(In Thousands of Dollars)
2025-26
2023-24 2024-25 Proposed
Actuals Estimate Budget
Arts and Cultural Facilities - - 3,950
Aviation 92,612 142,232 635,924
Economic Development 5,854 10,442 12,683
Environmental Programs 240 2 250
Facilities Management 20,526 26,581 35,119
Finance - 1,000 10,270
Fire Protection 1,953 4,076 5,587
Historic Preservation & Planning 24,540 6,500 5,000
Housing 30,544 47,281 128,514
Human Services 12,935 21,328 15,198
Information Technology 10,820 9,556 50,901
Libraries 1,722 3,061 1,917
Municipal Court - 4,684 4,944
Neighborhood Services 495 399 2,180
Non-Departmental Capital - - 6,720
Parks, Recreation & Mountain Preserves 84,009 71,623 107,071
Phoenix Convention Center 7,259 6,741 16,102
Public Art Program 1,765 3,420 9,676
Public Transit 86,068 139,372 411,627
Regional Wireless Cooperative - 1,925 2,192
Solid Waste Disposal 5,376 5,371 8,098
Street Transportation & Drainage 125,322 169,921 259,189
Sustainability - - 1,000
Wastewater 84,972 80,016 271,070
Water 169,491 135,432 328,486
Total Operating Funds 766,503 890,962 2,333,667

Source of Funds
General Fund 31,090 49,311 70,027
Library 975 746 1,020
Parks 1,995 481 3,119
Total General Funds 34,061 50,538 74,167

Arizona Highway User Revenue 75,594 85,448 131,352
Capital Construction 10,669 8,958 25,960
Community Reinvestment 3,120 5,764 5,315
Development Services 25,148 6,748 7,080
Golf 936 - 2,000
Grants 77,438 106,769 218,733
Other Restricted 5,437 22,664 74,493
Parks and Preserves 79,255 70,415 102,054
Regional Transit 6,036 7,006 15,066
Regional Wireless Cooperative - 1,925 2,192
Sports Facilities 2,084 2,810 8,531
Transportation 2050 83,661 148,589 395,422
Total Special Revenue Funds 369,377 467,096 988,199

Aviation 93,327 142,740 638,870
Convention Center 7,402 6,112 10,285
Solid Waste 7,189 6,145 10,877
Wastewater 88,645 81,893 277,088
Water 166,502 136,438 334,181
Total Enterprise Funds 363,065 373,328 1,271,302

Total Operating Funds 766,503 890,962 2,333,667


SCHEDULE 7
PROPOSED GENERAL FUND INTERFUND TRANSFERS
(In Thousands of Dollars)

2025-26
2023-24 2024-25 Increase/
Actuals Estimate Budget (Decrease)
Transfers to the General Fund

Enterprise Funds
Aviation
Central Service Cost Allocation 15,052 16,637 16,637 -

Convention Center
Central Service Cost Allocation 3,524 4,250 4,250 -

Solid Waste
Central Service Cost Allocation 11,166 11,620 11,620 -
In-Lieu Property Taxes 1,205 1,225 1,207 (18)
Total 12,371 12,845 12,827 (18)

Wastewater Funds
Central Service Cost Allocation 9,643 9,463 9,463 -
In-Lieu Property Taxes 10,365 10,354 11,421 1,067
Total 20,008 19,817 20,884 1,067

Water Funds
Central Service Cost Allocation 14,464 14,194 14,194 -
In-Lieu Property Taxes 17,638 17,574 18,448 874
Total 32,102 31,768 32,642 874

Total From Enterprise Funds 83,057 85,317 87,240 1,923

Special Revenue Funds
Excise
Transfer to General Fund 1,418,494 1,324,847 1,434,902 110,055

Development Services
Central Service Cost Allocation 6,528 6,683 6,683 -

Sports Facilities
Central Service Cost Allocation 89 115 115 -

ASU Facilities Operations Fund - 1,446 740 (706)
Downtown Community Reinvestment Fund 2,064 2,067 2,067 -
Housing Central Office Central Service Costs 522 676 676 -
Neighborhood Protection Central Service Costs 748 769 769 -
Wastewater Fund 133 - - -
Public Housing In-Lieu Property Taxes 121 120 120 -
Public Safety Enhancement Central Service Costs 514 612 612 -
Public Safety Expansion Central Service Costs 1,709 1,791 1,791 -
T2050 Central Service Costs 1,551 1,703 1,703 -
Sports Facilities Capital Reserve Fund - - 22,546 22,546

Total From Special Revenue Funds 1,432,473 1,340,829 1,472,724 131,895

Total Transfers to the General Fund 1,515,530 1,426,146 1,559,964 133,818

SCHEDULE 7 (Continued)
PROPOSED GENERAL FUND INTERFUND TRANSFERS
(In Thousands of Dollars)

2025-26
2023-24 2024-25 Increase/
Actuals Estimate Budget (Decrease)

Transfers from the General Fund

Aerial Fleet Capital Reserve Fund (7,000) - - -
Aviation - Emergency Transportation Services (372) (707) (540) 167
City Improvement - Library (129) (129) (129) -
Library Reserve Fund (608) - - -
City Improvement (47,717) (52,052) (52,428) (376)
Community Facilities Districts-Restricted Fund (174) (213) (381) (169)
Fire Sinking Fund (2,200) - - -
Housing Central Office Cost Center (2,500) (2,500) (2,500) -
Infrastructure Repayment Agreements (2,132) (3,885) (4,543) (658)
Development Services (86) - - -
Workforce Cost Pool Account (626) - - -
Public Safety Other Restricted Fund (18,000) (18,000) (18,000) -
Public Safety Pension Reserve Fund (1,000) - - -
Retiree Rate Stabilization Fund (1,022) - - -
Strategic Economic Development Fund (1,500) (1,650) (1,650) -
Marijuana Sales Tax to PSPRS (3,153) (2,992) (3,696) (704)
Street Capital Project (7,158) - - -

Total Transfers from the General Fund (95,377) (82,128) (83,868) (1,740)

Net Transfers to the General Fund 1,420,153 1,344,018 1,476,096 132,079




SCHEDULE 8
PROPOSED POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT
Number of Full Time Equivalent Positions


Estimate Budget
2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 2025-26
less less
Actual Adopted Estimate Budget
Adopted Estimate

General Government
Mayor's Office 15.0 15.0 16.0 1.0 16.0 0.0
City Manager's Office 62.5 61.0 64.5 3.5 63.5 (1.0)
City Auditor 25.4 25.4 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0
Information Technology Services 227.0 216.0 230.0 14.0 221.0 (9.0)
Equal Opportunity Department 30.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 30.0 0.0
City Clerk 52.5 51.5 51.5 0.0 51.5 0.0
Human Resources 139.7 138.7 141.7 3.0 139.0 (2.7)
Retirement 18.0 18.0 18.0 0.0 21.0 3.0
Phoenix Employment Relations Board 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
Law 86.0 85.0 86.0 1.0 86.0 0.0
Budget and Research 24.0 24.0 24.0 0.0 23.0 (1.0)
Regional Wireless Cooperative 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.0
Finance 240.0 237.0 238.0 1.0 231.0 (7.0)
Communications Office 24.0 23.0 24.0 1.0 24.0 0.0
Government Relations 6.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 6.0 0.0

Total General Government 997.1 977.6 1,003.9 26.3 985.2 (18.7)


Public Safety
Police 4,595.4 4,591.9 4,609.4 17.5 4,606.9 (2.5)
Fire 2,429.7 2,419.7 2,412.9 (6.8) 2,575.9 163.0

Total Public Safety 7,025.1 7,011.6 7,022.3 10.7 7,182.8 160.5


Criminal Justice
City Prosecutor 166.0 166.0 165.0 (1.0) 162.0 (3.0)
Municipal Court 282.0 281.0 283.0 2.0 282.5 (0.5)
Public Defender 16.0 16.0 16.0 0.0 16.0 0.0

Total Criminal Justice 464.0 463.0 464.0 1.0 460.5 (3.5)


Transportation
Street Transportation 770.0 772.0 790.0 18.0 789.0 (1.0)
Aviation 922.0 922.0 923.0 1.0 923.0 0.0
Public Transit 130.0 129.0 129.0 0.0 130.0 1.0

Total Transportation 1,822.0 1,823.0 1,842.0 19.0 1,842.0 0.0




SCHEDULE 8 (Continued)
PROPOSED POSITIONS BY DEPARTMENT
Number of Full Time Equivalent Positions


Estimate Budget
2023-24 2024-25 2024-25 2025-26
less less
Actual Adopted Estimate Budget
Adopted Estimate

Community Development
Planning and Development 545.8 545.8 545.8 0.0 545.8 0.0
Housing 135.0 132.0 136.0 4.0 135.0 (1.0)
Community and Economic Development 72.0 69.0 69.0 0.0 66.0 (3.0)
Neighborhood Services 201.0 201.0 203.0 2.0 203.0 0.0

Total Community Development 953.8 947.8 953.8 6.0 949.8 (4.0)


Community Enrichment
Office of Arts and Culture 16.1 28.7 29.8 1.1 29.3 (0.5)
Parks and Recreation 1,083.6 1,069.4 1,065.6 (3.8) 1,064.6 (1.0)
Library 418.2 402.7 435.0 32.3 396.8 (38.2)
Phoenix Convention Center 221.0 221.0 221.0 0.0 221.0 0.0
Human Services 442.5 401.0 427.5 26.5 423.5 (4.0)

Total Community Enrichment 2,181.4 2,122.8 2,178.9 56.1 2,135.2 (43.7)


Environmental Services
Office of Sustainability 7.0 5.0 6.0 1.0 6.0 0.0
Environmental Programs 17.0 14.0 16.0 2.0 16.0 0.0
Public Works 472.0 479.0 491.0 12.0 485.0 (6.0)
Solid Waste Disposal 628.5 628.5 628.5 0.0 626.5 (2.0)
Water Services 1,547.8 1,539.3 1,540.8 1.5 1,565.8 25.0

Total Environmental Services 2,672.3 2,665.8 2,682.3 16.5 2,699.3 17.0


Total 16,115.7 16,011.6 16,147.2 135.6 16,254.8 107.6




SCHEDULE 9
2025-26 CAPITAL FUNDS
RESOURCES AND EXPENDITURES PROPOSED BUDGET
(In Thousands of Dollars)

Budgeted Revenues Projected Funds
Beginning and Other Resources Available
Fund Sources/ Ending Beyond Beyond
Balance (Uses) (1) Expenditures Balance 2025-26 (2) 2025-26

1988 General Obligation Bonds
1988 Freeway Mitigation Bonds 849 - - 849 1,000 1,849
1988 Parks Bonds 419 - - 419 - 419
1988 Police Bonds 27 - - 27 - 27
1,295 - - 1,295 1,000 2,295
1989 General Obligation Bonds
1989 Historic Preservation Bonds 2 - - 2 - 2
2 - - 2 - 2
2001 General Obligation Bonds
2001 Affordable Housing and Homeless Shelter Bonds 1,011 - - 1,011 - 1,011
2001 Education, Youth and Cultural Facilities Bonds (362) - 902 (1,264) 1,700 436
2001 Environmental Improvement and Cleanup Bonds 244 - - 244 630 874
2001 Fire Protection Bonds - - - - 800 800
2001 Neighborhood Protection and Senior Centers Bonds 505 - - 505 2,355 2,860
2001 New & Improved Libraries Bonds 3,420 - - 3,420 900 4,320
2001 Parks, Open Space and Recreation Facilities Bonds (436) - - (436) 4,425 3,989
2001 Police, Fire and Computer Technology Bonds (189) - - (189) 615 426
2001 Police Protection Facilities and Equipment Bonds (566) - - (566) 1,115 549
2001 Preserving Phoenix Heritage Bonds (190) - - (190) 795 605
2001 Storm Sewer Bonds - - - - 50 50
2001 Street Improvement Bonds (532) - - (532) 2,225 1,693
2,905 - 902 2,003 15,610 17,613
2006 General Obligation Bonds
2006 Affordable Housing and Neighborhoods Bonds 3,621 - - 3,621 17,795 21,416
2006 Education Bonds (4,549) - - (4,549) 8,090 3,541
2006 Libraries, Senior and Cultural Centers Bonds (1,417) - 428 (1,845) 27,190 25,345
2006 Parks and Open Spaces Bonds 2,049 - - 2,049 13,685 15,734
2006 Police, Fire and City Technology Bonds 621 - - 621 4,790 5,411
2006 Police, Fire and Homeland Security Bonds (7,023) - - (7,023) 36,700 29,677
2006 Street and Storm Sewer Improvements Bonds 5,939 - - 5,939 27,495 33,434
(759) - 428 (1,187) 135,745 134,558
2023 General Obligation Bonds
2023 Affordable Housing & Senior Center Bonds - 43,158 43,158 - - -
2023 Economic Development, Environment & Culture Bonds - 35,756 35,756 - - -
2023 Fire, Police & Streets Bonds - 35,087 35,087 - - -
2023 General Obligation Bond Proceeds Clearing 162,831 (150,233) - 12,598 266,980 279,578
2023 Library, Parks and Historic Preservation Bonds - 36,232 36,232 - - -
162,831 - 150,233 12,598 266,980 279,578
Nonprofit Corporation Bond Funds
Aviation Bonds (182,872) 300,000 389,601 (272,473) 421,210 148,737
Convention Center Bonds 13 810 810 13 - 13
Other Bonds 132,937 166,500 150,270 149,167 92,445 241,612
Parks and Preserves Bonds - - - - 66,000 66,000
Solid Waste Bonds 6,483 26,500 52,925 (19,942) 118,500 98,558
Transportation 2050 Bonds - 900 900 - 1,099,100 1,099,100
Wastewater Bonds (385,967) 9,170 102,097 (478,894) 700,770 221,876
Water Bonds (162,172) 439,900 239,810 37,918 655,652 693,570
(591,578) 943,780 936,414 (584,211) 3,153,677 2,569,466

Total Bond Funds (425,303) 943,780 1,087,977 (569,500) 3,573,012 3,003,512



SCHEDULE 9 (Continued)
2025-26 CAPITAL FUNDS
RESOURCES AND EXPENDITURES PROPOSED BUDGET
(In Thousands of Dollars)

Budgeted Revenues Projected Funds
Beginning and Other Resources Available
Fund Sources/ Ending Beyond Beyond
Balance (Uses) (1) Expenditures Balance 2025-26 (2) 2025-26

Other Capital Funds
Capital Gifts 487 - 451 36 - 36
Capital Grants - 484,338 484,338 - 534,228 534,228
Capital Reserves 234,351 (12,796) 2,487 219,068 - 219,068
Customer Facility Charges 88,073 43,501 121,948 9,626 255,307 264,933
Federal, State and Other Participation - 175,871 175,871 - 333,807 333,807
Impact Fees 291,081 - 207,797 83,284 - 83,284
Other Capital 32,276 - 835 31,441 - 31,441
Other Cities' Share in Joint Ventures - 85,632 85,632 - 325,602 325,602
Passenger Facility Charges 79,473 105,717 100,007 85,183 434,628 519,811
Solid Waste Remediation 5,507 - 2,118 3,389 - 3,389

Total Other Capital Funds 731,248 882,263 1,181,482 432,029 1,883,572 2,315,601


Total 305,945 1,826,043 2,269,460 (137,472) 5,456,584 5,319,112



(1) Includes bond proceeds and funds which pass through capital funds such as grants, land sales, and other agency and private participation.
(2) Includes bonds authorized and available for sale, pledged resources, and cost recovery for projects billed and/or reimbursed on a cash-flow basis.




SCHEDULE 10
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 2025-26 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
BY PROGRAM AND SOURCE OF FUNDS
(In Thousands of Dollars)

Total
2025-26 General Nonprofit
Proposed Operating Obligation Corporation Other Capital
Program
Budget Funds Bond Funds Bond Funds Funds
Arts and Cultural Facilities 29,617 3,950 25,667 - -
Aviation 1,530,907 635,924 - 384,416 510,566
Economic Development 38,183 12,683 500 25,000 -
Environmental Programs 1,331 250 1,081 - -
Facilities Management 80,500 35,119 8,404 35,449 1,528
Finance 10,270 10,270 - - -
Fire Protection 59,335 5,587 10,379 39,339 4,029
Historic Preservation & Planning 16,422 5,000 2,422 9,000 -
Housing 176,699 128,514 40,629 - 7,557
Human Services 17,173 15,198 1,975 - -
Information Technology 62,565 50,901 - 11,665 -
Libraries 8,584 1,917 2,259 - 4,408
Municipal Court 4,944 4,944 - - -
Neighborhood Services 2,180 2,180 - - -
Non-Departmental Capital 231,281 6,720 - 20,737 203,824
Parks, Recreation & Mountain Preserves 154,594 107,071 32,276 - 15,248
Phoenix Convention Center 28,083 16,102 - 11,981 -
Police Protection 19,079 - 8,164 - 10,916
Public Art Program 15,996 9,676 926 5,394 -
Public Transit 411,627 411,627 - - -
Regional Wireless Cooperative 8,192 2,192 - - 6,000
Solid Waste Disposal 63,121 8,098 - 52,426 2,597
Street Transportation & Drainage 490,781 259,189 16,882 - 214,710
Sustainability 1,000 1,000 - - -
Wastewater 461,477 271,070 - 102,097 88,310
Water 679,185 328,486 - 238,910 111,790
Total 4,603,127 2,333,667 151,564 936,414 1,181,482




SCHEDULE 11
Tax Levy and Tax Rate Information
Fiscal Year 2025-26
(In Thousands)
2024-25 2025-26
1. Maximum allowable primary property tax levy.
A.R.S. §42-17051(A) $ 217,597 $ 226,692

2. Amount received from primary property taxation in
the current year in excess of the sum of that
year's maximum allowable primary property tax
levy. A.R.S. §42-17102(A)(18) $

3. Property tax levy amounts
A. Primary property taxes $ 217,597 $ 224,968
B. Secondary property taxes 139,948 144,688
C. Total property tax levy amounts $ 357,545 $ 369,656

4. Property taxes collected*
A. Primary property taxes
(1) Current year's levy $ 215,419
(2) Prior years’ levies 1,369
(3) Total primary property taxes $ 216,788
B. Secondary property taxes
(1) Current year's levy $ 138,549
(2) Prior years’ levies 821
(3) Total secondary property taxes $ 139,370
C. Total property taxes collected $ 356,158

5. Property tax rates
A. City/Town tax rate
(1) Primary property tax rate 1.2658 1.2658
(2) Secondary property tax rate 0.8141 0.8141
(3) Total city/town tax rate 2.0799 2.0799
B. Special assessment district tax rates
Secondary property tax rates - As of the date the proposed budget was prepared, the
city/town was operating one special assessment districts for which secondary
property taxes are levied. For information pertaining to these special assessment districts
and their tax rates, please contact the city/town.

* The 2025-26 planned primary and secondary levies are $224,967,827 and $144,688,188,
respectively. Historically, actual property tax collections have been slightly lower than the amount
levied. For 2025-26, actual collections for primary and secondary property taxes are estimated to
be $222,719,000 and $143,241,188, or 99% of the levy amount.
** Includes actual property taxes collected as of the date the proposed budget was prepared, plus
estimated property tax collections for the remainder of the fiscal year.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Reappointment of Phoenix Municipal Court Judge and Chief Presiding Judge -
Citywide

This item is for discussion and consideration of reappointment of Phoenix Municipal
Court Judge Alex Navidad for a four-year term, and reappointment of Judge B. Don
Taylor III to an annual term as Chief Presiding Judge of the Phoenix Municipal Court.

Summary
The Judicial Selection Advisory Board convened on April 4, 2025, and recommended
the following reappointments:
· Judge Alex Navidad as a Judge of the Phoenix Municipal Court for a four-year term
that would end on July 12, 2029.
· Judge B. Don Taylor III as Chief Presiding Judge for an annual term expiring June
30, 2026. Judge B. Don Taylor III is currently serving as a Judge of the Phoenix
Municipal Court for a four-year term that expires on February 9, 2029.

On May 7, 2025, the Public Safety and Justice Subcommittee also recommended the
reappointments of Judge Alex Navidad to another four year term as Judge of the
Phoenix Municipal Court and of Chief Presiding Judge B. Don Taylor III for an annual
term as Chief Presiding Judge.

If approved by the full City Council, Chief Presiding Judge B. Don Taylor III and Judge
Alex Navidad will be sworn in during the Formal City Council Meeting on June 4, 2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Municipal Court.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of Easements for Drainage, Water and Sewer Purposes (Ordinance
S-51910) - Districts 2, 3 & 8

Request for the City Council to accept easements for drainage, water and sewer
purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via
separate recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
MCR: 20250191609
Applicant and Grantor: Sonoran Foothills, Inc.; its successor and assigns
Date: April 7, 2025
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 31770 N. North Valley Parkway
APN: 204-12-009A
File: FN 250007
Council District: 2

Easement (b)
MCR: 20250191576
Applicant and Grantor: TDC Griffin PV APT Owner, L.L.C.; its successor and assigns
Date: April 7, 2025
Purpose: Water and Sewer
Location: 13000 N. Tatum Boulevard
APN: 167-25-151
File: FN 240101
Council District: 3

Easement (c)
MCR: 20250191610
Applicant and Grantor: Zanbour, LLC; its successor and assigns



Date: April 7, 2025
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 3179 E. Baseline Road
APN: 301-23-119B
File: FN 240107
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acquisition of Real Property for the Hohokam Drainage Package 2 Project
Located South of Dobbins Road and East of 20th Street (Ordinance S-51925) -
District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire all real property
and related property interests either by donation, purchase within the City's appraised
value, purchase at a settlement amount arrived at through mediation and determined
by the City Manager or designee to be reasonable under the circumstances, or by the
power of eminent domain, for the Hohokam Drainage Package 2 Project. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
This project is in collaboration with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County under
Intergovernmental Agreements 161961 and 161259. The acquisition of approximately
13.35 acres is required for construction flood mitigation measures as part of the
Hohokam Area Drainage Master Plan (ADMP) Study. The Hohokam Drainage Program
is a comprehensive storm water management initiative by the City of Phoenix to
mitigate flooding risks and enhance storm water infrastructure. This program involves
the design and construction of multiple storm drain systems, detention basins and high
capacity inlets across various sites identified in the ADMP within the city. The initiative
is focused on improving storm water capture, conveyance, and management through a
series of interconnect projects. The proposed projects will be designed and
constructed for a 10-year level of protection. The City of Phoenix entered into an
intergovernmental agreement with the Flood Control District of Maricopa County to
share the costs of these projects.

The parcels affected by this project are 9012 South 20th Street and 1901 East
Dobbins Road, identified by Maricopa County Assessor's parcel numbers 301-34-006
and 301-36-028C.

Financial Impact
Funding is available from the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget, using General Obligation bonds.

Location



South of Dobbins Road, East of 20th Street.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acquisition of Real Property for a Railroad Crossing Safety Improvement Project
Located West of 19th Avenue and McDowell Road (Ordinance S-51911) - District

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire all real property
and related property interests required by donation, purchase within the City's
appraised value, or by the power of eminent domain for a railroad crossing safety
improvement project located west of North 19th Avenue and West McDowell Road.
Further request to authorize dedication of land with roadway improvements to public
use for right of way purposes via separate recording instrument. Additionally, request
authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
Acquisition is required for a railroad crossing safety improvement project to enhance
traffic and pedestrian safety at the 19th Avenue and McDowell Road crossing. The
project includes upgrading two railroad crossings by installing new gate arms,
replacing existing railroad signals, and adding new cantilever signals. These
enhancements will improve safety for railroad engineers, conductors, residents, and
businesses by preventing vehicles from stopping on the tracks, a current issue that
has led to accidents.

The parcels affected by this project are identified in Attachment A.

Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget.

Location
West of the North 19th Avenue and West McDowell Road intersection.
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Street
Transportation and Finance departments.



Attachment A
Property Identification

Acquisition of Real Property for a Railroad Crossing Safety Improvement Project Located
West of 19th Avenue and McDowell Road

The following improved and/or unimproved parcels affected by acquisition and
included in this request are identified by the Maricopa County Assessor’s parcel
number (APN) and the address or location.

APN Address / Location
109-01-026C 1920 W. Fillmore Sreet
110-56-005A 1926 W. McDowell Road
110-56-006 1902 W. McDowell Road
110-56-013D NWC of 19th Avenue and McDowell Road




1 of 1 209



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Public Sector Budgeting Software - RFP 18-288 - Amendment (Ordinance S-
51942) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 149412 with Sherpa Government Solutions, LLC for an assignment from
Sherpa Government Solutions, LLC to Euna Solutions, Inc. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. No additional
funds are needed, request to continue using Ordinance S-45399.

Summary
This contract provides for the implementation, hosting and maintenance of the City's
enterprise budget development system, Sherpa Budget Formulation and Management,
and an associated reporting system, Business Objects Web Intelligence. The system
implementation was completed in June 2021. Hosting and maintenance services are
ongoing and are provided through the end of the contract.

The assignment from Sherpa Government Solutions, LLC to Euna Solutions, Inc., is
due to a merger. The assignment allows the City to continue receiving necessary
services to maintain critical operations.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on May 30, 2031.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $3,435,436 and no additional
funds are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
Public Sector Budgeting Software Contract 149412 (Ordinance S-45399) on February
20, 2019.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Budget and Research
Department.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Bicycles, Parts and Accessories, Including Repair and Maintenance Services
Contract - IFB 25-0489 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-51898) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Landis Cyclery, Inc., to provide bicycles, parts and accessories, including repair and
maintenance services for departments Citywide. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will
not exceed $175,000.

Summary
This contract will provide the City with bicycles, parts, accessories, repair and
maintenance services for various bicycle brands to be utilized Citywide with primary
usage by the Fire, Police, and Phoenix Convention Center departments. This contract
is necessary to allow departments to purchase and maintain bicycles in optimal
working condition for the safety of the employees who use bicycles as part of their
daily responsibilities.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

One vendor submitted a bid, which was deemed to be responsive to posted
specifications and responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following
an evaluation based on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the
following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Landis Cyclery, Inc.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about November 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $175,000.




Funding is available in the various departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Professional Development and Training Services Contract - RFQu 25-0572 -
Request for Award (Ordinance S-51903) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into 55 new contracts
with the companies listed under Award Recommendations in Attachment A to provide
Professional Development and Training Services for all City of Phoenix departments.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $3,500,000.

Summary
The Human Resources Department receives numerous requests from City
departments for consultation services of specialized professionals to provide
professional development, facilitation and training services. The resulting contracts will
provide a wide range of professional development, facilitation and training services for
all City departments. The companies are qualified firms who will be placed on a
Qualified Vendors List (QVL) to provide professional facilitation, training, motivational
speaking, or management consulting services to departments citywide or with
members of the community. The engagement formats may include, but are not limited
to community engagements, workshops, focus groups, informational sessions,
seminars, departmental training, meetings and work sessions. Solutions to be provided
by contracted companies range from turn-key solutions to highly customized sessions
in order to meet department and/or community needs.

The Human Resources Department is requesting funding and approval to award
contracts to 55 companies. The City is negotiating terms and conditions with three
other companies. If negotiations are successful, the Human Resources Department
will request Council approval to award contracts to the three remaining companies.
Attachment A identifies the companies being awarded and the companies in
negotiations.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendor List (QVL).

59 offerors submitted qualifications and 58 were deemed to be responsive and



responsible. One offer was deemed to be non-responsive. An evaluation committee of
City staff evaluated those offers and determined that 58 offers met the City's minimum
qualifications criteria. The 55 Offerors selected for award are included in Attachment
A.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about May 21, 2025, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts value will not exceed $3,500,000. Funding is available in the
various City's departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.





RFQu 25-0572 Professional Development and Training Services

Attachment A

Award Recommendations (55)

Offeror’s Name
1. Accelerated Team Dynamics, LLC
2. Accenture LLP
3. Aguiar Professional Training LLC
4. Allen Physicians, PLLC
5. ARG Coaching & Consulting Group LLC
6. Axis Culture Group
7. Blanchard Training and Development, Inc. dba Blanchard
8. Builded Corporation
9. California Creative Solutions, Inc. dba CCS Learning Academy
10. Career Connectors Network Inc dba Career Connectors
11. Corrin & King Business Strategies
12. Deborah Ostreicher dba Distinguished Communications
13. Michael Dickerson dba Dickerson Consulting Group, LLC
14. Dougherty, Inc. dba Dougherty, Inc. Facilitation & Training
15. Steven Jordan dba Dr. J Enterprises LLC
16. Dr. Karen Jacobson dba Dr. Karen Jacobson Enterprises, LLC
17. Dr. Maria Church International LLC
18. EQ Inspirations
19. GainShare Inc. dba Interface Technical Training
20. Deborah Adaugo Watts dba Global Village Campus LLC
21. Beyond Spiritual Healing LLC DBA Happiness Matters, LLC
22. Christine R Molina dba Heartfelt Workforce LLC
23. Holliday Kenning, Inc.
24. Innovations in Training, Inc.
25. International Futures LLC
26. Jacqueline Starks – Jacque of All TradeZ
27. John M. Bernard LLC
28. Karcsay Consulting Group, LLC
29. Nicole Marie Lance dba Lance Strategies, LLC
30. Lead Strong Inc.
31. Tracy Lenartz dba Lenartz Consulting, LLC
32. Looking Forward Consulting, LLC Looking Forward Consulting
33. MentorSource Training Corporation dba Workplace Safety Specialist
34. Right Management LLC
35. New Horizons Learning, LLC dba New Horizons
36. Nextec Inc.
37. Novus Origo Inc
38. People Factor LLC
39. Ponder Diversity Group LLC
40. Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc.


RFQu 25-0572 Professional Development and Training Services

Attachment A

Award Recommendations (Con’t)

41. Samira B Cook dba Purposeful World Strategies
42. Scholastic Inc.
43. SDS Global Enterprises, Inc.
44. Setanta Inc. dba Setanta Inc. dba The Carrie KC West Group
45. Sheila E. Murphy dba Sheila Murphy, LLC
46. SNVA LLC
47. Earnest Sears Jr SOS Technology LLC dba SOS Consulting
48. TBD Solutions Inc
49. The Lind Group LLC
50. Gerald Taylor dba The Performance Management Group LLC
51. The Pivotal Group Consultants Inc.
52. Dwayne Whitehead dba The Whitehead Group LLC
53. Trujillo Consulting Services, LLC.
54. Wellington Consulting Group, LTD
55. Ziksana Consulting Inc.


Awards in Negotiations (3)

56. Baker Tilly Advisory Group Parent, LP dba Baker Tilly Advisory Group, LP
57. Emergenetics International
58. Franklin Covey Client Sales, Inc. dba Franklin Covey









Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Online Access to Real Property Market Data - Request for Award (Ordinance S-
51908) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
CoStar Realty Information, Inc., to provide a one-year subscription for online access to
real property market database information Citywide. Further request an exception to
the indemnity and assumption of liability provisions of Phoenix City Code Section 42-
18. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $180,000.

Summary
CoStar is a comprehensive online database for commercial real estate market data,
statistics and reporting. CoStar provides staff the tools necessary to complete
appraisals, appraisal reviews and valuation services, manage existing contracts and
develop new business transactions for revenue contract services, and assist
developers, investors and companies interested in relocating to or investing in
Phoenix. The subscription enables staff to conduct market research and market-based
valuations to ensure compliance with the applicable federal, state and City regulations
and requirements related to real estate transactions.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition. CoStar is the only vendor that can
provide online access to real property market data as needed by the City.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about June 1, 2025, for a one-year term.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value for the one-year agreement is $180,000. Funding is
available in the various departments' operating budgets.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
NetValueCentral, Inc Real Estate Data Subscription Contract - RFA-24-0408
Request for Award (Ordinance S-51921) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contract with
NetValueCentral, Inc. to access Maricopa County Assessor Information System
Database for the Finance Department, Tax Compliance and Education Division.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $125,000.

Summary
This contract will provide the Finance Department, Tax Compliance and Education
Division the ability to access NetValueCentral's Maricopa Count Assessor Information
System Database for ensuring that all businesses comply with licensing, reporting, and
remitting Transaction Privilege Tax (TPT). The department monitors constructions'
contracting activities within the City's boundaries as part of the annual audit plan. The
construction industry generates between $120-$133 million in TPT revenue for the City
annually.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason: Sole
Source. NetValueCentral, Inc. has been providing online data services combining
parcel sales information derived from Maricopa County Assessor's office and Maricopa
County Recorder's office. Due to the length of time in operation, the database they
provide cannot be replicated due to the historical content it provides for each parcel of
land sold in Maricopa County.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about August 1, 2025 for a three-year term with two one-
year options to extend.





Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $125,000 for the five-year aggregate
term. Funding is available in the Finance Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance and Dedication of Easements for Public Utility and Sidewalk
Purposes (Ordinance S-51927) - Districts 1, 2, 5 & 8

Request for the City Council to accept and dedicate easements for public utility and
sidewalk purposes; further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are
recorded via separate recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below meets the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easement (a)
MCR: 20250209343
Applicant and Grantor: Thunder Phoenix LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: April 15, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2810 and 2828 W. Thunderbird Road
APN: 207-07-757; 207-07-758
File: 250017
Council District: 1

Easement (b)
MCR: 20250191611
Applicant and Grantor: Temple Chai Association; its successor and assigns
Date: April 7, 2025
Purpose: Sidewalk
Location: 6001 E. Bell Road
APN: 215-39-001D
File: 250014
Council District: 2

Easement (c)
MCR: 20250198619
Applicant and Grantor: Juan Saul Moreno and Hilaria Moreno; its successor and



assigns
Date: April 10, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 7432 W. Hazelwood Street
APN: 144-37-798K
File: 250020
Council District: 5

Easement (d)
MCR: 20250191608
Applicant and Grantor: Hector Medina Sr; Johnny Bonnie; its successor and assigns
Date: April 7, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2832 N. 28th Place
APN: 120-24-110B
File: 250025
Council District: 8

Easement (e)
MCR: 20250191647
Applicant and Grantor: KG Rentworth, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: April 7, 2025
Purpose: Public Utility
Location: 2437 E. Wier Avenue
APN: 122-54-005A
File: 250018
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Pest Control, Wildlife Relocation, and Bird/Bat Management - IFB 24-0017 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-51955) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 159442 with Southwest Avian Solutions, LLC for an assignment from
Southwest Avian Solutions, LLC to Budget Brothers Pest Control, LLC. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. No additional
funds are needed, request to continue using Ordinance S-50288.

Summary
This contract will provide various pest control treatments to prevent, destroy, repel, or
mitigate pests, and to relocate wildlife and birds, at various locations throughout the
City. The requested services are critical to citywide facility operations.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on October 31, 2028.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $560,000, and no additional funds
are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Pest Control, Wildlife Relocation, and Bird/Bat Management Contract 159442
(Ordinance S-50288) on November 1, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Annual Expenditure Limitation Report Designee to Arizona Auditor General
(Resolution 22302) - Citywide

Request City Council approval to designate Chief Financial Officer Kathleen Gitkin for
purposes of submitting the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Annual Expenditure Limitation
Report (AELR) to the Arizona Auditor General on the governing body's behalf.

Summary
Arizona Revised Statute 41-1279.07 (E) requires each county, city, town and
community college district to annually provide the name of the Chief Fiscal Officer the
governing board designates to submit the current year's AELR on the governing body's
behalf. The FY 2025-26 designation is due to the Arizona Auditor General by July 31.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Workers' Compensation Bill Review Services - RFP SAP 19-02, Amendment
(Ordinance S-51937) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 150636 with Corvel Healthcare Corporation to extend the contract term for six
months and add additional expenditures. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not
exceed $600,000.

Summary
This contract will continue to provide workers' compensation bill review services to the
Human Resources Department. Workers' compensation bill review services include
reviewing and re-pricing bills associated with medical and indemnity benefit payments
for City of Phoenix employees who have sustained an injury arising out of or in the
course of their work while employed with the City. The additional time and
expenditures are necessary to allow the City additional time to complete the solicitation
process and allot time for implementation services before the contract effective date of
January 1, 2026.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract will be extended through December 31, 2025.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $600,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $8,100,000. Funds are available in the Workers'
Compensation Program Trust Account.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Workers' Compensation Bill Review Services Contract 150636, Ordinance S-45880,
June 19, 2019.
· Workers' Compensation Bill Review Services Contract 150636, Ordinance S-51051,
June 26, 2024.





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Employee and Retiree Pet Health Insurance Contract - RFP 25-0637- Request for
Award (Ordinance S-51953) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
MetLife Pet Insurance Solutions, LLC to provide pet insurance to employees and
retirees for the Human Resources Department. There is no disbursement of funds or
impact to the General Fund as plan participants will pay the vendor directly.

Summary
This contract will provide pet insurance to employees and retirees. Pet Insurance is a
value-added employee and retiree benefit. This optional benefit is not a group plan and
is wholly paid by the participant directly to the vendor. Employees and retirees will
work directly with the contractor to select highly customizable plan design options that
meet the participant's needs.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Two vendors submitted proposals, one was deemed non-responsive and the other was
deemed responsive and responsible. An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated
those offers based on the following criteria with a maximum possible point total of
1000:

· Qualifications, Experience and References (0-325 points)
· Method of Approach (0-375 points)
· Pricing (0-300 points)

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:

MetLife Pet Insurance Solutions, LLC (878.31 points)

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about January 1, 2026, for a five-year term with no


options to extend.

Financial Impact
There is no cost to the City and no impact to the General Fund. Pet insurance
premiums are 100 percent paid by enrolled employees and retirees directly to the
contractor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Gila River Indian Community 2025 Gaming Grants (Ordinance S-51947) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply, accept, and if
awarded, enter into related agreements up to $18,245,089.55 in funding from the Gila
River Indian Community (GRIC) under the 2025 funding cycle. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse funds
as directed by GRIC in connection with these grants, including sub-recipients
associated with a project.

Summary
Grants for programs and projects can range in total from $1,000 to $300,000 and can
be paid out in installments to support the program for at least one but no more than
three years. Detailed and well-justified budgets are essential. GRIC will determine the
final amount and length of all grant awards; this may vary from the requested amount.

GRIC will also consider capital funding requests up to $500,000 to be paid out in
installments for at least one but no more than five years, however the ultimate level of
capital contribution will be at the discretion of the GRIC Tribal Council based on
interest in the project and available funding.

If awarded, these monies would be applied, as directed by the GRIC Tribal Council,
towards the following:

City Applications
· Arts and Culture: $242,190 for the S'edav Va'aki Museum Permanent Gallery Cases
and Lighting Project, which will fund the purchase of new climate-controlled object
cases and a new lighting system to support the implementation of a new exhibit in
the Museum's permanent gallery.
· Community and Economic Development Department: $32,950 (over two years) for
the Mini Medical School and Little Med School project, which will provide state-of-
the-art experiences for Phoenix Elementary School District students in the field of
health care.
· Community and Economic Development Department: $300,000 for the Yuma Street
Pocket Space, which will fund construction of a series of former residential lots into


a dynamic public memorial and community gathering areas.
· Housing Department: $15,000 for the Aeroterra After School Enhancement Project,
which seeks to enhance the variety and quality of health and educational activities
offered to undeserved and at-risk youth. The supplies outlined in the project
proposal will strengthen program capacity to engage participants more effectively
and provide enriching experiences that promote learning, well-being, and personal
growth. The funding will enable the program to expand their reach and impact,
ensuring that students have access to the resources and support needed to thrive.
· Housing Department: $27,800 for the Housing Outreach and Supplies Trailer
(HOST) project, which will allow the department to host community events, in
partnership with other city departments and stakeholders, at Housing properties and
in redevelopment areas by providing essential supplies and a dedicated trailer
needed for resource fairs, public safety and back-to-school events, mobile food
pantries, and other engagement activities.
· Housing Department: $32,600 (over two years) for the Preserving History Through
Community Storytelling project, which will host culturally significant storytelling
workshops in the Marcos de Niza-Grant Park community, documenting and
preserving community histories and personal narratives to enhance community
identity and engagement.
· Human Resources Department: $300,000 (over two years) for the Registered
Apprenticeship Programs, which will provide City of Phoenix employees with
opportunities for skill development, hands-on training, and career advancement
through the Registered Apprenticeship Programs. These programs offer structured,
high-quality training that combines on-the-job experience with classroom instruction,
enabling participants to gain technical skills and industry-recognized certifications
necessary for long-term career success.
· Human Services Department: $300,000 (over three years) for the Empowerment
Through Employment Initiative, which aims to provide comprehensive workforce
development services to marginalized communities across the region, including but
not limited to low-income individuals, dislocated workers, formerly incarcerated
individuals, unhoused individuals, individuals with disabilities, and other populations
facing significant employment barriers.
· Human Services Department: $300,000 (over three years) for the Senior Alternative
Transportation Program, which will provide transportation services to qualified
senior center members to be transported between their home and the closest senior
centers. This program allows members to be able to participate in activities, meals,
and programs they may otherwise not be able to attend due to limited income,
mobility, or ability to operate a vehicle.
· Human Services Department: $132,000 for the Nutrition Program Equipment Needs
Assessment and Procurement, which will replace aging equipment in production



kitchens.
· Neighborhood Services Department: $54,000 (over three years) for the Community
Health Collective in South Phoenix, which will implement a new Community Health
Collective to serve as a health resource hub in South Phoenix. The Health
Collective will promote health and wellness and bring resources directly to the
community with the goal to improve overall health.
· Neighborhood Services Department: $45,000 (over three years) for the Future
Neighborhood Leaders Program, which will help support a youth professional
development and leadership program that offers a theoretical and hands-on
learning approach to finding solutions to current neighborhood concerns.
· Neighborhood Services Department: $120,000 (over three years) for the Love Your
Block and Business Alliance Grants Program, which will help fund community-
driven projects that benefit Phoenix neighborhoods.
· Neighborhood Services Department: $96,000 (over three years) for the
Neighborhood Synergy Educational Conference, which will support the annual
conference by expanding and offering a free learning opportunity to more
neighborhood advocates and dedicated volunteers in Phoenix.
· Office of Environmental Programs: $137,920 (over two years) for the Cartwright
Community Food Fest, which will expand access to fresh, locally grown food while
fostering resilience. Through hands-on education and culturally relevant workshops,
this initiative empowers residents to improve health, strengthen local food systems,
and build long-term food security.
· Office of Environmental Programs and Housing Department: $299,900 (over three
years) for the HomeGrownPHX project, which will directly address food insecurity,
chronic disease, and socioeconomic inequity by improving garden infrastructure,
supporting community gardens, and providing education to residents living in
Phoenix Housing communities.
· Office of Environmental Programs and Parks and Recreation Department: $82,700
for the Empowering Community to Define the McDowell Urban Ag Innovation
Center, which will conduct outreach and meaningful engagement that reaches deep
into the community to gather input from residents, businesses, schools, and
nonprofit organizations within a two-mile radius of the proposed McDowell Urban Ag
Innovation Center.
· Office of Heat Response and Mitigation: $300,000 for the Summer Heat Relief:
Security at Extended Locations, which is seeking support for security at extended
hours Heat Relief Network sites. Access to cool space later into the evening is
critical for ensuring respite from high nighttime temperatures, but it also creates
hazards associated with nighttime activities. These funds will be essential to
promote public safety and enhance crime prevention.
· Office of Heat Response and Mitigation: $300,000 (over two years) for the Summer


Heat Relief: Supplies for Extended Hours Locations, which will support the
purchase of heat relief supplies such as sunscreen, cooling towels, reusable water
bottles, and hats to prevent and respond to heat-related illnesses at City of Phoenix
extended hours and overnight cooling, respite, and navigation centers.
· Office of Homeless Solutions: $300,000 for the Behavioral Health Engagement
Teams Supplement, which will provide outreach to individuals experiencing
homelessness, mental health, or substance use disorder in targeted areas to get
them connected to behavioral health or substance use services, housing, and/or
placement into shelter.
· Office of Homeless Solutions: $300,000 (over three years) for the Flexible Funding
for Individuals At-Risk of/or Experiencing Homelessness, which will provide funding
to expand the assistance it can provide to individuals experiencing, or on the verge
of experiencing homelessness, to remove expenses (barriers) that may stand in the
way of becoming or staying housed and/or employed.
· Office of Homeless Solutions: $300,000 (over three years) for the Homeless
Workforce Program Supportive Needs, which will fund supportive needs related to
workforce programming currently offered at City of Phoenix homeless shelters to
give program participants tools for success and remove barriers such as
employment-related costs and program needs for each site (desktop computers,
associated software, headphones).
· Office of Homeless Solutions: $230,000 (over three years) for the Short-Term
Emergency Hotel Program, which will allow the City to process and pay for internal
referrals for emergency hotel stays at a short-term, interim solution for individuals
who are awaiting placement in shelter, availability of other housing, or diversion to
avoid an individual spending the night unsheltered.
· Office of Sustainability: $200,000 (over two years) for the Energy Access Plan,
which will support the creation of the Energy Access Plan document and implement
an education campaign.
· Office of the Public Defender: $300,000 (over three years) for the Empowering
Change: Enhancing the City of Phoenix Veterans Court Treatment Program for
Homeless Veterans, which will provide homeless veterans involved in the criminal
justice system access to essential resources and support services aimed at
addressing their housing, health and reintegration needs.
· Parks and Recreation Department: $423,084.11(capital funding request) for
Playground Renovation, which will purchase and install new playground equipment
at Cesar Chavez Park.
· Parks and Recreation Department: $500,000 (over three years, capital funding
request) for the Rio Salado Transformation Site, which will transform a one-acre
vacant parcel along the Rio Salado into a dynamic public space that will focus on
ecological restoration, community connection and public access. The purpose of


this capital funding request is to cover fees associated with creating the design
documents for Phase 1 and 2 of the Rio Salado Transformation Site and Phase 1 of
the construction.
· Parks and Recreation Department: $77,316 for Equipment for Youth Sports, which
will provide sports equipment and uniforms for a youth sports program.
· Parks and Recreation Department: $10,000 for the Festival of Frights 2025, which
will fund a community event in the South Division.
· Parks and Recreation Department: $16,750 for the One Year, One Goal: Get Fit for
Free Program, which will fund a year-long, free fitness program offering accessible
yoga, aerobics, barre, and Zumba classes to promote healthy habits, and boost
community participation.
· Parks and Recreation Department: $20,600 for the FitPHX Initiative - WalkPHX
Program, which will support the expansion of the WalkPHX program by funding the
installation of WalkPHX signage and trail counters at four parks in marginalized
communities, promoting accessible physical activity and improving public health in
Phoenix.
· Parks and Recreation Department: $175,000 for Pickleball Courts, which will
provide funding for two pickleball courts at the Encanto Park Sports Complex.
· Parks and Recreation Department: $10,000 for the South Division Cultural
Programming, which will offer cultural programming to the youth of South Phoenix.
· Parks and Recreation Department: $8,345.48 for the Volleyball Program, which will
upgrade volleyball equipment for the emerging volleyball program for ages 9-17-
year-olds.
· Phoenix Fire Department: $7,385 for the Advanced Firefighter Heart Health Stress
System, which will upgrade heart stress testing equipment for the Phoenix Fire
Department Health Center.
· Phoenix Fire Department: $66,876 for the Community Trauma Bleeding Control
Initiative, which is a proactive, life-saving program designed to empower individuals
and the organizations with the knowledge, tools, and confidence to act in critical
bleeding emergencies.
· Phoenix Fire Department: $13,369 for the Fire Investigations Mapping Camera
Project, which will enhance the Phoenix Fire Department's incident documentation,
investigation, training, and regional preparedness capabilities by acquiring a 360-3D
camera system to create highly detailed, immersive scene models that improve
public safety and emergency response efficiency.
· Phoenix Fire Department: $90,000 for the Fireground Survival Training Props,
which will procure equipment to train firefighters in Fireground Survival techniques.
· Phoenix Fire Department: $71,133 for the Forcible Door Entry Training Props, which
will provide equipment for forcible door entry training.



· Phoenix Fire Department: $49,413 for the Hazardous Materials Program Training
Props, which will provide specialized training props to enhance Hazardous
Materials Training.
· Phoenix Fire Department: $79,504 for the Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Cleaning / Cancer Prevention Initiative, which will procure and install industrial
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) extractors and dryers to improve PPE
cleaning and enhance cancer risk reduction at the Phoenix Fire Department
Regional Training Academy.
· Phoenix Fire Department: $61,088 for the Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus Fit
Testing Equipment, which will update Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus face
mask fit testing machines.
· Phoenix Police Department: $110,000 for the Air Support Unit Smart Radio/MPU5
Portable Network, which will assist in purchasing equipment to expand the Phoenix
Police Department Air Support Unit's portable smart radio mesh network.
· Phoenix Police Department: $213,300 (over three years) for the Family
Investigations Bureau's Digital Forensics Lab, which will allow investigators to
further their training and purchase technology for the lab's forensic investigators to
have more capability to service more devices.
· Phoenix Police Department: $165,000 for the Comparison Microscope for Trace
Evidence Analysis, which will purchase a Leeds Trace-Z comparison microscope to
offer new technology to the Laboratory Services Bureau to upgrade their system
and add the capability of fluorescence microscopy to increase the efficiency in
analyzing fibers, paints, and miscellaneous trace materials enhance the forensic
aptitude of the Trace Evidence.
· Phoenix Police Department: $100,000 for the Bomb Squad X Ray System, which
will fund the purchase of an x-ray system for bomb technicians.
· Phoenix Police Department: $65,000 for the Advanced Training Detail Mechanical
Breaching for Patrol Program, which will fund the purchase of equipment necessary
to conduct comprehensive force-on-force training with recruits and officers at the
Phoenix Police Training Academy, which will aid in ensuring the safety and security
for members of the community.
· Phoenix Police Department: $93,817 for the Maryvale Estrella Mountain Precinct
Neighborhood Enforcement Team, which will fund the purchase of equipment to
help officers of the Maryvale Estrella Mountain Precinct Neighborhood Enforcement
Team leverage technology to locate and apprehend violent felony suspects.
· Phoenix Police Department: $255,798 for the Patrol Division Tire Deflation
Equipment, which will fund the purchase of the world's leading tire-deflation device
that will aid in high-speed pursuits quickly and safely for each Patrol Division
precinct.
· Phoenix Police Department: $90,000 for the Bomb Squad Small Explosive


Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Robot, which will fund the purchase of equipment to
assist in detection, identification, recovery and disposal of an explosive ordnance
and improvised explosive devices.
· Phoenix Police Department: $32,000 for the Air Support Unit Mobile Base Station,
which will fund the purchase of a wireless communication system to allow for
enhanced communications with the maintenance pilot and the maintenance
technicians.
· Phoenix Police Department: $475,000 (capital funding request) for the Special
Assignments Unit Armored Vehicle, which will provide enhanced crime prevention
with the use of the armored vehicle, necessary to apprehend violent criminals that
are committing a large part of the crimes. Armored vehicles provide safety and
security from violent offenders that are often armed with firearms.
· Phoenix Police Department: $58,809.52 for the Mountain View Precinct's
Neighborhood Enforcement Team, which will fund essential safety equipment for
law enforcement operations, allowing for more effective deployment of resources to
support community member's public safety.
· Phoenix Police Department: $98,764 (over two years) for the Recruitment Program,
which will provide support for the law enforcement recruitment team in efforts to
strengthen the Phoenix Police Department which will ultimately promote public
safety and community well-being.
· Phoenix Police Department: $296,553 for the Homicide Unit Digital Investigation,
which will provide updated equipment to help investigate homicides with gathering
and the analysis of digital intelligence within the City of Phoenix.
· Phoenix Police Department: $131,910 for the Community Health and Outreach for
Individuals with Coordinated Encouragement (CHOICE) Project, which will equip
the CHOICE program with enhanced technology and transportation to connect
unsheltered citizens with the correct entities to provide them with needed
assistance and to keep the community safe by removal of blight concerns and
proactively addressing open air drug use and nuisance crimes.
· Phoenix Police Department: $33,000 for the Gang Enforcement Unit Technology
Surveillance Equipment, which will provide the Gang Enforcement Unit essential
equipment to protect the public from criminal street gang violence by providing
equipment to combat criminal street gang violence through investigation,
enforcement, and intelligence support.
· Phoenix Police Department: $291,190 for the Crime Gun Intelligence Unit National
Integrated Ballistic Information Network Data Analysis, which will provide
technology and equipment for law enforcement operations to assist with solving
violent gun crime in the City of Phoenix and other communities in the State of
Arizona.
· Phoenix Police Department: $74,880 (over two years) for the Customer Service and


Support Team Mass Imaging Workstation Project, which will provide equipment for
the Information Technology Bureau to provide the quickest response to thwarting
security threats to the Phoenix Police Department.
· Phoenix Police Department: $204,000 (over two years) for the Transit Explosive
Detection K9 Unit Vehicles, which will allow the purchase of K9 patrol vehicles to
increase rapid and prompt response to critical calls related to explosives.
· Phoenix Police Department: $297,825 for the Violent Crimes Bureau Digital
Evidence Technology, which will provide equipment to increase capacity for
investigators to collect digital evidence in the field.
· Phoenix Public Library: $450,000 (over two years) for the Phoenix Public Library's
Special Collections, which will assist in purchasing archival storage for long-term
preservation of a multi-million-dollar rare books collection at Phoenix Public Library,
and exhibition cases to increase access to the public.
· Planning and Development Department: $300,000 (over two years) for the Rio
Reimagined Community Plan Phase 2, which will initiative community planning
efforts to transform Phoenix's western portion of the Salt River (Rio Salado) into a
local and regional destination, while identifying opportunities for improving
connectivity, housing, health, recreation, economic development, and cultural
expression across the river corridor.
· Planning and Development Department and the Office of Environmental Programs:
$300,000 (over three years) for the Rio Salado Celebration and Eco-Tourism
Program, which will promote economic development along the Rio Salado (Salt
River) by piloting and amplifying eco-tourism initiatives that draw visitors to the river
and adjacent communities. These initiatives will emphasize outdoor activities aimed
at fostering environmental education, improved community health, plus art and
cultural expression that promote biodiversity and connection to nature. The
proposed project will help and support connecting people to the river physically and
spiritually, enhance a sense of community, and focus on building a stronger
community by involving residents at every stage of the alignment with the newly
refreshed RIO PHX Area 1 (Rio Salado) vision and goals.
· Public Works Department: $174,762 (over one and half years) for the Circular
Plastics Microfactory - Economic Development and Community Outreach, which will
collaborate with an academic project partner and test workforce development
trainings and hands-on education methods while also engaging and educating the
community through tours and demonstrations of the Circular Plastics Microfactory
(and the mobile Microfactory) to support recycling education, economic growth, and
environmental sustainability.
· Public Works Department: $17,012.20 for the Public Works Illegal Dumping
Cameras project, which will fund a new program.
· Public Works Department: $162,950 for the Lithium-Ion Battery Collection Pilot and


Disposal Education Campaign, which will test community style collection method of
lithium-ion batteries for proper recycling and reuse while also educating the
community on the environmental hazards of fires and proper disposal pathways.
· Public Works Department: $30,697.24 for the School Food Waste Reduction Pilot
Program, which will introduce a Zero Waste education curriculum and waste sorting
system focused on helping to reduce food waste, lower transportation-related
emissions, and strengthen resiliency education across a selected Phoenix-based
school district. Through this pilot, students and staff will gain a deeper
understanding of how to establish food security, mechanisms for resource
conservation, and the environmental impact of food waste, including its contribution
to greenhouse gas emissions. By implementing effective waste diversion practices,
the program supports extending landfill lifespan and establishing a community that
is sustainability minded.
· Street Transportation Department: $300,000 for the Sidewalk Safety Project Phase
One-Mobile Lane, which will design and construct sidewalks, ADA ramps, driveway
entrances, and install streetlights, creating a vibrant, connected, and inclusive
community that respects its history and embraces the well-bring of its members.
· Street Transportation Department: $300,000 for the Sidewalk Safety Project Phase
Two-Chipman Road, which will design and construct sidewalks, ADA ramps,
driveway entrances, and install streetlights, creating a vibrant, connected, and
inclusive community that respects its history and embraces the well-bring of its
members.
· Street Transportation Department: $300,000 for the Sidewalk Safety Project Phase
Three-East Wier Avenue, which will design and construct sidewalks, ADA ramps,
driveway entrances, and install streetlights, creating a vibrant, connected, and
inclusive community that respects its history and embraces the well-bring of its
members.
· Street Transportation Department: $300,000 (over three years) for the Sidewalk
Safety Project Phase Four-South 19th Place, which will design and construct
sidewalks, ADA ramps, driveway entrances, and install streetlights, creating a
vibrant, connected, and inclusive community that respects its history and embraces
the well-bring of its members.
· Street Transportation Department: $300,000 (over two years) for the Sidewalk
Safety Project Phase Five-South 18th Place, which will design and construct
sidewalks, ADA ramps, driveway entrances, and install streetlights, creating a
vibrant, connected, and inclusive community that respects its history and embraces
the well-bring of its members.
· Water Services Department: $182,501 for the Advance Purified Water Public
Outreach program, which will inform and educate stakeholders of new
advancement in sustainable and locally produced water sources that will reduce the



dependence on imported water and strengthens water security.

Nonprofit Applications
· American Legion Auxiliary AZ: $171,162 (over three years) for the American Legion
Auxiliary 2026-2028 Arizona Girls State, which will provide financial support for an
annual week-long government educational session for high school girls.
· Area Agency on Aging: $500,000 (capital funding request) for the Justa Senior
Center, which will assist with the construction cost for building a senior center for
older adults experiencing homelessness.
· Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children (ACFC): $75,000 for the Kids with Cancer
Can Be Kids program, which will play a vital role in expanding ACFC's programs,
particularly Sunshine Visits, to meet the growing needs of families facing the harsh
realities of childhood cancer. With Arizona ranking among the leading states for
childhood cancer diagnoses, ACFC is committed to addressing the social,
emotional, and financial challenges these families endure.
· Arizona Educational Foundation: $15,000 for the Strengthen the Arizona Public
Education System program, which will expand its A+School of Excellence Award
program, Principals Leadership Academy of Arizona, Arizona State Spelling Bee
program, teachSTEM program, and Arizona Teacher of the Year Awards across
public schools in Maricopa County. This grant will provide more educators with
leadership training and professional development, increase student access to
literacy and STEM enrichment programs, and recognize outstanding schools and
teachers for their contributions to Arizona's public education system.
· Arizona Friends of Foster Children: $150,000 (over two years) for the Workforce
Development for Youth Aging Out of Arizona Foster Care, which will help youth
ages 16-26 aging out of foster care develop the education, employment and career
development needed to transition to independent adult living more successfully.
· Arizona Humane Society: $20,000 for the Animal Welfare Youth Education
Programs, which will support one-time investments in curriculum enhancements,
educator training, and outreach expansion to strengthen AHS' youth education
programs. The goal is to improve the long-term impact and sustainability of these
unique programs by refining lesson plans, increasing engagement opportunities,
and expanding access for underserved students.
· Arizona Science Center: $50,000 for the STEM Learning Programs for Low-Income
Children, which will provide free Focused Field Trips and Science on Wheels STEM
learning programs for 3,223 low-income children from Title 1 schools in the 2025-
2026 school year.
· Arizona Sustainability Alliance: $167,283 (over two years) for the Sow It Forward
and Food Tech for the Future program, which will implement two sustainable food
systems education programs for K-12 students in Phoenix schools.


· Arouet Foundation: $50,000 (over two years) for the Arouet's 2025-2026 ReEntry
Prosperity Model, which will fund the holistic, four-phase, ReEntry Prosperity Model.
Funding will assist to collectively empower approximately 600 justice-impacted
women to successfully reenter into society, rejoin the workforce, reunite with their
communities and families, and ultimately, restart their lives despite their criminal
justice histories.
· Assistance League of Phoenix: $50,000 for the Delivering Dreams Programs
(formerly Operation School Bell), which will help Delivering Dreams Program to
expand and provide new clothes, shoes, and hygiene items to impoverished K-8
children in the Greater Phoenix Area. The program aims to increase self-esteem,
fulfill a high-priority need, and ease financial stress for families.
· AZCEND: $50,000 for the Food Bank program, which will provide food boxes filled
with nearly 125,000 pounds of food for hungry children and adults in Maricopa
County.
· Catholic Education Arizona: $300,000 (over three years) for the K-12 Disabled or
Displaced Student Scholarships program, which will provide tuition assistance for K-
12 students with physical/learning challenges and/or those who have been in the
Arizona Foster Care System.
· Children's Museum of Phoenix: $270,000 for the Children's Museum of Phoenix's
Free First Friday Nights and IDEA Fellows Program, which will support the Free
First Friday Nights, which opens the Museum to the public 10 nights each year and
welcomes up to 25,000 visitors, and to sustain the IDEA Fellows Program, offering
two paid fellowships to individuals facing barriers while fostering diverse
perspectives in the field.
· Chrysalis Veterans: $100,000 for the Improving Economic Security by
Strengthening the Veteran's Job Readiness program, which will provide funding to
assist veterans to ensure their economic security and can consistently meet their
essential needs sustainably and with dignity.
· Civitan Foundation: $175,000 for the Civitan Flerish Marketplace - Capital
Improvements for Workforce and Economic Development, which will support critical
owner-occupied improvements at the new Flerish Marketplace, a workforce
development and economic empowerment hub for individuals with intellectual and
developmental disabilities.
· Creighton Community Foundation: $25,000 for the FrescaZona Interventional
Nutrition Center and Market, which will support nutrition education, food access,
SNAP enrollment, and other pathways out of hunger for low-income families.
· Desert Foothills Library: $16,250 for the Book Buds Intergenerational Reading,
which will provide funding for expansion of successful pilot program.
· Downtown Phoenix Inc: $25,000 for the Community Resource Hub and Outreach
Navigators program, which will help underwrite the costs of Downtown Phoenix


Inc.'s Community Resource Hub, along with supporting its Outreach Navigators
program in 2025-2026.
· Duet Partners in Health: $35,000 for the Improving the Health, Wellness, and
Housing Security of Vulnerable Homebound Seniors, which will improve the health,
wellbeing, and safety of homebound older adults and provide financial assistance
for those at risk of becoming homeless.
· Elevate Phoenix: $25,000 for the Improving At-Risk Youths' Academic Success and
Futures program, which will support Elevate Phoenix successful relationship-based
program that is proven to improve low-income, at-risk youth academic success and
life skills, graduate high school, prepare for college and a career, avoid substance
use, gain resilience, and help them escape poverty and achieve a better future.
· Fresh Start Women's Foundation: $50,000 for the Impact Program: Empowering
Women to Succeed, which will empower women in Phoenix to secure jobs and
achieve self-sufficiency.
· Foundation for Senior Living: $20,000 for the FSL's Food Security Program, which
will address rampant food insecurity among low-income Maricopa County residents
through the distribution of 32,000+ hot lunches, 27,000+ home-delivered meals, and
emergency food boxes totaling 500,000+ pounds of core nutrition.
· Girl Scouts Arizona Cactus Pine Council: $20,000 for the Girl Scout Leadership
Experience, which will provide 13,000 girls in grades K-12 with the Girl Scout
Leadership Experience activities that complement their academic goals. Through
Girl Scouting, girls will develop crucial life and leadership skills, connect with
positive adult mentors and peers, and engage in serving their communities,
empowering them to pursue bright futures.
· Greater Phoenix Urban League: $69,550 (over two years) for the Ultimate
Technology Extra-Curricular Education Programs, which will fund STEM extra-
curricular educational programs targeting underrepresented students.
· Greater Phoenix Chamber Foundation: $30,000 for the Connect to Work AZ
program, which will expand Connect to Work AZ, increasing its community impact.
This initiative helps place unemployed and underemployed individuals in Greater
Phoenix in high demand jobs at quality employers with excellent benefits and
opportunities for growth.
· Human Services Campus dba Keys to Change: $100,000 for the Client Navigation,
which will support the Client Navigation program at Keys to Change, which
connects individuals experiencing homelessness to housing and other services that
address social determinants of health impacting a person's ability to move from
homelessness to housing.
· Justa Center, Inc.: $40,000 for the Path to Housing, which will help seniors aged
55+ experiencing unsheltered homelessness secure housing while connecting them
to essential services and other support services needed to maintain their housing


placements.
· Live and Learn Program dba Live and Learn: $25,000 for the Empowering Maricopa
County Women to Break Free from Generational Poverty program, which will
strengthen its trauma-informed education and workforce development program,
which provides low-income women in Maricopa County with job training, financial
literacy, and access to higher education. The funds will directly support residents
through individualized career coaching, skills development, and wraparound
services, ensuring women achieve financial stability, economic independence, and
break free from generational poverty.
· Local First Arizona Foundation: $300,000 (over three years) for the Growing
Sustainable Food Systems Infrastructure, which will strengthen the Phoenix Food
System by encouraging local farm sourcing for food entrepreneurs in Local First's
Community Kitchens.
· Lost Boys Center for Leadership: $288,000 (over three years) for the Mentorship
Education and Leadership Development for Immigrant African Youth program,
which will provide meaningful educational, social and leadership opportunities for
second-generation Sudanese and other African refugees so they may thrive within
their families, schools, and Arizona communities.
· MentorKids USA: $81,600 (over three years) for the iLEAD My Generation program,
which will support their innovative high school mentoring and leadership
development program.
· New Pathways for Youth, Inc.: $100,000 for the New Pathways for Youth's 2025-
2026 Level Up Program, which will empower around 350 low-income, high-risk
Phoenix youth to transformatively 'level up' their educational outcomes.
· Opportunity, Community and Justice for Foster Kids: $25,000 for the Restoring
Dignity Room Programming, which will provide resources, support, and compassion
to improve the physical, mental and emotional health and well-being of girls whose
lives were shattered by pre-foster case abuse.
· Phoenix Rescue Mission: $40,000 for the Changing Lives Center for Women and
Children program, which will support the Changing Lives Center for Women and
Children, providing housing, childcare, recovery, counseling, and vocational training
for women.
· ReFRAME Youth Arts Center: $31,740 for the Green Spaces for Group Homes,
which will build a teen jobs program that trains public youth in carpentry, climate,
and gardening, so they may use these skills to build green spaces for local youth
group homes.
· Rising Families: $109,680 (over three years) for the Rising Families Expansion
Project, which will continue Rising Families' free youth sports program at Edison
and Green Valley Parks and expand to additional underserved communities,
ensuring equitable access to structured physical activities and community


engagement.
· Rosie's House: $60,000 (over two years) for the Free Afterschool Music and
Leadership Program for Under-Resourced Youth, which will support afterschool
music education and leadership opportunities for 668 underserved youth ages 4-18.
· Rumi Center: $122,842 for the Reading Bee program, which will expand the
program in the current location to twice a week and add two additional locations.
· SAAVI Services for the Blind: $50,000 for the Reaching Empowerment through
Achievement and Learning Program for Blind Children, which will fill the educational
gaps for blind children through personalized, nonvisual instruction and tutoring
services for academic achievement and independence in Phoenix.
· Southwest Autism Research and Resource Center: $200,000 (over two years) for
the Parent Training and Community Outreach Program, which will deliver an
evidence-based parent training program for families across Arizona, including those
in rural and remote areas supporting a child with autism spectrum disorder and
provide outreach, training, resources, and educational support to organizations in
communities statewide.
· Skye's the Limit! Foundation: $100,000 for the HeART Club: A Safe, Supportive
Afterschool Program for Youth in Under Served Communities, which will expand the
heART Club after school program to additional community housing sites, providing
structured creative engagement, mentorship, and mental health and opioid
prevention education for youth and families in underserved communities.
· Sonoran University of Health Sciences: $69,000 (over two years) for the Sonoran
University's Community Health Program, which will support seven no-cost
community clinics.
· St. Mary's Food Bank: $100,000 for the St. Mary's Food Bank Skills Center, which
will help homeless and/or formerly incarcerated adults become trained and
employed in jobs that offer advances and raises so they can become financially self
-sustaining.
· The Gentry Foundation: $30,000 for the Early Childhood Evaluations and Support
for Low Income Families, which will provide early autism identification and support.
· The Mathew 19:14 Project: $120,000 (over three years) for the Teacher Training for
Special Needs Students, which will provide school wide training for all teachers at a
specific school so that teachers have the best tools and methodologies to serve
students with special needs. The focus is Catholic schools with limited funding.
· The Phoenix Symphony: $105,263 for the In-School Assembly Program, which will
promote music education to Title 1 students.
· Three Precious Miracles: $75,000 for the Keeping Culture Connected program,
which will support the Native American foster youth community through culturally
relevant and sensitive programming to ensure their connection with their heritage to
promote their identification as Natives.


· Treasures 4 Teachers: $25,000 for the Free and Low-Cost Supplies for Teachers
and Students, which will provide essential school supplies to teachers and students
in Phoenix.
· UMOM New Day Centers: $300,000 (over three years) for the UMOM Family
Emergency Shelter Program to End Family Homelessness, which will fund 12,000
bed nights of its Family Emergency Shelter Program, covering the full stay for 30
families and providing safe shelter, job coaching, health care, youth programming,
and housing support to help those overcome homelessness and create stable
homes where their kids can thrive.
· UMOM New Day Centers: $500,000 (over two years, capital funding request) for
the UMOM Capital Campaign to End Family Homelessness, which will fund
UMOM's Capital Campaign to renovate, redesign, and reconfigure family
emergency shelter rooms to increase UMOM's overall capacity to serve 25% more
individuals and larger families in need. Renovations will also update aging spaces
to ensure ad dignified, healing environment for the families and children UMOM
serves.
· Upward for Children and Families: $50,000 for the Lifting Children Upward Inclusive
Early Education Scholarships, which will provide scholarships to low-income
children with and without disabilities so they can attend a five-star rated Early
Education program. Only 10 percent of childcare facilities in Arizona have achieved
a five-star rating.
· United Service Organizations (USO), Inc.: $90,000 (over three years) for the USO
Family Programming and USO Phoenix MEPS, which will strengthen and connect
military service members and their families with programs and services that boost
morale, provide a sense of community, and build resiliency among children from
military families. Funding will support USO family and youth programming including
USO Pre-School Power Hours, military family day events, Coffee Connections
program for military spouses, and support services for military service members
going through the Phoenix Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) location.
· Valleywise Health Foundation: $15,000 for the Family Resource Centers: Serving
and Supporting Families and Strengthening the Community, which will support and
sustain and enhance programming within its eight Family Resource Centers.
Services aid in Valleywise Health's efforts to boost the stability and resiliency of
families, address factors that contribute to health inequities, and promote healthy
growth and development among children.

The gaming compact entered into by the State of Arizona and various tribes calls for
12 percent of gaming revenue to be contributed to cities, towns and counties for
government services that benefit the public including public safety, mitigation of
impacts of gaming and promotion of commerce, and economic development. GRIC will



notify the City, by resolution of the Tribal Council, if it desires to convey to the City a
portion of its annual 12 percent local revenue-sharing contribution.

Financial Impact
There is no budgetary impact to the City and no general-purpose funds are required.
Entities that receive gaming grants are responsible for the management of those
funds.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Office of Government
Relations.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Loan Federal HOME Funds for 41st & Thomas East Apartments Affordable
Housing Development (Ordinance S-51915) - District 4

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Affordable
Housing Loan Program Agreement. The agreement is up to $2 million in federal U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOME Investment
Partnerships Program (HOME) funds with Richman 41st & Thomas East, LLC, or a
City-approved nominee, for the 41st & Thomas East Apartments affordable housing
development project. Further request to take all actions and execute all documents to
complete the loan. Authorization is also requested for the City Controller to disburse
the funds for the life of the contract. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
On November 18, 2024, the Housing Department issued a Call for Interest (CFI)
seeking proposals for the acquisition of new construction, and/or rehabilitation of
affordable rental housing based on the Affordable Housing Community Priorities.

The Community Priorities are:
1. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties that focus on
homeless or special needs populations, and that provide appropriate services to
assist and sustain these populations; and
2. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties where the
developer qualifies as a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO)
as defined by the HOME Program.

Procurement Information
Seven proposals were received and reviewed by an evaluation committee. The
proposals were evaluated on a 1,000-point scale based on the following criteria:
Developer Experience; Project Merits/Approach; Financial Feasibility; and Project
Impact. Five projects were recommended for funding, as follows:

· 41st & Thomas East - (The Richman Group)
· Alex Apartments - (Excelerate Housing Group)
· Northern Commons - (Resource Housing Group)
· Salamanca Square - (Helping Hands Housing Services)


· Verano Terrace II - (Bethel Development, Inc.)

41st & Thomas East Apartments, located at 2700 N. 41st Avenue (District 4), includes
the new construction of a 55-unit affordable housing community. The Richman Group,
a for-profit developer, through Richman 41st & Thomas East, LLC, requested $2
million to assist with the development of this project. All units will serve households
with incomes at or below 50 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) with at least 10
City HOME units serving households at or below 40 percent of the AMI. Other
proposed funding for this project includes permanent debt financing and Low-Income
Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) equity. Total development cost is estimated at
$24,938,889.

Project awards are contingent on full underwriting, environmental release of funds,
commitments of other financing, and availability of federal funds. The overall loan
structure will be consistent with the Housing Department's Underwriting Guidelines for
affordable rental housing projects.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. HOME is a federally funded program. Funding
for this CFI is made available from 2024 HOME funds, and a forward allocation of
2025 HOME funds. Funding commitments for projects with LIHTC equity are reliant
upon receiving a LIHTC award from the Arizona Department of Housing. Funding is
budgeted in the Housing Department’s Capital Improvement Project budget. Loan
execution is anticipated for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and the loan will be paid to the
developer over a two-to-four year period.

Public Outreach
All applicants were required to hold at least one community meeting with the
surrounding neighborhood to inform them of their proposed housing development.

Location
2700 N. 41st Avenue
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Loan Federal HOME Funds for Alex Apartments Affordable Housing
Development (Ordinance S-51916) - District 4

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Affordable
Housing Loan Program Agreement. The agreement is up to $1,980,000 in federal U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOME Investment
Partnerships Program (HOME) funds with Alex Apartments LP, or a City-approved
nominee, for the Alex Apartments affordable housing development project. Further
request to take all actions and execute all documents to complete the loan.
Authorization is also requested for the City Controller to disburse the funds for the life
of the contract. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
On November 18, 2024, the Housing Department issued a Call for Interest (CFI)
seeking proposals for the acquisition of new construction, and/or rehabilitation of
affordable rental housing based on the Affordable Housing Community Priorities.

The Community Priorities are:
1. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties that focus on
homeless or special needs populations, and that provide appropriate services to
assist and sustain these populations; and
2. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties where the
developer qualifies as a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO)
as defined by the HOME Program.

Procurement Information
Seven proposals were received and reviewed by an evaluation committee. The
proposals were evaluated on a 1,000-point scale based on the following criteria:
Developer Experience; Project Merits/Approach; Financial Feasibility; and Project
Impact. Five projects were recommended for funding, as follows:

· 41st & Thomas East - (The Richman Group)
· Alex Apartments - (Excelerate Housing Group)
· Northern Commons - (Resource Housing Group)
· Salamanca Square - (Helping Hands Housing Services)


· Verano Terrace II - (Bethel Development, Inc.)

Alex Apartments, located at 77 E. Weldon Avenue (District 4), includes the new
construction of a 59-unit affordable housing community. Excelerate Housing Group, a
for-profit developer, through Alex Apartments LP, requested $1,980,000 to assist with
the development of this project. All units will serve households with incomes at or
below 60 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) with at least 10 City HOME units
serving households at or below 40 percent of the AMI. Other proposed funding for this
project includes permanent debt financing, Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)
equity, and State Housing Trust Funds. Total development cost is estimated at
$33,427,765.

Project awards are contingent on full underwriting, environmental release of funds,
commitments of other financing, and availability of federal funds. The overall loan
structure will be consistent with the Housing Department's Underwriting Guidelines for
affordable rental housing projects.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. HOME is a federally funded program. Funding
for this CFI is made available from 2024 HOME funds, and a forward allocation of
2025 HOME funds. Funding commitments for projects with LIHTC equity are reliant
upon receiving a LIHTC award from the Arizona Department of Housing. Funding is
budgeted in the Housing Department’s Capital Improvement Plan budget. Loan
execution is anticipated for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and the loan will be paid to the
developer over a two-to-four year period.

Public Outreach
All applicants were required to hold at least one community meeting with the
surrounding neighborhood to inform them of their proposed housing development.

Location
77 E. Weldon Avenue
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Loan Federal HOME Funds for Northern Commons Affordable Housing
Development (Ordinance S-51917) - District 5

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Affordable
Housing Loan Program Agreement. The agreement is up to $2 million in federal U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOME Investment
Partnerships Program (HOME) funds with Northern Commons Apartments, LLC, or a
City-approved nominee, for the Northern Commons affordable housing development
project. Further request to take all actions and execute all documents to complete the
loan. Authorization is also requested for the City Controller to disburse the funds for
the life of the contract. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
On November 18, 2024, the Housing Department issued a Call for Interest (CFI)
seeking proposals for the acquisition of new construction, and/or rehabilitation of
affordable rental housing based on the Affordable Housing Community Priorities.

The Community Priorities are:
1. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties that focus on
homeless or special needs populations, and that provide appropriate services to
assist and sustain these populations; and
2. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties where the
developer qualifies as a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO)
as defined by the HOME Program.

Procurement Information
Seven proposals were received and reviewed by an evaluation committee. The
proposals were evaluated on a 1,000-point scale based on the following criteria:
Developer Experience; Project Merits/Approach; Financial Feasibility; and Project
Impact. Five projects were recommended for funding, as follows:

· 41st & Thomas East - (The Richman Group)
· Alex Apartments - (Excelerate Housing Group)
· Northern Commons - (Resource Housing Group)
· Salamanca Square - (Helping Hands Housing Services)


· Verano Terrace II - (Bethel Development, Inc.)

Northern Commons Apartments, located at 2050 W. Northern Avenue (District 5),
includes the new construction of a 60-unit affordable housing community. Resource
Housing Group, a for-profit developer, through Northern Commons Apartments, LLC,
requested $2 million to assist with the development of this project. All units will serve
households with incomes at or below 60 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) with
at least 11 City HOME units split to serve households at or below 40 percent of the
AMI and at or below 50 percent of the AMI. Other proposed funding for this project
includes permanent debt financing, and Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC)
equity. Total development cost is estimated at $30,082,749.

Project awards are contingent on full underwriting, environmental release of funds,
commitments of other financing, and availability of federal funds. The overall loan
structure will be consistent with the Housing Department's Underwriting Guidelines for
affordable rental housing projects.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. HOME is a federally funded program. Funding
for this CFI is made available from 2024 HOME funds, and a forward allocation of
2025 HOME funds. Funding commitments for projects with LIHTC equity are reliant
upon receiving a LIHTC award from the Arizona Department of Housing. Funding is
budgeted in the Housing Department’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget.
Loan execution is anticipated for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and the loan will be paid to the
developer over a two-to-four year period.

Public Outreach
All applicants were required to hold at least one community meeting with the
surrounding neighborhood to inform them of their proposed housing development.

Location
2050 W. Northern Avenue
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Loan Federal HOME Funds for Salamanca Square Affordable Housing
Development (Ordinance S-51918) - District 5

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Affordable
Housing Loan Program Agreement. The agreement is up to $2 million in federal U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOME Investment
Partnerships Program (HOME) funds with UMOM Housing 11, LLC, or a City-approved
nominee, for the Salamanca Square affordable housing development project. Further
request to take all actions and execute all documents to complete the loan.
Authorization is also requested for the City Controller to disburse the funds for the life
of the contract. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
On November 18, 2024, the Housing Department issued a Call for Interest (CFI)
seeking proposals for the acquisition of new construction, and/or rehabilitation of
affordable rental housing based on the Affordable Housing Community Priorities.

The Community Priorities are:
1. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties that focus on
homeless or special needs populations, and that provide appropriate services to
assist and sustain these populations; and
2. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties where the
developer qualifies as a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO)
as defined by the HOME Program.

Procurement Information
Seven proposals were received and reviewed by an evaluation committee. The
proposals were evaluated on a 1,000-point scale based on the following criteria:
Developer Experience; Project Merits/Approach; Financial Feasibility; and Project
Impact. Five projects were recommended for funding, as follows:

· 41st & Thomas East - (The Richman Group)
· Alex Apartments - (Excelerate Housing Group)
· Northern Commons - (Resource Housing Group)
· Salamanca Square - (Helping Hands Housing Services)


· Verano Terrace II - (Bethel Development, Inc.)

Salamanca Square, located at a Confidential Address (District 5), includes the new
construction of a 192-unit affordable housing community. Helping Hands Housing
Services, a non-profit CHDO, through UMOM Housing 11, LLC, requested $2 million to
assist with the development of this project. All units will serve households with incomes
at or below 60 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) with at least 11 City HOME
units of which six are proposed to serve domestic violence survivors. Other proposed
funding for this project includes permanent debt financing, bonds, State Housing Trust
Fund, private grant, and Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) equity. Total
development cost is estimated at $59,611,166.

Project awards are contingent on full underwriting, environmental release of funds,
commitments of other financing, and availability of federal funds. The overall loan
structure will be consistent with the Housing Department's Underwriting Guidelines for
affordable rental housing projects.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. HOME is a federally funded program. Funding
for this CFI is made available from 2024 HOME funds, and a forward allocation of
2025 HOME funds. Funding commitments for projects with LIHTC equity are reliant
upon receiving a LIHTC award from the Arizona Department of Housing. Funding is
budgeted in the Housing Department’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget.
Loan execution is anticipated for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and the loan will be paid to the
developer over an estimated two-to-four year period.

Public Outreach
All applicants were required to hold at least one community meeting with the
surrounding neighborhood to inform them of their proposed housing development.

Location
Confidential Address
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Loan Federal HOME Funds for Verano Terrace II Affordable Housing
Development (Ordinance S-51919) - District 4

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an Affordable
Housing Loan Program Agreement. The agreement is up to $500,000 in federal U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) HOME Investment
Partnerships Program (HOME) funds with Bethel Development, Inc., or a City-
approved nominee, for the Verano Terrace II affordable housing development project.
Further request to take all actions and execute all documents to complete the loan.
Authorization is also requested for the City Controller to disburse the funds for the life
of the contract. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
On November 18, 2024, the Housing Department issued a Call for Interest (CFI)
seeking proposals for the acquisition of new construction, and/or rehabilitation of
affordable rental housing based on the Affordable Housing Community Priorities.

The Community Priorities are:
1. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties that focus on
homeless or special needs populations, and that provide appropriate services to
assist and sustain these populations; and
2. Acquisition, rehabilitation, and/or new construction of properties where the
developer qualifies as a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO)
as defined by the HOME Program.

Procurement Information
Seven proposals were received and reviewed by an evaluation committee. The
proposals were evaluated on a 1,000-point scale based on the following criteria:
Developer Experience; Project Merits/Approach; Financial Feasibility; and Project
Impact. Five projects were recommended for funding, as follows:

· 41st & Thomas East - (The Richman Group)
· Alex Apartments - (Excelerate Housing Group)
· Northern Commons - (Resource Housing Group)
· Salamanca Square - (Helping Hands Housing Services)


· Verano Terrace II - (Bethel Development, Inc.)

Verano Terrace II Apartments, located at 1141 W. Monterosa Street (District 4),
includes the new construction of a 25-unit affordable housing community. Bethel
Development, Inc., a for-profit developer, through a to-be-formed entity, requested
$500,000 to assist with the development of this project. All units will serve households
with incomes at or below 60 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI) with at least 11
City HOME units serving persons with disabilities. Other proposed funding for this
project includes permanent debt financing, and Low-Income Housing Tax Credit
(LIHTC) equity. Total development cost is estimated at $10,424,230.

Project awards are contingent on full underwriting, environmental release of funds,
commitments of other financing, and availability of federal funds. The overall loan
structure will be consistent with the Housing Department's Underwriting Guidelines for
affordable rental housing projects.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. HOME is a federally funded program. Funding
for this CFI is made available from 2024 HOME funds, and a forward allocation of
2025 HOME funds. Funding commitments for projects with LIHTC equity are reliant
upon receiving a LIHTC award from the Arizona Department of Housing. Funding is
budgeted in the Housing Department’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget.
Loan execution is anticipated for Fiscal Year 2025-26 and the loan will be paid to the
developer over a two-to-four year period.

Public Outreach
All applicants were required to hold at least one community meeting with the
surrounding neighborhood to inform them of their proposed housing development.

Location
1141 W. Monterosa Street
Council District: 4

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request Authorization to Enter into Contract with Chrysalis Shelter Services for
Victims of Domestic Violence, Inc. (Ordinance S-51912) - Citywide

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract
with Chrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence, Inc. (Chrysalis) to provide
emergency shelter and transitional housing services for the Human Services
Department (HSD). The contract term will be for five-years beginning on or about July
1, 2025 with five-option-years to extend. The annual budget will be approximately
$153,000 subject to annual budget approval. The total contract value will not exceed
$1.53 million over the contract term. Further request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item for the contract term.

Summary
HSD provides a diverse array of support services to assist people in moving towards
self-sufficiency. Emergency shelter and transitional housing operation funds are part of
the comprehensive continuum of services HSD provides. This funding will assist
families and individual victims of domestic violence by providing a safe environment to
rebuild their lives. Since 2015, HSD has contracted with Chrysalis to provide 14,750
bed nights and shelter to 275 residents and 75 children. Chrysalis provides bed,
bedding, food, necessities, client advocacy, trauma counseling, and case
management. The shelter is in an undisclosed location, staffed 24 hours, and residents
are provided up to 120 days of shelter. This coordination is critical to serving
individuals and families experiencing homelessness who are victims of domestic
violence in the Phoenix metropolitan area and all of Maricopa County. Additionally,
Chrysalis offers a safe and secure location to become stable, make long-term lifestyle
changes necessary to live free from violence, and gain insight and knowledge
regarding the impact of domestic abuse on children.

Contract Term
The initial contract term will be for five-years, beginning on or about July 1, 2025, with
five, one-year options to extend at the discretion of the City Manager or designee.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of this agreement shall not exceed $1.53 million. General
Purpose funding is available for the contract in the HSD Victim Services Division



budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
February 15, 2006 with Ordinance S-32696.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request Retroactive Authorization to Apply for, Accept, and Enter into an
Agreement for 2025 Child and Family Advocacy Center Grant Funds (Ordinance
S-51928) - Citywide

Request retroactive authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for
and if awarded, accept Child and Family Advocacy Center grant funds and enter into
an agreement with the State of Arizona Attorney General Office (AGO). Funds will be
allocated statewide to child and family advocacy centers based on the number of
clients served in calendar year 2023. Further request authorization to take all other
action necessary or appropriate to carry out the grant terms. Request authorization for
the City Treasurer to accept and City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item for the grant life.

Summary
On February 28, 2025, the AGO announced availability of Child and Family Advocacy
Center grant funds with an application due date of April 11, 2025. The AGO worked
with the Arizona Legislature to re-appropriate monies from civil settlements to establish
a fund providing grant support to statewide Child and Family Advocacy Centers. To
address ongoing need, the AGO is providing up to $100,000 for multiple, one-time
grants. The sum of up to $47,500 may be available to the City of Phoenix based on the
number of victims served in calendar year 2023.

If awarded, this funding will provide essential support to victims of crime who are in
dangerous, emergency situations. Support may include clothing, hygiene items, and
gift cards for food and/or gas. In addition, the funding may be used to improve space
within the Family Advocacy Center such as waiting areas, conference rooms, and
forensic medical exam rooms.

Contract Term
The grant period shall commence upon award and shall remain in effect until
December 31, 2025.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is provided by the AGO and does not
have a match requirement.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Apply for, Accept and Enter into an Agreement for Victims of
Crime Act Grant Funds (Ordinance S-51930) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, accept, and enter
into an agreement with the Arizona Department of Public Safety for a Victims of Crime
Act (VOCA) grant. The amount is not to exceed $850,000. Further request
authorization for the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all
funds related to this item.

Summary
The VOCA grant is federally funded and administered by the Arizona Department of
Public Safety. This funding provides an opportunity to request ongoing funding that
enhances the victim services landscape in the Human Services Department Victim
Services Division. The VOCA application was released on April 7, 2025.

Since 2015, the Humans Services Department has requested and received approval
from City Council to apply for VOCA grant funds to partially fund victim advocates.
Victim Advocates funded by VOCA are located at the Family Advocacy Center, Family
Services Centers, Phoenix Municipal Court, and the Phoenix Police Department.
These positions provide an array of services to victims of violent crimes that occur
within the City of Phoenix, such as domestic and sexual violence, sex trafficking, and
homicide. These services include assisting victims in making critical safety decisions,
assisting victims seeking shelter from their abusers, connecting victims to necessary
resources inside and outside of the City, transportation assistance, and providing
information about the criminal justice system. The victim advocate is often a key
support person when a victim talks through the emotional impact of a crime.

This grant would provide continued funding for eight positions. The grant also requests
funds for operating expenses, such as cell phone services, office supplies, and other
equipment needed to provide direct service to victims. VOCA funding has provided the
opportunity to allow greatly reduced caseloads of victim advocates, thus improving the
quality and efficacy of services.

The grant application is due on June 2, 2025.




Contract Term
The grant period is from October 1, 2025 through September 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
If awarded, the total grant funding will not exceed $850,000.The City's funding for
current Victim Advocate positions provides the required 25 percent in-kind match.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Gina Montes and the Human
Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Enter an Intergovernmental Agreement with the State of Arizona to
Utilize the Pyramid Model Implementation Data System (Ordinance S-51938) -
Districts 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with the Arizona Department of Education to share
classroom observation data on social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes of children
from birth to five. Further, request an exception to Phoenix City Code Section 42-18 to
authorize inclusion of indemnification and assumption of liability provisions in the
agreement that would other be prohibited and to allow for mutual indemnification
pursuant to Phoenix City Code Section 42-20 for public entities.

The City of Phoenix Head Start Birth to Five Program is a federally funded program for
low-income families that promotes school readiness by supporting cognitive, social,
and emotional development of children ages three to five. The program uses the
Pyramid Model, an evidence-based framework focused on healthy social-emotional
growth. In recent years educators have noted an increase in challenging behaviors
such as aggression, defiance, and difficulty with transitions. These behaviors disrupt
classrooms and impact overall child development.

Multiple factors contribute to this trend, including the social-emotional impacts of the
COVID-19 pandemic, increased screen time, reduced socialization opportunities, and
other broader societal stressors. Educators, already stretched thin with curriculum
demands and classroom management, are now being asked to navigate a new level of
behavioral intervention with limited resources and training.

Systematic data collection is essential. Data helps identify behavior patterns, triggers,
and successful strategies. This guides targeted interventions, resource allocation, and
professional development. It also supports advocacy for additional behavioral and
mental health resources. The Pyramid Model Implementation Data System (PIDS)
supports this effort by tracking social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes for children
from birth to age five. Data-driven decision-making also strengthens advocacy efforts
for increased funding and policy changes prioritizing early childhood mental health and
behavioral support. By documenting the issue scope and evidence-based interventions
impact, educators can make a compelling case for more behavioral specialists, mental



health consultants, and family engagement initiatives.

Through this IGA, early childhood programs implementing the Pyramid Model can use
PIDs to collect meaningful data. The data shared will not include personally identifying
information of the children in the system and will be available as both aggregate and
individual data collection. The data supports informed decisions about staff
development, program strategies, and policy improvements which helps programs
move beyond reactive responses and evaluate the efficacy of current practices. In
return, this creates nurturing, inclusive learning environments that foster children’s
social and emotional growth.

Contract Term
The IGA will be valid for five years from the date of execution, beginning on or about
July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2030.

Financial Impact
There is no cost or financial impact.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was approved by the Head Start Birth to Five Policy Council on April 14,
2025.

Location
Alhambra Elementary School District, 4510 N. 37th Avenue
Cartwright Elementary School District, 5220 W. Indian School Road
Deer Valley Unified School District, 20402 N. 15th Avenue
Fowler Elementary School District, 1617 S. 67th Avenue
Isaac School District, 3348 W. McDowell Road
Laveen Elementary School District, 5601 W. Dobbins Road
Murphy Elementary School District, 3140 W. Buckeye Road
Pendergast Elementary School District, 3802 N. 91st Avenue
Phoenix Elementary School District, 1817 N. 7th Street
Riverside Elementary School District, 1414 S. 51st Avenue
Roosevelt Elementary School District, 6000 S. 7th Street
Washington Elementary School District, 4650 W. Sweetwater Avenue
Wilson Elementary School District, 3025 E. Fillmore Street
Council Districts: 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.




Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Public Library and Maricopa County Library District - Library
Assistance Program Intergovernmental Agreement (Ordinance S-51926) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an
intergovernmental agreement with Maricopa County Library District for the Library
Assistance Program. The Library Assistance Program allocation for Phoenix Public
Library for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 is estimated to be $1,200,000. Allocation for
additional fiscal years of the agreement will be determined on a primary assessed
valuation.

Summary
This agreement allows participating libraries in Maricopa County to issue free library
cards to residents of Maricopa County that do not live within the boundaries of their
individual jurisdictions. The agreement allows Phoenix residents to receive free library
cards at other participating libraries, including Tempe, Glendale, Scottsdale, and Mesa
public libraries. In return for the Library Department's participation in this program,
Maricopa County Library District will purchase additional library materials and provide
components of the Integrated Library System to Phoenix Public Library with an
estimated value of $1,200,000 in FY 2025-26.

Because of this agreement, savings will be generated in the Library's General Fund
operating budget. The Department requests these savings be used to convert 4.7
temporary College Depot FTEs to ongoing status. These positions are currently funded
by expiring American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds ending as of June 30, 2025. The
positions include one full-time Administrative Aide, three full-time Caseworkers IIs, and
0.7 FTE part-time Library Assistant. The College Depot team addresses student
achievement and learning gaps widened during the pandemic. Converting these
positions will allow the Library to continue to provide critical college planning and
guidance services.

Contract Term
The agreement is from July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2028.

Financial Impact



The Library Assistance Program allocation for Phoenix Public Library for FY 2025-26 is
estimated to be $1,200,000. Allocation for each additional fiscal years of the
agreement will be determined based on a primary assessed valuation. There is no cost
to convert the College Depot positions because of savings generated by this
agreement.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Library
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO WITHDRAW (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Approval of the
Neighborhood Block Watch Oversight Committee's Recommendations for the
2025 Grant Program Awards (Ordinance S-51940) - Citywide

This report requests the Public Safety and Justice Committee recommend City Council
approval of the recommendations from the Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program
(NBWGP) Oversight Committee to fund 171 grant applications for the 2025 grant
cycle. This report also includes an update on the gated alley and gated wash program
support by Neighborhood Block Watch funds.

Summary
The NBWGP Oversight Committee was established to solicit, evaluate, and
recommend to the Mayor and City Council appropriate proposals to expend funds for
the expansion of the Block Watch programs within the limits of the Neighborhood
Protection Ordinance. This ordinance, known as Proposition 301, was adopted at a
special election on October 5, 1993. The City Council adopted the format and
guidelines for this process on April 26, 1994. The NBWGP program is administered by
the Police Department.

The 2025 NBWGP grant application process opened on November 1, 2024 and closed
on December 7, 2024. The NBWGP Oversight Committee scored the grant
applications based on the following criteria: Crime Prevention/Quality of Life Factors
for 50 percent, Budget Evaluation for 20 percent, Community Involvement for 20
percent, and Project Viability/Feasibility/Ability to Complete the Project for 10 percent.

A total of 177 grant applications were received. Of those evaluated, 171 applications
are recommended for funding by the Oversight Committee totaling $2,154,111. Six
applications are not recommended for funding. All six applications not recommended
to receive funding scored below the minimum requirement of 5.25 out of ten (10)
points for various reasons to include lack of neighborhood participation, lack of
documentation or requesting items the grant does not cover.

On April 10, 2025, the Oversight Committee voted to fund 171 applicants. See
Attachment A for a full list of the FY25 recommended grant applications.




The Oversight Committee also voted (8 in favor, 1 opposed, 0 in conflict, 0 abstained)
to recommend to increase funding for the Neighborhood Block Watch Program from
$2,000,000 to $2,154,111 annually. The program’s fund balance allows for the
recommended increase.

Gated Alley Program Update
As a resident-driven initiative, the Gated Alley Program (GAP) significantly enhances
neighborhood safety and quality of life. Demand for the program has increased from
15 requests per month to 25 or more per month over the past year. A recent review of
Phoenix Police data showed a 15 percent reduction in calls for service overall, and an
incredible 11.4 percent reduction in violent calls for service for properties adjacent to
gated alleys over the year prior to gating.

In October 2024, City Council approved $3 million in Neighborhood Block Watch
Program (NBWP) funds to support the GAP over two years. This allocation is funding
approximately 250 alley segments, and recently helped Neighborhood Services
Department (NSD) complete the 1,000th gate under the program.

At the time of additional NBWP funding approval, the GAP received around 15
requests per month. However, following significant media coverage, interest in the
program surged. From November 2024 through March 2025, GAP requests averaged
25 per month. As of mid-April 2025, 118 alley segments have gates installed or are in
the construction process with an additional 45 requests under review. Based on this
rate, the $3 million allocation is now projected to be fully expended by early Fiscal Year
(FY) 2025-26, sooner than anticipated. To continue meeting community demand, staff
is requesting $2.25 million annually in NBWP funds, subject to availability, beginning in
FY 2025-26.

The proposed ongoing $2.25 million allocation from the Neighborhood Block Watch
Program represents a significant increase over the FY 2024-25 General Fund
allocation and would allow Neighborhood Services to gate approximately 200 alley
segments per year. Funding for future years is contingent on fund availability to be
monitored by the Phoenix Police, Neighborhood Services, and Budget and Research
departments and the City Manager’s Office. This will help enhance neighborhood
safety and further reduce calls for service.

Youth Prevention Program Pilot
As part of the City's public safety improvement efforts, Mayor and City Council and
members of the community have encouraged staff to provide additional resources and
establish programming specifically for youth. Youth prevention programs are intended
to alleviate and address potential risks to youth, such as substance abuse and


violence, while providing supportive environments and interventions. Additional
resources to support community organizations to provide these services are needed.
As a result, staff recommends, as part of the City's public safety improvement efforts,
to establish a pilot program through the Human Services Department (HSD) to
facilitate providing youth prevention programming through community based
organizations. Staff is requesting $500,000 of NBWP funds for this pilot program. If
approved, HSD staff will conduct a procurement process to select local service
providers for the youth prevention programming pilot.

Contract Term
The award period is July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
No matching funds are required.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Public Safety and Justice
Subcommittee at the May 7, 2025 meeting.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Managers Lori Bays and Inger Erickson,
Deputy City Managers Gina Montes and Alan Stephenson and the Police and
Neighborhood Services departments.





2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-196 19 North Council District 5 Safety Collaboration $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-095 44th Community Alliance Council District 6 Connect and Communicate $6,060.00 $6,060.00



25-078 Acoma Park Block Watch / Phoenix Life Church Council District 1 Acoma Park Block Watch 2025/2026 Program $6,303.00 $6,303.00



25-159 ALHAMBRA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION AND NW GRANADA Council District 4 Alleys, Speed Humps, GAIN and Park $14,385.00 $14,185.00


Safety and Crime Prevention through neighborhood connection and
25-147 Alta Vista Neighborhood Block Watch Council District 1 $10,900.00 $10,900.00
education.


25-105 Amigos Block Watch Council District 4 2025 Amigos Block Watch $13,610.00 $13,610.00



25-049 Anthem Neighborhood Watch-West Council District 1 ANW Block watch Group $12,600.00 $12,600.00



25-040 Arcadia Camelback Mountain Neighborhood Association Council District 6 2025-2026 ACMNA BLOCK WATCH GRANT $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-119 ARCADIA OSBORN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Council District 6 2025/2026 AONA NBWG $14,750.00 $14,750.00


ABLE (Arizona Black Law Enforcement Employees) 2025 Criminal
25-043 Arizona Black Enforcement Employees (ABLE) Council District 5 $10,000.00 $10,000.00
Justice Conference


25-023 Arlington Estates II Neighborhood Association Council District 8 Situational Awareness Saves Lives $15,000.00 $14,700.00


Arlington Estates II Neighborhood Association / Laveen Baseball
25-047 Council District 7 Laveen Baseball League, Inc. $10,500.00 $10,500.00
League, Inc.


25-120 Arroyo Crossing Council District 1 Meeting Furniture and Personal Safety $6,015.00 $6,015.00




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
269 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-073 Avalon Neighborhood Association Council District 4 Avalon Block Watch $14,374.00 $14,264.00



25-152 AVANCE COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE Council District 8 Avance Community Neighborhood Alliance 2025 Grant Application $15,000.00 $14,200.00



25-145 BEACON CREEK BLOCK WATCH Council District 3 Beacon Creek Crime Busters Project $2,359.00 $2,359.00



25-010 Belcanto Block Watch / Belcanto HOA Council District 2 Belcanto Grant 2025 $14,895.00 $14,895.00



25-133 Bell Road Business Alliance Council District 1 Bell Road Business Alliance 2025-2026 $14,110.00 $14,110.00



25-101 Berkeley Square Neighborhood Council District 5 Berkeley Square Project 2025 $14,998.00 $14,998.00


ACTS "Men of Valor" Leadership Development Project - AZ Jr.
25-062 Bernard Black Neighborhood Association Council District 8 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Champions Football


Bernard Black Neighborhood Association / The Syndicate Youth The Syndicate Youth Sports Organization Leadership Development
25-063 Council District 8 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Sports Organization Project – Youth Flag Football


25-012 Black Mountain Community Alliance Council District 1 2025 BMCA Crime Prevention & Safety Projects $14,985.00 $14,985.00


Black Mountain Precinct Phoenix Neighborhood Patrol / Moon Valley
25-041 Council District 3 Black Mountain Precinct Neighborhood Patrol $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Neighborhood Association


25-098 Bougainvillea Block Watch Council District 8 Bougainvillea Block Watch $2,990.00 $2,990.00



25-194 C28 BUSINESS ALLIANCE Council District 1 NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK WATCH GRANT PROGRAM (NBWGP) $12,000.00 $8,550.00



25-042 Cactus Park Community Alliance Council District 1 Crime Prevention Through Education and Support $10,000.00 $10,000.00




*Results not official until approved by City Council
270 Page 2 RI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-060 Cactus Park Phoenix Neighborhood Patrol Council District 1 Cactus Park Phoenix Neighborhood Patrol $10,000.00 $10,000.00



25-014 Cactus Wren Neighborhood Block Watch Council District 1 2025/2026 Cactus Wren Block Watch $15,000.00 $15,000.00


Cactus Wren Neighborhood Block Watch / Cactus Park Police 2025/2026 Partnership between Cactus Wren Block Watch and
25-015 Council District 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Precinct Cactus Park Police Precinct


25-044 Canal North Neighborhood Association Council District 4 Canal North Crime Prevention Task Force 2025 $3,993.00 $3,993.00



25-180 Canyon Corridor Neighborhood Alliance Council District 4 South 27th Ave Corridor Neighbor-2-Neighbor $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-165 Carnation Association of Neighbors Council District 4 Carnation 2025 NBWG $14,940.00 $14,940.00


CDP Neighborhood Committee - Providing Neighbors Security
25-056 Casa del Pueblo Neighborhood Committee Council District 5 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Enclosures to Prevent Trespassing


CDP Neighborhood Committee Safety - Emergency Responders
25-052 Casa del Pueblo Neighborhood Committee / Casa Del Pueblo HOA Council District 5 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Complex Signage and Designated Parking Project


25-151 Central City Precinct Phoenix Neighborhood Patrol Council District 8 Central City Precinct Neighborhood Patrol $10,000.00 $10,000.00



25-039 Colina Del Norte Block Watch Council District 2 Colina Del Norte Grant $7,506.00 $7,506.00



25-122 Collins Sun Devils / MOUNTAIN POINTE HIGH SCHOOL Council District 6 CSD/MOUNTAIN POINTE HIGH SCHOOL $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-178 Community Leaders In Action Council District 4 Block Watch Group Community Leaders in Action $14,975.00 $14,975.00



25-118 Coronado Neighborhood Association Council District 4 Safety Committee & Dispatch $14,996.00 $14,996.00




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
271 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award

Cox Meadows Neighborhood Block Watch, Inc. / Shaw Butte
25-025 Council District 3 Using More Services $14,860.00 $14,800.00
Elementary School


25-054 Crystal Terrace Community Block Watch Council District 3 Crystal Terrace Community Block WatchGrant Request 2025 $4,327.00 $4,327.00



25-013 Deer Valley Park Neighborhood Block Watch Organization Council District 1 2025 DVPNBWO Crime Prevention & Safety Project $14,990.00 $14,990.00



25-069 DEL NORTE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Council District 4 2025 Del Norte Community Outreach and Safety Grant $15,000.00 $14,950.00



25-032 Desert Horizon Precinct Block Watch and PNP Council District 3 DHP 25 26 Safer Communities $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-191 EARLL DR NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH Council District 4 Know our Neighbor $11,200.00 $10,200.00



25-059 East Glenrosa Avenue Council District 6 East Glenrosa Block Watch $14,520.00 $14,520.00


EAST SUNNYSLOPE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION & BLOCK East Sunnyslope Block Watch and Neighborhood Association
25-050 Council District 3 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
WATCH Continued Improvement


25-031 Encanto-Palmcroft Historic Preservation Association Council District 4 Alley Safety Lighting $3,000.00 $3,000.00



25-106 Estrella Mountain Village Block Watch Council District 1 2025 EMV BW Grant Application $9,762.00 $9,762.00



25-110 F.Q. Story Block Watch Council District 4 FQ Story Crime Prevention Efforts $13,870.00 $13,870.00



25-055 Fairview Place Neighborhood Association Council District 4 Fairview Place 2025 - Alley & Park Activation $15,000.00 $15,000.00


Fairview Place Neighborhood Association / Franklin Police and Fire Fairview Place and Franklin School 2024 - Community Synergy and
25-087 Council District 4 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
High School Safety




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
272 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award

Faith Missionary Baptist Church Neighborhood Association / Faith Save Our Sisters & Brothers - Community Safety Education &
25-115 Council District 7 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Missionary Baptist Church Awareness Program


Faith Missionary Baptist Church Neighborhood Association / Vessels Save Our Sisters & Brothers - MVP Community STEM Education &
25-116 Council District 7 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
of Possibilities, Inc. Safety Awareness Program


25-142 Garfield Organization A Neighborhood Alliance Council District 8 Garfield Neighborhood Alley Safety through Art $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-160 Grandview Neighborhood Association Council District 4 Grandview Block Watch Crime Prevention & Reduction $13,581.00 $13,581.00



25-175 GRAYBRIAR BLOCK WATCH / AAHHERC Council District 4 Graybriar Block Watch $11,851.00 $11,851.00



25-090 Greater Granville Community Block Watch 85027 Council District 1 Greater Granville 2025 BW Projects $12,925.00 $12,925.00



25-022 Greater Green Gables Neighborhood Association Council District 4 Greater Green Gables Neighborhood Association $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-082 Hatcher Road Business Alliance Council District 3 theHUB Community Redevelopment $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-184 Heritage Heights Block Watch Council District 3 Building a Better Community 2025 $6,352.00 $6,352.00



25-128 Highland Terrace Neighborhood Council District 8 Block Watch Grant 2025 $9,690.00 $9,690.00



25-111 Homedale Neighbors Council District 7 Building Safe Blocks $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-130 Homestead Block Watch Council District 4 Homstead Blockwatch/ Borman elementary School $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-094 Homestead Block Watch / Cartwright School District 83 Council District 7 Homstead blockwatch/ Charles W Harris Elementary Wake Up $15,000.00 $15,000.00




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
273 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-002 Hunter's Village/Tapestry 24 Hr Surveillance Council District 2 Stay Crime Free and Active $11,175.00 $11,175.00


To Detect, Deter and Delay Crime in the John Jacobs Elementary
25-045 John Jacobs Block Watch Council District 3 $14,825.00 $14,825.00
School Neighborhood


25-181 Kuban Neighborhood Association Council District 7 See Something Say Something $14,180.00 $14,180.00



25-113 Lake Biltmore Block Watch Council District 1 2025 LBBW Neighborhood Quality of Life & Safety Improvement $14,547.00 $14,547.00


Lakebrook VIllas II Blockwatch / Lakebrook Villas II Homeowners
25-144 Council District 1 LBVII 2025 Grant Application $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Association, Inc.


25-048 Laurelwood Homes Block Watch Council District 5 Villa de Paz Crime Prevention Program $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-102 LAVEEN MEADOWS Council District 7 Laveen Meadows 2025 Block Watch Initiatives $14,989.00 $14,989.00



25-127 Lindo Park Neighborhood Association/Block Watch Council District 8 Crime Prevention and Neighborhood Unification $14,640.00 $14,640.00


Lindo Park Neighborhood Association/Block Watch / ASU PREP
25-076 Council District 8 ASU PREP WAKE UP $15,000.00 $15,000.00
South Mountain


2025-2026 LLNA Blockwatch Grant-Neighborhood Safety &
25-135 Loma Linda Neighborhood Association Council District 4 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Communication


25-006 Maryvale Estrella Mountain Community Alliance Council District 7 2025 Maryvale Estrella Mountain Community Alliance $15,000.00 $15,000.00


Maryvale Estrella Mountain Community Alliance / Maryvale Estrella
25-007 Council District 7 2025 Maryvale Estrella Mountain Phoenix Neighborhood Patrol $14,986.00 $14,986.00
Mountain Phoenix Neighborhood Patrol


25-176 Maryvale Youth Leadership Association Council District 5 Movie Night $3,000.00 $3,000.00




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
274 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-005 McClellan Ranch Council District 7 McClellan Ranch Alliance Block Watch $14,980.00 $13,830.00



25-153 Melrose Community Alliance Council District 4 Growing Community Connectedness $14,880.00 $14,880.00



25-072 Metro Block Watch Council District 1 2025 Crime Prevention, Safety Awareness & Education $14,805.00 $14,805.00



25-182 Metro District Community Collaboration Council District 1 MDCC Safety and Security $6,160.00 $6,160.00



25-075 Midtown Neighborhood Association Council District 4 Community Unity $14,525.00 $14,525.00



25-016 Moon Valley Gardens Neighborhood Block Watch Council District 3 2025 MVGNBW Safer Neighborhood $14,955.00 $14,955.00


Moon Valley Gardens Neighborhood Block Watch / Glendale Union
25-017 Council District 3 2025 MVGNBW Engaging Youth $14,985.00 $14,985.00
High School District and Washington Elementary School District


25-030 Moon Valley Neighborhood Association Council District 3 Moon Valley Community Awareness $14,839.00 $14,839.00



25-070 MORRIS K. UDALL Council District 4 Speed Humps $2,000.00 $2,000.00



25-188 Mountain Estates Block Watch Council District 3 Mountain Estates 2025-2026 $3,000.00 $3,000.00



25-187 Mountain Preserve Block Watch Council District 3 Neigborhood Cohesion 2025 $5,650.00 $5,650.00



25-033 Mountain View Precinct Phoenix - Neighborhood Patrol Council District 4 Mtn View 25 26 Safer Communities $15,000.00 $15,000.00


Mountain View Precinct Phoenix - Neighborhood Patrol / Silent
25-034 Council District 4 Silent Witness 25 26 Outreach $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Witness




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
275 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-108 North Encanto Neighborhood Alliance Council District 4 Revive and Renew $14,823.00 $14,823.00



25-024 North Glen Square Neighborhood Association Council District 5 North Glen Square Neighborhood Crime Prevention $14,635.00 $14,635.00



25-109 North Park Central Council District 4 North Park Central Block Watch $14,321.00 $14,321.00



25-104 Northern Manor Two Block Watch Council District 5 Crime Prevention $10,441.00 $10,441.00



25-051 Northern Manor Two Block Watch / Wake Up! Program Council District 5 Cholla Middle School Wake Up! Program $14,995.00 $14,995.00


2025 Northtown PNP Crime Prevention and Safety for Senior
25-058 Northtown Community Block Watch/PNP Council District 3 $6,780.00 $6,780.00
Community


Northtown Community Block Watch/PNP / Northtown Community 2025 Northtown PNP/HOA Lighting Systems for Community Safety
25-088 Council District 3 $9,625.00 $9,625.00
Home Owners Assocation and Quality of Life


25-029 Norton Vista Neighborhood Association Council District 3 Children, Families, & Community $15,000.00 $14,900.00


2025 Ocotillo Hills Block Watch Bringing Neighbors Together To
25-089 Ocotillo Hills Block Watch Council District 3 $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Reduce Crime Through Community Involvement


25-185 PALM LAKES VILLAGE, INC. / PLV HOA Council District 2 Block Watch Grant $14,522.00 $14,522.00



25-143 Palo Verde Block Watch Council District 3 Palo Verde Neighbors Application $2,980.00 $2,980.00



25-186 Palomino Neighborhood Association / Palomino School Council District 2 Palomino 2025 $11,940.00 $11,940.00



25-064 Paradise Gardens Neighborhood Association and Block Watch Council District 3 Paradise Gardens Grant App 25-26 $2,286.00 $2,286.00




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
276 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award

Paradise Gardens Neighborhood Association and Block Watch /
25-027 Council District 3 Shea Wake Up! $14,995.00 $14,995.00
Shea Wake Up!


25-141 Perry Park Neighborhood Association Council District 8 "SAFE & PLEASANT ENVIRONMENT" $9,215.00 $9,215.00



25-018 Phoenix Block Watch Advisory Board Council District 3 crime prevention plus $14,720.00 $14,720.00


Phoenix Block Watch Advisory Board / Communication Engagement
25-019 Council District 3 Crime Prevention Plus $12,900.00 $12,900.00
Bureau


25-123 PHX LUV Council District 3 2025 Neighborhood Safety $14,998.00 $14,998.00



25-157 Pierson Place Historic District Council District 4 Crime Prevention, Personal Safety, and GAIN $14,439.00 $14,439.00



25-008 Rancho Ventura Neighborhood Association Council District 8 2025 NBWGP $6,453.00 $6,453.00



25-131 Redhawk At Rogers Ranch Block Watch Council District 7 2025 Redhawk at Rogers Ranch Block Watch $14,262.00 $14,262.00


Redhawk At Rogers Ranch Block Watch / Estrella Foothills Global
25-129 Council District 8 2025 Estrella Foothills Wake Up! Club $14,972.00 $14,972.00
Academy


25-028 Ridge Runners 2 Council District 2 2025 Grant $6,174.00 $6,174.00



25-138 Riverbend Block Watch Council District 7 2025 Block Watch Grant $14,765.00 $14,765.00



25-021 Riverwalk Villages Block Watch / Cheatham Elementary School Council District 7 Cheatham Elementary Wake Up Club! $14,987.00 $14,987.00



25-139 Roosevelt Action Association Council District 7 Keeping Roosevelt Safe Through Challenging Times $14,665.00 $14,665.00




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
277 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-117 Royal Palm Neighborhood Council Council District 3 GAIN Events $14,962.00 $14,962.00


Connecting for Safety: Launching a Neighborhood Association to
25-158 S Mountain Neighborhood Association Council District 3 $2,220.00 $2,220.00
Foster Community Bonds and Crime Prevention


Safe Schools "Focus On Excellence" / C.J. Jorgensen Neighborhood
25-150 Council District 7 RSD 'Teen Court' Project $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Association


Safe Schools "Focus On Excellence" / Safe Schools Youth Programs,
25-126 Council District 8 Safe Schools CityWide Diversion Project $15,000.00 $15,000.00
LLC


25-189 SANTIAGO BLOCK WATCH Council District 8 Santiago Block Watch $2,805.00 $2,805.00



25-065 Seven Palms Block Watch Council District 3 2025 7 PALMS BW EDUCATION AND SAFETY TECHNIQUES $14,750.00 $14,750.00



25-195 SEVENTH AVENUE MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION Council District 4 2025 BWG SAMA $14,985.00 $14,485.00



25-198 Shaw Butte Neighborhood Alliance Council District 3 2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-071 SHEABORHOOD BUSINESS ALLIANCE Council District 3 2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-169 Sienna Vista Council District 7 Sienna Vista - Quality of Life $14,995.00 $14,995.00



25-168 Sienna Vista / Santa Maria Middle School Council District 7 Santa Maria Wake-Up! Club $14,533.00 $14,533.00



25-164 Simpson Neighborhood Association Council District 4 Simpson Neighborhood 2025 Grant Application $14,945.00 $14,945.00



25-026 Simpson Neighborhood Association / Empower College Prep Council District 5 Empower Wake Up! Club $15,000.00 $15,000.00




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
278 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-132 Sky Harbor Association Council District 8 Building capacity to help our community $10,830.00 $10,830.00



25-183 South Mountain Block Watch Council District 8 Block Watch Group $14,600.00 $14,600.00



25-163 South Mountain Block Watch / Quest High School Council District 8 Conquerors Wake up $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-004 South Mountain Community Alliance (SOMCA) Council District 8 Promote Uniformity in Crime Prevention Education $14,468.00 $14,468.00


South Mountain High School Law Magnet Program / Safe Schools
25-155 Council District 7 'ACTS' Leadership and Mentoring $15,000.00 $15,000.00
Teen Court Network


25-077 South Mountain Village Clean and Beautiful / Jack L. Kuban School Council District 7 Kuban Wake Up! $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-140 St. Gregory Neighborhood Assoc Council District 4 St Gregory Neighborhood Assoc $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-036 SUNBURST FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Council District 1 Desert Foothills Wake Up! Club $14,996.00 $14,996.00



25-125 SUNBURST FARMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION Council District 1 Sunburst Farms Crime Prevention $8,951.00 $8,951.00



25-114 Sunnyslope High Schol Council District 3 2025 "Night Lights: After-Hours Library Program" $14,784.00 $14,784.00



25-084 Sunnyslope Historical Society and Museum Council District 3 2025 - 2026 Season $14,064.00 $14,064.00



25-083 Sunnyslope Village Alliance Council District 3 Sunnyslope Community Redevelopment $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-148 Target Area "B" / Phoenix Neighborhood Patrol (NSD#1985) Council District 8 Target Area B, PNP Education and Outreach Program 2025-26 $14,425.00 $14,425.00




5HVXOWVQRWRIILFLDOXQWLODSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLO
279 3DJHRI
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-103 Target Area "B" / Rider's Ranch Council District 8 2025 Equine Assisted Life Skills Program for At Risk Youth $14,950.00 $14,950.00



25-066 Tatum & Shea Action Area Master Block Watch Council District 3 Tatum and Shea Master Block Watch 2025 Grant $4,181.00 $4,181.00


TCCE Block Watch Second Year Secondary Grant Request with
25-081 Thunderbird Country Club Estates Block Watch / Future Stars Inc. Council District 8 $15,000.00 $14,500.00
Future Stars


Thunderbird Country Club Estates Block Watch / Phoenix Police
25-080 Council District 8 TCCE Block Watch Second Year Primary Grant Request $15,000.00 $14,850.00
Department Area 42


Tomahawk Village Block Watch / City of Phoenix Parks and
25-121 Council District 5 Tomahawk Village Block lets watch out for each others. $14,990.00 $14,990.00
Recreation PAC program


25-091 Trailside Point Block Watch Council District 7 Trailside Point General Community Crime Prevention and Safety $8,050.00 $8,050.00


Trailside Point Block Watch / Trailside Point Elementary
25-057 Council District 7 Trailside Point Block Watch/Trailside Point Wake Up! Program $14,950.00 $14,950.00
School/Performing Arts Academy


25-009 Tuscano Block Watch Council District 7 To keep our neighborhood Safe $14,440.00 $14,440.00



25-156 UNITY N.F.B. Council District 8 KWANZAA - Hermosa Park $8,775.00 $8,775.00



25-179 UNITY N.F.B. / Future Stars, Inc Council District 8 Unity N.F.B./Future Stars, Inc $14,895.00 $14,895.00



25-061 VALLE VENADO BLOCKWATCH Council District 3 Valle Venado Block Watch: Detect and Detour Crime $2,719.00 $2,719.00



25-100 VILLAGE MEADOWS CONCERNED CITIZENS NEIGH. ASSOC. Council District 1 Village Meadows ROCKS $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-137 Vista De Oeste 1 Block Watch Council District 5 Vista De Oeste Grant Application $13,370.00 $13,370.00




*Results not official until approved by City Council
280 Page 12 of 
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-074 Washington Park Neighborhood Association Council District 5 Collaborating to Deter Crime $14,885.00 $14,885.00



25-173 West Plaza Neighborhood Association Council District 5 Block Watch $14,725.00 $14,725.00



25-170 West Sunnyslope Neighborhood Association and Block Watch Council District 3 Collaboration $14,995.00 $14,995.00


West Sunnyslope Neighborhood Association and Block Watch / North
25-167 Council District 3 NMBA & West Sunnyslope Collaboration & Engagement $14,990.00 $14,990.00
Mountain Business Alliance


25-166 Western Enclave Council District 5 Western Enclave Blockwatch $9,226.00 $9,226.00


Western Enclave, Crime Free Multi-Housing Education and
25-177 Western Enclave / Phoenix Crime Free Multi-Housing Program Council District 5 $13,500.00 $13,500.00
Outreach Program 2025-26


25-003 Weston Park Block Watch - Weston Park/Grayson Square Council District 8 Personal Safety of Primary Concern $14,122.00 $14,122.00



25-161 Westwood Village & Estates Neighborhood Association Council District 4 Painting a Safer Westwood Together $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-124 WHITTON DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Council District 4 Whitton District Neighborhood Association $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-136 Willo Neighborhood Association Council District 1 Willo Neighborhood Association Block Watch Grant $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-093 Wilson Coalition / Wilson Elementary School Council District 8 Wilson Wake Up Club Grant $14,815.00 $14,815.00



25-149 Wilson Coalition / Wilson School District Council District 8 Wilson Community Involvement Project $15,000.00 $15,000.00



25-085 Woodlawn Park Neighborhood Association Council District 1 Block Watch Grant $14,924.00 $14,324.00




*Results not official until approved by City Council
281 Page 13 of 
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP) Funding Recommendations
Proposed by NBWGP Oversight Committee

Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award


25-162 Woodlea/Melrose Neighborhood Association Council District 4 WMNA Block Watch Grant 2025-26 $10,080.00 $10,080.00


2025 Woodridge Neighborhood Association Virtual Block Watch
25-068 Woodridge Neighborhood Association (WNA) Council District 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00
Launch

TOTAL FUNDING RECOMMENDATION $2,154,111.00




*Results not official until approved by City Council
282 Page 14 of 
2025 Neighborhood Block Watch Grant Program (NBWGP)
Not Recommended for Funding
Application City Council Amount Proposed
Applicant / Co-Applicant Project Title
Number District Requested Award

25-038 CAMELBACK COMMUNITY Council District 5 Camelback Safety and Engagement Project $8,076.00 $0.00

Lake Biltmore Block Watch / Shepherd of the Valley,
25-174 Council District 1 2025 LBBW & Shepherd of the Valley Wall Grant $15,000.00 $0.00
United Methodist Church

25-134 Las Casas Block Watch Council District 2 Las Casas Grant 2025 $765.00 $0.00


25-020 Riverwalk Villages Block Watch Council District 7 Block Watch and Safety Group $12,260.00 $0.00


25-154 Roots Life Unity in the Community LLC Council District 8 Roots Life Community Festivals $13,899.00 $0.00


25-092 Sierra Colina Block Watch Council District 7 Sierra Colina 2025-26 Solar & Flock Tools $13,300.00 $0.00


DENIED AWARD TOTAL $63,300.00 $0.00




*Results not official until approved by City Council
283 Page 32 of 32



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Auditorium Bleacher Systems Installation and Maintenance Contract - COOP 25-
0616 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-51923) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a cooperative
agreement with Norcon Industries, Inc. to provide auditorium bleacher seating systems
installation and maintenance services for the Parks and Recreation Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1,506,000.

Summary
This agreement will provide the Parks and Recreation Department with access to the
Mohave Educational Services Cooperative (MESC) Contract 24E-NOR1-1016. MESC
is an Arizona cooperative entity (Cooperative Agency). This adoption will ensure the
Department's ability to provide a wide range of products and repairs including
telescopic bleacher seating, telescopic platform seating, and fixed spectator seating
while leveraging cooperative pricing. These products and services are essential to the
operation of the Parks and Recreation Department gymnasiums and outdoor
recreation areas.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Alternative Competition. The MESC cooperative agreement
offers the best prices for Telescopic Bleacher Seating, Telescopic Platform Seating,
Fixed Spectator Seating Systems, and Repairs and aligns with the City's terms and
conditions. The agreement was awarded using a competitive process consistent the
City's procurement processes set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43. This
cooperative agreement is a procurement solution that offers competitive pricing by
utilizing a percentage off of the manufacturer's retail price list.

Contract Term
The agreement will begin on or about June 1, 2025, and will expire on October 16,
2029, with a one-year option to extend.





Financial Impact
The aggregate agreement value will not exceed $1,506,000 for the five-year and four-
month aggregate term. Funding is available in the Parks and Recreation Department's
operating and Capital Improvement Program budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Rolling List for Recreation Sports Officiating (Ordinance S-51941) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to establish a rolling list of
qualified recreation sports officials and enter into contracts with such officials to
provide sports officiating services for the Parks and Recreation Department. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
total cost of the contracts will not exceed $1,000,000 during the five-year term. There
is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
The Parks and Recreation Department (Parks) offers youth and adult sports leagues,
tournaments, and recreational programs to the community. Some of the activities
include basketball, soccer, softball, baseball, flag football, and volleyball. Establishing
a rolling list of qualified sports officials will enable prospective officials to apply through
an application process at any time during the year. After completing a process that
ensures officials meet minimum requirements, officials will be added to a rolling list for
use at Parks facilities. The rolling list may be amended by Parks at any time during the
five-year term.

Procurement Information
Officials will complete an application through the Parks process. Applications will be
evaluated and officials who meet all minimum requirements which include experience,
background checks, and insurance will enter into a Recreation Sports Officiating
Agreement with Parks.

With City Council's advanced authorization as provided in Phoenix City Code Section
43-2(B)(7), this rolling list of qualified officials is authorized to be excluded from the
scope of Phoenix City Code Chapter 43.

Contract Term
These contracts may be entered into for a maximum term of five years, beginning on
or about July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2030. Officials added to the rolling list after
July 1, 2025, must have a contract term that concludes no later than June 30, 2030.





Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the General Fund. Costs for officiating services are paid
from fees charged to program participants. The total cost of the contracts will not
exceed $1,000,000.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorize Additional Funding to Miscellaneous Building Repairs Contracts
(Ordinance S-51952) - Districts 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to add additional funding to
contracts with Andrus Properties, Inc. dba API General Contractors (Contract 159779);
CHASSE Building Team, Inc. (Contract 159778); DMS Companies, Inc. dba
Hernandez (Contract 159777); GCON, Inc. (Contract 159776); Haydon Companies,
LLC (Contract 159775); Sagebrush Restoration, LLC (Contract 159774); Skyline
Builders & Restoration, Inc. (Contract 159773); Tusk Developers LLC (Contract
159772); and Welch Companies, Inc. (Contract 159771) for the Parks and Recreation
Department. Further request the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available through the City's
General Obligation Bond program. The additional funding will not exceed $760,000.

Summary
These miscellaneous building repairs contracts provide commercial maintenance,
incidental building repairs, and tenant improvements repairs. The services are used on
an as-needed basis for urgent and planned projects for the Parks and Recreation
Department's facilities that require one-time, ongoing building repairs/improvements or
on-call emergency services.

The Planning and Development Department's Historic Preservation (HP) Office
obtained General Obligation (GO) Bond funding for repairs and improvements to
several of Parks and Recreation Department's historic buildings. This funding request
is to add HP's GO Bond funds to the existing Parks and Recreation contracts. The
additional funding is needed to perform improvements and repairs at multiple Heritage
Square facilities, which include replacing roofing, repairing porches, refinishing
hardwood floors, and repaving a parking lot. Additionally, the funding is needed to
restore windows at the Smurthwaite House at the Pioneer and Military Memorial Park.

Contract Term
The term of the contracts remain unchanged, which began December 1, 2023, for a
five-year term with one, two-year option to extend.





Financial Impact
The aggregate value for all contracts will not exceed $60.8 million. No General Funds
are requested. The additional funding is available in the Planning and Development
Department's Historic Preservation GO Bond budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
· Authorization to Add Funding for the Miscellaneous Building Repairs Contracts
(Ordinance S-51311) on October 2, 2024.
· Authorization to Enter Miscellaneous Building Repairs Contracts - PKS RFQu-
240080 (Ordinance S-50427) on December 13, 2023.

Location
Heritage Square, 115 N. 6th Street; and Smurthwaite House, 1400 W. Jefferson Street
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers John Chan and Alan Stephenson and
the Parks and Recreation and Planning and Development departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend the Development and Operating Agreements for 1101 N.
Central Avenue, with Prisma Community Care (Ordinance S-51902) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Development and
Operating Agreements (Contact No. 132389), and execute other agreements as
necessary (Agreements) with Prisma Community Care. This request is for the
continued operations, lease, and renovation of the City-owned parcel located at 1101
N. Central Avenue (Site). Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all
funds related to this item.

Summary
In March 2006, the City of Phoenix voters approved bonds, in part, for the purpose of
acquiring real estate, constructing, renovating, and equipping a center for HIV/AIDS
services. On July 7, 2010, Phoenix City Council approved Ordinance No. S-37273.
This Ordinance authorized the City Manager to enter into development and operating
agreements with the Southwest Center for HIV/AIDS, which has now changed their
business name to Prisma Community Care (Prisma). Additionally, in October 2010,
Ordinance No. 37464 was approved which authorized the City's acquisition of the Site
utilizing 2006 Bond Funds. Prisma and the City entered into their Agreements and the
facility has been operational since September 2013.

Prisma has been operating the facility, maintaining the Site, and providing care for the
community for more than 11 years with an operating budget of over $13 million.
However, the funding Prisma uses does not account for several major capital
improvements which are now needed. In July 2023, the City of Phoenix Public Works
Department completed a Facility Condition Assessment through a third-party
contractor which documented that more than $10 million in capital improvements were
needed for the Site over the next 20 years.

Prisma has brought quality community health care providers together under one roof,
in downtown Phoenix, and has maintained a tremendous level of community benefit to
the Phoenix residents. In order to continue providing these services at the Site, and
create the opportunity for Prisma to borrow against the leasehold interest of the Site
for the necessary capital improvements, staff propose the following business terms
and conditions:





· Within one year from City Council authorization, the parties will execute an
amendment to the Development and Operating Agreements which will convert
those agreements into a Lease.
· Prisma will continue to operate the Site with the same uses and conditions as in the
Operating Agreement incorporated into the Lease. Operations include providing the
community access to prevention, treatment, social services, wellness promotion,
and research services.
· Prisma shall have the right to continue its partnerships with its Sub-Operators.
· Prisma may use the leasehold interest of the Site for collateral, not to exceed $2.5
million at any given point in time, for capital improvements and deferred
maintenance, subject to City approval.
· If the City chooses to dispose of the Site in the future, Prisma would have a first
right to pursue a purchase of the Site from the City.

The Agreements will include other terms and conditions.

Contract Term
The Lease will have a maximum term of 99 years.

Financial Impact
Annual rent will be at a fair market value for the current Site use, and the tenant will be
credited for the improvement's value made to the Site. Additionally, credits from the
community benefits that are currently provided for in the Operating Agreement will be
transferred to the Lease. There will be no expense impact to the General Fund by this
action.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This project was originally approved on March 31, 2006 by the City of Phoenix voters
to use bond funds for the acquisition and development of the Site. Phoenix City
Council approved the Agreements on July 7, 2010.

Location
1101 N. Central Avenue
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Gina Montes and John Chan and the
Community and Economic Development and Human Services departments.






Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Marketing Services Contract - RFA PCC 24-0450 - Request for Award (Ordinance
S-51896) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a five-year
contract with the Greater Phoenix Convention and Visitors Bureau dba Visit Phoenix to
provide marketing services for the Phoenix Convention Center Department (PCCD).
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $89,980,167.

Summary
This contract will provide marketing services for the PCCD. Visit Phoenix delivers
marketing outreach and sales programs to attract citywide conventions, trade shows,
and tourism to the City of Phoenix. Additionally, Visit Phoenix works to attract and host
major events such as the National Basketball Association (NBA) All-Star Game and the
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Women’s Basketball Final Four.
PCCD's current five-year contract with Visit Phoenix expires on June 30, 2025.

Through this longstanding public-private partnership, Visit Phoenix has provided
marketing services for the Phoenix Convention Center (and its predecessor, Phoenix
Civic Plaza) since 1968, playing a vital role in attracting conventions and major events
to the city. Given the nature of PCCD’s business, Visit Phoenix is uniquely positioned
to market both the City of Phoenix and PCCD, driving tourism and economic impact.
Through strategic marketing and collaboration, Visit Phoenix strengthens the city’s
cultural and economic landscape. In Fiscal Year 1998-99, City Council approved the
funding formula for the Visit Phoenix contract, which remains based on 60 percent of
PCCD’s portion of Hotel/Motel Excise Tax collections, calculated using a three-year
rolling average, with five percent allocated to a PCCD Marketing Fund.

With this contract Visit Phoenix will establish defined goals, strategies, and
performance metrics in key areas such as convention sales, marketing, and visitor
services. In partnership with the City, Visit Phoenix will promote Phoenix as a premier
destination, with a focus on attracting conventions and trade shows, while also working
to increase bookings at the Phoenix Convention Center during non-peak periods. A
strategic sales approach will be implemented in alignment with the City’s priorities,
aimed at generating qualified sales leads on an annual basis. Additionally, the recently



established Phoenix Sports and Events Commission will operate as a division within
Visit Phoenix to proactively attract a wide range of youth, amateur and collegiate
tournaments plus arts, culture and music events that will deliver meaningful economic
and social outcomes to Phoenix residents, businesses, and organizations. This
agreement supports the City’s efforts to enhance economic impact through tourism,
conventions, and major events.

PCCD has worked with Visit Phoenix to secure and bid on future convention business
booked as far out as the year 2035, and is currently working with Visit Phoenix on the
execution of the 2026 NCAA Women’s Final Four and the 2027 NBA All-Star Game.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances Without Competition. In May 1998, the City Council established
and adopted terms and funding formula for future contracts with Visit Phoenix.
Entering into a contract was contingent upon several factors, including a five percent
allocation of the three-year rolling average for joint marketing efforts. Additionally, total
payments made in any contract year could not exceed the established funding formula
without Council approval. Visit Phoenix was also required to support efforts to attract
large conventions. The city was granted three voting seats and two ex-officio seats on
Visit Phoenix’s board of directors, and performance benchmarks were to be
established.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $89,980,167 over the five-year term of
the contract.

Funding is available in the Phoenix Convention Center Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Non-Exclusive Audio Visual, Equipment Rental and Exclusive Rigging Contract -
Request for Award (Ordinance S-51900) - Districts 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
AV Concepts, Inc., to provide non-exclusive audio visual, equipment rental, and
exclusive rigging services for the Phoenix Convention Center Department (PCCD).
Further request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept, and the City Controller to
disburse, all funds related to this item. The gross sales for the contract are estimated
to produce $22,769,467 over the five-year aggregate term, resulting in approximately
$7,790,000 in revenue to the City.

Summary
This contract will provide non-exclusive audio-visual and equipment rental services,
and exclusive rigging services, for event organizers and clients hosting events at the
Phoenix Convention Center.

Under the contract, the provider will supply equipment, setup, on-site technical
assistance, and ensure safe rigging operations for events such as conventions, trade
shows, and concerts. Exclusive services, limited to rigging and connections to the in-
house AV system, must adhere to the PCCD’s structural and safety guidelines. Non-
exclusive services, including AV rentals and support, remain open to market
competition. The contractor will collaborate closely with each client to assess needs,
prepare competitive proposals, including CAD drawings and visual renderings, and
secure bookings. Additionally, the provider will work with PCCD Sales and Marketing
staff, manage approved marketing materials, maintain current website content with
reciprocal links, and participate in promotional open houses as requested.

Approval of this contract is essential to ensure the Phoenix Convention Center meets
professional standards for AV production and rigging. Exclusive rigging services
guarantee safety, reduce liability, and ensure code compliant installations, critical
factors for the success and reputation of events hosted at the Phoenix Convention
Center.

Procurement Information
A Revenue Contract Solicitation was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix



Administrative Regulation 3.10.

One vendor submitted a response, and was evaluated after deemed to be responsive
and responsible.

The evaluation panel recommendations were reached by consensus in consideration
of published selection criteria with total points ranging from 0 - 1,000:

Operational Plan: 0-300 points
Firm History and Experience: 0-300 points
Equipment Inventory and Price Structure: 0-200 points
Commission Structure: 0-200 points

The following Proposer is selected for award:
AV Concepts, Inc. - 940 points

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The Contractor will pay to the PCCD as a monthly commission. The gross sales are
estimated to be $22,769,467 over the five-year aggregate term, resulting in
approximately $7,790,000 in revenue to the City.

Location
100 N. Third Street
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Theatrical Production Equipment Contracts - RFQu QVL PCC 24-0410 - Request
for Award (Ordinance S-51901) - Districts 7 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Barbizon Light of the Rockies, Inc.; Bluum USA, Inc.; Clearwing Systems Integration,
LLC; Ford Audio Video Systems, LLC; IES Communications, LLC; Inter Technologies
Corporation; LIT Lighting, LLC; and RTS Solutions, Inc. dba Solutionz, Inc. to provide
theatrical production equipment for the Phoenix Convention Center Department
(PCCD). Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $5,000,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide professional-grade theatrical production equipment such
as lighting fixtures, rigging hardware, control systems, and high-performance audio
components for both routine maintenance and replacement, as well as major
Theatrical Capital Improvement projects.

The equipment will support a wide range of live events, including theatrical
performances, concerts, and conferences held at the Phoenix Convention Center,
Symphony Hall, Orpheum Theatre, and Herberger Theater Center. This includes
maintaining existing systems, replacing outdated components, and enhancing
production capabilities to meet the evolving technical demands of touring productions
and rental clients. The equipment will also be integral to larger capital projects, and
include upgrading the assisted listening system, lighting control consoles, audio and
video infrastructure, and the lecture hall LED wall.

Providing advanced technical capabilities is essential to attracting and supporting
production and rental clients who rely on high-quality equipment for their events.
These venues consistently host local, national, and international productions that
require professional-grade, reliable technical systems.

Procurement Information
A Request for Qualifications procurement was processed in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10 to establish a Qualified Vendors List (QVL).




Eight offerors submitted qualifications and were deemed to be responsive and
responsible. An evaluation committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the
following minimum qualifications:

Minimum qualification one: Compliance with Requirements
Minimum qualification two: Product Offering
Minimum qualification three: Proposed Discounts

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following offerors:

· Barbizon Light of the Rockies, Inc.
· Bluum USA, Inc.
· Clearwing Systems Integration, LLC
· Ford Audio Video Systems, LLC
· IES Communications, LLC
· Inter Technologies Corporation
· LIT Lighting, LLC
· RTS Solutions, Inc. dba Solutionz, Inc.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about June 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts' value will not exceed $5,000,000.

Funding is available in the Phoenix Convention Center Department Operating and
Capital budgets.

Location
100 N. Third Street
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Phoenix
Convention Center Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance Report System for Fire Life and Safety
Contract - COOP 25-0576 Request for Award (Ordinance S-51897) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Brycer, LLC to provide Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance Report System for Fire
Life and Safety for the Fire Department. Further request to authorize the City Treasurer
to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item. This
contract is estimated to generate $2,500,000 in revenue over the term of the contract.

Summary
This contract will provide Brycer's compliance engine software to track fire prevention
system inspections, testing, and maintenance throughout the City of Phoenix, including
tracking and following up on deficiency reports. Fire Prevention is the inspection,
education, and enforcement division of the Phoenix Fire Department (PFD), providing
life safety services through fire code enforcement. One major component of protecting
Phoenix residents and businesses from a destructive fire or other life safety risks is the
regular inspection, testing and maintenance of fire protection systems. It is estimated
that more than 60,000 fire protection systems exist in Phoenix, and each one must be
evaluated and maintained properly. The Fire Code, which is based on nationally
adopted standards and has been codified by the Phoenix City Council, requires third-
party contractors to conduct these inspections and report life safety system
deficiencies to Phoenix Fire Prevention for appropriate follow-up and enforcement. The
Brycer inspection, testing, and maintenance reporting system will allow PFD to focus
on the required follow-up deficiencies that are reported by the third-party contractors.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances - Alternative Competition. The City of Tempe cooperative
agreement was established using a competitive process consistent with the City's
procurement processes set forth in the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43.

Contract Term
The contract will begin May 21, 2025, and continue until April 25, 2026, with four one-
year options to extend.




Financial Impact
This contract is estimated to generate an aggregate revenue of $2,500,000 for the City
over the contract term.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) - RFP 21-049 - Amendment - Fire
(Ordinance S-51956) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 154776 with Municipal Emergency Services (MES) Inc. for an assignment
from Municipal Emergency Services, Inc to MES Service Company, LLC, a
disregarded entity of MES I Acquisition Inc and to allow the Water Services
Department to utilize the contract for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA)
purchases, parts and related services. Further request to authorize the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. No additional funds are needed, request to
continue using Ordinance S-47804.

Summary
This contract provides SCBAs and related services to include annual inspection, fit-
testing, hydrostatic testing, preventative maintenance, repairs and parts for the
Phoenix Fire Department. By adding the Water Services Department to this contract, it
is a strategic addition that will allow them to access critical equipment, ensures
operational efficiency and streamlines the procurement process for their department.

Contract Term
The Contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $26,000,000, and no additional
funds are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA), Contract 154776 (Ordinance S-
47804) on July 1, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer and Phoenix Fire and Water Services departments.






Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Firefighter Equipment - RFP 24-0108-Amendment (Ordinance S-51913) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 162616 with Municipal Emergency Service, Inc., for an assignment from
Municipal Emergency Service, Inc. to MES Service Company, LLC, a disregarded
entity of MES I Acquisition Inc. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. No additional funds are needed, request to
continue using Ordinance S-51719.

Summary
This contract is one of 15 contracts was recently awarded to provide essential
firefighting equipment and other related products and services, including
extraction/attack tools, fire extinguishers, search and rescue equipment, apparel,
hoses, and personal protective equipment to various departments Citywide. By
providing cutting-edge solutions to the Fire Department, and various other
departments, these contracts will bolster the City's operational capabilities by enabling
effective responses to diverse emergencies and outfitting seven new fire stations with
required commodities to embark on service. These contracts allow access to products
and services required for the ongoing safety and well-being of both City staff and the
Phoenix community.

Since the contracts were approved in March 2025, one of the 15 entities changed
their name and tax identification number. Additional authorization is required as a
result of this change. The cumulative total of the 15 contracts will not exceed
$25,360,000 as originally approved in March.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on March 14, 2030.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contracts will not exceed $25,350,000, and no additional
funds are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:



· Firefighter Equipment, RFP 24-0108, Request for Awards (Ordinance S-51719) on
March 5, 2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton, Assistant City Manager Lori
Bays and the Finance and Fire departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fire Department Medical Direction Contract Extension (Ordinance S-51948) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 152101 with International Medical Direction LLC to extend the contract term
for one year for the provision of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Medical Direction
and related services for the Fire Department’s EMS Program. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditure will not exceed $567,779.

Summary
The Phoenix Fire Department (PFD) is required to have medical direction for the
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) program including its Emergency Medical
Technician (EMT) and Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic (EMT-P) programs.

The Medical Director is responsible for: establishing the overall medical direction for
patient care in accordance with state rules and regulations; establishing standards for
basic and advanced training; providing continuing education programs for all EMS
personnel; establishing appropriate medical protocols for all operational phases of the
basic and advanced life support programs; and establishing policy on the selection and
use of medications, supplies and medical equipment in coordination with the Fire
Department.

The Medical Director is also responsible for the management and coordination of
online direction to PFD paramedics and for providing oversight to other physicians that
may be used to provide medical direction to PFD paramedics while they are working in
the field.

In addition, the State of Arizona requires that any agency that provides medical
transport to patients (to the hospital) must have medical direction services. Only then
can an agency such as Phoenix Fire receive a “certificate of necessity” from the State
and provide emergency transportation (ambulance) services.

PFD requests an extension of the current Medical Direction contract for one year to
allow Finance time to complete the competitive procurement for a new Medical



Direction contract without interrupting operations.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract will be extended through June 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $567,779 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $2,815,168. Funds are available in the Fire Department’s
budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Fire Department Medical Direction, Ordinance S-46583 on May 6, 2020.
· Fire Department Medical Direction, Ordinance S-50011 on June 28, 2023.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Adopt Fire Department Computer Aided Dispatch Service Fees and Charges for
Fiscal Year 2025-26 (Ordinance S-51949) - Out of City

Request authorization for the City Manager to adopt the Fire Department's Fiscal Year
2025-26 Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) payments to be charged to: (1) the cities of
Avondale, Buckeye, Chandler, El Mirage, Glendale, Goodyear, Maricopa, Peoria,
Scottsdale, Surprise, Tempe, and Tolleson; (2) the fire districts of Buckeye Valley,
Daisy Mountain, Harquahala, and Sun City; (3) the Towns of Guadalupe and Paradise
Valley; (4) Arizona Fire and Medical Authority; and (5) Dignity Health. Further request
to authorize the City Treasurer to accept and for the City Controller to disburse these
funds.

Summary
The City Council approved agreements with each of the above jurisdictions, which
included CAD fees and charges to be updated regularly. Attachment A outlines Fiscal
Year 2025-26 CAD fees and charges. The City of Phoenix has Automatic and/or
Mutual Aid Agreements with these jurisdictions and provides dispatching for their fire
and emergency medical units. Each CAD member pays a dispatching fee for each call
dispatched, as well as charges for equipment and network maintenance.

Financial Impact
The General Fund revenue to be generated from these Intergovernmental Agreements
for Fiscal Year 2025-26 is estimated at $10,849,381.09 and is intended to offset a
portion of the operating costs of the City's Regional Dispatch Center, including salaries
of Dispatch Center staff. The $5,628,187 balance of the funds collected pays for
communications system and equipment maintenance and modernization.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.





Attachment A


Phoenix Fire Department
Fiscal Year 25-26 Projected Total CAD Revenues
Exhibit A Fees for Technical Services


CAD Partner Revenue
Arizona Fire & Medical Authority $949,995.34
City of Avondale $778,052.57
City of Buckeye $549,777.87
Buckeye Valley Fire District $531,614.13
City of Chandler $1,697,941.45
Daisy Mountain Fire District $473,484.30
City of El Mirage $248,684.27
City of Glendale $2,383,964.10
City of Goodyear $943,949.07
Town of Guadalupe $88,890.85
Harquahala Fire District $25,955.22
City of Maricopa $503,330.67
Town of Paradise Valley $131,404.37
City of Peoria $1,281,057.86
City of Scottsdale $2,559,616.37
Sun City Fire District $646,127.69
City of Surprise $1,068,092.48
City of Tempe $1,377,772.61
City of Tolleson $195,778.26
Dignity Health $42,078.61
Total FY 2024/2025 $16,477,568.09







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Pay Public Safety Personnel Retirement System for FY2025-26
Police Sworn Cancer Insurance Coverage (Ordinance S-51920) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to make a payment to the
Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (PSPRS) in the amount of $121,500 to
purchase cancer insurance for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 for the sworn personnel of the
Police Department. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item.

Summary
The Fire Fighter Cancer Insurance Policy Program (FFCIPP) was established in 1997.
The FFCIPP offers supplemental cancer insurance for firefighters, helping to offset
additional costs if a firefighter is diagnosed with cancer after enrollment. The insurance
is administered under the PSPRS. In 2007, HB2268 changed the name of the Fire
Fighter Cancer Insurance Policy Program to the Fire Fighter and Peace Officer Cancer
Insurance Policy Program and extended coverage to certified peace officers under this
program.

Financial Impact
The cost for FY2025-26 is $50 per peace officer. This item requests authorization to
pay up to $121,500. The payment will provide cancer insurance coverage for Police
sworn personnel for FY 2025-26. Funds are available in the Police Department's
budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Solid Waste and Recycling Collection and Transport Equipment with Related
Equipment, Supplies, and Accessories - COOP-20-053 (Ordinance S-51905) -
Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures under Contract 154568 with Anco Sanitation Systems, Inc, for the
purchase of solid waste and recycling collection and transport equipment with related
equipment, supplies, and accessories for the Aviation Department. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional
expenditures will not exceed $550,000.

Summary
The Aviation Department requires containers, balers, and compactors to be staged
throughout Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, and
Phoenix Goodyear Airport to contain trash and recyclable materials for proper disposal
and recycling of the collected waste. Additional funding is requested to replace
containers, balers, and compactors as necessary.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on April 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $550,000 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract
will not exceed $850,000.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:

· Solid Waste and Recycling Collection and Transport Equipment with Related
Equipment, Supplies, and Accessories - Requirements contract 150083 (Ordinance
S-47593)

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.




Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Badging Supplies Contract IFB 24-0460 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-51909)
- Districts 1, 8 & Out of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
ThermalPrint, LLC; ID Card Consultants, LLC; and B2B Holdings, Inc. to provide
badging supplies for the Aviation, Fire, Municipal Court, Police, Public Transit, and
Water Services departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The combined total value of the contracts will be
up to $3,366,000.

Summary
This contract will provide badging supplies for City employees and contractors.
Badging supply items include, but are not limited to lanyards, badge holders, printing
supplies (i.e., printer film, ribbons, and cleaning kits), ID card stock, proximity cards,
and re-validation stickers. These items are essential for the security access of City
employees and contractors. Badging supplies must be readily available to permit
necessary access to secured work areas.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative
Regulation 3.10.

Six vendors submitted bids covering four groups. Group 1 - Badging Accessories -
Core Items; Group 2 - Badge Print Supplies; Group 3 - ID Cards; and Group 4 - Badge
Revalidation Stickers. Four vendors have been deemed to be responsive to posted
specifications and responsible for providing the required goods. Following an
evaluation based on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following
vendors:

Selected Bidder Group 1
ThermalPrint, LLC

Selected Bidder Group 2
ThermalPrint, LLC




Selected Bidder Group 3
ID Card Consultants, LLC

Selected Bidder Group 4
B2B Holdings, Inc.

Contract Term
Each contract will begin on or about June 1, 2025, for a three-year term with two one-
year options, which may be exercised at the sole discretion of the Aviation Director, to
extend for a total five-year contract.

Financial Impact
The combined total value of the contracts will be up to $3,366,000 for the total five-
year contract term.

Funding is available in the Aviation, Fire, Municipal Court, Police, Public Transit, and
Water Services departments' operating budgets.

Location
Council Districts: 1, 8 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays, Deputy City Managers
Ginger Spencer and Mario Paniagua, Phoenix Municipal Court, and the Aviation, Fire,
Police, Public Transit and Water Services departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aviation Department Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure - Engineering
Services - AV09000103 (Ordinance S-51922) - Districts 1, 8 & Out of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with RS&H, Inc. to provide Engineering Services that include programming, schematic
design, and possible construction administration and inspection services for the
Aviation Department Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure project. Further request
authorization to execute amendments to the agreement as necessary within the
Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller
to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $400,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide modern and sustainable Electric Vehicle (EV)
charging infrastructure for vehicles and associated equipment for the City of Phoenix
Aviation Department. The EV charging infrastructure will be utilized at all Aviation
campuses including Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, Phoenix Deer Valley and
Phoenix Goodyear Airports. The infrastructure design shall align with Aviation goals in
sustainability, resiliency, and applicable key performance indicators.

RS&H, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: identify and provide EV charging
locations for EV vehicles and equipment in multiple locations; identify and provide
separate recommendations focused on Aviation Fleet and public use EV charging
infrastructure; identify and provide EV charging capacity needs (existing and future);
identify and provide options for Level 3 and Level 2 chargers that are open protocol;



identify and provide electrical requirements including electrical service entrance
sections by location, based on needs; identify and provide options for EV infrastructure
monitoring systems that tracks capacity, metering, usage, access control, and trends
analysis with dashboards, graphics, and other elements; recommend and provide
preliminary system specifications and anticipated production statistics; recommend
and provide an optimized EV infrastructure for maximum energy savings and
resiliency; recommend and provide design that includes consideration for future
infrastructure and upgrades where applicable; and recommend and provide
preliminary requirements for all anticipated/associated structural, electrical,
mechanical, technology, Fire/Life/Safety/Security, and civil design work as required.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Eight firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: RS&H, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.
Rank 3: NV5, Inc.
Rank 4: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Rank 5: GLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Rank 6: Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.
Rank 7: Affiliated Engineers, Inc.
Rank 8: Wright Engineering Corporation

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for RS&H, Inc. will not exceed $400,000, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program


budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport -2485 E. Buckeye Road
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, Arizona
Council Districts: 1, 8, and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, the City Engineer and the Aviation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Additional Expenditure for Cyclone Equipment, Parts, Accessories, and Repair
Services (Ordinance S-51931) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to allow additional
expenditures to Contract 154775 with Cyclone Technology, LLC (Cyclone) for the
purchase of equipment, equipment upgrades, and parts and repair services on the
existing runway rubber, paint and coating remover, and hard surface cleaners at
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditure will be
up to $650,000.

Summary
The additional expenditure will support the replacement of one piece of Cyclone
equipment, model 4006ST, a fully self-contained, high-efficiency system designed for
runway rubber, paint, and coating removal. Acquiring this equipment will serve as a
crucial backup during periods of downtime of the original equipment, ensuring
uninterrupted paint and rubber removal operations on runways and minimizing delays
caused by equipment repairs or servicing.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on May 31, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $650,000 in additional funds, the revised value of the contract will be
up to $1,350,000 for the remaining contract term.

Funds are available in the Aviation Department’s budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action

The City Council previously reviewed this request:

· Equipment, Parts Supply, and Services Contract #154775 (Ordinance S-47553) on
May 19, 2021.




Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning Filter Parts, Installation, and Services
Contract IFB 25-0518 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-51943) - Districts 1, 8 &
Out of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
American Air Filter Company Inc. dba AAF International to provide Heating, Ventilation,
and Air Conditioning Filter Parts, Installation, and Services for the Aviation Department.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contract will be up to $2,625,000.

Summary
This contract will provide heating, ventilation, and air conditioning filter parts,
installation, and services for Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX), and its
surrounding Aviation-owned properties, Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT), and
Phoenix Goodyear Airport (GYR).

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative
Regulation 3.10.

Four vendors submitted bids. Three vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive
to posted specifications and responsible to provide the required goods and services.
Following an evaluation based on price, the procurement officer recommends award to
the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
American Air Filter Company Inc. dba AAF International.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2025, for a total five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The contract value will be up to $2,625,000 for the total five-year contract term.




Funding is available in the Aviation Department's operating budget.

Location
· Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road;
· Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, 702 W. Deer Valley Road; and
· Phoenix Goodyear Airport, 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, AZ.
Council Districts: 1, 8, and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
NAPA Fleet Related Maintenance Equipment and Supplies Contract COOP 25-
0562 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-51945) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a cooperative
agreement with Genuine Parts Company dba NAPA Auto Parts to provide fleet-related
maintenance equipment, supplies and inventory management for the Aviation
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $1,500,000.

Summary
This contract will provide fleet-related maintenance equipment, supplies, and inventory
management for the Aviation Department. The Aviation Department, Facilities and
Services Division, owns and operates Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport,
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport, and Phoenix Goodyear Airport. The Facilities and
Services Division is responsible for maintenance of the Airports’ fleet of vehicles and
maintaining inventory of needed equipment for parts, supplies, and consumables. This
contract is needed to improve operations by maintaining inventories of equipment and
replacement parts, which will reduce vehicle down time and provide inventory space.
The contract will increase parts process efficiencies through reductions in invoicing
and will provide significant reductions in costs through wholesale pricing, rebates, and
decreased delivery costs. Other benefits include coverage of all operating hours,
providing inventory space, and performance reporting and training. Over 90 percent of
standard parts are delivered no later than the next business day.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstances, Alternative Competition. Sourcewell is a Minnesota state
government entity that serves government, education, and non-profit organizations
nationwide with a cooperative purchasing program. The contract was awarded through
a competitive process consistent with the City's procurement processes, as set forth in
the Phoenix City Code, Chapter 43. The Aviation Department will be able to leverage
the use of the Sourcewell cooperative Contract 110520-GPC.





Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about June 24, 2025, for a six-month term with an option
to extend for one year.

Financial Impact
The total contract value will not exceed $1,500,000. Funding is available in the Aviation
Department's operating budget.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road, Phoenix, AZ 85034
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Jet Fuel Remediation and Technical Dispute Environmental Consulting Services
Contract RFP 24-0328 Request for Award (Ordinance S-51946) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. to provide Jet Fuel Remediation and Technical Dispute
Environmental Consulting Services for the Aviation Department. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
the contract will be up to $250,000.

Summary
Through this contract, Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. will provide jet fuel remediation and
technical dispute environmental consulting services for the Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport. In the future, the City may develop infrastructure in the footprint of
areas remediated by the Airport Fueling Facilities Corporation and the City requires
support to avoid potential construction conflicts, costs, or delays.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Two vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An evaluation
committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria with a
maximum possible point total of 1,000:

Method of Approach to Scope of Work: 0-300 points
Qualifications and Experience of Consulting Staff: 0-275 points
Firm Qualifications and Experience: 0-225 points
Fee Schedule: 0-200 points

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:

Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., 835 points





Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2025, for a three-year term with two one-
year options to extend, which may be exercised at the sole discretion of the Aviation
Director, for a total five-year contract term.

Financial Impact
The contract value will be up to $250,000 for the total five-year contract term.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action

The Business and Development Subcommittee:
· Recommended approval of this item, by a vote of 4-0, on April 3, 2025; and

The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board:
· Recommended approval of this item, by a vote of 7-0, on April 17, 2025.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Right of Entry and Access Agreement with Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality and Arcadis U.S., Inc. (Ordinance S-51951) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Right of Entry
and Access Agreement with Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) and
Arcadis U.S., Inc. at City of Phoenix-owned property located at 3039 and 3051 East
Washington Street.

Summary
ADEQ has hired Arcadis U.S., Inc. as its contractor to perform remedial investigation
activities to determine the degree and extent of contamination in subsurface soil and
groundwater beneath the private property located at 3027 East Washington Street in
Phoenix, Arizona (Joray Site). ADEQ and Arcadis U.S., Inc. requests to enter into a
new Right of Entry and Access Agreement for five years with a one-year option to
extend.

Contract Term
The primary term of the Agreement will be for five years which will commence on
August 1, 2025 and will extend to July 31, 2030. Provisions of the contract include a
one-year option to extend, which may be exercised at the sole discretion of the
Aviation Director.

Financial Impact
This is a non-revenue generating contract. There are no costs associated with the
Agreement or any of the activities described in the Agreement.

Location
3039 and 3051 East Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Aviation
Department







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Transit Facilities Maintenance - PTD25-002 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-
51934) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
ABM Industry Group, LLC to provide facilities maintenance services at multiple transit
facilities for the Public Transit Department. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of this contract will
not exceed $22,500,000 over five years.

Summary
ABM Industry Group, LLC will be responsible for facility maintenance services for city-
owned transit properties, including three transit operating garages, one office building,
four transit centers, and eight park-and-ride locations. The contractor will be
responsible for all facilities’ maintenance, repairs, and preventative maintenance,
including those for electrical systems, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning,
elevators, plumbing, fluid and fuel system maintenance and dispensing, and fire safety
and special systems. Many Public Transit-owned sites are federally funded and require
compliance with the Federal Transit Administration's Transit Asset Management
requirements. Having a dedicated maintenance firm for transit sites ensures
compliance with these federal requirements as well as responsiveness to the continual
operations at Public Transit's multiple operating garages.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposals was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Three vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive. An evaluation committee of
qualified City and tenant staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria,
with a maximum possible point total of 1,000 points:

Method of Approach (400 points)
Qualifications and Experience (200 points)
Tracking and Reporting Capabilities (200 points)
Price Proposal (200 points)




After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:

ABM Industry Group, LLC (851 points)

Contract Term
The term of this contract will commence on or about July 1, 2025, for a period of five
years.

Financial Impact
The contract value will not exceed $22,500,000. Funding is available in the Public
Transit Department's Operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Transit
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 4 Fire Pump and Service
Entrance Section Replacement - Professional Services - AV21000107 (Ordinance
S-51907) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with SmithGroup, Inc. to provide Professional Services that include design and
construction administration and inspection services for the Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport Terminal 4 Fire Pump and Service Entrance Section Replacement
project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will
not exceed $250,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads, and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to replace and upgrade the Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport Terminal 4 processor main fire pump and connected service
entrance section to support existing and new fire pump loads and to ensure
compliance with current electrical code requirements.

As part of the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 4 South 1 Concourse
project, SmithGroup, Inc. prepared a study of the existing Terminal 4 fire protection
system and found the existing fire pump serving Terminal 4 would benefit from an
upgrade.




SmithGroup, Inc. was selected as the Architect of Record for the design phase of the
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 4 Fire Pump and Service Entrance
Section Replacement project due to their unique knowledge of the proposed work.
Design work included an upgrade to the electrical service to accommodate the fire
pump upgrade.

Modifications to the original design for the electrical service are now required based on
collaboration with Arizona Public Service. SmithGroup, Inc. and its subconsultants
have become very familiar with the requirements and operations of Phoenix Sky
Harbor International Airport Terminal 4 fire protection system, electrical service, and
operations of the facility. The knowledge base SmithGroup, Inc. allows for minimal
impacts to the project timeline and service areas while completing this additional work
and is essential moving into the construction phase of this project.

SmithGroup, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: design modifications;
construction administration and inspection services; and other tasks as assigned for a
complete project.

Procurement Information
SmithGroup, Inc. was chosen for this project using a Direct Select process set forth in
Section 34-103 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). The Direct Select process
reduces the time to procure professional services as opposed to an advertised
selection process; meeting the project deadline, ensuring continuity and the most
efficient use of staff and funding resources.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for SmithGroup, Inc. will not exceed $250,000, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program. The
Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve funding
availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up to
agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.




Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Architectural Services Agreement 155909 (Ordinance S-48324) on February 16,
2022.

Location
3400 E. Sky Harbor Boulevard
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Purchase of All-Terrain Vehicles, Utility Vehicles, and Golf Carts Contract - IFB
25-FSD-035 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-51914) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contract with
RumbleOn, Inc. dba RideNow Powersports to provide All-Terrain Vehicles, Utility
Vehicles, and Golf Carts for the Public Works Department. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the
contract will not exceed $2,000,000.

Summary
This contract will provide All-Terrain Vehicles (ATV's) and Utility Vehicles (UV's) in
providing versatile transportation and operations support across various departments.
These vehicles enhance the efficiency of emergency response teams by enabling
access to areas that a standard vehicle cannot reach. ATV's and UV's are beneficial
for maintaining parks and trails, navigating through rough terrain during inspections,
repairs, and supporting emergency services in off-road rescue situations. Their
compact size and maneuverability allow city personnel to respond quickly to incidents,
transport equipment, and conduct essential maintenance without disrupting public
spaces. Investing in ATV's and UV's improves the City's ability to provide timely and
effective services by increasing operations' flexibility and safety for employees.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Four bidders submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
RumbleOn, Inc. dba RideNow Powersports:
Polaris Ranger Crew SP570 - $12,729.60
Polaris Ranger Crew SP570 Premium - $14,799.60
Polaris Sportsman XP 1000 - $15,249.60
Polaris Ranger XP Crew - $21,099.60




Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about June 1, 2025, for a three-year term with two one-
year options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $2,000,000.

Funding is available in the Public Works Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Mario Paniagua and the Public Works
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Section 36-158, Schedule I, Local Speed Limits at 15
Locations (Ordinance G-7389) - Citywide

Request to amend Phoenix City Code, Section 36-158, Schedule I, Local Speed Limits
due to local speed limit changes at 15 locations.

Summary
Speed limits are established under Arizona Revised Statutes, Section 28-703, which
requires an engineering study and traffic investigation. The Phoenix City Code and
Charter require that all changes to local speed limits on City streets be approved by
Attachment A.

The Street Transportation Department conducted a comprehensive review of the
speed limit ordinance and is recommending local speed limit changes at 15 locations,
as summarized in Attachment B. Twelve changes are related to road and traffic
conditions, one change is for a newly constructed roadway segment and two changes
are for record keeping purposes, where speed limits posted on city streets do not
match the speed limits included in the current ordinance. As with all recommended
speed limit changes, these changes are based on traffic investigations coupled with
the engineering judgment of Street Transportation Department staff.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Proposed changes to Phoenix City Code, Section 36-158, Section I, Local Speed
Limits will be submitted to the Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning
Subcommittee for recommendation to City Council on May 21, 2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Street
Transportation Department.





Attachment A



ARTICLE XII. PENALTY AND SCHEDULES

36-158 Schedule I—Local speed limits.

It is hereby determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed limit
permitted by state law on the following streets or intersections is greater or less than is reasonable
under existing conditions, and it is hereby declared that the maximum speed limits shall be as
hereinafter set forth on those streets, parts of streets or intersections herein designated at the times
specified when signs are erected giving notice thereof.

The City Traffic Engineer may declare a maximum speed limit that is determined pursuant to this
section to be effective at all times or at such times as indicated on the speed limit signs. The City Traffic
Engineer may establish lower speed limits for different times of day, different types of vehicles, varying
weather conditions, special events, work zones for construction, maintenance or other activity in the
roadway and other factors bearing on safe speeds. The lower limits are effective when posted on
appropriate fixed, variable or portable signs.


Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Acoma Drive 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Acoma Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 23rd Avenue

Acoma Drive 36th Street to 40th Street

Acoma Drive Tatum Boulevard to 64th Street

Arroyo Norte Drive Northbound I-17 Frontage Road to 3900 West

Beardsley Road 32nd Street to 34th Street

Butler Drive 39th Avenue to 27th Avenue

Butler Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue

Campbell Avenue 71st Avenue to 51st Avenue

Campbell Avenue 113th Avenue to 107th Avenue




Page 1
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Campbell Avenue 35th Avenue to 15th Avenue

Campbell Avenue 12th Street to 16th Street

Campbell Avenue 20th Street to 44th Street

Canterbury Drive Thunderbird Road to Tam-O-Shanter Drive

Cashman Drive Pinnacle Peak Road to 44th Street

Central Avenue Liberty Lane to Chandler Boulevard

Central Avenue Lincoln Street to Madison Street

Central Avenue Grovers Avenue to Union Hills Drive

Chauncey Lane 68th Street to Scottsdale Road

Cholla Street 24th Street to Tatum Boulevard

CHOLLA STREET 24TH STREET TO 32ND STREET

CHOLLA STREET 40TH STREET TO TATUM BOULEVARD

Clarendon Avenue 55th Avenue to Maryvale Parkway

Colter Street 16th Street to SR-51

Copperhead Trail North Valley Parkway to Gambit Trail

Copperhead Trail West of 14th Lane Traffic Circle to Gambit Trail

Coral Gables Drive Thunderbird Road to 7th Street

Deem Hills Parkway 51st Avenue to Stetson Valley Parkway

Deer Valley Drive 1,200 feet west of 35th Avenue to 35th Avenue

Desert Willow Parkway East Dixileta Drive to Dynamite Boulevard

Desert Willow Parkway West 30200 North Cave Creek Road to 31000 North Cave Creek Road



Page 2
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Dove Valley Road 52nd Place to 56th Street

Dunlap Avenue 7th Street to 12th Street

Durango Street 67th Avenue to 63rd Avenue

Elwood Street 40th Street to 48th Street

Encanto Boulevard 93rd Avenue to 91st Avenue

Encanto Boulevard 75th Avenue to 73rd Avenue

Encanto Boulevard 71st Avenue to 51st Avenue

Encanto Boulevard 49th Avenue to 31st Avenue

Encanto Boulevard Grand Avenue to 19th Avenue

Freemont Road Rough Rider Road to Cashman Drive

100 Feet +/- North of East Papago Park to Traffic Circle at
Galvin Parkway
Botanical Garden Entrance

Grand Ave 7th Avenue to 15th Avenue

Greenway Road 20th Street to Cave Creek Road

Grovers Avenue 51st Avenue to 27th Avenue

Grovers Avenue Central Avenue to Cave Creek Road

Hatcher Road 19th Avenue to 12th Street

Highland Avenue Campbell Avenue to 107th Avenue

Highland Avenue 16th Street to 24th Street

HILLCREST WAY I-17 FRONTAGE ROAD TO 39TH LANE

Illini Street 30th Street to Riverpoint Parkway




Page 3
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Inspiration Mountain
Stetson Valley Parkway to Stetson Valley Parkway
Parkway

Jefferson Street 27th Avenue to 23rd Avenue

Jefferson Street 7th Avenue to 4th Avenue

Jesse Owens Parkway Central Avenue to 7th Street

Jones Avenue 103rd Avenue to 99th Avenue

Kelton Lane 29th Avenue to 28th Avenue

Knox Road Warpaint Drive to 36th Street

Lafayette Boulevard 44th Street to 64th Street

Lakewood Parkway West 3300 East to 3600 East to 17000 South to 15800 South

Lakewood Parkway East 3600 East to 3800 East to 17000 South to 15800 South

Liberty Lane 17th Avenue to Central Avenue

Lindner Drive (West Section) 45th Avenue to Augusta North

Lindner Drive (East Section) 45th Avenue to Grovers Avenue

Lockwood Drive Freemont Road to Cashman Drive

Marriott Drive Pathfinder Drive to Deer Valley Drive

Maryland Avenue 43rd Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway

Maryland Avenue Central Avenue to 16th Street

Maryvale Parkway 51st Avenue to Indian School Road

Missouri Avenue 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue

Missouri Avenue Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue




Page 4
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Mohave Street 7th Avenue to 7th Street

Morningside Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 21st Avenue

Morten Avenue 16th Street to 1900 East

Mountain View Road 23rd Avenue to 19th Avenue

Mountain View Road 12th Street to 17th Street

Mountain View Road 32nd Street to 36th Street

Northern Avenue 26th Street to 32nd Street

North Valley Parkway Carefree Highway to 33rd Lane

Oak Street 16th Street to 44th Street

Oak Street 48th Street to 52nd Street

Oak Street (Eastbound) 56th Street to 64th Street

Olympic Drive Central Avenue to Jesse Owens Parkway

Orangewood Avenue 43rd Avenue to 19th Avenue

Osborn Road 83rd Avenue to 75th Avenue

Osborn Road 73rd Avenue to Grand Avenue

Osborn Road Black Canyon Freeway to 7th Avenue

Osborn Road 40th Street to 56th Street

Paradise Lane 7th Street to 16th Street

Paradise Lane Tatum Boulevard to 56th Street

Paradise Lane 47th Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Pathfinder Drive 44th Street to Marriott Drive




Page 5
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Piedmont Road 48th Street to 51st Street

Pinnacle Vista Drive Pyramid Peak Parkway to Inspiration Mountain Parkway

Pinnacle Vista Drive 52nd Street to 56th Street

Pointe Golf Club Drive Thunderbird Road to Sharon Drive

Princess Drive 68th Street Scottsdale Road

Quail Track Drive North Valley Parkway to Copperhead Trail

Ranger Drive Tatum Boulevard to 55th Street

Riverpoint Parkway Wood Street to Illini Street

Roeser Road 7th Avenue to Central Avenue

Roeser Road 40th Street to 48th Street

Roosevelt Street 57th Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Roosevelt Street 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue

Roosevelt Street 33rd Avenue to 27th Avenue

Roosevelt Street 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Roosevelt Street Central Avenue to 16th Street

Rose Garden Lane 29th Avenue to 19th Avenue

Rough Rider Road Black Mountain Boulevard to 40th Street

Sells Drive 79th Drive to 71st Drive

Sky Crossing Way Deer Valley Road to Black Mountain Boulevard

SR-51 (East Access Road) 500 Feet North of Camelback Road to Colter Street

Stanford Drive 40th Street to 44th Street




Page 6
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Stetson Hills Loop 43rd Avenue to 39th Drive

Sweetwater Avenue 51st Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway

Sweetwater Avenue Cave Creek Road to 42nd Street

Sweetwater Avenue Paradise Valley Parkway East to Scottsdale Road

Thunderbird Road 28th Street to 32nd Street

Trailblazer Drive 44th Street to Tatum Boulevard

University Drive 24th Street to Magnolia Street (2700 East)

Utopia Road 23rd Avenue to 19th Avenue

Van Buren Street 7th Street to 16th Street

Via Del Deserto 33rd Lane to Via Puzzola

Via Puzzola Carefree Highway to Cloud Road

Via Tramonto Carefree Highway to Via Vista

Via Vista 27th Avenue to Via Tramonto

Vineyard Road 47th Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Virginia Avenue 35th Avenue to 27th Avenue

Virginia Avenue Central Avenue to 7th Street

Warpaint Drive Knox Road to Coconino Street

Washington Street 7th Avenue to 4th Avenue

Wier Avenue 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue

Winchcomb Drive 26th Avenue to Acoma Drive (2300 West)

Wood Street Riverpoint Parkway to University Drive




Page 7
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

1st Avenue Grant Street to Roosevelt Street

3rd Avenue Thomas Road to Osborn Road

3rd Street Monroe Street to Indian School Road

4th Street 5th Street crossover to Roosevelt Street

5th Street Van Buren Street to 5th Street Crossover

5th Street Crossover 5th Street to Fillmore Street

7th Avenue Jackson Street to Van Buren Street

7th Avenue Coral Gables Drive to Greenway Parkway

7th Street Jefferson Street to Van Buren Street

11th Avenue Greenway Parkway to Bell Road

11th Street Washington Street to Moreland Street

12th Street Vineyard Road to Southern Avenue

12th Street Moreland Street to Thomas Road

12th Street Osborn Road to Mountain View Road

12th Street Bell Road to Agua Fria Freeway

15th Avenue 0.25 miles south of Magnolia Street to Northern Avenue

15th Avenue Hatcher Road to Shangri-La Road

15th Avenue Bell Road to Grovers Avenue

15th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Utopia Road

16th Street Grovers Avenue to Beardsley Road

18th Street Camelback Road to 500 Feet North of Camelback Road




Page 8
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

19th Avenue Olney Avenue to Dobbins Road

20th Street Dobbins Road to Baseline Road

20th Street Roeser Road to Broadway Road

20th Street Jefferson Street to Roosevelt Street

20th Street McDowell Road to Cambridge Avenue

20th Street Greenfield Road to Highland Avenue

20th Street Missouri Avenue to Bethany Home Road

21st Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive

23rd Avenue Indian School Road to Glendale Road

23rd Avenue Orangewood Avenue to Dunlap Avenue

23rd Avenue Acoma Drive to Greenway Road

23rd Avenue Union Hills Drive to Utopia Road

24th Street South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road

24th Street Shea Boulevard to Sweetwater Avenue

26th Avenue Thunderbird Road to Acoma Drive

26th Street SR-51 to Shea Boulevard

27th Avenue Rose Garden Lane to Deer Valley Drive

27th Drive Carefree Highway to Via Vista

28th Street Cholla Street to Thunderbird Road

28th Street Oak Street to Camelback Road

28th Avenue 29th Avenue to Kelton Lane



Page 9
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

29th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Kristal Way

29th Avenue Beardsley Road to Rose Garden Lane

31st Avenue Van Buren Street to Encanto Boulevard

31st Avenue Thomas Road to Grand Avenue

31st Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road

31st Avenue Missouri Avenue to Orangewood Avenue

31st Avenue Northern Avenue to Dunlap Avenue

31st Avenue Cheryl Drive to Thunderbird Road

31st Avenue Bell Road to Kristal Way

31st Avenue Yorkshire Drive to Beardsley Road

32nd Street 750 Feet South of Beautiful Lane to Baseline Road

32nd Street Deer Valley Road to Sky Crossing Way

32nd Street Puget Avenue to Mountain View Road

33rd Lane North Valley Parkway to Via Del Deserto

36th Street Ranch Circle North to Suncrest Court

36th Street Roeser Road to Broadway Road

36th Street McDowell Road to Camelback Road

36th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard

36th Street Cactus Road to Greenway Road

39th Avenue Van Buren Street to Osborn Road

39th Avenue Missouri Avenue to Camino Acequia




Page 10
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

39th Avenue Peoria Avenue to Cactus Road

39th Avenue Bell Road to Yorkshire Drive

40th Street University Drive to 0.25 Miles North of University Drive

43rd Avenue Olney Avenue to Dobbins Road

44th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard

44th Street Ray Road to Warner-Elliot Loop

44th Street Paradise Village Parkway North to Bell Road

44th Street Deer Valley Drive to Cashman Drive

45th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive

46th Street Paradise Village Parkway North to Thunderbird Road

47th Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road

47th Avenue Thomas Road to Camelback Road

47th Avenue Thunderbird Road to Greenway Road

47th Avenue Acoma Drive to Bell Road

48th Street Pecos Park Entrance to Frye Road

48th Street Elwood Street to University Drive

48th Street Van Buren Street to McDowell Road

48th Street Cholla Street to Paradise Village Parkway South

50th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard

51st Street Elliot Road to Piedmont Road

52nd Place Rancho Paloma Drive to Dove Valley Road




Page 11
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

52nd Street Thomas Road to Osborn Road

52nd Street Cholla Street to Cactus Road

52nd Street Thunderbird Road to Bell Road

52nd Street Jomax Road to Pinnacle Vista Drive

53rd Avenue Maryvale Parkway to Indian School Road

55th Avenue McDowell Road to Camelback Road

55th Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Alameda Road

56th Street Mountain View Road to Shea Boulevard

59th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road

60th Street Desert Cove Avenue to Cholla Street Alignment

60th Street Cactus Road to Bell Road

63rd Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Pima Street

63rd Avenue Thomas Road to Osborn Road

63rd Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road

65th Avenue 2500 feet +/- south of to Dobbins Road

68th Street Princess Drive to Mayo Boulevard

70th Street Princess Drive to Mayo Boulevard

71st Avenue Van Buren Street to Roosevelt Street

71st Avenue McDowell Road to Indian School Road

71st Avenue Campbell Avenue to Camelback Road

71st Drive Indian School Road to Sells Drive




Page 12
Table A. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

71st Street Kierland Boulevard to Sandra Terrace

79th Drive Osborn Road to Sells Drive

80th Lane Thomas Road to Osborn Road

93rd Avenue Encanto Boulevard to Thomas Road

95th Avenue McDowell Road to Encanto Boulevard

103rd Avenue Broadway Road to Country Place Boulevard

103rd Avenue Indian School Road to Campbell Avenue

111th Avenue Campbell Avenue to Camelback Road




Table A1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on School Days.

Cactus road Wb 350 ft +/- east of 37th Avenue and eb 350 ft +/- west of 37th
Avenue
Ray Road 400 Feet North of Thunderhill Drive to 100 Feet South of
Mountain Sky Avenue
19th Avenue 450 Feet North of Orangewood Avenue to 450 Feet South of
Orangewood Avenue



Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Adams Street 27th Avenue to Washington Street

Anthem Way 46th Drive to Black Canyon Freeway

Ball Park Boulevard Camelback Road to Grand Canal

Beardsley Road 20th Street to Cave Creek Road

Bethany Home Road 16th Street to 18th Street

Black Mountain Boulevard Sr101 To Mayo Boulevard



Page 13
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Black Mountain Boulevard Rancho Paloma Drive to Carefree Highway

Buckeye Road 31st Avenue to 27th Street

Camelback Road 27th Avenue to 28th Street

Central Avenue Mineral Road to Thunderbird Trail

Central Avenue Thunderbird Trail to Dobbins Road
(Southbound)

Central Avenue Vineyard Road to Pioneer Street

Central Avenue Watkins Street to Lincoln Street

Central Avenue Roosevelt Street to Mountain View Road

Central Avenue Happy Valley Road to 2,050 Feet +/- North of Happy Valley Road

Chandler Boulevard Shaughnessey Road To 19th Avenue

Chandler Boulevard 19th Avenue to 15th Avenue
(Westbound)

Chandler Boulevard Pecos Road to Shaughnessey Road

Cheryl Drive 35th Avenue to Metro Parkway West

Circle Mountain Road New River Road to Barko Lane

Cotton Center Boulevard 40th Street to 48th Street

Desert Foothills Parkway Chandler Boulevard to 5th Avenue

Desert Willow Parkway East 31000 North Cave Creek Road (East Side) to 5000 East Dixileta
Drive

Dobbins Road Central Avenue to 19th Street

Dove Valley Road North Valley Parkway to 16th Avenue

Dunlap Avenue 7th Avenue to 7th Street



Page 14
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Encanto Boulevard 83rd Avenue to 75th Avenue

Estrella Drive SR202 to 51st Avenue

Frye Road 3rd Street to Desert Foothills Parkway

Galvin Parkway North of Traffic Circle at Botanical Garden Entry to McDowell Road

Grand Avenue 18th Avenue to 15th Avenue

Grant Street Black Canyon Freeway to Lincoln Street

Grant Street 16th Street to Sky Harbor Circle

Greenway Road Cave Creek Road to Greenway Parkway

Guadalupe Road 48th Street to Interstate 10

Holmes Boulevard Bell Road to Grovers Avenue

Indian School Road 27th Avenue to 20th Street

Indian School Road 45th Street to 48th Street

Jefferson Street 23rd Avenue to 7th Avenue

Jefferson Street 7th Street to Washington Street

Jefferson Street 7th Street to 265 Feet +/- East of 26th Street (except frontage road
which is 25 mph)

Jomax Road Cave Creek Road to Tatum Boulevard

Jomax Road Tatum Boulevard to 52nd Street

Kierland Boulevard Greenway Parkway to Scottsdale Road

Knox Road 36th Street to 48th Street

Liberty Lane Desert Foothills Parkway to 13th Way

Lincoln Street Grant Street to 7th Street



Page 15
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Lone Mountain Road 40th Street to Cave Creek Road

Lower Buckeye Road 300 Feet West to 300 Feet East of 99th Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 22nd Avenue to 19th Avenue

Maryland Avenue 19th Avenue to Central Avenue

Maryvale Parkway Indian School Road to 51st Avenue

Mayo Boulevard Black Mountain Boulevard to 40th Street

McDowell Road 27th Avenue to 32nd Street

Metro Parkway Entire Street Surrounding Metro Center

Missouri Avenue 19th Avenue to 24th Street

Mohave Street 7th Street to Sky Harbor Circle

Mohave Street 22nd Street to 24th Street

Mountain View Road Central Avenue to 12th Street

Norterra Parkway Happy Valley Road to Jomax Road

Oak Street 52nd Street to 56th Street

Osborn Road 7th Avenue to 36th Street

Paloma Parkway Bronco Butte Trail to Dove Valley Road

Paradise Village Parkway Entire Street Surrounding Paradise Village

Peoria Avenue 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Pinnacle Peak Road 19th Avenue to 7th Street

Pocono Way 800 feet north of Hackamore Drive to 33rd Avenue

Pyramid Peak Parkway 1,900 Feet +/- north of Brookhart Way to City Limits
(Northbound)



Page 16
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Ranch Circle North Ray Road (3600 East) to Ray Road (4300 East)

Ranch Circle South Ray Road to Mountain Parkway

Rancho Paloma Drive Black Mountain Boulevard to 56th Street

Roeser Road Central Avenue to 40th Street

Roosevelt Street 16th Street to 32nd Street

Rose Garden Lane 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Shea Boulevard 24th Street to 32nd Street

Sky Harbor Circle 22nd Street to Grant Street, Mohave Street to Grant Street, and
Mohave Street to 22nd Street

Southern Avenue 7th Avenue to 7th Street

Stetson Valley Parkway Deem Hills Parkway to Straight Arrow Lane

Tatum Boulevard 40th Street to Cave Creek Road

Thistle Landing Drive 48th Street to 50th Street

Thomas Road 27th Avenue to 32nd Street

Thunderbird Road 32nd Street to 38th Place

Tombstone Trail Norterra Parkway to 21st Avenue

University Drive 16th Street to 24th Street

Utopia Road Black Canyon Freeway to 23rd Avenue

Utopia Road Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street

Van Buren Street 35th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Van Buren Street 16th Street to 44th Street

Washington Street Adams Street to 7th Avenue



Page 17
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Washington Street 7th Street to 24th Street (except frontage road which is 25 mph)

Williams Drive Black Canyon Freeway to 19th Avenue

Yorkshire Drive 43rd Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway

1st Avenue Crossover Grant Street to Hadley Street

3rd Avenue Osborn Road to Indian School Road

3rd Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard

5th Avenue Desert Foothills Parkway to Chandler Boulevard

5th Street Crossover Fillmore Street to 4th Street

7th Avenue Dobbins Road to Baseline Road

7th Avenue Magnolia Street to Jackson Street

7th Avenue Van Buren Street to Missouri Avenue

7th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Hatcher Road

7th Avenue Greenway Parkway to Bell Road

7th Street Mineral Road to Baseline Road

7th Street Lincoln Street to Jefferson Street

7th Street Van Buren Street to Missouri Avenue

7th Street Butler Drive to Cinnabar Avenue

15th Avenue Southern Avenue to Broadway Road

16th Street Dobbins Road to Baseline Road

16th Street Maricopa Freeway to Bethany Home Road

16th Street Bell Road to Grovers Avenue




Page 18
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

17th Avenue Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard

17th Avenue Buckeye Road to Grant Street

19th Avenue Buckeye Road to the Grand Canal

19th Avenue Glendale Avenue to Northern Avenue (Except where noted in
subsection A.1 of this section)

20th Street Highland Avenue to Missouri Avenue

21st Avenue Jomax Road to Tombstone Trail

23rd Avenue Mountain View Road to Cactus Road

23rd Avenue Utopia Road to Deer Valley Drive

23rd Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road

24th Street Buckeye Road to Indian School Road

25th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Peoria Avenue

27th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road

27th Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Van Buren Street

27th Avenue Northern Avenue to Dunlap Avenue

27th Avenue Grovers Avenue to Union Hills Drive

27th Avenue Yorkshire Drive to Rose Garden Lane

27th Drive North Valley Parkway to Carefree Highway

28th Drive Peoria Avenue to Cactus Road

29th Avenue Dunlap Avenue to Metro Parkway

29th Avenue Greenway Road to Bell Road

32nd Street Air Lane to Van Buren Street



Page 19
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

32nd Street Chandler Boulevard to Pecos Road

33rd Avenue Pocono Way to Pinnacle Vista Drive

35th Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Baseline Road

35th Avenue Van Buren Street to Encanto Boulevard

35th Avenue Happy Valley Road to 800 feet north of Hackamore Drive

36th Street Shea Boulevard to Cactus Road

39th Drive Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road

40th Street 0.39 miles South of Air Lane to Washington Street

40th Street McDowell Road to Missouri Avenue

40th Street (Southbound) Shea Boulevard to Mercer Lane

40th Street Potter Drive to Deer Valley Drive

40th Street Tatum Boulevard to Lone Mountain Road

43rd Avenue Elwood Street Alignment to Lower Buckeye Road

43rd Avenue Anthem Way to 1,930 Feet North of Anthem Way

44th Street Campbell Avenue to Calle Feliz

44th Place Cotton Center Boulevard to Broadway Road

48th Street Frye Road to Chandler Boulevard

48th Street Washington Street to Van Buren Street

48th Street Piedmont Road to Guadalupe Road

50th Street Chandler Boulevard to Ray Road

51st Street 500 Feet South of Elliot Road to Warner-Elliot Loop




Page 20
Table B. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

52nd Street McDowell Road to Thomas Road

52nd Street Cactus Road to Thunderbird Road

55th Avenue Alameda Road to Happy Valley Road

56th Street South City Limit to Van Buren Street

56th Street Oak Street to Camelback Road

56th Street Bell Road to Central Arizona Project Canal

56th Street Lone Mountain Road to Rancho Paloma Drive

64th Street Oak Street to McDowell Road (Southbound Only)

64th Street 255 Feet North of Hillcrest Boulevard to Chaparral Road

64TH STREET MAYO BOULEVARD TO SR101

67TH AVENUE OSBORN ROAD TO CAMELBACK ROAD

71st Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road

79th Avenue McDowell Road to Thomas Road

107th Avenue Camelback Road to Missouri Avenue


Table B1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on School Days.

Dunlap Avenue For Westbound, 650 Feet +/- West of 29th Avenue to 625 +/- West
of 35th Avenue

Dunlap Avenue For Eastbound, 545 Feet +/- West of 35th Avenue to 30th Avenue




Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Air Lane 24th Street to 32nd Street




Page 21
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Baseline Road 43rd Avenue to 35th Avenue

Baseline Road 7th Avenue to 7th Street

Beardsley Road (Eastbound 37th Avenue to 27th Avenue
Frontage)

Beardsley Road Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street

Bell Road 19th Avenue to 12th Street

Bell Road 0.25 miles West of Cave Creek Road to 1,500 Feet East of 40th
Street

Bethany Home Road 43rd Avenue to 16th Street

Black Mountain Boulevard Mayo Boulevard to Pinnacle Peak Road

Broadway Road 51st Avenue to 32nd Street

Buckeye Road 39th Avenue to 31st Avenue

Cactus Road 39th Avenue to 350 ft West of 37th Avenue

Cactus Road 350 ft East of 37th Avenue to 19th Avenue

Cactus Road Cave Creek Road to 60th Street

Camelback Road 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue

Camelback Road 28th Street to 64th Street

Carefree Highway 700 feet West of North Valley Parkway to Via Puzzola

Cave Creek Road Dunlap Avenue to Peoria Avenue

Cave Creek Road Marco Polo Road to Rose Garden Lane

Central Avenue (Northbound) Thunderbird Trail to Dobbins Road

Central Avenue Dobbins Road to Vineyard Road




Page 22
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Central Avenue Pioneer Street to Watkins Street

Chandler Boulevard Marketplace Way to 34th Street

Deer Valley Drive 600 Feet West of 27th Avenue to 0.25 Miles East of 19th Avenue

Desert Foothills Parkway Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard

Desert Peak Parkway Lieber Place to Cave Creek Road

Dobbins Road From West City Limit to 1,320 Feet +/- East

Dobbins Road 23rd Avenue to Central Avenue

Dunlap Avenue 43rd Avenue to 7th Avenue (Except where noted in Table B1 of
this section)

Durango Street 35th Avenue to Black Canyon Freeway

Elliot Road 2,085 Feet +/- West of 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue

ELLIOT ROAD 2,085 FEET +/- WEST OF 59TH AVENUE TO 47TH LANE

Elliot Road 46th Street to 51st Street

Elwood Street 7th Street to 16th Street

Galvin Parkway Van Buren Street to 100 Feet +/- North of East Papago Park (Zoo
Entrance)

Gavilan Peak Parkway 800 Feet +/- West of 33rd Lane to Cloud Road

Glendale Avenue 43rd Avenue to 21st Street

Greenway Parkway 500 Feet West of 7th Avenue to 3rd Avenue (Except where noted
in Table B2 of this section)

Greenway Parkway Cave Creek Road to Greenway Road

Greenway Road 51st Avenue to 19th Avenue

Greenway Road Greenway Parkway to 300 Feet East of 30th Street


Page 23
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Greenway Road 52nd Street to 500 Feet East of 60th Street

Indian School Road 67th Avenue to 27th Avenue

Indian School Road 20th Street to 45th Street

Indian School Road 48th Street to 60th Street

Jomax Road Black Canyon Freeway to Norterra Parkway

Liberty Lane 13th Way to 24th Street

Lincoln Drive 21st Street to 32nd Street

Lower Buckeye Road 107th Avenue to 300 Feet +/- West of 99th Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 300 Feet +/- East of 99th Avenue to 95th Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 79th Avenue to 67th Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 27th Avenue to 22nd Avenue

Maricopa Freeway Frontage 23rd Avenue to 16th Street
Roads

McDowell Road 43rd Avenue to 27th Avenue

McDowell Road 32nd Street to 52nd Street

Mountain Parkway Chandler Boulevard to Ray Road

Norterra Parkway Jomax Road to North Valley Parkway

Northern Avenue 43rd Avenue to SR-51

North Valley Parkway Jomax Road to 30th Avenue

North Valley Parkway 800 Feet +/- West of 33rd Lane to 33rd Lane

Peoria Avenue 43rd Avenue to 19th Avenue

PINNACLE PEAK ROAD 55TH AVENUE TO 19TH AVENUE


Page 24
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Priest Drive Salt River Drive to Van Buren Street

Pyramid Peak Parkway 67th Avenue to City Limits
(Southbound)

Pyramid Peak Parkway 67th Avenue to 1,900 Feet +/- North of Brookhart Way
(Northbound)

Ray Road Chandler Boulevard to Interstate 10 (Except where noted in Table
A1 of this section)

Rose Garden Lane Cave Creek Road to 32nd Street

Shea Boulevard 32nd Street to 450 Feet East of 40th Street

Southern Avenue 39th Avenue to 31st Avenue

Southern Avenue 19th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Southern Avenue 7th Street to 24th Street

Stetson Valley Parkway Range Mule Drive to Deem Hills Parkway

Tatum Boulevard Mayo Boulevard to Deer Valley Drive

Thomas Road 800 Feet West of 59th Avenue to Grand Avenue

Thomas Road 32nd Street to 56th Street

Thunderbird Road 31st Avenue to Coral Gables Drive

Thunderbird Road 38th Place to Scottsdale Road

Union Hills Drive 27th Avenue to 19th Avenue

Union Hills Drive 7th Street to 20th Street

University Drive Wood Street to 48th Street

Van Buren Street 67th Avenue to 200 Feet West of 63rd Avenue

Van Buren Street 39th Avenue to 35th Avenue


Page 25
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Van Buren Street 44th Street to 500 feet +/- east of Project Drive

Warner-Elliot Loop 4600 East Elliot Road to 578 Feet East of Wakial Loop

Washington Street 24th Street to 34th Street

7th Avenue Baseline Road to Magnolia Street

7th Avenue Missouri Avenue to Dunlap Avenue

7th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive

7th Avenue Rose Garden Lane to Deer Valley Drive

7th Street Baseline Road to Lincoln Street

7th Street Missouri Avenue to Butler Drive

7th Street Cinnabar Avenue to Clinton Street

7th Street Thunderbird Road to 600 Feet North of Bell Road

16th Street Baseline Road to the Maricopa Freeway

16th Street Bethany Home Road to Northern Avenue

19th Avenue Dobbins Road to Buckeye Road

19th Avenue Grand Canal to Glendale Avenue

19th Avenue Northern Avenue to Evans Drive

24th Street Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard

24th Street Baseline Road to Buckeye Road

24th Street Indian School Road to Lincoln Drive

27th Avenue Baseline Road to 500 Feet +/- North

27th Avenue Van Buren Street to Northern Avenue




Page 26
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

32nd Street Baseline Road to Wood Street

32nd Street Van Buren Street to Lincoln Drive

32nd Street Mountain View Road to Bell Road

32nd Street Beardsley Road to Rose Garden Lane

35th Avenue Dobbins Road to South Mountain Avenue

35th Avenue Baseline Road to Broadway Road

35th Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Van Buren Street

35th Avenue Encanto Boulevard to Bell Road

35th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Beardsley Road

40th Street Pecos Road to Chandler Boulevard

40th Street 800 Feet South of Roeser Road to University Drive

40th Street Washington Street to McDowell Road

40th Street (Northbound) Shea Boulevard to Mercer Lane

40th Street Mercer Lane to Union Hills Drive

40th Street Mayo Boulevard to Pinnacle Peak Road

43rd Avenue Buckeye Road to Glendale Avenue

43rd Avenue Thunderbird Road to Beardsley Road

43rd Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road

44th Street Washington Street to Campbell Avenue

44th Street Calle Feliz to McDonald Drive

48th Street Chandler Boulevard to Piedmont Road




Page 27
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

51st Avenue Estrella Drive to Olney Avenue

51st Avenue Dobbins Road to Baseline Road

51st Avenue 0.5 Miles South of Lower Buckeye Road to Lower Buckeye Road

51st Avenue Roosevelt Street to Camelback Road

51st Avenue 250 Feet South of Cactus Road to Union Hills Drive

51st Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Range Mule Drive

52nd Street Van Buren Street to McDowell Road

55th Avenue Happy Valley Road to Deem Hills Parkway

56th Street Shea Boulevard to Bell Road

56th Street Central Arizona Project Canal to Pinnacle Peak Road

59th Avenue Dobbins Road to South Mountain Avenue

59th Avenue Roosevelt Street to Camelback Road

64th Street Cactus Road to Bell Road

67th Avenue 400 Feet +/- South of Elwood Street to Camelback Road

67TH AVENUE 400 FEET +/- SOUTH OF ELWOOD STREET TO OSBORN ROAD

67th Avenue Happy Valley Road to Pyramid Peak Parkway

75th Avenue Baseline Road to Vineyard Road

75th Avenue 0.25 Miles South of Thomas Road to Devonshire Avenue

83rd Avenue Van Buren Street to Papago Freeway

91st Avenue McDowell Road to Indian School Road

99th Avenue 0.5 Miles South of Lower Buckeye Road to Durango Street



Page 28
Table C. Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

107th Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road




Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Baseline Road 55th Avenue to 43rd Avenue

Baseline Road 35th Avenue to 7th Avenue

Baseline Road 7th Street to 48th Street

Beardsley Road (Frontage 27th Avenue to 20th Street
Roads)
Beardsley Road Frontage Road 27th Avenue to 51st Avenue
(Westbound)
Beardsley Road Frontage Road 51st Avenue to 37th Avenue
(Eastbound)

Bell Road 51st Avenue to 19th Avenue

Bell Road 12th Street to 0.25 Miles West of Cave Creek Road

Bell Road 1,500 Feet East of 40th Street to Scottsdale Road

Broadway Road 107th Avenue to 91st Avenue

Broadway Road 32nd Street to 48th Street

Buckeye Road 71st Avenue to 39th Avenue

Cactus Road 51st Avenue to 39th Avenue

Camelback Road 113th Avenue to 99th Avenue

Carefree Highway Via Puzzola to 0.5 Miles East of Via Tramonto / Paloma Parkway



Cave Creek Road Peoria Avenue to Marco Polo Road

Cave Creek Road Rose Garden Lane to Pinnacle Peak Road




Page 29
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Cave Creek Road Pinnacle Peak To 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane
(Southbound)
Cave Creek Road Peak View Road to Westland Road

Chandler Boulevard 19th Avenue to 15th Avenue
(Eastbound)
Chandler Boulevard 15th Avenue to Marketplace Way

Chandler Boulevard 34th Street to Interstate 10

Deer Valley Drive 35th Avenue to 600 Feet West of 27th Avenue

Deer Valley Drive 0.25 miles east of 19th Avenue to 56th Street

Dixileta Drive Tatum Boulevard to 52nd Street

Dobbins Road 1,320 Feet +/- East of City Limit to 200 Feet +/- West of 56th Glen

Dobbins Road 43rd Avenue to 0.25 Miles West of 35th Avenue

Dobbins Road 650 Feet West of 35th Avenue to 33rd Avenue

Dobbins Road 30th Lane to 23rd Avenue

Dove Valley Road 16th Avenue to Sonoran Desert Drive

Dynamite Boulevard Cave Creek Road to 40th Street

Greenway Parkway 17th Drive to 500 Feet West of 7th Avenue

Greenway Parkway 3rd Avenue to Cave Creek Road

Greenway Road 19th Avenue to 17th Drive

Greenway Road 300 Feet East of 30th Street to 52nd Street

Greenway Road 500 Feet East of 60th Street to Scottsdale Road

Happy Valley Road 67th Avenue to 29th Avenue

Happy Valley Road 800 Feet West of 23rd Avenue to 7th Street




Page 30
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Indian School Road 99th Avenue to 67th Avenue

Jomax Road Norterra Parkway to 19th Avenue

Lone Mountain Road 56th Street to 63rd Street

Lower Buckeye Road 95th Avenue to 79th Avenue

Lower Buckeye Road 67th Avenue to 27th Avenue

Mayo Boulevard Tatum Boulevard to Scottsdale Road

McDowell Road 83rd Avenue to 43rd Avenue

McDowell Road 52nd Street to 64th Street

New River Road 1.0 Mile Southwest of Black Canyon Freeway to Black Canyon
Freeway
Pinnacle Peak Road 55th Avenue to 19th Avenue

Pinnacle Peak Road Cave Creek Road to Tatum Boulevard

PINNACLE PEAK ROAD CAVE CREEK ROAD TO SCOTTSDALE ROAD

Shea Boulevard 450 Feet East of 40th Street to 64th Street

Sonoran Desert Drive Dove Valley Road to Cave Creek Road

Southern Avenue 59th Avenue to 51st Avenue

Southern Avenue 31st Avenue to 19th Avenue

Southern Avenue 24th Street to 48th Street

Tatum Boulevard Mockingbird Land to Deer Valley Drive

Tatum Boulevard Deer Valley Drive to Pinnacle Peak Rd

Tatum Boulevard Prickly Pear Trail to Cave Creek Road

TATUM BOULEVARD DEER VALLEY DRIVE TO CAVE CREEK ROAD




Page 31
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Thomas Road 99th Avenue to 800 Feet West of 59th Avenue

Thunderbird Road 51st Avenue to 31st Avenue

Thunderbird Road Coral Gables Drive to Cave Creek Road

Union Hills Drive 51st Avenue to 27th Avenue

Union Hills Drive 19th Avenue to 7th Street

Union Hills Drive 20th Street to Tatum Boulevard

Van Buren Street 83rd Avenue to 67th Avenue

Van Buren Street 200 Feet West of 63rd Avenue to 39th Avenue

Washington Street 34th Street to 56th Street

7th Avenue Union Hills Drive to Rose Garden Lane

7th Street Clinton Street to Thunderbird Road

7th Street 600 Feet North of Bell Road to Happy Valley Road

19th Avenue Evans Drive to Jomax Road

24th Street Baseline Road to Roeser Road

27th Avenue Southern Avenue to Broadway Road

29th Avenue Pinnacle Peak Road to Happy Valley Road

32nd Street Bell Road to Beardsley Road

35th Avenue 200 Feet South of Elliot Road to Dobbins Road

35th Avenue Baseline Road to 500 Feet +/- North

35th Avenue Broadway Road to Lower Buckeye Road

35th Avenue Bell Road to Union Hills Drive




Page 32
Table D. Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

35th Avenue Beardsley Road to Pinnacle Peak Road

40th Street Baseline Road to 800 Feet South of Roeser Road

43rd Avenue South Mountain Avenue to Southern Avenue

43rd Avenue Lower Buckeye Road to Buckeye Road

43rd Avenue Glendale Avenue to Thunderbird Road

48th Street Baseline Road to Southern Avenue

51st Avenue Baseline Road to Roosevelt Street

51st Avenue Union Hills Drive to Beardsley Road

59th Avenue Elliot Road to Dobbins Road

59th Avenue Broadway Road to Durango Street alignment

59th Avenue Buckeye Road to Roosevelt Street

75th Avenue Broadway Road to 0.25 miles south of Thomas Road

75th Avenue Devonshire Avenue to Camelback Road

83rd Avenue Broadway Road to Buckeye Road

83rd Avenue Papago Freeway to Camelback Road

91st Avenue Elwood Street to Buckeye Road

91st Avenue Indian School Road to Camelback Road

99th Avenue Mobile Lane to Riverside Avenue

99th Avenue Durango Street to Buckeye Road

99th Avenue Thomas Road to Camelback Road




Page 33
Table E. Prima Facie Speed Limit 50 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Buckeye Road 75th Avenue to 71st Avenue

Carefree Highway 0.5 Miles East of Via Tramonto / Paloma Parkway to 7th Avenue

Cave Creek Road Pinnacle Peak Road to 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane
(Northbound)

Cave Creek Road 660 Feet +/- North of Quiet Hollow Lane to Peak View Road

El Mirage Road 0.25 Miles South of Camelback Road to 0.50 Miles North of
Camelback Road

New River Road Cloud Road to 1.0 Mile Southwest of Black Canyon Freeway

Pinnacle Peak Road Tatum Boulevard to Scottsdale Road

Tatum Boulevard Pinnacle Peak Road to Prickly Pear Trail

91st Avenue 1.56 Miles South of Broadway Road to 0.5 Miles South of Broadway
Road




Table F. Prima Facie Speed Limit 55 Miles Per Hour at All Times.




G. Parks.

1. North Mountain Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

North Mountain Park Entire Length
Drive



2. Papago Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

All roadways except Galvin Parkway.



Page 34
3. Pecos Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

All roadways within park boundary.

4. South Mountain Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

All roadways within park boundary.

5. Piestewa Peak Park.

a. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Piestewa Peak Road Piestewa Peak Park Boundary to End of Road Within Piestewa
Peak Park




H. Sky Harbor Airport.

1. Prima Facie Speed Limit 15 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sky Harbor Boulevard (North and Between Terminal Curb and Sky Harbor Boulevard
South Roadway) Median on All Terminals 2 and 3 and on Level 1 of
Terminal 4

Sky Harbor Boulevard (North and All Ticketing/Check-in Lanes on Level 2 of Terminal 4
South Roadway)


2. Prima Facie Speed Limit 20 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sky Harbor Boulevard 4,400 Feet East of 24th Street to 6,300 Feet East of 24th Street
(South Roadway)


3. Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sky Harbor Boulevard All Ramps, Entries and Exits for All Ticketing/Check-in and Baggage
(North and South Claim Lanes at Terminals 3 and 4
Roadway)


4. Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 Miles Per Hour at All Times.



Page 35
Sky Harbor Boulevard 3,000 Feet East of 24th Street to 4,400 Feet East of 24th Street
(South Roadway)



5. Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 Miles Per Hour at All Times.

Sky Harbor Boulevard Between 24th Street and SR 143, Except as Provided in the Prior
(North and South Subsections
Roadway)




Page 36
ATTACHMENT B

SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN CITY OF PHOENIX SPEED LIMITS
AMENDING SECTION 36-158, SCHEDULE I - LOCAL SPEED LIMITS


Prima Facie Speed Limit 25 mph at all times
To be removed from ordinance

Council
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change
District

Recommend reduction from 30 mph 3
32nd Street to 40th to 25 mph by Traffic Engineer based
Cholla Street
Street on traffic study and amount of front
facing homes


Recommend reduction from 30 mph 3
Mountain View 12th Street to 17th to 25 mph by Traffic Engineer based
Road Street on traffic study and amount of front
facing homes


Recommend reduction from 30 mph 5
83rd Avenue to 75th to 25 mph by Traffic Engineer based
Osborn Road
Avenue on traffic study and amount of front
facing homes


Recommend reduction from 30 mph 4,5,7
73rd Avenue to Grand to 25 mph by Traffic Engineer based
Osborn Road
Avenue on traffic study and amount of front
facing homes


Recommend reduction from 30 mph 3
Cholla Street to to 25 mph by Traffic Engineer based
28th Street
Thunderbird Road on traffic study and amount of front
facing homes


Recommend reduction from 30 mph 5
Missouri Avenue to to 25 mph by Traffic Engineer based
31st Avenue
Orangewood Avenue on traffic study and amount of front
facing homes


Recommend reduction from 35 mph 6,8
McDowell Road to to 25 mph by Traffic Engineer based
40th Street
Stanford Drive on traffic study and amount of front
facing homes


Recommend reduction from 30 mph 4,5
Thomas Road to to 25 mph by Traffic Engineer based
47th Avenue
Camelback Road on traffic study and amount of front
facing homes

Prima Facie Speed Limit 30 mph at all times

Council
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change
District

I-17 Frontage Road to 1
Hillcrest Way New street to be constructed.
39th Lane


Prima Facie Speed Limit 35 mph at all times

Council
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change
District

Mayo Boulevard to Record keeping not included in
64th Street 2
SR101 previous ordinance.


67th Avenue Osborn Road to Recommendation for reduction from 5
Camelback Road 40 mph to 35 mph by Traffic Engineer


Prima Facie Speed Limit 40 mph at all times

Council
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change
District

51st Avenue to 47th Record keeping not included in
Elliot Road 8
Lane previous ordinance.


Pinnacle Peak Road 55th Avenue to 19th Recommendation for reduction from
Avenue 45 mph to 40 mph by Traffic Engineer




Prima Facie Speed Limit 45 mph at all times

Council
Street Changed Segment Changed Reason for Change
District

Pinnacle Peak Road Tatum Boulevard to Recommendation for reduction from
Scottsdale Road 50 mph to 45 mph by Traffic Engineer


Tatum Boulevard Pinnacle Peak Road Recommendation for reduction from
to Prickly Pear Trail 50 mph to 45 mph by Traffic Engineer




Note: All speed limit changes were recommended based on a traffic study and
approved by a Traffic Engineer.



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Val Vista Water Treatment Plant Reservoir 3 (1-ES5-3) Rehabilitation -
Construction Manager at Risk Services - WS85050019 (Ordinance S-51899) - Out
of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Sundt Construction, Inc. to provide Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction
and Construction Services for the Val Vista Water Treatment Plant Reservoir 3 (1-ES5-
3) Rehabilitation project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The fee for services will not exceed $25,350,000.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to rehabilitate Reservoir 3 at Val Vista Water Treatment
Plant. The reservoir is a 40 million gallon concrete potable water reservoir with hopper-
style side slopes and metal roof. The protective interior liner and the roof have reached
the end of their operation lifespan and need to be replaced, and the reservoir requires
major rehabilitation with improvements as a result.

Sundt Construction, Inc. will begin in an agency support role for Construction Manager
at Risk Preconstruction Services. Sundt Construction, Inc. will assume the risk of
delivering the project through a Guaranteed Maximum Price agreement.

Sundt Construction, Inc.'s Preconstruction Services include, but are not limited to:
provide detailed cost estimating and knowledge of market place conditions, assist in
the permitting process, advise City on choosing green building materials, provide long-
lead procurement studies and initiate procurement of long-lead items and participating
with the City in a process to establish a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) goal for the
project.

Sundt Construction, Inc.'s initial Construction Services will include preparation of a
Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal provided under the agreement. Sundt
Construction, Inc. will be responsible for construction means and methods related to
the project and fulfilling the SBE program requirements. Sundt Construction, Inc. will
be required to solicit bids from prequalified subcontractors and to perform the work



using the City’s subcontractor selection process. Sundt Construction, Inc. may also
compete to self-perform limited amounts of work.

Sundt Construction Inc.’s additional Construction Services include maintaining a safe
work site for all project participants, provide quality controls, arrange for procurement
of materials and equipment, deal with City issues, schedule and manage site
operations and coordinate with various City of Phoenix departments, other agencies
and utility companies.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Three firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Sundt Construction, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: MGC Contractors, Inc.
Rank 3: Hensel Phelps Construction, Co.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Sundt Construction, Inc. will not exceed $25,350,000,
including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
Council District: Out of City



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the City Engineer and the Water Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
2024 Booster Pump Station Improvements - Engineering Services - WS85100032
(Ordinance S-51904) - Districts 3, 6 & Out of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Wilson Engineers, LLC to provide Engineering Services that include assessment,
design and possible construction administration and inspection services for the 2024
Booster Pump Station Improvements project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The total fee for the services will not exceed $1.5 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to rehabilitate design and improvements of four Booster
Pump Stations (BPS) deemed critical for the operation of the water distribution system.
The City of Phoenix currently owns and operates approximately 112 BPS facilities. In
October 2017, the City completed a high level BPS Assessment as part of the Asset
Data Collection effort. The project included a detailed condition assessment review of
all BPS, including summarizing and prioritizing the BPS facilities for rehabilitation
and/or replacement as part of capital improvement projects over the next several
years.

Wilson Engineers, LLC's services include, but are not limited to: data collection and
final assessment, geotechnical and corrosivity with the City's asset management team;
hydraulic and transient modeling analysis for each station; design services for civil,



mechanical, structural, architectural, electrical, and assist with public outreach if
required.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603, the City may not publicly release information on proposals received or
the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Five firms submitted proposals and
are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Wilson Engineers, LLC

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: GHD, Inc.
Rank 3: Entellus, Inc.
Rank 4: Coe and Van Loo, LLC
Rank 5: Carollo Engineers, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Wilson Engineers, LLC will not exceed $1.5 million, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve
funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up
to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
Various locations throughout Phoenix, Tempe, and Paradise Valley
Council Districts: 3, 6, and Out of City






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the City Engineer and the Water Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Sub-Regional Operating Group - 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant 1A
Rehabilitation - Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services -
WS90100114 (Ordinance S-51906) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. to provide Construction Manager at Risk
Preconstruction Services for the Sub-Regional Operating Group - 91st Avenue
Wastewater Water Treatment Plant 1A Rehabilitation project. Further request to
authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-
approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not exceed $750,000.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to rehabilitate or replace assets throughout Plant 1A at
the 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant and incorporate current technologies
and equipment. Rehabilitation or replacement of assets throughout the Plant 1A
treatment train, may include, but are not limited to: primary sedimentation, aeration,
secondary sedimentation, reuse water system, disinfection, ancillary equipment and
systems, process air supply and distribution systems, and electrical and control
systems.

McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. will begin in an agency support role for
Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services. McCarthy Building
Companies, Inc. will assume the risk of delivering the project through a Guaranteed
Maximum Price agreement.

McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.'s Preconstruction Services include, but are not
limited to: site visits and field investigations, providing detailed cost estimating and
knowledge of marketplace conditions; providing construction phasing and scheduling
that will minimize interruption to the City operations, advise the City on ways to gain
efficiencies in project delivery, assist with life-cycle cost analyses to provide
recommendations for replacement equipment, and provide long-lead procurement
studies, initiate procurement of long-lead items, and participating with the City in a
process to establish a Small Business Enterprise goal for the project.




The 91st Avenue Wastewater Treatment Plant Facility is owned by the Sub-Regional
Operating Group (SROG) and operated by the City of Phoenix.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Five firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: McCarthy Building Companies, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: PCL Construction, Inc.
Rank 3: Kiewit Infrastructure West Co.
Rank 4: MGC Contractors, Inc.
Rank 5: Sundt Construction, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Work
scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may
be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. will not exceed $750,000,
including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Water Services Department's Capital Improvement Program
budget utilizing SROG funds from the City of Phoenix.

Location
91st Avenue and W. Roeser Road
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Ginger Spencer, the City Engineer and the Water Services Department.






Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Street Transportation Department Traffic Engineering and Design Support On-
Call Services (Ordinance S-51957) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with the three consultants listed in Attachment A, to provide Traffic
Engineering and Design Support On-Call services for the Street Transportation
Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreements
as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below,
and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total fee for all
services will not exceed $9 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The On-Call consultants will be responsible for providing On-Call Traffic Engineering
and Design Support services that include, but are not limited to: progress meetings,
Base Intersection CADD layouts, field verification, sealed Traffic Signal CADD plans
(including pedestrian hybrid and rapid flashing beacons), sealed Intersection CADD
and Americans with Disabilities Act CADD plans, update and seal Traffic Signal
Standard Detail sheets, and other services as required on an as-needed basis.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received



or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. A total of 15 firms submitted
proposals and are listed in Attachment A.

Contract Term
The term of each agreement is up to five years, or up to $3 million, whichever occurs
first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the
term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for each of the On-Call consultants will not exceed $3 million,
including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services will not
exceed $9 million.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department’s Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any On-Call task order of $100,000 or more.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, the Street
Transportation Department and the City Engineer.





ATTACHMENT A


Selected Firms
Rank 1: AZTEC Engineering Group, Inc.
Rank 2: Burgess & Niple, Inc.
Rank 3: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 4: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Rank 5: Y.S. Mantri & Associates LLC
Rank 6: Y2K Engineering, LLC
Rank 7: Lee Engineering, L.L.C.
Rank 8: Southwest Traffic Engineering, LLC
Rank 9: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Rank 10: CivTech Inc.
Rank 11: Dibble & Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Rank 12: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Rank 13: Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.
Rank 14: United Civil Group Corporation
Rank 15: Fehr & Peers, Inc.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Name Change Amendment - Aviation Department Environmental Consulting On-
Call Services for Fiscal Years 2021-25 (Ordinance S-51924) - Districts 1, 8 & Out
of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 154196 with WSP USA Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. for a name
change to WSP USA, Inc., for the Aviation Department Environmental On-Call
Consulting Services for Fiscal Years 2021-25 program. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item.

Summary
On July 19, 2021, the City and Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc.
entered into Agreement 154196 for Aviation Department Environmental Consulting On-
Call Services.

On September 23, 2022, Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, Inc. notified
the City of Phoenix of its name change from Wood Environment & Infrastructure
Solutions, Inc. to WSP USA Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. This was an
administrative name change only.

This amendment is necessary because on February 24, 2025, WSP USA
Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. notified the City of Phoenix of its name change
from WSP USA Environmental & Infrastructure, Inc. to WSP USA, Inc., and is now
operating under the name of WSP USA, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement remains unchanged from the issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The initial agreement value remains unchanged.




Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved Aviation Department Environmental On-Call Services
Agreement 154196 (Ordinance S-47515) on May 5, 2021.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport - 3400 E. Sky Harbor Boulevard
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport - 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Phoenix Goodyear Airport - 1658 S. Litchfield Road, Goodyear, AZ
Council Districts: 1, 8 and Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, the City Engineer and the Aviation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Sanitary Waste, Vent and Storm Drain Piping Replacement Engineering Services
- PW26700051 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-51929) - District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Gannett Fleming, Inc. to provide engineering services that include construction
administration and inspection for the Phoenix Municipal Court Sanitary Waste, Vent
and Storm Drain Piping Replacement project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The fee for services will not exceed $197,818.32.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide additional construction administration and
inspection services for the replacement of 9,770 linear feet of sanitary waste, vent and
storm drain piping, including restroom upgrades. On December 14, 2023, Gannett
Fleming, Inc. was contracted to perform design services for the Sanitary Waste, Vent
and Storm Drain Piping Replacement Project at the Phoenix Municipal Court Building
under the Engineering/Consulting 2023-24 On-Call Services Contract. Design was
completed in October 2024. Construction is scheduled to commence summer 2025.
During construction phase, construction administration, inspections, and third party
quality control are essential services to ensure project design specifications are met. It
is the request of the City to have the original design firm, Gannett Fleming, Inc.
perform this critical service. For the continuity and seamless services, it is imperative
for the original designer to perform this administrative service. Gannett Fleming, Inc. is



not on the City's on-call service contract for 2025-27, therefore, it is requested to direct
select them for this service.

Procurement Information
Gannett Fleming, Inc. was chosen for this project using a Direct Select process set
forth in Arizona Revised Statutes Section 34-103. The Direct Select process will
ensure project design specifications are met.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is two years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
The scope of work identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Gannet Fleming, Inc. will not exceed $197,818.32, including
all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Public Works Department's Capital Improvement Program.
The Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve funding
availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up to
agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
300 W. Washington Street
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, the City Engineer and the Public Works Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Preformed Thermoplastic Pavement Marking Material Contract - IFB 25-0515
Request for Award (Ordinance S-51932) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Preform LLC and Geveko Markings Inc. to provide Preformed Thermoplastic
Pavement Marking Material for the Street Transportation Department. Further request
to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value
of the contracts will not exceed $1,550,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide the Street Transportation Department Signing and Striping
Shop a variety of preformed thermoplastic pavement marking materials, such as turn
arrows, bicycle symbols, and straight-line segments to enhance traffic pavement
markings throughout the City's street infrastructure. In addition to standard white and
yellow colored marking materials, these contracts will include specialized marking
materials, such as bike lane green.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Four vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors:

Selected Bidders
Bidder A: Preform LLC
Bidder B: Geveko Markings Inc.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about July 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts value will not exceed $1,550,000. Funding is available in the



Streets Transportation Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Street
Transportation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Glass Reflectorized Beads Contract - IFB 25-0610 Request for Award (Ordinance
S-51933) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Potters Industries, LLC to provide glass reflectorized beads for the Street
Transportation Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse
all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $865,500.

Summary
This contract will provide glass reflectorized beads to the Street Transportation
Department on an as-needed basis in an effort to maintain the operation and safety of
the City's roadways. The Street Transportation Department uses reflectorizing glass
beads to add a retro-reflective element to pavement markings, making them more
visible to the motoring and biking public. The beads are used by the Signing and
Striping Shop for paint striping operations and applied to all paint and thermoplastic
pavement markings for use throughout the City of Phoenix street infrastructure.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Two vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Potters Industries, LLC

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about July 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $865,500. Funding is available in the
Street Transportation Department's operating budget.




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson and the Street
Transportation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Rental Car Center and East Economy
Parking Fire Alarm Systems Replacement - Engineering Services - AV15000077
and AV15000078 (Ordinance S-51935) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Jensen Hughes, Inc. to provide Engineering Services that include assessment,
design, and possible construction administration and inspection services for the
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Rental Car Center and East Economy
Parking Fire Alarm Systems Replacement project. Further request to authorize
execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved
expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. The total fee for services will not exceed $950,000.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services related to the
development, design and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunication, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize inclusion in the
documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and assumption of liability
provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City Code 42-18. This
authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real property.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to replace the Rental Car Center and East Economy
Parking fire alarm systems at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. The current fire
alarm system is 20 years old and requires upgrades including the fire alarm control
panels and all initiating and indicating devices. The project will also be installing an
Emergency Communications System to make it easier to maintain and test the system,
as well as integrate with the current fire alarm network infrastructure and system
monitoring.

Jensen Hughes, Inc.'s services include, but are not limited to: assess the current fire
alarm system including verifying as-built drawings and locations of all devices, conduit,



and wiring; provide field survey labor to verify fire alarm field device types and
locations for the areas listed; develop floor plans for each area reflecting new fire
alarm requirements by current code; review shop drawings submitted by Contractor;
provide elevation, riser, and detail sheets for installed fire alarm components; provide
network riser diagrams and installation detail sheets for panel and field devices;
provide plans and specifications; conduct coordination meetings with the City of
Phoenix Aviation Department as required; and all other tasks for a complete project.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Five firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Jensen Hughes, Inc.

Additional Proposer
Rank 2: Mo Mon Tai, Inc. dba TERPconsulting
Rank 3: Bowman Fire & Life Safety, Inc.
Rank 4: Telgian Engineering & Consulting, LLC
Rank 5: Coffman Engineers, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Jensen Hughes, Inc. will not exceed $950,000, including all
subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program. The
Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve funding
availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up to
agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.




Location
Phoenix Airport Rental Car Center, 1805 E. Sky Harbor Circle South
Phoenix Airport East Economy Lot, S. 41st Street and S. 42nd Street
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, the City Engineer and the Aviation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Rental Car Center and East Economy
Parking Fire Alarm Systems Replacement - Construction Manager at Risk
Services - AV15000077 and 15000078 (Ordinance S-51936) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with Chasse Building Team, Inc. to provide Construction Manager at Risk
Preconstruction and Construction Services for the Phoenix Sky Harbor International
Airport Rental Car Center and East Economy Parking Fire Alarm Systems
Replacement project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the
agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The fee for services will not exceed $7.4 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to replace the Rental Car Center and East Economy
Parking fire alarm systems at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. The current fire
alarm system is 20 years old and requires upgrades. Fire life safety system
replacements and upgrades will include the Fire Alarm Control Panels and all initiating
and indicating devices. The project will also be installing an Emergency
Communications System to maintain and test the system, and integrate with the
current fire alarm network infrastructure and system monitoring.

Chasse Building Team, Inc. will begin in an agency support role for Construction
Manager At Risk Preconstruction Services. Chasse Building Team, Inc. will assume
the risk of delivering the project through a Guaranteed Maximum Price agreement.

Chasse Building Team, Inc.’s Preconstruction Services include, but are not limited to:
provide detailed cost estimating, project planning, construction phasing and scheduling
that will minimize interruption to City operations; provide alternate systems evaluation
and constructability studies; advise City on ways to gain efficiencies in project delivery;
provide long-lead procurement studies and initiate procurement of long-lead items;
assist in the permitting processes; protect the City’s sensitivity to quality, safety, and
environmental factors; advise City on choosing green building materials; participating
with the City in a process to establish a Small Business Enterprise (SBE) goal for the
project; and other work as required.




Chasse Building Team, Inc.’s initial Construction Services will include preparation of a
Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal provided under the agreement. Chasse Building
Team, Inc. will be responsible for construction means and methods related to the
project and fulfilling the SBE program requirements. Chasse Building Team, Inc. will be
required to solicit bids from prequalified subcontractors and to perform the work using
the City’s subcontractor selection process. Chasse Building Team, Inc. may also
compete to self-perform limited amounts of work.

Chasse Building Team, Inc.’s additional Construction Services include: coordination
with various City of Phoenix departments, other agencies, and utility companies;
arranging for procurement of materials and equipment; scheduling and managing site
operations; bidding, awarding, and managing all construction related contracts while
meeting City bid requirements including the local and SBE participation goal; providing
quality controls; bonding and insuring the construction; addressing all federal, state
and local permitting requirements; maintaining a safe work site for all project
participants; and all other work as required for a complete project.

Procurement Information
The selection was made using a qualifications-based selection process set forth in
Section 34-603 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In accordance with A.R.S.
Section 34-603(H), the City may not publicly release information on proposals received
or the scoring results until an agreement is awarded. Four firms submitted proposals
and are listed below.

Selected Firm
Rank 1: Chasse Building Team, Inc.

Additional Proposers
Rank 2: Sun Eagle Corporation
Rank 3: Brycon Corporation
Rank 4: Basalt Building Group, Inc.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is five years from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term
may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the
agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for Chasse Building Team, Inc. will not exceed $7.4 million,


including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Aviation Department's Capital Improvement Program. The
Budget and Research Department will separately review and approve funding
availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be made up to
agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend past the
agreement termination.

Location
Phoenix Airport Rental Car Center, 1805 E. Sky Harbor Circle South
Phoenix Airport East Economy Lot, S. 41st Street and S. 42nd Street
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Mario Paniagua, the City Engineer and the Aviation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Customer Information System Managed Services Contract - RFP 2425-WCS-680-
Request for Award (Ordinance S-51939) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Ernst & Young LLP and RCC Global, LLC., to provide managed services to the
Customer Information System (CIS) for the Water Services and Public Works
departments. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $15,620,770.

Summary
This contract will provide the Water Services and Public Works departments with
managed services including Primary Support Services and Batch Operation Services,
to operate, maintain and improve the CIS on a 24/7 basis. The CIS consists of various
system applications utilized to support a range of customer service operations
including customer contact centers, account management, credit management, meter
reading, work management, field activities and financial management.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Four vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An evaluation
committee of City staff evaluated the offers based on the following criteria with a
maximum possible point total of 1,000:

Capability/Experience (0-470 points)
Method of Approach (0-280 points)
Cost (0-250 points)

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendors:




For Primary Support Services:
Ernst & Young, LLP (721.69 points) - Primary Vendor
RCC Global, LLC. (717.50 points) - Secondary Vendor

For Batch Support Services:
RCC Global, LLC. (825.00 points) - Primary Vendor
Ernst & Young, LLP (645.63 points) - Secondary Vendor

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about June 1, 2025 for a five-year term with no options
to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts value will not exceed $15,620,770.

Funding is available in the Water Services and Public Works departments Operating
budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and Mario Paniagua
and the Water Services and Public Works departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Element Laboratory Information Management System - Amendment (Ordinance
S-51944) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment
acknowledging and affirming the substitution of Promium L.L.C. under the Promium
L.L.C. Element Laboratory Information Management System Laboratory Management
System Contract 159164 by Clinisys, Inc.

Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to acknowledge and affirm the responsibility of
Clinisys, Inc. for all obligations and liabilities under the agreement originally with
Promium L.L.C. through merger. This amendment would allow for the project and
project duties to move forward unhindered.

This contract provides a Laboratory Information Management System that will replace
the current legacy system. The system is critical to manage the City's federal and state
permitting requirements as well as the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit and multiple
Environmental Protection Agency programs. The amendment also clarifies the
applicable software version under the contract.

Contract Term
Upon approval the contract will be extended through May 31, 2030.

Financial Impact
There is no requested change to the existing spending authorization for this contract
as part of this amendment.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:

Element Laboratory Information Management System Contract 159164, Ordinance S-
49559, on April 4, 2023.






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
HVAC Maintenance and Repairs - IFB-2425-WWT-685 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-51950) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate
agreements with Artic Air Heating & Cooling Inc., Delta Air Conditioning LLC, Evolution
Mechanical Services, LLC, HACI Service, LLC, and Lee Collins Air Conditioning
Company to provide heating, ventilation, and air conditioning maintenance and repairs
for the Water Services Department. Further request to authorize the CIty Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the agreements will not
exceed $18,693,218.

Summary
The Water Services Department (WSD) is responsible for the maintenance and
upkeep of the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units located in the
Phoenix Metropolitan area and neighboring cities. This agreement will allow WSD to
request maintenance, repairs, and parts on all HVAC units on an as needed basis.
Maintenance and repairs include scheduled preventative maintenance, repairs for
existing units that may break down, and new units when one fails and needs to be
replaced.

Procurement Information
The recommendations were made using an Invitation for Bid procurement process in
accordance with City of Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Twelve vendors submitted bids and are listed below, and five vendors were deemed to
be responsive and responsible. Following an evaluation based on price, the
procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors:

Selected Bidders:
Artic Air Heating & Cooling, Inc.
Delta Air Conditioning LLC
Evolution Mechanical Services, LLC
HACI Service, LLC
Lee Collins Air Conditioning Company




Additional Bidders:
Coolsys Commercial & Industrial Solutions, Inc.
Corporate Air Mechanical Services, Inc.
Optimum Air, LLC
A Quality HVAC Services, L.L.C.
I & A Air Conditioning LLC
Mechanical Brothers Heating & Cooling, LLC
Karber Corporation

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on or about July 1, 2025, for a base three-year term with four
one-year options to extend, for an aggregate seven-year contract term.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contracts value will not exceed $18,693,218.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 240039 - Alley located south of 817 W.
Jefferson Street and north of 119 S. 9th Avenue and stretches west and east
from lot 1 through 10 of Nearhs Addition Plat (Resolution 22304) - District 7

Abandonment: 240039
Project: 23-2020
Applicant: Eric Barcon, Maricopa County Facilities Management
Request: To abandon a 25-foot public utility easement (PUE) that is located between
lots 1 through 10 of block 27 of the Nearhs Addition Plat.
Date of Decision: October 24, 2024

Location
Generally located at the alley located south of 817 W. Jefferson Street and north of
119 South 9th Avenue and stretches west and east from lot 1 through 10 of Nearhs
Addition Plat.
Council District: 7

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the City,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

None. No consideration fee was required as a part of this submittal, although filing fees
were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Right-of-Way - ABND 240047 - Rights-of-way of 8th Avenue and
of 9th Avenue between W. Jefferson Street and W. Madison Street (Resolution
22305) - District 7

Abandonment: 240047
Project: 23-2020
Applicant: Maricopa County
Request: To abandon 8th Avenue and 9th Avenue rights-of-way between W. Madison
Street and W. Jefferson Street (51,480 square feet / 1.18 acres), as shown recorded
within the Neahrs Addition plat (9/29/1897, Book 2, Page 61).
Date of Hearing: December 12, 2024

Location
Generally located for the rights-of-way of 8th Avenue and of 9th Avenue between W.
Jefferson Street and W. Madison Street.
Council District: 7

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the City,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

A fee was also collected as part of this abandonment in the amount of $386,000.00

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Abandonment of Easement - ABND 250002 - 5750 W. Baseline Road (Resolution
22303) - District 8

Abandonment: 250002
Project: 21-1776
Applicant: Steven Bowser
Request: To abandon a 46-foot wide drainage easement described in DOD No. 2003-
0542167 recorded on April 30, 2003 MCR.
Date of Decision: March 6, 2025

Location
Generally located at 5750 W. Baseline Road
Council District: 8

Financial Impact
Pursuant to Phoenix City Code Art. 5, Sec. 31-64 (e) as the City acknowledges the
public benefit received by the generation of additional revenue from the private tax
rolls and by the elimination of third-party general liability claims against the City,
maintenance expenses, and undesirable traffic patterns, also replatting of the area
with alternate roadways and new development as sufficient and appropriate
consideration in this matter.

None. No consideration fee was required as part of this submittal, although filing fees
were paid.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application PHO-1-25--Z-12-
22-7 - Northwest Corner of 47th Avenue and Baseline Road (Ordinance G-7388) -
District 7

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the Planning
Hearing Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council on
matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on April 16, 2025.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-25--Z-12-22-7
Existing Zoning: R1-8
Acreage: 14.07

Owner: Ashton Woods Arizona
Applicant and Representative: Melissa Vasquez, Ashton Woods Arizona

Proposal:
1. Request to modify Stipulation 2 regarding the review of conceptual elevations.

VPC Action: The Laveen Village Planning Committee heard this request on April 14,
2025 and recommended approval with additional stipulations, by vote of 10-0.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer recommended approval with modifications.

Location
Northwest corner of 47th Avenue and Baseline Road
Council District: 7
Parcel Address: 4702 W. Baseline Rd

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STIPULATIONS APPLICABLE TO
REZONING APPLICATION Z-12-22-7 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY
ORDINANCE G-6999.

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning stipulations applicable to the site located at the

northeast corner of 47th Avenue and Baseline Road in a portion of Section 33,

Township 1 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit A and

depicted in Exhibit B, are hereby modified to read as set forth below.

STIPULATIONS:

1. The development shall be in general conformance to the site plan date
stamped May 4, 2022, with specific regard to the following element, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. A minimum of 16% of the gross site area shall be retained as open
space.

2. The conceptual elevations shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Hearing Officer through the public hearing process for
stipulation modification prior to approval of the Single-Family Design
Review Diversity Exhibit, with specific regard to the inclusion of the below
elements. This is legislative review for conceptual purposes only. Specific
development standards and requirements will be determined by the
Planning Hearing Officer and the Planning and Development
Department.



THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE WITH
THE ELEVATIONS DATE STAMPED MARCH 13, 2025, AS MODIFIED
BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS, AND AS APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

a. All elevations shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following
architectural embellishments and detailing: textural changes,
pilasters, offsets, recesses, variation in window size and location,
and/or overhang canopies.

b. All elevations shall incorporate a minimum of three of the following
building materials: native stone, burnt adobe, textured brick, wood
(when shaded by overhangs or deep recesses), slump block,
ceramic tile (matte finish), stucco, and/or exposed aggregate
concrete.

c. The front elevations shall consist of a minimum 25% non-stucco
accent material, EXCEPT SPANISH ELEVATIONS.

d. All garage doors shall have decorative embellishments such as
window panels, added materials surrounding the door, and/or
trellises.

e. A minimum of 75% of the standard elevations provided shall include
patios and/or covered porches in the front yard at a minimum of 60
square feet in area and a depth of at least six feet, and clearly
separated from the front yard with fencing, subject to the Phoenix
Zoning Ordinance.

F. MINIMUM 18-INCH OVERHANG ON ALL FOUR SIDES, EXCEPT
SPANISH ELEVATIONS.

G. ANY STREET FACING SIDE OF A TWO STORY HOME MUST
HAVE A MINIMUM OF 2 WINDOWS OR OTHER VISUAL
ELEMENTS TO BREAK UP BUILDING MASSING.

3. Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 along Baseline Road shall be limited to 26 feet, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. No more than two two-story homes shall be built adjacent to one another
along 47th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

5. Homes shall have minimum 5-foot-wide side yard setbacks.

6. The developer shall install wiring within homes for electric vehicle
capabilities.




7. Required landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 50% 2-inch
caliper and 50% 3-inch caliper large canopy drought-tolerant trees, 20
feet on center or in equivalent groupings, with 5-gallon shrubs per tree,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. The entry drives shall incorporate enhanced landscaping on both sides,
planted with a variety of at least three plant materials, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

9. The developer shall dedicate a 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement
(MUTE) along the north side of Baseline Road and construct a minimum
10-foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) within the easement in accordance
with the MAG supplement detail and as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where conflicts or restrictions exist, the
developer shall work with the Site Planning section on an alternate
design through the technical appeal process.

10. A minimum 22-foot setback shall be provided to the front of garages,
measured from the back of the sidewalk, for each home in the
development, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

11. The developer shall dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way along the west side
of 47th Avenue, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

12. The developer shall complete the west side of 47th Avenue to include a
minimum 5-foot-wide detached sidewalk and minimum 8-foot-wide
landscape area located between the back of curb and sidewalk to match
the northern limit of the site, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

13. The developer shall replenish the existing streetscape along Baseline
Road, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. Where sidewalks are detached along 47th Avenue, Baseline Road, and
internal to the site, the landscape area located between the sidewalk and
back of curb shall be planted to the following standards, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 3-inch caliper, large canopy, single-trunk, shade trees
placed a minimum of 25 feet on center or in equivalent groupings to
provide a minimum of 75% shade on adjacent sidewalks.

b. Drought tolerant shrubs and vegetative groundcovers with a
maximum mature height of 24 inches to provide a minimum of 75%
live coverage at maturity.




c. Where utility conflicts arise, the developer shall work with the
Planning and Development on an alternative design solution
consistent with a pedestrian environment.

15. The developer shall construct a clearly defined and shaded pedestrian
pathway providing access to the multi-use-trail along Baseline Road, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

16. Traffic calming measures shall be installed within the development, as
approved by the Street Transportation Department.

17. The developer shall construct all streets within and adjacent to the
development with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights,
median islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved
by the Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall
comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

18. The developer shall rebuild the bus stop pad along westbound Baseline
Road according to P1260 and P1258, unless stated otherwise by the
Public Transit Department.

19. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant
shall conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey
report of the development area for review and approval by the City
Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or
grading approval.

20. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from
the Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a
qualified archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are
necessary, the applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data
recovery excavations.

21. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during
construction, the developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing
activities within a 33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the City
Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office to properly
assess the materials.

SECTION 2. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district granted pursuant to Ordinance G-6999, this portion of the rezoning is now

subject to the stipulations approved pursuant to Ordinance G-6999 and as modified in

Section 1 of this Ordinance. Any violation of the stipulation is a violation of the City of




Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Building permits shall not be issued for the subject site

until all the stipulations have been met.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or

portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the

validity of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 21st day of May,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR



ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:


A - Legal Description (1 Page)
B - Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PHO-1-25--Z-12-22-7


The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Maricopa, State of
Arizona, and is described as follows:







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Consideration of Citizen Petition Related to High Visibility Crosswalk Markings
and Stop Bars - Citywide

This report provides the City Council with information in response to a citizen petition
submitted by Nicole Rodriguez at the May 7, 2025, Formal City Council meeting
regarding high visibility crosswalks and stop bars (Attachment A).

Summary
The petitioner requests the City Council to:
1. Update the City's policy and design guidelines to require the use of high visibility
crosswalk markings at all signalized and non-signalized pedestrian crossings; and,
2. To require stop bars at all pedestrian crossings, including intersections with signals,
stop signs, and HAWK crossings.

Phoenix has invested in a comprehensive Road Safety Action Plan (RSAP). The RSAP
includes a method for evaluating data and determines a High Injury Network (HIN) that
identifies problem locations and prioritizes solutions, providing a framework and key
strategies for safety enhancements Citywide. In September 2022, the Phoenix City
Council unanimously approved a comprehensive Vision Zero Road Safety Action Plan
and allocated $10 million in annual funding for its implementation. The plan creates a
data-driven, decision-making process to identify and prioritize transportation safety
improvements.

In January 2025, the Vision Zero Executive Task Force approved the Street
Transportation Department to install high visibility crosswalks and stop bars to those
areas of greatest need, balancing maintenance, budget limitations, and the need for
expansion of street infrastructure with a focus on school zones and high schools. The
department will also continue to focus on locations within the HIN.

Adding high visibility crosswalks and stop bars at all intersections and crossings is not
a requirement in City Code, Arizona statute or in rules published by the Federal
Highway Administration.

Staff recommends denying the petition but continue with installing high visibility
crosswalks and stop bars to those areas of greatest need, balancing maintenance,



budget limitations, and the need for expansion of street infrastructure with a focus on
school zones and high schools.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Inger Erickson and the Street Transportation Department.





ATTACHMENT A







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Consideration of Citizen Petition Related to 7th Avenue and 7th Street Reverse
Lanes - Districts 3, 4 & 6

This report provides the City Council with information in response to a citizen petition
submitted by Stacey Champion at the May 7, 2025, Formal City Council meeting,
requesting (1) the removal of the 7th Avenue and 7th Street reverse lanes, and (2) a
plan to remove or cover the reverse lane signage and create a reeducation /public
service announcement plan (Attachment A).

Summary
The petitioner requests the City Council to:
1. Remove the 7th Avenue and 7th Street reverse lanes; and,
2. Direct the City Manager, or his designee, to develop a timely plan to remove or
cover the reverse lane signage and create a reeducation/PSA plan and/or campaign
for drivers and the public who use the 7th Avenue and 7th Street reverse lanes.

Reverse lanes have been in place on 7th Avenue and 7th Street since 1979 and 1982,
respectively. They were created to address traffic concerns as Phoenix was growing its
downtown core. In 1979, the Mayor and City Council challenged staff to come up with
transportation system management solutions to the growing traffic congestion
problems caused largely by the lack of a regional freeway system. Reverse lanes were
proposed as a cost-effective solution to address the traffic issues, especially since
widening 7th Street and 7th Avenue was not practical.

In 1979, the two-way left turn lane on 7th Avenue was converted into a reverse lane
from approximately McDowell Road to Northern Avenue. Seventh Street was
converted to reverse lanes in 1982 between approximately McDowell Road and
Dunlap Avenue. In both cases, the reverse lanes added significant capacity while
reducing cut-through traffic in the neighborhood resulting from the congestion.

How the reverse traffic lane works on 7th Avenue and 7th Street:
· Monday through Friday during morning peak traffic hours, 6 a.m. to 9 a.m., the two-
way left turn lane (i.e. reversible lane) is used in the southbound direction and in the
afternoon peak hours, 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., it is used in the northbound direction.
· Left turns are typically prohibited at all arterial and most collector street


intersections but left-turns are allowed at other non-signalized streets and at
driveways for access.
· Overhead and roadside signs are used to indicate the reverse lane hours of
operation, direction of operation, and the prohibition of left-turns are posted
frequently throughout the corridors.

In recent years the department has received concerns from residents about the
reverse lanes. In response to concerns raised by residents, the Street Transportation
Department contracted with a third-party engineering firm to conduct a traffic study.
The results of the study were completed and released in December 2021 (Attachment
B).

The study concluded that the reversible lanes provide additional peak hour capacity
and serve as regionally significant routes. Eliminating the reversible lanes partially or
completely will create operational delays and increase travel times by more than 40
percent. In addition, several signalized intersections will operate at an unacceptable
level of service when reversible lanes are eliminated and can increase the potential for
crashes associated with traffic congestion. The study findings indicated that operations
along 7th Avenue and 7th Street did not differ significantly from other arterial streets in
the central Phoenix area.

As part of the City's Road Safety Action Plan, the City's High Injury Network (HIN) was
adopted. The HIN maps corridors where high numbers of people have been killed or
severely injured in traffic crashes and is a tool for road safety initiatives. The reversible
lanes did not meet data analysis qualifications to be included in the High Injury
Network.

A new study for the Central City Corridor (McDowell Road to Dunlap Avenue, 19th
Avenue to 16th Street) is expected to be procured in fiscal year 2025-26. This study
will review traffic for all arterials and collectors within this area, including a review of
the reversible lanes.

Staff recommends denying this petition to allow the Street Transportation Department
to conduct a more comprehensive study that will evaluate all the traffic impacts from
19th Avenue to 16th Street and McDowell Road and Dunlap Avenue, including the
reversible lanes. Staff will present the findings of the study to City Council for direction
on how to proceed upon completion of the study.

Location
7th Avenue from approximately McDowell Road to Northern Avenue and 7th Street
between approximately McDowell Road and Dunlap Avenue


Council Districts: 3, 4 and 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Inger Erickson and the Street Transportation Department.





ATTACHMENT A




ATTACHMENT B



7’s Reverse Lane Study
7th Street and 7th Avenue
from McDowell Road to Dunlap Avenue


Technical Memorandum


Project No. ST89340552-1




Prepared for:




Prepared by:




December 2021




12/20/2021 421
Project Leadership
200 W. Washington Street, 5th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85003

Simon Ramos
Email: Simon.Ramos@phoenix.gov
Telephone: 602.534.5351

Study Consultant

Burgess & Niple, Inc.
1500 N. Priest Drive, Suite 102
Tempe, AZ 85281
Telephone: 602.244.8100




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Page ii of vi December 2021422
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary................................................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 5
3.0 Study Area .............................................................................................................................................................. 6
3.1. 7th Avenue Study Area ................................................................................................................................. 8
3.2. 7th Street Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 8
3.3. Regional Significance of Reversible Lanes ...................................................................................................... 9
4.0 Relevant Studies ..................................................................................................................................................... 9
4.1. Washington D.C. ......................................................................................................................................... 10
4.2. State Route 173, Utah ................................................................................................................................. 10
4.3. Charlotte, North Carolina on Tyvola Road ................................................................................................... 11
4.4. Louisville, Kentucky on Bardstown Road ..................................................................................................... 11
4.5. Covington, Kentucky on the Clay Wade Bailey Bridge .................................................................................. 11
5.0 7th Avenue Overview............................................................................................................................................ 12
5.1. Roadway Characteristics and Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 12
5.2. Traffic Signal Timing Plans ........................................................................................................................... 15
5.3. Existing Traffic Volumes .............................................................................................................................. 15
5.3.1. INRIX Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 19
5.4. Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts .................................................................................................................... 21
5.5. Transit Service ............................................................................................................................................ 23
6.0 7th Street Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 24
6.1. Roadway Characteristics and Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 24
6.2. Traffic Signal Timing Plans ........................................................................................................................... 27
6.3. Existing Traffic Volumes .............................................................................................................................. 27
6.3.1. INRIX Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 31
6.4. Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts .................................................................................................................... 33
6.5. Transit Service ............................................................................................................................................ 35
7.0 Reversible Lane Conflict Areas .............................................................................................................................. 36
8.0 7th Avenue Crash Analysis .................................................................................................................................... 42
8.1. Driver Behavior – Field Observations........................................................................................................... 51
8.2. Bus Stop Conflicts ....................................................................................................................................... 53
9.0 7th Street Crash Analysis....................................................................................................................................... 53
9.1. Driver Behavior – Field Observations........................................................................................................... 61
9.2. Bus Stop Conflicts ....................................................................................................................................... 62
10.0 Traffic Operations Analysis.................................................................................................................................... 63
10.1.1. MAG Regional Travel Demand Model ........................................................................................... 63
10.1.2. Origin Destination Analysis ........................................................................................................... 64
10.1.3. Microsimulation Model Development in Vissim ............................................................................ 65
10.1.4. Synchro Model ............................................................................................................................. 66
11.0 7th Avenue Existing Conditions: Impact of Turn Violations .................................................................................... 67
12.0 7th Street Existing Conditions: Impact of Turn Violations ...................................................................................... 69
13.0 Field Review Findings ............................................................................................................................................ 72

7’s Reverse Lane Study
Page iii of vi December 2021423
13.1. ADA Compliance ......................................................................................................................................... 72
13.3. 7th Avenue ................................................................................................................................................. 76
13.3.1. Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................... 76
13.3.2. Sign Placement and Sign Type ...................................................................................................... 76
13.3.3. Driver Maneuvers......................................................................................................................... 78
13.4. 7th Street.................................................................................................................................................... 78
13.4.1. Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................... 78
13.4.2. Sign Placement and Sign Type ...................................................................................................... 78
13.4.3. Driver Maneuvers......................................................................................................................... 81
14.0 Improvement Strategies........................................................................................................................................ 81
14.1. Considered Improvement Strategies ........................................................................................................... 84
15.0 Preliminary Cost Estimates of Improvement Strategies ......................................................................................... 85
15.1. Static Sign Removal Cost Estimate............................................................................................................... 87
15.2. Static Sign Replacement Cost Estimate........................................................................................................ 87
15.3. Intersection Improvements Cost Estimate................................................................................................... 88
15.4. Fiber Trunk Line Cost Estimate .................................................................................................................... 89
15.5. Dynamic Lane Control Sign System Cost Estimate ....................................................................................... 89
15.6. Restriping Cost Estimate ............................................................................................................................. 91
15.7. Bus Bay Cost Estimate ................................................................................................................................. 92
16.0 Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................ 93

List of Tables

Table 3-1 – 7th Avenue: Street Classification Summary .................................................................................................... 8
Table 3-2 – 7th Street: Street Classification Summary ...................................................................................................... 8
Table 5-1 – 7th Avenue Route 8 Bus Stop Locations ........................................................................................................23
Table 6-1 – 7th Street Route 7 Bus Stop Locations ...........................................................................................................35
Table 8-1 – 7th Avenue Crash Distribution by Year and Severity ......................................................................................42
Table 8-2 – 7th Avenue Reversible Lane Crash Distribution by Year and Severity .............................................................42
Table 8-3 – 7th Avenue Standard Operation Crash Distribution by Year and Severity ......................................................43
Table 8-4 – 7th Avenue First Harmful Event ....................................................................................................................43
Table 8-5 – 7th Avenue Reversible Lane First Harmful Event ...........................................................................................44
Table 8-6 – 7th Avenue Standard Operation First Harmful Event .....................................................................................44
Table 8-7 – 7th Avenue Violations Cited in Pedestrian Crashes ........................................................................................45
Table 8-8 – 7th Avenue Manner of Collision in Multi-Vehicle Crashes..............................................................................48
Table 9-1 – 7th Street Crash Distribution by Year and Severity ........................................................................................53
Table 9-2 – 7th Street Reversible Lane Crash Distribution by Year and Severity ...............................................................54
Table 9-3 – 7th Street Standard Operation Crash Distribution by Year and Severity .........................................................54
Table 9-4 – 7th Street First Harmful Event .......................................................................................................................55
Table 9-5 – 7th Street Reversible Lane First Harmful Event..............................................................................................55
Table 9-6 – 7th Street Standard Operation First Harmful Event .......................................................................................56
Table 9-7 – 7th Street Violations Cited in Pedestrian Crashes ..........................................................................................57
Table 9-8 – 7th Street Manner of Collision in Multi-Vehicle Crashes ................................................................................59
Table 10-1 – Travel Time Comparison..............................................................................................................................65
Table 10-2 – LOS Thresholds for Signalized Intersections.................................................................................................66
Table 10-3 – LOS Thresholds for Unsignalized Intersections ............................................................................................66
Table 11-1 – 7th Avenue Overall Intersection Delay AM Peak Hour .................................................................................68
Table 11-2 – 7th Avenue Overall Intersection Delay PM Peak Hour .................................................................................68

7’s Reverse Lane Study
Page iv of vi December 2021424
Table 12-1 – 7th Street Overall Intersection Delay AM Peak Hour ...................................................................................70
Table 12-2 – 7th Street Overall Intersection Delay PM Peak Hour....................................................................................71
Table 14-1 – Improvement Strategy Considerations ........................................................................................................82
Table 15-1 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Static Sign Removal Improvements ..................................................................87
Table 15-2 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Static Sign Replacement Improvements ...........................................................87
Table 15-3 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Intersection Improvements ..............................................................................88
Table 15-4 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Fiber Trunk Line Network .................................................................................89
Table 15-5 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Dynamic Lane Control Sign Improvements (Staple Sign Structure)....................91
Table 15-6 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Restriping Improvements .................................................................................91
Table 15-7 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Bus Bay Improvements ....................................................................................92

List of Figures

Figure 1 – Improvement Levels Summary 7th Avenue ...................................................................................................... 3
Figure 2 – Imporvement Levels Summary 7th Street ........................................................................................................ 3
Figure 3 – Vicinity Area .................................................................................................................................................... 7
Figure 4 – Dynamic Lane Control Spatial Schematic .........................................................................................................10
Figure 5 – Reversible Lane on Tyvola Road, Charlotte, NC ...............................................................................................11
Figure 6 – 7th Avenue Existing Land Use .........................................................................................................................13
Figure 7 – 7th Avenue Future Land Use ...........................................................................................................................14
Figure 8 – 7th Avenue Turning Movement Count Locations.............................................................................................16
Figure 9 – 7th Avenue Existing Turning Movement Counts ..............................................................................................17
Figure 10 – 7th Avenue Existing Traffic Volumes .............................................................................................................18
Figure 11 – 7th Avenue Travel Speeds by Direction of Travel ...........................................................................................19
Figure 12 – 7th Avenue Travel Time by Direction of Travel ..............................................................................................20
Figure 13 – 7th Avenue Planning Time by Direction of Travel ..........................................................................................20
Figure 14 – 7th Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts at Crosswalks ..............................................................................22
Figure 15 – 7th Street Existing Land Use ..........................................................................................................................25
Figure 16 – 7th Street Future Land Use ...........................................................................................................................26
Figure 17 – 7th Street Turning Movement Count Locations .............................................................................................28
Figure 18 – 7th Street Existing Turning Movement Counts ..............................................................................................29
Figure 19 – 7th Street Existing Traffic Volumes................................................................................................................30
Figure 20 – 7th Street Travel Speeds by Direction of Travel .............................................................................................31
Figure 21 – 7th Street Time of Day Distribution by Direction of Travel .............................................................................32
Figure 22 – 7th Street Planning Time by Direction of Travel.............................................................................................32
Figure 23 – 7th Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts ......................................................................................................34
Figure 24 – Conflict Area Type 1 ......................................................................................................................................36
Figure 25 – Conflict Area Type 2 ......................................................................................................................................37
Figure 26 – Conflict Area Type 3 ......................................................................................................................................38
Figure 27 – Conflict Area Type 4 ......................................................................................................................................39
Figure 28 – Conflict Area Type 5 ......................................................................................................................................40
Figure 29 – Conflict Area Type 6 ......................................................................................................................................41
Figure 30 – 7th Avenue Pedestrian Crashes .....................................................................................................................47
Figure 31 – 7th Avenue Heat Map of Sideswipe Crashes..................................................................................................50
Figure 32 – 7th Street Pedestrian Crash Location and Severity ........................................................................................58
Figure 33 – 7th Street Heat Map of Sideswipe Crashes ....................................................................................................60
Figure 34 – Lane-Based Microsimulation Model Development Methodology ..................................................................63
Figure 35 – Vissim Model for the Reversible Lane Corridors ............................................................................................65
Figure 36 – Standard Reversible Lane Control Signs per MUTCD ......................................................................................84
Figure 37 – Reversible Lane Corridor Improvement Levels ..............................................................................................86
7’s Reverse Lane Study
Page v of vi December 2021425
Figure 38 – Sample Mast Arm Dynamic Sign Display ........................................................................................................90
Figure 39 – Sample Intersection Dynamic Sign Display ....................................................................................................90

Appendices

Appendix A 7th Avenue Roadway Classifications and Intersections
Appendix B 7th Street Roadway Classifications and Intersections
Appendix C 7th Avenue Traffic Signal Timing Plans
Appendix D 7th Street Traffic Signal Timing Plans
Appendix E 7th Avenue Existing Traffic Counts
Appendix F 7th Street Existing Traffic Counts
Appendix G 7th Avenue and 7th Street Conflict Areas
Appendix H 7th Avenue Existing Configurations Capacity Analysis Results
Appendix I 7th Street Existing Configurations Capacity Analysis Results
Appendix J 7th Avenue Corridor Improvements Map book
Appendix K 7th Street Corridor Improvements Map book
Appendix L 7th Avenue and 7th Street Preliminary Cost Estimates
Appendix M 7th Street Reverse Lane Operations Study McDowell Road to Osborn Road Technical Memorandum




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Page vi of vi December 2021426
1.0 Executive Summary
A planning and traffic operations study was initiated to examine the existing traffic operations, safety and ITS
infrastructure along the 7th Avenue and 7th Street corridors, where the reversible lanes are present, north of downtown
Phoenix. Currently, the reversible lanes are operational during the AM and PM peak hours (6-9 AM and 4-6 PM). This
planning and operations study identifies strategies and associated costs to improve the traffic operations and safety on
both the 7th Avenue and 7th Street reversible lane corridors. Strategies to improve operations and safety have been
developed based on field review, operational analysis, crash data analysis, review of existing infrastructure on the study
corridors and published documentation on reversible lane operations in similar cities.

The study was completed in two phases:
1. Phase 1 considered the removal of the reversible lane between McDowell Road and Osborn Road on 7th Street.
Phase 1 was expedited to support traffic impact studies for developments along 7th Street. Phase 1 concluded
that the reversible lane on 7th Street between McDowell Road and Osborn Road is essential to maintain
acceptable traffic operations and serve the expected travel demand to and from downtown Phoenix. Phase 1 also
concluded that the lane utilization of the reversible lane is less than the utilization of the normal through lanes
and that it can be increased by improving reversible lane sign visibility and enforcement.


2. Phase 2 evaluated the traffic operations along the entire stretch of the reversible lane corridors on both 7th
Avenue and 7th Street. 7th Avenue and 7th Street were evaluated separately to better convey the existing
operations as well as quantify corridor improvements. Phase 2 developed high-level cost estimates for
improvement strategies which ranged from improving communication and detection to an overhaul of existing
sign control in lieu of advanced dynamic lane control strategies. In addition to sign control, signal control and ITS
infrastructure improvement costs, Phase 2 also estimated costs to restripe the reversible lane corridors for
uniform lane widths and to add pull-out bus bays at Valley Metro bus stop locations.


Field reviews were conducted to observe traffic operations during peak hours and document existing intersection
infrastructure and reversible lane signs. Field observations indicated that most of the drivers on the reversible lanes are
generally familiar with using the reversible lanes. However, there were numerous instances where drivers performed
unsafe maneuvers as they exit or enter the reversible lane. These include turning left where prohibited, turning into the
reversible lanes from side streets when the reversible lane is operational as an opposing through lane, bypassing a vehicle
waiting to turn into a side street from the reversible lane by making sudden and unexpected lane changes at slow speeds
conflicting with fast moving vehicles on a regular through lane. Field review also indicated that vehicles bypass stopped
Valley Metro buses at bus stops often causing slowdown of traffic and resulting in unsafe headways in vehicular stream
on congested portions of the two corridors.

Operational analysis of the two corridors indicates that the reversible lanes are required to accommodate the directionally
heavy traffic in the peak hours. The ADT on 7th Avenue varies between 35,000 and 62,000 and on 7th Street between
46,000 and 65,000. Traffic counts provided by the City indicated that a few vehicles make prohibited left turning
maneuvers at signalized intersections during the peak hours when the reversible lanes are operational. Operational
analysis using the intersection volumes as provided indicated that the prohibited left turn maneuvers reduce the through
lane capacity substantially. Travel demand analysis of the two corridors using a dynamic traffic assignment process in
microsimulation platform indicated that the reversible lanes are essential to accommodate the vehicular demand in the
peak hours. Operations along parallel north-south arterials including Central Avenue, 15th Avenue and 12th Street will
deteriorate if the reversible lanes on 7th Street and 7th Avenue are eliminated. Moreover, the traffic using the reversible
lanes is generally on the shortest path to get to their eventual destinations; vehicular travel times will not improve if
reversible lanes are eliminated.


7’s Reverse Lane Study
Corridor crash analyses were performed to assess the safety of both corridors. Crash distributions and severities were
compared to the statewide averages for 2018 (expected fatal crash distribution of 0.51%, an expected possible injury crash
distribution of 26.8%, and an expected no injury crash distribution of 70.8%). These values were used as a baseline for all
crash analyses and it was determined that both corridors experience crash rates that exceed the statewide averages.
Findings indicate that along 7th Avenue 41.1% of crashes occurred when the reversible lane was operational and 58.9%
occurred during other times. Further, along 7th Street 44.1% of crashes occurred when the reversible lane was operational
and 55.9% occurred during other times. Within the Study Area, five of the top 100 high-risk crash intersections exist per
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) “Top 100 Intersections Ranked by Crash Risk – 2014 to 2018 Crash Data”.
These intersections are as follows:
1. 7th Avenue and Indian School Road
2. 7th Street and McDowell Road
3. 7th Street and Indian School Road
4. 7th Street and Bethany Home Road
5. 7th Street and Camelback Road


Improvement strategy categories, as defined in this report, can be used as a baseline for future corridor improvements to
improve traffic operations and corridor safety along 7th Avenue and 7th Street. Seven improvement strategies were
selected from a decision matrix based on corridor need and were categorized by:
1. No-build improvements,
2. Communication improvements, and
3. Operations improvements.

Field visits indicated that at a minimum the existing reversible lane static signs should be removed and replaced to remove
inconsistencies in signage and to eliminate sign structures with poor structural integrity of the mast arms. Beyond the
minimum requirements for improvement, alternatives including intersection improvements, fiber trunk line additions,
dynamic lane control signs, corridor restriping, and pull-out bus bay constructions were considered.

High-level cost estimates have been compiled for each improvement strategy and are broken down by individual corridor.
Corridor Improvement Levels have been defined to identify different paths to improve the operations and safety along
the reversible lanes on 7th Avenue and 7th Street along with the cost of each improvement level, in million USD as shown
in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 1 – Improvement Levels Summary 7th Avenue




$1.05

Static Sign Removal
and Replacement $7.02


Improvement Levels
Static Sign Removal Intersection
and Replacement Improvements $13.99



7th Avenue
Restriping and/or Bus
Static Sign Removal Fiber Trunk Line Dynamic Lane Control
Bays $19.96

Intersection Restriping
Static Sign Removal Fiber Trunk Line Dynamic Lane Control
Improvements and/or Bus Bays




Figure 2 – Imporvement Levels Summary 7th Street




$1.25

Static Sign Removal
and Replacement $9.93


Improvement Levels
Static Sign Removal Intersection $16.19
and Replacement Improvements



7th Street
Restriping and/or Bus
Static Sign Removal Fiber Trunk Line Dynamic Lane Control
Bays $24.87

Intersection Restriping
Static Sign Removal Fiber Trunk Line Dynamic Lane Control
Improvements and/or Bus Bays




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Proposed costs associated with each improvement strategy based on corridor are as follows:
• Static Sign Removal and Replacement
o 7th Avenue: $1.05 million
o 7th Street: $1.25 million
• Static Sign Removal
o 7th Avenue: $150,000
o 7th Street: $190,000
• Intersection Improvements
o 7th Avenue: $5.97 million
o 7th Street: $8.68 million
• Fiber Trunk Line
o 7th Avenue: $4.78 million
o 7th Street: $5.55 million
• Dynamic Lane Control
o 7th Avenue: $8 13 million
o 7th Street: $9.03 million
• Corridor Restriping
o 7th Avenue: $340,000
o 7th Street: $410,000
• Bus Bays
o 7th Avenue: $4.80 million
o 7th Street: $5.56 million

The City can pursue any combination of the above identified strategies to improve both traffic operations and safety along
the two corridors. At a minimum, it is recommended that the City remove and replace the existing static reversible lane
signs along the two corridors.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
2.0 Introduction
A planning and traffic operations study was initiated to examine the existing traffic operations, safety and ITS
infrastructure along the 7th Avenue and 7th Street corridors, where the reversible lanes are present, north of downtown
Phoenix. Currently, the reversible lanes are operational during the AM and PM peak hours (6-9 AM and 4-6 PM).

The reversible lane corridor along 7th Avenue extends from McDowell Road to Northern Avenue; the corridor along 7th
Street extends from McDowell Road to Dunlap Road. The corridors are considered as two separate entities for analysis
purposes. In doing so, traffic operations, safety analysis and cost estimates are able to be quantified. Analysis will be
conducted using travel demand and microsimulation models to classify the current operations of the reversible lanes for
the City. Travel demand modeling will enable the identification of origin-destination traffic patterns during reversible lane
hours. Microsimulation modeling will quantify operational effects of the reversible lane. Improvements strategies will be
recommended in order to ease traffic operations during reversible lane operations along both corridors, as well as provide
upgrades to the existing infrastructure of the corridor intersections.

The initial phase of the study evaluated the reversible lane operations on 7th Street between McDowell Road and Osborn
Road in the City of Phoenix (City) and determined that the reversible lanes shall remain within the corridors. Findings
proposed that sign visibility and enforcement improvements would improve the through volume capacity and vehicular
safety of the Study Area. This report was submitted to the City on June 15, 2020 and revised for submittal on July 10, 2020.
The full report can be found in Appendix M.

This report will analyze the second phase of the study which addresses the entire Study Area. The scope of the second
phase is to identify opportunities to improve traffic operations of reversible lanes on 7th Avenue and 7th Street in the City
of Phoenix. In the existing conditions, the reversible lanes are operational during peak hours and are implemented via
static overhead lane control signs. Several sign structures and foundations need repair and upkeep. A few static overhead
signs were recently removed and not replaced while the City identifies a comprehensive solution to address and improve
the reversible lane operations. The study team identified several improvement strategies to upgrade the corridors and
improve operations. This project report describes these improvement strategies, benefits and associated costs as well as
identifies the summary costs associated with each of the improvement strategies.

The static overhead sign structures need replacement and are included in the cost estimation process. Therefore, the cost
associated with the static sign structure removal and replacement will serve as a benchmark (no-build) cost for comparison
purposes. In addition to the static sign improvements, the signalized intersections along the corridor can benefit from
improved detection and communications. Therefore, an additional benchmark for cost considerations will be intersection
control upgrades which may include, upgrades to detection, communication, cabinets and other related infrastructure.

This report will review the existing reversible lane infrastructure and identify potential improvement strategies as
mentioned to enhance the functionality of the reversible lanes. The study will identify opportunities for efficient
operations, ITS infrastructure integration, and other traffic management measures in the corridors to optimize their
operational performance. Strategies to improve traffic flows and throughput on 7th Avenue and 7th Street include
dynamic lane control sign installation, upgrading striping to create travel lanes with uniform width and to replace in-lane
bus stops with pull-out bus bays. Project costs, inclusive of design, construction, right-of-way and utility costs were
calculated for each improvement category as outlined in this report as well.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
3.0 Study Area
The reversible lane corridors on 7th Avenue and 7th Street are from East McDowell Road to Northern Avenue and from
East McDowell Road to East Dunlap Road, respectively. The vicinity map is shown in Figure 3.

Interstate 10 (I-10), located south of the Study Area, is a major interstate facility in the region and provides connections
to the greater Phoenix region. All the roadways that provide a direct connection to I-10 include:
• 16th Street a mile Street to the east;
• 3rd Street a quarter-mile to the west;
• 7th Avenue a mile to the west; and
• 19th Avenue two miles to the west.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 3 – Vicinity Area




7’s Reverse Lane Study
3.1. 7th Avenue Study Area
7th Avenue is classified as a major arterial in the Study Area. It intersects with 6 major arterials streets and 5 collector
streets. There are 13 signalized intersections and 65 unsignalized intersections as listed in Table 3-1. A detailed list of the
corresponding roadways and intersections can be found in Appendix A. Unsignalized intersections account for the local
side streets that are along the corridor. Potential conflict areas are likely caused by prohibited turning movements at
signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Major/minor/local arterials in the north-south direction parallel to 7th Avenue include:
• 15th Avenue a half mile to the west;
• Central Avenue a half mile to the east; and
• 7th Street a mile to the east.


Table 3-1 – 7th Avenue: Street Classification Summary
Major Arterials Collector Streets Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections
6 5 13 65

Along 7th Avenue, within the study area, there are three locations of pedestrian High-intensity Activated crossWalK
(HAWK) signals. The pedestrian HAWK signals are located along 7th Avenue at Flower Street, Glenrosa Avenue, and
Highland Avenue. In the future, a pedestrian HAWK signal is planned for 7th Avenue and Turney Avenue. The pedestrian
HAWK signal gets activated when pedestrians push the ped actuation button associated with the HAWK signal. When the
HAWK is activated, the traffic in the north-south directions on 7th Avenue is stopped.

3.2. 7th Street Study Area
7th Avenue is classified as a major arterial in the Study Area. It intersects with 7 major arterials streets and 16 collector
streets. There are 20 signalized intersections and 63 unsignalized intersections as listed in Table 3-2. A detailed list of the
corresponding roadways and intersections can be found in Appendix B. Unsignalized intersections account for the local
side streets that are along the corridor. Potential conflict areas are likely caused by prohibited turning movements at
signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Major/minor/local arterials in the north-south direction parallel to 7th Street include:
• 12th Street a half mile to the east;
• 16th Street a-mile to the east;
• Central Avenue a half mile to the west; and
• 7th Avenue a mile to the west.


Table 3-2 – 7th Street: Street Classification Summary
Major Arterials Collector Streets Signalized Intersections Unsignalized Intersections
7 16 20 63

In addition to the signalized intersections identified above, the intersection of 7th Street and Oak Street has a pedestrian
HAWK signal. Operations of the HAWK signal are the same as those on 7th Avenue. This HAWK will be upgraded to a full
signal in the future with the Oak Street Project between 3rd Street and State Route (SR) 51. Evaluation of this signal was
not included in the scope of this project.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
3.3. Regional Significance of Reversible Lanes
In close proximity to the Study Area are Interstate 17 (I-17) to the west and SR 51 to the east. Both freeways run parallel
to the 7th Avenue and 7th Street reversible lane corridors. The initial implementation of the reversible lanes began in
1979; the City converted the center two-way left turn lane into a reversible lane between McDowell Road and Northern
Avenue along 7th Avenue. Shortly after, the City converted the center two-way left turn lane on 7th Street to a reversible
lane in 1982. The reversible lanes added through traffic capacity while reducing cut through traffic in the surrounding
neighborhoods resulting from the congestion during peak hours. Currently, both I-17 and SR 51 experience high volumes
of traffic during peak periods which causes traffic congestion. Due to this, drivers will seek alternative routes to travel to
and from downtown Phoenix. Existing footprints of both I-17 and SR 51 prevent the expansion which provides a rationale
to improve the reversible lane corridors. Improvements to the reversible lane corridors will help mitigate traffic congestion
along the existing highway network and provide drivers with alternative, yet time efficient routes.

4.0 Relevant Studies
Reversible lanes have been utilized by transportation and traffic engineers for the past 80 years to redirect heavy flows of
traffic at certain times of day or during certain occasions. In the late 1970s, Phoenix, Arizona, became one of the first cities
to implement reversible lanes to mitigate unbalanced traffic volumes during peak hours. These corridors are typically
accompanied by complex roadway signage and multiple traffic lights throughout the corridor. At times, they can provide
flexibility in the segment location because the hours of reverse lane operation can be adjusted to better suit the demand
of traffic volume.

Reversible lanes have been used to target high directional congestion, mitigate event traffic at stadiums, or in case of
emergencies (flood cases for hurricanes). The overall outcomes of reversible lanes should be to, at its maximum efficiency,
reduce congestion by borrowing lanes during peak hours, postpone the need to construct additional lanes to meet volume
demand, and hasten evacuation during unexpected weather conditions.

Reversible lanes have been most successful on existing roadways with at least two lanes in each direction where the traffic
volumes are split, at a minimum of 65 percent in one direction at a given time frame. Reversible lanes are incorporated
into existing roadway networks where the initial design of the road previously did not meet the capacity requirements.

In 2007, the Phoenix City Council asked the Street Transportation Department to evaluate the operations of the reversible
lanes and analyze project traffic conditions. Concerns arose from business owners along the corridors who expressed that
business was negatively impacted due to limited left turn access points during peak hours. For the scope of the study, four
alternatives were considered:
1. Maintain reverse lane operation;
2. Remove reverse lanes;
3. Keep reverse lanes and modify to add overhead flashing beacons or lane control devices; and
4. Test the removal of the reverse lane on 7th Avenue for one year.


As a result of the 2007 study, in 2010, the City published a Reverse Lane Study for 7th Avenue and 7th Street. The analysis
examined traffic crash history, capacity, and other operational characteristics. Study findings indicated that operations
along 7th Avenue and 7th Street were safe compared to similar arterial streets in the central Phoenix area. There was no
supporting evidence that crash data differed significantly from surrounding streets. Travel times are relatively the same
surrounding alternative northbound and southbound traffic routes. In addition, the reverse lane during peak hour
operations carries a substantial amount of traffic on both 7th Avenue and 7th Street. Future growth (from 2007 to present
day and future cases) will likely result in increased congestion and travel delays; removal of the reverse lanes could
intensify the traffic congestion during peak hours.



7’s Reverse Lane Study
The following sections document implementation of reversible lane strategies and implementation methods across
other major Cities in the United States.

4.1. Washington D.C.
In Washington D.C., the reversible lane system operates with reliable signal barriers to address safety concerns in the
highly populated area. The combination of high-level functional architecture, monitoring and controlling components, and
evaluation criteria create an effective system of reversible lanes.

High-Level Functional Architecture utilizes traffic control centers to monitor traffic performance, check timing, and
regularly updates data along the corridor. By doing so, it supports continuous monitoring of vehicles utilizing the reversible
lane. The unique roadway detectors can detect wrong way vehicles or misuse of the reversible lane during operation
hours. At the control centers, roadway signs are monitored and can be changed instantaneously to caution drivers about
changes in reverse lane operations. Within the roadway itself, monitoring and controlling components such as inductive
loop detectors (roadway sensors and video cameras) and in-pavement LED lights are used to enhance visibility of the
direction of the reversible lane. In using the design elements, the city has an effective method of informing drivers of the
presence and direction of reversible lane.

4.2. State Route 173, Utah
Along this Utah corridor, there is an imbalance of traffic during the AM and PM travel directions. Utah Department of
Transportation (UDOT) identified that flex lanes would ease congestion in the corridor. Flex lanes are synonymous to
reversible lanes. During the AM peak hour, there are four lanes traveling eastbound and two lanes traveling in westbound.
In the PM peak hour, the roadway configuration is the opposite; four lanes traveling westbound, two lanes traveling
eastbound. It also provides a two-way left turn lane. During different peak hour cases, the seven-lane corridor transitioned
between different reverse lane and two-way left turn lane configurations. The left most lane in either direction served as
a two-way left turn (i.e. during the AM peak hour, there were two westbound lanes, then a two-way left turn lane, next
to four eastbound lanes.

Schematic design of spatial transition zones was identified during the design phases of this corridor. Figure 4 depicts a
sample progression of dynamic lane control signs during reversible lane operations. The timing plans associated with the
displays were engineered based on reversible lane operation time frames. The State Route 173 corridor accounts for a
buffer zone during transition periods to allow drivers to adjust to the changes in lane control when necessary.

Figure 4 – Dynamic Lane Control Spatial Schematic




Source: Reversible Lanes in Utah – Adding Efficiency Safely (Proceedings of 2010 Transportation Association of Canada Annual Conference)



7’s Reverse Lane Study
4.3. Charlotte, North Carolina on Tyvola Road
The reversible lanes system was implemented prior to the Charlotte Coliseum opening in 1987 but was rebuilt in 1998 and
is used to accommodate the traffic demand associated with special events. A five-lane road was constructed with three
reversible lanes so that four lanes could be used before and after events. It uses overhead signals in order to direct traffic
at the coliseum for traffic to flow more smoothly. It is considered one of the most technologically sophisticated systems
in the United States. Obtained from the 2000 NCHRP Synthesis 340: Convertible Roadways and Lanes, Figure 5 displays
the dynamic lane control signs placed on overhead mast arms within the corridor.

Figure 5 – Reversible Lane on Tyvola Road, Charlotte, NC




4.4. Louisville, Kentucky on Bardstown Road
Bardstown Road is a major arterial feeding Downtown Louisville that has reversible lanes for 2½ miles. Southbound traffic
leaving Downtown Louisville is restricted to one lane during the morning rush hour with northbound traffic having the
same restriction during the evening rush hour. Electronic signs over the roadway alert motorists to the traffic flow
dedication of each lane.

4.5. Covington, Kentucky on the Clay Wade Bailey Bridge
The Clay Wade Bailey Bridge is a cantilever bridge that carries US Route 42 and 127 across the Ohio River which connects
Cincinnati, Ohio to Covington, Kentucky. It is 675 feet wide and has three lanes which use the center lane as a reversible
lane to be used during heavy traffic flow in the appropriate direction of flow.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
5.0 7th Avenue Overview
5.1. Roadway Characteristics and Infrastructure
7th Avenue is a six-lane arterial road with posted speeds of 35 mph between McDowell Road and Missouri Avenue and
40 mph between Missouri Avenue and Northern Avenue. The roadway consists of two southbound lanes, three
northbound lanes, and a reversible lane. The reversible lane operates from McDowell Road to Northern Avenue. When
the reversible lane is not in operation, the lane is used as a two-way left turn lane. The light rail crosses at the intersection
of Camelback Avenue and 7th Avenue.

The reversible lane operates as an additional southbound lane from 6 to 9 AM. Between 4 and 6 PM, the reversible lane
operates as an additional northbound lane. At most signalized intersections, northbound and southbound left turns are
prohibited during reversible lane operations. During certain hours of operations, northbound and southbound left turns
are permitted at signalized intersections. At McDowell Road, left turns are permitted on all approaches. At Encanto
Boulevard, northbound left turns are permitted during the PM peak period (4-6 PM). At Earll Drive, southbound left turns
are permitted during the AM peak period (6-9 AM). At Campbell Avenue, northbound left turns are permitted during the
PM peak hour and southbound left turns are permitted during the AM peak hour. At Camelback Road, northbound left
turns are permitted during the PM peak hour and southbound left turns are permitted during the AM peak hour. At
Northern Avenue, northbound and southbound left turns are permitted during the PM peak hour. Note that east and west
lane configurations do not change during peak or off-peak hours. Left turns in the southbound and northbound directions
are generally allowed at unsignalized intersections and to businesses adjacent to the corridor.

The Study Area is entirely in the jurisdictions of the City. The City operates and maintains all signalized intersections along
this corridor. Along 7th Avenue between McDowell Road and Indian School Road, the existing land use is primarily
residential with some open space and educational to the west and some commercial and medical to the east. Between
Indian School Road and Camelback Road, the existing land use is primarily commercial and residential. North of Camelback
Road, the existing land use is predominantly residential.

In the future, some land use along Camelback Road and east of 7th Avenue from McDowell Road to Camelback Road shifts
to mixed use. This shift might reduce auto dependency for travel as the area is served by light rail and transit. The existing
and future land use of the Study Area is shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 6 – 7th Avenue Existing Land Use




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 7 – 7th Avenue Future Land Use




7’s Reverse Lane Study
5.2. Traffic Signal Timing Plans
Traffic signal timing plans were provided by the City for signalized intersections within the Study Area. The traffic signal
timing plans can be found in Appendix C. The plans were used to perform the existing conditions analysis.

5.3. Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing turning movement count data were collected at 13 Study Area locations on November 27, 2018, with count data
for Camelback Road collected on November 29, 2018. Count locations are shown in Figure 8. Counts were collected for 6
hours: from 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM, from 11 AM to 1 PM and from 4 PM to 6 PM. The northbound through movements in
the PM peak hour are greater than the southbound through movements in the AM peak hour. The 2018 peak hour turning
movement counts collected for the Study Area are shown on Figure 9. As mentioned in Section 5.1, left turns are
prohibited at signalized intersections during the peak periods. However, left turn movements were observed at these
locations. These left turn maneuvers reduce the intersection capacity in the peak hours. More detailed traffic count data
is included in Appendix E.

The turning movement counts were used to derive 24-hour traffic volumes along the corridor. Figure 10 shows the existing
annual average daily traffic (AADT) for the Study Area corridor.

Existing daily traffic volumes along 7th Avenue within Study Area extents along the corridor; AADT ranges between
approximately 35,000 and 62,000 vehicles per day. The highest AADT is near the middle of the corridor at Indian School
Road. The AADT increases south to north between McDowell Road and Indian School Road, then the AADT decreases from
south to north between Indian School Road and Northern Avenue. The AADT is directionally skewed towards northbound.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 8 – 7th Avenue Turning Movement Count Locations




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 9 – 7th Avenue Existing Turning Movement Counts




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 10 – 7th Avenue Existing Traffic Volumes




7’s Reverse Lane Study
5.3.1. INRIX Data Analysis
The corridor experiences two traditional peaks representing commuter traffic and a mid-day peak representing
commercial traffic. Historic data, prior to the shelter-in home orders, was examined from the INRIX database for 7th
Avenue. The posted speed limited along 7th Avenue is 35 mph from McDowell Road to Missouri Avenue and 40 mph from
Missouri Avenue to Northern Avenue. The travel speeds by time and direction of travel are shown in Figure 11. The graphs
depict the average speed during a 24-hour typical weekday case. As shown, the speeds are generally less than that of the
posted speed even during off-peak hours possibly due to narrow lanes and side street friction. In both the northbound
and southbound directions, there is a notable travel speed reduction in both peak periods. The travel time by time and
direction of travel are shown in Figure 12 and the planning time by time and direction of travel are shown in
Figure 13. The decrease in travel speeds along 7th Avenue causes an increase in travel time and planning time. In the
northbound direction, there is an increase in travel and planning time during both peak periods. In the southbound
direction, there is also a notable increase in travel and planning time in both peak periods.


Figure 11 – 7th Avenue Travel Speeds by Direction of Travel




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 12 – 7th Avenue Travel Time by Direction of Travel




Figure 13 – 7th Avenue Planning Time by Direction of Travel




7’s Reverse Lane Study
5.4. Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts
Existing bicycle and pedestrian count data were collected at 15 Study Area locations on November 27, 2018, with count
data for Camelback Road collected on November 29, 2018. Counts were collected for 6 hours: from 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM,
from 11 AM to 1 PM and from 4 PM to 6 PM. The Study Area experiences a high bicycle and pedestrian volume.
Frequent pedestrian actuations at signalized intersections can reduce vehicular throughput and reduce capacity of the
overall intersections. In the study corridor, pedestrian push buttons are available at minor collector streets. Therefore,
the high pedestrian demand will not result in reduced capacity due to actuations. Higher peak hour travel demand
combined with pedestrian activity increases the potential for pedestrian related crashes in the Study Area. The 6-hour
bicycle and pedestrian counts collected for the Study Area are shown on Figure 14.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 14 – 7th Avenue Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts at Crosswalks




7’s Reverse Lane Study
5.5. Transit Service
The Study Area is serviced by the Valley Metro Rail and Local Bus systems. Metro Valley Local Bus Route 8 runs directly
along 7th Avenue as far south as Baseline Road and as far north as Dunlap Avenue and operates seven days a week. During
weekdays, it operates with approximately a half-hour frequency from 4:00 AM to 1:00 AM. Hours of operation extend
later on Friday evenings. Passengers may board the bus routes at designated bus stops. Bus Route 8 along the study
corridor primarily has “in lane” bus stops, with a few “pull out” bus stops, as shown in Table 5-1. When a bus stops at an
“in lane” bus stop, a lane of traffic is not operational for a few minutes. In that time, the vehicular throughputs are reduced
significantly.

Table 5-1 – 7th Avenue Route 8 Bus Stop Locations
Transit Stop Location NB Stop Location SB Stop Location
7th Avenue and McDowell Road In Lane Pull Out
7th Avenue and Palm Lane In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Encanto Boulevard In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Virginia Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Thomas Road Pull Out In Lane
7th Avenue and Earll Drive In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Osborn Road In Lane Pull Out
7th Avenue and Indianola In Lane In Lane
Avenue/Clarendon Avenue
7th Avenue and Indian School Road In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Glenrosa Avenue In Lane Pull Out
7th Avenue and Campbell Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Highland Avenue/Elm In Lane In Lane
Street
7th Avenue and Camelback Road In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Colter Road In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Missouri Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Luke Avenue In Lane -
7th Avenue and Montebello In Lane In Lane
Avenue/Solano Drive
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Rose Lane In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Maryland Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Ocotillo Road In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Glendale Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Myrtle Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Orangewood In Lane In Lane
Avenue/Vista Avenue
7th Avenue and Frier Drive In Lane In Lane
7th Avenue and Northern Avenue In Lane In Lane

Within the Study Area, the noted transit Route 8 overlaps with Valley Metro Local Bus Routes 17, 29, 41, 50, 60, 70, 80,
and 90. Bus Route 0 runs parallel to Bus Route 8 along Central Avenue as far south as Dobbins Road and as far north as
Dunlap Avenue. Bus Route 0 operates with approximately a half-hour frequency from 4:00 AM to 1:30 AM. During peak
travel periods, the bus route frequency increases. Hours of operation extend later on Friday evenings. Passengers may
board the bus routes at designated bus stops.


7’s Reverse Lane Study
The Valley Metro Rail extends from the intersection of 19th Avenue and Dunlap Avenue to the intersection of Gilbert Road
and Main Street. The Valley Metro Rail travels eastbound and westbound along Camelback Road west of Central Avenue
then travels along Central Avenue within the Study Area. The Valley Metro Rail operates during weekdays with
approximately a 15-minute frequency from 3:30 AM to 1:20 AM. Hours of operation extend later on Friday evenings.
Passengers may board the Valley Metro Rail at designated rail stations.

The Central Avenue and Camelback Road Park and Ride (PNR) is within the Study Area. In the current condition, the Central
Avenue and Camelback Road PNR can be accessed via two driveways. The driveway connecting to 3rd Avenue is a full
access drive while the driveway connecting to Camelback Road allows right in/right out access. The 7th Avenue and
Camelback Road PNR is also within the Study Area. This PNR can be accessed by two right in/right out driveways
connecting to Camelback Road.

Sunnyslope Multi Access Residential Transit (SMART), a free neighborhood circulator service provided by Phoenix Public
Transit, operates within the Study Area towards the north. SMART intersects with 7th Avenue at Hatcher Road, runs
parallel to Central Avenue between Hatcher Road and Mountain View Road, and intersects 7th Street at Alice Avenue,
Hatcher Road, and Mountain View Road. SMART operates during weekdays with a 35-minute frequency from 6:00 AM to
6:45 PM. Passengers may board SMART at designated bus stops and in “Flag Stop” zones.

6.0 7th Street Overview
6.1. Roadway Characteristics and Infrastructure
7th Street is a six-lane arterial road with posted speeds of 35 mph between McDowell Road and Missouri Avenue, 40 mph
between Missouri Avenue and Butler Drive, and 35 mph between Butler Drive and Dunlap Avenue. The roadway consists
of two southbound lanes, three northbound lanes, and a reversible lane. The reversible lane operates from McDowell
Road to Dunlap Avenue. When the reversible lane is not in operation, the lane is used as a two-way left turn lane.

The reversible lane operates as an additional southbound lane from 6 to 9 AM. Between 4 and 6 PM, the reversible lane
operates as an additional northbound lane. At most signalized intersections, northbound and southbound left turns are
prohibited during reversible lane operations. During certain hours of operations, northbound and southbound left turns
are permitted at signalized intersections. At McDowell Road, left turns are permitted on all approaches. Note that east
and west lane configurations do not change during peak or off-peak hours. Left turns in the southbound and northbound
directions are generally allowed at unsignalized intersections and to businesses adjacent to the corridor.

The Study Area is entirely in the jurisdictions of the City. The City operates and maintains all signalized intersections along
this corridor. Between McDowell Road and Indian School Road, the existing land use is primarily commercial/office to the
west and residential to the east. Between Indian School Road and Bethany Home Road, the land use consists of
commercial, educational, and some residential. From Bethany Home Road to Northern Avenue, the land use is
predominantly residential with some commercial. Between Northern Avenue and Dunlap Avenue, the land usage is
commercial and residential. In the future, the land use west of 7th Street shifts to mixed use. This shift might reduce auto
dependency for travel as the area is served by light rail and transit. The existing and future land use of the Study Area is
shown in Figure 15 and Figure 16.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 15 – 7th Street Existing Land Use




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 16 – 7th Street Future Land Use




7’s Reverse Lane Study
6.2. Traffic Signal Timing Plans
Traffic signal timing plans were provided by the City for signalized intersections within the Study Area. The traffic signal
timing plans can be found in Appendix D. The plans were used to perform the existing conditions analysis.

6.3. Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing turning movement count data were collected at 18 Study Area locations on November 29, 2018, with count data
for Bethany Home Road and Rose Lane collected on November 27, 2018. Count locations are shown in Figure 17. Counts
were collected for 6 hours: from 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM, from 11 AM to 1 PM and from 4 PM to 6 PM. The northbound
through movements in the PM peak hour are greater than the southbound through movements in the AM peak hour. The
2018 peak hour turning movement counts collected for the Study Area are shown on Figure 18. As mentioned in Section
6.1, left turns are prohibited at signalized intersections during the peak periods. However, left turn movements were
observed at these locations. These left turn maneuvers reduce the intersection capacity in the peak hours. More detailed
traffic count data is included in Appendix F.

The turning movement counts were used to derive 24-hour traffic volumes along the corridor. Figure 19 shows the existing
AADT for the Study Area corridor.

Existing daily traffic volumes along 7th Street within Study Area extents along the corridor; AADT ranges between
approximately 46,000 and 65,000 vehicles per day. The highest AADT is near Highland Avenue, in the middle of the
corridor. The AADT increases south to north between McDowell Road and Highland Avenue, then decrease from Highland
Avenue to Dunlap Road. Road. A K-factor of 8.0% was used. The AADT is directionally skewed towards northbound.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 17 – 7th Street Turning Movement Count Locations




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 18 – 7th Street Existing Turning Movement Counts




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 19 – 7th Street Existing Traffic Volumes




7’s Reverse Lane Study
6.3.1. INRIX Data Analysis
The corridor experiences two traditional peaks representing commuter traffic and a mid-day peak representing
commercial traffic. Historic data, prior to the shelter-in home orders, was examined from the INRIX database for 7th Street.
The posted speed limited along 7th Street rages from 35 to 40 mph. The travel speeds by time and direction of travel are
shown in
Figure 20. The graphs depict the average speed during a 24-hour typical weekday case. As shown, the speeds are generally
less than that of the posted speed even during off-peak hours possibly due to narrow lanes and side street friction. In the
northbound direction, there is a notable travel speed reduction in the PM peak period. In the southbound direction, there
is also a notable travel speed reduction in both peak periods. The travel time by time and direction of travel are shown in
Figure 21 and the planning time by time and direction of travel are shown in Figure 22. A decrease in travel speeds along
7th Street causes an increase in corridor travel time and planning time. For vehicles traveling northbound, there is an
increase in travel time and planning time during both peak periods due to reduced speeds. Similarly, during southbound
traffic, increased travel time and planning time is experienced by vehicle drivers during both peak periods.


Figure 20 – 7th Street Travel Speeds by Direction of Travel




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 21 – 7th Street Time of Day Distribution by Direction of Travel




Figure 22 – 7th Street Planning Time by Direction of Travel




7’s Reverse Lane Study
6.4. Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts
Existing bicycle and pedestrian count data were collected at 18 Study Area locations on November 29, 2018, with count
data for Bethany Home Road and Rose Lane collected on November 27, 2018. Counts were collected for 6 hours: from
6:30 AM to 8:30 AM, from 11 AM to 1 PM and from 4 PM to 6 PM. The Study Area experiences a high bicycle and pedestrian
volume. Frequent pedestrian actuations at signalized intersections reduce vehicular throughput and reduce capacity of
the overall intersections. In the study corridor, pedestrian push buttons are available at minor collector streets. Therefore,
the high pedestrian demand will not result in reduced capacity due to actuations. Higher peak hour travel demand
combined with pedestrian activity increases the potential for pedestrian related crashes in the study area. The 6-hour
bicycle and pedestrian counts collected for the Study Area are shown on Figure 23. Note that the mid-block HAWK at Oak
Street will become a fully signalized intersection in the future.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 23 – 7th Street Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts




7’s Reverse Lane Study
6.5. Transit Service
Metro Valley Bus Route 7 runs directly along 7th Street as far south as Dobbins Road and as far north as Deer Valley Road
and operates seven days a week. During weekdays, it operates with approximately a half-hour frequency from 4:00 AM
to 2:00 AM. During peak travel periods, the bus route frequency increases. Hours of operation extend later on Friday
evenings. Passengers may board the bus routes at designated bus stops. Bus Route 7 along the study corridor primarily
has “in lane” bus stops, with a few “pull out” bus stops, as shown in Table 6-1. When a bus stops at an “in lane” bus stop,
a lane of traffic is not operational for a few minutes. In that time, the vehicular throughputs are reduced significantly.

Table 6-1 – 7th Street Route 7 Bus Stop Locations
Transit Stop Location NB Stop Location SB Stop Location
7th Street and McDowell Road In Lane Pull Out
7th Street and Granada Road/Palm In Lane In Lane
Lane
7th Street and Oak Street In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Virginia Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Thomas Road Pull Out Pull Out
7th Street and Earll Drive In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Osborn Road In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Weldon Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Indian School Road Pull Out In Lane
7th Street and Montecito Avenue/ In Lane In Lane
Devonshire Avenue
7th Street and Grand Canal/Roma In Lane In Lane
Avenue
7th Street and Highland Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Camelback Road In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Colter Street In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Missouri Avenue In Lane Pull Out
7th Street and Montebello Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Bethany Home Road Pull Out In Lane
7th Street and Rose Lane In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Maryland Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Ocotillo Road In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Glendale Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Nicolet Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Orangewood Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Belmont Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Northern Avenue Pull Out In Lane
7th Street and Corte Oro/ Griswold In Lane In Lane
Road
7th Street and Butler Drive In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Alice Avenue In Lane In Lane
7th Street and Townley Avenue In Lane -
7th Street and Dunlap Avenue Pull Out Pull Out

Within the Study Area, the noted transit Route 7 overlaps with Valley Metro Local Bus Routes 17, 29, 41, 50, 60, 70, 80,
and 90. The Study Area is also serviced by the Valley Metro Rail and other local bus systems.


7’s Reverse Lane Study
7.0 Reversible Lane Conflict Areas
Conflict areas exist when vehicles make prohibited turning movements during reversible lane operations. Conflict areas
stem from vehicles turning left at signalized intersections or turning left at any other point along the corridor. Figure 24
through Figure 29 depict movements of vehicles at the mentioned potential conflict areas during the AM peak hour along
7th Avenue and 7th Street. All conflict areas for the corridors can be found in Appendix G. Reversible lane operations are
in effect during weekday peak periods, the remaining time periods and weekends the reversible lane acts as a center two-
way left turn lane.

Conflict Area Type 1 exists at signalized intersections along the 7th Avenue and 7th Street corridors. Posted regulatory
signs at intersection signal mast arms, with the exception of 7th Avenue and Camelback Road prohibit vehicles turning left
from northbound and southbound approaches during reversible lane operations. This conflict area is displayed in Figure
24.

Figure 24 – Conflict Area Type 1




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Conflict Area Type 2 exists along the corridor at any access point, in particular local roads or business driveways. Conflict
areas shall be considered when vehicles turn left across lanes of traffic during reversible lane operations and use the
reversible lane as a stopping point before merging into the flow of travel. As such, this creates the potential for a head-
on collision for drivers obeying reversible lane regulations. This conflict area is displayed in Figure 25.

Figure 25 – Conflict Area Type 2




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Conflict Area Type 3 considers vehicle drivers treating the reversible lane as only a turn lane to access side street or
driveway access points. This conflict area is displayed in Figure 26.

Figure 26 – Conflict Area Type 3




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Conflict Area Type 4 combines Conflict Area Types 2 and 3 to account for drivers who are unaware that the reversible
lane is in operation. This conflict area was commonly seen during field visits during transition periods (fifteen minutes
before and after the posted reversible lane operation time frame). This conflict area is displayed in Figure 27.

Figure 27 – Conflict Area Type 4




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Conflict Area Type 5 is a result of vehicles disobeying reversible lane operations per Conflict Area Type 3. When vehicles
use the reversible lane as a center two-way left turn lane, vehicles behind the driver turning left are queued. As a result,
queues drivers may signal to change lanes which results in creating unsafe driving conditions on through lanes adjacent
to the reversible lanes. This conflict area is displayed in Figure 28.

Figure 28 – Conflict Area Type 5




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Conflict Area Type 6 is a result of driver confusion of reversible lane operations. A conflict area arises when vehicles are
traveling in the reversible lane and a vehicle traveling in the opposite direction desires to make a prohibited left turn.
This causes a queue of vehicles in the reversible lane, which some may choose to merge to the right. This conflict area is
displayed in Figure 29.

Figure 29 – Conflict Area Type 6




7’s Reverse Lane Study
8.0 7th Avenue Crash Analysis
Crash data for the five-year period from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, was obtained from the City database.
Within this period, a total of 2,262 crashes occurred along 7th Avenue in the Study Area. Crash distribution by year and
severity is summarized in Table 8-1. Comparisons to statewide averages for urban areas are offered to provide context to
Study Area performance. Statewide crash information was collected from the 2018 Arizona Motor Vehicle Crash Facts
(Crash Facts) published by ADOT and was found to have an expected fatal crash distribution of 0.51%, an expected possible
injury crash distribution of 26.8%, and an expected no injury crash distribution of 70.8%. These values are used as a
baseline for all crash analyses.

Table 8-1 – 7th Avenue Crash Distribution by Year and Severity
Incapacitating Non-incapacitating Possible
Year Fatal No Injury Total
Injury Injury Injury
2014 1 9 30 69 282 391
2015 0 6 38 90 297 431
2016 1 10 64 78 355 508
2017 1 6 44 74 334 459
2018 2 13 37 75 346 473

Total 5 44 213 386 1,614 2,262
% 7th Avenue 0.22% 1.9% 9.4% 17.1% 71.4% 100%
% Statewide
0.51% 28.6% 70.8% 100%
Urban Areas
Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % statewide urban areas.


Table 8-1 indicates the Study Area experiences a higher proportion of property damage only (PDO) crashes than
experienced in urban areas statewide. Crash analysis was performed for both standard operation and reversible lane
operation. As previously noted, the reversible lane operates during the peak period for five hours a day. It should be noted
this period likely accounts for approximately 32% of average daily trips. Of the 2,262 crashes, 930 (41.1%) occurred while
the reversible lane was operational and 1,332 (58.9%) occurred during standard operation. Crash distribution during
reversible lane operation by year and severity is summarized in Table 8-2; standard operation is summarized in Table 8-3
Comparisons are offered to the five-year crash history for 7th Avenue.

Table 8-2 – 7th Avenue Reversible Lane Crash Distribution by Year and Severity
Incapacitating Non-incapacitating Possible
Year Fatal No Injury Total
Injury Injury Injury
2014 1 2 8 25 104 140

2015 0 1 16 29 143 189
2016 0 1 28 30 154 213

2017 1 2 15 30 144 192


7’s Reverse Lane Study
2018 0 3 10 42 141 196

Total 2 9 77 156 686 930

% 7th Avenue RL 0.2% 1.0% 8.3% 16.8% 73.8% 100%

% 7th Avenue 0.2% 1.9% 9.4% 17.1% 71.4% 100%

Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % of overall crashes on 7th Avenue.




Table 8-3 – 7th Avenue Standard Operation Crash Distribution by Year and Severity
Incapacitating Non-incapacitating Possible
Year Fatal No Injury Total
Injury Injury Injury
2014 0 7 22 44 178 251
2015 0 5 22 61 154 242

2016 1 9 36 48 201 295
2017 0 4 29 44 190 267
2018 2 10 27 33 205 277

Total 3 35 136 230 928 1,332

% 7th Avenue SO 0.2% 2.6% 10.2% 17.3% 69.7% 100%
% 7th Avenue 0.2% 1.9% 9.4% 17.1% 71.4% 100%

Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % of crashes on 7th Avenue.


Table 8-1 through Table 8-3 indicate that overall, 7th Avenue experiences a lower proportion of injury crashes than urban
areas statewide. The percentage of fatal crashes is equivalent during reversible and standard lane operation. A slightly
higher proportion of injury crashes occur during standard operation. Congested corridors sometimes experience fewer
severe crashes due to lower speeds, which may be a contributing factor to this distribution.

The first harmful event was assessed for the Study Area as well as both operations. The results follow in Table 8-4 through
Table 8-6.

Table 8-4 – 7th Avenue First Harmful Event
% Fatal % Fatal
% Statewide
First Harmful Event Type Total % 7th Avenue Fatal 7th Statewide
Urban Areas
Avenue Urban Areas
Collision with Motor Vehicle in
2,063 91.2% 80.5% 1 20.0% 38.4%
Transport
Overturning 0 0.0% 0.8% 0 0.0% 3.7%

Collision with Pedestrian 58 2.6% 1.4% 4 80.0% 34.0%


7’s Reverse Lane Study
Collision with Pedalcyclist 30 1.3% 1.1% 0 0.0% 3.4%

Collision with Animal 0 0.0% 0.3% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Collision with Fixed Object 44 1.9% 7.7% 0 0.0% 18.8%

Collision with Non-fixed Object* 36 1.6% 4.3% 0 0.0% 0.2%

Vehicle Fire or Explosion 0 0.0% 0.1% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Other Non-collision** 1 0.0% 0.2% 0 0.0% 1.1%

Unknown/Not Reported/Other 30 1.3% 3.7% 0.0% 0.4%

Total 2,263 100% 100% 5 100.0% 100.0%

Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % statewide urban areas.




Table 8-5 – 7th Avenue Reversible Lane First Harmful Event
% 7th Avenue % Fatal
First Harmful Event Type Total % 7th Avenue Fatal % Fatal
Reversible Lane 7th Avenue
Collision with Motor Vehicle in
898 95.4% 91.2% 0 0.0% 20.0%
Transport
Overturning 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Collision with Pedestrian 13 1.4% 2.6% 2 100.0% 80.0%

Collision with Pedalcyclist 8 0.9% 1.3% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Collision with Animal 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Collision with Fixed Object 13 1.4% 1.9% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Collision with Non-fixed Object* 6 0.6% 1.6% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Vehicle Fire or Explosion 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Other Non-collision** 1 0.1% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Unknown/Not Reported/Other 2 0.2% 1.3% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Total 941 100% 100% 2 100.0% 100.0%

Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % of crashes on 7th Avenue.




Table 8-6 – 7th Avenue Standard Operation First Harmful Event
% 7th Avenue
% Fatal
First Harmful Event Type Total Standard % 7th Avenue Fatal % Fatal
7th Avenue
Operation
Collision with Motor Vehicle in 1,175 88.2% 91.2% 1 33.3% 20.0%
7’s Reverse Lane Study
Transport

Overturning 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Collision with Pedestrian 46 3.5% 2.6% 2 66.6% 80.0%

Collision with Pedal cyclist 22 1.7% 1.3% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Collision with Animal 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Collision with Fixed Object 31 2.3% 1.9% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Collision with Non-fixed Object* 30 2.3% 1.6% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Vehicle Fire or Explosion 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Other Non-collision** 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Unknown/Not Reported/Other 28 2.1% 1.3% 0 0.0% 0.0%

Total 1,332 100% 100% 3 100.0% 100.0%

Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % of crashes on 7th Avenue.


Considering the corridor characteristics (straight, very urban setting, etc.), a higher proportion of multivehicle crashes and
fewer fixed object and animal crashes seems appropriate. However, there is a higher percentage of pedestrian and bicycle
crashes. Pedestrian crashes account for 4 fatalities (80.0%) and 16 incapacitating injuries (36.3%); bicycle crashes account
for 2 of the incapacitating crashes (4.5%). If possible, mitigating measures for bicycle and pedestrian crashes, especially
the latter, should be identified as part of potential solutions. Crash analysis indicated:

• 4 out of the 5 fatal crashes involved a pedestrian.
• Most of the pedestrian crashes occurred between 3 PM and 7 PM.
• Fault was assigned to the driver in 28 crashes and the pedestrian in 30 crashes.

Table 8-7 – 7th Avenue Violations Cited in Pedestrian Crashes

Violation Count Percent Driver Cited Pedestrian Cited

Did Not Use Xwalk 13 22.4% 0 13
Disregarded Pavement Markings 2 3.4% 1 1
Disregarded Signal 5 8.6% 5
Failed to Yield 19 32.8% 15 4
Inattention 1 1.7% 1 0
Speed Too Fast 2 5.2% 2 0
Traveling in Opposing Lane 1 8.6% 0 1
Unknown 7 3.4% 5 2
Other 5 1.7% 1 4

7’s Reverse Lane Study
None 3 12.1% 3 0

Total 58 28 30

As shown, the most prevalent driver violation was failure to yield; the most common pedestrian violation was not using a
crosswalk. Though street lighting is present, the majority of pedestrian crashes (53.4%) occur during dark/dusk/dawn
conditions; statewide, the majority of crashes occur during daylight conditions (70.9%). Pedestrian level lighting could be
considered to mitigate nighttime pedestrian crashes, whether at key intersections or through the corridor. The most
nighttime pedestrian crashes occurred at Indian School Road (7 crashes). A map showing the location and severity of
pedestrian crashes is included as Figure 30.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 30 – 7th Avenue Pedestrian Crashes




7’s Reverse Lane Study
473 Page 47 of 93 December 2021
There are pedestrian crashes clustered at Indian School Road, Camelback Road, and at the Grand Canal Trail multiuse path
crossing. Notes and observations from each of these locations follow.

Indian School Road
There are bus stops on all four legs of the intersection of Indian School Road and 7th Avenue. During the field review on
March 6, 2020 (pre-COVID-19 traffic shift), a large number of pedestrians were observed at this intersection.

Grand Canal Trail Multiuse Path Crossing
Based on aerial imagery, some type of overhead signing was installed on the north leg of the multiuse path intersection
just south of the intersection at Campbell Avenue and 7th Avenue sometime between February 2018 and August 2018; it
was converted to a HAWK between August 2018 and May 2019.

Camelback Road
There is a light rail station as well as bus stops on all four legs of the intersection at Camelback Road.

The manner of collision in multi-vehicle crashes was assessed and is presented in Table 8-8.

Table 8-8 – 7th Avenue Manner of Collision in Multi-Vehicle Crashes

7th Avenue
Collision Manner Standard % Statewide
All Times % All Times Reversible Lane
Operation
Angle 412 20.0% 16.7% 20.9% 14.5%

Backing 6 0.3% 0.0% 0.5% -

Left Turn 341 16.5% 11.0% 19.4% 16.5%

Rear End 717 34.8% 31.4% 34.8% 44.4%

Head-On 13 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 1.7%

Sideswipe (same) 513 24.9% 36.0% 14.3% 15.5%

Sideswipe (opposite) 31 1.5% 1.2% 1.5% 1.4%

U-Turn 24 1.2% 1.2% 1.0% 0.2%

Other 6 0.3% 2.3% 5.9% 5.2%

Unknown 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7%

Total 100% 100% 100%
Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values over statewide averages

The Study Area experiences a higher percentage of sideswipe crashes (same and opposite direction), as well as angle and
U-turn crashes compared to the statewide average. An analysis of the collision manner along 7th Avenue through the
Study Area indicated a higher percentage of left-turn and sideswipe crashes than the statewide area averages. Sideswipe
same direction crashes are exacerbated during reversible lane operation, occurring at 2.3 times the rate during standard
operations and compared to the statewide average. There is a slightly higher proportion of left-turn crashes during
standard operation. Solutions should seek to mitigate sideswipe same direction crashes during reversible lane operation

7’s Reverse Lane Study
and left-turn crashes at other times. Angle crash mitigation should also be considered.
An examination of the crash trends within the Study Area shows:

• During the AM peak period reversible lanes, 121 sideswipe crashes occurred. 80 of the crashes were when both
cars were heading south, in the direction of the reversible lane.
• During the PM peak period reversible lanes, 213 sideswipe crashes occurred. 174 of the crashes were when both
cars were heading north, in the direction of the reversible lane.
A heat map depicting the location of the sideswipe crashes is included as Figure 31. Figure 31 indicates hot spots at major
arterial intersections, especially at Indian School and Camelback Roads.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 31 – 7th Avenue Heat Map of Sideswipe Crashes




7’s Reverse Lane Study
476 Page 50 of 93 December 2021
8.1. Driver Behavior – Field Observations
The following are general observations which were taken from the field review conducted on Friday, March 6, 2020 as
well as on Wednesday, August 26, 2020.
• Numerous drivers traveling with and against the reversible lane make left-turns that can result in potentially
unsafe conditions.
o Drivers traveling with the reversible lane were observed using it as a left-turn lane at signalized
intersections; these turning movements violate posted no-left turn signs.
o Drivers treating the “Green-Ball” at intersections as a permissive left turn phase creating potential for
rear-end collisions.
o Drivers traveling against the reversible lane made mid-block left-turns either from the through lane
(adjacent to the reversible lane) or from the reversible lane;
• Little separation between reversible through lane and opposing traffic; potential for opposing direction side-swipe
crashes.




Photo 1 – Driver Turning Left at Northern Avenue During AM Peak (Static No Left-Turn Sign Visible)




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Photo 2 – Driver Turning Left at Camelback Road During PM Peak (No Left-Turn Sign Visible)




Photo 3 and Photo 4 – Driver Turning Left from Opposing Through Lane




Photo 5 – Queueing in Adjacent Through Lanes Approaching Indian School Road (Southbound)




7’s Reverse Lane Study
The reversible lane is operational during peak hours and likely experiences a large proportion of the same commuter traffic
day to day. It has also been operational for a number of years. Driver behavior, paired with the history and location of the
corridor, suggest many drivers are aware of the reversible lane operation, but are non-compliant. Based on field
observations, it appears there is poor driver compliance with no-left turn signage. Sideswipe collisions may be attributed
to drivers avoiding delay or rear-end collisions by abruptly merging when another driver is waiting to turn left from the
reversible lane. Crash reports may be able to provide additional insights. Potential solutions should strive to mitigate
sideswipe collisions during reversible lane operation and should consider past driver compliance challenges.

8.2. Bus Stop Conflicts
The majority of bus stops that exist along 7th Avenue are in-lane bus stops. The Valley Metro Route 8 travels northbound
and southbound within the corridor. In-lane bus stops require the bus to stop in the right-most travel lane in order to drop
off and/or pick up passengers. Corridor free flow travel is impacted by in-lane bus stops, as vehicles traveling behind on
the bus are required to stop or change lanes in order to maintain speed. Bus bay locations exist in few locations along the
corridor and can be found in Table 5-1. They provide buses the opportunity to allow passengers to enter and exit the
transit system without delaying the far-right travel lane. However, during congested periods bus bays may provide
challenges for buses to reenter the traffic. The conversion of in-lane bus stops to pull-out bus bays will improve free flow
travel and increase corridor safety by reducing the potential conflict pinch points.

9.0 7th Street Crash Analysis
Crash data for the five-year period from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, was obtained from the City database.
Within this period, a total of 3,989 crashes occurred along 7th Street in the Study Area. Crash distribution by year and
severity is summarized in Table 9-1. Comparisons to statewide averages for urban areas are offered to provide context to
Study Area performance. Statewide crash information was collected from the 2018 Arizona Motor Vehicle Crash Facts
(Crash Facts) published by ADOT and was found to have an expected fatal crash distribution of 0.51%, an expected possible
injury crash distribution of 26.8%, and an expected no injury crash distribution of 70.8%. These values are used as a
baseline for all crash analyses.

Table 9-1 – 7th Street Crash Distribution by Year and Severity
Incapacitating Non-incapacitating Possible
Year Fatal No Injury Total
Injury Injury Injury
2014 0 17 43 143 489 692
2015 2 11 72 174 497 756

2016 3 20 94 142 604 863

2017 5 16 82 141 601 845
2018 2 16 67 132 616 833

Total 12 80 358 732 2,807 3,989

% 7th Street 0.30% 2.0% 9.0% 18.4% 70.4% 100%
% Statewide
0.51% 28.6% 70.8% 100%
Urban Areas
Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % statewide urban areas.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Table 9-1 indicates the Study Area experiences a higher proportion of property damage only (PDO) crashes than
experienced in urban areas statewide. Crash analysis was performed for both standard operation and reversible lane
operation. As previously noted, the reversible lane operates during the peak period for five hours a day. It should be noted
this period likely accounts for approximately 29% of average daily trips. Of the 3,989 crashes, 1,759 (44.1%) occurred while
the reversible lane was operational and 2,230 (55.9%) occurred during standard operation. Crash distribution during
reversible lane operation by year and severity is summarized in Table 9-2; standard operation is summarized in Table 9-3.
Comparisons are offered to the five-year crash history for 7th Street.

Table 9-2 – 7th Street Reversible Lane Crash Distribution by Year and Severity
Incapacitating Non-incapacitating Possible No
Year Fatal Total
Injury Injury Injury Injury
2014 0 4 20 48 218 290
2015 0 6 25 66 236 333
2016 1 6 28 65 291 391

2017 1 3 29 67 264 364

2018 0 4 41 58 278 381

Total 2 23 143 304 1,287 1,759
% 7th Street RL 0.11% 1.3% 8.1% 17.2% 73.2% 100%

% 7th Street 0.30% 2.0% 9.0% 18.4% 70.4% 100%

Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % of overall crashes on 7th Street.




Table 9-3 – 7th Street Standard Operation Crash Distribution by Year and Severity
Incapacitating Non-incapacitating Possible
Year Fatal No Injury Total
Injury Injury Injury
2014 0 13 23 95 271 402
2015 2 5 47 108 261 423

2016 2 14 66 77 313 472

2017 4 13 53 74 337 481
2018 2 12 26 74 338 452

Total 10 57 215 428 1,520 2,230

% 7th Street SO 0.45% 2.6% 9.6% 19.2% 68.2% 100%

% 7th Street 0.30% 2.0% 9.0% 18.4% 70.4% 100%
Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % of overall crashes on 7th Street.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Table 9-1 through Table 9-3 indicate that overall, 7th Street experiences a lower proportion of fatal crashes than urban
areas statewide; it experiences a higher proportion of injury crashes. A higher proportion of fatal and injury crashes occur
during standard operation than reversible operation. Congested corridors sometimes experience fewer severe crashes
due to lower speeds, which may be a contributing factor to this distribution.

The first harmful event was assessed for the Study Area as well as both operations. The results follow in Table 9-4 through
Table 9-6.

Table 9-4 – 7th Street First Harmful Event
% Fatal % Fatal
% Statewide
First Harmful Event Type Total % 7th Street Fatal 7th Statewide
Urban Areas
Street Urban Areas
Collision with Motor Vehicle in
3,753 94.1% 80.5% 6 50% 38.4%
Transport
Overturning 0 0.0% 0.8% 0 0% 3.7%
Collision with Pedestrian 55 1.4% 1.4% 6 50% 34.0%
Collision with Pedal cyclist 51 1.3% 1.1% 0 0% 3.4%
Collision with Animal 0 0.0% 0.3% 0 0% 0.0%
Collision with Fixed Object 57 1.4% 7.7% 0 0% 18.8%
Collision with Non-fixed Object* 28 0.7% 4.3% 0 0% 0.2%
Vehicle Fire or Explosion 0 0.0% 0.1% 0 0% 0.0%
Other Non-collision** 5 0.1% 0.2% 0 0% 1.1%
Unknown/Not Reported/Other 40 1.0% 3.7% 0 0% 0.4%
Total 3,989 100% 100% 12 100% 100.0%

Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % statewide urban areas.




Table 9-5 – 7th Street Reversible Lane First Harmful Event
% 7th Street % Fatal
First Harmful Event Type Total % 7th Street Fatal % Fatal
Reversible Lane 7th Street
Collision with Motor Vehicle in
1,700 96.6% 94.1% 2 100% 50%
Transport
Overturning 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0% 0%

Collision with Pedestrian 16 0.9% 1.4% 0 0% 50%

Collision with Pedal cyclist 15 0.9% 1.3% 0 0% 0%

Collision with Animal 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0% 0%

Collision with Fixed Object 7 0.4% 1.4% 0 0% 0%
7’s Reverse Lane Study
Collision with Non-fixed Object* 10 0.6% 0.7% 0 0% 0%

Vehicle Fire or Explosion 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0% 0%

Other Non-collision** 2 0.1% 0.1% 0 0% 0%

Unknown/Not Reported/Other 9 0.5% 1.0% 0 0% 0%

Total 1,759 100% 100% 2 100% 100%

Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % of crashes on 7th Street.




Table 9-6 – 7th Street Standard Operation First Harmful Event
% 7th Street
% Fatal
First Harmful Event Type Total Standard % 7th Street Fatal % Fatal
7th Street
Operation
Collision with Motor Vehicle in
2,053 92.1% 94.1% 4 40% 50%
Transport
Overturning 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0% 0%

Collision with Pedestrian 39 1.7% 1.4% 6 60% 50%

Collision with Pedal cyclist 36 1.6% 1.3% 0 0% 0%

Collision with Animal 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0% 0%

Collision with Fixed Object 50 2.2% 1.4% 0 0% 0%

Collision with Non-fixed Object* 18 0.8% 0.7% 0 0% 0%

Vehicle Fire or Explosion 0 0.0% 0.0% 0 0% 0%

Other Non-collision** 3 0.1% 0.1% 0 0% 0%

Unknown/Not Reported/Other 31 1.4% 1.0% 0 0% 0%

Total 2,230 100% 100% 10 100% 100%

Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values exceeding the % of crashes on 7th Street.


Considering the corridor characteristics (straight, very urban setting, etc.), a higher proportion of multivehicle crashes and
fewer fixed object and animal crashes seems appropriate. However, there is a higher proportion of pedestrian and bicycle
crashes. Pedestrian crashes account for 6 fatalities (50.0%) and 14 incapacitating injuries (17.5%); bicycle crashes account
for 6 of the incapacitating crashes (7.5%). If possible, mitigating measures for bicycle and pedestrian crashes, especially
the latter, should be identified as part of potential solutions. Crash analysis indicated:

• 6 out of the 12 fatal crashes involved a pedestrian. 5 of 6 fatal crashes occurred after 6 PM.
• Most of the pedestrian crashes occurred between 3 PM and 7 PM.
• Almost half (47.3%) of the pedestrian crashes occurred between 4 PM and 8 PM.
• Fault was assigned to the driver in 28 crashes and the pedestrian in 27 crashes.

7’s Reverse Lane Study
Table 9-7 – 7th Street Violations Cited in Pedestrian Crashes

Count Percent Driver Cited Pedestrian Cited

Did Not Use Crosswalk 13 23.6% 0 13
Disregarded Signal 7 12.7% 2 5
Failed to Yield 15 27.3% 11 4
Inattention 1 1.8% 1 0
None 6 10.9% 5 1
Other 3 5.5% 0 3
Speed Too Fast 1 1.8% 1 0
Unknown 8 14.5% 8 0
Unsafe Lane Change 1 1.8% 0 1

Total 55 100.0% 28 27

Though street lighting is present, a large proportion of pedestrian crashes (43.6%) occur during nighttime
(dark/dusk/dawn) conditions. 7th Street experiences a lower proportion of nighttime crashes compared to the statewide
average (19.9% compared to 29.1%). These comparisons may be indicative that 7th Street lighting is acceptable for
vehicular traffic but may not be sufficient for pedestrians. Pedestrian level lighting could be considered to mitigate
nighttime pedestrian crashes, whether at key intersections or through the corridor. The most nighttime pedestrian crashes
occurred at Indian School Road (7 crashes). A map showing the location and severity of pedestrian crashes is included as
Figure 32. There is a cluster of crashes at McDowell Road, which includes two fatal crashes and one incapacitating crash
(9 crashes total). There are bus stops on all four legs of this intersection. There are also clustered crashes at the northern
end of the reversible lane near Dunlap Avenue, extending south to Townley Avenue.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 32 – 7th Street Pedestrian Crash Location and Severity




7’s Reverse Lane Study
484 Page 58 of 93 December 2021
The manner of collision in multi-vehicle crashes was assessed and is presented in percentages are presented in Table
9-8.

Table 9-8 – 7th Street Manner of Collision in Multi-Vehicle Crashes
7th Street
Collision Manner % Statewide
All Times % All Times Reversible Lane Standard
Angle 780 20.8% 17.6% 22.4% 14.5%
Backing 21 0.6% 0.1% 0.9% -
Left Turn 603 16.1% 11.0% 19.4% 16.5%
Rear End 1,303 34.7% 33.0% 34.4% 44.4%
Head-On 27 0.7% 0.6% 0.8% 1.7%
Sideswipe (same) 930 24.8% 34.1% 17.1% 15.5%
Sideswipe (opposite) 67 1.8% 1.9% 1.7% 1.4%
U-Turn 17 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.2%
Other 3 0.1% 1.8% 3.6% 5.2%
Unknown 2 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.7%
Total 3,753 100% 100% 100% 100%
Note: Bold, red, italicized text denotes values over statewide averages

An analysis of the collision manner along 7th Street indicated a higher percentage of sideswipe (same and opposite
direction), angle, and U-turn crashes compared to the statewide average for all times as well as both standard and
reversible lane operation. Left-turn crashes exceed the statewide average during standard operation only. Sideswipe
crashes are especially prevalent during reversible lane operation, occurring at a rate 2.2 times the statewide average.

An examination of the crash trends within the Study Area shows:
• During the AM peak period reversible lanes, 165 sideswipe crashes occurred. 101 of the crashes were when both
cars were heading south, in the direction of the reversible lane.
• During the PM peak period reversible lanes, 447 sideswipe crashes occurred. 357 of the crashes were when both
cars were heading north, in the direction of the reversible lane.
A heat map depicting the location of the sideswipe crashes is included as Figure 33. Figure 33 indicates hot spots at major
arterial intersections, especially at McDowell, Camelback, and Bethany Home Roads.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 33 – 7th Street Heat Map of Sideswipe Crashes




7’s Reverse Lane Study
486 Page 60 of 93 December 2021
9.1. Driver Behavior – Field Observations
The following are general observations which were taken from the field review conducted on Friday, March 6, 2020 as
well as on Monday, August 24, 2020.
• Numerous drivers traveling with and against the reversible lane make left-turns.
o Drivers traveling with the reversible lane were observed using it as a left-turn lane mid-block, which is
permitted during the AM peak. However, some mid-block intersections prohibit left turns, and the signage
is posted near to the reversible lane signage.
o Drivers traveling against the reversible lane made mid-block left-turns either from the through lane
(adjacent to the reversible lane) or from the reversible lane. No left-turn signs were often clearly visible.
• Queued vehicles waiting behind a vehicle turning left often change lanes to continue driving. Little separation
between reversible through lane and opposing traffic.




Photo 6 – Driver Turning Left from Opposing Through Lane (Northbound)




Photo 7 – Conflicting Signage at Winter Drive (Southbound)




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Photo 8 – Driver Turning Left from Opposing Through Lane (Southbound)

The reversible lane is operational during peak hours and likely experiences a large proportion of the same commuter traffic
day to day. It has also been operational for a number of years. Driver behavior, paired with the history and location of the
corridor, suggest many drivers are aware of the reversible lane operation, but are non-compliant. Based on field
observations, it appears there is poor driver compliance with no-left turn signage. Sideswipe collisions may be attributed
to drivers avoiding delay or rear-end collisions by abruptly merging when another driver is waiting to turn left from the
reversible lane. Crash reports may be able to provide additional insights. Potential solutions should strive to mitigate
sideswipe collisions during reversible lane operation and should consider past driver compliance challenges.

9.2. Bus Stop Conflicts
The majority of bus stops that exist along 7th Street are in-lane bus stops. The Valley Metro Route 7 travels northbound
and southbound within the corridor. In-lane bus stops require the bus to stop in the right-most travel lane in order to drop
off and/or pick up passengers. Corridor free flow travel is impacted by in-lane bus stops, as vehicles traveling behind on
the bus are required to stop or change lanes in order to maintain speed. Bus bay locations exist in few locations along the
corridor and can be found in Table 6-1. They provide buses the opportunity to allow passengers to enter and exit the
transit system without delaying the far-right travel lane. However, during congested periods bus bays may provide
challenges for buses to reenter the traffic. The conversion of in-lane bus stops to pull-out bus bays will improve free flow
travel and increase corridor safety by reducing the potential conflict pinch points.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
10.0 Traffic Operations Analysis
Existing traffic patterns for the Study Area and several subareas were assessed using a combination of methodologies and
software. A Synchro (Version 10.0) model, a microsimulation model (Vissim), and a macrosimulation model (TransCAD
and Visum) were developed for the Study Area to provide a complete description of traffic patterns within the Study Area
for the existing and alternate conditions. The analysis methodology, models, and results of the traffic analyses are
described in this section.

The general modeling methodology is illustrated in Figure 34. MAG travel demand model information was obtained for
the Study Area for the existing conditions. The data provided the Origin-Destination (OD) data needed to model the Study
Area microscopically and macroscopically. OD data, contained in a matrix format, has the number of trips for a specified
time period expected between each possible origin zone and destination zone in the Study Area network. The macroscopic
model was calibrated with existing traffic counts and the Study Area network was modeled for existing and alternate
conditions to identify circulation and intersection turning movement volumes.



Figure 34 – Lane-Based Microsimulation Model Development Methodology



Sub-Area
Network Synchro




MAG Regional Visum
Calibrated OD-
Travel Demand Macroscopic
Matrices
Model Model



Lane Based
Sub-Area
Traffic Counts Microsimulation
Matrices
in Vissim




10.1.1. MAG Regional Travel Demand Model
A Travel Demand Model (TDM) is often referred to as a “regional” model because the roadway network it represents
typically spans multiple jurisdictions. TDMs are extensively calibrated and rooted in survey-informed population,
employment, and socioeconomic data which influence trip generation and mode choice. Calibration is the process by
which the model is fine-tuned against actual count data to improve accuracy.

The Study Area lies completely within the MAG TDM. MAG TDM data representing the model network within the Study
Area and OD matrices with travel data for 24-hour, AM, PM, and mid-day peaks for existing year conditions were used in
this study. Travel data in the OD matrices reflects how many vehicles are entering and exiting the network, where they
are entering and exiting, and their origin or destination within the network, if applicable.


7’s Reverse Lane Study
10.1.2. Origin Destination Analysis
Much of the mobility-related information necessary to support the analysis of the 7th Street and 7th Avenue reversible
lanes comes from the regional travel demand model developed and maintained by MAG. Travel demand models assign
regionally generated household trips to transportation network using a variety of assignment procedures. Link capacities,
travel times and model measured congested travel times are used to find the best path between each origin destination
pair. The total travel demand for an Origin-Destination pair can be assigned to multiple paths connecting them. The final
converged assignment in the model usually aims to arrive at user equilibrium where the perceived travel times between
the different paths are in equilibrium and no user (driver) can improve their travel time by shifting to a different path.

The MAG regional model does not specifically model the reversible lanes on 7th Street and 7th Avenue. Therefore, the
directional capacities and turning movement restrictions in the peak periods are not exclusively modeled. While this
approach is imperfect at a local level, at a regional level it allows the identification of travel demand on 7th Street and 7th
Avenue.

Origin-destination analysis indicated that the travel times for traffic on reversible lanes will not improve, by choosing an
alternate path. Congested travel times along parallel north-south facilities are higher than those on 7th Street and 7th
Avenue. Furthermore, much of the demand on 7th Street and 7th Avenue serves local traffic and therefore the traffic
intends to use the two reversible lane corridors.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
10.1.3. Microsimulation Model Development in Vissim
A microsimulation model was developed for the project Study Area using PTV Vissim Figure 35 – Vissim Model for the
(Vissim) software to provide a detailed assessment of traffic circulation patterns and Reversible Lane Corridors
to evaluate the operations on reversible lanes. The microsimulation model was
developed to supplement the result from travel demand model and origin
destination analysis. The Vissim model accounts for lane restrictions and for
reversible lane operations.

Signal timing plans currently implemented in the field were emulated in the Vissim
software and travel demand was specified as OD matrices. Prior to developing the
Vissim models, travel demand information along with OD-matrices was imported
into Visum, a macroscopic model. The Visum model was used along with turning
movement counts and OD-matrices from the regional model to develop synthetic
OD-matrices that better represent traffic counts observed along the two corridors.
The calibrated OD-matrix was used in Vissim to evaluate scenarios where reversible
lane is eliminated, partially or completely.

This Vissim model network is illustrated in Figure 35. The Vissim model was used to
evaluate alternatives where the reversible lanes are eliminated. The sub-area OD
matrices were assigned in the Vissim models to identify impacts to travel times when
reversible lanes are eliminated. Table 10-1 below provides a comparison of travel
times along the two corridors when the reversible lanes are eliminated:

Table 10-1 – Travel Time Comparison
Corridor Travel Time with Travel Time without
Reversible Lanes Reversible Lanes
7th Street NB AM Peak 18 min 24 min
7th Street SB AM Peak 20 min 32 min
7th Street NB PM Peak 22 min 36 min
7th Street SB PM Peak 20 min 28 min
7th Avenue NB AM Peak 15 min 17 min
7th Avenue SB AM Peak 17 min 26 min
7th Avenue NB PM Peak 19 min 29 min
7th Avenue SB PM Peak 16 min 22 min




7’s Reverse Lane Study
The table above indicates the travel times along the corridors worsens significantly when the reversible lanes are
eliminated. Model simulations also indicated that the major signalized intersections experience severe congestion when
the reversible lanes are eliminated.

10.1.4. Synchro Model
A Synchro (Version 10.0) model was developed to provide a LOS analysis of Study Area intersections. The following
sections discuss the LOS analysis process and the factors that determine LOS.

10.1.4.1. Level of Service Analysis
LOS is a qualitative measure of how well an intersection or roadway segment operates on a graded scale of A (best) to F
(worst). LOS considers a variety of factors, including stability of traffic flow, opportunity for passing, and driver comfort.
Operations of LOS D and better are typically considered good and acceptable in urban settings. Operations of LOS E or F
typically need attention.

For the purpose of intersection analysis, LOS is determined using the total delay, in seconds, of vehicles which approach
the intersection over the course of one traffic signal cycle. Intersections within the Study Area were analyzed using the
LOS thresholds shown in Table 10-2 and Table 10-3 for signalized and unsignalized intersections, respectively.

Table 10-2 – LOS Thresholds for Signalized Intersections
Control Delay (s) Level of Service
<= 10 seconds A
10-20 seconds B
20 – 35 seconds C
35-55 seconds D
55- 80 seconds E
> 80 sec seconds F


Table 10-3 – LOS Thresholds for Unsignalized Intersections
Control Delay (s) Level of Service
<= 10 seconds A
10-15 seconds B
15 – 25 seconds C
25-35 seconds D
35- 50 seconds E
> 50 seconds F




7’s Reverse Lane Study
The LOS analysis was conducted using Synchro’s built-in methodology. While Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th edition
methodology is most commonly used to assess intersection LOS, it cannot assess intersections with unique signal timing
and geometric configurations. To allow for similar comparison between intersections and because multiple intersections
within the Study Area have unique signal timing and/or geometric configurations, the built-in Synchro methodology was
used.

11.0 7th Avenue Existing Conditions: Impact of Turn Violations
The intent of this study was to identify the impacts of prohibited left turns along 7th Avenue. Specifically, the delay at
each signalized intersection was compared for three cases. The provided turning movement counts from the City of
Phoenix provided insight into vehicle operations along both corridors. The impact of prohibited left turns is in question,
thus three conditions of traffic analyses were examined. It Is hypothesized that violations, even on a small scale, worsen
reversible lane operations during peak hours.

Case 1 considers the provided turning movement counts with the removal of any provided left turn movements in the
northbound and southbound approaches. There were not many vehicles throughout both corridors that were counted
turning left, but they were removed. This case is considered the “No Left Turn” case. Any traffic counts that were of left
turning movements were added as through movement counts.

Case 2 considers the turning movements as provided by the City of Phoenix. Turning movement counts were provided at
intersections where left turns are prohibited. These were at the following intersections:

7th Avenue AM Peak Hour
• Encanto Boulevard southbound only;
• Thomas Road southbound only;
• Earll Drive southbound only;
• Osborn Road southbound only;
• Indian School Road northbound and southbound;
• Campbell Avenue southbound only;
• Camelback Road southbound only;
• Missouri Avenue southbound only;
• Bethany Home Road southbound only;
• Maryland Avenue northbound and southbound; and
• Glendale Avenue northbound and southbound.

7th Avenue PM Peak Hour
• Encanto Boulevard northbound only;
• Thomas Road northbound and southbound;
• Earll Drive southbound only;
• Osborn Road southbound only;
• Indian School Road northbound only;
• Campbell Avenue northbound only;
• Camelback Road northbound only (turns are allowed during PM Peak operations);
• Missouri Avenue northbound only;
• Bethany Home Road northbound only;
• Maryland Avenue northbound only; and
• Glendale Avenue northbound only.
7’s Reverse Lane Study
Case 3 considers the addition of turning movements at intersections that did not display any left turning vehicles. Vehicles
were added to the Synchro models to analyze the delay impacts of the added vehicles. Any intersection within the corridor
that did not have left turn counts in either the northbound or southbound approaches were manually given an additional
10 vehicles. Operations under these conditions were then examined.

The calculated delay (in seconds) for the three described cases for 7th Avenue can be found in Table 11-1 and Table 11-2.
Highlighted rows indicate where the delay increased from Case 1 to Case 2 or from Case 1 to Case 3.

Table 11-1 – 7th Avenue Overall Intersection Delay AM Peak Hour
Case 1: No Left Turn Case 2: Accounted Lefts Case 3: Added Lefts
Intersection
Delay (s) Delay (s) Delay (s)
McDowell Road 42.4 43.3 43.3
Encanto Boulevard 15.7 17.0 21.6
Thomas Road 25.5 25.7 65.6
Earll Drive 41.3 38.8 37.7
Osborn Road 43.2 41.2 42.9
Indian School Road 99.8 112.0 111.2
Campbell Avenue 24.3 24.3 25.5
Camelback Road 70.4 69.0 69.6
Missouri Avenue 48.2 48.3 49.0
Bethany Home Road 60.2 67.3 68.6
Maryland Avenue 31.2 30.2 29.9
Glendale Avenue 49.1 54.8 54.9
Northern Avenue 35.5 35.6 35.6



Table 11-2 – 7th Avenue Overall Intersection Delay PM Peak Hour
Case 1: No Left Turn Case 2: Accounted Lefts Case 3: Added Lefts
Intersection
Delay (s) Delay (s) Delay (s)
McDowell Road 41.7 41.8 44.8
Encanto Boulevard 16.8 16.3 97.8
Thomas Road 28.8 29.4 29.4
Earll Drive 39.5 36.4 34.9
Osborn Road 31.3 31.3 68.2
Indian School Road 46.9 50.2 103.4
Campbell Avenue 23.0 24.1 29.2
Camelback Road 40.5 39.0 64.1
Missouri Avenue 42.2 43.0 57.1
Bethany Home Road 46.5 43.6 46.8
Maryland Avenue 27.3 26.2 29.5
Glendale Avenue 41.4 42.0 44.7
Northern Avenue 36.3 36.6 36.6




7’s Reverse Lane Study
From Table 11-1 and Table 11-2, it can be concluded that during the AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hour on 7th Avenue,
reversible lane operations worsened as left turns were added at most of the signalized intersections. This does not include
the prohibited left turns made to access businesses or private driveways along the corridor. Mitigation measures to reduce
the number of left turns made at prohibited intersections as well as to access points would improve overall corridor
operations.

General observations show that when more vehicles are added at prohibited left turns, the northbound and southbound
directions are compromised. When the reversible lane is in effect, the opposite direction of travel experiences increased
travel delays and worsening level of service. Detailed capacity analysis results can be found in Appendix H.

12.0 7th Street Existing Conditions: Impact of Turn Violations
The intent of this study was to identify the impacts of prohibited left turns along 7th Street. Specifically, the delay at each
signalized intersection was compared for three cases. The provided turning movement counts from the City of Phoenix
provided insight into vehicle operations throughout the 7th Street corridor. The impact of prohibited left turns is in
question, thus three conditions of traffic analyses were examined. It Is hypothesized that violations, even on a small scale,
worsen reversible lane operations during peak hours.

Case 1 considers the provided turning movement counts with the removal of any provided left turn movements in the
northbound and southbound approaches. There were not many vehicles throughout both corridors that were counted
turning left, but they were removed. This case is considered the “No Left Turn” case. Any traffic counts that were of left
turning movements were added as through movement counts.

Case 2 considers the turning movements as provided by the City of Phoenix. Turning movement counts were provided at
intersections where left turns are prohibited. These were at the following intersections:

7th Street AM Peak Hour
• Palm Lane northbound and southbound;
• Virginia Avenue northbound and southbound;
• Thomas Road southbound only;
• Osborn Road southbound only
• Indian School Road southbound only;
• VA Med Center northbound only;
• Campbell Avenue northbound and southbound;
• Highland Avenue southbound only;
• Campbell Avenue southbound only;
• Camelback Road southbound only;
• Missouri Avenue northbound and southbound;
• Bethany Home Road northbound and southbound;
• Rose Lane northbound and southbound;
• Maryland Avenue southbound only;
• Glendale Avenue southbound only;
• Northern Avenue northbound and southbound;
• Butler Drive northbound and southbound; and
• Alice Avenue northbound and southbound.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
7th Street PM Peak Hour
• Palm Lane northbound and southbound only;
• Virginia Avenue northbound and southbound;
• Thomas Road northbound only;
• Osborn Road northbound only;
• Indian School Road northbound only;
• VA Med Center northbound only;
• Campbell Avenue northbound only;
• Highland Avenue northbound and southbound;
• Camelback Road northbound only;
• Missouri Avenue northbound only;
• Bethany Home Road northbound only;
• Rose Lane northbound and southbound;
• Maryland Avenue northbound and southbound;
• Glendale Avenue northbound only;
• Northern Avenue northbound and southbound;
• Butler Avenue northbound and southbound; and
• Alice Avenue northbound and southbound.

Case 3 considers the addition of turning movements at intersections that did not display any left turning vehicles. Vehicles
were added to the Synchro models to analyze the delay impacts of the added vehicles. Any intersection within the corridor
that did not have left turn counts in either the northbound or southbound approaches were manually given an additional
10 vehicles. Operations under these conditions were then examined.

The calculated delay (in seconds) for the three described cases for 7th Avenue can be found in Table 12-1 and Table 12-2.
Highlighted rows indicate where the delay increased from Case 1 to Case 2 or from Case 1 to Case 3. Intersection Delay
was not accounted for at 7th Street and Dunlap Road as no counts were obtained.


Table 12-1 – 7th Street Overall Intersection Delay AM Peak Hour
Case 1: No Left Turn Case 2: Accounted Lefts Case 3: Added Lefts
Intersection
Delay (s) Delay (s) Delay (s)
McDowell Road 67.3 67.5 67.5
Palm Lane 11.7 12.5 12.5
Virginia Avenue 14.8 13.6 13.6
Thomas Road 44.4 47.5 49.7
Osborn Road 52.2 52.3 54.4
Indian School Road 39.6 38.6 39.4
VA Med Center 19.2 19.8 226.3
Campbell Ave 11.3 10.0 11.6
Highland Avenue 17.9 18.9 17.9
Camelback Road 50.0 58.9 59.1
Missouri Avenue 48.6 55.0 55.8
Bethany Home Road 56.8 61.4 64.0
Rose Lane 15.7 14.2 14.4

7’s Reverse Lane Study
Table 12-1 – 7th Street Overall Intersection Delay AM Peak Hour
Case 1: No Left Turn Case 2: Accounted Lefts Case 3: Added Lefts
Intersection
Delay (s) Delay (s) Delay (s)
Maryland Avenue 26.4 27.4 27.6
Glendale Avenue 46.2 56.3 56.7
Northern Avenue 70.9 75.7 75.4
Butler Avenue 8.4 8.3 8.3
Alice Avenue 15.0 14.6 14.5

Table 12-2 – 7th Street Overall Intersection Delay PM Peak Hour
Case 1: No Left Turn Case 2: Accounted Lefts Case 3: Added Lefts
Intersection
Delay (s) Delay (s) Delay (s)
McDowell Road 45.1 44.8 44.7
Palm Lane 18.3 18.6 16.4
Virginia Avenue 16.5 16.5 18.1
Thomas Road 34.8 35.7 108.5
Osborn Road 51.5 52.6 115.0
Indian School Road 40.2 43.6 68.3
VA Med Center 12.5 5.9 11.7
Campbell Ave 59.4 12.8 24.5
Highland Avenue 6.6 21.4 22.5
Camelback Road 41.8 39.0 80.5
Missouri Avenue 53.2 55.4 103.6
Bethany Home Road 52.2 64.2 66.2
Rose Lane 7.8 8.6 7.0
Maryland Avenue 27.2 26.1 29.0
Glendale Avenue 41.0 42.1 68.8
Northern Avenue 39.4 40.9 40.9
Butler Avenue 30.4 26.2 26.2
Alice Avenue 7.9 8.9 8.9

Similarly, operations on 7th Street worsen when left turns movements are added, violating reversible lane operations.
Recognition that many intersections worsen per Table 12-1 and Table 12-2 indicate that operations with left turn
violations increase intersection delay. In addition, intersection delay at minor street signalized intersections was drastically
impacted by the addition of prohibited left turns. This can be contributed to delay at the major intersections causing
congestion throughout the corridor and/or the desire for vehicles to turn left at these intersections due to available access
to neighborhoods and businesses.

General observations show that when more vehicles are added at prohibited left turns, the northbound and southbound
directions are compromised. When the reversible lane is in effect, the opposite direction of travel experiences increased
travel delays and worsening level of service. Detailed capacity analysis results can be found in Appendix I.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
13.0 Field Review Findings
The purpose of the field review was to document and evaluate the location of signs, pedestrian push buttons, controller
cabinets at each signalized intersection, in-pavement detection loops, and any CCTV or pre-emption technologies.

13.1. ADA Compliance
Per City of Phoenix Street Planning and Design Guidelines, Section 8.5 Sidewalks, “sidewalks shall be a minimum of 4 feet
in width on local streets and 5 feet on arterials, collector and on local street with setback sidewalks. As per the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA), a 5 foot by 5 foot passing area must be provided every 200 feet to allow wheelchairs to pass
on all sidewalks less than 5 feet wide.”

From visual observations and field visit documentation, the sidewalks in both corridors meet the requirements per the
City code, however, there are ample locations within both corridors where sections are not ADA compliant. A few locations
have been identified in Photos 9 through 12. Two trends of non-compliance for sidewalks prevail throughout the corridors:
• Reversible lane sign poles locations that constrict the sidewalk width to less than 4 feet.
• Light poles, overhead utility poles, and reversible lane sign poles located within the sidewalk panels.


The ADA (Americans with Disability Act) compliant regulations for arterial streets are defined as such:
• Minimum clear width of pedestrian access route (sidewalk) shall be 60 inches (5 feet), exclusive of the width of
the curb
• Exceptions:
o Driveways/alleyways where public sidewalks intersect driveways, the width may be reduced to 48 inches
o Accessible building entrances:” Where construction is permitted in the sidewalk to provide an accessible
entrance to an existing adjoining property, and site constraints do not allow full compliance with the
requirements of this section, the width of the pedestrian access route may be reduced to 48 inches (1220
mm).”
o Street Fixtures: “Where insufficient public right-of-way is available to locate street fixtures outside the 60
inch (1525mm) minimum clear width, the pedestrian access route may be reduced to 48 inches (1220mm)
for a length of 24 inches (610mm) maximum, provided that reduced width segments are separated by
segments of the pedestrian access route that are 60 inches (1525mm) minimum in length and 60 inches
(1525mm) minimum in width.”




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Photo 9 – Southbound on 7th Avenue between Encanto Boulevard and Thomas Road:
Overhead Power Pole in Sidewalk




Photo 10 – Northbound on 7th Street between Palm Lane to Virginia Avenue: Pole in Sidewalk




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Photo 11 – Southbound on 7th Street between Virginia Avenue to Thomas Road: Pole in Sidewalk




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Photo 12 – Southbound on 7th Street between Indian School Road and the VA Med Center: Pole in Sidewalk




7’s Reverse Lane Study
13.3. 7th Avenue
13.3.1. Infrastructure
Generally, the infrastructure at each intersection along 7th Avenue varied in terms of available technology, cabinet
controller placement, and mast-arm technology. Within the 13 signalized intersection corridors, not all intersections had
CCTV/pre-emption or intersection camera technologies. In addition, each signalized intersection was not equipped with a
pedestrian push button or loop detectors; it was rare to find an intersection that had both. Minor signalized intersections
tended to have pedestrian push buttons, whereas the major intersections did not. Loop detectors existed on the minor
intersection streets, and typically only in the left turn lane if there was one present, or the leftmost lane of the approach.
Mast arms placed on sidewalks provided a narrow walking path.

13.3.2. Sign Placement and Sign Type
• Driving through the corridor proved there was ample signs, conveying both information to drivers about reversible
lane operations and other traffic operations.
• Throughout the Melrose District (Indian School Road to Camelback Road) the sides of the corridor were cluttered;
traffic operation signs, billboards, and reversible lane operation signs took over the visibility of that stretch of the
corridor.
• There was no equal spacing between the location of the mast arms.
• At some points along the corridor, there were clusters of signs which could make it challenging for drivers to
quickly process the information.
• In the surrounding residential area, the reversible lane signs present were hidden by private property trees and
shrubbery.




Photo 13 – Northbound on 7th Avenue between Glendale Avenue and Northern Avenue:
Several Left Turn Prohibited Signs




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Photo 14 – Southbound on 7th Avenue between Glendale Avenue and Maryland Avenue:
Landscape Obstructing Reversible Lane Static Sign




7’s Reverse Lane Study
13.3.3. Driver Maneuvers
In the northern portion of the corridor (residential neighborhood area) drivers were more likely to turn left and cross the
reversible lane during the AM peak hour when no left turns are permitted for northbound traffic.




Photo 15 – Northbound on 7th Avenue between Missouri Avenue and Bethany Home Road:
Vehicle Turning Left from Leftmost Non-Reverse Lane during AM Peak Hour to Enter Side Street


13.4. 7th Street
13.4.1. Infrastructure
Generally, the infrastructure at each intersection along 7th Street varied in terms of available technology, cabinet
controller placement, and mast-arm technology. Within the 18 signalized intersection corridors, not all intersections had
CCTV/pre-emption or intersection camera technologies. In addition, each signalized intersection was not equipped with a
pedestrian push button or loop detectors; it was rate to find an intersection that had both. Minor signalized intersections
tended to have pedestrian push buttons, whereas the major intersections did not. Loop detectors existed on the minor
intersection streets, and typically only in the left turn lane if there was one present, or the leftmost lane of the approach.
Mast arms placed on sidewalks provided a narrow walking path. Some pedestrian push buttons were also placed on
sidewalks leaving minimized space for pedestrians.

13.4.2. Sign Placement and Sign Type
Driving through the corridor proved there was ample signs, conveying both information to drivers about reversible lane
operations and other traffic operations. Spacing between overhead mast arm signs was inconsistent. There was no equal
spacing between the location of the mast arms. At some points along the corridor, there were clusters of signs which could
make it challenging for drivers to quickly process the information. At the mast arm located on the southbound side of 7th
Street, across from The Carlyle, there was a vacant mast arm. It should be the location of a sign displayed in Photo 18, but
the sign was not present. At the Bethany Home and 7th Street intersection, the westbound approach mast arm did not
have the street sign labeled.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Photo 16 – Southbound on 7th Street: Warning Sign for End of Reversible Lane




Photo 17 – Southbound on 7th Street: End Reverse Lane Static Sign




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Photo 18 – Southbound at Highland Avenue and Camelback Road:
Missing Overhead Mast Arm Sign with No Construction




Photo 19 – Northbound on 7th Street Between Alice Avenue and Dunlap Road:
Change in Signage on Overhead Mast Arms




7’s Reverse Lane Study
13.4.3. Driver Maneuvers
Driver confusion was exhibited during the initial time-frame of the reversible lane operation, as drivers traveling
northbound were not aware that the double yellow dashed lane was a true southbound travel lane. Drivers aware of the
reversible lane made prohibited left turns from the reversible lane and left-most northbound lane during AM reversible
lane operations. These select vehicles were turning into businesses or driveways.




Photo 20 – Southbound on 7th Street Between Thomas Road and Osborn Road:
Vehicle Turning Left During AM Peak Reversible Lane Operations


14.0 Improvement Strategies
Evaluation of existing conditions and field visits lend themselves towards multiple corridor improvement strategies.
Proposed strategies are mutually exclusive or combined efforts, varying with the strategy selected. The strategies are
listed in Table 14-1.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Table 14-1 – Improvement Strategy Considerations
Improvement Strategy Explanation Benefits Challenges
Intersection Improvements Upgrade intersections along both Improves structural integrity of mast Closures of multiple intersections
as no-build improvements corridors for structural integrity, arms, replace signal heads, upgrade along both corridors would need to
technology updates. technology to support any proposed be closed, timely construction
solutions for reversible lanes. project.
Dynamic Lane Control Signs Dynamic Lane Control Signs are Provides flexibility compared to static Requires redesign of corridor mast
as operations improvements overhead signs that indicate the signs. Improved visibility of lane arms, and corridor monitoring and
direction of travel on reversible lanes control signs. Increases compliance. implementation by TMC.
and turn lane restrictions at Less information for drivers to Visibility may be unappealing for
intersections. decipher compared to existing residents Requires road closures for
infrastructure. installation.
Restriping to Widen Restripe the corridor for uniform lane Wider reversible lane. Limited curb space and reduced lane
Reversible Lane as widths. Improves safety and reduces widths along the corridor in the
operations improvements opposing side swipe crashes and current configuration make it difficult
same side swipe crashes. Improves to provide traditional lane widths.
operating speeds along 7th Street Reducing lane width of other lanes
and 7th Avenue corridors. corridor shutdown to restripe.
Intelligent RPMs (Raised Pavement markers, reflective devices Technology controlled system System is sensitive to pavement
Pavement Markers) as on the roadway to provide (changed quickly). temperature.
operations improvements delineation at night, during inclement Lane Management flexibility and Additional pavement treatments like
weather, and in places where control. Cool Pavement techniques must be
alignment variations require Ability to make buffer zones through used. Reversible lane operations in
guidance. ITS (utilize during transition periods). daylight may make RPMs difficult to
Have three colors (red, yellow, green) see.
and six different pattern displays to Operations/maintenance cost
provide information about lane increase as batteries need to be
operations/directional flow. changed occasionally; drivers would
need to be educated on the meaning
of the different pattern displays
Install Fiber Trunk Lines Add fiber along the reversible lane Improved video detection and Some property impacts.
along both corridors as corridors. communication.
communications
improvements
Modify Bus Pull-Outs as Bus pull outs are designated roadway Bus no longer has to stop in right Some ROW impacts.
operations improvements sections that allow a bus to exit the lane, contributing to traffic There is the possibility that the bus
right lane and release passengers will have to wait to access the

7’s Reverse Lane Study
508 Page 82 of 93 December 2021
Table 14-1 – Improvement Strategy Considerations
Improvement Strategy Explanation Benefits Challenges
from the bus without causing congestion. through lanes, which might impact
vehicles in the right lane to stop due Increase in right lane free flow. the bus schedule.
to bus operations. Improves travel Will require coordination with Valley
speeds, reduces rear end collisions. Metro.
Access Consolidation Consolidate access and reduce curb Improves safety and fewer conflict Coordinate buy-in from parcel
Improvements as operations cuts along the corridor to decrease points. owners’ businesses.
improvements left turns from/to reversible lanes. Very challenging given the
prevalence of commercial properties
in the corridors.
Computer Vision for Turn Emerging technology to monitor turn Improves operations, safety of Integration with TMC operations.
Violation as communications restriction violation (similar to red intersections during reversible lane Additional maintenance cost and
improvements light cameras and ticketing). operation duration. Improves ongoing agreements with service
compliance and reduces driver providers.
confusion. Additional warning signs for drivers
about monitoring.
Need mechanism for monitoring and
triggering system.
Entire Corridor Width Information of reversible lane and Alleviates driver confusion. Rather bulky sign structure
Dynamic Lane Control as non-reversible lane operations can Eliminates the reason for drivers to throughout entire corridor.
operations improvements be displayed at all hours. The same look at the clock to determine Could have resident push-back.
display would be shown on solely operation hours and directions. Requires corridor closure for
northbound and southbound lanes at Lane visibility improves during night installation.
all times. Reversible lane display travel.
would change based on peak and off- Transition period awareness
peak hours. improves.

Optimize and Coordinate Optimize and coordinate signal Provide as many available greens East-west streets may experience
Signal Timings as operations timings to give the northbound and based on speed limits and vehicle higher congestion if north-south
improvements southbound directional priority. In capacity to keep traffic flowing streets have longer green time.
addition, offsets can be implemented during peak hours.
that allow for coordination between
traffic signals, optimizing the green
time.



7’s Reverse Lane Study
509 Page 83 of 93 December 2021
Given the decision matrix in Table 14-1, the improvement strategies have been narrowed down to three feasible
categories for consideration: no-build, communications, and operations.

It is understood that, at a minimum, the existing static signs will be removed and replaced with regulatory signs. The
existing signs in the corridor are to Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standard, however, they need to
be replaced. Figure 36 conveys the to-standard signs that can be used to replace the existing reversible lane infrastructure,
if the improvement strategy is chosen. Exiting corridor signs are slight variations of MUTCD Standard Signs R3-9d, 53-9f,
R39g and R3-9h.


Figure 36 – Standard Reversible Lane Control Signs per MUTCD




14.1. Considered Improvement Strategies
After evaluation of the needs of the corridors, seven proposed improvement categories have been identified as
implementable:

1. Static Sign Removal
2. Static Sign Replacement
3. Intersection Upgrades
4. Fiber Trunk Line
5. Dynamic Lane Control (DLC) Sign System
a. DCL only for reversible lane on cantilever mast arm
b. DCL across all lanes on staple sign structure (preferred)
6. Upgrade striping (restripe for uniform lane width)
7. Replacing in-lane bus stops with bus bays where feasible


Improvement Categories 1, 2 and 3 should be considered as baseline costs that would be included in the no-build. Further,
some improvements are mutually exclusive, meaning only one for each pair can be selected.

Improvements 1 (Static Sign Removal) and 5 (Dynamic Lane Control Sign System) can be modified as desired, but both are

7’s Reverse Lane Study
required to meet reversible lane regulations per MUTCD. Design costs associated with Categories 4 and 5 are generally
inflated to account for variation in material and labor costs, depending on the vendor.

It was assumed that nearly all the existing sign structures and most of the intersection technologies will be replaced due
to their age and maintenance needs. The proposed cost associated with the existing infrastructure removal is listed in
Improvement Category 1.

The costs and assumptions associated with these proposed improvement strategies are found in Section 15.0. Proposed
improvements can be viewed in the 7th Avenue and 7th Street Corridor Map books, found in Appendix J and Appendix K
respectively.



15.0 Preliminary Cost Estimates of Improvement Strategies
The proposed cost estimate is driven from the indicated improvement strategies in Section 14.0. The considered
improvement strategies were optimized and divided into seven categories. Improvement strategy levels can be found in
Figure 37. While not all improvements need to occur simultaneously and along both 7th Avenue and 7th Street at the
same time, proposed improvement levels can be defined in order to consider associated costs of improvements. This
section includes cost estimates for construction and markup totals for the proposed improvements as individual entities.
Detailed Cost Estimates can be found in Appendix L.




7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 37 – Reversible Lane Corridor Improvement Levels
Static Sign Removal
and Replacement

Static Sign Removal Intersection
and Replacement Improvements

Static Sign Removal
Restriping
and Replacement

Static Sign Removal
Bus Bays
and Replacement

Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal
Control

Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal Restriping
Control

Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal Restriping Bus Bays
Control

Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal Fiber Trunk Line
Contrrol

Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal Fiber Trunk Line Restriping
Control

Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal FiberTrunk Line Restriping Bus Bays
Control

Intersection Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal
Improvements Control
Improvement Levels

Intersection Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal
Improvements Control

Intersection Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal Restriping
Improvements Control

Intersection Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal Restriping Bus Bays
Improvements Control

Intersection Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal Fiber Trunk Line
Improvements Control

Intersection Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal Fiber Trunk Line Restriping
Improvements Control

Intersection Dynamic Lane
Static Sign Removal Fiber Trunk Line Restriping Bus Bays
Improvements Control

7’s Reverse Lane Study
512 Page 86 of 93 December 2021
15.1. Static Sign Removal Cost Estimate
This proposed cost includes the cost of removing all static overhead lane control signs based on the understanding that
existing infrastructure and signs will be replaced. The proposed preliminary cost estimate for both corridors can be found
in Table 15-1.

Table 15-1 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Static Sign Removal Improvements
7th Avenue 7th Street
Item Description
Total Cost
Construction Subtotal $92,000.00 $121,000.00
Unidentified Item Allowance (20%) $18,400.00 $24,200.00
Construction Total $110,400.00 $145,200
Traffic Control (5%) $5,520.00 $7,260.00
Construction Engineering (14%) $15,456.00 $20,328.00
Consultant Services (2%) $2,208.00 $2,904.00
Construction Contingencies (3%) $3,312.00 $4,356.00
Construction Project Total $136,896.00 $180,048.60
Design (10%) $13,690.00 $18,005.00
Design and Construction Project Total $150,586.00 $190,053.60

15.2. Static Sign Replacement Cost Estimate
Per MUTCD guidelines for displaying information about reversible lanes, static signs should be used to supplement other
displayed information of reversible lane operations. MUTCD Regulatory signs are shown in Figure 36. The existing signs at
corridor extremes (7th Avenue and McDowell Road, 7th Avenue and Northern Avenue, 7th Street and McDowell Road
and 7th Street and Dunlap Road) are similar to the proposed signs. Corridor improvements can include newly installed
signs of the same nature and R3-9d sign structures at overhead lane control mast arms. The information displayed will
serve the same purpose: alert drivers that the reversible lane will begin in a variable X amount of feet, depending on the
placement of the sign. The proposed preliminary cost estimate for both corridors can be found in Table 15-2.

This cost estimate includes the cost assumed for the reconstruction of all mast arm and pole foundations with new static
signs (i.e. upgrade the existing reversible lane infrastructure).

If combined with the Improvement Category 5 (Dynamic Lane Control Sign System), a preliminary design calls for total of
six static signs at corridor extremes in addition to the dynamic lane control signs.

Table 15-2 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Static Sign Replacement Improvements
7th Avenue 7th Street
Item Description
Total Cost
Construction Subtotal $708,000.00 $838,000.00
Unidentified Item Allowance (20%) $141,600.00 $167,600.00
Construction Total $849,600.00 $1,005,600.00
Traffic Control (5%) $42,480.00 $50,280.00
Construction Engineering (14%) $118,944.00 $140,784.00
Consultant Services (2%) $16,992.00 $20,112.00
Construction Contingencies (3%) $25,488.00 $30,168.00
Construction Project Total $1,053,504.00 $1,246,944.00
Design (10%) $105,350.00 $124,694.00
7’s Reverse Lane Study
Table 15-2 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Static Sign Replacement Improvements
7th Avenue 7th Street
Item Description
Total Cost
Design and Construction Project Total $1,158,854.00 $1,371,638.00


15.3. Intersection Improvements Cost Estimate
The following assumptions were made:
• Intersection improvements are on a case-by-case basis. The proposed estimate includes an all-encompassing cost
to reconstruct all aspects.
• Intersection improvements do not include the cost for dynamic sign integration.
• Intersection improvements include:
o New mast arms and pole foundations
o New traffic signals (at least two per approach)
o New controller cabinets
o New pull boxes to support updated technology
o New pedestrian push buttons, or the addition of pedestrian push buttons at intersections that do not have
any existing
o Detection on all approaches
o CCTV cameras and pre-emption technology

The proposed preliminary cost estimate for both corridors can be found in Table 15-3.

Table 15-3 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Intersection Improvements
7th Avenue 7th Street
Item Description
Total Cost
Construction Subtotal $3,650,000.00 $5,300,000.00
Unidentified Item Allowance (20%) $730,000.00 $1,060,000.00
Construction Total $4,380,000.00 $6,360,000.00
Traffic Control (5%) $219,000.00 $318,000.00
Construction Engineering (14%) $613,200.00 $890,400.00
Consultant Services (2%) $87,600.00 $127,200.00
Construction Contingencies (3%) $131,400.00 $190,800.00
Construction Project Total $5,431,200.00 $7,886,400.00
Design (10%) $543,120.00 $788,640.00
Design and Construction Project Total $5,974,320.00 $8,675,040.00




7’s Reverse Lane Study
15.4. Fiber Trunk Line Cost Estimate
The cost of installing a fiber trunk line along 7th Avenue from McDowell Road to Northern Avenue and along 7th Street
from McDowell Road to Dunlap Avenue was based on a typical mile of fiber trunk line installation and assumes the
following:
• The trunk line consists of 3-4” PVC/HDPE conduit. One of these conduits is an empty spare.
• Laterals are installed at all dynamic sign pole locations.
• Laterals consist of 2-3” PVC/HDPE conduit. One of these conduits is an empty spare.
• When crossing paved streets, directional drilling of HDPE conduit is required.
• When installing conduit in all other areas, PVC conduit will be installed by open trench.
• Trunk line fiber will be single mode fiber-optic cable with 144 strands.
• Lateral fiber will be single mode fiber-optic cable with 12 strands and is spliced to the trunk line fiber.
• Number 9 pull boxes are installed at every lateral junction.
• Number 9 pull boxes are installed at every signalized intersection on the same corner as the signal cabinet.
• Number 7 pull boxes are installed at a minimum spacing distance of 1 per every 500 feet.
• Dynamic sign pole cabinets are not quantified in this estimate as they are a part of Lane Control System estimate.
• The estimate includes a 20% unidentified item allowance.

The proposed preliminary cost estimate for both corridors can be found in Table 15-4.


Table 15-4 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Fiber Trunk Line Network
7th Avenue 7th Street
Item Description
Total Cost
Construction Subtotal $2,852,930.10 $3,310,258.60
Unidentified Item Allowance (20%) $570,586.00 $662,052.00
Construction Total $3,423,516.10 $3,972,310.00
Traffic Control (5%) $273,881.00 $317,785.00
Construction Engineering (14%) $479,292.00 $556,123.00
Consultant Services (2%) $64,470.00 $79,446.00
Construction Contingencies (3%) $102,705.00 $119,169.00
Construction Project Total $4,347,864.10 $5,044,833.60
Design (10%) $434,786.00 $504,483.00
Design and Construction Project Total $4,782,650.10 $5,549,316.60



15.5. Dynamic Lane Control Sign System Cost Estimate

The following assumptions were made:
• All lanes will display lane management information.
• Signs will display either a green arrow or a red ‘X’ and will be doubly sided.
• For locations proposed (see Appendix J and Appendix K), sign locations with shared static and dynamic sings will
only have dynamic lane control signs on the opposite direction of traffic. The static sign will be displayed on the
correct side of traffic, informing drivers of beginning and ending reversible lane distances.
• All other proposed mast arm locations will include a dynamic lane control sign above each lane and only one
sign per lane.

7’s Reverse Lane Study
Figure 38 – Sample Mast Arm Dynamic Sign Display




Figure 39 – Sample Intersection Dynamic Sign Display




7’s Reverse Lane Study
The proposed preliminary cost estimate for both corridors can be found in Table 15-5.

Table 15-5 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Dynamic Lane Control Sign Improvements (Staple Sign Structure)
7th Avenue 7th Street
Item Description
Total Cost
Construction Subtotal $4,970,000.00 $5,518,600.00
Unidentified Item Allowance (20%) $994,000.00 $1,103.720.00
Construction Total $5,964,000.00 $6,622,320.00
Traffic Control (5%) $298,200.00 $331,116.00
Construction Engineering (14%) $834,960.00 $927,125.00
Consultant Services (2%) $119,280.00 $132,446.00
Construction Contingencies (3%) $178,920.00 $198,670.00
Construction Project Total $7,395,360.00 $8,211,677.00
Design (10%) $739,536.00 $821,168.00
Design and Construction Project Total $8,134,896.00 $9,032,845.00


15.6. Restriping Cost Estimate
The restriping is assumed to take place during other maintenance activities. This being the case, cost is not included for
striping obliteration or any chip seal activities.

Striping quantities are based on lane miles, including right-turn lane pockets.

The proposed preliminary cost estimate for both corridors can be found in Table 15-6.

Table 15-6 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Restriping Improvements
7th Avenue 7th Street
Item Description
Total Cost
Construction Subtotal $180,300.00 $213,400.00
Unidentified Item Allowance (20%) $36,100.00 $42,700.00
Construction Total $237,000.00 $280,600.00
Traffic Control (5%) $19,000.00 $22,400.00
Construction Engineering (14%) $19,000.00 $22,400.00
Consultant Services (2%) $4,700.00 $5,600.00
Construction Contingencies (3%) $11,90.00 $14,000.00
Construction Project Total $320,600.00 $379,200.00
Design (10%) $32,000.00 $33,800.00
Design and Construction Project Total $353,000.00 $413,000.00




7’s Reverse Lane Study
15.7. Bus Bay Cost Estimate
The proposed cost estimate for bus bay construction for 7th Avenue and 7th Street have been divided into separate
corridors as well as a Study Area cost estimate. Bus bay locations that were deemed infeasible due to significant right-of-
way needs or major utility reconstruction to construct were not included in the cost estimate. The following assumptions
were used in creating the cost estimate for both corridors:
• Typical bus bays are assumed to be constructed per MAG Standard Detail 252.
• Typical bus bays and modified bus bays are needed, but there is no true difference in cost.
• Bus bays have been categorized based on the needs of the location. The type of category of bus bay may exist on
7th Avenue, 7th Street, or both.
• Construction needs require a combination of right-of-way acquisition, driveway reconstructions, pole relocations,
and/or minor utility (pull boxes, telecom risers, water valves) relocations.
• Proposed bus bay locations with right-of-way acquisition costs do not require the reconstruction of any existing
buildings (commercial or residential).
• Rights-of-way for different residential properties for both corridors were assumed to be an average of $25,000.00.
This cost includes land acquisition, procurements costs, construction costs, and costs to cure for each parcel
owner.
• Rights-of-way of proposed bus bays with conflict zones with commercial properties were estimated to have the
same cost as residential rights-of-way.

The proposed preliminary cost estimate for both corridors can be found in Table 15-7.


Table 15-7 – Proposed Cost Estimate for Bus Bay Improvements
7th Avenue 7th Street
Item Description
Total Cost
Construction Subtotal $3,295,000.00 $3,815,000.00
Unidentified Item Allowance (20%) $659,000.00 $763,000.00
Construction Total $3,954,000.00 $4,578,000.00
Traffic Control (5%) $316,320.00 $366,240.00
Construction Engineering (14%) $553,560.00 $640,920.00
Consultant Services (2%) $79,080.00 $91,560.00
Construction Contingencies (3%) $118,620.00 $137,340.00
Construction Project Total $432,580.00 $5,051,060.00
Design (10%) $432,258.00 $505,106.00
Design and Construction Project Total $4,798,838.00 $5,556,155.00




7’s Reverse Lane Study
16.0 Recommendations
The reversible lanes provide additional peak hour capacity and serve as regionally significant routes. This report concludes
that eliminating the reversible lanes partially or completely will create operational delays and increase travel times by
more than 40 percent. Several signalized intersections will operate at an unacceptable level of service when reversible
lanes are eliminated and can increase the potential for crashes associated with traffic congestion. It is the study team’s
recommendation to retain the reversible lanes but consider the improvement strategies outlined in the report.

Improvement strategy categories, as defined in this report, can be used as a baseline for future corridor improvements to
improve traffic operations and corridor safety along 7th Avenue and 7th Street. Seven improvement strategies were
selected from a decision matrix based on corridor need and were categorized by:
1. No-build improvements,
2. Communication improvements, and
3. Operations improvements.

Field visits indicated that at a minimum the existing reversible lane static signs should be removed and replaced to remove
inconsistencies in signage and to eliminate sign structures with poor structural integrity of the mast arms. Beyond the
minimum requirements for improvement, alternatives including intersection improvements, fiber trunk line additions,
dynamic lane control signs, corridor restriping, and pull-out bus bay constructions were considered.

We believe that the dynamic lane control signs improve the overall operations and safety along the reversible lane
corridors. In addition to providing higher visibility, the dynamic lane control signs also provide the flexibility for reversible
lane operations for off-peak travel conditions.

Based on the condition of existing infrastructure, traffic operational and crash analysis, we recommend that the
improvements be implemented first along 7th Street and then along 7th Avenue.




7’s Reverse Lane Study



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Consideration of Citizen Petition Related to the City of Phoenix Municipal Golf
System - Districts 3, 4, 5, 6 & 8

This report provides information to the Phoenix City Council in response to a citizen
petition submitted by Jeremy Thacker at the May 7, 2025, Formal City Council Meeting
(Attachment A), concerning the City of Phoenix Municipal Golf System.

Summary
The petitioner requests the City Council to:
1. Establish an independent ad hoc committee to study the future of municipal golf in
Phoenix;
2. Acknowledge the disproportionate use of land;
3. Account for foregone revenue due to golf use; and,
4. Prioritize equity and transparency in park land use.

The petition also discusses water usage.

The City of Phoenix owns eight municipal golf courses, six of which are operated by
the City and two are managed through contractual partnerships. The eight courses
owned by the City include:
· Encanto 18
· Encanto 9
· Cave Creek
· Aguila 18
· Aguila 9
· Palo Verde
· Maryvale (Managed by Contract)
· Papago (Managed by Contract)

Municipal golf courses have long been a part of the Phoenix parks system, providing
affordable recreation opportunities to residents. The City’s first course, Encanto,
opened in 1936 and was only the third golf course in Arizona at the time. The City's
second course was Maryvale, which opened in 1961, then Papago opened in 1963.
Approximately 20 years later, the Cave Creek Golf Course was built in 2983 as a



landfill reclamation project, which was a pioneering golf course design at the time. In
1999, both Aguila and Palo Verde became part of the Phoenix golf system, continuing
the tradition of expanding access to golf throughout the City. Phoenix’s municipal golf
system has grown to serve the recreational needs of a diverse and expanding
community.

Over the past decade, golf rounds have increased by an average of 11,000 rounds per
year. In the most recent year, the courses hosted more than 427,000 rounds. This
steady growth has contributed to the system’s ability to remain fully self-sustaining.
Several strategic actions over the years have supported this sustainability, including
outsourcing maintenance and concessions, and establishing operational partnerships
at Maryvale and Papago golf courses.

Phoenix’s municipal golf courses offer a wide range of amenities to enhance the
playing experience and support skill development. These include eight putting greens,
five chipping areas, and six driving ranges. The chipping and putting areas are
available for free public use, while driving range access is affordably priced at $5.00
for 35 balls.

All eight courses provide youth and adult golf lessons, ensuring accessibility for
players at all skill levels. The facilities are also used extensively by local high school
teams, 33 teams currently practice and compete on City courses, including during the
AIA State Golf Championships. Youth golf development is further supported through
programs such as Arizona Junior Golf tournaments and the PGA First Tee Program.
The courses also promote inclusivity, with Encanto Golf Course serving as the host
site for the Arizona Special Olympics State Regional Tournament, creating meaningful
opportunities for athletes of all abilities to participate in the sport.

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the citizen petition be rejected in its entirety.

Municipal golf courses have a long history as a part of the Phoenix Parks and
Recreation system. Phoenix golf courses provide a variety of benefits to the
community. In addition to providing accessible and affordable recreational golf
opportunities for residents of all skill levels including youth, golf creates a positive
economic impact in the surrounding community. Golf courses can also contribute to
improving biological diversity, conserving natural environments, and are effective at
mitigating the heat island effect due to the large amount of green space and the
number of trees that cover a typical golf course.

Additionally, per Chapter XXIII, Section 2 of the Phoenix City Charter, the Parks and


Recreation Board is the appropriate authority charged with advising City Council on
the recreational needs of the City and in establishing operating policies for recreational
facilities including golf courses that comprise park property.

Location
Council Districts: 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Parks and
Recreation Department.





Attachment A

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

108 item(s)