← Back to meetings

Meeting Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee-9/17/2025 complete

2025-09-17 · Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee

Items: 84

Transportation, Infrastructure, and Planning Subcommittee

View on Agenda Online ↗


Synced: 2026-05-28 03:37 AZ

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on May 21, 2025

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of May 21, 2025, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
Street, 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
For Approval or Correction, the Minutes of the Formal Meeting on June 4, 2025

Summary
This item transmits the minutes of the Formal Meeting of June 4, 2025, for review,
correction and/or approval by the City Council.

The minutes are available for review in the City Clerk Department, 200 W. Washington
Street, 15th Floor.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Summary
This item transmits recommendations from the Mayor and Council for appointment or
reappointment to City Boards and Commissions.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Mayor's Office.





ATTACHMENT A




To: City Council Date: September 17, 2025
From: Mayor Kate Gallego

Subject: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – APPOINTEES

The purpose of this memo is to provide recommendations for appointments to the
following Boards and Commissions:

Mayor's Human Trafficking Task Force

Councilman Jim Waring and I recommend the following for appointment:

John Meza
Mr. Meza is the President and CEO of the Arizona Anti-Trafficking Network.

Susan Morris
Ms. Morris is a Senior Program Manager at Catholic Charities Community Services and
a resident of District 8.

Planning Commission

I recommend the following for appointment:

Marc Soronson
Mr. Soronson is the Vice President of HDR and a resident of District 2. He replaces Julie
Read for a partial term to expire May 1, 2028.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Our Lady of Czestochowa Roman Catholic
Parish Phoenix - District 1

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Kinga Hoffman

Location
2828 W. Country Gables Drive
Council District: 1

Function
Banquet

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 26, 2025 - 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. / 180 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Estilo Azteca - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 354074.

Summary

Applicant
Juanita Esparza, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
3555 W. Pinnacle Peak Road
Zoning Classification: RE-43 SP
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 28, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.




Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I understand and comply with all relevant laws and regulations regarding the sale and
service of alcohol. I have demonstrated responsible business practices, a clean legal
record, and a commitment to maintaining a safe and respectful environment for
patrons and staff. Additionally, I have completed all required training, such as the
Arizona required title IV basic and management training course, I have the financial
and managerial capacity to operate a licensed premises responsible and successfully.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“The proposed establishment will provide a safe, regulated, and professionally
managed environment to gather and socialize. It will contribute to the local economy
through job creation, increased tax revenue, and support for nearby businesses.
Furthermore, the license will allow the business to meet existing demand in the area,
reduce the need for residents to travel outside the community for similar services, and
enhance the overall quality and diversity of local dining and entertainment options."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Estilo Azteca - Data
Attachment B - Estilo Azteca - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: ESTILO AZTECA
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 1



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 20.67 23.77

Violent Crimes 12.31 2.86 3.5

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 5

Total Violations 69 6


Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6118001 3161 920 25 53

6118003 854 255 13 32

6119001 1987 449 11 33

6143001 1104 430 35 12

6145004 1909 510 33 27

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: ESTILO AZTECA
3555 W PINNACLE PEAK RD




Date: 8/12/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - K3 Market - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 354057.

Summary

Applicant
Harun Ozcan, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
3502 W. Dunlap Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 1

This request is for an ownership transfer of a liquor license for a liquor store. This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 20, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the



State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

76 Gas Station (Series 10)
1045 N. 24th Street, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 10
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I hold a certificate for "The Basic Liquor Law Training". This training provided me the
opportunity of learning the importance and significance of obtaining a beer and wine
license. I am assured to uphold the laws and regulations about beer and wine license.
I have never been involved in any criminal activity, no record of getting in trouble with
law and authorities.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“This store will provide a safe and secure place for the neighborhood to buy beer, wine
and li The location will be convenient for the people in neighborhood who may not
have access to transportation. Adding the long time experience of the owner with
running a store while upholding all the laws and regulations, the store will be a safe,
secure and convenience place for the customers to purchase quality liquor.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - K3 Market - Data
Attachment B - K3 Market - Map




Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: K3 MARKET
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 3 1

Liquor Store 9 4 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 11 5

Restaurant 12 6 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 236.43 254.88

Violent Crimes 12.31 44.05 62.42

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 134

Total Violations 68 255




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1042051 1324 539 47 89

1042053 1625 264 18 20

1042054 1560 187 71 626

1042061 1490 436 6 152

1042062 1136 203 29 327

1042063 1361 484 4 163

1056022 1868 197 61 602

1057011 1484 317 33 85

1057021 2689 600 18 316

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: K3 MARKET
3502 W DUNLAP AVE




Date: 8/11/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Shake Shack #1604 - District 1

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 354502.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
2222 W. Happy Valley Road
Zoning Classification: PUD
Council District: 1

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently under construction with plans to open in December 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 28, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
"Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards to maintain compliance
with all applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the techniques of legal
and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"Shake Shack offers a wide variety of customized delicious burgers, hot dogs, frozen
custard, shakes and more in a modern-day neighborhood restaurant. Applicant would
like to offer alcoholic beverages as an incident to the delicious meals served.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Shake Shack #1604 - Data
Attachment B - Shake Shack #1604 - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: SHAKE SHACK #1604
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 0

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 2

Liquor Store 9 4 3

Beer and Wine Store 10 4 2

Hotel 11 3 1

Restaurant 12 22 21


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 62.87 164.54

Violent Crimes 12.31 3.26 7.53
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 1

Total Violations 69 1


Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6123011 1283 239 38 24

6123012 3501 661 276 286

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: SHAKE SHACK #1604
2222 W HAPPY VALLEY RD




Date: 8/28/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Arizona Wine Foundation Inc. (November 1,
2025) - District 2

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Teresa Slade

Location
15215 N. Kierland Boulevard
Council District: 2

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
November 1, 2025 - 11 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. / 2,500 attendees
November 2, 2025 - 11 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. / 2,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Cactus Racks - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 354591.

Summary

Applicant
Shawn Manning, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
30845 N. Cave Creek Road, Ste. 107
Zoning Classification: C-1 PCD
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit. This
business has plans to open in October 2025 .

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 28, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Proven compliance with all laws and regulations in prior business operations, financial
stability to maintain a lawful, well-run establishment, strict controls over staff training,
inventory, and responsible alcohol service, commitment to public safety and preventing
over-service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Cactus Racks provides a safe, well-managed gathering place that supports local jobs,
hosts community events, and offers responsible on-premise service. Our
establishment enhances the area's dining and entertainment options while fostering a
welcoming environment for residents and visitors alike.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Cactus Racks - Data
Attachment B - Cactus Racks - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: CACTUS RACKS
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 3 2

Liquor Store 9 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 2 0

Restaurant 12 5 3

Craft Distiller 18 1 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 7.45 9.02

Violent Crimes 12.31 0.53 1.06
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 7

Total Violations 69 7




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6125001 1843 555 46 154

6126001 1116 435 11 15

6126002 1035 440 16 24

6127001 1065 447 32 41

6127002 1158 422 19 71

6130001 2580 1000 92 146

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: CACTUS RACKS
30845 N CAVE CREEK RD




Date: 8/11/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Humble Steakhouse - District 2

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 355052.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
5450 E. High Street, Ste. 117
Zoning Classification: C-2 DRSP
Council District: 2

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
is currently being remodeled with plans to open in October 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 3, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the
applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“From the owners of Humble Bistro, Humble Steakhouse will feature high-quality,fresh
menu dishes in an upscale, family-friendly atmosphere. Applicant would like to offer
guests 21 and over the opportunity to enjoy alcoholic beverages with their meals.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Humble Steakhouse - Data
Attachment B - Humble Steakhouse - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: HUMBLE STEAKHOUSE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 12 4

Beer and Wine Bar 7 4 3

Liquor Store 9 3 0

Beer and Wine Store 10 5 1

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 30 11


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 49.2 35.98

Violent Crimes 12.31 3.13 2.97

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 0

Total Violations 69 0


Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

6152011 656 0 41 20

6152012 6102 515 722 1020

6152022 84 50 30 0

6152023 3418 1016 778 112

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: HUMBLE STEAKHOUSE
5450 E HIGH ST




Date: 8/12/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - St. Luke Roman Catholic Parish Phoenix -
District 3

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Jonathan Leithman

Location
19644 N. 7th Avenue
Council District: 3

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 17, 2025 - 4 p.m. to 11 p.m. / 350 attendees
October 18, 2025 - 4 p.m. to 11 p.m. / 400 attendees
October 19, 2025 - 4 p.m. to 11 p.m. / 400 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Don's Liquor - District 3

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 352607.

Summary

Applicant
Tajinder Singh, Agent

License Type
Series 9 - Liquor Store

Location
14875 N. Cave Creek Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 3

This request is for an ownership and location transfer of a liquor license for a liquor
store. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales with a Series 10 - Beer and
Wine Store, liquor license.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 29, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This information is not provided due to the multiple ownership interests held by the



applicant in the State of Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have been in liquor business more than 20 years.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“A lot of potential, drive thru, more variety, been there for a long time.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Don's Liquor - Data
Attachment B - Don's Liquor - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: DON'S LIQUOR
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Liquor Store 9 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 3

Restaurant 12 3 1

Club 14 1 0


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 80.04 81.84

Violent Crimes 12.31 17.91 16.24

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 71

Total Violations 69 125




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1033061 1843 117 39 722

1033062 2351 283 67 609

1035011 1291 406 38 220

1035012 1000 315 7 39

1035024 1051 281 31 174

1036061 561 316 17 168

1036071 1147 284 27 123

1036072 1518 544 9 217

1036074 777 338 18 45

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: DON'S LIQUOR
14875 N CAVE CREEK RD




Date: 9/5/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
and Lounge - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 357120.

Summary

Applicant
Sarah Griffin, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4835 N. 15th Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2 TOD-1
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This business
has plans to open in November 2025.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 12, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of
Arizona.

Public Opinion
One letter protesting the issuance of this license has been received and is on file in the
Office of the City Clerk. The letter is from a local resident who feels the area is
oversaturated with liquor licenses. The resident is also concerned with the proximity of
the business to a nearby school and feels the addition of this liquor license will not
benefit the community.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I am a very responsible person. I have great instincts and think well on my feet. While
I am a peaceful and friendly person. My first responsibility is safety. I take policy very
seriously.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Phoenix is my hometown. I will be sure to be a positive influence in the community. I
attend church in the community and feed the homeless during the holidays.I love
people of all backgrounds.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff gave careful consideration to the protest letter received, however after reviewing
the application in its entirety staff is recommending approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Champagne Cafe and Lounge - Data
Attachment B - Champagne Cafe and Lounge - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.



Liquor License Data: CHAMPAGNE CAFE AND LOUNGE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 1 0

Bar 6 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 0

Liquor Store 9 4 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 2

Restaurant 12 8 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 126.35 153.71

Violent Crimes 12.31 24.86 31.21
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 40

Total Violations 69 57




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1165002 1667 315 21 256

1165003 1310 183 39 552

1166141 3619 1042 24 410

1166172 2057 651 24 281

1167322 1859 526 14 427

1167351 1566 364 15 265

1167352 1422 260 62 315

1167361 1231 107 15 473

1167362 2156 475 19 241

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: CHAMPAGNE CAFE AND LOUNGE
4835 N 15TH AVE




Date: 8/22/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Windy City Liqa' - District 4

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 354965.

Summary

Applicant
Jeffrey Miller, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
2720 W. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 4

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that does not sell gas.
This location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with
an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 3, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
"I am committed to operating responsibly within the community, maintaining a safe
environment for patrons, and contributing to the local economy. We will adhere to all
rules and regulations including those related to alcohol licensing and control.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"We are new owners taking over an established neighborhood convenience store. We
will continue to serve the needs of our community.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Windy City Liqa' - Data
Attachment B - Windy City Liqa' - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: WINDY CITY LIQA'
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Wholesaler 4 2 1

Bar 6 3 0

Liquor Store 9 3 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 17 5

Restaurant 12 4 1


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 227.41 260.82

Violent Crimes 12.31 84.23 117.51

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 100

Total Violations 69 168




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1090011 2026 156 94 827

1090012 3304 0 235 959

1090033 1038 8 61 152

1090034 1053 30 24 453

1091012 1585 278 17 108

1091022 3960 742 30 904

1091023 1136 190 72 301

1169001 2763 372 39 622

1170002 3121 431 53 676

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: WINDY CITY LIQA'
2720 W INDIAN SCHOOL RD




Date: 8/30/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - 7-Eleven #42391H - District 5

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 354939.

Summary

Applicant
Hardeep Cheema, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
9110 W. Thomas Road
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 5

This request is for a new liquor license for a convenience store that sells gas.This
location was previously licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an
interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 6, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.






Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations
on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

EZ Stop Market (Series 10)
1851 W. Northern Avenue, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 18
Liquor license violations: None

7-Eleven (Series 10)
1850 W. Glendale Avenue, Phoenix
Calls for police service: 124
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“7-Eleven is a on-stop shop for convenience items. The stores offer a wide variety of
goods, including fresh and ready-to eat foods, home and personal products, snacks,
and drinks. Applicant would like to offer beer and wine to customers 21 and over.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.



Attachments
Attachment A - 7- Eleven #42391H - Data
Attachment B - 7- Eleven #42391H - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: 7-ELEVEN #42391A
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Liquor Store 9 2 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 1 1

Restaurant 12 3 3


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 83.97 113.48

Violent Crimes 12.31 20.67 36.51
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 81

Total Violations 69 141



Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

0820091 2139 401 18 477

0820092 2788 421 21 98

0820161 0 0 0 0

0820162 4197 623 82 530

0820171 1887 192 18 229

0820172 0 0 0 0

0820181 2313 519 20 181

Average 1601 393 60 177



Liquor License Map: 7-ELEVEN #42391A
9110 W THOMAS RD




Date: 8/27/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - One Stop Market and Service Center - District 5

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 357474.

Summary

Applicant
Simon Isaac, Agent

License Type
Series 9S - Addition of Sampling Privileges for a Liquor Store

Location
6702 W. Indian School Road
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 5

This request is for the addition of Sampling Privileges to an existing liquor license for a
liquor store. This location is currently licensed for liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 14, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.



Public Opinion



No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“this business has been licensed with a Series 09 Liquor Store License since 2012.
The business has operated in full compliance with the Arizona liquor laws following
issuance of the Liquor Store License. Prior thereto, the business operated under a
Series 10 Beer and Wine Store License, Number 10075383. The business operated in
full compliance with the Arizona liquor laws under the Beer and Wine Store License.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“sampling will allow the liquor vendors of the business to introduce new liquor products
to the customers of the business and will allow customers to sample a small quantity of
a new liquor product carried by the vendor. After tasting a sample,one or more
customers may request the business order and carry in inventory a new liquor product.
Through this sampling process, the customers of the business will enjoy a new
amenity not previously available without sampling.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - One Stop Market and Service Center - Data
Attachment B - One Stop Market and Service Center - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: ONE STOP MARKET & SERVICE
CENTER
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 0

Beer and Wine Bar 7 1 1

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 9 3

Restaurant 12 6 2



Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 176.59 352.33

Violent Crimes 12.31 44.05 84.5

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 85

Total Violations 69 173




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1095002 1201 258 22 70

1095003 2295 425 29 304

1096022 3172 251 59 534

1096023 3031 592 2 596

1096041 3236 579 30 597

1097032 1915 195 39 345

1097071 1717 0 30 359

1097072 631 80 49 188

1097073 2485 0 85 1135

1098012 1340 248 8 518

1098021 1651 440 14 280

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: ONE STOP MARKET & SERVICE CENTER
6702 W INDIAN SCHOOL RD




Date: 8/19/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Dilla Libre Uno Phoenix - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 354804.

Summary

Applicant
Andrea Lewkowitz, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
1339 E. Northern Avenue
Zoning Classification: C-2
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 7, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.



Public Opinion



No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
"Applicant is committed to upholding the highest standards for business and
maintaining compliance with applicable laws. Managers and staff will be trained in the
techniques of legal and responsible alcohol sales and service."

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"Dilla Libre Uno Phoenix has served award-winning, high-quality, authentic Mexican
cuisine for several years. The new owner will continue the tradition with delicious,
innovative dishes and would like to continue to offer guests 21 and over the
opportunity to order alcohol beverages with the meals served."

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Attachments
Attachment A - Dilla Libre Uno Phoenix - Data
Attachment B - Dilla Libre Uno Phoenix - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: DILLA LIBRE UNO PHOENIX
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 5 1

Beer and Wine Bar 7 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 2

Restaurant 12 9 4

Club 14 2 2


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 74.89 113.26

Violent Crimes 12.31 8.99 16.45

*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 62

Total Violations 69 100




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1051023 1091 589 89 49

1052001 784 328 38 39

1052002 1993 584 57 82

1052004 1823 437 112 36

1063001 1881 242 59 253

1063002 1402 408 51 22

1063003 714 213 54 61

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: DILLA LIBRE UNO PHOENIX
1339 E NORTHERN AVE




Date: 9/3/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Uncle Bao Dumpling and Noodle House - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 354771.

Summary

Applicant
Wanying Cheng, Agent

License Type
Series 12 - Restaurant

Location
4206 E. Chandler Boulevard, Ste. 7
Zoning Classification: C-2 PCD
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a restaurant. This location was previously
licensed for liquor sales and may currently operate with an interim permit.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is September 29, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
The ownership of this business has an interest in other active liquor license(s) in the
State of Arizona. This information is listed below and includes liquor license violations



on file with the AZ Department of Liquor Licenses and Control and, for locations within
the boundaries of Phoenix, the number of aggregate calls for police service within the
last 12 months for the address listed.

Uncle Panda Dumpling and Noodle House (Series 12)
5626 W. Bell Road, Ste. 101, Glendale
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Chubby Skewers Phoenix (Series 12)
1955 W. Guadalupe Road, Ste. 105-107, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Spice Spirit (Series 12)
1955 W. Guadalupe Road, Ste. 101, Mesa
Calls for police service: N/A - not in Phoenix
Liquor license violations: None

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
“I have passed liquor manage license and I am owner for this restaurant. I train my
employees to handle liquor.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
“Our establishment will provide a safe, well managed environment for responsible
alcohol service, adding to the variety of dining and social options available in the
neighborhood.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.




Attachments
Attachment A - Uncle Bao Dumpling and Noodle House - Data
Attachment B - Uncle Bao Dumpling and Noodle House - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: UNCLE BAO DUMPLING AND
NOODLE HOUSE
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Bar 6 1 1

Liquor Store 9 3 2

Beer and Wine Store 10 7 4

Restaurant 12 21 12


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 60.61 86.41

Violent Crimes 12.31 7.93 11.99
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 41 9

Total Violations 69 12




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1167121 2305 158 156 168

1167122 1955 502 15 223

1167131 630 237 90 72

1167191 1868 555 17 106

1167194 1373 576 7 92

1167202 1180 172 41 380

1167203 1429 320 66 89

1167212 1598 640 51 0

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: UNCLE BAO DUMPLING AND NOODLE HOUSE
4206 E CHANDLER BLVD




Date: 8/28/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Zong Smoke Shop - District 6

Request for a liquor license. Arizona State License Application 355184.

Summary

Applicant
Jacob Krabbe, Agent

License Type
Series 10 - Beer and Wine Store

Location
2976 E. Indian School Road
Classification: C-2
Council District: 6

This request is for a new liquor license for a smoke shop. This location was not
previously licensed for liquor sales and does not have an interim permit. This location
requires a Use Permit to allow package liquor sales.

The 60-day limit for processing this application is October 14, 2025.

Pursuant to A.R.S. 4-203, a spirituous liquor license shall be issued only after
satisfactory showing of the capability, qualifications and reliability of the applicant and
that the public convenience and the best interest of the community will be substantially
served by the issuance. If an application is filed for the issuance of a license for a
location, that on the date the application is filed has a valid license of the same series
issued at that location, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the public
convenience and best interest of the community at that location was established at the
time the location was previously licensed. The presumption shall not apply once the
licensed location has not been in use for more than 180 days.

Other Active Liquor License Interest in Arizona
This applicant does not hold an interest in any other active liquor license in the State of



Arizona.

Public Opinion
No protest or support letters were received within the 20-day public comment period.

Applicant’s Statement
The applicant submitted the following statement in support of this application. Spelling,
grammar and punctuation in the statement are shown exactly as written by the
applicant on the City Questionnaire.

I have the capability, reliability and qualifications to hold a liquor license because:
"I am committed to operating responsibly within the community. We will maintain a safe
environment for patrons and contribute to the local economy. We will adhere to all
rules and regulations, including those related to alcohol control and licensing.”

The public convenience requires and the best interest of the community will be
substantially served by the issuance of the liquor license because:
"We would like to expand our business and serve the wants of our clientele by
including beer and win in our offered products.”

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application noting the applicant must resolve any
pending City of Phoenix building and zoning requirements, and be in compliance with
the City of Phoenix Code and Ordinances.

Attachments
Attachment A - Zong Smoke Shop - Data
Attachment B - Zong Smoke Shop - Map

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.





Liquor License Data: ZONG SMOKE SHOP
Liquor License

Description Series 1 Mile 1/2 Mile

Microbrewery 3 1 1

Bar 6 5 3

Beer and Wine Bar 7 5 1

Liquor Store 9 2 1

Beer and Wine Store 10 9 3

Hotel 11 1 0

Restaurant 12 22 10


Crime Data

Description Average * 1 Mile Average ** 1/2 Mile Average***

Property Crimes 64.2 139.7 181.42

Violent Crimes 12.31 20.83 28.34
*Citywide average per square mile **Average per square mile within 1 mile radius ***Average per square mile within ½ mile radius



Property Violation Data

Description Average 1/2 Mile Average

Parcels w/Violations 40 91

Total Violations 69 116




Census 2020 Data 1/2 Mile Radius

BlockGroup 2020 Population Owner Occupied Residential Vacancy Persons in Poverty

1084001 369 67 141 0

1084002 1348 427 93 67

1084003 1530 487 73 382

1084005 989 109 57 230

1085021 578 138 7 37

1085023 1015 433 88 109

1107021 2550 450 73 215

1107022 1817 465 28 324

1108011 1965 414 124 372

1108012 1583 396 149 158

1108022 1635 590 39 272

Average 1601 393 60 177




Liquor License Map: ZONG SMOKE SHOP
2501 E INDIAN SCHOOL RD




Date: 9/5/2025




Ü
0 0.170.35 0.7 1.05 1.4
mi

City Clerk Department



Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - The Great Arizona Puppet Theater, Inc. - District

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Lisa Pirro

Location
302 W. Latham Street
Council District: 7

Function
Theater Performance

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 3, 2025 - 6 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. / 120 attendees
October 4, 2025 - 6 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. / 120 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Local First Arizona Foundation - District 7

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Kimber Lanning

Location
67 W. Culver Street
Council District: 7

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
November 8, 2025 - 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. / 10,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Arizona Wine Foundation Inc. (January 24, 2026)
- District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Teresa Slade

Location
113 N. 6th Street
Council District: 8

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
January 24, 2026 - 11 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. / 2,500 attendees
January 25, 2026 - 11 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. / 2,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Beer Babes Family - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Rachel Benkowski

Location
113 N. 6th Street
Council District: 8

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
November 15, 2025 - 4 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. / 1,500 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Glow-Frame Initiative - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Christopher Smith

Location
455 N. 3rd Street
Council District: 8

Function
Sporting Event

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 18, 2025 - 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. / 3,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Osborn School District Education Foundation,
Inc. - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Juan Flamand

Location
215 N. 7th Street
Council District: 8

Function
Award Celebration

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 25, 2025 - 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. / 200 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Saint Sava Serbian Orthodox Church - District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Elizabeth Kresojevich

Location
4436 E. McKinley Street
Council District: 8

Function
Cultural Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
November 1, 2025 - 10 a.m. to 10:30 p.m. / 900 attendees
November 2, 2025 - Noon to 7:30 p.m. / 650 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Valiant College Preparatory (October 24, 2025) -
District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Michael Douglas Jr.

Location
1601 E. Jackson Street
Council District: 8

Function
Festival

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
October 24, 2025 - 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 4,000 attendees
October 25, 2025 - 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 4,000 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Liquor License - Special Event - Valiant College Preparatory (November 7, 2025)
- District 8

Request for a Series 15 - Special Event liquor license for the temporary sale of all
liquors.

Summary

Applicant
Michael Douglas, Jr.

Location
1601 E. Jackson Street
Council District: 8

Function
Concert

Date(s) - Time(s) / Expected Attendance
November 7, 2025 - 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 3,400 attendees
November 8, 2025 - 8 p.m. to 2 a.m. / 3,400 attendees

Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this application.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the City Clerk
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Dunlap Square Apartments, LLC

To pay a court order entered against the City for a combined total of $216,715 for
judgment, plus statutory interest and taxable costs, in City of Phoenix v. Dunlap
Square Apartments, LLC, case CV2021-001849, a condemnation case for land
acquisition for the Northwest Phase II Light Rail Extension Project, for the Finance
Department, pursuant to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
League of Arizona Cities and Towns

For $167,055 in payment authority for annual membership dues and assessments for
Fiscal Year 2025-26 for the Office of Government Relations. The League of Arizona
Cities and Towns provides services and resources focusing on member representation
and interests of cities and towns before the state legislature. The League also provides
technical and legal assistance and coordinates shared services, educational
conferences and events. This membership ensures that the City's interests are
represented and advocated for the Governor's Office, Arizona State Legislature, and
other State of Arizona agencies.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Mill Industries, Inc.

For $140,000 in payment authority for established Contract 161919 entered on
January 1, 2025, for a term of three years with two one-year options to extend. The
contract provides food waste collection services in City buildings, to include: Aviation
Headquarters, Command Center, and Facilities and Services buildings for the Public
Works and Aviation departments. The program allows City employees to divert food
waste including vegetables, fruits, grains, meats and dairy from the landfill. The
contract currently provides food waste collection services in Phoenix City Hall and
Calvin C. Goode buildings. By diverting food waste from the landfill and processing
into compost, this reduces greenhouse gas emissions while providing a nutrient-rich
soil additive which can be applied back on gardens and parks. Funding is available in
the Public Works and Aviation departments' budgets.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Universal Fog Systems, Inc.

For $100,000 in additional payment authority for Contract 158348 to provide
maintenance and repair services to the misting systems at two transfer stations for the
Public Works Department. The systems are used to maintain dust control to ensure
compliance with environmental and air quality requirements. Funding is available in the
Public Works Department's budget.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Crafco Inc.

For $63,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about September
16, 2025, for a term of five years for hot-applied flexible pavement marker adhesive for
the Street Transportation Department. Hot-applied flexible pavement marker adhesive
is an adhesive that bonds markers, reflectors and delineators to both asphalt and
concrete pavement surfaces.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Dawson Infrastructure Solutions LLC

For $80,000 in payment authority for a new contract, entered on or about October 1,
2025, for a term of five years for the purchase and service of parts for the IBAK
camera system for the Water Services Department. IBAK is used to perform inspection
of the City of Phoenix wastewater infrastructure sanitary system. Proper maintenance
and service on this camera system will allow the City to respond to issues with better
efficiency.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Settlement of Claim(s) Borta v. City of Phoenix

To make payment of up to $111,320 in settlement of claim(s) in Borta v. City of
Phoenix, CV2023-096251, 23-0067-001, GL, BI, for the Finance Department pursuant
to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of an auto accident claim
involving the Street Transportation Department that occurred on February 27, 2025.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Settlement of Claim(s) Malinski v. City of Phoenix

To make payment of up to $195,000 in settlement of claim(s) in Malinski v. City of
Phoenix, 24-0354-001, GL, PD, for the Finance Department pursuant to Phoenix City
Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of a water main break claim involving the Water
Services Department that occurred on October 19, 2024.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Settlement of Claim(s) Vasquez v. City of Phoenix

To make payment of up to $41,180 in settlement of claim(s) in Vasquez v. City of
Phoenix, CV2022-010166, 21-0376-003, AU, BI, for the Finance Department pursuant
to Phoenix City Code Chapter 42. This is a settlement of an auto accident claim
involving the Police Department that occurred on January 18, 2022.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acceptance of Easements for Water and Drainage Purposes (Ordinance S-52264)
- Districts 2 & 5

Request for the City Council to accept easements for water and drainage purposes;
further ordering the ordinance recorded. Legal descriptions are recorded via separate
recording instrument.

Summary
Accepting the property interests below will meet the Planning and Development
Department's Single Instrument Dedication Process requirement prior to releasing any
permits to applicants.

Easements (a)
MCR: 20250425422
Applicant and Grantor: Bell Road and 32 St LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: July 24, 2025
Purpose: Water
Location: 3152 E. Bell Road
APN: 214-03-151C
File: FN 250062
Council District: 2

Easement (b)
MCR: 20250425418
Applicant and Grantor: Ninety-Nine Holdings, LLC; its successor and assigns
Date: July 24, 2025
Purpose: Water
Location: 1675 N. 99th Avenue
APN: 102-33-002G
File: FN 240063
Council District: 5

Easement (c)
MCR: 20250425423
Applicant and Grantor: West 99th Holdings, LLC; its successor and assigns



Date: July 24, 2025
Purpose: Drainage
Location: 3939 N. 99th Avenue
APN: 102-26-887
File: FN 250058
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development and Finance departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Ice Supply, Delivery and Storage Contract - IFB 25-0709 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52265) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Reddy Ice LLC, a disregarded entity of SCIH Ice Holdings, Inc., to provide Ice Supply,
Delivery and Storage for Departments citywide. Further request to authorize the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the contract will
not exceed $2,000,000.

Summary
This contract will provide ice supply, delivery and storage for citywide use. Demand for
ice is a 24-hour need at the City and is most critical during the hottest months of May
through October. Ice is critical to the safety of City employees and the public in
preventing heat-related injuries. Ice is critical to Fire Department operations and is
carried on vehicles to ensure the safety of patients. Ice is also critical to the Water
Services Department's fiscal responsibilities and a lack of ice could result in serious
financial consequences to the City in the form of fines due to spoiled water samples.
Timely delivery of ice in the correct quantities is of the highest importance. The City of
Phoenix uses an estimated 1.1 million pounds of ice annually.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

One vendor submitted a bid deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendor:

Selected Bidder
Reddy Ice LLC, a disregarded entity of SCIH Ice Holdings, Inc.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about November 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no
options to extend.




Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $2,000,000. Funding is available in the
various departments' operating budgets.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Finance Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amendments to the City’s Combined Classification and Pay Ordinance (S-51144)
in Accordance With the Recommendation of Human Resources Committee 636
(Ordinance S-52287) - Citywide

Establish the classification of Project Coordinator, Job Code: 08690, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 063 ($54,454 - $118,872/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt.

Establish the classification of Senior Economic Development Specialist, Job Code:
08840, Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 063 ($54,454 - $118,872/annual), Labor Unit
Code: 007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status:
Exempt.

Regrade the classification of Economic Development Specialist, Job Code: 08830,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 055 ($44,803 - $97,781/annual), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Grade/Range: 059 ($49,379 - $107,806).

Establish the classification of Apprentice Attorney (NC), Job Code: 10100, Salary Plan:
001, Grade/Range: 064 ($55,806 - $121,826/annual), Labor Unit Code: 008, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt.

Establish the classification of OAT Deputy Director, Job Code: 06820, Salary Plan:
013, Grade/Range: 842 ($117,000 - $160,202/annual), Labor Unit Code: 008, Benefit
Category: 009, EEO-4 Category: Officials and Administrators, FLSA Status: Exempt.

Regrade the classification of Aviation Director (NC), Job Code: 25190, Salary Plan:
018, Grade/Range: 929 ($207,126 - $289,994/annual), Labor Unit Code: 008, Benefit
Category: 010, EEO-4 Category: Officials and Administrators, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Grade/Range: 932 ($239,782 - $335,005).

Establish the classification of Retired AZ Police Officer - School Resource Officer
(SRO), Job Code: 6221R, Salary Plan: 007, Grade/Range: 4SR ($98,238 -
$107,827/annual), Labor Unit Code: 004, Benefit Category: 004, EEO-4 Category:
Protective Service Sworn, FLSA Status: Nonexempt.




Regrade the classification of Assistant Crime Lab Administrator, Job Code: 62460,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 069 ($63,045 - $137,592/annual), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Grade/Range: 073 ($69,493 - $151,694).

Regrade the classification of Forensic Scientist Section Supervisor, Job Code: 62950,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 067 ($60,029 - $131,040/annual), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Grade/Range: 071 ($66,186 - $144,477).

Establish the classification of Forensic Scientist IV*Tech Lead, Job Code: 62941,
Salary Plan: 001, Grade/Range: 071 ($66,186 - $144,477/annual), Labor Unit Code:
007, Benefit Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt.

Regrade the classification of Forensic Scientist IV, Job Code: 62940, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 065 ($57,179 - $124,800/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Exempt to
Grade/Range: 069 ($63,045 - $137,592).

Regrade the classification of Forensic Scientist III, Job Code: 62930, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 057 ($47,029 - $102,669/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 063 ($54,454 - $118,872).

Regrade the classification of Forensic Scientist II, Job Code: 62920, Salary Plan: 001,
Grade/Range: 051 ($40,643 - $88,691/annual), Labor Unit Code: 007, Benefit
Category: 007, EEO-4 Category: Professionals, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 057 ($47,029 - $102,669).

Regrade the classification of Forensic Scientist I (NC), Job Code: 62910, Salary Plan:
006, Grade/Range: 347 ($36,858 - $80,454/annual), Labor Unit Code: 003, Benefit
Category: 003, EEO-4 Category: Technician, FLSA Status: Nonexempt to
Grade/Range: 353 ($42,661 - $93,122).

Regrade the classification of Equipment Service Worker II, Job Code: 73070, Salary
Plan: 004, Grade/Range: 237 ($31,845 - $63,045/annual), Labor Unit Code: 002,
Benefit Category: 002, EEO-4 Category: Service Maintenance, FLSA Status:
Nonexempt to Grade/Range: 241 ($31,845 - $69,493).




Regrade the classification of Industrial Maintenance Mechanic, Job Code: 50430,
Salary Plan: 004, Grade/Range: 250 ($39,666 - $86,590/annual), Labor Unit Code:
002, Benefit Category: 002, EEO-4 Category: Skilled Craft, FLSA Status: Nonexempt
to Grade/Range: 256 ($45,926 - $100,235).

Regrade the classification of Utility Technician Trainee (NC), Job Code: 53000, Salary
Plan: 004, Grade/Range: 228 ($32,635 - $50,627/annual), Labor Unit Code: 002,
Benefit Category: 002, EEO-4 Category: Service Maintenance, FLSA Status:
Nonexempt to Grade/Range: 234 ($32,635 - $58,594).

Summary
Effective August 7, 2023, the City implemented a systemic overhaul of its
compensation structure. Following this implementation, additional adjustments have
been identified to address and restore internal alignment within specific job families or
career paths. These changes stem from the findings of the Classification and
Compensation study. Staff respectfully requests approval of the adjustments listed
above.

Financial Impact
The estimated initial cost for this action is $157,500.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On August 14, 2025, Human Resources Committee 636 reviewed and recommended
these modifications for approval effective on September 29, 2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager David Mathews and the Human
Resources Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Ak-Chin Indian Community 2025 Gaming Grant (Ordinance S-52259) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply, accept, and if
awarded, enter into related agreements for up to $87,206.60 in new funding from the
Ak-Chin Indian Community under the 2025 funding cycle. Further request authorization
for the City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse funds as directed by
the Ak-Chin Indian Community in connection with these grants.

Summary
If awarded, these monies would be applied, as directed by the Ak-Chin Indian
Community towards the following:

Nonprofit Application
· South Mountain Community College: $87,206.60 for the STEM PREP (Science,
Technology, Engineering, and Math: Prepare, Retain, Excel, and Progress)
Academy, which aims to increase the participation and success of students in
STEM disciplines. The program will address both academic and systemic
challenges faced by non-traditional students by providing two extracurricular
programs for students, a project-based summer bridge program and undergraduate
student research opportunities.

The gaming compact entered into by the State of Arizona and various tribes calls for
12 percent of gaming revenue to be contributed to cities, towns, and counties for
government services that benefit the public including public safety, mitigation of
impacts of gaming, and promotion of commerce and economic development. The Ak-
Chin Indian Community will notify the City, by resolution of the Tribal Council, if it
desires to convey to the nonprofit a portion of its annual 12 percent local revenue-
sharing contribution.

Financial Impact
There is no budgeted impact to the City and no general purpose funds are required.
Entities that receive gaming grants are responsible for the management of those
funds.





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Manager Jeffrey Barton and the Office of Government
Relations.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Landscaping Services Residential Single-Family Home Contract - IFB-FY25-086-
17 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-52273) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Canyon State Barricade Service LLC, Big Boys RDS Landscaping Services, LLC,
Landscaping by Andre, Inc., and Artistic Land Management, Inc. to provide
landscaping services at the Housing Department's residential single-family homes.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The total value of the contracts will not exceed $414,000.

Summary
This contract will provide regular ground and landscape maintenance on single-family
homes owned by the City and managed by the Housing Department. Landscape
services at these homes will include, but are not limited to: vegetation control, trash
pickup, removal of illegal dumping, tree maintenance and removal, and other related
services. All work will be carried out in accordance with the technical specifications in
the solicitation and as directed by City Housing Department personnel.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Six vendors submitted bids deemed to be responsive to posted specifications and
responsible to provide the required goods and services. Following an evaluation based
on price, the procurement officer recommends award to the following vendors:

· Canyon State Barricade Service LLC
· Big Boys RDS Landscaping Services, LLC
· Landscaping by Andre, Inc.
· Artistic Land Management, Inc.

Contract Term
The contracts will begin on October 1, 2025, for a five-year term with no options to
extend.



Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $414,000. The contracts are funded with
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development funds. There is no
impact to the General Fund.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Funding for The Moreland Affordable Housing Development Project (Ordinance
S-52286) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to add $2 million in federal
HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Program and other affordable housing gap
funds for The Moreland, Phase I affordable housing development, and to take all
necessary actions and execute all documents. Further request authorization for the
City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item for the life of the grant(s). There is no impact on the General Fund.

Summary
To address a critical need for affordable housing in downtown Phoenix, the Housing
Department issued a Request for Proposals seeking a co-developer partner to
redevelop the former Deck Park Vista Apartments site into The Moreland, a new
affordable multifamily rental housing project. Brinshore Development, LLC was
selected to serve as co-development partner for the project with the Housing
Department. The Moreland will consist of two phases with Phase I being a 132-unit
development that contains studio to three-bedroom units, a community room, a fitness
center, a computer room, teen/youth space, and a parking garage. Phase II will be a
105-unit development that consists of studio and one-bedroom units, a community
room, a fitness center, and other amenities.

The property is located on two acres at 1125 N. 3rd Street, and falls within the
Downtown Core, currently zoned under the Downtown Core-Evans Churchill East
Character Area. Former Deck Park Vista residents have been relocated, and the
buildings have been demolished. The site is now vacant. For Phase I, the Housing
Department has committed 131 total project-based vouchers for returning and Choice
Neighborhoods residents. Resident services will be provided. Construction is
anticipated to begin in January 2026 and the project will be completed by the end of
2027. Cost increases and various market fluctuations have resulted in the need for
additional gap funding for the project in the amount of $2 million.

Financial Impact
There is no impact on the General Fund. Funding is available from the federal HOME
Program and other affordable housing gap funds budgeted in the Housing



Department’s Capital Improvement Plan budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On February 15, 2023, City Council approved, through Ordinance S-49424, American
Rescue Plan Act funding in an amount not to exceed $10 million to facilitate the
development of The Moreland Phase I affordable housing project.

On June 18, 2025, through Ordinance S-52107, City Council approved entering into a
contract with Brinshore Development, LLC to serve as co-development partner with
the Housing Department, and to allocate resources and take other actions to complete
the development of The Moreland affordable housing project.

Location
1125 N. 3rd Street
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Housing
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Ordinance S-48773 to Increase Payment Authority for
Custodial Services (Ordinance S-52277) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to increase funding for
Contract 156849-0 with Universal Building Maintenance, LLC dba Allied Universal
Janitorial Services (Allied Universal) for the Human Services Department (HSD).
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this
item. The additional expenditures will not exceed $6,240. Funds are available in HSD's
budget.

Summary
Allied Universal provides custodial services for 13 HSD locations. The services include
general cleaning of the interior and exterior of these locations on a daily and weekly
schedule, emergent services as necessary and ancillary services for more advanced
cleaning of floors, windows and upholstery, as needed. The additional funding will
support additional fees for floor buffing services on a quarterly schedule.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on June 30, 2027.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $6,240 in additional funds, the revised total value of the contract will
not exceed $1,689,020. Funds are available in HSD's budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On June 15, 2022, the City Council approved the Authorization to Enter into Contract
for Custodial Services Invitation for Bids with Ordinance S-48773.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Gina Montes and the Human Services
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Proposed Shopping Cart Ordinance (Ordinance G-7419) - Citywide

Request City Council approval of the proposed amendment to the City Code, adding
Sections 39-56 through 39-70, Article X related to Shopping Carts.

Summary
In October 2024, Neighborhood Services Department staff presented to the Economic
Development and Housing Subcommittee an update on the Abandoned Shopping Cart
Retrieval Program (Retrieval Program) and information on what other cities are doing
to reduce the abandoned shopping carts. Additionally, staff presented the framework of
a possible new ordinance requiring restrictive devices to prevent the removal of
shopping carts from retail premises. Subcommittee members provided feedback and
requested staff meet with the retailer associations to get more data about the efficacy,
or lack thereof, of locking wheel mechanisms.

Between October and March, staff held multiple meetings with representatives from
the Arizona Retailers Association, Arizona Food Marketing Alliance, and Arizona
Lobbying to discuss the issue and strategies to better address the problem. Staff
requested data on the efficacy of locking wheel mechanisms; however, the level of
data was not available for local stores. The retailer representatives did share a partial
list of stores using these systems; however, they were not able to provide details about
whether the systems are properly maintained.

The representatives appreciated being included in the conversation and shared some
of the challenges of implementing a broad requirement for locking wheel systems over
other solutions. They noted that the systems are costly to implement and maintain, and
in many cases have not been able to reduce the number of carts that end up beyond
retail property boundaries. They also discussed the additional challenges retailers that
rent space may face in convincing their landlords of the necessity for infrastructure
improvements required.

In March 2025, staff provided an update to the Economic Development and Housing
Subcommittee, including additional program metrics. An analysis revealed that most
retailers are either small enough, or have sufficient systems in place, to require only a
minor number of carts to be collected through the program. Based on this information,



staff proposed a new ordinance to better address the blight, nuisance, and public
health and safety hazards associated with off-site shopping carts.

Proposed Ordinance
The proposed ordinance (Attachment A) codifies the current Retrieval Program and
fees, establishes an annual shopping cart certification requirement for all retailers
providing shopping carts for their customers, and requires large retailers to maintain
locking wheel mechanisms on their carts or to submit a Shopping Cart Management
Plan (SCMP). The SCMP will outline how they will prevent removal of carts from the
premises and ensure prompt cart retrieval for the carts that are removed from the site.
At a minimum, a shopping cart retrieval contract will be required under the SCMP, with
weekly retrieval services as part of the cart retrieval plan plus one additional
prevention measure.

Should the City continue to collect a substantial quantity of shopping carts under the
Retrieval Program after the proposed City Code amendments are implemented, an
SCMP will be required, if none exists, or enhancements to their existing SCMP will be
required to address the amount of shopping carts that are leaving the premises. If the
plan revisions fail to reduce City retrievals, a mandatory plan may be imposed with
specific requirements to reduce the ongoing burden on the public resources to
continue retrieving a substantial number of carts. Failure to meet certification, SCMP,
or SCMP enhancement requirements, will result in revocation of the retail store's
certification.

Failure to timely deliver or maintain a certification will be a violation of the City Code
with the following civil penalties:
- Civil sanction of not less than $500 for a first violation.
- Civil sanction of not less than $750 for a second violation within 36 months.
- Civil sanction of not less than $1,000 for a third violation within 36 months.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
On March 26, 2025, the Economic Development and Housing Subcommittee
unanimously recommended City Council approval for a new ordinance to reduce the
number of shopping carts outside retail premises by a vote of 4-0.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the
Neighborhood Services Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT THE OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE
ARTICLE X – SHOPPING CARTS

SEC. 39-56 PURPOSE.


THE PURPOSE OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO ADDRESS BLIGHT, NUISANCE, AND
PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH OFF-SITE
SHOPPING CARTS NOT REGULATED UNDER ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES,
TITLE 44, CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE 19. TO ACHIEVE THAT PURPOSE, THIS ARTICLE
ESTABLISHES A REGULATORY SYSTEM TO ENSURE (1) THE RETURN OF OFF-
SITE SHOPPING CARTS TO STORES AND (2) THAT RETAILERS TAKE EFFECTIVE
MEASURES TO PREVENT THE OCCURRENCE OF OFF-SITE SHOPPING CARTS.

SEC. 39-57. DEFINITIONS.

T
IN THIS ARTICLE, UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES:
“AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE” MEANS A NATURAL PERSON DULY




AF
AUTHORIZED BY A RETAILER TO (I) RECEIVE NOTICES ON BEHALF OF A
RETAILER FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE; (II) OBTAIN AND CERTIFY
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN CERTIFICATIONS; AND (III) DIRECT
EMPLOYEES AND CONTRACTORS OF THE RETAILER AND TAKE OTHER
ACTION AS REASONABLY NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THIS
ARTICLE.“CERTIFICATION” MEANS THE CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY
SECTION 39-62, AS MAY BE AMENDED.
“CERTIFY” MEANS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION OR MAKE A
REPRESENTATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39-62, AS MAY BE
AMENDED.




DR
“CITY” MEANS THE CITY OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA.
“DEPARTMENT” MEANS THE CITY’S NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
DEPARTMENT, ITS DELEGEE, OR AUTHORIZED CONTRACTOR.
“DIRECTOR” MEANS THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT.
“ENHANCED PLAN” MEANS A SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT
MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 39-65(B), AS MAY BE
AMENDED.
“EVALUATION PERIOD” MEANS THE PERIOD OF TIME BEGINNING (I)
INITIALLY, UPON DELIVERY OF A STORE’S FIRST CERTIFICATION AND (II)
SUBSEQUENTLY, IMMEDIATELY UPON CONCLUSION OF THE PRIOR
EVALUATION PERIOD AND ENDING UPON THE EARLIEST OF (I) 180 DAYS
LATER OR (II) THE SATISFACTION OF THE CONDITIONS OF 39-66(D), AS
MAY BE AMENDED.



7 Ordinance G-
“GPS TRACKER” MEANS A DEVICE WHICH USES A GLOBAL POSITIONING
SYSTEM TO ALLOW A RETAILER TO REMOTELY DETERMINE THE
LOCATION OF AN OFF-SITE SHOPPING CART.
“IDENTIFIABLE SHOPPING CART” MEANS AN OFF-SITE SHOPPING CART,
OTHER THAN A VALUELESS SHOPPING CART, THAT CAN REASONABLY BE
ASSOCIATED WITH A PARTICULAR RETAILER OR STORE DUE TO SIGNAGE,
BRANDING, DESIGN, OR OTHERWISE.
“LARGE STORE” MEANS A STORE OF AT LEAST 50,000 SQUARE FEET.

“LOCKING WHEEL MECHANISM” MEANS A DEVICE THAT PREVENTS ONE
OR MORE OF A SHOPPING CART’S WHEELS FROM OPERATING


T
NORMALLY WHEN THE SHOPPING CART IS OUTSIDE OF A STORE OR ITS
PARKING LOT.
“MANDATORY PLAN” MEANS A SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN
THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 39-65(C), AS MAY BE




AF
AMENDED.
“OFF-SITE SHOPPING CART” MEANS A SHOPPING CART THAT
REASONABLY APPEARS TO BE LOST OR ABANDONED OUTSIDE OF A
STORE OR ITS PARKING LOT
“PARKING LOT” MEANS AN AREA THAT A RETAILER PROVIDES FOR
CUSTOMERS OF A STORE TO PARK MOTOR VEHICLES.
“RETAILER” MEANS ANY SOLE PROPRIETOR, PARTNERSHIP,
CORPORATION, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, OR OTHER PERSON THAT




D
OFFERS MERCHANDISE FOR PURCHASE BY CUSTOMERS AT A STORE
WITHIN THE CITY.
"RESTRICTIVE DEVICE" MEANS AN ELECTRONIC OR MECHANICAL




R
DEVICE, INCLUDING A LOCKING WHEEL MECHANISM, THAT PROTECTS
AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED REMOVAL OF SHOPPING CARTS FROM A
STORE OR ITS PARKING LOT OR PREVENTS THE NORMAL OPERATION
OF THE SHOPPING CART OUTSIDE OF A STORE OR ITS PARKING LOT.
"SHOPPING CART" MEANS A BASKET THAT IS MOUNTED ON WHEELS OR
A SIMILAR DEVICE THAT IS GENERALLY USED IN A STORE BY A
CUSTOMER FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPORTING MERCHANDISE OF
ANY KIND THAT DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF A.R.S. § 44-
1799.32(B).
“SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN” MEANS A WRITTEN DOCUMENT
DESCRIBING SPECIFIC MEASURES A RETAILER TAKES TO MINIMIZE OFF-
SITE SHOPPING CARTS AND TO ENSURE THAT ANY OFF-SITE SHOPPING




CARTS ARE PROMPTLY RETURNED TO THE STORE.
“SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CONTRACT” MEANS A CURRENTLY
EFFECTIVE AND LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN A RETAILER
AND A THIRD PARTY FOR THE COLLECTION AND RETURN OF OFF-SITE
SHOPPING CARTS TO A RETAILER’S STORE.
“STORE” MEANS A FACILITY WITHIN THE CITY WHERE A RETAILER
OFFERS MERCHANDISE FOR PURCHASE BY CUSTOMERS AND
PROVIDES SHOPPING CARTS FOR CUSTOMER USE.
“UNIDENTIFIABLE SHOPPING CART” MEANS A SHOPPING CART OTHER
THAN AN IDENTIFIABLE SHOPPING CART OR A VALUELESS SHOPPING
CART.


T
“UNSUCCESSFUL EVALUATION PERIOD” MEANS AN EVALUATION PERIOD
IN WHICH THE DEPARTMENT RETURNS 10 OR MORE SHOPPING CARTS
TO A STORE AND WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE CONDITIONS OF
SECTION 39-66(D), AS MAY BE AMENDED, OR SECTION 39-67(D), AS MAY




AF
BE AMENDED, HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
“VALUELESS SHOPPING CART” MEANS A SHOPPING CART IN SUCH
DISREPAIR OR HAVING SUCH DAMAGE THAT IT HAS NO APPARENT
MONETARY VALUE.


SEC. 39-58. AUTHORITY; DELEGATION.


A. THE DIRECTOR IS AUTHORIZED TO ENFORCE AND ADMINISTER THIS ARTICLE.




DR
WITHOUT LIMITATION, THIS AUTHORITY INCLUDES THE RIGHT TO COLLECT,
POSSESS, TRANSPORT, SELL, DESTROY, AND OTHERWISE DISPOSE OF
SHOPPING CARTS TO CARRY OUT THE PURPOSES OF THIS ARTICLE.

B. BY WRITTEN AGREEMENT ON FILE WITH THE CITY CLERK, TO THE EXTENT
ALLOWABLE UNDER LAW, THE DIRECTOR IS AUTHORIZED AND EMPOWERED
TO DELEGATE TO SPECIFIED CITY DEPARTMENTS OR PRIVATE CONTRACTORS
THE RIGHTS AND POWERS AS DIRECTED BY THE DIRECTOR TO ENFORCE AND
ADMINISTER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE.

DIVISION I. SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL.
SEC.39-59 SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL; PRESUMPTIONS; FEE.

A. THE DEPARTMENT MAY COLLECT OFF-SITE SHOPPING CARTS WITHIN THE CITY
OF PHOENIX FOR RETURN TO RETAILERS OR IMPOUNDMENT AND DISPOSITION
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS DIVISION.




B. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL RETURN AN IDENTIFIABLE SHOPPING CART TO THE
STORE INDICATED ON THE SHOPPING CART OR, IF NO STORE IS INDICATED,
TO THE STORE OF THE ASSOCIATED RETAILER NEAREST TO THE LOCATION
WHERE THE SHOPPING CART WAS COLLECTED.

C. THERE SHALL BE REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTIONS THAT AN IDENTIFIABLE
SHOPPING CART WAS REMOVED FROM THE STORE OF THE ASSOCIATED
RETAILER NEAREST TO THE LOCATION WHERE THE SHOPPING CART WAS
COLLECTED AND THAT THE ASSOCIATED RETAILER IS THE OWNER OF SUCH
IDENTIFIABLE SHOPPING CART.

D. AFTER RETURN OF A SHOPPING CART, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PROVIDE THE
RETAILER WITH A DETAILED INVOICE INCLUDING NOTICE OF THE RETAILER’S


T
RIGHT TO DISPUTE THE INVOICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE.

E. A RETAILER SHALL PAY TO THE DEPARTMENT A RETRIEVAL FEE OF (I) NO
MORE THAN $25 PER RETURNED SHOPPING CART IF, ON THE DATE THE
SHOPPING CART IS RETURNED, THE STORE’S CERTIFICATION INCLUDES A




AF
SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CONTRACT OR (II) NO MORE THAN $50 PER
RETURNED SHOPPING CART IF, ON THE DATE THE SHOPPING CART IS
RETURNED, THE STORE’S CERTIFICATION DOES NOT INCLUDE A SHOPPING
CART RETRIEVAL CONTRACT.

F. THE INVOICE REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION D SHALL BE DELIVERED TO A
STORE’S CERTIFIED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL OR CERTIFIED
MAIL, OR IF AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE HAS NOT BEEN CERTIFIED,
THEN BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE STORE’S ADDRESS.

G. WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF AN INVOICE, A RETAILER MAY




DR
DISPUTE OWNERSHIP OF RETURNED SHOPPING CART(S) OR THE AMOUNT OF
THE RETRIEVAL FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39-69, AS MAY BE
AMENDED.


SEC. 39-60 IMPOUNDMENT OF UNIDENTIFIABLE SHOPPING CARTS; NOTICE.

A. FOR A PERIOD OF AT LEAST 10 DAYS BEFORE SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF
DISPOSITION AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION D, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL HOLD
AN UNIDENTIFIABLE SHOPPING CART AT A LOCATION WITHIN THE CITY. THIS
LOCATION SHALL BE OPEN FOR BUSINESS AT LEAST SIX HOURS PER DAY,
EVERY MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, EXCEPT ON HOLIDAYS OBSERVED BY THE
CITY.

B. THE OWNER MAY CLAIM AN UNIDENTIFIABLE SHOPPING CART FROM THE
LOCATION AND DURING THE PERIOD PROVIDED FOR IN SUBSECTION A.

C. AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE PERIOD PROVIDED FOR IN SUBSECTION A,



AND BEFORE AN UNIDENTIFIABLE SHOPPING CART IS DISPOSED OF, THE
DEPARTMENT SHALL PREPARE A NOTICE OF DISPOSITION PROVIDING THE
FOLLOWING:

1. DESCRIPTION OR PHOTOGRAPH OF THE SHOPPING CART;

2. THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE OWNER, IF KNOWN;

3. THE DATE BY WHICH THE OWNER MUST CLAIM AND TAKE POSSESSION OF THE
SHOPPING CART; AND

4. THE METHOD FOR CLAIMING THE SHOPPING CART.

D. THE DEPARTMENT SHALL SERVE NOTICE OF DISPOSITION TO THE OWNER, IF


T
KNOWN, BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE OWNER’S ADDRESS, IF KNOWN. IF THE
NAME OR ADDRESS OF THE OWNER IS NOT KNOWN, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL
SERVE THE NOTICE OF DISPOSITION BY PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL
NEWSPAPER OF THE CITY OR BY POSTING ON A CITY WEBSITE AVAILABLE TO
THE GENERAL PUBLIC.




AF
E. THE OWNER SHALL HAVE 20 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THE NOTICE OF
DISPOSITION TO CLAIM THE SHOPPING CART.

F. IN THE EVENT OWNERSHIP OF A SHOPPING CART IS SUBJECT TO DISPUTE,
THE SHOPPING CART MAY BE DISPOSED OF BY LEGAL ACTION.

SEC. 39-61 DISPOSITION OF SHOPPING CARTS.

A. THE DEPARTMENT MAY DISPOSE OF VALUELESS SHOPPING CARTS AT ANY
TIME AFTER COLLECTION BY DESTRUCTION OR ANY OTHER LAWFUL MANNER.




DR
B. AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE PERIOD PROVIDED IN SECTION 39-60(E), AS
MAY BE AMENDED, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DISPOSE OF A SHOPPING CART
OTHER THAN A VALUELESS SHOPPING CART BY SALE AT PUBLIC AUCTION,
WHICH MAY BE CONDUCTED VIA THE INTERNET, TO THE HIGHEST BIDDER FOR
CASH. IF ANY SHOPPING CARTS ARE SOLD SUBJECT TO A MINIMUM BID, THEN
THIS SHALL BE MADE KNOWN IN ADVANCE OF BIDDING.

C. THE DEPARTMENT MAY DISPOSE OF ANY SHOPPING CARTS OFFERED FOR
SALE AT PUBLIC AUCTION AND NOT PURCHASED BY DESTRUCTION OR ANY
OTHER LAWFUL MANNER.

D. ALL MONIES RECEIVED FROM SALE OF SHOPPING CARTS SHALL BE PAID TO
THE CITY TREASURER AND DEPOSITED INTO THE GENERAL FUND OF THE
CITY.

E. ON DELIVERY TO ANY PURCHASER OF ANY SHOPPING CART SOLD UNDER
SUBSECTION B, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL EXECUTE TO THE PURCHASER A
RECEIPT OF SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY.




DIVISION II. SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT.

SEC. 39-62. SHOPPING CART CERTIFICATION.

A. NEW STORES. A RETAILER SHALL DELIVER THE CERTIFICATION
DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION C PRIOR TO OPENING A STORE TO THE
GENERAL PUBLIC WITH A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ISSUED ON OR
AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE AND WITHIN 30 DAYS
AFTER THE ANNIVERSARY OF THE MOST RECENT CERTIFICATION
ANNUALLY THEREAFTER, EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION D.

B. EXISITING STORES. A RETAILER SHALL DELIVER THE CERTIFICATION(S)
DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION C FOR EACH STORE FIRST OPEN TO THE GENERAL



T
PUBLIC ON OR BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE NO LATER
THAN JANUARY 15, 2026 AND WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE ANNIVERSARY OF
THE MOST RECENT CERTIFICATION ANNUALLY THEREAFTER, EXCEPT AS
REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION D.




AF
C. ALL RETAILERS SHALL TIMELY DELIVER AND CERTIFY IN WRITING, IN THE
MANNER PRESCRIBED BY THE DIRECTOR, THE FOLLOWING FOR EACH STORE:

1. STORE INFORMATION, INCLUDING:
I. ADDRESS;
II. NAME, PHONE NUMBER, AND MAILING AND EMAIL ADDRESSES FOR THE
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE(S);

III. DATE OF ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY; AND
IV. SQUARE FOOTAGE.




DR
2. SHOPPING CART INFORMATION, INCLUDING:
I. MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SHOPPING CARTS THAT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR
CUSTOMER USE DURING THE CERTIFICATION PERIOD;

II. IF APPLICABLE, SERIAL NUMBER OR OTHER IDENTIFIER FOR EACH
SHOPPING CART;

III. IF APPLICABLE, NUMBER OF SHOPPING CARTS EQUIPPED WITH A
RESTRICTIVE DEVICE;

IV. IF APPLICABLE, A DESCRIPTION OF THE RESTRICTIVE DEVICE(S); AND

V. IF APPLICABLE, NUMBER OF RESTRICTIVE DEVICES THAT ARE
MALFUNCTIONING AS OF THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION;




3. SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL INFORMATION, INCLUDING:
I. WHETHER THE STORE’S OFF-SITE SHOPPING CARTS ARE COLLECTED
UNDER A SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CONTRACT;

II. IF APPLICABLE, THE TERM OF THE SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL
CONTRACT;

III. IF APPLICABLE, A COPY OF THE SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL CONTRACT;
AND

IV. A CERTIFICATION THAT THE RETAILER IS AND WILL, FOR THE DURATION
OF THE CERTIFICATION PERIOD, REMAIN CURRENT ON ANY FEES OWED



T
UNDER SECTION 39-59, AS MAY BE AMENDED, FOR SHOPPING CARTS
RETURNED TO THE STORE.

4. SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN INFORMATION, AS APPLICABLE,
INCLUDING:




AF
I. A COPY OF THE CURRENT SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN;
II. THAT THE SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE IMPLEMENTED
FOR THE ENTIRE CERTIFICATION PERIOD, UNLESS A NEW PLAN
BECOMES REQUIRED DURING THE CERTIFICATION PERIOD PURSUANT
TO THIS DIVISION; AND

III. THAT THE SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN COMPLIES WITH THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THIS DIVISION TO THE BEST OF THE CERTIFIER’S
KNOWLEDGE.

5. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE CERTIFICATIONS, INCLUDING:




DR
I. THAT THE NATURAL PERSON EXECUTING THE CERTIFICATION HAS
AUTHORITY TO RECEIVE NOTICES ISSUED UNDER THIS ARTICLE ON
BEHALF OF THE RETAILER VIA THE MAILING AND EMAIL ADDRESSES
PROVIDED;

II. THAT THE NATURAL PERSON EXECUTING THE CERTIFICATION IS AN
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AS DEFINED IN THIS ARTICLE; AND

III. THAT THE NATURAL PERSON EXECUTING THE CERTIFICATION HAS
AUTHORITY TO DO SO ON BEHALF OF THE RETAILER.

D. A RETAILER SHALL DELIVER A NEW CERTIFICATION WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER
ANY CHANGE TO ANY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED.

E. THE CERTIFICATION SHALL BE EXECUTED BY AN AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE AND MADE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY.

SEC. 39-63. REVOCATION OF CERTIFICATION; NOTICE.



A. AFTER DISCOVERY THAT A CERTIFICATION IS INACCURATE, INCOMPLETE, OR
OTHERWISE FAILS TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIVISION, THE DEPARTMENT MAY
PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE OF ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. THE PORTION OF THE CERTIFICATION THAT IS INACCURATE, THE SPECIFIC
REQUIRED INFORMATION THAT WAS NOT INCLUDED, OR THE MANNER IN
WHICH THE CERTIFICATION FAILS TO OTHERWISE COMPLY WITH THIS
DIVISION;

2. THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE;

3. THAT THE DEPARTMENT WILL REVOKE THE STORE’S CERTIFICATION IF A



T
CERTIFICATION WHICH COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS
DIVISION IS NOT DELIVERED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF THE NOTICE;

4. THAT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE, A
RETAILER MAY APPEAL THE REVOCATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION




AF
39-69, AS MAY BE AMENDED; AND

5. THE MANNER IN WHICH AN APPEAL MAY BE FILED.

B. THE NOTICE SHALL BE DELIVERED TO A STORE’S CERTIFIED AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL OR CERTIFIED MAIL, OR IF AN AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE HAS NOT BEEN CERTIFIED, THEN BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO
THE STORE’S ADDRESS. THE NOTICE SHALL BE EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE OF
MAILING OR EMAILING.

C. FOLLOWING EXPIRATION OF THE 30-DAY PERIOD PROVIDED FOR IN




DR
SUBSECTION D, IF NO APPEAL IS TAKEN, OR, IF APPEAL IS TAKEN, FOLLOWING
RESOLUTION OF THE APPEAL AGAINST THE RETAILER, THE DEPARTMENT
SHALL REVOKE THE STORE’S CERTIFICATION.

D. WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE, A RETAILER
MAY DISPUTE THE REVOCATION OF A STORE’S CERTIFICATION IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39-69, AS MAY BE AMENDED.

SEC. 39-64. SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS.

A. TO ADDRESS BLIGHT, NUISANCE, AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY HAZARDS
ASSOCIATED WITH OFF-SITE SHOPPING CARTS, FOR ALL LARGE STORES,
UNLESS REQUIRED OTHERWISE BY THIS DIVISION, RETAILERS SHALL EITHER

1. EQUIP AND MAINTAIN ALL SHOPPING CARTS OFFERED FOR CUSTOMER USE
WITH LOCKING WHEEL MECHANISMS, OR

2. CERTIFY, IMPLEMENT, AND MAINTAIN A SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT




PLAN FOR THE STORE THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 39-
65(A), AS MAY BE AMENDED.

B. WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF AN UNSUCCESSFUL EVALUATION
PERIOD:

1. FOR STORES WHICH HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY BEEN REQUIRED TO CERTIFY
A SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN, AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
OF THE STORE SHALL CERTIFY, IMPLEMENT, AND, UNTIL REQUIRED
OTHERWISE BY THIS SECTION, MAINTAIN A SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT
PLAN THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 39-65(A), AS MAY BE
AMENDED.

2. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION C, FOR STORES WHICH HAVE


T
PREVIOUSLY BEEN REQUIRED TO CERTIFY A SHOPPING CART
MANAGEMENT PLAN, AN AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STORE
SHALL CERTIFY, IMPLEMENT, AND MAINTAIN IN PRACTICE AN ENHANCED
PLAN THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 39-65(B), AS MAY BE
AMENDED.




AF
C. WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF THE THIRD UNSUCCESSFUL
EVALUATION PERIOD WITHIN THE PAST SIX EVALUATION PERIODS, AN
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STORE SHALL CERTIFY, IMPLEMENT,
AND THEREAFTER MAINTAIN A MANDATORY PLAN THAT MEETS THE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 39-65(C), AS MAY BE AMENDED.

D. ANY SHOPPING CART RETURNED TO A STORE BY THE CITY DURING THE 30-
DAY TIME-PERIODS REFERENCED IN SUBSECTIONS B OR C SHALL NOT BE
COUNTED TOWARD THE NUMBER OF SHOPPING CARTS RETURNED TO A
STORE FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES.




D
SEC. 39-65. SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS.




R
A. INITIAL PLAN. ANY SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, AT A
MINIMUM, THE FOLLOWING:

1. THAT THE RETAILER WILL MAINTAIN IN EFFECT A SHOPPING CART
RETRIEVAL CONTRACT THAT REQUIRES THE CONTRACTOR TO SEARCH
FOR AND RETURN OFF-SITE SHOPPING CARTS TO THE STORE ON AT LEAST
A WEEKLY BASIS; AND

2. AT LEAST ONE OTHER SPECIFIC MEASURE REASONABLY CALCULATED TO
PREVENT THE OCCURRENCE OF OFF-SITE SHOPPING CARTS FOR THE
STORE.

B. ENHANCED PLAN. AN ENHANCED PLAN SHALL EITHER MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS OF A MANDATORY PLAN OR INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, THE
FOLLOWING:




1. THAT THE RETAILER WILL MAINTAIN IN EFFECT A SHOPPING CART
RETRIEVAL CONTRACT THAT REQUIRES THE CONTRACTOR TO SEARCH
FOR AND RETURN OFF-SITE SHOPPING CARTS TO THE STORE ON AT LEAST
A TWICE-WEEKLY BASIS; AND

2. OTHER SPECIFIC MEASURES REASONABLY CALCULATED TO PREVENT THE
OCCURRENCE OF OFF-SITE SHOPPING CARTS FOR THE STORE. SUCH
MEASURES SHALL INCLUDE:

I. ADDITIONAL MEASURES, NOT INCLUDED IN THE PREVIOUS SHOPPING
CART MANAGEMENT PLAN, WHILE MAINTAINING AT LEAST ONE
MEASURE INCLUDED IN THE PREVIOUS SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT
PLAN OR SIMILAR MEASURE(S); AND/OR



T
II. THE SAME OR SIMILAR MEASURE(S) INCLUDED IN THE PREVIOUS
SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN BUT IMPLEMENTED WITH
GREATER INTENSITY OR FREQUENCY.

C. MANDATORY PLAN. A MANDATORY PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, AT A MINIMUM, THE




AF
FOLLOWING:

1. THAT THE RETAILER WILL MAINTAIN IN EFFECT A SHOPPING CART
RETRIEVAL CONTRACT WHICH REQUIRES THE CONTRACTOR TO
SEARCH FOR AND RETURN OFF-SITE SHOPPING CARTS TO THE STORE ON
AT LEAST A DAILY BASIS;

2. ALL SHOPPING CARTS OFFERED FOR CUSTOMER USE AT THE STORE WILL
BE EQUIPPED WITH RESTRICTIVE DEVICES;

3. ALL SHOPPING CARTS OFFERED FOR CUSTOMER USE AT THE STORE WILL




DR
BE EQUIPPED WITH GPS TRACKERS; AND

4. ALL SHOPPING CARTS KEPT AT THE STORE WILL BE SECURED AGAINST
THEFT AND VANDALISM WHEN THE STORE IS NOT OPEN TO THE GENERAL
PUBLIC.

SEC. 39-66. EARLY TERMINATION AND FINDING OF UNSUCCESSFUL
EVALUATION PERIOD; NOTICE.

A. FOLLOWING THE RETURN OF THE TENTH SHOPPING CART TO A STORE BY THE
CITY DURING AN EVALUATION PERIOD, AFTER EXPIRATION OF THE 14-DAY
PERIOD PROVIDED IN SECTION 39-59(G), AS MAY BE AMENDED, IF NO APPEAL IS
TAKEN, OR IF APPEAL IS TAKEN, THEN AFTER RESOLUTION OF THE APPEAL
AGAINST THE RETAILER, THE DEPARTMENT MAY PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE
OF ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:

1. THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE;

2. THAT THE STORE’S CURRENT EVALUATION PERIOD WILL BE TERMINATED



AND CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED TO BE AN UNSUCCESSFUL EVALUATION
PERIOD 14 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE;

3. WHETHER THE RETAILER WILL BE REQUIRED TO CERTIFY, IMPLEMENT, AND
MAINTAIN IN PRACTICE A SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN, AN
ENHANCED PLAN, OR A MANDATORY PLAN AND THE DEADLINE FOR DOING
SO;

4. THAT WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE, A
RETAILER MAY APPEAL THE EARLY TERMINATION OF THE EVALUATION
PERIOD OR THE DETERMINATION OF AN UNSUCCESSFUL EVALUATION
PERIOD IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39-69, AS MAY BE AMENDED; AND

5. THE MANNER IN WHICH AN APPEAL MAY BE FILED.


T
B. THE NOTICE SHALL BE DELIVERED TO A STORE’S CERTIFIED AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL OR CERTIFIED MAIL, OR IF AN AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE HAS NOT BEEN CERTIFIED, THEN BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO
THE STORE’S ADDRESS. THE NOTICE SHALL BE EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE OF




AF
MAILING OR EMAILING.


C. WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE, A RETAILER MAY
APPEAL THE EARLY TERMINATION OF THE EVALUATION PERIOD AND/OR THE
DETERMINATION OF AN UNSUCCESSFUL EVALUATION PERIOD IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 39-69, AS MAY BE AMENDED.

D. UPON EXPIRATION OF THE 14-DAY PERIOD PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION C,
IF NO APPEAL IS TAKEN, OR, IF APPEAL IS TAKEN, THEN UPON
RESOLUTION OF THE APPEAL AGAINST THE RETAILER, THE EVALUATION




DR
PERIOD SHALL TERMINATE AND SHALL BE CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED
TO BE AN UNSUCCESSFUL EVALUATION PERIOD.

SEC. 39-67. REGULAR CONCLUSION OF EVALUATION PERIOD.

A. WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER THE CONCLUSION OF AN EVALUATION PERIOD, THE
DEPARTMENT MAY PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE OF ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
WITH RESPECT TO ANY STORE TO WHICH THE DEPARTMENT RETURNED AT
LEAST 10 SHOPPING CARTS DURING THE EVALUATION PERIOD:

1. THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE;

2. THAT THE STORE’S PRIOR EVALUATION PERIOD WILL BE CONCLUSIVELY
DETERMINED TO BE AN UNSUCCESSFUL EVALUATION PERIOD 14 DAYS
AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE;

3. WHETHER THE RETAILER WILL BE REQUIRED TO CERTIFY, IMPLEMENT, AND
MAINTAIN IN PRACTICE A SHOPPING CART MANAGEMENT PLAN, AN




ENHANCED PLAN, OR A MANDATORY PLAN AND THE DEADLINE FOR DOING
SO;

4. THAT WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE, A
RETAILER MAY APPEAL THE DETERMINATION OF AN UNSUCCESSFUL
EVALUATION PERIOD IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39-69, AS MAY BE
AMENDED; AND

5. THE MANNER IN WHICH AN APPEAL MAY BE FILED.


B. THE NOTICE SHALL BE DELIVERED TO A STORE’S CERTIFIED AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL OR CERTIFIED MAIL, OR IF AN AUTHORIZED



T
REPRESENTATIVE HAS NOT BEEN CERTIFIED, THEN BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO
THE STORE’S ADDRESS. THE NOTICE SHALL BE EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE OF
MAILING OR EMAILING.

C. WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE, A RETAILER




AF
MAY APPEAL THE DETERMINATION OF AN UNSUCCESSFUL EVALUATION PERIOD
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 39- 69, AS MAY BE AMENDED.

D. UPON EXPIRATION OF THE 14-DAY PERIOD PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION C, IF NO
APPEAL IS TAKEN, OR, IF APPEAL IS TAKEN, UPON RESOLUTION OF THE
APPEAL AGAINST THE RETAILER, THE EVALUATION PERIOD SHALL BE
CONCLUSIVELY DETERMINED TO BE AN UNSUCCESSFUL EVALUATION PERIOD.

SEC. 39-68. VIOLATION; PENALTIES.

A. FAILURE BY A RETAILER TO TIMELY DELIVER OR MAINTAIN A CERTIFICATION IN
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE A VIOLATION.




DR
B. ANY RETAILER WHO CAUSES, PERMITS, FACILITATES, OR AIDS OR
ABETS ANY VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION OR WHO FAILS TO PERFORM
ANY ACT OR DUTY REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION IS SUBJECT TO A CIVIL
SANCTION OF NOT LESS THAN $500.00. ANY RETAILER WHO COMMITS A
SECOND VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION WITHIN 36 MONTHS OF THE
COMMISSION OF A PRIOR VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO A CIVIL SANCTION OF NOT LESS THAN $750.00. ANY
RETAILER WHO COMMITS A THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT VIOLATION OF THIS
SECTION WITHIN 36 MONTHS OF THE COMMISSION OF A VIOLATION OF
THIS SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A CIVIL SANCTION OF NOT LESS
THAN $1,000.00.

C. THE 36-MONTH PERIOD PROVISION OF SUBSECTION B SHALL BE CALCULATED
BY THE DATES THE VIOLATIONS WERE COMMITTED.

D. EACH DAY ANY VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION OR THE FAILURE TO PERFORM




ANY ACT OR DUTY REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION EXISTS SHALL CONSTITUTE A
SEPARATE VIOLATION.

SEC. 39-69. ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL.

A. APPEALS OR DISPUTES AS AUTHORIZED UNDER THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE
MADE TO THE DIRECTOR OR HER OR HIS DELEGEE AS A REQUEST FOR AN
ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN THE NOTICE. A
REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE SHALL ACT AS AN
AUTOMATIC STAY OF ENFORCEMENT UNTIL THE APPEAL OR DISPUTE IS
RESOLVED.


B. THE DIRECTOR SHALL HOLD AN ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE WITHIN 60


T
DAYS OF RECEIPT OF A REQUEST, WITH NOTICE OF THE DATE, TIME, AND
LOCATION OF THE CONFERENCE DELIVERED TO THE STORE’S CERTIFIED
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL OR CERTIFIED MAIL, OR IF AN
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE HAS NOT BEEN CERTIFIED, THEN BY
CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE STORE’S ADDRESS.




AF
C. THE DIRECTOR SHALL ISSUE A WRITTEN DECISION ON THE APPEAL OR
DISPUTE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE AND
PROVIDE NOTICE OF THE SAME TO THE STORE’S CERTIFIED AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL OR CERTIFIED MAIL, OR IF AN AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE HAS NOT BEEN CERTIFIED, THEN BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE
STORE’S ADDRESS.

D. THE RETAILER MAY FURTHER APPEAL THE DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR
WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DECISION BY WRITTEN NOTICE SETTING FORTH THE
REASONS FOR THE APPEAL TO THE CITY MANAGER OR DELEGEE, WHO,




DR
WITHIN 60 DAYS OF RECEIPT OF THE WRITTEN NOTICE, SHALL ISSUE A
WRITTEN DECISION TO THE STORE’S CERTIFIED AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL OR CERTIFIED MAIL, OR IF AN AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE HAS NOT BEEN CERTIFIED, THEN BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE
STORE’S ADDRESS.

E. ANY RETAILER AGGRIEVED BY THE DECISION OF THE CITY MANAGER MAY
SEEK JUDICIAL REVIEW IN A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION.

SEC. 39-70. SEVERABILITY.

IF A COURT INVALIDATES ANY PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE OR ITS APPLICATION TO
ANY PERSON OR CIRCUMSTANCE, THE REMAINDER OF THE ARTICLE AND ITS
APPLICATION TO OTHER PERSONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES, OTHER THAN THAT WHICH
HAS BEEN HELD INVALID, SHALL NOT BE AFFECTED. TO THIS EXTENT, THE
PROVISIONS OF THIS ARTICLE ARE DECLARED SEVERABLE.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Enter Into an Agreement with UMOM New Day Centers for Halle
Women's Center Chiller Replacement (Ordinance S-52291) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with UMOM New Day Centers, Inc. (UMOM) to replace the chiller system at Halle
Women's Center. The total value of the contract will not exceed $150,000. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
Funding is available from Community Development Block Grant Coronavirus Aid,
Relief, and Economic Security Act (CDBG-CV) funding from the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD). There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
HUD funds the Neighborhood Enhancement Program to address community
infrastructure needs and improvements including critical projects for non-profit
organizations operating facilities that provide a public benefit.

UMOM’s Halle Women’s Center serves single women without children who are in need
of emergency shelter, including victims of domestic violence. The existing chiller
system, which serves multiple buildings, including three that house shelter units, is
nearing the end of its operational life. The aging infrastructure and failing plumbing
system pose a significant risk of system-wide failure. To ensure reliable climate control
and prevent disruption to shelter operations, UMOM proposes replacing the chiller
system with individual air conditioning units for each room and office.

UMOM applied for funds to replace the chiller system through the Neighborhood
Enhancement Program. The project will ensure continued use of the center and
eliminate major cooling outages in the future. Funding from the City would cover the
replacement expenses associated with this project.

Contract Term
The 12-month contract term will begin on or about September 22, 2025, with an option
to extend for three months, that may be exercised at the discretion of the City
Manager, or designee.





Financial Impact
The total contract value will not exceed $150,000. Funding is available in the
Neighborhood Services Department's Neighborhood Enhancement Program budget
using HUD CDBG-CV funds. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Location
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Alan Stephenson and Gina Montes,
the Neighborhood Services Department and Office of Homeless Solutions.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Aviation Land Reuse Strategy Land Disposal Located Adjacent to Interstate 17:
16 Parcels within Area G and 5 Parcels within Area I (Ordinance S-52257) -
District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to perform all acts necessary
to sell City-owned property identified by the Aviation Department as excess Aviation
Land Reuse Strategy land inventory at a price negotiated on the open market based on
the City's appraisal to Valutek, Inc. and De Rito Partners Development, Inc.
Additionally, request to authorize the City Treasurer to accept all funds related to this
item.

Summary
The Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) Land Reuse Strategy (LRS),
developed in 2017, addresses the reuse and redevelopment of 793 fragmented City-
owned parcels acquired for noise mitigation. In December 2022, the Aviation
Department received Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) authorization for the
disposal or redevelopment of 427 of these parcels. In April 2025, the Community and
Economic Development Department (CEDD) requested and received City Council
authorization to dispose of parcels in Areas F, G, H, I, and J, per the FAA's
determination (Ordinance S-51817). Working in coordination, Aviation and CEDD
prepared two groupings for public offering.

Grouping A
The entire Area G between 12th and 14th streets and north of Interstate 17. The
grouping consists of 16 separate and non-contiguous parcels, and their development
potential is impacted by their irregular shape and size, and remaining private property
owners within the block (Attachment A). The parcels are zoned R-3 and appraised at
$1,690,000 as of March 2025.

Grouping B
A portion of Area I located at 16th Street and Watkins Street. The grouping consists of
five separate and non-contiguous parcels, which impacts their development potential
(Attachment B). The parcels are zoned A-2 and appraised at $790,000 as of
November 2024.




Public Offering Process
The groupings were offered for sale from April 22 to May 21, 2025, (30 days) through
the City's website and an ad in the Arizona Republic. Each offer was required to
include:
· A narrative of intended site use and/or business operations.
· A preliminary conceptual site plan or improvement description.
· An offer meeting or exceeding the appraised value.

Results and Recommendation
The City received one offer for each grouping. Staff reviewed the offers and
recommends the following:

Grouping A
The recommended buyer, Valutek, Inc., proposes a two-phased development. Phase 1
will consist of a 45,000 square foot state of the art headquarters including: 5,000
square foot office, 5,000 square foot clean room manufacturing space, and 35,000
square foot warehouse. Phase 2 will require additional privately owned parcel
assemblage with a timeline to be determined based on the surrounding parcel owners.
The buyer has submitted an offer of $1,690,000 for all 16 parcels. The offer meets the
appraised value.

Grouping B
The recommended buyer, De Rito Partners Development, Inc., proposes to construct a
modern convenience store and gas station, designed to serve the area's high volume
of commuters, logistic teams, and small business owners. Additionally, two light
industrial buildings will be constructed providing vital infrastructure to support the
area's growing workforce and business ecosystem. The buyer has submitted an offer
of $790,000 for all five parcels. The offer meets the appraised value.

All disposals will require execution of an avigation easement and include a deed
restriction prohibiting residential use.

Financial Impact
The total revenue from this disposition will be $2,480,000 and will be returned to the
Aviation Department.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council authorized the disposition process on April 9, 2025, with
Ordinance S-51817.




Location
Grouping A (16 Assessor Parcel Numbers) - Multiple addresses, see Attachment A.
Grouping B (5 Assessor Parcel Numbers) - Multiple addresses, see Attachment B.
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION
Sell City-Owned Property Identified as Excess Aviation Noise Land Inventory as determined
in Phoenix Sky Harbor (PHX), Phoenix, AZ – Land Reuse Section 163 Determination dated
December 22, 2022: Disposal of 16 vacant real properties located north of Interstate 17 as
identified in Area G.



The following parcels included in this request are identified by the Maricopa County
Assessor’s parcel number (APN) and the address or location.

Parcel ID APN Address / Location
G.01 115-37-060A 1321 E. Hess Avenue
G.02 115-37-061C 1323 E. Hess Avenue
G.03 115-37-061D 1325 E. Hess Avenue
G.04 115-37-062B 2114 S. 14th Street
G.05 115-37-064A 1317 E. Hess Street
G.06 115-37-066A 1313 E. Hess Avenue
G.07 115-37-068A 1309 E. Hess Avenue
G.08 115-37-072 1301 E. Hess Avenue
G.09 115-37-076 1219 E. Hess Street
G.10 115-37-078A 1211 E. Hess Avenue
G.11 115-37-082 1207A E. Hess Avenue
G.12 115-37-085 1205 E. Hess Avenue
G.13 115-37-086A 1205 E. Hess Avenue
G.14 115-37-105A 1314 E. Maricopa Way
G.15 115-37-106A 1201 E. Hess Avenue
G.16 115-37-106B 1201 E. Hess Avenue




ATTACHMENT B
PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION

Sell City-Owned Property Identified as Excess Aviation Noise Land Inventory within
Phoenix Sky Harbor (PHX), Phoenix, AZ – Land Reuse Section 163 Determination dated
December 22, 2022: Disposal of five vacant real properties located south of Interstate 17
as identified in Area I.


The following parcels included in this request are identified by the Maricopa County
Assessor’s parcel number (APN) and the address or location.

Parcel ID APN Address / Location
I.14 115-35-027 2301 S. 15th Place
I.15 115-35-029 2303 S. 15th Place
I.16 115-35-032A 2206 S. 16th Street
I.17 115-35-033A 2307 S. 15th Place
I.18 115-35-034A 2208 S. 16th Street




Watkins Street



16th Street







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Arizona Board of Regents for the Use of City-Owned Land at 1st Street and
McKinley Street for Construction Staging and Parking (Ordinance S-52296) -
District 7

Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute a license with the Arizona
Board of Regents, or its designee, for the use of City-owned land located at 1st Street
and McKinley Street for construction staging and parking. Further request to authorize
the City Treasurer to accept all necessary funds related to this item.

Summary
The Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD) is working with the
Arizona Board of Regents and the University of Arizona to develop the Center for
Advanced Molecular and Immological Therapies building at the southwest corner of
7th Street and Fillmore Street in Downtown Phoenix. At the height of construction, the
project will require approximately 250 construction workers onsite daily. The University
of Arizona has requested use of additional, vacant City-owned properties for
construction staging and parking, including several parcels located at the southwest
and southeast corners of 1st Street and McKinley Street in Downtown Phoenix.

The license fee will be based on a prorated rental rate of $1 per square foot per year
and/or other valuable consideration. Each license may contain other terms and
conditions acceptable to the City. There are currently several construction staging
licenses on City parcels in Downtown Phoenix including two on the Phoenix
Biomedical Core for projects related to the 850 PBC Building. The terms of this
license, including the rental rate of $1 per square foot, will be consistent with other
licenses executed to support Phoenix Bioscience Core growth.

Contract Term
The license term is one year. The license may be extended on a month-to-month basis
at the City's discretion.







Financial Impact
The license fee will be based on a prorated rental rate of $1 per square foot per year
and/or other valuable consideration. Fees received would be deposited into CEDD's
Downtown Community Reinvestment Fund. This action will have no impact to the
General Fund.

Location
713, 714, 717, 718, 721, and 722 N. 1st Street, and 714, 718, and 722 N. 2nd Street.
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
One-Stop Operator Services Contract - RFP-CED25-OSO - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52278) - Citywide

Request authorization for the City Manager, or his designee, to contract with
International Rescue Committee, Inc. (IRC) to provide One-Stop-Operator (OSO)
Services on behalf of the Phoenix Business and Workforce Development Board
(Board). The aggregate value of the contract shall not exceed $2,200,000. Further
request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Summary
As a part of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), the Board is
required to procure OSO services. The role of the OSO is to coordinate service
delivery among all required One-Stop partners within the ARIZONA@WORK City of
Phoenix One-Stop Network. This network offers comprehensive services and
resources to job seekers while partnering with employers to help meet their workforce
needs in Phoenix.

The OSO is responsible for ensuring services provided at the two ARIZONA@WORK
easily accessible by being responsive to the community’s workforce development
needs, ensuring the system provides customer-driven and personalized services,
managing the customer referral platform, and providing a welcome function for
customers at the Comprehensive Job Centers that supports the Integrated Service
Delivery Model for the network.

Procurement Information
The One-Stop Operator Services Request for Proposals (RFP-CED25-OSO), was
issued on March 11, 2025, and conducted in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10. Four proposals were received, three of which were
responsive to the RFP’s requirements. An evaluation panel scored the responsive
proposals based on the following criteria:

· Proposer's Qualifications and Experience (0-300 points).
· Assigned Staff's Qualifications and Experience (0-275 points).


· Approach to Scope of Work (0-225 points).
· Proposed Budget (0-200 points).

Staff recommends the proposal offered by the IRC as the highest-scored, responsive,
and responsible proposal.

Contract Term
The term of the contract will be approximately 21 months beginning on or about
October 20, 2025 through June 30, 2027, with two one-year renewals. The purpose of
the 21-month term is to align the contract with the City’s fiscal year, which begins on
July 1.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $2,200,000. There is no impact to
the General Fund. Funding is available from the City’s allocation of federal WIOA
funds.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The Economic Development and the Arts Subcommittee recommended approval of
this item on September 10, 2025 by a vote of 3-0. In addition, this item was approved
by the Board as part of its Procurement Plan on May 23, 2024.

Location
ARIZONA@WORK - City of Phoenix - West Job Center
3406 N. 51st Avenue
Council District: 5

ARIZONA@WORK - City of Phoenix - South Job Center
4635 S. Central Avenue
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fiscal Year 2025-26 Bioscience Healthcare Strategic Initiative (Ordinance S-
52280) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to implement the Fiscal Year
(FY) Bioscience Healthcare Strategic Initiative, including authorization of an Arizona
Bioindustry Association (AZBio) membership for FY 2026-27 and participation at the
BIO International Convention in 2026. Further request authorization for the City
Treasurer to accept funds from the City’s BIO International Convention partners to
offset costs associated with the 2026 convention expenses, and for the City Controller
to disburse funds associated with this request. Funding for the AZBio membership and
convention efforts will not exceed $130,000. There is no impact to the General Fund.
Funding is available in the Genomics Facilities and Operations Fund.

Summary
Phoenix has grown to be one of the nation’s fastest growing hubs for bioscience
activity and is now ranked in the Top 20 of U.S. Life Science Markets. CBRE’s annual
life science reports ranked Phoenix First in Life Science Job Growth and First in Life
Science Graduate Growth Rate among emerging U.S. Life Science Markets. Arizona is
now ranked as the second fastest in life science job growth and ranked eighth in the
nation for the economic impact of clinical trials. An estimated 80 percent of the state’s
clinical trials take place in Phoenix. Much of this success is attributed to Phoenix’s
world-class medical centers, institutes of research excellence, research universities,
quality community colleges, a growing educated population, a pro-business
environment, and the spirit of entrepreneurship and collaboration. To build upon these
strengths, staff is continuing to implement a strategic plan introduced in 2018 designed
to grow, strengthen, and sustain a healthy bioscience industry. Since the launch of this
effort, there has been an acceleration of investment and growth in the bioscience
industry in Phoenix. By mid-2025, more than $6.7 billion has been invested in new and
expanded bioscience and healthcare facilities, and more than eight million square feet
of primary facility space for discovery, development, and care delivery creating more
than 14,000 jobs for Phoenix residents.

Staff has focused its economic development efforts in the areas of research,
development, precision medicine, healthcare delivery, health-tech, and education.
Focusing on these areas strengthens and solidifies Phoenix as a leader in the nation’s



bioscience healthcare industry. The Community and Economic Development
Department (CEDD) will continue to ensure there is a world-class real estate inventory
to meet the unique needs of life science companies. This commitment includes
support of Phoenix’s four bioscience hubs: Mayo Clinic’s Discovery Oasis, the Phoenix
Medical Quarter/Midtown, the Phoenix Bioscience Core (PBC), and the Cotton Center,
in addition to other submarkets within the City. CEDD has been working closely with
Wexford Science & Technology, to bring prospective tenants to the 850 PBC building
and its recently opened Connect Labs by Wexford on the fifth floor. The National
Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIH) being the latest major
tenant to lease space in 850 PBC. NIH will move out of its temporary space on the fifth
floor and to its new 35,000 square-foot lab on the seventh floor in October of this year.

To continue to advance the City's position in the bioindustry, CEDD is requesting to
continue the City's annual membership with the AZBio, the only statewide organization
exclusively focused on building Arizona’s bioindustry. AZBio is committed to building a
top-tier life science industry in Arizona and is a critical partner for Phoenix. As
specialists, AZBio provides industry insight, programs specifically designed for life
science organizations, visibility into investment opportunities, and a voice for the
industry in the media, across the community, and with elected leaders and government
agencies at the local, state, and federal levels. The AZBio annual membership cost is
$15,000 for Fiscal Year 2026-27.

Another key effort is the promotion of Phoenix's bioscience efforts nationally and
internationally by attending and exhibiting at the 2026 BIO International trade show to
be held in San Diego. The 2025 BIO International was held in Boston, with close to
22,000 attendees and 73 countries represented. The City of Phoenix received
heightened visibility with its partnership with BIO and the BBC StoryWorks with the
debut of its film as part of The Next Frontier series. The film showcases the world’s
largest brain health study taking place in Phoenix through the MindCrowd initiative at
the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen) part of City of Hope. The CEDD
Director participated on The Next Frontier panel alongside global leaders sharing the
story of the rapid and intentional rise in Phoenix’s bioscience industry’s growth.

As a sponsor of Start-Up Stadium, the City of Phoenix was able to kick off the event
this year and nominate three Phoenix-based companies that were selected as finalists.
These early-stage companies were able to engage with key members of the
investment community, venture philanthropy groups, and BIO attendees. This year’s
Phoenix delegation included 60 attendees, representing 33 Phoenix companies and
organizations. The delegation held more than 450 productive meetings along with
continuous engagement with BIO conference attendees in the Phoenix Pavilion. More
than 200 people attended the Phoenix Fast Pitch Reception featuring 15 Phoenix life


science leaders sharing their innovations with the audience. Attendance at the event
provided valuable networking and partnership opportunities and synergy with the City's
attending partners looking to promote their research and products to a global
audience. The knowledge and contacts generated by attending this trade show will be
used in communicating the City's competitive advantage, existing ecosystem and
resources in Phoenix to attract and grow companies in this industry to thrive and
generate quality jobs for the community.

Planning is currently underway, subject to City Council authorization of funding, for the
2026 BIO International trade show. Preliminary estimates for participation such as
sponsorships, pre and post targeted advertising, lead generation/retrieval, equipment,
pavilion set-up and shipping costs total approximately $115,000. Staff will continue to
work with industry partners to co-locate at the trade show. This shared effort may allow
the City to reduce its costs and boost visibility while assisting its partners in promoting
Phoenix.

These continued efforts enable CEDD staff to showcase Phoenix's citywide assets and
ensure success of future projects. CEDD and its partners continue to generate
qualified prospects to create a pipeline of businesses considering expansions and/or
relocations to Phoenix through a multi-faceted marketing approach targeted at this
industry. Phoenix's involvement and partnership with AZBio and the BIO International
trade show elevates the City's visibility as a hub for bioscience, building a critical mass
of life science and healthcare-related companies and attracting and developing top
talent vital to sustain the long-term growth of this thriving industry.

Financial Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding for the AZBio membership and to
participate in BIO International 2026 will not exceed $130,000 total for both efforts.
Funding is available in the Genomic Facilities and Operations Fund. Funding received
from the City's BIO International Convention partners shall reimburse the Genomic
Facilities and Operations Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Economic Development and the Arts
Subcommittee at the September 10, 2025 meeting by a vote of 3-0.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.






Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Amend Ordinance S-51289 Maricopa Community Colleges
Foundation Venture Café Sponsorship (Ordinance S-52281) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to approve the amendment to
Ordinance S-51289 for the sponsorship of Maricopa Community Colleges
Foundation’s Venture Café Phoenix Events Programming on the Phoenix Bioscience
Core (PBC) in the amount of $200,000 annually for three years, for a total amount not
to exceed $600,000. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item. There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding is available
in the Genomics Facilities and Operations Fund.

Summary
Launched in 2022, Venture Café Phoenix is a collaborative initiative to bring people of
all backgrounds together with a shared vision of building and sustaining an inclusive
community that champions innovation in Arizona. To date, this has been accomplished
through weekly gatherings of meaningful events that connect, inspire, and encourage
participants to take positive action and support one another’s goals. Venture Café
Phoenix is a community-driven movement to unleash local and state-wide potential
and make Phoenix a leader in innovation.

Since its inception, Venture Café Phoenix's event programming has facilitated 157
weekly events that resulted in over 1,097 break-out sessions with over 20,400
attendees, over 960 speakers, and an average weekly attendance of 160. The highest
attended Thursday Gatherings have ranged from 225-340 attendees. One-on-one
mentorship and office hours with subject matter experts are now available for
attendees. Venture Café Phoenix's weekly events encourage connectivity and
collaboration and serve to enhance Phoenix’s ecosystem and infrastructure to support
the growth of existing Phoenix companies, both in early-stage development and
mature organizations, along with the formation of new companies leading to the
creation of new jobs for Phoenix residents. Venture Café Phoenix has been an
instrumental platform for showcasing Phoenix's domestic and international economic
development efforts in bioscience, sustainability, advanced manufacturing, and other
synergistic industries and was awarded 2023 Fastest Growing Venture Café “Making
Things Happen Award” by Venture Café Global.




Venture Café Phoenix was modeled after the successful Thursday Gatherings of
Venture Café programs taking place in Wexford Science+Technology innovation
communities that have served to grow and strengthen the innovation districts in those
respective communities. Venture Café Phoenix events are free, open to the public, and
serve to connect attendees to employers, innovators, academic
educators/researchers, business mentors, and the community. Presentations and
breakout sessions are purposely curated to support the community’s connectivity,
collaborations, talent and workforce development, business strengthening, and access
to resources. Venture Café strengthens Phoenix’s entrepreneurial ecosystem and
enhances the City's Bioscience Healthcare Strategic Initiative.

Venture Café Phoenix plans to host approximately 40 Thursday Gatherings annually
with an annual goal of more than 6,000 attendees who will all convene on the City’s
Phoenix Bioscience Core, elevating its visibility as a premier location for companies to
locate for bioscience research, collaboration, and access to talent. Venture Café
Phoenix is hosted at the 850 PBC building and includes benefits such as:
· Serving as a convening hub of innovators from the region.
· Elevating the PBC’s brand as a premier location for bioscience-related companies
and Phoenix’s robust bioscience ecosystem.
· Increasing partnerships between and among the City, academia, industry, the
startup ecosystem, arts and culture.
· Facilitating international connections via the Innovation Bridge programming with
visiting business delegations.
· Curating meaningful events that connect, inspire/encourage participants to take
positive action.
· Prioritizing participation and support of attendees with marginalized identities.
· Enhancing infrastructure for research, education, entrepreneurship, arts and
culture.
· Providing access to one-on-one mentoring with subject matter experts.
· Bringing entrepreneurs, researchers, investors, artists, designers, corporate
innovators, technologists, small businesses, community members, etc. together to:
1. Find commonalities;
2. Share knowledge from different perspectives;
3. Forge partnerships; and
4. Explore opportunities for collaborations.

The City's original Founders Circle sponsorship has proven to be very successful in
engaging with Phoenix’s innovation community. The increased level of sponsorship to
a Legacy Founders sponsorship will provide the City with heightened visibility and
engagement, increased program planning and direct messaging to attendees to further


the City's economic development position as setting the standard for advanced
technology innovators to thrive.

The Legacy Founders Sponsorship will include at a minimum:
· Two seats on the Leadership Council.
· Premier logo placement on Venture Café’s website and newsletters with recognition
as the sole Legacy Founders sponsor.
· Recognition at all events, including announcements at beginning and end of event
programs.
· Inclusion in marketing material, social media, and Venture Café Phoenix’s weekly
newsletter.
· Monthly City of Phoenix economic development short article in the weekly
newsletter.
· Two City of Phoenix pop up banners at each event.
· Program planning for six events with the option for more to include programming
around visiting international delegations and industry conferences.
· Dedicated Legacy Founders slide with City of Phoenix logo on monitor rotation for
programming during events.

The increased sponsorship level will allow staff to be more actively engaged in the
planning and attending of events to pursue opportunities for business recruitment,
retention and expansion, and introductions to workforce development services and
programs.

The organizational framework will include the Center for Entrepreneurial Innovation as
the host institution along with providing programming, financial management, and staff
support. Venture Café will provide the City with an annual report of metrics of
attendance, voluntarily collected demographics of attendees, qualitative and
quantitative information from surveys, and engagement metrics.

Financial Impact
The fee for a Legacy Founders sponsorship is $200,000 annually, with a three year
total amount not to exceed $600,000. There is no impact to the General Fund. Funding
is available in the Genomic Facilities and Operations Fund.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
This item was recommended for approval by the Economic Development and the Arts
Subcommittee at the September 10, 2025 meeting by a vote of 2-0.





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager John Chan and the Community and
Economic Development Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Painting Services - IFB 24-FMD-004 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52258) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contracts 158349 with DMS Companies, Inc., 158350 with Bullseye Painting Company
LLC and 158351 with A & H Painting, Inc. to add the Phoenix Convention Center
Department (PCCD) as an authorized user of the painting services contracts. Further
request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The
additional expenditures will not exceed $300,000.

Summary
These contracts will provide painting services to the interior and exterior of buildings
for the Phoenix Convention Center (PCC) venue. The PCCD requires interior and
exterior painting services to maintain the facility’s appearance, protect structural
surfaces, and ensure a safe and welcoming environment for visitors, event organizers,
and staff. Interior painting is necessary to refresh walls, hallways, meeting rooms, and
public spaces that experience wear over time due to constant use. Exterior painting is
equally critical to preserve building surfaces from sun exposure, weathering, and
environmental damage. Regular painting helps prevent costly repairs by protecting
surfaces from moisture, corrosion, and deterioration.

Contract Term
The contracts' terms remain unchanged, ending on June 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $300,000 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contracts will not exceed $4,715,000. Funds are available in the PCC, Water Services,
Parks and Recreation, and Public Works departments' budgets.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Painting Services Agreement Contracts 158349, 158350, and 158351 (Ordinance S-
49750) on August 1, 2023.






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Managers Ginger Spencer and John Chan and
the Water Services, Public Works, Parks and Recreation and Phoenix Convention
Center departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Apply for FFY 2025 Homeland Security Grant Program Funds
(Ordinance S-52279) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to apply for, and accept, if
awarded, up to $17,273,107 from federal fiscal year (FFY) 2025 Department of
Homeland Security grant funds that include the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI)
and the State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) through the Arizona
Department of Homeland Security. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer
to accept, and for the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item.

Summary
The Department of Homeland Security distributes Homeland Security Grant funds to
enhance regional authorities' ability to prepare for, prevent, and respond to terrorist
attacks and other disasters.

The Police and Fire departments use UASI and SHSGP grant funds to purchase
equipment and vehicles, conduct training and exercises, assess critical infrastructure
sites, and implement target hardening measures to protect critical infrastructure.
Programs funded under the Homeland Security Grant Program include the Terrorism
Liaison Officer Program, Threat Mitigation Unit, Community Emergency Response
Teams, Rapid Response Task Force, and the Metropolitan Medical Response System.

The Fire Department and Police Department have received Homeland Security Grant
awards since 2003. In 2024, the total grant award from both UASI and SHSGP totaled
$5,250,000: $4,250,000 from UASI and $1,000,000 from SHSGP. In 2025, the total
regional allocation is $17,273,107 for both UASI and SHSGP. As the primary UASI city,
Phoenix is expected to receive a large portion of these funds.

Contract Term
The grant period of performance begins October 1, 2025, and ends September 30,
2028.

Financial Impact
No matching funds are required. Grant funds will be reimbursed through the Arizona
Department of Homeland Security and managed through the Fire Department and



Police Department.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire and Police
departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Request to Accept Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness Grant Funds -
Special Operations Training Prop (Ordinance S-52288) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept up to $14,719 from
the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to fund the procurement of a
Specialized Pipe Leak Training Prop for the Fire Department Special Operations
Section. Further request authorization for the City Treasurer to accept and for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness (HMEP) grant program,
established under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Uniform Safety Act of 1990,
aims to assist States, Territories, and Native American Tribes in developing and
improving emergency plans as part of the National Response System and the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act of 1986. The program
provides funding for planning and training activities related to hazardous materials
(HAZMAT) incidents in commercial transportation, with an emphasis on enhancing the
capabilities of public sector HAZMAT emergency response personnel. The ADEQ
manages the grant program as a pass-through grant.

The Fire Department previously received $23,500 from this program to run an
Advanced Tactical Chemistry class for participants across the state and to host three
Propane Response Advanced Tactics Classes for $17,500. Additional funds are
available from ADEQ and have been allocated for a Pipe Leak Training Prop for the
Fire Department Special Operations Section.

Pipe Leak Training Prop
The Phoenix Fire Department Special Operations Section has been awarded $14,719
in funding to acquire a specialized Pipe Leak Training Prop. This prop is designed to
replicate leaks from industrial chemical piping systems, enabling both new and veteran
hazardous material technicians to practice real-world mitigation techniques in a safe
and controlled environment. By simulating the flow of hazardous liquids or gases, the
prop provides hands-on training in identifying, controlling, and stopping chemical
releases using the same tools and equipment carried on HazMat units.




Procurement Information
The Fire Department will administer the grant per Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Contract Term
The performance period for this award will begin upon award notification and end on
September 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
There is no financial impact to the City of Phoenix.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Enter Into 2025 Readiness Cooperative Agreement with FEMA (Ordinance S-
52289) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to retroactively apply for,
accept, and disburse Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds totaling
$1,418,311 for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 National Urban Search & Rescue (US&R)
Response System Readiness Cooperative Agreement. Further request authorization
for the City Treasurer to accept and the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item.

Summary
The Department of Homeland Security and FEMA provide support and funding for the
maintenance and readiness of the National US&R Response System. This readiness
cooperative agreement aims to support the continued development and maintenance
of the National US&R capability. It provides direction to the Phoenix Fire Department
regarding the use of funding to provide administrative and program management,
training, support, equipment cache procurement, maintenance, and storage.

The Phoenix Fire Department is the sponsoring agency of Arizona Task Force One (AZ
-TF1), one of 28 National US&R response system task forces that can rapidly deploy
skilled personnel and state-of-the-art equipment to sites of natural disasters, terrorist
attacks, and building collapses. In addition to search and rescue, task force members
provide immediate medical treatment to survivors, hazardous materials monitoring,
and stabilization capabilities.

In the past, AZ-TF1 has deployed to a wide range of disasters and emergencies,
including flooding in New Mexico, wildfires in New Mexico, the Oklahoma City
bombing, the 9/11 World Trade Center response in New York City, Hurricanes Katrina,
Rita, Gustav, Ike, Harvey, Irma, and Florence, as well as more recent events such as
Tropical Cyclones Helene and Milton and the Kerr County, Texas floods.

Contract Term
The agreement's term is three years, from September 1, 2025, to August 31, 2028.






Financial Impact
The Fire Department will receive an amount not to exceed $1,418,311 from FEMA for
the FY 2025 National US&R Response System Readiness Cooperative Agreement.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Acquisition of Real Property Located on the Southwest Corner of W. Sahuaro
and N. 28th Drives for Future Fire Station 93 (Ordinance S-52292) - District 1

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to acquire all real property
and related property interests located on the southwest corner of W. Sahuaro Drive
and N. 28th Drive either by donation, purchase within the City's appraised value,
purchase at a settlement amount arrived at through mediation and determined by the
City Manager, or designee, to be reasonable under the circumstances, or by the power
of eminent domain, for Fire Station 93. Additionally, request authorization for the City
Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
This approximate 3.04-acre site has been identified as the location needed for
construction of a future fire station. The proposed location will improve response times
to better serve the public. The parcels affected by this acquisition and included in this
request are identified by Maricopa County Assessor's parcel numbers 149-17-154A
and 149-17-154B located at 10640 N. 28th Drive.

Financial Impact
Funding is available in the Fire Department's Capital Improvement Program budget.

Location
Southwest corner of W. Sahuaro and N. 28th Drives.
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Fire and Finance
departments.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
AZ Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AZAFIS) Hardware and
Maintenance - ADSPO 13-038750 - Amendment (Ordinance S-52267) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute amendment to
Contract 145675 with Idemia Identity & Security USA, LLC to extend contract term and
add additional expenditures. Further request to authorize the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional expenditures will not exceed
$343,673.

Summary
This contract provides the Phoenix Police Department's Information Technology
Bureau with automated fingerprint system hardware and maintenance in support of the
AZAFIS network located at various bureaus and precincts throughout the City. The
additional funds will support additional hardware and continued maintenance to the
system through the end of the contract term.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract will be extended through June 30, 2026 with a one-year
option to extend.

Financial Impact
Upon approval of $343,673 in additional funds, the revised aggregate value of the
contract will not exceed $2,646,046. Funds are available in the Police Department's
operating budget.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
· Fingerprint Systems Requirements - Contract 145675 (Ordinance S-43768) on June
28, 2017;
· Automated Fingerprint Identification System - Contract 145675 (Ordinance S-
46800) on June 24, 2020;
· Automated Fingerprint Identification System - Contract 145675 (Ordinance S-
47679) on June 16, 2021;
· Automated Fingerprint Identification System - Contract 145675 (Ordinance S-



48758) on June 15, 2022;
· AZ Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AZAFIS) Hardware and
Maintenance - Contract 145675 (Ordinance S-49831) on June 14, 2023; and
· AZ Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AZAFIS) Hardware and
Maintenance - Contract 145675 (Ordinance S-50677) on March 20, 2024.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Early Intervention System Contract - RFP 25-0629 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52268) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Benchmark Solutions, LLC dba Benchmark Analytics, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Benchmark Buyer, Inc. to provide an Early Intervention System for the Police
Department. Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds
related to this item. The total value of the contract will not exceed $3,416,511.

Summary
This contract will provide an Early Intervention System, along with ongoing
maintenance and support. The Early Intervention System is a predictive and adaptable
system that identifies department employees, sworn and civilian, who display the
indicators of potentially problematic behaviors. It will provide vital support to the Police
Department to ensure the safety and security of each person in the community while
fostering employee excellence through data-driven wellness and training.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Procurement Information
A Request for Proposal procurement was processed in accordance with City of
Phoenix Administrative Regulation 3.10.

Two vendors submitted proposals deemed responsive and responsible. An evaluation
committee of City staff evaluated those offers based on the following criteria with a
maximum possible point total of 1,000:
· Qualifications and Experience - 180 points
· Method of Approach - 560 points
· Price - 80 points
· Demonstration - 180 points

After reaching consensus, the evaluation committee recommends award to the
following vendor:



Benchmark Solutions, LLC dba Benchmark Analytics, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Benchmark Buyer, Inc. - 662.92 points

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about September 17, 2025, for a three-year term with two
one-year options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $3,416,511. Funding is available in the
Police Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Lori Bays and the Police Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 3 North Concourse 2 Package
3 Airport Concourse - Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services
Amendment - AV08000087, AV13000003 (Ordinance S-52270) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 160205 with McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. to provide additional
Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services for the Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport Terminal 3 North Concourse 2 Package 3 Airport Concourse
project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional fee for
services included in this amendment will not exceed $53,242,704.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to develop a new six-gate, two-level airport concourse at
Terminal 3 (T3) of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to accommodate
operations for airlines, passengers, and airport staff. The planned work will include an
aircraft apron to accommodate six Airplane Design Group III aircraft that may service
two Airplane Design Group V via two-for-one exchange; a connector bridge between
the existing and new concourse with moving walkways to facilitate passenger
movement; and one or more passenger bus lobbies at Terminal 4 north concourses to
facilitate a passageway or tunnel for inter-terminal passenger connections between
Terminal 3 and Terminal 4.

This amendment is necessary for the construction of a T3 Vertical Transportation
Node, a Passenger Level Video Wall, and a Mezzanine Level Lounge. This
amendment will provide additional funds to the agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment remains unchanged at five years. Work scope
identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be
agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement.
No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.





Financial Impact
The initial agreement for Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services was
approved for an amount not to exceed $325,785,000, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.

This amendment will increase the agreement by an additional $53,242,704, for a new
total amount not to exceed $379,027,704, including all subcontractor and reimbursable
costs.

Funding for this amendment is available in the Aviation Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Architectural Services Agreement 158106 (Ordinance S-49589) on April 19, 2023;
· Amendment to Architectural Services Agreement 158106 (Ordinance S-50678) on
March 20, 2024;
· Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services Agreement 158125
(Ordinance S-49591) on April 19, 2023; and
· Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services Agreement 160205 (Ordinance
S-50680) on March 20, 2024.

Location
2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Interim Deputy City
Manager Amber Williamson, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 3 North Concourse 2 Package
3 Airport Concourse - Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services
Amendment - AV08000087, AV13000003 (Ordinance S-52271) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 158125 with McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. to provide additional
Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services for the Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport Terminal 3 North Concourse 2 Package 3 Airport Concourse
project. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as
necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as provided below, and
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The additional fee for
services included in this amendment will not exceed $2 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to develop a new six-gate, two-level airport concourse at
Terminal 3 of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to accommodate operations for
airlines, passengers and airport staff. The planned work will include an aircraft apron to
accommodate six Airplane Design Group III aircraft that may service two Airplane
Design Group V via two-for-one exchange; a connector bridge between the existing
and new concourse to facilitate passenger movement with moving walkways; and one
or more passenger bus lobbies at Terminal 4 north concourses to facilitate a
passageway or tunnel for inter-terminal passenger connections between Terminal 3
and Terminal 4.

This amendment is necessary to facilitate preconstruction services for the future
tunnel/passageway between Terminal 3 and Terminal 4 to avoid disruptions on Sky
Harbor Boulevard. The fee for services will not exceed $2 million. This amendment will
provide additional funds to the agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment remains unchanged at five years. Work scope
identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be
agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement.
No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.




Financial Impact
The initial agreement for Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services was
approved for an amount not to exceed $4,797,000, including all subcontractor and
reimbursable costs.

This amendment will increase the agreement by an additional $2 million, for a new
total amount not to exceed $6,797,000, including all subcontractor and reimbursable
costs.

Funding for this amendment is available in the Aviation Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Architectural Services Agreement 158106 (Ordinance S-49589) on April 19, 2023;
· Amendment to Architectural Services Agreement 158106 (Ordinance S-50678) on
March 20, 2024;
· Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services Agreement 158125
(Ordinance S-49591) on April 19, 2023; and
· Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services Agreement 160205 (Ordinance
S-50680) on March 20, 2024.

Location
2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Interim Deputy City
Manager Amber Williamson, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal 3 North Concourse 2 Package
3 Airport Concourse - Architectural Services Amendment - AV08000087,
AV13000003 (Ordinance S-52272) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 158106 with Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum, Inc., dba HOK to provide
additional Architectural Services for the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport
Terminal 3 North Concourse 2 Package 3 Airport Concourse project. Further request to
authorize execution of amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-
approved expenditure authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to
disburse all funds related to this item. The additional fee for services included in this
amendment will not exceed $9,825,000.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to develop a new six-gate, two-level airport concourse at
Terminal 3 (T3) of Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport to accommodate
operations for airlines, passengers and airport staff. The planned work will include an
aircraft apron to accommodate six Airplane Design Group III aircraft that may service
two Airplane Design Group V via two-for-one exchange; a connector bridge between
the existing and new concourse to facilitate passenger movement with moving
walkways; and one or more passenger bus lobbies at Terminal 4 north concourses to
facilitate a passageway or tunnel for inter-terminal passenger connections between T3
and Terminal 4 (T4).

This amendment is necessary to facilitate additional design services for the Terminal 3
North Concourse 2 (T3N2), airside tunnel between T3 and T4, passenger level Video
Wall and Mezzannine Level lounge, and associated Construction Administration and
Inspection Services. This amendment will provide additional funds to the agreement.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement amendment remains unchanged at five years. Work scope
identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be
agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement.
No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.




Financial Impact
The initial agreement for Architectural Services was approved for an amount not to
exceed $30,700,000, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Amendment 1 to Agreement 158106 for Architectural Services increased the
agreement by an additional $7,675,000, for a new total amount not to exceed
$38,375,000, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs. This amendment will
increase the agreement by an additional $9,825,000, for a new total amount not to
exceed $48,200,000, including all subconsultant and reimbursable costs.

Funding for this amendment is available in the Aviation Department's Capital
Improvement Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately
review and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments.
Payments may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services,
which may extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Architectural Services Agreement 158106 (Ordinance S-49589) on April 19, 2023;
· Construction Manager at Risk Preconstruction Services Agreement 158125
(Ordinance S-49591) on April 19, 2023;
· Amendment 1 to Architectural Services Agreement 158106 (Ordinance S-50678) on
March 20, 2024; and
· Construction Manager at Risk Construction Services Agreement 160205 (Ordinance
S-50680) on March 20, 2024.

Location
2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Interim Deputy City
Manager Amber Williamson, the Aviation Department and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Trego/Dugan Aviation of Grand Island, Inc. Terminal Facility License Agreement
at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (Ordinance S-52275) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a facility license
agreement with Trego/Dugan Aviation of Grand Island, Inc. (Trego/Dugan) for
approximately 275 square feet of exclusive space in Terminal 3 at Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport.

Summary
Trego/Dugan operates under Commercial Use Permit Number 525-23 (CUP) to
provide passenger support services to Sun County Airlines, including passenger
assistance and skycap services. Trego/Dugan intends to use approximately 275
square feet of terminal space as an office in support of its CUP operation.

Contract Term
The term of the facility license agreement will be month-to-month and will be
retroactive effective on December 19, 2024.

Financial Impact
Trego/Dugan shall pay the terminal rate of $187.08 per square foot for the period of
December 19, 2024, through June 30, 2025. Starting July 1, 2025, Trego/Dugan will
pay the terminal rate of $197.88 per square foot. The terminal rate will be adjusted
annually in accordance with the Rates and Charges provision of Article IX of Chapter 4
of the Phoenix City Code.

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road.
Council District 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Interim Deputy City Manager Amber Williamson and the
Aviation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
RT Sky Harbor, LLC Amendment to Termination Agreement (Ordinance S-52283)
- District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Termination
Agreement 120545-TER-001 with RT Sky Harbor, LLC (RT) to increase the amount of
reimbursement to RT for the demolition and removal of the existing building structure
on the property in Sky Harbor Center at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.
Further request to authorize the City Controller to disburse the funds related to this
item.

Summary
RT leases premises in Sky Harbor Center under Ground Lease 102545 (Lease), which
commenced on December 1, 2002. On March 26, 2025, the City Council approved
early termination of the Ground Lease under Termination Agreement 102545-TER-001.
The Termination Agreement includes provisions of a payment of $10 million to RT to
buy out the remaining term of the Ground Lease with Aviation obtaining the facilities of
1,300-space parking garage, 746-space surface parking lot, and existing office building
structure. The parking garage and surface parking will be used by Aviation for airport
customer parking. Additionally, the Termination Agreement provided for Aviation to
reimburse RT for the demolition and removal of the existing building structure in an
amount of approximately $1.1 million.

Preliminary work on the demolition project revealed additional expenses related to the
demolition that were not anticipated when the original $1.1 million amount was
calculated. The additional expenses include archaeological investigation, additional
required environmental work, removal of underground storage tank, re-routing and
installation of electrical, and establishing new communications services to the garage,
and additional site work to maintain garage availability for airport parking during the
demolition of the building structure. These additional demolition-related expenses total
amount not to exceed $1,605,526. All demolition work performed by RT will be in
compliance with Title 34.

Contract Term
The amendment does not change the effective date of the Termination Agreement,
which remains contingent upon the final inspection of the demolition site and receipt of



all demolition-related expense documentation.

Financial Impact
If amended, the reimbursement amount for demolition and removal shall not to exceed
$2,705,526, and total compensation to RT, including buyout of Ground Lease and
demolition costs, shall not to exceed $12,705,526.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Sky Harbor, LLC (Ordinance S-51763) on March 26, 2025.

Location
Sky Harbor Center: 1820 E. Sky Harbor Circle South
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Interim Deputy City Manager Amber Williamson and the
Aviation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend Ground Lease with Cutter Aviation Deer Valley, Inc. at Phoenix Deer
Valley Airport (Ordinance S-52284) - District 1

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to amend Ground Lease
148261 with Cutter Aviation Deer Valley, Inc. (Cutter) to add 4,193 square feet to the
leased premises at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT) to enable the construction of an
additional executive aircraft storage hangar facility.

Summary
Cutter currently leases 1,131,854 square feet of land (approximately 26 acres) at DVT
to operate a Fixed Base Operator business, which includes covered tie-down units and
executive hangars in addition to providing aircraft fueling, aircraft maintenance, flight
training and aviation supply sales.

Cutter seeks to expand their leased premises by 4,193 square feet to accommodate
construction of an additional 55,000 square foot executive aircraft storage hangar
facility. The hangar construction will require removal of two rows of covered tie-down
spaces on Cutter's leased premises.

Contract Term
The term of Ground Lease 148261 commenced on July 1, 2018, and will expire on
June 30, 2048. This amendment does not change the lease term.

Financial Impact
Cutter currently pays approximately $601,232 per year in ground rent. This
amendment will increase annual rent by approximately $2,851 per year or
approximately $65,578 over the remaining 23 years of the lease.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Ground Lease Agreement 148261 (Ordinance S-44150) on December 13, 2017;
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board Business and Development Subcommittee
recommended approval of this item on August 7, 2025, by a vote of 3-0; and
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of this item on August
21, 2025, by a vote of 9-0.




Location
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport: 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Interim Deputy City Manager Amber Williamson and the
Aviation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Civil Air Patrol Lease Extension at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (Ordinance S-
52285) - District 1

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Corporate Hangar Lease 136822 with Civil Air Patrol (CAP) to extend the lease term
for 10 years and add one five-year extension option and incorporate approximately
10,400 square feet of additional premises at Phoenix Deer Valley Airport (DVT).

Summary
The Arizona Wing of CAP leases a corporate hangar at DVT of approximately 6,000
square feet that includes hangar, classroom, and office space. CAP is a civilian
auxiliary to the United States Air Force that provides aviation-related education and
flight training to local youth and adults to assist federal and local state authorities in the
event of local and national emergencies. CAP uses the hangar facility for its non-
commercial activities to support aerial search and rescue missions, humanitarian aid
services, and to operate a cadet program that introduces cadets to aviation. CAP has
been a tenant at DVT since 1989 and leases the hangar facility for one dollar per year,
consistent with FAA regulations.

Corporate Hangar Lease 136822 was amended in January 2021 to extend the term for
an additional five years, through December 31, 2025, with two one-year renewal
options. The amendment included a provision for an additional five-year extension if
CAP made a $1 million minimum capital investment to expand the hangar facility.

CAP recently received a $4.9 million grant from the State of Arizona for hangar
facilities improvements. Given the significance of the proposed capital investment,
CAP requested the Aviation Department exercise both remaining one-year renewal
options and extend the lease term for an additional 10 years, with one five-year
renewal option, to complete a remodel to expand the hangar facility by approximately
16,400 square feet. The expansion will accommodate an additional aircraft and
increase the size of the classroom and office space.

Contract Term
If approved, the lease term will be extended for 10 years, effective January 1, 2028,
with one five-year renewal option at the sole discretion of the Aviation Director,



contingent upon CAP investing a minimum of $4.9 million in hangar expansion and
improvements.

Financial Impact
Rent for the lease will remain at one dollar per year.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
Corporate Hangar Lease Agreement 136822 (Ordinance S-39339) on November 7,
2012;
Extension of Corporate Hangar Lease Agreement 136822 (Ordinance S-46174) on
November 20, 2019;
Extension of Corporate Hangar Lease Agreement 136822 (Ordinance S-49625) on
April 19, 2023;
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board Business and Development Subcommittee
recommended approval of this item on August 7, 2025, by a vote of 3-0; and
The Phoenix Aviation Advisory Board recommended approval of this item on August
21, 2025, by a vote of 9-0.

Location
Phoenix Deer Valley Airport: 702 W. Deer Valley Road
Council District: 1

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Interim Deputy City Manager Amber Williamson and the
Aviation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Fleet Management Technology for Heavy-Duty Vehicles - COOP 23-042 -
Amendment (Ordinance S-52290) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Contract 158354 with Wastech Corp. to extend the contract term. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. No additional
funds are needed; request to continue using Ordinance S-49672.

Summary
This contract provides a specialized solid waste collection software platform and Smart
Cities capabilities. Utilizing this technology, the Public Works Department receives
confirmation of collections, turn-by-turn routing, route optimization and equipment
records compliance (pre-trip and post-trip inspections). It also provides citywide
problem log recording capabilities, which eliminate paper driver's logs.

This item has been reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Services
Department.

Contract Term
Upon approval, the contract will be extended through September 29, 2029.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the contract will not exceed $3,780,000, and no additional
funds are needed.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously reviewed this request:
• Fleet Management Technology for Heavy-Duty Vehicles Contract 158354 (Ordinance
S-49672) on May 3, 2023; and
• Fleet Management Technologies with Related Software Solutions for Heavy-Duty
Vehicles Contract 158354 (Ordinance S-51699) on March 5, 2025.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Public Works
Department.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Electrical Parts and Supplies Contract - IFB-26-FMD-012 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52261) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into contracts with
Crescent Electric Supply Company, Electric Supply, Incorporated, Elliott Electric
Supply, Inc., Lighting Unlimited, Incorporated, and Six Points Hardware, Inc. to provide
electrical parts and supplies for the Public Works Department. Further request to
authorize the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of
these contracts will not exceed $17,500,000.

Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for maintenance and repair of
approximately 879 City-owned facilities. The Facilities Operations Division requires
these contracts to purchase necessary electrical parts and supplies from vendors with
a local Maricopa County presence. Local availability of electrical parts and supplies is
vital to ensure that critical facilities, including those of Fire, Police, and other public-
facing facilities, are maintained and in continuous operation. Known General
Obligation Bond Program expenditures for upcoming projects, within the next eight
months, is approximately $2,000,000.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

The City received seven offers, and five of them were deemed to be responsive and
responsible. The Procurement Officer evaluated the offers based on availability and
discounts off published prices, list prices, and catalog prices and recommends award
to the following Offerors:

· Crescent Electric Supply Company
· Electric Supply, Incorporated
· Elliott Electric Supply, Inc.
· Lighting Unlimited, Incorporated
· Six Points Hardware, Inc.



Contract Term
These contracts will begin on or about October 1, 2025, for a three-year term with two
one-year options to extend.

Financial Impact
The contracts' combined aggregate value will not exceed $17,500,000. Funding is
available in the Public Works Department's operating budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Public Works
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Generac Generators Maintenance and Repair Services Contract - RFA 26-FSD-
018 - Request for Award (Ordinance S-52262) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Energy Systems Holdings,Inc. dba West Coast Energy Systems, LLC to provide
maintenance and repair services for Generac generators. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The total value of the
contract will not exceed $163,950.

Summary
The Public Works Department is responsible for the maintenance and repair of
generators located at facilities citywide, including 77 Generac generators. These
generators provide backup, a power source, at critical locations such as wastewater lift
stations, fueling stations, and 911 dispatch centers. The repair of this equipment
requires calibration that only the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) dealer can
provide. It is necessary to have repairs completed by the OEM dealership to ensure
the proper operation of the generators in the event of a power failure. Generators that
are not functioning properly can result in loss of power that can affect public health and
safety.

Procurement Information
In accordance with Administrative Regulation 3.10, standard competition was waived
as a result of an approved Determination Memo based on the following reason:
Special Circumstance, Alternative Competition. Energy Systems Holdings,Inc. dba
West Coast Energy Systems, LLC is the sole source provider of OEM Generac
maintenance and repair services in Maricopa County.

Contract Term
The contract will begin on or about September 18, 2025 for a five-year term with no
options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate contract value will not exceed $163,950 for the five-year aggregate
term.




Funding is available in the Public Works Department budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Public Works
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Geosynthetic Material Contract - IFB 26-SWDD-015 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52269) - Out of City

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into an agreement
with PBR, Inc. dba SKAPS Industries, to provide geosynthetic liners for the State
Route 85 (SR85) Landfill, cell two phases three and four. Further request authorization
for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The aggregate value of
the agreement will not exceed $3,000,000.

Summary
The Agreement will provide geosynthetic liners at the SR85 Landfill design and
construction project for cell two phases three and four. The geosynthetic liners are
layered to protect the groundwater from landfill leachate. The layers conform to all
industry standards and meet federal and state requirements for groundwater
monitoring. The geosynthetic liners cover up to 3.4 million square feet in the new cell
and ensures the landfill leachate does not contaminate the groundwater.

Procurement Information
Invitation for Bid (IFB) 26-SWDD-015 was conducted in accordance with
Administrative Regulation 3.10. Four bids were received and evaluated based on the
price of the estimated square footage of the project, responsiveness to all
specifications, terms and conditions, and responsibility to provide the required goods.
The offer submitted by PBR, Inc. dba SKAPS Industries was the lowest responsible
and responsive bid.

Contract Term
The initial contract term is for three years beginning on or about October 1, 2025. This
contract includes an option to extend the term up to two years, in one-year increments.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value of the agreement will not exceed $3,000,000. Funds are available
in the Public Works Department's Capital Improvement Program budget.






Location
SR85 Landfill, 28361 W. Patterson Road, Buckeye, AZ.
Council District: Out of City

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Public Works
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Recycling Grant Opportunity for
Fiscal Year 2025-26 (Ordinance S-52276) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to retroactively apply for, and
if awarded, accept and enter into related agreements for disbursement of grant funding
from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) through its Recycling
Grant Program's Waste Reduction Assistance Grant (WRA). If awarded, grant funding
will be used to install a camera system at the 27th Avenue Materials Recovery Facility,
pilot an initiative that will help Green Business Leaders design and carry out
customized waste reduction projects, and pilot an education, outreach, and collection
program for lithium-ion batteries. Further request authorization from the City Treasurer
to accept, and the City Controller to disburse, all funds related to this item, including
sub-recipients associated with the projects. The total grant funds applied for will not
exceed $185,000.

Summary
The ADEQ Recycling Grant Program promotes recycling and source reduction through
public education and information on proper solid waste disposal and includes the WRA
category. The WRA supports community initiatives aimed at significantly reducing solid
waste output. Funding received is available through the Arizona Solid Waste Recycling
Act of 1990 and is derived from landfill disposal fees. More than one project application
per applicant may be submitted. Applications will be submitted under the WRA
category.

Project 1 - 27th Avenue Materials Recovery Facility Residue Belt Camera Application
The Public Works Department oversees the 27th Avenue Materials Recovery Facility
(MRF) which processes and sorts recyclables from the City’s recycling program.
Phoenix continually seeks to improve its sorting efficiency, with one key focus being
the identification of recyclable materials that are not being captured by the MRF
system. Currently, the residue belt carries non-recyclables out of the MRF to be
disposed of as trash at the landfill. If the system misses capturing a good recyclable,
that also ends up on the residue belt. To better understand and reduce this loss, the
Public Works Department is requesting grant funding to add a camera over the residue
belt to determine what recyclable materials are not being captured. The information will
provide data on the quantity and type of recyclables, which will provide insight and



justification for additional fine tuning or improvements to the MRF system. The total
grant funds applied for in this application is approximately $55,000.

Project 2 - Local First Arizona Green Business Boot Camp Application
The City of Phoenix Green Business Leader (GBL) program certifies and recognizes
businesses within City limits that implement sustainable practices to support Phoenix’s
2050 sustainability goals. Certified businesses gain access to benefits like water
efficiency audits, sustainability training, and promotional exposure through the City.
Currently, the GBL Program does not provide technical project assistance or project-
based incubation support to certified GBLs. To assess whether adding this assistance
can drive measurable waste diversion impacts, the Public Works Department is
requesting grant funding to launch a pilot program in collaboration with Local First
Arizona that will help 10 Phoenix businesses build customized waste reduction project
models. Recruitment for the boot camp will prioritize GBL-certified businesses to
enhance the existing GBL Program, however, non-certified businesses will also be
eligible to participate, creating an opportunity to expand the GBL Program. Participants
will leave with actionable waste reduction projects and access to City of Phoenix or
Local First Arizona resources to support implementation following the grant period. The
total grant funds requested for this application is approximately $40,000.

Project 3 - Lithium-Ion Battery Collection Application
The increasing prevalence of lithium-ion batteries in the solid waste stream poses a
fire risk to the City's solid waste collection trucks, transfer stations, material recovery
facilities, and landfill when individuals improperly dispose of them. To extend outreach
on the proper disposal of lithium-ion batteries, the Public Works Department is
requesting grant funding to launch a six-month pilot program which aims to educate
residents about responsible battery disposal and provide safe drop-off options for
lithium-ion batteries. The total grant funds applied for in this application is
approximately $90,000.

The Public Works Department is requesting retroactive authorization to submit grant
applications for ADEQ’s Recycling Grant Program’s WRA category due to the short
application timeline. If not authorized, the grant applications will be withdrawn. If
awarded, funds would be available by early 2026 and would need to be expended by
June 30, 2026. The Public Works Department is also requesting authorization to enter
into agreements to accept the funding if awarded.

Financial Impact
The Public Works Department is requesting grant funds up to $185,000 and the City's
cost would be $0 for the local match.



Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Public Works
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
SR85 Landfill Labor Services Contract - 26-SWDD-014 - Request for Award
(Ordinance S-52263) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a contract with
Arizona Labor Force Incorporated, dba Labor Systems to perform essential landfill
services at the Arizona State Route 85 (SR85) Landfill. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The aggregate value of this
contract will not exceed $900,000.

Summary
This contract provides essential services at the SR85 Landfill, including litter removal,
tarp maintenance, landscaping and custodial services. Due to regulatory requirements
from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and commitments with the City
of Buckeye through an Intergovernmental Agreement, these services are critical to
ensure that compliance is maintained.

Procurement Information
An Invitation for Bid procurement was processed in accordance with City of Phoenix
Administrative Regulation 3.10.

The City received six offers, all of them were deemed to be responsible and
responsive. Following an evaluation based on price, the procurement officer
recommends awarding to the following bidder:

Selected Bidder:
Labor Systems - $26.99/hour

Other Bidders:
Bio-Janitorial Service, Inc. - $27.50/hour
Bunney’s Inc. - $78.51/ hour
C Jenkins & Associates LLC. - $56/hour
Kary Environmental Services Inc. - $40/hour
Plan B Facility Services - $28/hour





Contract Term
This contract will begin on or about January 1, 2026, for a three-year term with two one
-year options to extend.

Financial Impact
The aggregate value will not exceed $900,000. Funding is available in the Public
Works Department's budget.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Public Works
Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Southwest Gas Facilities Extension Agreement WR4538108 for City Project
FD57100020 Fire Station 74 (Ordinance S-52274) - District 6

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into a Facilities
Extension Agreement with Southwest Gas (SWG) for new gas services to serve Fire
Station 74. Further request to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20
to authorize inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification
and assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix
City Code 42-18. Further request authorization for the City Controller to disburse all
funds related to this item in an amount not to exceed $95,356.

Summary
The City is constructing Fire Station 74 located at 15800 S. 19th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ
85045. This agreement represents the cost for SWG to install new services to provide
commercial heating and backup generators for the new fire station.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement will begin on or about September 17, 2025 and will expire
when the project is complete and accepted.

Financial Impact
Funding in the amount of $95,356 is available through the Fire Department's operating
budget.

Location
15800 S. 19th Avenue
Council District 6

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Managers Lori Bays and Inger Erickson, the
Phoenix Fire and Street Transportation departments and the City Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Innovation 27 Workforce Training and Education Collaborative - 2-Step
Construction Manager at Risk Services Amendment - ED20000008 (Ordinance S-
52293) - District 5

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
Agreement 161777 with Chasse Building Team, Inc. to provide additional Construction
Manager at Risk Construction Services for the Innovation 27 Workforce Training and
Education Collaborative project. Further request to authorize execution of
amendments to the agreement as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure
authority as provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to
this item. The additional fee for services included in this amendment will not exceed
$27 million.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to renovate an existing former big-box department store
into a workforce and training facility. The structure will provide a new vocational/trade
school with classrooms, multipurpose room, workforce training space, conference
rooms, huddle rooms, office space, and back of house support space.

The amendment is necessary as all funding for the project has been secured and is
ready to advance to the construction phase.

Chasse Building Team, Inc.'s additional services include, but are not limited to:
arranging procurement of materials and equipment; scheduling and managing site
operations; providing quality controls, bid, award, and manage all construction related
contracts while meeting City bid requirements; and maintaining a safe work site for all
project participants.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement remains unchanged. Work scope identified and
incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the
parties, and work may extend past the termination of the agreement. No additional
changes may be executed after the end of the term.





Financial Impact
The initial agreement for Construction Manager at Risk Services was approved for an
amount not to exceed $4,942,428, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding in the amount of $2 million is available through the City's allocation of Housing
and Urban Development funding. The remaining funds in the amount of $25 million is
available in the Community and Economic Development Department Capital
Improvement Program. The Budget and Research Department will separately review
and approve funding availability prior to the execution of any amendments. Payments
may be made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may
extend past the agreement termination.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council approved:
· Construction Manager at Risk Services Agreement 161777 (Ordinance S-51327) on
October 16, 2024; and
· Ordinance S-51502 authorizing the acceptance and disbursement of Community
Project Funding from the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development on December 18, 2024.

Location
2526 W. Northern Avenue
Council District: 5

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
John Chan, the Community and Economic Development Department and the City
Engineer.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Neighborhood Services Department Broadway Heritage Streetlights and North
Central Streetlights Community Development Block Grant - Design-Bid-Build
Services - ST85160021 (ND30070322) and ST87250010 (ND30010037) (Ordinance
S-52266) - Districts 4 & 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept BPG Designs, LLC
as the lowest-priced, responsive and responsible bidder and to enter into an
agreement with BPG Designs, LLC for Design-Bid-Build Services for the
Neighborhood Services Department Broadway Heritage Streetlights and North Central
Streetlights Community Development Block Grant project. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item. The fee for services will not
exceed $679,625.

Summary
The purpose of this project is to provide all equipment, materials, transportation,
managerial, administrative, and direct labor personnel to install 35 new streetlights and
the replacement of three luminaires on existing poles at multiple locations within the
Broadway Heritage neighborhood and 10 new streetlights at North Central
neighborhood.

BPG Designs, LLC’s services include, but are not limited to:
· Trenching and surveying for installation of 25 37W LED Fixtures with photoelectric
controls on existing mast arm.
· Installation of 10 68W LED Fixtures with photoelectric controls on 38 feet by 6 inch
direct-bury poles, each with 6 foot mast arm.
· Removal of an existing luminaire and installation of three 68W LED fixtures with
photoelectric controls on existing mast arms.
· Removal and salvage of streetlight poles, mast arms, and luminaires, as specified.

The selection was made using an Invitation for Bids procurement process set forth in
Section 34-201 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. Two bids were received on June 24,
2025 and were sent to the Equal Opportunity Department for review to determine
subcontractor eligibility and contractor responsiveness in demonstrating
responsiveness to Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program requirements. A
DBE goal has not been established for this project.



The Opinion of Probable Cost and the two lowest responsive, responsible bidders are
listed below:
· Opinion of Probable Cost: $482,100
· BPG Designs, LLC $679,625
· AJP Electric, Inc.: $1,080,730

Although the bid exceeds the Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Cost by more than 10
percent, it has been determined the bid represents a fair and reasonable price for the
required work scope. Additionally, the bid award amount is within the total budget for
this project.

Contract Term
The term of the agreement is 300 calendar days from issuance of the Notice to
Proceed. Work scope identified and incorporated into the agreement prior to the end of
the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may extend past the termination of
the agreement. No additional changes may be executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The agreement value for BPG Designs, LLC will not exceed $679,625, including all
subcontractor and reimbursable costs.

Funding is available in the Neighborhood Services Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will separately review and
approve funding availability prior to execution of any amendments. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Location
Area Bounded by 31st Street to 24th Street, north of Roeser Road to south of East
Illini Street.

Area bounded by 11th Avenue to 7th Avenue, south of Osborn Road to south of Indian
School Road.

Council Districts: 4 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Deputy City Manager
Alan Stephenson, the Neighborhood Services Department and the City Engineer.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Mill and Overlay Pavement Maintenance Program - 2-Step Job Order Contracting
Services - JOC242 (Ordinance S-52282) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to enter into separate master
agreements with three contractors listed below, to provide Mill and Overlay Pavement
Maintenance Program Job Order Contracting (JOC) services for the Street
Transportation Department. Further request to authorize execution of amendments to
the agreements as necessary within the Council-approved expenditure authority as
provided below, and for the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.
The total fee for all services will not exceed $375 million.

Additionally, request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to take all action
as may be necessary or appropriate and to execute all design and construction
agreements, licenses, permits, and requests for utility services relating to the
development, design, and construction of the project. Such utility services include, but
are not limited to: electrical, water, sewer, natural gas, telecommunications, cable
television, railroads and other modes of transportation. Further request the City
Council to grant an exception pursuant to Phoenix City Code 42-20 to authorize
inclusion in the documents pertaining to this transaction of indemnification and
assumption of liability provisions that otherwise should be prohibited by Phoenix City
Code 42-18. This authorization excludes any transaction involving an interest in real
property.

Summary
The JOC contractors’ services will be used on an as-needed basis to provide Mill and
Overlay Pavement Maintenance Program for the removal and replacement or
restoration of existing deteriorated or damaged pavements in the right-of-way for
Arterial, Major Collector, Minor Collector, and Residential Pavement Overlay on streets
within Phoenix city limits. The program includes Crack Seal, Slurry Seal, Microseal,
Sealcoating, Fractured Aggregate Surface Treatment, Scrub Sealing, and Fog Sealing.
Additionally, the JOC contractors will be responsible for fulfilling Small Business
Enterprise program requirements.

Procurement Information
The selections were made using a two-step qualifications and price-based selection



process set forth in Section 34-604 of the Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.). In
accordance with A.R.S. Section 34-604(H), the City may not publicly release
information on proposals received or the scoring results until an agreement is
awarded. Five firms submitted proposals and are listed below.

Selected Firms
Rank 1: Primavera Grading & Paving, LLC
Rank 2: M. R. Tanner Development and Construction, LLC
Rank 3: Talis Construction Corporation

Additional Proposers
Rank 4: Nesbitt Contracting Co., Inc.
Rank 5: ViaSun Corporation

Contract Term
The term of each master agreement is for up to five years, or up to $125 million,
whichever occurs first. Work scope identified and incorporated into the master
agreement prior to the end of the term may be agreed to by the parties, and work may
extend past the termination of the master agreement. No additional changes may be
executed after the end of the term.

Financial Impact
The master agreement value for each of the JOC contractors will not exceed $125
million, including all subcontractor and reimbursable costs. The total fee for all services
will not exceed $375 million.

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute job order
agreements performed under these master agreements for up to $4 million each. In no
event will any job order agreement exceed this limit without Council approval to
increase the limit.

Funding is available in the Street Transportation Department's Capital Improvement
Program budget. The Budget and Research Department will review and approve
funding availability prior to issuance of any job order agreement. Payments may be
made up to agreement limits for all rendered agreement services, which may extend
past the agreement termination.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, the Street
Transportation Department and the City Engineer.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Authorization to Apply for and Accept Transportation Funding for Traffic Signal
Optimization Through Maricopa Association of Governments for Fiscal Year
2025-26 (Ordinance S-52294) - Districts 7 & 8

Request to retroactively authorize the City Manager, or designee, to apply for, accept,
and if awarded, enter into agreements, if necessary, for transportation funding through
the Maricopa Association of Governments Traffic Signal Optimization Program
(TSOP). Further request an exemption from the indemnification prohibition set forth in
the Phoenix City Code Section 42-18 for a governmental entity pursuant to Phoenix
City Code Section 42-20. The total value of the requested grant funding will not exceed
$24,420 and there is no financial impact to the City.

Summary
On July 28, 2025, the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) announced a
regional competitive grant opportunity through a Call for Projects for TSOP funded with
Surface Transportation Block Grant Program funds. The purpose of the program is to
provide technical assistance to MAG member agencies for improving traffic signal
coordination, and traffic operations, with the goal of reducing traffic delays and crashes
along major travel corridors.

There are three eligible TSOP project types:
· Traffic signal retiming
· Data collection (turning movement counts)
· Offset Optimization

Eligible projects funded with TSOP should be focused on, adjusting signal timing to
account for changes in traffic patterns due to new developments and traffic growth,
reduce motorist frustration and unsafe driving by cutting down stops and delays,
improve traffic flow through a group of signals, which reduces emissions and fuel
consumption, and postpone or eliminate the need for a costly capital improvement
project. The City has identified a traffic signal re-optimization project directly related to
the Interstate 10 Broadway Curve Project. The City will look to improve signal timing in
and around the area bounded by Broadway Road to the north, Baseline Road to the
south, 7th Street to the west and 48th Street to the east. The project area has not been
re-timed in the last five years.



The deadline for the grant is Monday, August 25, 2025.

Financial Impact
The City requested $24,420 in TSOP funding. There is no financial impact to the City
of Phoenix as a local agency match is not required.

Location
Council Districts: 7 and 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Assistant City Manager Inger Erickson, Interim Deputy City
Manager Amber Williamson and the Street Transportation Department.








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Anchor Point Inspection, Testing and Repair - IFB-2021-WST-385 - Amendment
(Ordinance S-52260) - Citywide

Request to authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to execute an amendment to
consent to assignment of Anchor Point Inspection, Testing and Repair Contract
155480 with PK Industries LLC to State 48 Safety LLC. Further request to authorize
the City Controller to disburse all funds related to this item.

Summary
The purpose of this amendment is to consent to assignment of the agreement with PK
Industries LLC to State 48 Safety LLC. This amendment would allow for the project
and project duties to move forward unhindered.

This contract provides anchor point load-testing inspections and repair of the sockets
and surrounding matrix located throughout Water Services Department buildings. All
parts, control systems and safety requirements must be inspected annually to ensure
they are in safe operating condition, in accordance with Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) requirements. OSHA mandates that acceptable anchor
points be in safe operating condition with the capability of supporting 5,000 pounds of
force per person tied to the device.

Contract Term
The contract term remains unchanged, ending on November 30, 2026.

Financial Impact
There is no requested change to the existing spending authorization, as part of this
amendment.

Concurrence/Previous Council Action
The City Council previously approved Anchor Point Inspection, Testing and Repair
Contract 155480 (Ordinance S-48084) on November 3, 2021.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Ginger Spencer and the Water
Services Department.





Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1292 (Ordinance G-7417)
- District 2

Request to authorize the City Manager to amend Section 601 of the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1292. This amendment
reflects that the property owner has met all of the rezoning conditions previously
approved by City Council with Z-135-04-2 and the entitlements are fully vested.

Summary
To rezone parcels located at the southwest corner of the 19th Avenue and Dynamite
Mountain Road alignments.
Application No.: Z-135-04-2
Zoning: R1-10 PCD NBCOD, R-2 PCD NBCOD, and R-3A PCD NBCOD
Owner: Fireside at Norterra Community Association, et al.
Acreage: 51.13 (R1-10 PCD NBCOD); 28.94 (R-2 PCD NBCOD); 11.57 (R-3A PCD
NBCOD)

Location
Located at the southwest corner of the 19th Avenue and Dynamite Mountain Road
alignments
Address: N/A
Council District: 2

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADOPTING OFFICIAL
SUPPLEMENTARY ZONING MAP 1292.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX as

follows:

SECTION 1. That Section 601 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance is

hereby amended by adopting Official Supplementary Zoning Map 1292, which

accompanies and is annexed to this ordinance and declared a part hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of September,

2025.



________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


____________________________City Clerk



APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney




By:_________________________

_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




DI:arm:LF25-1755:09-17-2025







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
Amend City Code - Ordinance Adoption - Rezoning Application PHO-1-25--Z-58-
24-8 - Approximately 710 Feet North and 305 Feet West of the Northwest Corner
of 20th Avenue and South Mountain Avenue (Ordinance G-7418) - District 8

Request to authorize the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, to approve the
Planning Hearing Officer's recommendation without further hearing by the City Council
on matters heard by the Planning Hearing Officer on August 20, 2025. This ratification
requires formal action only.

Summary
Application: PHO-1-25--Z-58-24-8
Existing Zoning: R1-10
Acreage: 4.54

Owner: Dorothy Hallock
Applicant / Representative: John Fox

Proposal:
1. Legislative review and approval of conceptual site plan and landscape plan by the
Planning Hearing Officer per Stipulation 1.
2. Legislative review and approval of conceptual elevations by the Planning Hearing
Officer per Stipulation 2.

VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this request on
August 12, 2025, and recommended denial by a vote of 12-0.
PHO Action: The Planning Hearing Officer recommended approval with a modification.

Location
Approximately 710 feet north and 305 feet west of the northwest corner of 20th Avenue
and South Mountain Avenue
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: N/A






Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A

THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STIPULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO REZONING APPLICATION Z-58-24-8
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY ORDINANCE G-7386.

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning stipulations applicable to the site located

approximately 710 feet north and 305 feet west of the northwest corner of 20th

Avenue and South Mountain Avenue in a portion of Section 1, Township 1 South,

Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B,

are hereby modified to read as set forth below.

STIPULATIONS:

1. THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE
WITH THE SITE PLAN DATE STAMPED JUNE 2, 2025 AND THE
LANDSCAPE PLAN DATE STAMPED JUNE 24, 2025 AS MODIFIED
BY THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS AND APPROVED BY THE
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. The conceptual site
plan and landscape plan for future development of the site shall be
reviewed and approved by the Planning Hearing Officer through the
public hearing process, including review by the South Mountain Village
Planning Committee, for stipulation modification prior to preliminary site
plan approval. This is a legislative review for conceptual purposes only.
Specific development standards and requirements will be determined by
the Planning Hearing Officer and the Planning and Development
Department.



2. BUILDING ELEVATIONS SHALL BE PRESENTED FOR REVIEW AND
COMMENT TO THE SOUTH MOUNTAIN VILLAGE PLANNING
COMMITTEE PRIOR TO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN APPROVAL. The
conceptual elevations for future development of the site shall be reviewed
and approved by the Planning Hearing Officer through the public hearing
process, including review by the South Mountain Village Planning
Committee, for stipulation modification prior to final site plan approval. This
is a legislative review for conceptual purposes only. Specific development
standards and requirements will be determined by the Planning Hearing
Officer and the Planning and Development Department.

3. Prior to preliminary plat approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates participation in the Environmental Protection Agency's
WaterSense certification program, or an equivalent program, as approved
by the Planning and Development and Water Services departments.

4. A WaterSense inspection report from a third-party verifier shall be
submitted that demonstrates successful participation in the Environmental
Protection Agency's WaterSense certification program, or an equivalent
program, prior to certificate of occupancy, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

5. Only landscape materials listed in the Phoenix Active Management Area
Low­ Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List shall be utilized in the
common areas and within the front yards of individual residential lots, as
approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

6. Natural turf shall only be utilized on individual single-family lots (behind the
front yard); required retention areas (bottom of basin); and functional turf
areas within common areas, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

7. Pressure regulating sprinkler heads and/or drip lines shall be utilized in
any turf areas to reduce water waste.

8. A minimum of two green infrastructure (GI) techniques for stormwater
management shall be implemented per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure and Low-Impact Development Details for Alternative
Stormwater Management, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development Department.

9. Participation in the City of Phoenix Homeowner's Association Water
Efficiency Program shall be incorporated into to Covenants, Conditions,
and Restrictions for the subdivision, prior to final site plan approval

10. Swimming pools on individual single-family lots shall be limited to 600
square feet in size.




11. A minimum 50 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for
the full width of 20th Lane for the full length of the subject site, connecting
to the southern adjacent parcel.

12. A minimum 50-foot radius easement shall be dedicated, and a minimum
45-foot radius temporary turnaround shall be constructed at the southern
terminus of 20th Lane. Alternatively, a permanent turn-round design may
be considered and shall include a center landscaped island, designed to
Department.

13. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed
with paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median
islands, landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the
Planning and Development Department. All improvements shall comply
with all ADA accessibility standards.

14. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence,
and operational characteristics of Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future
owners or tenants of the property. The form and content of such
documents shall be according to the templates and instructions provided
which have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

15. In the event archeological materials are encountered during construction,
the developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities
within a 33- foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archeologist, and
allow time for the Archeology Office to properly assess the materials.

16. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the
rezoning application file for record.

17. The development shall be limited to a maximum of 16 units.

18. A minimum of 50% of building elevations shall include covered porches in
the front yard and rear yard at a minimum of 60 feet each and at a depth
of at least 6 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

19. The maximum building height for 80% of the lots shall be limited to one
story and 26 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. Two­ story lots shall be south of lots 5 and 14, as shown on
the site plan date stamped February 21, 2025.

20. A minimum of 8% of the gross project area shall be retained as common
area, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.




21. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials
Aand textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick,
stone, colored textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a
decorative and aesthetic treatment, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

22. All street-facing garage doors lengths shall be less than 50% of the total
width of the facade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

23. Front setbacks for covered building elements shall be staggered by a
minimum of 5 feet, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

24. The lot widths shall be a minimum of 55 feet.

25. The southern end of the street shall have landscaping and wrought iron
view fencing to enhance the view of South Mountain, until 20th Lane is
constructed to the south of the property, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

26. A retaining wall shall be provided along the northern boundary of Tract A
and Tract B, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February 21, 2025,
as approved or modified by the Planning and Development Department.

27. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped February 21, 2025, as modified by the above stipulations and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

28. Tract C, as depicted on the site plan date stamped February 21, 2025,
shall include seating features with a minimum of 50 percent shading
through the use of trees or a structure, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

29. All pedestrian pathways (including sidewalks) shall be shaded by a
structure, landscaping, or a combination of the two to provide a minimum
of 75% shade, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

30. Rural style fencing, such as a split rail fencing, shall be provided along the
east side of Tract A and the west side of Tract B, as depicted on the site
plan date stamped February 21, 2025, to provide a decorative and
aesthetic treatment consistent with the building elevations, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.




SECTION 2. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district granted pursuant to Ordinance G-7386, this portion of the rezoning is now

subject to the stipulations approved pursuant to Ordinance G-7386 and as modified in

Section 1 of this Ordinance. Any violation of the stipulation is a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. Building permits shall not be issued for the subject site

until all the stipulations have been met.

SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or

portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the

validity of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 17th day of

September 2025.



________________________________
MAYOR
________________________________
Date

ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By: _________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:




_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager


Exhibits:
A - Legal Description (1 Page)
B - Ordinance Location Map (1 Page)




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PHO-1-25--Z-58-24-8


The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Maricopa, State of
Arizona, and is described as follows:

THE NORTH 595.00 FEET OF THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF FARM UNIT
H, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS THE WEST HALF OF THE WEST HALF
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 1,
TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT RIVER BASE AND
MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY ARIZONA.







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 3, 2025) - Public Hearing - Abandonment
Appeal of Hearing Officer Decision - ABND 250004 - 817 W. Madison Street -
District 7

Abandonment: 250004 (Attachment A)
Project: 05-205
Abandonment Applicant: Greenman Law/Jordan Greenman
Date of Abandonment Hearing Officer’s Decision: May 15, 2025
Appellant: Greenman Law/Jordan Greenman

Summary
Rationale: Appellant is the original Applicant for abandonment, and is appealing the
Hearing Officer's DENIAL of the request to abandon the east 20 feet of the 45-foot
right-of-way lying westerly of lot 19, APN 112-05-016A. The Appellant's narrative, the
hearing summary, and the original staff report have been attached (Attachments B
and C) for consideration by City Council.

Location
Generally located at 817 W. Madison Street
Council District: 7

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
ABND 250004




±
1 inch = 60 feet
Disclaimer : The information provided on this map is based on record drawings submitted by others. 0 25 50 100 Feet Date: 6/17/2025 221
Users of this information are cautioned that independent verification of actual conditions may be necessary.
Printing Water Data is for Internal Staff Only
ATTACHMENT B




Planning and Development Department




DENIAL – ABND 250004




Your abandonment request was DENIED by Craig Messer, Abandonment Hearing Officer.

A summary of the hearing, and the Hearing Officer’s findings and rationale, are included in this
letter.

You have the right to appeal this decision to City Council if an appeal application is
received by the Planning and Development Department within 15 calendar days of this
decision (latest appeal date: May 30 2025). Please contact the Abandonment Coordinator,
Dru Maynus, at (602) 262-7403, or abandonments@phoenix.gov, for questions regarding
appeals.





Planning and Development Department


May 15, 2025
Preliminary Abandonment Staff Report: ABND 250004
Project# 05-205
Quarter Section: 10-26
District#: 7



Location: The east 20 feet of right-of-way lying
westerly of 817 West Madison Street

Applicant: Greenman Law / Jordan Greenman

Request: Request to the east 20-feet of the 45-feet
right-of-way lying westerly of lot 19, Block 1,
Neahr’s Addition APN 112-05-016A.

Purpose of request: Applicant states the right-of-way
abandonment will allow for the
redevelopment of the abutting parcel.

Hearing date: March 13, 2025
TAKEN OUT FROM UNDER
ADVISEMENT AND DENIED ON May 15,





City Staff Research
City Staff research shows that the 9th Avenue 90-feet right-of-way was dedicated on January 25,
1900 by the Evans Subdivision of Block 29 Nearh’s Addition Subdivision Plat under Book 2,
Page 77 of the Maricopa County Recorder. If abandoned, the 9th Avenue 20-feet-wide right-of-
way would be conveyed back to the abutting property owner.

City Staff Comments
This request was routed to various City departments for their recommendations. Listed below
are the responses from each department.

Street Transportation Department – Josh Rogers
The Street Transportation Department has reviewed the attached abandonment application and
has the following:

Comments:

The Capitol Mall is a distinct area within the City of Phoenix. Under the planning oversight of
the State of Arizona, the area serves multiple purposes including housing the State Capitol,
governmental offices, industrial and commercial businesses, and historic residences. As is
typical in urban settings, the open space within the Capitol Mall consists of both private and
public properties. Enhanced streetscapes along the public street network play a vital role in the
urban open space environment, improving its functionality and accessibility for the public.


Originally platted as one of Phoenix’s first subdivisions during Arizona’s territorial period, the
Capitol Mall features rights-of-way’s historically wider than typical city street cross-sections. Like
other urban districts near downtown, local roadways are designed to accommodate a diversity
of public and pedestrian uses, necessitating a broader streetscape than what is typical for local
roads.

Furthermore, modifications to the streetscape within the Capitol Mall District must be part of a
coordinated planning effort with the State of Arizona, City of Phoenix, and area stakeholders. As
such, the City of Phoenix Street Transportation Department does not support standalone
modifications.

Given the historic nature of the district’s street cross-sections, their intended function within an
urban area, and the absence of a unified streetscape modification plan, the Street
Transportation Department does not support the proposed abandonment of the 9th Avenue
right-of-way.

Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at
Joshua.rogers@phoenix.gov.

Street Transportation Utility Coordination Department– Andrea Diaz
The Street Transportation Department Utility Coordination section has no comments


PDD Traffic Department – Derek Fancon
Recommend denial of the 20-feet right-of-way. 9th avenue is offset to the ease, so abandoning
20-feet will bring the right-of-way to the back of curb, leaving no room for the sidewalk.
However, Traffic would recommend approval of the abandonment of 10-feet right-of-way so long
as the sidewalk is relocated.

PDD Planning Department – Dru Maynus
Capitol Mall Overlay District - The abandonment request is located within the Capitol Mall
Overlay District per Section 646 of the City of Phoenix Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of
Capitol Mall is prevent a concentration of certain uses which can restrict businesses and
residences from functioning normally and contributes to the deterioration of the business and
living environment the downgrading of property values, and the diminishment of health, safety
and general welfare conditions in the area. Further the intent of the district is to protect existing
residential and non residential uses from negative impacts caused by a concentration of
specified uses and to prohibit he addition of certain uses and restrict the addition of certain other
uses which have negative impacts on the area. Please be sure that the intended use of your
development is consistent with the permitted uses of Section 646.

Governmental Mall Notification Area - To add, the abandonment site is located within the
Governmental Mall Notification Area, thus, meaning is part of the Arizona Government Mall
Master Plan. The Master plan was adopted by the State Legislature; therefore, indicating that
the site is governed by the State of Arizona. Because of this all-development activity within the
area must first obtain approval from the Arizona Department of Administration (AZDOA). Please
contact Ruben Duran with AZDOA to start this process. Ruben can be contacted at 602-397-
1350 or ruben.duran@azdoa.gov.

Railroad - Please note that if you plan on obtaining any building permits a “Notice of Railroad


Proximity Disclosure” is required. This document will be provided during Site and Civil reviews
or when building plans are logged in.

Federal/State Superfund - This property is located in a Federal Superfund or State Superfund
site. The customer can obtain information by going to the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) website located at https://www.azdeq.gov/NPL_Sites [azdeq.gov] for Federal
Superfund sites or https://www.azdeq.gov/WQARF [azdeq.gov] for State Superfund sites.
ADEQ can also be reached by phone at 602-771-4410 for Superfund or State Superfund sites.
The City of Phoenix Office of Environmental Programs can be reached at 602-256-5669.

Future Light Rail - The abandonment area is located within a future light rail corridor. Please
contact the office of Customer Advocacy (OCA) at 602-534-7344 for more information.

Since the abandonment request has not received approval from AZDOA, the Site Planning
Division currently does not recommend approval of the abandonment request.

ADOA – General Services Division – Joel Carrasco
Prior to approval of ABND 250004 the applicant needs to contact Ruben Duran with AZDOA to
obtain approval of the abandonment request.

Office of Customer Advocacy – Renee Blakley
Although the property is near future expansion, it is more than a block away. The requested
area of ABND 250004 is not located on a street directly adjacent to a planned light rail extension
and will not have a negative impact to future light rail expansion.

Streetlights – Jason Fernandez
Recommend approval with the following comment:
1. Page 2 of ABND narrative paragraph 1, line 2 thru 4, sentence 2, references "The
proposed abandonment will enable the property owner to relocate existing sidewalks
and re purpose the land to better serve the community." Future sidewalk relocate and
re-purpose will require new streetlight / pedestrian lighting review and construction at
owners expense.

Solid Waste – Megan Sheets
Approved.

Water Services – Don Reynolds
WSD has NO stipulations for this Abandonment.

PDD Village Planner – Samuel Rogers
1. Staff has concerns regarding the request.
2. The Capital District Development Guidelines state: "For the safety and comfort of
pedestrians, sidewalks should be separated from traffic by an 8-foot width. This 8-foot
buffer may include landscaping, a bicycle lane, and/or on-street parking." The proposed
abandonment would eliminate this buffer, reducing walkability and compromising
pedestrian safety.
3. The Government Mall Master Plan identifies Madison Street as a proposed secondary
bike route. The proposed abandonment would negatively impact bicycle infrastructure
and pedestrian accessibility in the area.
4. The Government Mall Master Plan includes the following goals:
a. "Preserve, revitalize, and enhance the iconic and historical character of the area


through design guidance and enhanced public infrastructure; and"
b. "Foster an implementable approach to the development of iconic, vibrant, day-
and-night mixed-use activity centers serving residents and visitors to the area."

The proposed abandonment does not support these goals, as it would not enhance public
infrastructure nor preserve the historic character of the area. Furthermore, reducing pedestrian
and bicycle accessibility would create a less comfortable streetscape for residents and visitors

PDD Civil Department – Rachel LaMesa
Civil Division recommends approval without stipulations.

Public Transit Department – Skitch Kitchen
The Public Transit Department has no comment on this project.


Utility Comments
The request was also routed to outside utility companies for their input. Listed below are the
responses from each utility.
Cox – Zach Lawson
I have reviewed the abandonment request at ABND 250004 APN 112-05-016A 817 W
MADISON ST, in Phoenix, {Maricopa County}, AZ. Based upon the supplied drawings/exhibits
that you’ve submitted it has been determined that COX has no facilities within the easement and
therefore we approve your request to abandon.

Please note that although Cox Communications approves this abandonment, we do so with the
understanding that we will not assume any construction, relocation and/or repairs costs
associated or in result of this abandonment.

Southwest Gas – Susan R. Mulanax
After reviewing your request, it has been noted that we have a main gas line running in the area
proposed. Please contact Conflict Review at (480) 730-3843 to discuss and review your request
further.

Arizona Public Service – Darianna Arias
Not within APS’s service territory.

CenturyLink – Bill Paul
Quest Corporation d/b/a CENTURYLINK CQ (“CenturyLink”) has reviewed the request for the
subject abandonment request and has determined that in order to protect its facilities,
CenturyLink must deny the request at this time.

If you would like to discuss possible alternative resolutions to this abandonment request, please
contact Bill Paul 727-449-3544 or bill.paul@lumen.com..


Salt River Project – Michael Laguna
Salt River Project has no objection to the abandonment of the east 20 feet Right-of-Way as
shown in the abandonment package. This is in an Arizona Public Service serving area.




Hearing Officer Decision and Findings

I have concluded that the ROW requested for abandonment is still necessary for public
use and therefore have DENIED this request.

Additional details are provided below.
1. Requirements for Disposition of Public Rights-of-Way (ROW). In considering this request, this
Hearing Officer has had to examine whether the ROW requested for abandonment is, in fact, no
longer necessary for public use as roadways. The following two definitions in Section 31-63 of
the City Code are important to this analysis:

• Abandon, abandoning, and abandonment: Any one of the methods set forth in Section 31-
64 whereby the City Council may dispose of roadways or portions of roadways no longer
necessary for public use as roadways.
• Roadway: All or part of any platted or designated public street, highway, alley, lane, parkway,
avenue, road, sidewalk, public utility easement, or other public way, whether or not it has
been used as such. (italics added for emphasis)


Any interested party has the right to appeal this decision to City Council. An appeal
application must be received by the Planning and Development Department within 15
calendar days of this decision (latest appeal date: May 30, 2025).
Please contact the Abandonment Coordinator, Dru Maynus, at (602) 262-7403, or
abandonments@phoenix.gov, for questions regarding appeals.




May 15, 2025
Hearing Officer Signature: ____________________________________ Date: ___________




REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Dru Maynus, Abandonment Coordinator.

cc: Greenman Law, Jordan Greenman, Applicant
Craig Messer, Abandonment Hearing Officer


If the area to be abandoned is within or adjacent to a redevelopment area established pursuant to
A.R.S.§36-1471 ET.SEQ., Consideration may be given to the restrictions upon the property and the
covenants, conditions and obligations assumed by the redeveloper in the determination of fair market value.





ATTACHMENT C


Abandonment
Decision Appeal

In accordance with Section 31-70, Article V of the City Code, the decision of the Abandonment
Hearing Officer regarding the abandonment of public rights-of way may be appealed. Any
decision of the Abandonment Hearing Officer shall be considered final unless a person
aggrieved thereby, files a written Notice of Abandonment Appeal with the Planning &
Development Department within fifteen calendar days after the decision is made. The
completed abandonment appeal form and filing fee* must be submitted to the Planning &
Development Department, Check-In/Information Counter, located at 200 West Washington
Street, 2nd floor, Phoenix, Arizona 85003.

*All fees are pursuant to the current Fee Schedule contained in Appendix A.2. of the
Phoenix City Code.
Appellant’s Name:
Jordan Greenman - Greenman Law Firm

Address: City: State: AZ Zip:
1621 W Willetta St Phoenix 85007

Phone: 248-225-0428 Email:
Affiliation: Attorney - Applicant

Appeal to City Council
Be specific as to what you are appealing. Include the rationale for your appeal. Attachments
may be included.

Abandonment # ABND Date Heard:
250004 March 13, 2025


Located at approximately: Immediately west of 817 West Madison St

Abandonment Hearing Officer: Approved X Denied

Appealing Decision: Appealing denial of ABND 250004 - See attached narrative

Appealing Stipulation:

Appealing Stipulation:

Appealing Stipulation:

------------------------------------------------------------- Staff Use Only --------------------------------------------------------------
Received By: Receipt #: Date:
Reviewed By: Receipt #: Date:

An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorized substantive
policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicable review time frames, please
call 602-262-7811 or visit our website at Licensing Time Frames | City of Phoenix. This publication can be made available in alternate formats
(Braille, large print, or digital media) upon request. Contact Planning & Development at (602) 262-7811 voice or (602) 534-5500 TTY.
P:\Abandonment Decision Appeal TRT/DOC/00005
WEB\ EXTERNAL dsd_trt_pdf_00005 Rev. 11/12


Jordan Evan Greenman
1621 West Willetta Street
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Phone: 248.225.0428
jordan@greenmanlawfirm.com
May 30, 2025

Phoenix City Council
200 West Jefferson Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003

Formal Appeal of Denial of Abandonment Request – ABND 250004

Dear Phoenix City Council,

On behalf of Ian Likwarz, Greenman Law respectfully submits this appeal of the denial of ABND
250004, which concerns the proposed abandonment of the eastern 20 feet of South 9th Avenue right-
of-way adjacent to 817 West Madison Street, Phoenix, Arizona (Lot 19, Block 1, Neahr’s Addition;
APN 112-05-016A). The matter was originally heard on March 13, 2025, and taken under advisement,
but the decision was not issued until May 15, 2025—63 days later, well beyond the typical 30-day
timeframe provided for such determinations. This substantial delay created uncertainty and slowed
momentum on an adaptive reuse project that aligns directly with the City’s revitalization objectives
for the Capitol Mall area.
Functional Basis for the Abandonment Request
The project in question seeks to reactivate a pre-WWII industrial warehouse by converting it into a
banquet hall and community event venue, with outdoor dining and gathering space along the 9th
Avenue frontage. To support this, the applicant requested the abandonment of a 20-foot-wide strip
of underutilized right-of-way. This portion of 9th Avenue is significantly oversized, measuring 90 feet
in total width—far beyond the 50-foot standard for local streets established in the City’s 2018 Street
Classification Map. The eastern half-street alone spans 45 feet, when only 25 feet is required for public
functionality. Approving the abandonment would still preserve a 70-foot-wide right-of-way, which is
more than sufficient to accommodate vehicular travel, public utilities, and pedestrian infrastructure.

The need for abandonment is also driven by practical site constraints. The existing building is a 1940s
bow truss structure that currently lacks HVAC. Due to its age and construction type, the roof cannot
support the weight of rooftop HVAC units. As a result, the project requires a dedicated structure to
house the HVAC equipment on the west side of the building. The 14 feet of right-of-way proposed
for abandonment would be necessary to accommodate and support this mechanical structure, which
is essential to bringing the building up to modern functional standards.
ROW Dimensions and Sidewalk Relocation Feasibility
The purpose of the requested abandonment is not speculative. The project requires at least 15 feet of
the subject area for construction of the outdoor patio space that fronts 9th Avenue. If the full 20-foot
abandonment is approved, it would allow us to dedicate and build out five feet on the western portion



to reconstruct the sidewalk farther west, preserving pedestrian access while also improving public
safety. The existing curb lies approximately 20 feet from the edge of the building, making sidewalk
relocation feasible without affecting traffic flow or curb alignment. No vehicular lanes or curb lines
would be altered in any way as a result of the abandonment. Preliminary approval for the abandonment
of the eastern 28 feet of South 9th Avenue, adjacent to 817 West Madison Street, was previously
granted in 2018 under case number ABND 170026. Unfortunately, the project was delayed and the
approval lapsed.
Alignment with City Policy and Light Rail Objectives
This adaptive reuse effort directly supports the goals of the Capitol Mall Overlay District, which calls
for coordinated redevelopment that respects the area’s historic character while fostering mixed-use
investment and pedestrian activity. The surrounding neighborhood has long suffered from vacancy,
disinvestment, and persistent social challenges. This project would introduce regular foot traffic,
community events, new employment opportunities, and high-quality streetscape enhancements to a
corridor that has seen little improvement in decades. The site is also located within one block of the
future light rail expansion, making it an ideal location for transit-oriented development. The City has
repeatedly emphasized the importance of placing walkable, mixed-use projects near the light rail line,
and this proposal would contribute directly to that effort.
Agency and Utility Review Summary
Importantly, this request was not rejected due to a technical deficiency or a safety concern. In fact,
most City departments either supported the abandonment or had no objections. The Civil Division,
Water Services, Solid Waste, Streetlights, and Public Transit all approved the request outright. The
Traffic Department recommended partial approval—specifically 10 feet—conditioned on sidewalk
relocation, confirming the basic viability of shifting pedestrian access westward. The Office of
Customer Advocacy confirmed that the abandonment area is more than a block away from any
planned light rail expansion and would not interfere with any future transit development. CenturyLink
and Southwest Gas noted the presence of existing facilities but indicated a willingness to work through
utility coordination processes, as is standard for abandonment cases. Cox and SRP approved without
objection.
ADOA Approval and Planning Staff Concerns
Further, Greenman Law has already obtained formal written approval from the Arizona Department
of Administration (ADOA), which oversees the Governmental Mall area. In a letter dated March 27,
2025, ADOA confirmed that it reviewed and approved the proposed abandonment of the subject 20-
foot strip and deferred to the City of Phoenix for implementation. This directly contradicts the
Planning Department’s assertion that the abandonment should not proceed absent ADOA support,
and eliminates any ambiguity as to state-level approval of the proposal.





Despite this overwhelming technical support, the abandonment was denied based on generalized
planning theories and speculative concerns about future streetscape design, rather than any practical
or site-specific rationale. The City's own transportation and planning maps confirm that the right-of-
way is substantially oversized. There is no identifiable or realistic public use for the subject strip, and
its retention serves only to obstruct meaningful and needed redevelopment. Phoenix City Code
Section 31-64 authorizes abandonment of public rights-of-way when they are no longer necessary for
public use, and that standard is unquestionably met here.
Conclusion and Request for Reversal
This neighborhood needs reinvestment. The City should be encouraging catalytic projects like this—
especially those that preserve historic buildings and convert them into vibrant community-serving
spaces. This proposal is consistent with Phoenix’s Adaptive Reuse Program, with the City’s General
Plan, with Capitol Mall overlay goals, and with the City's long-term light rail vision. The applicant has
done everything possible to coordinate with City and State staff and has responded constructively to
agency feedback at every stage.

We respectfully ask that the City Council reverse the Hearing Officer’s decision and approve the
abandonment as requested. This project deserves the opportunity to move forward and help breathe
life back into a part of the city that has waited far too long for meaningful investment. Please contact
me at any time with questions or for further information.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,




Jordan Evan Greenman
Greenman Law








Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 3, 2025) - Public Hearing and Resolution
Adoption - General Plan Amendment GPA-SM-1-25-8 - Approximately 1,130 Feet
East of the Northeast Corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road (Resolution
22329) - District 8

Request to hold a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment for the following item
to consider adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation and the related
resolution if approved. Request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map designation
on 14.37 acres from Residential one to two dwelling units per acre, Residential two to
three-and-a-half dwelling units per acre, and Residential three-and-a-half to five
dwelling units per acre to Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre. This item is a
companion case to Z-31-25-8 and must be heard first, followed by Z-31-25-8.

Summary
Application: GPA-SM-1-25-8
Current Designation: Residential one to two dwelling units per acre (5.29 acres),
Residential two to three-and-a-half dwelling units per acre (8.90 acres), and
Residential three-and-a-half to five dwelling units per acre (0.18 acres)
Proposed Plan Designation: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 14.37
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to allow for multifamily residential.

Owner: Mundall Family Revocable Trust c/o Danny Mundall and Georgia Mundall
Applicant/Representaive: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

Staff Recommendation: Approval.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on June
10, 2025, and recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-4.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on August 7, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the South Mountain Village Planning Committee
recommendation, by a vote of 8-0.
Appeal: The Planning Commission recommendation was appealed by a community
member on August 13, 2025.





Location
Approximately 1,130 feet east of the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline
Road
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 2102 and 2150 W. Baseline Road

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED RESOLUTION



RESOLUTION


A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2025
GENERAL PLAN FOR PHOENIX, APPLICATION GPA-SM-1-25-8,
CHANGING THE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION FOR THE
PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN.

____________


BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The 2025 Phoenix General Plan, which was adopted by

Resolution 22191, is hereby amended by adopting GPA-SM-1-25-8. The 14.37 acres

located approximately 1,130 feet east of the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and

Baseline Road is designated as Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre.

SECTON 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the 2025 Phoenix General Plan to reflect this land use classification change as

shown below:




PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of September 2025.



MAYOR




ATTEST:


____________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk




APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney

-2- Resolution

By:___________________________
___________________________



REVIEWED BY:


______________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager




-3- Resolution


ATTACHMENT B




GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
STAFF ANALYSIS
June 2, 2025

Application: GPA-SM-1-25-8

Owner: Mundall Fam. Revocable Trust c/o Danny Mundall
and Georgia Mundall

Applicant/Representative: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

Location: Approximately 1,130 feet east of the northeast
corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road

Acreage: 14.37 acres

Current Plan Designation: Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre (5.29
acres), Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre
(8.90 acres), and Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
per acre (0.18 acres)

Requested Plan Designation: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre (14.37
acres)

Reason for Requested Change: Minor General Plan Amendment to allow for
multifamily residential.

South Mountain Village Planning
Committee Date Meeting Date: June 10, 2025

Staff Recommendation: Approval

FINDINGS:

1) The proposed Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre land use designation is
a compatible transition between the single-family residential development to the
west and the commercial development to the east.

2) The proposed multifamily residential land use designation is appropriate for the
site as it is located on an arterial street, Baseline Road.




Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-1-25-8
Page 2


3) The companion Rezoning Case Z-31-25-8, as stipulated, includes standards that
ensure consistency in design and character with the adjacent area.

BACKGROUND

The subject site is 14.37 acres located approximately 1,130 feet east of the northeast
corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road and is currently agricultural land. The
companion rezoning case Z-31-25-8 is requesting to rezone the subject site from S-1
(Ranch or Farm Residence) to R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) to allow multifamily
residential.

The General Plan Land Use Map designation of the subject site is Residential 1 to 2
dwelling units per acre, Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre, and Residential 3.5
to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed General Plan Amendment is to designate the
site as Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre.

SURROUNDING LAND USES

NORTH
North of the subject site are single-family residential subdivisions zoned R1-10 (Single-
Family Residence District) and R1-8 (Single-Family Residence District). This area is
designated as Commercial and Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units acre on the General
Plan Land Use map.

SOUTH
South of the subject site, across Baseline Road, is a single-family subdivision zoned S-1
(Approved R1-10) (Ranch or Farm Residence, Approved Single-Family Residence
District) and single-family homes zoned S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence). This area is
designated as Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units acre on the General Plan Land Use map.

EAST
East of the subject site are single-family homes zoned S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence)
and a commercial development zoned C-2 (Intermediate Commercial). This area is
designated as Commercial and Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre on the General
Plan Land Use map.

WEST
West of the subject site is a single-family subdivision zoned R1-8 (Single-Family
Residence District). This area is designated as Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units acre
on the General Plan Land Use map.




Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-1-25-8
Page 3




Existing and Proposed General Plan Land Use Map, Source: City of Phoenix




Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-1-25-8
Page 4


RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN CORE VALUES AND PRINCIPLES

CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS
• CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; HEALTHY NEIGHBORHOODS; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Establish
design standards and guidelines for parking lots and structures, setback
and build-to lines, blank wall space, shade, and other elements affecting
pedestrians, to encourage pedestrian activity and identify options for
providing pedestrian-oriented design in different types of development.

As stipulated in the companion Rezoning Case Z-31-25-8, the proposal includes
design and development standards to encourage walking, bicycling, and transit
use. These standards include the provision of bicycle parking, shade throughout
the development, and a multi-use trail along Baseline Road.

CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE
• BICYCLES; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Development should include convenient
bicycle parking.

As stipulated in Rezoning Case Z-31-25-8, the proposal will encourage bicycling
and transit use and leverage its proximity to the adjacent commercial
development by including enhanced bicycle parking and infrastructure.

BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY
• DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Integrate trees and shade into the design of new
development and redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The proposal, as stipulated in Rezoning Case Z-31-25-8, includes enhanced
landscape setbacks, shaded parking, shaded pedestrian pathways, and a wide
landscape detachment for the public sidewalk that will be planted with shade
trees that will shade the public and private sidewalks to 75 percent. These
improvements will create a comfortable pedestrian environment along Baseline
Road and make the walk to nearby destinations more safe and comfortable.

COMMUNITY INPUT SUMMARY

As of the writing of this report three letters of opposition have been received. Concerns
raised were regarding traffic impacts, prioritization of corporate profit, impacts on
electric grid and water supply, lack of sustainability measures, rental properties vs.
homeownership, the property management company, impacts on property values,
safety, infrastructure, and the long-term stability of the area.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends approval of GPA-SM-1-25-8. The proposed General Plan Land Use



Staff Analysis
GPA-SM-1-25-8
Page 5


map designation of Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre is consistent in
character with existing land uses in the surrounding area. The land use map
designation, as requested, will provide an appropriate transition between the adjacent
commercial and single-family residential uses.

As stipulated, the concurrent case Z-31-25-8 will enhance the compatibility with the land
use pattern in the surrounding area. Approval of the request, with concurrent case Z-31-
25-8, will support the development of this underutilized property and provide additional
housing options that are compatible with the land use designations and zoning districts
in the general area.

Writer
Samuel Rogers
June 2, 2025

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Sketch Maps (2 pages)
Correspondence (13 pages)




5/8/25, 10:24 AM Mail - Samuel S Rogers - Outlook




Outlook


May 6th 2025 mtg - Case Nos GPA-SM-8-25 and Z-31-25

From joanna garcia
Date Mon 5/5/2025 2:00 PM
To Samuel S Rogers




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious


On the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue/Baseline is the site they are proposing to build these
homes. And also the property 11,130 feet from corner of 23rd avenue is also proposed to build
multifamily homes? That is also alot housing on those properties. We need family homes built
not rental homes. What is to be considered for them to be approved? How do we stop this
from happening/ or do we? There is soooo much traffic on Baseline Road now - its like a mini
freeway and you propose to add even more traffic. Is there a proposal to add a street light on
23rd Avenue for that growth. This is insane that that much housing can be built when the road
system is the same.
I live just down the street from 23rd Avenue and across the street the other proposal.
Who benefits from this - because we do not!!!!!

Josepha M Garcia




https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAMkADNkMzc1MjA2LTRjOTktNGNjNi04OWVkLTM5NzllZmM4N2U4MwBGAAAAAADQz%2F7E8ZzVSY3U0Dm…
1/1
5/8/25, 10:13 AM Mail - Samuel S Rogers - Outlook




Outlook


Case Nos GPA-SM-8-25 and Z-31-25

From Joseph Melton
Date Thu 5/8/2025 9:53 AM
To Samuel S Rogers




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious


Dear Samuel Rogers,


I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed zoning changes; case numbers GPA-SM-
8-25 and Z-31-25. As a property owner adjacent to the proposed development, I have
significant concerns regarding the impact on property values, personal enjoyment, and safety.
After attending the neighborhood meeting my concerns have been amplified. It appears Taylor
Morrison has more interest in their own profits than the long-term benefits to our community.
The proposed change from the current residential zoning to 10-15 dwelling units per acre
appears to prioritize corporate profit over community welfare. The addition of 188 dwelling units
will likely exacerbate traffic congestion, strain our already limited electric grid and water supply,
and negatively affect surrounding property values.
Taylor Morrison’s plan to develop the Yardly rental units rather than homes for sale raises
further concerns with their commitment to our community’s well-being. I understand the logic
behind rental units vs individual homes backing up to retail/commercial space, however the
number of dwellings is concerning. Homeowners typically have a greater vested interest in their
communities compared to renters, and rental communities often experience higher crime rates.
In South Phoenix, this could lead to increased crime and reduced property values, issues we
are already facing.
The development will also add over 200 vehicles to the already congested Baseline Road and
potentially obstruct views of South Mountain. As an HOA board member in Addison Park, I have
witnessed the negative impact of rental properties on our community, including increased
damage and crime. The property manager they have chosen, GreyStar has horrible reviews
and reputation per online research and the Better Business Bureau.
Per the meeting, Taylor Morrison is anticipating to charge between $1800-$2300 per month for
750 sq foot 1-2 bedroom homes. My neighbors property is a 3 bedroom 2 bath 1392 sq ft single
family residence and they’re struggling to find tenants for $2100 per month. The previous
tenants were destructive and disrespectful to the community and have lead the owner to now
trying to sell the property.


https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAMkADNkMzc1MjA2LTRjOTktNGNjNi04OWVkLTM5NzllZmM4N2U4MwBGAAAAAADQz%2F7E8ZzVSY3…
1/2
5/8/25, 10:13 AM Mail - Samuel S Rogers - Outlook

It does not sound like Taylor Morrison is realistic to the demographic of who their tenants will be
in this South Mountain area and it concerns me that the long term impact will be reduced rental
prices and/or Taylor Morrison selling out to a large conglomerate from out of state who will let
the property go to the way-side.
I urge you to decline this zoning change request. If Taylor Morrison is willing to put their money
where their mouth is and can guarantee that property values will not decrease while offering
compensation for any devaluation, I would reconsider my stance.
Please feel free to reach out to me with any questions. Thank you greatly for considering my
concerns.
Sincerely,
Joe Melton
Meltjoe@AOL.com
(414) 737-3921
7265 S. 22nd Ave, PHX AZ




https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAMkADNkMzc1MjA2LTRjOTktNGNjNi04OWVkLTM5NzllZmM4N2U4MwBGAAAAAADQz%2F7E8ZzVSY3…
2/2
5/21/25, 10:56 AM Mail - Samuel S Rogers - Outlook




Outlook


Opposition to Proposed Zoning Changes – Case Numbers GPA-SM-8-25 and Z-31-25

From Melissa Campos
Date Tue 5/13/2025 7:10 PM
To Samuel S Rogers
Cc Melissa Campos


2 attachments (7 MB)
Opposition to Proposed Zoning Changes – Case Numbers GPA-SM-8-25 and Z-31-25.docx; Article PDF.pdf;




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious



Hello Samuel,
I hope this email finds you well.

Attached are my concerns/opposition regarding this rezoning case and supporting
research - please feel free to reach out to me with any questions or concerns.

Thank you,
--
Melissa Campos




https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAMkADNkMzc1MjA2LTRjOTktNGNjNi04OWVkLTM5NzllZmM4N2U4MwBGAAAAAADQz%2F7E8ZzVSY3…
1/1
Dear Samuel Rogers -

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed zoning changes identified as GPA-
SM-8-25 and Z-31-25. As a property owner in Addison Park, a neighboring community, I have
significant concerns about the potential negative impact on property values, safety,
infrastructure, and the long-term stability of the area—particularly if the proposed Yardly by
Taylor Morrison development fails to meet its projected profitability.

After attending the recent neighborhood meeting, I left with the distinct impression that Taylor
Morrison is prioritizing short-term profit over the long-term health and cohesion of the
surrounding community. Many of the concerns voiced by residents, including myself, were not
meaningfully addressed during the meeting. I raised the following key issues, which remain
unresolved:

1. Traffic and Infrastructure Concerns

• There are no concrete plans to mitigate increased traffic, such as installing a traffic signal
between 19th and 27th Avenue on Baseline.

• The proposed single entry and exit point for the community will create bottlenecks,
especially with turning lanes, similar to the current congestion we experience at Addison
Park’s entrance at 23rd Avenue.

2. Lack of Sustainability Measures

• The proposed homes lack energy-efficient features such as solar panels or commitments
to energy-saving materials.

• With the proposed density, this development will place additional strain on local utilities
and contribute to pollution and resource depletion in an already stressed area.

3. Target Renter Profile and Market Mismatch

• The projected rent range ($1,800–$2,300/month for 750 sq ft units) is aimed at young
professionals with white-collar jobs. As someone who fits that demographic, I can attest
that the location lacks proximity to major employment hubs, entertainment, and
essential amenities.

• This misalignment suggests the development may struggle to attract and retain its
intended audience. When profitability declines, what happens next? Will Taylor
Morrison sell off the property to the highest bidder—potentially resulting in
unregulated, lower-quality ownership or management?

4. Transparency and Accountability




• Yardly, a two-year-old offshoot of Taylor Morrison, has no established track record and is
outsourcing property management to Greystar—a third-party entity that is not BBB
accredited.

• A recent article in Builder magazine highlights the industry’s financial challenges,
referencing “temporarily dampened rent growth” and increasing operating expenses.
These trends raise red flags about the long-term viability of this project.

5. Density and Misuse of Zoning Flexibility

• Previous re-zoning efforts proposed approximately 50 fewer units than this plan. The
current unit-per-acre density appears excessive and profit-driven, not community-
centered.

6. Comparative Site Selection

• When I asked about other Yardly projects in the Phoenix market, representatives were
unprepared to respond. Upon reviewing the data myself during the meeting, I noted
that other Yardly communities:

1. Were not situated between existing, established residential communities; and

2. Were located in areas without the significant traffic congestion we currently
experience.

3. Multi-point entrance and exit for each community vs the proposed only have one
entry/exit – further raising safety concerns
(Screenshots and comparisons of lot access and layout are attached for
reference.)

Requested Follow-Up from Taylor Morrison

In preparation for the next community meeting, I respectfully request Taylor Morrison provide
written responses and supporting documentation for the following:

1. 2024 and year-to-date 2025 occupancy rates for all Phoenix Yardly properties

2. Default rates and percentage of missed rent payments

3. Average duration of vacant units

4. Written guarantees or commitments to neighboring communities regarding ownership
stability, specifically in the event of a sale within the next 20 years




I urge you to decline the zoning change request based on the unresolved issues, lack of
transparency, and the disproportionate impact this project could have on our community.

Please feel free to contact me directly should you have any questions or require further
information. Thank you for your time and for considering the concerns of the residents most
affected by this proposal.

Sincerely,
Melissa Campos
602 377 5603 / mccampos19@gmail.com




ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-1-25-8

Date of VPC Meeting June 10, 2025
Request From Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre, Residential 2
to 3.5 dwelling units per acre, and Residential 3.5 to 5
dwelling units per acre
Request To Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre
Proposal Multifamily residential
Location Approximately 1,130 feet east of the northeast corner
of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road
VPC Recommendation Approval, per the staff recommendation
VPC Vote 7-4

VPC DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDED STIPULATIONS:

Item Nos. 6 (GPA-SM-1-25-8) and 7 (Z-31-25-8) are companion cases and were heard
concurrently.

Five members of the public registered to speak on this item, one in support, and four in
opposition.

STAFF PRESENTATION

Samuel Rogers, staff, displayed the location of the subject site and noted the acreage
and proposal. Mr. Rogers stated that the applicant was proposing a multifamily
development, provided an overview of the proposed General Plan Land Use
amendment, summarized the surrounding land uses, and explained the site would act as
a transition between the adjacent commercial and single-family developments. Mr.
Rogers displayed the site plan and elevations and concluded the staff presentation by
summarizing the staff findings and proposed stipulations.

Committee Member George Brooks asked where the subject site is located. Mr.
Rogers displayed the subject site’s location.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION

Brian Greathouse, representing the applicant, introduced the development team,
explained that the development would be a transition between commercial and single-
family residential, explained the site would be gated, stated that the development would
be primarily single-story units, explained access would be from Baseline Road, and




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-1-25-8
June 10, 2025

described the amenities, open space, and units. Mr. Greathouse described the request,
discussed land use transitions, traffic generation, the traffic study, and the demand for
the housing type.

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE

Chair Arthur Greathouse III asked the applicant team to speak to the public outreach
conducted for the project. Mr. Greathouse described the outreach process and efforts
made to inform nearby residents.

Committee Member Brooks inquired about the square footage of the proposed homes.
Mr. Greathouse stated that the homes would range in size from approximately 700 to
1,400 square feet.

Committee Member Kassandra Alvarez asked if the amenities would facilitate a sense
of community and expressed concern about the lack of sustainability measures and
potential traffic impacts. Mr. Greathouse explained that many of the traffic concerns are
related to 23rd Avenue and existing half-street conditions and explained that a different
rezoning case in the area includes stipulations to expand 23rd Avenue and incorporate
traffic mitigation. Mr. Greathouse explained that current conditions do not warrant a traffic
signal, stated that Baseline Road’s capacity had been studied, and explained that the
traffic study had been approved by the City. Mr. Greathouse stated that the project team
is evaluating features such as solar panels and stated that the applicant is providing
energy-efficient pavement seal and EV charging. Mr. Greathouse explained the rezoning
request includes stipulations related to the plant palette, shade, bike parking, and a bike
fix-it station. Chris Williams, with the applicant team, stated that a right-turn deceleration
lane was the only mitigation measure identified in the traffic study, stated that a warrant
analysis showed a signal is not currently justified, and explained a signal may be
warranted if additional development occurs on 23rd Avenue.

Chair Greathouse stated that a large rezoning case at 19th Avenue and Baseline Road
will increase density in the area and may eventually warrant a traffic signal. Committee
Member Mark Beehler echoed Chair Greathouse’s comments and asked whether the
applicant team had reviewed the two recent rezonings in the area. Mr. Williams stated
that the team always considers growth factors when analyzing traffic. Committee
Member Beehler commented that the Committee is receiving many development
proposals in the area. Mr. Williams responded that the goal is to space signals
approximately every half mile and explained that it is a balancing act to avoid excessive
signals that slow down traffic while ensuring placement at key intersections.

Committee Member Ralph Thompson II asked for confirmation that the proposed rents
would be in the range of $1,600 to $2,100. Mr. Greathouse confirmed that the projected
rents fall within that range.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-1-25-8
June 10, 2025

Committee Member Fred Daniels asked whether the City evaluates nearby
developments collectively when reviewing traffic impacts. Mr. Rogers stated that the City
requires applicants to submit traffic studies and that those studies must be approved by
the City. Mr. Rogers explained that the City is aware of other rezonings in the area and
considers them during the review process. Chair Greathouse asked about the review
process by the Street Transportation Department. Mr. Rogers stated that he would
follow up with more information. Mr. Williams stated that there are sometimes
unknowns in the process and not all future developments are visible during traffic
evaluations.

Committee Member Alvarez asked what solutions are available to address traffic issues
on Baseline Road. Mr. Greathouse stated that developers will add improvements over
time as the area continues to develop.

Committee Member Brooks asked whether fire and water studies had been conducted
and requested elaboration on the sustainability measures. Cholla Susini, with the
applicant team, described planned features including dual-pane windows and high-
efficiency materials, stated that the energy efficiency rating of the homes would exceed
that of typical new construction, and offered to provide additional information.

Committee Member Beehler asked whether dedicated left-turn and right-turn lanes
could be added. Mr. Greathouse stated that approximately 60 trips were anticipated
during peak hours, averaging about one car per minute. Mr. Williams stated that the
lane widths should accommodate two cars and offered to follow up with additional detail.

Committee Member Lee Coleman asked whether the community would be gated. Mark
Reddie, with the applicant team, stated that the entry gate is set back 200 feet to allow
for vehicle queuing.

Committee Member Coleman asked whether there was a landscape plan. Mr.
Greathouse displayed and described the landscape plan for the project.

Committee Member Brooks asked where the fire exit would be located. Mr.
Greathouse stated that the development is not required to have secondary access. Mr.
Reddie explained that secondary fire access is not required because all units will be
equipped with fire sprinklers.

Committee Member Brooks asked whether applicants are advised to review the South
Mountain Village Food Action Plan. Mr. Rogers stated that during the pre-application
process he informs all applicants of the 2025 Food Action Plan and recommends that
they review it. Mr. Greathouse stated that the project team had not yet reviewed the
Food Action Plan.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-1-25-8
June 10, 2025

Committee Member Alvarez asked how the applicant could guarantee the proposed
unit prices. Mr. Greathouse stated that the units would be market-rate, explained that
pricing would be determined by market conditions, and stated that the development is
not intended to be either “attainable” or “luxury” housing.

Committee Member Alvarez asked whether there had been difficulty in attracting
tenants or if there was interest in the product. Ms. Susini stated that there has been high
demand and that people are excited about the project.

Chair Greathouse asked for details regarding parking, including whether garages would
be provided and whether the overall parking count meets City requirements. Mr. Reddie
stated that some of the townhomes would include garages, stated that the project
exceeds the minimum parking requirements, and explained that the development model
has been successful in 50 similar projects over the past 12 years without parking issues.
Mr. Reddie stated that each unit would have one designated space, with additional
shared and visitor parking available.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Thomas Kelly stated that he is with Valley Leadership, stated that he is in favor of the
request, and explained that Valley Leadership supports promoting quality projects within
the community. Mr. Kelly acknowledged that all development places stress on a
community but stated that the project represents a good approach. Mr. Kelly stated that
the proposed buffers between the single-family neighborhood and commercial areas are
appropriate.

Tawee Phattarak expressed concern about cumulative traffic impacts, stated that
additional subdivisions in the area will also contribute to congestion, and asked about
the traffic generation. Mr. Williams stated that the traffic study predicted 31 left turns
and 31 right turns out of the development during the morning peak hour, with
approximately 600 total trips anticipated over the course of the day. Mr. Williams stated
that post-COVID traffic patterns have shifted and that changes in travel behavior were
considered in the study. Ms. Phattarak stated that there are already traffic issues in the
area and that this development would worsen them.

Joe Melton expressed concern with the proposed density and the target market for the
development, stated that he would not have chosen to live in the area if he had not had
the opportunity to purchase a home, and stated that while he understands the need for
a land use transition this project should offer something different. Mr. Melton expressed
doubt that a $5,000 incentive would make a significant difference for a home buyer and
stated that a mix of condominiums and for-sale homes would be more appropriate.

Melissa Campos echoed the comments made by Mr. Melton, stated that she had
reviewed other Yardly communities and found that they generally have two to three




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-1-25-8
June 10, 2025

points of access and greater spacing between access points, expressed concern about
traffic, and stated that a previous rezoning proposal for the site included 50 to 60 fewer
units. Ms. Campos stated that her written comments focused more on concerns about
water and electricity availability in the area, rather than the energy efficiency of the
proposed homes.

Josepha Garcia stated concerns about traffic impacts and that the development would
create additional congestion.

APPLICANT RESPONSE

Brian Greathouse stated that the property is going to be developed and that all
development generates traffic. Mr. Greathouse stated that the proposed residential
project would generate less traffic than a commercial use, stated that the development
team has worked with the City to confirm water and sewer availability, and explained
that the proposal represents a reasonable compromise for the area.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE

Committee Member Brooks stated that having only one point of ingress and egress is a
concern, expressed concern that the applicant team did not review the 2025 Food Action
Plan, and asked for a list of the proposed sustainability features.

Committee Member Beehler asked how the density of the project compares to other
Yardly developments. Mr. Reddie stated that density depends on the unit mix, explained
that the inclusion of four-plex units allows for higher density without creating
overcrowding, stated that the average for Yardly developments is 11.5 to 12 units per
acre, and explained that the proposal includes 13 units per acre.

Committee Member Beehler asked about the size of typical Yardly developments. Mr.
Reddie stated that the minimum size is typically 100 to 120 units.

Chair Greathouse stated that he is familiar with Taylor Morrison products and asked for
the Committee’s thoughts on 700-square-foot attached units. Committee Member
Beehler stated that there is a good example of a similar development in the area and
that he has not seen any issues with the product. Chair Greathouse stated that he has
seen similar projects from other developers that did not maintain quality but expressed
confidence in Taylor Morrison as a reputable builder.

Committee Member Brooks asked whether the proposed price range would be
considered common or affordable. Chair Greathouse stated that the units are market
rate. Mr. Greathouse stated that the homes are intended to be more attainably priced
than single-family homes for purchase.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-1-25-8
June 10, 2025

Vice Chair Dr. Emma Viera stated that an individual would need to earn between
$60,000 and $90,000 annually to afford the proposed rent levels. Committee Member
Brooks asked what the median income in South Phoenix is. Vice Chair Viera stated that
the median household income in South Phoenix is approximately $45,000. Committee
Member Brooks stated that the project appears to be targeted toward individuals
outside the South Phoenix community.

Chair Greathouse asked about the target demographic. Mr. Reddie stated that this is a
popular product across the Valley and the state and explained that typical residents
include young professionals, divorced women, and older empty nesters who do not want
to deal with home maintenance but still value privacy. Mr. Reddie stated that the homes
are designed for smaller families, explained the homes are positioned as an alternative
to renting apartments or purchasing a home, and stated that the development offers
strong amenities.

Chair Greathouse expressed concern that the project may attract residents from outside
the community and asked whether current South Mountain renters would be able to
afford living in the development. Mr. Greathouse stated that the development would
likely include both groups and could serve as a transitional step before homeownership.

Committee Member Beehler stated that he supports the project and that the area
around 19th Avenue is being considered for future development as a center. Committee
Member Beehler stated that apartments are already being built in the vicinity and that
this proposal fills a missing housing option.

Committee Member Marcia Busching expressed concern that the staff report did not
address the Rio Moñtana Area Plan, explained that she has difficulty supporting a jump
to a higher-density land use designation, and stated that the project does not represent a
land use transition.

Chair Greathouse asked the applicant team to speak to open space and the single
access point. Mr. Reddie stated that the entry drive is designed with two travel lanes and
a center median, explained that there are two internal loops within the community that
allow for circulation in the event of an obstruction, and stated that these loops meet Fire
Department access standards. Mr. Reddie stated that the development includes 44
percent open space. Mr. Greathouse added that each unit includes a private backyard.

Committee Member Brooks asked about the project’s water detention and retention
systems. Mr. Reddie stated that the project will utilize underground retention, explained
that the site plan will need to demonstrate adequate retention, and stated that
underground retention tanks will be located beneath the drive aisle.

Motion:




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
GPA-SM-1-25-8
June 10, 2025

Committee Member Kay Shepard made a motion to recommend approval of GPA-
SM-1-25-8. Committee Member Mark Beehler seconded the motion.

Vote:
7-4, motion to recommend approval of GPA-SM-1-25-8 passed with Committee
Members Alvarez, Beehler, F. Daniels, Falcon, Shepard, Viera, and Greathouse in favor
and Committee Member Brooks, Busching, Coleman, and Thompson, opposed.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
AUGUST 7, 2025

ITEM NO: 2
DISTRICT NO.: 8
SUBJECT:

Application #: GPA-SM-1-25-8 (Companion Case Z-31-25-8)
Location: Approximately 1,130 feet east of the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and
Baseline Road
From: Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre, Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling
units per acre, and Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units per acre
To: Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre
Acreage: 14.37
Proposal: Minor General Plan Amendment to allow multifamily residential
Applicant: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Owner: Mundall Family Revocable Trust c/o Danny Mundall & Georgia Mundall
Representative: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
South Mountain 6/10/2025 Approval, per the staff recommendation. Vote: 7-4.

Planning Commission Recommendation:
Approval, per the South Mountain Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A.

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve GPA-SM-1-25-8, per the
South Mountain Village Planning Committee recommendation.

Maker: Matthews
Second: Hu
Vote: 8-0
Absent: Jaramillo
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The proposed Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre land use designation is a
compatible transition between the single-family residential development to the west and
the commercial development to the east.

2. The proposed multifamily residential land use designation is appropriate for the site as
it is located on an arterial street, Baseline Road.

3. The companion Rezoning Case Z-31-25-8, as stipulated, includes standards that
ensure consistency in design and character with the adjacent area.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Saneeya Mir at 602-686-6461, saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.
ATTACHMENT E

CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

*REVISED – 8/13/2025

FORM TO REQUEST PC to CC
I HEREBY REQUEST THAT THE CC HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON:

APPLICATION NO/ * GPA-SM-1-25-8 (SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL IN FILE)
LOCATION and Z-31-25-8 opposition X applicant

Approximately
1,130 feet east of
the northeast
corner of 23rd
Avenue and
Baseline Road
APPEALED FROM: PC 8/7/2025 7724 South 22nd Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85041

PC DATE STREET/ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
TO PC/CC CC 9/3/2025 Brittany Conklin
HEARING 602-463-4799
Brittany.e.conklin@gmail.com

CC DATE NAME / PHONE / EMAIL
REASON FOR REQUEST:

Community and nearby residents not properly informed of project and need
opportunity to review and comment. South Mountain Planning reportedly rejected and
needs review. Full community feedback is vital.


RECEIVED BY: 8/13/2025 RECEIVED ON: Dom Amodio

Joshua Bednarek Dalia Adams
Tricia Gomes Camryn Thompson/Teresa Garcia
Racelle Escolar Micah Alexander
Sarah Stockham GIS
Adam Stranieri Byron Easton (for PHO appeals only)
Heather Klotz Village Planner - Robert Kuhfuss
Stephanie Vasquez Applicant




REVISED 10/16/2024 vcm
*REVISED 8/13/2025
CITY OF PHOENIX

AUG 132025
PlANNINC. AND D[V[lOPM[NT DlPARIM[NI
Planning & Development
The PLANNING COMMISSION agenda for August 7, 2025 is attached. Department

The CITY COUNCIL may approve the recommendation of the Planning Commission wit hout further
hearing unless:

1. A REQUEST FOR A HEARING by the CITY COUNCIL is filed within seven (7) days.

There is a $630.00 appeal fee for hearings requested by the applicant, due by 5:00 p.m. August 14,
2025.

Any member of the public may, within seven (7) days after the Planning Commission's action, request a
hearing by the City Council on any application. If you wish to request a hearing, fill out and sign the form
below and return it to the Planning and Development Department by 5:00 p.m., August 14, 2025.

2. A WRITTEN PROTEST is filed, no later than seven (7) days after the Planning Commission's action, which
requires a three-f ourths vote. A written protest will require a three-fourths vote of the City Council to
approve a zoning change when the owners of at least 20 percent of the property by area and number of
lots, tracts, and condominium units within the zoning petition area have signed the petition. The zoning
petition area includes both the area of the proposed amendment, and the area within 150 feet of the
proposed amendment, including all rights-of-way. For condominium, townhouse and other types of
ownership with common lands, authorized property owner signatures are required. Please see Planning
and Development Department Staff for additional information prior to gathering signatures.

To require a three-fourths vote of the City Council for approval, a written protest for applications on this
agenda must be filed with the Planning and Development Department by 5:00 p.m. August 14, 2025.

The Planning and Development Department will verify ownership by protestors to determine whether or not
a three-fourths vote will be required.

3. A CONTINUANCE is granted at the PLANNING COMMISSION. In the event of a continuance, there is an
$830.00 fee due from the applicant within fourteen (14) days, by 5:00 p.m. August 21, 2025.

FORM TO REQUEST CITY COUNCIL HEARING
I HEARBY REQUEST THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING:
*6.-P�,-�ff\ -\ -�5-i
APikiEATIWN
I t�Oft E. o£-()£ CPV\.QJ/ �
{OCATION OF APPLICATION SITE

� �Bis,e,l\� \
& Z-31-25-8
4N�PEi�;Ror7'0oZ) KJoPPOSITION P�� AN'-D).?lO
0 APPLICANT ER TAKING THE APPEAL)

LOW, I ACKNOWLEDGE
Y'v\L\\V\..,




ATTACHMENT F

From: Tom Kelly
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Support for Z-31-25-8. 23rd Ave and Baseline Road
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 12:25:10 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious   ‌


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I’m writing in strong support of Zoning Case Z-31-25-8, a project that brings much-needed
housing diversity to the South Mountain Village. Rezoning from S-1 to R-3A will allow for a
thoughtfully designed, medium-density residential development that aligns with the city’s long-
term goals and responds to our region’s housing shortage.

I disagree with the South Mountain Village Planning Committee’s decision to deny this project due
to the overall density. This project is unique and provides a new type of housing for the area.
Providing more options for families and individuals who rent near jobs, schools, and nature is
critical to addressing the needs of Phoenix residents.

As Phoenix works to ensure that home is where it all starts for every resident, projects like this are
essential. I respectfully urge you to recommend approval.

Sincerely,

Tom Kelly
30 E Saint Anne Ave, Phoenix 85042

Sent from my iPad




From: Sarah Amaral CFRE
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Amanda Straight
Subject: Support for Z-31-25-8 – 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 12:57:08 PM
Attachments: firstplaceicon-emailgreenbackground_9f09191c-9984-4267-bbcb-169b7026a193.png
1_9cd01675-c4ea-4a80-9732-ddffb230bb07.png
5_07e5fbfe-80bb-41d0-af98-e074ed5778da.png
2_70a09438-1177-4cfd-8796-b9aa72a050b6.png
4_cba3eafa-56b6-4be6-a987-46cafead6cd4.png
firstplaceemailsignaturebanner_16af16b4-2a44-4916-8bf2-0d993d4f3ca9.png




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I’m writing in strong support of Zoning Case Z-31-25-8, a project that brings much-
needed housing diversity to the South Mountain Village. Rezoning from S-1 to R-3A will
allow for a thoughtfully designed, medium-density residential development that aligns
with the city’s long-term goals and responds to our region’s housing shortage.

I disagree with the South Mountain Village Planning Committee’s decision to deny this
project due to the overall density. This project is unique and provides a new type of
housing for the area. Providing more options for families and individuals who rent near
jobs, schools, and nature is critical to addressing the needs of Phoenix residents.

As Phoenix works to ensure that home is where it all starts for every resident, projects
like this are essential. I respectfully urge you to recommend approval.

Sincerely,
Sarah Amaral
1941 E El Parque Dr.
Tempe, AZ 85282


Sarah Amaral CFRE
Director of Development, First Place AZ
p: 602-464-6630 c: 602-697-5352
e: samaral@firstplaceaz.org | [yourdomain.url]firstplaceaz.org
[firstplaceaz.org]
3001 N. Third St., Phoenix, AZ 85012



[facebook.com] [linkedin.com] [instagram.com]
[firstplaceaz.org] [youtube.com]




[azmvdnow.gov]

First Place AZ is a qualified Arizona Charitable Tax Credit Organization. Your gift may qualify
for a dollar-for-dollar credit on your Arizona state taxes—up to $495 for individuals and $987 for
married couples filing jointly. Learn more at firstplaceglobal.org/donate [firstplaceglobal.org].




From: Atllas Hopkins
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Support for Z-31-25-8 – 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 2:11:57 AM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


To whom it may concern,

I’m writing in strong support of Zoning Case Z-31-25-8, a project that brings much-needed
housing diversity to the South Mountain Village. Rezoning from S-1 to R-3A will allow for a
thoughtfully designed, medium-density residential development that aligns with the city’s
long-term goals and responds to our region’s housing shortage.

I disagree with the South Mountain Village Planning Committee’s decision to deny this
project due to the overall density. This project is unique and provides a new type of housing
for the area. Providing more options for families and individuals who rent near jobs,
schools, and nature is critical to addressing the needs of Phoenix residents.

As Phoenix works to ensure that home is where it all starts for every resident, projects like
this are essential. I respectfully urge you to recommend approval.



Atllas Hopkins
3522 N Flower st.

Thank you,
M. Architectural Studies
Arizona State University' 25
S.E.E.D Philanthropy Founder
SOULJAISM DESIGN HOUSE
602-577-0517 | atllasehopkins@gmail.com




From: Bruce Weber
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Support for Z-31-25-8 – 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 5:56:49 PM
Attachments: image003[61].png
image004[26].png




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious   ‌


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I’m writing in strong support of Zoning Case Z-31-25-8, a project that brings much-needed
housing diversity to the South Mountain Village. Rezoning from S-1 to R-3A will allow for a
thoughtfully designed, medium-density residential development that aligns with the city’s
long-term goals and responds to our region’s housing shortage.

I disagree with the South Mountain Village Planning Committee’s decision to deny this
project due to the overall density. This project is unique and provides a new type of housing
for the area. Providing more options for families and individuals who rent near jobs,
schools, and nature is critical to addressing the needs of Phoenix residents.

As Phoenix works to ensure that home is where it all starts for every resident, projects like
this are essential. I respectfully urge you to recommend approval.

Sincerely,
Bruce Weber
4628 E Berneil Dr
Phoenix, AZ 85028




Docusign Envelope ID: B1D54B8C-9367-4CED-A6D7-1B01CBB5D4D7





I write to you as the owner of approximately 0.4 acres of commercial
property on the northeast side of Broadway Rd at 24th St urging you
to support the rezoning of land with Z-31-25-8 and GPA SM 1-25-8-
VPC.

The builder has a plan that will integrate very well into the
surrounding community. Taylor Morrison is a reputable nationwide
home builder who plans to bring a much-needed varied housing
product to the area with quality finishes and amenities.

I urge you to please support this project.


Sincerely,


Sid Chalasani 7/24/2025

Twenty Peaks, LLC
2424 E. Broadway Rd
Phoenix, AZ 85040







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
(CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 3, 2025) - Public Hearing and Ordinance
Adoption - Rezoning Application Z-31-25-8 - Approximately 1,130 Feet East of
the Northeast Corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road (Ordinance G-7416) -
District 8

Request to hold a public hearing and consider amending the Phoenix Zoning
Ordinance, Section 601, the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix, by adopting Rezoning
Application Z-31-25-8, and rezone the site from S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence) to R-3
(Multifamily Residence District) to allow multifamily residential. This is a companion
case to GPA-SM-1-25-8 and must be heard following GPA-SM-1-25-8.

Summary
Current Zoning: S-1
Proposed Zoning: R-3
Acreage: 14.37
Proposal: Multifamily residential

Owner: Mundall Family Revocable Trust c/o Danny Mundall and Georgia Mundall
Applicant/Representative: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.
VPC Action: The South Mountain Village Planning Committee heard this item on June
10, 2025, and recommended denial as filed and approval of R-2 with a deleted
stipulation and a modified stipulation, by a vote of 6-5.
PC Action: The Planning Commission heard this item on August 7, 2025, and
recommended approval, per the staff recommendation, by a vote of 7-1.
Appeal: The Planning Commission recommendation was appealed by a community
member on August 13, 2025.

Location
Approximately 1,130 feet east of the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline
Road
Council District: 8
Parcel Address: 2102 and 2150 W. Baseline Road





Responsible Department
This item is submitted by Deputy City Manager Alan Stephenson and the Planning and
Development Department.





ATTACHMENT A
THIS IS A DRAFT COPY ONLY AND IS NOT AN OFFICIAL COPY OF THE FINAL,
ADOPTED ORDINANCE




ORDINANCE G-

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 601 OF THE CITY OF
PHOENIX ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE ZONING
DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN (CASE Z-31-25-8) FROM S-1 (RANCH OR FARM
RESIDENCE) TO R-3 (MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT).

____________



BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PHOENIX, as

follows:

SECTION 1. The zoning of a 14.37-acre site located approximately 1,130

feet east of the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road in a portion of

Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 2 East, as described more specifically in Exhibit

“A,” is hereby changed from “S-1” (Ranch or Farm Residence) to “R-3” (Multifamily

Residence District).

SECTION 2. The Planning and Development Director is instructed to

modify the Zoning Map of the City of Phoenix to reflect this use district classification

change as shown in Exhibit “B.”

SECTION 3. Due to the site’s specific physical conditions and the use

district applied for by the applicant, this rezoning is subject to the following stipulations,




violation of which shall be treated in the same manner as a violation of the City of

Phoenix Zoning Ordinance:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped April 21, 2025, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

2. Building elevations shall be presented for review and comment to the South
Mountain Village Planning Committee prior to preliminary site plan approval

3. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and
textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone, colored
textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a decorative and
aesthetic treatment, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. A minimum of one-third of the dwelling unit buildings shall not exceed one story
or 20 feet in height.

5. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Secure bicycle parking shall be provided per Section 1307 of the Zoning
Ordinance.

b. Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05
spaces per dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces required.

c. A minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall
include standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging
capabilities.

d. Bicycle parking spaces shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade.

e. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
on site within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance, and
separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The
repair station shall include, but not be limited to:

i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the
ground;




iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while making adjustments to the bike.

6. A minimum 5% of the required parking spaces shall provide EV installed
infrastructure.

7. Site lighting shall be provided at building entrances/exits and in public
assembly and parking areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

8. If perimeter fencing is provided along the south side of the site it shall be a
minimum of 75 percent open view fencing, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

9. The landscape setback along Baseline Road shall be planted to include native
cacti or similar spiny desert accent plants, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

10. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, with
a minimum five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work
with the Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

11. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

12. All internal pedestrian pathways shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or
a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

13. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

15. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This




includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

16. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas located on properties for uses such as residential common areas, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

18. The developer shall reconstruct the bus stop pad on westbound Baseline Road.
Bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall be spaced from an
intersection according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved
or modified by the Public Transit Department. Trees shall be placed to provide
50% shade coverage to bus stop pad at full maturity.

19. A 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated along the
north side of Baseline Road, adjacent to the subject site and a minimum 10-
foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed within the easement, in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and, as approved or modified by
the Planning and Development Department.

20. The sidewalk along Baseline Road shall be a minimum of 6 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted
20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

21. A minimum of 55 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for
north side of Baseline Road.




22. All existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-way shall be underground,
adjacent to the development. Developer to coordinate with the affected utilities
company for their review and permitting.

23. Existing SRP facilities along Baseline Road are to be relocated outside of City
right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Street Transportation
Department. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer
require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.

24. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

26. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners
or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

27. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the
development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

28. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

29. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

30. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.




SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or

portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the

decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity

of the remaining portions hereof.

PASSED by the Council of the City of Phoenix this 3rd day of September,

2025.




________________________________
MAYOR


ATTEST:


_________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney


By:
_________________________
_________________________


REVIEWED BY:


_________________________
Jeffrey Barton, City Manager



Exhibits:
A – Legal Description
B – Ordinance Location Map




EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR Z-31-25-8

Real property in the City of Phoenix, County of Maricopa, State of Arizona, described as
follows:

THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 2 EAST OF THE GILA AND SALT
RIVER BASE AND MERIDIAN, MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT A BRASS CAP IN HAND HOLE MARKING THE SOUTH
QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36, SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 89°51’15”
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2647.63 FEET FROM A BRASS CAP IN HAND HOLE
MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36;

THENCE NORTH 89°51'15" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 763.58 FEET TO A POINT;

THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE, NORTH 00°20'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF
55.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 55 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING;

THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00°20'41" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1263.65 FEET TO
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36;

THENCE NORTH 89°51'10" EAST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF
556.35 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36;

THENCE SOUTH 00°10'34" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE
OF 789.72 FEET TO A POINT;

THENCE NORTH 89°49’26” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 203.10 FEET;

THENCE SOUTH 00°53’47” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 475.13 FEET TO THE NORTH
LINE OF THE SOUTH 55 FEET OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;

THENCE SOUTH 89°51’15” WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF
351.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
APN: 105-86-017M




ATTACHMENT B




Staff Report Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025

South Mountain Village Planning June 10, 2025
Committee Meeting Date:
Planning Commission Hearing Date: August 7, 2025
Request From: S-1 (Ranch or Farm Residence)
(14.37 acres)
Request To: R-3 (Multifamily Residence District)
(14.37 acres)
Proposed Use: Multifamily Residential
Location: Approximately 1,130 feet east of the
northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and
Baseline Road
Owner: Mundall Fam. Revocable Trust c/o
Danny Mundall and Georgia Mundall
Applicant/Representative: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo,
P.A.
Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations

General Plan Conformity
Current: Residential 1 to 2 dwelling
units per acre (5.29 acres),
Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units
per acre (8.90 acres), and
Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling units
General Plan Land Use Map Designation
per acre (0.18 acres)

Pending (GPA-SM-1-25-8):
Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units
per acre
Scenic
Street Map Drive – 33 to 55-foot north half
Baseline Road
Classification Major street
Arterial




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




CELEBRATE OUR DIVERSE COMMUNITIES AND NEIGHBORHOODS CORE
VALUE; HEALTHY NEIGHBORHOODS; DESIGN PRINCIPLE: Establish design
standards and guidelines for parking lots and structures, setback and build-to
lines, blank wall space, shade, and other elements affecting pedestrians, to
encourage pedestrian activity and identify options for providing pedestrian-
oriented design in different types of development.

The proposal, as stipulated, includes design and development standards to
encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use. These standards include the provision
of bicycle parking, shade throughout the development, and a multi-use trail along
Baseline Road.
CONNECT PEOPLE AND PLACES CORE VALUE; BICYCLES; DESIGN
PRINCIPLE: Development should include convenient bicycle parking.

The proposal, as stipulated, will encourage bicycling and transit use and leverage its
proximity to the adjacent commercial development by including enhanced bicycle
parking and infrastructure.
BUILD THE SUSTAINABLE DESERT CITY CORE VALUE; DESIGN PRINCIPLE:
Integrate trees and shade into the design of new development and
redevelopment projects throughout Phoenix.

The proposal, as stipulated, includes enhanced landscape setbacks, shaded parking,
shaded pedestrian pathways, and a wide landscape detachment for the public
sidewalk that will be planted with shade trees that will shade the public and private
sidewalks to 75 percent. These improvements will create a comfortable pedestrian
environment along Baseline Road and make the walk to nearby destinations more
safe and comfortable.


Applicable Plans, Overlays, and Initiatives
Rio Montaña Area Plan: Background Item No. 6.

Housing Phoenix Plan: Background Item No. 7.

Shade Phoenix Plan: Background Item No. 8.

Complete Streets Guidelines: Background Item No. 9.

Transportation Electrification Action Plan: Background Item No. 10.

Zero Waste PHX: Background Item No. 11.




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan: Background Item No. 12.

Monarch Butterfly Pledge: Background Item No. 13.

Conservation Measures for New Development: Background Item No. 14.

Phoenix Climate Action Plan: Background Item No. 15.

Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning
Land Use Zoning
On Site Agricultural land S-1
North Single-family residences R1-8, R1-10
West Single-family residences R1-8
Commercial and single-
East S-1, C-2
family residences
S-1, S-1
South (across Baseline Road) Single-family residences
(Approved R1-10)

R-3 (Multifamily Residence District)
Planned Residential Development Option
Standards Requirements Site Plan Provisions
Gross Acres - 14.37 acres
Maximum Dwelling Units 218, 240 with bonus 188 (Met)
Maximum Density (dwelling 15.23, 17.40 with 13.08 (Met)
units/acre) bonus
Maximum Building Height 2 stories and 30 feet One story, 16 feet and
for first 150 feet; 1 foot eleven inches to two
in 5 feet increase to 48 stories, 33 feet and 3
feet and 4 stories inches (Met)
Minimum Landscape Setbacks
Adjacent to Public Street 20 feet 20 feet (Met)
(Baseline Road)
East 5 feet 5 feet (Met)
West 5 feet 5 feet (Met)
North 5 feet 5 feet (Met)
Minimum Building Setbacks
Adjacent to Public Street 20 feet Not specified
(Baseline Road)




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




East 15 feet 15 feet (Met)
West 15 feet 15 feet (Met)
North 15 feet 15 feet (Met)
Lot Standards
Minimum Open Space 5 percent 5 percent (Met)
Maximum Lot Coverage 50%, plus an 33.8 percent (Met)
additional 10% for an
ADU and/or attached
shade structures, total
60%
Minimum Parking 282 spaces, 1.5 376 spaces (Met)
spaces per dwelling
unit

Background/Issues/Analysis

SUBJECT SITE
1. This request is to rezone 14.37 acres located approximately 1,130 feet east of the
northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road from S-1 (Ranch or Farm
Residence) to R-3 (Multifamily Residence District) for multifamily residential. The
subject site is largely vacant agricultural land.

2. The northern portion of the subject site is designated as Residential 2 to 3.5
dwelling units per acre on the General Plan Land Use Map, the southern portion is
designated as Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre, and there is a small strip
along the west boundary of the subject site that is designated as Residential 3.5 to
5 dwelling units per acre.

The area to the west of the subject site is designated Residential 3.5 to 5 dwelling
units acre and the area to the east is designated Commercial and Residential 1 to
2 dwelling units per acre. The area to the south, across Baseline Road, is
designated Residential 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre and the area to north is
designated Residential 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre. The requested R-3 zoning
district is not consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map designation. To
ensure consistency with the General Plan, a concurrent General Plan Land Use
Map amendment, GPA-SM-1-25-8, is proposed to change the land use map
designation to Residential 10 to 15 dwelling units per acre. The requested R-3
zoning district is consistent with the proposed General Plan Land Use Map
designation.




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




General Plan Land Use Map; Source: Planning and Development Department




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
3. To the north the subject site are single-family residential subdivisions zoned R1-10
and R1-8. To the west is a single-family subdivision zoned R1-8. To the south,
across Baseline Road is a single-family subdivision and single-family homes zoned
S-1 and S-1 (Approved R1-10). To the east are single-family homes zoned S-1 and
a commercial development zoned C-2.

Location Map; Source: Planning and Development Department




PROPOSAL
4. Site Plan
The proposal is for 188 units with a mix of one- and two-bedroom units. The
conceptual site plan, attached as an exhibit, depicts the site layout including the
location of the proposed structures, parking, trash enclosures, leasing office, pool,




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




and amenity areas. The site will have one point of ingress/egress from Baseline
Road.

Staff recommends Stipulation No. 1 to require the site be developed in general
conformance to the conceptual site plan, so that the site develops as proposed. To
promote enhanced walking, cycling, and transit-use staff recommends Stipulation
No. 5 to require shaded guest and secured bicycle parking, receptacles for electric
bicycle parking, and a bicycle repair station. Staff recommends Stipulation No. 12
to require that all pedestrian pathways be shaded, Stipulation No. 13 to require
pavement treatments that visually contrast parking and drive aisles where
pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path to enhance pedestrian safety, and
Stipulation No. 14 to require shaded vehicular parking.

Conceptual Site Plan; Source: RVI Planning + Landscape Architecture




5. Conceptual Building Elevations
The conceptual building elevations, attached as an exhibit, depict varied 4-plex,
duplex, and single unit structures, the community building, the mailroom, and
detached garage building. Staff recommends Stipulation No. 2, which requires that
the elevations be presented to the South Mountain Village Planning Committee
prior to preliminary site plan review, and Stipulation No. 3 that the elevations
include architectural variation.




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




Conceptual Building Elevations; Source: Felton Group




STUDIES AND POLICIES
6. Rio Montaña Area Plan:
The Rio Montaña Area Plan encourages preservation of the rural character of the
area and incorporates
transition zones to protect
desert and open space
areas. The plan also
encourages pedestrian and
equestrian activities through
a network of trails and
aspires to develop a sense of
community while
encouraging investment in
the community.

The Rio Montaña Area Plan
intended to accomplish this Source: Planning and Development Department
vision through seven goals that
include: promoting balanced, high quality development; protecting and improving
neighborhoods through maintenance, rehabilitation and infill projects; keeping a
distinctive character that reflects the diversity in its equestrian heritage, culture,
history and architecture; protecting the rural character, the Sonoran Desert and the
riparian potential of the Rio Salado Habitat Restoration Project; promoting future
business development and economic growth; developing the tourism industry
through a wide range of opportunities; and providing a variety of transportation
options.




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




This infill site is located in the western portion of the Rio Montaña Area Plan
boundaries in an area with a mix of single-family residential neighborhoods,
commercial, and some multifamily. Per Stipulation Nos. 10 and 20, the project site
will enhance the connectivity and pedestrian comfort in the area by providing street
improvements, including shaded detached sidewalks along Baseline Road and
enhanced landscape setback planting standards. Similarly, this development will
provide a 30-foot multi-use trail easement and minimum 10-foot multi-use trail
along Baseline Road that will connect to a multi-use trail system spanning the
northside of Baseline Road. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 19. Additionally,
Stipulation No. 8 requires that any perimeter fencing along Baseline Road be view
fencing in order to preserve that area’s open and rural atmosphere and Stipulation
No. 4 requires that a minimum one-third of structures be one-story to preserve the
view of South Mountain.

To promote Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles
and enhance neighborhood safety, staff recommends Stipulation Nos. 7 through 9,
which requires site lighting at building entrances and exits, in public assembly
areas, and within parking areas, if fencing is provided along Baseline Road it shall
be 75 percent open view fencing, and that the landscape setback along Baseline
Road be planted with native cacti or similar plants, further contributing to a safe
and well-designed environment.

Other design elements of the Rio Montaña Area Plan will be addressed through the
design guidelines of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance in Chapter 5, Section 507.Tab.
A. (Guidelines for Design Review).

7. Housing Phoenix Plan:
In June 2020, the Phoenix City Council approved the Housing Phoenix Plan. This
Plan contains policy initiatives for the development and preservation of housing
with the vision of creating a stronger and more vibrant Phoenix through increased
housing options for residents at all income levels and family sizes. Phoenix’s rapid
population growth and housing underproduction has led to a need for over 163,000
new housing units. Current shortages of housing supply relative to demand are a
primary reason why housing costs are increasing.

The proposed development supports the Plan’s goal of preserving or creating
50,000 housing units by 2030 by providing housing that will address the supply
shortage at a more rapid pace while using vacant or underutilized land in a more
sustainable fashion.




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




8. Shade Phoenix Plan:
In November 2024, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Shade Phoenix Plan.
The Shade Phoenix Plan prioritizes increasing shade coverage throughout the City
to improve health and quality of life. Investing in shade can address the urban heat
island effect, clean the air, preserve Sonoran vegetation, and prevent health
complications related to prolonged exposure to heat. The Shade Phoenix Plan
provides numerous strategies to increase shade including expanding and
maintaining existing shade, strengthening tree code enforcement, and developing
shade stipulations in rezoning cases.

The proposal, as stipulated, will create a streetscape environment with a shaded
and detached sidewalk, enhanced landscape setbacks, and a multi-use trail. These
are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 10, 19, and 20. Additionally, Stipulation No. 14
will require that the parking lot area be shaded a minimum 25 percent and
Stipulation No. 12 will require that internal pedestrian pathways be shaded a
minimum 75 percent.

9. Complete Streets Guidelines:
The City of Phoenix City Council adopted the Complete Streets Guiding Principles.
The principles are intended to promote improvements that provide an
accessible, safe, connected transportation system to include all modes, such as
bicycles, pedestrians, transit, and vehicles. The proposed development, as
stipulated, will support walking, bicycling, and transit use by including enhanced
bicycle parking and infrastructure on the site, providing a multi-use trail along
Baseline Road, and by constructing a shaded and detached sidewalk along
Baseline Road. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 5, 19, and 20.

10. Transportation Electrification Action Plan
In June 2022, the Phoenix City Council approved the Transportation Electrification
Action Plan. The current market desire for the electrification of transportation is
both a national and global phenomenon, fueled by a desire for better air quality, a
reduction in carbon emissions, and a reduction in vehicle operating and
maintenance costs. Businesses, governments and the public are signaling strong
future demand for electric vehicles (EVs), and many automobile manufacturers
have declared plans for a transition to fully electric offerings within the coming
decade. This Plan contains policy initiatives to prepare the City for a future filled
with more EVs, charging infrastructure and e-mobility equity, and outlines a
roadmap for a five-step plan to prepare for the EV infrastructure needs of 280,000
EVs in Phoenix by 2030. One goal of the Plan to accelerate public adoption of
electric vehicles through workplace, business, and multifamily charging
infrastructure recommends a standard stipulation for rezoning cases to provide EV
charging infrastructure. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 5.c and 6 that




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




requires a minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces include
electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging, and that minimum 10 percent of
the required parking spaces to be EV installed.

11. Zero Waste Phoenix PHX:
The City of Phoenix is committed to its waste diversion efforts and has set a goal to
become a zero waste city, as part of the city’s overall 2050 Environmental
Sustainability Goals. One of the ways Phoenix can achieve this is to improve and
expand its recycling and other waste diversion programs.

Section 716 of the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance establishes standards to encourage
the provision of recycling containers for multifamily, commercial, and mixed-use
developments meeting certain criteria. The application materials indicate that
recycling services shall be provided.

12. Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan:
The City of Phoenix adopted the Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan in 2014 to
guide the development of its bikeway system and supportive infrastructure. The
Comprehensive Bicycle Master Plan supports options for both short- and long-term
bicycle parking as a means of promoting bicyclist traffic to a variety of destinations.
As stipulated, the development will provide enhanced bicycle parking and
infrastructure by requiring guest and secured bicycle parking spaces, that all
bicycle parking spaces be shaded, that receptacles for electric bicycle parking
capabilities be provided, and that a bicycle repair station be provided. This is
addressed in Stipulation No. 5.

13. Monarch Butterfly Pledge:
In April 2021, Mayor Kate Gallego signed the National Wildlife Federation's Mayor's
Monarch Pledge. This pledge commits the city to take action to support the
monarch butterfly population. In the United States, loss of milkweed habitat is a
major factor in the decline of the monarchs. Arizona has at least 29 species of
milkweed native to the state. Adult monarchs feed on the nectar of many flowers,
but they breed only where milkweeds are found. To support the monarch butterfly
population, Stipulation No. 11 addresses the planting of milkweed shrubs, or other
native nectar plant species, on the subject site.

14. Conservation Measures for New Development:
In June 2023, the Phoenix City Council adopted the Conservation Measures for
New Development policy as part of a resolution addressing the future water
consumption of new development (Resolution 22129). This resolution addresses
the future water consumption of new development to support one of the City’s Five
Core Values in the General Plan which calls for Phoenix to - Build the Sustainable




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




Desert City. The Conservation Measures for New Development policy includes
direction to develop standards for consideration as stipulations for all rezoning
cases that will address best practices related to water usage in nine specific
categories. This is addressed in Stipulation Nos. 14 through 17.

15. Phoenix Climate Action Plan
In October 2021, the Phoenix City Council approved the Climate Action Plan. The
Climate Action Plan will serve as a long-term plan to achieve greenhouse gas
emissions reductions and resiliency goals from local operations and community
activities as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. This plan contains
policy and initiatives regarding stationary energy, transportation, waste
management, air quality, local food systems, heat, and water. Goal W2 (Water),
Action W2.4, pertains to the implementation of the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure (GI) and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater
Management to benefit the environment, promote water conservation, reduce
urban heat, improve the public health, and create additional green spaces. This
goal is addressed in Stipulation No. 15, which requires a minimum of two GI
techniques for stormwater management to be implemented in this development.

COMMUNITY CORRESONDENCE
16. As of the writing of this report three letters of opposition have been received.
Concerns raised were regarding traffic impacts, prioritization of corporate profit,
impacts on electric grid and water supply, lack of sustainability measures, rental
properties vs. homeownership, the property management company, impacts on
property values, safety, infrastructure, and the long-term stability of the area.

INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
17. The Street Transportation Department recommended that a multi-use trail
easement be dedicated and that a multi-use trail be constructed in the easement,
that a detached sidewalk be provided along Baseline Road, that all existing utilities
be undergrounded and SRP facilities be relocated out of the right-of-way, and that
the developer replace and construct all improvements in the right-of-way with all
required elements and to ADA standards. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos.
20 through 25.

18. The Public Transit Department recommended the construction of a bus stop pad
on westbound Baseline Road. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 18.

19. The City of Phoenix Aviation Department commented that the property owner shall
record a Notice to Prospective Purchasers of Proximity to Airport in order to
disclose the existence, and operational characteristics of the Phoenix Sky Harbor




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




Airport to future owners or tenants of the property. This is addressed in Stipulation
No. 26.

OTHER
20. The site is located in a larger area identified as being archaeologically sensitive. If
further review by the City of Phoenix Archaeology Office determines the site and
immediate area to be archaeologically sensitive, and if no previous archaeological
projects have been conducted within this project area, it is recommended that
archaeological Phase I data testing of this area be conducted. Phase II
archaeological data recovery excavations may be necessary based upon the
results of the testing. A qualified archaeologist must make this determination in
consultation with the City of Phoenix Archaeologist. In the event archaeological
materials are encountered during construction, all ground disturbing activities must
cease within a 33-foot radius of the discovery and the City of Phoenix Archaeology
Office must be notified immediately and allowed time to properly assess the
materials. These are addressed in Stipulation Nos. 27 through 29.

21. Staff has not received a completed form for the Waiver of Claims for Diminution in
Value of Property under Proposition 207 (A.R.S. 12-1131 et seq.), as required by
the rezoning application process. Therefore, a stipulation has been added to
require the form be completed and submitted prior to preliminary site plan
approval. This is addressed in Stipulation No. 30.

22. Development and use of the site are subject to all applicable codes and
ordinances. Zoning approval does not negate other ordinance requirements. Other
formal actions such as, but not limited to, zoning adjustments and abandonments
may be required.

Findings

1. The requested R-3 zoning district will provide a transition between the
commercial development to the east and the single-family development to the
west.

2. The proposal, as stipulated, will create a strong pedestrian environment along
Baseline Road with a shaded detached sidewalk and multi-use trail that will
convey residents safely and comfortably along the Baseline Road multi use
trail alignment.

3. The proposal will create additional housing options in line with the Housing
Phoenix Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030.




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




Stipulations:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date
stamped April 21, 2025, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

2. Building elevations shall be presented for review and comment to the South
Mountain Village Planning Committee prior to preliminary site plan approval

3. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and
textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone, colored
textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a decorative and
aesthetic treatment, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

4. A minimum of one-third of the dwelling unit buildings shall not exceed one story
or 20 feet in height.

5. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Secure bicycle parking shall be provided per Section 1307 of the Zoning
Ordinance.

b. Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05
spaces per dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces required.

c. A minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall
include standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging
capabilities.

d. Bicycle parking spaces shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade.

e. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
on site within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance, and
separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The
repair station shall include, but not be limited to:




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the
ground;

iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while making adjustments to the bike.

6. A minimum 5% of the required parking spaces shall provide EV installed
infrastructure.

7. Site lighting shall be provided at building entrances/exits and in public
assembly and parking areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

8. If perimeter fencing is provided along the south side of the site it shall be a
minimum of 75 percent open view fencing, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

9. The landscape setback along Baseline Road shall be planted to include native
cacti or similar spiny desert accent plants, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

10. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, with
a minimum five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work
with the Planning and Development Department on alternative design solutions
consistent with a pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

11. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native
nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.

12. All internal pedestrian pathways shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or
a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by
the Planning and Development Department.

13. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




14. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by
structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a
combination thereof.

15. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the
Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This
includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure
and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative Stormwater Management.

16. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin,
and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf
areas located on properties for uses such as residential common areas, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

18. The developer shall reconstruct the bus stop pad on westbound Baseline Road.
Bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall be spaced from an
intersection according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved
or modified by the Public Transit Department. Trees shall be placed to provide
50% shade coverage to bus stop pad at full maturity.

19. A 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated along the
north side of Baseline Road, adjacent to the subject site and a minimum 10-foot-
wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed within the easement, in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and, as approved or modified by
the Planning and Development Department.

20. The sidewalk along Baseline Road shall be a minimum of 6 feet in width and
detached with a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as approved
by the Planning and Development Department.




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted
20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

21. A minimum of 55-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for
north side of Baseline Road.

22. All existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-way shall be underground,
adjacent to the development. Developer to coordinate with the affected utilities
company for their review and permitting.

23. Existing SRP facilities along Baseline Road are to be relocated outside of City
right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Street Transportation
Department. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer
require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.

24. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, replace any
broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and
upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

26. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
operational characteristics of the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners
or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been reviewed
and approved by the City Attorney.

27. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall
conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the




Staff Report: Z-31-25-8
June 2, 2025




development area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to
clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

28. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations

29. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-
foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the
Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

30. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207
waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County
Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning
application file for record.

Writer
Samuel Rogers
June 2, 2025

Team Leader
Racelle Escolar

Exhibits
Zoning sketch map
Aerial sketch map
Conceptual Site Plan date stamped April 21, 2025 (2 pages)
Conceptual Building Elevations date stamped April 4 2025 (12 pages)
Correspondence (13 pages)




R1-10 DARREL RD R1-8*
Z-140-00 Z-83-98
DARREL RD

24TH DR 23RD LN
DARREL RD DARREL RD


22ND LN 21ST LN 19TH LN MALDONADO RD
MALDONADO DR MALDONADO RD MALDONADO RD

21ST DR R1-8 * CARSON RD
Z-70-04
23RD LN 19TH DR
CARSON RD CARSON RD
R1-6

24TH LN 22ND LN 21ST LN
R1-8 * R1-10* R1-8 PRD
R1-8 * S-1
Z-178-99
Z-112-02 Z-89-88 CARTER RD
Z-34-00
CARTER RD CARTER RD CARTER RD



23RD AVE
FREMONT RD

MINTON ST
MINTON ST R1-8 * MINTON ST
Z-28-22
S-1
24TH LN
PARK ST
PARK ST R-2 * POLLACK ST

24TH AVE 22ND LN 22ND AVE
R1-8* R1-8* C-2 * Z-36-06

18TH DR
Z-71-17


19TH AVE
ELLIS ST Z-17-14 Z-128-05

DUNBAR DR C-2 *
Z-36-06
DARROW ST S-1
DONNER DR
S-1 C-2 C-2*
Z-72-15

BASELINE RD
S-1
20TH DR
DR
BR
AN
S-1 VALENCIA DR
C-2*
Z-101-76
21ST
N
HA DL C-2*
M
LN 23R S-1 BRANHAM LN
C-2 SP*
Z-SP-2-18 Z-110-07 C-2 *
L N
HAM

23RD AVE
R1-10 BRAN C-2 SP* Z-92-23


20TH LN
Z-SP-10-16
FAW Z-109-00 R1-10*
N DR

22ND LN
FAWN DR Z-66-01
BE R1-6 *
VE
RL
YR
D Z-121-03
S-1


¯ Miles 27TH AVE
7TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST
16TH ST
32ND ST 40TH ST 48TH ST
24TH ST
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 19TH AVE
I-10
BROADWAY RD
SOUTH MOUNTAIN VILLAGE SOUTHERN AVE
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8 BASELINE RD
DOBBINS RD
Z-31-25-8


REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
FROM: S-1 ( 14.37 ac.)
DATE:
4/18/2025
APPLICATION NO: Z-31-25-8 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
R-3 ( 14.37 ac.)
14.37 Acres QS 1-24 D-7
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
S-1 14 N/A
R-3 208 250
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 325
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2025\Z-31-25.aprx
R1-10 DARREL RD R1-8*
Z-140-00 Z-83-98
DARREL RD

24TH DR 23RD LN
DARREL RD DARREL RD


22ND LN 21ST LN 19TH LN MALDONADO RD
MALDONADO DR MALDONADO RD MALDONADO RD

21ST DR R1-8 * CARSON RD
Z-70-04
23RD LN 19TH DR
CARSON RD CARSON RD
R1-6

24TH LN 22ND LN 21ST LN
R1-8 * R1-10* R1-8 PRD
R1-8 * S-1
Z-178-99
Z-112-02 Z-89-88 CARTER RD
Z-34-00
CARTER RD CARTER RD CARTER RD



23RD AVE
FREMONT RD

MINTON ST
MINTON ST R1-8 * MINTON ST
Z-28-22
S-1
24TH LN
PARK ST
PARK ST R-2 * POLLACK ST

24TH AVE 22ND LN 22ND AVE
R1-8* R1-8* C-2 * Z-36-06

18TH DR
Z-71-17


19TH AVE
ELLIS ST Z-17-14 Z-128-05

DUNBAR DR C-2 *
Z-36-06
DARROW ST S-1
DONNER DR
S-1 C-2 C-2*
Z-72-15

BASELINE RD
S-1
20TH DR
DR
BR
AN
S-1 VALENCIA DR
C-2*
Z-101-76
21ST
N
HA DL C-2*
M
LN 23R S-1 BRANHAM LN
C-2 SP*
Z-SP-2-18 Z-110-07 C-2 *
L N
HAM

23RD AVE
R1-10 BRAN C-2 SP* Z-92-23


20TH LN
Z-SP-10-16
FAW Z-109-00 R1-10*
N DR

22ND LN
FAWN DR Z-66-01
BE R1-6 *
VE
RL
YR
D Z-121-03
S-1


¯ Miles 27TH AVE
7TH AVE
CENTRAL AVE
7TH ST
16TH ST
32ND ST 40TH ST 48TH ST
24TH ST
0 0.05 0.1 0.2 19TH AVE
I-10
BROADWAY RD
SOUTH MOUNTAIN VILLAGE SOUTHERN AVE
COUNCIL DISTRICT: 8 BASELINE RD
DOBBINS RD
Z-31-25-8


REQUESTED CHANGE:
APPLICANT'S NAME: Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
FROM: S-1 ( 14.37 ac.)
DATE:
4/18/2025
APPLICATION NO: Z-31-25-8 REVISION DATES:

GROSS AREA INCLUDING 1/2 STREET
AND ALLEY DEDICATION IS APPROX.
AERIAL PHOTO &
QUARTER SEC. NO.
ZONING MAP TO:
R-3 ( 14.37 ac.)
14.37 Acres QS 1-24 D-7
MULTIPLES PERMITTED CONVENTIONAL OPTION * UNITS P.R.D OPTION
S-1 14 N/A
R-3 208 250
* Maximum Units Allowed with P.R.D. Bonus 326
S:\Department Share\Information Systems\PL GIS\IS_Team\Core_Functions\Zoning\sketch_maps\2025\Z-31-25.aprx
5/8/25, 10:24 AM Mail - Samuel S Rogers - Outlook




Outlook


May 6th 2025 mtg - Case Nos GPA-SM-8-25 and Z-31-25

From joanna garcia
Date Mon 5/5/2025 2:00 PM
To Samuel S Rogers




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious


On the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue/Baseline is the site they are proposing to build these
homes. And also the property 11,130 feet from corner of 23rd avenue is also proposed to build
multifamily homes? That is also alot housing on those properties. We need family homes built
not rental homes. What is to be considered for them to be approved? How do we stop this
from happening/ or do we? There is soooo much traffic on Baseline Road now - its like a mini
freeway and you propose to add even more traffic. Is there a proposal to add a street light on
23rd Avenue for that growth. This is insane that that much housing can be built when the road
system is the same.
I live just down the street from 23rd Avenue and across the street the other proposal.
Who benefits from this - because we do not!!!!!

Josepha M Garcia




https://outlook.office365.com/mail/id/AAMkADNkMzc1MjA2LTRjOTktNGNjNi04OWVkLTM5NzllZmM4N2U4MwBGAAAAAADQz%2F7E8ZzVSY3U0Dm…
1/1
5/8/25, 10:13 AM Mail - Samuel S Rogers - Outlook




Outlook


Case Nos GPA-SM-8-25 and Z-31-25

From Joseph Melton
Date Thu 5/8/2025 9:53 AM
To Samuel S Rogers




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious


Dear Samuel Rogers,


I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed zoning changes; case numbers GPA-SM-
8-25 and Z-31-25. As a property owner adjacent to the proposed development, I have
significant concerns regarding the impact on property values, personal enjoyment, and safety.
After attending the neighborhood meeting my concerns have been amplified. It appears Taylor
Morrison has more interest in their own profits than the long-term benefits to our community.
The proposed change from the current residential zoning to 10-15 dwelling units per acre
appears to prioritize corporate profit over community welfare. The addition of 188 dwelling units
will likely exacerbate traffic congestion, strain our already limited electric grid and water supply,
and negatively affect surrounding property values.
Taylor Morrison’s plan to develop the Yardly rental units rather than homes for sale raises
further concerns with their commitment to our community’s well-being. I understand the logic
behind rental units vs individual homes backing up to retail/commercial space, however the
number of dwellings is concerning. Homeowners typically have a greater vested interest in their
communities compared to renters, and rental communities often experience higher crime rates.
In South Phoenix, this could lead to increased crime and reduced property values, issues we
are already facing.
The development will also add over 200 vehicles to the already congested Baseline Road and
potentially obstruct views of South Mountain. As an HOA board member in Addison Park, I have
witnessed the negative impact of rental properties on our community, including increased
damage and crime. The property manager they have chosen, GreyStar has horrible reviews
and reputation per online research and the Better Business Bureau.
Per the meeting, Taylor Morrison is anticipating to charge between $1800-$2300 per month for
750 sq foot 1-2 bedroom homes. My neighbors property is a 3 bedroom 2 bath 1392 sq ft single
family residence and they’re struggling to find tenants for $2100 per month. The previous
tenants were destructive and disrespectful to the community and have lead the owner to now
trying to sell the property.


https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAMkADNkMzc1MjA2LTRjOTktNGNjNi04OWVkLTM5NzllZmM4N2U4MwBGAAAAAADQz%2F7E8ZzVSY3…
1/2
5/8/25, 10:13 AM Mail - Samuel S Rogers - Outlook

It does not sound like Taylor Morrison is realistic to the demographic of who their tenants will be
in this South Mountain area and it concerns me that the long term impact will be reduced rental
prices and/or Taylor Morrison selling out to a large conglomerate from out of state who will let
the property go to the way-side.
I urge you to decline this zoning change request. If Taylor Morrison is willing to put their money
where their mouth is and can guarantee that property values will not decrease while offering
compensation for any devaluation, I would reconsider my stance.
Please feel free to reach out to me with any questions. Thank you greatly for considering my
concerns.
Sincerely,
Joe Melton
Meltjoe@AOL.com
(414) 737-3921
7265 S. 22nd Ave, PHX AZ




https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAMkADNkMzc1MjA2LTRjOTktNGNjNi04OWVkLTM5NzllZmM4N2U4MwBGAAAAAADQz%2F7E8ZzVSY3…
2/2
5/21/25, 10:56 AM Mail - Samuel S Rogers - Outlook




Outlook


Opposition to Proposed Zoning Changes – Case Numbers GPA-SM-8-25 and Z-31-25

From Melissa Campos
Date Tue 5/13/2025 7:10 PM
To Samuel S Rogers
Cc Melissa Campos


2 attachments (7 MB)
Opposition to Proposed Zoning Changes – Case Numbers GPA-SM-8-25 and Z-31-25.docx; Article PDF.pdf;




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.
Report Suspicious



Hello Samuel,
I hope this email finds you well.

Attached are my concerns/opposition regarding this rezoning case and supporting
research - please feel free to reach out to me with any questions or concerns.

Thank you,
--
Melissa Campos




https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAMkADNkMzc1MjA2LTRjOTktNGNjNi04OWVkLTM5NzllZmM4N2U4MwBGAAAAAADQz%2F7E8ZzVSY3…
1/1
Dear Samuel Rogers -

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed zoning changes identified as GPA-
SM-8-25 and Z-31-25. As a property owner in Addison Park, a neighboring community, I have
significant concerns about the potential negative impact on property values, safety,
infrastructure, and the long-term stability of the area—particularly if the proposed Yardly by
Taylor Morrison development fails to meet its projected profitability.

After attending the recent neighborhood meeting, I left with the distinct impression that Taylor
Morrison is prioritizing short-term profit over the long-term health and cohesion of the
surrounding community. Many of the concerns voiced by residents, including myself, were not
meaningfully addressed during the meeting. I raised the following key issues, which remain
unresolved:

1. Traffic and Infrastructure Concerns

• There are no concrete plans to mitigate increased traffic, such as installing a traffic signal
between 19th and 27th Avenue on Baseline.

• The proposed single entry and exit point for the community will create bottlenecks,
especially with turning lanes, similar to the current congestion we experience at Addison
Park’s entrance at 23rd Avenue.

2. Lack of Sustainability Measures

• The proposed homes lack energy-efficient features such as solar panels or commitments
to energy-saving materials.

• With the proposed density, this development will place additional strain on local utilities
and contribute to pollution and resource depletion in an already stressed area.

3. Target Renter Profile and Market Mismatch

• The projected rent range ($1,800–$2,300/month for 750 sq ft units) is aimed at young
professionals with white-collar jobs. As someone who fits that demographic, I can attest
that the location lacks proximity to major employment hubs, entertainment, and
essential amenities.

• This misalignment suggests the development may struggle to attract and retain its
intended audience. When profitability declines, what happens next? Will Taylor
Morrison sell off the property to the highest bidder—potentially resulting in
unregulated, lower-quality ownership or management?

4. Transparency and Accountability




• Yardly, a two-year-old offshoot of Taylor Morrison, has no established track record and is
outsourcing property management to Greystar—a third-party entity that is not BBB
accredited.

• A recent article in Builder magazine highlights the industry’s financial challenges,
referencing “temporarily dampened rent growth” and increasing operating expenses.
These trends raise red flags about the long-term viability of this project.

5. Density and Misuse of Zoning Flexibility

• Previous re-zoning efforts proposed approximately 50 fewer units than this plan. The
current unit-per-acre density appears excessive and profit-driven, not community-
centered.

6. Comparative Site Selection

• When I asked about other Yardly projects in the Phoenix market, representatives were
unprepared to respond. Upon reviewing the data myself during the meeting, I noted
that other Yardly communities:

1. Were not situated between existing, established residential communities; and

2. Were located in areas without the significant traffic congestion we currently
experience.

3. Multi-point entrance and exit for each community vs the proposed only have one
entry/exit – further raising safety concerns
(Screenshots and comparisons of lot access and layout are attached for
reference.)

Requested Follow-Up from Taylor Morrison

In preparation for the next community meeting, I respectfully request Taylor Morrison provide
written responses and supporting documentation for the following:

1. 2024 and year-to-date 2025 occupancy rates for all Phoenix Yardly properties

2. Default rates and percentage of missed rent payments

3. Average duration of vacant units

4. Written guarantees or commitments to neighboring communities regarding ownership
stability, specifically in the event of a sale within the next 20 years




I urge you to decline the zoning change request based on the unresolved issues, lack of
transparency, and the disproportionate impact this project could have on our community.

Please feel free to contact me directly should you have any questions or require further
information. Thank you for your time and for considering the concerns of the residents most
affected by this proposal.

Sincerely,
Melissa Campos
602 377 5603 / mccampos19@gmail.com




ATTACHMENT C




Village Planning Committee Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8

Date of VPC Meeting June 10, 2025
Request From S-1
Request To R-3
Proposal Multifamily residential
Location Approximately 1,130 feet east of the northeast corner
of 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road
VPC Recommendation Deny as filed and approved as R-2 with a deleted
stipulation and a modified stipulation
VPC Vote 6-5

Item Nos. 6 (GPA-SM-1-25-8) and 7 (Z-31-25-8) are companion cases and were heard
concurrently.

Five members of the public registered to speak on this item, one in support, and four in
opposition.

STAFF PRESENTATION

Samuel Rogers, staff, displayed the location of the subject site and noted the acreage
and proposal. Mr. Rogers stated that the applicant was proposing a multifamily
development, provided an overview of the proposed General Plan Land Use amendment,
summarized the surrounding land uses, and explained the site would act as a transition
between the adjacent commercial and single-family developments. Mr. Rogers displayed
the site plan and elevations and concluded the staff presentation by summarizing the staff
findings and proposed stipulations.

Committee Member George Brooks asked where the subject site is located. Mr. Rogers
displayed the subject site’s location.

APPLICANT PRESENTATION

Brian Greathouse, representing the applicant, introduced the development team,
explained that the development would be a transition between commercial and single-
family residential, explained the site would be gated, stated that the development would
be primarily single-story units, explained access would be from Baseline Road, and
described the amenities, open space, and units. Mr. Greathouse described the request,
discussed land use transitions, traffic generation, the traffic study, and the demand for the
housing type.



200 West Washington Street, 3rd Floor • Phoenix, Arizona 85003-1611 • (602) 262-6882 354
South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8
June 10, 2025

QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMITTEE

Chair Arthur Greathouse III asked the applicant team to speak to the public outreach
conducted for the project. Mr. Greathouse described the outreach process and efforts
made to inform nearby residents.

Committee Member Brooks inquired about the square footage of the proposed homes.
Mr. Greathouse stated that the homes would range in size from approximately 700 to
1,400 square feet.

Committee Member Kassandra Alvarez asked if the amenities would facilitate a sense
of community and expressed concern about the lack of sustainability measures and
potential traffic impacts. Mr. Greathouse explained that many of the traffic concerns are
related to 23rd Avenue and existing half-street conditions and explained that a different
rezoning case in the area includes stipulations to expand 23rd Avenue and incorporate
traffic mitigation. Mr. Greathouse explained that current conditions do not warrant a traffic
signal, stated that Baseline Road’s capacity had been studied, and explained that the
traffic study had been approved by the City. Mr. Greathouse stated that the project team is
evaluating features such as solar panels and stated that the applicant is providing energy-
efficient pavement seal and EV charging. Mr. Greathouse explained the rezoning request
includes stipulations related to the plant palette, shade, bike parking, and a bike fix-it
station. Chris Williams, with the applicant team, stated that a right-turn deceleration lane
was the only mitigation measure identified in the traffic study, stated that a warrant
analysis showed a signal is not currently justified, and explained a signal may be
warranted if additional development occurs on 23rd Avenue.

Chair Greathouse stated that a large rezoning case at 19th Avenue and Baseline Road
will increase density in the area and may eventually warrant a traffic signal. Committee
Member Mark Beehler echoed Chair Greathouse’s comments and asked whether the
applicant team had reviewed the two recent rezonings in the area. Mr. Williams stated
that the team always considers growth factors when analyzing traffic. Committee Member
Beehler commented that the Committee is receiving many development proposals in the
area. Mr. Williams responded that the goal is to space signals approximately every half
mile and explained that it is a balancing act to avoid excessive signals that slow down
traffic while ensuring placement at key intersections.

Committee Member Ralph Thompson II asked for confirmation that the proposed rents
would be in the range of $1,600 to $2,100. Mr. Greathouse confirmed that the projected
rents fall within that range.

Committee Member Fred Daniels asked whether the City evaluates nearby
developments collectively when reviewing traffic impacts. Mr. Rogers stated that the City
requires applicants to submit traffic studies and that those studies must be approved by
the City. Mr. Rogers explained that the City is aware of other rezonings in the area and




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8
June 10, 2025

considers them during the review process. Chair Greathouse asked about the review
process by the Street Transportation Department. Mr. Rogers stated that he would follow
up with more information. Mr. Williams stated that there are sometimes unknowns in the
process and not all future developments are visible during traffic evaluations.

Committee Member Alvarez asked what solutions are available to address traffic issues
on Baseline Road. Mr. Greathouse stated that developers will add improvements over
time as the area continues to develop.

Committee Member Brooks asked whether fire and water studies had been conducted
and requested elaboration on the sustainability measures. Cholla Susini, with the
applicant team, described planned features including dual-pane windows and high-
efficiency materials, stated that the energy efficiency rating of the homes would exceed
that of typical new construction, and offered to provide additional information.

Committee Member Beehler asked whether dedicated left-turn and right-turn lanes could
be added. Mr. Greathouse stated that approximately 60 trips were anticipated during
peak hours, averaging about one car per minute. Mr. Williams stated that the lane widths
should accommodate two cars and offered to follow up with additional detail.

Committee Member Lee Coleman asked whether the community would be gated. Mark
Reddie, with the applicant team, stated that the entry gate is set back 200 feet to allow for
vehicle queuing.

Committee Member Coleman asked whether there was a landscape plan. Mr.
Greathouse displayed and described the landscape plan for the project.

Committee Member Brooks asked where the fire exit would be located. Mr. Greathouse
stated that the development is not required to have secondary access. Mr. Reddie
explained that secondary fire access is not required because all units will be equipped
with fire sprinklers.

Committee Member Brooks asked whether applicants are advised to review the South
Mountain Village Food Action Plan. Mr. Rogers stated that during the pre-application
process he informs all applicants of the 2025 Food Action Plan and recommends that they
review it. Mr. Greathouse stated that the project team had not yet reviewed the Food
Action Plan.

Committee Member Alvarez asked how the applicant could guarantee the proposed unit
prices. Mr. Greathouse stated that the units would be market-rate, explained that pricing
would be determined by market conditions, and stated that the development is not
intended to be either “attainable” or “luxury” housing.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8
June 10, 2025

Committee Member Alvarez asked whether there had been difficulty in attracting tenants
or if there was interest in the product. Ms. Susini stated that there has been high demand
and that people are excited about the project.

Chair Greathouse asked for details regarding parking, including whether garages would
be provided and whether the overall parking count meets City requirements. Mr. Reddie
stated that some of the townhomes would include garages, stated that the project exceeds
the minimum parking requirements, and explained that the development model has been
successful in 50 similar projects over the past 12 years without parking issues. Mr. Reddie
stated that each unit would have one designated space, with additional shared and visitor
parking available.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Thomas Kelly stated that he is with Valley Leadership, stated that he is in favor of the
request, and explained that Valley Leadership supports promoting quality projects within
the community. Mr. Kelly acknowledged that all development places stress on a
community but stated that the project represents a good approach. Mr. Kelly stated that
the proposed buffers between the single-family neighborhood and commercial areas are
appropriate.

Tawee Phattarak expressed concern about cumulative traffic impacts, stated that
additional subdivisions in the area will also contribute to congestion, and asked about the
traffic generation. Mr. Williams stated that the traffic study predicted 31 left turns and 31
right turns out of the development during the morning peak hour, with approximately 600
total trips anticipated over the course of the day. Mr. Williams stated that post-COVID
traffic patterns have shifted and that changes in travel behavior were considered in the
study. Ms. Phattarak stated that there are already traffic issues in the area and that this
development would worsen them.

Joe Melton expressed concern with the proposed density and the target market for the
development, stated that he would not have chosen to live in the area if he had not had
the opportunity to purchase a home, and stated that while he understands the need for a
land use transition this project should offer something different. Mr. Melton expressed
doubt that a $5,000 incentive would make a significant difference for a home buyer and
stated that a mix of condominiums and for-sale homes would be more appropriate.

Melissa Campos echoed the comments made by Mr. Melton, stated that she had
reviewed other Yardly communities and found that they generally have two to three
points of access and greater spacing between access points, expressed concern about
traffic, and stated that a previous rezoning proposal for the site included 50 to 60 fewer
units. Ms. Campos stated that her written comments focused more on concerns about
water and electricity availability in the area, rather than the energy efficiency of the
proposed homes.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8
June 10, 2025


Josepha Garcia stated concerns about traffic impacts and that the development would
create additional congestion.

APPLICANT RESPONSE

Brian Greathouse stated that the property is going to be developed and that all
development generates traffic. Mr. Greathouse stated that the proposed residential
project would generate less traffic than a commercial use, stated that the development
team has worked with the City to confirm water and sewer availability, and explained that
the proposal represents a reasonable compromise for the area.

FLOOR/PUBLIC DISCUSSION CLOSED: MOTION, DISCUSSION, AND VOTE

Chair Greathouse stated that he is not in favor of the proposed density and asked
whether the applicant was open to reducing the number of units.

Committee Member Alvarez asked whether a second point of access could be added,
including pedestrian or vehicular connections to adjacent retail.

Chair Greathouse noted that other developments in the area have connected to
adjacent commercial properties.

Committee Member Busching stated that the Committee has required pedestrian
connections in the past and that this project could include a vehicular access point.

Chair Greathouse asked about the density of a nearby townhome development.

Mr. Reddie responded that the nearby development has a density of 13 to 18 units per
acre.

Committee Member Busching asked what the maximum density is under the R-2
zoning district.

Samuel Rogers, staff, stated that the R-2 PRD option allows for a maximum of 10.5
dwelling units per acre.

Chair Greathouse asked whether the applicant team would consider reducing the unit
count.

Committee Member Busching reiterated that the proposal does not conform to the Rio
Moñtana Area Plan.

Chair Greathouse asked what options are available to the Committee.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8
June 10, 2025


Mr. Rogers stated that the Committee could either stipulate a maximum number of units
or deny the request as filed and approve the R-2 zoning district. Mr. Rogers noted that
the application includes a stipulation requiring general conformance with the site plan,
and that this stipulation would need to be removed if a new motion is made.

Committee Member Busching stated that stipulating the unit count would allow the
number of units to be changed through the Planning Hearing Officer process, whereas
approving R-2 zoning would require a full rezoning process to increase the density.

Motion:
Committee Member Kay Shepard made a motion to recommend denial of Z-31-25-8
and approve as R-2 with a deleted stipulation and a modified stipulation. Committee
Member Lee Coleman seconded the motion.

Vote:
6-5, motion to recommend denial of Z-31-25-8 and approve as R-2 with a deleted
stipulation and a modified stipulation, passed with Committee Members Alvarez, F.
Daniels, Falcon, Shepard, Viera, and Greathouse in favor and Committee Member
Beehler, Brooks, Busching, Coleman, and Thompson, opposed.

Committee Member Beehler stated that Committee Member Busching argued that the
development should be denied as filed and approved as R-2 but voted against the motion
and asked Committee Member Busching to explain her vote. Committee Member
Busching explained that she voted against the motion because the R-2 zoning district
does not comply with Rio Moñtana Area Plan designation for the site and stated that
reducing the project’s density through the zoning district is more effective than through
stipulations.

VPC recommended stipulations:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan
date stamped April 21, 2025, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

2. Building elevations AND SITE PLAN shall be presented for review and
1. comment to the South Mountain Village Planning Committee prior to
preliminary site plan approval

3. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and
2. textural changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone,
colored textured concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a
decorative and aesthetic treatment, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8
June 10, 2025


4. A minimum of one-third of the dwelling unit buildings shall not exceed one
3. story or 20 feet in height.

5. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below
4. and as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Secure bicycle parking shall be provided per Section 1307 of the
Zoning Ordinance.

b. Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05
spaces per dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces required.

c. A minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall
include standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging
capabilities.

d. Bicycle parking spaces shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or
a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade.

e. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained
on site within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance, and
separated from vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The
repair station shall include, but not be limited to:

i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the
ground;

iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin
freely while making adjustments to the bike.

6. A minimum 5% of the required parking spaces shall provide EV installed
5. infrastructure.

7. Site lighting shall be provided at building entrances/exits and in public
6. assembly and parking areas, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

8. If perimeter fencing is provided along the south side of the site it shall be a
7. minimum of 75 percent open view fencing, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8
June 10, 2025

9. The landscape setback along Baseline Road shall be planted to include
8. native cacti or similar spiny desert accent plants, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

10. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large
9. canopy, shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings,
with a minimum five 5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department. Where utility conflicts exist, the developer
shall work with the Planning and Development Department on alternative
design solutions consistent with a pedestrian environment for installing the
required plants.

11. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other
10. native nectar species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

12. All internal pedestrian pathways shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping,
11. or a combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

13. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be
12. constructed of decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other
pavement treatments that visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

14. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as
13. approved by the Planning and Development Department. Shade may be
achieved by structures or by minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade
trees, or a combination thereof.

15. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for
14. stormwater management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by
the Planning and Development and/or Street Transportation departments.
This includes but is not limited to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales,
permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater Phoenix Metro Green
Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for Alternative
Stormwater Management.

16. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of
15. basin, and only allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and
functional turf areas located on properties for uses such as residential
common areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8
June 10, 2025

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that
16. demonstrates a commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup
program for a minimum of 10 years, or as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

18. The developer shall reconstruct the bus stop pad on westbound Baseline
17. Road. Bus stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix
Standard Detail P1260 with a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall
be spaced from an intersection according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail
P1258, as approved or modified by the Public Transit Department. Trees
shall be placed to provide 50% shade coverage to bus stop pad at full
maturity.

19. A 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated along the
18. north side of Baseline Road, adjacent to the subject site and a minimum 10-
foot-wide multi-use trail (MUT) shall be constructed within the easement, in
accordance with the MAG supplemental detail and, as approved or modified
by the Planning and Development Department.

20. The sidewalk along Baseline Road shall be a minimum of 6 feet in width and
19. detached with a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape strip located between the
sidewalk and back of curb and planted to the following standards, as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted
20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature
height of two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to
achieve a minimum of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a
pedestrian environment for installing the required plants.

21. A minimum of 55-feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for
20. north side of Baseline Road.

22. All existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-way shall be
21. underground, adjacent to the development. Developer to coordinate with the
affected utilities company for their review and permitting.

23. Existing SRP facilities along Baseline Road are to be relocated outside of
22. City right-of-way, unless otherwise approved by the Street Transportation




South Mountain Village Planning Committee
Meeting Summary
Z-31-25-8
June 10, 2025

Department. Relocations that require additional dedications or land transfer
require completion prior to obtaining plat and/or civil plan review approval.

24. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, replace any
23. broken or out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets
and upgrade all off-site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA
guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with
24. paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands,
landscaping and other incidentals as per plans approved by the Planning and
Development Department. All improvements shall comply with all ADA
accessibility standards.

26. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and
25. operational characteristics of the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners
or tenants of the property. The form and content of such documents shall be
according to the templates and instructions provided which have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

27. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant
26. shall conduct Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey
report of the development area for review and approval by the City
Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing, landscape salvage, and/or
grading approval.

28. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the
27. Phase I data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified
archaeologist, determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the
applicant shall conduct Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations

29. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction,
28. the developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a
33-foot radius of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time
for the Archaeology Office to properly assess the materials.

30. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition
29. 207 waiver of claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa
County Recorder's Office and delivered to the City to be included in the
rezoning application file for record.

STAFF COMMENTS REGARDING VPC RECOMMENDATION:

None.




ATTACHMENT D

REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
AUGUST 7, 2025

ITEM NO: 3
DISTRICT NO.: 8
SUBJECT:

Application #: Z-31-25-8 (Companion Case GPA-SM-1-25-8)
Location: Approximately 1,130 feet east of the northeast corner of 23rd Avenue and
Baseline Road
From: S-1
To: R-3
Acreage: 14.37
Proposal: Multifamily residential
Applicant: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.
Owner: Mundall Family Revocable Trust c/o Danny Mundall & Georgia Mundall
Representative: Brian Greathouse, Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A.

ACTIONS:

Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to stipulations.

Village Planning Committee (VPC) Recommendation:
South Mountain 6/10/2025 Denial as filed and approval as R-2 with a deleted stipulation and a
modified stipulation. Vote: 6-5.

Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, per the staff recommendation.

Motion Discussion: N/A

Motion details: Commissioner Matthews made a MOTION to approve Z-31-25-8, per staff
recommendation.

Maker: Matthews
Second: Gorraiz
Vote: 7-1 (Chairperson Busching)
Absent: Jaramillo
Opposition Present: Yes

Findings:

1. The requested R-3 zoning district will provide a transition between the commercial
development to the east and the single-family development to the west.

2. The proposal, as stipulated, will create a strong pedestrian environment along Baseline
Road with a shaded detached sidewalk and multi-use trail that will convey residents
safely and comfortably along the Baseline Road multi use trail alignment.

3. The proposal will create additional housing options in line with the Housing Phoenix
Plan’s goal of preserving or creating 50,000 housing units by 2030.




Stipulations:

1. The development shall be in general conformance with the site plan date stamped April
21, 2025, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

2. Building elevations shall be presented for review and comment to the South Mountain
Village Planning Committee prior to preliminary site plan approval

3. Building elevations shall contain multiple colors, exterior accent materials and textural
changes that exhibit quality and durability such as brick, stone, colored textured
concrete or stucco, or other materials to provide a decorative and aesthetic treatment,
as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

4. A minimum of one-third of the dwelling unit buildings shall not exceed one story or 20
feet in height.

5. The development shall incorporate bicycle infrastructure as described below and as
approved by the Planning and Development Department.

a. Secure bicycle parking shall be provided per Section 1307 of the Zoning
Ordinance.

b. Guest bicycle parking shall be provided at a minimum rate of 0.05 spaces per
dwelling unit, up to a maximum of 50 spaces required.

c. A minimum of 10 percent of the provided bicycle parking spaces shall include
standard electrical receptacles for electric bicycle charging capabilities.

d. Bicycle parking spaces shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade.

e. A bicycle repair station (“fix it station”) shall be provided and maintained on site
within an amenity area or near a primary site entrance, and separated from
vehicular maneuvering areas, where applicable. The repair station shall include,
but not be limited to:

i. Standard repair tools affixed to the station;

ii. A tire gauge and pump affixed to the base of the station or the ground;

iii. A bicycle repair stand which allows pedals and wheels to spin freely
while making adjustments to the bike.

6. A minimum 5% of the required parking spaces shall provide EV installed infrastructure.

7. Site lighting shall be provided at building entrances/exits and in public assembly and
parking areas, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

8. If perimeter fencing is provided along the south side of the site it shall be a minimum of
75 percent open view fencing, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department.

9. The landscape setback along Baseline Road shall be planted to include native cacti or
similar spiny desert accent plants, as approved by the Planning and Development
Department. 365
10. All landscape setbacks shall be planted with minimum 2-inch caliper, large canopy,
shade trees, planted 20 feet on center, or in equivalent groupings, with a minimum five
5-gallon shrubs per tree, as approved by the Planning and Development Department.
Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment for installing the required plants.

11. A minimum of 10% of the required shrubs, shall be a milkweed or other native nectar
species, and shall be planted in groups of three or more, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

12. All internal pedestrian pathways shall be shaded by a structure, landscaping, or a
combination of the two to provide a minimum of 75% shade, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department.

13. Where pedestrian walkways cross a vehicular path, the pathway shall be constructed of
decorative pavers, stamped or colored concrete, or other pavement treatments that
visually contrasts parking and drive aisle surfaces, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

14. A minimum of 25% of the surface parking areas shall be shaded, as approved by the
Planning and Development Department. Shade may be achieved by structures or by
minimum 2-inch caliper, drought tolerant, shade trees, or a combination thereof.

15. A minimum of two green stormwater infrastructure (GSI) elements for stormwater
management shall be implemented, as approved or modified by the Planning and
Development and/or Street Transportation departments. This includes but is not limited
to stormwater harvesting basins, bioswales, permeable pavement, etc., per the Greater
Phoenix Metro Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development Details for
Alternative Stormwater Management.

16. Natural turf shall only be utilized for required retention areas (bottom of basin, and only
allowed on slopes if required for slope stabilization) and functional turf areas located on
properties for uses such as residential common areas, as approved by the Planning
and Development Department.

17. Prior to final site plan approval, documentation shall be provided that demonstrates a
commitment to participate in the Water Efficiency Checkup program for a minimum of
10 years, or as approved by the Planning and Development Department.

18. The developer shall reconstruct the bus stop pad on westbound Baseline Road. Bus
stop pad shall be constructed according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1260 with
a minimum depth of 10 feet. Bus stop pad shall be spaced from an intersection
according to City of Phoenix Standard Detail P1258, as approved or modified by the
Public Transit Department. Trees shall be placed to provide 50% shade coverage to
bus stop pad at full maturity.

19. A 30-foot-wide multi-use trail easement (MUTE) shall be dedicated along the north side
of Baseline Road, adjacent to the subject site and a minimum 10-foot-wide multi-use
trail (MUT) shall be constructed within the easement, in accordance with the MAG
supplemental detail and, as approved or modified by the Planning and Development
Department.

20. The sidewalk along Baseline Road shall be a minimum of 6 feet in width and detached
with a minimum 10-foot-wide landscape strip located between the sidewalk and back of
curb and planted to the following standards, as approved by the Planning and
Development Department.

a. Minimum 2-inch caliper, single-trunk, large canopy, shade trees planted 20 feet
on center, or in equivalent groupings.

b. Shrubs, accents and vegetative groundcovers with a maximum mature height of
two feet evenly distributed throughout the landscape area to achieve a minimum
of 75% live coverage.

Where utility conflicts exist, the developer shall work with the Planning and
Development Department on alternative design solutions consistent with a pedestrian
environment for installing the required plants.

21. A minimum of 55 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated and constructed for north side
of Baseline Road.

22. All existing electrical utilities within the public right-of-way shall be underground,
adjacent to the development. Developer to coordinate with the affected utilities
company for their review and permitting.

23. Existing SRP facilities along Baseline Road are to be relocated outside of City right-of-
way, unless otherwise approved by the Street Transportation Department. Relocations
that require additional dedications or land transfer require completion prior to obtaining
plat and/or civil plan review approval.

24. Replace unused driveways with sidewalk, curb and gutter. Also, replace any broken or
out-of-grade curb, gutter, sidewalk, and curb ramps on all streets and upgrade all off-
site improvements to be in compliance with current ADA guidelines.

25. All streets within and adjacent to the development shall be constructed with paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, curb ramps, streetlights, median islands, landscaping and other
incidentals, as per plans approved by the Planning and Development Department. All
improvements shall comply with all ADA accessibility standards.

26. The property owner shall record documents that disclose the existence, and operational
characteristics of the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport to future owners or tenants of the
property. The form and content of such documents shall be according to the templates
and instructions provided which have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

27. If determined necessary by the Phoenix Archaeology Office, the applicant shall conduct
Phase I data testing and submit an archaeological survey report of the development
area for review and approval by the City Archaeologist prior to clearing and grubbing,
landscape salvage, and/or grading approval.

28. If Phase I data testing is required, and if, upon review of the results from the Phase I
data testing, the City Archaeologist, in consultation with a qualified archaeologist,
determines such data recovery excavations are necessary, the applicant shall conduct
Phase II archaeological data recovery excavations.

29. In the event archaeological materials are encountered during construction, the
developer shall immediately cease all ground-disturbing activities within a 33-foot radius
of the discovery, notify the City Archaeologist, and allow time for the Archaeology Office
to properly assess the materials.

30. Prior to final site plan approval, the landowner shall execute a Proposition 207 waiver of
claims form. The waiver shall be recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's Office
and delivered to the City to be included in the rezoning application file for record.

This publication can be made available in alternate format upon request. Please contact
Saneeya Mir at 602-686-6461, saneeya.mir@phoenix.gov, TTY: Use 7-1-1.




ATTACHMENT E

CITY OF PHOENIX
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

*REVISED – 8/13/2025

FORM TO REQUEST PC to CC
I HEREBY REQUEST THAT THE CC HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON:

APPLICATION NO/ * GPA-SM-1-25-8 (SIGNATURE ON ORIGINAL IN FILE)
LOCATION and Z-31-25-8 opposition X applicant

Approximately
1,130 feet east of
the northeast
corner of 23rd
Avenue and
Baseline Road
APPEALED FROM: PC 8/7/2025 7724 South 22nd Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85041

PC DATE STREET/ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
TO PC/CC CC 9/3/2025 Brittany Conklin
HEARING 602-463-4799
Brittany.e.conklin@gmail.com

CC DATE NAME / PHONE / EMAIL
REASON FOR REQUEST:

Community and nearby residents not properly informed of project and need
opportunity to review and comment. South Mountain Planning reportedly rejected and
needs review. Full community feedback is vital.


RECEIVED BY: 8/13/2025 RECEIVED ON: Dom Amodio

Joshua Bednarek Dalia Adams
Tricia Gomes Camryn Thompson/Teresa Garcia
Racelle Escolar Micah Alexander
Sarah Stockham GIS
Adam Stranieri Byron Easton (for PHO appeals only)
Heather Klotz Village Planner - Robert Kuhfuss
Stephanie Vasquez Applicant




REVISED 10/16/2024 vcm
*REVISED 8/13/2025
CITY OF PHOENIX

AUG 132025
PlANNINC. AND D[V[lOPM[NT DlPARIM[NI
Planning & Development
The PLANNING COMMISSION agenda for August 7, 2025 is attached. Department

The CITY COUNCIL may approve the recommendation of the Planning Commission wit hout further
hearing unless:

1. A REQUEST FOR A HEARING by the CITY COUNCIL is filed within seven (7) days.

There is a $630.00 appeal fee for hearings requested by the applicant, due by 5:00 p.m. August 14,
2025.

Any member of the public may, within seven (7) days after the Planning Commission's action, request a
hearing by the City Council on any application. If you wish to request a hearing, fill out and sign the form
below and return it to the Planning and Development Department by 5:00 p.m., August 14, 2025.

2. A WRITTEN PROTEST is filed, no later than seven (7) days after the Planning Commission's action, which
requires a three-f ourths vote. A written protest will require a three-fourths vote of the City Council to
approve a zoning change when the owners of at least 20 percent of the property by area and number of
lots, tracts, and condominium units within the zoning petition area have signed the petition. The zoning
petition area includes both the area of the proposed amendment, and the area within 150 feet of the
proposed amendment, including all rights-of-way. For condominium, townhouse and other types of
ownership with common lands, authorized property owner signatures are required. Please see Planning
and Development Department Staff for additional information prior to gathering signatures.

To require a three-fourths vote of the City Council for approval, a written protest for applications on this
agenda must be filed with the Planning and Development Department by 5:00 p.m. August 14, 2025.

The Planning and Development Department will verify ownership by protestors to determine whether or not
a three-fourths vote will be required.

3. A CONTINUANCE is granted at the PLANNING COMMISSION. In the event of a continuance, there is an
$830.00 fee due from the applicant within fourteen (14) days, by 5:00 p.m. August 21, 2025.

FORM TO REQUEST CITY COUNCIL HEARING
I HEARBY REQUEST THAT THE CITY COUNCIL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING:
*6.-P�,-�ff\ -\ -�5-i
APikiEATIWN
I t�Oft E. o£-()£ CPV\.QJ/ �
{OCATION OF APPLICATION SITE

� �Bis,e,l\� \
& Z-31-25-8
4N�PEi�;Ror7'0oZ) KJoPPOSITION P�� AN'-D).?lO
0 APPLICANT ER TAKING THE APPEAL)

LOW, I ACKNOWLEDGE
Y'v\L\\V\..,




ATTACHMENT F

From: Tom Kelly
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Support for Z-31-25-8. 23rd Ave and Baseline Road
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 12:25:10 PM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious   ‌


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I’m writing in strong support of Zoning Case Z-31-25-8, a project that brings much-needed
housing diversity to the South Mountain Village. Rezoning from S-1 to R-3A will allow for a
thoughtfully designed, medium-density residential development that aligns with the city’s long-
term goals and responds to our region’s housing shortage.

I disagree with the South Mountain Village Planning Committee’s decision to deny this project due
to the overall density. This project is unique and provides a new type of housing for the area.
Providing more options for families and individuals who rent near jobs, schools, and nature is
critical to addressing the needs of Phoenix residents.

As Phoenix works to ensure that home is where it all starts for every resident, projects like this are
essential. I respectfully urge you to recommend approval.

Sincerely,

Tom Kelly
30 E Saint Anne Ave, Phoenix 85042

Sent from my iPad




From: Sarah Amaral CFRE
To: PDD Planning Commission
Cc: Amanda Straight
Subject: Support for Z-31-25-8 – 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 12:57:08 PM
Attachments: firstplaceicon-emailgreenbackground_9f09191c-9984-4267-bbcb-169b7026a193.png
1_9cd01675-c4ea-4a80-9732-ddffb230bb07.png
5_07e5fbfe-80bb-41d0-af98-e074ed5778da.png
2_70a09438-1177-4cfd-8796-b9aa72a050b6.png
4_cba3eafa-56b6-4be6-a987-46cafead6cd4.png
firstplaceemailsignaturebanner_16af16b4-2a44-4916-8bf2-0d993d4f3ca9.png




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I’m writing in strong support of Zoning Case Z-31-25-8, a project that brings much-
needed housing diversity to the South Mountain Village. Rezoning from S-1 to R-3A will
allow for a thoughtfully designed, medium-density residential development that aligns
with the city’s long-term goals and responds to our region’s housing shortage.

I disagree with the South Mountain Village Planning Committee’s decision to deny this
project due to the overall density. This project is unique and provides a new type of
housing for the area. Providing more options for families and individuals who rent near
jobs, schools, and nature is critical to addressing the needs of Phoenix residents.

As Phoenix works to ensure that home is where it all starts for every resident, projects
like this are essential. I respectfully urge you to recommend approval.

Sincerely,
Sarah Amaral
1941 E El Parque Dr.
Tempe, AZ 85282


Sarah Amaral CFRE
Director of Development, First Place AZ
p: 602-464-6630 c: 602-697-5352
e: samaral@firstplaceaz.org | [yourdomain.url]firstplaceaz.org
[firstplaceaz.org]
3001 N. Third St., Phoenix, AZ 85012



[facebook.com] [linkedin.com] [instagram.com]
[firstplaceaz.org] [youtube.com]




[azmvdnow.gov]

First Place AZ is a qualified Arizona Charitable Tax Credit Organization. Your gift may qualify
for a dollar-for-dollar credit on your Arizona state taxes—up to $495 for individuals and $987 for
married couples filing jointly. Learn more at firstplaceglobal.org/donate [firstplaceglobal.org].




From: Atllas Hopkins
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Support for Z-31-25-8 – 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 2:11:57 AM




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious     ‌


To whom it may concern,

I’m writing in strong support of Zoning Case Z-31-25-8, a project that brings much-needed
housing diversity to the South Mountain Village. Rezoning from S-1 to R-3A will allow for a
thoughtfully designed, medium-density residential development that aligns with the city’s
long-term goals and responds to our region’s housing shortage.

I disagree with the South Mountain Village Planning Committee’s decision to deny this
project due to the overall density. This project is unique and provides a new type of housing
for the area. Providing more options for families and individuals who rent near jobs,
schools, and nature is critical to addressing the needs of Phoenix residents.

As Phoenix works to ensure that home is where it all starts for every resident, projects like
this are essential. I respectfully urge you to recommend approval.



Atllas Hopkins
3522 N Flower st.

Thank you,
M. Architectural Studies
Arizona State University' 25
S.E.E.D Philanthropy Founder
SOULJAISM DESIGN HOUSE
602-577-0517 | atllasehopkins@gmail.com




From: Bruce Weber
To: PDD Planning Commission
Subject: Support for Z-31-25-8 – 23rd Avenue and Baseline Road
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 5:56:49 PM
Attachments: image003[61].png
image004[26].png




CAUTION: This email originated outside of the City of Phoenix.
Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the sender and were
expecting this email.

Report Suspicious   ‌


Dear Planning Commission Members,

I’m writing in strong support of Zoning Case Z-31-25-8, a project that brings much-needed
housing diversity to the South Mountain Village. Rezoning from S-1 to R-3A will allow for a
thoughtfully designed, medium-density residential development that aligns with the city’s
long-term goals and responds to our region’s housing shortage.

I disagree with the South Mountain Village Planning Committee’s decision to deny this
project due to the overall density. This project is unique and provides a new type of housing
for the area. Providing more options for families and individuals who rent near jobs,
schools, and nature is critical to addressing the needs of Phoenix residents.

As Phoenix works to ensure that home is where it all starts for every resident, projects like
this are essential. I respectfully urge you to recommend approval.

Sincerely,
Bruce Weber
4628 E Berneil Dr
Phoenix, AZ 85028




Docusign Envelope ID: B1D54B8C-9367-4CED-A6D7-1B01CBB5D4D7





I write to you as the owner of approximately 0.4 acres of commercial
property on the northeast side of Broadway Rd at 24th St urging you
to support the rezoning of land with Z-31-25-8 and GPA SM 1-25-8-
VPC.

The builder has a plan that will integrate very well into the
surrounding community. Taylor Morrison is a reputable nationwide
home builder who plans to bring a much-needed varied housing
product to the area with quality finishes and amenities.

I urge you to please support this project.


Sincerely,


Sid Chalasani 7/24/2025

Twenty Peaks, LLC
2424 E. Broadway Rd
Phoenix, AZ 85040







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO ADD-ON (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Enter Into Employment
Agreement with the City Manager (Ordinance S-52295) - Citywide

Request to authorize the Mayor, on behalf of the City Council, to enter into an
agreement with Ed Zuercher as City Manager effective November 17, 2025, with the
following principal terms.

Summary
The agreement with the City Manager shall commence on November 17, 2025 and
shall continue for an indefinite term as provided in the City Charter.

The City Manager shall receive an annual salary of $415,542 paid bi-weekly, with
annual increases equal to the total compensation percentage awarded by the City
Council to employee bargaining groups, subject to City Council disapproval at the City
Manager's annual performance review. The City Manager shall receive the same
benefit and fringe benefit package as other City executives.

The City Council recognizes the importance of the City Manager's participation in
professional and civic organizations in the performance of his duties and the City shall
reimburse the City Manager for ordinary and usual educational and membership
expenses incurred by the City Manager not to exceed $2,500 annually.

The City Manager, as a City employee, is entitled to full benefits of the City Retirement
System as set forth in the City Charter, Chapter 24. Because the City Manager
currently is a City of Phoenix Employees' Retirement System (COPERS) retiree, the
City Manager’s current retirement benefit shall be suspended as of November 17,
2025 and the City Manager shall be restored to the status of an active Member in
COPERS. In this regard, the City Manager shall accrue additional service credit and
benefits in COPERS for his employment under this Agreement. Upon his termination in
accordance with Section 3 of this Agreement, the City Manager’s COPERS’ benefit
shall be recalculated to include his additional benefit accrual. The City Manager’s
current benefit option and designated survivor(s) shall remain in effect for his original
COPERS benefit. However, the City Manager shall be entitled to elect a benefit option
and to designate a survivor, if applicable, in accordance with COPERS’ plan terms for
the additional benefit he accrues during his employment under this Agreement.




The City Manager, as a qualifying City employee, is entitled to full benefits of the
Medical Expense Reimbursement Plan (MERP). Because the City Manager currently
is a covered retiree, the City Manager’s current MERP benefit shall be suspended as
of November 17, 2025 and the City Manager shall be restored to the status of an
active employee. Upon his termination in accordance with Section 3 of this Agreement,
the City Manager’s MERP benefit shall be reinstated. The City Manager’s current
benefit ($202 per month) and designated survivor(s) shall remain in effect for his
original MERP benefit.

The City agrees to defend and indemnify the City Manager against any claim or
demand for damages, including legal actions, arising out of or in connection with any
alleged act or omission occurring within the course and scope of performance by the
City Manager of the City Manager duties as such.

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by the Law Department on behalf of the City Council.





AGREEMENT NO.

THIS AGREEMENT is made this 17th day of September 2025, by and
between the CITY OF PHOENIX (the "City"), a municipal corporation of the State
of Arizona, acting by and through its Mayor and City Council; and ED
ZUERCHER (the "Manager"), City Manager of the City of Phoenix.

W I T N E S S E T H:

1. Scope.

The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the basic terms and
conditions under which Ed Zuercher shall perform his duties as Manager for and
on behalf of the City, including the compensation, reimbursement, and fringe
benefit provisions relating to said position.

2. Term.

This Agreement shall commence on November 17, 2025, for an
indefinite term as required by the City Charter, Chapter III, Sec. 2, and shall be a
continuing agreement between the Manager and the City unless subsequently
amended. The specific provisions relating to payment of Salary and Fringe
Benefits as set forth in Paragraph 6 below shall continue until such time as they
may be changed by further amendments to this Agreement. The adoption of any
amendments to this Agreement shall not be deemed to affect any other term or
condition of this Agreement unless specifically modified by such amendment
and agreed to by the parties.

3. Termination or Resignation of Manager.

a. Charter Requirements. The parties recognize the applicability of the
provision of Chapter III, Section 2 of the Charter of the· City relative
to removal of the Manager without cause and· removal of the
Manager for cause. "For cause" may include but shall not be limited
to affecting or concerning the ability or fitness of the City Manager
to perform the duties required by the City Charter and the City Code
or affecting the capacity or fitness for the Office of the City Manager,
such as inefficiency, incompetency, or other acts leading to
disqualification.
b. Notice of Resignation. The Manager further agrees that if he
voluntarily resigns from his position with the City, he will provide
the City Council with a minimum of sixty (60) days advance notice.



c. Termination for Cause. The Manager further agrees to fully
comply with the City of Phoenix's Ethics Policy and Non-
Discrimination and Anti-Harassment ordinance as either may be
amended from time to time. In the event the Manager violates the
Ethics Policy or Non-Discrimination and Anti- Harassment
ordinance, the parties agree that such a violation constitutes cause
for termination under Chapter III, Section 2 of the City Charter.

4. Duties.
The duties of the Manager shall be as set forth in the City Charter,
City Code, Ordinances, and formal actions taken by the City Council.

a. Hours. The parties recognize that no specific hours limit the
performance of the duties of the Manager. The Manager is
expected to devote as many hours to the job as may be necessary
to satisfactorily perform the duties of his office.

b. Full Time Performance. The parties agree that the Manager shall
devote his full time to the performance of his duties as Manager.
The provisions of this subparagraph shall not prohibit the
Manager from engaging in outside employment, such as teaching,
writing, or speaking activities before or on behalf of any
educational, professional, or civic groups or association on his own
time and not at City expense.

c. Outside work. The City Manager may not accept compensation or
an honorarium for such activities, except:
• The Manager may receive expense reimbursement from the
inviting group or association or may be reimbursed by the
City for such activities related to his leadership position.
• The City Manager currently receives compensation as a
trustee of the Virginia G. Piper Charitable Trust, designation
of which predates this Agreement. The parties agree to
continue this arrangement. The Trust holds meetings on one
Monday afternoon per month and on rare occasions at other
times throughout the year. Trustees award charitable gifts
from the Trust to qualified nonprofits in Maricopa County
in the areas of health care, education, children, religious
organizations, older adults, and the arts. The Manager
agrees to take vacation leave for those meetings. The
Manager agrees that his employment with the City will take



precedence at all times and that he will not participate in any
activity that creates a conflict of interest.
• The Manager further agrees that all outside activities shall
be conducted only in such a manner as to cause no
interference or conflict of interest with the normal course of
business activities and duties of the Manager.

5. Residency.

Pursuant to Chapter III, Section 2 of the City Charter, the Manager
shall be a resident of the City.

6. Performance Evaluation.

The City Council and the Manager will, as part of the Manager's
performance evaluation, mutually establish the Manager's annual work objectives
and review such objectives once each year by December 31. These objectives will
be based on an appraisal of the Manager's performance related to the current
conditions in the City, major work program goals necessary to achieve the City
goals, and the resource capabilities of the City organization.

The Mayor and the City Council will annually, prior to the end of
December, as part of said annual review, evaluate the Manager's progress and
performance for results achieved in relation to the past objectives, based on the
goals established for the prior year. The parties agree that they will bring perceived
problems or inadequacies to the attention of the other, and that they will exercise
good-faith efforts to mutually resolve such perceived problems or inadequacies
and differences of opinion.

7. Salary and Fringe Benefits.

The salary and fringe benefits of the Manager shall consist of the
following:

a. Salary. Biweekly payroll remuneration to be computed on an annual
basis as set forth herein in the annual sum of FOUR HUNDRED
FIFTEEN THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-TWO
DOLLARS AND ($415,542.00).

b. Salary Increases. The Manager shall receive annual pay increases
equal to the total compensation percentage awarded by the City



Council to employee bargaining groups, effective on the date the
increases are effective for the employee bargaining groups, subject to
disapproval by the Council at the time of the annual performance
evaluation, effective with the next pay period. If the employee
bargaining groups do not all receive the same percentage increase in
salary, the Manager shall receive the lowest total compensation
percentage increase given to a bargaining group that year. Any
additional performance-based increases must be approved at a formal
Chapter III, section 2.

c. Deferred Compensation (40l(a) Plan/457 Plan). Payment by the City
into the 401(a) Plan shall be computed on the same percentage basis
as that provided for other members of the Executive Class of City
employees. To the extent permitted by federal law and consistent with
the City's 401(a) Plan, the City Manager may also include any form of
payment due at retirement into the 401(a) Plan. Such payment may
include, but not be limited to, sick leave or vacation leave payments,
performance payments, and any other similar pay. To the extent
permitted by federal law and the City's 457 Plan, the City Manager
may also participate in the City's 457 Plan under the same terms and
conditions provided to the City of Phoenix Executive Class of
employees. The entire amount of such Deferred Compensation,
401(a) or 457 Plan(s), benefits paid under this paragraph shall be
deemed compensation for Retirement Plan purposes, to the extent
permitted by law.

d. Other Payments Consistent with Executive Class. The City Manager
shall receive payment by the City of direct insurance premiums and
other direct payments as made applicable by this Agreement or
generally applicable to the Executive Class of City employees as set
forth in the Annual City Pay Ordinance adopted by the City Council.


8. Reimbursed Expenses.

The parties recognize that it is of value to the City to provide the
Manager with access to professional and civic organizations and institutions in the
performance of his duties. The City Controller is, therefore, directed to reimburse
from City funds ordinary and usual educational and membership expenses
incurred by the Manager at his discretion in the performance of his duties in an



amount not to exceed TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS
($2,500.00). These amounts may include the following:

a. Professional Membership. Professional membership dues and
subscriptions to professional organizations and journals.

b. Civic Organizations. Initiation and annual dues to not more than
two civic organizations.


9. Automobile and Communication Allowances.

The parties agree the Manager shall receive the same automobile
and communication allowances as generally applicable to the Executive Class of
City employees as set forth in the Annual City Pay Ordinance adopted by the City
Council. These payments shall not be deemed compensation for Retirement Plan
purposes.


10. Other Fringe Benefits.

The Manager shall be entitled to the same other fringe benefits, such
as insurance benefits, vacation, sick leave, vacation buy-back, and other
miscellaneous benefits as are available to all members of the Executive Class
pursuant to the City Pay Plan and Administration Regulations. The City
Manager’s vacation accrual will be limited to the number of hours that can be
rolled over at the end of each calendar year consistent with other members of the
Executive Class. The parties agree to 240 hours of vacation leave annually, with
120 hours at the beginning of employment. These other fringe benefits shall not
be deemed compensation for purposes of computing Final Average Salary and
retirement benefits.

11. Retirement Benefits.

The retirement components for the Manager for COPERS shall
consist of the following:

11.1. Compensation. The Manager, as a City employee, is entitled to
full benefits of the City Retirement System as set forth in the
City Charter, Chapter 24. To the extent permitted by law it is the
specific intent of the parties that the Manager's compensation for



Retirement Plan purposes shall be calculated based on his salary
as set forth in Paragraph 6.1 (as may be amended pursuant to
Sec. 6.2) and Deferred Compensation.

11.2 Sick Leave Pay Out. The Manager acknowledges that pursuant
to Administrative Regulation 2.441, VI. A., payment for
accumulated sick leave at retirement shall not be used for
purposes of calculating his Final Average Salary and retirement
benefits under the Retirement Plan. Unused sick leave shall be
used as service credit as prescribed by the Retirement Plan.

11.3 Vacation Leave Payout. The Manager acknowledges that
pursuant to Administrative Regulation 2.18 VI. A. 3., payment
for accumulated vacation leave at retirement shall not be used
for purposes of calculating his Final Average Salary and
retirement benefits under the Retirement Plan.

11.4 Reservation of Rights. Other than using only his salary and
Deferred Compensation to calculate his Final Average Salary
for Retirement Plan purposes, the Manager expressly preserves
all other rights, interests, and privileges to benefits under the
City Retirement System as made available to all members of the
Executive Class of employees to the extent permitted by law.

11.5 Participation in COPERS. The Manager, as a City employee, is
entitled to full benefits of the City Retirement System as set
forth in the City Charter, Chapter 24. Because the Manager
currently is a COPERS retiree, the Manager’s current retirement
benefit shall be suspended as of November 17, 2025 and the
Manager shall be restored to the status of an active Member in
COPERS. In this regard, the Manager shall accrue additional
service credit and benefits in COPERS for his employment
under this Agreement. Upon his termination in accordance with
Section 3 of this Agreement, the Manager’s COPERS’ benefit
shall be recalculated to include his additional benefit accrual.
The Manager’s current benefit option and designated
survivor(s) shall remain in effect for his original COPERS
benefit. However, the Manager shall be entitled to elect a
benefit option and to designate a survivor, if applicable, in
accordance with COPERS’ plan terms for the additional benefit
he accrues during his employment under this Agreement.



11.6 Participation in MERP. The Manager, as a qualifying City
employee, is entitled to full benefits of the Medical Expense
Reimbursement Plan (MERP). Because the Manager currently
is a covered retiree, the Manager’s current MERP benefit shall
be suspended as of November 17, 2025 and the Manager shall
be restored to the status of an active employee. Upon his
termination in accordance with Section 3 of this Agreement, the
Manager’s MERP benefit shall be reinstated. The Manager’s
current benefit ($202 per month) and designated survivor(s)
shall remain in effect for his original MERP benefit.

12. Indemnification.

The City shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the Manager
against any claim or demand for damages, including legal actions, whether
groundless or not, arising out of or in connection with any alleged act or omission
occurring within the course and scope of performance by the Manager of the City
Manager duties as such. In the event of a compromise or settlement of such a claim,
the City shall pay such compromise settlement or claim. The City's obligations and
duties in this Paragraph to defend, save harmless, and indemnify the Manager shall
survive the expiration and/or termination of this Agreement.

13. Furlough Provisions.

At his discretion, the City Manager, in addition to any vacation or
personal leave days provided in the normal Pay Plan of the City of Phoenix, shall
be allowed to take furlough days, without compensation.

14. General Provisions.
, '
This Agreement and the referenced provision of the City Pay
Ordinance shall constitute the entire agreement between the parties. To the extent
applicable, this Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the heirs
at law of the Manager.

If any provision or any portion is held to be unconstitutional, invalid
or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement or a portion, shall be deemed
severable, and shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and effect.




15. Adoption of Ordinance.

The City of Phoenix authorized the Mayor to execute and sign this
Agreement on its behalf on the 17th day of September 2025 by adoption of
Ordinance No. S-________________.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to
be signed and executed on its behalf by its Mayor and City Council on this 17th
day of September 2025.

Ed Zuercher, City Manager CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal
corporation
___________________________ ____________________________
KATE GALLEGO, MAYOR




ATTEST:



___________________________
Denise Archibald, City Clerk


APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Julie M. Kriegh, City Attorney

___________________________________







Report

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
***REQUEST TO ADD-ON (SEE ATTACHED MEMO)*** Request Authorization to
File a Petition for Special Action Relief with the Arizona Court of Appeals Related
to Airport Baggage Handling Systems Operations and Maintenance Procurement
- District 8

Law and Aviation departments request approval to file a Petition for Special Action
Relief and/or appeal with the Arizona Court of Appeals from Maricopa County Superior
Court’s ruling in Daifuku Services America Corporation v. City of Phoenix.

Summary
In August 2024, the City’s Aviation Department posted its recommended award of a
contract under a solicitation for baggage handling systems, AVN RFP 24-0156.
Daifuku Services America Corporation (“Daifuku”) was the unsuccessful incumbent. In
November 2024, Daifuku protested the City’s recommendation of award to another
bidder and the City’s disqualification of Daifuku for a violation of the City’s Solicitation
and Transparency Policy. After Daifuku exhausted its administrative remedies through
protest and protest appeal, on May 19, 2025, Daifuku filed a Special Action in the
Maricopa County Superior Court. On August 28, 2025, the Maricopa County Superior
Court issued its ruling. On September 15, 2025, the Maricopa County Superior Court
entered Final Judgment.

Justification
The City Attorney, after consultation with Aviation and outside counsel, requests
authority to file a Petition for Special Action Relief, with a request for expedited review,
and/or appeal with the Arizona Court of Appeals. Council must vote in a public meeting
whether to file a lawsuit or appeal a ruling. See Desert Mountain Energy Corp. v. City
of Flagstaff, 566 P.3d 333 (App. 2025), review denied (September 9, 2025).

Location
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, 2485 E. Buckeye Road
Council District: 8

Responsible Department
This item is submitted by City Attorney Julie Kriegh, Interim Deputy City Manager
Amber Williamson and the Law and Aviation departments.

Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.


View on Agenda Online ↗

84 item(s)