Snell & Wilmer
Law Firm
327
Mentions
13
Meetings
5
Jurisdictions
2021-03-03 – 2026-04-08
Activity range
All 327 Mentions
(13 meetings, 5 jurisdictions)
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2026-02-25
#71
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
71. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Approve a competition impracticable procurement for attorney Brett Johnson of Snell & Wilmer law firm in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for Mr. Johnson to represent the County Atto
#71
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
71. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Approve a competition impracticable procurement for attorney Brett Johnson of Snell & Wilmer law firm in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for Mr. Johnson to represent the County Atto
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2026-02-23
#1
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
1. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621 Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
#1
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
1. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621 Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
Maricopa County ·
Travel Reduction Program
· 2026-02-10
#82
Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Snell & Wilmer, LLP
#82
Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2025-12-10
#120
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
120. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Approve a competition impracticable procurement for attorney Brett Johnson of Snell & Wilmer law firm in an amount not to exceed $135,000 for Mr. Johnson to represent the County Att
#120
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
120. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Approve a competition impracticable procurement for attorney Brett Johnson of Snell & Wilmer law firm in an amount not to exceed $135,000 for Mr. Johnson to represent the County Att
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2025-12-08
#2
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
2. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621 Rachel Mitchell, County Attorney, County Attorney's Office Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's
#2
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
2. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621 Rachel Mitchell, County Attorney, County Attorney's Office Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2025-07-21
#6
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
6. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
#6
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
6. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2025-05-05
#3
PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
3. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
#3
PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
3. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2025-04-04
#64
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION
64. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION Approve a Competition Impracticable agreement with law firm Snell and Wilmer in the amount of $27,518 for the firm’s representation of M
#64
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION
64. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION Approve a Competition Impracticable agreement with law firm Snell and Wilmer in the amount of $27,518 for the firm’s representation of M
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2024-03-13
#17
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL AND WILMER
D WILMER
17. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL AND WILMER Approve a competition impracticable for Snell & Wilmer in the matter of Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona v. Maricopa County in the amount of $200,000. (C-19-24-116-X-00)
#17
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL AND WILMER
D WILMER
17. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL AND WILMER Approve a competition impracticable for Snell & Wilmer in the matter of Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona v. Maricopa County in the amount of $200,000. (C-19-24-116-X-00)
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2023-09-25
#1
MAST V. HOBBS, ET AL; LEGAL ADVICE RE PENDING LITIGATION
ISCUSSIONS MAST V. HOBBS, ET AL; LEGAL ADVICE RE PENDING LITIGATION Brett Johnson, Outside Counsel, Snell & Wilmer Eric Spencer, Outside Counsel, Snell & Wilmer Zach Schira, Executive Director, County Manager's Office
#1
MAST V. HOBBS, ET AL; LEGAL ADVICE RE PENDING LITIGATION
ISCUSSIONS MAST V. HOBBS, ET AL; LEGAL ADVICE RE PENDING LITIGATION Brett Johnson, Outside Counsel, Snell & Wilmer Eric Spencer, Outside Counsel, Snell & Wilmer Zach Schira, Executive Director, County Manager's Office
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2023-04-12
#8
SAFSTOR SELF-STORAGE – CAMELBACK ROAD AND WIGWAM CREEK
K ROAD AND WIGWAM CREEK Case #: Z2022189 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Mike Maerowitz , Snell & Wilmer LLP / Desert Viking El Mirage, LLC Request: Zone Change with Overlay from C-2 to C-2 CUPD Site Location: Generally located at the NEC of Wigwam Creek Blvd. and Camelback Rd. Commission
#8
SAFSTOR SELF-STORAGE – CAMELBACK ROAD AND WIGWAM CREEK
K ROAD AND WIGWAM CREEK Case #: Z2022189 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Mike Maerowitz , Snell & Wilmer LLP / Desert Viking El Mirage, LLC Request: Zone Change with Overlay from C-2 to C-2 CUPD Site Location: Generally located at the NEC of Wigwam Creek Blvd. and Camelback Rd. Commission
Maricopa County ·
Planning & Zoning Commission
· 2023-03-09
#3
SAFStor Self-Storage – Camelback Road and Wigwam Creek Boulevard Camelback Rd.
…t
Case:
Z2022189 – SAFStor Self-Storage – Camelback Road and Wigwam
Creek Boulevard
Hearing Date:
March 9, 2023
Supervisor District:
4
Applicant:
Mike Maerowitz, Snell & Wilmer LLP
Owner:
Desert Viking El Mirage, LLC
Request:
Zone Change with Overlay from C-2 to C-2 CUPD
Site Location:
Generally located at the NEC of Wigwam Creek Blvd. and
Camelback Rd.
…
Firm
Maricopa County ·
Board of Supervisors
· 2022-08-17
#7
AGAVE SOLAR
AGAVE SOLAR
7. AGAVE SOLAR Case #: Z2021160 Supervisor Districts: 4 & 5 Applicant & Owners: Snell & Wilmer, LLP / Arizona Public Service Company Request: Zone Change, with Plan of Development, from Rural-190 to IND-2 IUPD Site Location: Generally located 1/2 mile south of Elliot Road along 363rd Ave
Activity by Jurisdiction
× clear filter
| Jurisdiction | Meetings | Items | Withdrawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| City of Phoenix | 36 | 63 | — |
| Maricopa County | 13 | 13 | — |
| Town of Wickenburg | 2 | 2 | — |
| City of Glendale | 1 | 1 | — |
| City of Tempe | 1 | 3 | — |
Relationships
| Entity | Relationship | Entity |
|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer (Law Firm) | Attorney | Z-146-06 (Case) |
Meeting Timeline
Filtered by Maricopa County
Item 71
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#71
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
71. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Approve a competition impracticable procurement for attorney Brett Johnson of Snell & Wilmer law firm in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for Mr. Johnson to represent the County Atto
#71
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
71. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Approve a competition impracticable procurement for attorney Brett Johnson of Snell & Wilmer law firm in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for Mr. Johnson to represent the County Atto
Item 1
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#1
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
1. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621 Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
#1
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
1. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621 Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
Item 120
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#120
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
120. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Approve a competition impracticable procurement for attorney Brett Johnson of Snell & Wilmer law firm in an amount not to exceed $135,000 for Mr. Johnson to represent the County Att
#120
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
120. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Approve a competition impracticable procurement for attorney Brett Johnson of Snell & Wilmer law firm in an amount not to exceed $135,000 for Mr. Johnson to represent the County Att
Item 2
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#2
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
2. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621 Rachel Mitchell, County Attorney, County Attorney's Office Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's
#2
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621
2. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN CV2025-020621 Rachel Mitchell, County Attorney, County Attorney's Office Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's
Item 6
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#6
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
6. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
#6
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER
6. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
Item 64
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#64
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION
64. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION Approve a Competition Impracticable agreement with law firm Snell and Wilmer in the amount of $27,518 for the firm’s representation of M
#64
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION
64. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE PROCUREMENT FOR SNELL & WILMER IN ELECTION LITIGATION Approve a Competition Impracticable agreement with law firm Snell and Wilmer in the amount of $27,518 for the firm’s representation of M
Item 3
PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#3
PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
3. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
#3
PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION
3. A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3) - LEGAL ADVICE PROCUREMENT; COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL & WILMER; ELECTION LITIGATION REPRESENTATION Tom Liddy, Civil Division Chief, County Attorney's Office
Item 17
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL AND WILMER
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#17
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL AND WILMER
D WILMER
17. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL AND WILMER Approve a competition impracticable for Snell & Wilmer in the matter of Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona v. Maricopa County in the amount of $200,000. (C-19-24-116-X-00)
#17
COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL AND WILMER
D WILMER
17. COMPETITION IMPRACTICABLE FOR SNELL AND WILMER Approve a competition impracticable for Snell & Wilmer in the matter of Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona v. Maricopa County in the amount of $200,000. (C-19-24-116-X-00)
Planning & Zoning
Item 3
SAFStor Self-Storage – Camelback Road and Wigwam Creek Boulevard Camelback Rd.
Snell & Wilmer LLP
Item 1
MAST V. HOBBS, ET AL; LEGAL ADVICE RE PENDING LITIGATION
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#1
MAST V. HOBBS, ET AL; LEGAL ADVICE RE PENDING LITIGATION
ISCUSSIONS MAST V. HOBBS, ET AL; LEGAL ADVICE RE PENDING LITIGATION Brett Johnson, Outside Counsel, Snell & Wilmer Eric Spencer, Outside Counsel, Snell & Wilmer Zach Schira, Executive Director, County Manager's Office
#1
MAST V. HOBBS, ET AL; LEGAL ADVICE RE PENDING LITIGATION
ISCUSSIONS MAST V. HOBBS, ET AL; LEGAL ADVICE RE PENDING LITIGATION Brett Johnson, Outside Counsel, Snell & Wilmer Eric Spencer, Outside Counsel, Snell & Wilmer Zach Schira, Executive Director, County Manager's Office
Item 8
SAFSTOR SELF-STORAGE – CAMELBACK ROAD AND WIGWAM CREEK
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#8
SAFSTOR SELF-STORAGE – CAMELBACK ROAD AND WIGWAM CREEK
K ROAD AND WIGWAM CREEK Case #: Z2022189 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Mike Maerowitz , Snell & Wilmer LLP / Desert Viking El Mirage, LLC Request: Zone Change with Overlay from C-2 to C-2 CUPD Site Location: Generally located at the NEC of Wigwam Creek Blvd. and Camelback Rd. Commission
#8
SAFSTOR SELF-STORAGE – CAMELBACK ROAD AND WIGWAM CREEK
K ROAD AND WIGWAM CREEK Case #: Z2022189 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant & Owner: Mike Maerowitz , Snell & Wilmer LLP / Desert Viking El Mirage, LLC Request: Zone Change with Overlay from C-2 to C-2 CUPD Site Location: Generally located at the NEC of Wigwam Creek Blvd. and Camelback Rd. Commission
Travel Reduction Program
Item 82
Snell & Wilmer, LLP
(+1 more mention)
All mentions in this meeting
#82
#82
Item 7
AGAVE SOLAR