← Back to meetings

Meeting 4622 complete

2025-04-09 · Formal

Items: 63 / 63
Docs: 169
Votes: 53

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - JUNTA DE SUPERVISORES

View on Agenda Online ↗

Synced: 2026-05-08 23:52 UTC

Item text
1. ROLL CALL - LISTA
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
2. INVOCATION - INVOCACIÓN INVOCATION - INVOCACIÓN
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - JURO FIDELIDAD A LA BANDERA
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
4. PET SHOWCASE BY MARICOPA COUNTY ANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL - PRESENTACIÓN DE ANIMALES DOMESTICOS POR EL DEPARTAMENTO DE CONTROL Y CUIDADO DE ANIMALES
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-070-X-00 (base: C-44-26-070-X)
Base
C-44-26-070-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes 
5.99TH AVE & OLIVE AVE MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS Case #: Z250035 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Ashley Z. Marsh and Michelle Santoro, Gammage & Burnham, P.L.C / Lennar Arizona, LLC Request: Modification of Conditions to approval of the R1-6 RUPD zoning district Site Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of Olive Ave. and 99th Ave. in the Sun City/Peoria area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Co
Related P&Z hearings
  • 2026-01-08 — January 8, 2026 Planning and Zoning Comm
Item text
5. 99TH AVE & OLIVE AVE MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS Case #: Z250035 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Ashley Z. Marsh and Michelle Santoro, Gammage & Burnham, P.L.C / Lennar Arizona, LLC Request: Modification of Conditions to approval of the R1-6 RUPD zoning district Site Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of Olive Ave. and 99th Ave. in the Sun City/Peoria area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Rochwalik D3) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250035 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’. a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Riverwalk”, consisting of 25 pages, dated April 23, 2021, and stamped received April 23, 2021, except as modified by the following conditions and removing minimum age requirements with a revised narrative dated October 28, 2025. b. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. No development approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building lots, drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 2. The traffic study is under review at MCDOT. MCDOT comments will be provided to the applicant as part of the preliminary plat review (case number S2021007). 3. Engineering review of re-zone cases is conceptual in nature. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. c. All buildings subject to noise attenuation as per State law and Maricopa County requirements. d. The master developer shall notify future homeowners that they are located within the state-defined “territory in the vicinity of a military airport” with the following language: “You are buying a home or property in the ‘vicinity of a military airport’ as described by State of Arizona statute ARS §28-8481. Your house should include sound attenuation measures as directed by State law. You will be subject to direct over flights and noise by Luke Air Force Base jet aircraft in the vicinity. Luke Air Force Base executes over 200,000 flight operations per year, at an average of approximately 170 overflights per day. Although Luke's primary flight paths are located within 20 miles from the base, jet noise will be apparent throughout the area as aircraft transient to and from the Barry M. Goldwater Gunnery Range and other flight training areas. Luke Air Force Base may launch and recover aircraft in either direction off its runways oriented to the southwest and northeast. Noise will be more noticeable during overcast sky conditions due to noise reflections off the clouds. Luke Air Force Base's normal flying hours extend from 7:00 a.m. until approximately midnight, Monday through Friday, but some limited flying will occur outside these hours and during most weekends. For further information, please check the Luke Air Force Base website or contact the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department.” Such notification shall be recorded on all Final Plats, be permanently posted on not less than a 3 foot by 5 foot sign in front of all home sales offices, be permanently posted on the front door of all home sales offices on not less than an 8½ inch by 11 inch sign, and be included in all covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) as well as the Public Report and conveyance documents. e. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. f. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. g. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. h. The following R1-6 RUPD standards shall apply: 1. Minimum Lot Area: 3,600 sq. ft. 2. Minimum Lot Width: 45’ 3. Maximum Lot Coverage: 60% 4. Minimum Front Yard Setback: 10’ 5. Minimum Street Side Setback: 5’ 6. Minimum Rear Yard Setback: 5’ (C-44-26-070-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-071-X-00 (base: C-44-26-071-X)
Base
C-44-26-071-X
Revision
00
Related P&Z hearings
  • 2026-01-08 — January 8, 2026 Planning and Zoning Comm
Item text
6. SONORAN SERENITY Case #: Z250023 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Michael Ripson, Ripson Homes / Kashmir Kapital, LLC Request: Zone change with overlay from Rural-43 to R1-35 RUPD Site Location: Generally located ½ mile east of NEC Patton Rd. and Crozier Rd. in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 8-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Leighton D4) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250023 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’. a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Sonoran Serenity“, consisting of one full-size sheet, dated November 9, 2025, and stamped received November 10, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial compliance with the Narrative Report entitled “Sonoran Serenity”, consisting of nine pages, dated November 9, 2025, and stamped received on November 10, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering comments shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout and/or a reduction in the number of building lots may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the subdivision drainage infrastructure. 3. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Infrastructure) Plans must be submitted with the application for Final Plat Approval and Building Permits. d. The following Maricopa County Department of Transportation’s Planning comments shall apply: 1. Patton Rd. is classified as a principal arterial roadway requiring a fee dedication of 65’ half-width right-of-way from the section line, as per Section 804 of the updated Zoning Ordinance. 2. The applicant is required to provide, at their expense, an American Land Title Association (ALTA) Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance illustrating title vested in Maricopa County, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona. It is the developer’s responsibility to determine if the existing right-of-way fee is simple, if it is not then the developer shall provide the right-of-way in said form. 3. The developer shall be required to improve Patton Rd. to the ultimate classification as described in Section 303 of the County’s Subdivision Regulations. Since 215th Ave. along the site’s eastern boundary and Peak View Rd. along the site’s northern boundary is not proposed to be a MCDOT roadways, the requirement for street improvements will be determined by the County’s Planning & Development Department. However, if the roadways of this future subdivision are to be MCDOT maintained roadways, then these roadways shall be improved to the standards outlined in the MCDOT Roadway Design Manual. 4. Any additional dedication and/or offsite improvement requirements shall be determined by MCDOT Traffic based on the required Traffic Impact Analysis/ Study. If a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study has been previously submitted, then approval is only valid for one year and if construction is not underway within this time period, then MCDOT reserves the right to request an updated traffic report to assess any changes in conditions. 5. Per the approved Right-of-Way Reservation Action Request, 215th Ave. along the eastern boundary of the site and Peak View Rd. along the northern boundary of the site shall have a reserved half-width right-of-way of 25’, instead of 40’. 6. These comments do not include identification of utilities or underground facilities within or adjacent to the required right-of-way that may have prior rights and/or require relocation. 7. Prior the submittal of any subdivision plat on this site, the applicant shall notify ADOT via the Red Letter Process, RedLetter@azdot.gov, since this site is proximate to the future White Tanks Frwy. e. All buildings are subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). f. The master developer shall notify future homeowners that they are located within the state-defined “territory in the vicinity of a military airport” with the following language: “You are buying a home or property in the ‘vicinity of a military airport’ as described by State of Arizona statute ARS §28-8481. Your house should include sound attenuation measures as directed by State law. You will be subject to direct overflights and noise by Luke Air Force Base jet aircraft in the vicinity. Luke Air Force Base executes over 200,000 flight operations per year, at an average of approximately 170 overflights per day. Although Luke's primary flight paths are located within 20 miles from the base, jet noise will be apparent throughout the area as aircraft transient to and from the Barry M. Goldwater Gunnery Range and other flight training areas. Luke Air Force Base may launch and recover aircraft in either direction off its runways oriented to the southwest and northeast. Noise will be more noticeable during overcast sky conditions due to noise reflections off the clouds. Luke Air Force Base's normal flying hours extend from 7:00 a.m. until approximately midnight, Monday through Friday, but some limited flying will occur outside these hours and during most weekends. Luke Air Force Base Auxiliary Field 1 located approximately 15 miles to the northwest of Luke Air Force Base is a site of intense instrument procedure landing approaches, with approximately 12,000 flight operations per year. Aircraft will descend down to 200 feet above the ground over the Auxiliary Airfield and will create severe noise in that area. Such notification shall be recorded on all Final Plats, be permanently posted on not less than a 3 foot by 5 foot sign in front of all home sales offices, be permanently posted on the front door of all home sales offices on not less than an 8½ inch by 11 inch sign, and be included in all covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) as well as the Public Report and conveyance documents. For further information, please check the Luke Air Force Base website or contact the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department.” g. Prior to initial Final Plat approval or initial precise plan of development approval, the applicant shall submit to the Maricopa County Planning and Development Department confirmation of service by Liberty Utilities and an approved Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CC&N) issued by the State of Arizona. h. The following R1-35 RUPD development standards shall apply: 1. Minimum 30,000 sq. ft. lot area. 2. Minimum 120’ lot width (except 80’ minimum for lots at a cul-de-sac, street knuckle or street eyebrow). 3. Minimum 30’ front setback. 4. Minimum 30’ rear setback. i. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-26-071-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-072-X-00 (base: C-44-26-072-X)
Base
C-44-26-072-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes 
7. Prior the submittal of any subdivision plat on this site, the applicant shall notify ADOT via the Red Letter Process, RedLetter@azdot.gov, since this site is proximate to the future White Tanks Frwy. e. All buildings are subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). f. The master developer shall notify future homeowners that they are located within the state-defined “territory in the vicinity of a military airport” with the following language: “You are buying a home or property in the
Related P&Z hearings
  • 2026-01-08 — January 8, 2026 Planning and Zoning Comm
  • 2025-12-04 — December 4, 2025 Planning and Zoning Com
Item text
7. CALVARY CHAPEL ARISE Case #: Z250018 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Randy L. Barnes, RBA Architecture / Calvary Chapel Arise Request: Zone change from Rural–43 to C-2 Site Location: Generally located approx. 355’ SE of the SEC of 203rd Ave. & U.S. Hwy 60. in the Wittman area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom, D1) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250018 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’. a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Site Plan entitled “Calvary Chapel Arise”, consisting of one full-size sheet, stamped received September 17, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. Staff may determine slight refinements to remain in substantial conformance with the approved site plan. Minor and major amendments to the site plan will be determined in accordance with Chapter 3 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Calvary Chapel Arise”, consisting of four pages, dated August 15, 2025, and stamped received September 17, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. Any amendments to the Plan of Development shall be processed administratively through a new Plan of Development application with Maricopa County Planning & Development. d. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Plans submitted for building permit issuance must show that a minimum 25-foot separation between septic facilities (including reserve area) and the retention basin(s) is maintained. 2. The subject site is not located within the County’s Urbanized; and thus will not require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Permit (SWPPP) from the County. This does NOT preclude the requirement to obtain a Notice of Intent to Discharge (NOID) from the State (ADEQ), as may be required. 3. A Traffic Study must be approved by MCDOT prior to Application for Building Permit. Any stipulations of approval of the Traffic Study must be incorporated into plans prior to Building Permit Issuance. 4. If any additional right-of-way dedication is required, applicant, at their own expense, must provide Maricopa County with Owner’s ALTA Title Insurance for ROW dedication prior to Building Permit approval. 5. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction permit. 6. Based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the drainage infrastructure 7. Detailed Grading and Drainage (Infrastructure) Plans and Final Drainage Report must be submitted with the application for Final Building Permits. e. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. f. Noncompliance with any Maricopa County Regulation shall be grounds for initiating a revocation of this Zone Change as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. g. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property shall revert to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-26-072-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-073-X-00 (base: C-44-26-073-X)
Base
C-44-26-073-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes 
8.ALL THINGS METAL 15-ACRE EXPANSION Case #: MCP250010 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Jack Gilmore, Gilmore Planning & Landscape Architecture / Industrial Steel Ranch, LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) for steel fabrication and storage of structural steel components in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district Site Location: Generally located approximately 400’ west of the SWC of 195th Ave. & Jomax Rd. in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission
Related P&Z hearings
  • 2026-01-08 — January 8, 2026 Planning and Zoning Comm
Item text
8. ALL THINGS METAL 15-ACRE EXPANSION Case #: MCP250010 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Jack Gilmore, Gilmore Planning & Landscape Architecture / Industrial Steel Ranch, LLC Request: Military Compatibility Permit (MCP) for steel fabrication and storage of structural steel components in the Rural-43 MAAMF zoning district Site Location: Generally located approximately 400’ west of the SWC of 195th Ave. & Jomax Rd. in the Wittmann area Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom, D1) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve MCP250010 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘h’. a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “All Things Metal: Master Land Use Plan,” consisting of two pages, dated October 30, 2025, and stamped received November 3, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Application for a Military Compatibility Permit for All Things Metal 15 Acre Expansion,” consisting of 12 pages, dated October 30, 2025, and stamped received November 3, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Engineering review of planning and/or zoning cases is for conceptual design only. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. 2. Sealed Grading and Drainage (Site Infrastructure) Plans and a sealed drainage report must be submitted with further entitlements. Design must address the floodplain that traverses throughout the site and other offsite flows, onsite retention requirements, retention percolation, and finish floor elevations of any structure in a floodplain. 3. This site did not include a plan of development nor did it include any details of the potential layout of expansion therefore, based on the conceptual design nature of the information submitted, changes to the site layout may be necessitated by the final engineering design of the site’s drainage infrastructure. 4. Further entitlements will require the submittal of a traffic impact study and specific use of site. 5. Maricopa County does not supply water, fire or sewer services. It is the applicant/owner’s responsibility to coordinate and secure water, fire and sewer services for this site. d. All buildings are subject to noise attenuation as per ARS § 28-8482(B). e. The following MCP standards shall apply: 1. Maximum Building Height: 45’. 2. Maximum Height of Building Appurtenances: 1’ for each 1’ setback from the MCP area perimeter, up to 100’. 3. Minimum Setbacks from the MCP area perimeter: 20’. 4. Minimum Setbacks from lot lines and noise contours within the interior of the MCP area: 0’. 5. Maximum Lot Coverage: 30% of the MCP area. 6. Minimum Parking Spaces required: 1 per 900 SF of floor area. 7. Minimum Screening: minimum 6’ wall with steel panels along perimeter or temporary chain-link fencing along interior phase lines until built out with perimeter screening; otherwise, screening interior to the MCP area is waived. 8. Minimum Surfacing for onsite driveways and parking: pavement or stabilized DG. f. Approval of a Plan of Development will be required prior to approval and issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. The Plan of Development shall incorporate the risk and hazard mitigation actions recommended by Luke Air Force Base in the Use Compatibility and Consistency Determination (UC250009) dated August 4, 2025, or in any subsequent communications from Luke Air Force Base to the applicant, developer, or property owner. g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. h. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell, or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the MCP. The MCP enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the MCP is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the MCP had never been granted. (C-44-26-073-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-075-X-00 (base: C-44-26-075-X)
Base
C-44-26-075-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes 
9.NEC 491ST AVE & THOMAS RD Case #: CPA250009 Supervisor District: 5 Applicant and Owners: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC / Grandilla (Arizona) Inc. and Foot Creek Corporation Request: General Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) of the Maricopa County Vision 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s land use designation from Rural Development Area (RDA) to Utilities. CPA approval is by resolution. Site Location: Generally located at the NEC of Thomas Rd & 491st Ave in the Harquahala Valley area. Commissi
Related P&Z hearings
  • 2026-01-08 — January 8, 2026 Planning and Zoning Comm
Item text
9. NEC 491ST AVE & THOMAS RD Case #: CPA250009 Supervisor District: 5 Applicant and Owners: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC / Grandilla (Arizona) Inc. and Foot Creek Corporation Request: General Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) of the Maricopa County Vision 2030 Comprehensive Plan’s land use designation from Rural Development Area (RDA) to Utilities. CPA approval is by resolution. Site Location: Generally located at the NEC of Thomas Rd & 491st Ave in the Harquahala Valley area. Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom, D1) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve CPA250009. (C-44-26-075-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-074-X-00 (base: C-44-26-074-X)
Base
C-44-26-074-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes 
10.NEC 491ST AVE & THOMAS RD Case #: Z250027 Supervisor District: 5 Applicant and Owner: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC / Grandilla (Arizona) Inc. and Foot Creek Corporation Request: Zone change with overlay from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD Site Location: Generally located NEC of Thomas Rd & 491st Ave in the Harquahala Valley area. Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom, D1) to adopt a motion recommend
Related P&Z hearings
  • 2026-01-08 — January 8, 2026 Planning and Zoning Comm
Item text
10. NEC 491ST AVE & THOMAS RD Case #: Z250027 Supervisor District: 5 Applicant and Owner: Jason Morris, Withey Morris Baugh, PLC / Grandilla (Arizona) Inc. and Foot Creek Corporation Request: Zone change with overlay from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD Site Location: Generally located NEC of Thomas Rd & 491st Ave in the Harquahala Valley area. Commission Recommendation: On 1/8/26, the Commission voted 9-0 (motion by Commissioner Toma, D4, seconded by Commissioner Lindblom, D1) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250027 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘j’. a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Z250027 Zoning Exhibit“, consisting of 1 full-size sheet, dated November 3, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “NEC 491st Ave & Thomas Rd Rezone Project Narrative”, consisting of 10 pages, dated November, 2025, and stamped received December 11, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following IND-2 IUPD standards shall apply: 1. Maximum Height – 80’ 2. Minimum Parking - 1 space per 9000 sq ft 3. Minimum Screening - A 6’ metal security fence. Chain-link fencing with razor wire is prohibited 4. Permitted uses - All uses permitted in the IND-2 Zoning District including Data Centers and accessory uses, electric substations and battery storage, and Power generation facilities for on-site utilization or sale to a utility or other off-site users. Until such time as the site is served by sewer, uses on the site shall only be those acceptable to the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) that can be accommodated by septic systems. A public water system shall be required prior to establishment of any non-residential use that requires potable water. d. The following engineering conditions: 1. Without the submittal of a precise plan of development, no development approval is inferred by this review, including, but not limited to number of proposed building lots/units, drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 2. A Traffic Study/Statement must be submitted with future entitlement (POD) application(s). See following link to MCDOT Traffic Impact Manual. (RDM 7.1.4) https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/303 3. Engineering review of re-zone cases is conceptual in nature. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. e. Unless waived or modified by the County, the applicant or developer shall implement the best practices and any recommendations by the Arizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD). The Zoning Inspector and/or their designee shall review whether these best practices are being implemented in accordance with the letter following the issuance of relevant permits and periodically as needed through either the inspection process or communication with AZGFD. Should the Zoning Inspector and/or their designee decide that the owner or developer has not substantially undertaken these best practices in good faith, the owner or developer shall not receive final permits or certificate of occupancy until the best practices are implemented. f. Administrative approval of a plan of development will be required prior to approval and issuance of construction permits to develop and establish use of the site. g. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. h. The developer must submit any project narrative to the Department of Defense Siting Clearinghouse for Energy, Installations, and Environmental for review at the following site: osd.dod-siting-clearinghouse@mail.mil prior to the submittal of any Plan of Development. i. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. j. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-26-074-X-00)
Supporting documents (2)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-076-X-00 (base: C-44-26-076-X)
Base
C-44-26-076-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes 
11.TONOPAH LOGISTICS CENTER Case #: Z250003 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Ed Reichenberg Request: Zone Change with Overlay from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD Site Location: Generally located approx. 1,979 linear feet west from the NWC of Indian School Rd & 411th Ave in the Tonopah area Commission Recommendation: On 12/04/25, the Commission voted 8-0 (motion by Commissioner Leighton D4, seconded by Commissioner Toma D4) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z25000
Related P&Z hearings
  • 2025-12-04 — December 4, 2025 Planning and Zoning Com
  • 2025-11-06 — November 6, 2025 Planning and Zoning Com
  • 2025-10-23 — October 23, 2025 Planning and Zoning Com
Item text
11. TONOPAH LOGISTICS CENTER Case #: Z250003 Supervisor District: 4 Applicant and Owner: Ed Reichenberg Request: Zone Change with Overlay from Rural-43 to IND-2 IUPD Site Location: Generally located approx. 1,979 linear feet west from the NWC of Indian School Rd & 411th Ave in the Tonopah area Commission Recommendation: On 12/04/25, the Commission voted 8-0 (motion by Commissioner Leighton D4, seconded by Commissioner Toma D4) to adopt a motion recommending the Board of Supervisors approve Z250003 subject to conditions ‘a’ – ‘k’: a. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Exhibit entitled “Z250003 Tonopah Logistics Center Zoning Exhibit IND-2 IUPD”, consisting of 1 page, dated November 4, 2025 and stamp received November 5, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. b. Development of the site shall be in substantial conformance with the Narrative Report entitled “Request for Rezoning from Rural-43 to I-2 IUPD Tonopah Logistics Center”, consisting of 16 pages, revision dated November 4, 2025, and stamp received November 5, 2025, except as modified by the following conditions. c. The following Planning Engineering conditions shall apply: 1. Without the submittal of a plan of development, no development approval will be inferred by the engineering review, including, but not limited to drainage design, access and roadway alignments. These items will be addressed as development plans progress and are submitted to the County for further review and/or entitlement. 2. Indian School Road is a MCDOT maintained roadway classified as an arterial roadway. The MCDOT R/W requirement for arterial roadways is 55-65 feet (half-width). Dedication of R/W (0 feet existing) may be required across the frontage of the subject premises to provide the required R/W, as determined otherwise by MCDOTPlanning@maricopa.gov. See https://www.mcdot.maricopa.gov/744/Right-of-Way-Dedications for more information on the dedication process. If dedication is required, applicant is required to provide, at applicant’s expense, an American Land Title Association(“ALTA”) Owner’s Policy of Title Insurance showing title vested in Maricopa County, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona. 3. Campbell Road (north of I-10) is “public right-of-way” that has not been accepted by the County; and is therefore not maintained by the County. Development and maintenance of the roadway would be the responsibility of the developer(s). 4. A Traffic Study/Statement must be submitted with future entitlement (POD) application(s). See following link to MCDOT Traffic Impact Manual. (RDM 7.1.4) https://www.maricopa.gov/DocumentCenter/View/303 5. Off-site roadway improvements, including additional R/W dedication(s) may be required pending MCDOT approved Traffic Impact Study/Statement 6. The above comments do not include identification of utilities or underground facilities within or adjacent to the required right-of-way that may have prior rights and/or required relocation. 7. Given the site’s proximity or access to I-10, the applicant should inquire of any concerns with ADOT via their red-letter process (email redletter@azdot.gov) 8. Engineering review of re-zone cases is conceptual in nature. All development and engineering design shall be in conformance with Section 1205 of the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance; Drainage Policies and Standards; Floodplain Regulations for Maricopa County; MCDOT Roadway Design Manual; and current engineering policies, standards and best practices at the time of application for construction. d. The following Maricopa County Environmental Services conditions shall apply: 1. Per the Safe Drinking Water Act, any water system that supplies more than 25 people or 15 service connections per day for at least 60 days per year is classified as a Public Water System (PWS). If the above criteria are met, a Public Water System application and a New Source Approval application are required and must be submitted to the MCESD’s Drinking Water Program. A water quality analysis report will be required with submittal and is good within one-year of testing. 2. An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the MCESD’s Treatment Program for all PWS water treatment facilities. For questions, please contact the Water/Wastewater Treatment Program at (602) 372-2861 or email treatmentplantprogram@maricopa.gov 3. An Approval to Construct application is required to be submitted to the MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for all PWS water system infrastructure. For questions, please contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure Program at (602) 506-1058 or email subdivision@maricopa.gov. For additional Drinking Water related questions, please contact the Drinking Water program at (602)506-6935 or by email at sdwquestions@maricopa.gov 4. A notice of Intent to Discharge application for a septic system is required for any construction. Application must be submitted to the MCESD Onsite Wastewater Program. 5. Wastewater is not permitted to discharge to an adjacent parcel’s septic system. 6. If conducting food service in unincorporated Maricopa, a grease trap will be required by Onsite Wastewater Program. 7. Setback requirements must be maintained per Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapter 9, Article 312, C (Features Requiring Setback). 8. Projected flows between 3000 and 24,000 gallons per day require a 4.23 General Permit and may require nitrogen treatment. For Onsite Wastewater related questions, please contact the Onsite Program at (602) 506-6666 or by email at septicquestions@maricopa.gov. 9. An Approval to Construct application is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program for water, reclaimed water and/or wastewater system infrastructure. 10. A Water Service Agreement signed by the Utility is required and must be submitted to MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development will be provided with water and/or reclaimed water by a Utility. A capacity Assurance Form issued by the Utility is required to MCESD’s Subdivision & Infrastructure Program if the site/development wastewater service is being provided by a Utility. For subdivision related questions, please contact the Subdivision and Infrastructure Program at (602) 506-1058 or email subdivision@maricopa.gov. e. Prior to approval of construction permits for the site, documentation of compliance with the Arizona Game and Fish Department’s recommendations provided in the report dated March 13, 2025 must be provided to the Planning and Development Department. f. The IUPD overlay is applied to restrict the uses of the site. Until such time as the site is served by sewer, uses on the site shall only be those acceptable to the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department (MCESD) that can be accommodated by septic systems. A public water system shall be required prior to establishment of any non-residential use that requires potable water. In lieu of pre-annexation service agreement the developer must provide a ‘will serve’ letter from the certificated water and sewer provider(s). g. The following IUPD standards shall apply: 1. Restricted Uses: Residential, adult oriented businesses, dancehalls, marijuana oriented establishments, paraphernalia (smoke & vape) shops 2. The first 600’ measured from ultimate right-of-way for Indian School Rd shall be preserved for uses allowed in C-2, including stand-alone light industrial, service-oriented business, uses allowing retail combined with outdoor storage screened and secured from public view; uses listed in g.1 above are prohibited in this area 3. Minimum lot area: 35,000 sq. ft. 4. Minimum lot width: 150’ h. Administrative approval of a Plan of Development will be required prior to approval and issuance of construction permits to develop and establish the uses of the site. Prior to issuance of a building permit, written confirmation will be required from the emergency fire protection jurisdiction having authority that the facility has been designed in accordance with their regulations and requirements, and that emergency fire protection service will be provided to the facility. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, local fire protection jurisdiction review and approval will be required. i. Noncompliance with any of the conditions assigned to the approval of this Zone Change by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors may be grounds for revocation in accordance with the requirements and procedures as set forth in the Maricopa County Zoning Ordinance. j. The property owner/s and their successors waive claim for diminution in value if the County takes action to rescind approval due to noncompliance with conditions. k. The granting of this change in use of the property has been at the request of the applicant, with the consent of the landowner. The granting of this approval allows the property to enjoy uses in excess of those permitted by the zoning existing on the date of application, subject to conditions. In the event of the failure to comply with any condition, the property may be considered for revocation to the zoning that existed on the date of application. It is, therefore, stipulated and agreed that either revocation due to the failure to comply with any conditions, does not reduce any rights that existed on the date of application to use, divide, sell or possess the property and that there would be no diminution in value of the property from the value it held on the date of application due to such revocation of the Zone Change. The Zone Change enhances the value of the property above its value as of the date the Zone Change is granted and reverting to the prior zoning results in the same value of the property as if the Zone Change had never been granted. (C-44-26-076-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-06-26-217-X-00 (base: C-06-26-217-X)
Base
C-06-26-217-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
12.BINGO LICENSE APPLICATION FOR SUN LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION NO. 2, INC. (Supervisorial District 1) Pursuant to A.R.S. § 5-404(I), convene the scheduled public hearing regarding the application filed by Sun Lakes Homeowners Association No. 2, Inc for a Class B Bingo License to be used at 25219 South EJ Robson Boulevard, Sun Lakes, Arizona, 85248. The Board of Supervisors will recommend approval or disapproval of the application and forward the original application endorsed with its approval
Item text
12. BINGO LICENSE APPLICATION FOR SUN LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION NO. 2, INC. (Supervisorial District 1) Pursuant to A.R.S. § 5-404(I), convene the scheduled public hearing regarding the application filed by Sun Lakes Homeowners Association No. 2, Inc for a Class B Bingo License to be used at 25219 South EJ Robson Boulevard, Sun Lakes, Arizona, 85248. The Board of Supervisors will recommend approval or disapproval of the application and forward the original application endorsed with its approval or disapproval to the Arizona Department of Revenue. (C-06-26-217-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-64-26-082-X-01 (base: C-64-26-082-X)
Base
C-64-26-082-X
Revision
01
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
13.PATENT EASEMENT ABANDONMENT: ROAD FILE NO. PAB-0307 (Supervisory District No. 2) Convene a hearing for Road File No. PAB-0307 to consider the request to abandon a portion of a Federal Patent Easement Numbers 1199048 and 1196276 lying in the Southeast quarter of Section 21 – T5N, R4E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona. Located in the general vicinity of Montgomery Road and 63rd Street and known as Assessor Parcel Number 211-45-091C. Notice conditions and the request
Item text
13. PATENT EASEMENT ABANDONMENT: ROAD FILE NO. PAB-0307 (Supervisory District No. 2) Convene a hearing for Road File No. PAB-0307 to consider the request to abandon a portion of a Federal Patent Easement Numbers 1199048 and 1196276 lying in the Southeast quarter of Section 21 – T5N, R4E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona. Located in the general vicinity of Montgomery Road and 63rd Street and known as Assessor Parcel Number 211-45-091C. Notice conditions and the request for comment requirements have been met. In addition, direct the Clerk of the Board to record the Board of Supervisors resolution with the County Recorder. (C-64-26-082-X-01)
Supporting documents (3)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-06-26-233-X-00 (base: C-06-26-233-X)
Base
C-06-26-233-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
14.DUPLICATE WARRANTS Pursuant to A.R.S § 11-632, approve and ratify the issuance of duplicate warrants to replace county warrants and school warrants which were either lost or stolen. Necessary affidavits have been filed with the Board. (C-06-26-233-X-00) NameWarrant NoAmountDept/SchoolParis O'Connell30102129431,218.63County AttorneyKatina Castillo301022284991.78County AttorneyR & R Family Trust30102272724,200.00Human ServicesLori A. Cynova3700931048531.17Queen Creek USD #95Cindy Webb3700923625
Item text
14. DUPLICATE WARRANTS Pursuant to A.R.S § 11-632, approve and ratify the issuance of duplicate warrants to replace county warrants and school warrants which were either lost or stolen. Necessary affidavits have been filed with the Board. (C-06-26-233-X-00) Name Warrant No Amount Dept/School Paris O'Connell 3010212943 1,218.63 County Attorney Katina Castillo 3010222849 91.78 County Attorney R & R Family Trust 3010227272 4,200.00 Human Services Lori A. Cynova 3700931048 531.17 Queen Creek USD #95 Cindy Webb 3700923625 148.25 Saddle Mountain USD #90 Miriam Mayte Acosta Vega 3010217619 48.40 County Attorney Margarita Velasquez 3010215324 477.87 County Attorney Manuel Enrique Cortez Alvarez 3010222860 195.32 County Attorney Eida Ramos 3010207708 416.92 County Attorney Kendra Hall Comb 3010205281 40.00 County Attorney Gabriel Lugo 3010203538 1,591.34 County Attorney
Supporting documents (11)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-06-26-239-X-00 (base: C-06-26-239-X)
Base
C-06-26-239-X
Revision
00
Item text
15. STALE DATED WARRANTS Pursuant to A.R.S. §11-644 the Board of Supervisors finds that claims presented, are legitimate and that claimants have demonstrated good and sufficient reason for failure to present the original check or warrant within the allotted time. Accordingly, the claims are allowed. (C-06-26-239-X-00) Name Warrant No Amount Dept/School Layne Family Trusted 1302275 1,116.05 Treasurer Layne Family Trusted 1290262 1,121.93 Treasurer Robert E. Sutton Jr. Trust 1307877 178.24 Treasurer John Stamatinos 1309146 399.47 Treasurer Cynthia L. Paxson 1307810 549.42 Treasurer John Stamatinos 1332804 314.90 Treasurer John Stamatinos 1348762 302.24 Treasurer Cynthia L. Paxson 1314206 468.06 Treasurer Layne Family Trusted 1326261 1,105.18 Treasurer Layne Family Trusted 1342711 1,017.01 Treasurer Robert E. Sutton Jr. Trust 1314281 175.38 Treasurer Robert E. Sutton Jr. Trust 1347659 157.41 Treasurer Layne Family Trusted 1358479 213.62 Treasurer Rosenberg Family Trust 1478201 1,079.48 Treasurer Rosenberg Family Trust 1365879 9,338.46 Treasurer Rosenberg Family Trust 1456941 1,224.89 Treasurer Rosenberg Family Trust 1411927 4,170.09 Treasurer Rosenberg Family Trust 1389448 7,572.28 Treasurer Rosenberg Family Trust 1443619 3,402.52 Treasurer Realty Transition Company LLC 963814 509.41 Treasurer Jody R. Sterling 1072390 641.06 Treasurer Ralph/Heather Caliendo 1081461 346.46 Treasurer Michael L. Ebert/Susan M. Ebert Trust 1092732 3,079.04 Treasurer Edgewood Farms LLC 1093720 3,290.07 Treasurer TOH Family Tom Hopkins Trust 1102876 834.28 Treasurer Silvia R. Brindwell 1093572 216.87 Treasurer Cynthia L. Paxon 996160 243.41 Treasurer John Stamatinos 998273 240.76 Treasurer Zhao Qinglan 1017014 327.65 Treasurer Demian Miller/Heather Curry 1045492 723.51 Treasurer Robert E. Sutton Jr Trust 996288 104.7 Treasurer Jody R. Sterling 1009926 602.97 Treasurer Rosenberg Family Trust 1028966 3,878.08 Treasurer Zenn Arizona Inc. 1068627 98.51 Treasurer Layne Family Trusted 1016879 427.82 Treasurer Carl L. Brenden 1108646 48.46 Treasurer Brenden Berrier Properties LLC 1108647 190.57 Treasurer Michael L. Ebert/Susan M. Ebert Trust 1157661 5,148.07 Treasurer Michael S. Dawson 1133855 293.8 Treasurer Terri Siyi Pan 1111939 85.88 Treasurer Vicky L. Knack 1126571 61.24 Treasurer Tze John Yu 1111833 135.02 Treasurer Tze John Yu 1144991 164.66 Treasurer Tze John Yu 1111901 148.25 Treasurer Kevin/Tracy Pogue 1163533 617.51 Treasurer Kathryn A. Micek 1168358 310.7 Treasurer William S./Margaret Ackroyd 1165494 649 Treasurer Dana M. Gaydac Revocable Trust 1166556 68.81 Treasurer Red Castillo LLC/Castillo Roses Et. Al. 1190353 228.06 Treasurer Vicki L. Day 1169791 155.48 Treasurer Ghia Rossi 1196837 1,166.82 Treasurer Jeffrey L./Jennifer D. Robinson 1176282 242.47 Treasurer John Moran/Cynthia Mary Sheridan 1187039 439.68 Treasurer Cynthia L. Paxson 1216523 601.72 Treasurer John Stamatinos 1240153 404.53 Treasurer Randall S./Jolene Michelle Johnson 1220777 298.77 Treasurer Robert E. Sutton Jr Trust 1238814 182.26 Treasurer John Stamatinos 1218133 411.72 Treasurer Layne Family Trusted 1232055 1,135.79 Treasurer Layne Family Trusted 1252442 1,126.83 Treasurer Cynthia L. Paxon 1276969 563.17 Treasurer Cynthia L. Paxon 1258367 580.42 Treasurer John Stamatinos 1278357 392.73 Treasurer Layne Family Trusted 1271350 1,149.86 Treasurer Robert E. Sutton Jr Trust 1277046 42.46 Treasurer Robert E. Sutton Jr Trust 1258456 181.41 Treasurer
Supporting documents (66)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-06-26-230-X-00 (base: C-06-26-230-X)
Base
C-06-26-230-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
16.MICROBREWERY FESTIVAL LICENSE FOR VULTURE PEAK BREWING COMPANY (Supervisorial District 4) Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-203.03, approve a Series 3 Microbrewery Festival Liquor License Application filed by Bryce Webster for Vulture Peak Brewing Company at 50607 U.S. Highway 60 89, Wickenburg, Arizona 85390 to be held on Thursday, February 19, 2026 from 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm. (C-06-26-230-X-00) Motion to approve by Supervisor Debbie Lesko, seconded by Supervisor Mark Stewart Ayes: Kate Brophy McGee, Debb
Item text
16. MICROBREWERY FESTIVAL LICENSE FOR VULTURE PEAK BREWING COMPANY (Supervisorial District 4) Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-203.03, approve a Series 3 Microbrewery Festival Liquor License Application filed by Bryce Webster for Vulture Peak Brewing Company at 50607 U.S. Highway 60 89, Wickenburg, Arizona 85390 to be held on Thursday, February 19, 2026 from 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm. (C-06-26-230-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-06-26-235-X-00 (base: C-06-26-235-X)
Base
C-06-26-235-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
,017.01TreasurerRobert E. Sutton Jr. Trust1314281175.38TreasurerRobert E. Sutton Jr. Trust1347659157.41TreasurerLayne Family Trusted1358479213.62TreasurerRosenberg Family Trust14782011,079.48TreasurerRosenberg Family Trust13658799,338.46TreasurerRosenberg Family Trust14569411,224.89TreasurerRosenberg Family Trust14119274,170.09TreasurerRosenberg Family Trust13894487,572.28TreasurerRosenberg Family Trust14436193,402.52TreasurerRealty Transition Company LLC963814509.41TreasurerJody R. Sterling1072
Item text
17. SPECIAL EVENT LICENSE FOR RISEN SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH (Supervisorial District 1) Pursuant to A.R.S. § 4-203.02, approve a Special Event Liquor License Application filed by Jill Marie Lopez for Risen Savior Lutheran Church at 23620 South Alma School Road, Sun Lakes, Arizona 85248 to be held on Saturday, February 28, 2026 from 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm. (C-06-26-235-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-19-26-071-X-00 (base: C-19-26-071-X)
Base
C-19-26-071-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
18.SETTLEMENT/RESOLUTION OF PROPERTY TAX CASES AND CLAIMS Pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 42-16201 through 16258, approve the settlement/resolution of tax cases and claims as listed: 2024: WCCP 90 MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC; MRR HOLDINGS III, LLC (TX2024-000352) Represented by Aaron Clouse; 2025: CIO SAN TAN I, LP; CIO SAN TA II, LP; and SWVP SANN TAN, LLC (TX2024-000270) Represented by Aaron Clouse; JDM II Tempe OC, LLC (TX2024-000337) Represented by Aaron Clouse; WCCP 90 MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC; MRR HOLDINGS III, LL
Item text
18. SETTLEMENT/RESOLUTION OF PROPERTY TAX CASES AND CLAIMS Pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 42-16201 through 16258, approve the settlement/resolution of tax cases and claims as listed: 2024: WCCP 90 MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC; MRR HOLDINGS III, LLC (TX2024-000352) Represented by Aaron Clouse; 2025: CIO SAN TAN I, LP; CIO SAN TA II, LP; and SWVP SANN TAN, LLC (TX2024-000270) Represented by Aaron Clouse; JDM II Tempe OC, LLC (TX2024-000337) Represented by Aaron Clouse; WCCP 90 MOUNTAIN VIEW, LLC; MRR HOLDINGS III, LLC (TX2024-000352) Represented by Aaron Clouse; NEXT GEN NORTH MOUNTAIN, LLC (TX2025-000153) Represented by Aaron Clouse; 2026: CIO SAN TAN I, LP; CIO SAN TA II, LP; and SWVP SANN TAN, LLC (TX2024-000270) Represented by Aaron Clouse; MOORE RANCHES, INC. (TX2025-000082) Represented by James Nearhood; NEXT GEN NORTH MOUNTAIN, LLC (TX2025-000153) Represented by Aaron Clouse; (C-19-26-071-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-50-26-051-X-00 (base: C-50-26-051-X)
Base
C-50-26-051-X
Revision
00
Item text
19. APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY (ONDCP) FOR THE HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) PROGRAM – INITIATIVE XXXVI Approve Application for $667,924 with the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) for the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Program. The term of this funding is January 1, 2026, to December 31, 2027. This amount represents the total FY 26/27 budget and spending ceiling for this initiative. The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office is the Fiduciary of these funds for the County. The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office will receive up to $547,174. The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office will receive up to $120,750. The Sheriff’s Office funding award is designated for two separate initiatives: Intelligence Initiative (HIDTAISC): $73,393 and Interdiction Initiative (MCDST): $473,781. The total indirect cost amount for these two initiatives is $151,348.32 ($20,300.50 and $131,047.82). The Sheriff Office indirect rate for FY26 is 27.66% and MCSO will not recover $151,348.32. The County Attorney’s funding award is designated for the Investigation Initiative (MISTIC) and its FY26 indirect rate is 18.85%. The total indirect cost amount for this initiative is $22,761.38 and MCAO will not recover $22,761.38. This funding supports the Sheriff’s public safety mandate through efforts to reduce illegal drug use with the interruption of drug trafficking. The funding is recurring and has been awarded to the Sheriff’s Office for over thirteen years. There is no matching requirement and there are no future or ongoing contributions required after the grant period ends. This is a competitive award. Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure limitation, and therefore, expenditures of these revenues are not prohibited by the budget law. (C-50-26-051-X-00)
Supporting documents (7)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-43-26-035-X-00 (base: C-43-26-035-X)
Base
C-43-26-035-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
20.TREASURER'S COLLECTIONS AND DISBURSEMENT SUMMARY FOR DECEMBER 2025 Pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-501, accept the Treasurer's Collections and Disbursement Summary for December 2025, as on file in the clerk of the board's office and retained in accordance with the Arizona State Library Archives and Public Records (ASLAPR) approved retention schedule. (C-43-26-035-X-00) Motion to approve by Supervisor Debbie Lesko, seconded by Supervisor Mark Stewart Ayes: Kate Brophy McGee, Debbie Lesko, Mark Stewart
Item text
20. TREASURER'S COLLECTIONS AND DISBURSEMENT SUMMARY FOR DECEMBER 2025 Pursuant to A.R.S. § 11-501, accept the Treasurer's Collections and Disbursement Summary for December 2025, as on file in the clerk of the board's office and retained in accordance with the Arizona State Library Archives and Public Records (ASLAPR) approved retention schedule. (C-43-26-035-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-43-26-036-X-00 (base: C-43-26-036-X)
Base
C-43-26-036-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
21.DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAX INTEREST WAIVER Pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-18053(C), the attached delinquent property tax interest waiver is presented to the Board of Supervisors for consideration and approval. (C-43-26-036-X-00) Motion to approve by Supervisor Debbie Lesko, seconded by Supervisor Mark Stewart Ayes: Kate Brophy McGee, Debbie Lesko, Mark Stewart, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo
Item text
21. DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAX INTEREST WAIVER Pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-18053(C), the attached delinquent property tax interest waiver is presented to the Board of Supervisors for consideration and approval. (C-43-26-036-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-43-26-031-X-00 (base: C-43-26-031-X)
Base
C-43-26-031-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
22.OFFER ON TAX DEEDED LAND PARCEL 220-19-002P (Supervisorial District 2) The Maricopa County Treasurer’s Office received the following offer to purchase parcel 220-19-002P. This offer is subject to consideration and approval by the Board of Supervisors. No additional offers on the parcel will be considered. Parcel Number – 220-19-002PDate Previously Offered – N/APurchaser / Name for the Deed – Keith and Peggy MartinOffer Amount – $251.67 Pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-18303, the County may sell parcel
Item text
22. OFFER ON TAX DEEDED LAND PARCEL 220-19-002P (Supervisorial District 2) The Maricopa County Treasurer’s Office received the following offer to purchase parcel 220-19-002P. This offer is subject to consideration and approval by the Board of Supervisors. No additional offers on the parcel will be considered. Parcel Number – 220-19-002P Date Previously Offered – N/A Purchaser / Name for the Deed – Keith and Peggy Martin Offer Amount – $251.67 Pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-18303, the County may sell parcel no. 220-19-002P (tax-deeded land held by the State of Arizona) directly to a purchaser if certain requirements are met. Here, the purchaser’s offer to purchase the tax-deeded land is made pursuant to subsection F, based on their status as a contiguous property owner in compliance with the statutory requirements. The Assessor’s Office’s subsection F review is attached. If the Board of Supervisors accepts the offer to purchase parcel 220-19-002P, the Treasurer’s Office will accept payment and prepare the quit claim deed to convey the property to the winning bidder and deliver it to the Clerk of the Board for further processing. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-18303(C), the proceeds of the winning bid shall be paid to the County Treasurer. After deducting and distributing interest, penalties, fees, and costs charged against parcel 220-19-002P, the Treasurer shall apportion the remaining proceeds pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-18303(C). The subject property lies within Supervisorial District 2. The crossroads are N Ellsworth Rd & E Brown Rd. (C-43-26-031-X-00)
Supporting documents (6)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-21-26-017-X-00 (base: C-21-26-017-X)
Base
C-21-26-017-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
23.FY26 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FOR ELECTIONS In accordance with A.R.S. 42-17106(B), approve the following adjustments to the FY 2026 budget:1. Increase the expenditure authority in the Elections (D210) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget by $30,426.2. Decrease the expenditure authority in Non Departmental (D470) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget in the line “Unreserved Contingency” (4711) by $30,426. In addition, direct the Budget Office to make the following adjustments to the FY 202
Item text
23. FY26 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FOR ELECTIONS In accordance with A.R.S. 42-17106(B), approve the following adjustments to the FY 2026 budget: 1. Increase the expenditure authority in the Elections (D210) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget by $30,426. 2. Decrease the expenditure authority in Non Departmental (D470) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget in the line “Unreserved Contingency” (4711) by $30,426. In addition, direct the Budget Office to make the following adjustments to the FY 2027 Baseline Operating budget to support the annualized position costs: 3. Increase the expenditure authority in the Elections (D210) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget by $92,634. 4. Decrease the expenditure authority in Non Departmental (D470) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget in the line “Unreserved Contingency” (4711) by $92,634. This action will have a net zero impact on the overall County budget. (C-21-26-017-X-00) 24. PRECINCT COMMITTEEMEN Pursuant to A.R.S. §16-821(B), determine whether a vacancy (or vacancies) exists in the office of Precinct Committeeman and, if so, make appointments to that office. The list of suspected vacancies and recommended nominations is on file in the Clerk of the Board’s Office and retained in accordance with Arizona State Library, Archives, and Public Records (ASLAPR) approved retention schedule. (C-21-26-015-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-21-26-017-X-00 (base: C-21-26-017-X)
Base
C-21-26-017-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
24.PRECINCT COMMITTEEMEN Pursuant to A.R.S. §16-821(B), determine whether a vacancy (or vacancies) exists in the office of Precinct Committeeman and, if so, make appointments to that office. The list of suspected vacancies and recommended nominations is on file in the Clerk of the Board’s Office and retained in accordance with Arizona State Library, Archives, and Public Records (ASLAPR) approved retention schedule. (C-21-26-015-X-00) Motion to approve by Supervisor Debbie Lesko, seconded by Supe
Item text
23. FY26 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FOR ELECTIONS In accordance with A.R.S. 42-17106(B), approve the following adjustments to the FY 2026 budget: 1. Increase the expenditure authority in the Elections (D210) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget by $30,426. 2. Decrease the expenditure authority in Non Departmental (D470) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget in the line “Unreserved Contingency” (4711) by $30,426. In addition, direct the Budget Office to make the following adjustments to the FY 2027 Baseline Operating budget to support the annualized position costs: 3. Increase the expenditure authority in the Elections (D210) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget by $92,634. 4. Decrease the expenditure authority in Non Departmental (D470) General Fund (100) Operating (OPER) budget in the line “Unreserved Contingency” (4711) by $92,634. This action will have a net zero impact on the overall County budget. (C-21-26-017-X-00) 24. PRECINCT COMMITTEEMEN Pursuant to A.R.S. §16-821(B), determine whether a vacancy (or vacancies) exists in the office of Precinct Committeeman and, if so, make appointments to that office. The list of suspected vacancies and recommended nominations is on file in the Clerk of the Board’s Office and retained in accordance with Arizona State Library, Archives, and Public Records (ASLAPR) approved retention schedule. (C-21-26-015-X-00)
Supporting documents (3)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-88-12-010-7-00 (base: C-88-12-010-7)
Base
C-88-12-010-7
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
25.BOARD OF HEALTH FEE WAIVER REIMBURSEMENT Approve a fund transfer of $8,815 from the General Fund (100) to the Environmental Services Environmental Health Fund (506). The purpose of the transfer is to reimburse Environmental Services for Fee Waivers approved by the Board of Health pursuant to C-88-12-010-7-00. Pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17106B, authorize the transfer of FY2026 expenditure authority in the amount of $8,815 from Non Departmental (D470) General Fund (100) Non Recurring Non Project (N
Item text
25. BOARD OF HEALTH FEE WAIVER REIMBURSEMENT Approve a fund transfer of $8,815 from the General Fund (100) to the Environmental Services Environmental Health Fund (506). The purpose of the transfer is to reimburse Environmental Services for Fee Waivers approved by the Board of Health pursuant to C-88-12-010-7-00. Pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17106B, authorize the transfer of FY2026 expenditure authority in the amount of $8,815 from Non Departmental (D470) General Fund (100) Non Recurring Non Project (NRNP) Contingency (4711) to Non Departmental (D470) General Fund (100) Non Recurring Non Project (NRNP) Other Programs (4712) to the line item titled “Board of Health Fee Waiver Fund Transfer” for the reimbursement of the Environmental Services fee waivers approved by the Board of Health. Also authorize an increase in revenue authority in the amount of $8,815 in Environmental Services (D880) Environmental Services Environmental Health Fund (506) Non Recurring Non Project (NRNP) and increase expenditure authority in the amount of $8,815 in Non Departmental (D470) Grants Fund (249) Non Recurring Non Project (NRNP) with offsetting revenue and expenditure adjustments in Eliminations (D980) Eliminations Fund (900) Non Recurring Non Project (NRNP). This action will have a net zero impact on the overall County budget. Board of Supervisors item C-88-12-010-7-00, approved on June 20, 2012, authorized reimbursement to The Environmental Services Fee Fund for fees waived by the Board of Health for its work on behalf of the Board of Supervisors. At the Board of Health meeting on Monday, January 26, 2026, the Board of Health approved fee waivers totaling $8,815. Environmental Services requests reimbursement pursuant to C-88-12-010-7-00. (C-88-26-017-X-00)
Supporting documents (2)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-20-16-032-G-00 (base: C-20-16-032-G)
Base
C-20-16-032-G
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
26.ACCEPT TRIBAL GAMING FUNDS FROM FORT MCDOWELL YAVAPAI NATION Pursuant to A.R.S. §5-601.02 and the Resolution Regarding Processing of Tribal Gaming Fund Applications (C-20-16-032-G-00) approved on May 31, 2016, authorize Maricopa County to approve and sign the intergovernmental agreement between Maricopa County and the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation. The resolution to apply for these grant funds was previously approved on 4/9/2025 (C-18-25-062-X-00). Allow the Office of Budget & Finance to accep
Item text
26. ACCEPT TRIBAL GAMING FUNDS FROM FORT MCDOWELL YAVAPAI NATION Pursuant to A.R.S. §5-601.02 and the Resolution Regarding Processing of Tribal Gaming Fund Applications (C-20-16-032-G-00) approved on May 31, 2016, authorize Maricopa County to approve and sign the intergovernmental agreement between Maricopa County and the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation. The resolution to apply for these grant funds was previously approved on 4/9/2025 (C-18-25-062-X-00). Allow the Office of Budget & Finance to accept and pass-through Tribal Gaming Grant funds from the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation for the programs listed below in the not-to-exceed amount of $20,000.00 in FY 2026. These funds are for government services that benefit the general public, including public safety, mitigation of the impacts of gaming, or promotion of commerce and economic development. Grant Applicant: American Indian Veterans Memorial Organization Grant Program: Military Flags and Flagpoles for American Indian Veterans Memorial Amount Requested: $5,000.00 Grant Applicant: Hunkapi Programs Grant Program: 6 Week First Responder Cohort Amount Requested: $10,000.00 Grant Applicant: Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation Grant Program: Mobile Sensory Station Amount Requested: $5,000.00 The grant award is one time and there is no cash or in-kind match requirement. Indirect costs are not applicable to Tribal Gaming Grants. Future ongoing cash contributions are not required after the grant period. The grant award is not a mandated function and the services provided by this grant benefit the general public, including public safety, mitigation of the impacts of gaming, or promotion of commerce and economic development. The grant award is competitively bid and determined by the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation. There are no costs that will need to be absorbed by the department’s operating budget. Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure limitation, and therefore, expenditure of the funds is not prohibited by the budget law. (C-18-26-033-X-00)
Supporting documents (2)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-18-26-035-X-00 (base: C-18-26-035-X)
Base
C-18-26-035-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
27.66% and MCSO will not recover $151,348.32. The County Attorney’s funding award is designated for the Investigation Initiative (MISTIC) and its FY26 indirect rate is 18.85%. The total indirect cost amount for this initiative is $22,761.38 and MCAO will not recover $22,761.38. This funding supports the Sheriff’s public safety mandate through efforts to reduce illegal drug use with the interruption of drug trafficking. The funding is recurring and has been awarded to the Sheriff’s Office for ove
Item text
27. FUNDS TRANSFERS; WARRANTS - TRANSFERENCIAS DE FONDOS; WARRANTS Approve regular and routine fund transfers, warrant reports 1/09/2026 through 01/22/2026, from the operating funds to clearing funds including payroll, journal entries, allocations, loans, and paid claims and authorize the issuance of the appropriate related warrants. Pursuant to A.R.S. §11-217(D) and A.R.S. §11-623, said warrants and claims are on file in the Clerk of the Board’s office and retained in accordance with LAPR approved retention schedule. (C-18-26-035-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-063-X-00 (base: C-44-26-063-X)
Base
C-44-26-063-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
28.WHITE TANK FOOTHILLS PARCEL 3.19 SUBDIVISION ASSURANCE AGREEMENT (Supervisor District 4) Approve White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.19 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC, and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.19 Subdivision (case number S
Item text
28. WHITE TANK FOOTHILLS PARCEL 3.19 SUBDIVISION ASSURANCE AGREEMENT (Supervisor District 4) Approve White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.19 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC, and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.19 Subdivision (case number S2024013). This agreement is to be recorded as required pursuant to A.R.S. §11-1101. This subdivision assurance agreement shall become effective on the date its related subdivision plat is recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder. (Supervisor District 4) Approve by Resolution, the proposed White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.19 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County, and authorize the Chair to execute the Agreement as submitted. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.19 (case number S2024013). (C-44-26-063-X-00)
Supporting documents (2)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-065-X-00 (base: C-44-26-065-X)
Base
C-44-26-065-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
29.WHITE TANK FOOTHILLS PARCEL 3.12 SUBDIVISION ASSURANCE AGREEMENT (Supervisor District 4) Approve White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.12 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC, and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.12 Subdivision (case number S
Item text
29. WHITE TANK FOOTHILLS PARCEL 3.12 SUBDIVISION ASSURANCE AGREEMENT (Supervisor District 4) Approve White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.12 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC, and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.12 Subdivision (case number S2024011). This agreement is to be recorded as required pursuant to A.R.S. §11-1101. This subdivision assurance agreement shall become effective on the date its related subdivision plat is recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder. (Supervisor District 4) Approve by Resolution, the proposed White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.12 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County, and authorize the Chair to execute the Agreement as submitted. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.12 (case number S2024011). (C-44-26-065-X-00)
Supporting documents (2)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-066-X-00 (base: C-44-26-066-X)
Base
C-44-26-066-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
30.WHITE TANK FOOTHILLS PARCEL 3.11 SUBDIVISION ASSURANCE AGREEMENT (Supervisor District 4) Approve White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.11 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC, and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.11 Subdivision (case number S
Item text
30. WHITE TANK FOOTHILLS PARCEL 3.11 SUBDIVISION ASSURANCE AGREEMENT (Supervisor District 4) Approve White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.11 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC, and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.11 Subdivision (case number S2024010). This agreement is to be recorded as required pursuant to A.R.S. §11-1101. This subdivision assurance agreement shall become effective on the date its related subdivision plat is recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder. (Supervisor District 4) Approve by Resolution, the proposed White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.11 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County, and authorize the Chair to execute the Agreement as submitted. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.11 (case number S2024010). (C-44-26-066-X-00)
Supporting documents (2)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-064-X-00 (base: C-44-26-064-X)
Base
C-44-26-064-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
31.WHITE TANK FOOTHILLS PARCEL 3.18 SUBDIVISION ASSURANCE AGREEMENT (Supervisor District 4) Approve White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.18 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC, and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.18 Subdivision (case number S
Item text
31. WHITE TANK FOOTHILLS PARCEL 3.18 SUBDIVISION ASSURANCE AGREEMENT (Supervisor District 4) Approve White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.18 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC, and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.18 Subdivision (case number S2024012). This agreement is to be recorded as required pursuant to A.R.S. §11-1101. This subdivision assurance agreement shall become effective on the date its related subdivision plat is recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder. (Supervisor District 4) Approve by Resolution, the proposed White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.18 Subdivision Assurance Agreement with Ashton Woods Arizona, LLC and RLS (White), LLC; and Maricopa County, and authorize the Chair to execute the Agreement as submitted. This agreement serves as part of the subdivision’s assurance as required by Arizona Revised Statutes §11-821(C) and must be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to approval of the Final Plat for White Tank Foothills Parcel 3.18 (case number S2024012). (C-44-26-064-X-00)
Supporting documents (2)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-73-26-026-X-00 (base: C-73-26-026-X)
Base
C-73-26-026-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
32.260032-RFP, ARIZONA@WORK MARICOPA COUNTY YOUTH PROGRAM SERVICES Approve the contract for award between Maricopa County at an estimate of $928,166.00 over one year until June 30, 2027, with four one-year renewal options. The effective date of the contract will be July 1, 2026. Contract services are funded by Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) WIOA Title I Youth-CFDA 17.259 and in accordance with 29 CFR 97.21 and contractors must remain in compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Admin
Item text
32. 260032-RFP, ARIZONA@WORK MARICOPA COUNTY YOUTH PROGRAM SERVICES Approve the contract for award between Maricopa County at an estimate of $928,166.00 over one year until June 30, 2027, with four one-year renewal options. The effective date of the contract will be July 1, 2026. Contract services are funded by Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) WIOA Title I Youth-CFDA 17.259 and in accordance with 29 CFR 97.21 and contractors must remain in compliance with 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. The contract replaces contract 210192-RFP Arizona@Work Maricopa County Youth Program Services which expires 6/30/2026. The purpose of the contract is to provide Maricopa County with services as identified by Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Youth Program Services. The services address employment and educational needs of County youth, with the exception of youth residing in the City of Phoenix. Youth participants are from one or more of the following categories: high school dropouts, justice involved, pregnant or parenting; in or aged out of foster care, homeless/runaway, have a disability, low income and basic skills deficient, and low income and/or English Language Learners (ELL). Recommended for Award: Empowering Services, LLC dba Family First Home Care of Arizona; LifeologyAZ Inc. dba Homeless Youth Shelter; and Melabiz Community Hub (C-73-26-026-X-00)
Supporting documents (3)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-73-26-027-X-00 (base: C-73-26-027-X)
Base
C-73-26-027-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
33.260052-RFP, CVAZ MESSAGE EXCHANGE PLATFORM AND MOBILE DEVICE APPLICATION Approve the contract for award between Maricopa County and Sonamore Inc dba P3Mobility and Trustpoint Systems Inc. The purpose of the contract is to provide to Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) a qualified contractor to provide a complete Network-Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Message Exchange Platform (MEP) and a mobile device application that sends and receives connected vehicle safety and signal messag
Item text
33. 260052-RFP, CVAZ MESSAGE EXCHANGE PLATFORM AND MOBILE DEVICE APPLICATION Approve the contract for award between Maricopa County and Sonamore Inc dba P3Mobility and Trustpoint Systems Inc. The purpose of the contract is to provide to Maricopa County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) a qualified contractor to provide a complete Network-Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Message Exchange Platform (MEP) and a mobile device application that sends and receives connected vehicle safety and signal messages at an estimate of $1,210,000.00 over four years until January 31, 2030 with a maximum of four additional renewal years. The effective date of the contract will be February 11, 2026. MCDOT is receiving funding for the Connected Vehicle Acceleration Zone (CVAZ) project in whole or in part through the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) under the program titled Saving Lives with Connectivity: Accelerating Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Deployment. MCDOT is collaborating with the City of Phoenix, Tolleson, and Avondale to complete this project. (C-73-26-027-X-00)
Supporting documents (2)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-73-26-025-X-00 (base: C-73-26-025-X)
Base
C-73-26-025-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
34.260006-RFP, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, OPERATING SUPPLIES, INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES, AND RELATED PRODUCTS AND SERVICES Approve the contract for award between Maricopa County and HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, Ltd. Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. and Home Depot USA, Inc. The purpose of the contract is to replace the County’s current contract to provide to Maricopa County a source to purchase maintenance, repair, operating supplies, industrial supplies, and related products and services in a reta
Item text
34. 260006-RFP, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, OPERATING SUPPLIES, INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES, AND RELATED PRODUCTS AND SERVICES Approve the contract for award between Maricopa County and HD Supply Facilities Maintenance, Ltd. Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. and Home Depot USA, Inc. The purpose of the contract is to replace the County’s current contract to provide to Maricopa County a source to purchase maintenance, repair, operating supplies, industrial supplies, and related products and services in a retail and wholesale environment at an estimate of $3,800,000 over five years until January 31, 2031, with the option to renew the term of this contract up to a maximum of five additional years. The effective date of the contract will be February 11, 2026. (C-73-26-025-X-00)
Supporting documents (3)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-73-26-002-X-06 (base: C-73-26-002-X)
Base
C-73-26-002-X
Revision
06
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
35.250038-CMR, OFFICE SPACE OPTIMIZATION PROJECT PHASE II GMP 8 Approve the Phase II, Guaranteed Maximum Price #8 (GMP) for $1,809,888.56 for the renovation of approximately 6,700 square feet of the first floor of the West Courts Building. The purpose of this contract is to provide Phase II construction manager at risk (CM@R) services for the Facilities Management Department and the work consists of architectural improvements and associated upgrades to building systems, including electrical, sec
Item text
35. 250038-CMR, OFFICE SPACE OPTIMIZATION PROJECT PHASE II GMP 8 Approve the Phase II, Guaranteed Maximum Price #8 (GMP) for $1,809,888.56 for the renovation of approximately 6,700 square feet of the first floor of the West Courts Building. The purpose of this contract is to provide Phase II construction manager at risk (CM@R) services for the Facilities Management Department and the work consists of architectural improvements and associated upgrades to building systems, including electrical, security, fire protection, mechanical, plumbing, communications/audio-visual, and technology systems. The Office Space Optimization Program includes improvements in five separate County facilities to ensure the best overall use of County space. The buildings covered under the program are: 1) Administration, 2) Chambers, 3) West Courts, 4) Downtown Justice Center, and 5) East Courts. (C-73-26-002-X-06)
Supporting documents (2)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-73-26-024-X-00 (base: C-73-26-024-X)
Base
C-73-26-024-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
36.260039-C, PEANUT BUTTER Approve the contract for award for the purpose of providing Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office with a source of peanut butter for inmate dietary purposes at an estimate of $1,600,000.00 over two (2) years until March 31, 2028 with three (3) one-year renewal options. The effective date of the contract will be April 12, 2026. This contract is replacing the existing contract 240164-C Peanut Butter. Recommendation for award:Global Foods, IncHighland Wholesale Foods, IncJNS F
Item text
36. 260039-C, PEANUT BUTTER Approve the contract for award for the purpose of providing Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office with a source of peanut butter for inmate dietary purposes at an estimate of $1,600,000.00 over two (2) years until March 31, 2028 with three (3) one-year renewal options. The effective date of the contract will be April 12, 2026. This contract is replacing the existing contract 240164-C Peanut Butter. Recommendation for award: Global Foods, Inc Highland Wholesale Foods, Inc JNS Food, LLC LA Foods, LLC Robbins Sales Co, Inc Sunco Foods (C-73-26-024-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-86-26-030-X-00 (base: C-86-26-030-X)
Base
C-86-26-030-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
37.ACCEPT FUNDS AND APPROVE CONTRACT WITH STATE OF BLACK ARIZONA TO PROVIDE DOULA SERVICES Accept funds and approve a Contract between State of Black Arizona (SBA) (Contracting Entity), and Maricopa County, by and through its Department of Public Health (MCDPH) (Contractor) to provide funding for Doula Services. SBA is providing funding for MCDPH to mentor and train 20 community doulas to be certified and licensed. The not-to-exceed amount is $144,000 for the budget period February 15, 2026, thr
Item text
37. ACCEPT FUNDS AND APPROVE CONTRACT WITH STATE OF BLACK ARIZONA TO PROVIDE DOULA SERVICES Accept funds and approve a Contract between State of Black Arizona (SBA) (Contracting Entity), and Maricopa County, by and through its Department of Public Health (MCDPH) (Contractor) to provide funding for Doula Services. SBA is providing funding for MCDPH to mentor and train 20 community doulas to be certified and licensed. The not-to-exceed amount is $144,000 for the budget period February 15, 2026, through January 14, 2027. The contract term is February 15, 2026, through January 14, 2027. This is the first time funding has been contracted to MCDPH for these services, and it is unknown if the funding will be provided again. It is non-competitive and there is no cash or in-kind match requirement, nor are on-going contributions required. This is not a mandated service but provides a valuable benefit to the citizens of Maricopa County through providing essential Doula Services. This contract award deviates from County Policy A2505 and does not allow for indirect cost reimbursement. The Department of Health’s indirect rate for FY26 is 16.69%. Total indirect expenses are estimated to be $24,033.60, all of which are not recoverable and will be absorbed by the department’s operating budget. Grant revenues are not local revenues for the purpose of the constitutional expenditure limitation, and therefore expenditure of the revenues is not prohibited by the budget law. This Agreement does not alter the budget constraining expenditures of local revenues duly adopted by the Board pursuant to A.R.S. §42-17105. The overall budget will be adjusted as necessary to accommodate this award through future reconciliation. Funding for this Agreement is provided through pass-through funds awarded to SBA. (C-86-26-030-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-86-26-026-X-00 (base: C-86-26-026-X)
Base
C-86-26-026-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
38.ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION FOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING SERVICES CONTRACTS Approve an Administrative Correction to item C-86-26-026-X-00, for five (5) PH RFP 260029 contracts which were approved by the Board on 01/28/2026. Section 1.0, CONTRACT TERM, was incorrectly listed in the contract as “twenty-four months beginning February 1, 2026, and ending on January 31, 2027.” The correct verbiage and CONTRACT TERM should be “twenty-four months beginning February 1, 2026, and ending January 31,
Item text
38. ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTION FOR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING SERVICES CONTRACTS Approve an Administrative Correction to item C-86-26-026-X-00, for five (5) PH RFP 260029 contracts which were approved by the Board on 01/28/2026. Section 1.0, CONTRACT TERM, was incorrectly listed in the contract as “twenty-four months beginning February 1, 2026, and ending on January 31, 2027.” The correct verbiage and CONTRACT TERM should be “twenty-four months beginning February 1, 2026, and ending January 31, 2028.” This contract contains three (3) one (1) year renewal options and there is no change needed to them. (C-86-26-026-X-01)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-86-22-200-X-02 (base: C-86-22-200-X)
Base
C-86-22-200-X
Revision
02
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
39.AMENDMENT TO AFFILIATION AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Approve Amendment number two (2) to the Affiliation Agreement (AA) between the Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR), on behalf of the University of Arizona (U of A), and Maricopa County, by and through its Department of Public Health (MCDPH), to provide clinical nutrition training experience for graduate students in the dietetic internship. The original term of the AA began July 1, 2021. The
Item text
39. AMENDMENT TO AFFILIATION AGREEMENT WITH THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA Approve Amendment number two (2) to the Affiliation Agreement (AA) between the Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR), on behalf of the University of Arizona (U of A), and Maricopa County, by and through its Department of Public Health (MCDPH), to provide clinical nutrition training experience for graduate students in the dietetic internship. The original term of the AA began July 1, 2021. The AA referenced in this Amendment is hereby amended as follows: I. The above-named agreement is hereby amended to extend the term from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2031. II. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. (C-86-22-200-X-02)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-86-26-029-X-00 (base: C-86-26-029-X)
Base
C-86-26-029-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
40.CONTRACT WITH COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH, LLC. FOR RYAN WHITE PROGRAM CONSULTING SERVICES Approve a contract pursuant to PH RFP 260061 between Maricopa County, by and through the Department of Public Health (MCDPH), and Collaborative Research, LLC. The term of this contract is 03/01/2026 through 02/28/2029 with three (3) one (1) year renewal options. Services shall be provided as needed at the Contractor’s requested rate of $125.00 per hour. The purpose of this contract is to strengthen the deliv
Item text
40. CONTRACT WITH COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH, LLC. FOR RYAN WHITE PROGRAM CONSULTING SERVICES Approve a contract pursuant to PH RFP 260061 between Maricopa County, by and through the Department of Public Health (MCDPH), and Collaborative Research, LLC. The term of this contract is 03/01/2026 through 02/28/2029 with three (3) one (1) year renewal options. Services shall be provided as needed at the Contractor’s requested rate of $125.00 per hour. The purpose of this contract is to strengthen the delivery of HIV care and support services in the Phoenix Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA), which includes Maricopa and Pinal Counties. Contractor shall provide consulting services that enhance program planning, technical assistance, oversight, evaluation, and community engagement for the Ryan White Program (RWP) and related initiatives. Services under this contract may include Planning Council support, technical assistance and training, subrecipient monitoring, research and evaluation, and client/provider engagement. The intent is to build capacity, maintain compliance with federal requirements, and advance progress toward ending the HIV epidemic. (C-86-26-029-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-86-26-031-X-00 (base: C-86-26-031-X)
Base
C-86-26-031-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
41.CONTRACT WITH TRIYOUNG, INC. FOR RYAN WHITE IT CONSULTING SERVICES Approve a contract pursuant to PH RFP 260063 between Maricopa County, by and through the Department of Public Health (MCDPH), and TriYoung, Inc. The term of this contract is 03/01/2026 through 02/28/2029 with three (3) one (1) year renewal options. Services shall be provided as needed at the Contractor’s requested rate of $140.00 per hour. The purpose of this contract is to strengthen the data and technology infrastructure tha
Item text
41. CONTRACT WITH TRIYOUNG, INC. FOR RYAN WHITE IT CONSULTING SERVICES Approve a contract pursuant to PH RFP 260063 between Maricopa County, by and through the Department of Public Health (MCDPH), and TriYoung, Inc. The term of this contract is 03/01/2026 through 02/28/2029 with three (3) one (1) year renewal options. Services shall be provided as needed at the Contractor’s requested rate of $140.00 per hour. The purpose of this contract is to strengthen the data and technology infrastructure that supports HIV care and services in the Phoenix Eligible Metropolitan Area (EMA), which includes Maricopa and Pinal Counties. Contractor shall provide IT consulting services that enhance system performance, security, reporting, and data integration for the Maricopa County Ryan White Program (MCRWP) and related initiatives. Services under this contract include CAREWare system support, system integration and enhancements, reporting for federal and local requirements, technical assistance and training for MCRWP staff and subrecipients. (C-86-26-031-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-86-25-056-X-02 (base: C-86-25-056-X)
Base
C-86-25-056-X
Revision
02
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
42.NOTICE OF AWARD FOR THE PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS RESPONSE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Approve Notice of Award (NOA) 6 NU90TP922302-01-04 from Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), for Public Health Crisis Response to support the county’s ability to rapidly mobilize, surge, and respond to public health emergencies. This is a no cost extension. The project period began on January 17, 2025 and has been extended through January 16, 2027. All other
Item text
42. NOTICE OF AWARD FOR THE PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS RESPONSE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Approve Notice of Award (NOA) 6 NU90TP922302-01-04 from Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), for Public Health Crisis Response to support the county’s ability to rapidly mobilize, surge, and respond to public health emergencies. This is a no cost extension. The project period began on January 17, 2025 and has been extended through January 16, 2027. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. (C-86-25-056-X-02)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-86-26-028-X-00 (base: C-86-26-028-X)
Base
C-86-26-028-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
43.REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE GREATER PHOENIX RYAN WHITE HIV SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL Approve the following reappointments to the Greater Phoenix Ryan White HIV Services Planning Council (Council). All terms will be effective upon Board approval. 1. Steve Gallardo (Board of Supervisors Designee) renewal appointment. Term Effective 3/1/2026 to 2/28/2027. 2. John Gomez (Alternate to the Board of Supervisors Designee) renewal appointment. Term effective 3/1/2026 to 2/28/2027. (C-86-26-028-X-00) Motion
Item text
43. REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE GREATER PHOENIX RYAN WHITE HIV SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL Approve the following reappointments to the Greater Phoenix Ryan White HIV Services Planning Council (Council). All terms will be effective upon Board approval. 1. Steve Gallardo (Board of Supervisors Designee) renewal appointment. Term Effective 3/1/2026 to 2/28/2027. 2. John Gomez (Alternate to the Board of Supervisors Designee) renewal appointment. Term effective 3/1/2026 to 2/28/2027. (C-86-26-028-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-64-26-107-X-00 (base: C-64-26-107-X)
Base
C-64-26-107-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
44.BID AND AWARD FOR (TT0633) CONSTRUCTION ON SOUTHERN AVE 51ST AVE TO 37TH LANE (Supervisory District No. 5) Maricopa County Department of Transportation’s is requesting approval for the solicitation of bids for the construction of Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Project TT0633 on Southern Ave 51st Ave to 37th Lane. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive responsible bidder, provided that the lowest responsive responsible bidder does not exceed the Engineer’s estimate by
Item text
44. BID AND AWARD FOR (TT0633) CONSTRUCTION ON SOUTHERN AVE 51ST AVE TO 37TH LANE (Supervisory District No. 5) Maricopa County Department of Transportation’s is requesting approval for the solicitation of bids for the construction of Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Project TT0633 on Southern Ave 51st Ave to 37th Lane. The contract will be awarded to the lowest responsive responsible bidder, provided that the lowest responsive responsible bidder does not exceed the Engineer’s estimate by more than ten percent. (C-64-26-107-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-64-21-177-X-07 (base: C-64-21-177-X)
Base
C-64-21-177-X
Revision
07
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
45.CHANGE ORDER WITH T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL FOR (TT0372) NORTHERN PARKWAY: 103RD AVE TO 91ST AVE (LOOP 101) (Supervisory District No. 4) Request Approval of Change Order No. 7 for Contract 2021-016 with T.Y. LIN, International for Northern Parkway: 103rd Ave to 91st Ave (Loop 101) for a sum not-to-exceed, one million six hundred twenty thousand one hundred seventy-six dollars and seventy-six cents ($1,620,176.76). The contract completion date is requested to extend to June 30, 2031. (C-64-21-177
Item text
45. CHANGE ORDER WITH T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL FOR (TT0372) NORTHERN PARKWAY: 103RD AVE TO 91ST AVE (LOOP 101) (Supervisory District No. 4) Request Approval of Change Order No. 7 for Contract 2021-016 with T.Y. LIN, International for Northern Parkway: 103rd Ave to 91st Ave (Loop 101) for a sum not-to-exceed, one million six hundred twenty thousand one hundred seventy-six dollars and seventy-six cents ($1,620,176.76). The contract completion date is requested to extend to June 30, 2031. (C-64-21-177-X-07)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-06-26-242-X-00 (base: C-06-26-242-X)
Base
C-06-26-242-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
46.DEANNEXATION FROM CITY OF MESA TO MARICOPA COUNTY (Supervisory District 2) Pursuant to A.R.S. §9-471.03(D), set a hearing for February 25, 2026, to determine if the public interest is served by de-annexing road right-of-way from City of Mesa jurisdiction to Maricopa County in accordance with the City of Mesa Ordinance No. 5999. Also, for the hearing, direct MCDOT to prepare an analysis of the requested action. Right-of-way location: SW corner Brown Rd. and Crismon Rd. Supervisory District No.
Item text
46. DEANNEXATION FROM CITY OF MESA TO MARICOPA COUNTY (Supervisory District 2) Pursuant to A.R.S. §9-471.03(D), set a hearing for February 25, 2026, to determine if the public interest is served by de-annexing road right-of-way from City of Mesa jurisdiction to Maricopa County in accordance with the City of Mesa Ordinance No. 5999. Also, for the hearing, direct MCDOT to prepare an analysis of the requested action. Right-of-way location: SW corner Brown Rd. and Crismon Rd. Supervisory District No.2. At the hearing, if after reviewing the analysis and hearing those that may appear for or against the action, the Board determines that the public interest is served by this de-annex/annexation action, the Board shall file in the Clerk of the Board’s Office an ordinance setting forth the legal description of the public right-of-way and declare the return of the right-of-way contingent on the fulfillment of the additional conditions of the statute which would include setting a second public hearing on this matter. The Board action will result to add 0.0002 square miles to County ownership and enable the County to assume responsibility for road maintenance. (C-06-26-242-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-44-26-061-X-00 (base: C-44-26-061-X)
Base
C-44-26-061-X
Revision
00
Related P&Z hearings
  • 2026-01-22 — January 22, 2026 Planning and Zoning Com
Item text
47. PLANNING AND ZONING SETTING OF HEARING Schedule the following items for public hearing at the February 25, 2026 Board Hearing: Z250031– Sun Basin VII – ZC with Overlay - Dist. 4 Z250021 – Royal Landscaping – ZC with overlay – Dist. 2 MCP250006 – Butler Billboard – MCP Amendment – Dist. 4 (C-44-26-061-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-64-26-101-X-00 (base: C-64-26-101-X)
Base
C-64-26-101-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
48.ROAD FILE NO. A0757 (Supervisorial District No. 1) Set a hearing for March 11, 2026, to adopt Road File No. A0757 to Open and Declare the following described alignments into the County Transportation System. In accordance with A.R.S. § 28-6701, 6702 and 6703, it is recommended by the Department of Transportation Director, that the Board of Supervisors Open and Declare the following described alignments into the County Transportation System, Road File No. A0757. ROAD FILE NO. A0757 Two Roadway
Item text
48. ROAD FILE NO. A0757 (Supervisorial District No. 1) Set a hearing for March 11, 2026, to adopt Road File No. A0757 to Open and Declare the following described alignments into the County Transportation System. In accordance with A.R.S. § 28-6701, 6702 and 6703, it is recommended by the Department of Transportation Director, that the Board of Supervisors Open and Declare the following described alignments into the County Transportation System, Road File No. A0757. ROAD FILE NO. A0757 Two Roadways having a width consistent with the existing right-of-way and appurtenant rights, together with any additional right-of-way and appurtenances necessary to provide for construction, operation, and maintenance of the highway as designed and constructed by the Maricopa County Department of Transportation; the centerline of the highways are described as follows: Power Road: BEGINNING at the intersection of Power Road and Happy Road; Thence Northerly along the East line of Section 36, Township 2 South, Range 6 East to the intersection of Power Road and Mews Road being the POINT OF ENDING. San Tan Boulevard: BEGINNING at the intersection of San Tan Boulevard and Valencia Avenue; Thence Easterly along the mid-section lines of Section 36, Township 2 South, Range 6 East and Section 31, Township 2 South, Range 7 East to the intersection of San Tan Boulevard and Lime Drive being the POINT OF ENDING. The highways are known as Power Road from Happy Road to Mews Road and San Tan Boulevard from Valencia Avenue to Lime Drive, lying in Supervisory District No. 1. The beginning, ending, general course and direction of the highway is depicted in the attached Exhibit, pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-6701(B); General Vicinity: San Tan Boulevard and Power Road. In addition, direct the Clerk of the Board to record the Board of Supervisor’s resolution with the County Recorder. (C-64-26-101-X-00)
Supporting documents (3)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-64-26-102-X-00 (base: C-64-26-102-X)
Base
C-64-26-102-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
49.ROAD FILE NO. 6026 (Supervisorial District No. 4) Set a hearing for March 11, 2026 to adopt a resolution for Road File No. 6026 to declare streets in Granite Vista Phase 1C as shown in Book 1265 of Maps, Page 15 into the County Transportation System. In accordance with A.R.S. 28-6701 and 28-6702, it is recommended by the Department of Transportation Director, that the Board of Supervisors Open and Declare the following streets in Granite Vista Phase 1C into the County Transportation System, R
Item text
49. ROAD FILE NO. 6026 (Supervisorial District No. 4) Set a hearing for March 11, 2026 to adopt a resolution for Road File No. 6026 to declare streets in Granite Vista Phase 1C as shown in Book 1265 of Maps, Page 15 into the County Transportation System. In accordance with A.R.S. 28-6701 and 28-6702, it is recommended by the Department of Transportation Director, that the Board of Supervisors Open and Declare the following streets in Granite Vista Phase 1C into the County Transportation System, Road File No. 6026. OPEN AND DECLARE ROAD FILE NO. 6026 All streets consistent with the rights-of-way and appurtenances as depicted in “Granite Vista Phase 1C”, a subdivision recorded in Book 1265 of Maps, Page 15, Maricopa County Records, lying Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter in Section 35 – T3N, R2W, Maricopa County, Arizona. Containing 0.07 Acres A map or plat depicting such streets is attached. General Vicinity: Northern Avenue and Cotton Lane, lying within Supervisory District No. 4, in an unincorporated area. In addition, direct the Clerk of the Board to record the Board of Supervisors resolution with the County Recorder. (C-64-26-102-X-00)
Supporting documents (3)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-64-26-103-X-00 (base: C-64-26-103-X)
Base
C-64-26-103-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
50.ROAD FILE NO. 6023 (Supervisorial District No. 4) Set a hearing for March 11, 2026, to adopt a resolution for Road File No. 6023 to declare streets in White Tank Foothills Parcel 17 as shown in Book 1389 of Maps, Page 37 into the County Transportation System. In accordance with A.R.S. 28-6701 and 28-6702, it is recommended by the Department of Transportation Director, that the Board of Supervisors Open and Declare the following streets in White Tank Foothills Parcel 17 Subdivision into the Co
Item text
50. ROAD FILE NO. 6023 (Supervisorial District No. 4) Set a hearing for March 11, 2026, to adopt a resolution for Road File No. 6023 to declare streets in White Tank Foothills Parcel 17 as shown in Book 1389 of Maps, Page 37 into the County Transportation System. In accordance with A.R.S. 28-6701 and 28-6702, it is recommended by the Department of Transportation Director, that the Board of Supervisors Open and Declare the following streets in White Tank Foothills Parcel 17 Subdivision into the County Transportation System, Road File No. 6023. OPEN AND DECLARE ROAD FILE NO. 6023 All streets consistent with the rights-of-way and appurtenances as depicted in “White Tank Foothills Parcel 17”, a subdivision recorded in Book 1389 of Maps, Page 37, Maricopa County Records, lying in a portion of Section 34 – T3N, R2W, Maricopa County, Arizona. Containing 6.11 Acres. A map or plat depicting such streets is attached. General Vicinity: Olive Avenue and Perryville Road, lying within Supervisory District No. 4, in an unincorporated area. In addition, direct the Clerk of the Board to record the Board of Supervisors resolution with the County Recorder. (C-64-26-103-X-00)
Supporting documents (3)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-64-26-104-X-00 (base: C-64-26-104-X)
Base
C-64-26-104-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
51.ROAD FILE NO. 6022 (Supervisorial District No. 4) Set a hearing for March 11, 2026, to adopt a resolution for Road File No. 6022 to declare streets in Trail of Light as shown in Book 884 of Maps, Page 27 into the County Transportation System. In accordance with A.R.S. Titles 28-6701 and 28-6702, it is recommended by the Department of Transportation Director, that the Board of Supervisors Open and Declare the following street in Trail of Light Subdivision into the County Transportation System,
Item text
51. ROAD FILE NO. 6022 (Supervisorial District No. 4) Set a hearing for March 11, 2026, to adopt a resolution for Road File No. 6022 to declare streets in Trail of Light as shown in Book 884 of Maps, Page 27 into the County Transportation System. In accordance with A.R.S. Titles 28-6701 and 28-6702, it is recommended by the Department of Transportation Director, that the Board of Supervisors Open and Declare the following street in Trail of Light Subdivision into the County Transportation System, Road File No. 6022. OPEN AND DECLARE ROAD FILE NO. 6022 223rd Avenue consistent with the rights-of-way and appurtenances as depicted in “Trail of Light”, a subdivision recorded in Book 884 of Maps, Page 27, Maricopa County Records, lying in a portion of Section 26 – T5N, R3W, Maricopa County, Arizona. Containing 3.56 Acres. A map or plat depicting such streets is attached. General Vicinity: 223rd Avenue and Dixileta Drive, lying within Supervisory District No. 4, in an unincorporated area. In addition, direct the Clerk of the Board to record the Board of Supervisors resolution with the County Recorder. (C-64-26-104-X-00)
Supporting documents (3)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-64-26-106-X-00 (base: C-64-26-106-X)
Base
C-64-26-106-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
52.PATENT EASEMENT ABANDONMENT: ROAD FILE NO. PAB-0313 (Supervisorial District No. 3) Set a hearing for April 22, 2026, for Road File No. PAB-0313 to consider the request to abandon that portion of the easement described in Patent Easement Number 1187976, lying in the Northwest quarter of Section 05 – T4N, R3E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona. Located in the general vicinity of Jomax Road and 3rd Avenue and known as Assessor Parcel Number 210-13-045H. (C-64-26-106-X
Item text
52. PATENT EASEMENT ABANDONMENT: ROAD FILE NO. PAB-0313 (Supervisorial District No. 3) Set a hearing for April 22, 2026, for Road File No. PAB-0313 to consider the request to abandon that portion of the easement described in Patent Easement Number 1187976, lying in the Northwest quarter of Section 05 – T4N, R3E, of the Gila and Salt River Meridian, Maricopa County, Arizona. Located in the general vicinity of Jomax Road and 3rd Avenue and known as Assessor Parcel Number 210-13-045H. (C-64-26-106-X-00)
Supporting documents (3)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-06-26-246-X-00 (base: C-06-26-246-X)
Base
C-06-26-246-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
53.APPOINT A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE FOR THE IRONWOOD JUSTICE COURT (Supervisor District 5) Pursuant to A.R.S. §11-251(16) and the vacancy created by the resignation of Joe Getzwiller, Justice of the Peace, Ironwood Justice Court, consider nominations and make an appointment to fill the vacancy for a Justice of the Peace for the Ironwood Justice Precinct. Such appointment shall be effective February 11, 2026. (C-06-26-246-X-00) Motion to approve Lori Burkhart as interim as the Justice of the Peace
Item text
53. APPOINT A JUSTICE OF THE PEACE FOR THE IRONWOOD JUSTICE COURT (Supervisor District 5) Pursuant to A.R.S. §11-251(16) and the vacancy created by the resignation of Joe Getzwiller, Justice of the Peace, Ironwood Justice Court, consider nominations and make an appointment to fill the vacancy for a Justice of the Peace for the Ironwood Justice Precinct. Such appointment shall be effective February 11, 2026. (C-06-26-246-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-19-26-075-X-00 (base: C-19-26-075-X)
Base
C-19-26-075-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
54.CONFLICT WAIVER FOR DECONCINI MCDONALD YETWIN & LACY, P.C. Approve a conflict waiver request from law firm DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy, P.C. to permit the firms’ attorney Michael Urman to represent a client in an unrelated quiet title action. This matter was heard in Executive Session on February 9, 2026. (C-19-26-075-X-00) Motion to approve by Supervisor Debbie Lesko, seconded by Supervisor Mark Stewart Ayes: Kate Brophy McGee, Debbie Lesko, Mark Stewart, Thomas Galvin, Steve Gallardo
Item text
54. CONFLICT WAIVER FOR DECONCINI MCDONALD YETWIN & LACY, P.C. Approve a conflict waiver request from law firm DeConcini McDonald Yetwin & Lacy, P.C. to permit the firms’ attorney Michael Urman to represent a client in an unrelated quiet title action. This matter was heard in Executive Session on February 9, 2026. (C-19-26-075-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-19-26-074-X-00 (base: C-19-26-074-X)
Base
C-19-26-074-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
55.INITIATE LITIGATION REGARDING ZONING CODE VIOLATIONS LOCATED AT 36423 N. 27TH PLACE, CAVE CREEK, AZ 85331 (Supervisor District 3) Authorize the Maricopa County Attorney to pursue litigation to enforce zoning ordinances against the owners and operators of the property located at 36423 N. 27th Place, Cave Creek, AZ 85331 and to obtain a judgment to include civil penalties and injunctive relief. This item was heard in Executive Session on February 9, 2026. (C-19-26-074-X-00) Motion to approve by
Item text
55. INITIATE LITIGATION REGARDING ZONING CODE VIOLATIONS LOCATED AT 36423 N. 27TH PLACE, CAVE CREEK, AZ 85331 (Supervisor District 3) Authorize the Maricopa County Attorney to pursue litigation to enforce zoning ordinances against the owners and operators of the property located at 36423 N. 27th Place, Cave Creek, AZ 85331 and to obtain a judgment to include civil penalties and injunctive relief. This item was heard in Executive Session on February 9, 2026. (C-19-26-074-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-19-26-073-X-00 (base: C-19-26-073-X)
Base
C-19-26-073-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
56.INITIATE LITIGATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CODE AND ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES VIOLATIONS AT 2905 N. SADDLE VISTA RD, TONOPAH, AZ 85354 (Supervisor District 4) Authorize the Maricopa County Attorney to pursue litigation to enforce environmental health code and Arizona Revised Statutes violations against the property located at 2905 N. Saddle Vista Rd, Tonopah, AZ 85354 and to obtain a judgment for civil penalties and injunctive relief. This item was heard in Executive Session on Februar
Item text
56. INITIATE LITIGATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CODE AND ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES VIOLATIONS AT 2905 N. SADDLE VISTA RD, TONOPAH, AZ 85354 (Supervisor District 4) Authorize the Maricopa County Attorney to pursue litigation to enforce environmental health code and Arizona Revised Statutes violations against the property located at 2905 N. Saddle Vista Rd, Tonopah, AZ 85354 and to obtain a judgment for civil penalties and injunctive relief. This item was heard in Executive Session on February 9, 2026. (C-19-26-073-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-06-26-248-X-00 (base: C-06-26-248-X)
Base
C-06-26-248-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
57.Direct Recorder Heap to Make Reports Pursuant to ARS 11-253 Significant new information that has recently come to the attention of the Board of Supervisors, which may require substantive changes in county planning and policies concerning budgeting, appropriations, facilities management, the procurement of real and personal property, ballot printing, the physical distribution of early ballots, the geographical distribution of in-person voting sites, vote tabulation, and election canvassing. Be
Item text
57. DIRECT RECORDER HEAP TO MAKE REPORTS PURSUANT TO ARS 11-253 Significant new information that has recently come to the attention of the Board of Supervisors, which may require substantive changes in county planning and policies concerning budgeting, appropriations, facilities management, the procurement of real and personal property, ballot printing, the physical distribution of early ballots, the geographical distribution of in-person voting sites, vote tabulation, and election canvassing. Before voting on such significant policy changes, the Board of Supervisors wishes to understand the underlying facts and assess the credibility of conflicting factual allegations that are critical to such policy questions. Recorder Heap is the elected Maricopa County Recorder. Pursuant to ARS § 11-253(a) the Board of Supervisors may require any county officer to make reports under oath on any matter connected with the duties of his office. The proposed report will allow the Board of Supervisors to understand the material facts in advance of anticipated votes on changes to countywide policies. The requested report from Recorder Heap must report in detail all facts and circumstances, and must authenticate and attach all records within Recorder Heap’s possession, custody, or control, concerning each of the following topics: the expenditure and pre-payment issues identified in the January 22, 2026 letter from Kate Brophy McGee to Justin Heap (the “Letter”); the signature verification and curing issues identified in the Letter; the special election board and deputy registrar program issues identified in the Letter; the actual or alleged disenfranchisement of Maricopa County voters who cast a provisional ballot due to the unavailability of an Agilis device or inconvenience of using a hand scanning machine, including without limitation records sufficient to identify the affected voters and any disclosure(s) of such disenfranchisement to individuals or entities outside the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office; any requests by the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office for federal funds, legislative appropriations, or county funds that the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors denied or ignored from January 1, 2025 to the present; communications with the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office concerning the distribution of mail-in ballots to voters who had not requested them in the 2025 special election in Congressional District 7; and/or the reassignment of space in MCTEC from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office to the Maricopa County Recorder’s Office. The Recorder must produce his report and all supporting records by the close of business on February 18, 2026. (C-06-26-248-X-00)
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-64-26-105-X-00 (base: C-64-26-105-X)
Base
C-64-26-105-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
58.WARRANT WITH RUMMEL CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR 130TH STREET AND CHANDLER HEIGHTS ROAD PAVING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (Supervisory District No. 1) Adopt a warrant authorizing Rummel Construction, Inc., the contractor, to demand and receive assessments for the 130th Street and Chandler Heights Road Paving Improvement District, pursuant to ARS 48-927. (C-64-26-105-X-00) Motion to approve by Director Debbie Lesko, seconded by Director Mark Stewart Ayes: Kate Brophy McGee, Debbie Lesko, Mark Stewart, Tho
Item text
58. WARRANT WITH RUMMEL CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR 130TH STREET AND CHANDLER HEIGHTS ROAD PAVING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (Supervisory District No. 1) Adopt a warrant authorizing Rummel Construction, Inc., the contractor, to demand and receive assessments for the 130th Street and Chandler Heights Road Paving Improvement District, pursuant to ARS 48-927. (C-64-26-105-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-69-26-023-X-00 (base: C-69-26-023-X)
Base
C-69-26-023-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
59.IGA WITH THE CITY OF BUCKEYE FOR DOWNTOWN BUCKEYE REGIONAL BASIN AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT (Supervisorial District 5) Approve Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) FCD 2024A004 for Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain project (PROJECT) between the City of Buckeye (CITY) and the Flood Control District of Maricopa County (DISTRICT). This Agreement shall become effective as of the date it has been executed by all PROJECT PARTNERS and shall expire ten years from that date, or upon Project co
Item text
59. IGA WITH THE CITY OF BUCKEYE FOR DOWNTOWN BUCKEYE REGIONAL BASIN AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT (Supervisorial District 5) Approve Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) FCD 2024A004 for Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain project (PROJECT) between the City of Buckeye (CITY) and the Flood Control District of Maricopa County (DISTRICT). This Agreement shall become effective as of the date it has been executed by all PROJECT PARTNERS and shall expire ten years from that date, or upon Project completion, whichever occurs first. The PROJECT area is located within the City of Buckeye. The PROJECT is intended to mitigate flood damages to residential, commercial, and industrial properties, government buildings, and schools, while increasing traffic safety, and improving the community's flood insurance program rating. The Downtown Buckeye Regional Basin and Storm Drain project lies within the southern part of the Buckeye/Sun Valley Area Drainage Master Study (ADMS), which identified areas of flooding problems. The PROJECT will provide a Ten (10)-Year level of protection and will relieve historic Downtown Buckeye of frequent flooding occurrences by implementing storm drains, channels, retention basins, and an outlet infrastructure. The DISTRICT is participating in funding a portion of the storm drain system through this IGA with the CITY. Construction of this PROJECT is the next step in implementing the drainage improvements for this area. The estimated PROJECT cost the CITY and DISTRICT are sharing is $26,997,704, and will be shared 50%/50% between the DISTRICT and the CITY. The City will operate and maintain the completed Project. (C-69-26-023-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-69-26-024-X-00 (base: C-69-26-024-X)
Base
C-69-26-024-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
60.MOA WITH HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES MODIFICATION TO SOFTWARE Approve Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) FCD 2026A008 Modification to software developed and maintained by Hydrologic Engineering Center, Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (CEIWR-HEC). This MOA allows CEIWR-HEC to add new software features, which will allow Maricopa County to model specific hydrologic and hydraulic details based on local environmental conditions. The MOA shall
Item text
60. MOA WITH HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES MODIFICATION TO SOFTWARE Approve Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) FCD 2026A008 Modification to software developed and maintained by Hydrologic Engineering Center, Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (CEIWR-HEC). This MOA allows CEIWR-HEC to add new software features, which will allow Maricopa County to model specific hydrologic and hydraulic details based on local environmental conditions. The MOA shall become effective on the last date of execution by both parties and will be in force for a period of 7 years. Under this MOA, the services will be performed under several Support Agreements (SAs). The Flood Control District and CEIWR-HEC shall negotiate mutually agreed-upon written SAs. The total amount to be expended for this MOA shall not exceed $700,000. CEIWR-HEC has developed and maintained several industry-standard engineering software tools for hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, which are the Flood Control District’s standard modeling tools. With this MOA, CEIWR-HEC will be able to customize their software based on Maricopa County’s current standards and needs. This item impacts all Supervisorial Districts. (C-69-26-024-X-00)
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

C-number
C-78-26-030-X-00 (base: C-78-26-030-X)
Base
C-78-26-030-X
Revision
00
Vote — approved
Kate Brophy McGee yes
Debbie Lesko yes
Mark Stewart yes
Thomas Galvin yes
Steve Gallardo yes 
61.EASEMENT, RIGHT OF WAY AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTS Approve easements and right of way acquisitions documents, appraisal and relocation assistance services contracts under $5,000 pers Resolutions FCD 87-12; Escrow Instructions per Resolutions FCD 87-13; Payment of Tax Notices per Resolutions FCD 97-07; License Procedures and Fee Schedules per Resolution FCD2002R002; and disposal of easements, excess real property and fixtures under $250,000 documents per FCD 1999R016 for Flood Control
Item text
61. EASEMENT, RIGHT OF WAY AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE DOCUMENTS Approve easements and right of way acquisitions documents, appraisal and relocation assistance services contracts under $5,000 pers Resolutions FCD 87-12; Escrow Instructions per Resolutions FCD 87-13; Payment of Tax Notices per Resolutions FCD 97-07; License Procedures and Fee Schedules per Resolution FCD2002R002; and disposal of easements, excess real property and fixtures under $250,000 documents per FCD 1999R016 for Flood Control purposes. A. Project: 700.24.30 Floodprone Properties Assistance Program Item No: F00478 – APN: 402-15-142 and 143 Displacee: Adolfo Granillo A1. Determination of Relocation Benefits Due and Entitlements Supervisory District 5 B. Project: 700.24.31 Floodprone Properties Assistance Program Item No: F00479 – APN: 402-15-003A Grantor: Joel Campos B1. Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions B2. Warranty Deed Supervisory District 5 C. Project: 700.24.39 Floodprone Properties Assistance Program Item No: F00487 – APN: 402-15-135A, 136 and 137 Displacees: Jesus F. and Maria E. Lopez C1. Determination of Relocation Benefits Due and Entitlements Supervisory District 5 D. Project: 702.24.37 Floodprone Properties Assistance Program Item No: F00506 – APN: 402-15-206B, 207B, 208B and 209B Grantor: Maria T. Evans D1. Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions D2. Warranty Deed D3. Determination of Relocation Benefits Due and Entitlements Supervisory District 5 (C-78-26-030-X-00)
Supporting documents (8)
View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
62. Public comment on matters pertaining to Maricopa County government. Please limit comments to two minutes. Note that pursuant to Arizona Open Meeting Law, Board members may not discuss matters raised under this public comment portion of the meeting; however, an individual Board member may respond to criticism made by those who have addressed the Board, ask staff to review an issue raised or may ask that the matter be placed on a future agenda. (Public comment is at the discretion of the Chairman.) If you would like to send a written comment, please send email to agenda.comments@maricopa.gov . Written comments will be summarized at the meeting noting the topic or topics. All written comments will be forwarded to each Board Office for their review. Comentarios del público sobre las materias relacionadas con el gobierno del Condado de Maricopa. Por favor limite sus comentarios a dos minutos. Tenga en cuenta que de conformidad con el Derecho de Reunión Abierta de Arizona, miembros de la Junta no podrán abordar las cuestiones planteadas en esta parte de comentario público de la reunión, sin embargo, un miembro de la Junta individuo puede responder a las críticas de quienes se han ocupado de la Junta, pida al personal para examinar una cuestión planteada o puede pedir que la cuestión se incluya en una agenda de futuro. (Comentario público es a discreción del Presidente.) Si le gustaría mandar sus comentarios por escrito favor de enviarlos por correo electrónico a agenda.comments@maricopa.gov. Comentarios escritos se resumirán en la reunión tomando nota del tema o temas. Todos los comentarios escritos se remitirán a cada Oficina de la Junta para su revisión.
Supporting documents (1)
View on Agenda Online ↗

Item text
63. Supervisors'/County Manager's summary of current events - Resumen de temas de actualidad de los Supervisores/Administrador del Condado
Supporting documents

No supporting documents stored.

View on Agenda Online ↗

63 item(s)